Thanks for this. I personally don't find it annoying -- as the pop-up video only talks about the report. At any rate, I have added an alternate source. Cheers.
I pulled it because we had already run it a week ago. A few readers submitted it today (actually, plenty of outlets have run the story today), hence the confusion.
Hi,
I'm the editor who approved the submission. I found it interesting and thought readers here will find it useful. It's not an advertisement, and I intentionally edited the headline and body text to make things clear.
Thanks for pointing that out. It's a feature article, so you wouldn't find this news elsewhere. I have updated the story to add a Google cache link of the story, check if that helps.
That was different. The company was making select Android apps available to Chrome OS users. And "the tools" that developers could use didn't include Google Play.
It was indeed a case of autocorrect system fixing my words for me. Apologies. Disabling this terrible extension I downloaded. Thanks for pointing out, guys.
1. It's an unmanned spacecraft -- so be rest assured that there is no person inside it that was trying to fix it. 2. It's a submission by an anonymous reader. 3. NASA hasn't made available the details of the people who worked on getting the spacecraft back to shape.
Thanks for the feedback, nonetheless.
Slashdot Mirror
Thanks. The story was based on a TechCrunch report. At the time of filing, these documents were not available, I feel.
Thanks to everyone who submitted similar stories.
It's a Bloomberg original report. So all roads will lead to the same destination. Nothing I can do about that.
Thanks for this. I personally don't find it annoying -- as the pop-up video only talks about the report. At any rate, I have added an alternate source. Cheers.
Yes sir. It's pretty sad, though.
For some reason, this whole fiasco reminds me of this scene from Office Space.
It is for the United States. I have added the links to the story, please have a look. Thanks.
Prison Break is returning in a few months.
Fixed! Was editing some other story, saw this breaking news -- had to quickly get it up.
I pulled it because we had already run it a week ago. A few readers submitted it today (actually, plenty of outlets have run the story today), hence the confusion.
My bad, folks. It's indeed July 29. Thanks for pointing it out -- have fixed it.
Hi, I'm the editor who approved the submission. I found it interesting and thought readers here will find it useful. It's not an advertisement, and I intentionally edited the headline and body text to make things clear.
Thanks for pointing that out. It's a feature article, so you wouldn't find this news elsewhere. I have updated the story to add a Google cache link of the story, check if that helps.
Glad you like it :) I played with Quartz's headline and made some tweaks.
Medium is relatively new in the business, and it currently does advertorial. And while it has avoided ads. That is likely to change soon (video).
That was different. The company was making select Android apps available to Chrome OS users. And "the tools" that developers could use didn't include Google Play.
Hi, I just read your article. It's very insightful. Have added it to the story.
best thing I have read in weeks.
It was indeed a case of autocorrect system fixing my words for me. Apologies. Disabling this terrible extension I downloaded. Thanks for pointing out, guys.
Hey, yeah just fixed all the glitches. Was planning to run this story later, but there was an issue with the timestamp.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Thanks :)
I hope you're not being sarcastic.
1. It's an unmanned spacecraft -- so be rest assured that there is no person inside it that was trying to fix it. 2. It's a submission by an anonymous reader. 3. NASA hasn't made available the details of the people who worked on getting the spacecraft back to shape. Thanks for the feedback, nonetheless.
What do you mean? We are talking about a spacecraft here.