Slashdot Mirror


Did HP Defraud the Canadian Government?

lightsaber1 writes "In this age of financial scandal in the Canadian Government it's hardly surprising to see that Hewlett-Packard is now being accused of charging the Canadian Department of National Defence for more than $160 million in software, hardware, and labour that was not delivered. The DND is confident it will get the money back, but HP is denying all responsibility, pinning the blame on an error within the DND itself. In all of this it is clear that the Government can lose track of a lot of money easily and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then."

465 comments

  1. Sigh by dolo666 · · Score: 0, Informative

    This is likely part of the recent Liberal scandal, and therefore it's evident that there is a significant level of corruption in the Liberal party of Canada. For all those of you who are Americans, you should know that the Liberal party is the same as the Republicans, the Progressive Conservative party is also the same as the Republicans, while the New Democratic Party is quite left of the Democrats in the US. Yes, it's true, we have TWO Republican parties in Canada.

    My thoughts are that this is definately part of the Liberal scandal, and not to restate this, but it's very important someone cleans up Canadian politics, and IMHO, that is the NDP. The thing is, the NDP would need to remain in power for two or three terms in order to do that, and it may take even longer to clean up the huge mess left from years of PC and Liberal waste/corruption. People would go to jail, people would pay for their crimes. People like Jean Cretien, former prime minister of Canada, who oversaw the entire scandal, and was likely heavily involved. People like the current PM, Paul Martin. Leaders should go to jail if they rob the taxpayers as much as these people have!

    1. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better check your facts as Canada doesn't have a Progressive Conservative party.

    2. Re:Sigh by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh please. The Liberal's in Canada are considerably more left than the Republicans in the US. Of course, the Conservative Party here in Canada is also considerably more left than the Republicans in the US. This probably has something to do with less religious fundamentalism in this country.

      The real difference between the Liberal's and the Conservatives in Canada is their fiscal, rather than social policies. Socially, they're very close (though, the conservatives are, unsuprisingly, slightly more socially conservative (see same-sex marriage, marijuana laws, etc)). Fiscally, they are comparable to the Dems/Reps in the US, except the Conservatives in Canada want to cut spending along with taxes, rather than just the latter.

      As for the rest of it, well, that remains to be seen. There was plenty of corruption in the previous Liberal governments. Will that continue? I don't know. Would it be better with an NDP or Conservative government? I'm not so sure...

    3. Re:Sigh by dreadnougat · · Score: 2, Informative

      He means the Conservative Party of Canada, which was formed by the recent merger of the old PC party and Canadian Alliace, which had split apart years back (the CA was the reform party at that time).

    4. Re:Sigh by G-funk · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...the Liberal party is the same as the Republicans, the Progressive Conservative party is also the same as the Republicans, while the New Democratic Party is quite left of the Democrats in the US

      So basically they're all the same, the difference being to which corporations they've sold out?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:Sigh by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, and one other thing. You may love your NDP party, but the people in BC probably don't. And the people of Saskatchewan weren't all that please with them either, as was evident in the last election. So, please, quite twisting facts. All the parties have their problems. There is no magic bullet. Although, a minority government might be *a* solution...

    6. Re:Sigh by abigor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the Republicans are pretty far to the right of the Liberals. The Conservatives are pretty close, I guess. Of course, they have no chance of ever getting elected, as some of their prominent members let it be known that they are religious, which is political death in Canada.

      Anyway, personally I think the middle-of-the-road path is good, although I agree about the NDP. A leftist party like that makes for a good social conscience; they would be well suited as a powerful Official Opposition. Canadians haven't raised a huge stink about the financial scandals simply because the economy is good, the budget is balanced (there's a huge surplus, in fact), there's lots of job creation, and life is generally okay. So we need an opposition with teeth.

      I'm not so sure I'd like to see the NDP in power. But certainly years of Liberal government have led to the inevitable corruption.

    7. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      more than $160 million in software

      Why, that's over 10 years of the Canadian national defense budget. Is this possible? Looking at the 2003 budget:

      Molson Ale $11.2 mil
      Tuques $3.5 mil
      Flags $1.8 mil
      Fireworks $1.2 mil
      Bullwinkle Horns $0.8 mil
      Girls Gone Wild video $0.3 mil

      Of course, that's in Canadian dollars. US money, it's only $34.12.

    8. Re:Sigh by Coneasfast · · Score: 5, Informative

      For all those of you who are Americans, you should know that the Liberal party is the same as the Republicans

      This is Wrong! Former PM Chretien and current PM Martin, both Liberal, were for a bill to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana and i believe Chretien wanted to legalize gay marriage throughout all of canada. These are just some examples, but they are definitely as left wing as, if not more than, the USA Democratic Party.

      This is going off-topic but i believe you needed to be corrected on this matter.

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    9. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a centre Canadian, I can say for certain that your left wing bias leads you to errors like saying that the federal Liberals are right wing. Nothing could be farther from the truth, they very centre, if not left of centre. Fellow Canadian mods, vote this pack of lies down.

    10. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NDP has less chance of forming a gov't or opposition than the Conservatives...

    11. Re:Sigh by optikSmoke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow, it's a good thing THAT got moderated informative, as it sure was chock-full of accurate, unbiased information (especially considering that the Progressive Conservatives *no longer exist*). The new Conservative Party (merger of the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservatives) is a more right-wing party, that definitely has some basis of social conservatism (via the Alliance) as well as your usual fiscal conservatism and other generally right-wing-associated policy. They are probably comparable to the Republicans.

      The Liberals are more like the Democrats, though probably a little more to the left. More progressive socially, though recently they have a streak of fiscal conservatism (which is likely the reason for the parent's comparison to the Republicans, as this has not always been their hallmark and moves them little more to the right than Canadians are used to). Traditionally a "central" party, though more "a little right-of-center with the occasional spattering of the left". Whatever that means.

      As for the NDP, they are a much more left-leaning party, and there is no real comparison to an American party (IMHO they would likely be lynched -- figuratively :) -- in some parts of the States, unfortunately, due to ingrained fears of anything remotely "communist"). Anyway, they aren't a "communist party", they are simply more toward the left than Americans have in a mainstream party.

      This is (I hope) a slightly less biased outlook on the three major Canadian parties than that presented by the parent, who I expect is a fervent NDP supporter ;).

    12. Re:Sigh by MicktheMech · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fiscally, they are comparable to the Dems/Reps in the US, except the Conservatives in Canada want to cut spending along with taxes, rather than just the latter.

      Of course the leader of the Liberals well known for his massive spending cuts. Also note that the last Tory government racked up record levels of debt while the current liberal government has placed Canada as the only G8 country without a deficit. I don't think there's really an idealogical difference between the (old Tories) and the Liberals, at least fiscally.

      On the first point, I don't know where the Grandparent was coming from. All major Canadian parties are way 'left' of the republicans, and in most cases the democrats too. What would happen if a Canadian party suggested ending public healthcare? What would happen if an American party seriously hinted at implementing public health-care?

      The Reform-Tory merger will change things, but overall I hope that the old guard take control over the (new) Conservative party so that there's a reasonable alternative to Liberal east of Manitoba.

    13. Re:Sigh by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think there's really an idealogical difference between the (old Tories) and the Liberals, at least fiscally.

      Well, I live in Alberta, so I'd have to disagree a bit.:) Of course, Klein is probably one of the most fiscally conservative government leaders in all of Canada, so my view of the Conservative Party might be a bit coloured. :)

      What would happen if an American party seriously hinted at implementing public health-care?


      Actually Clinton (both of them) hinted at the idea for a while there, as you might recall. It went over like a lead balloon, as you'd probably expect.

      The Reform-Tory merger will change things, but overall I hope that the old guard take control over the (new) Conservative party so that there's a reasonable alternative to Liberal east of Manitoba.

      Well, we'll see. The way things are going, Harper very well may be the new leader. And if that's the case, it might be hard for the new party to shed the image of being just a reformed Reform Party, which would significantly reduce their chances in the East. But, we shall see... I'm left-leaning, personally, but a little more competition at the Federal level can only be a good thing for democracy in Canada.

    14. Re:Sigh by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      More progressive socially

      I always get a kick out of the term "progressive". I mean, it's sheer marketing genius. Who in their right mind would vote against the candidate who plans to "make progress"?

    15. Re:Sigh by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      I can honestly say, that as a Fed Gov't employee, you are correct.

    16. Re:Sigh by MicktheMech · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Alberta government and the recently displaced Ontario conservatives were significantly more "right" than others. But, I don't think you can compare Federal and Provincial politics. The local dynamics are too strong. The Albertan government vs. a Maritime conservative government are two very, very different entities.

    17. Re:Sigh by gobbo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Left, Right, what a lot of Bunk! Communists and Fascists, not much difference in the end. Canadians float around in the middle. Ultimately not as socialist as many nations in the industrialized world, and more so than the USA. We're under considerable pressure to align our policies with the Republican agenda, however, and there's a groundswell of resistance around sovereignty issues.

      The Liberals aim to appear just that, generally liberal. They purport to support a social safety net, and a large federal government that ensures equality in many areas, including in distribution of services between the civil powers, i.e. the provinces. Note I said "purport," because while they make these noises and a mixture of real gestures and superficialities in that direction, they're also busy working on moving power and resources over to the corporate sector under the guise of trade liberalization.

      The various conservative voices, now mostly under the banner of the new-ish Conservative Party, are social individualists and fiscal corporatists (not as ravenously domineering or overtly theocratic as the Republicans, but close). The powers in the party actually want to be more like the Republicans, but strategically can't pull it off (most of us wouldn't stand for it).

      The New Democratic Party is out-and-out socialist in platform, and many of its members are easily identified as such, but as a whole they don't always vote in that direction, and don't instil much confidence in most voters at the federal level. However, they have occasionally been brilliant in opposition (a voice for accountability) and often do well on the provincial level, forming many provincial governments over the years.

      And the Bloc Quebecois? Well, you'd have to ask a Quebecker to really get a grasp of what they're about, it seems to be a mix of all of the above with a large dash of Quebec semi-nationalism, it's a powerful strategic alliance really.

      Anyway, you can vote early and vote often, but the government still gets in. Much of the power really lies one level down from the Cabinet Ministries, in the top-level bureaucrats, many of whom are graft appointees. We have marginally more choice than the republic to the south, but it's still a first-past-the-post system, and so is questionably democratic, as people wind up voting strategically (or lazily) instead of for the representatives they really want.

    18. Re:Sigh by cynical+kane · · Score: 1

      Except "progressive" is a historical term dating back before the 1920s in the U.S.

    19. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny factoid: Provincial-level NDP support in BC is neck-in-neck with Provincial-level Liberal support.

      This is largely an artifact of having only two real parties. A third real party (ie, not the greens) would siphon off at least half the NDP support, and I don't know how much of the Liberal.

    20. Re:Sigh by shepd · · Score: 1

      >My thoughts are that this is definately part of the Liberal scandal, and not to restate this, but it's very important someone cleans up Canadian politics, and IMHO, that is the NDP.

      LOL! Look at the great things they did for Ontario! Rae days and photo radar! Please, TAX ME MORE so that I can RAISE PRICES.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    21. Re:Sigh by saforrest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, it's true, we have TWO Republican parties in Canada.

      Oh, come on. I'll probably be voting NDP as well in the next federal election, as I did in the last two elections I voted in, but comparing the Liberals and even the Conservatives to the Republicans is completely ridiculous.

      Perhaps you just don't understand how incredibly reactionary and right-wing the Republicans are.

      First off, Republicans don't support socialized medicare on the scale present in Canada, they generally don't like gay marriage, they are generally against gun control, they are generally in favour of harsh penalties for drug violations.
      And they seem to like funding the military.

      Though the Liberals haven't done much about gay marriage or drug law yet, they are talking about it, and on the rest of these issues they disagree with Republicans. If you want any evidence, look how often Ralph Klein is complaining about the Liberals doing stuff that threatens Alberta's oil industry; the thought of Republicans (at least the ones in office now) coming out against the oil industry is laughable.

      The Conservatives don't really have much of a cohesive policy set yet, but after that flap with two-tier health care in 2000 they're sure as hell not going to go against the Canada Health Act, whatever Belinda Stronach says. I agree they're the most Republican of Canada's parties, though.

      I agree that, far too often, the Liberals talk left, do little, and it's becoming more and more obvious they are disturbingly corrupt. Chretien (spell his name right, btw) did a bit as he was leaving, but it remains to be seen how much of that will really see the light of day. But they're not complete liars; most of them honestly are leftists.

      I have high hopes for the NDP in the next election. Layton is a bit of a showman at times, but he really does seem to be building momentum.

    22. Re:Sigh by perf_monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't say much in defense of the liberal party but I can tell you about HP practices from a business perspective. HP hosts our multi-million dollar environment and I see them "double-dipping" (and even triple-dipping!) on a daily basis. They'll charge us for a service they are supposed to provide at no extra cost past the SLA. Aside from they're already steep hosting fees, they actually charge my company for my time when I get paged out by HP. It's fantastically stupid that someone big hasn't sued their ass into the next world by now. It's too bad they didn't spend all of that extra dosh on their technical staff...

    23. Re:Sigh by AZhun · · Score: 1


      Oh I get it...

      Your "Liberal Party of Canada" is like the bunch of Republicans in Washington, D.C. now,...

      ...while the "Progressive Conservatives" are like the regular Eisenhower GOPs.


      See we are so much alike despite "Canadian Bacon".

      :-)

      --

      AZhun
      a bright tomorrow comes by new mistakes not by repeating the old ones
    24. Re:Sigh by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bunk. Sheer Bunk. This 'scandal' is not "liberal corruption" but general incompetence by *any* large beuracracy.

      The Grits are not taking kickbacks or something here, all these "miss-used" fund issues are the RESULT of an AUDIT. This is exactly what the audit is supposed to accomplish. Identify monies that go astray. Now, I know this is serious $, but make no mistake, ANY entity of the size of the Federal Government has crap like this fall through the cracks.

      Im not exactly a Liberal Defender here (see sig), but I find it very odd that people are so damn up-in-arms over what *I* see as a positive. Our government is conducting its finances in an open way, our auditor has discovered a problem. We should hang the contractors out to f-ing dry for trying to rob the government... this is by no means the result of POLITICIANS misdeeds.

      im not happy about it, but all this fuss is really grandstanding... especially on the part of those Reform half-wits. If they got to office they'd simply sell everything to their golf-buddies.
      eople like Jean Cretien, former prime minister of Canada, who oversaw the entire scandal, and was likely heavily involved. People like the current PM, Paul Martin.

      You are out of your mind. Do you think the PM or FM knows how every measly $200 million is spent?! I am NOT being sarcastic -- that is the job of the bureaucrats.

    25. Re:Sigh by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      s/beuracracy/bureaucracy

    26. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit O.T., but I am reminded of watching the Bush-Dukakis debates with my girlfriend (yes, you read that correctly.) Bush hammered away: "you are a liberal, you are liberal, you are liberal!" We looked at each other, then looked at the TV screen and asked "And your point would be...?"

    27. Re:Sigh by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      Something to realize is that Paul Martin, the new PM, is "cleaning house", removing the loyalists of the old PM. It's exposing a lot of accumulated dirty laundry after three majority governments.

      This is also the same PM whose famous "come hell or high water" attitude towards balancing the budget as finance minister pushed Canada from huge deficits to a long string of surpluses(*), so I think he's earned his reputation for intolerance to waste, so really what we're seeing is a big cleanup now that he's in charge. I say this as someone who will vote against him on principal (I don't like any of the other parties better, I just feel that no one party should be in power for four straight terms - it's bad for democracy).

      (*) assuming the accounting is accurate.

    28. Re:Sigh by laugau · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here in Petoria, we have no such problems. One time, we took over the neighbor's pool, but the US negotiated to get it back.

      Afterwards, our space program looked like it was going to take off but Chris fell out of the tree.

    29. Re:Sigh by rowdent · · Score: 0

      Read any current political science study... The Federal Liberals are actually right-of-centre now, especially with Martin at the helm. The only major left-of-centre party left is the NDP. The Liberals ceased to be left-of-centre or even centre after Martin started gouging social programs.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    30. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 0, Troll

      There is substantial difference between fascism and communism.

      Fascism is based on the princple that the best leaders should rule a country in the form of an oligarchy, that egalitarianism is a fiction, and that the standard of value that a state should pursue should be aesthetic, rather than materialistic.

      Communism in principle rejects the concept that some are superior to others and thus should rule by that right, it is based on the concept of egalitarianism, and materialism is the sole standard of value.

      Fascism is the modern form of Sparta.

      Communism is the most depraved form of the democratic ideal, it seeks to make all people equal by force.

      What we are finding in the world today is that the principles of socialism are incompatible with egalitarianism. Simply allowing anyone and everyone to reproduce is crushing socialist systems throughout the world. The ridiculous assertion that all people are equal in every way is reducing humanity to an amalgamated mass of practically inhuman swine, who do nothing but indulge in their base desires.

      Egalitarian socialism is destined for failure wherever it is practiced because unrestricted human reproduction of any life form results in the inferior soon overtaking the superior. When that happens, society collapses and anarchy reigns.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    31. Re:Sigh by rowdent · · Score: 1

      It's too bad that the Ontario Liberals are now thinking of both of those ideas again. Seems like the NDP actually did have their head screwed on straight, it's just that the media hated them.

      Rae days happened so all public-sector employees could keep their jobs. Massive layoffs followed the removal of these unpaid days off.

      Photo radar makes sense, so long as the threshold is set to like 130-140km/h range. That would make sense, too bad Rae didn't do that (probably a legal thing that was the barrier. ie. it would be saying to motorists that the speed limit is actually 130-140). The best way to implement photo radar would be to have it as a supplement to catch the most grievous violators.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    32. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like that four billion he set aside this year for emergency relief programs?

    33. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is substantial difference between fascism and communism."

      In theory and beliefs yes. But in actual governments that purport to be fascist or communist there is rarely much difference.

    34. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...your usual fiscal conservatism and other generally right-wing-associated policy. They are probably comparable to the Republicans."

      Have you seen the republican budget this year? They're closer to the canadian conservatives alright -- SPEND! SPEND! SPEND! :P

    35. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the grandparent poster got off his meds for a while, and thought Stalin was still alive.

    36. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are. Canadians are just melodramatic brats. :P

      "ooh! A scandal! We're as corrupt as the yanks now," **puts hand on forehead**

    37. Re:Sigh by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Seems like the NDP actually did have their head screwed on straight, it's just that the media hated them.

      The media hated them because they were a cash grabbing government who wasted everyone's money.

      The Liberals intend to follow in the NDP's footsteps.

      "Ontario could re-deploy photo radar on its highways to raise badly needed funds, Premier Dalton McGuinty suggested on Wednesday"

      "I have long been a supporter of photo radar," the premier told reporters on his way into a cabinet meeting. "It's a revenue generator, absolutely."

      Fact: The original legislated speed of the 401 was 115 km/h prior to a gas conservation act passing in the 70s and lowering the speed of the highway to 100 km/h. It is absolutely safe at that speed. This means that the designers of the highway designed it to accomodate speeds of over 140 km/h, if they have any sense at all (they do).

      Photo radar has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with squeezing pocket books.

      Oh, second fact: Photo radar during the Rae-era caused 401 speed to decrease, on average, from 99 km/h to 97 km/h, IIRC.

      Third fact: Photo Radar has absolutely NOTHING to to do with safety whatsoever, admits Premier Dalton.

      Last fact: Photo Radar, when re-implimented, will have so little to do with public safety, it is likely it will be the same as running a red light with a camera attached. Which means it will be listed as a minor moving violation no matter how serious the infraction (even, say, 100 km/h over the limit) without the possibility of losing ones license or even gaining demerit points. Safety is the last thing from the minds of anyone implementing photo radar.

      >The best way to implement photo radar would be to have it as a supplement to catch the most grievous violators.

      Why? Even at the more conservative value it did as good a job as the "Buckle Up For Safety" signs. ie: Nothing of value.

      >Rae days happened so all public-sector employees could keep their jobs. Massive layoffs followed the removal of these unpaid days off.

      Also, Rae days caused public unrest and massive Ontario-wide wildcat sympathy strikes. Why the hell should someone keep their job if they aren't needed? Get rid of them the way everyone else does: Lay them off. It was a bad idea all around. It meant the government couldn't do house cleaning of lazy bastards, and they would provide less service at the same cost to consumers. If I did that sort of stuff I'd be out of business faster than you can imagine.

      BTW: I'm not joking about the price increases. As our store uses electricity for heating and cooling, and as we have to use the 407 (where rates will also be increasing) and because we are using the 401 to transport goods (which will be cash-cowed to death) prices in my shop will raise by a minimum of 15% over the next 12 months to meet break-even rates.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    38. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the BC Marijuana Party. They came in third in my previous riding last election. I was a bit surprised, but they did appear to have the best candidate. He had actual ideas, and not just reading from a book, or repeating the same thing we've heard before.

      Thankfully we use the first past the post system for now. I'd hate to see what would happen if the NDP got back into power. Even during the last election Mr Clark admitted that taxing the rich doesn't work. Of course, now he's the president of a company owned by BC's most famous capitalist--Jim Pattison.

