It's often required for the purpose the individual thing serves. The issue comes from sharing data - be it to other products by a large corporation, the government, for separate revenue streams like advertising, or to other corporations/entities. Lots of sites NEED to collect user data (e.g. usernames, emails, etc) but they only collect excessive quantities of data when they intend to share it.
It's not about racism, it's about chaos. When every other candidate is a straight-up globalist out to destroy the country the chaotic nationalist is the best choice. Trump bought us another 4-8 years plus whatever damage he can do to the globalist infrastructure before the nation collapses. The renewable sector was part of the original globalist power grab against the energy and manufacturing sectors.
Both Bushes were a globalists, they have the same agenda as the liberals. For that matter, most Republicans are RiNO globalists, the only real difference is that there's a small minority who aren't.
You're thinking of the "free market," which we don't have and the lack thereof is actually what lead to the rise of renewables in place of coal+nuclear. Capitalism allows for heavy-handed government intervention and there's a whole subset of microeconomics and of macroeconomics devoted to regulations and counter regulations entirely within the confines of capitalism.
The swamp isn't draining or filling - critters are just migrating in a circle. The renewable sector was created as a power grab over the energy and manufacturing sectors by liberals along with global warming (thus NASA and NOAA repeatedly being caught faking data.) This is the original members of those sectors taking back ground. Both sides are corrupt, both sides will always be corrupt, that corruption will continue until the system collapses. Throughout Human history the only thing to temper corruption has been the collapse of civilization and the subsequent lack of inefficiency to exploit. Corruption is the decay of society, it's like aging at the scale of a society - we haven't cured it yet and there's no cure visible on the horizon.
I get that they don't have good code in VSO to train their self-programming AI's on (just a bunch of business code with shitloads of patchwork by lots of maintenance devs - a true mess.) I also get that they want to stick stuff into GitHub's EULA bypassing any open source license or patent rights for themselves when code is uploaded to GitHub. But not a fucking chance will I continue using it if that traitorous corporation of so-pc-they-actually-fire-entire-departments-for-being-"too-white" globalist h1b hacks buys it out.
Even if Google follows this, how is it going to prevent the DoD from weaponizing what Google develops? Google is clearly not naive so this all reeks of a public show for something they’ll never be able to enforce.
Obviously by making the US military dependent upon Google SaaS style, the anti-AI-weapon fear could just be hype from their marketing department for that ends.
Paul Allen has single-handedly killed over 80% (and counting) of the world's coral reefs which are known to be dead. He parks his yacht over top them and allows the anchor to drag around for months on end. This is not even a joke, it is not hyperbole, it is not a lie of any other form, this is an absolute publicly known fact (fucking Google it.) Either climate change killing the reefs is fake news on behalf of Paul Allen covering his ass or Paul Allen is taking an active role in creating the effects of "climate change" to perpetrate a hoax to regulate competitors of himself and his investments. Either way, coral reefs dying off are unrelated to any climate change effects and given the ready availability of the information relating to the damage Paul Allen has done to coral reefs around the world and researchers not seriously citing him as the root cause are at best paid shills and at worst entirely incompetent.
Because you can get conductive transparent films to block the signal and hack it to display someone else's plates while doing illegal shit, why else would politicians want to make them legal?
I don't know about you, but I probably clock 12+ hours of TV per day on average - basically any time I'm programming I have something (usually TV shows, but push that number up to 16-18+ hours if you count movies) streaming in the background. What we really need to look at, as a national issue, is forcing entertainers to make more quality sci-fi, I can only rewatch it so much before being forced to watch lesser programming.
A corporation is an abstract entity which does not exist save for government sanction, it derives all rights it has from what the government itself is allowed to convey. Moreover, the economy is a system meant to facilitate the efficient allocation of finite resources, it doesn't exist for anyone to leverage inefficiencies to the tune of the GDP of small nations, or even small towns - it exists to distribute resources. Fuckerberg is absolutely irrelevant, his wants and needs and desires are irrelevant, he's just a man, like any other.
Haven't you heard? Everyone is equal: that means whoever charges the least will produce just as well as those who charge the most and old people are going to care about a personal life and benefits in addition to having the experience to negotiate for better compensation and defend their stances, while a fresh dev will do 80+ hours a week on an entry level salary until they burn out. It's cheaper for them to buy out small innovative corporations who take on all the risk of R&D (seen in contrast to the number of small innovative corporations which go under before getting bought out) and just hire a bunch of hacks to daisychain it all together.
Since when does the federal government ask for people to stop impersonating them? Lock Bezos up and have him pounded in the ass by a big guy with aids just like if anyone else did this shit.
You can't have ecological issues to spur global warming, climate change, and other regulations against your competitors if you aren't single-handedly destroying 80% of the world's coral reefs with your yacht anchor or putting feral cat feeding stations next to endangered wildlife. This is just good business.
Slashdot Mirror
It's often required for the purpose the individual thing serves. The issue comes from sharing data - be it to other products by a large corporation, the government, for separate revenue streams like advertising, or to other corporations/entities. Lots of sites NEED to collect user data (e.g. usernames, emails, etc) but they only collect excessive quantities of data when they intend to share it.
