Slashdot Mirror


Ahmed Mohamed, His Clock, and the Curious Turn of Events

New submitter poity writes: After the news first broke of the 9th grader getting cuffed for scaring school officials with what turned out to be a digital clock, Ahmed Mohamed has experienced a surge of popular support — hailed as a genius and a hero, with college scholarships, internship offers, and even an invitation to the White House by President Obama himself. Now, amid rumors of possible racial discrimination lawsuits against the school and local police, some people have begun to more deeply scrutinize the details of the case, especially on the tech side with regard to the homemade clock in question. Recently, a writer at the creative site Artvoice posted a remarkable analysis of Ahmed's clock project, which raises new questions about the case and the manner in which people and the media alike have reacted. The linked analysis posits that Ahmed's clock started out as another clock, rather than a box of parts, and Ahmed can be said to have repackaged rather than "invented" a wholly new clock, but acknowledges that "none of us were there and knows what happened."

662 comments

  1. I liked the cartoon that read: by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 4, Funny

    Child invents Islamophobia detector.

    --
    A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    1. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You know he was there to start shit. He brings a clock without a shell to school located inside a suitcase with suspicious wires poking out of it, the thing starts beeping in class, and he gets arrested (= big bux from the lawsuit). This is all the work of his father.

    2. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by JMJimmy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems to me the kid simply used the term "invented" in the incorrect or loose manner. Had he said "creation" instead of "invention" there would be no problem. He created something "new" with parts from two different things. If anything patent law is filled with "inventions" of this type.

    3. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a suitcase, it was a little pencil box.. and that WAS the shell.

    4. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by doc+d'X · · Score: 2

      Perhaps not a little pencil box, but a pencil box nonetheless. 8.25 x 5.5 x 2.5 Inches You can buy them on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Vaultz-L...

    5. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From what I can see there is nothing special about him or what he did, he is just some cheeky kid who used a very naive way of getting attention and it got out of hand. All this talk of discrimination etc. seems like a beat-up and the poor kid will pay the price in the long run for all the manipulating adults have done to politically capitalise on his prank. Now he has the entire world watching him and expecting to live up to their expectations when there is no solid evidence he is gifted at all.

      How is he going to have a normal and healthy adolescence with that weight on his shoulders? How many children pushed into the limelight crashed and burned as young adults when reality came along and burst their artificially inflated egos? How is messing with children like that in any way ethical regardless of the cause you think it is in aid of?

    6. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Goddamn; remarkably astute and well-said.

    7. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! You've managed to stereotype Muslims AND Europeans, in one comment! Well played, sir!

    8. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      It was half a bomb, according to some...

      https://theintercept.com/2015/...

      But I still agree that it was an Islamophobe detector that works with incredible accuracy, even here at /.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    9. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by FranTaylor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Now he has the entire world watching him and expecting to live up to their expectations when there is no solid evidence he is gifted at all.

      Feel free to judge a 12 year old for what he will do with the rest of his life! The christians are out in force tonight!

    10. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by graphius · · Score: 0

      I kind of agree with what you are saying. I made things similar to this when I was a kid (anyone remember the RadioShack 100 in 1 kits?). This kid is nothing special* but because of some racist over reaction he is now being handed golden keys to the kingdom.
      if the teachers and police had not gone all "OMG, MUSLIM" he would have just been an average, somewhat nerdy kid.

      *The kid may be a genius, but this one event does not prove that, and I have not really seen anything else of past "inventions"

    11. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

      he is now being handed golden keys to the kingdom.

      No, he's still going to have to work to prove his worth, just like the rest of us. Getting an invitation to a school is not the same thing as earning a degree. Getting a meeting with a president, with that and five dollars you can get a cup of coffee. It's really not so much.

    12. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 4, Informative

      This happens to non-muslims too. White teenage girls from MIT.

    13. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what is special was his being jacled by the man. The sheriff who would toss the "hoax-bomb" at anything - an iPhone, it can be a timer or a trigger switch.
      an analogue wall clock, is a timer.
      A wrist watch is a timer.

      Do not go to neighbor, becuase everyone is a walking bomb-hoax inventor.

    14. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Star is hapa, not white.

    15. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He also said in an interview he only spent about 20 minutes on it, and it was anything but one of his best "inventions" (something that a number of other people in interviews have mentioned).

      The kid is 14. And here we have someone at Artvoice who put great effort into writing an article criticizing him for not silk-screening his own circuit boards. I mean, seriously? What sort of person did he think he was writing for? Someone who looked at the clock picture and automatically assumed, "I bet a 14-year-old made that circuitboard"?

      --
      "This administration is so incompetent that they cover their tracks with bigger tracks." - Seth Meyers
    16. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was a pencil box shaped like a suitcase and with no openings to see the actual clock face.

    17. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happens to non-muslims too. White teenage girls from MIT.

      Shhh, that doesn't fit the "white people are all racist" message they're trying to push.

    18. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by graphius · · Score: 1

      I'm white and, I believe, not racist. I am also one of the minority that seems to have some common sense...

    19. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's possible that Hitler would not have become such a threat if he had only been admitted to art school. If this kid gets let in to elite school, it might take away any desire he may feel to head to the Middle East for that "training".

    20. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by graphius · · Score: 1

      He is getting a lot more publicity and support than you, I, or any other kid who has made a science project...

    21. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      > Had he said "creation"

      Had said, "evolution" Fox News would have had coverage for the next 12 news cycles. ;)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    22. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A trigger is nowhere near half a bomb. Many peoples' opinions don't matter, especially those formed in fear or uncertainty. The only reason this got out of hand is because schools have zero tolerance. Had the kid been showing off in say YouTube videos for instance or at home, nothing would have happened.

    23. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And here we have someone at Artvoice who put great effort into writing an article criticizing him for not silk-screening his own circuit boards. I mean, seriously? What sort of person did he think he was writing for?

      He was probably writing for someone with reading comprehension. He doesn't criticize the kid at a for silk-screening or not, but simply points out that most hobbyists do not silkscreen their boards, especially hand drawn ones (as opposed to cheap boardhouses that deal with only electronic formats now). It is just a big hint that the board is not a hobbyist's, d.i.y. board.

      Plenty of people learned electronics as a young teenager or even younger, and were making their own boards. I remember getting the supplies to do so for $10 from Radioshack decades ago, and it is even easier and cheaper online, with far more instructions and tutorials available. If I hear a teenager say they made an electronic clock, I would assume they did make their own boards, because it is a common project to do...

    24. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it's actually nice to have those kind of problems instead of being railroaded by a hysterical bigoted and ignorant local police dept and school system

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    25. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Eh, he's about the right age where most people should start learning that it is often not about how hard you work or what you accomplish, but who you know and how much of a show you can put on (whether on purpose or not). Science fairs are full of kids stuck in the middle of drama and local politics, where sometimes the kids with brains and hard work move on and sometimes not. The only ones that win are those that do things for themselves so they at least learn from the process regardless of what the people around them do or don't do.

    26. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by fyngyrz · · Score: 0

      Be that as it may, you failed to address the points that were made, so I wouldn't be too proud of yourself.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    27. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How is it anti Jewish or anti Christian to point out that all witches must be killed? Anything anti semetic in pointing out that every living thing in Jericho was commanded to be killed, man, woman, child, animals. Or the law in Deuteronomy that if you're caught raping a virgin you must pay her father and marry her? And also in Deuteronomy, if someone convinces one of your family to follow another god, you should kill them? If everyone followed the letter of their religious texts, I'd be pretty afraid of Jews and Christians also.

      As far as Europeans go, they're not nearly the liberal hippie types that Americans like to think they are. There are plenty of people we'd classify as rednecks over there, there's a very racist and homophobic segment all over, etc. Generally Europe has seen to not have had a big race problem in the past because the countries were very homogenous for a very long time (but always an underlying anti-semetic and anti Roma nastiness).

    28. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He did exactly what most of us slashdotters did as kids; take stuff apart to see how they work and put them back together in different ways. Of course it wasn't an invention, he said it only took him a few moments.

    29. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I meant "minutes", sorry.

    30. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must have been a small school, or a very large suitcase.

    31. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How is he going to have a normal and healthy adolescence with that weight on his shoulders?

      Worked out OK for Woz.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Half a bomb is a stupid way to phrase things. The clock before it was taken apart was therefore also half a bomb. Radio Shack before it went bankrupt could be classified as a Do-It-Yourself half-a-bomb factory. It's not even a trigger yet, it's just a clock with minimal changes to put it into a pencil box (looks cooler, like something maybe from a really bad spy movie where you have to cut the red wire, no the green one).

      Did he intend it to look like a bomb? I don't know. It does not look like one to me. It did NOT look like a bomb to the police or teachers either or they would panicked, maybe have an evacuation drill, and they would not have kept a possible-bomb around. What they thought was that the kid intended it to be a hoax bomb, which the kid denied, and they arrested him and against Texas law did not have his parents present. The school wanted him to sign a "confession" without his parents present.

      It sounds like a big case of the police and school assuming the kid did something wrong, not having any solid proof of any of it, then just wanting to send a big message with the hand cuffs and perp walk. The kid is supposed to learn the lesson to not stand out, keep curiosity in check, go play football when the urge to study strikes. All hail zero tolerance, keeping our kids safe and stupid for a decade.

    33. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Beeftopia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I can see there is nothing special about him or what he did, he is just some cheeky kid who used a very naive way of getting attention and it got out of hand. All this talk of discrimination etc. seems like a beat-up and the poor kid will pay the price in the long run for all the manipulating adults have done to politically capitalise on his prank.

      I didn't get the impression that the boy is cheeky or that this was a prank.

      It just seems like he's a precocious kid interested in how things work and he wanted to show one of his teachers. Unfortunately, teachers' detectors are up for school violence (remember the child who was penalized for chewing his Pop Tart in the shape of a gun?) and the rise of radical Islam (Islamic gunmen attack the "Draw The Prophet" 40 minutes away in Garland Texas) resulted in this situation.

      It's a tricky situation. However, calling the cops seems slightly absurd. They didn't think it was a bomb by the fact they didn't evacuate the premises and bring a bomb robot to blow it up. If the authorities find a credible threat, they bring in a bomb robot and blow up whatever the threat is. That didn't happen.

      As far as taking things apart and putting them back together, Henry Ford did that sort of thing. This might have been simpler, but the boy correctly put it together in a different way.

    34. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by x0ra · · Score: 2

      and I once brought a metal firecracker revolver at school (in Europe), openly playing with it during recess. Would it be wise to do it today ? Probably not.

    35. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by unixisc · · Score: 0

      Child invents Islamophobia detector.

      Well, we're always asked nowadays. 'If you see something, say something'. Well, that's what the teachers here did. The police ought to have investigated this thoroughly, but instead, due to the hue & cry over bullying a Muslim kid, they stopped right there. Had it been anyone else, they'd have done the complete investigation.

      The next time the Jihadis want to plan something, they can just get a kid like Ahmed to do the same thing, but this time w/ a real time bomb or similar contraption. This time, the teachers, cops or authorities would think ten times before reporting anything. By doing what they did, Obama, as well as Google and Facebook just enabled the Jihadis to plan their next move that would mirror what Ahmed did. While Ahmed may have been innocent (but that's not been proved as yet: this could even have been a dry run). the next time, Jihadis could put up a Muslim kid to do something similar w/ something real.

      The next time a successful Jihadi attack is pulled off, be it one like Boston, Chattanuga, et al, anybody who sees warning signs would do best to avoid reporting it, let it happen, and then say, 'I saw something that I thought was suspicious, but I didn't say anything b'cos the person in question was a Muslim, and I didn't want to be thought of as a bigot'.

    36. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      His father is a presidential candidate in Sudan. He's probably using the kid to gain votes. And he (the father) must be well-connected, as the other silly bomb scares didn't gather anywhere as much attention.

      Remember the MIT girl who entered an airport carrying LEDs of mass destruction which could have wiped out the whole continent hadn't the valiant men and women of the TSA pointed a gun to her face? NASA and the rest of the media circus (rightfully) didn't give a shit about her, although that might be because she wasn't of the right race.

    37. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by dullertap · · Score: 2

      Your mOM is half a bOMb.

    38. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      He is getting a lot more publicity and support than you, I, or any other kid who has made a science project...

      Jealous much?

      Yeah, there is a reason he is getting attention. And it isn't because he's muslim either. It's just that todays schools have been turnen into an insane asylum by administrators who have complete intolerance as their goal, and armed police who have turned sassing into a crime. We need to step back from this abyss of endless war on our children,

      Because It Doesn't Make Schools Any Safer

      But it does make science a taboo subject. Vinegar and Baking soda mixed should become a state secret. Maybe the Mythbusters shouold be incarcerated as well becuz trst!

      Since schools are working very hard to install a War on Drugs type solution to ordinary teenage behavior, I expect before long, we'll have police popping kids to make certain we have proper order, and administrators declaring that it the new divide by zero tolerance efforts being implemented. "Sorry, Mrs Smith, we had to shoot your son because he disagreed with the teacher"

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    39. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by PvtVoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      As far as Europeans go, they're not nearly the liberal hippie types that Americans like to think they are. There are plenty of people we'd classify as rednecks over there, there's a very racist and homophobic segment all over, etc. Generally Europe has seen to not have had a big race problem in the past because the countries were very homogenous for a very long time (but always an underlying anti-semetic and anti Roma nastiness).

      This. Having spent lots of time on both continents, I have to say that Europeans are much more racist than Americans, by which I mean prevailing attitudes among the educated, genteel middle class, not the right-wing fringe. Dog-whistle ideas like "cultural identity" and "tradition" are widely accepted without any critical thinking at all.

    40. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... no solid evidence he is gifted at all.

      Who said he was gifted? I haven't heard anyone make that claim.

      ... that weight on his shoulders?

      You mean it's not enough for a teenager to be enthusiastic, motivated and learning from personal experience? No-one claims 'genius' when a teenager goes to the Olympics or even to space camp. Why claim it when one 'builds' a machine that's been around for 40 years?

      ... when reality came along and burst their artificially inflated egos?

      Artificially inflated by whom? I usually rant about the double-standard around teens and sex. Thank-you for exposing another double-standard: We demand teens who don't have the authority to buy a phone, to plan the rest of their life when they have little understanding of reality.

      Why would reality harm someone who enjoys electronics (current adults aside)? Besides, he may lose interest in electronics, or fail to gain advanced skills, or other adults may not value the advanced skills he does gain. An "artificially-inflated ego" says more about the lies that adults tell to children than about reality.

    41. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I made small bombs when I was a kid. Nothing special, but I certainly played with timers and modest gun powder charges. Any kid who's played with remote launch systems for model rockets, and with ramping up home assembled fireworks from model rockets or firecrackers has done this.

    42. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While Ahmed may have been innocent (but that's not been proved as yet [my emphasis]

      Somehow I missed this gem in my first reply? Did you realise that you are now so scared of terrorists that you are willing to throw out the Magna Carta? Is that how you "defend your freedoms"? - by capitulating to their demands?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    43. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a Muslim, I can categorically state that anyone who thinks that we are required by our religion to kill or convert "infidels" has never actually met one of us, and only knows about us from Fox News. Fox News may accuse us of being ignorant and intolerant people, but history and fact does not support that assertion.

      Our religion has a 1,400 year history of living side by side with Christians, Jews, fire worshippers, and atheists, even within the borders of Muslim nations, without incident. The wars in the middle east today are instigated by the idiots kept in power by foreign aid money. How many Muslims do you think actually support Assad? How many of us support the Saudi royals? Saddam Hussein? These people got into power by playing the game that landed them military support allowing them to seize power. The vast majority of Muslims do not support the barbaric idiocy demonstrated by these people, and that's to say nothing of the rabid dogs in ISIS.

      You're judging 1.5 billion people, who collectively have a one and a half millennium long history of tolerance and acceptance, by the actions of a ragtag bunch of barbarians who are opposed by Muslims as much as they are by the rest of the world. That strikes me as rather, well, ignorant and intolerant.

      --
      I hate printers.
    44. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most of them don't do this. Just like Christians and Jews are supposed to stone adulterers and we don't do that either.

    45. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    46. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      Explain why this is a troll, and the islamophobic post above is insightful?

    47. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, nothing is ever Islams fault. It is wrong to judge Islam by the stated tenants, you need to go out and search for one who disagrees with them, then assume that everyone does. Islam can do no wrong, ever. It's all the West's fault, everything, every time.

    48. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't heard the kid use any term, yet. I've only read press reports on what some teachers and police said.

    49. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 2

      There are 1.5 billion of us. Believe me, if we really were the blood thirsty monsters that the sensationalist media makes us out to be, then these and thesestatistics would look a lot different. According to the FBI and Europol, between 90% and 99% of global terrorist acts are committed by non-Muslims.

      Kinda skewers your narrative there, sparky. I see you have a nasty case of ignorant world view-itis. I prescribe a daily dose of reserch, along with a healthy diet of facts.

      --
      I hate printers.
    50. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I can spell "research", honest!

      --
      I hate printers.
    51. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by wnfJv8eC · · Score: 1

      Bad use of the word prank. He's a child using his brain to do something he couldn't do before. That's not a prank. He's a geek. We often don't see the world through christian/muslim terrorist eyes. We're still working on the concept of sex.

      A boy was trying to impress his female teacher. Really you guys can't see this as what it is. A boy bringing a shiny red apple to his female teacher hoping she will smile at him like he's a man, not a boy?

      WOW! A homemade clock to impress her and she thinks he made a bomb. Well, I suppose it was a bomb as he didn't get her approval.

    52. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      You know he was there to start shit.

      Exactly. I mean, he was a muslim, he was named Mohammed, he had dark skin, you just know that he isn't going to the school to get an education but purely for jihadterrorohmygoshgollybombs!.

    53. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Our religion has a 1,400 year history of living side by side with Christians, Jews, fire worshippers, and atheists, even within the borders of Muslim nations, without incident.

      Oh, there has been plenty of incident. To mention one thing that has been on my mind with the war in Syria of late, one thing that struck me traveling there before the war is that even under the "anti-fundamentalist" Assad regime, Christians were forbidden by law from putting crosses on their places of worship or inviting Muslims to their faith, while among Muslims it was completely allowed to engage in da'wah among the Christian population. As I would later discover, this discrimination in law holds for most Muslim states.

      I wouldn't disagree that most of the 1.5 billion Muslims in the world are peaceful in individual interaction, and I'm certainly grateful for the immense hospitality I have received across the Muslim world from the Maghreb to southeast Asia. But when this population acts as a political bloc, I don't believe that the outcome is as pleasant for non-Muslim minorities as you claim.

    54. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll paraphrase Tom Robbins' description of the Native Americans....

      "The real problem with the Indians is that they're just as lazy and stupid and greedy as the rest of us."

      Muslims, and everyone, is no different. People are really shitty a lot of the time. Racism/culturalism/religion being a big part of the evidence for that sentiment.

      Hate everyone. Hurt no one.

    55. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's turn that around.

      "We're a free country and a liberal democracy. These reductions in citizens' rights, enactment of draconian "security" laws, and militarized police forces are all the fault of invading mozlems who are overrunning our country and hating our freedoms."

      It's called "Hegelian Dialect". Wake up, foo'.

    56. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fox News may accuse us of being ignorant and intolerant people, but history and fact does not support that assertion.

      Citation? Has "Fox News" really said that?

      Our religion has a 1,400 year history of living side by side with Christians, Jews, fire worshippers, and atheists, even within the borders of Muslim nations, without incident

      Look, in general I am a defender of Islam. I don't believe that Islam requires aggression any more than Christianity requires crusades. If you want to look for genocide, forced conversion, and slavery, you need look no further than Christian Europe. However, I don't really find your statement above to be accurate either.

      Historically, in territories controlled by Muslim polities, religious minorities have not fared particularly well. Jewish massacres in particular have happened like clockwork across Islamdom. Religious minorities were often forced to wear special identifying clothes. Christians were not allowed to build churches or even ring bells, historically (and in the present day in many areas). In every Islamic state that I know of--from Spain to India--religious minorities had few (if any) legal rights and were required to pay large taxes. If this sounds a lot like how the Nazis treated minorities, you would be correct. The Nazis of course were European Christians, so don't take this as a defense of Christianity.

      Whether you're talking about the non-Muslim slaves of the Ottoman Empire (and the conversion of so many churches into Mosques--most notably the Hagia Sophia / Aya Sofya), the jihads against the "kafirs" of Kafiristan in Afghanistan (Kafiristan means land of the infidels, today pleasingly renamed to Nuristan, the land of enlightenment, after their forced conversion in the 19th century), or any number of similar clashes, it's very hard to make the case as Islam as a positive force for religious minorities. It's also incredibly ironic that you mention the Zoroastrians--who you insultingly call "fire worshippers"--as an example of Islam's tolerance. The Zoroastrians, one of the oldest religious on the planet, have probably fared worse than any other minority group under Islamic rule.

      The wars in the middle east today are instigated by the idiots kept in power by foreign aid money. How many Muslims do you think actually support Assad? How many of us support the Saudi royals? Saddam Hussein? These people got into power by playing the game that landed them military support allowing them to seize power. The vast majority of Muslims do not support the barbaric idiocy demonstrated by these people, and that's to say nothing of the rabid dogs in ISIS.

      Ridiculous assertions. You are correct when you state there is plenty of foreign interference in the Middle East and foreign interference has almost certainly been a negative for the vast majority of residents of the Middle East. However, the House of Saud rose as a fanatical fundamentalist regime aligned with Wahhabism. It rose with popular support. Today might be a different question, but I see no great satisfaction coming out of Sunni Saudi Arabia (barring the Shia minority areas). Assad and Saddam--Assad remains popular amongst his people, and his father--like Saddam--arose out of a period of Arab nationalism, secularism, and socialism. This is the Baathist movement (one of the main founders of which was a Christian, incidentally). Baathism was perhaps the dominant and most popular ideology across much of the Middle East for much of the 20th century.

      You're judging 1.5 billion people, who collectively have a one and a half millennium long history of tolerance and acceptance, by the actions of a ragtag bunch of barbarians who are opposed by Muslims as much as they are by the rest of the world. That strikes me as rather, well, ignorant and intolerant.

      A ragtag bunch of barbarians who are opposed by Muslims? You must be talking about the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakis

    57. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      When Muslims acted as a political bloc, the overwhelming majority of political interactions were positive. Political leaders were well known as the place of last resort for Jews escaping persecution in Europe. In fact a Muslim leader saved Jews from the Spanish Inquisition. They were famed for their willingness to send aid, no strings attached in an era when foreign aid was virtually unknown.

      An honest and comprehensive reading of history simply does not support the proposition that Muslims are a sleeping mass of West-hating, xenophobic barbarians, waiting for the right moment to cleanse the world of infidels. There just isn't any real evidence to support this proposition.

      --
      I hate printers.
    58. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Historically, in territories controlled by Muslim polities, religious minorities have not fared particularly well.

      Totally untrue, unless you're judging by the post-Islam governments of the colonially forged middle east of today. Muslims are NOT represented by and do NOT support the maniacal loonies in power across the middle east today.

      Jewish massacres in particular have happened like clockwork across Islamdom.

      [citation needed]. Also, this and this kinda ruins your "Muslims hate Jews" narrative.

      The rest of your post is plain wrong. Muslims as a whole do NOT support groups like the Taliban, ISIS, Boko Haram, etc and the only way you'd think otherwise is by having little or no contact with actual Muslims. I am a Muslim. I am very active in the Muslim community both locally and internationally. Support for those groups is, to judge generously, minuscule, and confined to the least educated among us. 5 minutes talking to them and they change their mind. I know, I've been involved in de-radicalisation efforts.

      I get that you were raised as a Muslim, and almost everybody who is raised in a faith believes that faith is correct and most importantly morally good and right. Does anyone who practices a religion believe their religion is bad?

      I was raised in a Muslim family, but never had the religion forced upon me. I explored other religions freely, went to a Uniting Church school and had lengthy conversations with out pastor. I also spent time learning about the Buddhist faith. Islam for me is as active a choice as any other aspect of my lifestyle. Don't go making assumptions on my behalf, it's borderline insulting.

      They don't seem to feel the need to make up a false white-washed history of Christianity.

      I'm not making up a "false white-washed" history of Islam. I'm using documented facts and verified historical accounts to counter claims made that are simply not true.

      It would be great if more people across the Muslim world would stand up against suicide bombings, against beheadings, against fundamentalist states, and against the persecution of religious minorities. Sure, some do, but not enough to seemingly affect real change anywhere around the world.

      ALL of those things are explicitly forbidden in our faith. Without question, or exception. This is why we all call BS when those groups claim to do what they do in the name of Islam. They are doing it in the name of furthering their own political ends.

      Also, the very moment the west stops sending foreign aid to regimes like the Saudi government, the Pakistani ISI, the Nigerian rebels, and other shadowy power centers throughout the Muslim world, that will be the moment we clean out the lunatics running around running amok.

      --
      I hate printers.
    59. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

      When Muslims acted as a political bloc, the overwhelming majority of political interactions were positive.

      Just because there wasn't outright slaughter does not make for positive interaction. Freedom of religion inherently involves being allowed to build new places of worship for one's religion or renovate older ones. It involves being allowed to invite others to one's faith and to display symbols of one's faith (like a cross on churches). These things were missing in Muslim-ruled states for most of the history of Islam.

      Even those Jews from Spain were treated unfairly. They may have been accepted in Muslim countries, and they were certainly fleeing a horrid Reconquista, but in their new homelands they faced a new set of challenges such as being forced to live in districts set aside for them instead among the general population, being forbidden from riding a horse, and so on.

      An honest and comprehensive reading of history simply does not support the proposition that Muslims are a sleeping mass of West-hating, xenophobic barbarians, waiting for the right moment to cleanse the world of infidels.

      If you want to be taken seriously here, you need to stop deliberately misinterpeting those to whom you respond. I never said that Muslims are xenophobic or barbaric. And I would suspect that for the majority of Muslims in states with historically Christian and/or Jewish minorities, they tried to explain the discriminatory strictures placed on religious minorities away. Even today you can hear, "Oh, it's just to keep the peace", or "They can believe what they want as long as they don't seek to convert Muslims", or "They just need to pay this large tax because we won't let them serve in the army". I don't believe that most Muslims think very actively about eradicating the infidel. However, the end result for non-Muslim religions in the "Muslim world" was still the same: demographic decline, political disempowerment, and a whole host of laws that applied to them and not to Muslims.

    60. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Allow me to counter it. There are (at least) hundreds of thousands of Muslims in the U.S. They either really suck at killing non-muslims, or the claim is bullshit. Any other questions, moron?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    61. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [citation needed]. Also, this and this kinda ruins your "Muslims hate Jews" narrative.

      Did you even read the Wikipedia article you linked to? It only proves the OP's point: "Like all non-Muslims, Jews ... faced other restrictions in clothing, horse riding, army service etc." (I found this informative, I thought that the horse-riding restriction was only imposed on refugee Jews in the Maghreb.)

      And you completely skipped over the OP's mention that Christians were forbidden from ringing bells and the conversion of churches into mosques by force. That is awfully disingenous. If you sincerely want to defend Islam against critiques that may be unfair, then you still have to acknowledge and rebut all attacks. Remaining silent as you did here really only weakens your own cause.

    62. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Of course, members of the Religion of Peace merely want to live in the House of Peace

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    63. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      forced to live in districts set aside for them instead among the general population

      This is a fabrication and I refer you to the Jewish historian Bernard Lewis' account of the Jewish experience post-Spain.

      However, the end result for non-Muslim religions in the "Muslim world" was still the same: demographic decline, political disempowerment, and a whole host of laws that applied to them and not to Muslims.

      If by "decline" you mean "rose to greater wealth than in their home nations" and by "political disempowerment" you mean "able to participate in the highest levels of government, provided independence including the legal right to govern their communities based on their own religious or cultural laws", then sure, I guess you're right. The Greeks in Ottoman Turkey were far more prosperous than the Greeks in Greece. Jews were able to achieve levels of economic prosperity unheard of in Europe, and actively participated in government right up to national government level.

      Your view of history does not seem to be based on any mainstream accounts.

      --
      I hate printers.
    64. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I find out what I need to know by watching ISIS videos, don't know what Fox News says but it sounds a lot like what ISIS has been up to.

    65. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have all the details of the story, but...

      The handcuffing was probably excessive. Actually, for a 14 year old, definitely excessive. However, I do question the possibility that he knew what would happen when he brought his clock to school in hopes that it would get (no pun intended) blown out of proportion. I am not saying that was the case. I am not accusing him of doing that. But it's one thing that crossed my mind when I heard about the story. I'm also not so sure this happened because of his skin color. I suspect it might have happened even if a white Christian kid were to bring in the same thing. Regardless, it was an overreaction by the school.

      Check out September 16th's episode of the Nightly Show to hear what Iced Tea has to say. About minute 20 out of 30.

    66. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1,400 year history of living side by side with Christians, Jews, fire worshippers, and atheists, even within the borders of Muslim nations, without incident. " - we must have read different Korans.
      "The vast majority of Muslims do not support the barbaric idiocy demonstrated by these people" - I have yet to meet a muslim that will say they will go to hell.
      "who collectively have a one and a half millennium long history of tolerance and acceptance" - a prime example of whitewashing history.\

      As one who's ancestors lived under the rule of Muslims, What color is the sky in your world?

    67. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      This is a fabrication and I refer you to the Jewish historian Bernard Lewis' account of the Jewish experience post-Spain.

      Not a fabrication at all, and again, I wonder if you even try to read sources before you claim that someone else's statement is a fabrication. Read about the mellah, and that article even cites indirectly a publication by Bernard Lewis where he points out that Jewish life was not as rosy as some Muslims claim..

      If by "decline" you mean "rose to greater wealth than in their home nations".

      Again you are deliberately misquoting people here. I specifically said "demographic decline, and I was mainly speaking about Christians. The weath to which these minorities may have had access as they became a shrinking percentage of the population is irrelevant here.

      ...actively participated in government right up to national government level.

      It doesn't matter how high they soared in administration. If they were forbidden from becoming head of state, then they still faced discrimination.

      ...provided independence including the legal right to govern their communities based on their own religious or cultural laws...

      That's not enough for freedom of religion. They were denied the right to invite Muslims to their faith, and therefore they were treated well.

    68. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      "therefore they were not treated well", rather.

    69. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the fuck are "suspicious wires?" I have a drawer containing assorted lengths of wire, and if some of them are suspicious, I want to know about it.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    70. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      I do believe that overwhelmingly the people of Iran like the United States. Perhaps, folks have forgotten this

      Iran did a candlelight vigil for 9/11 victims. And our president didn't even bother to acknowledge it. For all the shit that we threw at Iran, it was because of the U.S. it is a theocracy because of fucking oil. It was a liberal, western loving country at one point.

    71. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that it is ridiculous to judge a large group by the actions of a few and that no religion can be judged by the religious texts that form their core anymore. That being said, the Quran is pretty clear on what to do with non-believers. Also the religion, as a whole, hasn't spent 1400 years coexisting peacefully. A few areas had some times of peace, but by and large there was constant friction, be it the slow grinding wars over the Byzantine Empire to the regular violent isolated conflicts on the Iberian penisula prior to the Reconquista. Furthermore your attempt to break down the source of current events and friction to as few words as possible is just laughable, at least it would be if it weren't so damn depressing that you probably think you're serious.

    72. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is wrong to judge Islam by the stated tenants"

      Man I didn't know they had apartments! Hey fuckdick, it's

      TENETS

      you moron!!!!

    73. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Adriax · · Score: 2

      You have a drawer full of assorted lenghts of wire, and you didn't start your post with "Good news everyone."?

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    74. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So the kid that bites a pop-tart into the shape of a gun gets arrested and that's okay, but the kid that brings in something that looks like a bomb (GO LOOK AT IT) is just the victim of discrimination? The school called the cops because even his teachers had no idea what it was. Both did what they thought was right given the thing that LOOKED LIKE A BOMB, and not because the kid is Arabic.

      All kids are being scrutinized and arrested for anything that may potentially be drugs or weapons. Not some kids, and in fact the majority of those arrested and in media for insane weapon claims have been white. The kid that was arrested for posting "I'd like to kill Obama" on Facebook was white, and he didn't even have a device that looked very suspicious.

      You really can't be that goddamn dumb.. er yes you can.

    75. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately there are sects that are pushing for pure Muslim states and are anti-everything but Muslim. You don't have to like it, but I'm sure that Christians dislike the fact that The Westboro Baptist Church claims to be following Christian rules. You have to admit and own the problems as well as the good parts.

    76. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was a fucking clock. His engineering teacher could have verified it. Second, if they were really concerned why the fuck was the bomb squad and fire dept not called? They kept that kid for two class periods interrogating him without a lawyer and his parents. The principal trying to force him to write some kind of written confession. Again, without his parents. Do you think that was reasonable? Jeezus.

      Also speculating what the kid was up to? Really? Why not just give him the benefit of the doubt?

    77. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      He's also had an horrific experience for doing nothing. He got suspended as well, for building a fucking clock.

    78. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have repeatedly seen you claim that anything anti-Muslim, even with links to history, are just "untrue". You have no evidence that the history you are being provided is wrong, and no arguments against them. Rational dialogue requires both parties to be responsible for dialogue. You are just trolling.

    79. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no. I've seen Afghan cities set on fire because a few Korans were accidentally destroyed. I saw civilians join ISIS in Mosul because they thought that the Iraqi army wasn't the right kind of Islam. I'm not quite old enough to remember when Muslims demanded tribute from American ships, with the subsequent historically illiterate quotes that the U.S. isn't founded on Christianity.

      I don't judge Islam by Fox News. I judge it by the Khobar Towers, the Beirut barracks bombings, assorted school buses and pizza joints in Israel, both World Trade Center bombings, the USS COLE, and the 350+ other attacks since 1980. Christianity and Judaism get a bad rap, but that's only because neither group chases Jon Stewart around the studio with a scimitar.

    80. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Alypius · · Score: 2

      Benefit of the doubt? Seriously? Clearly you haven't been paying attention to the zero-tolerance zeitgeist.

