Slashdot Mirror


Tobacco Use is Soaring Among US Kids, Driven By E-cigarettes (axios.com)

Public health officials Monday said there's a growing epidemic of tobacco products currently used by children -- 4.9 million high school and middle school kids used tobacco products in 2018 up from 3.6 million in 2017 -- mainly due to a growth in e-cigarette usage. From a report: For the fifth year in a row, e-cigs were the most popular product amongst high school students, but in 2018 it reached unprecedented epidemic levels, with the addition of another 1.5 million kids, said Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Current users" are defined as people who've used a tobacco product in past 30 days. "Frequent users" are defined as people who've used the product for more than 20 out of the past 30 days.

246 comments

  1. e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I personally doubt they are any better for you, but vape juice is definately not tobacco.

    1. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by pegr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely better for you. Nicotine is no worse for you than caffeine. It's the other nasties in tobacco that are bad for you.

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/s...
       

    2. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I personally doubt they are any better for you

      They are certainly better that tobacco. Nicotine is bad, but the other stuff in tobacco smoke is worse, and you avoid that with vaping.

      The problem is that kids are stupid and naive, and they don't realize that vaping is just as addictive as tobacco. By the time they realize how stupid it is, they are hooked.

      We need to find a way to keep vaping devices away from pre-18ers. Maybe move to a prescription model. But that might mean less harm reduction for smokers. It is a difficult issue.

    3. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by wiggles · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not true. Nicotine is directly associated with increased stroke and heart attacks. It attacks the venous system.

      https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com...

    4. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by tk77 · · Score: 2

      Absolutely better for you....

      Perhaps a better way to put it would be "not as terrible for you".

      http://www.center4research.org...

    5. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The health affects of caffeine aren't fully known, but Nicotine does reduce your body's defenses against cancer.

      You're right that vaping is definitely less unhealthy than cigarettes though.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by slashkitty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As does caffeine!

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    7. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by EvilSS · · Score: 0

      Did you even read that study?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    8. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by danlip · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, nicotine is much more addictive than caffeine. It would be a mistake to equate them. And there are a variety of other chemicals in the vapes, which may or may not be harmful. And nicotine itself may contribute to cancer too.

    9. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by wiggles · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. Caffeine in the form of 4 cups or more of coffee per day actually has a preventative effect according to this meta-analysis:
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

    10. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Informative

      As does caffeine!

      Quite the opposite. Caffeine (and more broadly, the coffee that many people consume it in), has all sorts of wide ranging health benefits. There have been hundreds of studies by people trying to prove how unhealthy coffee (and caffeine) is, and all the studies ending up proving the exact opposite; that it actually reduces all sorts of illnesses.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      From your link:

      Conclusions: The use of NRT is not associated with any increase in the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death.

      So no, nicotine minus the tar, particulates, and carbon monoxide is NOT associated with an increased of cardiovascular risk.

      Looks like you read what you (for some reason) wanted to read rather than what was written.

    12. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Tobacco may give you a stroke, heart attack, or cancer. Maybe not.

      But it WILL give you COPD. It's only a matter of frequency and time.

      I buried my Dad two years ago and my Mom three months ago. Both smokers. Both COPD. And it's an awful way to die.

      FUCK cigarettes.

    13. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It actually isn't as addictive as tobacco. Cigarette smoke contains MAO inhibitors that potentiate the addictive properties of nicotine. Vape juice doesn't have those.

      Some vape juice doesn't even have nicotine.

    14. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by fuzznutz · · Score: 2

      The health affects of caffeine aren't fully known, but Nicotine does reduce your body's defenses against cancer.

      You're right that vaping is definitely less unhealthy than cigarettes though.

      Until it blows up in your face and kills you.

      https://www.huffingtonpost.com...

    15. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So no, nicotine minus the tar, particulates, and carbon monoxide is NOT associated with an increased of cardiovascular risk.

      BUT...you don't get the enjoyment of lighting one up on the vape thing.

      What was half the fun of smoking real cigarettes....carrying lighters, firing it up, etc....

      I guess the vape things are ok for quitting smoking....but really, once you get off the nicotine, they aren't nearly so much fun as real smoking that uses real fire, and other things like flicking ashes, etc...it kept your non-drinking hand busy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 0

      We need to find a way to keep vaping devices away from pre-18ers.

      Unilateral permanent confiscation of the vaping device when they are caught, a criminal record that stays on file for the next 7 years even though they are a minor, and the threat of losing access to public education if they are caught again might do the trick, at the very least, it will put the parent(s) or guardians in the loop who might be better equipped to deal with whatever further disciplinary actions are required.

    17. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Informative

      As does caffeine!

      Quite the opposite. Caffeine (and more broadly, the coffee that many people consume it in), has all sorts of wide ranging health benefits. There have been hundreds of studies by people trying to prove how unhealthy coffee (and caffeine) is, and all the studies ending up proving the exact opposite; that it actually reduces all sorts of illnesses.

      In moderation though - I have a friend who damn near died from palpitations brought on by coffee consumption.

      As well, the puritans who are shitting their pants because the tobacco users have found a loophole in vaping need vaping to be made as socially unacceptable as tobacco products.

      As a coffee addict, I can tell you that they are hoping to latch onto it as the next thing to be eradicated.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From your link:

      Conclusions: The use of NRT is not associated with any increase in the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death.

      So no, nicotine minus the tar, particulates, and carbon monoxide is NOT associated with an increased of cardiovascular risk.

      Looks like you read what you (for some reason) wanted to read rather than what was written.

      It is the modern purist's version of reefer madness. The puritans don't need actual facts.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, it is believed that the ritual of smoking is a significant contributor to the addiction.

    20. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The health affects of caffeine aren't fully known, but Nicotine does reduce your body's defenses against cancer.

      You're right that vaping is definitely less unhealthy than cigarettes though.

      I have some bad news for you about nitrates in vegetables. https://livehealthy.chron.com/... But bacon is bad!

      Life is invariably fatal. SO if you aren't doing harm, chillaxe, bro. And while you are at it, check out the effects of phytoestrogens, which are heavy in foods that are considered the most healthy things you can eat these days. It takes a suspension of logic to think that vaping is any worse than that.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    21. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Troll

      However, nicotine is much more addictive than caffeine. It would be a mistake to equate them. And there are a variety of other chemicals in the vapes, which may or may not be harmful. And nicotine itself may contribute to cancer too.

      And maryjooanna - AKA devil's lettuce -makes black people violent! That sounds insane, but once upon a time, that was considered to be truth,

      The nicotine causes cancer bugaboo is so easy to pull out. Yet it backfires on the puritans on occasion, like when they shit their panties about bacon and cured meats "causing cancer" then we found out that humans get most of their nitrate load from....... wait for it..... veggies!

      We should make eating veggies illegal, just to be safe.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In moderation though

      Nearly all caffeine users have little difficulty keeping their use in the "good" range. But for nicotine, there is no "good" range, and it is far more addictive.

      As well, the puritans who are shitting their pants because the tobacco users have found a loophole in vaping

      Nonsense. We are only shitting our pants over kids getting ahold of vaping devices. Adults can do what they want.

      Do you really think that putting a highly addictive and harmful product into the hands of kids is acceptable? They are too stupid and naive to understand the consequences.

    23. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We need to find a way to keep vaping devices away from pre-18ers.

      Unilateral permanent confiscation of the vaping device when they are caught, a criminal record that stays on file for the next 7 years even though they are a minor, and the threat of losing access to public education if they are caught again might do the trick, at the very least, it will put the parent(s) or guardians in the loop who might be better equipped to deal with whatever further disciplinary actions are required.

      Holy fuck, you left out summary and immediate execution.

      I suspect you are Poeing, but if not, I think it was W.F. Buckley, ont of my two favorite conservatives, who suffered fro glaucoma and went offshore to treat it with devil's lettuce that said:

      " Marijuana laws have unquestionably destroyed more lives than marijuana ever did." reminds me of your suggestion.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    24. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A longitudinal study by the NIH found that vaping is a gateway to smoking, and it is likely that access to vapers increases tobacco use among adolescents.

    25. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "People's health depends on it!"

      perhaps use the more modern "for the children"? that seems to be the preferred method of whipping up hysteria.

    26. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Tawnos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > for nicotine, there is no "good" range, and it is far more addictive.

      Are you sure about that? From what I've read, there's a potentiating effect of the nicotine caused by MAOIs in tobacco. Further, I have a very hard time finding studies about the health effects of nicotine that isn't from tobacco (smoked, chewed, or otherwise ingested). The health effects of nicotine sans tobacco seem akin to those of caffeine.

    27. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    28. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. I used Nicorette lozenges this summer to help me lose some weight curbing cravings while doing fasting. I used no more than 2mg per day and I stopped using it for more than a month. I haven't even though of using it or needing it again.

