Many more people move INTO Texas, dumbfuck. Nobody is clamoring to move to your shit hole state. They are probably leaving just to get away from people like you.
Interesting. That's solid logic, at least. For all the bad parts of California, it's hard to argue about the weather. It's awesome. Snow can be fun if you have some mountains to go with it. Snow in Kansas, well.... Uh, maybe have a snowball fight? When it comes to dreaming of buying a house, I'm in the same boat. Where I live with my low six-figure salary - there is little chance it'll happen without some severe re-adjustment in prices.
aaand you miss the point... again. You can change a fucking pin code. You can't change your iris-scan, dumbass. Not to mention the fact that you could have chose to use a password instead of a stupid ass PIN. You could have chose to use a dumbphone/dadphone and not have much information worth stealing on the device anyway, but you had to play Pokemon Go, right? We couldn't drag down your productivity by taking that away, I forgot... sorry.
Says the Anonymous Coward. I bet Texas is doing a helluva lot better than whatever shithole place you are in. Ponder that, Mr Coward. You're lucky to be graced with the presence of any Texans at all, motherfucker. You certainly don't deserve it.
You are right to be concerned. I'm from Texas but lived in Colorado for the last 20 years. It went from a red state to a blue state in that time and the Commiefornians are coming here in droves and have thoroughly changed the place for the worse. It's amazing that they ruin their own beautiful state with sky high taxes, hordes of illegals & homeless folks they created, brain dead regulation, zoning laws that gentrify areas + lock-out new home building, and then they want to come here and make all the same mistakes. Too bad they can't just stay there and stew in the hell they created for themselves. It's so unfortunate that people come to Texas to take advantage of the low taxes and more reasonable levels of regulation but then seem to think "Hey, let's make this into California since it worked out so well there!"
No. It's coming soon. The stuff in HEAD is already spanking Solaris pretty badly performance-wise, though. It just wasn't tested well enough by the time 12-RELEASE came time to cut.
No, he is just a run-of-the-mill moron. I'm from Texas. John Carmack is from Texas (well born in Kansas, but still lived most of his life in Texas). There are a lot of religious dipshits like this guy in Texas, don't get me wrong. However, the place is a mix of clay and gold like any other place. There are a lot of smart folks there, too. It's a big place.
The ZFS version is a bit political. Sun originally designed ZFS with versions to enable various features along the version continuum. However, many things happened they didn't foresee. OpenSolaris was pretty much a failure (yes, one can argue *today* about Illumos but that's not in the context when ZFS was created). Now you have four groups essentially charting a different course for ZFS and only two of them really matter: Oracle and FreeBSD. Linux doesn't matter a lick since licensing issues will forever prevent Linux from fully adopting ZFS properly. Illumos doesn't matter because it has nowhere near critical mass or the needed dev talent. ZFS code in FreeBSD gets changes often and their source code repos prove this clearly. In fact, much more clearly than lets-lay-off-everyone-related-to-Solaris-at-Oracle folks at Oracle. have demonstrated in the last few years. Yes, the version in Solaris is newer and yes it has encryption. Yes, GELI isn't as stable as the encryption in ZFS in Solaris. However, keep in mind that ZFS native encryption *is* underway and will probably work in 12.1 or 12.2 at this rate. At worst, it'll be in the next major rev of FreeBSD. However, if you are holding your breath for BTRfs or trying to wave the ZFS on Linux banner, you'd better eat an energy bar or something, because you are going to be there a while.
Hey, sounds like something Linux would do. Here are some other ideas for the new-school Linux children. 1. Drop support for any text configuration file. Go full binary registry. Hell, make it an SQL database that has to start before the system can boot. 2. Convert all log files to encrypted binary files. Just making them binary wasn't good enough. 3. Disable all support for shell scripting. Only Python scripting is allowed now so that you can get the joy of tracebacks for everything you do. 4. Disable pipes and redirection since Unix gurus just make other people feel dumb with them. Who needs that? 5. Bring WINE into the kernel and natively start supporting DLLs. 6. Disable RPM in favor of MSI installers. You gotta have that built-in GUI, brah!