    81. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Alypius · · Score: 1

      Well, no. I've seen Afghan cities set on fire because a few Korans were accidentally destroyed. I saw civilians join ISIS in Mosul because they thought that the Iraqi army wasn't the right kind of Islam. I'm not quite old enough to remember when Muslims demanded tribute from American ships, with the subsequent historically illiterate quotes that the U.S. isn't founded on Christianity. I don't judge Islam by Fox News. I judge it by the Khobar Towers, the Beirut barracks bombings, assorted school buses and pizza joints in Israel, both World Trade Center bombings, the USS COLE, and the 350+ other attacks since 1980. Christianity and Judaism get a bad rap, but that's only because neither group chases Jon Stewart around the studio with a scimitar.

    82. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know the poptart kid was suspended for repeatedley misbehaving and that the official report came out stating that reason came out after the media stopped caring. He made it into the shape of a gun, no big deal he's a kid. But he was contstantly making distractions by firing the fake gun at students during class time and lunch which in any school I've been to equals misbehaving which equals punishment. After warning and parent teacher conferences the kid was suspended after no other alternative was found. Go google it up and do some research on opinions that you can't back up because you only see some news posts with generic information. This is a totally different scenario.

    83. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Did any major country in the ancient world have true freedom of religion? Freedom of religion seems a very modern development.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    84. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Also speculating what the kid was up to? Really? Why not just give him the benefit of the doubt?'

      Lol, I find it ironic that every sentence in your post is speculative

    85. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didnt build shit. He took a clock out of a plastic shell and put it in a pencil case.

      PS You are one of the worst posters on this board.

    86. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...who are opposed by Muslims as much as they are by the rest of the world.

      You are somewhat sensible, but this statement is very wrong, and the source of most of the problem with Islam today.

    87. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All he did was remove some screws from a plastic shell then moved the contents to a pencil case. There was no precociousness or scientific curiosity, no genius at work, only a deficit in creativity. Its obvious that it was intended to look like bomb. The question is what his motives were and what is his fathers involvement in any of this if any.

    88. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that we are required by our religion to kill or convert "infidels" has never actually met one of us

      I don't have to meet you, this requirement is in your religious texts. But don't worry, you are not alone, it is a requirement for Jews and Christians too. The punishment commanded by God for blasphemy and heresy is death (by stoning). There is no wiggle room here. If you choose to cherry pick from the ancient texts because you cannot handle the unacceptable parts, why do you accept any of it? It is like being a member of the KKK for the barbecues, because the Grand Wizard can make a wicked pulled pork sandwich.

      Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are heinous mortality systems. Come out of the dark ages.

    89. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by mtempsch · · Score: 1

      A boy was trying to impress his female teacher. Really you guys can't see this as what it is. A boy bringing a shiny red apple to his female teacher hoping she will smile at him like he's a man, not a boy?

      WOW! A homemade clock to impress her and she thinks he made a bomb.

      From the articles I've read - he brought it in to show his engineering teacher, who AFAICT appears to be male, and recognized that it was indeed just a clock. The female teacher was in a later class and she was only shown the clock because of her request, since the alarm had gone off during class.

    90. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by is+as+us+Infinite · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll be honest, my reading is that he's writing it to deflate the groundswell of support for Ahmed. He straw-man's Ahmed's statement that he invented it, as you describe, and then goes on to talk about how the teachers actually weren't responding absurdly. It's an article intended to give points of support to those who want to argue against the commonly expressed opinion that Ahmed was targeted absurdly and unfairly. It does this partly by whittling away at Ahmed's 'credibility' as a young inventor.

      It's definitely contrary to my viewpoint, but I think that's what's going on here.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. . . . . . . .
    91. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Calydor · · Score: 1

      What he did would be more accurately called case modding, I suppose.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    92. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we're judging 1.5 billion people. If something wasn't inherently wrong with your religion (i.e. if it didn't produce extremism/fanatacism every single time some non-believer sneezed the "wrong" way) nobody would be "persecuting" you.

      Don't want to deal with prejudice and hatred? How about you and the rest of your 1.5 billion DO SOMETHING to deal with your EXTREMELY PREVALENT subculture of worshiping death and destruction so that we inferior non-believers don't have to deal with YOUR community's bullshit?

      Yes, Christianity and Judaism are full of nutjobs as well, but you don't see them carbombing innocents EVERY. SINGLE. FUCKING. DAY. OF. THE. WEEK. Nobody clicks a LiveLeak link that says "terrorists behead some dude" expecting to see some radical Christian or Jew murdering someone in cold blood. I WONDER WHY THAT IS?

      There is something SERIOUSLY wrong with your religion/community. Boohoo. Poor you. I'm sorry that you can't handle that fact. Fix it and you won't have to deal with stereotypes anymore. Simple.

      TLDR: You and your 1.5 billion are COMPLETELY COMPLACENT in what a "minority" of your community does. So go fuck yourself.

    93. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I did similar stuff as a kid, but I didn't bring stuff to school because I knew they'd be to dumb to understand the stuff I did. I took everything apart, and I had a running disassembled digital clock running (this was in the late 1970s/early 1980s). Later I moved on to more advanced stuff than just disassembling everything and fixing stuff. I taught myself assembly language and started writing all sorts of hacks and whatnot (back then the IBM technical reference manual included a full BIOS listing and schematics). I now know a lot of stuff I did as a kid was a major shock hazard (if not a fire hazard), and I did frequently shock myself with mains voltage.

      Of course I recall that with the digital clock I disassembled I was able to do stuff like put it in 24 hour mode which it couldn't do until I got my paws on it.

      I was soldering CPU turbo boards for the Heathkit H89 Z80 based computer when I was 11 years old which my father sold. The small board would replace one of the chips and allow the computer to switch to 4MHz under software control.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    94. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I have a copy of the Qur'an open right now. Care to point me to that reference?

      --
      I hate printers.
    95. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by rworne · · Score: 1

      While I have some doubts as to how wise it was to bring the device to school, I do not find it in any way odd that a kid of that age would be tearing apart electronic stuff and messing with it in the way that he did. He's also not an adult, so holding him to strict interpretations of the word "invent" is a little unfair too. He's a tinkerer, a critical first step in figuring out how stuff works.

      The Islamophobia angle is what irritates me. Anyone who brought something like that into a school unannounced would raise a concern, no matter what their ethnicity/religion may be.

      This student was up on felony charges for a science fair volcano project:

      16-year-old expelled, charged with felonies over volcano science experiment (auto play video warning)

      There was a fair amount of media furor over that too.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    96. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to think that Muslims are more violent than other groups.
      Perhaps this might interest you.

    97. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by rworne · · Score: 1

      To anyone that opened it, it would look like a box of electronic junk and wires. Yes, there's a huge red display, but LED alarm clocks do not turn on their display when they are not plugged into AC power. The 9V battery is just to run the clock and alarm circuit. There were no ominous huge red numbers counting down when they opened the box.

      It was nothing like this alarm clock.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    98. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the best example of taqiyyah I have seen. You are lying. Specifically, you are lying to further the interests of islam.

    99. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'm a regular guy with a regular life. If you think I'm sitting in a dark room plotting global Islamic domination then you're the pathological xenophobe, not me.

      --
      I hate printers.
    100. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Muslim, I can categorically state that anyone who thinks that we are required by our religion to kill or convert "infidels" has never actually met one of us, and only knows about us from Fox News.

      Your problem is that other people who do call themselves Muslims are doing these things.

      Fox News may accuse us of being ignorant and intolerant people, but history and fact does not support that assertion.

      Perhaps not, but what have Muslims and the Middle East done for us lately other than cause problems?

      Our religion has a 1,400 year history of living side by side with Christians, Jews, fire worshippers, and atheists, even within the borders of Muslim nations, without incident.

      I don't care about your idealized version of the past, that doesn't matter. What matters is that the Middle East keeps making their problems our problems while contributing essentially nothing, except oil, to the progress of humanity.

      The wars in the middle east today are instigated by the idiots kept in power by foreign aid money

      The US foreign aid budget is far too small to bankroll the dictatorships of the Middle East. No, it's the oil money that keeps everyone fighting, not foreign aid, and we don't control how other countries spend their money. Whenever we try to run other countries people call us "Imperialists". Damned if you do and damned if you don't so I'd rather we didn't spend a single dollar more on trying to civilize barbarians.

      How many Muslims do you think actually support Assad? How many of us support the Saudi royals? Saddam Hussein? These people got into power by playing the game that landed them military support allowing them to seize power.

      And what have they done about it? Lived their lives with a boot on their necks, each of them hoping to go unnoticed. Freedom isn't free, you have to fight for it.

      The vast majority of Muslims do not support the barbaric idiocy demonstrated by these people, and that's to say nothing of the rabid dogs in ISIS.

      Then why don't they stand up and fight instead of running away to Europe and begging for help? The Syrian people outnumber ISIS (aks DAESH) and their foreign fighters 100 to 1. If even half of them would grow a pair and fight back they could have wiped them out already.

      You're judging 1.5 billion people, who collectively have a one and a half millennium long history of tolerance and acceptance, by the actions of a ragtag bunch of barbarians who are opposed by Muslims as much as they are by the rest of the world.

      If the Muslims oppose the barbarians of ISIS, why don't they march their armies into Syria and wipe them out?

      That strikes me as rather, well, ignorant and intolerant.

      Americans are perfectly willing to tolerate other people's beliefs. After all, freedom to say what you want and believe what you want are top of the list in the US Constitution. But respect is a two way street and many Muslims don't seem to understand that. Instead, they want special protections and accommodations, which of course we cannot allow since doing so would completely undermine our fundamental rights to speak freely and associate (or not) with whomever we wish.

    101. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not, but what have Muslims and the Middle East done for us lately other than cause problems?

      Last I checked, your army is there, and not the other way around. And nobody buys the whole "we're stopping a repeat of 9/11 and they hate our freedoms" BS any more.

      What matters is that the Middle East keeps making their problems our problems while contributing essentially nothing, except oil, to the progress of humanity.

      And how are the middle easterners doing that? Are they sending planes and warships to your territory? Tell me, before the whole "War on Terror" thing, how many times did a middle easterner cause a problem in the US? According to Europol, less than 1% of terrorist attacks in Europe were carried out by Muslims. According to the FBI, 94% of terrorist acts in the US between 1985 and 2005 were carried out by non-Muslims.

      The US foreign aid budget is far too small to bankroll the dictatorships of the Middle East.

      That's because the aid budget does not include military aid, logistical support, or black op support of rebel groups. These things are specifically and carefully hidden from the public, and hidden in the military budget. Where do the expenses for the CIA's operations in Chile in the 70s show up in the aid budget?

      Then why don't they stand up and fight instead of running away to Europe and begging for help?

      They are farmers. Their governments are sporting high end weaponry courtesy of foreign powers. Taking your family into a war zone and going up against machine guns with a pitchfork is not bravery, it's stupidity.

      If the Muslims oppose the barbarians of ISIS, why don't they march their armies into Syria and wipe them out?

      Which armies? The ones commanded by the lunatics in charge who have no interest in stability and are only interested in preserving their own power?

      Americans are perfectly willing to tolerate other people's beliefs.

      After all, freedom to say what you want and believe what you want are top of the list in the US Constitution.

      I suppose I'd be better off talking from a free speech zone, then.

      But respect is a two way street and many Muslims don't seem to understand that. Instead, they want special protections and accommodations, which of course we cannot allow since doing so would completely undermine our fundamental rights to speak freely and associate (or not) with whomever we wish.

      No. The ONLY thing we want from the US, the UK, and other foreign powers is that they stop interfering with the internal politics of Muslim nations by arming, financing, or supporting certain groups and then blaming us for the consequences. We want them to stop creating groups like the Taliban when a proxy fighting group is needed to fight the enemy of the day, and then later acting like the Taliban are a Muslim problem.

      Remove foreign interference, and the lunatics will be gone the next day.

      --
      I hate printers.
    102. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it anti-semitic to point out that Judaism requires their adherents to covet the entire world's wealth, perpetuate the myth of 19 trillion dead Jews from the Holocaust, continue to stir up shit in the middle-east including raping and pillaging the Gaza Strip and Palestine, and continue to accuse anyone (even fellow Jews) of anti-semitism for any kind of criticism, no matter how well deserved?

    103. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't know how the system works... Guilty until proven innocent!

    104. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Eeeh, it is quite a stretch to call her "white". If I recall from a contemporary interview she was quite dark skinned - at least at the time, not sure if it was helped by a tan - but in any case not caucasian. Also, it was an airport - paranoia to the max!

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    105. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author is responding in kind. The media made this kid out to be Nikola Tesla with dark skin.

    106. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our religion has a 1,400 year history of living side by side with Christians, Jews, fire worshippers, and atheists, even within the borders of Muslim nations, without incident.

      That's bullshit, and you know it. Musilms have been at war with everyone else since the Crusades. It's the only thing holding that pathetically weak minded sheep together. Try reading a little history instead of the propaganda in The Daily Rag. And look at what your religious does to suppress, mutilate and torture females. You are all cowards for letting it happen. Shame on you! But as you turn a blind eye and claim to believe in a god, you're going to hell. Enjoy!

    107. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Musilms have been at war with everyone else since the Crusades.

      Umm... I have no words...

      You're aware that the Crusades were a wholly unprovoked war waged by Europe against Muslim lands, right? And you're aware that when General Allenby marched into Jerusalem in WW1 he declared "now the Crusades are finally complete", right? And you're aware that Bush declared the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to be a "new Crusade", right?

      Care to try again?

      --
      I hate printers.
    108. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Mayor of his town may offer some context

    109. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by johannesg · · Score: 2

      I think the estimated 270 million victims of islam would probably disagree, had any of them survived:

      http://www.politicalislam.com/...

    110. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      In that case, a piece of wire is half a bomb. Plug one end to the detonator, the other end to the mains outlet and boom. Will not give the terrorist time to escape, but then again, terrorists are not known for their concern for self-preservation.

      Which means that any device that has a power cord is half a bomb. The average home has how many of them? Arrest everyone!!!!

      Or maybe the device without explosives is not a bomb or even half a bomb? I mean you can build a bomb that doe not need electricity at all (just put the bomb down, light the fuse and (optional) run).

      OK OK, maybe a PC can be a bomb, the capacitors in the PC power supplies are known to explode sometimes...

    111. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. They are more at war with each other. Everyone else is just war spoils. It is said that there will be peace when only muslims are left. Wrong. They will keep killing until only one type of muslim if left. Then they will start killing each other for power and wealth.

    112. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where in Europe you were, as there really are different cultures from country to country. I would guess that you didn't spend any time in e.g. Scandinavia while you were there?

    113. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by skam240 · · Score: 1

      The norm for the world of this era was "slaughter the other". In the Muslim world the norm was "oppress the other a bit but otherwse leave them be". Sure you can point to examples of Muslims treating non-muslims poorly if you rate them by the standards of today. If you rate them by the standards of history then Muslims come out amazingly tolerant.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    114. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      The next time the Jihadis want to plan something, they can just get a kid like Ahmed to do the same thing, but this time w/ a real time bomb or similar contraption.

      And not make the real bomb look like a movie bomb. And not take it out of the backpack or wherever.

    115. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      He's a ninth grader and there are adults that would make the same definition mistake. I once met some guy that "invented" a "fuel saving carberettor" by putting a spacer in there and thus tuning it to use less fuel on idle - and shit performance under load.

    116. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that is the real koran? A chop job was done a few centuries back with 'fake' korans destroyed. Given that it claims to be the truth and we know for certain that it is not the original book recited through mohammad, how can you trust it at all.

      Face it, your religion is based on lies. Obvious lies.

      Consider what harm the quran incites. Why would you want to inflict this on others?

      If someone burned your book would you try to kill them?

      Do you believe in cutting off human female sex organs? How about cutting off a human male's penis?

      Would you do anything prescribed in the quran?

      From the looks of it Islam has declared war. On everyone. And itself.

    117. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      by administrators who have complete intolerance as their goal

      Personally I think that's one of many obvious consequences of having someone who has never been a professional teacher running a school. The US school system seems to be utterly fucked up compared with a lot of other places (and the US school system of some years ago) and that seems to be the major distinguishing feature. An "administrator" who knows a bit about kids is unlikely to have fucked up in such a dramatic way.

    118. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

      Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

      Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"Â

    119. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Most hobbyists I know now (and since I'm a hackspace regular, it's a fair few) use either breadboard or use one of the cheap board houses. Those guys all do silkscreening at pretty much no extra cost so most customboards have silkscreen now.

      We even have a good etching system with a stock of etchant but few people use it, because it's (a) a PITA, (b) hard to do fine traces, (c) single sided, (d) no soldermask, all of which combine to make using fine pitch components a right pain.

      Of course the home made boards are much faster turnaround for cheap and you can do soldermask (and even through hole plating with dedication), but I've never seen anyone actually do those.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    120. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      The Qur'an is the most widely memorized book in history. It's print production is arguably the most tightly controlled and thoroughly verified print project in existence today. I most certainly do NOT have a copy that differs in any way from the authentic text that has been in circulation for around 1,400 years. Whatever your view of the Qur'an may be, historians both Muslim and non-Muslim agree that it's historical authenticity back to the time of Muhammad is certain.

      Consider what harm the quran incites. Why would you want to inflict this on others?

      I treat people in accordance with the principles in the Qur'an. It's why I do my best to conduct my business in an honest way, it's why I help my neighbours any time I see they need (no, they aren't Muslim), it's why I get involved in community work assisting the homeless and other people in need, etc.

      If someone burned your book would you try to kill them?

      Why? It's a bunch of paper. I have no reason to take it personally, and the vast majority of Muslims feel the same, notwithstanding the lunatics the media loves to parade.

      Do you believe in cutting off human female sex organs? How about cutting off a human male's penis?

      FGM and castration are both forbidden in the religion, with no exceptions. FGM occurs as a cultural thing in some places that happen to be Muslim. It also happens in places where the population are not Muslim. But it has nothing at all to do with Islam.

      Would you do anything prescribed in the quran?

      I do my best already to live my life according to the Qur'an.

      From the looks of it Islam has declared war. On everyone. And itself.

      From the looks of it, yes. So perhaps, rather than going by "the looks of it", you do some research, go to your nearest mosque, meet some Muslims, tell them you're an infidel, and then watch in horror as they... do precisely nothing.

      --
      I hate printers.
    121. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Znork · · Score: 1

      I built a timer controlled firecracker for a presentation on European terror groups. Probably wouldn't do that either.

    122. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ignorance of Jewish and Christian theology from this statement is breathtaking to say the least. It's on a level with the kid who has the brilliant idea of exceeding the speed of light by throwing a ball from a train moving at the speed of light. To even propose it shows you know less than nothing.

    123. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

      OK so God is saying that he'll be unhappy with those who disbelieve. What's that got to do with me?

      Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

      If you read the immediate preceding verse, it is clear that this refers to those who have declared war against Muslims and have attacked without provocation. In fact it's right there in this one too. The following verse makes it clear that all are to be spared punishment if they cease fighting. Furthermore, punishments are only to be enacted by a valid government; it's not like any random person off the street can implement the rules of punishment.

      Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

      Nice picking half the verse. This is a story contained in the Qur'an of the instruction given to angels during the course of a historic battle. The verse begins: "When God said to the angels: ..."

      Thank you for playing "Take Things Out Of Context", better luck next time.

      --
      I hate printers.
    124. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main concern is having a large percentage of the population who can turn on a dime tomorrow deciding to destroy our civilisation. This has already started here. Islamasists openly declare their intentions. They laud their results.

      The community feeling here is that they can bugger off to a muslim country.

    125. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Americans especially seem to forget that Europe doesn't have a single culture like America does.

      Dog-whistle ideas like "cultural identity" and "tradition" are widely accepted without any critical thinking at all

      Parent probably wasn't in Western Europe. This sounds more like Poland or other former Eastern Bloc countries than for instance Britain or France.

    126. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your society doing as a whole to educate young muslims that killing innocent people is wrong on all levels, and that no way would a great god reward you for torturing, maiming and killing people. Especially over a freakin cartoon!

      This lack of quality leadership in the muslim world is worrying, to say the least.

      Muslims need intelligent leaders, not the current set of professional bullshitters.

    127. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Muslims would love to bugger off to a Muslim country. Except that Muslim countries are ruled by tinpot dictators who are all financed by external powers looking to expend their sphere of influence. Saddam, Ghaddafi, Assad, Mobarek, Sisi... all products of foreign powers. That's even true of the groups like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

      Leave our countries alone, and we'll go back there faster than you can say "They hate are freedums".

      --
      I hate printers.
    128. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly sounds like it.

      Built any home made clocks recently?

    129. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Well, in January of this year I was part of a youth camp where we ran a program which explained to young Muslims the rules of warfare in Islam. A quick summary:
      1. Killing anyone of any faith is never allowed unless they are a direct threat to you personally.
      2. The state may not declare war on any other nation or group unless that group has first declared war or physically attacked first. There is no such thing as a "preemptive strike".
      3. Under no circumstances may prisoner of war be killed while a prisoner.
      4. Under no circumstances may a civilian be killed in the course of war. There is no such thing as "acceptable collateral damage".

      To answer your other points:
      1. It is forbidden to compel anyone to convert. A person's belief is an internal thing, and forcing them to say something does not make a believer out of them anyway.
      2. Insults have traditionally been ignored in Islam. Unfortunately, in the age of the modern media, it's just too easy for an angry mob to form. Most educated Muslims just didn't care about the cartoons, but there are enough angry fools out there that things got out of control.

      Muslims need intelligent leaders, not the current set of professional bullshitters.

      And I think every Muslim who are not professional bullshitters or in their employment would agree with you. Stop the foreign support of the tinpot maniacs who are running the countries that make up the Muslim world, and Muslims will clean them out pretty quick smart.

      --
      I hate printers.
    130. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The norm for the world of this era was "slaughter the other". In the Muslim world the norm was "oppress the other a bit but otherwse leave them be". Sure you can point to examples of Muslims treating non-muslims poorly if you rate them by the standards of today. If you rate them by the standards of history then Muslims come out amazingly tolerant.

      We rate them by the standards of today because they still do it today.

      Today's muslems can't change history (they can only lie about it, as seen up-thread), they can only change what they do today.

      What they do today still remains proof they are oppressive, prone to abhorrent behavior like terrorism, abuse of animals, abuse of women and females and overall anti civilized crap. Anybody anywhere is justified being afraid of a muslem that is holding what appears to be a bomb. Period.

      Whilst I agree the kid did not commit a crime, whining like an idiot over the arrest and investigation is more muslem lies. (And, if you read their tenets, they are allowed to lie with impunity to non-muslems.)

    131. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Yea, and I planted it under your bed. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

      --
      I hate printers.
    132. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by geekmux · · Score: 2

      ...How is messing with children like that in any way ethical regardless of the cause you think it is in aid of?

      Messing with? I guess we've somehow overlooked where this child would be at today if they would have just stayed the course with this paranoia-based interrogation.

      Had we the masses not been alerted to this event, had the POTUS himself not intervened, I can promise you that this kids arrest record would have stuck with him for quite a long time, along with the fact he would likely be sitting on the Federal No Fly list by now, for the same non-reasons he was interrogated.

      Go ahead. Tell me again how I'm exaggerating and that somehow wouldn't happen. A 14-year old was hauled off in handcuffs for putting clock parts together. The paranoia at which this even rose to this level is unreal, and when it comes to the national security excuse, all liberties are clearly null and void.

      As for the after-effects at this point, I'd probably rather deal with people expecting me to be a prodigy of some kind and allow that 15 seconds of fame to merely evaporate rather than have to explain a criminal past falsely born from pure Islamophobia.

    133. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I'm a regular guy with a regular life. If you think I'm sitting in a dark room plotting global Islamic domination then you're the pathological xenophobe, not me.

      Regular guys can be liars too.

    134. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, a little research discovers that the primary adult person doing the manipulating is this boy's father, which suggests that this whole thing may have been a set-up.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    135. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps not, but what have Muslims and the Middle East done for us lately other than cause problems?

      What has USA done for Middle East lately other than cause problems?
      What has USA done for the World lately other than cause problems?
      What matters is that USA keeps making their problems everyone elses problems while contributing essentially nothing, except burning oil.

      Freedom isn't free, you have to fight for it.

      USA lost the role of the freedomfighters in the middle of the last century. Deutschland and Japan were liberated but Iran, Korea or Vietnam some years later, not so much.

      Our grandparents and parents still think of the USA as the great freedom bringer. It was true and then it became propaganda.

    136. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the bomb squad was called
      what wasn't reported was an attempted jihad attack on Texas church the day before. was it an overreaction maybe, but what would you rather have an overreaction or 30 dead kids

    137. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what tinkers do.... Most adults with STEM careers started off as "that kid that tinkered".. the same way an automotive engineer started out as a gear-head who fixed and modified cars...

    138. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Damn. You got me. I better dispose of the dynamite underpants I have hidden under my bed before the cops arrive.

      --
      I hate printers.
    139. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tinkers sounds like a subset of the lgbt community, I think you meant tinkerers.

      Either way, if in 2015 and at 14 years old this qualifies as tinkering or science then it should also be an indictment of our education system. Pumping gas in to your car is a more complicated and time consuming activity than removing 4 screws and then adding 2 more.

      We dont need more kids like this becuase what he did was so unremarkable, other than building something that could pass as a hollywood prop.

      When this little shithead tweeted about being a little muslim boy you have to know that the fix was in and it was likely his CAIR activist dad that got this ball rolling

    140. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had really thought it was a bomb they would have evacuated the school and not let him keep it with him the whole time.

    141. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You told him, bro! Yee haa, the South shall rise again!

    142. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most hobbyists I know now (and since I'm a hackspace regular, it's a fair few) use either breadboard or use one of the cheap board houses. Those guys all do silkscreening at pretty much no extra cost so most customboards have silkscreen now.

      Yes, but most of the cheap places (and a lot of the pricier ones too) want to minimize effort and processing, so are pretty strict about receiving only gerber files or files from their own layout program. Hence it would be very difficult for a hobbyist to have hand drawn boards and silkscreening. It is the combo of the two that makes it look like a board from decades ago.

    143. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What abort these facts: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/opinion-polls.htm

    144. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nazis of course were European Christians, so don't take this as a defense of Christianity.

      Small objection: They - as a movement - seemed to have pushed for a return to germanic paganism.

    145. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he did it on 9/11, and his dad is an Islamic activist..

    146. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Posting as AC means you likely won't get my response. But here goes:

      ICM Poll: 20% of British Muslims sympathize with 7/7 bombers
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

      NOP Research: 1 in 4 British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified
      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories...
      http://www.webcitation.org/5xk...

      I call BS. I specifically do work in my community in de-radicalisation efforts, and also liaise with other efforts internationally. I seek out people like this, and I have to tell you, they're pretty hard to find. Admittedly, I'm in Australia, but if there are anything like double digit percentage chunks of our community who sympathize with bombers, I'd know about it. I'd be surprised of the number of Muslims who condone terrorism is above 1%.

      People-Press: 31% of Turks support suicide attacks against Westerners in Iraq.
      http://people-press.org/report...

      The mosque I usually attend is mainly a Turkish community. My wife is Turkish, and I've spent time there specifically discussing global politics with them. Once again, there's no way almost 1 in 3 support suicide attacks in any form against anyone. Suicide attacks are, in any Islam 101 class, specifically ruled out, and the fact that brainwashed youngsters are conned into it doesn't change that fact. No mainstream Muslim who has had a modicum of Islamic education would condone a prohibited act. ...

      Looking down the rest of these "surveys", I can only speculate that they are the result of very skewed research, or perhaps loose interpretation of the answers to leading questions. Also, looking into the actual paper referenced in the one that states "World Public Opinion: 61% of Egyptians approve of attacks on Americans" I found that the actual research results showed that only 8% of Egyptians approved of attacks on Americans in America, and 7% approved of attacks on Americans working abroad (I'd have thought it'd go the other way, but meh). I was not able to find 61% approval of attacks anywhere.

      At this point, I shall terminate evaluating that site, it's clearly (and I'm being charitable with my wording here) badly mistaken in the facts it is presenting.

      --
      I hate printers.
    147. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was a fucking clock. His engineering teacher could have verified it. Second, if they were really concerned why the fuck was the bomb squad and fire dept not called? They kept that kid for two class periods interrogating him without a lawyer and his parents. The principal trying to force him to write some kind of written confession. Again, without his parents. Do you think that was reasonable? Jeezus.

      Also speculating what the kid was up to? Really? Why not just give him the benefit of the doubt?

      Cuz in 'Murika we do not given the benefit of the doubt to kids with Muslim-sounding names (whatever that means) and/or suffer from Dermal Hypermelaninetis (a condition clearly documented in the "Take Our Country Back" medical manual.)

    148. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by onepoint · · Score: 1

      yes, and at the end, he is rewarded with, free ride to a university, some awards and I bet some opportunity. All for tinkering. Not a bad outcome.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    149. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      "I don't personally believe these statistics, therefore they are false" How about the survey in 2006 showing the large minority of Muslims in the UK supporting Sharia law? When I visited Niger, even those very Islamic people did not want Sharia, so I'm not sure why so many I the UK apparently do, but it's anti-human. You sound like a sane, good person, like so many other Muslims I know. That doesn't change the fact that Islam, along with the other Abrahamic religions, is a brutal, archaic religion that needs to be left to history. And for the record, I am supportive of this kid regardless of TFA, even if he was pretending it was a bomb, it clearly isn't. The whole thing is a combination of the worse aspects of 21st century America.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    150. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like PJ O'Rourke said - the individuals in the Muslim world are very friendly and hospitable, but when you get them in a group and shove a Koran down their pants, they start acting like a pack of crazed civet cats in heat.

    151. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      An "administrator" who knows a bit about kids is unlikely to have fucked up in such a dramatic way.

      This touches upon a hypothesis of mine, that the inability of large numbers of parents to allow their children to grow up, safety culture, and people who simply hate children have combined in an unholy triumvirate that is now getting to be a positive feedback loop.

      All enforced by the police. And it doesn't work. You would think that armed police and administrators ready to stomp out anything unnaceptable would have the situation in public schools pretty well cleaned up by now. A quarter billion arrests in the last 20 years should have the little bastards shaking in their shoes, and afraid to open their mouths.

      But getting tougher and tougher on any "problem" just makes it worse. Which is why I call the present situation "America's war on children".

      A one strike and you're out society, and the idea that that strike could be for sass, perfume, or just about any science project just means that after sassing the teacher, you are finished. And in the mindset of a teenager, that means there isn't much point of behaving at all any more.

      The school system is supposed to groom and guide children toward adulthood, not be the entry level introduction to the criminal justice system

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    152. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      "I don't personally believe these statistics, therefore they are false"

      Well, I go so far into the article as to verify that the article said 61% when the referenced research paper said 8%. So I'm not denying the statistics, I'm denying the article.

      How about the survey in 2006 showing the large minority of Muslims in the UK supporting Sharia law?

      So what? I support Shari'ah law. Do I support its implementation in Australia and the forcible subjugation of my countrymen to it? No. The Qur'an clearly states that there is no compulsion in religion. It is a core tenet of our faith, that forced belief, or even blind, unquestioning belief, is not belief. Belief is a sincere internal state of a person, not merely forced or imitated actions or words.

      This question gets asked all the time to Muslims, and the answer gets misinterpreted all the time. If the asked question is "Do you support Shari'ah law?" then Muslims will answer yes every single time, just like a Jew would answer yes to "Do you support Halakhah?", and a Buddhist would answer yes to "Do you support Dharma?". How a journalist looking to sell papers writes up those answers is another matter entirely.

      You sound like a sane, good person, like so many other Muslims I know.

      Awww shucks :)

      That doesn't change the fact that Islam, along with the other Abrahamic religions, is a brutal, archaic religion that needs to be left to history.

      That's your opinion, and you're welcome to it. I invite you to actually go to your local mosque and ask whatever community members you find there to sit down with you and answer any questions you may have that have led you to this conclusion. I think you'll find that spending time and having the common misconceptions dispelled will change your opinion.

      --
      I hate printers.
    153. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Go read your history again. The crusades were not "unprovoked" at all.

    154. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      that's not 'research' its converative 'talking points' that they are using to try to twist this to THEIR agenda.

      I knew the southern yokels would not take a lesson from this. "double down on the derp!" is the southern way, isn't it?

      damn. sometimes I do want to get off this planet. "the stupidity, it burns!"

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    155. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I can categorically state that anyone who thinks that we are required by our religion to kill or convert "infidels" has never actually met one of us,

      sorry, but your books do have some pretty condemning bits in them. how about this wonderful bit of prose:


      Book 041, Number 6985:

              Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

      you know, if your religion was serious about changing its world view and being more accepting of others, you would fight to have that passive removed or at least nullified. why isn't anyone doing that? because they think its god's words and they take it VERY seriously!

      do I think every muslim believes this deep-down? no! of course not. but its written, its part of the religion and there are many examples of this.

      you cannot deny it. but what you can do is to deny that its the word of god and that its something that was a mistake, to be fixed.

      no religion ever updates itself. has any ever done that? so its not just islam, all religions have an aspect of hate to them ('the other guys have it wrong; we have the only real truthful way!' and so on). but to say that your religion does not have hate as its basis is to be dishonest.

      people can be good or bad. but religions have a dark aspect to them that I'd prefer we didn't have, as a species. this 'us vs them' view is really tearing the world apart. and the islam religion is a classic example of 'if you are not with us, you are against us'.

      please be honest about this. we can all look up passages and read them. if you are honest about this and say 'yes, its an embarrasment and none of us really believe this phrase' then we're all good. can you say that much, at least?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    156. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as taking things apart and putting them back together, Henry Ford did that sort of thing.

      But to be fair, Henry Ford would have also supported arresting the kid as an anti-American troublemaker just for being a minority.

    157. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You mean in the same way they "twisted" the Michael Brown story?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    158. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I'm not an expert in the interpretation of hadith, so I can neither verify that that is an accurate translation, nor can I comment on its significance in deriving a religious rule.

      However, I CAN say without a shadow of a doubt that all of the passages that talk about the killing of non-Muslims are in the context of warfare, where there are very strict rules in place. The hard religious principles that apply to this sort of thing include things like:

      1) One may not attack a person who is a civilian. There is no such thing as "acceptable collateral damage".
      2) One may not attack a person who does not pose a threat, or who is not an active participant in war. So there's no justification for, say, bombing the cafeteria at the civilian head office of a military contractor that makes bombs, or any other civilian target.
      3) One may not kill a person merely because of their belief. The principle that there is no compulsion in religion is a hard principle with no exceptions.
      4) One may not deliberately kill oneself in battle, or deliberately sacrifice oneself by one's own hand. So suicide bombing and/or harakiri is out.

