Slashdot Mirror


Hotmail, Others Follow Gmail's Storage Boost

BobPaul writes "Following behind Yahoo Mail's recent upgrade to 100MB of free storage, and trailing behind GMail's 1GB (last mentioned here), ZDNet reports that Hotmail will soon boost email storage as well. 'The upgrade will increase Hotmail's free e-mail storage limits from 2 megabytes to 250MB and its paid e-mail service, which costs $19.95 a year, from 10MB to 2 gigabytes. The changes will begin in early July.' Another interesting tidbit from the article: 'Ask Jeeves also plans to grant its e-mail subscribers more storage room... According to an e-mail sent to iWon users, Ask Jeeves plans to give each of the sites' e-mail subscribers 125MB of free storage.'"

623 comments

  1. competition by some_god · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hurray for competition :)

    1. Re:competition by mikera · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep - just shows the power of the free market once again!

      Think how little progress we'd see if large segments of the IT industry were dominated by single large corporations with no incentive to innovate..... oh wait.....

    2. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google is a large company. They're worth quite a bit of money.

      MS and Yahoo are offering the e-mail systems that they are now because they know Google is going to steal a lot of their business (The business model is draw in people with free accounts and try to sell more).

      Actually, if you think about it, this is probably going to really hurt MS and Yahoo's business because much fewer people see the need for having more than 100mb of mail, as opposed to needing more than 6mb.

      Google may just be hurting this whole e-mail industry more than it is helping.

      And just to add a little twist to this comment, imagine of MS was doing what Google is doing. People would be screaming bloody murder and citing the reason I cited above. Sort of sad really....

    3. Re:competition by bnet41 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sadly what you say is pretty true, especially concerning the role reversial. Some people seem to have such a biased view is MS that the never allow them to do anything right. I will agree with everyone else that this is great for the market, 2MB was really low.

    4. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But Hotmail, and the MSN site is getting more and more tied to the MSN Messenger. If you want one, you might as well use the others when they're there anyway.

    5. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH google does not change every default browser on every windows computer to default to msn as the homepage, even sp and upgrades.

    6. Re:competition by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      Now that the overall storage has been raised (by a considerable amount), I imagine the next shootout will be over who will allow the largest attatchments or the most attatchments. It sucks when trying to email a bunch of digital pictures to a person that can't use winzip or gzip. If you send them all individually many web email services will only let you send up to 5 at a time.

      --
      9 Gmail invitations availiable

    7. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think how little progress we'd see if large segments of industry were dominated by single large government entity with no incentive to innovate.

      Yet somehow socialism is alive and well in our society, and the majority of Slashdotters advocate it.

    8. Re:competition by Cyberdork · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hotmail was actually more tied to MSN Messenger in the beginning than it is now (and has been for a while :P), at least now you can use any e-mail address you wish to instead of just msn.com and hotmail.com

    9. Re:competition by CastrTroy · · Score: 0

      You actually know people who can't use winzip? God help you. Actually, you might want to hook them up with windows XP, which treats a zip file just like any other folder.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:competition by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Who could you possibly know who can't use winzip or gzip? I would expect that any OS capable of viewing jpegs would also be capable of using compression utilities...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:competition by timlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with that. I also think that since storage space is no longer an issue, it's all about who has the best GUI. Google is probably the best that I can see so far because of its Labels system instead of Folders. It takes getting used to but it is definitely better. My only complaint is that they should allow users with more control over how the message looks. But it's only in beta and I sent feedback about this already so hopefully they decide to implement it.

    12. Re:competition by tekunokurato · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google may just be hurting this whole e-mail industry more than it is helping.

      Um, the original point was regarding the benefit to consumers. It's not hurting anyone, from that perspective. The competition is free and serves to remove excess profits from the industry, not profits altogether (the definition of a market approaching efficiency).

    13. Re:competition by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes, but it all boils down to a question of trust.

      I trust Google. I trust Yahoo. I don't trust Microsoft/hotmail.

      One of the interesting things about how Google has been able to increase the perceived value of their gmail service is that you need an invite (thanks turg).

      It also creates a "web of trust". People who have been invited by other people are less likely to use a gmail account to spamminate everyone. This is the true innovation of gmail.

    14. Re:competition by Captain+Caveman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Google's GMail Business Plan:

      1.Offer 1GB email storage capacity to a few thousand users in a beta program

      2.Wait for competitor's to match your offer and lose millions by offering 100x more storage capacity as before for free

      3.Cancel beta test and never launch service

      4.PROFIT!!!

    15. Re:competition by RevDobbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do not send large attachments over email.

      Again, do not send large attachments over email.

      Nothing is worse then trying to download a really important email, but being stuck waiting for a hand full of large, mostly less-important messages to download. Ofoto, Shutterfly, and others offer free image hosting, allowing your friends & family the chance to view pictures at their leisure -- and often order hard copies as a bonus. Not everybody has broadband access, and us "Technology Haves" should be teaching the "have nots" to 1) not send huge f'in emails and 2) don't blindly open every attachment you get.

      In conclusion, do not send large attachments over email.

    16. Re:competition by SirPrize · · Score: 1
      I've never had service pack or update installations change my homepage settings. The only MS program that wanted to change this during installation was MSN Messenger, and it clearly indicated it was going to change it, and allowed you to tell it not to do so. I change the default homepage as soon as I install Windows, and I've never had to reset it due to it being changed by another program.

      Then again, there are various programs which can and do change your default homepage as part of your agreement to using that program. I remember someone's computer always resetting its homepage to search.com or something like that, because he was using a POP3 mail-indicator ala xbiff, which had as part of its usage agreement that it would always reset your homepage. At least this page had a link explaining why you might keep seeing this page, and that it was in fact linked to this program.

    17. Re:competition by mini+me · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think e-mail will become the next platform for file sharing. E-mail already handles poor man's multicasting and you can download the files at your leasure. Just because your e-mail client doesn't work properly, doesn't mean it's a bad idea.

    18. Re:competition by TV-SET · · Score: 1
      imagine of MS was doing what Google is doing. People would be screaming bloody murder and citing the reason I cited above. Sort of sad really....


      I don't think that it is sad. When you have Mike Tyson kicking ass in an average school - that is not surprising. But if you will have a second grader kick Mike Tyson's butt you'll have a sensation. At the end of the day, it was just a beating of one man by another. Now, I am too drunk to apply this analogy to Google vs MS doing the same thing, but I hope you can do it. :)

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    19. Re:competition by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Or with a recent version of KDE.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    20. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the whole beauty of web mail such as gmail, hotmail and yahoomail? You can instantly see all of your new messages, how big they are, and then choose to download the ones you want.

      Shouldn't you also rather be using an email client that downloads the headers first anyway. Saves you downloading all that spam along the way too. Just a thought.

    21. Re:competition by RevDobbs · · Score: 1
      I think e-mail will become the next platform for file sharing.

      I disagree. They are already predicting the death of email due to spam & worms & other crap.

      . . . you can download the files at your leasure. Just because your e-mail client doesn't work properly, doesn't mean it's a bad idea.

      Yes, some email clients offer a "message preview" before downloading thw whole email; some clients don't automatically download large emails. But those are not default configurations in the majority of email programs out there. Further, not seeing your all your email automatically, as one is used to, can be disconcerning for those that don't know better.

      Finally, SMTP is an ASCII protocol; if you're going to send binary attachments over email, they must first be encoded into a 7-bit ascii friendly format. Doing that adds at least 12 perecent (7 usable bits/byte vs. 8), so it makes your download even larger than it has to be.

      No, HTTP -- and even FTP -- are available for distributing files: those protocols were made to do that; SMTP wasn't.

    22. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's if you use POP... just ask your ISP if you can use IMAP instead. If your ISP doesn't support POP, guess you're just stuck downloading those big attachments!

    23. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or OSX.

    24. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the invites will die once it moves out of beta, then.

    25. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. IMAP and web clients allow you to see how big the attachments are.

      Besides, what kind of ass connection do you have anyway? I would need to get an attachment of 100MB or more before I would get upset.

    26. Re:competition by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Poster wrote:
      Too bad the invites will die once it moves out of beta, then.
      Why should they stop the invite system? As I pointed out, it creates a "web of trust", and a traceable route for who invited who, so it's less likely that spammers will be able to use it in bulk.

      Consider this scenario:

      1. Spammer snags a gmail account.
      2. Spammer gets invite credits
      3. Spammer "invites" a dozen fake spam accounts to gmail
      4. Spammer starts using those new acounts as response boxes for spam
      5. Google flags this
      6. Google deletes receiving accounts
      7. Google notes that they all originated from invites from one account.
      8. Google deletes that account as well.
      End result: Spammer has no way to receive his (the vast majority of spammers are guys) responses, goes back to using shotmail or aohell accounts. This results in gmail accounts maintaining their perceived value.

      Hopefully, someone from gmail will recognize the value of keeping the invite system, either exclusively, or alongside a seperate open system.

      Anyone want to point this thread to the gmail developers?

    27. Re:competition by pdp0x14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One assumes that storage is allocated on the fly in all these systems, as opposed to giving each user an entire allocation at account origination time. Consequently, the players only have to increase storage on an actuarial basis.

      However, Gmail encourages its users to approach e-mail in a new and storage-intensive way, i.e. to "never" delete messages and use search to recover them. The incumbents have standard user interfaces and are not attempting to change their users' usage paradigms. Thus, users of the incumbent systems won't be particularly apt to increase their storage requirements even if more storage is available.