They still can't seem to get BTRFS working anywhere nearly as well as ZFS on FreeBSD. Plus, you get a lovely init structure with no Systemd garbage. I love it.
SSL = corporations hand-jobbing each other ("signing") and claiming they are "trusted". By who? Each other? Gimme a break. Too many times people trust encryption only to be let down by it either being a shitty implementation that gets hacked or the algo itself gets broken (or more likely becomes "questionable" and in some grey area due to some asshole's "paper" on some esoteric part of the algo). Do I see the need for it in theory? Yes. I do understand why authorization and authentication processes as well as data transport is best secured. I'm just saying that on the flipside of these needs, it's also worth looking at the fact that the old saying about 'putting your eggs in one basket' looks pretty apt for crypto. It's a great place to put all your shit and then find out it's nowhere near as secure as writing it in cleartext on a 3x5 notecard in your desk. People need to keep in mind that no single security measure keeps you protected. That's why we have defense in depth strategies that view crypto as one small part (a part I believe should get even smaller). Crypto also seems to work a lot better for corrupt governments and rich assholes, but nobody likes pointing that out and instead resort to fantasies about Greenpeace and Amnesty International NGO's using PGP to send secret messages to the free world. In reality, it's the corporations and giant global fuckers that get the most mileage out of it (think SSL and other corporate design-by-committee crypto garbage). I'd sooner trust sensitive data to a typewriter and a steel safe than a crypto algorithm and someone's lame implementation. Experience shows that shit has a rough track record.
Smart strategy. I'm not convinced the entire generation acts for the same reason, but I'm sure a significant number do if they were old enough to be paying attention in 2008. I just wonder what will happen when the Baby Boomers decide to use their outsized voting habits to say, raid the 401k and IRA accounts of the Millenial generation in their 30's or 40's. After all, grandma shouldn't have to eat cat food right? So, now that you are done paying off that student loan let ol' Uncle Sam have a swing at whatever you've managed to save.
Anytime the government forms a new department these days you can pretty much bet they are failing at that badly and need a smokescreen that will make it look like they are doing something. The consumer protection agency was the same thing. They swung for the fences while trying to set it up, but once the suit weasels got done with them, they couldn't police a bingo game.
I won't argue at all. However, I'd rather get a Fields Medal than a Nobel Prize, anyday. Then again, I'm not going to get either one wasting time posting on/.:-)
Readers aren't the same as Vidiots. They have enough brain cells to tell that they are reading AI-generated garbage. I'm more inclined to believe GAN will produce movies before it'll write a decent book. However, I'm probably just heavily biased since I'm a voracious reader myself (and completely fucking unashamed of it).
After giving the peace prize to several bloody dictators the phrase "Nobel Prize" means 4/5ths of 5/8ths of fuck all, nowadays. I have to wonder if the same mentality has infected the folks who decide the science and literature prizes.
I thought it was pretty damn funny. Perhaps you need to take your own meds, bruh. I suspect you bow up every time the word "snowflake" or acronym "SJW" is used, like about 30% of the rest of/.
That's more or less the same as my understanding. So, like I said, I'd be surprised if it was vulnerable to speculative execution attacks. However, with bizarre ISA they've got, I'm sure they made plenty of mistakes somewhere. However, it's also pretty likely they'd be able to fix those issues with recompiled binaries rather than whole new TLB strategies.
Slashdot Mirror
Many more people move INTO Texas, dumbfuck. Nobody is clamoring to move to your shit hole state. They are probably leaving just to get away from people like you.