    29. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the one reaching too far. We currently do much of what is described for persons caught drinking before age 21 (thanks feds) and so if vaping is illegal for young'uns, then there should be similar penalties.

      I support making all vaping by prescription only. If you want to get off tobacco, it can't be that hard to get a prescription. Heck, plenty of people lined up for Marijuana prescriptions.

    30. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, it is believed that the ritual of smoking is a significant contributor to the addiction.

      Oh, absolutely the ritual.

      While I'm glad I quit smoking....it really WAS nice to smoke in bars while drinking. You can still in most places down here....and it is tempting.

      There's also the social aspect of it....maybe diminishing,

      BUT...I found at work as they made you smoke outside, I often was talking with co-workers I don't sit near and getting scuttlebutt, I also found myself talking with people MUCH higher up on the totem pole than I, and while I had their ear, I'd give my views on things as well as getting inside info on how things were going. Often I got selected for things due to familiarity driving I believe in part, by them knowing who I was out in the "smoke hole" with them.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 0

      Holy fuck, you left out summary and immediate execution.

      Such measures should not be necessary.

      The idea is to bring real world consequences for a person's choices, and the fact that they are a minor should not factor into it.

      And the severity of the measures I've described would probably prevent repeat offenders as well... those that did repeat could find themselves on pretty darn hard times in the years to come... but again, that's a path that they *CHOSE* to go down.

      We like to sometimes protect children from the consequences of foolish choices, but sometimes as adults we have to let them feel the ramifications of being thoughtless or not caring about the consequences of an action. What I've described is harsh, but if they behave themselves afterwards, it shouldn't be life altering.... even the criminal record I suggested wouldn't be around forever, and may even be gone by the time they graduate post secondary. Maybe 7 years is too long, but I'm sure something could be worked out.

    32. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The social aspect at work is very definitely there. Indoors, you couldn't even get 10 seconds with the boss's boss. In the smoking area you could shoot the breeze w/ the CEO.

      When I did system installs, I found that a trip to the designated smoking area was sometimes a great way to break through a management log jam.

    33. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      And maryjooanna - AKA devil's lettuce -makes black people violent!

      Well, that makes sense. Virginia Governor Ralph Northam latest explanation is that a bong hit made him wear blackface.

      . . . or maybe it was his measles vaccination . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    34. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your friend had a preexisting heart condition.

    35. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea. Have them explode about 10% of the time. It'll be like Russian Roulette! It'll quickly eliminate the people stupid enough to start doing it in the first place. That would be a major win for the human gene pool.

    36. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not according to the FDA. In their view, all vape juice is a tobacco product.

      Liquids that use nicotine derived from tomatoes or eggplants, still a tobacco product.

      Liquids that contain absolutely no nicotine at all are also still considered a tobacco product.

      I am a diabetic and I took up vaping zero nic liquids as a way to gorge on sweet flavors without affecting my glucose levels and I know a lot of older people who use zero nic vapes for similar reasons. A lot of the 18-21 year old vapers I encounter at vape shops also tend to go with zero nicotine juices because they use vapes for the flavor and/or a fascination with cloud chasing and have no intention of ever using nicotine.

      Pretty much the only people I see using liquids with nicotine are the cigarette smokers who have recently quit or are trying to quit cigarettes and the unavoidable broskis who think overdosing makes them more attractive to potential mates and want 50mg/ml juices. There's no help for the virgins, but most the ex-smokers tend to wean themselves down to zero nic within a couple years as, in my experience anyway, a lot of smokers are more "addicted" to the hand to mouth/oral fixation than the nicotine and once they discover that, have little difficulty getting off nicotine.

    37. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, smoking was a much bigger contribitor to early death because of heart disease, than cancer. Something like only 15% of smokers died of lung cancer or related.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    38. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Kid: So...if I vape they will kick me out of school permanently?

      Good plan

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    39. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps we should make the laws surrounding other substances more reasonable.

    40. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 2

      What antifreeze?

    41. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Mom has COPD. She never smoked a day in her life and people generally did not smoke indoors in her family, so second-hand smoke exposure was pretty minimal.

      Point is, there is no guarantees in life.

    42. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wondered how far we'd get into t6his before someone pulled the "I have an anecdote that refutes your scientific survey" bullshit.

      While you're at it, care to refute climate change with a picture of snow on your lawn?

    43. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars are still more dangerous to teenagers than vape pens.

    44. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a kid in college who vapes. He coughs more than cigarette smokers do.

    45. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      The fact that everybody including the tobacco lobby is trying to find negatives and they've been grasping at straws for the last several years tend to suggest it is more healthy. If nothing else it improves blood oxygen and provides an increase in lung capacity equivalent to stopping smoking.

      The mechanism really isn't much different than devices used to deliver medicine for a number of classes of lung illness so I doubt it is innately evil. There might be some devils in the details, certain flavorings, certain materials used in manufacture, etc.

      That said, you are right, it definitely is not tobacco use. Though the nicotine may have been extracted from tobacco and there are tobacco flavors that have actual tobacco extracts in them. I suppose you could call those tobacco products.

    46. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link doesn't say what you think it does. It says juice is bad for you full stop. And that e-cigs do lead to crossover cigarette smoking.

    47. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      "I guess the vape things are ok for quitting smoking....but really, once you get off the nicotine, they aren't nearly so much fun as real smoking that uses real fire, and other things like flicking ashes, etc...it kept your non-drinking hand busy."

      Nah, it's definitely the draw, exhale, and keeping your non-drinking hand busy. Vaping does all of the above... except the last one if you don't chain vape but who doesn't chain vape? As an added bonus it doesn't taste like shit.

    48. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Correct. Nicotine is not very addictive unless it's processed and mixed with additives to maximize delivery and the addictive properties of nicotine, as is done with cigarettes or the nicotine used in most studies into it's 'addictiveness'. Many people who take up vaping find it far easier than they've been led to expect to move to zero nicotine liquids once they eliminate cigarette use as they never experience the symptoms often attributed to nicotine withdrawal; as they're not addicted to the nicotine, but the oral fixation created by years of smoking cigarettes. Vaping satisfies the hand to mouth and oral fixations thus, little to no withdrawal when they go off it.

      Vape liquids themselves are (generally) made from polypropylene glycol, glycerin and flavoring. With a few exceptions with certain flavors (Most of which were reformulated by flavor manufacturers without harmful compounds like diacetyl years ago) every component of e-liquids are GRAS (An FDA designation which stands for Generally Recognized as Safe) compounds that have been extensively tested to be safe, even when vaporized and inhaled in large quantities. For example, PG and Glycerin are found in things like asthma inhalers and most of the compounds in the flavorings are literally found in everything you eat, drink or inhale be it natural or not.

      No matter how much it looks like it, vaping isn't smoking and the effort to shoehorn vaping into the same category as tobacco use is akin to the reefer madness that caused us to persecute pot smokers for the last 80 years. Vaping has nothing to do with tobacco use and lumping them together is pure stupidity.

    49. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after I quit smoking I continued to go hang out with the smokers periodically. After all what are they going to do, punish me for taking the same breaks I did when I smoked?

    50. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person is already consuming nicotene so replacement therapies do not increase the risk of those events. The person is already at increased risk from the smoking habit they are trying to quit. A non-smoker just putting on nicotene patches for fun would most definitely be at increased risk.

    51. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"We need to find a way to keep vaping devices away from pre-18ers. Maybe move to a prescription model. But that might mean less harm reduction for smokers. It is a difficult issue."

      It isn't that difficult. We already have laws on the book, they just need reasonable enforcement... it is no different than alcohol or actual tobacco products. Retailers just need to check ID's for age. It really is that simple. We don't have or need a "prescription model" for alcohol either (and alcohol is responsible for FAR FAR FAR more third-party deaths than tobacco). And we shouldn't be recording that information (like SCANNING and storing ID information) because it could be severely abused.

      We don't want to make it more difficult for adult tobacco users to get into [switch to] vaping- it is a zillion times less harmful, as well as FAR less annoying. The main problem with the article is they are are using obscure technical terminology of classifying vaping as "tobacco", and it is certainly not (in any real sense that matters). It is no more "tobacco" than nicotine gum, lozenges, or patches (it doesn't really matter if the nicotine in the product is synthetic or plant derived). They are intentionally trying to skew and distort the terminology to make it sound like there is an epidemic of young vaping LEADING TO ACTUAL TOBACCO USE. And that sensationalist conclusion is absolutely, 100% FALSE, and can and will do LOTS OF HARM to society if such nonsense is believed.

      Ask 10 people to read that "shocking" headline or skim the article, and I bet 9 of the 10 will come away with a false impression.

