I cannot see how easy a freemium environment works inside the business space. Is it something like the difference between Visual Studio Express ( (1) freemium) and Visual Studio (premium)? Or between Windows Starter and Windows Pro? If you need a specific feature - and most of the time you need that specific thing in the higher tier license - you just go for the premium version. If you do not realize you need the premium version at the beginning, then both vendor and you are in a bad position. If you are going to change software, you might also consider at this stage alternatives. Then you will get remorse due to the time you spent with this half-arsed version of the tool.
At the end of the day, we are talking about the business world, and not a consumer one. If freemium is so prevalent in the consumer mobile space is because applications can get revenue from advertising. You better not show unrelated adverts to a business client.
Note 1: Large business should not use Visual Studio Community due to licensing.
From what I gather, H264 and H265 may be supported by hardware (HW) today, and their HW decoders can be pretty efficient on portable devices. If you look at recent Apple devices, their main chips do support both decoding and encoding of both video formats. VP9 HW support is championed by Google, as far as I can see from an advert / white paper on www.deepchip.com . I assume Google will try to make all Android phones VP9 friendly, but I am not so sure what is the status right now. I suppose that VP9 is probably used by YouTube when you use Chrome as a web browser. Anyone else does know better than me?
However, the problem you described should not be solved by a third party like Nintendo TVii - it should have been fixed by the ones delivering the programmes to the households. We have been given EPG for years now, and the broadcasters still cannot match their internal timetable to the EPG listings. I am not sure if it is malice or incopetence this time.
If you got a recent car, you probably are using composite video in NTSC format! And I bet most surveillance cameras use this cheap distribution mechanism too. Apart from that, I had to remote login to some Solaris 5.8 machines with SPARC CPUs due to availability of software. There are simply no new versions of the software for this given cheap to run machine. I am not sure if I prefer C on an outdated Solaris box, or the new but outdated MS Excel + VBA 6 solution that new machines use.
I do not know much about enterprise DBs like what Oracle offers. I wonder if there are viable alternatives. The world of software I know shows three major software vendors, with loads and loads of tools in each bundle. From the statistics I have seen, there is no easy way to ditch a given software suite because it probably is the best tool from the whole range of options. Even if it is buggy as hell.
I have been doing my job on GNU/Linux for almost 10 years. Surely I have not been using the latest OS, but that is something I do not mind in most cases. After all, it is the software that sets which version of RHEL you must use. Otherwise, you lose the vendor support. My main gripe is that most users are given a laptop in order to use the latest and greatest from Microsoft: Office, SharePoint, Lync/Skype for business, Project. I hate laptops for work. They are expensive, generally slower, takes space from the desk... The only thing I can think of is that laptops consume less power.
Most people I know started long term relationships with somebody they happen to spend time with, or that they are just nearby: same high school, same college, same circle of friends, same workplace. Study does not bring much information unless it is comparing likeliness of other situations like the ones I listed. Unfortunately I can only add anectodorial evidence. By the way, only a few ones were due to predatorial skills at night.
Unless there is so much cruft in there that cleaning up seems like a good thing to do. MS Office has a lot of technology in there, and is usually the showcase of any embedding of one application into another. Now, the usecases for that are minimal. OK, I know of an ATE (Automated Test Equipment) that uses MS Office 2003 + Visual Basic 6 as the means to test chips. As with any legacy code, you cannot update the version of Office in that machine because it breaks the purpose of the Windows machine after all. What I was talking about? Get off my lawn!
My experience with this app from the Windows Store is that it did not start when I logged in. I am one of those ecohipsters that unplugs the machine when not in use! So, it is a hassle to use, and is not a bright idea, if I may add. Even my Samsung TV does logs in automatically to Skype if told so! That is a lifesaver for old people.
How does it compare to others like Go or Java then? Pleas do correct me if I am wrong. Go is controlled mainly by Google, and Java is Oracle's foster child. And like Swift will have, Java has some components that are open source.
As I neither use Spotify or Pandora (music I consume comes in CDs), let me ask: Should we worry about market segmentation? I remember people getting upset becuase Taylor Swift exited Spotify in order to get into Tidal. Another player means (a) more pressure to lower prices due to competition or (b) publishers creating scarcity in order to avoid competition.
Or do people just want some random noise in the background?
I suppose that the usual thing that happens is that with a given language you have a given set of frameworks. As such, there are languages that are better suited for a given task. For example, if I had to do many string operations, perl and its related frameworks would suit this one the best.
So, the less popular a language is, the lower number of accessible frameworks you will have. As such, please scale down your goals accordingly. You do not want to reinvent the wheel again, unless you are only focused on the wheel.
I wonder how many IPv6 unready appliances do we have. For instance, I do not trust my ISP to have given me an IPv6 compatible router. And I cannot easily replace this router, Huawei HG253s V2, due to the fact that is needed for the optical trasducer.
Well, my company still uses - I suppose - an old version of Cisco WebEx, that uses a Java applet. Not that I can run a modern web browser anyhow - I am still stuck with RHEL5 due to legacy software. Latest Firefox version I can run is v17.
You forget that with the predistortion and other needed effects, your effective resolution is going to be less!
However, this 3D GUI is needed if you do not want to take off your glasses anytime between different software. It would be similar to having a dedicated machine for MAME with your joystick and buttons, but that requires a physical keyboard due to missing GUI frontend.
Or a racing car that you need to tow from race track to race track. Most people do that, but it is inconvenient. It would be nice if you could just drive from one place to another.
If there is value added on rolling your own, then any money spent on that IT guy is well spent. I suppose guys like the ones in Venezuela do not trust US companies anymore, so they have to roll their own.
Not that I trust the US companies that are under NSA rule these days.