      This suggests that the incumbents are not dramatically increasing their costs by permitting larger e-mail storage and that the average Gmail user will have significantly higher storage requirements than users of the incumbent systems.

      I also question the extent to which Gmail will become the primary account for people who currently use Yahoo Mail and Hotmail. People don't switch e-mail addresses lightly.

      However good the Gmail paradigm may be, it's one of those things like power windows that you have to use to "grok." There's also a bit of a learning curve that might be enough to further discourage users who are perfectly happy where they are.

    28. Re:competition by radiophonic · · Score: 1

      I disagree. They are already predicting the death of email due to spam & worms & other crap.

      Hahahha...he said "the death of email". Please, next they'll say that toasters will die because you have to clean out the crumbs every once in a while. Who are these 'they' people anyway?

      --
      Whenever you read this sig someone's refrigerator light turns on.
    29. Re:competition by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      toasters have died, and have been replaced by functionally better toasters. please explain why people wouldnt swap to a replacement for email if it meant no more spam, worms and other crap?

      Note: dont bother attacking the feasability of such a replacement, thats not what I asked for. explain why if it existed, you wouldnt use it

      --
      TIAEAE!
    30. Re:competition by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      I trust google too. they only required me to give a first name, last name, password and desired username to sign up. they are not an intrustive PoS company that wants completely unnecassary details like certain others :D

      --
      TIAEAE!
    31. Re:competition by sirvulcan · · Score: 1

      imap is ye friend

    32. Re:competition by mini+me · · Score: 1
      I disagree. They are already predicting the death of email due to spam & worms & other crap.

      Just like the Windows RPC worms and spy/adware will be the death of Windows right?

      No, HTTP -- and even FTP -- are available for distributing files: those protocols were made to do that; SMTP wasn't.

      I realize from a technical standpoint that SMTP isn't well suited for file transfers. But HTTP and FTP do not address the problems that e-mail file sharing solves. The only thing that has been limiting the practice in the past is storage space and transfer limits, Google has changed all that.
    33. Re:competition by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And they (Google) don't seem to be afraid of the competition. I emailed them this morning suggesting that they keep the invite system (because it creates a "web of trust" between users, and will allow the tracking of spammers who abuse invites to create tons of bogus recipient mail boxes to receive spam responses), and here's what they sent back:
      Hello,

      Thank you for your suggestion -- we are forwarding it to the appropriate team. We certainly appreciate hearing from Gmail users and encourage you to continue to let us know how we can improve the Gmail experience.

      You might be interested to hear that we are working on many upcoming features:

      - Automatic forwarding of your email to another account

      - Plain HTML version of Gmail

      - Import/export Contacts

      We hope you enjoy Google's approach to email.

      Sincerely,
      The Gmail Team

      The auto-forwarding and import/export features show they don't fear competition, IMHO.

      The text ads don't bother me - I've noticed they actually are relevant to what I'm working on.

      Now if we can just convince them that keeping the invite system is worth it ... (hint hint - email them with the suggestion :-)

    34. Re:competition by singleantler · · Score: 1

      Functionally better toasters still turn bread in to toast.

      Better e-mail services from the ISP and filtering on the e-mail client will cut down the spam, which is alreading happening. I can't see anyone giving up e-mail any time soon, most of the bleating I've heard about it has come from journalistic circles where it seems to be something used to fill up column inches.

      --
      "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
    35. Re:competition by singleantler · · Score: 1

      I've never noticed a real e-mail address in a spam, it makes them far too easy to block. Generally they just point to a website which will have the contact details, or more likely just sales material, on it. Also, if I was receiving e-mail from spam, I wouldn't want to dig through a webmail interface to get it, that's pretty inefficient compared to getting it over POP/IMAP where the client can also filter out the responses with lots of swearing in them.

      The invites system has been a great way of getting people to talk about the service. I've seen threads on several mailing lists and forums about who has invites and giving them out. It's scored a real buzz for the service which the other providers don't have.

      --
      "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
    36. Re:competition by toydutta · · Score: 1

      Anybody noticed, Rediffmail is giving free 1 Gb.

    37. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you really this stupid to think that spammers use hotmail and yahoo to send mail from? they just need addresses in yahoo and google and gmail to send mail to.

    38. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says that Google will ever drop the invitation system?

      It even lets them control and manage the rate at which they grow... Pretty much ideal for them in a lot of ways...

      They might loosen up the invites for a while to grow more rapidly, however, if it gets out of beta. That, or allow some other limited form of signups...

    39. Re:competition by malfunct · · Score: 1

      If you subscribe to MSN premium service the picture attachement problem is solved. They allow you to make a "picture mail" which allows you to attach a LOT of full size pictures but they are all stored on an MSN server, the mail is quite small as it only has the links to the picture location on the net. Thats the way to do pictures anyway, smtp is not efficient with large files.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    40. Re:competition by NiteRyder66 · · Score: 1

      You are too quick to trust Google! You really shouldn't trust ANY service! NO matter what, if the Feds want to get you... they WILL! :-( Take a look at this about the GMail service and maybe you'll think twice about trusting Google! Heck, you better think twice about trusting any site... www.eff.org

    41. Re:competition by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      AC posted:
      are you really this stupid to think that spammers use hotmail and yahoo to send mail from? they just need addresses in yahoo and google and gmail to send mail to.
      they use open mail relays to send their spam - everyone knows that.

      They eventually have to receive a response (even if its through a web interface) to an address that actually exists, and a LOT of these are hotmail accounts.

      Also, a lot of people who spam the usenet groups ARE dumb enough to use a hotmail or yahoo account, rather than a "spammer-friendly" server.

    42. Re:competition by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and for once, we know that a company is actually going to try to help the people. Unlike Microsoft... But don't get me wrong -- I'll be very happy once they upgrade, because I use hotmail, but you know how Microsoft is... getting their fingers in on everything. Oh well though, no disrespect, they have to follow the lead like everyone else, or no one will use hotmail anymore.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    43. Re:competition by Psymunn · · Score: 1

      Attachment size eh? Aventuremail offers 2GB of free storage as well as unlimited attachment size. So if that's your thing, go for it. Personally I think 1GB is enough and 10 MB attachments more then suffice, so i'm going to just stick with my g-mail account. Remember, it's not only size, it's also how you use it and g-mail uses it well!
      E-mail with a built in zip program would be cool but i have yet to find someone who doesn't have zip readely available.

      --
      The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    44. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nothing like advocating an elitist system once you are on the inside, eh? -1 for you.

      ===---===

    45. Re:competition by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Poster wrote:
      Nothing like advocating an elitist system once you are on the inside, eh? -1 for you.
      A valid point, except that everyone will be able to get inside with an invite. It's more a question of accountability and networks of trust, which preserves the system's (in this case gmail) value.

      After all, if, for example, your cell phone began receiving hundreds of spam SMS messages every day, the value of SMS would drop to zero, wouldn't it?

    46. Re:competition by zachmagaw · · Score: 1

      MSFT and YHOO its not just storage...

      checkout my review... gmail's UI is fast... slick/simple... http://zachmagaw.blogspot.com

    47. Re:competition by ArchAngel21x · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to take the time to download large attachtments before other e-mails, use web mail. You can see all your mail instantly and cherry pick which e-mails you deal with first.

    48. Re:competition by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I was amazed at how accurate the text ads were. I was planning a trip to San Fran last week, and happened to mention it to a relative in the area, that the conference would be at the Moscone Center, and an ad for the hotel I had 90% decided on popped up. Later he sent back some info about the BART and ads (and a 3 result search) for all the schedules for public transpertation were included. I thought they were great.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    49. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a gmail account, you can always submit feedback through their bug report link at the top of the page.

      I to also agree with you on the keep it to invites only, to get in!
      Well probably only because it's like an "IN" club thing going, is the reason I like it alot (apart from all the nice features) as soon as it goes public to everyone, my spirity and brag rights dies =(!

    50. Re:competition by sbpope · · Score: 1

      I realize your post was in jest, but I don't understand step 4. How does google profit by making it's competitors spend more money?

    51. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't trust anyone. Trust is a weakness. 0.o

    52. Re:competition by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Time to de-generalize.

      "In conclusion, do not send large attachments over email..." to that guy, who through some bizarre rift in time apparently still lives in 1995.

      To everybody else who lives in the 21st century, knock yourself out.

      --

      I write in my journal
    53. Re:competition by pantherace · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like any 2.0 or above version or so.

    54. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has SPF records for gmail, so sending spam from a non-google smtp that claims to be from gmail should be pretty easy to recognize as spam, just add an SPF checking thingy to spamassassin or have your MTA reject based on SPF.

    55. Re:competition by cinchel · · Score: 1

      i would also like to add that the format of the gmail page is much more user friendly then either yahoo/msn/hotmail..and it loads a heck of a lot quicker...and the ability to reply without having to load another page is very nice as well

      cinchel

    56. Re:competition by irritant-1 · · Score: 1
      I have always considered attachments the height of bad manners. Especially because of the virus risks. FYI: I just tried to apply for an Adventuremail account (mainly to see thier interface) however when you apply for a free account you end up at a page that says:
      "We are currently not accepting new registrations. Accounts can be purchased in our store (http://www.aventuremail.co.uk/store) in the mean time".
      The UK site has yet to go live.
    57. Re:competition by De+Lemming · · Score: 1

      The only thing that has been limiting the practice in the past is storage space and transfer limits, Google has changed all that.