      As an aside for those who do defeat ID checking through bad retailers or straw purchases- Young people are going to experiment with stuff, regardless of what we do. Much better if they experiment with vaping and never go further. So far there is NO REAL EVIDENCE THAT ANY significant number of young vapors ever move onto actual tobacco products.

    52. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      In fairness nicotine and caffeine both carry other benefits which might outweigh any negatives. It is naive to assert there are no risks or benefits just as it is naive to assume the existence of risks means it is poor choice to make.

      Caffeine and nicotine are both shown to improve cognitive function with nicotine improving focus and providing a calming effect (including in those who haven't been exposed before). That is a hell of a complimentary pair and the benefits of improved cognitive function and focus may well outweigh an increased risk of illness.

      After all for these two intentional exposures there are hundreds of things you ingest and breath each day that aren't well studied at all. When you consider that the results of combining substances isn't predictable even the study we have done is of minimal use. Considering you expose yourself to dozens of carcinogens on a daily basis for little or no benefit what is one more with a known benefit?

    53. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      It's just a battery. The issue isn't new to vapes and is common to just about any portable device with a battery depending on what battery chemistry they use.

    54. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      The blackface thing seems silly. It really is no different than men dressed as women in the theater of old. The only negative tone is in the ignorant views of african americans during the time period black face was used, that has nothing to do with blackface itself.

    55. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost like they'd rather directly attack a multi-million dollar industry than talk to their kids about substance abuse.

    56. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 1

      Citation needed

    57. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The verb you was looking for is âoeare.â You fuckwit.

    58. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. Nicotine is directly associated with increased stroke and heart attacks. It attacks the venous system.

      https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com...

      The report you cite doesn't back your statement. What it says is that "overall there is no increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death in the 56 days after the first prescription for NRT."

    59. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering that thanks to our busted AF border pretty much any kid in the USA can get crack, meth, and heroin less than 20 minutes from their house? Yeah really not so worried about one puffing on an ecig, nope.

      BTW if the local teens are any indication (have a grandson that vapes, call 'em "smoky" as you can find him and his buds by the fog bank) the vast majority of 'em? Yeah using no nic, in fact talking to my local vape shop their #1 sellers by a huge margin is no nic, which I assume is relatives getting it for teens as most of the adults I know are on 3mg or 6mg nic.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    60. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think most people just have a problem with the idea that vaping is safe so vapers can do it anywhere including in the office which means I now have to breathe in your vape cloud which while yes, being much better than smoking is still forcing me to inhale a completely unregulated substance.

      Most people I know just vape outside where it obviously doesn't matter. But the few assholes that will just vape anywhere and blow it in your face are the ones ruining it for everyone else.

      Persecuting cigarette smokers for the last 60 odd years has indeed resulted in far less smoking so people want to apply the same techniques to vaping. It's the old principle of your freedom stops at my nose. Naturally people want to do the same shit for high fructose corn syrup which is probably at least as harmful as cigarettes are/were.

    61. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      That's just it, this is only sold age restricted. Who is putting it in kids' hands?

    62. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      If we looked at the whole population though, and saw adults switching from cigarettes to vaping, would we say smoking is a gateway drug to vaping?

    63. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NRT is not the same as e-cigarettes.

      https://tobacco.ucsf.edu/first-evidence-long-term-health-damage-ecigs-smoking-e-cigarettes-daily-doubles-risk-heart-attacks

    64. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Yeah we should pass a law saying you have to be 18 to buy it.

      Oh... We did. Hmm

    65. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mentil · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, nicotine also has some health benefits. It's not recommended to start smoking just to get those benefits, but if consumed in isolation perhaps.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    66. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Yup... good luck with that.

      But hey, you can always try and get your Diploma later on when you realize that you actually really do need it to survive in modern society.

      Either that, or you can eventually find yourself in jail for committing property crime that you've had to resort to just to survive once your parents kick you out the day you turn 18.

    67. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Do you think that the laws which prohibit the sale or distribution of any smoking paraphernalia, including e-cigarettes, to minors to be unreasonable

    68. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      In moderation though

      Nearly all caffeine users have little difficulty keeping their use in the "good" range. But for nicotine, there is no "good" range, and it is far more addictive.

      https://www.webmd.com/mental-h...

      Perhaps I work in the wrong crowds. Nearly everyone I have ever worked with has been told to cut back on their caffiene use, and most have suffered withdrawal symptoms. Several, including me, have hit the 10 cups per day mark that is considered too damn much.

      As well, the puritans who are shitting their pants because the tobacco users have found a loophole in vaping

      Nonsense. We are only shitting our pants over kids getting ahold of vaping devices. Adults can do what they want.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Perhaps we might keep the children out of the bars, if we only care about them, and have no intention of impeding adult use. I mean - bar bans if we are interested in keeping vaping devices out of the hands of kids, thry must be hanging out in bars.

      Do you really think that putting a highly addictive and harmful product into the hands of kids is acceptable? They are too stupid and naive to understand the consequences.

      I think that there are some fairly simple ways to attempt to keep them out of the hands of those who have not achieved the age of majority. But if I might cite my own and my friend's experience. I and most of my friends started smoking when we were in 7th grade, which for me was 13. Why? Forbidden fruit. Smoking was something "adults" did. So we were playing adults. We had no trouble getting cigarettes or tobacco. Teenagers are indeed capable of taking stupid risks, but they can also be very very capable. Some of us were pretty good at shoplifting tobacco, who didn't have parents that smoked.

      Today? Tobacco is harder to get, but I assume I would be as precocious now if I was in junior high. I'd simply make my vapor device. Probably something like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Mine would be a lot better, but its simple, and my homebrew version would make me look even more adult to my silly friends.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    69. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That's just it, this is only sold age restricted. Who is putting it in kids' hands?

      Hillary and the liberals?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    70. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      "It functions as an antiherbivore chemical; consequently, nicotine was widely used as an insecticide in the past,[11][12] and neonicotinoids, such as imidacloprid, are widely used."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine, hmm tasty, tasty pesticide. There are also cancer indicators and even birth defects. So way worse than caffeine.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    71. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "People's health depends on it!"

      perhaps use the more modern "for the children"? that seems to be the preferred method of whipping up hysteria.

      Heh... Won't anyone think of the children's health?!!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    72. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You are the one reaching too far. We currently do much of what is described for persons caught drinking before age 21 (thanks feds) and so if vaping is illegal for young'uns, then there should be similar penalties.

      I support making all vaping by prescription only. If you want to get off tobacco, it can't be that hard to get a prescription. Heck, plenty of people lined up for Marijuana prescriptions.

      Go back and re-read.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    73. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yup... good luck with that.

      But hey, you can always try and get your Diploma later on when you realize that you actually really do need it to survive in modern society.

      Either that, or you can eventually find yourself in jail for committing property crime that you've had to resort to just to survive once your parents kick you out the day you turn 18.

      The habit of incarcerating as many people for as long as possible - largely to help the for profit prison system has worked out pretty well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    74. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 1

      No, that's fine. I was referring to:

      Unilateral permanent confiscation of the vaping device when they are caught, a criminal record that stays on file for the next 7 years even though they are a minor, and the threat of losing access to public education if they are caught again might do the trick, at the very least, it will put the parent(s) or guardians in the loop who might be better equipped to deal with whatever further disciplinary actions are required.

    75. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Do you think that the laws which prohibit the sale or distribution of any smoking paraphernalia, including e-cigarettes, to minors to be unreasonable

      Hell no. But your idea of destroying their lives for what is a silly and minor infraction is plenty unreasonable.

      Reactionary and totalitarian in fact.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    76. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. CIA.

    77. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck, you left out summary and immediate execution.

      Such measures should not be necessary.

      The idea is to bring real world consequences for a person's choices, and the fact that they are a minor should not factor into it.

      And the severity of the measures I've described would probably prevent repeat offenders as well... those that did repeat could find themselves on pretty darn hard times in the years to come... but again, that's a path that they *CHOSE* to go down.

      Killing them would eliminate repeat offenders. As well as sparing the government the expense of incarceratingf them. Sincce children who offend, probably have parents the same, we can eliminate crime by just killing them too. The CHOSE to not abide by all aspects of the law, therefore in the interests of a crime free society, excess in the culling of the undesirables is no vice. One strike, and you cease to exist. Summary execution the standard punishment - no repeat offenders.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    78. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The idea is to make some real-world consequences that are severe enough to strongly discourage anyone from doing it in the first place.

      If they want to ruin their lives completely by pulling it off again, well.... that's on them. Their choice, their consequences.

    79. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Killing them would eliminate repeat offenders.

