Why? Adblock told me it was doing this, and asked if I wanted to override it and block everything, which I obviously selected. There is no such thing as an acceptable ad.
A taxi driver should be allowed to take whatever fares he wishes. Someone might look violent, or unable to pay etc. Plus if he doesn't like Muslims then he shouldn't have to serve them.
Most customers won't give a damn about the emissions, if it's performing as they wanted they got what they paid for. I certainly wouldn't send mine back to get "corrected" to the new age emissions rubbish.
What's happened here is the stupid treehuggers have ruined one of the world's best car makers for their petty little emissions standards. The world is going madder and madder.
The back of your car is tougher than the front. And a rear end shunt pushes you into your seat instead of forwards. And it's the driver behind's fault. So it's best for you and your car and your insurance premium to get hit from the back than the front. So avoid the car in front, and if someone hits you, tough shit on them.
Do they really warn the driver first? What's the point in that? I thought they just braked if you didn't (computers react faster, so if you miss it, it's still got time to).
Slashdot Mirror
Talktalk are criminals themselves. They lie about their special offers. I used them for 1 week then cancelled.
Funny, I've got plenty. I use them to cut up food. Most of them could allow me to kill you if I wanted to.
I'm surprised the right wing copyrighters haven't thought about suing each other for "stealing" three letter acronyms!
Agreed.
Looks villainous to me, eyes too close together.
14 year olds can think. Don't blame the parents for those.
What about not bothering with the treehugging tests in the first place?
The problem is the environmentalists.
Well said.
Why? Adblock told me it was doing this, and asked if I wanted to override it and block everything, which I obviously selected. There is no such thing as an acceptable ad.
A taxi driver should be allowed to take whatever fares he wishes. Someone might look violent, or unable to pay etc. Plus if he doesn't like Muslims then he shouldn't have to serve them.
Why would customers care? I buy a car that performs well and is reliable, and that will always be VW.
The emissions tests are shit if they can be detected by a car's computer.
They underestimated the number of treehugging fools that care about emissions.
If the computer can detect the artificial driving, the test is just not good enough.
What we need to do is to outlaw ethics, they get in the way of progress.
They could sell their car to a country without such ridiculous tests.
Most customers won't give a damn about the emissions, if it's performing as they wanted they got what they paid for. I certainly wouldn't send mine back to get "corrected" to the new age emissions rubbish.
What's happened here is the stupid treehuggers have ruined one of the world's best car makers for their petty little emissions standards. The world is going madder and madder.
Nothing wrong with erring on the safe side. Most inventions by those sort turn out to be explosive.
It's the Islam religion that tells them to blow us all up. Your naivety will get your country destroyed. They are invading you.
The back of your car is tougher than the front. And a rear end shunt pushes you into your seat instead of forwards. And it's the driver behind's fault. So it's best for you and your car and your insurance premium to get hit from the back than the front. So avoid the car in front, and if someone hits you, tough shit on them.
Do they really warn the driver first? What's the point in that? I thought they just braked if you didn't (computers react faster, so if you miss it, it's still got time to).
I love people like you that leave big gaps so I can pull into them.
People like you is why I'm 99% of the time stuck behind some loser who has such a slow brain he can't drive fast.