      Gmail limits the total message size to 10MB. In practice - mostly due to the encoding of the binary - you get a maximum attachment size of +/- 7MB.

    58. Re:competition by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Nothing is worse then trying to download a really important email, but being stuck waiting for a hand full of large, mostly less-important messages to download.

      Well, one solution - which is something I'm already doing with yahoo - is using a large capacity webmail account to recieve big attachments, making the account a bit like the upload directory of your own ftp server. You can then use the webmail interface to choose whether or not you want to download the file, without interfering with your normal email.

      Mind you - I completely agree with you about not sending photos via email, simply because it's much easier to view lots of photos on a dedicated photo hosting website. I've found fotopic.net to be extremely good in this regard.

    59. Re:competition by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      of course, if you use something like IMAP instead of POP (why does this still exist?) you can view the messages subject/filesize before choosing to download the message. Cool huh? This works the same way with webmail.

      I do agree though that it's stupid to send large attachments to people you KNOW who are on dialup and still using a POP account. That's just rude.

    60. Re:competition by WorkEmail · · Score: 1

      Yay! Now I get to have 250MB of spam to delete instead of 2MB!

    61. Re:competition by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      By raising costs to your competitors, you reduce the profit they can make. If their profit is reduced, then they can't spend as much on research and development of new products.

      This allows you to get a foothold, or in Google's case, to continue to stay ahead of the pack.

    62. Re:competition by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Newbies that will not understand how to do it no matter how well you explain it in the e-mail.

      And beside, it can be too long to explain to them and just send files unzipped.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    63. Re:competition by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I would trust MS more than Yahoo, given their past abuse...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    64. Re:competition by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as excess profits. When a market approaches effiecency, it maximizes profits, and minimizes cost. Not the other way around. But I guess we should be anti-corporation, or something like that. Hold on, give me five minutes to run down to Hot Topic and get my Anarchy shirt.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    65. Re:competition by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? I'm discussing economics in academic terms here, where an efficient market is one in which there is a frictionless entry and exit of firms that ensures price competition and excess profit is removed. Excess profit is defined as profit above the "cost of capital," economic cost of doing business, or the best alternative use of capital.

      Your comment clearly demonstrates that you have so little economic knowledge that you think my remarks are anti-corporate (when in fact they are anti-legislative and pro-market). I'm not trying to be elitist--indeed, by all means educate yourself. But don't try to argue economics until you do, because you're hopelessly out of sorts with the basic terminology required to do so. You are referring to an efficient company with little to no competition, where I am referring to the marketplace, where goods and services are exchanged at rates optimal to their respective owners.

    66. Re:competition by klui · · Score: 1

      This is their standard "canned" response. But from my experience, they do read and have other more appropriate responses.

    67. Re:competition by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      If you think winzip of gzip will save more than 3% on your pictures, that is because you saved your pictures in the wring format.

      gzip or winzip will not compress GIF or JPG files by any more than 5%. And that's a best case.

    68. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, I read your reply to my post on the quantum computing article a ways back. While there may not be many algorithms available for quantum copmuters, I can't think of two more revolutionary ones than factoring and database searching...

      posted anon, to spare my karma from the facists with an itchy trigger finger for offtopic mods. You guys do realize that you almost always get metamodded unfair, right? That this behavior just makes you less likely to be given mod points?

      Anyway back "on topic" for my original post; I don't understand your complaint that Quantum Computers are slow at most things, when they're fast at the things that traditional computers are completely inept at. Thanks for the reference, though. Interesting article!

      jaz

    69. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're complaining about a major piece of bad design in your e-mail software, nothing else. MS Outlook? Vote with your feet. The way it handles large e-mails is a really good example of extremely bad software.

  2. If you build it.... by JackJudge · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they will come But what the feck am I gonna do with 250MB of spam ??

    1. Re:If you build it.... by andhravodu · · Score: 5, Informative

      While it's true that hotmail in its earlier version was a huge spambait, the recent experiences are pretty good. I recently opened a new account (completely new registration) and had one spam mail in 4 months. Now, i'm impressed. Oh wait, we shouldn't have got that one spam mail too...

    2. Re:If you build it.... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      OK, it was a joke. But with Yahoo! at least, the stuff that gets filtered into "Bulk Mail" doesn't count towards your total.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:If you build it.... by D4MO · · Score: 1

      "feck" - you oirish? or has Father Ted become globally popular?

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    4. Re:If you build it.... by Cyberdork · · Score: 1

      Hotmails spam filter is quite good actually... just go to the settings and check the "treat all emails not from my contacts or on my safe list to be treated as spam" option... granted, some legitimate e-mails will get sorted to the spam box, but those are easily moved to the inbox (when you move a mail from spambox to inbox you'll automatically get a question on wether to add the e-mail address to the safe list or your contacts list) Then again, either hotmail has improved their spam filter before the mail even hits my mailbox, or the spammers have removed me from their lists... nowadays I don't get more than 1 or 2 spam mails per day.

    5. Re:If you build it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impressive. What's your email address? >:)

    6. Re:If you build it.... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Thats a nice change. I remember registering a hotmail account when I was 16, forgot the login by now, but it wasn't something a wordlist would have. Started getting spam within a week even though I hadn't even sent a message from it (I just wanted to use msn messanger). I had opted out of all 'list me in directory' features. Makes you think MS might of been selling userlists, which is ironic considering I was 16 and getting all the porn spam you can think of, with the only way for that address to get out being microsofts fault.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    7. Re:If you build it.... by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      I for one will store picture files and it will also be good for all the graphic groups out there. Before we were limited to 1mb file size,send/recieve, now its 10 with yahoo so this is a good thing for graphic groups.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    8. Re:If you build it.... by roror · · Score: 1

      i have had a hotmail account for 3-4 years .. and i haven't received any spam .. unbelievable ? may be because my id is rather long (16chars@hotmail.com) so .. auto address generators are yet to catch it.

    9. Re:If you build it.... by nfg05 · · Score: 1

      I think it was more likely that you had a simple user name and an address generator happened to guess your user ID.

    10. Re:If you build it.... by Arker · · Score: 1

      Not long ago I made a hotmail account just to run msn messenger for a short time. Never logged into the account. Never posted it anywhere. Never used it in any way, except to log into messenger. Quit using that after about two weeks, but messenger did have a popup about unread mail when I logged in, and after two weeks it was over 250 messages. Every damn one of them spam. And it wasn't a common name either.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    11. Re:If you build it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arse!!

  3. Go Google Go!! by MrRTFM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Step 1 - on April 1st, give away 1G mail boxes to all - start with a small Beta group
    Step 2 - invest in Hard drives, and wait until MS and others implement size increases
    Step 3 - declare it was a joke all along
    Step 4 - ???
    Step 5 - IPO !!!

    --
    You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    1. Re:Go Google Go!! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The 1gb limit is simply a carrot for us all.

      Most normal users won't get anywhere near filling a gMail account for a good long time.

      Its used to show the difference between the good and the bad.

      Now - when google move into ISP land, with 100mbit broadband i'll be happy :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Go Google Go!! by pebs · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm planning to create 100 1GB accounts, and then back up my hard drive by e-mailing it to all these accounts.

      --
      #!/
    3. Re:Go Google Go!! by MrRTFM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most normal users won't get anywhere near filling a gMail account for a good long time.

      Agreed - and even if everyone in the world filled it up, how much would be genuinely unique content. Not much, I'd guess the size ratio would be something like:
      70% - Funny videos of dancing monkeys or Powerpoint jokes
      25% - MP3 files, zipped software (legal or not)
      5% - genuine emails

      Of the 95% size, Google would keep one copy of the file and link the others (hell - they probably already have a copy in \pub\jokes anyway)

      --
      You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    4. Re:Go Google Go!! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely - I've thought about this as well.

      The same could hold true for viruses, trojans and spam inside mails.

      If google decide to zap one virus, then they have zapped it worldwide and cured a problem instantly.

      There are problems with implimenting such a (on the surface) simple solution however. Not anything the massed collection of PHDs and brainiacs at Google couldn't solve though :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Go Google Go!! by gurrufio · · Score: 1

      In the not-so-long-run I believe you're right. Those capacities will be rendered meaningless in a few years, what with the popularization of digital video and photography, mp3-amassing, etc. Plus, hard drive sizes are constantly increasing, so even these capacities are doomed to seem small in the future.

    6. Re:Go Google Go!! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Currently, attachments can be up to 10MB in size and cannot contain executable files, even if they're zipped. While it's still possible to rename Cracked_Photoshop.exe to Cracked_Photoshop.tmp and zip it up, it'll certainly cut down on the amount of warez/viruses passed through Gmail.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Go Google Go!! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Hmm... wouldn't that mean Gmail is decoding attachments too? I would have expected to hear about that before now, since that seems much worse for privacy than just reading the text of the email.

      Also, I wonder if it works if you use gzip, bzip2, rar, etc?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Go Google Go!! by mjh · · Score: 1
      they probably already have a copy in \pub\jokes anyway

      Doesn't google run on Linux? If so, shouldn't that be /usr/local/jokes?

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    9. Re:Go Google Go!! by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1
      They support multiple archive formats, although bzip2 and rar are strangely missing from the list:
      Can I send or receive an executable file?

      As a security measure to prevent potential viruses, Gmail does not allow you to receive executable files (such as files ending in .exe) that could contain damaging executable code.