      Indeed, but it would also eliminate the possibility that they might learn from their mistakes having faced some real measurable consequences for them, and make smarter choices in the future.

    80. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misspelled "too sexy"?

    81. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we ban perfumes, scented candles, air fresheners, etc. in buildings. I don't want to breath in clouds of that unregulated crap.

      Still, there are a few assholes that insist on sticking strangers noses in their cloud of stink-um everywhere they go.

    82. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Alypius · · Score: 2

      That along with "If it saves even one life, it's worth it" garbage.

    83. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But muh SCIENCE(tm)!!!!??11!!?!!!

    84. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary and her faction are right-wing Corporate Progressive nazis - NOT liberals.

    85. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Huffington Post - the story is probably just made up completely.

    86. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't like breathing in your body odor. So I guess you're next on the list of things to persecute!

    87. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is _wrong_ with you, you fucking nazi?

      I propose we take all violent neopuritans, like you, and hang them from the lampposts in front of City Hall. Given the manifest harm done by your pernicious and petty lust for persecution, my proposal is no more disproportionate than your mean spirited proposal to destroy the lives of rebellious teenagers.

    88. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Research paper you link to "Use of nicotine replacement therapy and the risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and death" appears to conclude the opposite:

      "Conclusions: The use of NRT is not associated with any increase in the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death."

    89. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some parental words is all you need to beat an army of psychologists and chemists going after someone who has not developed yet a sense of self-control.

    90. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct.

    91. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      MAO inhibitors aren't addictive. I used to take one, then quit cold turkey because of the headaches it gave me after a while. Was nice whilte it lasted, though.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    92. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 1

      I didn't say the MAOI is addictive, I said it POTENTIATES the addictive properties of the NICOTINE.

      That is, without the MAO, the nicotine hits harder and faster which makes it more addictive.

    93. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by DethLok · · Score: 1

      In what legal realm would a child be able to legally buy or use a vaper?

      Is your govt retarded, ignorant or totally under the power of lobbyists that this would even be conceivable?

    94. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it has to be the death penalty then. By your logic it's the only way to be sure.

    95. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump and the #MAGAtards, more likely.

      You know, cuz rugulashuns bad!!!

    96. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was just his gun that backfired.

    97. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Since some of you are illiterate I guess, from the study:

      "Conclusions: The use of NRT (nicotine replacement therapy) is not associated with any increase in the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death."

      "There was no evidence that an increase in the incidence of either myocardial infarction or stroke occurred after the prescription of any particular formulation of NRT, or that the results differed for people prescribed NRT before or after April 2001 (table 4). Although the numbers were smaller the results were similar when we repeated the analyses using second myocardial infarction and stroke as the outcomes."

      That link directly contradicts wiggles' assertion.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    98. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by gnick · · Score: 1

      #1 sellers by a huge margin is no nic

      No nic is the way to go. My vape pens are full of THC. Much better for you.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    99. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by gnick · · Score: 1

      As an added bonus it doesn't taste like shit.

      There are flavors available that taste like shit if you really want to recreate the experience.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    100. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The blackface thing seems silly. It really is no different than men dressed as women in the theater of old. The only negative tone is in the ignorant views of african americans during the time period black face was used, that has nothing to do with blackface itself.

      Oh shit, really? Yeah, the ignorant views of what and who black people were was definitely the issue. And that is why everyone should know that wearing blackface is not okay. It's like saying that the problem with the KKK was not the white sheets and hoods. True, but the white sheets and hoods are now associated with violent racism. So they are a problem, just like blackface is a problem.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    101. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      "It's like saying that the problem with the KKK was not the white sheets and hoods. True, but the white sheets and hoods are now associated with violent racism. So they are a problem"

      They are also associated with improvised ghost costumes. The problem is compiling an ever growing list of excuses to be offended regardless of intent. Associated with racism is not the same as racist, the later is something bad on the part of the racist the former is something bad on the part of others anytime the later isn't true. If an 80+ year old black man from the states is offended it is understandable but for the rest it is just drama for the sake of drama.

      We can't really know but given how the guy had to be restrained by his wife from excitedly jumping into his moonwalk routine I'm actually inclined to believe him. How is that any different than someone going to a costume party as a viking with a horn helmet? If you have a Nordic background you can get all butt hurt about it but honestly it's you being an asshole for bringing on the heavy, not the guy in the bad costume.

    102. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicotine as a stimulant is really quite bad, that is if you care about your productivity. First few times, it can really boost your attention and ability to think, and reduce stress. Once you get hooked (which happens very quickly), it still has this affect, but your baseline has now been lowered so you need nicotine just to get back to normal. Very addicting both directly and indirectly. Shitty medicine: avoid.

    103. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      True and it might be fair to call them tobacco products since they usually include tobacco extracts. For the rest, the misleading conflation of e-cigs to tobacco should be a signal that people don't just want their cake and to vape it to. There really is a lobby going out of their way to create bogus negative information regarding e-cigs. It isn't just some crazy conspiracy theory.

    104. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that putting a highly addictive and harmful product into the hands of kids is acceptable?

      Maybe I am missing something here... but I was under the impression that people under 18 years of age can't buy vaping materials legally. If that is the case, we are no more putting these things into the hands of kids than we are putting alcohol into the hands of kids.

      Or are you referring to something else here?

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    105. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nicotine is from tobacco, therefore they are "tobacco products."

      It helps government jackasses call a vast improvement in health an "epidemic."

    106. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Choices like that don't merit a death penalty. The consequences they will have wrought upon themselves for it will be plenty severe enough.

      The idea isn't to be "sure", it's to provide a sufficiently discouraging penalty so that people will generally *choose* to not go and do it, even if the only reason they are avoiding it is because they are afraid of the consequence. By the time they are adults, hopefully they will have come to realize that such measures were actually in place for their own benefit. If it takes directly experiencing some really harsh consquences to get them to that point if they do decide to infringe, then why is that so bad?

      Seriously, if you think that what I've described is no better than simply killing them, then you do not have any appreciation at all for the ability of people to adapt and grow. We would still be living in caves, or more likely have long since been rendered extinct if we could not learn from our mistakes.

      However harsh what I've described sounds, the kids would still be alive, and where there is life, there is still hope.

    107. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by mark-t · · Score: 1

      There's nothing mean spirited about it... the idea is to make the consequences severe enough that many young people will simply not even try, or if they do, then eventually come to regret that choice because of the consequences, and learn as they become adults that the measures were actually there for their own welfare.

    108. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      I'm going to assume the preventative effects of coffee are probably more likely due to the phytochemicals in coffee rather than the caffeine alone. Coffee and various tea types are more than just liquid caffeine. Perhaps something in it gives you increased health defenses.... but I doubt it's entirely the doing of the caffeine.

    109. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to be waaaaaaaaay better than cigarettes. Not to mention diesel fumes are probably way worse than e-cigarettes.

    110. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      (and more broadly, the coffee that many people consume it in), has all sorts of wide ranging health benefits.

      One of the most interesting ones was a Japanese study from a few years ago where it showed that having around 4 cups of coffee a day (since I already saw someone else mention 4 a day earlier) gave older men a resistance to sarcopenia (muscle loss due to aging). I found this incredibly interesting. While I know it would do little for your joints... I'd rather still have strength and ability than not.

      Also I started the quote after caffeine because I believe it is more likely that other components of the coffee are largely more responsible for the benefits of coffee, rather than the caffeine itself.

    111. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Trump and the #MAGAtards, more likely.

      You know, cuz rugulashuns bad!!!

      But her emails!!!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    112. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good one, too!!

      I think my favorite, though is why they cry about there being no evidence of his collusion with Russia, even though everyone in his inner circle is being indicted over it.

    113. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Hillary and her faction are right-wing Corporate Progressive nazis - NOT liberals.

      Everyone but the extreme farthest right is a liberal these days.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    114. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That's a good one, too!!

      I think my favorite, though is why they cry about there being no evidence of his collusion with Russia, even though everyone in his inner circle is being indicted over it.

      Ad Rudy G asks, Is crime even a crime?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    115. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No. CIA.

      No, FDR.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    116. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Propylene glycol, Bro.

    117. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Modded down by the Vape Mafia, no doubt.

    118. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by sjames · · Score: 1

      In contrast to ethylene glycol, a potent cause of acute toxicity in humans, propylene glycol is a “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) additive for foods and medications. Propylene glycol rarely causes toxic effects, and then only under very unusual circumstances.

    119. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your friend had a preexisting heart condition.

      Nope, she's fine, just had to cut way back on the coffee.

      https://www.webmd.com/balance/... [webmd.com] The causation of panic attacks and their symptoms and coffee abuse has been known for a long time.