    39. Re:Sigh by grub · · Score: 0


      The Federal Liberals are actually right-of-centre now

      "right" of what "centre"? Are you using the American yardstick to measure centre? A Canadian one? British? French? The whole concept of "left and right" is political meta-data. It floats around on the whims of the day.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    40. Re:Sigh by rowdent · · Score: 1

      It wasn't that lazy, useless people were being laid off, it was that those with low seniority were being let go. Also, that's not to say that these jobs weren't needed (special education teachers, for example), it was that the government couldn't afford to keep them. Given the choice between one day of inactivity for all employees and the wide-scale loss of essential services, I think Rae made the best choice. However, I'm no Rae defender. He also promised a lot of stuff he never delivered on. Lots of corporations suddenly showed up on his doorstep with lots of money and he lost track of his senses. Meanwhile, the NDP caucus and general membership was urging him to live up to his promises (hell, NDP MPP Peter Kormos was back-benched because he spoke up against Rae).

      As for the 407, well that's an issue of privatization. The 407 is privately owned and is therefore not in the jurisdiction of the government, unless they want to pass laws.

      BTW, I think the Ontario Liberals are hilarious. They combine the worst of Harris/Eves PCs and Rae-era NDP policies, heh.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    41. Re:Sigh by rowdent · · Score: 1

      There is a fairly well-established international "yardstick" among political scientists. Although the linear model is far from perfect, it does allow us a common ground to work from. Often the left-right model is replaced with a two-dimensional graph, with economic and social on either axis.

      Let's just say that the Liberals, especially Paul Martin, are both economically right, and somewhat socially conservative. Check out Political Compass to see an example of this put into practice.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    42. Re:Sigh by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Fact: The original legislated speed of the 401 was 115 km/h prior to a gas conservation act passing in the 70s and lowering the speed of the highway to 100 km/h. It is absolutely safe at that speed. This means that the designers of the highway designed it to accomodate speeds of over 140 km/h, if they have any sense at all (they do).

      Fact: The stretch of the 401 between Windsor and Chatham was known as "Death Alley" just a few short years ago. The entire length of the 401 is currently in the process of being upgraded over the next few years, largely as a result of "Death Alley".

      Based on this fact, I find your assertion that this road was designed for speeds over 140 km/h to be quite unlikely to say the least.

      Furthermore, with the way a lot of people drive these days, more enforcement is sorely needed. If budgets don't allow for more policing, then photo radar suits me fine.

      Don't like it? Don't speed.

    43. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stand against the coronation of Paul Martin! VOTE GREEN!"

      According to their website, the polls have them at 5% support in both Ontario and Quebec - how the hell are they going to stop PM's coronation when they won't get anything in the only two provinces that count!?

      Oh yeah, you just want to stand against it, not stop it. Well go ahead and do absolutely nothing, if that's your thing.

    44. Re:Sigh by gobbo · · Score: 1

      "There is substantial difference between fascism and communism."

      True, in theory. I was being flip by saying there's no diff, but I was serious too, because we've never really seen communism, it's always a disguised variation on fascism, usually a form of state monopoly capitalism. Gramsci and his captors were birds of a feather: assh*les.

      "The ridiculous assertion that all people are equal in every way"

      I don't ever recall an avowed communist or a fascist stating that seriously, much less a socialist. You're trolling.

      "anarchy reigns"

      Oh, that's ripe! You do get the irony of that statement, right? Military intelligence, jumbo shrimp, and all that?

    45. Re:Sigh by gobbo · · Score: 1
      You may love your NDP party, but the people in BC probably don't.

      Look, BC'ers don't want their drunk-drivin' pseudo-plaid connin' Campbell leadership any more than they wanted Clark and his wannabe-Teamster style thuggery. Face it, BC politics has been hosed since long before the boozy Bennett regimes. What a cartoon! Remember Vander Zalm? The guy lived in a theme park palace called Fantasy Gardens, and acted the part! Every single premier there in living memory has been implicated in some scandal... well, hapless Harcourt was a nice guy and took the fall for his party, but he wasn't really responsible for... Bingogate! Ahaha!

      No, BC is the only jurisdiction in the world where the pot smokin' party makes more sense (no pun intended) than the 'serious' candidates.

      But seriously, because of this, BC waffles from one 'wing' to another, and in the last election, the Liberals appeared to be reasonable (they aren't, they turned out to be extremists). But remember in the 'first past the post' system, while they won almost all the seats, they had a bare majority of the votes.

    46. Re:Sigh by gobbo · · Score: 1
      they have no chance of ever getting elected, as some of their prominent members let it be known that they are religious, which is political death in Canada.

      Having religion isn't political death in Canada, most PM's went to church (don't think Trudeau did).

      What is political death in Canada, and rightly so, is theocratic statements. That's why you have politicians saying things like they personally oppose gay marriage, but it's not their job description to worry about it. No-one's going to cram their faith down our laws any more...or so we hope.

    47. Re:Sigh by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Are you "anti-life" or "anti-choice"?

      Let's vote against the "PATRIOT Act"!

      Politics are full of marketing. The only reason TIA got shot down is because the guy in charge of it was awful at marketing.

    48. Re:Sigh by pdboddy · · Score: 1

      ROFL! The NDP? Good f'ing luck. Ontario remembers the NDP, and there's no way the NDP would ever get elected to a Federal gov't. I doubt BC would go for it, nor Saskatchewan either. Alberta, which you could call Texas North, would probably laugh the NDP outta the province... Good luck in Quebec. As for HP ripping us off, I am more likely to believe DnD made an error somewhere.

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    49. Re:Sigh by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      You obviously do not understand how Democracy works.... or are you caught in the 'vote for the lesser of two evils' is a good thing camp. "There are too many choices" you cry.

      The Greens are much higher than 5% in BC. Our numbers have been better than 5% in QC & ON. The Greens are the most dynamic, surging party in the Country. A new political force. With new ideas.

      We need Proportional Representation. We need to END FPTP voting. We need real changes, not the same old crap the Grits and Tories want to feed you.

      If you care about a vital, vibrant democracy Vote Green.

    50. Re:Sigh by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      That's because both these forms of government are really ideals, and in order to achieve them, a totalitarian government must be implemented, which essentially means that the idea cannot be achieved. It's a Catch 22.

    51. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could mod this down... stealing who chunks of quotes from Family Guy is not worth +2 funny, especially as it makes no sence in the context of the post. Can someone please mod this idiot down???!

    52. Re:Sigh by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      I remember the NDP in Ontario too. Remember 'Rae -days", the 12 unpaided "holidays' government workers took in order to save the government money? Well, I can tell yeah, after 8 years of Mike Harris and Ernie Eves PC's slashing health and education, they are yearning for the good old days with the NDP.

      The best thing Mike Harris ever did was make Bob Rea look good.

      Funny, it seems that only the last two non-NDP governments (Mike/Ernie of the PC and David Peterson/Robert Nixon of Liberals) said on the day the election started we had a surplus and on the day the new government came in they discovered it was actually a giant deficit.

      You may disagree with the NDP on philisophical grounds, but don't try to pull any of that "they remember" crap. Sure they remember the NDP in BC and Saskatchewan, but they elect an NDP government every few years. And Ontario certainly remembers the Liberals and PC mismangement and lies but still vote them in pretty regularly.

      Don't count the NDP out Federally, especially not this year...

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    53. Re:Sigh by Julien+Brub · · Score: 0

      Yeah, anyway, they are all the same! That's why I want MARIO FOR PRIME MINISTER!!! MARIO! MARIO! MARIO...

      --
      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance." Isaac Asimov
    54. Re:Sigh by Julien+Brub · · Score: 0

      Ho, BTW, I meant Mario Bros, not Mario Dumont...

      --
      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance." Isaac Asimov
    55. Re:Sigh by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this bears clarification.

      The Conservatives sell out to numerous corporations, opting to screw over the public in fabulous ways.

      The Liberals sell out to fewer corporations, but make up for it by funnelling money to their corporate cronies. Screwing over the public is more of a side thing.

      The NDP buy out all kinds of corporations (by purchasing them at prices they more or less set and making them Crown corporations). They then screw over the public by spending massive amounts on social programs, and raising taxes, leaving us well cared-for, but with no dispensible income. OTOH, they've almost never had any real power, so they'll doubtless do poorly in orchestrating any decent scandals.

      I think this year I'll vote Communist. That way, ALL the corporations will be screwed over, as will the vast majority of citizens. That sounds pretty fair...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    56. Re:Sigh by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Fact: The stretch of the 401 between Windsor and Chatham was known as "Death Alley" just a few short years ago. The entire length of the 401 is currently in the process of being upgraded over the next few years, largely as a result of "Death Alley".

      Fact: That section of highway was developed in 1930, before it was Highway 401. Also fact: Few cars could reach 100 km/h in that era.

      I'm talking about the most used part of the 401, the MacDonald-Cartier Freeway part, not the ancient Highway 98 stretch. That part clearly needs fixing, but is detritus from old years, not part of the new (and safe at high speeds) 401.

      >Based on this fact, I find your assertion that this road was designed for speeds over 140 km/h to be quite unlikely to say the least.

      Then, perhaps you aren't a road designer? I'm not either, but for a road designer to create a road safe at only 87% of the intended speed limit is definitely illegal, and to create a road not safe at 121% of the intended speed limit is clearly negligent.

      >Furthermore, with the way a lot of people drive these days, more enforcement is sorely needed. If budgets don't allow for more policing, then photo radar suits me fine.

      So, it's okay to have a driver driving poorly for over 2 weeks without them even knowing they are, and, more importantly, to only assess a monetary fine and no record, points, endorsements, or loss of license no matter how poorly they are driving (even if they are doing 320 km/h)? Because that's how photoradar works. It won't assess points, and it is unlikely insurance will even find out about a ticket. In other words, if you are monied, it's a license to speed, since the cops won't be patrolling, and there's a maximum speed the cameras can be used to catch, also.

      >Don't like it? Don't speed.

      Did you know that speeding is one of the very least likely ways to cause severe property damage and injury? You can check it out in the Ontario safety report.

      The most dangerous, IMHO, action a driver can do is improper lane changes. Having spoken with members of the trucking industry (nice having a shop on a popular trucking route! :-) I can tell you that is the singlemost dangerous thing they encounter on the roads, apart from danger number 2: People who enter a 100 km/h highway at 80 km/h. You'll also find Young Drivers and many other safe driving organizations agree: A small amount of speeding is only a tiny factor in poor driving.

      Lastly, the police encourage people on the 401 to do faster than the speed limit. They have ticketed people doing 100 km/h on that highway before, and have explained in the October wheels of the Toronto Star that they'll be doing it again if you are caught doing under 110 km/h in the fast lane.

      Overall, it is far more dangerous to lane change without acceleration (cutting people off) and extremely dangerous to slow an entire highway down due to nerves.

      So, without the support of the police, driving associations, and history on your side, *WHY* do you feel that speeding on the 401 is a bad idea? It seems that you are the only person in Canada with that feeling. 85% of drivers on the 401 drive at over 110 km/h, and that's the entire 401, not just "Death Alley".

      Basically, when even the police disagree with you, you're probably going to be found wrong (and ticketed).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    57. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Thats nihilism right there. Ideals cannot be achieved. And people wonder why our society is culturally bankrupt.

      Totalitarian governments established everything of beauty and wonder in this world, only decadent democracies destroy them. Every great artist, every great architect, every innovative cuisin, every great composer... They all came from societies you would characterize as totalitarian.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    58. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure I understand how it works - if only 5% of the people are willing to vote for one party (hint: by far most people disagree with the Green Party, so it's not just a "lesser of two evils" issue - to many people they're a far greater evil), those people's votes will be wasted.

      It's not a good thing, but it's better than the alternative. I'm not sure why voting for the "good" party is good when you know it will lead to the greater of two evils getting in... or in this case, a majority vs a minority government.

    59. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are the first openly fascist person I have met.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    60. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      The Liberals are center-left in my opinion. Martin might shift it towards center or center-right but they are not there yet. Yes, the Liberals cut funding and off-loaded costs to the provinces and cities, but they still support social programs. Therefore they are left-leaning.

      I also disagree with your view that Martin is socially conservative. He may be more conservative than, say, Chretien but I can't consider him conservative. He still isn't against homosexuality like conservatives. He still isn't against immigration like conservatives. He still isn't against medicare like conservatives. He still isn't against funding public education like conservatives. The Liberals aren't conservative yet IMO.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    61. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I know you are being humourous but on a serious note... why not the Green Party? They can never be bought by corporations (since they are environmentally friendly)... at least that's the theory :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    62. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      It might have started off as propaganda but it has very specific implications these days. Progressive is basically on the left. To conservatives, progressives are automatically bad since they prefer static values and systems. Therefore, conservatives won't really vote for "progress". In contrast, liberals would consider progressive to be good and would likely vote for a candidate that is progressive than one that is not.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    63. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Sure I understand how it works - if only 5% of the people are willing to vote for one party (hint: by far most people disagree with the Green Party, so it's not just a "lesser of two evils" issue - to many people they're a far greater evil), those people's votes will be wasted.

      With that reasoning ALL parties are evil. I mean, hardly any party ever gets over 50% of the vote. Yet there is always one winner in the end. What does that mean? That an "illegimate" party is ruling? Of course not. I don't think you understand how democracy works--especially British-style systems (which Canada uses) where it is based on many parties winning small percentages (this is in contrast to US-style systems).

      Whether you like the Greens or not is irrelevant. My point is that a party getting 5% or even 1% is in no way "far greater evil". In general, under British-style systems, the goverment is ruled by coalitions. In Canada, some party has dominated each election so it doesn't happen but that is more common.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    64. Re:Sigh by dolo666 · · Score: 1

      Paul Martin caused the Liberal money scandal. Simple as that. He was the finance minister when $250 Mil simply walked away from the government coffers. It's totally his fault.

    65. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 0, Troll

      True, in theory. I was being flip by saying there's no diff, but I was serious too, because we've never really seen communism, it's always a disguised variation on fascism, usually a form of state monopoly capitalism. Gramsci and his captors were birds of a feather: assh*les.

      Then you really don't know what fascism is. You are stuck in the materialistic world of the present, where the cult of economics defines our lives. Fascism has very little to do with economics, and in fact seeks to transcend that inherently inhuman pseudoscience.

      I don't ever recall an avowed communist or a fascist stating that seriously, much less a socialist. You're trolling.

      Well, since we have clearly established your ignorance of fascism as a movement, part of your statement is irrelevant. As far as communism, where the standard of value is materialistic, all communist countries attempted to provide equal distribution of all material wealth to the people.

      "anarchy reigns"

      Oh, that's ripe! You do get the irony of that statement, right? Military intelligence, jumbo shrimp, and all that?


      You are ignorant of the definition of the word "to reign". While it can mean actually ruling power, it also applies to general influence in this case of a type of governmental system: anarchy, the abscence of a governmenal system.

      It is rather common to suggest that philosophical concepts "reign" when discussing their influence over a particular society at a particular point in time.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    66. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 0, Troll

      You haven't met me.

      And there are more of us than you think, most don't use the term "fascist" any longer due to the relentless propaganda of marxists such as yourself. I personally value the significance of the term irrespective of our modern twisting of meaning.

      I can assure you however, I won't be the last. Maybe you are safe in North America, where the oppressive governments there imprison anyone with anti-democratic viewpoints... But the tide is rising in most of Europe, and certainly in the east. You have but to look at the various Front National groups through Europe.

      Democracy is dead. Egalitarianism is dead. Global Capital is dead. Materialism is dead.

      To simply exist is not enough, to be provided basic necessities, and have the time to indulge your base desires is not enough.

      Only through unity of purpose towards an aesthetic ideal can civilization prosper. Only with the guidence of enlightened leaders can peace be maintained.

      I suggest you prepare yourself, as the revolution will come in your lifetime.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    67. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      So what type of fascist are you? Who will be the "superclass" under your system? Are you a neo-Nazi? Or White Supremist? Or ...?

      Only through unity of purpose towards an aesthetic ideal can civilization prosper. Only with the guidence of enlightened leaders can peace be maintained.

      Well, history seems to suggest otherwise. The last time an "enlightened" leader wanted to unify certain people and create a super civilization, he caused the deaths of 50 million, and ended up killing more of "his kind" than anyone else in history.

      I suggest you prepare yourself, as the revolution will come in your lifetime.

      I think that is the only point I agree with. I DO expect a revolution within my lifetime. I predict this will happen when capitalism collapses...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    68. Re:Sigh by gobbo · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm being flamed by a frothing-at-the-mouth white supremacist, so I guess that's a good thing, but anyway:

      Then you really don't know what fascism is. You are stuck in the materialistic world of the present, where the cult of economics defines our lives. Fascism has very little to do with economics, and in fact seeks to transcend that inherently inhuman pseudoscience.

      Do you mean fascism as practiced by its ideological architects, or by various subsects of skinheads, or by hairy backcountry double-barreled bunker-builders in Idaho, or by suit-wearing middle-aged guys with square rimless glasses and hair parted to one side? Or contemporary european ultra-nationalists? Or as discussed in political science, sociology, history, etc? Or do you mean your particular self-aggrandizing version of it? I guess you don't mean the version referred to in common parlance by /. readers.

      I most certainly am ignorant of your particular self-aggrandizing version. That's OK, though, no need to elaborate, I'm satisfied with my research on the other versions to date.

      Well, since we have clearly established your ignorance....

      Funny, I didn't read any facts, citations, references, examples, analysis, or even a whit of measured discourse in your post. All you established were the flecks of foam on your chin.

      You are ignorant of the definition of the word "to reign".

      Pfft, dude, uncross your eyes. Wordplay requires the intentional and shared inversion of meanings; I even gave you a clue by using the word "irony," but as the saying goes, 'irony is wasted on the..." oh nevermind. 'Jumbo shrimp' and 'anarchy reigns' are in the category of humour known as oxymora. Look it up, golem.

      anarchy, the abscence [sic] of a governmenal system

      That definition sucks in this context. Try "self-governing organization without control by a central state" and by your own standards you would be more accurate. Most anarchists who are serious about political reorganization are actually more like libertarian municipalists.

      Your assertion that economics and fascism have little to do with each other is absurd in practise, since the self-avowed fascists who achieved power always did so with close collaboration by industrialists and banks, and so results in a hegemony by murderous brutes and capitalist plutocrats. But I'm guessing that you aren't referring to historical record, but something else. By the way, since you're concerned about the definition of fascism, shall we invite an authority to weigh in on the matter? I'm sure you're familiar with the source material...

      A National Socialist state must begin by raising marriage from the level of a continuous defilement of the race and give it the consecration of an institution which is called upon to produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape. . . .

      It must set race in the center of all life. It must take care to keep it pure. It must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. It must see to it that only the healthy beget children . . . .

      And that, I think, invokes Godwin's Law, which means the thread is dead, and I lost the argument by default. Oh well.
    69. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 1

      So what type of fascist are you? Who will be the "superclass" under your system? Are you a neo-Nazi? Or White Supremist? Or ...?

      Platonist. I advocate the society proposed in Plato's Republic. The superclass should be philosopher kings.

      Well, history seems to suggest otherwise. The last time an "enlightened" leader wanted to unify certain people and create a super civilization, he caused the deaths of 50 million, and ended up killing more of "his kind" than anyone else in history.

      Death is a part of life, and your numbers are wildly inflated. It is also fairly ignorant to associate Hitler with racism as you seem to be implying. The Waffen-SS had tens of thousands of volunteers from India and Tibet, and Germany's closest ally was Japan. The Americans didn't allow anyone non-white in their ranks, and the war against Japon was as racist as one can imagine.

      But the events of WWII are but one small chapter in the ideological struggle between Athens and Sparta which began over 2600 years ago. Nazi Germany is also not really fascist, nor did they refer to themselves as such. Your banal comments have not even scratched the surface of a debate you seem to think is over.

      I am referring more to the prosperity and culture which was fostered in Italy, France, and Germany prior to twentieth century. How many great philosophers, composers, artists came from that age?. The west today has no Michaelangelo, or Leonardo da Vinci, or Mozart... Western culture, for all intents and purpose is dead and has been for a half century.

      For some sign of cultural unity you will have to turn your head east. The cultural rebirth in China and Malyasia is impressive.

      I think that is the only point I agree with. I DO expect a revolution within my lifetime. I predict this will happen when capitalism collapses...

      Then you will have to give some careful thought to alternatives, and the true motivation of existence. People are not going to die for a system which simply provides them with the most basic requirements of survival. Simple existence is not enough to rally a people to battle. I would be wary of attempting that.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    70. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm being flamed by a frothing-at-the-mouth white supremacist, so I guess that's a good thing, but anyway

      I have never stated any belief that one particular race is superior to another. A lion is different from a panther, is one necessarily superior than the other? Suggesting that people are different does not at all mean one is superior.

      Pfft, dude, uncross your eyes. Wordplay requires the intentional and shared inversion of meanings; I even gave you a clue by using the word "irony," but as the saying goes, 'irony is wasted on the..." oh nevermind. 'Jumbo shrimp' and 'anarchy reigns' are in the category of humour known as oxymora. Look it up, golem.

      Yes, that is a misuse of the term irony which is quite common today. Nothing you mentioned is actually ironic. A simple clue to remember what the word means is to remember the original greek meant "feigned ignornance". Why don't you read Wikipedia's Definition. Of course, you could actually read a little Plato and learn about it from the source.

      But what am I trying to help you? After all you have declared this thread dead.

      oh, btw... Hitler was no fascist. I was thinking more along the lines of Mussolini or Franco.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    71. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Platonist. I advocate the society proposed in Plato's Republic. The superclass should be philosopher kings.

      Are you being serious or what?

      I am referring more to the prosperity and culture which was fostered in Italy, France, and Germany prior to twentieth century. How many great philosophers, composers, artists came from that age?. The west today has no Michaelangelo, or Leonardo da Vinci, or Mozart... Western culture, for all intents and purpose is dead and has been for a half century.