Interesting. That's solid logic, at least. For all the bad parts of California, it's hard to argue about the weather. It's awesome. Snow can be fun if you have some mountains to go with it. Snow in Kansas, well.... Uh, maybe have a snowball fight? When it comes to dreaming of buying a house, I'm in the same boat. Where I live with my low six-figure salary - there is little chance it'll happen without some severe re-adjustment in prices.
Then you'd be a moron. Locking phones doesn't deter theft worth a shit considering they are easy to factory reset. Dumbfuck.
Buwahahahahaha!
aaand you miss the point ... again. You can change a fucking pin code. You can't change your iris-scan, dumbass. Not to mention the fact that you could have chose to use a password instead of a stupid ass PIN. You could have chose to use a dumbphone/dadphone and not have much information worth stealing on the device anyway, but you had to play Pokemon Go, right? We couldn't drag down your productivity by taking that away, I forgot... sorry.
Says the Anonymous Coward. I bet Texas is doing a helluva lot better than whatever shithole place you are in. Ponder that, Mr Coward. You're lucky to be graced with the presence of any Texans at all, motherfucker. You certainly don't deserve it.
You are right to be concerned. I'm from Texas but lived in Colorado for the last 20 years. It went from a red state to a blue state in that time and the Commiefornians are coming here in droves and have thoroughly changed the place for the worse. It's amazing that they ruin their own beautiful state with sky high taxes, hordes of illegals & homeless folks they created, brain dead regulation, zoning laws that gentrify areas + lock-out new home building, and then they want to come here and make all the same mistakes. Too bad they can't just stay there and stew in the hell they created for themselves. It's so unfortunate that people come to Texas to take advantage of the low taxes and more reasonable levels of regulation but then seem to think "Hey, let's make this into California since it worked out so well there!"
You can't replace your fingerprints, iris, or head once they are compromised which happens about every 10 minutes these days.
The Chinese might think we'll treat her like they treat Western prisoners.
No. It's coming soon. The stuff in HEAD is already spanking Solaris pretty badly performance-wise, though. It just wasn't tested well enough by the time 12-RELEASE came time to cut.
No, he is just a run-of-the-mill moron. I'm from Texas. John Carmack is from Texas (well born in Kansas, but still lived most of his life in Texas). There are a lot of religious dipshits like this guy in Texas, don't get me wrong. However, the place is a mix of clay and gold like any other place. There are a lot of smart folks there, too. It's a big place.
The ZFS version is a bit political. Sun originally designed ZFS with versions to enable various features along the version continuum. However, many things happened they didn't foresee. OpenSolaris was pretty much a failure (yes, one can argue *today* about Illumos but that's not in the context when ZFS was created). Now you have four groups essentially charting a different course for ZFS and only two of them really matter: Oracle and FreeBSD. Linux doesn't matter a lick since licensing issues will forever prevent Linux from fully adopting ZFS properly. Illumos doesn't matter because it has nowhere near critical mass or the needed dev talent. ZFS code in FreeBSD gets changes often and their source code repos prove this clearly. In fact, much more clearly than lets-lay-off-everyone-related-to-Solaris-at-Oracle folks at Oracle. have demonstrated in the last few years. Yes, the version in Solaris is newer and yes it has encryption. Yes, GELI isn't as stable as the encryption in ZFS in Solaris. However, keep in mind that ZFS native encryption *is* underway and will probably work in 12.1 or 12.2 at this rate. At worst, it'll be in the next major rev of FreeBSD. However, if you are holding your breath for BTRfs or trying to wave the ZFS on Linux banner, you'd better eat an energy bar or something, because you are going to be there a while.
Hey, sounds like something Linux would do. Here are some other ideas for the new-school Linux children. 1. Drop support for any text configuration file. Go full binary registry. Hell, make it an SQL database that has to start before the system can boot. 2. Convert all log files to encrypted binary files. Just making them binary wasn't good enough. 3. Disable all support for shell scripting. Only Python scripting is allowed now so that you can get the joy of tracebacks for everything you do. 4. Disable pipes and redirection since Unix gurus just make other people feel dumb with them. Who needs that? 5. Bring WINE into the kernel and natively start supporting DLLs. 6. Disable RPM in favor of MSI installers. You gotta have that built-in GUI, brah!