      Gmail does not accept these types of files, even if they are sent in a zipped (.zip, .tar, .tgz, .taz, .z, .gz [emphasis added]) format. If someone tries to send this type of message to your Gmail account, the message will be bounced back to the sender.
      I assume they use file or something similar to identify executables and archives. I fail to see how that is any worse than Yahoo identifying file type and scanning for viruses.
      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    10. Re:Go Google Go!! by ttrafford · · Score: 1

      /usr/local/share/jokes, right?

    11. Re:Go Google Go!! by gphinch · · Score: 1

      I think you mean
      Step 1. give away 1G mail boxes
      Step 2. IPO
      Step 3. Profit!
      (Step 4. declare it all a joke)

      --
      in bed.
    12. Re:Go Google Go!! by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      10 megs at a time? Good luck.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    13. Re:Go Google Go!! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Hmm... wouldn't that mean Gmail is decoding attachments too? I would have expected to hear about that before now, since that seems much worse for privacy than just reading the text of the email.

      Every email provider that scans for viruses inside of zip files decodes attachments as well. This is not the privacy issue you're looking for... move along.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    14. Re:Go Google Go!! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      I'm at about 500MB for the last 10 years of email right now, and that's not even all of my accounts. 1GB is nice especially for remote storage, but it's by no means a lifetime's worth of email.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  4. All the storage I need. by javaman83 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have close to 40 gigs of email storage, if I want to fill up my /home partition.

    1. Re:All the storage I need. by dyefade · · Score: 1

      That's my thoughts exactly, I've always had all the storage space I need, and it's hundreds of times bigger than Gmail, WHAT IS ALL THE FUSS ABOUT!?

    2. Re:All the storage I need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Beleive it or not, a lot of people perfer to have webmail, but then, because dyefade said it's not so, I guess everyone else is wrong eh? bleh.

    3. Re:All the storage I need. by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some people are like me, and move between home and school every few months. Would you like to have to waite 2 days for DNS settings to circulate every 3 months or so, so that you can get your email?

      Plus, I like being able to check it at work, where all I have access to is a terminal during my lunch hour.

    4. Re:All the storage I need. by mark_lybarger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      perhaps you're kidding, i dunno, but these free services do provide a lot. webmail, hosted on someone elses server has more reliable backup/recover procedures. in the 7 years i've used yahoo mail, i've _never_ has a message just disapear. i have had a hard drive crash w/o a backup anywhere in sight. and once i d/l my email from ISP and delete from their server, it makes it more challenging to get to the emails. hotmail/yahoo/gmail whatever is generally accessable anywhere you can get a public ip and out the firewall on port 80. though sometimes it may be more challening from some business who deem necessarry to block the well known webmail sites.

      now, personally, i think that while gmail will be enticing (and i'll certainly sign up when given a chance), they'll need to really provide more than email. yahoo's calendar is really nice. it becomes a challenge now to simply forget when the date you officially became a domesticated individual.

    5. Re:All the storage I need. by Genom · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's my thoughts exactly, I've always had all the storage space I need, and it's hundreds of times bigger than Gmail, WHAT IS ALL THE FUSS ABOUT!?

      Unless you've got a static IP (or good DDNS), and your ISP doesn't do port filtering, you can't get at that storage from just anywhere. Gmail's available from anywhere you've got a recent web browser.

      Additionally, Gmail has pretty darned good search capabilities into that storage (it *is* Google, after all).

      About the only thing I can really complain about Gmail is that it's so heavily reliant on Javascript. It'd be really nice if it worked through a text-based browser.

    6. Re:All the storage I need. by dyefade · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, yeah, I guess you would benefit from it, but this is surely an unusual case? I've never used an ISP who didn't provide POP access, and now I have my own domain. I just don't see that this surge in email space will benefit many people, especially since there was never perceived (again I may be wrong here) to be a problem with only having a few mb of space.

    7. Re:All the storage I need. by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Set a short TTL on your DNS records (like a week before you move, set the TTL down to an hour or something.) Then when you actually move the changes will propogate very quickly.

    8. Re:All the storage I need. by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've obviously not actually used or looked into GMail very much, if at all - as has already been said, the real treat is not the 1GB storage.

      The real good stuff comes in the form of a clean and fast interface, being able to use Google search on your mail, threaded display of your messages, having webmail that doesn't blast you with intrusive ads, and so on.

    9. Re:All the storage I need. by kayen_telva · · Score: 3, Informative

      MTA+SQUIRRELMAIL+DDNS = independence

      in my case its exim4+squirrelmail+noip.com

      gmail really cannot compare

    10. Re:All the storage I need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sendmail+dovecot+sitelutions.com

      I can expand my email storage for ~1e/GB. :) Hosting your own email is just great. Everyone here should try it. ;) I really can't respect people without their own email server. ;P :)))

    11. Re:All the storage I need. by m2bord · · Score: 1

      "The real good stuff comes in the form of a clean and fast interface, being able to use Google search on your mail, threaded display of your messages, having webmail that doesn't blast you with intrusive ads, and so on." this is so true...i'm sick of yahoo mail's reliance on doubleclick for ads. i have doubleclick blocked via a hosts file and via privacy blockers. since i don't allow doubleclick on my pc, the yahoo mail page doesn't display properly and i cannot delete, forward, move, or do much else with that page...except refresh and hope or flat out leave it.

      --
      Is it 5:30 yet?
    12. Re:All the storage I need. by cbx_cbx · · Score: 1

      1GB email space = 1Gb SPAM. Quite easy hum?

    13. Re:All the storage I need. by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that clean interface pushes some key functionality into not easy to use places. I guess they want to retrain me to think thier way, but I don't like it. The drop down "do everything" menu that is on many of the pages annoys me.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    14. Re:All the storage I need. by singleantler · · Score: 1

      I know lots of people who use webmail at work because they're not supposed to send personal e-mail through their work accounts.

      Also, people can send mail to their friends, and still use the same mailbox when they get home in the evening.

      Using webmail is a lot easier than setting up POP on whatever client your office uses, even if that's a setting you have permission to change.

      --
      "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
    15. Re:All the storage I need. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      gmail really cannot compare

      Yes, that's true.

      Time required to set up a Gmail account? About four seconds.

      No comparison at all.

      --

      I write in my journal
    16. Re:All the storage I need. by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Some people are like me, and move between home and school every few months. Would you like to have to waite 2 days for DNS settings to circulate every 3 months or so, so that you can get your email?

      What kind of goofy email set up do you have, anyway? It doesn't matter *where* I am, I send and receive email with several dozen accounts on my laptop! I can use the wifi at a coffee shop in San Diego as easily as my home or work DSL line.

      What's this "waiting 2 days for DNS" you speak of? Does you email address change? If so, why not get your own domain and set any/all new addresses to forward to your own email address?

      Services like Gandi allow for email redirection without having to set up your own server anywhere.

      And, if you just need email hosting, I can cut you a deal...

      -Ben

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    17. Re:All the storage I need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, and that's a solution that works fairly well.
      But what if you upgrade your machine? What if you lose a hard drive? What happens when you buy a new computer? What if you have a power outage? What if your apartment floods or you have a bad power surge?

      The problem in your solution is that it requires a single computer in your possession to be online and available, all the time. If you ever replace that computer, you'll have to reconfigure your old machine as well as migrate your data.

      All this is doable, but I'd much rather have Google do it for me, as well as maintain a high level of uptime.

      Gmail still wins.

    18. Re:All the storage I need. by echucker · · Score: 1

      Those people are lucky. We're not supposed to use corporate email for personal stuff, but they've also removed the alternatives. All of the major web-based email services are blocked by our IT department.

    19. Re:All the storage I need. by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the fact that SquirrelMail completely sucks compared to Gmail. I tried it about 3 months ago. It was horrid. Hell, Yahoo's interface is better.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
  5. Hotmail is sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Pretty Sweet. I have a gmail account but there's no way I'm filling it up. I've only been able to get 4 megs of mail in the past 3 months. I doubt I'll ever reach the 250 meg limit from Hotmail. Good Job MS responding to competition. :)

    1. Re:Hotmail is sweet! by masterQba · · Score: 1

      I've done 4 mb in 3 days - try subscribing to some mailing lists - I tried the Fedora Core one and Suse.
      Gmail is great, but I also have a little problem what to do with all that space.

      --
      xb0x
    2. Re:Hotmail is sweet! by ATAMAH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, i too have no friends and have to resort to emailing myself... :(

    3. Re:Hotmail is sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Actually I think the geometric expansion of GMail accounts means that almost *everyone* that really wants one has one now. The invitations are flowing like water in the last week or two, which leads me to believe that GMail is getting close to prime time (though they still have quite a bit of stability work to do).

      but for each of those new invites, that's another person that has the power to invite... it grows quickly my friend. I have 8 or 9 unused invites at the moment that I have nothing to do with. I've given out close to 20, and now I'm out of friends...

    4. Re:Hotmail is sweet! by sk8king · · Score: 1

      Not to be picky or anything, but you've received 4MB in 3 days.....how can you read it all? Is it actual text data or did someone send you a movie?

      I guess my original, false impression of your statement was that it was simply words [and not possibly binary data]. So, if you do receive >1MB/day of text data to read from mailing lists, do you actually read it all or end up deleting it like spam?