      Whatever the sound bites that get paraded may indicate, these principles are hard principles that any Muslim you ask will know about. Feel free to print them out as-is, just as I've stated them here, and take them to your nearest mosque and ask the people you find there if they agree with them all. I'd be surprised if you find a single person who says "well, I think we could be flexible on one or more of those".

      If you're really interested, I can ask my local scholars about the background and context for this particular reference and get back to you. These recounted sayings obviously took place in the context of conversations, and the rest of the conversation's context and lead up are as important as the quoted phrase itself. Feel free to email me, my address is Nazeer Gassiep at gma il dott com, and I'll get back to you with a full explanation of that in a day or two. Alternatively, visit your nearest mosque and ask the Imam there. Or do both, and compare the answers.

      --
      I hate printers.
    159. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Hey you forgot this one!

      If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which the LORD thy God giveth thee, man or woman, that hath wrought wickedness in the sight of the LORD thy God, in transgressing his covenant; 17:3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded; 17:4 And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel; 17:5 Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die.

      Oh wait that's the Bible telling Christians to stone disbelievers...

    160. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Muslims would love to bugger off to a Muslim country. ...
      Leave our countries alone, and we'll go back there faster than you can say "They hate are freedums".

      This is a really fascinating statement. The usual claim by apologists is that Muslims integrate extremely well and become loyal to their new countries, just like any other group of immigrants. But, as a Muslim raised in a Western country (USA?) yourself, you're telling me you would love to leave a non-Muslim country to return to a Muslim dominated area? Interesting.

      Except that Muslim countries are ruled by tinpot dictators who are all financed by external powers looking to expend their sphere of influence. Saddam, Ghaddafi, Assad, Mobarek, Sisi... all products of foreign powers. That's even true of the groups like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

      Yeah, right. Your knowledge of history is extremely weak to make these claims. Saddam and Assad arose as heads of POPULAR movements. Is Sisi worse than the Ikhwan and their religious excesses (did you notice how well Christians were doing in Egypt under Ikhwan rule?). What role did the West play in Ghaddafi's rise?

    161. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      you're telling me you would love to leave a non-Muslim country to return to a Muslim dominated area? Interesting.

      I love living in Australia. I find the place welcoming, civilized (aside from Australian rules football, but don't tell my mates that or I'm out), and prosperous.

      However, if I were given the opportunity to enjoy these benefits in a country where I have religion in common with everyone else, I'd go. And I really, don't see how you consider this to be "interesting" rather than obvious.

      Saddam and Assad arose as heads of POPULAR movements.

      They are both Ba'athists despite their rivalry. Ba'athism cannot even be described as a "significant minority" in either Iraq or Syria. My history is just fine, thank you very much.

      What role did the West play in Ghaddafi's rise?

      In the late 1960s, King Idris was on the way out, and every political analyst knew it was inevitable. The CIA was active in the country at the time, attempting to ensure that whatever transition took place, Western oil interests would be preserved. Ghaddafi's FOM group were presumably identified as conducive (despite public anti-West rhetoric), and so were provided with intelligence and logistical support which allowed them to successfully pull off a coup. There are numerous reports by FOM members of meetings that took place with operatives from the US. Nonetheless, this has since been denied by the CIA.

      While I suppose no hard evidence has emerged of the West's role in Ghaddafi's rise like in the case of Pinnochet or Bin Laden, I do point out that picking the winner from a bunch of rebel groups to "manage" the transition from a failing state is pretty much the CIA's main MO. If they were NOT involved, they'd have been specifically failing in the job that they are assigned.

      --
      I hate printers.
    162. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      [citation needed]. Also, this [wikipedia.org] and this [wordpress.com] kinda ruins your "Muslims hate Jews" narrative.

      Read what you linked! Here are some massacres/expulsions/forced conversions of Jews off the top of my head (a few links included, you can research the rest if you don't believe me). A colleague of mine in graduate school was coming up with a complete list of such assaults. I'm not sure if his article was ever published. Ottoman history is my particular area of knowledge, but I've included some other particularly famous incidents from elsewhere.

      627 AD, Muhammad slaughters (beheading many of them--a practice you claim is forbidden in Islam) Jews in Medina and expels the rest. See also at least two other Jewish tribes that Muhammad extirpated.
      The first of the Rashidun, Umar, expels all Jews from the Arabian peninsula (~650?). Even today, there are no Jews allowed in Saudi Arabia.
      Granada, 1066. Jewish quarter massacred.
      ~1200, the Almoravid dynasty expels Jews and Christians from parts of Moorish Spain and North Africa.
      1656, Jews expelled from Isfahan and forced to convert (or die).
      1660, Safed (Israel, Ottoman Empire), Jews massacred.
      About this same time there was a Jewish leader (forget his name, sorry) --and his followers -- who were forced to convert en masse to Islam. They're still called Donme today Turkey, and it's a common slanders against politicians that they are secret Jews.
      1678, Yemeni Jews expelled.
      1840, Damascus, Jews tortured, forced to convert.

      These are just a few of the more egregious. There is not a single century in which I could not find Jews massacred, forced to convert, being expelled from their homes, and having their synagogues and homes destroyed.

      I was raised in a Muslim family, but never had the religion forced upon me. I explored other religions freely, went to a Uniting Church school and had lengthy conversations with out pastor. I also spent time learning about the Buddhist faith. Islam for me is as active a choice as any other aspect of my lifestyle. Don't go making assumptions on my behalf, it's borderline insulting.

      Anybody who is raised religious as a child had the religion forced on them. Think, if you were raised in a Christian household, do you think you would convert to Islam? if you were raised in a Jewish household would you convert to Islam? Of course not. Minus a tiny percentage of converts (by choice or forced), most people do not switch faiths.

      I made exactly two assumptions about you. I assumed, from what you said, that you were Muslim, and I assumed that you were raised Muslim in a Western (probably US/Canada) country. I actually made a third assumption, based on your seeming ignorance and confusion of Arab ideologies and affairs, that you're desi (also Naz).

      I'm not making up a "false white-washed" history of Islam. I'm using documented facts and verified historical accounts to counter claims made that are simply not true.

      Remeber in my post I bolded one part and said if you chose to respond to only one part of my post to respond to that. Well, it's EXTREMELY telling that you chose to skip over that part. I will repeat it for you.

      Tolerance and acceptance--please point out the great historical Muslim philosophers, preachers, and leaders who have preached tolerance and acceptance. Perhaps Akbar in Mughal India? Perhaps some specific syncretic Sufi sects that preached a kind of universalism. Anybody else? Seriously, if you honestly believe that Islam as a religion emphasizes tolerance and acceptance, what's the evidence for your statement? You won't find it in the Qur'an or Hadith.

      ALL of those things are explicitly forbidden in our faith. Without question, or exception. This is why we all call BS when those groups claim to do what they do in the name of Islam. They are doing it in the name of furth

    163. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      However, if I were given the opportunity to enjoy these benefits in a country where I have religion in common with everyone else, I'd go. And I really, don't see how you consider this to be "interesting" rather than obvious.

      No, I actually find it interesting because of how honest it is! Everybody wants to live with their compatriots. That's why many neighborhoods or parts of town end up being majority Lesbian or Gay, White or Black, Hispanic or Chinese, etc. People naturally self segregate. It's just not often to hear people actually say that in a straightforward way.

      They are both Ba'athists despite their rivalry. Ba'athism cannot even be described as a "significant minority" in either Iraq or Syria. My history is just fine, thank you very much.

      But it was when they came to power. The Baath movement (Arab nationalism) was probably the dominant political movement across much of the Middle East during the middle part of the 20th century. Not now no. Today the dominant movement is political Islam.

      I don't particularly agree with your assessment of the CIA picking Ghaddafi ("presumably" I noticed you said), and if they did, they picked terribly badly since he was so anti-Western.

    164. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even if it *was* a setup, it shouldn't have worked.

    165. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL'ing at the premise of a southerner correcting someone's spelling. :-)

    166. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with erring on the safe side. Most inventions by those sort turn out to be explosive.

    167. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > The Islamophobia angle is what irritates me. Anyone
      > who brought something like that into a school
      > unannounced would raise a concern, no matter what
      > their ethnicity/religion may be.

      Bullocks.

      I brought electronics projects into school when I was a kid. Remember when Radio Shack existed and still carried electronics components tested of just trying to resell cellular plans? I was all over those when I was young. "Electronics Discovery Sets", crystal radio kits, potato-battery clocks, morse code keys attached to adjustable tone generators, the lot of them. I devoured as many as my parents would let me get my hands on; and brought a decent number of them into school to show off. Yeah, I was a hella nerd. But it was never an issue.

      Hell, in my sophomore year, I actually made honest-to-god explosives in the school itself. I had a really cool chemistry teacher who, amongst other things, thought me how to make nitrocellulose and nitrogen triiodide. Eventually on we even built our own model rocket engines and used them to fire off rockets in the fields out back. And it was never an issue.

      But I'm white. And I'm not a muslim. So no one looked at me with suspicion and assumed was a criminal by default.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    168. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      As a Muslim, I can categorically state that anyone who thinks that we are required by our religion to kill or convert "infidels" has never actually met one of us, and only knows about us from Fox News.

      What would it serve to meet a Muslim? I have never read the Quran, but the Muslim religion is based on Christianity (and seems like a quite standard abrahamic religion), I do not even have to read it to know that there will be many sentences in it demanding believers to kill non-believers. Period. I can say with absolute certainly that I am not making a fool of myself, while stating that not only does Islam inherent commandments to kill infidels from prior abrahamic holy books but their own will be filled with the stuff. No amount of meeting individual people will change the text written in their holy books.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    169. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by AnnaZed · · Score: 1

      From what I can see there is nothing special about him or what he did, he is just some cheeky kid who used a very naive way of getting attention and it got out of hand. All this talk of discrimination etc. seems like a beat-up and the poor kid will pay the price in the long run for all the manipulating adults have done to politically capitalise on his prank. Now he has the entire world watching him and expecting to live up to their expectations when there is no solid evidence he is gifted at all. How is he going to have a normal and healthy adolescence with that weight on his shoulders? How many children pushed into the limelight crashed and burned as young adults when reality came along and burst their artificially inflated egos? How is messing with children like that in any way ethical regardless of the cause you think it is in aid of?

      As a mother I thought the same thing instantly, the poor boy - what have they done to him!

    170. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half a bomb is a stupid way to phrase things

      No, it's really not. In fact with 9 letters and 3 words, it cuts straight to the heart of the situation. Half a bomb is exactly the root of the fear that is the root of the issues in this case. That many more people need to be educated about the technical reality of the world we live in, is what needs to come across. Right now I think I saw a poll about how 24% of GOP voters believe that Obama isn't a U.S. citizen or some crazy shit. Probably 50% of them believe that only cannabis smoking satanist muslims have the appropriate magic wands to make bombs out of casio wristwatches. 'Half a bomb' is PRECISELY the right way to describe Mohommed's clock.

    171. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you have a nasty case of ignorant world view-itis.

      Ah, the ignorance accusation. You seem to think that if I just read more, I'll fall in love. That's not the case. I know plenty about Islam, and I don't like it. Christianity is bad enough at holding humanity back, but Islam is actively working to send us back to a dark age. So I don't care how great any individual Muslim is, it is not a religion that should be encouraged. It has no place in modern civilized society.

    172. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I do concede that there is little by way of historically accepted evidence supporting the CIA's Libya involvement. However, that Ghaddafi was anti-West isn't any indication of his suitability. After he took power, Libya nationalized all its oil interests, the majority of which were British, and the oil flowed freely on the open market. Britain lost a large amount of its pricing power in the petroleum market. That, too, was very good for US interests. Read into it what you will.

      The CIA supported Saddam at one time, and he was never pro-West. They supported bin-Laden, and he at best had a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" attitude towards the west. Pakistan's ISI still receives massive support from the US, and it's not like Pakistan sings the West's praise. The politics of military support goes well beyond public rhetoric.

      --
      I hate printers.
    173. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea man. Who needs to read. Reading is for un-American pussies. Why read when they're plotting to take our freedoms.

    174. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by rworne · · Score: 1

      May I ask what years you did this?

      I had no trouble myself, but I went to school in the 80's. The environment in the schools now is totally different than what I remember.

      I already gave one example of a non-muslim running into trouble with a science project. And here's another: MIT Sophomore Arrested at Logan For Wearing LED Device

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    175. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you, but when I tell people I built my desktop, I mean I designed and fab'ed the circuit boards, welded the case together, and wrote the software myself.

    176. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow rude af

    177. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22 awg red and blue.
      Those are the ones you need to choose between to cut.

    178. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes at first glance it is suspicious.
      Sure it could be a bomb timer. Any clock can.
      Does it look like bomb? How many have seen a real one. TV does not count.
      But there is nothing that could be an explosive.
      Call the police?
      Sure.
      Arrest?
      Bad call.
      Suspend?
      Very bad call.

    179. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by sjames · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I have to wonder what right any of the 'adults' involved have to tell any child "grow up" when clearly they never did. Are these people really allowed to be in charge of something?

    180. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by MarkOden · · Score: 0

      I believe the word "Adapted" is best to describe what he did.

    181. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poptart kid wasn't arrested, you shit.

    182. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Child invents Islamophobia generator.

    183. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pazuzu you bastard. You changed your name. Satan, you should have told me...don't think you don't still owe me.

    184. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kid didn't create anything, but the teachers and cops absolutely overreacted.

    185. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still racism. Note how the kid in the article you linked is black.

      A white kid would never have been arrested, charged with a crime and expelled from school for doing something like this.

    186. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the world is much more racist than Americans.

    187. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't appear anyone took the "bomb" serious as it wasn't disposed of nor caused evacuation.

    188. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

      Child invents Islamophobia detector.



      But ironically when some asshole burns down a Synagogue and stabs a Rabbi, that's not labeled a hate crime? Go fuck yourself. Have some perspective. And he didn't INVENT anything, the little shit just repackaged an already existing clock. ...and I hate to break your bubble, bu that's a rudimentary beginning skill in bomb making, to re-purpose a clock.So yeah, people have right to be concerned.

      Aloha-Snackbar
      --
      There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
    189. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.Then why didn't they evacuate the school? Like you do when there's a bomb
      2. Why didn't they call the bomb squad? Like you do when there's a bomb?
      3.why didn't they get as far away as possible from him? Like you do when there's a bomb?
      4.they then locked him AND the clock, in a room to wait for police.
      Then proceeded to put the material in question or "bomb" IN the car with police!
      They never once thought this boy had a bomb. They just wanted to humiliate a muslim/African boy.

    190. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what most of us slashdotters do while the rest of us would open our classmate's backpack quietly,unnoticed, close it with a little bit of wiring showing, bite out half his sandwich, leave THAT sticking out, wave the class bully-dumbo over, whisper to him about the sandwich, then catch him in the act of stealing Hey his project! a Bo...logna sandwich *sigh

    191. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > May I ask what years you did this?

      A decade later than you. Mid '90s. Before 9/11, but definitely well after the Lockerbie bombing and the wave of aircraft and cruise ship hijackings by Yasser Arafat's minions in the '80s.

      And I'll point out that in both of your examples, the student was non-white. So i'll concede that we could be talking not about Islamophobia, per se, but just plain old racism. After all, one of your examples takes place in a state that, like Texas, is fairly notoriously racist. And the other takes place in a city that enjoys the same reputation, on top of over-the-top Keystone Cops overreactions to non-threats like Aqua Teen Hunger Force characters.

      I'll also point out that I have, in fact, worn t-shits with das blinkenlights on them... in public, not just at raves and Burning Man... and never been arrested or had submachine guns pointed at me.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    192. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes his father manipulated the police into arresting him, and the school into overreacting.
      he manipulated the cop into syaing "of course he's muslim".

      Attila, you're a fucking bigot.
      always have been.
      always will be.

    193. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach on brother!

    194. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      Well, a little research discovers that the primary adult person doing the manipulating is this boy's father, which suggests that this whole thing may have been a set-up.

      And the teacher, principal and police fell for it in a scary way.

      --
      So say we all
    195. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also in Deuteronomy, if someone convinces one of your family to follow another god, you should kill them? If everyone followed the letter of their religious texts, I'd be pretty afraid of Jews and Christians also.

      My personal hope is that someday as SCOTUS wrestles with Jedi-ism as having the legal protection of other religions, they choose a set of litmus tests that involve whether the questionable religion has a tenet that in some situations a higher power will command one to commit the most serious crimes (e.g. murder) under the prevailing law of the land. As you point out, clearly all the most popular easily pass that test.

    196. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

      The problem really is that his writing was entirely on the basis that a 14 year old mistakenly said invented when he probably meant modded, while giving an impromptu interview.

      And yet as a boy, I would learn about electronics, not by reading or listening to a teacher, but by taking things apart and then putting it back together. I say kudos for going one step further and seeing what he could put it in and reassembling it in the new case. Sure it's not genius level work, but I say it's a good start.

    197. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i should have also added, I am already quite afraid of Jews and Christians. Holy shit do they scare the fuck out of me. And I'm even a Christian.

    198. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      What it looks like to me is that "administrators" moved in for a range of reasons.
      Running a school is a prestigious position in society (or it used to be), but the barrier of entry of having to be a successful teacher for many years kept out those who just wanted the position but would be useless at it. Now a well connected person in their twenties who has never had a job before can be put in charge of a school of a few hundred children!
      Teachers running schools wanted to spend what was seen as "too much money" by accountant types, so there's the trigger to remove them.
      There's the myth "a good manager can run anything", so following that the kids get handed over to someone more interested in cutting costs than positive outcomes for the students.

      Thus we end up with losers who call for the Police over a minor matter instead of disciplining kids.

      So yes, I agree with you, and that's how I see the feedback loop as starting off. There's a push for such a stupid system where I live but professional teachers are mostly still in charge.

    199. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You also don't realise that this is also an attack on computer geeks/nerds because of changes in right wing politics where stupid is smart and actual smart is evil. How about stuff like a hacker who exposed a rapist getting a greater penalty that the rapist, hmm (no race or colour or religion in that). How about all those many other instance where computer geeks/nerds get far severer penalties for non-violent crimes that those convicted of violent crimes. In this instance they kept it going long after they knew it was not a bomb and was not a hoax bomb because they were sticking it to a computer nerd and failed jock strap law enforcers truly hate, smart phone recording, web site producing and public exposure inducing computer geeks/nerds.

      Surely no one has forgotten the computer geek girl with a tiny circuit board on her T-shirt, law enforcement response, she was lucky I did not shoot her in the head. That is all failed jock strap rage based around jealousies still left over from high school. It seems to be getting worse in some countries than others, those countries that politically attack the education system, universities, teachers and people who are more educated being targeted as being out of touch because smarter equals stupid and there is strength in ignorance.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    200. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1
      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    201. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      And here we have someone at Artvoice who put great effort into writing an article criticizing him for not silk-screening his own circuit boards. I mean, seriously? What sort of person did he think he was writing for?

      He was probably writing for someone with reading comprehension. He doesn't criticize the kid at a for silk-screening or not, but simply points out that most hobbyists do not silkscreen their boards, especially hand drawn ones (as opposed to cheap boardhouses that deal with only electronic formats now). It is just a big hint that the board is not a hobbyist's, d.i.y. board.

      Plenty of people learned electronics as a young teenager or even younger, and were making their own boards. I remember getting the supplies to do so for $10 from Radioshack decades ago, and it is even easier and cheaper online, with far more instructions and tutorials available. If I hear a teenager say they made an electronic clock, I would assume they did make their own boards, because it is a common project to do...

      for a one off project, it still seems easier to me to wire and solder. might be different if i was trying to save space or something, though.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    202. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      It was a fucking clock. His engineering teacher could have verified it. Second, if they were really concerned why the fuck was the bomb squad and fire dept not called? They kept that kid for two class periods interrogating him without a lawyer and his parents. The principal trying to force him to write some kind of written confession. Again, without his parents. Do you think that was reasonable? Jeezus.

      Also speculating what the kid was up to? Really? Why not just give him the benefit of the doubt?

      was the school evacuated? did the bomb squad arrive? did the police wear armor when approaching the "bomb"? was there a bomb-sniffing dog? was the "bomb" deactivated by dunking it in a barrel of water or shooting it or whatever they do?
      this is what happens when you suspect something is a bomb http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09...
      the story here is "we didn't think it was a bomb, but we think you're a bomber"

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    203. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      From what I can see there is nothing special about him or what he did, he is just some cheeky kid who used a very naive way of getting attention and it got out of hand. All this talk of discrimination etc. seems like a beat-up and the poor kid will pay the price in the long run for all the manipulating adults have done to politically capitalise on his prank. Now he has the entire world watching him and expecting to live up to their expectations when there is no solid evidence he is gifted at all. How is he going to have a normal and healthy adolescence with that weight on his shoulders? How many children pushed into the limelight crashed and burned as young adults when reality came along and burst their artificially inflated egos? How is messing with children like that in any way ethical regardless of the cause you think it is in aid of?

      if he'd been a "real American" kid caught with a gun in his backpack, the NRA and the whole pack of republicans would be defending his right to defend himself in our dangerous schools.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    204. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I Googled this guys name "Nazeer Gassiep" (from Australia, talks the same, etc) and you can find where he said Saddam Hussein was a good guy and that Americans are assholes and impossible to trust (because they defy the UN, etc).

      It's not smart giving your location and full name on heated discussions.

    205. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Half a bomb is a stupid way to phrase things. The clock before it was taken apart was therefore also half a bomb. Radio Shack before it went bankrupt could be classified as a Do-It-Yourself half-a-bomb factory. It's not even a trigger yet, it's just a clock with minimal changes to put it into a pencil box (looks cooler, like something maybe from a really bad spy movie where you have to cut the red wire, no the green one).

      Did he intend it to look like a bomb? I don't know. It does not look like one to me. It did NOT look like a bomb to the police or teachers either or they would panicked, maybe have an evacuation drill, and they would not have kept a possible-bomb around. What they thought was that the kid intended it to be a hoax bomb, which the kid denied, and they arrested him and against Texas law did not have his parents present. The school wanted him to sign a "confession" without his parents present.

      It sounds like a big case of the police and school assuming the kid did something wrong, not having any solid proof of any of it, then just wanting to send a big message with the hand cuffs and perp walk. The kid is supposed to learn the lesson to not stand out, keep curiosity in check, go play football when the urge to study strikes. All hail zero tolerance, keeping our kids safe and stupid for a decade.

      everybody knows that's not what a bomb looks like. This is what a bomb looks like: http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2815...

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    206. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Well, a little research discovers that the primary adult person doing the manipulating is this boy's father, which suggests that this whole thing may have been a set-up.

      Yes, the father, a Sufi (as if you'd know what that means) who ran a no-chance-in-hell campaign for president of Sudan on a platform including repealing the laws against converting from Islam, said to the kid one day, "Ahmed, take this clock to school, the infidels will surely think it's a bomb and win us valuable sympathy"

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    207. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polytheists perhaps? What's one more god to the bunch? I believe Rome was rather tolerant (as long as you toed the political line). Until the christian conversion anyway..

    208. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Well they live in third world countries, it's to be expected. Only when the West gained afluence for the masses did it ditch the sort of extremism you see in the rest of the world and it doesnt matter what religion they are. Just look up what was happening in CAR last year with Christian militias getting doped up out of their heads and literally hacking up muslim villagers with machetes.

      Raising them selves out of this status is doubly hard for the Middle East (and Africa too) because they lack the common ethnic bonds that European countries obtained through hundreds of years of war and slaughter. Having your boarders drawn for colonial convenience rather then along ethnic lines is a real drag.

      In the context of the arrest of this kid, we have a nerdy suburban kid with a clock getting arrested. It's not much of a stretch of the imagination that there could have been other issues such as his ethnicity playing a part in his arrest. In other words, suburban nerdy kid with a clock doesnt seem like a good reason to call the cops.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    209. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I said nothing of the sort, and that kind of deliberate misquoting is pretty dishonest.

      --
      I hate printers.
    210. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Well, a little research discovers that the primary adult person doing the manipulating is this boy's father, which suggests that this whole thing may have been a set-up.

      a little research, i.e. reading pam geller's latest fever dream and swallowing it unconditionally. it was a setup.... because THE DAD IS A MUSLIM TOO!!! THEY"RE IN ON IT TOGETHER!!! IT WAS A DRY RUN!!! IT WAS A PROVOCATION BY THE ISLAMIST FATHER!!!! SEND THE REPUBLICANS ALL YOUR MONEY!!!!
      read the comments and weep for America. http://www.breitbart.com/big-g... I challenge any people who still consider themselves decent, rational Republicans to wade through that swill and still defend "Conservatism" as it is practiced in today's America.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    211. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are "suspicious wires?" I have a drawer containing assorted lengths of wire, and if some of them are suspicious, I want to know about it.

      Explosive devices!!! Put a couple of thousand amps through any of them and KABOOM! OMIGODYOUREASECRETMUSLIMTERRORISTSLEEPERAGENT!!!

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    212. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Our religion has a 1,400 year history of living side by side with Christians, Jews, fire worshippers, and atheists, even within the borders of Muslim nations, without incident.

      Oh, there has been plenty of incident. To mention one thing that has been on my mind with the war in Syria of late, one thing that struck me traveling there before the war is that even under the "anti-fundamentalist" Assad regime, Christians were forbidden by law from putting crosses on their places of worship or inviting Muslims to their faith, while among Muslims it was completely allowed to engage in da'wah among the Christian population. As I would later discover, this discrimination in law holds for most Muslim states.

      I wouldn't disagree that most of the 1.5 billion Muslims in the world are peaceful in individual interaction, and I'm certainly grateful for the immense hospitality I have received across the Muslim world from the Maghreb to southeast Asia. But when this population acts as a political bloc, I don't believe that the outcome is as pleasant for non-Muslim minorities as you claim.

      Ironically, the kid's father (remember the kid? with the clock?) ran a quixotic campaign for president of Sudan, which included as a platform repealing the laws against converting from Islam.
      which oddly enough, causes the insane rightwingers to conclude it's all a SETUP!!!

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    213. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you're just a little kid.

    214. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used to blow up the water fountain heads at school with M80s. We also used to burn those Rubbermaid trash cans down until they were nothing but melted plastic rings on the ground.

    215. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by rworne · · Score: 1

      Since I posted those two examples, another article came up with this very topic. I feel it was rather inflammatory and brings up left-right politics, but it does bring up some points:

      How Ahmed’s clock became a false, convenient tale of racism

      and another:

      Suspicious Pop-Tart guns versus scientific suitcase clocks

      In here is the white kid who was expelled for biting aPop-Tart into an "L" shape and expelled for bringing a gun to school. Another was pointing a finger and saying "bang". Yet another I recall was kicked out for saying "bless you" to a student that sneezed.

      After all these examples, I think rather than point out the treatment white vs. minority kids get, I think the system as a whole needs a good enema.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    216. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'All ya-all' is redundant, it used to indicate a yankee posing. But like most idiocy, is becomes accepted, first by morons.

    217. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it look like bomb?

      But there is nothing that could be an explosive.

      if you are looking for a 'stick' or something for 'explosive', I'm afraid you;ll be walking away disappointed

      Now, take a look at the power of C4 ...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      The explosion showcased on the vid above only takes 400g of C4, something that can be fit inside the palm of a grown-up

      Now, of course a real bomb for a classroom does not need 400g of C4. 100g is enough to cause real damage

      Now, a pix of a REAL suitcase bomb which was designed to cause massive damage...

      https://ellisonblog.files.word...

      ... and a pix of an IED
      https://a.disquscdn.com/upload...

    218. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a drawer full of assorted lenghts of wire, and you didn't start your post with "Good news everyone."?

      I have a fear of assorted lengths of wire, you insensitive clod.

    219. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christians don't "own" any of the sects that say and do awful things...those people are not-true-Christians. Modern Christianity has more to do with judging who is and isn't part of the club than concern for fellow man.

    220. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should all be ashamed for making light of those who are afflicted with autocorrect adema.

    221. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do know what a Sufi is. Of course, the fact that the father is a Sufi is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the father has acted as a provocateur in attempting on multiple occasions in attempts to magnify various incidents into "America is persecuting Muslims." I am going to guess from your take on this that you still think that Michael Brown had his hands up when he was shot.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    222. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do know what a Sufi is. Of course, the fact that the father is a Sufi is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the father has acted as a provocateur in attempting on multiple occasions in attempts to magnify various incidents into "America is persecuting Muslims." I am going to guess from your take on this that you still think that Michael Brown had his hands up when he was shot.

      You ever notice how rightwingers not only seem to revel in the belief that they have access to information that we peons do not have; but they enjoy that fact so much that they can't actually point you to that information.
      it all goes back to that hierarchical authoritative cognitive style of theirs.
      1) They are good
      2) the sources on their side are good
      3) therefore they can believe whatever those sources say without checking
      4) furthermore, their opponents (who of course are evil) know that they are good, and are therefore evil by definition, for opposing goodness
      5) therefore their opponents know that they possess the truth and should believe everything they say
      6) and doing something like posting a link to a primary source is just confusing the issues with lying facts.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    223. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by neoritter · · Score: 1

      And do we remember the hello kitty bubble gun incident with the 5 year old girl?

    224. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

      How tolerant are Muslims of apostates?

    225. Re: I liked the cartoon that read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know three.
      Why? Did you hear something on TV?

    226. Re:I liked the cartoon that read: by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      It was a fucking clock. His engineering teacher could have verified it. Second, if they were really concerned why the fuck was the bomb squad and fire dept not called? They kept that kid for two class periods interrogating him without a lawyer and his parents. The principal trying to force him to write some kind of written confession. Again, without his parents. Do you think that was reasonable? Jeezus.

      Also speculating what the kid was up to? Really? Why not just give him the benefit of the doubt?

      Cuz in 'Murika we do not given the benefit of the doubt to kids with Muslim-sounding names (whatever that means) and/or suffer from Dermal Hypermelaninetis (a condition clearly documented in the "Take Our Country Back" medical manual.)

      While I'm completely on his side and think the teachers/cops handled this very poorly, I'm curious where the parents where in this situation the night before.

      If I had a kid and they wanted to bring anything unusual (as in, not the class book, pens,paper, etc..) in to show people, I would tell my child to ask the teacher if it was alright, and then bring it in the next day. I mean, it was that way 35'ish years ago at my school. If I wanted to bring anything that wasn't a school supply of some sort, my parents made me ask the teacher if it was OK. Show and tell day was just that: a day to bring in unusual stuff.

  2. Tinkering is still tinkering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And ignorant authorities are still ignorant. The kid's curious, which will let him go far, provided he can get out of the vise of The System.

  3. I took off the plastic shell on my TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and bought it to school. Where's my invitation to the White House and MIT?

    1. Re:I took off the plastic shell on my TV by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Where's my invitation to the White House and MIT?

      Both places have web sites where you can book a reservation for a public tour, have at it.

    2. Re:I took off the plastic shell on my TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obama can't use you as a token of tolerance and forward thinking so you're fucked.
       
      The kid's not brilliant, not by a long shot. He shouldn't have gotten arrested but anyone who's legitimately involved in STEM who looks at his device knows it's garbage from an alarm clock.
       
      Obama just took advantage of the kid but it gets the kid out of any real trouble he probably shouldn't have gotten into in the first place so I guess it's almost a break even.
       
      Personally, I'd tell Obama to go fuck himself. He, just like Bush, has signed off on shit that makes the pursuit of science from anyone without a government badge on their chest a bit tougher.

    3. Re:I took off the plastic shell on my TV by x0ra · · Score: 1

      does that include shaking hands with the "president" ?

    4. Re:I took off the plastic shell on my TV by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      you put the word president in quotes?

      are you afraid that if you shake hands with him, some black may come off?

      (channeling don rickles, here, are you?)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  4. Genius or not by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He is being hailed as a symbol against prejudice and suspicion. Whether he is a genius or not makes absolutely no difference in this case.

    1. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes that's exactly how the dipshits behind these propaganda scandals think too. Making people dumber to push a good point forward doesn't do a damn bit of good. If you make people dumber what difference does it make what their opinions are? They're just going to form even stupider ones in the future, and you will have to think of new ways to trick them into thinking how you want.

      Just give it a rest and stop trying to bend people to your way of thinking.

    2. Re:Genius or not by x0ra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it does. Because the clock isn't his invention. There is no honor in undeserved glory.

    3. Re:Genius or not by thakalas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whether he is a genius or not makes absolutely no difference in this case.

      Actually it does. If all he did was rip the guts out of a working clock and stuff it in a box, he was probably trying to provoke exactly this reaction. Considering some of the other information (the cop saying he thought that's who it was) it's likely that this is the dad trying to start crap. Sounds like small town infighting in a rather large town.

    4. Re: Genius or not by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every time he was asked about it, he plainly explained it was a clock.

      Also, the school indicated they knew it wasn't a bomb, but thought he built it to look like a bomb. They thought he was going to call in a bomb scare later.

    5. Re:Genius or not by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      the cop saying he thought that's who it was

      One of the reports I say indicated the cop who said that had never seen Ahmed before. So how did he know who it was going to be, if he never met him? Is the entire department briefed on "that Mooslim kid"?

    6. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all he did was rip the guts out of a working clock and stuff it in a box, he was probably trying to provoke exactly this reaction.

      The reaction wasn't reasonable. No sane person could have predicted that the school and law enforcement would have acted that retarded.

      The boy and his clock isn't very interesting in this case. What is interesting is how the school acted and that is what we should be focusing on.

    7. Re:Genius or not by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am not sure where this this kid is a Genius came from. He does have interest in technology and figuring out how things work.
      When I was in 4th or 5th grade I had a cheap Atari/Sega/Amstrad PC joystick that broke. So I took it apart and I realized it was a simple design, so I played with making contacts with the wires and I saw what happened, then I made a cardboard Game pad that didn't work well. Then I went to Radio shack got some push buttons and drilled holes in some spare Plexiglas and made a game pad, actually the joystick supported one button, and the game pad supported two buttons by seeing what the other wire that wasn't used did.
      Now I am not trying to brag, taking part a clock and finding how to trigger the same functionality takes the same amount of skill. It isn't Genius stuff, but it takes curiosity on how things work and try to get things working again.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Genius or not by thakalas · · Score: 1

      That's why I call it small town infighting. Ahmed probably looks like his dad, and the dad has been pissing off the cops for one reason or another. Pure assumption, but that's exactly how the small towns I've lived in (3) worked.