      Obviously you are living the past. Like conservatives of all stripes, you miss the past. Your vision is nothing more than a romanticized past. The people during the Renaissance seem great because Europe didn't have anything before it (dark ages). Things have changed. Right now we have science which has replaced a lot of things. The Leonardo da Vincis and the Michaelangelos have been replaced by the Einsteins, Plancks, and Hawkings. The Mozarts have been replaced by Steven Spielbergs, Stanley Kubricks and John Williams. Film has replaced plays and operas. Clearly you haven't gotten over such changes.

      Then you will have to give some careful thought to alternatives, and the true motivation of existence.

      Most humans are slaves to the capitalist overlords. Until they are free their true potential will neve show.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    72. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Are you being serious or what?

      Yes, Plato's Republic is the basis for fascism. It is neither democracy, nor monarchy.

      Obviously you are living the past. Like conservatives of all stripes, you miss the past. Your vision is nothing more than a romanticized past.

      No, not really. I do however, want to build a better future. Also, if there is one thing that is missing from this world it is romance...

      The people during the Renaissance seem great because Europe didn't have anything before it (dark ages).

      Why don't you look up the definition of Renaissance and reconsider that statement.

      The Leonardo da Vincis and the Michaelangelos have been replaced by the Einsteins, Plancks, and Hawkings.

      Ahh, the postmodernist. I would argue technological advancements have done much to rob us of our humanity.

      The Mozarts have been replaced by Steven Spielbergs, Stanley Kubricks and John Williams. Film has replaced plays and operas.

      Spielberg is no artist. Kubrick makes the exact arguments I am making now. 2001 was a direct attack upon the postmodernist obsession with progress you are advocating right now. A Clockwork Orange deals specifically with the innate aesthetic tastes, contrasting the taste for blood with the taste for high culture art. I have also never considered anything dramatic to be particularly artistic. But that is another debate.

      Clearly you haven't gotten over such changes.

      The world is always changing, that is the nature of existence. The question is to what are we changing? History is made by those who seek to change the course of civilization. I have my vision, and you have yours... Perhaps we will meet on the battlefield someday and see which triumphs.

      Most humans are slaves to the capitalist overlords. Until they are free their true potential will neve show.

      Free to do what? That is the important question.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    73. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Yes, Plato's Republic is the basis for fascism. It is neither democracy, nor monarchy.

      I don't know much about Plato's Republic but I have never heard anyone consider it to be fascist of any kind. If anything, it seems to be the basis of democracy.

      I do however, want to build a better future. Also, if there is one thing that is missing from this world it is romance...

      By romantizing the past you are simply deluding yourself. World HAS progressed over time whether you think so or not.

      I would argue technological advancements have done much to rob us of our humanity.

      What are you doing on Slashdot then? :) Are you just spying on the evil technology-oriented inviduals? ;) In any case, technology is neutral. If humanity has lost its ways, it's its own doing. I agree to some degree that technology is not being used in the best manner. However, that is humanity's fault.

      Spielberg is no artist.

      Spielberg is no more an artist than Shakespeare. So yes, if you consider anyone popular to be lacking artistry thenyou might be right.

      I have also never considered anything dramatic to be particularly artistic.

      Your definition of art is very narrow. Why do I get the feeling that you are the type of person who would consider classical music to be art but not techno music?

      I have my vision, and you have yours... Perhaps we will meet on the battlefield someday and see which triumphs.

      I'm the non-violent type. I hope I don't end up on any battlefield.

      Free to do what? That is the important question.

      Humans should be free to do whatever they want, within some reason of course (eg. I shouldn't be free to kill you). If someone wants to hang around doing nothing, that's perfectly ok with it. If someone wants to spend their whole life trying find an alternative energy to modern fossil fuels, that's fine. If someone wants to contemplate the meaning of existence, they should be allowed to do that. If someone wants to spend all their time debating on internent message boards ;) they should be free to do that.... People should be free to do whatever they want. Clearly this does not sit well with you because you want yourself--as well as all humans--to have some purpose. You still haven't figured out that the purpose of life is to figure out your own purpose. Instead of worrying about others and trying to force people into your mould, you should spend time contemplating how YOUR life should be...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    74. Re:Sigh by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I would have to examine their policies, but I find that most environmental groups worry more about the environment than they do about the quality of life of the average citizen. This will keep them out of the mainstream, and remove their power (currently, animals don't vote). If they're unwilling to stirke a balance between progress and the environment, they'll have to figure out how to deal with a spike in unemployment, and I don't want it to be MY job...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    75. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about Plato's Republic but I have never heard anyone consider it to be fascist of any kind. If anything, it seems to be the basis of democracy.

      Unfortunately, it is the exact opposite. The book is at its heart a direct attack on democracy, and seeks to put in its place an entirely different society that is ruled by philosopher kings. The book has nothing to do with a Republican form of government, the title is as it originality meant.. Res Publica... the people's business. Many of Plato's dialogues attack democracy, btw.

      Your definition of art is very narrow. Why do I get the feeling that you are the type of person who would consider classical music to be art but not techno music?

      I haven't really provided a definition. Aesthetics is the most difficult of philosophical studies so I won't bore you here with a tedious explanation. Its simply a personal opinion.

      I'm the non-violent type. I hope I don't end up on any battlefield.

      Of course you don't, but in time you won't have much of a choice. Wars are not fought for the petty reasons you imagine, they are fought for survival. The question is will the ideology you support be powerful enough to inspire enough people to sacrifice their lives so that you... and your ideology will prevail?

      Humans should be free to do whatever they want, within some reason of course (eg. I shouldn't be free to kill you). If someone wants to hang around doing nothing, that's perfectly ok with it. If someone wants to spend their whole life trying find an alternative energy to modern fossil fuels, that's fine. If someone wants to contemplate the meaning of existence, they should be allowed to do that. If someone wants to spend all their time debating on internent message boards ;) they should be free to do that.... People should be free to do whatever they want. Clearly this does not sit well with you because you want yourself--as well as all humans--to have some purpose. You still haven't figured out that the purpose of life is to figure out your own purpose. Instead of worrying about others and trying to force people into your mould, you should spend time contemplating how YOUR life should be...

      Yes Yes, the very typical libertarian explanation for life. You haven't thought into this quite enough however, you also discount the man is a political animal. What if we all spoke different languages? Truly had different beliefs about everything? What if we just popped out children and told them they could do whatever they want?

      The freedom you are describing only exists because a few thousand years ago, people joined together to form cities where their way of life was enforced. The variety of the world's cultures appeared then BECAUSE they were enforced. Only when human population encompassed almost all the usable land did this abstract freedom you advocate become popular. People can no longer be banished, they must live within a society.

      The point is we force people into a mould every day. Whether it is language, school, laws, propaganda of television and media... the list goes on.

      We haven't even touched on this issue of the inherent powerlessness of a single man from a civilzed point of view. Surely, a single man would have no means of surviving in the natural world as we have said. What of great arts? Where would Mozart be without a symphony? Where would our cities be without the beautiful buildings constructed by a plethora of expert craftsmen?

      Man is a political animal who strongly desires to be a part of a community that exists for a purpose greater than simple survival. You have fallen into the trap of the bourgeoise illusion.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    76. Re:Sigh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it is the exact opposite. The book is at its heart a direct attack on democracy, and seeks to put in its place an entirely different society that is ruled by philosopher kings. The book has nothing to do with a Republican form of government, the title is as it originality meant.. Res Publica... the people's business. Many of Plato's dialogues attack democracy, btw.

      I don't see how that can be. Was democracy even present at that time? My impression was that there was no such as democracy at that time.

      You haven't thought into this quite enough however, you also discount the man is a political animal. What if we all spoke different languages? Truly had different beliefs about everything? What if we just popped out children and told them they could do whatever they want?

      What you describe is utopia. We will reach that stage (assuming we don't kill ourselves off with our warmongering ways). I don't see any problem in people doing different things, whatever they wanted.

      The point is we force people into a mould every day. Whether it is language, school, laws, propaganda of television and media... the list goes on.

      No one is forced into anything--IF they are strong enough to resist. There are some who seek to advantage themselves by forcing others into some mould. You can resist and live life the way YOU want it to be. Conformists copy the rest; but I don't!

      Man is a political animal who strongly desires to be a part of a community that exists for a purpose greater than simple survival. You have fallen into the trap of the bourgeoise illusion.

      No, I have not fallen into anything. It's you who has fallen into some sort of a nihilistic pit. Your meaning in life seems to be outside your reach...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    77. Re:Sigh by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that can be. Was democracy even present at that time? My impression was that there was no such as democracy at that time.

      Socrates lived during the collapse of Athenian democracy after the Peloponnesian War. His student and lover Alcibiades played a major role in that defeat, and another one of his students Critias lead the oligarchy that ruled Athens during the Spartan occupation. Plato actually lived to see the end of democracy.

      Check out the Wikipedia Article on the subject.

      Perhaps you should read some of these books as you clearly are gravely mistaken about what Plato wrote about.

      You can resist and live life the way YOU want it to be.

      That is the naivete of youth. You can never live life the way you want, that is my point. If your parents did not raise you to speak or learn to eat the proper foods, you would have died before you could formulate this thought. The State is merely an extension of your immediate family.

      A human can NEVER live the way "he wants", his choices and paths are always predetermined by those who preceeded him.

      Conformists copy the rest; but I don't!

      You clearly copy the manner of speaking of others. Why don't you create your own language? You can speak that to yourself.

      Your meaning in life seems to be outside your reach...

      When you read Plato's Republic I will accept your criticisms, but you are at a stage in life where your understanding of the meaning of life is very limited. Why ignore the brilliant people who have come before you? You are truly ignorning thousands of years of wisdom. Use your youthful energy to read these books, and don't waste your time trying to reinvent the wheel. You aren't smart enough. I am not smart enough.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  2. HP+Canda=Stealing by HappyCitizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    HP: Invent

    --
    http://www.beyourowneviloverlord.tk
    http://www.frozenchickenthrowing.tk
    http://www.killercamel.tk
  3. Fraud? Seems like old times... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In a company I once worked for was a rather nice fellow who worked in the Accounts Payable department. It was discovered that he would have checks issued for as many times as an invoice arrived. Apparently some vendors noticed this and items were paid for as many as 4 times. That they knew what was going on and didn't report it back suggests ethics is a broad problem. Many refused to return the money once it was revealed they had collected multiple times.

    How the heck the guy didn't have any indication something was already paid I have no clue, but others in the finance department would try to catch as many duplicate checks on the way out as they could. As you might have guessed, the company is long gone.

    How is it that the government spent $160-million, got nothing in return and no one noticed?"

    It happens and not just in the public sector.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. Yeh, I'd be pissed off too. by MrRTFM · · Score: 3, Funny

    That amount of money should at least cover the maintenance contract to get a teenager in a suit to come and clean the filter on the power supplies of at least 3 mini's.

    Oh, you said HP? Sorry, I thought you meant Data General. Coz, back a few years we used to pay a *hell* of a lot of money just to get a couple of filters cleaned.

    --
    You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    1. Re:Yeh, I'd be pissed off too. by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Oh, you said HP? Sorry, I thought you meant Data General. Coz, back a few years we used to pay a *hell* of a lot of money just to get a couple of filters cleaned.

      Maybe 20 years ago? And you're still grousing about it. Why the fuck didn't you clean the damn filters yourself. I guess you'd rather keep your hands clean, spend the outrageous cash and complain 20 years later.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    2. Re:Yeh, I'd be pissed off too. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Prolly you had to have them do it or you couldn't get the rest of the service contract.

      Companies are good at inserting hidden costs. Technology companies are really good at it.

  5. I think you mean... by sik0fewl · · Score: 0

    HP: Defraud

    --
    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  6. Exchange rate? by Bobdoer · · Score: 4, Funny

    $160 million in software, hardware, and labour
    So after the exchange rate, what's that in moose?

    1. Re:Exchange rate? by petabyte · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know thats a joke but it raises a good point.

      $160 Million US is 210 Million CA.
      $160 Million CA is 121 Million US.

      Though, if you've lost over 100 Million, whats another 40 Million between friends. I accept donations :).

    2. Re:Exchange rate? by Phosphor3k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Assuming it was 160 million canadian, 121 million US: all told Moose meat is about .50$ a pound US if you hunt and prepare it yourself. So thats about 242 million pounds of moose.

    3. Re:Exchange rate? by blorf · · Score: 1

      that's a lot of m00se to get bit by...

    4. Re:Exchange rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A m00se bit my brother...

    5. Re:Exchange rate? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      My sister got bitten by a moose once.

    6. Re:Exchange rate? by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1

      except that it was HP Canada, so it's Canadian funds....so who cares what the exchange rate is?

    7. Re:Exchange rate? by Malc · · Score: 1

      You haven't been paying attention have you? This might have been funny 18 months ago... but let me tell you as somebody who earns USD$ but lives in Canada that it's not funny anymore. Please ask that Bush guy to fix the exchange rate and reverse my 22% pay cut.

    8. Re:Exchange rate? by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      Speaking of not paying attention...

      You posted that you earn USD but live in Canada. Therefore each dollar you earn buys CDN$1.34 of groceries/CDs/rent/utilities/etc at the exchange rate as of the time of this posting.

      Please explain what pay cut are you refering to?

      Or is this an anit-Bush posting?

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    9. Re:Exchange rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's referring to the fact that each dollar he earned used to be worth CDN$1.50.

    10. Re:Exchange rate? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Are you not used to dealing with different currencies? You can't compare based absolute value. A loaf of bread that costs USD$1 in the US isn't going to cost CAD$1 in Canada, but CAD$1.34... well, it's not that simple but you catch my drift.

      As the other AC poster pointed out, at the beginning of last year I would get CAD$1.58 for every USD$ I earned... I'm currently getting CAD$1.31 (well, the bank's less than favourable exchange rate is slightly worse and costs me a percent or two). A month or two back it was closer to $1.28. That's a huge change and it happened very quickly. My disposable income has shrunk significantly and in fact I've moved to a smaller and cheaper apartment to lower my costs by CAD$800/month. I'm thinking of selling the car too as my pre-tax income has dropped by between $1,500 and $2,000/month.

      I'm just thankful to have a job and not be one of those people I know who've searched for 6 mos in this crappy economy.

      You shouldn't be so-sensitive either. I wasn't be anti-Bush but light-hearted... as if anybody here is going to be able to whisper in 'Dubya's ear and get him to implement fundamental policies that would reverse the dollar's slide.

      I'm fully expecting it to drop further mind you. The Economist has a 12 month prediction of CAD$1.25/$1. They're also saying the dollar is still over-valued and has some way to go down. IMHO it can't just keep devaluing as it will start seriously destabilising either economies and that will cause their currencies to weaken and slow or hold the USD$ slide.

    11. Re:Exchange rate? by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to the fact that each dollar he earned used to be worth CDN$1.50.

      Good point, I hadn't thought of that.

      On the other hand, I also think 'duh'bya is doing all he can to weaken the US dollar against ANY foreign currency, so I really don't think the original poster can blame his 'pay cut' exchange rate on Bush...

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    12. Re:Exchange rate? by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      Hey, I wasn't being sensitive - I was agreeing with you! (see my second post) I AM being anti-Bush. Yes, he is the president. No, I don't think he is doing a good job. Yes, I am a registered voter. No, I will not be voting for him in November.

      I must still be dense, as I can't see how, if you USED TO pay CAN$1.58 (US$1.00) for a loaf of bread and you NOW pay CAN$1.34 (US$1.00), you have lost anything unless you are actually taking home less - which I can't figure out how to make Duh'byas fault.

      It seems to me you are saying you are receiving less when you exchange your US$ for CAN$, but the prices you pay are going down by the same amount - i.e., the bread thing above - which to me does not represent a pay cut.

      I can see where a lease or long term payment obligations (i.e., pay out of fixed number of CAN$) can be a hassle if they are not pegged to the exchange rate, but to say you used to be able to buy 1,000 loaves of bread with your take-home pay and now with the change in exchange rate your take-home pay can only buy 1,000 loaves of bread so you must have gotten a pay cut does not follow.

      As I said, I can see that your disposable income as a percentage of total income has dropped, but that is because of the amount of the fixed expenses; as the total CAN$ income drops, the proportion needed to service fixed costs rises - and the amount of fixed costs is not a US policy/exchange rate issue.

      Seems to me that the landlord / car loan note holder / bank are enjoying the weak exchange rate now, where you were enjoying it when the USD was strong. I thought you were aware the Duh'bya was pro-business...

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    13. Re:Exchange rate? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Oh I'm just confused now! ;)

      I think we really are agreeing somewhere. Everything costs the same (ignoring inflation) - I just have less money to spend. If my costs were in USD$ then nothing would have changed.

  7. Huh? by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know unrestrained cynicism is the "in-thing" among nerds these days, but this statement is silly:

    "In all of this it is clear that the Government can lose track of a lot of money easily and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then."

    They can't both be at fault here! I mean, its not physically possible. The Canadian government could not have lost products if HP never gave them any!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Huh? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      That's two really crap stories in a row. I did a quick scan of my front page and CowboyNeal doesn't have anything else cool on there. I've just added him to my JonKatz list. I'll still see stuff via search.pl, but I think I can do without such needlessly bitter writeups on the main page for a little while at least.

    2. Re:Huh? by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      He's saying HP collected money and didn't provide goods -- thus, HP engaged in fraud and the government paid out money without checking whether they had recieved the paid-for items and services.

      Whether it's true I don't have the slightest idea but I don't see what the semantic mystery is.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They can't both be at fault here! I mean, its not physically possible.
      how do you figure? if the government was being incompetent (god knows it happens) and completely lost track of 160 million dollars, then they are at least to some extent "at fault", and if HP realised that they were ahead 160 million for nothing either maliciously or by accident, they are also responsable. the two aren't mutually exclusive i always post as anonymous coward because i lack confidence
    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      behold the glory of hand typed "sig" + forgetting to use html instead of normal whitespace + not previewing. good job i posed as anonymous coward...

    5. Re:Huh? by pavon · · Score: 1

      They can't both be at fault here! I mean, its not physically possible.

      Why not? Suppose the government really did give HP more money than HP provided product. Neither of them did anything about it for years anything for years. Therefore parties at both could be at fault for sloppy book keeping, intentional fraud or both.

      It is possible that someone in the middle could have been embezeling the money, and HP knew nothing about it, but that is not the only possibility.

    6. Re:Huh? by thinkliberty · · Score: 1

      What if HP provided half of the services to the CA government and the CA government says that HP provided no services. They CAN both be at fault

      But it's not very likely ;)

    7. Re:Huh? by Zardoz44 · · Score: 1
      Maybe you're missing the context. In the past month, there's been scandals all over the Canadian news about the mismanagement of money. Take a look at this story which sums up some of the latest and greatest.

      This doesn't even go into the problems discovered with expense accounts etc.

      So "In all of this..." may be referring to both this new HP revelation as well as other recent news that was not Slashdot-worthy (having nothing to do with nerd's news).

  8. An interesting difference by Mr.+Ophidian+Jones · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are some differences in the Canadian governmental system than American, and buying off our representatives is a bit harder. Not impossible, mind you.

    Our Senate is appointed, not elected, so campaign funding on that front isn't really viable. Although out-and-out bribery could still be a possibility.

    The Prime Minister is the leader of the party with the most seats in the House of Commons, not a separately elected individual, and therefore controls how the party votes.

    The ethics minister (theoretically) is a watchdog to prevent abuses of power or introducing bills based on the needs of special interest.

    Add into this that each MP has limited power, based on the fact that their ridings are relatively small compared to US electoral areas (population-wise, I'm sure many of the geographical areas are quite large), and it would take a very concentrated effort to garner enough support through bribery and financing to make a dent.

    Of course, this is all from the deep recesses of my high school social science memories, so I could be a bit off.

    1. Re:An interesting difference by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Our Senate is appointed, not elected, so campaign funding on that front isn't really viable. Although out-and-out bribery could still be a possibility.


      Important to note that the Senate is also completely useless.


      The Prime Minister is the leader of the party with the most seats in the House of Commons, not a separately elected individual, and therefore controls how the party votes.

      The PM has some control but not complete. That was one of the biggest problems when Cretien was on his way out and liberal MPs started rebeling on some votes.

      Overall I'd say our system is significantly more resistant to corporate influence than the US but we are certainly not immune.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:An interesting difference by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Our Senate is appointed, not elected, so campaign funding on that front isn't really viable. Although out-and-out bribery could still be a possibility.
      This is what is good with the canadian senate: they don't do what people want, but what is good for the country.
    3. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? the only informative thing I see there is that there is a guy somehow named Ophidian on this planet.

    4. Re:An interesting difference by LeninZhiv · · Score: 1

      ...And the Governor General and the Queen are even further removed from party politics than those you mentioned. (No Canadian has the $$ to bribe the latter!)

      What we have had, however, is a five-party situation in which the right-wing vote is regionally split into three (a Western party, an Eastern English party, and an Eastern French party), which means the Liberals have known for a few elections in a row now that they're the only game in town. (The fifth party, the socialist NDP, is still deemed too left-wing to have a shot at winning a majority.)

      Small wonder then, that the Liberal party stops caring about their public image, opening the door both to sloppy management of policies and outright corruption (which is all coming to light now). They don't even care how bad they look because they're the only party who can win.

      We'll see if in the next election the new super-Tories (the two English right-wing parties have merged) will change this situation. Personally I think they'll still have trouble getting votes in Eastern Canada, but I hope they can get enough to bring about a minority government (Liberal+NDP).

