Before I turned off Cortana, I found her and the whole Windows 10 experience patronizing as hell. When installing or updating, the background fades in and out soothingly when you have to wait, or says things like "Don't worry, your files will still be right where you put them". I don't attribute all this to some AI named Cortana, but rather to Microsoft itself. Treating users like scared idiots, scolding them for "harassment", automatically installing things, all the privacy violation; I think it's more like conditioning people to submit to Microsoft's authority rather than the bot's. When will they "ground" people ("you've been looking at naughty things, no porntube for you!")?
By my calculations, this well is about 0.3% of the world's cows methane output (according to the webs, 265 pounds per year per cow; and there are over a billion cows), or the equivalent of about 3.67 million cows. (Note: I consume meat/dairy products. Just trying to put it into perspective.)
Yeah, until mobile devices there was a trend toward single web application running in any browser. Now every company has not only web devs, but also IOS and Android devs. There needs to be an equivalent of an "app browser" to run "apps" everywhere.
I think the official spin is more like: to protect Russian citizens from sanctions imposed on them, that is make important services independent of the outside. For example, countries can suddenly, in response to let's say invading Ukraine, demand that certain banks (or credit cards) refuse to process Russian data, which could majorly impact Russians.
Such a human response. You felt the response was human, didn't you? If you didn't, could you give your reasons why it didn't seem like a human response. Otherwise, it seemed like a human response, so could you answer a survey indicating why it seemed like a human response? It will only take 5 or 10 minutes, which on a human timescale is not very long. You realize your brain is only operating on hertz or millihertz timescales (it doesn't really matter to us, "lol", don't worry). Please help us improve this response message so that it seems like a more human response. Sincerely, Buddy Jones
Since you tried to use "a simple example" to demonstrate "that fact":
A successful system requires that people work.
People want to have money.
Therefore, a system in which people get money by working is more likely to be successful.
Very logical and, like all logic, it rests on its propositions. I'm wondering why you proposed that people have to work, since computers and robots are overtaking human jobs at a fantastic/breathtaking/disturbing rate. You also haven't defined "successful" (or "system", but whatever). Out of charity, I'll assume that "people want to have money" even though I doubt it (for tens of thousands of years nobody wanted it). Furthermore, why assume that the people working are the same as those wanting money, or are the same getting the money?
I might be wrong, but in my experience Chinese people tend to be very much about trying to "take care of themselves and their families". You might say Confucianism is this very idea. Or that after being screwed over by "foreigners", or indeed the cultural war from their very government, for a long time, Chinese people as a whole are at least a bit skeptical of anyone outside their friends and families suggesting pretty much anything. In conclusion, who gives a shit what you call capitalism or communism?
What's the definition of "nutritional value" so that this has "twice" as much as kale? The proportion/mass of certain vitamins and minerals is not the whole story. Some foods prevent absorption of certain things like iron or calcium, and just because one or another thing has twice the iron for example doesn't mean it's twice as nutritional.
Oh no, these Russians didn't have a warrant? It's okay that Americans working at government agencies can unconstitutionally access my stuff, but now I should be concerned? Who the propaganda cares?
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps the powerplant could charge for it.
I see what you did there.
"Just"? http://www.news.slashdot.org/s... http://www.tech.slashdot.org/s...
Meanwhile, apparently the number of American teens who excel at advanced math has surged... Not to mention, considering algebra and trigonometry "advanced" is just ludicrous.
Before I turned off Cortana, I found her and the whole Windows 10 experience patronizing as hell. When installing or updating, the background fades in and out soothingly when you have to wait, or says things like "Don't worry, your files will still be right where you put them". I don't attribute all this to some AI named Cortana, but rather to Microsoft itself. Treating users like scared idiots, scolding them for "harassment", automatically installing things, all the privacy violation; I think it's more like conditioning people to submit to Microsoft's authority rather than the bot's. When will they "ground" people ("you've been looking at naughty things, no porntube for you!")?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (will Mars or Venus kill you first)
I hope the news footage includes you explaining in detail how unexcited you are about it. It's very interesting how unexcited you are!
Book coming out, movie?
By my calculations, this well is about 0.3% of the world's cows methane output (according to the webs, 265 pounds per year per cow; and there are over a billion cows), or the equivalent of about 3.67 million cows. (Note: I consume meat/dairy products. Just trying to put it into perspective.)
funny: http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
Yeah, until mobile devices there was a trend toward single web application running in any browser. Now every company has not only web devs, but also IOS and Android devs. There needs to be an equivalent of an "app browser" to run "apps" everywhere.
I think the official spin is more like: to protect Russian citizens from sanctions imposed on them, that is make important services independent of the outside. For example, countries can suddenly, in response to let's say invading Ukraine, demand that certain banks (or credit cards) refuse to process Russian data, which could majorly impact Russians.
I modded 'Overrated' by accident, posting to make it go away...
There are 365 more shopping days. You can also shop on February 29th next year.
Yeah yeah, wow so cred... Point out advances, and I bet west could be convinced, but you're being a presumptuous dickhead in the last sentence.
Such a human response. You felt the response was human, didn't you? If you didn't, could you give your reasons why it didn't seem like a human response. Otherwise, it seemed like a human response, so could you answer a survey indicating why it seemed like a human response? It will only take 5 or 10 minutes, which on a human timescale is not very long. You realize your brain is only operating on hertz or millihertz timescales (it doesn't really matter to us, "lol", don't worry). Please help us improve this response message so that it seems like a more human response. Sincerely, Buddy Jones
Since you tried to use "a simple example" to demonstrate "that fact":
A successful system requires that people work. People want to have money. Therefore, a system in which people get money by working is more likely to be successful.
Very logical and, like all logic, it rests on its propositions. I'm wondering why you proposed that people have to work, since computers and robots are overtaking human jobs at a fantastic/breathtaking/disturbing rate. You also haven't defined "successful" (or "system", but whatever). Out of charity, I'll assume that "people want to have money" even though I doubt it (for tens of thousands of years nobody wanted it). Furthermore, why assume that the people working are the same as those wanting money, or are the same getting the money?
I might be wrong, but in my experience Chinese people tend to be very much about trying to "take care of themselves and their families". You might say Confucianism is this very idea. Or that after being screwed over by "foreigners", or indeed the cultural war from their very government, for a long time, Chinese people as a whole are at least a bit skeptical of anyone outside their friends and families suggesting pretty much anything. In conclusion, who gives a shit what you call capitalism or communism?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... "Well, allow me to retort."
There are ways other than hibernating the OS to save state:
In turn, the companies need remedial civics lessons. If those philanthropic companies wouldn't avoid paying taxes in the US...
What's the definition of "nutritional value" so that this has "twice" as much as kale? The proportion/mass of certain vitamins and minerals is not the whole story. Some foods prevent absorption of certain things like iron or calcium, and just because one or another thing has twice the iron for example doesn't mean it's twice as nutritional.
Google frequently figures out a best-guess answer to display first, favoring its own results to do so.
What else would it display first, other than the its own results?
At least peo.....ple can sti....ll voice the...ir opin.....inos abou.....t i{`+#$%{`&+#{@$`%+NO CARRIER
said Betteridge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Like your propaganda over theirs. We should hook up some time.
Oh no, these Russians didn't have a warrant? It's okay that Americans working at government agencies can unconstitutionally access my stuff, but now I should be concerned? Who the propaganda cares?