    9. Re:Genius or not by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      he was probably trying to provoke exactly this reaction.

      This is the exact same thing they say about every misunderstood child. Idiots like you think that a 12 year old kid with an interest in science is going to be playing politics. What a joke.

    10. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am not responsible for the delusional fantasies of school administration and police departments and neither is Ahmed Mohamed.

      They can take a chill pill.

    11. Re: Genius or not by tomhath · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Every time he was asked about it, he plainly explained it was a clock.

      That's his side of the story. But every story has two sides.

      What I found interesting was that when he showed it to his electronics teacher, the teacher warned him not to show it to anyone else. So even though that teacher believed him, there was apparently something very suspicious looking about it.

    12. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep saying Irving, TX is a "small town". The more you say it, the truer it becomes. Except for those of us familiar with DFW. Which recently surpassed metro Houston as the fourth largest glob of people in the US. Yeah. Small town. Chock full of slack-jawed yokels.

    13. Re:Genius or not by thakalas · · Score: 1
      And that's why I said

      Sounds like small town infighting in a rather large town.

      I never said Irving is a small town, just that everything that's been reported so far reeks of small town mentality.

    14. Re:Genius or not by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Irving is a "small town" that's a large suburb in one of the largest metropolitan areas in the nation. It's bigger than Pasadena, and other large suburbs of large cities people have heard of.

    15. Re:Genius or not by thakalas · · Score: 2

      Just because you were oblivious at 12 doesn't mean everyone was. I was a 12 year old kid with an interest in science. I was a shit stirrer. I could have been this kid if I'd grown up muslim in Texas and it very much would have been "playing politics."

    16. Re: Genius or not by AK+Marc · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yet is proves that Ahmed doesn't follow directions, and was looking for a reaction. Why would he keep showing it to people once warned not to?

    17. Re: Genius or not by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But every story has two sides.

      The part where the school claims they thought it was a bomb, so they left the bomb in his possession while they waited for the cops, and didn't evacuate the school? The side where the police claim it was a bomb, so they didn't call the bomb squad?

      When one side is obviously full of lies, waiting for them to refine their lies to something that's not explicitly contradictory isn't "fair", it's stupid.

    18. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't change the fact that suspending the kid, forcing him to sign a statement under duress with no legal representation, arresting him and carting him off in handcuffs and putting him in a juvenile detention center is such a ridiculous overreaction that the word "injustice" just doesn't capture it. Whether the kid invented a clock or put clock parts in a box and said "look at my clock" is completely irrelevant.

      The kid did not say "look at my bomb!" or anything like that. The whole "bomb" element was invented by the teacher and used to drag this kid through a fire for no reason at all. That is what is important about this case, in my opinion. I don't care if the kid is a genius or an idiot, he does not deserve to be treated like this for doing harmless things.

      Lastly...if the school really thought that was a bomb, why in God's name didn't they evacuate the school? Either they knew it wasn't a bomb and should have the book thrown at them for what they did to this innocent kid, or they honestly thought it was a bomb and should have the book thrown at them for not protecting the other students from it.

    19. Re: Genius or not by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      He did explain what it was. He said it was a clock. The police present assumed he was guilty of something and refused to accept that answer. They were trying to police technique of wearing down the suspect on a kid in a school and hoping a confession pops out. Not appropriate behavior for the police to engage in.

    20. Re: Genius or not by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yup, if you're in Texas, keep your head down, don't make eye contact, try to get through the state as quickly as possible before you're noticed.

    21. Re:Genius or not by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The whole incident would have been over had the school, without calling the cops, just said "this is an inappropriate toy, some people think it looks bomb like, I'll keep it in the desk and you can pick it up after school". Once the cops were called, the incident would have been over had the cops said "why are you wasting our time on this?"

      It *should* have been a non-story. But people wanted to send a message to this kid ("don't mess with Texas punk"). What happened is that a different message got out.

    22. Re: Genius or not by klui · · Score: 1

      Based on the articles I've read, he did not bring it upon himself to show the clock to his English teacher. The clock's alarm went off when it was in his desk which prompted his teacher to ask Ahmed what it was, leading him to show the clock.

    23. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you take your Kool Aid straight or on the rocks?

      His discipline problems are on the record. He DID NOT identify it until he was in the Principal's office.

      Did you see a fucking picture of it?

    24. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure...we'd prefer you just drive through Detroit or Chicago or places like Ferguson, or any Blue City, all which have a better chance of getting you shot, mugged, etc..

      By the way, all your neighbors...They're leaving you in the hell hole you live in and moving here.

    25. Re:Genius or not by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Keep saying Irving, TX is a "small town". The more you say it, the truer it becomes. Except for those of us familiar with DFW. Which recently surpassed metro Houston as the fourth largest glob of people in the US. Yeah. Small town. Chock full of slack-jawed yokels.

      It's not a small town, but it IS full of slack-jawed yokels.

      --

      Enigma

    26. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He didn't keep showing it to people. The alarm went off because it's an ALARM CLOCK. Another teacher saw it when he turned off the alarm.

    27. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've forgotten the part about how THE ALARM WENT OFF?

      Dumbass.

    28. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a small town, but it IS full of slack-jawed yokels.

      Not unlike your town, which has at least ONE douche bag.

    29. Re: Genius or not by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah and it is illegal in Texas to pretend to have a bomb or try to lead someone to think you have a bomb.

    30. Re: Genius or not by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Here's another theory. Kid who was picked on by someone wants to scare them and gets caught.

    31. Re:Genius or not by tirefire · · Score: 1

      Idiots like you think that a 12 year old kid with an interest in science is going to be playing politics.

      Most 12 year old kids wouldn't. But when your father ran for president of Sudan, maybe. Just maybe.

    32. Re:Genius or not by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      the cop saying he thought that's who it was

      You mean the obviously racist cop? If the kid had a history of hoaxes or crying wolf, the school district and cops would be pointing out with every sentence coming out of their mouths.

      They're not.

    33. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a small town, but it IS full of slack-jawed yokels.

      Relative to what other towns? Please, share with us your knowledge of yokel metro infestations. Would Irving top your list? Or would it rank somewhere lower on your yokel index? Go ahead and bequeath us with your wisdom on the most slack-jawist towns in the US. While you're at it, tell us which one you live in.

      Because, you know, your comment screams half-eyelid open-mouthed drool trailer trash.

      Cheers!

    34. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you sack of cunt. The part where they thought it was a _hoax_ bomb which is also a crime.

    35. Re:Genius or not by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      If all he did was rip the guts out of a working clock and stuff it in a box, he was probably trying to provoke exactly this reaction.

      Well OBVIOUSLY. We all know you can't learn ANYTHING by taking things apart. Any 14 year old should already know how digital circuits work from our amazing educational system. The kid's only possible motive was terrorism. For crying out loud he had a NASA shirt on which we all know stands for Nefariously Attacking Stateside Americans..Kudos to that brave teacher that prevented a massacre.

    36. Re: Genius or not by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      The other 4 people calling you a moron aren't enough. The alarm went off by accident else no one else probably would have seen it. Someone mod parent back down.

    37. Re: Genius or not by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Also, the school indicated they knew it wasn't a bomb, but thought he built it to look like a bomb. They thought he was going to call in a bomb scare later.

      So they decided to beat him to it...

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    38. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An appropriate punishment for that disobedience would be....take the clock away from him. Make him pick it up after school.

      The punishment he received is egregious, and his having ignored the warning not to show his toy to anyone does not even remotely justify what they did to him.

    39. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he didn't. it made a noise during one of his classes, he showed the teacher, the teacher showed the principal, and he got handcuffed.

    40. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reading too much into it. My understanding was the clock went off in class and he had to shut the thing off. To do that he had to pull it out which at that point is when it was taken from him. I've had stuff like that happen to me with palm pilots in the 2000ish time frame. It's hardly something he did intentionally after being told not to. Even if he had I think it's still not at all suspicious. He was excited about it and could have easily written off the other teachers suggestion. It's not like the other teacher was there to reprimand him and who would have thought it was a bomb? It doesn't look like one to a 14-year old let alone a sane adult!

    41. Re: Genius or not by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If a bomb scare is called in, even if they "know" it's fake, they have to evacuate and wait until the building is cleared by the bomb squad (or local equivalent). If they "discover" a bomb that's not called in, they have discretion. So the principal calling in his own bomb didn't shut the school down, but if a kid called it in , the school would be shut down.

    42. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the teacher warned him not to show it to anyone else. So even though that teacher believed him, there was apparently something very suspicious looking about it.

      Not necessarily. My guess is that the teacher is/was well familiar with the level of idiocy and ignorance in his colleagues that would catapult it to the level it went to.

    43. Re: Genius or not by aevan · · Score: 0

      So he set the alarm to go off mid class? I mean, he could have mistakenly meant to have it go off at say, night time and instead set it for midday midclass....

    44. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and it is illegal in Texas to pretend to have a bomb or try to lead someone to think you have a bomb.

      Well and truly established it wasn't a bomb. Repeatedly answering upon questioning that 'it is a clock' is 'leading someone to think you have a bomb' !? Can I call the cops on everyone driving past me on the road as I walk on the sidewalk? After all I could fear that they were going to turn/swerve and hit me...

    45. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some articles and comments here say he was in a robotics club, that he had realized many other projects, that he had a lot of components and tools in his room, and that the clock thing took him 20 minutes the day before.

      Of course, that's very far from 'genius', and the clock thing is probably significant in understanding some of his limitations (that is, he's probably just a slightly-above-average modern geeky adolescent like many others -if he had been born 20-30 years earlier, he probably would have gotten much further, much quicker in electronics), but all the rest is only the usual media and PR bullshit you see everywhere, everyday, from anyone, on any story. It's far from being the main point of the story.

      And considering the negative consequences of all this on him, it's not necessarily bad he receives disproportionately high support (although it sure could affect him negatively too, depending on various factors... but considering his father is a public figure, who seems to handle the situation pretty well, I suppose he'll be able to cope with the pressure, and make proper use of the help given).

    46. Re:Genius or not by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but a clock in a box is a clock and not a "fake bomb" unless you are utterly clueless and demented. Your statement has no merit.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    47. Re: Genius or not by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, said teacher just knew how utterly stupid the other teachers are...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    48. Re: Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've forgotten the part about how THE ALARM WENT OFF?

      Dumbass.

      So the kid (who allegedly "built" the fake bomb) is too dumb to pull the battery, or set the alarm to a different time so it doesn't go off in class?

      He wanted attention. He didn't get it from the first teacher so he arranged to have the second teacher annoyed by an alarm during class to get the attention.

      It appears to me that the kid got what he wanted.

    49. Re:Genius or not by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Because Ahmed's father is a rather prominent agitator. It is not impossible that the cop had seen pictures of Ahmed with his father at one or more of the events where the father was agitating, or recognized him as his father's son just by looking at him. My father has been dead for over thirty years and people who knew him, but have never met me before, often recognize me as his son to this day.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    50. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first teacher he showed the clock to told him "this is an inappropriate toy, some people think it looks like a bomb." But rather than keeping the clock in the desk, the first teacher told the kid not to show it to anyone else. So the story should have been a non-story, except for the fact that the kid ignored the first teacher's advice.

    51. Re:Genius or not by thakalas · · Score: 1

      I pulled a lot of things apart when I was 12. I tried to put them back together. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't. I had a box of spare parts that I'd try to make something new out of from the old failures. I learned a lot from that. I never took a case mod to school to show off my amazing skills at removing screws.

    52. Re:Genius or not by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that Westerners DO have justification for being cautious around Muslims, given the known history of some very heinous terrorist acts by Muslim terrorists at least since the middle 1960's.

      The way Ahmed Mohamed acted when questioned by school authorities and the police didn't help matters, either.

    53. Re: Genius or not by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I solve that problem by refusing to even enter the shit-hole known as texas. not for business and not for anything. I actively avoid the deep south. not my kind of 'culture' down there. they have have their white christian world view without me. I want no part of their 'heritage of hate'.

      but don't point out how racist texas is to a texan. them's fightin' words!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    54. Re:Genius or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      literally thousands of people have ran for president in Sudan.
      not exactly the big ticket item you make it out to be

    55. Re:Genius or not by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Given known history, Westerners have a lot more to fear from Italians, Basques, Germans and Irish.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  5. Explosive like a Star Trek control-console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After years of watching Star Trek, I am a veteran observer of control-consoles exploding and taking the lives of precious, non-player-character crew members.

    Clearly the LED display on his suit-case clock is a console, ergo it is an explosive weapon.

    The real question is: does it explode faster than the speed of plot? That could make it even MORE dangerous.

    1. Re:Explosive like a Star Trek control-console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only stop it when it has 00:02 or less seconds left.

    2. Re:Explosive like a Star Trek control-console by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Gonna have to go through the choppers first, too.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    3. Re:Explosive like a Star Trek control-console by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      But...they serve no useful purpose!

      Whoever wrote that episode should DIE!

      (However, the best quote from that movie remains: "Is there air out there? You don't know!)

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    4. Re:Explosive like a Star Trek control-console by aevan · · Score: 1

      With this in mind, All Bombs Timers will detonate at 1:12:00.
      ~Revised and Extended Overlord Handbook (6th ED)

    5. Re:Explosive like a Star Trek control-console by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      And, does it make a huge BOOM that somehow travels through the vacuum of space?

  6. About over-reactive police state, not genius by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It doesn't matter if he bought the clock and broke it, rather than 'made it'.

    He's a 13 year old kid, not an engineer.

    This story is about a huge over-reaction by fools that can't tell the difference between "Should be questioned/looked into" and "Should be arrested, suspended, and punished".

    We have to start holding government employees to a HIGHER standard than they hold non-employees. We should never punish regular citizens, let alone children for appearing to have committed a crime - just for actually doing it. But at the same time we need to start punishing police, principals, and similar people for APPEARING to have committed crimes. That's the only way to stop government over-reach.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could conceivably build a clock with off the shelf electronics without an engineering degree or really anything more than google and 20$ to spend.

    2. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Part of investigating crimes is detaining people involved.

    3. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you here. I knew someone who blew up mailboxes with pipe bombs because it was fun (this was in rural Oklahoma). The cops at the time knew he was a bit of a trouble maker and they heard through the grapevine about him setting off pipebombs. They pulled him into the office, tricked him into confessing, made him buy a new mailbox, and told him if he did it again he would go to jail.

      This kid should have gotten less than that, even if his intent was mischievous. Call him to the office, listen to him, agree it's a clock, get him to understand that we know it's a clock but it does kind of look like a bomb and we have to be careful with things like that. Tell him to leave it home next time, and if he does bring it in, send him home for the day. Handcuffs should not be a part of this.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    4. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Part of investigating crimes is detaining people involved.

      What crime?

    5. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In this instance it most certainly was not. Especially considering THERE WAS NO CRIME! The investigation was complete and the situation completely understood. *Then* he was arrested for absolutely no reason at all. Then he was suspended so the principal could try to save face instead of being an adult and admitting he was wrong.

    6. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    7. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Re-read the previous post. He was making a general statement.

    8. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Re-read the previous post. He was making a general statement.

      a completely irrelevant and pointless one

    9. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Handcuffs, being told he can't call his parents, the police not calling his parents for hours, a 3-day suspension after the fact ...

      I agree that handcuffs, if that were all that it was, would have been a simple overreaction. This was so far beyond that. There need to be consequences for the adults involved here.

    10. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by trout007 · · Score: 1

      These are the se type of people that suspend kids for biting breakfast pastries into gun shapes. Modern education is run by C+ students.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    11. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-read the previous post. He was making a general statement.

      a completely irrelevant and pointless one

      Only pointless and irrelevant if you don't care for the truth.

    12. Re: About over-reactive police state, not genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, and I say IF, it was intended as a hoax bomb then that was the crime.

    13. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the ultimate form of incompetence when this type of issue is literally escalated to the president for damage control.

      The kids bomb pretty much looked like a bomb, but teachers should have had the common sense to deal with this without it getting so out of hand.

      America, fuck yeah or America fuck you?

    14. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      It would be a good idea to reintroduce the pillory for this and put all those involved in there for a few days. Teachers and police. It would send a clear message that mistakes like that aren't just understandable overreaction but are in fact despicable behaviour that should not be tolerated.

      Oh wait, we all think it's understandable overreaction that sort of got out of hand! Damn. My bad.Wrong planet. Or wrong country.

    15. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Modern education is run by C+ students.

      cops are like that, too! and most authority figures, truth be told.

      reminds me of a joke:

      "cop: so, do you know why I pulled you over?"
      "driver: because you got c's and d's in school?"

      (not my joke; but forget the comedian's name.)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    16. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      That's my point, I was using handcuffs as a shorthand for the whole situation.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    17. Re:About over-reactive police state, not genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I found most interesting is that Rush Limbaugh is sporting that over reacting police state. I'm not sure if the police reaction was due to bias or not. I don't have the facts, but Rush's bias is pretty darn clear here.

  7. My view of this by poity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Submitter here. Since partisan accusations were quickly thrown when I mentioned this elsewhere, I'd like to just clarify my own view regarding this case: I think Ahmed didn't deserve to be handcuffed, he very clearly wasn't a danger to anyone. I also think he didn't deserve to be glorified and cast as a heroic genius with all this acclaim in the media, as the new evidence suggests.

    My takeaway? Reality is complex (in this case perplexingly so), and the media doesn't do well with complexities.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:My view of this by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Clearly he didn't 'invent' the clock - but I don't think anyone really thought he did.

      After all - we already have clocks.

      He likes to tinker, and he calls the result his 'inventions'. Not the most nuanced use of language - but he is 13.

      Whether he just took apart and repackaged an existing clock, or did something more technically challenging, your implied charge of misleading us over his 'invention' seems rather ungenerous in spirit.

    2. Re:My view of this by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      The media ignores complexities that don't go with the narrative they want to push. Complexities that match their narrative are eaten up.

    3. Re:My view of this by Strudelkugel · · Score: 2



      Wasn't there, don't know he people involved, so who knows what the situation was. What I don't like is the fact that Ahmed Mohamed didn't accomplish anything worth of presidential attention, yet he was invited to the White House. There are children who do far more interesting things. Let's not forget David Hahn. I think it can be said Hahn set the bar quite high for teenage science projects.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    4. Re:My view of this by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      He neither invented nor built nor even "rebuilt" a clock; he repackaged one.

    5. Re:My view of this by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      Oops, apparently I didn't read your entire post; my apologies.

    6. Re:My view of this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also think he didn't deserve to be glorified and cast as a heroic genius with all this acclaim in the media, as the new evidence suggests.

      He was "glorified" as a way of apologizing. An apology that was well-deserved.

      Don't be so bloody-minded as to not see that Ahmed was a proxy for the insane racism in this country and a mentality of security theater hysteria that is destroying people's lives.

      Ahmed wasn't invited to MIT or the White House because of the clock he made. He was invited to the White House and MIT to let regular Muslims know that not everyone in this country is a fucking racist yokel or thick-fingered vulgarian like Donald Trump (who said yesterday that he was "looking into" sending all Muslims back to where they came from if he became president). It's an acknowledgement of our collective shame.

      And give the kid a break. He seems like a decent sort who didn't ask for any of this bullshit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:My view of this by FranTaylor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I don't like is the fact that Ahmed Mohamed didn't accomplish anything worth of presidential attention

      that's completely irrelevant, the point is to show the country that we should cherish the experimenter spirit.

    8. Re:My view of this by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Clearly he didn't 'invent' the clock - but I don't think anyone really thought he did.

      There's a difference between taking apart a clock (As I've seen posted here) and making a clock from scratch (well, Radio Shack parts). The media reports indicate the latter, the comments here indicate the former. That's the distinction that seems to be the "technical" issue for what his personal capabilities actually are.

    9. Re:My view of this by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I'd like to just clarify my own view regarding this case: I think Ahmed didn't deserve to be handcuffed, he very clearly wasn't a danger to anyone.

      The why in $DIETY's name would you link to the second article - which does everything it can to give the impression that he is but which stops just short of actually declaring him a terrorist?
       

      My takeaway? Reality is complex (in this case perplexingly so), and the media doesn't do well with complexities.

      My takeaway? You're fooling yourself, trying to give one impression with your words - but giving a very different one with your actions. You claim one thing now, but your submission includes a link to someone trying to justify the very actions your claim Ahmed didn't deserve.
       
      There's nothing complex or perplexing about the case - fake bomb or not a fake bomb, the actions of the school and police department were way out of line.

    10. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the thing is... the former is a precursor step to making a bomb.

    11. Re:My view of this by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      I also think he didn't deserve to be glorified .

      your use of the word "deserve" implies that you think you have moral authority over others. You are suffering from a bad case of Calvinist Christianity.

    12. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also think he didn't deserve to be glorified and cast as a heroic genius with all this acclaim in the media, as the new evidence suggests.

      Sure, at a purely factual level, if a hero is someone who actually accomplishes something extraordinary then the 9/11 firefighters and Iraq veterans and John McCain (tortured in Vietnam) and even policemen killed in the line of duty aren't really heroes. In such cases, the idea is that someone was trying (but ultimately failed) to do something good and then had something bad happen to them in the process - sort of an "A for effort" approach.

      And that's what I see here - a kid was trying to do something good (learn about technology) and although, at a purely factual level, he wasn't all that successful, it was still nice that he took the risk - that ultimately resulted in being hauled away in handcuffs.

      Probably one reason that people feel strongly about this is that they don't want to live in a world where everyone is just cowering in selfish fear but they want to live in a world where people are willing to take risks for the benefit of others.

    13. Re:My view of this by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no new evidence here - it was obvious the instant we saw the photo of his project that he'd repackaged the guts of some old AC clock! Good for you that you figured out exactly which one it was, but really, so what? I worked on similar projects when I was his age. You have to start somewhere, and casemodding a piece of old garage-sale junk is a totally reasonable project for a 14-year-old newbie.

      We aren't making a fuss over him because he's an extraordinary genius; rather, we're making a fuss over him because he's just an ordinary kid who *ought* to have been treated with ordinary respect, and we're trying to make up for the unforgivably shitty dumbass bullshit he's been subjected to.

      And really, it's less about him than it is about all the other kids like him: the message is "don't let those fucknuts in Texas scare you, smart young Muslim inventor kids; America at large thinks you're cool".

    14. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I would love to see the congregation of the Mosque he attends to speak out against the prejudice against Muslims. They could get out and have a march protesting against it.

      At the same time, this march of Muslims should speak out against Islamic terrorism and the sort of extremism that their religious brethren in the ISIL areas, and the Boko Haram practice in the Middle East, and Africa. Burning folks alive in cages, auctioning off 12 year old girls for sex slavery . . . this is what Islam is all about.

      Will you get out a crowd of Muslims to come out and condemn this . . . ? No way. That's what Islam is all about. Ask Hilary Clinton or Carly Firorina what they think about that.

      I used to play with a chemistry toy set as a child. Nope, can't do that anymore, because of Muslim Terrorists. I used to be able to fly in planes, without any security hassles. Nope, that doesn't work anymore, because of Islamic Terrorists. Now, I can't even take a train in Europe, without the threat of Islamic Terrorists. The EU is being teared apart, because of Islamic Terrorist migrants.

      One of the pillars of Islam, is supposed to be "Charity" . . . the rich Islamic Gulf States shit on that.

      So why would one have anything against folks that want to institute Sharia law in Texas . . . ?

      Without all this Islamic aggression against the West, nobody would care about a digital clock.

      American Muslims need to get together, and fight Islamic terrorists. Well, otherwise, they should be surprised what they get.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    15. Re:My view of this by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Amazing that our country is somehow so insanely islamophobic and yet only 11% of our religiously motivated hate crimes are against muslims, while 62% are against the group that is overwhelmingly hated and reviled throughout the entirety of the muslim world.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    16. Re:My view of this by tomhath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The issue isn't whether he invented anything. The question is whether he intentionally made a device that looked like a bomb in order to get a reaction from people. The reaction he got (intentionally or otherwise) was that the police considered charging him with making a "hoax bomb".

    17. Re:My view of this by Rei · · Score: 2

      Right, because he was invited to the Whitehouse because it was the most awesome invention ever? Is that the takeaway that you got out of this?

      Hahn had indeed an inventive spirit - although his accomplishments were rather overplayed in the media. Also, he was 17 when he did what he did, not 14, which is a fairly big difference in terms of education and time to gain experience tinkering. But still, Hahn is an interesting case, and his dedication to learning and experimenting was commendable (the lying and stealing, not so much). Unfortunately, the postscript isn't very pretty. It turns out that he has paranoid schizophrenia and he's struggled to live a normal life since then.

      --
      "This administration is so incompetent that they cover their tracks with bigger tracks." - Seth Meyers
    18. Re:My view of this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amazing that our country is somehow so insanely islamophobic and yet only 11% of our religiously motivated hate crimes are against muslims

      Anti-muslim hate crimes make up 11% of our religiously motivated hate crimes, but they make up 0.8% of our population.

      And yes, that's a decimal place before the "8".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:My view of this by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Great kid, he is just following the spirit and the letter of current state of USA economy - repackaging things and calling it 'manufacturing'. Ironically in this case the kid repackaged a piece of old American technology that was likely completely built in the USA.

    20. Re:My view of this by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry submitter, not buying. Have you read the news articles about the city council and mayor of Irving, Texas? You can start with this one: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/ahmed-mohamed-beth-van-duyne-sharia

      So, basically, a kid is hauled off in handcuffs and some clown goes to substantial efforts to demonstrate that he started with a Radio Shack clock.

      We *need* kids tinkering around with stuff.

      We even need kids who get maybe a teensy bit cheeky with their stupidest teachers.

      And when the cheeky kid happens to be "not quite white" in a community with stupid bigots in charge, and they get hauled off in handcuffs, and the school leaves him suspended, we don't need some clever jackass backward-engineering his little toy to demonstrate media overreaction. We need people looking into how bigots ended up in leadership positions in Irving, Texas. Then, instead of investigating its overreaction, maybe the mainstream media could investigate why it hasn't been plain-old-reacting to this bigotry for the last fourteen years, or to the stupidity we've been witnessing for 14,000.

    21. Re:My view of this by Rei · · Score: 1

      At the same time, this march of Muslims should speak out against Islamic terrorism and the sort of extremism that their religious brethren in the ISIL areas, and the Boko Haram practice in the Middle East, and Africa. Burning folks alive in cages, auctioning off 12 year old girls for sex slavery . . . this is what Islam is all about.

      Funny, then, that Daesh is more popular in Europe than it is in the Middle East.

      --
      "This administration is so incompetent that they cover their tracks with bigger tracks." - Seth Meyers
    22. Re:My view of this by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      He was invited to the White House and MIT to let regular Muslims know that not everyone in this country is a fucking racist yokel

      I must have missed the memo, what race are Muslims?

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    23. Re:My view of this by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Either is a precursor step for one of the common bomb triggers. But if that were the standard, every student in the school with a phone (probably more than half) should be in jail with him.

    24. Re:My view of this by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      What is this tripe?

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    25. Re:My view of this by Dorianny · · Score: 0

      So why would one have anything against folks that want to institute Sharia law in Texas . . . ? .

      Sharia Law in Texas? Are they mad! Everyone knows that only Christian law apply in Texas.

      Christians trying to ram their beliefs down our throats in the name of "Religious Freedom" gives me a uneasy feeling about Christianity as well..

    26. Re:My view of this by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I used to play with a chemistry toy set as a child. Nope, can't do that anymore, because of Muslim Terrorists. I used to be able to fly in planes, without any security hassles. Nope, that doesn't work anymore, because of Islamic Terrorists. Now, I can't even take a train in Europe, without the threat of Islamic Terrorists.

      That is all a lot of bullshit, and you should be ashamed of repeating it. You can't play with a chemistry set any more because of a scripted overreaction designed to convince people that something is being done to protect them, when in fact something is being done to expose them to more danger — U.S. foreign policy. The same is true of the terrorism and sexual molestation the state perpetrates against the people when they travel. You're a bootlicking apologist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:My view of this by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      Hmm, where to start countering your points... what an overwhelming task. Let's try this... That's retarded. And you're retarded for saying it.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    28. Re:My view of this by r-diddly · · Score: 1

      Exactly, sheesh. The only reason he's being called a "genius" now is because people are overcompensating for the fact that he was called a "terrorist" before. People suspecting the clock. People defending the clock. People putting the clock on a pedestal, and now people debunking the clock. People projecting all sorts of drama onto the clock. Hey guys, who gives a shit about the clock? Could it be that before school employees fucked up, this was actually the unremarkable story of a typical and not-inherently-interesting (no offense) teenager with maybe an engineering bent?

    29. Re:My view of this by poity · · Score: 2

      I'd like to highlight a part of the article that I thought made some good points:

      [...]Teachers are taught to be suspicious and vigilant. Ahmed wasn’t accused of making a bomb – he was accused of making a look-alike, a hoax. And be honest with yourself, a big red digital display with a bunch of loose wires in a brief-case looking box is awful like a Hollywood-style representation of a bomb. Everyone jumped to play the race and religion cards and try and paint the teachers and police as idiots and bigots, but in my mind, they were probably acting responsibly and erring on the side of caution to protect the rest of their students, just in case. “This wouldn’t have happened if Ahmed were white,” they say. We’re supposed to be sensitive to school violence, but apparently religious and racial sensitivity trumps that. At least we have another clue about how the sensitivity and moral outrage pecking order lies.

      Because, is it possible, that maybe, just maybe, this was actually a hoax bomb? A silly prank that was taken the wrong way? That the media then ran with, and everyone else got carried away? Maybe there wasn’t even any racial or religious bias on the parts of the teachers and police.

      I don’t know any of these things. But I’m intellectually mature enough to admit I don’t know, and to also be OK with that. I don’t feel a need to take the first exist to conclusionville. But I do like to find facts where I can, and prefer to let them lead me to conclusions, rather than a knee jerk judgement based on a headline or sound bite.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    30. Re:My view of this by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And this is really the most you expect at that age, even from geniuses. You need more advanced maths really to design anything new. Well maybe not that much maths of you're just doing digital stuff, but even then an original design is going to involve stuff a lot more complex than you learn in middle school. But it is the perfect age to start taking stuff apart, experimenting with ways to put them back together, etc.

    31. Re:My view of this by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      For the average non-technical adult, both cases are indistinguishable from magic.

    32. Re:My view of this by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Ahmed didn't accomplish anything worthy of presidential attention. The authorities surrounding him did. Since the president cannot call them does on national TV, he does the same thing by inviting Ahmed to the White House.

      It's the PR equivalent to owing a house in an area that [insert billionaire] wants to turn into his complex. You get a lot of reward for being in the right place at the right time.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    33. Re:My view of this by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      a big red digital display with a bunch of loose wires in a brief-case looking box is awful like a Hollywood-style representation of a bomb

      Adults should be smart enough to know that the Hollywood depiction of something often doesn't resemble real-life. What's next, people getting arrested for having dangerous weapons because they were carrying flashlights and the police thought they were lightsabers? People (particularly people who are supposed to be educating the next generation) need to learn to apply critical thinking skills.

      --

      Enigma

    34. Re:My view of this by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      What I don't like is the fact that Ahmed Mohamed didn't accomplish anything worth of presidential attention, yet he was invited to the White House.

      1. You're not the President.
      2. The person who is the President decided otherwise.
      3. The world has no obligation to make you like it.
      4. Ditto for a second term, post-midterm President.

    35. Re:My view of this by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      And jews are less than 2% of the population but make up 60% of religiously motivated hate crimes, a vastly more disproportionate gap.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    36. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should cherish the experimenter spirit. We should revile attempts at using a young child as a political tool. We should be annoyed at the media sideshow made a smalltown issue a nationwide debacle.

    37. Re:My view of this by Uberbah · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      At the same time, this march of Muslims should speak out against Islamic terrorism and the sort of extremism that their religious brethren in the ISIL areas, and the Boko Haram practice in the Middle East, and Africa. Burning folks alive in cages, auctioning off 12 year old girls for sex slavery . . . this is what Islam is all about.

      Or you could take this ten pounds of racist dumbfuckery in a five pound sack and cram it back up the orifice it sprang out of.

      1) Muslims aren't bombing countries on the other side of the planet from them, who are zero threat to them. You are. Muslims aren't busy overthrowing democracies and starting bloody civil wars in countries they don't like. You are. Muslims don't have 900+ military bases around the world, or are responsible for 30-50 million deaths around the world since WWII - you do.

      2) All this "Muslim terrorism" you're whining about is either directly sponsored by the United States, or a backlash in response to actions taken by the United States.

      Isis? Created by Obama, Hillary and Kerry to fight Assad. Iran's theocracy getting you down? Wouldn't exist if the U.S. and Britain hadn't overthrown their secular democracy in '53. Don't like the Taliban? Go piss on Reagan's grave, who gave them weapons and training to fight the Soviets in the '80s.

    38. Re:My view of this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      And jews are less than 2% of the population but make up 60% of religiously motivated hate crimes, a vastly more disproportionate gap.

      And what percentage of those are perpetrated by neo-nazis, christian evangelical religionists and white supremacists?

      I think you've just made my point.

      Of the 1,223 victims of anti-religious hate crimes: 60.3 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders' anti-Jewish bias. 13.7 percent were victims of anti-Islamic (Muslim) bias. 6.1 percent were victims of anti-Catholic bias.

      There was clearly a need to send to send a message, and the White House, MIT, NASA etc sent it: Not all of America is made up of hateful bigots.

      There were 784 active hate groups in the United States in 2014, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The number of such groups surged in response to President Barack Obama's election and the economic downturn — growing from 888 in 2008 to 1,007 in 2012 — before falling to 939 a year later and then the lowest level since 2005, according to Mark Potok, who tracks extremist groups for the SPLC.

      "Those numbers may be somewhat deceiving," Potok wrote in the SPLC's "The Year in Hate and Extremism" report. "More than half of the decline in hate groups was of Ku Klux Klan chapters, and many of those have apparently gone underground, ending public communications, rather than disbanding."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    39. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is 14, and a freshman in high school. Stop downplaying his age and give him more intellectual credit.

