What ever the rats were eating may now end up with a massive increase in population
No shit sherlock, that was the entire point of the erradication, they were killing and eating the local wildlife population.
, and the excreta that the rats generated had to be fertilizing something, so at least one other species won't do as well, and there will be knock on effects from that.
Rats are not native to the environment on the island, hence a pest. Anything dependent on them can only also be a recent introduction so if it kills off other introduced species all the better. The island is mostly barrow with just ground shrub and I seriously doubt the Rats were providing any benefit that the birds couldn't.
Neither game is fixable, unless I tell my users to click, for no reason, other than Google is stupid.
I don't like ads either, but I think everybody should follow the rules.
I despise google and avoid them wherever possible. But the fault here isn't googles it is every fucking site that abuses auto play, the feature is fundamentally broken due to it being in the control of the website instead of the user and every arsehole website, news site and ad company abuses it by autoplaying content. this isn't just a problem with ads. yes you are an unfortunate victim, but the standard is broken and heavily abused. What needs happening here is modification of the standard.
It broke all of my Captivate tutorials that use autoplay feature as well. Chrome is really making it difficult for me to recommend it lately.
I wouldn't recommend Chrome anyway, BUT this is a positive rather than negative. What broke Captivate was Captivate with its assumption it has rights and access to autoplay.
I used to think the same way, but the reality is these are people IT has failed. They have a need and IT has repeatedly failed to deliver it to them over the years. Sure what they produce quality wise is absolute shit, but they produce it because that shit is better than the nothing you are delivering them. One of the constant thing I am fighting nowadays is the self entitled IT, they think IT is special and business must follow IT rather than understanding IT exists to provide the business with a service, this is especially prevalent in the public service.
many of the bots have been written to use multiple identities already. unfortunately you seem to be 10 years out of date with how the bots work or just looking to justify a pointless solution.
popular bands don't just want to cater to the megarich. just because they could sellout priced at $1000 a ticket doesn't mean they should. It alienates their fans and in the long run will hurt them. what the want is for everyone to have a fair chance at tickets across varying price ranges. Regardless as others have said this is already a solved problem, their are various systems in place to lock out the scalpers now should a band/event wish to do so including multiple shows, registered fan ticket purchasing, identity verification for smaller events, various ticket limiting systems etc etc.
Many already do record buyer with the ticket, the issue is it is near impossible to verify identity at gate, even a few seconds extra per person is a massive investment. for example you have a stadium with 100,000 people. if each person takes 10 seconds to verify identity (very optimistic estimate) then you are looking at an extra 277 hours of labour or to put it another way to get those 100,000 through the gates in 1 hour you need an extra 277 people manning the gates doing identity.
This is a solution in search of a problem and the problem it found is not the main issue. This doesn't prevent fraud or the problems at all. A fraudster can just buy one legitimate ticket then flog it off to many people, similar to what they do already. As for tying an identity to the ticket, this is BS and useless. Event organisers and gate entry don't have the manpower to check the identity of people as they enter anyway. .
unlikely. This feature would mean government agencies and many regulated industries simply won't be permitted to use gmail as you can't have email that self destruct when you have mandatory data retention.
luckily where I live a "NO JUNK MAIL" sign on the mailbox blocks 99% of that. once that filter fell off for about a week and I was honestly shocked at how much shit really is stuffed into mailboxes.
mostly stopped using my gmail account now, it is 90% spam content. Only check it occasionally now to point the people that still mail me their to my new address.
surprise surprise a high publicity name gets published everywhere when there is news. Of course it shows up everywhere, we are in earnings season, so far there have been only a few major names to have hugely negative news, negative news gets clicks.
Goldman Sachs would trade in dog turds if they thought it would make them money or they thought they could launder or cheat others with it. Them being involved adds precisely NOTHING to crypto coins legitimacy
yeah I know. I am a long time cable cutter. But the reality is that this is what they should have been doing for a long time, bundling in bonus's and benefits for keeping cable. This doesn't force you to keep them, but it is a step (small one) in the right direction, when you provide a company with loyalty they should be giving back benefits for that loyalty. I am sure a lot of people here are pissed because they miss out on a benefit.
