You're correct, all that's been left behind is those in denial and the lesser class. The former will follow to 8chan while the latter are worthless anyway.
However, 8chan isn't doing so great itself. It might die as well.
A few years from now, people are going to look back at this as The Great Splintering. The Exodus lead to the great 4-8 split, and when both of them die, it's just going to become hundreds of small minor chans struggling to become.
And the only thing you are doing by that is purposefully offending someone.
No, it has nothing to do with offending anyone, it has to do with referring to others how I choose to refer to them, rather than the other way around. It's not about insulting people, that's only incidental. If they don't like it, well too bad, they can suck my feces.
But that doesn't make me an asshole, even if they get a brown smile.
And if [you agree with me], you'll put people into the imaginary social boxes that they want to be in instead of the imaginary social boxes you want them to be in
Well I don't agree with you, so that is that.
I will put these people into whatever "imaginary social boxes", as you call them, that I please. And as such, if I do not put her into the box she desires, she will not considered a man to me, in which case she is indeed not a man according to your very own definition.
[She] was already a man to [herself].
Certainly; but I care not of her own self image.
so the only question is whether to [agree with me] or not
What an incredible debating strategy you have there! I think I shall fuck it directly off!
Your argument fraudulently conflates "child molester" with "pedophile", and then uses that argue that LGBT positions are all immoral.
There is simply no argument in support of the currently popular pervs that does not equally apply to all other pervs, as long as somebody can claim consent was involved.
Yes, and? You may see it as a slippery slope into hell, but I see it as a positive progression towards liberty for all.
The reason to use 320x240 is because the pixels were square.
I would agree with you, except DOOM actually did use 320x200, and indeed the pixels were rectangular. It's a common problem that forks (known in DOOM circles as "source ports") face when they try to change up the rendering engine. Many of the graphics in the game were even designed with the knowledge that the screen would be stretched due to the non-square pixels, meaning that unstretching would degrade them.
320x200 has slightly rectangular pixels, but the framebuffer is linear and fits in 64KiB, which is the largest segment size that can be accesses in real mode DOS.
Yeah, except doom uses DPMI, so this doesn't even matter.
The issue with opening up the remaining bits (at least OpenCL and Vulkan) is that the drivers are cross-OS and include a lot of OS-specific bits (for other OSes than Linux) that we don't have the right to expose publicly.
Is the windows display driver API not publicly disclosed? I thought anyone could write a display driver for windows.
What if they don't own a smartphone? What if their smartphone doesn't have gyro bullshit? What if they don't have a phone or data plan, just a phone itself?
No, what they're saying is if your system has less than 16 cores you still need to pay for 16, and if you have less than 8*n cores in an n-socket systme you still need to pay as if you did.
Basically they're hiking the price on systems with many cores.
It's clear there are people exaggerating the claims or severity of sexual violence, but it's also clear that many women have participated in "real sex" that they wanted no part of, either before, during or after. That latter number is hard to pin down, but does consistently seem to be somewhere in the 10-20% range. We have to stop that.
"real sex" that they wanted no part of, either before, during or after
after
What? If they fuckin' fucked and then regretted it later, so fucking what? That's the way this shit goes, bitch. Now suck it down or I'll make you suck mine down.
2) Is other people's enjoyment of play reduced by being told to fuck their mother?
Only if the other "people" are merely worthless sacks of garbage. League is competitive; if someone tells you to fuck your mother, then you're doing it right. Don't like it? Then fuck right off, faggot. You're obviously not prepared to handle actual social interaction.
client side: $('sendButton').on('click',function(){ socket.emit('send message',msg,Dale) }); server side: socket.on('send message',function(msg,targetUser){
for(var i in sockets){
if(socket.thisuser==targetUser){socket.emit('sent msg',msg);} } });
This is all javascript, all of which will not execute because most users do not have such a thing enabled in their browsers. Did you even read my post before you started shooting raw liquid feces all over your screen?
