If you don't understand why that's wrong, then you're part of the problem
Translated:
If you're not with us, you're against us
and
it would seem that *the allegations that were actually made* have some basis in fact
Or he was forced to save any face he could because the backlash against this gossip was so strong.
Given that there is no evidence, no factual account, no story about specifics from either side, it's not that hard to figure the motive behind this if you don't get hooked by your misplaced emotions. Accuse some one and watch as they burn. This is why humanity invented law and order.
When public opinion turns against you, it doesn't matter what you say, you're 'guilty', and denying it only makes it worse.
He absolutely did not admit his guilt, there was no description of the exact events that happened by either party.
The "sexual harassment" witch trials continue, fueled by bleeding hearts of the naive (to put it the nicest way possible), burning independent businessmen at the stake, paving the way for further acquisition and consolidation of "rogue" businesses competing against the status quo.
Or another, equally likely, possibility is this is a controlled leak and it's meant to mislead us about the nature of the telemetry.
But this isn't the full source is it? So probably we'll never know. But do we need to? The Corporate Plutocracy is attempting to destroy us all anyway. Until there is a movement against the state, nothing matters but survival.
Standing by to be modded down by cowards who refuse to realize the implications of things like federally mandated education standards, mass surveillance, media consolidation, etc.
Yep, little wonder most of the intelligent people have already left / stopped commenting.
Liberal media consolidation, the sale of Slashdot for example, has one goal in mind above all: stopping intelligent discourse so people can be crunched down into brainless slaves.
You haven't made an argument for the quality of the inputs!
You still haven't addressed the reasoning of the poster.
If the conclusions from the data repeatedly show the hypothesis is false, then continuing to test for the hypothesis, let alone concluding its true, DOES NOT FOLLOW
It's surreal seeing so many people buy this bullshit and take stock in gossip when the editors of this site clearly have a bribery-fueled vendetta against Uber, posting propaganda against it nearly every single day. It's almost like seeing the left-wing media cartel's penchant for conspiracy in action.
WHOOPS actually there isn't a 100% chance that Hillary will win. Actually it was more like 10%
And the drones still buy anything they hear as long as it appeals to their twisted emotions and stunted intellect.
So let's get this straight. There is an anti-Uber story on this site almost, and I'm hardly exaggerating, EVERY DAY. Even if we can ignore that, what's the story here? Literally some random employees BLOG POST totally unsubstantiated with any sort of evidence which would be easy to provide without legal ramifications.
Real headline:
With Her Left-Wing-Media-Backed Blog Post About Uber and Fist-fulls of Cash Paid to Her by Said Media, Susan Fowler Proved That Made-Up Story of One Person Can "Trigger" a Bunch of SJW-Inclined Morons into Being a Corporate-Controlled Drone Mob to Fight for Uber's Enemies
Toxic
False poetry over what displeases you for no rational reason, every time. You don't need fancy words to decorate your self-righteousness.
The Slashdot crowd of rabid left-wing editors' pets have some success in certain discussions in their rampaging around each-others Foes list and suppressing any opposing point of view. Those of us who care about the community should be more vigilant in disallowing them to spin their echo-chamber cocoon in seemingly sympathetic stories like this.
Even if it's false, it's in no way fallacious. But you haven't addressed the evidence at all. You've been caught. Just stop. You're a dogmatic climate change proponent.
The richest man in the world (that no one today has heard of) once owned the mine and the mill in this town and fueled the World Wars in part with its products.
A reminder that the downsizing of jobs led to the World Wars, and that automation will lead to much worse than world war; our annihilation.
Karl Wittgenstein was a very cunning man, but a proxy for the globalist cabal. They killed all of his sons except the famous Ludwig and bled away the fortune. Another reminder that no matter how well you do for them, they will never accept you and will always betray you to the end of your line.
Perhaps this is too much for some of you to accept, but can you really deny that automation prioritized profit ahead of people? That it in fact automation totally disregards the people? Is this the point when you parrot your masters' notions that some must fall for progress to continue? Exactly what portion of this progress benefits you?