Slashdot Mirror
I cannot see how easy a freemium environment works inside the business space. Is it something like the difference between Visual Studio Express ( (1) freemium) and Visual Studio (premium)? Or between Windows Starter and Windows Pro? If you need a specific feature - and most of the time you need that specific thing in the higher tier license - you just go for the premium version. If you do not realize you need the premium version at the beginning, then both vendor and you are in a bad position. If you are going to change software, you might also consider at this stage alternatives. Then you will get remorse due to the time you spent with this half-arsed version of the tool.
At the end of the day, we are talking about the business world, and not a consumer one. If freemium is so prevalent in the consumer mobile space is because applications can get revenue from advertising. You better not show unrelated adverts to a business client.
Note 1: Large business should not use Visual Studio Community due to licensing.
From what I gather, H264 and H265 may be supported by hardware (HW) today, and their HW decoders can be pretty efficient on portable devices. If you look at recent Apple devices, their main chips do support both decoding and encoding of both video formats. VP9 HW support is championed by Google, as far as I can see from an advert / white paper on www.deepchip.com . I assume Google will try to make all Android phones VP9 friendly, but I am not so sure what is the status right now. I suppose that VP9 is probably used by YouTube when you use Chrome as a web browser.
Anyone else does know better than me?
Did it launch in Europe?
However, the problem you described should not be solved by a third party like Nintendo TVii - it should have been fixed by the ones delivering the programmes to the households. We have been given EPG for years now, and the broadcasters still cannot match their internal timetable to the EPG listings. I am not sure if it is malice or incopetence this time.
If you got a recent car, you probably are using composite video in NTSC format! And I bet most surveillance cameras use this cheap distribution mechanism too.
Apart from that, I had to remote login to some Solaris 5.8 machines with SPARC CPUs due to availability of software. There are simply no new versions of the software for this given cheap to run machine. I am not sure if I prefer C on an outdated Solaris box, or the new but outdated MS Excel + VBA 6 solution that new machines use.
I do not know much about enterprise DBs like what Oracle offers. I wonder if there are viable alternatives.
The world of software I know shows three major software vendors, with loads and loads of tools in each bundle. From the statistics I have seen, there is no easy way to ditch a given software suite because it probably is the best tool from the whole range of options. Even if it is buggy as hell.
I have been doing my job on GNU/Linux for almost 10 years. Surely I have not been using the latest OS, but that is something I do not mind in most cases. After all, it is the software that sets which version of RHEL you must use. Otherwise, you lose the vendor support.
My main gripe is that most users are given a laptop in order to use the latest and greatest from Microsoft: Office, SharePoint, Lync/Skype for business, Project. I hate laptops for work. They are expensive, generally slower, takes space from the desk... The only thing I can think of is that laptops consume less power.
Most people I know started long term relationships with somebody they happen to spend time with, or that they are just nearby: same high school, same college, same circle of friends, same workplace. Study does not bring much information unless it is comparing likeliness of other situations like the ones I listed. Unfortunately I can only add anectodorial evidence. By the way, only a few ones were due to predatorial skills at night.
You know you cannot play over the internet without it!
Just wait until my preordered Windows 10 is installed! I heard the lengthy public beta nailed down most of the bugs.
Star Wars are also a good example of this endless rerun of the same old but known franchises.
So now I can play both originals and remasters! Hurray!
Unless there is so much cruft in there that cleaning up seems like a good thing to do. MS Office has a lot of technology in there, and is usually the showcase of any embedding of one application into another. Now, the usecases for that are minimal. OK, I know of an ATE (Automated Test Equipment) that uses MS Office 2003 + Visual Basic 6 as the means to test chips. As with any legacy code, you cannot update the version of Office in that machine because it breaks the purpose of the Windows machine after all. What I was talking about? Get off my lawn!
Yeah, article should have mentioned Delphi instead.
My experience with this app from the Windows Store is that it did not start when I logged in. I am one of those ecohipsters that unplugs the machine when not in use! So, it is a hassle to use, and is not a bright idea, if I may add. Even my Samsung TV does logs in automatically to Skype if told so! That is a lifesaver for old people.
How does it compare to others like Go or Java then? Pleas do correct me if I am wrong. Go is controlled mainly by Google, and Java is Oracle's foster child. And like Swift will have, Java has some components that are open source.
As I neither use Spotify or Pandora (music I consume comes in CDs), let me ask: Should we worry about market segmentation? I remember people getting upset becuase Taylor Swift exited Spotify in order to get into Tidal. Another player means (a) more pressure to lower prices due to competition or (b) publishers creating scarcity in order to avoid competition. Or do people just want some random noise in the background?
So, the less popular a language is, the lower number of accessible frameworks you will have. As such, please scale down your goals accordingly. You do not want to reinvent the wheel again, unless you are only focused on the wheel.
I wonder how many IPv6 unready appliances do we have. For instance, I do not trust my ISP to have given me an IPv6 compatible router. And I cannot easily replace this router, Huawei HG253s V2, due to the fact that is needed for the optical trasducer.
Although I need to say that bloggers or wanna-be-reporters are getting it wrong. You know what? Pink ponies are real.
Well, my company still uses - I suppose - an old version of Cisco WebEx, that uses a Java applet. Not that I can run a modern web browser anyhow - I am still stuck with RHEL5 due to legacy software. Latest Firefox version I can run is v17.
However, this 3D GUI is needed if you do not want to take off your glasses anytime between different software. It would be similar to having a dedicated machine for MAME with your joystick and buttons, but that requires a physical keyboard due to missing GUI frontend.
Or a racing car that you need to tow from race track to race track. Most people do that, but it is inconvenient. It would be nice if you could just drive from one place to another.
It looks like the ones behind Nada software were right: the only bug free software is the most useless one.
My mother!
Not that I trust the US companies that are under NSA rule these days.