      It is odd that so many people are apologists for coffee. It is a true psychoactive drug. It can be abused. It is abused. Four grams of pure caffeine will kill an adult. As a coffee addict, I understand this well.

      I always caution people who like coffee not to get on too high of a horse about cigarettes and especially vaping. As G.W. Bush said to Saddam Hussein, "You're next!"

      Remember when smoking was socially acceptable and even considered healthy? You're next!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    120. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I wondered how far we'd get into t6his before someone pulled the "I have an anecdote that refutes your scientific survey" bullshit.

      I wondere how far we'd get into this until a coward showed up strutting like a cock-a-whoop, thinking he'd scored the game winning touchdown.

      Anecdotes? If you were capable of googling you could find that it's real.

      https://www.webmd.com/balance/...

      https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-we-worry/201805/espresso-stress-o-coffee-anxiety-and-panic

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... Not an anecdote in the bunch. Caffeine is a psychoactive substance, and excessive consumption can be a real problem. Deal with it.

      While you're at it, care to refute climate change with a picture of snow on your lawn?

      Nope, because the relationship between the composition of an atmosphere and the atmosphere's energy retention characteristics is irrefutable.

      Claims that there is no relationship between caffeine consumption and panic attacks, well now that's the anti-science viewpoint, my dear coward.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    121. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In what legal realm would a child be able to legally buy or use a vaper?

      Is your govt retarded, ignorant or totally under the power of lobbyists that this would even be conceivable?

      They aren't legal for kids to buy. The hand wringing crowd is just going kookoo. The anti-tobacco crowd is pissed that some folks have found a way around thier favorite hate target. Occam's razor makes for the simplest answer being most likely the correct one.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    122. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that putting a highly addictive and harmful product into the hands of kids is acceptable?

      Maybe I am missing something here... but I was under the impression that people under 18 years of age can't buy vaping materials legally. If that is the case, we are no more putting these things into the hands of kids than we are putting alcohol into the hands of kids.

      Or are you referring to something else here?

      He's pulling out the old if you aren't A, you must be B shaming tactic. I never said Anywhere that I was in favor of giving kids nicotine or tobacco. Or ethanol based adult beverages.

      Bit I'm also a pragmatic. Trying to keep vaping materials out of kid's hands is something you attempt to do, but you won't ever actually succeed.

      Especially since we can simply make the devices. And whereas the hand wringers and general tobacco haters appear to want an extension of the war on drugs, it simply isn't going to work. Kids are in many ways stupid, but in many ways very resourceful, and will just take this as a challenge.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    123. Re: e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminal record? For vaping? Weak. Hard labor for the first offense, public caning for the second, and hanging for the third.

      We can increase punishment to the point that nobody will want to commit crimes. Because every person carefully reasons out their actions beforehand.

    124. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that thanks to our busted AF border pretty much any kid in the USA can get crack, meth, and heroin less than 20 minutes from their house?

      It may be less about border security and more because American kids are vile little junkie cunts. They deserve everything they get and a lot more. Every dead American teen is a victory for humanity. It frees up enough resources for 4 normal people.

    125. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicotine is found in other plants, i.e. tomatoes and eggplants as stated above. Even e-juice without nicotine is considered a "tobacco product" which is even more ridiculous than tomato-derived nicotine e-juice.

    126. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally doubt they are any better for you, but vape juice is definately not tobacco.

      It is the cancer free version if you consider that better.
      Nicotine on the other hand constricts and hardens veins and arteries. This mean the potential for heart attacks, strokes and the big one that big tobacco successfully kept out of tobacco warnings.. Dick Shrinkage/impotence (because your penis also needs blood flow).
      Now we do not know the total affects due to vaping running far lower blood serum nicotine levels compared to tobacco use. Is it good for you? No (well probably only in preventing Alzheimers). Is it close to as bad as tobacco? Nope.

      Now who wants you to think it is a huge risk and go out across the internet sowing fear?
      1. Big Tobacco. Yep it turns out their business model has a problem with everyone dropping their product.
      2. Big Pharma: Pfizer donations are the reason that it used to be that when you called The American Cancer Society they would tell you to take up smoking if vaping was the only thing that allowed you to quit. Pfizer hates that vaping is a cheap and far more effective alternative to their products like Chantix and the Nicotrol inhaler. The makers of chemo are probably also not happy at the drop in potential customers.
      3. Politicians: Not only to they hate losing all those tasty tobaccos tax dollars but the big reason is the impact that everyone quitting has on Tobacco Bonds (how most states received their pay outs from big tobacco). Everyone quits and the bonds will not be valuable.

      So all that money is on one side of the fight. On the other side.. a moron in a stupid hat who vocabulary extends all the way from "Bro" to "dude" and who thinks vaping should be considered a "sport".. Vaping proponents are generally their own worst enemy.

      So this story is not news, it is misinfotainment. Vaping is not tobacco use any more than nicotine gum/inhalers/patches are (Big Pharma will not let those get classed as such). So the actual news story is "Teen Tobacco use continues to plummet due to vapes.". They will not be dying of cancer now so this means a lot more years of shaking our canes at them and telling them to get off our lawn.

    127. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to find a way to keep vaping devices away from pre-18ers.

      No, we don't. Vaping devices, by themselves, contain no vaping liquid. It's just a battery and a heater.

      Vaping liquid, also, is not harmful by itself. Not all of it contains nicotine. You can buy nicotine-free liquid, which I've been doing for years. I enjoy the flavour and it allows me to participate in the "social experience" of vaping with others, none of whom shame me for using "0 mg" liquid. You never have to worry about anyone calling you a pussy for using nicotine-free juice, it just isn't a thing.

      For vaping to be harmful, you need to buy a vape, buy a tank, fill that tank with nicotinized juice, atomize it and inhale it. What you're advocating is no different than keeping lighters away from kids and saying it'll prevent cigarette consumption.

      That kind of overkill is EXACTLY what the teenagers need to stop taking adults seriously. They're not stupid and if they see us freaking out over something that causes zero harm, they're not going to listen to us when we try to talk to them about REAL harms.

      Let them vape, just regulate the sales of nicotinized e-juice. If it's really about the nicotine, nobody should take issue with this way of doing things.

    128. Re:e-cigarrettes arent tobacco by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I wondered how far we'd get into t6his before someone pulled the "I have an anecdote that refutes your scientific survey" bullshit.

      While you're at it, care to refute climate change with a picture of snow on your lawn?

      All that's missing is a car analogy.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  2. Does that really count? by thereddaikon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah kids shouldn't be using vapes but should it be considered a tobacco product when it doesn't have tobacco in it? The biggest issues I see with them are that they often contain nicotine which is addictive, and the Fed's refusal to regulate them properly means they could have god knows what in the vape juice. Instead of having the pearl clutching knee jerk of they are evil maybe the FDA should actually regulate the things properly so we can ensure that they don't have unsafe chemicals in them.

    1. Re:Does that really count? by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it shouldn't count; however, they still lump these products together.

      That said, there is some evidence e-cigs help others to quit actual tobacco use, even though the FDA has not yet .

      Kids are going to experiment with shit, regardless of controls and limits; we should probably be glad they're experimenting with this delivery method as opposed to what every prior generation has for the last 100+ years.

    2. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah kids shouldn't be using vapes but should it be considered a tobacco product when it doesn't have tobacco in it?

      The biggest issues I see with them are that they often contain nicotine which is addictive, and the Fed's refusal to regulate them properly means they could have god knows what in the vape juice. Instead of having the pearl clutching knee jerk of they are evil maybe the FDA should actually regulate the things properly so we can ensure that they don't have unsafe chemicals in them.

      On the bright side smoking is a form of population control, and then maybe we wont see all these annoying climate change(tm) articles on slashdot anymore.

    3. Re: Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be the only Galaxy where it's legal to sell addictive products that kill people, or there is no intelligent life in this Galaxy.

    4. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kids do need the vascular contraction in order to not to look all lively and slutty after a bathroom quickie with a cell phone, magazine or with each other. The vampire look is the best kind of chaste look to convince the class mates and parents, without the sprinkles of course. In my youth, people just didn't do such things at schools and the magazines were hidden in the DFPs from the 19th century wars. I think I lost my thought somewhere there.

    5. Re: Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, it's my body let me do what I want with it.

      What's next, you going to tell Rock climbers they can't free climb anymore because it's dangerous?

    6. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what, adults should only be able to choose from flavors such as Buttered Ass and Steamed Kale? Things that are "appealing to kids" are also appealing to adults. How about we stop trying to ban everything 'for the children', because it's making the world pretty lame for the rest of us.

    7. Re:Does that really count? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      On the bright side smoking is a form of population control, and then maybe we wont see all these annoying climate change(tm) articles on slashdot anymore.