    5. Re:An interesting difference by s20451 · · Score: 1

      The main difference is that the Prime Minister of Canada has an enormous amount of power (proportionately) compared to the President of the USA. Consider, the PM:

      - can appoint and dismiss cabinet members without parliamentary approval
      - can appoint federal judges, including supreme court justices, without approval
      - can appoint senators without approval
      - cannot be removed or impeached by parliament without also causing the collapse of the government

      In a majority government situation (which is the rule, not the exception), the PM and cabinet have enough clout to pass virtually any bill that they see fit, without amendment.

      I'm not so concerned about the PM being bought. I'm concerned about those around him having a hell of a lot of power, and being basically unaccountable to the public between elections. This is a recurring problem in Canadian government (remember Mulroney?).

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    6. Re:An interesting difference by optikSmoke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Important to note that the Senate is also completely useless.

      Completely useless? I would tend to disagree. From what I remember of high school history, the Senate is meant primarily as a "check" on what the House of Commons passes. The idea is that Senators are *not* elected, do not have an expiring term, and are not part of a party so that their decisions are not influenced by politics -- they are supposed to be appointed, respected members of society (which is not always the case, unfortunately). In any case, this seems to me to be much better than an elected Senate, which would simply be another House of Commons. The States seem to have a problem in that their Senate is subject to similar political wrangling as their Congress is. People don't seem to realize that you cannot simply throw democracy/elections at something and make it better (which is why I disagree with the sentiment some politicians are floating around that the Senate should be elected).

      And of course, if the Senate ever did stomp on a bill that the public really wanted passed, the wave of public opinion and the media would probably result in a reform of how the Senate works.

    7. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think having *less* democracy with an appointment system is better than the people having control over who rules them?

      Why not just go back to letting the Queen/King decide everything and disband the whole government. Afterall, as others have said in response to this before me, we know the Queen can't be bribed and having appointees makes them more likely to do what is right for the country.

      A monarchy is what you're looking for. Can't be bribed, appointed by God. Screw democracy, right? The people certainly don't know right from wrong, eh?

    8. Re:An interesting difference by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I agree with the concept of the Canadian senate, the problem is that it has become little more than a spellchecker at best. Perhaps if a government came in and tried to dismantel our democracy than it might show its use by voting down the offending laws (as long as the party doesn't have the 2/3 majority necessary to overrule the senate). But when considering the kinds of laws that corporate lobbying would get passed the senate is never going to do anything do disagree with the government.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    9. Re:An interesting difference by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Completely useless? I would tend to disagree. From what I remember of high school history, the Senate is meant primarily as a "check" on what the House of Commons passes.

      Yeah, this is what they tell us in highscool, the whole "school of sober second thought" line I heard from grade eight all the way through high school.

      On reflection, after seeing politics in action for a number of years, I think that whole line was just propaganda. Occasionally the Senate may come up with some useful ideas, but in general it seems to be just a gigantic patronage scheme.

      Really, how the Senate not completely useless? I don't believe the Senate has successfully blocked a bill the House of Commons wanted passed since I've paid attention to Canadian politics, and when the Senate tried to keep Mulroney from passing the Free Trade Act (or maybe was it the GST?), he just appointed more Tory Senators until the vote got through.

      And of course, if the Senate ever did stomp on a bill that the public really wanted passed, the wave of public opinion and the media would probably result in a reform of how the Senate works.

      No, I think the Prime Minister would probably do just what Mulroney did and add more senators.

      I would be very surprised if such a tactic wouldn't work, simply because, as you suggest, the public has little tolerance for antics from the Senate, viewing them correctly as a patronage institution. This is exactly why it's unlikely senators would be stupid enough to really exert their authority: it would mean the end of their comfortable lifestyle.

      If the Senate is likely to rebel on anything, it's by killing some bill which the Prime Minister and the House of Commons supports but for which they think there is considerable public discontent. Public support for the Senate on that issue would then keep the Prime Minister from rendering it powerless.

      For example, we may see a Senate rebellion if Martin attempts to decriminalize pot or legalize gay marriage, though I think it's quite unlikely, since there is significant public support for both of these initiatives.

    10. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, they have to attend in order to vote, first. But, of course, what is the attendance rate for Canadian Senators? Pretty fucking horrible, yet they still get their $100K tax free salary every year until they die.

      The senate is totally and completely useless in Canada, and should be changed.

    11. Re:An interesting difference by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are appointed by elected officials. They just hold their position for a very long time. Cabinet ministers are appointed, for example. So the idea is that you consider the senators that they will appoint as a corollary of actually voting for your party.

      The real purpose is this: senators have to be placed in the first place, but after that they are accountable to noone. And they don't have to be cagey and electable, they just have to have the respect of your elected representative enough to appoint them.

      IMHO, their terms should have a long set length (not just till they retire) - say, 20 years - and they should not be reappointable. This would prevent any anachronistic Thurmond-types kicking around.

      Either way they are placed democratically - they are appointed by an elected person. The real advantage is that after their appointment, they have no ties to anyone who could manipulate them - not their party, not their home riding, not their campaign contributors.

      But yes, they also have no responsibility to the populace. That's the catch.

    12. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Important to note that the Senate is also completely useless

      Not Quite. I dont remember who it was but one senator went on a hunger strike to protest some government program cut. He just lay on a mat in the senate entrance and drank only water. after a few weeks the government caved in.

    13. Re:An interesting difference by MicktheMech · · Score: 1

      Laws passing small taxes on certain items, or your every-day run of the mill bill isn't what the senate is there for. It's there for things like the GST. That was almost blocked by the senate before the PM pulled some constitutional strings to add a few (favourable) senators. Reforms are needed to how the senate fits into government, but I don't think they should be elected.

    14. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Important to note that the Senate is also completely useless.

      The senate (chamber of sober second thought) spent months last year debating whether the words to 'O Canada' should be gender neutral - <sarcasm>how can you say they are useless?</sarcasm>

      The PM has some control but not complete

      Last year zero of the oppositions bill's were accepted, zero of the bills proposed by members not in the cabinet were accepted, zero bills were rejected by the senate, and 100% of the PM's bills passed. How is that not complete control?

    15. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, among other details you have wrong, some of which have been corrected already, where the hell did you get the idea that Senators have no party?

      I found this in my first five seconds on Google, if you demand a source. It mentions how many Senators appointed by a PM belong to the PM's party.

      And there's one fellow, can't recall his name, who was formerly the lone Canadian Alliance senator - a Mulroney appointee who defected.

    16. Re:An interesting difference by optikSmoke · · Score: 1

      If the Senate is likely to rebel on anything, it's by killing some bill which the Prime Minister and the House of Commons supports but for which they think there is considerable public discontent. Public support for the Senate on that issue would then keep the Prime Minister from rendering it powerless.

      This is pretty much what I meant, and is why the Senate isn't useless (IMHO) as long as it isn't an elected House.

    17. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you use to define right?

      The Bloc is a leftwing party, in most people's books, with the PC-breakaways providing sane fiscal policy as well as their most prominent leader (Bouchard).

    18. Re:An interesting difference by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Also, with this coming Federal Election, all Parties which recieve more than 5% popular vote will be given funding. $1.?? per vote per year for the duration of that government.

      The reason is simple, to make them less reliant private donations.

    19. Re:An interesting difference by optikSmoke · · Score: 1

      Whoah, cool down cowboy. My bad, my memory is obviously a little hazy, but I remember the main point behind it -- the Senators don't have to have any particular allegiance to their party, its not like in the House where the party oftens makes voting decisions that are only reluctantly and rarely broken by MPs. Senators have more freedom in their voting decisions.

    20. Re:An interesting difference by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      The idea is that Senators are *not* elected, do not have an expiring term, and are not part of a party so that their decisions are not influenced by politics -- they are supposed to be appointed, respected members of society
      How on earth does this shield them from being influenced by politics? They have accountability other than to the democratically elected benevolent dictator de jour.

      You also seem to fail to realize that public opinion is meaningless since we (Canadians) have no ability to recall our elected officials, and seems to be blindingly stupid enough to re-elect a man who repeatedly lies to us (Chretien).

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    21. Re:An interesting difference by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Sheesh! It's a one dollar tax to vote in Canada!

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    22. Re:An interesting difference by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      That's why at least half the senators are part of a party? When I watch CPAC i rarely see a senator labeled as an independant

    23. Re:An interesting difference by LeninZhiv · · Score: 1

      I know this is the more common classification, but as you've picked up, I don't agree with it. They do cross some right-left lines, for sure, which makes them hard to classify. It depends on what you see as most important. But I think the key question is, what party have they replaced in Quebec? (Answer: Progressive-Conservative). Which was my main point, that the regionalism-versus-federalism in Canadian politics has guaranteed the more federal party a win in the last few elections, since obviously the regions divided against each other are smaller than the whole.

      Specifically though, as far as increased provincial autonomy/decreased federal government, restrictions on immigration, and their use of the colour blue ;) they are more like Tories than Liberals. Also I would consider nationalism to be a right-wing position regardless of the economic theory that accompanies it.

    24. Re:An interesting difference by tx_kanuck · · Score: 1

      Umm.....if the PM cannot be removed or impeached without collapsing the government, why is Paul Martin the PM, and not Chretains deputy PM now the PM when JC stepped down? Granted I've never really understood all the little details so I'm really just asking for some clairification here, not so much an accusation. The way I thought it went was as follows:

      A vote of no confidence by the government = a new general election.

      A vote for a new party leader = a new PM, but no general election.

      We got a new party leader, hence no general election.

      --
      Now, if that makes sense to anyone, could you please explain it to me? I think I've confused myself.
    25. Re:An interesting difference by wrenkin · · Score: 1

      They're definitely part of a party, but it's not like they'll lose their jobs by occasionally (or always) voting against the party line.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
    26. Re:An interesting difference by wrenkin · · Score: 1

      Why are people so obsessed with recall? They're gonna be up for 'recall' in a few years anyways. That's the whole point of elections.

      If it was that serious, then they would be voted out then too. If people forget after the fact at an election how bad the original transgression was, that's their fault. I'm glad we don't have a Californian-style system with the potential for perpetual recalls...

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
    27. Re:An interesting difference by wrenkin · · Score: 1

      Something about the Prime Minister being forced out early.

      The thing about the Canadian/British system is that control is absolute, but once it starts to crumble, it crumbles rapidly. In Canada especially, where there is stricter party discipline the contrast is more marked, even if such things happen less frequently. Then the PM (Thatcher, for example) has to go.

      Doesn't happen often, but a real executive/President could survive longer under the same conditions.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
    28. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For example, we may see a Senate rebellion if Martin attempts to decriminalize pot or legalize gay marriage, though I think it's quite unlikely, since there is significant public support for both of these initiatives. "

      Actually there was a senate committee that recommended complete decriminalization of marijuana. Probably because there are some pretty strong arguments for it, and senators don't have to worry about the politics of an issue.

    29. Re:An interesting difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also I would consider nationalism to be a right-wing position regardless of the economic theory that accompanies it.

      Oh? Experience dictates to me that the most strongly nationalist (and federalist) forces in this country fall under the NDP umbrella.

      Orchardists aside, perhaps.

    30. Re:An interesting difference by s20451 · · Score: 1

      I mean involuntarily removed. The PM can certainly resign/retire voluntarily if he wants, as did Chretien.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    31. Re:An interesting difference by LeninZhiv · · Score: 1

      Not true: the Governor General can involuntarily remove the PM at any time--which would happen in case of a blatant and dangerous abuse of power on the PM's part. It would never happen for anything less than a major crises though, as without massive popular support the monarchy could not survive such a bold move.

      The system works well, because the GG can oust the PM, but only if it's really necessary. You can never have an impeachment for political gain, as may or may not have happened south of the border not too long ago...

    32. Re:An interesting difference by mpe · · Score: 1

      People don't seem to realize that you cannot simply throw democracy/elections at something and make it better (which is why I disagree with the sentiment some politicians are floating around that the Senate should be elected).

      Sounds like you are describing the US. Where one of the basic problems is the lack of political parties. The other thing is that elections do not equate to democracy. It's quite possible to have elections and a complete absence of democracy. Or to have elected governments which completly ignore the populace once they get elected.

    33. Re:An interesting difference by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

      People are rightly concerned with the lack of a system to hold liars accountable. Recall is only one of the mechanisms proposed to solve the problem. Besides, its the sheep in Ontario and Quebec that seem content to repeatedly vote in liars... and its easy because of the masses of sheep. Politicians count on this since they know the sheep wll forget by the time the next election comes around.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    34. Re:An interesting difference by LazyBoyWrangler · · Score: 1

      As a child of both countrys, (Citizen of US and Canada, born to American father and Canadian mother), I see both systems pretty clearly. The appointed Canadian Senate (loosely mirroring the House of Lords in British terms) is a highly partisan collection of political people being paid back for years of loyal service to the goverment of the time. There is no accountability, no voter control and no representation of the people. There is no election / funding corruption, but this is due to the unelected nature - not at all to the people being on unimpeachable nature. Completely useless? Yes. Completely corrupt? As corrupt as every politically appointed body. This means that 80% of the people are politically partisan, and the 20% that deliver value for their time are outvoted in the Senate all the time. Sober second thought? I live on Ottawa, and the discussion that go on in some of the establishments like Hys downtown are not exactly sober - lobbyists are campaigning HARD here, and money is moving constantly. Canada's system isn't better or worse than the US - just different and just as corrupt. The kind of people attracted to power determines the corruption level, not the specific system of government.

    35. Re:An interesting difference by tb3 · · Score: 1

      And an ordinary citizen couldn't have done this?

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    36. Re:An interesting difference by s20451 · · Score: 1

      True, but the GG is appointed and hence not directly accountable to the people, either.

      Also, if it ever did happen, a constitutional crisis would be almost guaranteed. In Canada, the nearest analog is the "King-Byng" affair of 1925, when in the midst of scandal the GG (Byng) refused to dissolve parliament at the request of the PM (Mackenzie King), and instead appointed Arthur Meighen as PM.

      Something like this actually did happen in Australia in 1975. During a deadlock between the PM and the Senate, the GG intervened by unilaterally dismissing the PM, appointing the Senate leader in his place, and calling immediate elections. The dismissed PM was furious, and there were immediate angry demonstrations against the GG. Parliamentary sessions passed bills in confusion immediately afterward as nobody seemed to know who was in charge.

      No GG would attempt to use this power except in the most egregious circumstances, by which time it might be too late anyway.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    37. Re:An interesting difference by wrenkin · · Score: 1

      People aren't sheep just because they disagree with you :) It's hard to garner sympathy for Western alienation if you purposefully alienate them.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
  9. HP Isn't Stealing by SeinJunkie · · Score: 0

    According to Darl, commercial vendors are the only ones who are capable of honest transactions. It's the sticky fingered open source people that are tearing down the walls of governments across the globe.
    Maybe if Canada had gone OSS they wouldn't be fighting for $160 mill back. (is that $160 Canadian or real money?)

    1. Re:HP Isn't Stealing by El · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...is that $160 Canadian or real money? That is $159 million Canadian or $120 million US

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:HP Isn't Stealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real money? You mean Euros?

  10. What? by Malicious · · Score: 5, Funny
    As a red blooded Canadian, I have only one question to ask.

    Who gave the Canadian Department of National Defence $160,000,000?

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a rather good point. 160 000 000 is a huge part of the DND's budget, even over a 10 year period.

    2. Re:What? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Seriously... who is Canada going to defend against? Russia was once a threat, but not very much anymore. Are there massive funds devoted to defending against the US?

      Of course, a metric shitload of cash is spent on CA/US co-ventures like radar stations and early warning NORAD stuff...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of course, a metric shitload of cash is spent on CA/US co-ventures like radar stations and early warning NORAD stuff..."

      Not by Canadians.

      In any case, a military is also there to help in the event of a major emergency such as a terrorist attack. Not to mention peacekeeping. We don't need and can't support a huge military, but would could support a slightly larger and much better trained and equipped military.

    4. Re:What? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Canada is defending against Santa and his elves.

      Don't you read sluggy?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:What? by G-funk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey man, you never know when oil will be discovered north of the border :-)

      *ducks*

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    6. Re:What? by codemachine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Like the largest oil reserve in the world perhaps? Of course it is all stuck in some bloody tar sands in northern Alberta, making it a bitch to get at.

    7. Re:What? by robbot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah it's surprising how many American's are ignorant of the above fact.

      Does anyone out there know how much it costs to extract a standard barrel of oil from the tar sands?

      Sure it's more expensive than just scooping up the stuff from saudi arabia, but a lot of money is being invested around here...

    8. Re:What? by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I knew about the oil, but it hardly seems viable to invade for it... except for the U.S., which is very unlikely. Everyone else has a whole lotta tundra between them and canada.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    9. Re:What? by Zarquil · · Score: 1
      Hmm...

      I think they may have discovered a barrel or 180 billion of conventional oil in Canada already.

      This omits the "frontier" resources such as the oil reserves found off the shore of Newfoundland and the enormous reserves in the Alberta Oil sands which, although the oil is difficult to extract, the quantities of reserves are stunning, at an estimated quantity of 1.6 trillion barrels remaining.

      When you're finished being clever, an economic specialist at the American embassy wrote a very informative article on the state of Canada - U.S. energy trade relations. It can be found in .pdf form right here

    10. Re:What? by operagost · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? Canada has a department of defence?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:What? by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1

      shhh....don't tell them that...they might look us up on a map and make up some excuse to attack us. "In the latest showing of force, Canada has amassed 80% of it's population along its border!" -- Canadian Bacon

    12. Re:What? by Zarquil · · Score: 1

      (snicker)

      Considering Stewart's report is working from the premise that most U.S. citizens don't actually know who provides them with the majority of their energy, I figure I can afford to inform a FEW along the way.

      And considering that I'm sitting on top of some of that black Alberta goodness, I'm clearly too disillusioned by the federal government to bother staying on topic discussing the scandel. I just expect that. (grin)

      - Zarq

    13. Re:What? by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      Canada is the US' largest foreign supplier of oil, natural gas and electricity

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    14. Re:What? by shfted! · · Score: 1

      In Russia?

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    15. Re:What? by codemachine · · Score: 1

      The cost is a bit high, and right now they're only able to get about 10% of the oil extracted. I'm not sure if getting the rest is too expensive, or just beyond the capability of current extraction methods. Probably the former.

      Google did find me this on production costs though, and I've heard the $9 a barrel figure elsewhere too.

    16. Re:What? by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      It costs about $8-$10 to extract a barrel of oil from the tar sands. In comparison, it costs about $2-$3 to pull a barrel of oil from a more traditional oil reserve in the middle east. But, the cost drops as the technology improves, and it's a lot of oil.

    17. Re:What? by codemachine · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself I know, but I actually read the entire article I linked and noticed this line:

      maybe Canada could take the place of Saudi Arabia in the American universe.

      My only thought is I HOPE NOT! Please don't let Canada become the next Saudi Arabia or Middle East to the Americans. Burn the tar sands before it is too late!!

      Okay, maybe that is taking it a bit too far...

    18. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."make up some excuse to attack us."

      Perhaps they could liberate us from the Liberals. Then Ralph Klein can try for greater power for the Albertans under a new constitution, just like the Kurds.

    19. Re:What? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Pipeline to port + tankers. Works everywhere else in the world.

    20. Re:What? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about moving the oil, I was referring to taking it from Canada forcibly. You'd have to cross the continental US, Alaska, the polar ice cap, or north east canada. None of which are feasible, really.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    21. Re:What? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      We took oil from Iraq forcibly, and that's across the Atlantic, the Mediterranean, and a couple of land masses in the way.

    22. Re:What? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      More or less true. But there wasn't a large and militarily dominant neighbor to protect it. Plus, we have lots of carriers (soverign US territory) to attack from.

      I was (earlier) referring to someone other than the US attacking Canada. If we attack, the canucks are fucked.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    23. Re:What? by DataSquid · · Score: 1

      Wait 30 years until the ice melts, and then it will be shipped by us daily. Not that we're at all prepared for policing that....

      --

      DataSquid.net, a little about me.
    24. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you attack, the world is fucked, 'cause that would start World War III.

    25. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was up there a few years ago the price of extraction was around 12 bucks/barrel. I think they've got the cost now to somewhere between 9.50 and 10.00. So 45 gallons per barrel with a cost of 10.00 for the lot is a profit of about $35US per barrel. No wonder they are pulling 750,000 barrels per day out of there. Can you say $9.5 Billion US per year? Highway 63 is paved with black gold.

    26. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but a lot of money is being invested around here...

      Ahh, yes. Good ole Syncrude. They had so much money invested, they could afford good salaries for a management team that was capable of managing around a million employees.

    27. Re:What? by zuikaku · · Score: 1

      Actually, the president of Shell once said that the largest known reserves were below the Gulf of Mexico. Of course, he may have been referring to the largest known profitable reserves.

    28. Re:What? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Agreed, sir.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  11. SOMEBODY WORKS FOR HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when HP used to advertise on slashrot?

  12. War by fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In all of this it is clear that the Government can lose track of a lot of money easily and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then.""

    Iraq, nuff said.

  13. Everyone and No one is at fault by pholower · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    In this day of age, everybody is trying to pull something over somebody else. It is clear in this story that neither company nor government is going to accept the blame in this. A Scapegoat is always a profitable option.

    Sadly, scapegoats are usually the one that are the victims in the first place.

    --
    -- johntracy.com, because everybody else is wrong.
  14. shhh Haliburton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cough

  15. That's a libelous claim by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The PM of Canada had better have something to back that up with. That's a very serious allegation to make, especially against a multinational corporation or even its contractors. Will the FTC play a part in the investigation?

    1. Re:That's a libelous claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trolling? The FTC is an American agency. Canada is not a US state! They have their own people for investigating fraud within Canada!

