They do, but just as CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, NPR, CBS, HuffPost, Salon, Mic, Vox, Rolling Stone, and Mother Jones, etc.. all lean left, from slightly left of center, to completely out of the ballpark.
It really needs to stop all around with the over-editorializing and partisanship. Newspapers should stop endorsing candidates, and stick to non-partisan objective reporting. But it'll never happen, because sensationalism sells.
Well, that would be fair turnabout for all the Clinton/Bernie supporters who attack Trump supporters, steal their signs, and vandalize GOP campaign offices, but I don't think they've sunk as low as that in that regard. If anyone has lived up to the Brown shirts ideal this election, it's been the Leftists, because actions speak louder than words.
Yes, it was different. He didn't run his own insecure server in an attempt to have complete control and deniability of the contents. The emails lost weren't under protection orders from the FBI.
Not if those messages outright contradict. That's not "tailoring" a message, that's lying, and it's especially not the same circumstance as some average Joe who yaks to his bar buddies, and someone who's currently running for high office; or would you like to use that defense for Trump too? He wasn't running for office 11 years ago, and maybe he was just talking smack, bragging to "bar buddies", "tailoring his message" to look more suave to them. Don't buy that? Good. Neither do I, but neither do I buy Hillary's innocence either.
BTW, nice ad-hominem dig in there to anyone who doesn't support your goddess as "small minded folk" and "anti-intellectual" (sounds Obama-esque). Why just insult the candidate you don't like when you can insult the people who won't support your pick as well?
That's the exact same kind of crap that Politifact pulls too, even more so. Their facts *may* be facts, but their final judgment is still highly subjective.
It only appears one-sided because the media appears quite willing to publish any dirt they can find Trump. We don't need to go to Wikileaks for that.
We also don't need any single media source to be impartial. We need multiple partial media sources to keep each other on their toes.
This is how I've always viewed Fox New's claim of "Fair and Balanced"; not internally, everyone knows they're right wing, but in the context of MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, NYT, Huffpost, NPR, Salon, Vox, Mic, Mother Jones, etc.. it provides a little balance in the media overall.
Not a total load of bullshit. I never said they didn't contribute to Rs, but the CEO is democrat, the organization is generally "progressive" and they have liberal leanings.
The Koch brothers also donated heavily to democrats, yet they are firmly labeled here as conservatives.
Except Comcast is quite squarely in bed with Democrats, in this case. Lobbyists are lobbyists, and both parties love them. Many Democrats talk publicly like they want less corporate influence, but mostly it's an act.
Fake Call Centers in India Scam Americans Of Millions
I denounce this racist spin for advancing the hillbilly prejudice against brown people as rapis..., err, never mind, scammers. This advances the othering and contributes to building of evil walls instead of welcoming bridges.
Obviously, specifying the criminals' country of origin, sex and gender-identity (not the same!!!!) as well as religion or skin-color, is racist.
(Unless, of course, they are White Christian males.)
And Poynter are the same openly liberal people who own the Tampa Bay Times, and politifact. But y'know, they're totally objective in their judgements, no bias whatsoever there.
Me too! I always use my cell phone for everything, including Internet; I even have the slashdot app. But obvious scam is obvious, I wasn't about to fall for th
I think it's a bit of both as well.. but since the reports were also lowered where/when certain cops didn't wear cameras (and they knew they weren't), it's possible that perps weren't sure if they were being recorded or not, and acted more civilized, where as a cop without a camera would carry on as always. So probably fewer false complaints, mostly, and the handful of whatever bad cops there are conducting themselves better.
Going bankrupt (by the way, Chapter 11, not Chapter7, know the difference) on 4 business (I've heard as many as 8) compared to the over 500 he's involved with is actually a pretty good track record, business-wise. Say whatever else you want about him, but to attack him on business acumen is not very convincing.
I changed the battery in my old iPhone5 some months back, but that was a major PITA that I don't think I'd do again; the case is hard enough to open without damaging it, but they glue the damn battery in too. In the end, I wound up leaving some a couple of small specks of loose kruft that showed in the camera lens.
Early muslims preserved much of the classical era knowledge, and built on it. As to who torched the Library of Alexandria, that's still a contentious issue up for debate; no one is sure. They filled the void left by the collapse of the Roman Empire, and fortunately they decided knowledge was valuable. Islamic nations have seriously regressed since then, but that was a different time.
And that's what led to the dark ages, the loss of classical knowledge for many centuries (at least as far as Europe was concerned). In fact, one could argue that without the rediscovery of that knowledge brought back to Europe by returning crusaders, which sparked the Renaissance, who knows.. we might've have remained in the dark ages to this day, or at best we'd be a couple of centuries behind where we are now. And that was with the early Islamic culture preserving much of that knowledge (sans Roman concrete, anyway); imagine if they'd felt it wasn't worth keeping, we could be a millennium behind.
In what way is that "racist"??
So the mere acknowledgment that humans are of different races,cultures, and languages is racist now? In what way did her assumption that an asian person might actually speak an asian language imply the superiority or inferiority of said asians? Or white/black people? Because that's what racism is, believing that a race is superior or inferior in some manner to other races. Racism in practice is treating a person worse or better than another, solely on the basis of their race.
Sounds to me like she was thoughtfully trying to accommodate the asian person.
Slashdot Mirror
They do, but just as CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, NPR, CBS, HuffPost, Salon, Mic, Vox, Rolling Stone, and Mother Jones, etc.. all lean left, from slightly left of center, to completely out of the ballpark.
It really needs to stop all around with the over-editorializing and partisanship. Newspapers should stop endorsing candidates, and stick to non-partisan objective reporting. But it'll never happen, because sensationalism sells.
