When Obama was president, criticism of him was proof that you are a racist and don't deserve to have rights*.
When Trump will be president, refusal to fall in line and mouth the slurs that have been prepared for you to utter without thinking will be proof that you are a racist and don't deserve to have rights.
* Certain left-wing extremists who criticize him for "not going far enough" can be granted an exclusion (consistency is also a trait of racism).
Where the fuck are all these special-snowflake IBM employees when they have no problem helping their corporate masters commit actual violations of civil liberties in China?
That's because racist Donald Trump put a stupid 'park' over it to prevent it from giving free energy to LGBTQRPLMNOPs because he hates everybody.
But you know what's similar to 'park'? I'll tell you... a camp. Donald Trump turned Yellowstone into a concentration camp and anybody denying it is spreading fake news and should be shot.
'Muricans are anti-science idiots who deny the existence of volcanoes, which is why they don't live directly on top of one that can supply them with heat and lava.
I personally blame Trump's racist wall for keeping out the undocument volcanoes.
Given the cult-like atmosphere at the EPA and the frankly abusive behavior towards the citizens it supposedly exists to protect I think some reduction in useless bloat is warranted.
Oh, and since the science is settled abuot climate change, the EPA obviously doesn't need anybody to research it... right?
Yeah so if this happened here in America we'd have the usual litany of whines about how Net Neutrality has been destroyed and that it's all Trump's fault blah blah blah.
The article cites Slashdot reader Larry Press as "a California-based expert on the Cuban internet," who also shares some more thoughts on his blog. "I'd love to see a country -- even a small one -- in which Google Plus was more popular than Facebook."
OK, it looks like this "Larry Press" is identified as being "Slashdot reader" as idiotic attempt at an appeal to authority that can't even be arsed to include a legitimate authority to which the appeal should be addressed. Congratulations overpaid douchenozzle Slashdot "editors", you couldn't even pull off a logical fallacy properly.
While nobody wants a huge abusive spy agency tracking Americans at all times, there are going to be plenty of people on here jumping up and down hoping for the destruction of the NSA... while simultaneously running around like chickens with their heads cut off claiming that Russian Hackers are the sole reason that Trump is president.
Do you have any evidence that this Bannon person is a racist?
For example I have incontrovertible proof that, Keith Ellison, who is a front runner to run the Democratic National Committee, is an anti-semitic bigot.
China us left-wing!!! Only a deluded white-supremaist KKK member would think that. China is more in line with the current Republican party line of thinking.
Fascinating. I guess since Obama can't say enough good things about China then Obama must be a deluded white-supremaist KKK member. Either that or Obama is actually a Republican... yeah that's it.
If only Aaron Sorkin wasn't still detoxing from all that Xanax he took after the election. You could be writing 10 minute long self-indulgent monologues for his next failed cable show.
So people only have rights if you decided that they've been discriminated against -- as a class and not individually I might add -- in the past?
You know who else said that? Hitler. He rose to power based on a message that the Germans as a class were being oppressed and unfairly blamed for everything bad that happened in WW1. In his mind he was just as oppressed as you claim anyone else is, and you both place your arbitrary assignment of who gets to have rights or not based on that irrational subjective emotional perspective.
This is what happens when you decide that laws and principles don't matter just as long as you get to arrive at the emotionally-correct "result" where all those people you don't like can be sent off to the camps.
Just remember that Hitler literally agreed with EVERYTHING you are saying. He just swapped "gay" or "jew" with Nazi based on his subjective emotional feelings to come to his conclusion. His irrational emotions are just as valid as your irrational emotions, just as his stupid conclusion is just as invalid as your stupid conclusion.
Yes, and you get to decide for us who gets to be "protected" or not be "protected" based on some vague emotional reaction.
After all, those Nazis were totally evil for enforcing a rule of law that applied rights equally to all citizens instead of deciding that some people were in a "protected category" while other people aren't in a "protected category" oh wait.
After all, some animals are more equal than others.
Funny how you accuse Trump of fascism while confirming that you are a fascist.
Sweden must be full of racist, misogynist DENIERS because they racistly claimed that snow still exists in the world of APOCALYPTIC GLOBAL WARMING and even abandoned their non-patriarchal non-removal of non-existent snow policy: http://dailycaller.com/2016/11...
Copying the software to those machines might be a technical violation of the license, but was there any evidence that those unlicensed copies were ever actually used?
Otherwise, this is more of a theoretical violation as opposed to showing that the Navy was using software that it just didn't want to pay for.
Slashdot Mirror
Slashdot can't go more than a few days without the usual article about how backwards the U.S. is and how far advanced China's "green" energy is.
Does this mean that green energy is the cause of all this air pollution?
When Obama was president, criticism of him was proof that you are a racist and don't deserve to have rights*.
When Trump will be president, refusal to fall in line and mouth the slurs that have been prepared for you to utter without thinking will be proof that you are a racist and don't deserve to have rights.
* Certain left-wing extremists who criticize him for "not going far enough" can be granted an exclusion (consistency is also a trait of racism).
Where the fuck are all these special-snowflake IBM employees when they have no problem helping their corporate masters commit actual violations of civil liberties in China?
http://vannevar.blogspot.com/2...