    40. Re:My view of this by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I must have missed the memo, what race are Muslims?

      The memo says this has been obvious to anyone paying a modicum of attention. Because anyone whining about muslims is invariably thinking of people of Arab descent, or sub-saharan african. And thus, racist.

    41. Re:My view of this by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Informative

      The question is whether he intentionally made a device that looked like a bomb in order to get a reaction from people.

      If that were the case, the teacher, principal, superintendent and chief of police would be screaming from the rooftops that Ahmed had joked about making a bomb, or otherwise led people to believe a bunch of wires and circuits was a bomb.

      They're not. Which means you don't have a question, you have a non-sequitur.

    42. Re:My view of this by poity · · Score: 1

      I kind of expected this. Let me say again my position:

      1. He doesn't seem to be dangerous, which is why I think the cuffs and arrest were an overreaction
      2. He doesn't seem to be a boy genius as the media has been touting, which is why I think the public response (NASA, MIT, and Obama included) were also an overreaction
      3. As the article demonstrates, the OTHER (unconsidered) explanation is that he pranked everyone.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    43. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      1) Muslims aren't bombing countries on the other side of the planet from them, who are zero threat to them.

      Um, 9/11? You should try flying on an airplane these days, and going through the security checks. Shoe bombers, underwear bombers, etc, etc. Ask the security folks who they are looking for. It's not Presbyterian grandmothers. Or Hindus. Or Bahai's. Or a thousand other religions anyone could name. It's Muslim terrorists . . . that's it. Nobody else in the world is try to kill innocent people.

      2) All this "Muslim terrorism" you're whining about is either directly sponsored by the United States, or a backlash in response to actions taken by the United States.

      This is what really bothers me about Muslims who live in the West . . . they blame the victim. Like I said in my original post. I would welcome it, if Muslims would condemn terrorism, and state that ISIL and Boko Haram do not represent Islam. But they don't. Instead, they complain that it is the fault of liberal democracies. It is abhorrent that Muslims want to live in countries that are prosperous because of their culture, but want to destroy that culture, and replace it with Islamic dogma.

      Isis? Created by Obama, Hillary and Kerry to fight Assad.

      Is that you, Donald Trump . . . ?

      If you want to live in an Islamic country, just go there please. We do not want to lose the benefits of a liberal democracy culture because of your Islamic dogma.

      Buh-bye!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    44. Re:My view of this by poity · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree with the basis of your sentiment. There ought to be an apology for his being arrested and put in cuffs. There just doesn't seem to be a case for us lionizing him as a genius.

      We can apologize and atone for mistakes without constructing myths.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    45. Re:My view of this by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Some random counterpoints to your post that someone accidentally modded up (there is no other logical explanation aside from the mod also a troll)

      "The Free Muslims Coalition believes that there can NEVER be a justification for terrorism." (first line on their "positions" page)

      http://theamericanmuslim.org/t... (fatwa agains terrorism)

      http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...

      Its a good thing all the red states have eliminated poverty with all their charity...oh wait, Texas with all its oil riches is #5 in poverty in the US. FYI, the bible belt is all about sharia law when you consider it translates more or less into "religous law". The only difference is which 1000 year old book you take instructions from on how to oppress women and non-believers.

    46. Re:My view of this by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      As a fellow who built a wire-wrapped digital clock from a couple dozen CMOS chips when I was 15, I am keenly aware of the distinction. Yet it really has nothing to do with this story. I brought my clock to school also, but I didn't get in trouble for it. It had no alarm; it was in a metal box; I was white; it was 1976. Many differences. I think all of them are factors.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    47. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      You can't play with a chemistry set any more because of a scripted overreaction designed to convince people that something is being done to protect them, when in fact something is being done to expose them to more danger — U.S. foreign policy.

      Ok, Mr. John Foster Dulles . . . how do YOU think that US foreign policy can change to reduce Islamic terrorism . . . ?

      You're a bootlicking apologist.

      You know, whenever people revert to name calling, it says a lot about them.

      The governments have used the threat of Islamic terrorism to chip away at our rights. Once the threat is removed, then we can fight back against our governments intrusions to our privacy. And then we can fly again without getting our bodies fried in a scanner.

      Today featured an convicted Islamic terrorist in Germany stabbing a policewomen. He was out on probation, with an ankle tracker, but he broke it off. And yet again, a train from Amsterdam to Paris needed to be stopped because of a guy with a bomb on board.

      German politicians have stated that the only hope of integrating the Syrian refugees lies with the Islamic federations in Germany. We'll see how well that goes. Although, the chief of the biggest Islamic group stated, that if refugees don't abide by German law . . . they will need to be deported.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    48. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      That's retarded. And you're retarded for saying it.

      If you're applying for a top university in the US, like MIT or Princeton, you will have to do an interview with a local representative. The rep will ask you outrageous and controversial questions, just to see how you respond, under stress, provocation and pressure. An answer of:

      "U R retard!"

      . . . well, you might want to start looking at you local community college . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    49. Re:My view of this by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      Well the thing is... the former is a precursor step to making a bomb.

      Beer leads to heroin, there's no doubt about that.
      -- George Carlin

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    50. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no "experimenter spirit" here. He took the case off a Radio Shack clock, and put it into a pencil case.

      He took the clock to school, and was told to stop carrying it around by the engineering teacher he was supposedly showing off to. He didn't. He then plugged it in during his English class, and set the alarm so that it began beeping. When confronted about the device, he refused to cooperate or explain, but just kept repeating the same "It's a clock" over and over again. He did not explain that he brought it in to show the engineering teacher, or that he had 'invented' it, or anything. All of his explanations were given in his media interview after the arrest, not to the police before the arrest. Almost as if he was deliberately provoking the police.

      Take into consideration that his father is a loud-mouthed and controversial Islamic activist and publicity hound, and this looks like a set up. One the school and police fell for hook, line, and sinker. The two Mohammeds get what they wanted: a nice public "Islamaphobia" incident.

    51. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to a Muslim country? Are you left handed? All Ned Flanders jokes aside, Google on "Islam left hand", and read some of the wacky comments. Sure, I know, Muslims haven't discovered toilet paper yet, and use their left hand, instead. But it doesn't mean that I do.

      I had no problem with this in Turkey where I was teaching a course for professors at a university there. When I tried to write something on the white board with my right hand, the profs saw that something was wrong, giggled, and then told me it was OK for me to write with my left hand.

      On the other hand, when I was in Egypt . . . I got frowns whenever I used my left hand . . . like signing into the hotel!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    52. Re:My view of this by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      The SPLC literally gives a free pass to actual literal commits-hate-crimes criminals as long as they either bribe the SPLC or act under the right banner, while simultaneously branding non-hategroups with the scarlet letter for opposing actual criminals. Citing them is just a bad choice all around.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    53. Re:My view of this by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      The memo says this has been obvious to anyone paying a modicum of attention. Because anyone whining about Christians is invariably thinking of people of Caucasian descent, or Hispanic. And thus, racist.

      Being critical of a religion isn't racist - these ideologies have no shortage of self loathing and righteous aggrievement. Yokels aside, equating detractors to racists is wicked nonsense.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    54. Re:My view of this by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      Atheists are to blame, they haven't contributed anything to religious hate crimes in years.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    55. Re:My view of this by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Out of all the Christians I've met, not one of them has apologized for the Lord's Resistance Army's atrocities. The monsters! If Christians would just come out against and hold marches disavowing it and saying it doesn't represent Christianity then maybe I could respect them.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    56. Re:My view of this by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      And my grandpa was slapped whenever he tried to write with his left hand at Catholic school. How is it news that traditional societies hate anything non-conformist?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    57. Re:My view of this by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've done it as well, but it seems that so many are talking up his technical prowess, and the postings on slashdot indicate he just took the case off a regular alarm clock and moved it to a pencil case (mostly). I've made a clock with a setup you describe. But when I did it, it was a school assignment, so nobody would have thought it odd. But for NASA and MIT to congratulate him on his achievement if it were just taking the case off a clock, it seems silly. But nearly everyone here is posting that's what he did. Though the news reports all indicate he "built" it. I mentioned it more because I was interested in where the truth sat between the two.

    58. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least we're getting follow-ups and attention paid to those that are now saying something here stinks.

    59. Re:My view of this by mtempsch · · Score: 1

      A hoax bomb that he showed off to his relevant teacher, AFAICT, pretty much directly in the morning. Didn't leave somewhere half-hidden for someone to find, but kept with him Apparently didn't show anyone else until requested to do so after the alarm went off during class. No blocks of clay (C4/Semtex) or cardboard tubes (dynamite). Yes, that sounds JUST like the actions of a bomb hoaxer... NOT.

    60. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing that our country is somehow so insanely islamophobic and yet only 11% of our religiously motivated hate crimes are against muslims, while 62% are against the group that is overwhelmingly hated and reviled throughout the entirety of the muslim world.

      And that group is so universally loved by all other groups? I do recall some peculiar things happening in Europe a while ago - nah, clearly must be mistaken...

    61. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was invited to the White House and MIT to let regular Muslims know that not everyone in this country is a fucking racist yokel

      I must have missed the memo, what race are Muslims?

      The non-actual race racist, bigoted, yokels see them as?

    62. Re:My view of this by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      that's completely irrelevant, the point is to show the country that we should cherish the experimenter spirit.

      No, sorry, that's exactly the kind of politico nonsense that lead to the president getting a nobel peace prize before he had a chance to do anything worthy of such a prize.

      Don't draft some random kid into your political machinations. He's in school, he shouldn't have to fight your social wars for you. And that goes for both you AND the president.

    63. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down now. Cease this sensible thought process. Engage your faux outrage and join the moronic masses, at least until some celebrity selfie takes over the spot.

    64. Re:My view of this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The SPLC literally gives a free pass to actual literal commits-hate-crimes criminals as long as they either bribe the SPLC or act under the right banner

      That's Glenn Beck stuff. I'm surprised you actually believe it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    65. Re:My view of this by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      The only "Glenn Beck" stuff here is the sheer level of doublethink it takes for you to accuse me of "Glenn Beck stuff" in the face of the SPLC's own absolutely glaring refusal to recognize as a hate group anyone operating under the banner of feminism no matter how blatant, egregious, or outright criminal their conduct is. Their hypocrisy even goes so far as to recognize a homophobic hate group which doesn't lay claim to the banner of feminism while simultaneously ignoring the feminists they have worked hand in hand with (and who pay them lots of money).

      Once again PopeRatzo you prove unequivocably that you don't actually care about equality in the slightest, or the truth for that matter.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    66. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . The rep will ask you outrageous and controversial questions, just to see how you respond, under stress, provocation and pressure.

      I went through some of the local rep interviews less than a decade ago for several different schools that do that. They didn't ask stressful or outrageous questions. The meetings were all rather chill, and mostly involved the interviewer being excited that someone was interested in their alma mater. They asked you to give your spiel in some open ended introduction, then looked through application material for something that both could geek out over. Or in one case there was not much overlap in interests, so it was just a conversation about student life and seeing if I had any questions about the school.

    67. Re: My view of this by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      we're making a fuss over him because he's just an ordinary kid who *ought* to have been treated with ordinary respect, and we're trying to make up for the unforgivably shitty dumbass bullshit he's been subjected to.

      It's not just that. If we hadn't made such a big deal about it, this innocent kid would probably have a criminal record. Even after the media got involved the cops were STILL deciding whether to press charges. Luckily, now that Obama has got involved in the story, I'm pretty sure nobody's gonna be dumb enough to pursue this further.

    68. Re:My view of this by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Um, 9/11? You should try flying on an airplane these days, and going through the security checks. Shoe bombers, underwear bombers, etc, etc. Ask the security folks who they are looking for. It's not Presbyterian grandmothers. Or Hindus. Or Bahai's. Or a thousand other religions anyone could name. It's Muslim terrorists . . . that's it. Nobody else in the world is try to kill innocent people.

      In Britain, muslim terrorists killed 50 people. A harmless looking white GP named Harold Shipman killed about 200 over the course of many years. To be rational, clearly we should watch out for white GPs, especially harmless looking ones. Or Timothy McVeigh, who surely wasn't a muslim. Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, they all weren't muslims.

    69. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      There is a very simple answer for this. Most folks in the world have never heard of the LRA. The only reason I know them, is because I read The Economist. I'm very much anti-religious, but I'll play the Devil's Advocate for the Christians here. The LRA doesn't claim to represent all of Christianity in the world. The Muslim terrorists claim that they are the true Islam. And the problem is, it is difficult for Kafir to tell the difference between "radical" Islam, and plain ordinary vanilla Islam. Is beating your wives just OK, or is it mandatory . . . ?

      Also, note that the LRA hasn't bombed down a skyscraper in a foreign country, tried to shoot up passengers on an international train, used shoe and underwear bombs on planes, bombed a marathon race, knifed a policewomen yesterday in Berlin . . . etc., etc., etc. . . .

      The Open Societies of the West have welcomed Muslims to their countries with open arms, and had hoped to live together in states where the government is not dictated by religion. Unfortunately, some in the Islamic communities fight openly against that. And far too many in the Islamic communities silently agree.

      The result? People in the West feel that the Muslims have worn out their welcome.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    70. Re:My view of this by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We agree on your first statement, that he doesn't seem to be dangerous.

      Your second statement -- he's not *really* a boy genius -- applies to all mainstream media coverage of science. No science fair kid is ever just clever, anyone who does anything at all is a presumptive genius. The same with kids in spelling bees, FFS. Papers need to be sold, advertisements need to be swathed in content, channel changers need to be kept at bay.

      Your third statement is irrelevant. A child who brings a pencil box filled with clock parts to a school should not be suspended or, as you have said, arrested and cuffed. It's not a bomb hoax if everyone involved except for the idiot English teacher agrees it didn't particularly look like a bomb. If it was a bomb hoax, then any student bringing the insides of a toaster to school should cause immediate suspension and arrest for the student and the three hapless kids sitting closest to the student.

      What is missing is your fourth statement: the reason the kid's actions turned into a media firestorm. Simply, it is that a great deal of tinder and kindling existed in leadership positions in Irving, Texas. The media is quite properly pointing out the existence of anti-Muslim bigotry in Irving. While bigotry's role in this may have been indirect, it seems to me to be impossibly naive to suggest the bigotry had no connection to the incident.

    71. Re:My view of this by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Have you ever forced your wife/girlfriend to offer two turtles upon the altar while she has her period? If not I hope you destroyed all chairs that she sat on because they are unclean. I can also tell you keep your slaves in line by beating them as the good book tells you to since you have time to post on the internet and don't need to tend to your flock (as I see you live on ranch). Its good that only Muslims have weird stuff in their book and Christians are completely normal.

      Also, toilet paper? Really? Civilized countries use badays. They have been proven to be more sanitary and use far less water than lowly toilet paper. Which would be smart for the backwards southwest US which is facing increasing water shortages but hasn't discovered an effective substitute for toilet paper.

    72. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      And my grandpa was slapped whenever he tried to write with his left hand at Catholic school . . .

      . . . because your religious zealot great-grandparents sent him to a Catholic school, instead of a public school, or a sane private school like "Friends" (Quakers), or other progressive school groups.

      How is it news that traditional societies hate anything non-conformist?

      Well, apparently, the nuns slapped your grandpa . . . but they didn't burn him alive in a cage for being left-handed, otherwise you wouldn't be here :-) Islamic texts have some explicit descriptions of what devout Muslims should do with left handed folks. About 10% of any population are left-handed. It's a scientific fact. But the Koran says otherwise. It says that by using your left hand, you are deliberately insulting Allah.

      There is a difference between telling a preteen boy to be polite, and keep his elbows off the table . . . and threatening an adult with death for using their left hand.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    73. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      A harmless looking white GP named Harold Shipman killed about 200 over the course of many years.

      This was not about terrorism. He just wanted to kill people for his own pleasure. He wasn't doing it for any political or religious reason. And he didn't do it to induce fear in the general population.

      To be rational, clearly we should watch out for white GPs, especially harmless looking ones.

      That's basically what has been implemented now by state security services: Everyone is being looked at, all the time.

      Or Timothy McVeigh, who surely wasn't a muslim.

      Timothy McVeigh had no religious affiliations.

      Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, they all weren't muslims.

      Muslims, or more honestly stated, a small fraction of them, are the new Hitlers, Stalins, Pol Pots and Idi Amins. But back on topic, only the moderate Muslims can solve this problem. Radical Muslims will no listen to Kafir. If other Muslims talk to the radical ones . . . this horror might see an end.

      Unfortunately, this will not likely occur in my lifetime. This is actually very hilarious, when I look back on my life. In the 70's, the world was supposed to end in an Ice Age, combined with an OPEC embargo. Then, in the 80's, the world was supposed to end in a nuclear war between Russia and the US. In the 90's . . . well, we were a little concerned about the Middle East, but the Berlin Wall was down, and everything was supposed to be Hunky Dory. Oh, then came 9/11 . . . where we have been trapped since then.

      We should have moved on to Global Warming or some other kind of new threat, but we are still stuck in the Muslim conflict. As soon as the moderate Muslims knock down the radical ones, we can move on to the next threat to the human civilization in the world. But I think that it's stuck, and won't budge.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    74. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Have you ever forced your wife/girlfriend to offer two turtles upon the altar while she has her period?

      No, but you can probably find a Tube or Webcam for that, if that is what you are looking for.

      If not I hope you destroyed all chairs that she sat on because they are unclean.

      That's the way they come from IKEA.

      Its good that only Muslims have weird stuff in their book and Christians are completely normal.

      I hate to play the Devil's advocate for Christians, since I am anti-religious . . . but both the Koran and the Bible have wacky stuff in them that are based on Jewish fairy tales. The difference between the Christians and the Muslims, is that the Christians don't practice the wackier parts of the Bible. ISIS says all the gruesome stuff that they are doing is justified in the Koran. Fellow Muslims do not refute that, and instead blame it all on the West. And send the refugees from this nonsense to Europe. And the rich Arab Muslim Gulf States offer no hel.

      Also, toilet paper? Really? Civilized countries use badays.

      Civilized countries, which then, by definition, excludes Muslim countries. So what is your point . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    75. Re:My view of this by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      The way I see it, these points of view are formed from willful ignorance. If we tolerate this sort of behavior, we'll only be encouraging it in the future. Of course, an answer of "Wow... you must be retarded," from a position of ignorance is just as bad. Therefore I only use it in extreme circumstances when I feel it's justifiable. That preserves the potency of the position when it is used, while conveying the requisite level of scorn to the aforementioned willfully ignorant party. I usually reserve it for examples of extreme racism.

      If I found myself in the position of being interviewed by a university, my own controversial position that I can very effectively argue is that a degree is not required for success if an individual is sufficiently motivated. As an investment, the value is questionable, and it's certainly not worth incurring tens of thousands of dollars of non-dischargeable debt to pay for it. They'd have to sell me on the idea of attending their school much more than I'd have to sell them on the idea of me attending their school. But I digress.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    76. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, these points of view are formed from willful ignorance.

      OK, then try to refute them with arguments, instead of ignorant insults. You, on the other hand, have demonstrated the toxic mix if ignorance and arrogance.

      Of course, an answer of "Wow... you must be retarded," from a position of ignorance is just as bad.

      Which you said . . . I didn't

      Therefore I only use it in extreme circumstances when I feel it's justifiable.

      I can't know that you "only use it in extreme circumstances" . . . my sampling number with you is only one. I could rightly infer that anything else you say after that, is, well, sorry, I can't post words like that on Slashdot.

      And "when I feel it's justifiable" . . . that's exactly what Muslim terrorist and their passive supporters do . . . they think that shooting up a comic office in Paris is justifiable. When you support that stuff, who is the racist now, my friend . . . ?

      That preserves the potency of the position when it is used, while conveying the requisite level of scorn to the aforementioned willfully ignorant party. I usually reserve it for examples of extreme racism.

      In your mind, extreme racism. In the minds of the police, it is who is committing crimes and why. And how to prevent more terror on their population. If others in the Islamic community would toss the Islamic extremists out of their Mosques, that would be a good start.

      If I found myself in the position of being interviewed by a university, my own controversial position that I can very effectively argue is that a degree is not required for success if an individual is sufficiently motivated. As an investment, the value is questionable, and it's certainly not worth incurring tens of thousands of dollars of non-dischargeable debt to pay for it. They'd have to sell me on the idea of attending their school much more than I'd have to sell them on the idea of me attending their school. But I digress.

      Don't bother applying at a good university in the US. They will not want you.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    77. Re:My view of this by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Being critical of a religion isn't racist

      All racists have intellectual justifications for their racism. Islamophobes pretend their prejudice against people is merely criticism of a religion, then act all offended when someone calls them out on their slight of hand.

    78. Re:My view of this by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      1) Muslims aren't bombing countries on the other side of the planet from them, who are zero threat to them.

      Um, 9/11?

      Um, are you fucking kidding with that question?

      1) Long before 911, the United States was busy bombing and occupying Muslim countries, overthrowing their governments, backing brutal dictatorships throughout the region, including but not limited to Egypt, Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia. That means that of cooooourse the United States was a threat to Muslims.

      2) You do know the 911 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, right? Right? Not only is the U.S. not bombing the Saudis, it's selling billions of dollars worth of bombs to the Saudis.

      This is what really bothers me about Muslims who live in the West . . . they blame the victim. Like I said in my original post. I would welcome it, if Muslims would condemn terrorism, and state that ISIL and Boko Haram do not represent Islam. But they don't.

      But you're either stupid or lying, as Muslims have long condemned terrorism.

      Isis? Created by Obama, Hillary and Kerry to fight Assad.

      Is that you, Donald Trump . . . ?

      What's that? I'm sorry, it's hard to hear you when your head is buried so far up your ass. That the United States has given weapons, money and training to the very "terrorists" you're complaining about, as long as they are supporting "regime change" in Syria, is as indisputable as the fact that Iraq had no WMD's and nothing to do with 911 prior to the 2003 invasion.

      Timothy McVeigh had no religious affiliations.

      Except Christianity. But that's to be expected from hypocritical, racist Islamophobes. Whenever someone who happens to be Muslim engages in violence, it's because he his Muslim. When people who are Christian engage in violence - whether it be the the IRA, dominionists in the U.S. military, or the KKK - it never has anything to do with their religion.

      Muslims, or more honestly stated, a small fraction of them, are the new Hitlers, Stalins, Pol Pots and Idi Amins.

      And, back to square one with the racist dumbfuckery: Muslims aren't flying drones over Mexico or Argentina, murdering people with impunity. Muslims haven't invaded Iceland and set up a puppet government. Muslims haven't run a world-wide kidnapping and torture program, nor are they continuing to hold people in Gitmo that have been cleared for release for a decade.

      Watching American Exceptionalists whine about violent Muslims is like watching Zombie Ted Bundy lecture Chris Brown on his bad attitude towards women.

    79. Re:My view of this by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      All racists have intellectual justifications for their racism.

      The absolutism sounds like Yoda speaking about Sith and I highly doubt that, people are lazy and don't like to even think. Religion isn't a trait that someone is born with and cannot change. It's a lie to suggest that religions correlate to skin colors, Islam, Christianity et al have followers of all types. If fear of an ideology rendered one racist, all those who fear conservatism or liberalism should be considered racist. Is the faulty logic not apparent?

      Islamophobes pretend their prejudice against people is merely criticism of a religion, then act all offended when someone calls them out on their slight of hand.

      That may very well be the case concerning bigots (bigots gonna' bigot), however the post specifically stated anyone whining about $religion is racist. Is the creator of Piss Christ now a racist? The slight of hand that's occurring the false equivalence of religion and skin color. The fact remains that the term "Islamophobia" has one purpose - to suppress any criticism, legitimate or not, of Islam. Certainly one can see how fundamentally important criticism of religion is historically. This issue isn't about Islamophobia, it's about zero tolerance. (My emphasis):

      Did he intend it to look like a bomb? I don't know. It does not look like one to me. It did NOT look like a bomb to the police or teachers either or they would panicked, maybe have an evacuation drill, and they would not have kept a possible-bomb around. What they thought was that the kid intended it to be a hoax bomb, which the kid denied, and they arrested him and against Texas law did not have his parents present. The school wanted him to sign a "confession" without his parents present.

      It sounds like a big case of the police and school assuming the kid did something wrong, not having any solid proof of any of it, then just wanting to send a big message with the hand cuffs and perp walk. The kid is supposed to learn the lesson to not stand out, keep curiosity in check, go play football when the urge to study strikes. All hail zero tolerance, keeping our kids safe and stupid for a decade.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    80. Re:My view of this by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Most inventions consist of taking a bunch of existing inventions and putting them together in a novel way.
      Anybody doubt the kid could have gotten a patent for it?

    81. Re:My view of this by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe Muslims should keep to themselves, and then the Kafir would also keep to themselves . . . would that be OK with you?

      Why don't you Muslims make the first move, and remove your Islamic forces from Western countries . . . ? A win-win for everyone.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    82. Re:My view of this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It's a lie to suggest that religions correlate to skin colors, Islam, Christianity et al have followers of all types.

      Then why do all the Charlie Hebdo cartoons of Muslims always portray them as brown-skinned Arabs? Why do all the far-right cartoon blogs only portray Muslims as dark-skinned and Middle-Eastern?

      We're talking about racists here. Don't expect them to fact-check their hatred.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    83. Re:My view of this by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Then why do all the Charlie Hebdo cartoons of Muslims always portray them as brown-skinned Arabs? Why do all the far-right cartoon blogs only portray Muslims as dark-skinned and Middle-Eastern?

      Stereotypes perhaps? And we all know how sound those are :) Is it your perception that Muslims are exclusively brown or black? Jews white? All Christians white and brown? I'm tempted to compile some photos and have you tell me what religion they are. Take this man for example, based on his skin color, what would you say he is?

      We're talking about racists here. Don't expect them to fact-check their hatred.

      Indeed. I'm hoping my arguments aren't being misconstrued as support of these lazy folk. More to the point, you may be referring exclusively to racists, this other person said anyone who whines about $religion is racist. BS.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    84. Re:My view of this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Stereotypes perhaps?

      Ding ding ding!

      Is it your perception that Muslims are exclusively brown or black?

      Of course not. And that's what prompted my comment that originated this entire discussion: That the support for Ahmed the Clockmaker was shown as a way to show Muslims that not all Americans are stereotyping racist yokels.

      Hatred of specific religions, racism, it's all bigotry. And most people aren't bigots. Fortunately, the ones that are like to shout it from the rooftops. It makes them easy to spot.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    85. Re:My view of this by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I'd like to highlight a part of the article that I thought made some good points:

      [...]Teachers are taught to be suspicious and vigilant. Ahmed wasn’t accused of making a bomb – he was accused of making a look-alike, a hoax. And be honest with yourself, a big red digital display with a bunch of loose wires in a brief-case looking box is awful like a Hollywood-style representation of a bomb. Everyone jumped to play the race and religion cards and try and paint the teachers and police as idiots and bigots, but in my mind, they were probably acting responsibly and erring on the side of caution to protect the rest of their students, just in case. “This wouldn’t have happened if Ahmed were white,” they say. We’re supposed to be sensitive to school violence, but apparently religious and racial sensitivity trumps that. At least we have another clue about how the sensitivity and moral outrage pecking order lies.

      Because, is it possible, that maybe, just maybe, this was actually a hoax bomb? A silly prank that was taken the wrong way? That the media then ran with, and everyone else got carried away? Maybe there wasn’t even any racial or religious bias on the parts of the teachers and police.

      I don’t know any of these things. But I’m intellectually mature enough to admit I don’t know, and to also be OK with that. I don’t feel a need to take the first exist to conclusionville. But I do like to find facts where I can, and prefer to let them lead me to conclusions, rather than a knee jerk judgement based on a headline or sound bite.

      Sure. Just as likely as that it was a hoax spaceship. Or a hoax robot. Heck, as long as you require no evidence whatsoever, it could be a hoax any damn thing. except a hoax clock. Couldn't be a hoax clock, because it was a real clock.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    86. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reaction he got (intentionally or otherwise) was that the police considered charging him with making a "hoax bomb".

      ... and national media attention and an invitation to the White House. Sounds like a genius to me.

    87. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh don't be so naive. Obama could be totally playing this as a psyop to flush out a possible muslim bombmaking ring.

    88. Re:My view of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no new evidence here - it was obvious the instant we saw the photo of his project that he'd repackaged the guts of some old AC clock!

      I don't know about you, but I saw a little checkerboard pouch, the contents of which could have been G4 for all I would know.

    89. Re:My view of this by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      That the support for Ahmed the Clockmaker was shown as a way to show Muslims that not all Americans are stereotyping racist yokels.

      That is several stereotypes: all Americans are racists, all Yokels are non-Muslim, Muslims are not American. Stereotypes themselves are not inherently racist, they're generalities based on characteristics that among others may include ethnicity and national origin. Birds can fly, Basketball players are tall, the French are mean etc. A racist makes judgments on based exclusively on ethnicity. It's evident by the previous response, and unlike the other poster, that Muslims aren't from specific racial backgrounds. Unless $religion is tied to a specific ethnic group, it cannot be argued as racist. Not to mention people wouldn't be able to convert to it. There's a very big difference between discrimination based on what people intrinsically are, and discrimination based on sets of ideas that people sign up to.

      Hatred of specific religions, racism, it's all bigotry. And most people aren't bigots. Fortunately, the ones that are like to shout it from the rooftops. It makes them easy to spot.

      Couldn't agree more, although I'd expand specific to all, and not all bigotry is hatred.

      tl;dr some racists are also anti-Muslim, anti-Muslim != racist. Muslim is sometimes used as a shorthand for middle-eastern brown people; the ones who aren't jews (who are all white, of course). Confusion stems from implicit code for "those brown guys" vs people who believe Allah is God.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    90. Re:My view of this by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      At the same time, this march of Muslims should speak out against Islamic terrorism and the sort of extremism that their religious brethren in the ISIL areas, and the Boko Haram practice in the Middle East, and Africa. Burning folks alive in cages, auctioning off 12 year old girls for sex slavery . . . this is what Islam is all about.

      OK, and if you don't parade up and down outside my house every day saying you're not a neo-Nazi paedophile, I can conclude that you are, in fact, a neo-Nazi paedophile? Right?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    91. Re:My view of this by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The governments have used the threat of Islamic terrorism to chip away at our rights.

      Indeed.

      Once the threat is removed, then we can fight back against our governments intrusions to our privacy

      I can't believe you are that naive. We will always be at war with Eastasia.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    92. Re:My view of this by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      the public response isn't because he is some amazing boy genius.

      the public response is a big FU to the authorities who try to criminalise someone for tinkering.

      they are _not_ saying

      "we think this kid is the best tinkerer"
      If they wanted to invite the best tinkerer to the white house / nasa / etc, then they'd hold a competition to find her.

      they _are_ saying

      "FU for being asshats to this kid. We want to make the point that his _kind_ of behaviour should be encouraged. We are inviting him to our place of work because we think the kid has had a crappy time and could use some good news - but more importantly to show publicly that we stand behind the principle of freedom to tinker/invent/repackage/etc"

      This is not an over-reaction by MIT, NASA, Obama. It _is_ important that people stand up for the right of kids to tinker whether they are geniuses or not.

  8. I love how MIT hails him as a genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At best, he built a clock. At worst, he tore the guts out of a clock shell and put it in a briefcase. Genius!

  9. It's an outrage scam by koan · · Score: 0

    Muslims are currently negotiating for sharia law in Irving TX (Google it) this kid didn't do anything interesting that much was obvious from the start.
    The school officials are required to report strange items like his "clock"

    But the sheer backlash and media sensation indicates this was planned, I wouldn't be a bit surprised at the "outrage industry" if the 2 were connected.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:It's an outrage scam by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Muslims are currently negotiating for sharia law in Irving TX (Google it)

      OK, I googled it. You lose.
      http://www.politifact.com/texa...

    2. Re:It's an outrage scam by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I was certain that such a court would have no legal basis, but given what the government has been doing to "legal basis" I wasn't sure that mattered.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:It's an outrage scam by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Facts ruin good conspiracy theories.

      What I find amusing is that they want judges to ignore all foreign laws. But American law and the laws of the individual states are built upon the back of foreign laws. British, French, German, even Spanish.

    4. Re:It's an outrage scam by koan · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article you posted?

      "Moujahed Bakhach, described as one of the tribunal judges, said generally that state and federal laws would always take precedent."

      Generally?

      Apparently some people don't understand how things get started.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  10. Article misses the point by kamath.ben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody got mad because his "invention" was being discredited, or even really cared if a 14 year old claimed he invented something he merely assembled. The reaction to show encouragement and support was to counteract the fact that this young boy might think the whole country would consider him a terrorist suspect for showing interest in electronics. I absolutely don't care if he is a boy wonder or not, lets not treat kids as terrorists because they are brown and like engineering.

    1. Re:Article misses the point by JBMcB · · Score: 2

      Even if he simply transplanted a clock into a pencil case, he shows more knowledge of electronics than the vast majority of adults.

      Geek cred: I was reading Getting Started in Electronics by Forrest Mimms in 5th grade, and wiring stuff to the user port of my C64 in middle school.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    2. Re:Article misses the point by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Even if he simply transplanted a clock into a pencil case, he shows more knowledge of electronics than the vast majority of adults.

      Unless he altered the electronics, simply taking something apart shows more knowledge of using a screwdriver than anything else. Kudos to him for being curious about how things work and more if he can reassemble the thing.

      Best lesson I ever learned when I was in grade school was in taking apart a motorcycle carburetor, reassembling it, and having parts left over. Taught me to pay attention and be organized when working on things.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Article misses the point by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Kudos to him for being curious about how things work and more if he can reassemble the thing.

      any kid can rip a clock to shreds, but not any kid can put the pieces back together again and get it to boot up

    4. Re:Article misses the point by x0ra · · Score: 1

      we are talking about a one-piece part (made of a few sub-parts) from a 80's electronic clock. It's not rocket science to merely... move it to a different cast. On a personal side, the reason I generally could not put stuff back together is because the tear-down involved destructive force. And anyway, the gizmo I was playing with was already broken. I agree, it would have been awesome to fix it, but I wasn't there yet.

