The odd thing is, the article actually refers to the data in the second image ("drawn from the official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia"). Simply by the fact that 1998 was the warmest year on record he draws his little conclusion.
That assuming that "these same scientist's findings are being dismissed by others because their funding is cooperate", and not because they contain similar logic to your's.
In case you missed it, the point wasn't that his science is wrong because he gets money from the oil industry, it's that his claim that he can't do science because he can't get funding is wrong.
Spindler shipped a LOT of product, and under him, the confusing gobbledygook of naming conventions like "Performa 6225" was born. Now, if you can tell me the difference between Performa 6220 and a 6225 off the top of your head...imagine what it was like in support when Apple had 40-some odd machines based on four logic boards and varying form factors, markets...
Come on, off the top of your head, tell me the differences between the 1999 iMac DV and iMac SE (apart from color), and those from 2000. How about the difference between the iBook and the iBook?
Well, actually that isn't Evolution, but selective breeding. Simply because Evolution isn't goal-driven - which is exactly why it can come up with stuff we can't even dream of until we find them. But even selective breeding shows that "the Creation" isn't static.
You linked to a site that does not show what you want it to show. Since you completly ignored the page I linked to, which does show what I said it does, and what you claim isn't true - IKYABWAI.
There is nothing that can be ignored on the page you linked to. You're just blowing smoke. Which adds to global dimming and thus prevents global warming, so this is good.
It scarcely mattered what the Milankovitch orbital changes might do, wrote Murray Mitchell in 1972, since "man's intervention... would if anything tend to prolong the present interglacial." Human industry would prevent an advance of the ice by blanketing the Earth with CO2. A panel of top experts convened by the National Academy of Sciences in 1975 tentatively agreed with Mitchell. True, in recent years the temperature had been dropping (perhaps as part of some unknown "longer-period climatic oscillation"). Nevertheless, they thought CO2 "could conceivably" bring half a degree of warming by the end of the century.(27) The outspoken geochemist and oceanographer Wallace Broecker went farther. He suspected that there was indeed a natural cycle responsible for the cooling in recent decades, perhaps originating in cyclical changes on the Sun. If so, it was only temporarily canceling the greenhouse warming. Within a few decades that would climb past any natural cycle. "Are we on the brink of a pronounced global warming?" he asked.(28*)
Meanwhile in 1975, two New Zealand scientists reported that while the Northern Hemisphere had been cooling over the past thirty years, their own region, and probably other parts of the Southern Hemisphere, had been warming.(29) There were too few weather stations in the vast unvisited southern oceans to be certain, but other studies tended to confirm it. The cooling since around 1940 had been observed mainly in northern latitudes. Perhaps cooling from industrial haze counteracted the greenhouse warming there? After all, the Northern Hemisphere was home to most of the world's industry. It was also home to most of the world's population, and as usual, people had been most impressed by the weather where they lived.(30*)
Exactly. If it hadn't been for Bill's mum, who knew one higher-up of IBM from a charity organization, IBM would have asked Microsoft not once instead of twice if they could fix them up with an OS for their PC.
So, how many online music stores can you buy music for your iPod from?
Several, as was pointed out already. More importantly, the songs cost far less than what you have to pay for a simple ringtone from those providers already.
What you meant to write: Drummer: Whoa? You serious dude? Everyone likes pirate music. Why does tpgp have to go all the way across town to copy the files again? They're allready here.
You sound rather narrow-eyed and guilty. Even if you have a twelth month guarentee by law, you do not have the right to get a new machine on the spot, let alone does anybody have to copy your data over to the new machine.
Slashdot Mirror
Ahh, so your "official" numbers are official numbers plus a fudge factor of 19 for water vapor.
Wrong. You don't even quote the guy right in his wrong conclusion. And you are calling us the kooks.
The odd thing is, the article actually refers to the data in the second image ("drawn from the official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia"). Simply by the fact that 1998 was the warmest year on record he draws his little conclusion.
Well, why don't you show us these "official" numbrs?
In case you missed it, the point wasn't that his science is wrong because he gets money from the oil industry, it's that his claim that he can't do science because he can't get funding is wrong.
Thanks for showing that the Global Warming deniers can't count (or can't read).
Talking about future products of a company is not first amendment issue.
Here.
Come on, off the top of your head, tell me the differences between the 1999 iMac DV and iMac SE (apart from color), and those from 2000. How about the difference between the iBook and the iBook?
Bush reminds me of King Arnulf from Eric the Viking: "So whatever's happening, you can rest assured, Hy-Brasil is NOT sinking. Repeat, NOT sinking."
Well, actually that isn't Evolution, but selective breeding. Simply because Evolution isn't goal-driven - which is exactly why it can come up with stuff we can't even dream of until we find them. But even selective breeding shows that "the Creation" isn't static.
You linked to a site that does not show what you want it to show. Since you completly ignored the page I linked to, which does show what I said it does, and what you claim isn't true - IKYABWAI.
They didn't steal, they inovated new names.
And what would those facts be?
There is nothing that can be ignored on the page you linked to. You're just blowing smoke. Which adds to global dimming and thus prevents global warming, so this is good.
So where exactly does this prove me wrong? Did you even read what's written at my link?
Here
Oh, come on. Bush admits We - first of all, there is - the globe is warming. The fundamental debate: is it manmade or natural. Put that aside.
Ohh yeah, that "cooling trend" that only affected the Northern Hemisphere.
Exactly. If it hadn't been for Bill's mum, who knew one higher-up of IBM from a charity organization, IBM would have asked Microsoft not once instead of twice if they could fix them up with an OS for their PC.
Several, as was pointed out already. More importantly, the songs cost far less than what you have to pay for a simple ringtone from those providers already.
Sorry, but it's time somebody joined the late 90s. MP3s have tags now.
What you meant to write: Drummer: Whoa? You serious dude? Everyone likes pirate music. Why does tpgp have to go all the way across town to copy the files again? They're allready here.
You sound rather narrow-eyed and guilty. Even if you have a twelth month guarentee by law, you do not have the right to get a new machine on the spot, let alone does anybody have to copy your data over to the new machine.