Um, dude, speaking of reading comprehension, I think maybe you need some practice too. The entire next subsection is entitled "License to IBM of Licensed SCO Materials and SCO Project Work".
A dirty nuke is a pure fission weapon designed to create as much fallout as possible. Most nuclear weapons these days are 'clean', they're thermonuclear weapons that spread very little radiological waste around.
A classic example of a dirty nuke would be a cobalt bomb, which encases the fusion bomb in a cobalt shell. The neutron emission from the fusion reaction converts the stable cobalt into cobalt-60, which is highly radioactive, before this new highly dangerous substance is spread by the explosion itself.
A cobalt bomb would not only destroy a large area, but also render it unliveable for at least a decade. No rebuilding for you!
And if you look at the WHOIS records, you'll see that the site is owned by Daniel Brandt. Brandt is the guy who launched the anti-Google crusade because he was pissed that his site (NameBase) wasn't ranked #1 whenever you searched for anybody.
You are wrong. Quantum teleportation of photons. You leave the routing information unencrypted - the routers never have to look inside the envelope - and use quantum teleportation to bounce the unread message from router to router.
That's because if you go to the UK, everybody's driving around shiny new Mercedes. The only reason people in the UK pay crazy prices for cars is they're willing to pay crazy prices to buy a brand new car every year.
If people living in Britain stop being obsessed with proving their status by the emblem on the front of the car and the license plate on the back, then car prices will drop to what the rest of the world pays.
It costs about $8-$10 to extract a barrel of oil from the tar sands. In comparison, it costs about $2-$3 to pull a barrel of oil from a more traditional oil reserve in the middle east. But, the cost drops as the technology improves, and it's a lot of oil.
That's the stupidest thing I've heard all day. Changing the code SCO claims to be infringing isn't admitting guilt, it's covering your ass and is perfectly fine.
To learn how to produce ever heavier elements, obviously.
But why do we want to do that? Well, there are predicted patches of stability in the 120s and 130s, I believe. There are also some interesting properties predicted about those super-heavy and stable elements.
Well, in a typical environment you're not talking to the root servers at all, but rather sending a recursive DNS query to an intermediate DNS server. This will be faster than handling the root zone yourself in many cases as your intermediate DNS server can handle many clients (see large ISP) and cache results.
Sort of. The root servers don't support recursive DNS queries, but any DNS client/library worth its salt will be able to cope with iterative DNS lookups. You may notice performance problems though: without an intermediate DNS server handling recursive queries there's no DNS caching.
That's the dumbest thing I've heard all week. If HP were losing money hand over fist with their PC business they wouldn't need an excuse to get out of it. Who would stop them?
Slashdot Mirror
That would be Mach, right?
But I'm sure our descendents will still be sticking it to their descendents in the least spiritual way imaginable.
Um, dude, speaking of reading comprehension, I think maybe you need some practice too. The entire next subsection is entitled "License to IBM of Licensed SCO Materials and SCO Project Work".
It supports much larger polygons than PostgreSQL's native geometry types, and far more operations on those types.
A classic example of a dirty nuke would be a cobalt bomb, which encases the fusion bomb in a cobalt shell. The neutron emission from the fusion reaction converts the stable cobalt into cobalt-60, which is highly radioactive, before this new highly dangerous substance is spread by the explosion itself.
A cobalt bomb would not only destroy a large area, but also render it unliveable for at least a decade. No rebuilding for you!
And if you look at the WHOIS records, you'll see that the site is owned by Daniel Brandt. Brandt is the guy who launched the anti-Google crusade because he was pissed that his site (NameBase) wasn't ranked #1 whenever you searched for anybody.
Right, because obviously crossfire is just what we need on a crowded aircraft.
See subject.
You are wrong. Quantum teleportation of photons. You leave the routing information unencrypted - the routers never have to look inside the envelope - and use quantum teleportation to bounce the unread message from router to router.
Bleach. I hear it has some nasty side-effects though. :)
IIRC, Google's machines have no hard drives. It's too slow so they just keep everything in memory and network boot.
Mmmm. Shmeat.
If people living in Britain stop being obsessed with proving their status by the emblem on the front of the car and the license plate on the back, then car prices will drop to what the rest of the world pays.
These things are huge. Do you know how long it would take for all the helium to leak out of a few bullet holes?
It costs about $8-$10 to extract a barrel of oil from the tar sands. In comparison, it costs about $2-$3 to pull a barrel of oil from a more traditional oil reserve in the middle east. But, the cost drops as the technology improves, and it's a lot of oil.
Oye. That's Mary Anne Hobbs.
That's the stupidest thing I've heard all day. Changing the code SCO claims to be infringing isn't admitting guilt, it's covering your ass and is perfectly fine.
I've got some Dark Matter for you. It also repels elephants.
Ah, good ol' rock. Nothing ever beats rock.
But why do we want to do that? Well, there are predicted patches of stability in the 120s and 130s, I believe. There are also some interesting properties predicted about those super-heavy and stable elements.
Daemon is the original spelling of demon.
Well, in a typical environment you're not talking to the root servers at all, but rather sending a recursive DNS query to an intermediate DNS server. This will be faster than handling the root zone yourself in many cases as your intermediate DNS server can handle many clients (see large ISP) and cache results.
Sort of. The root servers don't support recursive DNS queries, but any DNS client/library worth its salt will be able to cope with iterative DNS lookups. You may notice performance problems though: without an intermediate DNS server handling recursive queries there's no DNS caching.
Try this sometime:
That's the dumbest thing I've heard all week. If HP were losing money hand over fist with their PC business they wouldn't need an excuse to get out of it. Who would stop them?
gcc doesn't support all the language features. The major missing piece is the export keyword is completely unimplemented.