    5. Re:Hotmail is sweet! by masterQba · · Score: 1

      I read only those topics that intrest me. The same I do with usenet groups - I subscribe to over 20 groups but I don't read them all. Also I don't read every comment on /. :-)

      --
      xb0x
    6. Re:Hotmail is sweet! by frodo-nl · · Score: 1

      I thought I had friends, but have yet to get an invite... *G*

  6. Email Arms Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the amount of spam Hotmail accounts get my guess is that this will simply increase the amount of junk mail Microsoft has to store.

    Has google kicked off an email arms race that will end in tears?

    1. Re:Email Arms Race by koniosis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hotmail spam protection is actually very good

      --
      I spent ages trying to think of sig, but never did :(
  7. capitalism's finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    250 MB email? I love competition. Not to mention that's one big storage dump on the net. Now let's see how the RIAA can find me transferring MP3's over e-mail

    1. Re:capitalism's finest by Sukh · · Score: 1

      Copyright is in no way an essential part of capitalism. Perfect competition (read: efficient capitalism) is achieved without copyright and without differentiating using brands and patents. Copyright is used to protect someones thoughts and brands. Patents were originally introduced because they were meant to encourage innovation - IMHO, due to the length that patents can now last, they are doing the opposite.

    2. Re:capitalism's finest by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why MP3 trading is a foregone conclusion:
      1. P2P Applications
      2. Binary Newsgroups
      3. Bittorrent
      4. IRC
      5. FTP
      6. Messenger to messenger.
      6. Now anonymous based e-mail accounts.

      The RIAA is currently trying to sue users of #1. They might go after #3, 4 and 5. They can't stop #2 and #6. They've lost, whether you believe that mp3 trading is copyright infringement or not.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:capitalism's finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can now last? they last 20 from filing which is pretty much the same as the 17 years from issue that it's always been. And patents discourage innovation? how? Without patents, the innovations would be secret. Without patents, drug companies would completely stop research. Without patents, intel and amd would never improve their chips.

      And I love the idea that there are too many patents. there are only about approximately 6,800,000 US patents issued since 1789, to inventors all over the world. And there are 280,000,000 people now living in the US alone.

      And before you say something asinine like the commentary on the microsoft "clicking" patent here on slashdot, maybe you should read the patent first.

      For example, the MS "click" patent has absolutely nothing to do with double clicking a mouse. It has to do with changing the function of a button *in an application software program* based on how long you hold it down, or how quickly you click in rapid succession. And it's related to their pocketpc platform.

      And having used palms, linux devices, macs and windows for years, I can tell you that no one did that before, so it is new, it is useful, and it is not obvious.

      I'd like to see some slashdot readers try to get a patent and then talk about how easy it is. It's easy to knock patents as killing innovation when the open source community is built around the idea of trying to copy programs that are already out there. (For example Gimp & Photoshop). If adobe decided to enfore their patent portfolio GIMP would disappear.

    4. Re:capitalism's finest by NiteRyder66 · · Score: 1

      First of all, it's NOT a good idea to use GMail with privacy concerns lurking about their service. That being said, and the cookies stored on your computer, can result in RIAA tracking you down and busting you! If you don't know what I mean about Google's GMail service, check this out... www.eff.org

    5. Re:capitalism's finest by Sukh · · Score: 1

      A patent is simply there to encourage innovation - which they do in the short term. However, because they last up to 20 years (which IMHO is too long), by the time the patents have run out, the device/technology is usually outdated. It works as a way to block competition (although this isn't ALWAYS the case).

      I like how you put words into my mouth - where did I say there were too many patents?

      And yes - it's DAMNED easy for billion dollar multi-nationals to get patents. Compare that to the average Joe who might have a really good worked out idea but can't afford the thousands of pounds required to patent it.

      And back to the point - neither copyright nor patents are required in a truely market-driven capitalist economy. In fact, I'd say theoretically that they are detrimental to a market-drive economy.

    6. Re:capitalism's finest by tcha · · Score: 1

      Excuse my ignorance here. But why can't they go after #2?

    7. Re:capitalism's finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MPAA goes after bittorent so don't use that. Your best bet is to find a private direct connect server.

    8. Re:capitalism's finest by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      But if they beat it back to just 2 and 6 then really they have won. The scale of the sharing going on today is what they perceive as the problem, not every individual instance. If they kill P2P alone they will have won in their eyes.

    9. Re:capitalism's finest by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 1

      I predict they will go after 7 (well, 6 #2) and that we will be heearing the press release on it within the year. Any takers?

      --

      ---

      WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

  8. It will be put to good use by StoatBringer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just think, 250Mb of spam to deal with when you come back from holiday.

    --
    Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
    1. Re:It will be put to good use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry after 30days there won't be an account to come back to.

  9. Yeah, but Gmail's better by David+Horn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hotmail and Lycos are missing the point here - people aren't flocking to Google cause of the 1GB of space; it's because of the innovative design; the powerful search; the conversation layout; the lack of intrusive ads etc.

    They have to fix the fact that their services are crap before handing out space willy-nilly.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    1. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This I agree with.

      The main problem I have with hotmail is its lack of respect for sent mails, it is up to a user to say they want to save every outgoing message, and even then, they are deleted frequently.

      It just stops it being usable for anything other than signups and notifications.

      gMail has made it easy and fun once again, and I'm glad the others are panicing.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by turnin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... adding to that, amount of mandatory personal information yahoo,hotmail collects is more in comparison to gmail.

    3. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by haakoneide · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the ads. Do I want to see ads for dating-services every day? And the speed! Hotmail is sooo slow on Opera and sometimes ot won't even load. I think MSN have a whole different redirection sequence for Opera, but that's offtopic

    4. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, but with only a couple of MB of available space to the normal user it's reasonable to not save every outgoing email. The first batch of pictures and all of a sudden nothing works! I would expect that if Hotmail's default mailbox size grows to 250 MB then they will likely save sent items by default since size is less of a concern.

    5. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by masterQba · · Score: 1

      they are flocking because of the invites, you are 1337 if you have a gmail account. the design is a secondary issue.

      --
      xb0x
    6. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by gerf · · Score: 1

      I agree that Hotmail has little respect for sent items, or even a lot of items incoming (Gmail invites, the do-not-call-list, ect).

      However, for a person who likes to easily download all of their messages locally, this is a pretty good deal. Sure, I use OE6, but it works well enough for some spam accounts. As far as I know, there's an ass-backwards method to pop3 to gmail, but I really don't feel like having to mess around like that, sorry.

      Yes I do have gmail accounts, and if you want one, email me at my spam account at edtgerf@hotmail.com. I also have edtgerf@gmail.com, but I really don't check it as often as I do accounts I have on OE. Eas of use there buddy.

    7. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Im already sorted for accounts thanks, and I see your point about pop access.

      However, in googles case, leaving the mails ONLINE actually makes for a better solution, since taking the mail offline and into which ever mail applications store prevents the pigeons from sorting and searching my mail, it becomes just a dump, and for that, a smallish standard account is better suited.

      I prefer having google searching my personal mails and its grouping and management are better than any of the offline pop mail programs I've tried.

      There is room in this world for both types of account, for instance, I wouldn't even consider moving business mails onto ANY of the free providers, thats just suicidal, but for personal mails google just wipes the floor with everything else out there.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    8. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can flock to Gmail all they want, as long as it's impossible to sign up it doesn't really matter how good it is.

    9. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by bigkahunafish · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Im sticking with yahoo for now....

      Its the most reliable out there: Hotmail doesnt always work, thats why I switched to yahoo.

      Yahoo is fast. when i send an email, its to its destination instantly, With hotmail, it usually took over an hour.

      Gmail sounds ok: Not sure about the privacy issues...but if gmail made it possible to email LARGE attachments (>100megs)... that would be sweet.

      --
      Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
    10. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      They're flocking to gmail because they are idiot sheep who can do no better than to follow pointless hype.

      Hey, just because nobody's actually offered you an account yet, that's no reason to be so negative about it.

      I'm sure you'll get your chance when it comes out of beta...

    11. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by trix_e · · Score: 4, Insightful

      GMail *is* better... much much better. it's quite possibly the best UI I've ever seen in a web browser. if you take a few minutes to figure out the shortcut keys, it's better than just about anything else out there. Yes, you can't format mail just yet, but still it is in beta.

      it's fast, incredibly intuitive. I'm in love.

      the only thing I didn't like was the lack of new mail notification, so I downloaded Pop Goes the GMail (windows only... one downside -- but I doubt its long before something like this comes along for other platforms) and it takes care of that for me.

      In short I'm never going back to any other webmail service. It'll take me a lot to pry me away from GMail.

      --
      No man is an island, but Gary is a city in Indiana.
    12. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. The UI on Gmail is superb. If I could get that UI for all my email accounts, I'd gladly pay a subscription fee.

    13. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by pyrosoft · · Score: 3, Funny

      since when does any of that info have to be truthful? With all the signups I do, I've probably singlehandedly increased the number of 97-year-old Albanian midgets making $200K by 300% in the last 6 months.

      --
      Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. Albert Einstein
    14. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by nacturation · · Score: 1

      One of my pet peeves with Hotmail is how it changes every web link to put a Hotmail frame around it. If you have a long email and you spend a lot of time reading it, then click on a link, it tells you that your message has expired and that you need to reload the message. WTF??? They probably just want more ad impressions.

      Gmail, on the other hand, opens links up in a new clean window without any extra crap around it -- as should be the case. That's what I find a lot with Gmail, as with Google in general... it just feels right and works intuitively.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    15. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by gerf · · Score: 1

      Well, with pop accounts that you download locally, you have the option of leaving a copy on the server. With Gmail this would be awesome, as it'd be a perpetual backup!