      Not a very effective one. It doesn't kill off people before they reproduce and it only lowers their life expectancy by 10%. As a population control it is weak.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re: Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to defeat the accusation that there's no intelligent life with an idiotic statement.

    9. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Righto. Just like we don't need cake flavored vodka, beer with chocolate undertones, or fruity wine.

      Fuck off and take your insipid FUR DUH CHILLIN with you.

    10. Re:Does that really count? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It also damages their fitness for a long time before it kills them, which reduces output from the mines.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re: Does that really count? by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buttered Ass and Steamed Kale

      Together or separate?

    12. Re:Does that really count? by sjames · · Score: 1

      For adults, most do it for the nicotine, but it's not that unusual for an adult who started vaping to quit cigarettes to eventually end up vaping 0 nic juice. The purpose is to keep the manual oral habit satisfied so they don't get tempted by cigarettes.

      For teens, this could actually be the cure for peer pressure. They can get 100% of the cool rebellious look with 0% of the nicotine.

    13. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it's just me that thinks vapers look like morons? Why would you want an "oral habit"?

    14. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What these figures show is that substantially *more* kids are experimenting with this shit than previously did with smoking.

      So the reassurance that "it's basically for people who are quitting smoking" is false - vaping is drawing in a large number of new users who would never have touched old-fashioned cigarettes.

      Does that mean it's a terrible thing? Not in itself, no. But it's an important contribution to the debate.

    15. Re: Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    16. Re:Does that really count? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's just you.

      For some, the oral habit is left over from when they smoked. They satisfy it with the vape so they don't end up satisfying it with a cigarette.

    17. Re: Does that really count? by MemeRot · · Score: 0

      Vape juice uses nicotine sourced from tobacco

    18. Re:Does that really count? by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, and I could be wrong on this, the only harm of nicotine is that its addictive. The bad part about cigarettes is the tar, heavy metals, literal smoke and a whole host of other nasty things going straight into your lungs. However there have been scandals before where various vape juice brands have been contaminated and included things like arsenic. That's the kind of thing I'm talking about.

    19. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do a google image search for "mouth fedora".

    20. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I agree, they look like morons. Idiot with a square box spewing huge clouds of smoke. You may as well wear a big flashy light that says "Look at me, I'm important".

    21. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vaping does work as a replacement to cigarettes. My personal experience was that I switched to vaping and quit smoking cigarettes instantly. No withdrawal; no missing the ritual/habit; no more cigarette stink; no problems other than I was hitting the e-cig too hard when I started which caused me to cough. While the science is not definitive yet on the safety, it was a painless transition.

    22. Re: Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the tomatoes.

    23. Re:Does that really count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which reduces output from the mines.

      But, then, they aren't quite as focused on how bad it is to work there, so it works out for everyone.

  3. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    âoeFor the fifth year in a row, e-cigs were the most popular product amongst high school students.â

    I would have expected social media to be the most popular product. I feel like there are a lot more teens using dangerous things like Facebook and Instagram than e cigarettes.

    1. Re: Interesting by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      The most popular bruduct is right, the kids ate never sovial medias costumers, social media is in the data collection buisniss, the kids, or rather targeted ads served to the kids, arethe product. Am I wrong.

    2. Re: Interesting by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The most popular bruduct is right, the kids ate never sovial medias costumers, social media is in the data collection buisniss, the kids, or rather targeted ads served to the kids, arethe product. Am I wrong.

      Whoa, I think I know what someone has been smoking, and it isn't tabacky!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. Are those numbers really that bad? by cordovaCon83 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I'm Reading this right, about 15% of American adults smoke these days, compared to about 42% of adults in 1942. Granted, this story is about teenagers that will soon be adults, and a million more than expected is not a number to be scoffed at, but really when we start getting numbers down that low, I don't know how much more outrage is necessary. The number is never going to be zero percent, no matter what the Puritans wish.

    1. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If I'm Reading this right, about 15% of American adults smoke these days, compared to about 42% of adults in 1942. Granted, this story is about teenagers that will soon be adults, and a million more than expected is not a number to be scoffed at, but really when we start getting numbers down that low, I don't know how much more outrage is necessary. The number is never going to be zero percent, no matter what the Puritans wish.

      I'm surprised it's as high as 15%. I almost never see people smoking anymore- and vaping is pretty rare around here.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Different people from different backgrounds, both ethnically and financially have different habits. We had a bunch of interns from singapore who smoked like chimneys. A bunch of people can be seen smoking in chinatown... in lower (very very low) income neighborhoods I drive through I see a bunch of people smoking...
       
      White collar workers will smoke on the weekends at parties, but might never smoke during the week or at the office. Your personal experiences may not reflect all of society.
       
      15% sounds about right to me.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      You must live in an absent the poor and uneducated, who comprise the majority of those that still smoke.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    4. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      White collar workers will smoke on the weekends at parties, but might never smoke during the week or at the office. Your personal experiences may not reflect all of society.

      Well, my experiences don't reflect society if it's at 15%.

      However, I suspect we've seen a shift, not just in % that smoke, but HOW people smoke. The city I live in, 15 years ago there would be butts on the ground outside on every corner where smokers would drop cigarettes out their windows... a lot of burnt grass in intersection medians where they would simmer and char the grass. You don't see that very often now.

      It appears that people that DO smoke are more conscientious about how they smoke now (or just are more brow-beaten by non smokers); there is a lot less smoking in public, or even on the roads. I suspect a higher % of smoking now happens in the homes and gardens of the smokers rather than on the streets.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1991, my highschool had a smoking area - for the students. Just about everyone I knew smoked. My parents smoked at work - at their desks. Restaurants all had smoking sections.

      Now I hardly see anyone smoke, especially young people. It's not cool anymore. All of my friends have quit. All of my family who smoked died (from smoking). There's a smoking area at work and I hardly ever see anyone there.

      So the numbers are LOW today. Any researcher who claims otherwise has to be fudging their numbers.

    6. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outrage isn't necessary to be concerned about a reversal of what was a nice trend of younger people not smoking.

      Vaping seems like a great tool to stop smoking, but it appears it may also serve as a bit of a gateway to smoking. Regardless of how much that is the case, we don't want kids vaping.

    7. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the numbers are LOW today where I am. Any researcher who claims otherwise has to be fudging their numbers or not talking about where I am.

      FTFY

    8. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      You must live in an absent the poor and uneducated, who comprise the majority of those that still smoke.

      Quite the contrary actually. I live in a poor midsized Southern town. Now granted, most of the people I personally spend time with are decidedly in the middle, like myself; and I work in a facility where smoking is prohibited, employees are not even allowed to go outside for a smoke break.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I knew one guy that vaped for awhile who had never smoked previously. Another guy vapes after quitting smoking, and it drives me nuts because he does it inside at work despite being warned (I think he can't smell it so he assumes no one near him will notice).

    10. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      It appears that people that DO smoke are more conscientious about how they smoke now (or just are more brow-beaten by non smokers); there is a lot less smoking in public, or even on the roads. I suspect a higher % of smoking now happens in the homes and gardens of the smokers rather than on the streets.

      What we need to curtail smoking is a law that says you can only do it in your car if all the windows are rolled up. I'm so fucking tired of people smoking in their cars right outside supermarkets and restaurants, I've started saying mean things to them like "you fucking stink" or "you smell nasty". If smoking was so goddamned great, they'd keep their windows up so they could breathe the second hand smoke, too.

      And yes, I used to be a smoker, but I always made a conscious effort not to stand upwind of people, bus stops, etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Are those numbers really that bad? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      In 1991, [...] Restaurants all had smoking sections.

      Back then, it felt like restaurants had non-smoking sections which were a dinky little area off in the corner. Then, a few years later, the sections swapped and it was the dinky smoking section. Then they finally did away with all of that.

      When I was a kid, avoiding cigarette smoke was seen as a deliberate decision and request (which my parents frequently made). Thankfully, now, smoking is pretty much out-of-sight/out-of-mind. I only even know it still happens because I can smell it on the breath of people who I've never actually seen smoking in front of me.

  5. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe lung cancer and whatever eating Tide Pods does to them will keep them from voting for morons like AOC...

  6. Almost as if this is targetted to addiction by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 4, Informative

    Almost all nicotine addiction occurs in middle school (not, as many believe incorrectly, in high school and college), and there are people working for the tobacco addiction industry who know this and are doing what they can to addict the next generations of addicts.

    And, don't lie to yourselves, you're addicts.

    Me, I do socially acceptable addictions that are common in Seattle instead.

    Bubble tea ftw!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Almost as if this is targetted to addiction by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Me, I do socially acceptable addictions that are common in Seattle instead.

      Bubble tea ftw!

