Technically you could use several asymmetrical algorithms over MD5. (Not saying it's a good idea, but neither is using MD5.) Thus saying MD5 covers everything.
I wrote a project in 2.6 a while ago but a week before production I'm told that the machine would use 2.4 Imagine my surprise when I noticed that some keywords were working differently (something about the exception handling was looking like it was working, but breaking, I don't remember exactly what).
Now, if I want to use some scripting language to quickly so something (by opposition to do something fast) I use perl (cleanly) or bash.
(For the serious stuff I'm more an asm/C/C++/C# guy anyway.)
Flying implies a "machine" or possibly "creature" (*) Object implies "built".
UAP should be used instead.
(*) accurate since in fact the first OVNI ever reported was a bird. The pilot told about a v-shaped thing that was moving "a bit like a saucer bouncing on water". It would have been nothing but a journalist reported it badly (of course) only keeping the movement of the object instead of its shape... This lead to a history of hysterical reports of flying saucers, when instead we should have got a history of hysterical reports of flying v-shaped "bouncing" objects.
These stupid warnings ended up pissing me off so much I simply stopped buying disks. For a while I switched to a well know ads-free streaming platform, until they banned VPN. Since I simply browse the web, read books or play games.
They should not underestimate how much customers despise being interrupted with stupid insulting warnings (or worse : anti-piracy videos)
What genius didn't realise the pirates will not be the ones seeing these annoying messages ?
The job, if anyone doubted it, is to make people angry or afraid, making their brain more available for advertising. So when something is good (less people dying) you spin it as a negative.
"Oh no, less people dying means that we will have a shortage of organs to save people" (Excluding people not needing an organ because they weren't in a car accident)
I've yet to see a job made by an Indian team that was not utterly incompetent. But yes, given the geniuses that want lower-cost-per-employee, a strategy is to hire a few experts and a bunch of Indians. The first group works on the project, the second group generates crap on an isolated versioning system. In the end, the cost-per-head is lower and the project made by the experts is ready.
Please feel free to tell me when someone breaks a real-life (a.k.a without any known weakness) 1024 bits RSA key. These keys are rolling "fast". If the keys ended being broken, DNS will be the least of our problems but it will be trivial for ROOT to revoke the old keys and use stronger ones (size or algorithm).
Note that if you take care to look at the root zone, you'll see both the KSK and ZSK are 260 bytes long. That is : 256 bytes or 2048 bits for the modulus.
I'm trying to understand where you are going with DNSSEC. If you mean using a 'private' validating caching name server : yes, this may help and very easy to do (I'm using one right now on an Odroid).
Anyway, if push comes to shove, it would be trivial to set a local resolver looking on a third-party server on a non-DNS port or tunnel on TCP. Technical solutions are legion.
This was increasingly happening to me too. Then they banned VPN usage, reducing my choices even more and leading to a satisfying cancellation of the subscription. If quality-lovers where all cancelling, Netflix could then focus on serving mostly bad content and let a (new) competitor serving mostly quality rise up to serve the "niche" we represent.
While I was a Netflix subscriber (before the VPN ban), I was already appalled by the lack of quality content.
The way I handled it was by using the worthless Netflix shows as background noise (ie: doing the chores) and reserved the few good ones for when I had a couple of hours to chill-out in front of the screen.
I know for a fact that's a quite common habit around here.
The AI is not dishonest, it has been designed to make-up stuff.
Its a bit like doing the fractal compression of an image, then restore to an higher resolution than the original. You will get a more detailed image, but it's content will have been made-up. Fractal compression existed well before Google and no idiot used this feature as proof AFAIK.
I cannot believe anybody in his right mind would take any "make-up" algorithm as reliable evidence. One has to be pretty ignorant, or criminally insane, to use what is a (very nice) party-trick in a court of laws.
The Paralympics make sense to me. I don't think I need to get into detail about this (Including the mandatory note of an amputee running faster than a fully organic champion).
Is that what they are saying for women in science ?
I'm not enough of a misogynistic bastard to think it makes sense, and that's saying a lot.
Contemplating this silly idea disqualifies the Dutch science academy from ever being taken seriously again.
Do you remember the time when we had these machines ? ZX-81, Alice32, Commodore 64, Schneider CPC 464 (as well as 664 and 6128),... For the less young among us, they were monolithic, kind of cheap computer toys. I say toy as it was the general view around here since kids were better at them than adults. (The image of programming = playing remained strong in my family from my 6th birthday until my first paycheck).
I can't help but feel that Apple went back to that time, when you could get these imitations of the real deal. They just innovated by replacing "cheaper" by "more expensive".
Slashdot Mirror
Human languages are ambiguous.
So, yes.
... in your opinion.
Technically you could use several asymmetrical algorithms over MD5. (Not saying it's a good idea, but neither is using MD5.)
Thus saying MD5 covers everything.
That and the language (lack of) compatibility.
I wrote a project in 2.6 a while ago but a week before production I'm told that the machine would use 2.4
Imagine my surprise when I noticed that some keywords were working differently (something about the exception handling was looking like it was working, but breaking, I don't remember exactly what).
Now, if I want to use some scripting language to quickly so something (by opposition to do something fast) I use perl (cleanly) or bash.