    5. Re:Article misses the point by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Or white

    6. Re:Article misses the point by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      any kid that can solder wires to a circuit board correctly and get it to fire up again is pretty talented. 99% of kids end up with garbage when they try this.

    7. Re:Article misses the point by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Classical survivorship bias, because 1 item survived him doesn't mean he doesn't have his own pile of garbage.

    8. Re: Article misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only... He didn't even do that. He has these "inventions", and decides to make a new one. He stuffs an already assembled click into a case, his media whore dad encourages him to take it to school... The first school day back after 9/11. I mean, this weird, non school project, that looks like a Hollywood bomb should certainly be paraded around the school and activated during class.

      How are you too blind to see that it was planned, and successful. It's a shame the way the kid was treated, but he AND his farther knew the outcome. The kid admitted it might look suspicious.

    9. Re:Article misses the point by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Unless he altered the electronics, simply taking something apart shows more knowledge of using a screwdriver than anything else.

      But taking things apart is the usual first step. It may have been uneventful for him this time, but next time he may break off a wire or let the smoke out of something and need to repair it. Just like your carburetor example, you start some serious learning when things start going wrong.

      When I was a little kid, I was lauded as some sort of electronics whiz for fixing broken appliances, too. Your average adult is not even comfortable with a screwdriver and has no idea what the inside of an alarm clock might even look like.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  11. Who read this and thought he invented something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is he was a kid learning. Of course he didn't invent a new kind of clock, that's redicalus and has nothing to do with anything. The point is a kid trying to learn and building things with the tools around him was assumed to be building a bomb simply because he's brown skinned and named Mohammed. Most kids that age are not creating electronics projects like that. It's not a new clock but he should be rewarded not punished for learning regardless of race or religion

  12. Passive agressive accusation by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gotta love the passive agressive accusations in the second article - "I don't mean to accuse him of being a terrorist, but wasn't he acting suspicious, isn't all this a little funny, isn't it kinda like he was a terrorist?".

    1. Re:Passive agressive accusation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no racist, but...

    2. Re:Passive agressive accusation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't happen often (actually, it's extremely rare) but this time I agree with you, completely. Good observation and comment, Derek. (Got no mod-points, today, or I would have modded you up.)

    3. Re:Passive agressive accusation by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Gotta love the passive agressive accusations in the second article - "I don't mean to accuse him of being a terrorist, but wasn't he acting suspicious, isn't all this a little funny, isn't it kinda like he was a terrorist?".

      once again I'll say it; people have two modes of thinking; data-based reasoning, and gut level intuition and faith. And individuals vary on how much of each they do, with some folks being very polarized at one mode or the other. And today, you can't be a rightwing American with any modicum of data-based individual thinking in you. It's entirely hierarchical/authoritarian/identity based.
      the point being, that once one of these guys jumped to the conclusion the kid was a terrorist, there's no amount of data, or lack of data, that can cause him to alter his gut level belief. In fact, obviously, the other way around; "I wouldn't be thinking he was a terrorist unless he was doing things to make me think, that, right?"

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  13. So let's just say that this article is true... by bmo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... and go with what happened.

    They didn't evacuate the school, or even the room. They didn't call the bomb squad. They did everything *but* treat the purported "possible bomb" as a bomb.

    It wasn't about whether it was a bomb or not, it was about humiliating the brown kid.

    If it was a bomb, and it did explode and take out the administration office, Uncle Chuck Darwin would have been smiling. But it wasn't, so it's not even close to a Darwin Award, but rather a damn good example of straight-out racism.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      Steve Wozniak actively tried to build a fake bomb at school. When the principal found it ticking, he ran with it to the football field and ripped the wires off. Wozniak started laughing when he heard it, but they sent him to juvy. While there, he taught the other prisoners how to "disconnect the wires leading to the ceiling fans and connect them to the bars so people got shocked when touching them."

      The principal in Woz's case deserves real credit for risking his life to save kids from a bomb. Principal today? Not so much.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re: So let's just say that this article is true... by Bartles · · Score: 0

      If I wanted to put the guts of a clock in a case and make it look like a movie bomb, I would have built it exactly like this one. And then when caught I could claim it was just a clock.

    3. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They knew it wasn't a bomb, but they assumed it was intended to look like one (and it might have very well been) and that he was possibly planning to call in a bomb scare.

    4. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't about whether it was a bomb or not, it was about humiliating the brown kid

      No, it was kicking down the nerdy kid. Things like this happen, not all the time, but not uncommon either. It just normally doesn't get this much media attention. Normally it's a white kid and now that by chance the kid is brown it's suddenly all about race? No. It's your standard kid knows something the ignorant teacher doesn't and teacher overreacts in excreting his/her power over the student.

      And where's all my college scholarships? I used to take apart and reassemble clocks, handle held video games, radios, toasters, etc...

    5. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Well, you can assume that, sure.

      Personally, knowing Dallas cops and bureaucracies in general, I'm more inclined to go with the cops and school admins are policy-following dullards whose "rulebook" said that in circumstance A, you cuff the "perp".

      Of course, this is patently ridiculous with a willowy 9th grader who's not even close to being violent, but the lawyers have pretty thoroughly shaved off all the "independent thought" from such a situation.

      Personally, I'm an incompetence-before-malice sort of guy, but then I'm not looking for fuel to fire my indignant rage either.

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus fuck, the city of Boston was nearly in lockdown about ten years ago over something that pretty much everyone agreed with wasn't a bomb and no one cried racism then. So what's your fucking problem, dildo?

    7. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Jesus fuck, the city of Boston was nearly in lockdown about ten years ago over something that pretty much everyone agreed with wasn't a bomb and no one cried racism then. So what's your fucking problem, dildo?

      1) The cops in Texas knew full well from the very beginning that there was no bomb - as opposed to the cops in Boston, who actually called out the bomb squad and actually blew the damn things up.

      2) No one in Boston was arrested and interrogated for hours, after they knew it wasn't a bomb.

      So, you were saying something about people being dildos?

    8. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Just a blatant case of straight-out idiocy.
      I completely agree with the part about the school COMPLETELY failing to follow protocol for a suspected bomb. Then to try and dump on a kid who did nothing but tinker with some electronics.....?
      Years ago, an old friend of mine told a story, where he was travelling to some place by plane. As he sat in the airport, awaiting his flight, he took out a wire-wrap board, and his schematic (for a microcontroller), and went to work to pass the time. He failed to notice as the whole section of the airport slowly cleared out. After a while, he noticed he was sitting next to a guy in a black suit, who was asking what he was building. The suit turned out to be an FBI agent; some ignorant person saw my friend working with a circut board and said "IT'S A BOMB!!" The one thing about stupid. It's not new.

    9. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the funny thing. Wozniak actually deserves the censure Ahmed got and more (and it sounds like he got it, and while still a prankster, at least, AFAIK, hasn't done a bomb scare again).

    10. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by pepty · · Score: 1

      No one in Boston was arrested and interrogated for hours, after they knew it wasn't a bomb.

      Actually that is what happened in Boston. They were arrested and for charged with placing a hoax device to incite panic, and then jailed overnight until arraignment. Don't know how long they were interrogated though.

    11. Re:So let's just say that this article is true... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Arrested for accusations of conducting a hoax - something the Texas cops also knew Ahmed had not done. He never said it was a bomb, never joked about it being a bomb, he only said 'it's a clock'.

      Otherwise, the teacher, principal, superintendent and the chief of police would be spreading the accusation that Ahmed had made jokes or threats or hints of having a bomb, 24/7.

  14. Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by x0ra · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm gonna be bold, but he didn't invent shit. At best, from the picture, the "clock" seems more to be a commercial product hacked up in a different case. Why would he add 2 source of power (9V battery + main) ? Why do this on 2 different boards linked up by ribbon cables ?

    1. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna be bold, but he didn't invent shit.

      you can be as bold as you want about stuff that is irrelevant

    2. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take apart a standard LED clock. You will find exactly those same parts (and probably the same IC chip) inside it. The only difference will be the board with the buttons on it is customized for the case it gets put into. It's a design that basically hasn't changed since 1980. I think they're still using a linear power supply (with a transformer) in those things.

      He literally just took the intact guts of a generic LED clock and put them into a pencil case that looked like a suitcase.

    3. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Clocks really aren't as hard to make as radioshack made them appear back in the 70's see: http://www.electro-labs.com/di...

      But the 9v battery was there to keep the time so your alarm would still go off when it was supposed to if mains was disconnected.

      Nowadays we just put CR2032's in everything.

      No I don't feel he invented anything either but I thought that as soon as I saw the transformer and how it was mounted in the box.
      No one is going to bother cutting one of those stupid transformers out of a wall wart.

      However the schools reaction was still wrong. Possibly even more wrong because it wasn't even home made just disassembled.

      Anyone ever heard of the Mintyboost? Some people (the TSA) think they look scary and they are all home made http://www.natch.net/stuff/TSA...

      Oh what fun things I would have made if I had had access to a 3d printer when I was in school.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    4. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by dpidcoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At best, from the picture, the "clock" seems more to be a commercial product hacked up in a different case. Why would he add 2 source of power (9V battery + main) ? Why do this on 2 different boards linked up by ribbon cables ?

      You answered your own question with your first sentence. According to analysis in TFA, he took apart an LED clock (a Micronta 63756 to be exact) and transplanted it into a pencil case. I had an old LED alarm clock (since replaced by my phone) that plugged into a 120V source, but also took 2 AA batteries as a backup source so that you wouldn't lose your alarm if the power went out. The oddities of the design are due to whatever engineer came up with it in the 70s.

    5. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      I would expect to find chip-on-boards in any modern design.

    6. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by Megane · · Score: 1

      You seem to be assuming that they would use a "modern" design in those things. Like I said, "It's a design that basically hasn't changed since 1980".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      by modern design, I merely think about a new board revision to cut production cost.

    8. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by LaurenCates · · Score: 2

      Eh, I've traveled with some microcontrollers I got from Adafruit in my carry-on. I've never been called out on it before.

      However, my husband and I went on a long trip once maybe ten years ago, and he was carrying a bunch of spare batteries in his bag (instead of carrying the charger...don't ask, I don't know why either). He was pulled aside for that.

      Another time, he was pulled aside for having a bunch of Maxim magazines in his bag. For whatever reason, the (female) TSO felt it necessary to flip through them quickly, as if he couldn't have bought them in the terminal.

      I'd like to point out that if one of the two of us hits the "racial profiling" button in racist dirtbags, it's me. He's white as can be: blonde, blue eyes, damn near translucent. No freaky piercings or tattoos or anything. Totally normal looking. I, however, am what they call "ethnically ambiguous". You'd think if there was a reason to pick on one of us, it would be me. And that's never happened, even when traveling alone.

      It's why I tend to lean heavily into the category of "idiot administrators looking to punch down" and use race as an excuse to do it. Racism is a factor, yes, but ultimately, with idiots like these, they would have found someone to pick on and a reason to do it.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    9. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by Megane · · Score: 1

      Well, ya know, they still sell these things by the cartload at Goodwill. And the board isn't exactly the main cost in these, it's the labor of putting together all the wiring to have buttons where the case designer wanted them.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    10. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      I'm going to state the obvious and state you are stating the obvious. This isn't a story about a genius invention, its about an idiotic overreaction to some nerdy kid trying to teach himself something. As such your post doesn't tell us shit....but the ending is especially hilarious. Paraphrasing: "this kid's project is stupid and lame...but it perplexes me and I can't figure it out".

      Perhaps you could learn a thing or two from this kid eh?

    11. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Red herring argument. Your genius isn't really one, so you try to move the debate on something irrelevant.

    12. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by mtempsch · · Score: 1
      "invented" / "hacked" In the interview he said it was something he threw together in 20 minutes, so clearly not something groundbreaking / super involved, so probably more journalistic interpretation rather than his own claim. If he did use the word invention? He's a kid.

      But props for curiosity and hacking at tech. 99+% these days are reduced to passive consumers. I did pretty much the same, ripping the radio part out of a clock radio and using the trigger wire from the clock board (that used to power/turn on the radio part) to switch a relay so I could instead turn on my big stereo system.

      as to the power sources - clearly the original clock was mains powered with a battery backup to keep the clock going and possibly powering a buzzer, so that you don't oversleep if there was/is a power failure. Pretty much standard for alarm clocks / clock radios...

    13. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Heh, the problem is this story we are commenting on has already been red herringed.

      The guy in the "analysis" is pissed at the media overreaction and claims of racism that he went through a fair bit of trouble to say invoking "genius" is wrong. And yeah that's probably right but who the fuck cares how complicated the project is when kids are getting arrested for any sort of tinkering at all?

      What if he had drawn and etched the PCB himself in some novel process that will save $billions in manufacturing and programmed the micro with sentient AI? Would the outcome have been any different when the alarm went off in english class? That question indeed relevant and it doesn't matter if he is a genius or not. Give the kid a break.

    14. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Older alarm clocks often have a 9v connector and compartment, so that if the power goes out, it still saves the time. So he didn't even add the 9v connector.

    15. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna be bold, but he didn't invent shit. At best, from the picture, the "clock" seems more to be a commercial product hacked up in a different case. Why would he add 2 source of power (9V battery + main) ? Why do this on 2 different boards linked up by ribbon cables ?

      He's not being arrested for patent violation, you know.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    16. Re:Genius ? Really ? No, Sir. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Red herring argument. Your genius isn't really one, so you try to move the debate on something irrelevant.

      The argument isn't about how good an electronics engineer he is. Is that really so hard to understand?

      It's about civil rights, the over-reaction through fear or ignorance of those in authority, and the seeming likelihood of racism, or at least ridiculous cultural stereotypng.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  15. 'Built' by kheldan · · Score: 0

    Ironically, from the looks of the photo, he didn't even really 'build' it, he pulled it out of whatever casing it originally was in, and mounted it in that briefcase. Not trying to be mean to the kid (because the school staff and police were wrong and were big jerks) but I would have been more impressed if he'd actually built a digital clock from scratch.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:'Built' by FranTaylor · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would have been more impressed if he'd actually built a digital clock from scratch.

      Does he need to gather up beach sand to make silicon chips or is it okay if he uses a pre-made chip?

      If he uses a pre-made chip, does it need to be blank or can he use a dedicated clock chip?

      maybe he also needs to mine the copper for the wires?

    2. Re:'Built' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Is there some reason you're such a gigantic jerk? Shitty life full of regrets? Cunt of a wife who nags you constantly? Powerless and a pussy, you get pushed around by everyone? Or are you an alcoholic, and also a mean drunk? Drug addict maybe? Or are you just a plain old, garden-variety, shitty Internet troll who has nothing better to do and no other way to feel relevant than to say whatever you can to stir shit up on the Internet? Bet you're fat, ugly, and smell like old shit, too, as you sit in your basement and jack off to hentai or Japanese catgirls or whatever it is that gets your rocks off. Here's a new thrill for you: go drink a bottle of Drano and fucking DIE. You contribute nothing of value to anything, you're a waste of perfectly good oxygen and other vital resources, so why don't you just do one good thing for this world and go sequester some carbon for us (read as: KILL YOURSELF) mmkay? Please be sure you get your entire head in front of the shotgun.

    3. Re:'Built' by x0ra · · Score: 2

      "Appeal to extreme" fallacy.

    4. Re:'Built' by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how people here seem to look at a 14 year old through adult eyes without even realising it. I mean sure I started hacking at a young age, and I've been through an undergrad degree with plenty of electronic engineering, then done a bunch more and now sometimes design circuits for a living, so OBVIOUSLY making an alarm clock out of transistors and relays is pretty easy and why couldn't the kid do it. Now, if he was a REAL genius...

      Back to the real world, no at 14 I wasn't up to much. Yes, I was smart by the standards of such things and I was certainly much better at electronics than anyone else in the school but that's really not saying much at all. I really just don't think a lot of people here realise what it's like being 14.

      It's not like you have 14 years of experience. You have more like 2 to 3 years at most from the point where your brain has developed enough to actually think about this kind of stuff in any remotely reasonable way, but in those 3 years you have to also figure out even how to go about learning. Especially as it sounds like he doesn't have a surfeit of super awesome mentors in his life.

      14 is almost unimaginably far back---too far back to remember properly. Thankfully, I remember, not so much what it was like but the projects I was able to make work and those I wasn't. That allows me to deduce what my level was, and I'm sure I was at the level where the slashdot peanut gallery would happily have crapped all over any project I could have managed.

      I have also had a small chance to interact with some kids of various levels in an educational capacity, which gives me at lease some idea of how a smart 14 year old thinks.

      Oh yes, and none of the organisational/neatness things which allows one to actually develop a bigger project have really been learned or developed at that age. Going forwards you're just as likely to break something and wind up at square 1. Even getting something with a couple of 741s working is right on the upper end of what even the best kids in a school might achieve.

      End result: clock in a new box is not the most impressive project ever especially for an adult. But 14 is much, much further back than almost everyone here realises.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:'Built' by kheldan · · Score: 1
      Note that I said:

      I would have been more impressed..

      {emphasis mine}
      ..not 'I am unimpressed.

      Also, know what I was doing at 14 years old? Taking the original COSMAC Elf microcomputer trainer from the 1976 Popular Electronics article, designing and building a RAM expansion, adding an integer BASIC-in-ROM to it, designing and building a serial interface and RS232-to-20ma current-loop interface, and repairing a Teletype model 33ASR I got for free from one of the local highschools that was throwing it out, and writing software on the whole monstrosity. In this day and age a 14 year old freshman in highschool can spend $20 for an Arduino, add some 7-segment displays to it, and write alarm clock software to run on it -- assuming they aren't a little bit ahead of the curve, and are designing alarm clocks in FPGAs or some other programmable logic. Taking apart an existing alarm clock without destroying it isn't bad, but it's a little behind the curve. Kid's got potential, though, many of his contemporaries wouldn't even get that far without wrecking the thing, so hopefully this sad incident won't deter him from his interests in electronics.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:'Built' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't know what built from scratch means then?

  16. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1, Interesting

    OK if a $color kid brought in a suitcase with wires sticking out, which he plugged in and it making a noise and then refused to answer questions what is was exactly, I suspect he would have received the similar treatment.

  17. Cops didn't think the clock was a bomb by twasserman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As noted elsewhere, the authorities in Irving, Texas, didn't act in a way that was consistent with a potential bomb threat. If they found a mysterious unattended package on the street, they would have cleared the area, brought in the bomb squad, and destroyed the contents of the package. But neither Ahmed's school, nor the cops that they called, did any of those things. Either they didn't act to protect the students and teachers in the school (on the assumption that it might be a bomb) or they knew from the outset that the clock wasn't a bomb, in which case it was Islamophobia in action.

    1. Re:Cops didn't think the clock was a bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You snakeophobe. Why don't you get in this box with snakes. Only 40% of them are poisonous.

    2. Re:Cops didn't think the clock was a bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, religious fucks deserve what they get. Or does that only count if they're christians?

    3. Re:Cops didn't think the clock was a bomb by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Well, religious fucks deserve what they get. Or does that only count if they're christians?

      Or Sam Harris. "Those people over there are violent and irrational - that's why we should be able to torture and bomb them, even though they are no threat to us".

      Yeah, no threat chickenhawks. 911 hijackers were from and funded by Saudi Arabia, remember? Call us when you've enlisted and your "boots are on the ground" of Riyadh.

    4. Re:Cops didn't think the clock was a bomb by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Not Islamophobia. I think this is more along the lines of making sure Americans are kept paranoid and afraid, so that plans to eliminate their rights can proceed on schedule.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    5. Re:Cops didn't think the clock was a bomb by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      As noted elsewhere, the authorities in Irving, Texas, didn't act in a way that was consistent with a potential bomb threat.

      Absolutely right, genius. They did never think it was a bomb threat. They thought it was a bomb hoax. Not the same thing, less damaging (although if it's done right, it can cause an expensive and disrupting evacuation), and punishable. The question is not: Was this a bomb? The question is: Was this a bomb hoax?

  18. I hate to break it to the author... by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    From one of TFA's:

    and even that dirty garbage-picked black and white TV my parents dragged home that they knew I’d have a blast playing with

    I hope I'm not shattering the illusion of a pleasant childhood but if his either of his parents were at all technically inclined, then there's only one reason to provide a kid with a used TV to take apart... and while there probably won't be a blast, I'd certainly expect a loud spark and possibly the smell of burning flesh... :p

    1. Re:I hate to break it to the author... by slazzy · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a kid I did take apart a old, large TV, and there was sparks, shocks and the smell of burning flesh even though it was unplugged (capacitors...)

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    2. Re:I hate to break it to the author... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Capacitors... yeah, that's kind of what I was getting at. ;)

    3. Re:I hate to break it to the author... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      As a kid I did take apart a old, large TV, and there was sparks, shocks and the smell of burning flesh even though it was unplugged (capacitors...)

      Yeah, that's how a bright kid learns about capacitors before school addresses the topic. If you're bright enough, you won't have to learn it a second time, with a friend's Tesla coil. I wasn't bright enough.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  19. I don't believe this guy... by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So... a 14 year old did not actually build electronic integrated circuits with his own 2 hands. He either assembled or repackaged something commercially available. How is that even relevant? That changes this situation how exactly?

    And how does this in any way excuse or even mitigate the behavior of the teachers, administrators & police involved in the situation?

    Why don't you come out and admit your reasons... you have too much invested emotionally in the hard right narrative and cannot bear the thought that your side fucked up, and you are now doubling down and rolling around in the mud trying to save face. The though of offering up a simple apology would never occur to your lot.

    1. Re:I don't believe this guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... a 14 year old did not actually build electronic integrated circuits with his own 2 hands. He either assembled or repackaged something commercially available. How is that even relevant? That changes this situation how exactly?

      It makes the scholarship offers extremely stupid. They're being awarded based on celebrity status instead of achievement. The kid is far from graduating and going to college.

    2. Re:I don't believe this guy... by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      It makes the scholarship offers extremely stupid. They're being awarded based on celebrity status instead of achievement.

      if the kid doesn't cut it academically then they will give the scholarship to someone else

    3. Re:I don't believe this guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It "changes the situation" by giving slashdot's racists an excuse to side with the police and school administrators, which they didn't have yesterday.

    4. Re:I don't believe this guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He either assembled or repackaged something commercially available. How is that even relevant? That changes this situation how exactly?

      Because when the story first broke the slant was that Ahmed was a burgeoning genius who would have been applauded had he been white, when in fact what he actually did was trivial. And now we see him invited to the White House as a face-saving gesture. I doubt that such an invitation would have been extended had he not been a minority.

  20. Full of bad reporting by bangular · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I generally support him, the media has been TERRIBLE at reporting this story. The LA Times had a very popular article that kept comparing him to Steve Jobs. JOBS!??! Don't they mean Woz?! The police also release misleading photos making it look like it was the size of a suitcase (it was waaaay smaller than that). I guess once the mass media gets their hands on something their only concern is ad clicks...

    1. Re:Full of bad reporting by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Yep. Keep that in mind no matter what the story is.

    2. Re:Full of bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs seems more appropriate. Woz made stuff, Jobs packaged it. The kid took the intact guts of a generic LED clock and stuffed them into another box without modification. He didn't "create" a clock.

    3. Re:Full of bad reporting by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the woz comparison is better than you know:

      "TIL Steve Wozniak put a fake bomb in a locker during high school and spent the night in a juvenile detention center where he taught prisoners how to disconnect the ceiling fan wires and connect them to bars so it would shock people on touch"

      https://www.reddit.com/r/today...

      including this tidbit:

      The principal had been summoned when the device was found, bravely ran onto the football field clutching it to his chest, and pulled the wires off.

      woz made an actual fake bomb intended to frighten. in today's day and age he would be locked up for life

      ps: the comparison to jobs, even though less valid than woz, still has the slightly valuable point that jobs was an arab:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Jobs's biological father, Abdulfattah "John" Jandali (b. 1931), was born into a Muslim household and grew up in Homs, Syria.[9]

      the added poignancy right now being the way syrian refugees are being treated by racists and bigots in europe right now

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:Full of bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I generally support him, the media has been TERRIBLE at reporting this story. The LA Times had a very popular article that kept comparing him to Steve Jobs. JOBS!??! Don't they mean Woz?! The police also release misleading photos making it look like it was the size of a suitcase (it was waaaay smaller than that). I guess once the mass media gets their hands on something their only concern is ad clicks...

      A young Steve Jobs is perhaps the better comparison - only contribution was the case; and got most of the credit for the inventiveness of others.

    5. Re:Full of bad reporting by x0ra · · Score: 1

      So, it's all a marketing fraud ?

    6. Re:Full of bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For crying out loud, one more time repeat after me. STEVE JOBS WAS NOT A COMPUTER DESIGN GENIUS. He was a business geek. STEVE WOZNIAK WAS THE COMPUTER GENIUS!

    7. Re:Full of bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just so the world knows: Syrians are not Arabs. Arabicized maybe, but they are not Arabs. You may get that impression from the (Arabicized) names but that just comes from the fact that a bunch of Arabs went-out conquering and converting people (at sword at first) to Islam, taking Arabic with them. They did not, in fact, actually absorbe those populations or magically replace their genes or other identities, however: Syrians are mixed bunch, but more Turkic in some ways; a bunch are probably more related to Jews than anyone from Saudi Arabia (don't say that openly to them though), and to "Byzantines" (eastern Romans, themselves a mixed bunch and only "Roman" much later in their history). The Turks (and they) often co-identify and not always religiously, but in socio-ethnicity, and that would actually put them at direct odds with Arabs since the latter were forcibly subjugated by the Ottoman empire, though both were Islamic. Just a hint: stop referring to the middle east as "Arab", and the locals (of many identitites and histories, largely without actually being descendents of the same people) will really appreciate it.

    8. Re:Full of bad reporting by Megane · · Score: 1

      This kid is no computer genius either. He stuck someone else's clock in a different box and claimed it was his creation. Very Steve Jobs. Check the Artvoice link, he had a bunch of other stuff where he took the guts out of other stuff and showed the naked guts like they were some brilliant creation.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:Full of bad reporting by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      your argument is mostly historical. it is common and normal to call syrians arabs. they fall under the umbrella due to language, and, increasingly, simple ethnicity

      although you are correct that ethnic and sectarian pride means this can be a touchy subject, and that i shouldn't use the blanket term that all syrians be called arab, because there are significant minority populations who are most definitely not arab

      but as an aside, ethnic jingoism and a sense of superiority based on sect is the source of most of the problems in the middle east

      therefore: yeah, we get it, it's touchy. but: fuck your touchiness. syrians and others in the middle east are murdering people because of this topic. which is fucking retarded and exactly why the middle east is the way it is

      so, based on your comment, i'll respect your request and not use the term arab to describe all syrians from now on. thank you for the clarification

      but the more important point is that syrians themselves stop fucking murdering each other on the same fucking topic: respect

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    10. Re:Full of bad reporting by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The official name of Syria is the Syrian Arab Republic. Ask them to stop calling themselves arab before you ask other people to stop.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    11. Re:Full of bad reporting by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Speaking of reporting, I found this scrap in my various files of commentary from back in usenet days:

      >This AP article has been making the rounds. It's rather shoddy journalism in that it takes the words of the spammers completely at face value.

      I've been a journalist for over 8 years. I see a lot of misconceptions in the two lines of your post. Maybe it's the TV's fault. Maybe you've grown used to think about Dan Rather or Barbara Walters as journalists. They're not. They're celebrities. A journalist walks his beat, watches, listens and reports the facts. Just the facts.

      I've interviewed murderers and rapists. I've also interviewed way more politicians than you'd ever care to meet. And when I come back to my desk and write the story, I simply report what they said. Nobody cares what I think about it; my job is to tell you what they said.

      So, taking their words at face value is NOT shoddy journalism. It's real journalism. You, the reader, should decide what to make of their words.

      Shoddy journalism would be to assume spammers lie, and mocking them, distorting what they said. It would be a lot more gratifying for antispammers, yes, but it would also be the worst kind of journalism: A distortion of the truth.
      --- end quote ---

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    12. Re:Full of bad reporting by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The LA Times had a very popular article that kept comparing him to Steve Jobs. JOBS!??! Don't they mean Woz?!

      No they mean Jobs just like they mean Edison with the light bulb and Gore with the internet. They want a lone hero to keep things simple and not a team - and if the hero is a businessman all the better.

    13. Re:Full of bad reporting by gweihir · · Score: 1

      As Jobs never had any engineering skills and never built any electronics, but was into marketing and design, the comparison may not be so far off. Still stupid.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:Full of bad reporting by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      While I generally support him, the media has been TERRIBLE at reporting this story. The LA Times had a very popular article that kept comparing him to Steve Jobs. JOBS!??! Don't they mean Woz?!

      I don't think Woz did take radios apart and put the parts into pencil boxes when he was 14. Jobs? I don't think, but he might have :-)

    15. Re:Full of bad reporting by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      you didn't write that routine to read a disk file. you didn't write that routine to do virtual memory at the MMU level. you didn't write that floating point divide routine. and yet, you write code (I assume) that uses these things. you, sir, didn't 'create' anything, then!

      no, the kid is no genius. not the point, though. he is starting out, he is curious about the stuff and he is transplanting electronics guts from one chassis to another. what's so bad about that? you start somewhere.

      he's guilty of over-boasting, but last time I checked, almost every kid his age is guilty of things like that! if this was a 25 yr old, I would judge much differently, but a young kid that is overly proud of what he has done? no big deal, really. he'll grow up like most of us.

      its the adult reactions that are key, here. the kid was just being a kid. the adults are supposed to be a bit more clueful about life and this showed they all failed.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  21. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by beernutmark · · Score: 1

    Did he refuse to answer what it was? Seems to me he was pretty clear that it was a clock. The only thing he refused is to say was that it was anything other than a clock.

  22. Only inside a circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could a digital clock cause such a storm.

  23. No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    TL;DR: No one ever thought it was an actual bomb.

    Long version:

    Since no one ever actually thought it was a bomb, the fact that the school and police took no action as if it were a bomb does not somehow "prove" it's racism and/or Islamophobia. That isn't to say one or more of the people involved had something in that vein in their minds, but their lack of treating it as a bomb doesn't demonstrate it, since numerous accounts of this story indicate the school and police never thought it was an actual bomb.

    Some people thought it "looked like" a bomb, and wondered why he would bring it to school, because they don't understand why kids who like things like science and electronics do what they do.

    And there are laws dealing with what are called "hoax devices". Many people have gotten into trouble for such things before. Hoax device statutes have been around for many, many years, long before 9/11.

    Here is the Texas statute:

    http://www.statutes.legis.stat...

    The only thing that matters in the hoax device statute is intent â" a feature that is not unique. For example, intent matters when someone is killed. Was it an accident? Was it negligence? Was it premeditated? That is the difference between someone having done nothing wrong, and murder. And it is interviews and investigations and evidence that determine intent.

    Even in the original Dallas Morning News article that broke this story â" before it went viral and Ahmed got invited to the White House, JPL, MIT, got scholarships, and become the hero of Silicon Valley â" the only thing the police officials said was that they knew it wasn't a bomb, that Ahmed never claimed it was anything but a clock, and that they were trying to determine WHY he built and AND brought it to school. Once it was determined there was no intent to alarm, scare, or deceive, it was further determined there was no wrongdoing.

    Steve Wozniak got in trouble for using a hoax device (with intent to scare), and was arrested and spent a night in jail. I got in trouble with authority figures â" school, police â" for things similar to what Ahmed did several times, when doing nothing wrong. Maybe a little borderline, maybe a little, "What on earth are you doing?" but not illegal. And frankly, some of those came down only to intent as well.

    So this little trope misunderstands what happened. Could racism or Islamophobia been an element in anyone's mind? There is no way to know, as much as people desperately want to come to that conclusion. When people say, "What white kid would have gotten in trouble for doing nothing wrong?"

    Plenty. Ignore the title, read the article (for those who haven't already):

    https://reason.com/blog/2015/0...

    His English teacher overreacted by getting the principal's office involved. The school overreacted by calling the police. The school bears almost all of the responsibility here â" not "post-9/11 America", racism, or police. If the police had not been called, none of this would ever have happened â" and Ahmed wouldn't be a celebrity, either.

    When police are called for a situation where any of the parties involved are not in perfect agreement, and there is no controversy, even if nothing illegal occurred, I would submit that there are not many times that results in a more positive outcome. The police are there, in part, to investigate and to determine if there was any wrongdoing, which they did. I wish they would have simply handled it at the school, but what I really wish is that the school would not have called the police in the first place.

    1. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Even in the original Dallas Morning News article that broke this story Ã" before it went viral and Ahmed got invited to the White House, JPL, MIT, got scholarships, and become the hero of Silicon Valley Ã" the only thing the police officials said was that they knew it wasn't a bomb, that Ahmed never claimed it was anything but a clock, and that they were trying to determine WHY he built and AND brought it to school.

      None of which required that he be handcuffed, fingerprinted, suspended... etc... etc...

      The issue isn't whether they thought it was a bomb or not - the issue is their overreaction and it's racist overtones.
       

      I would submit that there are not many times that results in a more positive outcome.

      I would submit that you're an idiot trying to give other idiots a free pass for being idiots.
       

      what I really wish is that the school would not have called the police in the first place.

      What I really wish is that apologists like yourself would go away. You're much corrosive and dangerous to society than out-and-out racists and idiots because you honestly think (read: have deluded yourself into thinking) that you're neither, that you're on the side of the good guys. You're not.

    2. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      None of which required that he be handcuffed, fingerprinted, suspended... etc... etc...

      The police were called, and they are compelled and required to investigate once called. They don't just show up and say, "Eh, whatever," and leave. I don't think they police should have been called at all, but they were. And during the course of their investigation, they choose to transport him for questioning, and handcuffs are, rightly or wrongly, standard procedure nearly any time anyone is detained or transported for any reason, even if they didn't do anything wrong.

      The issue isn't whether they thought it was a bomb or not - the issue is their overreaction and it's racist overtones.

      The issue is exactly that. Even if race or religion was on the mind of one or more of the people involved, you can't know that. People are using the fact this happened to him and "wouldn't happen if he was white" as proof that it has to be racism. But white kids are arrested and suspended for similarly innocent, or even more innocent, things all the time. That fact alone dismantles the position that "because this happened, it must have had a racial element." It MAY indeed have had a racial element, but the facts of the situation aren't what demonstrates that. That would be only in peoples' minds.