There are no forces of nature standing plain in sight for us to conquer. We cannot overcome our limitations with material. No amount of capital will take us beyond the Earth. The people are the only thing we have; only by investing in them will the solutions to our progress be found. We must stop the class of madmen that bred themselves to accumulate capital for its own end. Left alone they would kill us all to stop us from competing for their capital.
since you did, you should explain to the other person the error you perceive, otherwise it rather seems you are just taking an opportunity to inflate yourself
and what you call a "valid implication" i wouldn't. The problem is that you are generalizing over too much controversy.
Again, this goes back to your motive. Are you trying to inflame the controversy or put it to rest?
yeah, there aren't people that do business all over the world and conspire against any competitors. so we shouldn't come up with a word for them!
seriously, you are mentally defective. no one cares about your knee jerk reactions. you are irrational and self-righteous. you have no right to speak about anything.
Actually this story is an example of how it does not matter.
Having to run to the court for permission to say anything on the "PC" borderline....in this case not even that....this is exactly what the first amendment was designed to prevent....
The world should embrace its demise at the hands of the soulless plutocracy and their machine slaves!
AI in the hands of the people would be a different story, which is the vision the average proponent pastes over reality while humming a merry tune (while their head is on fire)
Slashdot Mirror
If you don't understand why that's wrong, then you're part of the problem
Translated:
If you're not with us, you're against us
and
it would seem that *the allegations that were actually made* have some basis in fact
Or he was forced to save any face he could because the backlash against this gossip was so strong.
Given that there is no evidence, no factual account, no story about specifics from either side, it's not that hard to figure the motive behind this if you don't get hooked by your misplaced emotions. Accuse some one and watch as they burn. This is why humanity invented law and order.
if the story hadn't been publicized so much
When public opinion turns against you, it doesn't matter what you say, you're 'guilty', and denying it only makes it worse.
He absolutely did not admit his guilt, there was no description of the exact events that happened by either party.
The "sexual harassment" witch trials continue, fueled by bleeding hearts of the naive (to put it the nicest way possible), burning independent businessmen at the stake, paving the way for further acquisition and consolidation of "rogue" businesses competing against the status quo.
Corporate espionage strategists have found a weakness in the public mindset that they harp on whenever they get the chance.
Just stir up a "women's rights" fervor and watch as companies defying the status quo crumble.
Standing by to be modded down by the naive bleeding hearts who love gossip more than rational thought.
Or another, equally likely, possibility is this is a controlled leak and it's meant to mislead us about the nature of the telemetry.
But this isn't the full source is it? So probably we'll never know. But do we need to? The Corporate Plutocracy is attempting to destroy us all anyway. Until there is a movement against the state, nothing matters but survival.
Standing by to be modded down by cowards who refuse to realize the implications of things like federally mandated education standards, mass surveillance, media consolidation, etc.
For the real story to be mined out of this trove.
I predict we will see that consumer and small business software is heavily back-doored while corporate software is less so.
Yep, little wonder most of the intelligent people have already left / stopped commenting.
Liberal media consolidation, the sale of Slashdot for example, has one goal in mind above all: stopping intelligent discourse so people can be crunched down into brainless slaves.
Have you read any of the comments?
Have you seen how all the comments such as you describe are modded down constantly?
You're talking pure bullshit
What about this aren't you getting?
You haven't made an argument for the quality of the inputs!
You still haven't addressed the reasoning of the poster.
If the conclusions from the data repeatedly show the hypothesis is false, then continuing to test for the hypothesis, let alone concluding its true, DOES NOT FOLLOW
You are WRONG
the end
It's surreal seeing so many people buy this bullshit and take stock in gossip when the editors of this site clearly have a bribery-fueled vendetta against Uber, posting propaganda against it nearly every single day. It's almost like seeing the left-wing media cartel's penchant for conspiracy in action.
WHOOPS actually there isn't a 100% chance that Hillary will win. Actually it was more like 10%
And the drones still buy anything they hear as long as it appeals to their twisted emotions and stunted intellect.