(For the serious stuff I'm more an asm/C/C++/C# guy anyway.)
Why not simply wait for the announce ?
I don't see Slashdot as a place overflowing with excitable kids. I may be wrong.
For anybody missing the reference: "This is Spinal Tap"
And with only one screen.
It does not really looks ergonomic either (not that the 3DS was great)
Are we sure it's an object and not an optical illusion ?
The use of the word UFO is implicitly biased.
Flying implies a "machine" or possibly "creature" (*)
Object implies "built".
UAP should be used instead.
(*) accurate since in fact the first OVNI ever reported was a bird. ...
The pilot told about a v-shaped thing that was moving "a bit like a saucer bouncing on water".
It would have been nothing but a journalist reported it badly (of course) only keeping the movement of the object instead of its shape
This lead to a history of hysterical reports of flying saucers, when instead we should have got a history of hysterical reports of flying v-shaped "bouncing" objects.
... Boom !
These stupid warnings ended up pissing me off so much I simply stopped buying disks.
For a while I switched to a well know ads-free streaming platform, until they banned VPN.
Since I simply browse the web, read books or play games.
They should not underestimate how much customers despise being interrupted with stupid insulting warnings (or worse : anti-piracy videos)
What genius didn't realise the pirates will not be the ones seeing these annoying messages ?
That's how "news" work now.
The job, if anyone doubted it, is to make people angry or afraid, making their brain more available for advertising.
So when something is good (less people dying) you spin it as a negative.
"Oh no, less people dying means that we will have a shortage of organs to save people"
(Excluding people not needing an organ because they weren't in a car accident)
Great job.
We are only 17 years after what was predicted : that's not so bad.
I've yet to see a job made by an Indian team that was not utterly incompetent.
But yes, given the geniuses that want lower-cost-per-employee, a strategy is to hire a few experts and a bunch of Indians. The first group works on the project, the second group generates crap on an isolated versioning system. In the end, the cost-per-head is lower and the project made by the experts is ready.
Or you could simply say "no" ?
There are other games that are not actively working against you and treating you as a criminal.
Please feel free to tell me when someone breaks a real-life (a.k.a without any known weakness) 1024 bits RSA key. These keys are rolling "fast".
If the keys ended being broken, DNS will be the least of our problems but it will be trivial for ROOT to revoke the old keys and use stronger ones (size or algorithm).
Note that if you take care to look at the root zone, you'll see both the KSK and ZSK are 260 bytes long. That is : 256 bytes or 2048 bits for the modulus.
I'm trying to understand where you are going with DNSSEC. If you mean using a 'private' validating caching name server : yes, this may help and very easy to do (I'm using one right now on an Odroid).
Anyway, if push comes to shove, it would be trivial to set a local resolver looking on a third-party server on a non-DNS port or tunnel on TCP. Technical solutions are legion.
This was increasingly happening to me too.
Then they banned VPN usage, reducing my choices even more and leading to a satisfying cancellation of the subscription.
If quality-lovers where all cancelling, Netflix could then focus on serving mostly bad content and let a (new) competitor serving mostly quality rise up to serve the "niche" we represent.
While I was a Netflix subscriber (before the VPN ban), I was already appalled by the lack of quality content.
The way I handled it was by using the worthless Netflix shows as background noise (ie: doing the chores) and reserved the few good ones for when I had a couple of hours to chill-out in front of the screen.
I know for a fact that's a quite common habit around here.
I was going for "sarcasm", but I don't blame you. The tone of voice doesn't translate well into text.
The AI is not dishonest, it has been designed to make-up stuff.
Its a bit like doing the fractal compression of an image, then restore to an higher resolution than the original. You will get a more detailed image, but it's content will have been made-up.
Fractal compression existed well before Google and no idiot used this feature as proof AFAIK.
I cannot believe anybody in his right mind would take any "make-up" algorithm as reliable evidence. One has to be pretty ignorant, or criminally insane, to use what is a (very nice) party-trick in a court of laws.
The Paralympics make sense to me. I don't think I need to get into detail about this (Including the mandatory note of an amputee running faster than a fully organic champion).
Is that what they are saying for women in science ?
I'm not enough of a misogynistic bastard to think it makes sense, and that's saying a lot.
Contemplating this silly idea disqualifies the Dutch science academy from ever being taken seriously again.
Do you remember the time when we had these machines ? ZX-81, Alice32, Commodore 64, Schneider CPC 464 (as well as 664 and 6128), ...
For the less young among us, they were monolithic, kind of cheap computer toys. I say toy as it was the general view around here since kids were better at them than adults. (The image of programming = playing remained strong in my family from my 6th birthday until my first paycheck).
I can't help but feel that Apple went back to that time, when you could get these imitations of the real deal. They just innovated by replacing "cheaper" by "more expensive".
Lenovo has been caught putting spyware on its laptops.
Who in his right mind would buy any of their products ?
Self-destruct in 5 ... 4 ...
Windows 10 or SystemD, or a $2000 macbook pro with crippled ports. These are your choices in 2016.
I've been using a Manjaro-OpenRC instead of my W10 and loving every minute of it.