      As for Google not being able to search emails downloaded offline, I've been trying to think of an alternative for this myself. Given that Google's strength is Adsense and the posting of text-only advertisements near to the pertinant information, and offline viewing of emails would put a wrench in this system, there are several options. They could send a separate email with advertisements (ineffective, I think), create their own email program that would show advertisements that are sent from a google server, or create an offline version of Adsense that does this. Or, as they sugguest at gmail.com's FAQ, they can charge for pop3 access.

    16. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People are flocking to GMail because it is the geek thing to do. Everyone wants one and they will beg you for an invite (I know I just gave out my 6).

      As far as the design of GMail I am not all that impressed. Search functions are nice and all but I don't use searchs that much. The "conversations" aren't exactly what I want as I would prefer standard folders. I certainly don't like not having an option to keep ALL old emails open in a conversation w/o having to click on them to "expand"). The filters are nice and seem to work well for my uses but I haven't played around with them enough to see just how useful they are.

      I haven't received any spam but that's no surprise. I haven't had any issues at work but at home GMail seems sluggish. Almost too sluggish. I don't know why that is but there is a noticable lag after clicking on things at home before actions are taken.

      The space is nice and all (and I am forwarding all mail from home -> GMail for now for permanent storage as a test) but it's certainly not necessary. They are going to eliminate it eventually claiming national security or kiddy porno/warez violations.

    17. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by accelleron · · Score: 1

      actually, I have a corporate account with [censored]. If you're talking about space, [censored] only sends me about 5-20 emails daily, averaging 20 kb for a normal e-mail and 200 for an attatchment (i.e. powerpoint presentation), so space would not be an issue as far as GMail is concerned. Privacy issues: Google basically sends it's bot to crawl through your e-mail looking for certain words that it flags in association with your account. For example: if out of your 100 e-mail messages 35 contain the word "arcade" and 60 the word "games", Google might send you ads about coin-ops in your area. As far as sniffing corporate secrets, their admins have no access to e-mail, only the bots. Therefore, unless you're afraid of the GMail Bot EBaying off your secrets, there's not much to worry about. As for GMail's security, there are dents in my walls from me banging my head against them after various attempts to hack me an account (or into an account) during the beta's earlier stages. I wouldn't consider myself such an asshat hacker, so I believe Google's a fairly safe place to store your e-mail. As far as prestiege, being an amateur PC-tech with my own business in NY, I've only noticed people impressed when I gave them my GMail address, so while I wouldn't exactly expect HP to send me mail from hewlpack@gmail.com, I think it's fine for small and even some medium businesses, excluding web-design firms.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    18. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by gazbo · · Score: 0
      People's evidence #1: Gazbo turning down a gmail invite yesterday.

      Annoyingly you might have to log in to see it, but what the hell. Fact is you picked just the wrong day to make that dig ;-)

    19. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by accelleron · · Score: 1

      people, don't feed the trolls.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    20. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by AntiChris · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the l33tn355 factor of it all!
      ^_^

      -

      --
      From 0 to drunk in $20
    21. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by ThomK · · Score: 1

      Gmail doesn't integrate with any Messenger, nor does it have decent contact list management. when those two things work (Oh yeah, and I can check it from outlook), I'll shift everyone over to my Gmail account.

      --

      TK

    22. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      What do you do if google goes out of business?

      I'm sorry, but this is EXACTLY what a domainname and mailserver is for. A true business domain with matching website is required as part of the trust you are trying to build.

      If my own server goes down then I miss mails for a day or so, but if google goes down, its feasible I could lose a great deal more.

      Also, think about if your new prospective customer has been stung for whatever reason by google - bad rankings, spam spyware - the reasons could be trivial, but enough for a person or company to simply say "do not deal with google or its afiliates anymore".

      It would be similar to sending mail from liquid@manchesterunited.com to a london based business.

      So to sum up, its not space constraints, or hacking considerations, its corporate image.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    23. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by manavendra · · Score: 1

      quite right too! for years, email service providers have treated the email boxes as just a static table really such that after a couple of hundred emails, it is all left up to the user to search and locate the emails, or resort to keeping the chain of conversation in each message.

      But then of course, you can't preserve the conversation chain, because you dont have enough space. So for doing anything reasonable, you have to pay them, hence the idea of free email is nothing but luring you to use and then ultimately pay

      Oh and we have all have been numbed and blinded by those nasty flash ads making it a nightmare to navigate or find that hidden obnoxious button to close the advert.

      Now comes along google, and suddenly everyone panics. I think one of the biggest scares is because of the excitement generated by google's offering in the developer/geek community. MS and Yahoo know that for any product to be successful it has to generate a fair interest and spreads faster through word of mouth than anything else really, which Google succeeded to do.

      So now, it has become the case of who makes the biggest thunder!

      --
      http://efil.blogspot.com/
    24. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by cunnilingus · · Score: 0

      that's why hosting companies still can sell mail forwarding services (probably you can buy domain with default catch to some remote account for free)

    25. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Do you know about Hotmail Popper? POP3 access for Hotmail. I haven't used it, but am told by those who do that it works pretty well. There's also one for Yahoo.

      And yes, I'd like to have a GMail account, on General Principles -- just seems like it'd be a Good Thing to have even if one doesn't use it for primary email. Struck me as good for general info mailing lists cuz of the search functions.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    26. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Reziac · · Score: 1

      What I meant to get at in my previous reply, but got sidetracked and forgot, was that since there are POP3 access clients for Hotmail and Yahoo, it's only a matter of time before someone makes one for GMail too. As to the search/ad functions, I suppose there's no reason Google couldn't create a little add-on for standard mail clients, for folk who want to read mail offline. It could parse mail as it's being processed for download, and insert the handful of textads as separate messages following the email to which they refer (that way your regular mail isn't edited, yet you still get the exact same content). If they use logical subject lines, those "ad messages" would be easy to filter and sort, too.

      In fact, that could be developed into a "fetch/don't-fetch me more textads regarding this here topic" sort of client, perhaps as simple as a ReplyTo link in the textads you just got, frex "show me more on this topic" or "wrong adset, I never want to hear about this again". And your next set of emails would have more, or less, of whatever type of ad messages. And it needs to make sure you only see a given message NN-many times (once might be enough).

      Custom-tailored spam :) (And if it was all only ads for stuff we're actually interested in, and only as often as we wish to see it, spam wouldn't be a problem!!)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    27. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by randyest · · Score: 1

      Wow, super evidence, may I reprint it here? Hope so:

      The Dank Hole create account | faq | wiki | accounts | search


      Diaries | Everything Else | Who's online? | The Hole
      You don't have permission to read comments in this section.

      I'm convinced :)

      --
      everything in moderation
    28. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by UU7 · · Score: 1

      Pop Goes the Gmail

      That should do the trick for people wanting pop3 access :)

      "Pop Goes the Gmail is a program that sits between the http://gmail.com web server and your email client, converting messages from web format into POP3 format that a program such as Outlook Express or Thunderbird can understand."

    29. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Haha! That was quick [g]. Mondo coolness, thanks for the link.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    30. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks unprofessional. Having a business email at a free provider is one of the first tipoffs that I might not want to do any serious business with the person on the other end.

    31. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      rez - send me a mail to my gmail.com account (same username) and you can have my last invite :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    32. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Aslan72 · · Score: 1
      Someone could offer me an account :)...I'd be appreciative :).

      --pete

    33. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Done, assuming I interpreted that correctly (it's still B.C. here -- Before Caffeine :) and thanks much!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    34. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      In short I'm never going back to any other webmail service. It'll take me a lot to pry me away from GMail.

      It is important to note that GMail is *FULL* of JavaScript and is unusuable w/o it. For me that's completely acceptable as my mobile Internet doesn't support Javascript and no one should anyway.

      If they would switch to something that didn't require JavaScript (and wasn't just so damn sluggish) I would also hop on the bandwagon. Until then I will stick to my standard email setup.

    35. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 1

      > I certainly don't like not having an option to keep ALL old emails open in a conversation w/o having to click on them to "expand"

      There is an "Expand All" link on the right-hand side that will mostly do what you are requesting with a single click.

    36. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can't format mail just yet

      I call that a feature. I hate recieve emails from some moron who thinks yellow text on white backgrounds look funky. its an email, it should be plain text. you want formatting? make a website, email me that. ill probably trash it without looking though

      --
      TIAEAE!
    37. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      What do you do if google goes out of business?

      sit tight and wait for the Apocalypse

      --
      TIAEAE!
    38. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by TheClam · · Score: 1

      Check out Mozilla Firefox and the "Hotmail Tabs" extension. It removes the frame from hotmail links and allows you to middle-click on messages to open them in new tabs, whereas now hotmail restricts you to one window.

    39. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by strawbo · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried it yet, but have you considered running Pop Goes the GMail with Mono? PGtGM is written in .NET, which should run with the Mono implementation of the .NET framework. A good alternative if you want to stick with Linux...

    40. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to mention that Gmail's javascript makes it entirely inaccessable to disabled users. It breaks all screen-readers in use today because none of them can figure out that the javascripted 'buttons' are actually links.

    41. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by zurab · · Score: 1
      I prefer having google searching my personal mails and its grouping and management are better than any of the offline pop mail programs I've tried.

      Wow. I did not know I would be seeing stuff like this on /.