Why on earth would she put in a rate limiter? One of the few things she's good at is collecting other people's money.
Here, have a look inside this small tin I just bought at the convenience store counter ..
Grand Ol' Vatican?
Looking on the bright side, Hitler did kill Hitler.
Well, that would be fair turnabout for all the Clinton/Bernie supporters who attack Trump supporters, steal their signs, and vandalize GOP campaign offices, but I don't think they've sunk as low as that in that regard. If anyone has lived up to the Brown shirts ideal this election, it's been the Leftists, because actions speak louder than words.
Yes, it was different. He didn't run his own insecure server in an attempt to have complete control and deniability of the contents. The emails lost weren't under protection orders from the FBI.
Not if those messages outright contradict. That's not "tailoring" a message, that's lying, and it's especially not the same circumstance as some average Joe who yaks to his bar buddies, and someone who's currently running for high office; or would you like to use that defense for Trump too? He wasn't running for office 11 years ago, and maybe he was just talking smack, bragging to "bar buddies", "tailoring his message" to look more suave to them. Don't buy that? Good. Neither do I, but neither do I buy Hillary's innocence either.
BTW, nice ad-hominem dig in there to anyone who doesn't support your goddess as "small minded folk" and "anti-intellectual" (sounds Obama-esque). Why just insult the candidate you don't like when you can insult the people who won't support your pick as well?
That's the exact same kind of crap that Politifact pulls too, even more so. Their facts *may* be facts, but their final judgment is still highly subjective.
Would you want Sarah Palin peeping in your back window? Sounds pretty creepy to me.
I dunno.. she's kinda hot, in a way.. or was, back then at least. As long as she didn't talk.
It only appears one-sided because the media appears quite willing to publish any dirt they can find Trump. We don't need to go to Wikileaks for that.
We also don't need any single media source to be impartial. We need multiple partial media sources to keep each other on their toes.
This is how I've always viewed Fox New's claim of "Fair and Balanced"; not internally, everyone knows they're right wing, but in the context of MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, NYT, Huffpost, NPR, Salon, Vox, Mic, Mother Jones, etc.. it provides a little balance in the media overall.
If it's any consolation, at least they rejected the notion of shutting it down.They want the White House to supervise it.
Not a total load of bullshit. I never said they didn't contribute to Rs, but the CEO is democrat, the organization is generally "progressive" and they have liberal leanings.
The Koch brothers also donated heavily to democrats, yet they are firmly labeled here as conservatives.
https://www.opensecrets.org/or...
http://usuncut.com/politics/de...
http://www.nationalcenter.org/...
Except Comcast is quite squarely in bed with Democrats, in this case. Lobbyists are lobbyists, and both parties love them. Many Democrats talk publicly like they want less corporate influence, but mostly it's an act.
Or write a candidate in.
I denounce this racist spin for advancing the hillbilly prejudice against brown people as rapis..., err, never mind, scammers. This advances the othering and contributes to building of evil walls instead of welcoming bridges.
Obviously, specifying the criminals' country of origin, sex and gender-identity (not the same!!!!) as well as religion or skin-color, is racist.
(Unless, of course, they are White Christian males.)
And Poynter are the same openly liberal people who own the Tampa Bay Times, and politifact. But y'know, they're totally objective in their judgements, no bias whatsoever there.
Me too! I always use my cell phone for everything, including Internet; I even have the slashdot app. But obvious scam is obvious, I wasn't about to fall for th
I think it's a bit of both as well.. but since the reports were also lowered where/when certain cops didn't wear cameras (and they knew they weren't), it's possible that perps weren't sure if they were being recorded or not, and acted more civilized, where as a cop without a camera would carry on as always. So probably fewer false complaints, mostly, and the handful of whatever bad cops there are conducting themselves better.
Going bankrupt (by the way, Chapter 11, not Chapter7, know the difference) on 4 business (I've heard as many as 8) compared to the over 500 he's involved with is actually a pretty good track record, business-wise. Say whatever else you want about him, but to attack him on business acumen is not very convincing.
Anyway, if you want a headphone jack on the iPhone, all you have to do is drill it in the right place. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Did you really think that would fool anyone here?
I changed the battery in my old iPhone5 some months back, but that was a major PITA that I don't think I'd do again; the case is hard enough to open without damaging it, but they glue the damn battery in too. In the end, I wound up leaving some a couple of small specks of loose kruft that showed in the camera lens.
Early muslims preserved much of the classical era knowledge, and built on it. As to who torched the Library of Alexandria, that's still a contentious issue up for debate; no one is sure. They filled the void left by the collapse of the Roman Empire, and fortunately they decided knowledge was valuable. Islamic nations have seriously regressed since then, but that was a different time.
And that's what led to the dark ages, the loss of classical knowledge for many centuries (at least as far as Europe was concerned). In fact, one could argue that without the rediscovery of that knowledge brought back to Europe by returning crusaders, which sparked the Renaissance, who knows.. we might've have remained in the dark ages to this day, or at best we'd be a couple of centuries behind where we are now. And that was with the early Islamic culture preserving much of that knowledge (sans Roman concrete, anyway); imagine if they'd felt it wasn't worth keeping, we could be a millennium behind.
I took it that he was surreptitiously busting on her, saying she's only been an "adult" for the past 4 years. I chuckled.
In what way is that "racist"?? ,cultures, and languages is racist now? In what way did her assumption that an asian person might actually speak an asian language imply the superiority or inferiority of said asians? Or white/black people? Because that's what racism is, believing that a race is superior or inferior in some manner to other races. Racism in practice is treating a person worse or better than another, solely on the basis of their race.
So the mere acknowledgment that humans are of different races
Sounds to me like she was thoughtfully trying to accommodate the asian person.