      So that is what hipsters call masturbation these days.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Almost as if this is targetted to addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the American Lung Association, in 2015 2.3% of middle school students smoked in the last 30 days, and 9.3% of high school students. So, it's kind of hard to see how "almost all nicotine addiction occurs in middle school".

      https://www.lung.org/stop-smoking/smoking-facts/tobacco-use-among-children.html

    3. Re:Almost as if this is targetted to addiction by DogDude · · Score: 2

      Me, I do socially acceptable addictions that are common in Seattle instead.

      What's that? Smart phone addiction?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Almost as if this is targetted to addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your days are numbered. Didn't Seattle take away your straws?

    5. Re:Almost as if this is targetted to addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost all nicotine addiction occurs in middle school (not, as many believe incorrectly, in high school and college)

      Citation needed.

      socially acceptable [...] Bubble tea

      Citation fucking needed!!

    6. Re:Almost as if this is targetted to addiction by mentil · · Score: 1

      (not) Funny enough, I read a few years ago that a large portion of bubble tea mix was imported from countries with lax QC, and was contaminated with substantial amounts of various harmful substances. So it might not be much healthier.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  7. I don't see the problem here by JudgeFurious · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anything that makes the stupid people easier to identify from a distance is OK by me.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  8. Not tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am not sure if anyone noticed but an e-cigarette contains no actual tobacco. As a cigar smoker I am sick of it getting lumped in.

    1. Re:Not tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst it's a bit misleading and the headline sounds flat out incorrect, calling e-cigs a tobacco product is technically correct given its main ingredient is a tobacco extract. Still, it's written like that for clickbait.

    2. Re:Not tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst it's a bit misleading and the headline sounds flat out incorrect, calling e-cigs a tobacco product is technically correct given its main ingredient is a tobacco extract. Still, it's written like that for clickbait.

      No, that is still false. There is no single part of tobacco that ends up in an ecig, not even as extract. Electronic cigarettes use nicotine that is 100% man made. Every tobacco plant in the universe could disappear today and ecig juice would still be able to be made.

    3. Re:Not tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean my Mountain Dew is a coffee product? Or is it a tea product?

    4. Re:Not tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicotene is the component that is in the smallest quantity. It's far from the main ingredient.

  9. Light up while you can! by vegabook · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why is everyone moaning? Our leaders' policies will likely light us all up like Krakatoa before we hit 40. Might as well light up and enjoy because the way things are going, smoking is probably the last thing that'll kill you.

    1. Re:Light up while you can! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone moaning? Our leaders' policies will likely light us all up like Krakatoa before we hit 40.

      If I had to guess, 40 is probably below the median age on Slashdot.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. Are they actually bending the truth like this? by LostMyAccount · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As far as I can tell, the people with a vested interest in opposing cigarettes are also vehemently opposed to e-cigarettes, despite their much lower risk profile.

    Time and again I find myself reading "news" stories where e-cigarettes are lumped with tobacco use, and many anti-tobacco activists swear up and down that if you vape candy-flavored vape juice FOR SURE you will switch to Marlboro Reds at the first opportunity.

    I just don't see how this could be the case -- I smoked for a decade and *liked it*. In the years since I quit I have tried a few cigarettes out of nostalgia and been absolutely repulsed by them. When I smoked I rolled my own, and occasionally a "light" cigarette smoker would want to try one out of curiosity or because they were out, and almost universally they hated them. If an actual cigarette smoker is turned off by a slightly harsher actual cigarette, then the idea anyone who has only or mostly vaped switching to tobacco seems absurd.

    1. Re:Are they actually bending the truth like this? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, the people with a vested interest in opposing cigarettes are also vehemently opposed to e-cigarettes, despite their much lower risk profile.

      Time and again I find myself reading "news" stories where e-cigarettes are lumped with tobacco use, and many anti-tobacco activists swear up and down that if you vape candy-flavored vape juice FOR SURE you will switch to Marlboro Reds at the first opportunity.

      It is just another manifestation of most of humanity's deep seated need to hate. Just one out of several target to pick from. As well, the same group is really pissed off that vaper's have found a loophole.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Are they actually bending the truth like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, us anti-smokers are all just selfish bastards. We honestly don't care if you kill yourself slowly. We draw the line where you try to draw more people in and where your addiction affects us. Smoking, toking and vaping in public are non-starters, because they contaminate the air that everybody breathes. Unlike other drugs, you can't keep smoke and vapor to yourself. What you do at home is your choice, unless there are kids around. Smoking and vaping are equally disgusting, btw. The residue ruins everything. And you stink, literally. You just can't smell it, because smoking kills the sense of smell (and with it taste).

    3. Re:Are they actually bending the truth like this? by spitzak · · Score: 1

      You apparently switched from nothing to your hand rolled cigarettes, so you are yourself a counter example to your argument.

    4. Re:Are they actually bending the truth like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just another manifestation of most of humanity's deep seated need to control the behavior of others.

      FTFY

    5. Re:Are they actually bending the truth like this? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It is just another manifestation of most of humanity's deep seated need to control the behavior of others.

      FTFY

      Yeah, six of one, a half dozen of the other.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Are they actually bending the truth like this? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Look, us anti-smokers are all just selfish bastards.

      I dunno about selfish, but a lot of you are bigots.

      I started smoking in 7th grade. I smoked 3 packs a day for several years, I quit in 1976, and haven't looked back. Ya gotta be pretty dumb to smoke. A lot of things people do are pretty dumb.

      But one thing I know, I've never met a smoker who was as sanctimonious an asshole as the anti smoking bigots I meet.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  11. Marijuana by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Tobacco is BAD but Marijuana is OK!

    That burning sensation in your lungs is ALL NATURAL!

    1. Re:Marijuana by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Tobacco is BAD but Marijuana is OK!

      That burning sensation in your lungs is ALL NATURAL!

      Oh, that's a real strawman. People who arebig on hating tobacco use tend to be pretty puritanical about anything. Fear not - they hate those heepees that smoke the deviul's lettuce just fine.

      Meanwhile, one favorite way of smoking weed is rolled as a mix with tabacky, a hollowed out cigar, aka a blunt

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Marijuana by mentil · · Score: 1

      The REAL burning question is:

      is the strawman smokeable?

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    3. Re:Marijuana by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The REAL burning question is:

      is the strawman smokeable?

      For me, the burning question (I see what you did there) is why whacky tabacky looks so much different today then when I was growing up.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Marijuana by mentil · · Score: 1

      Decades of cross-breeding and selecting for higher THC content.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    5. Re:Marijuana by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Decades of cross-breeding and selecting for higher THC content.

      So if I get a prescription for pain, I'm going to get really baked, I guess.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Marijuana by mentil · · Score: 1

      So if I get a prescription for pain

      If your doctor is also a sadist, this can happen.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    7. Re:Marijuana by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So if I get a prescription for pain

      If your doctor is also a sadist, this can happen.

      Hmmm, looks like I'm writing in Amish today!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  12. Re:It's not a gateway drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outlawing marijuana would likely have increased its reputation as a "gateway drug". The main reason it's considered a gateway drug is because pushers that sell marijuana often also sell harder drugs and try to push them onto the users. So in fact outlawing it was the complete wrong thing to do.

  13. Misconceptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Children as a catalyst for change is often a tactic employed to the benefit of a particular group. It is obvious that people will choose "e-cigs" if given the proper knowledge, equipment, and most importantly, a lack of associated social stigma over cigarettes. However, vaping products do not put money in the hands of big tobacco, not any worth using that you might actually replace cigarettes with. Moreover the "Stop Smoking" campaigns have largely been effective as well, leaving many groups needing an evil to keep the funding rolling in. So here we are, saving children.

    1. Re:Misconceptions by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Nope. Altria bought a 35% interest in Juul.
      https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/19...

  14. Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have an alternative to smoking that improves our health and big tobacco is scared and pulls out the think of the children card. Vaping has saved my life. Do not take it away.

    1. Re:Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vaping has saved my life.

      So. Wait. You're not going to die now?

    2. Re: Cigarettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not because of smoking I won't :)

  15. Did you read it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the study you cited:

    The use of NRT is not associated with any increase in the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death.

    Did you even?

  16. Kids not being honest, as smoking is clearly bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Jesus Christ who told lie, I don't care how he dies.

  17. Big Tobacco - Lies and Deception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is what really gets me about the tobacco industry.

    1. They knowingly and willfully lied about the effects of cigarettes for years (and still do)
    2. They fought with so much money and vigor against judgments brought on them they bought themselves over a decade of time: https://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/doj-final-opinion.pdf
    3. The ads they ended up airing post judgement are stark, monotone and intentionally boring so as to not cause anyone to notice them: https://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/anti-smoking-tv-ads-big-tobacco-forced-run/311379/
    4. By the time the ads aired, they had successfully shifted the narrative from "smoking" to "vaping", even further rendering the ads they were forced to air useless.