      (As for one of the cops ALLEGEDLY saying "it's who I thought it would be", we have no way of knowing 1. whether that was even actually said, or 2. IF it was said, whether it referred to Ahmed personally (i.e., did he have any brushes before because of his interests), or because he was "brown" and Muslim -- the conclusion that everyone who desperately wants to attribute this to racism wants to rush to. And, on that point, if that was the motivation, wouldn't that cop have already felt that upon seeing his name was "Ahmed Mohamed", instead of making an allegedly racist remark right to his face, and only upon seeing him? In short, that allegation doesn't stand up to scrutiny as definitive proof that there was anything racial involved on the part of police in this case, either.)

      I am ignoring the rest of your fallacious attacks that don't speak to the facts of the situation, which I have shown that you have ignored. You're the corrosive one, here, because you have already decided that this simply must be racism when the facts and evidence don't support that conclusion, and ignore all other considerations.

    3. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel you are astroturfing here. Lots of work at useless information, no mention of the cops denying a 14 year old (for hours) a phone call to either his parents or a lawyer. The cops FUCKED UP.

    4. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like you ignored the whole fucking comment, and the article that is the subject of this post.

    5. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I pretty much did (ignore everything), because it was delivered in the exact same bullshit way that everyone wanting to present a one-sided argument but appear "balanced" does things. The best liars do so by omissions and barely perceptible tweaks of the truth.

      For example -

      "And during the course of their investigation, they choose to transport him for questioning, and handcuffs are, rightly or wrongly, standard procedure nearly any time anyone is detained or transported for any reason, even if they didn't do anything wrong."

      This is a gross understatement of what they did. Yet, no mention of that. Instead, the post just plows ahead into "white kids have had it happen to them too" while skipping over the objectively illegal things that the cops did here.

    6. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      The police were called, and they are compelled and required to investigate once called.

      The police have no duty to the public at all. They don't even need to show up if they don't want to. They aren't compelled to do anything.

      They don't just show up and say, "Eh, whatever," and leave.

      Of course they do, they do it all the time and that's exactly what they should have done in this case. They should have looked at the clock, asked the kid "Were you trying to make people think you had a bomb? Did you have any plans to leave this somewhere or did you intend to keep it in your possession at all times?" If the kid answered correctly the police should have said "There was no crime committed here, have a nice day!". Instead, they arrested and handcuffed a child.

      --

      Enigma

    7. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The police were called, and they are compelled and required to investigate once called. They don't just show up and say, "Eh, whatever," and leave

      Next time there is a burglary in your street, see if the police actually investigate it, or just say: "here is a report number to give to your insurance company".

      No, the police are not required to do anything.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then please explain the over-the-top-and-down-again over-(and INCORRECT) response.
      Sir, you are wrong.

    9. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police have no duty to the public at all.

      The police have no duty to the public? That's your position? Really? You might as well say government has no duty to the public. I can only assume that you're one of those politicofreaks that believes up is down and left is right etc. etc.

    10. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the police officials said was that they knew it wasn't a bomb, that Ahmed never claimed it was anything but a clock, and that they were trying to determine WHY he built and AND brought it to school.

      Maybe he built a clock at age 14 so he wouldn't grow up to be a fuckin' English teacher or a cop.

    11. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The police have no duty to the public at all.

      The police have no duty to the public? That's your position? Really?

      Did you read the link, idiot? The courts have decided that the police do "...not owe a specific duty to provide police services to the plaintiffs based on the public duty doctrine."

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    12. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by sribe · · Score: 1

      The police were called, and they are compelled and required to investigate once called.

      They have wide discretion as to how to proceed, what level of investigation to undertake.

      They don't just show up and say, "Eh, whatever," and leave.

      Of course they do, all the damn time.

    13. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      (As for one of the cops ALLEGEDLY saying "it's who I thought it would be", we have no way of knowing 1. whether that was even actually said, or 2. IF it was said, whether it referred to Ahmed personally (i.e., did he have any brushes before because of his interests), or because he was "brown" and Muslim -- the conclusion that everyone who desperately wants to attribute this to racism wants to rush to. And, on that point, if that was the motivation, wouldn't that cop have already felt that upon seeing his name was "Ahmed Mohamed", instead of making an allegedly racist remark right to his face, and only upon seeing him? In short, that allegation doesn't stand up to scrutiny as definitive proof that there was anything racial involved on the part of police in this case, either.)

      I assumed "it's who I thought it would be" is a reference to the kid's father, who is apparently well known for speaking up about Islamophobia.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:No one ever thought it was an actual bomb by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The police were called, and they are compelled and required to investigate once called. They don't just show up and say, "Eh, whatever," and leave

      Next time there is a burglary in your street, see if the police actually investigate it, or just say: "here is a report number to give to your insurance company". No, the police are not required to do anything.

      They are not required to guarantee you protection as an individual, i.e. you can't sue them if they fail to stop someone committing a crime against you. This is because it would be impossible to prvide such protection without some sort of twenty four hour one on one bodyguarding service.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  24. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that he didn't refuse to answer questions. He repeatedly stated it was a clock. All while authorities didn't take any sort of measures to protect anyone else, so obviously they either believed him or also knew that it wasn't a bomb.

  25. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that has no relation to what actually happened. It wasn't in a suitcase, it was in a pencil box (although the police photo was staged to make it look larger than it actually was). There weren't wires sticking out until after the police tore it open. And he didn't just plug it in and refuse to answer questions about it. He brought it to his teacher and said "Look at this clock I made." And then when he was questioned they said he was uncooperative because he was telling the truth! The Principal and then the police asked him what it was, he said it was a clock and they said "We know you're lying." Not only that but the police locked him away and questioned him without his parents or without a lawyer despite him asking for his parents repeatedly, which is a violation of the law. There is no way you can defend the actions of the principal or the police in this matter. They overreacted and violated this kids rights because of their deeply held prejudices and that's it.

  26. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    It wasn't a suitcase, it was a pencil case. http://www.officedepot.com/a/p.... About 5 by 8 inches.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  27. Genius, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How so?

    Throwing that word around is an insult to those who have properly earned it.

  28. First projects should be celebrated even if minor by rhysweatherley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My first computer program was little more than 10 PRINT "HELLO WORLD", but young me was damn proud at the time of making a computer do something ... anything ... and would have loved to share that enthusiasm with others.

    It doesn't matter whether Ahmed built the clock from scratch after forging his own components from rocks in a furnace or disassembled something else and made a small change. Who cares. We all had to start somewhere and a little encouragement goes a long way.

    Don't let the know-nothings get you down Ahmed. Keep at it.

  29. THANK YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had this same argument the other day on my state's local forums about how the project was just a reassembled clock, not something he built. Liberals were not too happy about it and swarmed like flies on shit using all sorts of nasty names and telling me I'm a horrible person. EFF THAT NOISE! Now I'm going to flaunt this article in their faces.

    1. Re:THANK YOU by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Like this? That's some semi serious hacking/electronics.

  30. Are you all idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, Back in 1971 I was building a timer/clock at the age of 14 without ICs and I was no genius. Has the world turned so dumb that someone hooking up a 555 timer, a second IC for counting, and a display driver chip is a genius, and who got the whole schematic from the Internet with little effort.

    I suppose that he did have to use a breadboard and since 80% of teenagers and 99.99% of teachers don't know what that is I suppose he is a genius.

    1. Re:Are you all idiots? by x0ra · · Score: 1

      I thought you didn't use any IC, yet, you used a 555 ?

    2. Re:Are you all idiots? by MacTO · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      The wonderful thing about microcontroller project boards is the reduced barrier of entry to electronics. The downside is that everything is a programming and physical interfacing project. The end result is that very few people are equipped to think about the electronics behind digital logic and analog design. Indeed, the only reason why I (as a younger person) even have a clue about what you're talking about is because I took a very-much-outdated-by-the-time course on developing instrumentation in university. Even though I could recreate a clock without microcontrollers from basic principles and data sheets, it would be a far-from-optimal design simply because that level of design has limited application in the modern world. (Obviously people still need that level of knowledge to design microconollers and such, but that is a very limited segment of engineers and scientists -- nevermind the general population.)

    3. Re:Are you all idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension not your strong suit, huh?

  31. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

    Yep, you're absolutely right! Had that situation happened, I'm willing to bet the kid would have received similar treatment to what Ahmed received.

    Except Ahmed received it for bringing in a pencil case with no wires sticking out, and he then answered all the questions saying it was a clock, repeatedly.

    So, the $color kid would have been treated with suspicion (rightly so) for behaving suspicion, while Ahmed was treated with suspicion despite not acting suspicious.

    So what are your motives here in the statement that you made?

    You're either ignorant of the circumstances and trying to push an agenda/your opinions despite being ignorant, or you know what the circumstances actually were and are lying to try and push an agenda as well as basing your opinions on an intentional disregard for the truth.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  32. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    Don't pretend this doesn't happen to white kids.
    http://boingboing.net/2008/09/22/star-simpson-one-yea.html

  33. Regardless, it looks like a suit case bomb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like a suit case bomb. Just google it, and look at other pictures and how close they resemble this kids "clock". If the kid was such a genius, he would have figured out that maybe SOMEONE, some single person at that school, would see the same thing. It doesn't take a genius to see that. I think he was looking for attention and knew this was a questionable build.

    Shit, kids get suspended for making a poptart into a gun shape and the clowns here sit silently. Kids aren't allowed to have toy guns that look real, especially in a school setting... but this is OK? Please, take all your faux outrage and suck on it somewhere else, crybabies.

    1. Re: Regardless, it looks like a suit case bomb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where's the explosive? you know... the main ingredient for any bomb... a timer is incidental, and only seen in movies..

  34. My 2 cents by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we stop and think – was it really such a ridiculous reaction from the teacher and the police in the first place?

    Yes.

    How many school shootings and incidents of violence have we had, where we hear afterwards “this could have been prevented, if only we paid more attention to the signs!”

    Well there are actually not that many school shootings period, as tragic as the ones that do occur are. Furthermore, people generally have a better idea of what a gun looks like than what a bomb looks like.

    Teachers are taught to be suspicious and vigilant.

    They are also apprently very stupid in that not only do they not know what a bomb looks like, they also don't know that they don't know what a bomb looks like. If we are going to call the cops every time a kid has something that *could* be a bomb, we are going to arrest every kid with a possible cell phone IED detonator, and blow up every backpack with a bomb squad robot. It seems the suspicion and vigilance teachers actually have is very selective and misguided.

    Ahmed wasn’t accused of making a bomb – he was accused of making a look-alike, a hoax.

    I didn't realize the police were required to deal with known hoaxes. IT seems pretty obvious that the accusation was switched to that of a hoax after it was discovered that it wasn't a real bomb.

    And be honest with yourself, a big red digital display with a bunch of loose wires in a brief-case looking box is awful like a Hollywood-style representation of a bomb.

    There are a bunch of kids we could probably arrest for being hackers because they match the Hollywood-style representation of a hacker. I don't know why adults are not held to the standard of knowing that reality is different than TV.

    Everyone jumped to play the race and religion cards and try and paint the teachers and police as idiots and bigots

    Because many of us are pretty sure we (if not muslim looking) could have (and did) bring/make similar looking things to school without issue.

    , but in my mind, they were probably acting responsibly and erring on the side of caution to protect the rest of their students, just in case.

    I don't think it's reasonable or responsible to assume that a bunch of electronics is a bomb, any more than it is reasonable or responsible to assume that a cell phone is an IED detonator.

    “This wouldn’t have happened if Ahmed were white,” they say.

    I agree

    We’re supposed to be sensitive to school violence, but apparently religious and racial sensitivity trumps that.

    You can and should be sensitive to school violence. You should also know your own limitations in discerning the credibility of potential threats. And if your sensitivity to potential bombs is heavily affected by the way the the kid holding the bomb looks or what his name is, then you are probably a bigot. Just like if your sensitivity to gang violence causes you to only suspect blacks and mexicans, you are still a racist even if you hide your racism behind the pretense of violence mitigation.

    At least we have another clue about how the sensitivity and moral outrage pecking order lies.

    When non-muslim looking/named kids start being suspected of making bombs simply for being interested in electronics, then maybe the conversation will be different.

    Kudos for figuring out that the clock was actually just an existing clock taken out of it's original housing. But to me this illustrates even more how ridiculous it is to overreact to this "bomb". Maybe we need the teachers to be trained on "what the insides of common things look like", so they don't need to freak out that something is a bomb just because it's not in it's original housing.

    I don't want to fault people for being cautious in dealing with a potential bomb. I am criticizing people for being incompetent and racist in their method of determining which potential bombs are credible.

    1. Re:My 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Slashdot get so sensitive about religion? Holy cow (pardon)

    2. Re:My 2 cents by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I don't know why adults are not held to the standard of knowing that reality is different than TV.

      Well, it seems that the cops took their training from Keystone so it's entirely reasonable that they judge bombs based on the best efforts of Holywood too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:My 2 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://boingboing.net/2008/09/...

      They would have killed someone for wearing leds into an airport. Research.

  35. This is not news by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Not that it matters, but in the first article that I read on this story when it first happened it said exactly this, that he took apart an old clock and reassembled it.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  36. Plan B, business school ... by MacTO · · Score: 1

    I honestly cannot see a downside to this hoax. Plan A, set yourself up for a future in engineering. Plan B, if the hoax is discovered, set yourself up for a future in business school.

    More seriously though, a lot of people were sympathetic to the headlines because it mirrors our own fears. At least, that was the case for me. I'm the type of person who mails my neatly packed and disconnected electronic components ahead of me whenever I have to fly somewhere. Why? Because the risk of having some ill informed airport security agent misinterpreting my hobby is too risky. Heck, I've been questioned about not-so-common (but equally not-so-uncommon) consumer electronics, such as graphics tablets. Now I wouldn't go so far as being afraid about bringing my electronics projects to school, but: (a) I'm an adult who has had background checks to work within public schools, and (b) my skin is the perfect shade to be unsuspicious (i.e. not brown, nor pasty).

    1. Re:Plan B, business school ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . I'm the type of person who mails my neatly packed and disconnected electronic components ahead of me whenever I have to fly somewhere. Why? Because the risk of having some ill informed airport security agent misinterpreting my hobby is too risky.

      Aren't you concerned that in this day and age, they'll be intercepted and blown to pieces by some bomb robot? After all, it could be interpreted as a mail bomb, those contain electronics, ya know...

  37. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by Megane · · Score: 1

    and made a small change

    That's the point. He didn't even make a small change. Unless you count stuffing it into another box as a "change". That's literally all he did. And people are acting like he's some kind of super genius whiz kid for doing that.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  38. I Has Skillz by AMMalena · · Score: 1

    He put an existing clock into a different case.

    I need to be on the FBI's watchlist. I can (gasp) assemble a computer from parts. I can also (don't tell anyone!) install the OS, and use it. I better now share any other skillz I has. :-P

    --
    AMMalena (www.Malena.net) "The avalanche has already begun. It is too late for the pebbles to vote." (Kosh, B5)
  39. Hide the ball, AKA /. jumps the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it hilarious that a community that prides itself on the supposed intelligence of its userbase not only published a piece so obviously designed to obscure the real issues while pushing a blatantly racist right-wing agenda.

    The fact that so many here have taken the bait and gotten on board with the ridiculous "it was a hoax perpetrated by the left wing media" line just because this 13 year old kid didn't solder his own ICs is mind boggling.

    The kid was frog-marched out of his school in handcuffs because he had a clock repackaged in a pencil case and his name is Ahmed Mohammed. That is the story. All of it.

  40. Speculation it was intended to look bomb-like by steveha · · Score: 2

    The fine article contains some speculation as to whether it was really intended to be a clock, because it's a poor design for a clock:

    It's awful hard to see the clock with the case closed. On the other hand, with the case open, it's awful dangerous to have an exposed power transformer sitting near the snooze button

    Well, that makes me wonder if the kid who made the clock mounted the display to be viewed with the case open, or if he cut a hole in the side of the pencil box and mounted the display to be viewed the other way.

    Someone familiar with how LED clock displays look from the front and from the back: can you tell which way the clock display was mounted? Was it in fact mounted such that you can't read the time without opening the case?

    If you really can't read the clock without opening the case, then it really is an odd design for a clock. If form follows function, then what indeed was the intended function?

    I'm wondering how often the kid brought other projects to school, and what the other projects were. I can well imagine a kid that age making a fake bomb to troll everyone, but I can also imagine someone who is just a hobbyist, so I am not going to draw any conclusions here at all.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Speculation it was intended to look bomb-like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    So are we just ignoring the fact that the father is a Muslim activist and blames Republicans? He also shows up at churches with the Koran and disrupts. This was a clear provocation. Just like Charlie Hebdo and the Texas cartoon contest, a reaction was not only expected but inevitable. At least nobody died this time.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  42. was I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reading the article.. it seems that his "clock" was in fact fabricated. alongside that, but the "police" photo looked identical to the one that was from the manufacturer's website... ?!?

    this seems like it was a "fake" story in regards to what is on the national news.. am I wrong?

  43. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    OK if a $color kid brought in a suitcase with wires sticking out, which he plugged in and it making a noise and then refused to answer questions what is was exactly, I suspect he would have received the similar treatment.

    Yes, that's right.

    But reason and perspective don't feel nearly as good as finally finding them some "backlash".

  44. has anybody on Slashdot ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... realized yet that his father is an activist? Ran twice for president of Sudan (from the US!)? Debated that FL pastor who burned a koran?

    I knew this was too "perfect" the first whiff of it I got, and the more details come out, the more right I was.

    1. Re:has anybody on Slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true, his father ran for president (though never got on the ballot). You might be interested to learn that his platform included legalizing apostasy from Islam.

    2. Re:has anybody on Slashdot ... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      ... realized yet that his father is an activist? Ran twice for president of Sudan (from the US!)? Debated that FL pastor who burned a koran?

      I knew this was too "perfect" the first whiff of it I got, and the more details come out, the more right I was.

      ran for president of Sudan, on a moderate Islamic platform (with no hope of winning, just to make a statement). including the platform that people should be allowed to convert AWAY FROM Islam if they want to.
      As for the pastor thing; Hell, I'd debate that asshole pastor if I was offered the chance. You're backing the wrong horse there buddy.
      And, you must have missed in your deep and extensive research, he is big in a Sufi sect. You and your buddies might need to google that.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  45. Minority easy street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened is that a muslim was mistakenly profiled as a potential terrorist and now the apologists are lining up to make amendments by hailing him as a hero and a genius, offering him college scholarships and arranging a meeting with the president. If anything this just shows how pathetic western civilizations are when faced with any hint of racism accusations and the muslims in particular. If it were a white kid, noone would give a flying fuck about what happened to him.

  46. Electrocution hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Children should be strongly discouraged from doing anything remotely like Ahmed did with this clock. You should *never* disassemble or modify a mains-powered appliance. In the photo you can clearly see the stepdown transformer just laying loose in the box, and the box has metal all around it. It is a very dangerous electrocution and fire hazard. And I second what has been stated technically here, which is that he pulled the guts out of a clock and stuffed them into some other enclosure (which is what I've said in the previous two stories about this).

  47. Why is this an issue? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    I had expected a bit more of an example of technical ability, Its pretty obvious he just took a retail alarm clock and pulled it out of its case. But he is just a kid, I know that's basically how I started out. A clock or some other electronic device would stop working or its backup battery wouldn't function so I would pull it apart, I usually just put it back in its original case after (attempting) to fix it instead of wasting a perfectly good storage case. That said I don't see why this is an issue, the kids technical abilities aren't all that important, the knowledge and competence of school and police officials is. The second you open the case its obvious to anyone above a 4th grade comprehension level that its not a bomb, why they would pursue the matter with apparently no evidence of malicious intent is very troubling.

    1. Re:Why is this an issue? by x0ra · · Score: 1

      before being debunked he's a genius, and after, he just a kid. yeah... the excuse machine is on.

  48. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    But to the cop, this visit to the school was the most interesting part of his week so far. So maybe he wanted to spend a few more hours browbeating this kid and seeing if he could get a confession.

  49. Don't forget Geoffrey McGann, TSAed for watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/17/geoffrey-mcgann-arrest-oakland-airport_n_2149963.html
      arrrested at airport for watch with toggle switches http://www.geoffmcgann.com/design-photo-product/#/product/ Also , Ahmed's father is activist. They are Sufi Moslems, the most liberal, almost like Unitarian Universalist Christians in doctrinal liberality. The video of the police said he was handcuffed "for his own protection". Enjoy your internet.

  50. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected...

  51. Fake switchblade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so say my teenage boy takes a comb/switchblade to school. Suspended? Ya, likely. Arrested? Depends. Clock/bomb? Ya likely. Any difference? Nope.

      I'd put money that this kid was race baiting, as he went and showed the 2nd teacher.

  52. I liked the Charle Hebdo cartoons by huckamania · · Score: 4, Informative

    And the Danish cartoons and the cartoons drawn in Garland.

    You can call me Islamaphobic, but that doesn't mean there aren't muslims willing to kill me over a cartoon.

    1. Re:I liked the Charle Hebdo cartoons by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      Liking Charle Hebdo, Danish cartoons and Garland, does not make you islamaphobic. But assuming a brown kid with some wires and circuit is holding a bomb (and you decide not to evacuate, but still charge the kid with making a hoax bomb, force him to write a statement with the threat of expulsion, and deprive him of access to his parents while in your custody) does however.

    2. Re:I liked the Charle Hebdo cartoons by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

      Huckamania is far more likely to die of heart disease, drunk driving, etc. Shit, you're probably more likely to die from a christian terrorist than a muslim one. Don't walk past any abortion clinics by accident.... If you're really worried about muslims willing to kill you over a cartoon (which I doubt you even draw), you should be SUPER worried about that guy on the street corner willing to kill you for your wallet. He's far more real and far more present. Which is to say, not at all....

      Are you THAT afraid of something that's so obviously overblown and sensationalized?

  53. It has nothing to do with him being brown. by ArylAkamov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get ready for a wall of text. All of this happened in a small town in Washington state, for reference.

    I've had similar things happen to me for dicking about with electronics and I'm as white as you can get.

    I had my desk and backpack searched in grade school because "some kids" reported me to the principal talking about fireworks (It was July) and told him I was looking up bombs on the computers (Electromagnets are apparently bombs). Of course I had random PCBs from shit I took apart in my backpack and that was damning enough evidence to call my parents and suspend me for a week (For "Disrupting the learning environment, a copout term when you piss off school administration but technically didn't break any rules). Cops were threatened but weren't called.

    I was also (Without my parents knowledge) placed into a "special" class, consisting mostly of the "slow" kids where we got to talk about our feelings (By pointing to an expression on a plush cube). This was run by the school counselor.

    According to her it was wrong to enjoy the things I enjoyed at the time (Average kid stuff for the most part. Drawing guns, playing video games, playing with soldering irons). I learned a few years ago after talking with my parents that she literally told them that I would be the next "Columbine kid" if they didn't put me on drugs to "fix" me (They didn't).

    Same thing in middle school, again was looking up AVR tutorials in the library and a number of kids would come up behind me and yell out "IS THAT A BOMB!?" and variations of that. Again, all of my stuff searched, escorted by security, etc. Suspended for a few days for "abusing school computer privileges" because "School computers are not for learning whatever you want, your activities must relate to classwork".

    In highschool I finally got a break, amazing teacher who had a back room lined with soldering irons and breadboards. We even started a F.I.R.S.T. robotics team before I graduated.

    So please, don't give me bullshit about this only happening because of the color of his skin. Blame the school's lack of understanding and zero tolerance policies. Blame the culture of fear in this country, don't buy into this stereotypical "LOOK! LOOK! AMERICANS ARE RACIST" crap.

    If anything, I would bet the only reason this story has taken off is because he was brown and race politics are all the rage these days.

    There are a lot more victims of "Zero tolerance" policies than what you see in the news, stories like this and the poptart gun kid are more common than most people think.

    1. Re:It has nothing to do with him being brown. by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      I had my desk and backpack searched in grade school because "some kids" reported me to the principal talking about fireworks (It was July) and told him I was looking up bombs on the computers (Electromagnets are apparently bombs). Of course I had random PCBs from shit I took apart in my backpack and that was damning enough evidence to call my parents and suspend me for a week (For "Disrupting the learning environment, a copout term when you piss off school administration but technically didn't break any rules). Cops were threatened but weren't called.

      Exactly: cops were not called. You weren't handcuffed, you weren't perp-walked in front of your classmates, and you weren't interrogated for hours without getting one of your parents.

      So, yeah, being brown and Muslim might have something to do with the batshit crazy freakout from the school and PD.

    2. Re:It has nothing to do with him being brown. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have quite a history of kids across schools accusing you of looking up information about bombs.

      And none of being arrested and denied proper procedure.

  54. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by rhysweatherley · · Score: 1

    So are we just ignoring the fact that the father is a Muslim activist and blames Republicans? He also shows up at churches with the Koran and disrupts. This was a clear provocation. Just like Charlie Hebdo and the Texas cartoon contest, a reaction was not only expected but inevitable. At least nobody died this time.

    And my father is a Christian preacher. Seriously? Sins of the father? That's what you think is the most important issue to discuss right now? And not that the kind of people who judge based on the sins of the father are the actual real problem that caused this mess in the first place.

  55. If you see something, say something by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the teachers/cops thought the box was a credible threat, the school would have been evacuated and the bomb squad called in, they do the evacuation part even if they think it is a prank call. Neither action was taken here, yet they had physical 'evidence' of the bomb. To me this indicates they thought the kid was being a smart-arse and gave him the "scare the naughty boy" routine. The only thing different about the millions of other kids around the world who have received a traditional "official scare," is that this time it backfired on the officials. Which IMO is a good thing, since the practice does nothing but stamp the "might is right" message on its hapless victims.

    The odd thing here is that one teacher knew he had the clock and it knew was harmless, that teacher "saw something", why did he not speak up when the others thought it was a "credible threat"?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:If you see something, say something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the teachers/cops thought the box was a credible threat, the school would have been evacuated and the bomb squad called in

      BULLSHIT! The teachers don't make that call, the Police do. Any other kid doing the same thing would have resulted in the cops being called. The kid would be detained just like this one, while the cops would try to figure out what the device is. We have kids that are being handcuffed, jailed, and expelled from schools for having toys, pointing with their finger and saying "bang", and biting food into what someone thinks is the shape of a gun. The overwhelming majority of these kids are white, so this is not an issue of discrimination.

      Now what happens after the cops get on scene and detain the kid? They look and notice there is no explosive in the box, just wire and circuit. They realize they don't need to bring in the bomb squad and containment trailer, but that does not mean they can just let the kid go. They have to find out what the thing is, they have to find out if it's against the law or in any way criminal. They did just that while the kid was handcuffed. They didn't beat him, they didn't pepper spray him, throw him in jail, slap him around or waffle him, they did their due diligence.

      Stop being an apologist for every damn thing and use your head. I realize that is hard to do, and that you have had a good amount of brain washing to ensure you believe everything done to a non-white is purely because of "discrimination!" . I realize you believe that only whites can be bad. Read some Dinesh D'Souza and get a different perspective from a non-white.

      If you really want to be pissed off at people, then be pissed off at the politicians who keep pushing for "see something say something" and fear mongering. Be pissed off at school faculty and administration that have taken things to such extremes. Be pissed at the parents who believe the FUD and push schools to this zero tolerance for everything mindset.

    2. Re:If you see something, say something by dbIII · · Score: 1

      why did he not speak up when the others thought it was a "credible threat"?

      We don't know if they did and were ignored or shouted down or if they kept quiet. Once the egos of people who see themselves as more important than their jobs get into the picture the mere mortals tend to fade into the background.

    3. Re:If you see something, say something by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      If the teachers/cops thought the box was a credible threat, the school would have been evacuated and the bomb squad called in, ...

      Apparently they didn't believe that it might be a bomb, but they did believe that it was a bomb hoax. A bomb hoax is illegal, because a good bomb hoax would lead to a costly evacuation. A bad bomb hoax wouldn't.

      Now you can argue whether this was a bomb hoax or not, but if it was a bomb hoax and they figured out it wasn't actually a bomb, then the bomb hoax is itself still punishable.

    4. Re:If you see something, say something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The engineering teacher was probably not notified. He probably did not know until after the fact. The police "experts" thought it looked like a "movie bomb". This event is another collection of poor choices culminating in lots of people getting upset and a small few whole have been more than just inconvenienced.

    5. Re:If you see something, say something by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      A bomb hoax would presumably involve deliberately causing some indication that there might be a bomb. The kid showed the clock to his engineering teacher, and then kept it in his backpack until the alarm went off and his English teacher ordered him to open his backpack. I see no intent to create a hoax bomb.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  56. Wow. Really Fucking Sad. by PvtVoid · · Score: 1

    I gotta say, after sampling the noxious comments on this story, I feel really sad. Even the geeks, who should be siding with this poor kid, are jumping all over each other to paste him with partisan talking points.

    He's a kid who was excited about technology and wanted to show his teacher. Now look.

    1. Re:Wow. Really Fucking Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe people are just tired about everything being tied to race. People aren't talking about makers/tinkerers/etc being targered. It's all about race/religion/skin. Most tech types I've seen argue against are arguing that the wrong aspects are being looked at.

    2. Re:Wow. Really Fucking Sad. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck are you to tell other what to think ? You're not Righteous.

  57. Play is a legitimate activity by cohomology · · Score: 2

    I'm surprised by comments that Ahmed "just" took things apart and put them together. Do you remember getting your first chemistry set, or bicycle, or learning how switches work? I'll bet that you tried things out, many times.

    If you played basketball, I bet you went out to shoot baskets, just because you could.

    If you took shop class, did you invent wood, or drills, or nails? I bet you did things that somebody showed you.

    If you played a musical instrument, I bet you played the same practice pieces over and over.

    Those activities are "play" and most mammals do that. They practice their skills, even if they are not immediately needed to survive. That is a developmentally appropriate thing to do! There are parts of your brain that are not wired up to the rational, language using parts, and those parts need to develop.

    I don't care if all Ahmed did was take something apart and put it together again. That was encouraged in me, and I hope it will be encouraged in others.

    --
    Don't mess with The Phone Company. Piss them off and you'll be using two tin cans and a piece of string.
  58. Fake story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is another fake story be our evil government. I'll bet the kid, his family and the school are in on it. This is another hoax like Sandy Hook.

  59. Nor was there ever a hint that it was a hoax. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Ahmed never said it was a bomb, never joked about it being a bomb. So all this hoax talk is a non-sequitur. "But but but it could have been a bomb" - what did the Boston Marathon Bombers drop off their pressure cookers in, again? Yet schools didn't ban backpacks.

  60. Opinions are like assholes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody has one.

    .

    But some people (such as "the linked "analysis") seem to offer an opinion for purposes of fame rather that educational discussion.

  61. According to the current account, he didn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current story is that it started beeping in a different class, and he was made to show the teacher what it was. But the device as we see it has no way to beep, unless it was plugged into the mains. The 9volt battery snap on these old LED alarm clocks powers the battery back-up, which allows the clock to keep time while the power is out, but not run the display or the alarm.

    Which brings me to an important thing - the first teacher to see that device should have impounded it, and given the child an important lesson about electrical safety!

  62. What really happened .. by nickweller · · Score: 1

    'The linked analysis posits that Ahmed's clock started out as another clock, rather than a box of parts, and Ahmed can be said to have repackaged rather than "invented" a wholly new clock, but acknowledges that "none of us were there and knows what happened."'

    What really happened was in this politicly correct day-and-age the teachers were desperate to not really get fired ..

  63. How did the alarm go off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those old wall clocks were wall powered with battery for backup (which also appears non existent).

    1. Re: How did the alarm go off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore my reference to "wall" ... Dunno what I was thinking.

  64. Get some perspective by slincolne · · Score: 1
    Ahmed took an old clock, repackaged it in a different enclosure, got it working and took it to school to show off

    Sorry - but the worst label you could put on him is a designer - and having seen the Apple 1 I think he did a better job than Jobs and 'Woz when they were much older so get a grip.

    If I cam across someone of his age doing what he did - i'd stop and happily give him some time and encouragement. There's every possibility that he could turn out something fantastic in his future - as long as the US education system does not beat his desire to tinker out of him. You really have to question the intellect and ability of the teachers who escalated this, and the police who thought handcuffs were justified.

    Or has the USA reached such a low point that a balloon with the word 'bomb' written on it would spook everyone?

    America - the rest of the world is ROTFLMAO over this

  65. I think he's faking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems an easy way to setup law enforcement for a hearty lawsuit, knowing how they overreact to everything these days. He didn't "BUILD" a clock, he just took one apart and moved it into a pencil box. Many ten year olds could do this. He showed it to everyone knowing someone would freak. He refused to talk and explain things to the police, thus insuring his arrest. Now we've got media attention, donations from bleeding hearts, all kinds of attention, possible scholarships, and even a promised trip to the white house. I wouldn't be surprised if there were adults involved who helped him plan this out. Easy money.

    1. Re:I think he's faking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the Time Warner kids who put up what was basically "lite brites" around the city hanging from bridges? Even the bomb squad professionals could not tell a lite brite with batteries from a real bomb. The cops practically shut down the entire city in a panic over it, and in the end they crucified the two lunkheads who made and hung up the signs. Easy to freak out LE these days, and many are realizing they can do it for profit.

  66. More clues that he's the muslim bubble boy by JoeyRox · · Score: 0

    The more information that leaks the clearer it becomes that this was a planned hoax to achieve exactly the outcome that it did. To wit:

    1) Ahmed claimed he invented the clock - now we know he simply repackaged it.
    2) Mark Cuban on Bill Maher's show said that he spoke with multiple individuals in the school district (Cuban lives in Dallas) and they claimed that Ahmed took it upon himself to take his "invention" out of his bag in every one of his classes and it was only in the 6th class that a teacher became suspicious, in English clash.
    3) That teacher repeatedly asked Ahmed to explain what his invention was and to put it away and Ahmed failed to engage and respond to the teacher.
    4) Mark Cuban had a long conversation with Ahmed on the phone and said he could hear Ahmed's sister advising him how to respond to each of Marks' questions as he asked them
    5) New stores leaking imply that Ahmed's parents are muslim activists, although there is weak confirmation of this.