    2. Re:That's a libelous claim by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      But HP is an American company.

    3. Re:That's a libelous claim by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      An American company with a Canadian subsidiary. Who do you think the Canadian government dealth with? Do you understand business at *all*?

    4. Re:That's a libelous claim by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Just because the subsidary was Canadian doesn't mean that HQ couldn't have had something to do with it.

    5. Re:That's a libelous claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be retarded, man. Admit you're wrong. Maybe the FBI should break down Carly Fiorina's door to see if she possibly had something to do with a deal that HP Canada (a Canadian corporation) did with the government. If Microsoft of Canada does something fishy, they investigate Microsoft of Canada. If there's some big evil plot going on, let the evidence in Canada show that.

    6. Re:That's a libelous claim by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it had something to do with it. But this investigation will deal with the Canadian subsidiary, thus puts this battle squarely in Canadian territory where the FTC has absolutely no power.

    7. Re:That's a libelous claim by rsteele19 · · Score: 1

      Which allegation in particular are you referring to? If it was something spoken in the House of Commons, he is protected by parliamentary privilege from any action or libel.

      --

      This sig is umop apisdn.

    8. Re:That's a libelous claim by stygar · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would the FTC have any jurisdiction?

  16. Above a little fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then"

    Since when does the size of a company matter regarding fraud or other ethical considerations?

  17. Fraud? Really?-Everyone's a "G" man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The government is made up of people who couldn't get jobs in the private sector. "

    Considering the present job situation in the US. I guess the ranks must filled to overflowing.

    1. Re:Fraud? Really?-Everyone's a "G" man. by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually... Lou Dobbs has been hammering on this. I don't have the figures here, but Lou has been showing that the little job growth that IS going on is in the public sector. Private employment continues to decrease while public employment is increasing in drips and drabs thanks to all the new government that continues to be added for defense or anti-terrorist or whatevers sake.

      --

      Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
  18. Large companies and fraud by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then."

    Seems like lots of large companies these days seem to specialize in fraud. I won't mention Halliburton or anyone else accused of defrauding the US government.

    1. Re:Large companies and fraud by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Why stop there?, Microsoft, Exxon-Mobile, Chevron-Texaco, Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, hell It would be easier to name the one that don't. One hell of a lot shorter list. All of which donate the max to BOTH political parties every year, not just election years.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:Large companies and fraud by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      I won't mention Halliburton or anyone else accused of defrauding the US government.

      Subtlety isn't one of your strengths is it ;)

    3. Re:Large companies and fraud by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because we all know that HP is automatically guilty right?

      Don't believe everything you hear on Slashdot, plebe.

  19. How far back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article I read said the Canadian government was auditing accounts back to 1991... don't you Canucks have a statute of limitations on fraud? Come on, if I screwed you out of money 13 years ago and you're just now getting around to noticing it, how bad can it be? Maybe we could just let this one slide!

    -- Carly

    1. Re:How far back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the natives who are still bitching about land that was "stolen" from them near 200 years ago.

  20. Looks more like a govt messup... by xot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would lay my money on this being a govt screwup rather than HP fooling them.Theres no way a big corp like HP would fool a prospective HUGE customer like the canadian govt and charge them for something that they didnt deliver.(and get caught!)
    The world around govt's have know to screw things up due to the sheer laziness and absence of co-ordination between govt departments.Looks like one desk jockey for got to enter a few bills into the accounting system :-)

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
    1. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by mveloso · · Score: 1

      You'd think that, and you might be right. Only the accountants will be able to tell. It's simple really:

      * who submitted the invoces?
      * what checks were issued and when?
      * who cashed them?

      If the RCMP and the auditors can find this information, then it'll be fairly simple.

      However, there are lots of situations where the paper trail was destroyed. If someone inside the government was printing fake invoices and submitting them, then HP would be in the dark as to the invoices, which seems to be the case here.

      It's unclear from the article if HP is denying fraud or denying submitting the invoice(s).

      In any case, they'll just follow the money anyway. No need to fuss.

    2. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by El · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right. And there is no way a big company like Oracle would fool a prospective HUGE customer like the California government and charge them for something they couldn't use like 270,000 licenses for their 230,000 employees, only a quarter of which actually needed to access a database... and yet they did! Now, HP has a slightly better reputation to uphold than Oracle, but still, I wouldn't put it past them. (By the way, doesn't CA (California) have a larger government budget than CA (Canada)?)

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    3. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      There is a significant difference between selling you something you don't need but shipping the product to you and selling you something and never getting the end product.

      Oracle was acting like a cars salesman (want that clearcoat protector), end of the day you still got the car. They are accusing HP of failure to physically deliver something which was paid for (i.e. never getting the car from the salesman).

    4. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by spectasaurus · · Score: 1

      Ya think the fact that the population is bigger in California has anything to do with it? I hear France has a bigger government budget than Rhode Island too. What's your point?

    5. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by donutello · · Score: 1

      The big difference is that what Oracle did was unethical, but legal and what HP is accused of doing is criminal.

      The first kind you get to laugh and say "Ha, ha!" while the second kind you have the Royal Canadian Mounted Police seize your assets and take you to the Royal Candian pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    6. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by stygar · · Score: 2, Informative
      California 2003-2004 state budget: $165 billion US
      Canadian Federal Government budget 2003: ~$144.58 Billion US

      I looked at the California budget summaries for the last couple of decades and was shocked. WTF has been going on in California that the state budget has increased 65% between 1997-98 and 2003-04?

      Also, when you consider that the Canadian federal government budget is paying for a hell of a lot more services (including health care - the bulk of medicare funding still comes from the federal government), California voters have a right to feel ripped off.

    7. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by grqb · · Score: 1

      I'm sure though that the Canadaian DND made damn sure that it was HPs fault before announcing a law suit.

    8. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by shepd · · Score: 1

      RCMP? Bah! They're *WAY* too busy arresting people for competing with them on pirate US Television and bringing their own personal Mary Jane to deal with something as unimportant and piddly as a few million dollars and sliming the government with egg-on-the-face.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >There is a significant difference between selling you something you don't need but shipping the product to you and selling you something and never getting the end product.

      Um... 75% of staff don't need to use Oracle. They didn't recieve the product.

      And besides, the fact is that someone paid an insane amount of money without someone questioning it.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    10. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by El · · Score: 1

      What Oracle did is only legal if you buy the assertion that certain California state employees are too stupid to count the number of employees before ordering software, and that they weren't bribed or encouraged by Oracle in any way to over-order. Having worked for the Oracle Marketing department and having observed first hand them billing customers for work that was never done, I find that very, very difficult to beleive.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    11. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by El · · Score: 1

      Population of California: 35.4 million
      Population of Canada: less than 32 million

      If the California government was was providing its citizens all the same services that the Canadian goverment was providing its citizens, these budget numbers would not be out of line. But they are not, so there must be something seriously screwed up about California. But then, that's one of the reasons I moved from California to Oregon.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    12. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by robbot · · Score: 1
      FYI

      This budget page says the Canadian Federal budget was 192.9 Billion in 2003. The numbers are at the bottom of the page.

      I'll hand it to Paul Martin, the debt hasn't decreased much. but at least it ain't increasing while he's been in charge...

      I'm too lazy to look up California's on google...

    13. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      Are you familiar with Oracle? It runs basically one system, if you have one user or thousands of users it's the same product. California recieved every single piece of software they purchased. They installed it on the server and just because they only had 25% of the max capacity users signed in does not mean they didn't receive it.

      75% of the people don't live in an area legal to go >100mph, again did they not receive the product because they can't legally go that fast?

    14. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1
      FYI Paul Martin has been in charge (as PM) since December.

      If you want to go back to when he came into power as the finance minister the, yes, not only has the deficit been eliminated, but the feds have run a surplus every year since I think about '96. They've been paying off the debt bit by bit, but they're in no hurry.

      The surplusses plus all this scandalous money spending that has come to light in recent weeks makes me wonder wtf are we missing out on? I, for one, would have loved to see this money go into university funding or in health care.

    15. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paying off the debt is not the important part. if you run a balanced budget every year then the debt will shrink as a percentage of GDP (becasue the econonomy grows). That's what has happened Canada's debt has gone from 76% to 44% of GDP and it's still dropping. The US is going the opposite direction and are basically fucked if they keep going.

    16. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by AstroSurf · · Score: 1

      N.B. The city of Toronto had a computer contract boondoggle involving .... Oracle licenses (among other things).

      --
      Astro
    17. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by robbot · · Score: 1

      Yeah I meant as Finance Minister...

      Man, I really hated the jackass we used have as a PM. He made Mulroney look like a freakin saint...and that's no easy feat.

      I have higher hopes for Martin, too bad the liberals didn't choose him the first time round.

    18. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by robbot · · Score: 1

      Good point, didn't think of it that way.

    19. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      funny when you think about it ... Canadas debt is $583 billion (in '97, http://www.fin.gc.ca/update97/factDEBT-E.html). The US DEFICIT for this year is $590 billion.

      ok. not funny, kinda scary.

      thats a huge amount of money.
      0.00000002% of that would pay off all my debts and leave enough for a 2-4.

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    20. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assure you California voters feel ripped off. It's why Gray Davis was recalled. His government was out of control and put the state in financial ruin.

    21. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by wfberg · · Score: 1

      (By the way, doesn't CA (California) have a larger government budget than CA (Canada)?)

      I misread that as ComputerAssociates in California vs. ComputerAssociates in Canada... D'oh!

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    22. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Proposed Budget Expenditures for the State of California for the year 2004-2005 is 99.144 Billion Dollars (Budget Summary)

      In 2003-2004 the Canadian Government budget weighed in at approximately 180.7 Billion Dollars (Expenditures)

      Please note that the Canadian Government expenditures do not include provincial or municipal tax revenue.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Black and White Case by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If HP did receive the payment, but failed to deliver the goods, then isn't it clear who's to blame?

    Imagine if your client mistakenly paid your company $2,000 extra, do you

    (1) keep quiet?
    (2) ask what that $2K is for?

    One of my clients has a habit of overpaying the bill, because it is always late in paying, thus when the next invoice (with 2 months balance) arrives, they then paid the 1st invoice, and the 2nd invoice. I have to tell them that, and hold the credit for the following month(s).

    1. Re:Black and White Case by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      Imagine if your client mistakenly paid your company $2,000 extra, do you

      i guess this really is a moral issue -
      1 - are you immoral
      2 - are you moral

      before the law, immoral usually gets their ass spanked. (unless you're OJ ;)

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
  23. Re:Fraud? Really? by jmv · · Score: 1

    Worldcom is known as a very smart company. Its employees are all selected through an interview process designed to select the best and brightest minds. The threat of termination always hangs over the heads of Worldcom employees. This encourages the best performance from Worldcom employees because subpar performance leads to being kicked out to the streets, especially in these bad economic times.

    So who to believe?..

  24. Compaq by TastelessGarbage · · Score: 1
    The end of the article notes "The contract to provide software, hardware and computer services to DND was originally awarded to Compaq Canada in 1991. It was transferred to HP after its acquisition of Compaq."

    HP acquired Compaq two years ago.

    --
    That ain't liver; that's beef kidney!
  25. Everyone and No one is at fault-Get your goat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A Scapegoat is always a profitable option."

    1-Grow scapegoats.
    2 ???
    3-Profit.

  26. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US government racks up half a trillion dollars in deficit spending, while Canada has had billions of dollars in surpluses for the last couple of years and is paying down the debt. Scandals go on no matter what the party in office (hint: it's not which party, it's which people), and NDP likely wouldn't have managed to get the budget under control like the Liberals have. Blame the people all you want, but the Liberals have put Canada in a fine position for the future.

  27. Canada has a department of defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why the hell do they need that? It's not like anybody hates Canada. I mean, why do you think US citizens put maple leafs on their backpacks when they travel around Europe?

    The US - yeah, we need a big defense department the way we go around pissing everybody off. But not Canada. They're like a harmless little mouse.

    1. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peacekeeping and in case of an emergency such as a terror attack (for example there was a foiled attempt to bomb a Canadian synagogue a while back). There are people who want Canadians dead - at the very least specific ethnicities.

    2. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by gobbo · · Score: 4, Informative
      We remember 1812 and 54/40 or fight!, believe me. Deep down, especially among those canadians who don't have deep ties (family, jobs, etc.) to the U.S., we're just waiting for the tanks to roll across the border and secure oil and water pipelines.

      OK, maybe not. But we have the largest coastline in the world, and we have alliances with other nations that lead to obligations overseas.

      Then there's the national role in "Aid to the Civil Power" -- which means that if there's unrest in a region, like the Oka crisis or the October crisis, they want to be able to roll in and maintain that appearance of canadian civility. Actually there's a lot more tension in this big happy nation than outsiders realize, especially since the conquest of the First Nations isn't complete. In other words, the military unfortunately seems to be primarily there to keep us in line.

      That said, chances are that the bored military administrators screwed up and HP took huge advantage of it.

    3. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by jayveekay · · Score: 1
      They're like a harmless little mouse.

      Thanks to recent events like the SARS and Mad Cow outbreaks, the next version of the HHGTTG will have an updated entry for Canada: "Mostly Harmless."

    4. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Why the hell do they need that? It's not like anybody hates Canada. I mean, why do you think US citizens put maple leafs on their backpacks when they travel around Europe?

      The US - yeah, we need a big defense department the way we go around pissing everybody off. But not Canada. They're like a harmless little mouse.


      I hate responding to a troll but when it's +4 Informative I'll make an exception :)

      Ignoring the many peacekeeping missions we partake in, a military (no matter how anaemic) is essential for any sovereign nation. We're already paranoid enough as it is about becoming the 51st state (you have 50 right?) and without a military it wouldn't be long before the US started saying "well we're the only ones defending you so you must be american territory so all your base are belong to us" (only with smaller/nonexistant words if Bush was still in office) this would be followed by an invasion of Mexico.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by boudie · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed, here in Canada we have a standing army of some 50,000 soldiers. We also have 40,000 people working for Revenue Canada (our IRS), and let me tell you, you do not want to piss them off. Additionally, we have what are considered the meanest and cruellest Hells Angels chapters in the world in Quebec. But they're not as bad as the bunch from Revenue Canada.

    6. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      and lets not forget the Royal Canadian Kilted Yaksmen

    7. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      You mean the agency formerly known as Revenue Canada. They are now the knigh .. the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency.

      In Canada, the idea is to keep changing the words to the national anthem and the names of government agencies until we're so confused that we .. umm .. I forget.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by wrenkin · · Score: 1

      They changed names again. I think it's just the Candian Revenue Agency now, although I'm not sure. There was an article in the paper wondering why they just didn't go back to Revenue Canada, since that's what people still call them.

      I believe Customs was merged with other things in some post-9/11 'border security' thing to appease the Americans.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
    9. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Unless they're using old envelope stock (which they don't), it was still Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (or CCRA - ADRC) as of March 8th.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    10. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by Demolition · · Score: 1

      Unless they're using old envelope stock (which they don't), it was still Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (or CCRA - ADRC) as of March 8th.

      The CCRA was split into two separate agencies on December 12, 2003 -- the Canada Border Services Agency and the Canada Revenue Agency. The CRA is at the old CCRA URL, but they have nothing to do with Customs anymore.

      In the past, it was handy to only visit one office to conduct business that dealt with both taxation and customs, even if the office was ostensibly for revenue matters only. Since January, I've been forced to go to two separate places (the CRA occupies the same old CCRA offices, while anything to do with the customs has been moved down to the border stations). Kind of a pain in the ass, but I'm told that it will streamline operations for both agencies and eventually cut down on the bureacracy that citizens have to deal with. In that case, I guess I'm all for it.

      D.

    11. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada has a larger coastline that Australia? I think not.

    12. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by schovanec · · Score: 1
      Then there's the national role in "Aid to the Civil Power" -- which means that if there's unrest in a region
      Which apparently includes such highly important duties as clearing snow in Toronto!
    13. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Well, for one thing, they are needed every year to shovel Toronto's snow.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    14. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Canada has a larger coastline that Australia? I think not.

      Erm, Canada does kind of have the second largest landmass of any country in the world (after Russia).

      Mind you, most of this coastline is on the Arctic Ocean, so it's often frozen in the winter and is not often travelled. But it's there.

      Hudson's Bay does see more shipping traffic than you might think given its latitude, though.

    15. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by gobbo · · Score: 1

      "Which apparently includes such highly important duties as clearing snow in Toronto!"

      Darn tootin'. Make 'em useful.

    16. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget Kofee Anan (sp?), Secretary General of the UN who was up here recently saying "What happened to you, Canada? You used to be cool, a country we could rely on, but now you're fat and lazy. Come on, get your shit together." Ok, he said it a little more diplomatically, but the message was clear. And he's right. It's sad that we feel stretched with just a couple of thosand troops in Afghanistan and we have to stretch to send 450 more to Haiti.

      It would be nice if they could get the 160 million back from HP and put it back into the military, but knowing the way the gov't works, they'll spend 250 million in the attempt, half of that somehow winding up in the pockets of friends of the Liberal party.

    17. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by baldcamel · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing a canadian stand up in the UK who said "I am from Cananda surrounded by the French and the Americans. So when I say I am happy to be here (the UK) I really fucking am." Followed by " I live a 667 next door to the beast"

    18. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by ojQj · · Score: 1

      The precision of your measurement will change your end result significantly. That's because coastlines are fractal. For more explanation of this principle check out this explanation of fractal coastlines.

    19. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      ...especially since the conquest of the First Nations isn't complete.

      Hell, the conquest of the French hasn't gone too well for Canada either. We took a slightly different tack than the U.S. The French got all kinds of liberties that previously-conquered peoples wouldn't have dreamed of, and the First Nations got far better treaties in Canada than their American cousins. Now we have a highly fractured country, being pulled in at least 4 different directions (French, First Nations, Eastern Canadians, and Western Canadians who are pissed off with the Eastern Canadians for kow-towing to the French and First Nations).

      Remember, we had local terrorism in the '70s. That isn't so long ago.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    20. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I'm shocked. In the past, government agencies usually destroyed any stationary with the old name right away. I guess they've changed names so many times that it was getting silly.

      Call me cynical, but all these mergers and splits of agencies have more to do with who the prime minister wants to be holding those cards at the time. (Not unlike playing KingMaker.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    21. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by Demolition · · Score: 1

      Just thought you'd like to know that I received three items from the CRA today: a 2002 tax reassessment; a refund direct-deposit confirmaton; and something about my 2003 RRSP contribution limit. All of them arrived separately in old "Canada Customs and Revenue Agency" envelopes.

      I guess they're going to keep using them until they run out.

      D.

  28. This is such an incorrect description. by tentimestwenty · · Score: 5, Informative

    Canada has MANY parties. The four biggest are the Liberals, Conservatives, Bloq Quebecois, and the NDP. There are many smaller parties as well and many independents run for seats in the house of commons (like the US congress). The Conservatives are the equivalent to US Republicans. The Liberals (although getting more right wing) are the equivalent to the Democrats. The NDP is quite a bit left, but still in the Democratic vein.

    Overall though, all the parties in Canada, including the Conservatives are more left wing than anything in the US. We have national medicare, publicly funded universities etc. that even the Conservatives fundamentally believe in. Recently, it's true that the Liberals were involved in a scandal involving many millions of dollars of "favours" to private companies, but even these were more along the lines of fast-track bidding and not all out policy-bribery like is common in the US.

    To get back to the original point of the article, with the department of Defence getting shafted by HP, this is likely due to the general incompetence of a few technology people and their managers, not a particular party.

    1. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Recently, it's true that the Liberals were involved in a scandal involving many millions of dollars of "favours" to private companies, but even these were more along the lines of fast-track bidding and not all out policy-bribery like is common in the US. "

      No. The scandal money went to liberal supporting companies only, and most of the time no work was done to earn it. It was just given to them.

    2. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, we got better bribery here in Canada!

    3. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still wrong. The Conservatives are left of, or at most equivalent to, the US Democrats. Look at policies, don't just think: 'Well, I like the US Democrats more than the Republicans, so the party I prefer shall be analogous to the Democrats.'

    4. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by rowdent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only reason the Conservatives would be, in any way, left of the Democrats is because of the fact that the Canadian people would rebel if the social programs were completely done away with.

      The reality is that the Conservatives are against gay marriage, they love slashing social programs (case in point, the Ontario PCs, many of which have now joined the Federal PCs), and they think Star Wars is a good idea...

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    5. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? I didn't know the Conservatives had an official policy against gay marriage (or anything else, yet, for that matter). Nor did the CA and the PCs.

      Despite the fact that it's a total fringe issue which only gay people and god freaks care about, tell me... How many members of the federal Liberals voted against the bill of three or so years ago which confirmed the definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman? Precious few is the answer.

    6. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go Rhinos!

    7. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Recently, it's true that the Liberals were involved in a scandal involving many millions of dollars of "favours" to private companies, but even these were more along the lines of fast-track bidding and not all out policy-bribery like is common in the US.

      I think you'd better re-examine how bribery is done in the US. IIRC, the politicians get money from the companies, not the other way around. But what do you expect in Canada...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

      I don't think I was saying that it was the other way around in the US. The companies bribe the politicians to make policy that suits the companies' interest. I was just saying that it isn't that overt in Canada. As it's been said in other posts, a bribe can't really influence policy to a great extent because of the decentralized nature of our government. Things like contract fast-tracking are about the worst thing that happens. Sometimes a company will get money for no work if they have a very good contact, but this is rare. In the HP case, the government department likely forgot to check to see if the work was delivered, or perhaps gave some favouritism to the HP salesperson, but in an audit they'll likely get it all back when the mistake is found.

