It's not true. A shotgun to protect your home? Almost nobody has a problem with that. Just like almost nobody has a problem with reasonable background checks. The agitators who want to create partisan divide make it seem a huge partisan issue when it's not.
Right now the media is full of crying kiddies demanding the 2nd Amendment be abolished.
Sounds like you're the one crying. The 2nd amendment is already limited (no guns on planes), just like the 1st and all the rest. For the record, nobody wants to take your guns away, they just want their kids to be safe when they go to school.
Sounds about right. I'm also betting nobody bothered to explore low tech solutions like shade and reflective paint. Where I live it's as hot as Hawaii and schools get by without AC.
stop blaming the tool for what the person holding it does.
I love this argument. So guns aren't the cause of gun violence, but things that might be the cause of gun violence are:
* Movies
* Video games
* Not enough guns
* The FBI
Look, it's pretty clear to everybody that that kid should probably not have been able to get his hands on assault weapons. A regular handgun tops.
That's silly, how many people will read the politifact report vs see the tweets? Russia knows we're onto them, but they also know that they're still effectively manipulating us.
It is harder to trick college educated people into believing false statements.
That doesn't explain the willful ignorance of Trump's college-educated administration. Trump himself somehow went from a democrat who got news from reliable sources to a Fox News bubble viewer.
OK, I get what you're saying, but your terminology is wrong.
A 10-1 long-shot will pay out 10% of the time, not because someone fucked up in as calculating the odds, but because it's built-in risk.
Sometimes things don't break your way, and that's just how it is.
Ok but that's not a poorly calculated risk, that's an upset.
There wasn't a single bookmaker anywhere in the world that didn't have Trump as a long shot up until the day of the election or HRC as the favorite from the moment she announced.
Gerrymandering doesn't exist. It's a convenient scapegoat to explain why even with densely packed cities, Democrats can still lost elections.
Gerrymandering has always existed, but lately it's gotten out of control. SCOTUS is hearing 2 gerrymandering case this term and the decisions will decide the races in those areas.
In what way would the world have been better off if Gore had won in 2000 or Hillary in 2016? Are you talking about the Iraq and Afghan wars? Those military actions that most Democrats in congress voted in favor of taking?
The White House was pushing a false narrative that personally enriched Cheney. So no, Gore having no reason to lie about WMDs = no Iraq war. Also, Gore is a boy scout, I don't see him lying if he did.
Slashdot Mirror
You are without honor.
It's not true. A shotgun to protect your home? Almost nobody has a problem with that. Just like almost nobody has a problem with reasonable background checks. The agitators who want to create partisan divide make it seem a huge partisan issue when it's not.
Right now the media is full of crying kiddies demanding the 2nd Amendment be abolished.
Sounds like you're the one crying. The 2nd amendment is already limited (no guns on planes), just like the 1st and all the rest. For the record, nobody wants to take your guns away, they just want their kids to be safe when they go to school.
Sounds about right. I'm also betting nobody bothered to explore low tech solutions like shade and reflective paint. Where I live it's as hot as Hawaii and schools get by without AC.
You must have dropped out in 8th grade. I had to take at least 6 of them.
There's only 2 reasons for a powerwall:
The grid is unreliable/too remote
The local net energy metering situation sucks
Speed bumps in the parking lot, dude. This is easy to prevent because there's nobody lobbying against speed bumps.
Nah. Kids can get out of the way of a truck. I think there's usually speed bumps and other speeding impediments around schools anyway.
stop blaming the tool for what the person holding it does.
I love this argument. So guns aren't the cause of gun violence, but things that might be the cause of gun violence are:
* Movies
* Video games
* Not enough guns
* The FBI
Look, it's pretty clear to everybody that that kid should probably not have been able to get his hands on assault weapons. A regular handgun tops.
How about identity theft? You still have an identity so therefore it's merely "identity breach"?
Please don't feed the Russian trolls.
That's silly, how many people will read the politifact report vs see the tweets? Russia knows we're onto them, but they also know that they're still effectively manipulating us.
I would have said Russia, but there's no evidence of collusion.
And that's why Jesus was a carpenter and not an engineer.
When Fox News fakes or gets something wrong, they just delete the story and pretend it never happened.
And then they throw to a high speed chase.
It is harder to trick college educated people into believing false statements.
That doesn't explain the willful ignorance of Trump's college-educated administration. Trump himself somehow went from a democrat who got news from reliable sources to a Fox News bubble viewer.
It used to be normal to be a virulent racist and anti-semite. It still is, but it used to be too.
Also, training ex-coal miners to make solar panels like HRC wanted might have kept us in the top 10. Just Saying.
OK, I get what you're saying, but your terminology is wrong. A 10-1 long-shot will pay out 10% of the time, not because someone fucked up in as calculating the odds, but because it's built-in risk. Sometimes things don't break your way, and that's just how it is.
I believe Amazon started it though when they refused to sell Google products. Google is probably getting more screwed here than Amazon.
Ok but that's not a poorly calculated risk, that's an upset.
There wasn't a single bookmaker anywhere in the world that didn't have Trump as a long shot up until the day of the election or HRC as the favorite from the moment she announced.
Yes. May made a poorly calculated risk, just like Clinton did. So, both blame Russia.
Huh? Poorly calculated because they didn't account for Russian interference? What would a well calculated risk have looked like?
Who would pay to see that?
Gerrymandering doesn't exist. It's a convenient scapegoat to explain why even with densely packed cities, Democrats can still lost elections.
Gerrymandering has always existed, but lately it's gotten out of control. SCOTUS is hearing 2 gerrymandering case this term and the decisions will decide the races in those areas.
In what way would the world have been better off if Gore had won in 2000 or Hillary in 2016? Are you talking about the Iraq and Afghan wars? Those military actions that most Democrats in congress voted in favor of taking?
The White House was pushing a false narrative that personally enriched Cheney. So no, Gore having no reason to lie about WMDs = no Iraq war. Also, Gore is a boy scout, I don't see him lying if he did.