    1. Re:More clues that he's the muslim bubble boy by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The more information that leaks the clearer it becomes that this was a planned hoax to achieve exactly the outcome that it did

      Wow - a master manipulator at such a young age! If your fantasy is true he really did deserve a trip to the White House.

      they claimed that Ahmed took it upon himself to take his "invention" out of his bag in every one of his classes

      Ever noticed that kids like to show off in front of other kids?

    2. Re:More clues that he's the muslim bubble boy by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      I see kids do this all the time... manipulate people, they do it to adults and other kids. One kid will start doing something annoying to piss off another, then will act innocent "I was just doing xxxxx" full well knowing it would piss the other one off. You would have to be pretty stupid to being a crappy clock to school, it's not going to impress anyone, so he can claim "it's just a clock", he's either stupid or trolling.

    3. Re:More clues that he's the muslim bubble boy by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      It's not the child who masterminded the hoax, the same as it was with balloon boy.

    4. Re:More clues that he's the muslim bubble boy by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Oh, a conspiracy! Who is behind it this time?

      could hear Ahmed's sister advising him how to respond to each of Marks' questions as he asked them

      In the situation of small child versus Mark Cuban you think the small child should not be allowed help? Of course he was coached in that situation. If you had a kid that age would you leave them to fend for themselves against a journalist?

    5. Re:More clues that he's the muslim bubble boy by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      If I had a small kid I wouldn't parade him on national TV multiple times. Think a little bit deeper about this one.

  67. He Built The First Half of a Bomb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mohamed said "I built the clock to impress my teacher. But he didn't "build" anything. Instead he took a working alarm clock out of it's cabinet and mounted the components into a pencil case (a small briefcase). Because he omitted a single step (he neither tied a detonator to the clock alarm wires nor packed the briefcase with explosives/shrapnel) it legally/formally is not a bomb. But it likely could be made a bomb in minutes.

    He spoke of it as an "invention" but he almost undoubtedly knows better. I would never have spoken of such a device as an "invention" at the age of 10, much less 14 - to me it would have been "a disassembled clock" and no "invention" at all. Mohamed's English is too good for him to not know the true meaning of "invention".

    Considering that Mohamed's father is a fervent islamist and after reading fuller accounts of the incident such as the article linked to above, it appears to me, at this time, that the authorities were probably correct and that Mohamed and his father are likely guilty of an attempted bomb hoax.

  68. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to police reports, all he said was "It's a clock" - in response to ALL questions.

    Police: What is this?
    Ahmed: It's a clock.
    Police: Why is it this case?
    Ahmed: It's a clock.
    Police: Why did you bring it to school?
    Ahmed: It's a clock.

    See? Being uncooperative will get you arrested for even the silliest accusations, because you aren't actually defending yourself from them. Just imagine, if he had actually bothered to explain what he supposedly did and why, so that there was the opportunity for the people in authority to make reasonable decisions.
    But in this case, he was arrested by default, because he was accused of something and didn't explain.

  69. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok hes not a genius

    but its not like you did it either

  70. Ahmed's Father by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahmed's Father: Hey Ahmed, look what I found. An old digital clock.
    Ahmed: Cool.

    Ahmed's Father: It would be funny if you made it into a vest and wore it to school.
    Ahmed: Nah.

    Ahmed's Father: How about a shoe?
    Ahmed: Nah.

    Ahmed's Father: Hmmm... Put it into a pencil suitcase?
    Ahmed: Awesome! You're the best, dad.

  71. does this lad have a history? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something else to consider is this kid's history. Is he a prankster? Or, has he shown anti-social behavior, written long rambling notes about how he'd like to kill the teachers and other students? Is he on anti-psychotic drugs? The schools keep records on that kind of stuff, they should know.

    If he had no troubled history, there was no reason to think he'd suddenly turned into an angry, dangerous teen, and was about to enact a murder-suicide revenge fantasy. The school's reaction was way over the top, and cowardly.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:does this lad have a history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because all of those things were true for the various school kid massacres? Was handcuffing too much? I don't know, does it match how they treat kids who bring toy guns in to school, and even turn themselves in if they did it on accident? In other words, Schools are overly paranoid, Police are overly paranoid, all because some parents are overly paranoid.

    2. Re:does this lad have a history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh cmon. The news has long taught us that those mass murderers are always the quite ones nobody ever suspects or the ones with like minded confederate flag waving friends. I think its time to start getting serious about crime by simple executing everyone.

    3. Re:does this lad have a history? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Something else to consider is this kid's history. Is he a prankster? Or, has he shown anti-social behavior, written long rambling notes about how he'd like to kill the teachers and other students? Is he on anti-psychotic drugs? The schools keep records on that kind of stuff, they should know.

      If he had no troubled history, there was no reason to think he'd suddenly turned into an angry, dangerous teen, and was about to enact a murder-suicide revenge fantasy. The school's reaction was way over the top, and cowardly.

      Has he denied being a member of the Communist Party? Is he still silent on the Black Dahlia murder of 1947? Has anyone actually heard him denounce the KKK?

      Plenty of questions remain unanswered.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  72. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But in this case, he was arrested by default, because he was accused of something and didn't explain.

    The default is to not arrest somebody.

    Furthermore, he did explain. It's a clock. That is a valid answer to all those questions.

  73. no lawsuit win for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He and his parents stand zero chance of winning any lawsuit.

    Why, because Texas is the land of Jesus, Guns and Football!

  74. taquiyaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    taquiyaa.

    nuf sed

    1. Re: taquiyaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolling. Quite a good troll too.

  75. Idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adults should be smart enough not to drink and drive, adults should be smart enough not to give personal information to someone over the phone, adults should be smart enough to study politicians before voting for them, adults should be smart enough not to use real names when signing up for sites promoting and assisting with infidelity, adults should be smart enough to know that Gambling favors the house every time, adults should be smart enough to use protection to reduce the chances of contracting and spreading diseases, but countless adults do just that.

    Very few people have actual experience with explosives in fact. I'm betting you really are not that much smarter, just that you feel guilty because this guy was Arabic and of course it's only them white kids that blow up schools and commit mass murder right?

    It's really odd that so many people defend the actions when it's white kids with Nerf Guns and Pop-Tarts expelled from school, you know.. we can't take the risk and zero tolerance means zero tolerance. But when it's a Muslim we are supposed to be hands off? You are simply an apologist.

  76. part of american nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me regular americans seem like hardworking, business minded people. But america as a country seems to have a problem when it comes to trust. As a european tourist i feel myself treated as a terrorist upon entering the US. When u treath someone as X, it is possible that they will become X; in any case u probably won`t many friends. Security is good, distrust and maybe paranoia not. Media, gun control, respect, education, employment are important in a broader sense. As a said before, american people are fine, but u need mutual trust.

  77. Wrong. by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    When there is a bomb scare, you don't evacuate the school. Since as early as the 50's we've known that you should Duck... and Cover!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Wrong. by karbonforms · · Score: 1

      +1 to your explosives skill!

  78. Says more about awful US culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How could anyone not tell the difference between the parts of a disassembled clock, and a bomb. I don't believe for a minute that US teachers are really this stupid. The teacher concerned was likely just a vindictive individual, probably with some kind of personal dislike to this particular child. For what reasons, who knows. I think that that school will now have to seriously look at disciplining or sacking that teacher.
    Really, it's pretty unlikely that some kid is going to come to school with a bomb - particularly one that can do serious damage. I know that America is not as safe as more developed and civilised countries, and I'd certainly never bring up my children in such a terrible country, but violence with seriously offensive weapons is still quite unlikely even there.
    This story also underlines the rotten state of the media in America. Nothing like spreading stories about bombs, whether they are real or not, to keep the population living in fear.

  79. Art voice 'analysis' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remarkable analysis? You mean complete lack of appreciation of the fact that for a fourteen year geek, repackaging IS inventing, just as for many fourteen year olds, writing about lovelorn teenage vampires is becoming an 'author'.

  80. Plenty of Blame to Go Around by Quantam · · Score: 2

    The article makes some good points and some not so good points. Here's the TL;DR version of this whole affair as best anyone can tell from the evidence so far:
    - Ahmed brought disassembled clock to school for show and tell
    - Ahmed never claimed it was a bomb
    - Neither the school nor police actually thought it was a bomb (if they had, the entire event would have gone down much more dramatically)
    - Given that, it's entirely possible the whole affair was racially motivated (or some idiotic zero-tolerance thing where they thought scaring him would teach him a lesson)
    - Ahmed did not build the clock in question, he merely disassembled a store bought clock
    - Ahmed is a fledgling tinkerer and may have a productive career in engineering when he grows up...if he doesn't crack from the pressure of being a world-renowned boy genius and shining jewel of Muslim-Americans
    - Disassembling a clock at 13 does not a boy genius make. Even building a clock from a microcontroller at 13, while nothing to sneeze at, would fall short of the title of "genius".
    - Obama's presidency will be ending soon, but the memories (and pictures/videos) of him inviting a kid that disassembled a clock to the White House are forever

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
  81. Try that here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A school kid would be arrested if he did that here. We no longer live in a time where you can take a box of electronics which looks like a bomb in to a public place. Did he tell the teacher? No. How did he teacher find it? When it started beeping. Right. This kid needs a swift kick up the ass or a night in a cell. If this kid tried this stunt here he would be suspended. Meeting the leader of the country for this? Now we know things are out of control.

  82. build your own, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to make "the Clock" yourself .
    http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2015/09/17/reverse-engineering-ahmed-mohameds-clock-and-ourselves/
    http://www.amazon.com/Vaultz-Locking-Pencil-Inches-VZ01479/dp/B001BXZ28K
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/MICRONTA-Large-Red-Display-Digital-Alarm-Clock-w-Battery-Backup-63-765A-VINTAGE/291565559523

  83. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by Quantam · · Score: 1

    Really I think the reason people are putting him down is because a lot of the maker community immediately jumped to his defense, then felt deceived when they learned he hadn't even made the thing himself. Of course this response is directed at the wrong party - the ones who were deceptive was not Ahmed but the media that blew the whole story enormously out of proportion and made him look like a boy genius. Nevertheless, feelz.

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
  84. What do you do when you think there is a bomb by theCzechGuy · · Score: 1

    I don't get any of this. Any school I ever was in got evacuated if there was even slightest suspicion that there is anything explosive inside and a bomb squad got called in. This school just carried on with the classes while the boy was locked in a room with his clock. So these "erring on the side of the cation" arguments must be wrong too.

  85. I invented first ever bubble radar when I was 12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I invented first ever bubble radar when I was 12.

    I was ever so proud.

    I somehow managed to perforate a jam jar lid, mount a lamp in the middle and put the leads through water and connect the circuit to a battery.
    The water bubbled and the radar shines like no other radar ever did producing bubble of gas as it churned away.

    Does it require an in depth analysis as what this writer troll did?

  86. Bad Repackaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many Muslim bomb makers out there... a muslim kid repackages a clock in a briefcase.

    I think it is perfectly reasonable to question the motive for building such a device. Certainly, a clock can and has been used as a trigger for bombs.

    Nothing wrong with questioning it at all - if nothing is found, it's all good and well. Life goes on.

    What the hell is the president wasting his time on a non-issue? Does he have nothing better to focus on? Government needs a thorough cleansing - just too many career politicians spinning wheels for money.

  87. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First projects should be celebrated even if minor

    Sure. But by the whole fucking world? You do realize that this is international news because the media had a selling point (the kid was brown! omigosh don't you feel bad?!)

    Had the kid not been a Muslim this would not have been blown up the way it did.

  88. Kid was trolling by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    He knew his repackaged clock would get a reaction. Did I tear stuff apart as a kid? Yeah when I was in elementary school. by high school I was tearing apart different broken things to make a working thing... Obviously he was seeking attention.

  89. The real issue is the failure of the adults involv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look at it: It had several of the necessary components of a scary-looking movie bomb, like wires and power-hungry LEDs. For all we know, when you turned it on it probably started counting down seconds until the detonation time.

    Seriously, this is more a testament to the idiocy of the adults that looked at it than the genius of a 14-year old. It's not even close to being a good fake movie bomb. There's no block of something that looks like C-4 with blasting caps that could be pulled out easily or otherwise rendered harmless just by cutting the wires, and no schematic somewhere that could uncovered and interpreted by someone over the phone to some colorblind sweaty guy with wire cutters to disarm it at the last possible second. I bet the kid didn't have a troubled back-story or even an evil laugh.

    The kid isn't a genius, but he IS trying to be creative. Kind of like Sid in Toy Story, but for electronics, and without the nastiness. The proper thing to do here was give him some guidance to focus his interests. "Hey, this is cool but it needs polish: you needs to clean up your wiring so it's not a fire hazard, and the display needs an opening so you can read it from the outside. Let me show you how to use a Dremel tool."

    Instead of becoming those fondly-remembered favorite teachers who helped him grow as an artist or electrical engineer, these will be the people who got him dragged off to the police station, made him the center of a debate about prejudice and intolerance, and kid will probably end up as something terrible - like a lawyer.

  90. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Exactly, as a kid some of my "inventions" were quite similar. But it gave me experience and encouragement and the *desire* to do something bigger and better. I was just learning how things worked. Taking something apart and transplanting it, without breaking it in the process, lets you observe all the parts inside that you need to make it work. Then you start learning about those parts, maybe replacing them with others to see what happens, taking the parts off and making them work individually, putting them together to make something else... This is all part of the learning process and some people learn more visually and more hands-on than with theory. Your first project ever as a kid won't be the most amazing thing that's for sure.

  91. Techinal S/N ratio -100dB by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

    Most reasonable people agree that some adult authority figures made serious mistakes. These mistakes suggest a combination of islamophobia, teenagemalephobia, plain old racism and technophobia. For Ahmed, our binary political rhetoric collapsed into two states and since Ahmed's accusers were wrong, then Ahmed must be right.

    I can't think of any of my science or engineering friends who would have made it through school in the 70s and 80s under such a zero tolerance system. But I do have a number of questions: Does Ahmed deserve the praise he is getting or is he merely being used as a political campaign? Put another way, if you had done something like this and Obama stood up and declared you brilliant and innocent, would you feel worthy or would you feel a tiny bit of guilt over the fact that you lie somewhere on the spectrum between guilty and genius?

    With all that has been written on Ahmed and his clock, I have a number of unanswered technical questoins:

    • What noise did it make? Was a ticking sound also part of its functionality?
    • Was the 110V cord plugged in during English class? Why?
    • Why was the briefcase/suitcase described as a pencil case? Every pencil case I've seen is large enough to hold no more than a few dozen pencils. Ahmed's seems like it could hold 1000.
    • When was the pencil case purchased? Was it a reuse of an old case or was it purchased purposely for the clock? If it was purchased for the clock, why not use a case which would allow the clock's display to be seen from the outside.
    • Cool clock? Seriously? Is assembling this really exceptional for an American kids of his age? I work with younger kids at a coderdojo, I've met kids at makeshops and science fairs. Most are capable of far more complex, interesting and scary inventions. A volcano or potato clock might even be more interesting.
    • Taking apart, reusing and "hacking" existing devices would have been far more impressive, though potentially much more illegal under DMCA and other draconian federal laws.
    • Where was Obama, the tech industry and the press when 14-year old Domanik Green's faced felony cybercrime charges instead of internships and invitations to the Whitehouse?
  92. Re:Pop Tart by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Nobody said anything about the Pop Tart gun kid.

  93. He's a kid by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    What does it matter. The kid is a little geek, all of us have been. Even if he just took apart a clock and put it back in a box, that's a good attempt to build confidence. He didn't choose to have police come to school and he didn't choose to get invited to the White House. He was just playing and making a project.

    This is it, this is the moment this whole security theatre turned from ridiculous to ridiculously stupid, again.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  94. Failure of adults here by mister_hoberman_to_y · · Score: 1

    This whole thing is a testament to a failure of the so-called adults involved rather than the genius of a 14-year-old.

    They should have immediately seen that this wasn't a bomb, or even a decent hoax. The display doesn't have enough power-hungry LED digits for a scary-looking hh:mm:ss countdown to detonation, and there isn't a block of something that looks like C-4 with blasting caps that could easily be pulled out or wire-clipped. I bet the kid didn't even have a schematic hidden somewhere that could be remotely interpreted over the phone to a sweaty colorblind guy with wire cutters who could somehow manage to disarm it anyway - but only at the last possible second.

    The kid isn't a genius; he's just an average 14-year-old trying to be creative in a Toy Story-Sid way, but for electronics instead of toys and without the nasty. The proper thing to do here wasn't to call the cops, but instead to tell him "Hey, this is pretty cool but let's make it better. Your wiring needs to be cleaned up so it's not a fire hazard, and the display needs an opening so you can see it from the outside. Ever used a Dremel?"

    But no: instead of becoming fondly-remembered teachers who helped him become an artist or electrical engineer, they called the cops and got him dragged down to the police station. Now he'll probably end up on a long slide towards a law degree.

  95. Re: firing the fake gun by hackwrench · · Score: 1
    How do you fire a fake gun? Especially one without blanks?

    Go google it up

    Doing an internet search only returns those low quality news stories.

    If misbehaving means doing something that not related to listening to the teacher, I misbehaved a lot, but that doesn't mean that it was disruptive.

  96. Re:Techinal S/N ratio -100dB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is described as a pencil case because it is one.

    Take a look at the pics with the standard 110v pronged cord next to it to get an idea of the actual size.

    The case is like 8 inches across, tops. It's just styled like a protective case, but the thing is smaller than a lunchbox.

  97. Some points to consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some points to consider:

    - The "clock" in question does look like classical time bomb. It is therefore perfectly reasonable to have the device investigated even without "islamophobia" or "racism".
    - These kind of electronic clocks have actually been used as time bombs (the signal from the buzzer cords works as the ignition trigger) in exactly this kind of briefcase configuration.
    - The kids father is sheik Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed, a known islamic apologist (to put it mildly).
    - The "islamophobia" story came out on CNN and written by Haroon Moghul, another islamic apologist.
    - We do not who actually built the "clock". After all, it does look a little bit too well made in order to be a kids project.

    So let's speculate a bit. Could it be that the kid did not actually build the "clock" but it was something he found laying around somewhere and it indeed was a timing device for an explosive? Or could it be that the kid was told to bring a bomb-looking device to school in order to trigger the "islamopohobia" outrage we are witnessing?

    In any case, this story is very fishy and is obviously blown out of proportion. Obama made a fool out of himself.

  98. University Material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'll bring a clock I had taken out of it's plastic case.... Put it in a much bigger small brief case... Bring it to school... Set it off to go in the middle of my class... For no particular reason... Than being an American Islamic attention seeking teenage turd...

    1. Re:University Material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only he didn't set the alarm to go off in the middle of class... He would not have gotten to see the President? Sounds like someone needed a school lunch with more than 500 calories and not tasting like cardboard...

  99. Clock Issues by Meniconi,Nando · · Score: 1

    The linked analysis posits that Ahmed's clock started out as another clock, rather than a box of parts, and Ahmed can be said to have repackaged rather than "invented" a wholly new clock, but acknowledges that "none of us were there and knows what happened." Yes, because the issue here is who invented the clock... Idiots.

  100. Moderates usually put down the fanatics ... by drnb · · Score: 1

    The problem is that there is a significant minority of Muslims who are willing to kill to spread or defend (including against the slightest of insults) their interpretation of Islam. Historically moderates who were quite happy to interact and trade with non-Muslims would keep these guys in check. Moderates who in fact considered these fanatics Islamic heretics. This is not my interpretation. This is how members of the Saudi royal family explained things to TE Lawrence during the first world war. According to these Muslim royals once or twice a century these heretics would rise and have to be put down by the moderates who correctly understood Islam. Lawrence was then advised to travel in Bedouin clothing with a Muslim guard because if spotted by one of these fanatics he would be killed for nothing more than being a Christian in Muslim lands, even though he was under the protection of the Saudi King in Mecca.

    Now if the billions of moderate Muslims would do something about the hundreds of thousands of fanatical heretical Muslims causing trouble, then the narrative about Muslims would change very quickly. Right now these fanatics are allowed to thrive and expand and dominate the news, to create the misperception of Islam. Its not Fox news creating this misperception, its these fanatics doing so. It would also be beneficial to moderate Muslims to do so not only to correct the public misperception but due to the fact that Muslims are far more often the victims of these fanatics than anyone else.

    A modern twist on things, some of the modern heretics in Saudi Arabia have access to oil profits and being a bit smarter than some of their peers have taken a more low key and long term approach. They have taken a path of evangelism rather than direct action. For many decades now they have used these oil profits to build mosques and madrasas and support like minded imams to promote their heretical interpretation of Islam. While these "educational" efforts are not necessarily producing fanatics who take terroristic actions they have been increasing the percentage of Muslims who while not fanatical themselves are somewhat more tolerant of fanatical interpretations of Islam, considering such interpretation old fashioned but valid rather than heretical. Tolerance for the heretics has been increasing over the decades. Admittedly still a minority opinion but a disturbing trend. A trend that should disturb and motivate moderate Muslims to actions as well.

  101. What if he tried to board an airplane? by therealbev · · Score: 1

    A person with a middle-eastern name tries to bring a ticking electronic thingy on board a plane. Does anyone actually think he wouldn't have been wrestled to the ground, possibly injured, and put on the do-not-fly list before they even figured out what the thing was? Are school administrators any smarter or less wary? The kid showed extremely poor judgment. Period. He's lucky he's still alive.

    1. Re:What if he tried to board an airplane? by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      And that is a good thing? So a Timothy McVeigh could walk on the plane with an electronic thingy, and that would be OK, but not a kid with a light brown complexion? Like I said, it is a perfect Islamophobia detector. So now in the US you are lucky if you have light brown skin, and you are caught with any type of electronic device if you aren't shot dead?

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    2. Re:What if he tried to board an airplane? by therealbev · · Score: 1

      No, it's not a good thing, but it exists. Norwegian grandmothers didn't bring down the twin towers. If you can't check everyone you have to play the odds. Humans draw conclusions from what they observe. Those conclusions aren't always correct, but they're all we have and they've kept us alive for quite a while. Until McVeigh, white guys with trucks full of fertilizer in the middle of a city didn't set off alarm bells; now they do.

      It's not Islamophobia, it's "crazy assholes who want to wipe out western civilization" -phobia. Who are the people mostly likely to be those crazy assholes? Take a guess, and NO, it's not Norwegian grandmothers.

    3. Re:What if he tried to board an airplane? by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 1

      No broad brush condemnation of whole groups, eh? No extreme paranoia about "the other", hmm? Islamophic detector indeed. You should be embarrassed, but I am sure you are not in the slightest and will defend your paranoia and smearing of a huge swath of humanity to the hilt.

      --
      A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    4. Re:What if he tried to board an airplane? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Until McVeigh, white guys with trucks full of fertilizer in the middle of a city didn't set off alarm bells;

      ...in the USA.

      In case you hadn't noticed, terrorism is not an Arab invention, and the rest of the world has had to deal with terrorists of various descents, including lily-white ones sponsored by the US.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  102. Invitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I wonder does MIT, Facebook, etc. still want to host him and reserve science-fair spots for him knowing that he didn't actually build anything but simply unscrewed the cover off the original clock and placed the loose parts in a box? Is there a chance they will respond now that they know? How did they not realize nothing was "invented" or "built" in the first place from looking at the pictures? Did they knew the whole time but saw a chance for media attention and marketing?

  103. Re: firing the fake gun by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

    .."that doesn't mean it was disruptive ".... Said every disruptive kid who just doesn't get it...

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
  104. The ONLY reson the media hales him as a "genius" by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    is to distract from the overt racism at that school, and the fact that everyone that works there, from the teachers to the administration, are bigoted, racist, religious fanatical pieces of shit.

  105. A Sad Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is sad that paranoid F-students get jobs like English teachers, Chief of Police, and the President of the US - Richard Nixon.

    I lay even money that the English teacher is gay and was upset that Ahmad refused his sexual advances, so the English teacher called the Police for help.

  106. Teaching in This Day and Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it frustrating that so much of the focus of this discussion has been on one of two things:

    1: Political and Social History of Islam and of Islam in the US including the degrees of ignorance and intolerance in this or that place.

    2: The merits of the chid's work and wether such work merits X or Y consideration given that the child may/may not be gifted and/or talented

    These are both irrelevant to the problem at hand. I will first address the inevitable barrage of "how can X be irrelevant..." and then, as simply as possible, address the idea of gifted and/or talented children and the evaluation of the work of those and other children by non-educators. The political history of an entire society and its associated religion are of no consequence to the fears that drive behavior. Most people are barely cognizant of the history of their own country and aware of little more than what the news might mention concerning that particular nation or ideology; if they are lucky, they might even know a bit about some dish or other that has become shorthand for an entire culture (think Tacos:Mexico and Ethnic Food nights). No, fears do not come from knowledge but from ignorance; however, the worst fears come from the sort of informed ignorance that makes one think they have some form of awareness with which to judge the life experience and conditions of others. Our culture has become dramatically distorted by the absurdly insular nature of the mass media outlets -what happened yesterday in a small city two states over? Nothing? Something? I would venture to guess that no one outside of a radius of a few hundred miles is aware -even within their own state. Further distortion has been caused by the hypocritical pandering by the mass media to subpopulations of all sorts seeking the more elusive than ever advertising dollar. Thus, Fox News may spout all manner of ignorance -and do so at a louder volume than any other television station; however, it is ignorance that may or may not be believed by those spouting it in what I personally consider an irresponsible manner precisely BECAUSE they are certain (they have the surveys to back it up to their advertisers) that their core audience DOES believe the particular nonsense is the truth. Think I am wrong? Ask around, George Washington did not have wooden teeth! They were Ivory stained by his, normal for the time, consumption of port wine; however, I am certain that only a modest percentage will know that or that the Battle of Bunker Hill was not fought on Bunker Hill or that when Theodor Roosevelt charged up San Juan hill, neither him nor his troopers rode horses; they had been left behind because there was no space on the ships carrying the invasion force for them. Too old? How many people in certain places still think President Obama is, all evidence to the contrary, not a natural born citizen and Muslim?

    The work of children, I am pained to say, is rarely evaluated on its proper merits by adults who are not educators. It is easy to be dismissive, as I once was, of the simplistic and repetitive nature of the material that is presented to children and the manner in which it is presented -from the point of view of an adult. In the past, I have dismissed almost all of the science presented to children in middle school as "WOW! Science" and the experiments that children perform in high school as simplistic outside of the most advanced AP and Honors classes. Moreover, even then, out of expediency, sometimes, even that is dumbed down. However, I was WRONG. Children need the exposure to wow! science and generally, cannot infer from the abstractions that may be presented, the same information as an adult. This difference is far more dramatic the more educated the adult with the added problem that it is often these adults that are asked to judge X or Y competition at the school. Taking something apart and putting it back together without pieces left over and with the original function intact is not something to be taken lightly. Looking back, I can see a

  107. Re: firing the fake gun by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Well, in my case, I was never sent to the principal's office, so there's evidence that it wasn't disruptive.

  108. Random Act of Genius?! by philmmaker · · Score: 1

    So was this for a science fair, science club, class project or did he take it upon himself to just show up one day with a suitcase clock?! And I think the authenticity of this clock project is relevant and should be objectively reviewed. And if it turns out to be dishonest then there should be further questions about the motivations behind the incident and what responsibility the parents should be held accountable for. Or do we want our children's schools to become more tolerant about suitcase clocks just showing up unannounced?

  109. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

    No, people are acting like he deserves encouragement more than handcuffs.

  110. Re: firing the fake gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love pop tarts!

  111. Re:Who read this and thought he invented something by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Did he refuse to answer what it was? Seems to me he was pretty clear that it was a clock. The only thing he refused is to say was that it was anything other than a clock.

    I can see it now "What is it? Well, it's a flat panel LED numerical display, hooked up to an IC driver, which is being run from a clock IC which is fed from a power supply which runs either off the mains via a transformer and bridge rectifier with a pi filter, or a battery powered backup which will drive the clock chip but not the display, and..."
    "???? KNOCK OFF THE GOBBLEDEGOOK KID, WHAT IS THIS THING???"

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  112. Re:First projects should be celebrated even if min by gidyn · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. His engineering is worthless unless he picked up all the atoms individually and assembled them into molecules.

  113. phones can explode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Israeli military uses them to blow people's heads off, yet kids take'em to school all the time! It's a security nightmare...

  114. My siblings gave me lots of extra credit for that by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It turns out my younger siblings had always given me more credit than I deserved for taking things apart and putting them back together - they apparently hadn't realized how few of the things I took apart were the same things that got put together (though I did reuse parts), and the things that I did successfully put back together were mostly ones I didn't aggressively disassemble. (So the vacuum-tube amp from the old record player - this was back when those were current or a bit old, as opposed to retro - did get a bunch of different things attached to it, but the dead TV mostly had parts unsoldered, back when parts were still big enough to recognize and reuse.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  115. Dissing the kid's work to defuse critics of racism by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yup. It's clearly an attempt to deflect from the obvious demonstration that there's too much racism* and Islamophobia around, as well as too much of the "Zero Tolerance - Panic About Everything" movement. Probably the most vilely opportunistic part of it I've seen was the "#HalfABomb" crowd - well, duh, a "movie set bomb" or "hoax bomb" has something that looks like a timer, and something that looks like an explosive, and maybe also some wires of different colors so Our Hero can create extra dramatic tension about which wire to cut.

    * It's probably more Islamophobia than racism, though both of those were part of it, but for instance one of the cops who shows up in the "Ahmed in NASA T-Shirt" picture is black, and the mayor of the town is a well-known Islamophobe. ( And ok, I partly emphasized racism in the Subject line because there weren't enough characters to fit Islamophobia.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  116. Custom Circuit boards vs. Breadboard by billstewart · · Score: 1

    He's doing pretty well for a 14-year-old who also hacks go-kart engines. Sure, if you're trying to build a production thing, custom circuit-boards are the way to go, but if you're doing a quick learning project, bread-boards are the way to go. From my perspective, if he'd used a project-specific circuit board, it would have looked more like one of those beginner education projects you could get from Radio Shack until they went bust (and I'm not criticizing that; I've used some of those in the past couple of years), but if he'd done that, the same crowd would also be dissing his work, because the objective is to draw attention away from how badly he was treated.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  117. Re-Branding by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Sounds more like he discovered the art of re-branding electronics... His future is bright it seems.

  118. Sarah Palin was right by pseudorand · · Score: 1

    It kills me to say this, but if the steel briefcase in the picture is the "clock," Sarah Palin was right, he was asking for it. He should consider himself lucky the cops didn't shoot him on the spot, no matter where his parents were from. Considering every major school shooting I can remember was perpetrated by white people, I'd doubt skin color is what makes school cops trigger-happy.

  119. The Cops and Teacher Failed Not Only Mohamed But J by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, allow me to untangle this web of shit, and call a spade a spade. The teacher is a racist bafoon, and the cops were A-typical Robo-Pigs incapable of offering any intelligent advice, diplomacy, or helpful mitigation tactics, and instead do what dummy cops always do when they don't know what to do.... Hauled an innocent man off to jail, because apparently the public and the innocent must are required to pay for the under-training and lack of intelligence and social skills of cops with our freedom!!!

            But lets take a step back and look at who failed this briliant young man, and where?

  120. The Cops and Teacher Failed Not Only Mohamed But J by Theindependentv · · Score: 1

    So, allow me to untangle this web of shit, and call a spade a spade. The teacher is a racist bafoon, and the cops were A-typical Robo-Pigs incapable of offering any intelligent advice, diplomacy, or helpful mitigation tactics, and instead do what dummy cops always do when they don't know what to do.... Hauled an innocent man off to jail, because apparently the public and the innocent must are required to pay for the under-training and lack of intelligence and social skills of cops with our freedom!!! But lets take a step back and look at who failed this briliant young man, and where?

  121. Failed Justice continued by Theindependentv · · Score: 1

    So, as I was saying Mohammed and justice were failed, long before the arrest ever took place. Justice had been failed long before any of the actors whom had parts in this Greek Tragedy even got up for work or school that day. Let's start with the racist and ever-so-enlightened supposed educator, whom was too stupid to realize was not a bomb, and was such a horrible coward and educator that he could not control his classroom or students well enough to conduct the simple investigation into whether a student of his had a bomb on his person or not!!! It gets no more pathetic than this loser, want-to-be educator whom felt a need to call the police and have an innocent boy arrested. And why? Because the teacher is ignorant and a coward, and so a young genius must suffer for this cowards lack of gonads or intelligence!!! What's worse is this idiot is supposedly an educator! Granted, the true bad guy here is the media, and how they portrey young Arab men... Among many other groups, which due to a clear lack of intelligence was consumed, believed, and adopted as being realistic and a possibility inside the tiny brain of this "teacher." It was these images and ideas which the media constantly broadcasts, both settley and not so settley, all the time that installed the irrational fear in the mind of some one so seseptable to irrational fears. Granted, one hopes our educators would be more intelligent and enlightended. At least enough to know better than to allow their racist fantacies of discovering a secret Alcadia sleeper cell in the 9th grade room full of barely pubecent young teenagers! If the media had not been pumpig this idiot teahers head so full of bullshit, this could had and should had been easily avoided!!!

  122. Failed Justice continued by Theindependentv · · Score: 1

    Next, the under trained Robo-pigs, whose relationship with the community, youngsters, and inability to defuse the situation by way of interjecting an authoritative voice of reason, is so freaking A-typical that this could had happened any where. Had the cops had any of the training that all modern cops seem to be lacking (Along with the social skills to enact that training), the cops could had arrived on scene, made a judgement and educated call (THAT THERE WAS NO FREAKING BOMB!), calmed the teacher and school administration down, and we would never had heard of Mohamed or his clock. But instead we get these Robo-pigs, who going off either the orders or suggestion of the school administration haul an innocent young man into jail for having a genius science project, because they themselves are idiots!!!! This is what they mean when they say "Community Policing." Had these cops had brain one in their heads, they could had defused the situation by they investigating as to whether the was a bomb or not, but they were incapable of this, and the proof is the arrest of Mohammed. Moreover, you can obviously tell that the rapore and communication between the cops and piblic is abismal to outright non-existant. The fact that the cops arrested a kid, this time for literally just being smarter than them (LITERALLY), is proof of how this kid and justice were both failed by the ignorance and lack of training of these robo-pigs!!!