Mass surveillance will start working for terrorism now! It really will this time! Just forget about all the possible abuses. You should trust us with your freedom!
That's not in line with their agenda of shaping our perception of China, Russia, and North Korea as backwards lands full of idiots that we are clearly better than.
Anything negative that anyone says about Nazis is automatically accepted without any kind of reference, proof, or rationale.
This complete omittance of critical thought is inexcusable. For the most important issues in our history, we must devote our rational faculties to understanding the causes, facts, and implications.
People knew that Adolf Hitler was a violent demagogue
Good reason to shut them down and go back to the sort of professional military intelligence that they replaced some decades back.
What makes you think "that kind" of professional military intelligence was replaced? That it doesn't exist and deals with a higher level of information refinement? Of course this is the scheme.
If you have the sense to guess that this is true, then you might start to realize that the object of intelligence is less defense and more governance. Military governance. That is the reality of our society.
Yet we continue to dance around an idea of mental illness that I would guarantee is foggy at best. Any clue would be dependent on this idea.
Anyway I was just pointing out how you are using the same lingo as the media is using. That may seem to some as though you aren't using your own words and give them reason to go jumping to assumptions about your opinions.
This is all business as usual. Things ALWAYS go like this.
You are trying to give your government an out by saying what a tragedy it is they were tricked into hiring these incompetent people. It. Was. All. Intentional. These people's incompetence is valuable. They are still good at their trained tasks, they are easily manipulable, and they allow for central command to go blameless because people like you assume that when something goes wrong it was a personal mistake of the people directly executing programs.
You a trampling right over my point with some serious tunnel-vision in on this.
The point is mental illness is looking more and more popularly accepted label but seems to be a completely irrational subjective judgement that seems akin to the label of "witch". What's more the way rumors are pieced out in the media makes it seem that promoting this ignorant paradigm is intentional and is being used to make the public more pliable in their opinions.
"Reports" does not seem accurate, it seems to imply a legitimacy that there is no proof of. I think "rumors" is more honest. "Red flags" is therefore melodramatic.
You are getting carried away judging some one you don't know for no reason and thereby closing off a rational discussion of what could cause a person to do things like this and thereby promoting blindness as to what causes these terrible events. We could be solving problems but instead we are stuck in a cycle of circular auto-gratification. This is why democracy fails.
so you're comfortable without completely abandoning rationale just as long as "it's just obvious"? You only have to whip out the critical thinking when you're not comfortable judging the situation on its face? It's all about your opinion right?
you're talking about things that honestly seem way over your head. You don't know what a right is. You are just echoing popular sentiment.
You do have a right to "force" others to pay attention. It's a natural right. It's a consequence of being able to live a free life. It's often called "protesting".
The event in question has nothing to do with mental illness.
But the story is what's important here, not the event. The story has EVERYTHING to do with mental illness.
People with physically damaged brains are mentally ill. People who don't conform to recent social doctrine are "mentally ill".
An obvious overtone in the media is the promotion of the idea of "mental illness". It's as though there is an agenda to get people to distrust each other for being odd and therefore dangerous.
Slashdot Mirror
AI is so harmless look at all the cute things it does!
no, it's a sign that they profit from delivering their customers to criminals
I wonder who he pissed off and how.
Makes no sense to assume the default explanation is true. He is dead, that is the only fact that cannot be manipulated.
Mass surveillance will start working for terrorism now! It really will this time!
Just forget about all the possible abuses. You should trust us with your freedom!
Is it just me or does Sony appear to be the target of a crazy amount of espionage?
All part of the plan to destabilize Japan and force it to go multicultural I guess.
Most of their users can barely read and write anyway
That's not in line with their agenda of shaping our perception of China, Russia, and North Korea as backwards lands full of idiots that we are clearly better than.
This story is proof the slashdot editors are for sale 100%
Stop trying to talk sense to the animals.
The headline is all they need to know.
Maybe stop waiting and start actively resisting
Anything negative that anyone says about Nazis is automatically accepted without any kind of reference, proof, or rationale.
This complete omittance of critical thought is inexcusable. For the most important issues in our history, we must devote our rational faculties to understanding the causes, facts, and implications.
Who? How? To what degree?
Trash thinking.
What makes you think "that kind" of professional military intelligence was replaced? That it doesn't exist and deals with a higher level of information refinement?
Of course this is the scheme.
If you have the sense to guess that this is true, then you might start to realize that the object of intelligence is less defense and more governance. Military governance. That is the reality of our society.
Yes you can.
It comes with a specific cost though:
Freedom
Yet we continue to dance around an idea of mental illness that I would guarantee is foggy at best. Any clue would be dependent on this idea.
Anyway I was just pointing out how you are using the same lingo as the media is using. That may seem to some as though you aren't using your own words and give them reason to go jumping to assumptions about your opinions.
You just aren't getting it I guess.
This is all business as usual. Things ALWAYS go like this.
You are trying to give your government an out by saying what a tragedy it is they were tricked into hiring these incompetent people.
It. Was. All. Intentional.
These people's incompetence is valuable. They are still good at their trained tasks, they are easily manipulable, and they allow for central command to go blameless because people like you assume that when something goes wrong it was a personal mistake of the people directly executing programs.
And some people are just automatically dismissive, ignorant herd animals
You a trampling right over my point with some serious tunnel-vision in on this.
The point is mental illness is looking more and more popularly accepted label but seems to be a completely irrational subjective judgement that seems akin to the label of "witch". What's more the way rumors are pieced out in the media makes it seem that promoting this ignorant paradigm is intentional and is being used to make the public more pliable in their opinions.
"Reports" does not seem accurate, it seems to imply a legitimacy that there is no proof of. I think "rumors" is more honest. "Red flags" is therefore melodramatic.
You are getting carried away judging some one you don't know for no reason and thereby closing off a rational discussion of what could cause a person to do things like this and thereby promoting blindness as to what causes these terrible events. We could be solving problems but instead we are stuck in a cycle of circular auto-gratification. This is why democracy fails.
where on fucking earth are you getting any of this from?
Yes, to a growing number of people, "hate" is anything that does not satisfy them.
What is your point? That Gay Nìggers should be banned? Why?
They are probably trying to provoke some thought in people who tend to think critically at the expense of people who tend to react emotionally.
I haven't seen them but I am good at not engaging in what I want to avoid.
"it's just obvious"
so you're comfortable without completely abandoning rationale just as long as "it's just obvious"? You only have to whip out the critical thinking when you're not comfortable judging the situation on its face? It's all about your opinion right?
you're talking about things that honestly seem way over your head. You don't know what a right is. You are just echoing popular sentiment.
You do have a right to "force" others to pay attention. It's a natural right. It's a consequence of being able to live a free life.
It's often called "protesting".
But how can you know it is destructive? You are missing the point of my questioning.
LOL
The event in question has nothing to do with mental illness.
But the story is what's important here, not the event.
The story has EVERYTHING to do with mental illness.
People with physically damaged brains are mentally ill.
People who don't conform to recent social doctrine are "mentally ill".
An obvious overtone in the media is the promotion of the idea of "mental illness". It's as though there is an agenda to get people to distrust each other for being odd and therefore dangerous.
INSIIIGHTFULL!!
you took the bull by the horns and tossed it outta the stadium on this one