The picture you link to is a result of poorly planned excavation. They were digging out for an underground parking structure. But they were piling the excavated earth on the far side of the building, creating uneven lateral pressure. After heavy rains, they had the excavated pit erode out from underneath the building.
Depends on the concrete formulation and the type of steel used. It also depends on how soon the structure is used and the the climate it's situated in.
Look at Roman aqueducts. Unlike modern concrete water diversion, aqueducts could sometimes sit for YEARS before water would be put through them (as it took so long to build).
Also, you have two millennium old concrete structures still standing.
Note that many of them have no steel in them. And most of the surviving examples are in relatively mild climates.
There are things one can do to a concrete mix to make them last longer. And proper preparation of rebar, or even using non-metallic rebar (basalt/fiberglass) can make a HUGE difference.
Also, your grandma's brick house has had a hell of a lot of maintenance done to it over the last 220 years (you'd probably be shocked by exactly how much).
They're basically saying that portions of the building structure were 3D printed or CNC'ed, then assembled on site.
We've had net-positive buildings for years. We've had prefab net-positive buidlings for years. We've had 3D printed buildings and buildings with CNC'ed parts.
They're just trying to claim that nobody's ever done it at this level before. And, possibly, they're right.
No. They're not bombing reviews. Because the movie isn't out yet. So RT isn't accepting reviews for the film's Tomatometer score yet.
What is being affected is the "Want to see" score (currently at 29% and falling). This is where the person marks whether or not they are interested in seeing the film.
Ah. Someone else who doesn't understand the problem.
What's going on is that NOW, you can post something that's completely legitimate and drawing money.
Then a random third party can come in and post something unacceptable in the comments, and BOOM, your otherwise perfectly legit money-making content gets demonetized.
And "fuck off to your own hosted video". Yep, like I said, a barrier to entry for new content creators.
Basically, with the new "comments on your video can get you demonetized" policy is going to slowly strangle the content creator community. Because it favors established creators with multiple revenue streams already established.
And it is slowly looking to present an insurmountable barrier to entry for NEW creators.
The fact that A Random Person can drive-by your video with a simple off-color comment, getting you demonetized and Google still plays ads that they then keep the money for pretty much makes your attempt at a point useless to anyone.
I also understand that a content creator could do NOTHING WRONG, and could still have legitimate videos demonetized through no fault of their own. Simply because some jackass puts up a comment.
Slashdot Mirror
Then you can't travel, can't rent a car. Can't go certain places. Can't leave the country.
Basically you become a public services pariah.
I shouldn't hold their idiocy against them...
Wait...yes I should!
Basically the UK has had OVER TWO YEARS for the people in power to map out a plan for everything INCLUDING No Deal.
But they've essentially sat upon their thumbs and complaining about how that made their colon feel.
Now, having basically whistled through the graveyard and done NOTHING (but hope that someone nullifies the will of the people)...
Guess again. I've joked up the points a bit.
But all of them are actual anti-Brexit arguments that've been made.
Strawmen?
While I've joked some of them up, ALL OF THESE are anti-Brexit arguments that have ACTUALLY BEEN MADE!
So who's the dipshit here dipshit?
Color me stunned. Just stunned...
Here's my "stunned" face. =|
FUD FUD and more FUD.
If we leave the EU! Everyone is gonna die!
If we leave the EU! It'll be like Venezuela! Overnight! Plus cannibals! Do you want cannibals?
If we leave the EU! The terrorists win!
If we leave the EU! It'll be like the rape scene from Pulp Fiction! FOR EVERYONE!
If we leave the EU! Your momma won't love you no more!
Ain't NOBODY ever got fired for staying in the EU!
And on, and on, and on...
It's a bunch of stupid, petty excuses from people who just want their way.
The picture you link to is a result of poorly planned excavation.
They were digging out for an underground parking structure.
But they were piling the excavated earth on the far side of the building, creating uneven lateral pressure.
After heavy rains, they had the excavated pit erode out from underneath the building.
Over it goes.
Depends on the concrete formulation and the type of steel used.
It also depends on how soon the structure is used and the the climate it's situated in.
Look at Roman aqueducts. Unlike modern concrete water diversion, aqueducts could sometimes sit for YEARS before water would be put through them (as it took so long to build).
Also, you have two millennium old concrete structures still standing.
Note that many of them have no steel in them. And most of the surviving examples are in relatively mild climates.
There are things one can do to a concrete mix to make them last longer.
And proper preparation of rebar, or even using non-metallic rebar (basalt/fiberglass) can make a HUGE difference.
Also, your grandma's brick house has had a hell of a lot of maintenance done to it over the last 220 years (you'd probably be shocked by exactly how much).
Prefab.
It means a new spin on a prefab home.
They're basically saying that portions of the building structure were 3D printed or CNC'ed, then assembled on site.
We've had net-positive buildings for years.
We've had prefab net-positive buidlings for years.
We've had 3D printed buildings and buildings with CNC'ed parts.
They're just trying to claim that nobody's ever done it at this level before.
And, possibly, they're right.
Flipflipflipflipflipflipflipflipflipflipflipflipflipflipflip
Automotive AI!
And remember.
If you simply try to have a civil discussion, you're shut down as a misogynist who suffers from "male fragility".
Maybe if I take my car to a track day, I might want to run it SLIGHTLY faster than the posted speed limits on the roads around the track.
Maybe once you sell me something, it's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS what I do with it.
Turns out that the stores were nothing but a problem for everyone involved.
Basically it didn't allow Tesla to play quite as fast and loose with it's customers as Tesla would like.
No. They're not bombing reviews.
Because the movie isn't out yet. So RT isn't accepting reviews for the film's Tomatometer score yet.
What is being affected is the "Want to see" score (currently at 29% and falling).
This is where the person marks whether or not they are interested in seeing the film.
And sealing the entrance shut with successive layers of concrete and steel plating.
Eventually, the Apple ecosphere will be COMPLETELY irrelevant.
Ah. Someone else who doesn't understand the problem.
What's going on is that NOW, you can post something that's completely legitimate and drawing money.
Then a random third party can come in and post something unacceptable in the comments, and BOOM, your otherwise perfectly legit money-making content gets demonetized.
And "fuck off to your own hosted video". Yep, like I said, a barrier to entry for new content creators.
Any other dumbfuckery you want to spew?
Basically, with the new "comments on your video can get you demonetized" policy is going to slowly strangle the content creator community.
Because it favors established creators with multiple revenue streams already established.
And it is slowly looking to present an insurmountable barrier to entry for NEW creators.
Thank you Captain Obvious.
Did you want to kick sand in people's faces too?
The fact that A Random Person can drive-by your video with a simple off-color comment, getting you demonetized and Google still plays ads that they then keep the money for pretty much makes your attempt at a point useless to anyone.
I don't think you understand.
Even in a demonetized video, ads still play.
If the video's demonetized, Google keeps that ad revenue all to themselves.
I understand.
I also understand that a content creator could do NOTHING WRONG, and could still have legitimate videos demonetized through no fault of their own.
Simply because some jackass puts up a comment.
Can't do that. That requires adulthood and actual initiative.
Everyone MUST be coddled and saved from everything, including themselves!
All this really is, is another push at screwing content creators out of their cut.
Oh dear!
An innocent little lamb!
"Hey Tim!"
"Yeah?"
"They said we couldn't crush them!"
"I dunno! I've got the sights lined up perfect!"
"Bombs away!"
*DOPPLER WHISTLE*
*SPLAT!*