Well bully for you, aren't you just ever so special, you Internet Tough Guy, you.
As for the non-morons among us, we have to live in this thing called a society, which is run by this other thing called a government, so what "we should be taking responsibility for" is electing a leader who is marginally capable of doing the damn job.
Which, in case you're terminally sarcasm-impaired, is why ALL government lobbying for BOTH parties needs to be a) truly public, i.e. easily available to and searchable by EVERYONE, and b) capped at a sane figure, say $1000 MAXIMUM per lobbyist.
There's a reason the breathless old bugger's become the canonical naturalist: he's always worked with terrific photographers who use the best equipment available to them at the time.
Ooh, are these the same history books that refer to slaves as "workers"?
Because American history books are NEVER EVER EVER biased, nope, nope, nosiree.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/1...
Wrong. Free markets allow competition right up until one player swallows enough of the competition to become a monopoly.
Then you're completely screwed without regulation to break up those monopolies.
Ma Bell, anyone?
All of which just goes to show that the so-called "pro-lifers" are absolutely nothing of the sort. They're all about controlling women and punishing them for having sex, and they'll happily murder doctors and let women die to make it happen.
Protip: if it doesn't have a god then IT ISN'T A RELIGION, you definition-mangling moron.
Unless, of course, you're claiming that public schools are teaching the explicitly nontheistic varieties of Buddhism, Hinduism, etc., but I really doubt you are.
Slashdot Mirror
Yyyeeeaaahhh because men NEVER EVER EVER spoke up for themselves before Trump. Riiiiiiiiight.
it's got to suck when one is in love with someone who they cannot create biological offspring with
It's got to suck when you're so braindead your One True Definition Of Love TM is cranking out the crotchdroppings.
FTFY.
Lies. Coors Light HAS no taste!
Of course it's factually false.
Conservatives harass and abuse women FAR FAR MORE.
It's right there in their POLICIES.
Yeah, how annoying is that?
What the hell was wrong with the old UI where you could change your damn selection in the dropdown?
Surely this new one means the moderations must be less accurate, because there is NO way to correct mistakes?
On what planet is less accurate moderation a good idea?
Well bully for you, aren't you just ever so special, you Internet Tough Guy, you.
As for the non-morons among us, we have to live in this thing called a society, which is run by this other thing called a government, so what "we should be taking responsibility for" is electing a leader who is marginally capable of doing the damn job.
Budgie ripple!
Which, in case you're terminally sarcasm-impaired, is why ALL government lobbying for BOTH parties needs to be a) truly public, i.e. easily available to and searchable by EVERYONE, and b) capped at a sane figure, say $1000 MAXIMUM per lobbyist.
The US has the BEST government MONEY CAN BUY.
There's a reason the breathless old bugger's become the canonical naturalist: he's always worked with terrific photographers who use the best equipment available to them at the time.
The original and still the best!
THIS! How I wish they'd do a similar-quality update of "The Ascent of Man".
Bronowski's book from the series was bloody amazing too.
https://www.amazon.com/Ascent-...
Ooh, are these the same history books that refer to slaves as "workers"? Because American history books are NEVER EVER EVER biased, nope, nope, nosiree. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/1...
Wrong. Free markets allow competition right up until one player swallows enough of the competition to become a monopoly. Then you're completely screwed without regulation to break up those monopolies. Ma Bell, anyone?
No. No thought whatsoever was involved in that post of yours.
Bzzt, WRONG answer! Hint: what do you do when ALL the apps are shitty?
Somebody got the goooood drugs.
"larvae". What wonderful father material you aren't.
All of which just goes to show that the so-called "pro-lifers" are absolutely nothing of the sort. They're all about controlling women and punishing them for having sex, and they'll happily murder doctors and let women die to make it happen.
You Must Be New Here.
I don't see the folks on the right trying to actively suppress the liberal views being presented in public.
The only way you can't be seeing it is if your head is so far up your ass you'll never see daylight again.
Conservatives are VERY actively trying, in many ways, across many states, to MAKE PROTEST ILLEGAL.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/02/24/republican-lawmakers-introduce-bills-to-curb-protesting-in-at-least-17-states/
So much for that pesky bit in the constitution about the right to protest.
Since when do you have to PAY for a Twitter account?
Protip: if it doesn't have a god then IT ISN'T A RELIGION, you definition-mangling moron. Unless, of course, you're claiming that public schools are teaching the explicitly nontheistic varieties of Buddhism, Hinduism, etc., but I really doubt you are.
That's one for the proctology journals...
Step 1: Skinbots Step 2: Sexbots Step 3: PROFIT! Step 4: Retread GOTO Step 1
When has it ever?