If you want a proper setup it should be nodejs with a websocket handling data flow
A websocket to whom, the client? The client surely is not a javascript-enabled browser, since everyone with a brain in their heads disables that shit on day one.
PHP is unable to broadcast data between clients or to specific clients from another client
??????????????
Do you actually have any idea what you're talking about? This sounds completely out of touch with the web.
I think there's a mistake here. We have two different applications:
* High-bandwidth, latency-insensitive, jitter-insensitive applications, such as torrents, streams, large HTTP actions, etc.
* Low-bandwidth, latency-sensitive or jitter-sensitive applications, such as VOIP, SSH, etc.
We're trying to jam both of these into the same system and either:
a) Fuck everything, no priority because the ISP can't be trusted
b) Let the ISP prioritize whatever they please
But why? Why not just provide two lines to every user and let them decide? One high-priority low-bandwidth not-oversold line. One low-priority, high-bandwidth, oversold-as-shit line which is thus affected by peak usage, etc. Users can decide what traffic really is high priority and what traffic is garbage. Alternatively, you could provide the same oversold bandwidth to both (ugh), but cap the shit out of the high-priority line to create an incentive not to prioritize shit you don't actually need, fucker.
Thoughts?
Slashdot Mirror
I singed up for a service advertised at 39.95 my bill is 52.95 why?
Simple: fraud.
You're correct, all that's been left behind is those in denial and the lesser class. The former will follow to 8chan while the latter are worthless anyway.
However, 8chan isn't doing so great itself. It might die as well.
A few years from now, people are going to look back at this as The Great Splintering. The Exodus lead to the great 4-8 split, and when both of them die, it's just going to become hundreds of small minor chans struggling to become.
And the only thing you are doing by that is purposefully offending someone.
No, it has nothing to do with offending anyone, it has to do with referring to others how I choose to refer to them, rather than the other way around. It's not about insulting people, that's only incidental. If they don't like it, well too bad, they can suck my feces.
But that doesn't make me an asshole, even if they get a brown smile.
And if [you agree with me], you'll put people into the imaginary social boxes that they want to be in instead of the imaginary social boxes you want them to be in
Well I don't agree with you, so that is that.
I will put these people into whatever "imaginary social boxes", as you call them, that I please. And as such, if I do not put her into the box she desires, she will not considered a man to me, in which case she is indeed not a man according to your very own definition.
[She] was already a man to [herself].
Certainly; but I care not of her own self image.
so the only question is whether to [agree with me] or not
What an incredible debating strategy you have there! I think I shall fuck it directly off!
Your argument fraudulently conflates "child molester" with "pedophile", and then uses that argue that LGBT positions are all immoral.
There is simply no argument in support of the currently popular pervs that does not equally apply to all other pervs, as long as somebody can claim consent was involved.
Yes, and? You may see it as a slippery slope into hell, but I see it as a positive progression towards liberty for all.
Hint: a transgendered man is someone who was born female and now identifies as a man.
You're telling me a "transgendered man" is a woman who wishes she was a man? Now that's confusing shit, right there.
I'm getting too old for this newspeak, and I'm not even 30.
(Score:4, Insightful)
No, please.
The reason to use 320x240 is because the pixels were square.
I would agree with you, except DOOM actually did use 320x200, and indeed the pixels were rectangular. It's a common problem that forks (known in DOOM circles as "source ports") face when they try to change up the rendering engine. Many of the graphics in the game were even designed with the knowledge that the screen would be stretched due to the non-square pixels, meaning that unstretching would degrade them.
320x200 has slightly rectangular pixels, but the framebuffer is linear and fits in 64KiB, which is the largest segment size that can be accesses in real mode DOS.
Yeah, except doom uses DPMI, so this doesn't even matter.
The issue with opening up the remaining bits (at least OpenCL and Vulkan) is that the drivers are cross-OS and include a lot of OS-specific bits (for other OSes than Linux) that we don't have the right to expose publicly.
Is the windows display driver API not publicly disclosed? I thought anyone could write a display driver for windows.