      I'd like to remind you of this statement in the future in case google gets accused of selling this info to FBI for Carnivore III/CAPPS III, or something like this happens to them. In the latter case, spammers could even offer you a personalized targeted spam brought to you by your friendly google data mine.

      Personally, I prefer that no 3rd parties search through, tag keywords and phrases, and categorize my personal e-mails at all, not with my express permission anyway. It's just too prone to abuse. Google now is "good." After IPO - who knows: change of management or strategy? Acquired by another company? You know all you personal data collected (minus e-mail texts) could be up for sale to the highest bidder.
    42. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even consider moving business mails onto ANY of the free providers, thats just suicidal, but for personal mails google just wipes the floor with everything else out there.

      Hmmmm, a paid gmail for business mails. Sounds very useful and promising.

    43. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, I have a "condense all" and that's it. It needs to remain this way after I click it once (or at least have the option to keep it like that all the time). Having to do it everytime is a hassle.

    44. Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better by ElliotLee · · Score: 1
      The "conversations" aren't exactly what I want as I would prefer standard folders.

      The Gmail equivalent to folders are labels. Conversations is something else - a way of organizing subsequent replies to messages.

  10. Does anybody use all that space? by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was under the impression that most of the people who routinely sent or recieved large attachments had a 'proper' paid email service, with more features than your average webmail. Will any of these new developments lure any of these people back into the land of webmail?

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    1. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I was under the impression that most of the people who routinely sent or
      > recieved large attachments had a 'proper' paid email service, with more
      > features than your average webmail. Will any of these new developments lure any
      > of these people back into the land of webmail?

      I'm going to get 5 or 6 free 100 meg accounts (don't care who with) and email all my digital photos there. Partly as a backup, and partly to make it easier to email pictures to people. I'll have another account with the best pictures that I want to share with people, and i'll just give people that I trust the password so they can look at them whenever they feel like it. Sort of like hosting them on a website, but without tedious download restrictions and that annoying thing whereby free accounts have a strip at the top of the page with is always there even if you're now viewing a completely unconnected webpage.

      The logical extension of this sort of size-boost is for homepages to become bigger to compensate. It's about time thing changed to reflect the massive decrease in the cost of storage since all these free services started.

    2. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that most of the people who routinely sent or recieved large attachments had a 'proper' paid email service

      One problem with gmail is that despite the size of the mailbox in total, the messages you can send are still very small, limited to 10MB total (I don't know if that's 10,000KB or 10,2400KB). That's worth taking into consideration before swapping over

      I routinely need to email documents up to 50MB in size, and without that support, Gmail is not for me.

      --
      RST
    3. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by matth · · Score: 1

      As I tell our customers who complain about this. If you're trying to e-mail a 50MB attachment YOU HAVE ISSUES! E-Mail is for text. FTP is for files. Say it with me people. E-Mail is not a medium for sending large files! Things break... like your POP3 client. It's just not good, if you routinely send things that big you should invest in a proper FTP server/service from someone.

    4. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      i often have to email attachments that run over 10mb, which makes me break them up. i would love to use an ftp or other transfer method (partly because the stupid ISP's smtp server will bounce the entire msg including attachment as ascii) but the clients that i send stuff to have a hard time with a standard zip file most the time. to me it's just not worth the effort to explain it to all those ppl

    5. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by jbarr · · Score: 1

      It's really a mindset change. Because there is so much available space, I no longer have to worry about deleting important messages just to free up space. I've imported about 1000 archived messages and have received several emails with very large attachments, and I only have used about 2% of my space.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    6. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      "most of the people who routinely sent or recieved large attachments had a 'proper' paid email service"

      Actually I have been paying $9.00 a year for extra storage on Yahoo. I have had the same Yahoo email address since Yahoo started their service, and I am loath to give it up. All my High School and College friends know it. I can access it anywhere in the world. I pay for the extra storage to keep critical files stored online. I have copies of my resume, all my important contacts, all my registration keys. It was really great to log in the other day and discover my 'usage' had gone from 48% of my available storage to 2% of my available storage. 2 Gig Rocks!

      Now if I only had 12 Gig I could store my mp3's online...

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    7. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by matth · · Score: 1

      ISPs mail server isn't stupid, ours does that as well... that's because that's what the message looks like! The mail server is just bouncing back the message! E-mail is not for file transfer.

      Ahh I remember the day when smart people used computers.. now everyone and their mother can use one and we have issues like this.

    8. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 1

      It's not an "issue"

      I send large emails. People receive them. No issue

      --
      RST
    9. Re:Does anybody use all that space? by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      my point is that you dont need the entire msg to tell what msg bounced, all you need is the headers, subject and some of the body. limit it to a few hundred k thats sent back and i would be happy

  11. Hard disk manufacturers happy campers? by jaf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With this extra demand, will it lead to a faster curve towards even cheaper hard disks with even more space on them?

    Time to invest in Seagate? :-)

    --
    -- jaf
    1. Re:Hard disk manufacturers happy campers? by fulana_lover · · Score: 2, Interesting

      one might argue the reverse might be true - people may want/need/buy smaller hard drives for their personal computers because they have such large online, virtual drives. So maybe western digital sells 100,000 more drives to google but 10,000,000 less profitable/smaller drives to Dell/etc. great for users - upload (encrypted) important stuff regularly to gmail, no worries about backup/remote access/version control/etc.

    2. Re:Hard disk manufacturers happy campers? by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


      Rule #1 of investing: Don't tell a half-million other people what your stock strategy is.

      Okay, we need to reset things a bit... What about solid-state storage, that'll be sure to put the hard drive manufacturers' feet to the fire! Oh, and holographic storage just might be the wave of the future! I've always thought that large arrays of hampster wheels were underrated for mass storage...invest now!!!

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    3. Re:Hard disk manufacturers happy campers? by Shadarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you serious? gMail's 1GB of storage is huge for free email accounts, but it's still only 1/40th of the size of the smallest harddrive you can get in a new computer. People who buy 120 gig drives aren't doing it for email.

  12. Wouldn't it be funny by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Google all of a sudden now says: "Meh, we tried it out with the testing phase, and we've decided not to start a email service at this time".

    Now that Yahoo and Hotmail and everyone else has done the "look, we're offering 1Gig storage too!"

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    1. Re:Wouldn't it be funny by lurker412 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that thought occurred to me as well. However, that would take the wind out of Google's IPO sails, not to mention the harm it would do to their corporate karma. Not likely.

    2. Re:Wouldn't it be funny by Mercaptan · · Score: 1

      That'd be pretty bastardly.

      Though if they did that and then let existing users keep their accounts, either through a forwarding service or actually letting the service continue for a lucky few, imagine the completely insane market there'd be for gmail.com addys.

      --
      -- "Sucks to your ass-mar"
    3. Re:Wouldn't it be funny by jbuilder · · Score: 1

      Spymac has had these services for a while, so I don't see what the big deal is...

      http://www.spymac.com/network.php?p=tour

      --
      Polymorphism -- It's what you make of it.
    4. Re:Wouldn't it be funny by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      It would be funny, but I don't think it would be worth it for them. The fact is, storage is cheap now, and gMail reflects that. Consumer harddrives are less than a doller per gig. Not sure what Google uses, but I don't imagine it would be much more than that. A doller per customer isn't a lot of overhead, especially when you consider the publicity it got them.

  13. Not to mention.... by arcite · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to mention its less evil! When you use google, only part of your soul is consumed. Better than the alternative I say.

    1. Re:Not to mention.... by krumms · · Score: 1

      When you use google, only part of your soul is consumed. Better than the alternative I say.

      GMail: 2 times the calories, 1/3 of your soul!

    2. Re:Not to mention.... by accelleron · · Score: 1

      Hotmail: all your GMail are belong to us...

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    3. Re:Not to mention.... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? They have to fill all the storage with something, you know!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  14. This is all well and good, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's more to GMail than pure storage capacity. Personally, i wouldn't consider switching back to Hotmail or any other service until they improve the system in some of the ways Google have -- such as the conversation system for tracking replies, and the searchable "All Mail" folder which holds both incoming and outgoing conversations.
    Its funny -- in all the hyperbole about the disk space being offered, people are neglecting some of the real innovations/advancements GMail has managed.

    1. Re:This is all well and good, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's been the biggest benefit of Gmail. Either people waking up and starting to look around at the feature sets of webmail offered to them. And/or companies waking up and saying we have to do something to keep our customers.

      Traditionally people just took it because it was free. But it would appear as though webmail is important to these companies for some reason(exposure or profit) so they are quickly learning that they need to offer a good product in order to retain customers. Instead of the traditional "They will take what we give em because it's free"

  15. Its good to see them changing.... by Cyb3rBull3ts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trying to save customers, but honestly, with a sleak, sexy UI of GMail, without those SUPER ANNOYING banners. 2GB of free space, or even unlimited wouldn't be enough to bring me over since those HUGE and OBNOXCIOUS banners are still there.

    They have to Googleize, and learn that small, relavent banners produce more then spaming me with flashy popups that install spyware, and that Mozilla/GoogleToolbar will block.

    But it is a step in the right direction.

    1. Re:Its good to see them changing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      mozilla + adblock.

      I am a regular Yahoo user and the few times I've had to use it from IE I've gone mad with all the annoyingly fast flash animations and popups.