That's because racist Donald Trump put a stupid 'park' over it to prevent it from giving free energy to LGBTQRPLMNOPs because he hates everybody.
But you know what's similar to 'park'? I'll tell you... a camp. Donald Trump turned Yellowstone into a concentration camp and anybody denying it is spreading fake news and should be shot.
'Muricans are anti-science idiots who deny the existence of volcanoes, which is why they don't live directly on top of one that can supply them with heat and lava.
I personally blame Trump's racist wall for keeping out the undocument volcanoes.
Given the cult-like atmosphere at the EPA and the frankly abusive behavior towards the citizens it supposedly exists to protect I think some reduction in useless bloat is warranted.
Oh, and since the science is settled abuot climate change, the EPA obviously doesn't need anybody to research it... right?
Yeah so if this happened here in America we'd have the usual litany of whines about how Net Neutrality has been destroyed and that it's all Trump's fault blah blah blah.
But if it happens in Cuba? Cool, no problem.
OK, it looks like this "Larry Press" is identified as being "Slashdot reader" as idiotic attempt at an appeal to authority that can't even be arsed to include a legitimate authority to which the appeal should be addressed. Congratulations overpaid douchenozzle Slashdot "editors", you couldn't even pull off a logical fallacy properly.
While nobody wants a huge abusive spy agency tracking Americans at all times, there are going to be plenty of people on here jumping up and down hoping for the destruction of the NSA... while simultaneously running around like chickens with their heads cut off claiming that Russian Hackers are the sole reason that Trump is president.
You can't have it both ways.
Do you have any evidence that this Bannon person is a racist?
For example I have incontrovertible proof that, Keith Ellison, who is a front runner to run the Democratic National Committee, is an anti-semitic bigot.
You can listen to an analysis of him right here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Fascinating. I guess since Obama can't say enough good things about China then Obama must be a deluded white-supremaist KKK member. Either that or Obama is actually a Republican... yeah that's it.
Can we contact Obama to have him punish Slashdot for posting more fake news?
Meanwhile, to burst your propaganda bubble about China is so welcoming and "tolerant" of immigrants, try this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Amazon needs to innovate suicide-prevention nets just like Tim Cook did.
Come to think of it, suicided-prevention nets are about the only thing that Tim Cook can credibly claim he innovated...
Take that strawman you invented in your head!
If only Aaron Sorkin wasn't still detoxing from all that Xanax he took after the election. You could be writing 10 minute long self-indulgent monologues for his next failed cable show.
Obama shows once again how he is a global citizen by complaining about Fake News just like China.
Thank you Obama, if only you could save us from Trump.
I vote that Poland be retroactively punished for the disgusting xenophobia it showed towards Germany and the Soviet Union in WWII.
Furthermore, the Ukraine shouldn't be allowed to get away with its Xenophobia against undocumented Russian immigration.
So people only have rights if you decided that they've been discriminated against -- as a class and not individually I might add -- in the past?
You know who else said that? Hitler. He rose to power based on a message that the Germans as a class were being oppressed and unfairly blamed for everything bad that happened in WW1. In his mind he was just as oppressed as you claim anyone else is, and you both place your arbitrary assignment of who gets to have rights or not based on that irrational subjective emotional perspective.
This is what happens when you decide that laws and principles don't matter just as long as you get to arrive at the emotionally-correct "result" where all those people you don't like can be sent off to the camps.
Just remember that Hitler literally agreed with EVERYTHING you are saying. He just swapped "gay" or "jew" with Nazi based on his subjective emotional feelings to come to his conclusion. His irrational emotions are just as valid as your irrational emotions, just as his stupid conclusion is just as invalid as your stupid conclusion.
Yes, and you get to decide for us who gets to be "protected" or not be "protected" based on some vague emotional reaction.
After all, those Nazis were totally evil for enforcing a rule of law that applied rights equally to all citizens instead of deciding that some people were in a "protected category" while other people aren't in a "protected category" oh wait.
After all, some animals are more equal than others.
Funny how you accuse Trump of fascism while confirming that you are a fascist.
Drink the koolaid and ascend to the mothership!
But But But... TRUMP!
There is no future. He's already destroyed the economy and the climate forever.. didn't you fucking read Slashdot's goodthink headlines!?!?!?
I declare this to be a fake story and demand that Zuckerberg delete it from my safe space!
Sweden must be full of racist, misogynist DENIERS because they racistly claimed that snow still exists in the world of APOCALYPTIC GLOBAL WARMING and even abandoned their non-patriarchal non-removal of non-existent snow policy: http://dailycaller.com/2016/11...
DAMMIT TRUMP!
Copying the software to those machines might be a technical violation of the license, but was there any evidence that those unlicensed copies were ever actually used?
Otherwise, this is more of a theoretical violation as opposed to showing that the Navy was using software that it just didn't want to pay for.
Damn Russkies stopping Clinton by attacking their own banks!
That's a good way to illustrate the post-hoc fallacies Slashdot is relying on these days.
Russian Hackers did shit during practically every day of Obama's presidency.
Conspiracy?!?!?!?!?