If you think they are kicking up a stink about the sticker wait till they try that. That will be a straight to court thing, no warnings as most countries have laws about required consumer warranties.
This is actually the kinda behaviour we want to see, rather than simply fucking users they are providing incentives to keep cable TV, this is the sort of incentive that should have been offered years ago.
Anyone that can look past the special effects and the at the time brilliant use of 3D sees a cliched poorly written script with nothing original and some really poorly put together dialogue.
horseshit. driving on the highway is one of the least complex and simple things UNTIL something happens then it can be one of the most dangerous highly complex environments to be on due to the speed of other vehicles and reduced time to react, Road Works, animals, items fallen off a truck, other irresponsible drivers, accidents etc.
A police officer called the behavior "reckless," adding that autopilot controls like the ones on Teslas "are in no way a substitute for a competent motorist in the driving seat who can react appropriately to the road ahead."
Is he suggesting this guy was a competent motorist?, his actions alone prove he shouldn't be allowed to drive ever as he obviously has no understanding of what is required to be competent, maybe in this case the Tesla Autopilot "was" the safer option and at least it revealed what a fucking moron he is and that he shouldn't have a license.
think you meant well done Moon Jae-in? basically really only 2 things that have lead to the possibility of peace, Moon Jae-in's efforts and North Korea's collapse of their test site. If they even nominated Trump it would be truly a last straw for the peace prize, it was bad enough when they gave it to Obama, it would make the whole thing into an even worse joke.
Slashdot Mirror
10 times faster than full size helicopter sure, but pretty well standard for a model helicopter of that size. so nothing special to note for the rpm.
What ever the rats were eating may now end up with a massive increase in population
No shit sherlock, that was the entire point of the erradication, they were killing and eating the local wildlife population.
, and the excreta that the rats generated had to be fertilizing something, so at least one other species won't do as well, and there will be knock on effects from that.
Rats are not native to the environment on the island, hence a pest. Anything dependent on them can only also be a recent introduction so if it kills off other introduced species all the better. The island is mostly barrow with just ground shrub and I seriously doubt the Rats were providing any benefit that the birds couldn't.
Neither game is fixable, unless I tell my users to click, for no reason,
other than Google is stupid. I don't like ads either, but I think everybody should follow the rules.
I despise google and avoid them wherever possible. But the fault here isn't googles it is every fucking site that abuses auto play, the feature is fundamentally broken due to it being in the control of the website instead of the user and every arsehole website, news site and ad company abuses it by autoplaying content. this isn't just a problem with ads. yes you are an unfortunate victim, but the standard is broken and heavily abused. What needs happening here is modification of the standard.
It broke all of my Captivate tutorials that use autoplay feature as well. Chrome is really making it difficult for me to recommend it lately.
I wouldn't recommend Chrome anyway, BUT this is a positive rather than negative. What broke Captivate was Captivate with its assumption it has rights and access to autoplay.
I used to think the same way, but the reality is these are people IT has failed. They have a need and IT has repeatedly failed to deliver it to them over the years. Sure what they produce quality wise is absolute shit, but they produce it because that shit is better than the nothing you are delivering them. One of the constant thing I am fighting nowadays is the self entitled IT, they think IT is special and business must follow IT rather than understanding IT exists to provide the business with a service, this is especially prevalent in the public service.
the point of many of those features is you don't need a data scientist to do it. The fact you do with CALC is a huge negative.
many of the bots have been written to use multiple identities already. unfortunately you seem to be 10 years out of date with how the bots work or just looking to justify a pointless solution.
popular bands don't just want to cater to the megarich. just because they could sellout priced at $1000 a ticket doesn't mean they should. It alienates their fans and in the long run will hurt them. what the want is for everyone to have a fair chance at tickets across varying price ranges. Regardless as others have said this is already a solved problem, their are various systems in place to lock out the scalpers now should a band/event wish to do so including multiple shows, registered fan ticket purchasing, identity verification for smaller events, various ticket limiting systems etc etc.