It's not about racism, it's about chaos. When every other candidate is a straight-up globalist out to destroy the country the chaotic nationalist is the best choice. Trump bought us another 4-8 years plus whatever damage he can do to the globalist infrastructure before the nation collapses. The renewable sector was part of the original globalist power grab against the energy and manufacturing sectors.
Both Bushes were a globalists, they have the same agenda as the liberals. For that matter, most Republicans are RiNO globalists, the only real difference is that there's a small minority who aren't.
You're thinking of the "free market," which we don't have and the lack thereof is actually what lead to the rise of renewables in place of coal+nuclear. Capitalism allows for heavy-handed government intervention and there's a whole subset of microeconomics and of macroeconomics devoted to regulations and counter regulations entirely within the confines of capitalism.
The swamp isn't draining or filling - critters are just migrating in a circle. The renewable sector was created as a power grab over the energy and manufacturing sectors by liberals along with global warming (thus NASA and NOAA repeatedly being caught faking data.) This is the original members of those sectors taking back ground. Both sides are corrupt, both sides will always be corrupt, that corruption will continue until the system collapses. Throughout Human history the only thing to temper corruption has been the collapse of civilization and the subsequent lack of inefficiency to exploit. Corruption is the decay of society, it's like aging at the scale of a society - we haven't cured it yet and there's no cure visible on the horizon.
I get that they don't have good code in VSO to train their self-programming AI's on (just a bunch of business code with shitloads of patchwork by lots of maintenance devs - a true mess.) I also get that they want to stick stuff into GitHub's EULA bypassing any open source license or patent rights for themselves when code is uploaded to GitHub. But not a fucking chance will I continue using it if that traitorous corporation of so-pc-they-actually-fire-entire-departments-for-being-"too-white" globalist h1b hacks buys it out.
Even if Google follows this, how is it going to prevent the DoD from weaponizing what Google develops? Google is clearly not naive so this all reeks of a public show for something they’ll never be able to enforce.
Obviously by making the US military dependent upon Google SaaS style, the anti-AI-weapon fear could just be hype from their marketing department for that ends.
Paul Allen has single-handedly killed over 80% (and counting) of the world's coral reefs which are known to be dead. He parks his yacht over top them and allows the anchor to drag around for months on end. This is not even a joke, it is not hyperbole, it is not a lie of any other form, this is an absolute publicly known fact (fucking Google it.) Either climate change killing the reefs is fake news on behalf of Paul Allen covering his ass or Paul Allen is taking an active role in creating the effects of "climate change" to perpetrate a hoax to regulate competitors of himself and his investments. Either way, coral reefs dying off are unrelated to any climate change effects and given the ready availability of the information relating to the damage Paul Allen has done to coral reefs around the world and researchers not seriously citing him as the root cause are at best paid shills and at worst entirely incompetent.
Because you can get conductive transparent films to block the signal and hack it to display someone else's plates while doing illegal shit, why else would politicians want to make them legal?
I didn't pick an argument to begin with.
I don't know about you, but I probably clock 12+ hours of TV per day on average - basically any time I'm programming I have something (usually TV shows, but push that number up to 16-18+ hours if you count movies) streaming in the background. What we really need to look at, as a national issue, is forcing entertainers to make more quality sci-fi, I can only rewatch it so much before being forced to watch lesser programming.
Nice comeback.
A corporation is an abstract entity which does not exist save for government sanction, it derives all rights it has from what the government itself is allowed to convey. Moreover, the economy is a system meant to facilitate the efficient allocation of finite resources, it doesn't exist for anyone to leverage inefficiencies to the tune of the GDP of small nations, or even small towns - it exists to distribute resources. Fuckerberg is absolutely irrelevant, his wants and needs and desires are irrelevant, he's just a man, like any other.
Haven't you heard? Everyone is equal: that means whoever charges the least will produce just as well as those who charge the most and old people are going to care about a personal life and benefits in addition to having the experience to negotiate for better compensation and defend their stances, while a fresh dev will do 80+ hours a week on an entry level salary until they burn out. It's cheaper for them to buy out small innovative corporations who take on all the risk of R&D (seen in contrast to the number of small innovative corporations which go under before getting bought out) and just hire a bunch of hacks to daisychain it all together.
Waiving your micropenis around on the internet isn't a form of humor.
He created their culture or crushing the little guy, locking in customers, and generally producing shit that is well marketed.
Point being you had no point and were wrong and don't care to admit it.
Since when does the federal government ask for people to stop impersonating them? Lock Bezos up and have him pounded in the ass by a big guy with aids just like if anyone else did this shit.
Yet it's used directly by millions of people every day
Air is used by more and most of them are still fucking retarded.
No real nerds fail to understand the meaning behind error 418, but the beasts will never understand.
I'll have you know I lost the password to a 5-digit id years ago, you pleb.
MS Linux
If this happens I'll start a Kickstarter to get people together and mushroom stamp Bill Gates into a concussive state.
They aren't software geeks. Silicon Valley are just all marketing and PR people who usurped the image of nerds for the sake of a disguise.
anything that references a blog or other news aggregator and not the primary source needs to be weeded out of the Firehose with extreme prejudice.
+1
You can't have ecological issues to spur global warming, climate change, and other regulations against your competitors if you aren't single-handedly destroying 80% of the world's coral reefs with your yacht anchor or putting feral cat feeding stations next to endangered wildlife. This is just good business.