So let's get this straight. There is an anti-Uber story on this site almost, and I'm hardly exaggerating, EVERY DAY.
Even if we can ignore that, what's the story here? Literally some random employees BLOG POST totally unsubstantiated with any sort of evidence which would be easy to provide without legal ramifications.
Real headline:
With Her Left-Wing-Media-Backed Blog Post About Uber and Fist-fulls of Cash Paid to Her by Said Media, Susan Fowler Proved That Made-Up Story of One Person Can "Trigger" a Bunch of SJW-Inclined Morons into Being a Corporate-Controlled Drone Mob to Fight for Uber's Enemies
Toxic
False poetry over what displeases you for no rational reason, every time. You don't need fancy words to decorate your self-righteousness.
The Slashdot crowd of rabid left-wing editors' pets have some success in certain discussions in their rampaging around each-others Foes list and suppressing any opposing point of view. Those of us who care about the community should be more vigilant in disallowing them to spin their echo-chamber cocoon in seemingly sympathetic stories like this.
Even if it's false, it's in no way fallacious.
But you haven't addressed the evidence at all.
You've been caught. Just stop. You're a dogmatic climate change proponent.
Because it isn't fallacious.
It's a matter of fact, true or false.
The richest man in the world (that no one today has heard of) once owned the mine and the mill in this town and fueled the World Wars in part with its products.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://faculty.frostburg.edu/p...
A reminder that the downsizing of jobs led to the World Wars, and that automation will lead to much worse than world war; our annihilation.
Karl Wittgenstein was a very cunning man, but a proxy for the globalist cabal. They killed all of his sons except the famous Ludwig and bled away the fortune. Another reminder that no matter how well you do for them, they will never accept you and will always betray you to the end of your line.
Perhaps this is too much for some of you to accept, but can you really deny that automation prioritized profit ahead of people? That it in fact automation totally disregards the people? Is this the point when you parrot your masters' notions that some must fall for progress to continue? Exactly what portion of this progress benefits you?
There are no forces of nature standing plain in sight for us to conquer. We cannot overcome our limitations with material. No amount of capital will take us beyond the Earth. The people are the only thing we have; only by investing in them will the solutions to our progress be found. We must stop the class of madmen that bred themselves to accumulate capital for its own end. Left alone they would kill us all to stop us from competing for their capital.
You say that like it isn't already there.
exactly, why should you bother
since you did, you should explain to the other person the error you perceive, otherwise it rather seems you are just taking an opportunity to inflate yourself
and what you call a "valid implication" i wouldn't. The problem is that you are generalizing over too much controversy.
Again, this goes back to your motive. Are you trying to inflame the controversy or put it to rest?
yeah, there aren't people that do business all over the world and conspire against any competitors. so we shouldn't come up with a word for them!
seriously, you are mentally defective. no one cares about your knee jerk reactions. you are irrational and self-righteous. you have no right to speak about anything.
Now to take legislative measures against problems that actually matter....like the globalist-architected invasion and the rape of the Swedish people
So the constitution does still matter
Actually this story is an example of how it does not matter.
Having to run to the court for permission to say anything on the "PC" borderline....in this case not even that....this is exactly what the first amendment was designed to prevent....
Why the special treatment of ni--gger?
Why? Probably the same reason as the special treatment of Jews.
Thank you for giving me my rights, master, your permission is most valued to me
Tagging the cattle, how noble
snarky acronym, really proves your point
you should watch even more of the daily show and the 'current year' guy show, you probably have the potential to take over as the host of either!
"Fallacy" is not just some magic word you incant upon things you don't like, at least if you're not an idiot.
What fallacy? Can you even describe a logical inconsistency without strawmanning your opponent's meaning?
From reading many of your comments on this site, my life savings is on NO
The human-caused climate change theory is mired in academic corruption. Warming spurt coinciding with human activity is not proof anyway.
Please fund our bubble
The world should embrace its demise at the hands of the soulless plutocracy and their machine slaves!
AI in the hands of the people would be a different story, which is the vision the average proponent pastes over reality while humming a merry tune (while their head is on fire)