Many already do record buyer with the ticket, the issue is it is near impossible to verify identity at gate, even a few seconds extra per person is a massive investment. for example you have a stadium with 100,000 people. if each person takes 10 seconds to verify identity (very optimistic estimate) then you are looking at an extra 277 hours of labour or to put it another way to get those 100,000 through the gates in 1 hour you need an extra 277 people manning the gates doing identity.
This is a solution in search of a problem and the problem it found is not the main issue. This doesn't prevent fraud or the problems at all. A fraudster can just buy one legitimate ticket then flog it off to many people, similar to what they do already. As for tying an identity to the ticket, this is BS and useless. Event organisers and gate entry don't have the manpower to check the identity of people as they enter anyway. .
unlikely. This feature would mean government agencies and many regulated industries simply won't be permitted to use gmail as you can't have email that self destruct when you have mandatory data retention.
luckily where I live a "NO JUNK MAIL" sign on the mailbox blocks 99% of that. once that filter fell off for about a week and I was honestly shocked at how much shit really is stuffed into mailboxes.
mostly stopped using my gmail account now, it is 90% spam content. Only check it occasionally now to point the people that still mail me their to my new address.
I use the digital keyboard interface, it completely blocks the site from loading once it has annoyed me one too many times.
surprise surprise a high publicity name gets published everywhere when there is news. Of course it shows up everywhere, we are in earnings season, so far there have been only a few major names to have hugely negative news, negative news gets clicks.
Goldman Sachs would trade in dog turds if they thought it would make them money or they thought they could launder or cheat others with it. Them being involved adds precisely NOTHING to crypto coins legitimacy
yeah I know. I am a long time cable cutter. But the reality is that this is what they should have been doing for a long time, bundling in bonus's and benefits for keeping cable. This doesn't force you to keep them, but it is a step (small one) in the right direction, when you provide a company with loyalty they should be giving back benefits for that loyalty. I am sure a lot of people here are pissed because they miss out on a benefit.
If you think they are kicking up a stink about the sticker wait till they try that. That will be a straight to court thing, no warnings as most countries have laws about required consumer warranties.
This is actually the kinda behaviour we want to see, rather than simply fucking users they are providing incentives to keep cable TV, this is the sort of incentive that should have been offered years ago.
might want to read that yourself, the company was for TNK-BP, not BP.
I think what he is aluding to is that approach produces buckets of shit like Jupiter Rising
Anyone that can look past the special effects and the at the time brilliant use of 3D sees a cliched poorly written script with nothing original and some really poorly put together dialogue.
horseshit. driving on the highway is one of the least complex and simple things UNTIL something happens then it can be one of the most dangerous highly complex environments to be on due to the speed of other vehicles and reduced time to react, Road Works, animals, items fallen off a truck, other irresponsible drivers, accidents etc.
A police officer called the behavior "reckless," adding that autopilot controls like the ones on Teslas "are in no way a substitute for a competent motorist in the driving seat who can react appropriately to the road ahead."
Is he suggesting this guy was a competent motorist?, his actions alone prove he shouldn't be allowed to drive ever as he obviously has no understanding of what is required to be competent, maybe in this case the Tesla Autopilot "was" the safer option and at least it revealed what a fucking moron he is and that he shouldn't have a license.
think you meant well done Moon Jae-in? basically really only 2 things that have lead to the possibility of peace, Moon Jae-in's efforts and North Korea's collapse of their test site. If they even nominated Trump it would be truly a last straw for the peace prize, it was bad enough when they gave it to Obama, it would make the whole thing into an even worse joke.