    On top of all of this...
    They knowingly and willfully still sell and market to kids.
    They have warped the truth about vaping.
    So you end up with over 10+ years and $100s of millions of government money spent to essentially have nothing happen.

    Yes it is true that cigarettes have bad stuff in them. But it is also true that vape oil has bad stuff in it too. Best part of it is that the vape oil is not nearly as regulated as what went into a cigarette - so no, you really have no idea whats in that oil, specially the flavored ones.
    Im sorry to tell you this but 2nd hand vape is not good either, although it may not be as bad a 2nd hand cigarette smoke. Vape "smoke" is actually an aerosol and so now it can more effectively deliver the nicotine and also the other bad chemicals into your and everyone around you's lungs.

    I am so sick and tired of hearing people say, well vape is OK because it is not smoking.
    Sorry, that is false. Vaping is bad and it is simply a matter of time before we find out what the real effects of vaping are. After-all it took 30+ years to go from "4 out of 5 docs recommend camels after dinner" to "hmm.. maybe cigarette smoke is bad" and then another 20+ years for the tobacco companies to actually get penalized for deceitful practices.

    Look this rant is not about me disparaging those who smoke or anyone's right to smoke if they want (but don't do it around me, cause it's nasty). This is about companies purposefully attempting to deceive and spread misinformation regarding smoking.

    FUCK BIG TOBACCO!

       

    1. Re: Big Tobacco - Lies and Deception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former smoker who was on deaths door who now vapes it saved my life. If they ban vaping ban smoking too so it's not at every store around every corner.

      The effects of smoking are hell and I don't want the only alternative to vaping to be around if they ban it. If you're not a former smoker or smoker you have no idea what you're talking about.

      Keep big tobacco off of my life saving vape device.

  18. big tobacco influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    this is exactly why tobacco companies lobbied to have E-cigs classified the same as tobacco. Its so that they can get titles like this and draw more attention off them and onto regulations surrounding E-cigs. Then when the small independent juice and device makers are overloaded with costs due to regulations, big tobacco can come in buy everything up and start lobbying for looser regulations on E-cigs, claiming that they are helping while absorbing all of the profits from the industry. its right there in article:

    "FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb told Axios the agency will "have to reconsider our enforcement policy" if these numbers aren't turned around"

    Guess who will be the ones to enforce a much more stringent enforcement policy?

    Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

    1. Re: big tobacco influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, big entrenched corporations love to "help" write regulations. They provide expert advice on how to keep the public safe while also ensuring no small players can exist in the market.

  19. life at the top by epine · · Score: 1

    For the fifth year in a row, e-cigs were the most popular product amongst high school students,

    More popular than Apple, Nike, pornography, snow closure days, and Facebook's latest nightmare loss vector?

  20. Safer than pot by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    E-cigs are not totally safe, but they're way safer than smoking marijuana. If you need your THC, get it some other way than inhaling the smoke from burning pot.

    As for nicotine, I get mine from using Swedish snus. Far safer than smoking or using American snuff or dip.

    1. Re:Safer than pot by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      If they're not doing it already I'd expect it to be in vape pens ASAP if/when it becomes federally legal.

  21. Next Up: The Draft & Dying Abroad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gotta do something with all these excess poors.

  22. e-cigs aren't necessarily tobacco-based by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very small quantities of nicotine can be found in the leaves of potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, and ucuch. If an extraction process is used to purify the nicotine, then it doesn't matter too much if tobacco plants are used or some other related plants. With the advantage of eggplant production having a great deal of green waste that is not regulated like tobacco. And the advantage of ucuch being that it has much higher concentrations of nicotine than tobacco, and is mainly regulated in its use as a pesticide.

  23. Nicotine delivery system by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    How's about a cheaper, cleaner, safer nicotine delivery system? Regulate that shit like caffeine.

    --
    ...
  24. Statistics from Australia by labnet · · Score: 1

    Australia has smoking rates half in the last 15 years from around 30% to 15%
    - We banned tobacco advertising in the 80's
    - Put them behind counters out of sight in the 90's
    - Instigated plain packaging and banned them from clubs & pubs, office buildings, restaurants in the 00's
    - Highest tax in the world making cigs. about $1/stick, so 20/day will set you back $7k/yr
    - Poor people are twice as likely to smoke as rich.
    - Country people smoke twice as much as city people.

    Of our 70 staff, none of our engineers or management smoke (30 staff): about 5 production staff smoke.
    I saw most of them try vaping last year, but they all went back to cigarettes because... well I think laziness...

    --
    46137
  25. Terrible and Misleading Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Is this Buzzfeed? I'd expect something a bit more reasonable. As others have pointed out, ecigs != tobacco and nicotine != tobacco.

    While nicotine can be extracted from tobacco, and calling it a "tobacco product" is technically correct, but also not. I am guessing it can probably be synthesised by now as well.

    The harm from tobacco is all the other crap that Big Tobacco sprays it with to make it burn faster, or more addictive, or whatever other conspiricies you wish to cook up.

    Big Tobacco would love nothing more that to get Ecigs banned, so they can have their monopoly back.

  26. Re:It's not a gateway drug by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    I can honestly say that the only drug weed is a gateway to is diet pills. And even that seems debatable.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  27. Fake news by stevent1965 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so....not tobacco. Nicotine? Sure. Undeniable and verifiable. Tobacco? Not such much. Just another sorry and sordid example of what passes for "journalism" these days. I swear, yellow journalism was once a thing and it still is, only it can reach many,many more people much more quickly than ever before.

    1. Re:Fake news by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. The health insurers don't classify vaporized nicotine juice as tobacco.

  28. Misleading Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "E-cigarette Use is Soaring Among US Kids, Authorities Choose to Manufacturer a 'Tobacco' Crisis by Playing a Game of Semantics" - FTFY

  29. Teenagers aren't kids, by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Adolescence is a fairly recent social trends that came about as a economic effect. I say Trend because it's the idea is only around a hundred years old,. These "kids" you speak of , their age group built this civilization, country, sciences, industry... The foundation of everything we enjoy today. They ruled countries, they created the modern world... But they can't Vape if they want to..

  30. Smoking, not nicotine, is addictive by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Someone somewhere else pointed out that nicotine substitutes (patch, gum) don't work as well as you would think.

    1. Re:Smoking, not nicotine, is addictive by sjames · · Score: 1

      They fail on multiple points. First, they don't substitute for the ritual of smoking.

      Perhaps bigger, they don't have enough nicotine in them. They seem to be constructed to relieve "just enough" suffering rather than actually replace the nicotine. This is probably because they didn't realize that the MAOIs in cigarettes are part of the effect. A replacement actually needs to provide MORE nicotine than cigarettes to compensate for the lack of MAOI. Do that for a while and the addiction will loose urgency without even a bit of suffering.

      Finally, they try to ramp you down too fast, again as if designed to make sure you suffer, just not as much. They're perfectly designed for failure.

  31. FDA is nanny state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just another crack in the dam of liberty. The nanny state will flood in from all sides one day, and we will all wonder where our nation went.

    Ban everything that could potentially harm some one. Guess what, we aren't going to all suddenly live to be 120. We're still going to die in our 80's because after a certain point it's genetics that determines your final age. Maybe the FDA should worry more about potassium bromate in bread than about nicotine free vape juice.

    Amazingly I pay a higher tax on pipe tobacco than I pay on ammunition. How's something that only harms myself more dangerous than something that can immediately harm innocent bystanders?

    As for my smoking. I'm totally OK with fines for smoking in places where it is not allowed. What I don't agree to is the regulation of commerce when it interferes with free speech, freedom of expression, or personal enjoyment (excluding anti-social behavior, like violence).

  32. Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Popcorn Lung
    Won'tcha come
    And take my breath awaaaaaayy?

    Popcorn Lung
    Won'tcha come?
    Won'tcha come?

    Oh, hey - what about chemicals other than nicotine?

    1. Re:Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? by PKI+Champion · · Score: 1

      Popcorn lung is a likely outcome from vaping, particularly with the flavored vape juice. Your comment is the only one that mentions it. I would mod you up if I had points.

    2. Re:Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are zero cases of popcorn lung from vaping. If you can show me one, you'd be the first.

  33. Strong growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spurred by deregulation. MAGA

  34. Bobbitize the Busybodies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What this country needs is a Bobbitize the Busybodies movement. Get hold of all the professional buttinskis that have nothing better to do than mind other peoples business and whack! Off with their weenies!

  35. Puritanism at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Someone ingested something not made from soy or kale, we have to stop them!" (Oh, and the soy and kale are only to be ingested in the specified oral way, no smoking it or shooting it up!)