    9. Re:This is such an incorrect description. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, the Canadian Alliance was against homosexual marriages. They might have been ok with civil unions or some other quasi-marriage system for homosexuals but I'm not 100% sure. The Conservatives uner Harper will likely be against it (I think Harper said that in his recent campaign) but Stronach supports it (or at least civil unions) so it remains to be seen. The Liberals under Chretien was in favour of homosexual marriages. Under Martin, I am not sure. Martin wants an open vote in the Commons and has sent the issue for further study by the courts but this is like sweeping the issue under the rug. I'm not sure what the Liberal Party and Martin support.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  29. even large companies?? by spazoid12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then

    Wow, that's alarming.

    I thought only the tiny puny mom-n-pop companies like Global Crossing and Enron had fraud problems.

    1. Re:even large companies?? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And that poor little Worldcom store on the corner had to change their name to MCI. Shocking!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  30. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Monkelectric · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Reminds me of my grandmother... Before she passed away she had terrible alzheimers disease.

    A month before my birthday I receive a letter, "Hi grandson, I always forget your birthday and decided to send a present early this year! Love Grandma" (check enclosed, keep in mind Im 20 years old at this time and have no desire to get money from anyone, ESPECIALLY my granmother). I stick the check in a drawer, call grandma to thank her, and forget about it.

    Two months later -- its my birthday. Another letter, "Hi, I can't afford much of a present but I wanted you to know I haven't forgotten about you." (another check, stick it in the drawer, call grandma to thank her)

    A month after my birthday, A third card arrives! "Hi, Im soo sorry I missed your birthday! Please forgive me! I am forgetful in my old age, love grandma" (another check enclosed, blah blah blah)

    She died not long after that. Is there a +1 Sad? :(

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  31. Re:Fraud? Really? by irokie · · Score: 2, Informative

    The government is made up of people who couldn't get jobs in the private sector. They also have job security for life. This encourages the worst in government employees, attracting the laziest and least skilled among the working populace.

    that's a stunningly ignorant remark...
    however stupid the actions of governments may seem, it takes an awful lot of effort to get elected (system of checks and balances...?), particularly to the higher echelons of government.
    i don't know about canada, but here in ireland, most of the members of our government are barristers or financiers or any one of hundreds of highly trained professions. yes, there are one or two wildcards, but that's the nature of a democracy!
    Insightful? Flamebait...

    --
    and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
  32. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
    In a company I once worked for was a rather nice fellow who worked in the Accounts Payable department. It was discovered that he would have checks issued for as many times as an invoice arrived. Apparently some vendors noticed this and items were paid for as many as 4 times. That they knew what was going on and didn't report it back suggests ethics is a broad problem. Many refused to return the money once it was revealed they had collected multiple times.
    Reminds me of that jewish joke:

    Pappa, what is "business ethics"???

    Oh, my son, this is a very important concept. Hmmm, let's see. Suppose a customer left the store and dropped a $20 bill on the floor and did not notice. This is when business ethics comes into play: should you tell your partner or not???

  33. even large companies.... by adamfranco · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then."

    Enron anyone?

    --
    "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
  34. Simpsons time by irokie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i'm sorry to fire you apu, but we need to use you as a scapegoat or... sacrificial lamb...

    uh-huh, and if i could obtain for you these creatures...?

    --
    and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
  35. Re:Fraud? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elected officials are the smallest minority of government workers. Most employees are lifetime workers who got in at age 18 and retire at 65 with their government pension. The process to remove them is long and rife with opposition from the government worker unions.

    The people making mistakes in accounting aren't the "barristers or financiers". They are the pimple-faced kid who couldn't join the military because his eyesight wasn't good enough.

  36. That could go the other way. by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    Here's another scenario, that doesn't bash the government:

    "Hmm, so HP is a very smart company. With the best and brightest minds. Who have a big interest in making their company money.

    Well, looks like those bright, intelligent employees found a good way of making money for the company! Take it from the government!

    Bet the guy that thought of that is sitting on a promotion and vacation time in the Bahamas..."

    Just because you're intelligent, doesn't mean you have morals.

    I think we should all wait on this one to see what the investigation shows, before jumping to conclusions.

    1. Re:That could go the other way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't mean to say that we have to wait until the investigation is completed to jump to the conclusion that the government is staffed by incompetent people do you? Jeez, how kind are you?!

  37. Recursive court case? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gov: We want our money back for the stuff you didn't deliver.

    HP: It is too late. You waited too long to ask.

    Gov: But we didn't have the software and servers to track stuff, and so didn't know fast enough.

    HP: Well, why didn't you get such a computer system?

    Gov: Because you haven't delivered it yet.

    1. Re:Recursive court case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very funny

    2. Re:Recursive court case? by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      sadly, this kind of thing probably happens all the time, heh

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
  38. $160 Million ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that the entire DND budget?

  39. obligatory response on cue by Jonathan+Quince · · Score: 0, Troll

    Blame Canada!

    --
    Microsoft Windows is, fittingly, the official Desktop OS of Olig
  40. Maybe HP is a reseller by josteos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe HP is now reselling Software Assaurance to the DND?

    In which case, its upgrade protection, not outright theft. Oh, wait.....

    --
    Save the Music; Save the World at http://www.TuneTriever.com (Our latest Android game)
    1. Re:Maybe HP is a reseller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, no, you see...I haven't heard the term for awhile, but I suppose it applies to hardware as well as software...it's vaporware...=)

  41. An interesting difference-Ring around the nosie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm not so concerned about the PM being bought. I'm concerned about those around him having a hell of a lot of power, and being basically unaccountable to the public between elections. This is a recurring problem in Canadian government (remember Mulroney?)."

    Ashcroft, nuff said.

  42. I'll bet against the DND by Linegod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After 17 years in the DND, I'll bet against the DND in this battle. A Defense WAN ripped off from the Reserves (and then re-implemented incorrectly), Admin Clerks and Truckers in charge of IT resources, zero to none knowledge of networking, an Officer corps that believes sending email means that you are an 'e-business' and a R&D section that wonders why it's so difficult to implement Netbios nationally.

    Top that off with a mentality that everything and everything has to run through either an outside consultant or a 10 year contact with a 'Quebec company' (which only means that they have a place in Quebec to send the cheques), and you have a recipe for disaster.

    HP 1, DND 0.

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    1. Re:I'll bet against the DND by Linegod · · Score: 1

      Man, I am so getting charged for that comment. Hatless dance here I come!

      --
      -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    2. Re:I'll bet against the DND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Distract the hounds from hell - ask them how the Firearms Registry's computer software has cost $750 million to date.

      Other than a day or two of headlines, this has been ignored. $750 million for a fucking database, and the programs to interact with it? That's 7,500 well-paid man-years!

    3. Re:I'll bet against the DND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Vancouver Sun article (c&p'd elsewhere) on Gun Registry software cost overruns.

      http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t= 20548

    4. Re:I'll bet against the DND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you are. My girlfriend works at D&D and showed your comment to everyone at ITSS.

    5. Re:I'll bet against the DND by Linegod · · Score: 1

      D&D? She works for Dungeons & Dragons?

      --
      -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    6. Re:I'll bet against the DND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her job is to cast magic missile at the darkness.

  43. Re:Fraud? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear sir,

    You obviously have never worked at HP in the last 10 years, unless you are one of their lamest employees. As lame as that would make you, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are merely naive and have not worked there recently.

    After working at different HP sites as a contractor, I can tell you that HP is the most wasteful, dishonest place I've ever seen, far worse than the dotcoms or the government workplaces in which I've worked. At least a quarter of the HP employees are worthless, even for government work. Unless you are one of the lamest 25 percent, I can't imagine that you could've worked there and still say such glowing things.

    The threat of termination almost never hangs above the heads of HP employees. That's why they have "voluntary" salary reductions; to keep everyone employed even in this labor market. In fact, I once had an HP manager tell me "we don't terminate" in response to my subtle suggestion that a chronically destructive and disruptive employee be let go or transferred.

    The interview process you laud is a bunch of red tape intended to look rigorous. The candidate has often already been chosen by a crony.

    Yes, HP does have some very good workers. Unfortunately, they are not that common and are surrounded by clowns. Perhaps you mistook today's HP for Intel or for the HP of years ago.

    Ranting Sincerely,

    AC

  44. Wait a minute... by Jonathan+Quince · · Score: 1

    Who gave Canada a Department of National Defence?

    --
    Microsoft Windows is, fittingly, the official Desktop OS of Olig
    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is who took it away - we used to have an effective military.

    2. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WW2, the English sent them to the front lines and they never stood a chance.

      Mind you, this was long before the US ever considered entering the war.

      -B

    3. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada pretty much invented modern military tactics in WWI. Everyone else was just going "over the top" and getting wasted by machine guns. In WWII the Canadians were also an effective fighting force - just fewer troops because we were/are a less populous country. But we sent a huge percentage of our population to fight.

    4. Re:Wait a minute... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      and why would you need one anyway? You have the U.S. to defend you.

    5. Re:Wait a minute... by Keith+McClary · · Score: 2, Funny

      and why would you need one anyway? You have the U.S. to defend you.


      And what was the US doing last time Canada was invaded?

      (tricky historical question)

    6. Re:Wait a minute... by RoundTop-VJAS · · Score: 1
      Simple, they were the ones invading.

      And we went back and torched the white house. Go canucks!

      I live in Canada

      --
      RoundTop

    7. Re:Wait a minute... by supafly613 · · Score: 1

      Gettin' beat down by the Canadians :)

      --
      - - - "Some people hate the English. I don't. They're just wankers. We, on the other hand, are colonized by wankers."
  45. HP could team up with Conan O'Brien by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Carly Fiorina and Triumph the Dog could be a comdey/larceny duet.

    Sitck it to Canada, guys! Rah, rah, rah, siss, boom and so on!

    What do you mean "How do you tell Carly and Triumph apart?"

    Ooooo! POW!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  46. Re:Fraud? Really? by irokie · · Score: 1

    why yes, let's give this "pimple-faced kid who couldn't join the military because his eyesight wasn't good enough" the authority to sign off on 160 million dollars...

    i accept your point, but look at the context.

    --
    and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
  47. Re:Fraud? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The government is made up of people who couldn't get jobs in the private sector. They also have job security for life. This encourages the worst in government employees, attracting the laziest and least skilled among the working populace. HP is known as a very smart company. Its employees are all selected through an interview process designed to select the best and brightest minds." ..And then they're outsourced to India.

    Get the fuck off my screen. HP's CEO has been on record, several times, saying she plans on "Outsourcing as many jobs to India as possible."

    Now kindly shut the fuck up. The best of HP left the company last year after the Compaq merger. Get used to it.

  48. Re:Fraud? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple slipped decimal points and you can 'lose' a lot of money. For all we know, this could be a single order of magnitude error.

  49. Why do the need it? by tec27 · · Score: 0

    And can someone tell me why exactly the Canadian Department of National Defence would need $160,000 dollars in the first place? I mean, what would they do with it?

    1. Re:Why do the need it? by tec27 · · Score: 0

      Its Canada.

  50. Coverage of this story on CBC and Radio-Canada by saforrest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the The CBC article about this story, and here's the

    Radio-Canada story (in French, of course).

    By the way, I'm quite impressed with Radio-Canada's record at scooping its English equivalent. This story was available on src.ca a good few hours before it was on CBC. A good excuse to practise my French.

    1. Re:Coverage of this story on CBC and Radio-Canada by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they have far more experience with fraud in Quebec. :^P

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Coverage of this story on CBC and Radio-Canada by silvaran · · Score: 1

      I found a few rather interesting things in the CBC article worth mentioning:

      Hewlett-Packard said it was asked by National Defence to manage a group of suppliers and often the nature of the work of these sub-contractors was kept secret from the company.

      And then later on down the article:

      [...]the government released a letter to Hewlett Packard saying the company was responsible for checking that sub-contractors were doing the work they were being paid for.

      A bit of a contradiction. The DND kept the work details of the sub-contractors from HP, and yet claims that HP has to make sure the sub-contractors actually do the work?

      Also:

      One employee of National Defence has been fired[...] the role of departmental supervisors is also being investigated.

      So if I were on the DND's side, they fired this employee why... because he was in kahoots with HP?

  51. As a canadian... by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 0

    My biggest problem is the fact that they got caught. I am not naive enough to know that the gov. employees are not taking kickbacks. I feel cheated in that these people are not smart enough to not get caught. This not only shows the corruption but the stupidity.

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
  52. HP is innocent! by teledyne · · Score: 0

    Oh, the Canadians got what they wanted, they just purhcased 160M in intellectual property!

  53. Compaq Canada - RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The alleged fraud took place under the watch of Compaq Canada. HP just inherited it when they acquired Compaq.

    1. Re:Compaq Canada - RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did RTFA, you fucktard. Compaq Canada is now the legal entity HP Canada. For better or worse, HP inherited all the shit generated by Compaq. So any fraud committed by Compaq is now a fraud committed by HP. Sorry to ruin your day.

  54. Re:Fraud? Really? by TykeClone · · Score: 1

    Dude - I don't think the elected officials are the ones he's talking about. Buereaucrats are.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  55. Damn... by routerwhore · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's a lot of canoes...

  56. Golden toilet seats? by mveloso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A closer reading of the article shows something odd:

    HP suggested that the dispute stems from a defense department request for the company to process invoices for suppliers, whose work HP knew little about.

    "DND's instructions to HP were to process invoices for these suppliers, although the nature of the work being performed was, in many instances, never disclosed by DND," HP said in a statement.

    This implies that its a black billing project that government auditors stumbled onto. Black billing (I'm not sure what the real term is) is when you fund stuff off-budget by inflating other parts of your budget.

    The $500 toilet seats back in the day weren't really $500, it's just some other government agency with an acronym as its name was getting $450 of that. This sounds like the same kind of thing...

    1. Re:Golden toilet seats? by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 1

      We know where area 51 is down south, where is area 51a?

    2. Re:Golden toilet seats? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Black billing (I'm not sure what the real term is) is when you fund stuff off-budget by inflating other parts of your budget.

      I used to work as a management consultant at a subsidiary of a holding company that owned many media and advertising business. It's called the "champagne and flowers" account, since, as every knows, "creative" people get through a lot of champagne and flowers, and how're you going to audit that? But if you needed funding for pretty much anything, that was where to get it. Other companies call it the "investor relations" account.

  57. Are you pondering what I'm pondering... by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Carly Fiorina becomes Martha Stewart's cell mate, can we expect some tasteful lavendar-scented gingham-pattern HP boxes in the near future?

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    1. Re:Are you pondering what I'm pondering... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Oh dear god, please expunge the "women in prison" scenes that just flashed through my mind. Use a brillo pad, and some goof off if you have to...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  58. Holy Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's gotta be like 99% of the Canadian military budget! How the hell are they going to pay to continually repair their broken-ass Sea-Kings?

  59. Flamebait, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot really needs to tighten up on who's allowed to moderate. This is getting more ridiculous everyday.

    1. Re:Flamebait, eh? by pholower · · Score: 1

      Thank you

      --
      -- johntracy.com, because everybody else is wrong.
  60. top of the food chain by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then"

    Large companies are above nothing, but they don't commit fraud - the people who work there do. The bigger the company, the less accountable anyone usually is, especially in the billing bureaucracy (ironically staffed by "accountants"). And the bigger the company, the more valuable the "mistakes" which can be pulled off, and accumulated. When I worked for Northern Telecom in Toronto, they failed to pay my tiny consulting company over C$50K, out of C$300K, that they owed us for over 6 months (after the latest allowed pay date). They wasted $Ks of our management's otherwise billable time in the 1990s bubble, making us chase their accounts-payable people around all of North America. And since their bureaucracy was so distributed, no one cared if we stopped working on our deadline until they paid us, so we would just have lost the gig and any leverage on getting paid. To see how consistent this is, consider that from the first week on the project there were career NorTel managers, helpfully reminding me that NorTel commonly pulled that kind of crap, and kept the $Ms in interest on late payments, as part of their profitability. And that was the pattern of most of the larger corporations we had as clients. Smaller companies' billing problems could be dealt with directly, with decisions made by a single person, so turnaround could be swift. Imagine how long it took the Federal Canadian and Ontario Provincial governments to pay us the $10Ks they owed us: years.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  61. Insightful My Ass... by windside · · Score: 2, Informative

    "It is very clear that it is going to take all of the actions to recover the monies," Prime Minister Paul Martin told reporters after a cabinet meeting. "I've met with [Defence Minister] Mr. Pratt. He's been in contact with the authorities and we will be doing everything we can."

    That's the only quotation in the article attributed to PM Paul Martin. Unless I'm really missing something, it's fairly benign and not the least bit libelous.

    I have two bits of advice for you, Mr. Gary:

    1. Read the fucking article.
    2. Realize that not every decision or assertion made in Canada is made by our PM. I'm assuming that you do realize that Canada is quite a large country - our parliament contains 301 seats that are filled by asses of people who are *constantly* searching for a way to get into the news.

    --
    ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
    Churchill
    1. Re:Insightful My Ass... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      2. Realize that not every decision or assertion made in Canada is made by our PM. I'm assuming that you do realize that Canada is quite a large country - our parliament contains 301 seats that are filled by asses of people who are *constantly* searching for a way to get into the news.

      Most of the outrageous and stupid claims made by the US federal government, however, come from Bush Jr., so it's a reasonable analogy to draw.

  62. Tried and Convicted by Slashdot Story Poster by uberchicken · · Score: 2, Interesting
    even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then

    Have they been convicted of fraud then? You're sure this isn't a mistake, incompetence, whatever? It really is fraud?

    What brilliant insight allowed you to interpret an accusation as proof that "a little fraud" took place?

    1. Re:Tried and Convicted by Slashdot Story Poster by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Accounting mistakes are fraud with or without intent. At least that's what I understand of case law.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Tried and Convicted by Slashdot Story Poster by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Who convicts companies anymore? The standard line we see in news stories is "company XXXXXX settled class-action lawsuit from YYYYYY organization while admitting no wrongdoing". I just read about Cooper Tire about an hour ago doing exactly that.

      Fraud is for the little guy. Businesses just "settle" ... they settle with individuals, organizations and even governments.

      There's your free clue.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    3. Re:Tried and Convicted by Slashdot Story Poster by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      What brilliant insight allowed you to interpret an accusation as proof that "a little fraud" took place?

      Journalistic integrity... NOT!

  63. mod parent up! by ShallowThroat · · Score: 0

    come on mods, have a sense of humor. we canadians do, i found this hilarious.

    --
    The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
  64. NDP. by Trillan · · Score: 1

    The NDP specialize in spending a lot more money than they have. We just got rid of them in BC last election, and they were without a doubt the worst thing to ever happen to BC. We're now so deep in debt that we can only see the light from above for two minutes around noon. What's sad is that there is probably enough of a split in the vote that they'll get in again next election.

    There is absolutely no hope for Canadian politics.

    1. Re:NDP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this comment is soooooo full of misinformation.

      >The NDP specialize in spending a lot more money than they have.

      Wrong (and its always been wrong). Tommy Douglas the NDP premier of the province of Saskatchewan in the 40s and 50s delivered 17 balanced budgets in a row (that's 17) *and* introduced province-wide medicare, a first in the country (it was later adopted federally).

      The astronomical level of debt here in B.C. was *not* created by the NDP. The current right-wing government came to power promising huge tax cuts "that would pay for themselves". They cut taxes all right--but guess what, you guessed it--the tax cuts didn't pay for themselves. Result: the highest debt in the province's history--courtesy of the right-wing not those wacko left-wing socialists. (The American parallel would be the Reagan years).

      The only question is how soon we can get these incompetents out of power before they destroy B.C., the fairest province in Canada.

    2. Re:NDP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the Sask NDP was smart enough to create a rainy-day fund to draw upon in times of deficit.

      Oh, wait, that never existed. Every time we draw upon it we go further into debt...

    3. Re:NDP. by Locutus233 · · Score: 1

      Unlike like the NDP the BC Liberals last budget had the highest amount of spending and debt in BC history. The only way the province was able to balance the books was to use the goverment credit card to transfer some of the spending onto the goverment credit card. I should also point out that the BC Liberals are not the same as the federal Liberals.

      It should also be noted that the BC Liberals are great at burning money for example selling the Fast cats at less then 20 million dollars when it cost over 300 million to build them. The constant intrest in spliting up BC Hydro which was/is a cash cow for the BC Goverment.

      Under the BC Liberals spending in BC has grown and taxes have been cut. I have yet to see any of this new prosperity and more money in my pocket. The fact of the matter is the BC goverment has its balls in a vice and the public unions in this province are constantly tightning that vice. Often the unions in this province often have very narrow minded vision. This explains many of the recent layoffs and turning to outsourcing in many hospital and health services. The same thing happened many years ago with the ministry of highways.

    4. Re:NDP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rainy day funds aren't smart, even the federal Liberals have one...

    5. Re:NDP. by Trillan · · Score: 1

      True, they sold the fast ferries for $20 million when it cost $300 million to build them. But they needed $80 million in repairs and were unsuitable even once repaired. The NDP never did any kind of study on their suitability for the run before having them built. So you can blame the NDP for the loss.

    6. Re:NDP. by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      Well, let's not go too far and say that 'spending money they don't have' is soley NDP trait.

      If I remember the 80's (and I do - I was able to vote back then) the PC's were elected on the Mulroney promise to cut the deficit and debt. 9 years later they turned out to be the government that ran the BIGGEST deficit in the history of Canada. And after 8 years of the good ole PCs in Ontario, lo and behold, a $6.5 BILLION deficit from the party the claimed to be running surpluses, even after the defict was discovered by the new Liberal government (who, ironically did the same thing to Bob Rae's NDP back in 1990...).

