"Yesterday, AMD announced a new graphics card, the $700 Radeon VII, based on its second-generation Vega architecture. The GPU is the first one available to consumers based on the 7nm process. It's impressive technology, and Nvidia has touted it as the primary reason to upgrade from previous generation GPUs. AMD's GPUs, notably, do not support it."
So AMD made a GPU that NVIDIA thinks is the primary reason to upgrade, yet AMD doesn't support it. DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY READ WHAT THEY APPROVE TO BE POSTED?
It's all about copyright, correct? Copyright only applies to creative expressions. Purely functional expressions are not protected. APIs only provide context for calling functions and passing parameters. They, themselves, do not perform any function but merely describe how the function should be called.
The original ruling was mistaken. Google's use was not Fair Use. What was copied wasn't subject to copyright to begin with. Google used Java APIs but wrote the code behind the APIs. Oracle invented a new copyrightable thing, Structure, Sequence, and Organization. There is nothing in law to support this view.
Funny you mention that. When I first heard of it, I bought the game. I didn't download it or play it, I just bought it. And I explained to them why I did as well!;)
It's not easy, but it can be done. The USB keyloggers present themselves over the USB bus as a keyboard, but not necessarily YOUR keyboard. They will have the same USB vendor/device ID across all of the devices. So look for that ID in place of your normal keyboard. Boom, detected in software.;)
PC-MOS used 32bit Enhanced Mode of the 386 to make a multiuser/multitasking DOS. Making sure you've correctly defined the unused address space between 640K and 1024K was absolutely required and was a bit of black magic.
PC-MOS was good at a few apps, terrible on others. If it worked, it worked well. Most of the time it didn't work.:(
(Trained and certified on PC-MOS back in the day.)
Did the lack of this feature affect your buying decision? If it's a part of the chipset that the phone vendor didn't implement because nobody wanted it, can you really be upset for not having it?
OTOH, Other markets really use this feature. If it's there and people want it, it will happen. This might be the first step.
The officer may be guilty of misrepresentation, but I blame NASA for not telling folks how to handle a NASA phone. CITIZENS have no requirement to answer any questions or facilitate a search. Leave the phone and keep walking.
It's beta code for an OS that came out last week, something unsupported by the vendor. It doesn't work with AV and you want a refund. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-...
I agree, you should move to another vendor. Do Avast a favor.
So a self-extracting RAR can be rigged to exploit your machine. A self-extracting RAR is an executable. So a executable from an untrusted source can exploit your box. Wake me when you have a real vulnerability.
Oh, and samzenpus, that was the most clickbait bullshit Slashdot headline in months. You should be horsewhipped.
You mean like the company that lost the root key material for their authentication tokens? The one that wanted to charge customers to replace the tokens that they themselves compromised by lax and ineffective key handling procedures? What was that companies name again?
I can't tell you. But the history is the history. The product is infamous for it's crippling security bugs over many many years. PHP was shit a decade ago, and it hasn't gotten any better. Featurits? That's part of it.
Slashdot Mirror
Absolutely better for you. Nicotine is no worse for you than caffeine. It's the other nasties in tobacco that are bad for you.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/s...
"Yesterday, AMD announced a new graphics card, the $700 Radeon VII, based on its second-generation Vega architecture. The GPU is the first one available to consumers based on the 7nm process. It's impressive technology, and Nvidia has touted it as the primary reason to upgrade from previous generation GPUs. AMD's GPUs, notably, do not support it."
So AMD made a GPU that NVIDIA thinks is the primary reason to upgrade, yet AMD doesn't support it. DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY READ WHAT THEY APPROVE TO BE POSTED?
Who do they really expect to buy a reboot of some shitty DOS game? Who. Cares. Get over yourselves.
OMG! Google has hit peak Microsoft! Lol!
Bela Legosi's dead...
It's all about copyright, correct? Copyright only applies to creative expressions. Purely functional expressions are not protected. APIs only provide context for calling functions and passing parameters. They, themselves, do not perform any function but merely describe how the function should be called.
The original ruling was mistaken. Google's use was not Fair Use. What was copied wasn't subject to copyright to begin with. Google used Java APIs but wrote the code behind the APIs. Oracle invented a new copyrightable thing, Structure, Sequence, and Organization. There is nothing in law to support this view.
Funny you mention that. When I first heard of it, I bought the game. I didn't download it or play it, I just bought it. And I explained to them why I did as well! ;)
"...no way for an OS to detect it."
It's not easy, but it can be done. The USB keyloggers present themselves over the USB bus as a keyboard, but not necessarily YOUR keyboard. They will have the same USB vendor/device ID across all of the devices. So look for that ID in place of your normal keyboard. Boom, detected in software. ;)
PC-MOS used 32bit Enhanced Mode of the 386 to make a multiuser/multitasking DOS. Making sure you've correctly defined the unused address space between 640K and 1024K was absolutely required and was a bit of black magic.
PC-MOS was good at a few apps, terrible on others. If it worked, it worked well. Most of the time it didn't work. :(
(Trained and certified on PC-MOS back in the day.)
Where does the time go?
Did the lack of this feature affect your buying decision? If it's a part of the chipset that the phone vendor didn't implement because nobody wanted it, can you really be upset for not having it?
OTOH, Other markets really use this feature. If it's there and people want it, it will happen. This might be the first step.
The officer may be guilty of misrepresentation, but I blame NASA for not telling folks how to handle a NASA phone. CITIZENS have no requirement to answer any questions or facilitate a search. Leave the phone and keep walking.
Nope.The first woman to lose a presidential election was Victoria Woodhull in 1872, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.
Filthy casuals...
You've been here a long time. If you haven't left by now, you're not going anywhere.
It's beta code for an OS that came out last week, something unsupported by the vendor. It doesn't work with AV and you want a refund. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-...
I agree, you should move to another vendor. Do Avast a favor.
Shhhh. He's going to post it on Twitter. ;p
Can they subpoena signing keys? Can they force Apple to sign a firmware used to bypass protections? That's really the question here.
Sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.
"How Content Theft Sites and Malware Are Exploited By Cybercriminals to Hack Into Internet Users' Computers and Personal Data"
And you've blown any credibility you may have had.
"remote" as in, unlikely to affect users smart enough to avoid running untrusted binaries.
So a self-extracting RAR can be rigged to exploit your machine. A self-extracting RAR is an executable. So a executable from an untrusted source can exploit your box. Wake me when you have a real vulnerability.
Oh, and samzenpus, that was the most clickbait bullshit Slashdot headline in months. You should be horsewhipped.
You can make a damn effective single-shot shotgun with plumbing parts from the hardware store for about $12.
You mean like the company that lost the root key material for their authentication tokens? The one that wanted to charge customers to replace the tokens that they themselves compromised by lax and ineffective key handling procedures? What was that companies name again?
I can't tell you. But the history is the history. The product is infamous for it's crippling security bugs over many many years. PHP was shit a decade ago, and it hasn't gotten any better. Featurits? That's part of it.