What if they don't own a smartphone? What if their smartphone doesn't have gyro bullshit? What if they don't have a phone or data plan, just a phone itself?
This shit doesn't make sense.
I can't find an answer, therefore the answer is taking your guns.
Genius logic there, faggot.
There is no "answer". Terrorism is immortal.
No, what they're saying is if your system has less than 16 cores you still need to pay for 16, and if you have less than 8*n cores in an n-socket systme you still need to pay as if you did.
Basically they're hiking the price on systems with many cores.
Vote with your shotgun, people.
They are absolutely at odds with eachother, and your entire comment is entirely off base. Read the questions again:
What free speech is being limited?
You don't like the censorship?
Here's a hint for your dumb ass: "censorship" and "free speech being limited" are identical.
The entire argument is that the terms and conditions are improper, and their enforcement is something which should be documented. Hence, the site.
Can you really complain when they refuse to seat you if you're not wearing a suit & tie?
Yes. Yes I can.
What free speech is being limited?
You don't like the censorship?
Your questions are at odds with one another. You deny free speech is being limited, but then admit to it with the second question.
It's clear there are people exaggerating the claims or severity of sexual violence, but it's also clear that many women have participated in "real sex" that they wanted no part of, either before, during or after. That latter number is hard to pin down, but does consistently seem to be somewhere in the 10-20% range. We have to stop that.
"real sex" that they wanted no part of, either before, during or after
after
What? If they fuckin' fucked and then regretted it later, so fucking what? That's the way this shit goes, bitch. Now suck it down or I'll make you suck mine down.
I regret my past actions; therefore, rape.
Absolutely ludicrous. Get the fuck out of here.
Really, they track my cash-only purchases do they?
Maybe. Or maybe these duplicate SSN's are so common and it just happened that this one had the same legal name for both parties as well.
2) Is other people's enjoyment of play reduced by being told to fuck their mother?
Only if the other "people" are merely worthless sacks of garbage. League is competitive; if someone tells you to fuck your mother, then you're doing it right. Don't like it? Then fuck right off, faggot. You're obviously not prepared to handle actual social interaction.
client side:
$('sendButton').on('click',function(){ socket.emit('send message',msg,Dale) });
server side:
socket.on('send message',function(msg,targetUser){
for(var i in sockets){
if(socket.thisuser==targetUser){socket.emit('sent msg',msg);}
}
});
This is all javascript, all of which will not execute because most users do not have such a thing enabled in their browsers. Did you even read my post before you started shooting raw liquid feces all over your screen?
If you want a proper setup it should be nodejs with a websocket handling data flow
A websocket to whom, the client? The client surely is not a javascript-enabled browser, since everyone with a brain in their heads disables that shit on day one.
PHP is unable to broadcast data between clients or to specific clients from another client
??????????????
Do you actually have any idea what you're talking about? This sounds completely out of touch with the web.
God damn fucking piece of shit posted as HTML formatted. Fuck off.
I think there's a mistake here. We have two different applications: * High-bandwidth, latency-insensitive, jitter-insensitive applications, such as torrents, streams, large HTTP actions, etc. * Low-bandwidth, latency-sensitive or jitter-sensitive applications, such as VOIP, SSH, etc. We're trying to jam both of these into the same system and either: a) Fuck everything, no priority because the ISP can't be trusted b) Let the ISP prioritize whatever they please But why? Why not just provide two lines to every user and let them decide? One high-priority low-bandwidth not-oversold line. One low-priority, high-bandwidth, oversold-as-shit line which is thus affected by peak usage, etc. Users can decide what traffic really is high priority and what traffic is garbage. Alternatively, you could provide the same oversold bandwidth to both (ugh), but cap the shit out of the high-priority line to create an incentive not to prioritize shit you don't actually need, fucker. Thoughts?
What controversy? It's not being forced onto people, so what's the issue?
If it's using editable div tags instead of forms then it isn't a login form.