      No buddy, 'spending lots of money they don't have' is specialization of every political party (even GWB in the States). The difference is, the NDP choose to spend that money on things like education and health care, rather that corruption (our present Liberal government) or bailing out failed banks owned by thier friends (Mulroney) and other frivoulous things most average people don't care about.

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  65. Canadian Military History by Jonathan+Quince · · Score: 1
    The question is who took it away - we used to have an effective military.

    Yup. 228 years ago, they beat back Richard Montgomery and Benedict Arnold, killing Montgomery and wounding Arnold in the process.

    And more recently, the Canadians have been a staunch US ally. ;-)

    --
    Microsoft Windows is, fittingly, the official Desktop OS of Olig
    1. Re:Canadian Military History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing that shocks Canadians is to learn that by the end of the second world war, Canada was the world's third strongest world power. More a matter of the others getting beaten down, but still...

  66. Re:$160 million by kid-noodle · · Score: 1

    You've got $121,406,519.36 going spare.. And you post on slashdot.

    Mr. Gates, is that you?

    --
    fortune -o
  67. Re:Pardon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Practise is valid English, if you use British (AKA non-US) English spellings.

  68. Actually, to be fair... by Trillan · · Score: 1

    Pickton was probably the worst thing to ever happen to BC. And the blame for him not being caught goes to the Vancouver police, not the province or federal governments.

  69. Dude.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you've got no idea.

    Check out Frontline and this is just really about one small segment of fraud when companies, like Haliburton of course, use fake leases to defraud the government of literally billions of dollars on individual transactions. The amount of discrepency in the Haliburton fuel probe is so small that that probably is an oversight. When they steal they go much bigger. Personally everyone who participated in such transactions should be hung as traitors, but that's me.

    Corporations are paying about half in corporate taxes now as they had from 1950 to 2000. The 2000 is something of a coincidence because it just took that long to catch on because some were worried they'd get caught. The Republican congress did a good job taking care of that though.

    Most of the very-rich people are using their capital to steal everyone elses capital.

  70. HP CEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't put it past Fiorina.

  71. The Can. gov't defrauded the Can. gov't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/s tory.html?id=2ff03208-134b-4296-917b-8a1c09946233

  72. um... by TeknoTurd · · Score: 0

    ...hopefully

    --
    Erin Go Bragh!
  73. Re:Fraud? Really? by charlesnadeau · · Score: 1

    Wrong! When I graduated, I had job offers from the public and the private sector. I choose the public because it meant working for the Department of Foreign Services and International Trade. Since I got hired I got to live & work in 2 countries and visit 20+ other on business trip. The salary is good and the benefits are not that bad. And I work only 40-hours/week and get compensatory time for my overtime. I don't know a lot of companies with coditions like these...
    I have friends at Nortel, JDS and Alcatel. They have much better pay but they work long hours in cubicule and don't get to see much outside their company.
    I do not regret my choice. I boils down with quality of life.

  74. CDN Government by TigerDawn · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a CDN, I would go with the followng description of the assumption:

    DND: We want a program to do this. We will pay yu 160,000,000.
    HP: Okay, sounds good...
    DND: Delivery Day: This is not what I ordered. Your software is not psychic, and I need something that will do my thinking for me.
    HP: Uh huh....
    DND: We are mental rejects so will make this a issue. Definition of CDN Government.

    At least the CDN Government did not bribe HP Execs for support in a election. Unlike certain unnamed Quebec companies.

    Summary,
    DND: Mentally Challenged
    HP: Thanks for your business. Plz come again.

    --
    Internet Retail spaces are wonderful. Get over it!
    1. Re:CDN Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to playing Dungeons & Dragons, especially since you have a D&D initials fetish.

    2. Re:CDN Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft vs The World. Microsoft is arrogant enough to think it will win.

      So is the US

  75. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Monkelectric · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    can I have her #? j/k, sorry to hear that :)

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  76. Who do we have to fear? by Mistlefoot · · Score: 1

    Quiet probably we have the US to fear.

    And this isn't an I hate th US post. Rather, the US would feel compelled to protect their neighbour against any foreign invader.

    If, however, at some point in the future, our Great Protector needed something we had badly enough, they would probably end up with it, through pressure or other means.

    Either way our military is more for show in the form of 'doing our part' than as any real World force.

  77. Should be a poll (possibly OT) by modder · · Score: 2, Informative

    There should be a poll, which big software/tech/IT company has the largest reputation for being unethical.
    While I'm pretty sure I know who would finish first given sentiments around here, I'm curious about the others rankings.

  78. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by cybergrue · · Score: 3, Informative
    How is it that the government spent $160-million, got nothing in return and no one noticed?

    DND (Department of National Defence) had a problem a few years back with their accounting system, and ended up paying late charges on almost all invoices because they couldn't process them in time. They have since claimed to have fixed this problem It may be that the guys in DND fixed that problem by not doing enough checking of the accounts before paying the invoice.
    Want to know how bad the account is over at DND. The other defence scandle this week involved some solders on training who had their daily food allowances reduced retroactivly by 2/3. Several of them had to take out loans to repay the money.

  79. Re:Pardon by saforrest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope, I'd suggest you practice your English :-)

    Well, as might have been evident from my post :), I'm a Canadian.

    Along with a monarch and a parliamentary system, we inherited mostly British spellings, which includes 'practise' as the verb and 'practice' as the noun.

    Similarly, I can license my code under the GNU General Public Licence.

  80. Re:Fraud? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hours you work is inversely proportional to how efficiently you work...

    For the record I work in one of those companies you name and have worked 5 day overtime over my regular hours. I have very good reviews for the past few years.

  81. This is a first! by Viking5150 · · Score: 0

    In all of this it is clear that the Government can lose track of a lot of money easily...

    The Canadian Gov't losing track of money? This must be a first, right? ;-)

  82. Another ethical dilemma by boudie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, as a Canadian taxpayer, I have to decide whether I'm being hornswaggled by the Canadian government or the Hewlett-Packard corporation. That is a tough call. I am feeling mighty tender after the numerous scandals which have come to light recently, so I guess it doesn't make much difference. When I read last summer that the CEO of H-P (Ms. Fiorentino?) was paid in excess of $100 million my thought was that you don't make that much money for doing anything honest. That's a lot of money to misplace though, and I'm guessing a lot more to find it.

  83. HP is investigating this themselves by codemachine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out the CBC story about this scandal. HP claims that the Canadian government is actually a victim of fraud from someone in the DND. Given the other scandals in this government, I wouldn't be all that shocked.

  84. Well Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is nothing new it seems in the current age of the canadian goverment. I sure hope that Mr. Martin calls an election soon.

  85. HP dishonest? by Alcoholist · · Score: 1
    This is the Hewlett Packard company after all. Perhaps the DND made the mistake of ordering a couple of new workstations for a department somewhere.


    This is the same company that charges forty-five bucks for one dollar of printer ink.

    --
    Bibo Ergo Sum.
  86. I gotta a better one READ THIS by Brigadier · · Score: 3, Informative



    Unamed city in CA, having a unamed noise program that spends over 20 million a year. pays consultant (large nation wide acoustic company) to prepare plans. When the city realizes the plans are riddled with errors and confronts the consultant, the consultant request additional funds because QC. was not a part of their contract. Not only that the contract that the consultant has with the city is time & materials. the consultant by the way is currently requesting more funds to complete the project that they ( a year ago) signed a contract for saying they woudl complete. Yes this is all true and my grammer sucks. But This is happening right now in a Southern CA city near you. moral of the story, get involved with your local municipality and find where your tax dollars are going. Administration doesnt' give a damn if the tax payers dont give a damn

    1. Re:I gotta a better one READ THIS by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Administration doesnt' give a damn if the tax payers dont give a damn

      I remember when I thought 'Audit' was a bad thing. After watching audits uncover all kinds of screw-ups at at former employer, I learned they are a good thing, a very good thing. Particularly when the results are made public or brought to the attention of share holders. (Unless your auditor was Arthur Anderson, then it could be lies.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:I gotta a better one READ THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "my grammer sucks"

      haha! yea, it does! :)

    3. Re:I gotta a better one READ THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in so cali and would like to know what city. Why didnt you refrain form naming? Do you have any connections with the city or something?

    4. Re:I gotta a better one READ THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California?
      I tough Canada would make more sense, like QC mean Quebec...

      but i don't know what he said about QC.

    5. Re:I gotta a better one READ THIS by Brigadier · · Score: 1

      QC = Quality Control as far as which city I didn't post the info because it would be unprofedessional. This is just an example of something that happens all over america.

  87. Re:Fraud? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, from my experience working with the Canadian federal government, it is a stunningly accurate remark.

    I would peg the signal to noise ratio at about 1/5.

    Even if they don't start out useless, they soon get that way because there is no incentive for them to do their job. Promotion is not based on their job skills, but on a series of tests, mostly about administration/beauracracy. The process is such that people who don't do their normal jobs, through pure laziness or sheer incompentence, have lots of work time to prepare for them (we are talking weeks, if not months) while the few who do their jobs don't have time to prepare for them. So who ends up getting promoted? The very people who don't know what they are doing in the first place. This cycle continues until all the way up through the management chain.

    People who are competent and hardworking are eventually so worn down by having to do the work of the people who are not, that eventually they give up and become like the rest.

    Don't even get me started on the blatant corruption, fundamental lack of respect for taxpayers money, and nepotism. Ever wonder why there are so many federal employees with the same last name? There are entire families in the government, all hired by relatives. And has already been mentioned, once you are in there, they cannot get rid of you.

    It's worse than you think.

  88. Only a little fraud? by bi_boy · · Score: 1

    I thought fraud was a big corporations business?

    --
    Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
  89. Phony! by Mudillo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Come on, people, this is a hoax. Canadian Deparment of DEFENSE? Not to mention that semiconductors don't even exist as matter at the temperatures commonly found in Canada.

  90. Re:Pardon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nope, I'd suggest you practice your English :-)

    He's practised it enough already, it seems. As the mnemonic goes, "is" is a verb, "ice" is a noun.

  91. The Canadian Military Budget by konmaskisin · · Score: 1

    is about 12 billion $

    $12,000,000,000.00
    $___160,000.000.00__

  92. I think the record will clearly show by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    That two ink cartridges were, in fact, delivered.

    Hey what do you want for $161 million?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:I think the record will clearly show by turgid · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. That $161 million is to give to uncle Bill from Carly for the Windows licenses that the Canadians might possibly need to have at some point in the nest 100 years just in case all of their citezens need to use it at some point and we wouldn't want them to be pirates now would be and if there is even the remote possiblity that they may use or access any Microsoft system or software or information or anything they'd better pay for it up front just in case or Bill will get angry and all of Canada will have to go to jail for being criminals.

  93. Who's your daddy now, Carly? by anonymousman77 · · Score: 1

    Carly Fiorina--

    You said it's no longer an American's right to have a good job. Guess what, lady? It's no longer your right to skee-roo the taxpayers out of millions of bucks so you can have a fat salary.

  94. Re:Yeah, but they deserved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're mistaking Canadians for Minnesotans

  95. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Felinoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I got invoiced for Magazines I never order and of course never receaved.
    I tossed it in the trash.
    Later a dept collection agentcy shows up.

    Now I'm having to go to cort to dispute the bill.

    Multi billing is fraud but it's up to the guy signing the checks to catch it.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  96. Its always nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always nice when people don't let facts get in the way of propaganda.

  97. May not be HP doing is this case. by baomike · · Score: 1

    More info needed , it could be HP got made onto a bag holder.
    The Air Farce with have the real scoop on Friday.

  98. Surprised no other canadians mentioned this... by Lord+Haha · · Score: 1

    But this is not the 1st case of hundreds of millions of dollars going "missing", Question is with this one is Martin (current Prime Minister, former Finance) Responsible or is Chretien(former PM)/Manley(was Finance Minister after Martin) or is this another Art Eggleton matter(he already was involved and convicted on abuse of government funds - losing funds)?
    A good reference to the other current scandal though: Advertising Scandal

  99. Summary of the situation... by brucmack · · Score: 1

    Many of the comments here are wondering how exactly this happened.

    From what I've read and seen on the news, it seems that people inside the DND were sending false invoices. These invoices were met with billings by HP and subsequent payments from the DND.

    Basically, the government believes that HP either knew about the false invoices or should have known about them, because they were in fact billings for work that never happened. If HP is really completely innocent and nobody knew, it can still be considered as wrong, because they were sending bills for nothing.

    1. Re:Summary of the situation... by Sjobeck · · Score: 1

      stealing or ignorant, take your pick, which is better?

  100. PM Martin by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    Yeah, a industry giant that puts his money into the caymans, so that he dont pay taxes to his own country is so much better than Bush.

    It seams now that he got into office by similar ways as Bush (preventing supporters of his rival from voting).
    I surely hope that Copps wins her appeal and becomes PM. While she isnt perfect, at least she does pay taxes.

    Oh, and because even Paul saw that a PM that is not paying taxes is a bit off, he decide to fix the problem.
    But instead of transferring his money back to Canada and pay taxes (making an example for other companies), he decided to give the company to his sons.

    Kind of reminds a quote from DeBruler :
    "Computer science is the discipline that believes all problems can be solved with one more layer of indirection."
    Seams that it applies to political moral to.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:PM Martin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I surely hope that Copps wins her appeal and becomes PM. While she isnt perfect, at least she does pay taxes.

      You can't be serious?! Copps as PM? That wouldn't be a good thing.

    2. Re:PM Martin by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

      You can't be serious?! Copps as PM? That wouldn't be a good thing.

      I never said it would be good. I said it would be better than Martin.

      Martin stole, through tax avoidance, billions of dollars that belong morally to Canada, even before he became PM. Can you trust or even only expect him to respect the interest of the country now, while he always put his personal interest first in the past?

      Finally, if Copps is that unpopular, the liberals might loose the election and this might be good. It's never healthy if a party holds the power for too long.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    3. Re:PM Martin by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't know the details of what you are talking about but what Martin did is ok. There is a word for it: capitalism. Capitalism calls for free markets and easy transfer of capital. If someone wants to stash all their money in Monaco, or Bahamas, or whatever, that is not the person's fault. If there is a fault, it's with the system--not the person.

      Everyone who is wealthy (obviously you and I are not) does it. Take the Conservative candidate Stronach's family. Her father avoids paying taxes by living in (I think) Switzerland. Is that immoral? Not really. That's the rules. If you don't like it, change it. The fault is with the system...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    4. Re:PM Martin by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

      I clearly reject the fact that just because something is legal it is "ok" and "not immoral".

      And to become PM, you should have a higher moral than the common CEO.

      Granted, Martin acted according to the law.
      The system permits people to be extremly selfish, even against the interest of their country.

      In theory, you pay taxes for the infrastructure the governement provides. By profitting from the canadian infrastructure, but hiding his profits from the canadian governement, he morally stole something from the canadian people.

      As the owner of his company he had to choose if he wanted to maximise his personal fortune, or give his country a just part of his profits.

      I dont say he should be punished for what he did.
      But I say he shouldnt become PM either.

      There is the huge conflict of interest : the best for Canada would be to pass laws that stop or at least restrain this tax avoidance. The best for his company would be to pass laws who make it even easier.
      He has choosen the benefit of his company over the benefit of his country in the past.
      I dont think that suddenly, by being nominated PM, he turns into a selfless, highly moral human that put's Canada's interests over his own.

      Oh, and it's not capitalism either. Capitalism is all about free market. Subventions disturb the market and are therefor bad.
      But allowing big companies to escape taxes while providing them with the same infrastructure is a form of hidden subventions and therefor a Bad Thing even in liberal theory.

      The system that we have currently isnt capitalism. The corporated world demands (and gets :( ) lower taxes, less social system, but as soon as you touch their subventions, they cry foul!
      For example, while cutting social expenses, Bush increased the subvention of the agriculture.

      The current system is being transformed into a system where people are taxed and the money is given through subventions to corporations.
      I dont call this capitalism, I'd call it corporalism and it cannot work as it is deflationists in nature, but we will learn this soon enough the hard way.

      Oh, and about changing the system : The best position to change the system is PM. So when we put someone on this post that has used every possibility the system offers him for his personal gain, do you expect the system to change for the better?

      And about Stronach's : I have the similar problems with her that I have with Martin. Except that she isnt PM yet.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    5. Re:PM Martin by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      And to become PM, you should have a higher moral than the common CEO.

      Since when? Not really... To start with, nearly all politicians are liars. They break their promises all the time. This pretty much means that they cannot have any high moral ground. A prime minister is just a politician that has more power than others.

      In theory, you pay taxes for the infrastructure the governement provides. By profitting from the canadian infrastructure, but hiding his profits from the canadian governement, he morally stole something from the canadian people.

      He didn't HIDE his profits. He just minimized paying taxes. Find me one corporation or business that doesn't do this. Even YOU have probably done this. The only difference, however, is that you cannot afford to stash your account in some bank in a far-away country. Wealthy people and corporations can. Private businesses spend millions trying to avoid paying taxes and using all the loopholes. This is pretty much the norm. Ask any accountant or financial officer in a corporation.

      As the owner of his company he had to choose if he wanted to maximise his personal fortune, or give his country a just part of his profits.

      Everyone, except some truly altruistic people, will maximize their personal wealth. It is not reasonable to expect the prime minister to not do something that others take for granted.

      There is the huge conflict of interest : the best for Canada would be to pass laws that stop or at least restrain this tax avoidance. The best for his company would be to pass laws who make it even easier.

      There are FAR WORSE things than that. Take Bush for instance. He has pretty much handed his friends in the oil industry whatever they wanted. Bush has weakened all sorts of environmental regulations (Cheney even made up his policy by consulting oil executives only). Don't expect the politicians to do anything to hurt themselves.

      Oh, and it's not capitalism either. Capitalism is all about free market. Subventions disturb the market and are therefor bad. But allowing big companies to escape taxes while providing them with the same infrastructure is a form of hidden subventions and therefor a Bad Thing even in liberal theory.

      No, it's capitalism all right. Capitalism calls for lowering of taxes so I don't know where you get the idea that "escaping" taxes was bad thing. In fact, (pure) capitalism calls for aboslishment of all corporate taxes. In any case, I don't see anything insidious or hidden happening (you do).

      The system that we have currently isnt capitalism. The corporated world demands (and gets :( ) lower taxes, less social system, but as soon as you touch their subventions, they cry foul!

      My theory is that capitalism will result in corporations ruling the world. So far I seem to be right...

      After saying all that, I can only conclude one thing. You hold the prime minister's position in high regard. In contrast, I don't. My philosophy is 'expect the worst when it comes to econopolitics'. This goes for the PM or anyone else...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  101. What the story forgot to mention.... by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    What the story forgot to mention is that the DND did actually receive something for the $160 million...
    ....A couple Microsoft "Software Assurance" licensing agreements.
    So technically they got something from HP and recieved nothing all at once.

  102. Did HP Defraud DND? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You had better be damn careful who you accuse of fraud. Based on CBC's news coverage this evening, both sides agree that an employee of HP along with up to 6 sub contractors billed for work that was never done. HP denies that it had any official knowledge of what was happening. The goverment apparently believes them. The RCMP has been called in for a criminal investigation (seemingly targetted at the individuals involved). I don't think either side disputes what happened. It's just that the government claims that as a matter of civil law, HP is on the hook for the cash. HP, of course disagrees. I'm sure we'll see this in court. However, I don't think anyone claims that HP, as an enitity, did *anything* illegal. One of it's employees did.

    I don't think you can go around saying that HP are a bunch of crooks. Especially when the evidence seems to point to the contrary. This is a pretty public forum. IANAL, but my understanding is that you could be liabel for damages done to the company's reputation...

  103. Typical Slashdot Hive mentality... by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    Hey Slashdrones... maybe if you'd have stopped popping your zits for two seconds you could've read that HP was only accused of this crime, not guilty. Of course, Slashdrones will believe any story posted, no matter how dumb.

  104. HP looks bad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I work for a supplier to DND, I've been a contractor to DND, I used to work for one of HP's predecessor companies.

    Total dollar wise this has nothing on what they piss away on plain incompetence (for those familar with DND I will invoke CFSSU as a classic example, where on top of the insane waste on the project itself they had to pay Accenture $20M as a penalty for having screwed up the procurement in the first place), but this is much more than that.

    On the government side there is one person fired already and likely to be criminal charges and it will be VERY revealing when we find out who the subcontractor companies are but for HP nee Compaq to claim innocence beggars belief. We sat around the office today and tried to figure out if there would be ANY way my current employer could participate in something like this and figured out that just the stuff we have to do as a US based public company to keep revenue recognition all nice and legal for the SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley should have prevented something like this. There are days I curse the folks who do this stuff because they're a pain in the ass generally but today I was reminded of their value, given how viscously I got raked over the coals recently for doing two days of work without a signed contract because the customer's VP was on vaction and couldn't sign the paperwork the day they wanted me to start I'm amazed how lax Compaq's project controls must have to be to allow this kind of stuff (well actually I'm not, I used to work there I know how bad it was then, I would have thought HP would have fixed some of that. Let's keep in mind that not only has HP been an (giving them the benefit of the doubt, unknowing) agent in this they also certainly added that $160M to their revenue numbers.

  105. See what happens when people get carried away... by olePigeon+(Wik) · · Score: 1


    See what happens when people get carried away with DND? It'll be 3 hours of bickering and we'll never get the adventure started.

    - Gullstaff, Sorcerer of Light.

