What a piece of work is a man! How noble I reason, how infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an Angel! in apprehension how like a god! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals! And yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no, nor Woman neither; though by your smiling you seem to say so.
As long as it's a dollar less than physical books, they are price cutting by their innovation, and are heroes.
"Hey! You're trying to rip us off (in this market you created which didn't even exist a few years ago, and still offers a way better price than physical printing)! How dare you!"
That technique, still used by bushmen in Africa, may be why humans lost their fur. After 4 hours of light jogging after an animal, it had heat stroke and they didn't.
Basically. They were notorious for letting their products use hidden internal APIs that gave them an advantage.
Ironically, I have no problem with that. Why should one company help another to build similar stuff? But I like seeing them be petarded by their own hoist.
> They don't have an inherent right to access youtube. It's not in the constitution.
It's on the Internet, it's not the web site's business what kind of browser, or device, you access it from. I hate the device restrictions, too. It's none of YouTube.com's business.
Chopping ads is a different story -- YouTube could claim ad strippers are altering copyrighted presentations, if they choose to go that route.
Instead it does something called ‘annealing’, where an answer is arrived at by looking for the lowest energy state of the bits in the computer chip...
The D-Wave Two computer, which has 512 quantum bits, is designed to tackle classification-type problems that are useful in machine learning and image recognition. Essentially it is good at determining the best ways to sort things into different categories, such as X-ray scans that contain an image of a bomb and ones that don’t.
This is partitioning using neural network-based pattern recognition techniques.
The annealing is simulating raising the temperature of your variable encoding, which amounts to throwing your solutions around more violently on the gradient descent space in hopes of exiting your local minimum and finding a lower one.
Sales of weapons to nasty governments has at least, in theory, been nominally approved by accountable, elected officials, and is in accordance with some policies set by same.
1. George Whoever (censored by German government) 2 . George Whoever (censored by German government) 3 . George Whoever (censored by German government) 4 . George Whoever (censored by German government) 5 . George Whoever (censored by German government) etc.
I have an iPod, not an iPhone. However, the AppleMobileDeviceService.exe process is running in the background. I have never seen it gobble up cycles. It normally sits at "00" CPU. When I plug in the iPod, it jumps to an incredible "01" for a very short interval and then returns to "00". So, does anyone else have this process gobbles up to 50% of the CPU?
50% is 100%, just hogging one of a dual-core processor. Since you see 1%, I'm jelly of ur 100-core.
Given the bigger the number, the more smaller numbers that could divide into it, suggests primes should be getting further and further apart. So a proof they don't is important because it suggests the growing density of divisors (smaller primes) starts to lose out vs. the general increase in sheer quantity of all numbers.
It approaches a limit that is neither infinity nor zero (since we know there are infinite primes.)
I still feel this proof has to be wrong for that reason. Well let math at larege look at it for some years and we shall see.
I think Chrome works by matching any links you want to go to against known bad links Google has already determined are bad by its crawler.
It doesn't go to them as you type them in in messages.
That, by the way, would be a nice feature, like some kind of CheckOutIfThisURLIsSpam.com. But voluntary, and not buried in TOS on page 97 of your clickthru.
"There must be no doubt that the United States of America welcomes change that advances self-determination and opportunity,” President Obama said in May. In his typically weak manner, he also cautioned that, “we must proceed with a sense of humility."
1. He is correct about the humility. Unless we are interested in creating a proper constitution that does not allow religion in lawmaking, with associated 15+ year pacification-level military involvement, i.e. 10x more, more like what we did after WWII, such that a whole new generation can grow up under it, expecting it, forget it. You see the issues in Afghanistan and Iraq.
2. The idea of "ooooh! Look at them self-determine!", when that means either a different dictatorship, or a constitution that acknowledges primacy of one religion beyond trivialities, is no thing to view as a value, and we should be embarrassed to do so.
There is no honor in that, and we disable ourselves by feigning so.
It is no different from terrorists seizing a stadium of people and some idiot external politician praising the stadium for practicing self-determination.
Oh I forgot my point -- my point was science fiction has long had lab-grown meat for people. Except it won't have fat, which will have to be added, making the entire creation of meat pointless. You might as well create something better for you and add the fat to that.
My own opinion is that AI has failed to fulfill its promise because we are using the wrong kind of computers. We are using digital computers, and the human brain is probably analog rather than digital
1. Meat tastes terrible. It's the fat that tastes good. Go make a burger from steak tartar, no cheese, if you don't believe me.
2. Red meat, because of carnetines and gut bacterial, may be causing the lion's share of heart disease problems.
So we've been fooled by science fiction for 80 years. Meat is a useless substrate to convey delicious fats to the mouth, and give you something to chew on while savoring them. And it's a hideously unhealthy substrate.
Some tofu burger, but with beef fat, is probably the way to go. Lack of fats is why tofu, like plain baked taters, taste...boring, to be kind to both.
What a piece of work is a man! How noble I
reason, how infinite in faculty! In form and moving
how express and admirable! In action how like an Angel!
in apprehension how like a god! The beauty of the
world! The paragon of animals! And yet to me, what is
this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no,
nor Woman neither; though by your smiling you seem
to say so.
I read it -- it took me 4 minutes to figure it out.
Old way: Server sends, say, menu of 5 items with indicator to highlight first.