They still can't seem to get BTRFS working anywhere nearly as well as ZFS on FreeBSD. Plus, you get a lovely init structure with no Systemd garbage. I love it.
SSL = corporations hand-jobbing each other ("signing") and claiming they are "trusted". By who? Each other? Gimme a break. Too many times people trust encryption only to be let down by it either being a shitty implementation that gets hacked or the algo itself gets broken (or more likely becomes "questionable" and in some grey area due to some asshole's "paper" on some esoteric part of the algo). Do I see the need for it in theory? Yes. I do understand why authorization and authentication processes as well as data transport is best secured. I'm just saying that on the flipside of these needs, it's also worth looking at the fact that the old saying about 'putting your eggs in one basket' looks pretty apt for crypto. It's a great place to put all your shit and then find out it's nowhere near as secure as writing it in cleartext on a 3x5 notecard in your desk. People need to keep in mind that no single security measure keeps you protected. That's why we have defense in depth strategies that view crypto as one small part (a part I believe should get even smaller). Crypto also seems to work a lot better for corrupt governments and rich assholes, but nobody likes pointing that out and instead resort to fantasies about Greenpeace and Amnesty International NGO's using PGP to send secret messages to the free world. In reality, it's the corporations and giant global fuckers that get the most mileage out of it (think SSL and other corporate design-by-committee crypto garbage). I'd sooner trust sensitive data to a typewriter and a steel safe than a crypto algorithm and someone's lame implementation. Experience shows that shit has a rough track record.
Either the people who say renewable energy is now cheaper than fossil fuels are right or not. I'll keep an eye on my energy company Xcel.
Smart strategy. I'm not convinced the entire generation acts for the same reason, but I'm sure a significant number do if they were old enough to be paying attention in 2008. I just wonder what will happen when the Baby Boomers decide to use their outsized voting habits to say, raid the 401k and IRA accounts of the Millenial generation in their 30's or 40's. After all, grandma shouldn't have to eat cat food right? So, now that you are done paying off that student loan let ol' Uncle Sam have a swing at whatever you've managed to save.
H1Bs, tuberculosis, phone solicitor calls, terrible food, scamware. What's next? You guys gonna send us all your ugly women?
Anytime the government forms a new department these days you can pretty much bet they are failing at that badly and need a smokescreen that will make it look like they are doing something. The consumer protection agency was the same thing. They swung for the fences while trying to set it up, but once the suit weasels got done with them, they couldn't police a bingo game.
Huh? I thought I was already on that site. :-)
I won't argue at all. However, I'd rather get a Fields Medal than a Nobel Prize, anyday. Then again, I'm not going to get either one wasting time posting on /. :-)
Readers aren't the same as Vidiots. They have enough brain cells to tell that they are reading AI-generated garbage. I'm more inclined to believe GAN will produce movies before it'll write a decent book. However, I'm probably just heavily biased since I'm a voracious reader myself (and completely fucking unashamed of it).
After giving the peace prize to several bloody dictators the phrase "Nobel Prize" means 4/5ths of 5/8ths of fuck all, nowadays. I have to wonder if the same mentality has infected the folks who decide the science and literature prizes.
I thought it was pretty damn funny. Perhaps you need to take your own meds, bruh. I suspect you bow up every time the word "snowflake" or acronym "SJW" is used, like about 30% of the rest of /.
That's more or less the same as my understanding. So, like I said, I'd be surprised if it was vulnerable to speculative execution attacks. However, with bizarre ISA they've got, I'm sure they made plenty of mistakes somewhere. However, it's also pretty likely they'd be able to fix those issues with recompiled binaries rather than whole new TLB strategies.