  106. Don't make me start singing... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    South Park show tunes...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  107. Quebec...? by risings0n · · Score: 1

    ... Then you guys wonder why we want to separate? This stuff is laughable, Mulroney wasn't any better, and Martin will be worse.

    I give half my taxes to a government that spends it to give lucrative contracts to their friends (read: corruption), buy thousands of red and white flags to plague my eyes (read: propaganda) and buy back helicopters of which they cancelled the order 2 years before (read: stupid).

    When I say I'm a Separatist, people either start laughing at me, or just start bashing me. Especially the ones from Ontario. I'm tired of that... Don't we have the CHOICE? Isn't that the definition of DEMOCRACY? Let's face it, you guys need Quebec to pay for all that stuff, and the ones smart enough to realize that want separation. Show us a proof that you want change (NPD). Or we'll just slam the door on our way out.

    On another note, I went to B.C. this summer and the people over there are AWESOME! B.C. and Quebec should separate from Canada to unite and make a new SUPER-COUNTRY! Plus there's the letters B and C in Quebec, so let's just call it that way. British-Columbia sounds a little too british to me ;)

    No hard feelings, I just had to get it off. :)

    1. Re:Quebec...? by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      And you somehow magically think that we're gonna have a different kind of government? No crooked politicians around here? Everything is gonna be fine and dandy? Enough with the wishfull thinking.

    2. Re:Quebec...? by risings0n · · Score: 1

      no, not at all. What I wish is that OUR money stayed in OUR province, to use on OUR priorities.

      I'm not saying Quebec politicians are better, but they can't waste as much since they don't have as much. Also I think if a referendum is ever one, the party that's going to be in power will work his ass out to prove everybody it was worthwhile, not waste it's money on some flags. Okay, maybe _some_, but not zillions of dollars in shady marketing.

  108. Initial Reaction by lamz · · Score: 1

    As a Canadian who reads newspapers, my initial reaction was to blame the Liberal Government 100%, and assume complete innocence on the part of Hewlett-Packard. Whatever HP has done in the past, they have got to be saints compared to the extreme corruption in the Canadian government.

    Damn Liberals, I hate those bastards!

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  109. As I Proud Canuck I must say.. by grub · · Score: 0


    Bahahahahahahahahaha! hilarious!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  110. This makes sense by Eminor · · Score: 1

    We have one cross country highway (the trans-canada, 4,860 miles). We can't even get the funding to make it as good as an interstate highway. We have taxes that are much higher than in America. We have one tenth the population and America has more than 42,000 miles of interstate (nearly ten times the length of the trans-canada).

    So of course we find out that are tax money is being divied out to large corporations through various government departments. Now it all makes sense.

    We are all slaves to capitalism (that goes for Yankies too).

  111. DND is just damn stupid with our money by cyberspyke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a Canadian myself, I have heard many stories from ex-DND employees a few years ago when I was working for a defence contractor in Ottawa that was hiring lots of ex military guys to work on projects. One ex-DND guy once told me a good story that happened a couple of years ago at a DND facility here in Canada. A DND project team wanted to purchase a computer system to do special work and was about 100 000$. They finally got it, tried it and found out it wasn't the right system to do the work they wanted to perform. Instead of returning it back, get a refund from the seller, they just shrank wrapped it, and stored it indefinitely in a DND warehouse to collect dust forever (and not to mention the cost for storage). Then they bought another system for about the same price that was good enough to do the work. WHAT A WASTE OF OUR MONEY! This is only one example but there are TONS of stupid waste like this at DND and I am sure at many other government agencies.

  112. You forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the extra $0.5 mil to provide a French translation to those Girls Gone Wild videos!

  113. MOD PARENT UP by StandardCell · · Score: 1

    Alberta has more oil than Saudi Arabia, but most people don't know that, or the way to get at it conveniently since it is stuck in sand.

  114. What do you expect? by nadolph · · Score: 0

    The government is full of Liberals! Sorry to all you grits out there but i have had enough of the corruption, scandel, and complete abuse of our country. Canada used to be a strong country that I could be proud of but instead its a play i often think of leaving.

    --
    With the moo and the cow and the fish. Minesweeper Record: 7 sec
  115. Canada, HP and some Creative Journalism by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    " In all of this it is clear that the Government can lose track of a lot of money easily and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then."

    Really. And in all of your exaustive research, how did you come to this conclusion? ESP? I mean screw facts, lets skip to assumption of guilt and be done with it. Obviously you know neither party is innocent here. After all, all governments are incompentent and all coporations are crooks, right? Well that's what you just said. Fuck, we should just appoint you to the supreme court since you apparently know who is already innocent and guilty in matters that have barely even been investigated.

    Get real. This is nothing more than "He said/she said" at this point. Sure, somebody is to blame, but I'm fairly confident you don't know a damn thing about it, so go push your opinions off as facts somewhere else. Ain't creative jounalism grand, Michael Moore?

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  116. Don't judge the contract on seats by Stone316 · · Score: 1
    Its very common for corporations to have more Oracle seats than they have employees for a number of reasons. For one, they may have acquired other companies who have Oracle licenses, redundant staff were laid off thus a surplus. One company I was employed with bought quite a few companies and we had at least 20k more seats than employee's. Now, alot of people were in manufacturing and never touched an app that accessed a database.

    Now, thats not the case in California but its also common for sales people to toss in extra seats to sweeten the deal and to account for future growth. Did they pay too much? Looks like it but you can't judge it based on the number of seats, there are many factors. If any of you dealt with tech. sales people I think you'd understand.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  117. And if they find HP not responsible... by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Canada can still easily investigate why HP charges $40 for a printer with a cartridge, yet $50 for a new cartridge. I'm sure they can find that to be against the law somehow... maybe an environmental one.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:And if they find HP not responsible... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

      Well, since the cartridge that comes with the printer only has half the ink of a cartridge that you buy separately, it's only "worth" $25... The other $15 is for their crappy printer, it all works out, in a demented, costly, HP sort of way.

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    2. Re:And if they find HP not responsible... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Easy. They sell the printers for a loss to make it up on the cartridges. They use patent/DCMA to try to make it illegal for anyone to use any other cartridge in the printer.

  118. Re:Canada's coastline by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    Believe it.

    Australia is one really big island.
    Canada has 52,455 really tiny islands.

    Toss in the mainland and you're looking at about 243,792km (151,485 miles) of coast, vs Australia's relatively puny 36,735km (22,826 miles).

  119. I blame both by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    Some people in HP and some in the DND are probably in on this whole fraud.

  120. I don't buy it by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    It's too easy to have a "Misc" account specifically notes as being "for covert operations". There are plenty of organizations that have areas in their budget that have minimal oversight -- I believe that a Congressional board is the only group able to see some CIA fund areas, for example.

    Why would someone go to the effort of mucking around with accounts like this? Especially with civilian contractors obviously involved, I'm much more inclined to blame the good old standard buddy-network-with-corruption solution than an X-Files style far-reaching conspiracy with black ops. Mr. Smith is an old college buddy of Mr. Jones, and Mr. Smith is a high-ranking government official, and manages to shuffle some funds over to Mr. Jones, and gets a kickback from Mr. Jones.

    Granted, money upwards of $100M is pushing one's luck, but I'm sure that there's all kinds of small scale corruption and cronyism all over both business and government.

  121. Re:Pardon by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    I believe "practise" is accepted in US English as an alternate spelling. It is listed on Mirriam-Webster without a "British variant" note.

  122. Big money up north! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Wow. I thought that the US government was awfully vulnerable to vendor fraud, but the Canadian government is definitely trying to compete.

  123. Re:An interesting difference-Ring around the nosie by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Rumsfield.

  124. So many replies, so little understanding by temojen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In order to understand statements about both the Liberals and the Conservatives being like the Republicans, you must look at politics not as a single dimension (left-right), but in two dimensions. There is the economic (left--right or popular--corporate), and the social ( libertarian--authoritarian ).

    For a better explaination of this, see The Political Compass.

    As I see it, the Republicans and the Conservatives are Authoritarian (except for gun control), and economically right-wing (in everything but paying lip-service to the Canada Health Act, in the case of the Conservatives). I base this on the actions of the Reagan, Bush Sr, Mulroney, and Bush Jr administrations, and the public comments of Preston Manning, Stockwell Day, Peter McKay, and the current leadership candidates.

    The Liberals are socially slightly authoritarian (remember, Gay Marraige and Marijuanna decriminalization were decisions by the supreme court, not the Liberal party, and the crackdowns outside the APEC (Vancouver, 1997) and FTAA (Quebec, 2001) conferences).

    Economically under Chretien the Liberals tend to govern right wing, while running for office by making left-leaning promises. In 1993 these were scraping the GST and the FTA. Since they were elected Paul Martin (finance minister through most of Chretien's administration) has kept the GST, while allowing some corporations to defer billions of dollars in taxes.

    Meanwhile Pierre Pettigrew has been negotiating the extremely corporateist NAFTA, FTAA and MAI agreements.

    The Liberals also pay lip-service to the Canada Health Act while strangling funding to health care in poorer provinces.

    Since Paul Martin came to the leadership moderates in the Liberal caucus like Sheila Copps are being forced out. This is very similar to the transformation of the BC Liberal party into a reactionary corporatist elite after it was flooded by disenfranchised Socreds, who elected Gordon Campbel their leader despite him being so right-wing he's even making Socreds uneasy. I actually had a conversation about this issue with Gordon Wilson when he was leader of the now defunct PDA. I suggested he join the NDP; about a week later he did. I doubt it was from my urging, I'm just some schmo who ran into him in the halls of the leg. when I was sightseeing in Victoria.

    Under Bill Clinton, the Democrats tended to govern libertarian and economically centrist, except for negotiating the corporatist FTA, and NAFTA.

    The NDP's official policies tend to be libertarian and left leaning. Party members are mostly libertarian and range on the left-right scale from centrist to quite left. In power in BC (I'm talking about this because of someone who implied the NDP is hated in BC), the NDP had 4 successive administrations (in 3 terms).

    • Mike Harcourt was premier from 1991 to 1995 using a mostly centrist (in both dimensions) style. One notable exception to this was his cuts to welfare coverage, which many of the party supporters saw as an attack on the poorest, and a ploy to pander to the right wing press (the Vancouver Sun and the Vancouver Province, mostly). Reaction to this is part of why Glen Clark's leadership bid was successful (as a return to the party's principles), but not why he left office. He was nearly forced out due to the Liberal party's clamouring over the fictional "fudge-it budget", since proven to have been within GAAP, and the "bingogate" non-scandal, where Hon. MLA Dave Stupich leading the Nanaimo Commonwealth Holdings Society gave some bingo and raffle proceeds to the NDP and the Democrat (the provincial NDP's newsletter). These purposes were expressly in the Society's constitution, and were used by almost every party in the province at the time they occured (1983-1985).
    • Glen Clark was premier from 1996 to 1999. His administration ired the corporatist media conglomerates (mostly the Vancouver Sun, Vancouver Province, and
    1. Re:So many replies, so little understanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah what a sham Cambell's campaign was. Did you read any of the literature he produced for his campaign dipshit? It outlined his plan plain and simple. So did every news story I saw. Face it loser people got what they wanted "anybody but the ndp", it's hardly the liberal's fault that you idiots didn't take the election seriously.

    2. Re:So many replies, so little understanding by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Wow.. did you write all that up? :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  125. Yet soldiers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
  126. Does this mean they actually defrauded the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean M$ actually defrauded the US - Canada has a National Defense?

  127. Why is it not "Defense Canada" by Secrity · · Score: 1

    Why hasn't the Canadian Department of National Defence updated it's name to Defense Canada, like Health Canada and some other agencies have? "Defense Canada" has a much nicer ring to it than "Canadian Department of National Defence".

  128. End of fiscal year by thepeete · · Score: 0

    This is the end of the fiscal year in Canada. This means that the budgets will be coming out soon.

    Now, over the last decade, there has been (from whithin Canada) a concerted effort to made the Canadian Defense look bad in an effort to reduce their budget.

    Add to that the feud between the current prime minister and the former one... It is not a surprise that all of these scandals come out at the same time. The formar prime minister is still pulling some strings and is trying to do as much damage as possible.

    --
    My Karma is so low that even my own postings are beyond my current threshold
  129. Right wing nutbars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Candian Alliance, Reform, PC, Conservative, whatever...they're all just updates of the old National Socialist German Workers' Party, ported to Canadian standards. Every so often, one of these Nazis opens his big mouth and shows these assholes' true colours.

    1. Re:Right wing nutbars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And anything on the political left is communist... grow up, asshole.

  130. Nice logic there by katre · · Score: 1

    In all of this it is clear that the Government can lose track of a lot of money easily and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then.

    Actually, no. It's clear that one of these is true. Either the government screwed up, or HP defrauded them. In this case, only one of those statements is true, sorry.

  131. not surprizing by MadSweeper · · Score: 1

    When the rules say that you must spend your budget by the end of the fiscal year, of which I would say 20-40% is left until the end, it is not surprising that there is something overlooked.
    It is always a nice sight to walk around a government office in the first few weeks of April to see hardware upgrades sitting in boxes that won't be used until June or July. The 19 inch CRT monitor bought last year is being replaced with a nice new flat screen LCD...
    My Question: Is this really necessary? Don't we Canadians pay enough tax to be spent in a last ditch effort at the end of the year?

  132. It's called the trickle down effect. by mcdade · · Score: 1

    I can pretty much figure out what went on here without even reading it.. the DND hires HP to do some work, HP hires some other consultanting companies to do the actual work, that company turns around and hires someone else. that person shows up to do the work, they get the run around and no one knows what they should be doing so they go home, bill the first company for their time, so the billing moves backup the chain. The DND pays HP $160million, no work is actually done.

    I have seen this happen first hand, I was contracted on a Bell Canada project, which Bell hired a well know consulting firm, that firm hired out a smaller firm (who I have contacts) who then hired out a bunch of individual contractors. 3 degrees of seperation from the client. We were to install SAP software, at $20/station (you could have done about 20 a day if they had their shit together). We mostly got the run around, no one knew who we were or what we were there for. We did do some work, but averaged less then 10 workstations a day per person, so I said 'screw this' and went home. I still got paid for the work I did do, but I'm wondering what Bell was paying that orginal company. I figured that each 'company' takes at least 50% off the top.. so the company I was working for got $40 or $50 per station, the top company prob. got $100 to $150 perstation..

    all works out as a trickle down effect. Some people just don't want to do the actual work.

    -b

    1. Re:It's called the trickle down effect. by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      There was a Dilbert comic not too long ago about that:

      Dilbert enters PHB's (Pointy-Haired Boss) office shuffling papers:

      Dilbert: "I have some disturbing news."

      Dilbert: "We outsourced our customer-service function to India a few years
      ago."

      PHB: "So?"

      Dilbert: "Apparently, they sub-contracted the job to Mexico."

      Dilbert: "Then Mexico sub-contracted the job to Vietnam who sub-contracted
      to the Philippines."

      Dilbert: "Who subcontracted it to us."

      Dilbert: "It turns out we're the lowest-cost provider because we lie about
      our hold times."

      Dilbert: "In summary, we pay ourselves to hose ourselves."

      Dilbert: "Are you thinking what I'm thinking?"

      PHB: "We should raise our prices?"

  133. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this a "Jewish joke"? One would think it was just a general commentary on business and business ethics in general. Not sure why you felt the need to bring religion into the fold. Just saying.........

  134. campaign finance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have marginally more choice than the republic to the south, but it's still a first-past-the-post system, and so is questionably democratic, as people wind up voting strategically (or lazily)instead of for the representatives they really want.

    Agreed, but I have some small hope for the new campaign finance rules - with a good ceiling on private / corporate donations, and taxpayer funding on a per-vote basis, every vote counts over the long haul, even if your candidate can't win this time around.

    I know some people don't like this funding model, but think about the old saying - "He who pays the piper, calls the tune." - who'd you rather have your politicians dependant on, the taxpayer, or Enron? People have called it "welfare for politicians", but this isn't really true, you don't get the money automatically (that would be welfare), rather the voters choose to provide it to you by giving you their vote. Somebody's gotta pay for politics, and whoever that is is going to expect ROI - so I'd rather it's me.

    1. Re:campaign finance by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      What makes you think the dominant parties will implement anything like that? The Liberals and Conservatives are already against reforing the voting system (especially proportional representation). Down south, Democrats and Republicans have consistently watered down any campaign financing policy.

      I actually support what you are saying (although I'm not sure if voting should be based on votes--I want caps and minimums of some sort). However, I don't see your proposal being implemented in the next...oh... 200 years. Unfortunately, that's well past your lifetime :(

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  135. Do the Math by prgrmr · · Score: 1

    The $160 mil (canadian) was paid out over 12 years to 6 subcontractors, which averages out to only $2.22 mil per year, per contractor. The DND if it's anything like the US military, probably spends $2 mil a year on printer paper. An amount that small, compared to the entire year's defense budget, would be relatively easy to lose track of.

    Personally, I'm waiting for the US DoD to catch-on and high Pricewaterhouse to run the same sort of audit for them.

  136. Typical ... by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    The entire IT industry is based on vapor. Canada got what HP was selling - nothing as something.

    Let the buyer beware. Let Canada admit they happen to be HPs biggest suckers *chuckle* :p

  137. Re:Pardon by iantri · · Score: 1
    I was under the impression that the verb form was always spelt with an "se" in all variations of English..

    But it did give an American a good chance to prove their ignorance, once again.

  138. Too lazy to come up with your own reply? by Astin · · Score: 1

    Wow, I'm impressed you were able to track down my old reply to another post and copy it
    VERBATIM. A link to the original would have been courteous.

    --
    - In hell, treason is the work of angels.
    1. Re:Too lazy to come up with your own reply? by Mr.+Ophidian+Jones · · Score: 1

      A link to the original would have been courteous.

      Sorry, can't be bothered with such things.

  139. HP _is_ a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a consultant at HP several years ago, General Managers like Rajiv Gupta were telling folks they could only get funding for a project if they agreed to _only_ hire H-1b workers from India. HP is quite simply _not_ the company founded in that garage in Palo Alto.

  140. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Pope · · Score: 1

    Why on Earth would you turn down money, at any age? When I was 20, I was in university and appreciated any and all donations from my family, every little bit helps.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  141. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

    What country do you live in? Your spelling and that debt collectors can't do that in the USA tips me off.

  142. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a joke, don't destroy the great world of jokes with your pc attitude. In case you haven't noticed, there are jokes about other religions as well as professions, races, genders, etc.

    The bad ones should be censored though, because they are a threat to humanity... leave the good ones alone.

  143. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

    because my grandmother needed it more then I did.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  144. Ignore the truth if you wish by dolo666 · · Score: 1

    You can simply ignore what's been happening in Canada for the past twenty years. That's your choice. It's a very Canadian thing to do, also. The simple fact is, crisis in Canada is the only motive for change that has ever existed, so when we have slow moving scandals where money is filtered off the top from Liberals and spent on riches for the wives of candidates, the bottom line is that Canada *is* corrupt, and the people of Canada are to blame, not the politicians. We never give the left a chance to stay in for more than a few terms. This is because the right (Libs/Tories) always railroad the NDP whenever they get in. The right always spend their money playing dirty politics too.

    I worked the Ontario elections and let me just say, I have never seen dirtier politics than the Lib we ran against. Kicked over our signs, bussed people in from another riding, cheated the election by sending goons to threaten voters at the polls to vote for him. He also pulled one hell of a stunt: this Candidate is in TV, so some of you are going to know who he is right away, but he somehow pulled some strings and really nailed our candidate. This TV station arranges an all-candidate debate for a particular date/time. They phone ahead and "cancel" it, saying that the other candidates couldn't make it. So they say, they have changed it to a phone interview only for all the Candidates. Our candidate gets a call from the station, they do the prep talk with him, and then he's on the air. The announcer is in the station with the other candidates LIVE! They un-invited our candidate! So he's on the phone and they say, "tell us your wonderful platform", and he has no idea what's about to happen. He rattles off the Public Power platform like a real pro, and the announcer goes, "Wow, that's a wonderful platform, but how are you going to pay for all THAT?!" and then the TV station hangs up with our candidate. The announcer acts like it was our candidate who hung up the phone!!! *sigh*

    Before this stunt we were leading: we ended up with 12%........

  145. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by solman · · Score: 1

    The joke would have gained much and lost nothing had it not been identified as a "jewish joke"

    In this case it is the ADDITION of racism that hurt the joke, not its subtraction.

    Don't let your anti-PC attitudes get in the way of humor.

  146. You're right, but people are the problem by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

    You're right about the general involvement of Canadians in government but I think that's going to change as we become a more connected country. Canada is huge and has always been an East vs. Quebec vs. West political map. It's been hard to organise on a larger scale so historically the Liberals, who are the most average have always been the default party.

    Now, as we become more technologically and geographically connected, I think common voices will be able to band together in a way that has never happened. I'm amazed for example, that here in Ottawa, the Arts community recently came together to protest the City's budget cuts to the Arts and Community Services. They were proposing to spend only $0.57 per person on funding compared to Toronto at $14 and Montreal at $26 (approx. amounts). I'd never seen such organization from such a typically "removed" group. The internet played a huge part. There were protests, banner and poster campaigns, fund raisers etc.

    The NDP more than any other party is realizing that there's now an easy way to get younger people and people of conscience involved that never existed before. I think there's a very good chance we see a significant number of left wing candidates in parliament after the next election.

    The other by-product of this new awareness is that left-wingers will be held more accountable for notorious overspending. It all points to more open government. Because of Canada's parliamentary style, I think there is much opportunity to clean things up through public pressure.

  147. Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should change that to "a Canadian who reads right-wing newspapers, such as the National Post".