User arrows down two, client sends two down arrows. Server notes this that it is on 3rd item, but only in theory.
User hits enter. Server receives enter and decides 3rd item is selected.
Patent: Send IDs for all that shit and client reports ID-based activities.
You'd also think they's have these attached to the spafe station for many years, so they could study wear and tear on it.
Or do most websites have at least some infringing content?
The OP makes it sound like they deliberately did this to stir things up. I don't get it.
As long as it's a dollar less than physical books, they are price cutting by their innovation, and are heroes.
"Hey! You're trying to rip us off (in this market you created which didn't even exist a few years ago, and still offers a way better price than physical printing)! How dare you!"
That technique, still used by bushmen in Africa, may be why humans lost their fur. After 4 hours of light jogging after an animal, it had heat stroke and they didn't.
It's why you typed that out on a fancy handheld and have shelves jammed with stuff.
Humanity tried building worlds based on "money is evil", and the results are universally vastly substandard.
Basically. They were notorious for letting their products use hidden internal APIs that gave them an advantage.
Ironically, I have no problem with that. Why should one company help another to build similar stuff? But I like seeing them be petarded by their own hoist.
> They don't have an inherent right to access youtube. It's not in the constitution.
It's on the Internet, it's not the web site's business what kind of browser, or device, you access it from. I hate the device restrictions, too. It's none of YouTube.com's business.
Chopping ads is a different story -- YouTube could claim ad strippers are altering copyrighted presentations, if they choose to go that route.
Two articles deep:
This is partitioning using neural network-based pattern recognition techniques.
The annealing is simulating raising the temperature of your variable encoding, which amounts to throwing your solutions around more violently on the gradient descent space in hopes of exiting your local minimum and finding a lower one.
Sales of weapons to nasty governments has at least, in theory, been nominally approved by accountable, elected officials, and is in accordance with some policies set by same.
Wow! How high does the charge get?
Ha ha, you assholes clicked on a bing link.
Here's how Google should comply.
Seargh: George Whoever
1. George Whoever (censored by German government)
2 . George Whoever (censored by German government)
3 . George Whoever (censored by German government)
4 . George Whoever (censored by German government)
5 . George Whoever (censored by German government)
etc.
I have an iPod, not an iPhone. However, the AppleMobileDeviceService.exe process is running in the background. I have never seen it gobble up cycles. It normally sits at "00" CPU. When I plug in the iPod, it jumps to an incredible "01" for a very short interval and then returns to "00". So, does anyone else have this process gobbles up to 50% of the CPU?
50% is 100%, just hogging one of a dual-core processor.
Since you see 1%, I'm jelly of ur 100-core.
Given the bigger the number, the more smaller numbers that could divide into it, suggests primes should be getting further and further apart. So a proof they don't is important because it suggests the growing density of divisors (smaller primes) starts to lose out vs. the general increase in sheer quantity of all numbers.
It approaches a limit that is neither infinity nor zero (since we know there are infinite primes.)
I still feel this proof has to be wrong for that reason. Well let math at larege look at it for some years and we shall see.
I think Chrome works by matching any links you want to go to against known bad links Google has already determined are bad by its crawler.
It doesn't go to them as you type them in in messages.
That, by the way, would be a nice feature, like some kind of CheckOutIfThisURLIsSpam.com. But voluntary, and not buried in TOS on page 97 of your clickthru.
1. He is correct about the humility. Unless we are interested in creating a proper constitution that does not allow religion in lawmaking, with associated 15+ year pacification-level military involvement, i.e. 10x more, more like what we did after WWII, such that a whole new generation can grow up under it, expecting it, forget it. You see the issues in Afghanistan and Iraq.
2. The idea of "ooooh! Look at them self-determine!", when that means either a different dictatorship, or a constitution that acknowledges primacy of one religion beyond trivialities, is no thing to view as a value, and we should be embarrassed to do so.
There is no honor in that, and we disable ourselves by feigning so.
It is no different from terrorists seizing a stadium of people and some idiot external politician praising the stadium for practicing self-determination.
Extortion is a Good Public Cause, at least according to all Good Public Politicians in all countries throughout all human history.
> in Belize
Belize, is that, wait! HAS ANYONE SEEN MCAFFEE LATELY?
Oh I forgot my point -- my point was science fiction has long had lab-grown meat for people. Except it won't have fat, which will have to be added, making the entire creation of meat pointless. You might as well create something better for you and add the fat to that.
I never got the appeal -- it was just MySpace with access control for your friends. Hence it took off as "safer" for students.
Thank you! Been saying this for 10 damned years.
Yes, it is harsh -- you get to do that when inventing something. That's why these somethings exist.
I invent something. That you have a heartbeat doesn't mean you are suddenly deprived of it.
1. Meat tastes terrible. It's the fat that tastes good. Go make a burger from steak tartar, no cheese, if you don't believe me.
2. Red meat, because of carnetines and gut bacterial, may be causing the lion's share of heart disease problems.
So we've been fooled by science fiction for 80 years. Meat is a useless substrate to convey delicious fats to the mouth, and give you something to chew on while savoring them. And it's a hideously unhealthy substrate.
Some tofu burger, but with beef fat, is probably the way to go. Lack of fats is why tofu, like plain baked taters, taste...boring, to be kind to both.