      OTOH, I browse with colours disabled to so maybe I am weird :)

    2. Re:Its good to see them changing.... by haakoneide · · Score: 1

      That made me think of the emails you frequently get from "Hotmail Staff", "What do you do this easter?!?!". AND, it's impossible to click the "Report spam"-button on them.

    3. Re:Its good to see them changing.... by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

      "slick" is the right word?
      and it is "obnoxious" :)

    4. Re:Its good to see them changing.... by alain1234 · · Score: 1

      Adblock for Mozilla is not as powerful as proxy filters like privoxy but it's really easy to hide images/flash/iframes with regexp patterns

    5. Re:Its good to see them changing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... I am not sure which you are reffering too, but if you pay for yahoo to get 2gb or if you use sbcyahoo and link your email to your account, there are no ads. It actually works quite nicely and there is a relatively decent search. Yes, I do have a gmail account, but I still think that as of yet my ad-free yahoo account is more reliable/useful. Gmail is quite nice though.

  16. problem since upgrade by millahtime · · Score: 1

    I have noticed a problem since the upgrade of yahoo. there is a delay in getting email from hotmail. it started right when the upgrade happened for me. But, it is nice to have the extra space.

  17. Whats the diffrence? by Viceice · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But what good is all that storage space without a proper way of archiving and accessing it?

    Remember years ago when the max e-mail size wasn't 2mb and you suddenly got mail bombed? You had to go looking through 100's of pages of mail and deleting all the junk. All that work is enough to give anybody carpel tunnel syndrome. Also, Hotmail's recent restriction on opening only one page at a time only makes the matter worse.

    The reason why Gmail can give 1GB of space is because it has developed an excellent system of mail archival, retrieval and display. So unless Hotmail changes its interface and pulls something as good as Google, we are soon going to see frustrated users shifting through many pages of spam.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:Whats the diffrence? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      At MS, the marketing people decide how it looks without any care to how it actually feels, not that they EVEN use it, though I think its time to block *.gif *.jpg from hotmail.com to speed up access, why doesnt MS just store the images inside IE itself at least it would make hotmail from within IE actually FAST and a dream to use, not like a crock of shit with 100 gifs taking 200seconds on dialup.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:Whats the diffrence? by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      To be fair, hotmail now has filters (hidden away in options) and lists mail "from my contacts" separately.

      Many people are utterly startled when they find out hotmail has filters.. You can even apply them to old mail, not just new incoming messages.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    3. Re:Whats the diffrence? by superyooser · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You're exactly right. Google's competitors are falling into a trap. All that space is good only if it's organized and easy to search. Hotmail and Yahoo are digging their own graves by incorporating only one piece of Google's business strategy. Google has made clear their philosophy of why they're giving users a whole gigabyte. Google wants to leverage its superior searching ability. The other email providers don't have this! What are they thinking?

      Google has pulled off a perfect rope-a-dope scheme, perhaps unintentionally. At first, GMail appears vulnerable since Microsoft and Yahoo could easily match its 1 GB storage. But that's not GMail's real strength. By its competitors raising their storage limits, they are *emphasizing* their own strategic *weaknesses* (no automatic organization, lousy searching), and Google will pummel them in the webmail market with its arsenal of exclusive advantages.

    4. Re:Whats the diffrence? by jbrw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My boss has maxed out his 100Mb of paid Hotmail email storage. The bloody thing keeps timing out opening his folders, doing searches etc.

      I dread to think what'll happen when he's got 2Gb to play with.

    5. Re:Whats the diffrence? by cygnusx · · Score: 1

      > Google wants to leverage its superior searching ability.

      Um, searching email is not rocket science. Yahoo does it quite well, and so does Hotmail. Btw, I am an early beta tester and I wouldn't rate Gmail's search as very good: "tolkien" fails to match "tolkien's", "Silmarillon" does not result in a "Did you mean... Silmarillion" (both of these work in Google's standard web search).

      Plus, the search interface is not easy for the average n00b. typing "label:label-foo -label:bar" is not terribly intuitive. It's not even consistent: whitespace in labels are encoded with hyphens but spaces in other searches are parenthesized (e.g., to:(john doe)).

      To be fair, the Gmail team has always come back positively when I've reported these, I guess v1.1 of Gmail will be much better than it is now. But again, it ain't rocket science. On the other hand, Google niceties like not putting a tag-line to outgoing mail are rather nice, and so is the fast, uncluttered interface. I hope Google does a XUL/XAML client sometime - that'd rock.

    6. Re:Whats the diffrence? by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      Considering how fast Yahoo and Hotmail were to fall in line with increased storage, I don't think it's going to hit them very hard financially. Seems like they could have been doing this all along, but were content giving 10mb since there was not much else out there.

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
  18. Re:Very good news by sigaar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now imagine Google was just bluffing and causing everyone to panic and enlarge their free storage offers. Either ways, for a change the consumer scores....

    --
    sigaar
  19. Will Yahoo upgrade accounts for other countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my 100 MB upgrade 2 days ago for my @yahoo.com account, but not yet for @yahoo.co.uk and @yahoo.co.jp which are both still at 6 MB.
    If you're willing to put up with some spam and fill out some surveys, you can get a 2 GB box at Yahoo.

  20. Is it really a good idea... by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To use a remote computer as permanent storage?

    I just don't trust a free service provider to care too much about my data.

    1. Re:Is it really a good idea... by Threni · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > To use a remote computer as permanent storage?
      > I just don't trust a free service provider to care too much about my data.

      You are conflating two issues. Of course it's a good idea to have the data stored non-locally. If your office/house burns down, you're going to thank those servers.

      Store your data in multiple locations if you're worried about it. Get 2,3,5,10,50 free accounts and treat them like a RAID server if its data you just can't afford to lose.

      Whether or not a service is free is irrelevant. Yahoo/Hotmail etc aren't going to want to get a bad name for losing customers data even if you're not paying.

    2. Re:Is it really a good idea... by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I just don't trust a free service provider to care too much about my data.

      So you prefer the service provider to buy your trust by making you pay them money. Hmm.

      Whether or not you directly pay them do not forget you are still their source of income as their advertisers will pay nothing without you. If they piss off an advertiser there are likely hundreds waiting more waiting for an ad spot. However, if they piss of a user, that user will tell more users and much more will be lost. Their business model walks a thin line of supplying what the customer wants (ermanent personal information remaining permanent and personal included).

    3. Re:Is it really a good idea... by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      Whether or not a service is free is irrelevant. Yahoo/Hotmail etc aren't going to want to get a bad name for losing customers data even if you're not paying.

      Um, are you sure?

    4. Re:Is it really a good idea... by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whether or not you directly pay them do not forget you are still their source of income as their advertisers will pay nothing without you.

      However, bear in mind that this makes you their product which they are selling to their customers, the advertisers.

      And it's the customer who is always right.

      KFG

    5. Re:Is it really a good idea... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Um, are you sure?

      Yes, I'm sure.

    6. Re:Is it really a good idea... by alain1234 · · Score: 1

      Probably not

    7. Re:Is it really a good idea... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Sounds just like TV, radio, magazines, ....

      Damned insightful way to put it, tho. No wonder we're no longer being treated as customers; we're NOT! We're just product in the pipeline. No wonder companies feel free to sue [process] "customers" as a business model...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Is it really a good idea... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Sounds just like TV, radio, magazines, ....

      Because it is, which is why so many of us rent tapes/DVDs (although they're putting ads in those now too, the bastards), listen to subscription radio (which they're turning into ads for the CDs, just like the music portion of commercial radio really is, but at least the scope is far greater than top 40. It'll be a cold day in hell before you hear Bizet or Shankar on ClearChannel) and read Consumer Reports (they're holding out, but the downside is that they often lack expertise in the products they're testing and actually give bad advice).

      Ok, we're screwed.

      We're just product in the pipeline.

      I used to work at Sears. One of my jobs there was taking returned and unwanted product, breaking it up, and throwing it in the dumpster. Sound familiar?

      KFG

    9. Re:Is it really a good idea... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      You mean we can expect to be returned as unwanted, broken up, and trashbinned?! Eeep!!

      [thinking] That explains the Lawsuit phase... :(

      I'm reminded of some movie where Our Hero gets beaten up and tossed into a dumpster. Some black "street person" comes along digging in the trash, and says, "Hey, someone threw away a perfectly good white guy!" -- Somehow this is no longer funny!! :/

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:Is it really a good idea... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      It all depends.

      Who keeps better managed backups, you or Google?

    11. Re:Is it really a good idea... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that Google doesn't backup (at least for their primary search engine). They can simply get the data from the source if they lose it.

      But as for GMail, I just don't think they'll put a lot of effort into data backup. Sure, they'll probably have redundant disks, and probably do a regular backup, but I don't think they'll do anything more than that. I'm not going to put faith in a company unless they have more at stake than they do.

      Incidentally - I do have data on my hard disk that is older than Google (or Yahoo for that matter). So, in answer to your question - I do! :)

  21. Hotmail sucks. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a little surprising, given that in the past they were so pressed for space that they decided to delete every sent message stored on their servers, so pressed for space that they decided to delete all mail after 45 days of not logging in, up from a year as it had been originally.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Hotmail sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think now it's down to 30 days, last time I checked.

      I don't know what I'm gonna do on my 5 week trip abroad without internet access.

    2. Re:Hotmail sucks. by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      I don't know what I'm gonna do on my 5 week trip abroad without internet access.
      Get a decent free email provider?

      --
      TIAEAE!
    3. Re:Hotmail sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering the same thing. Yahoo too reduced their free account from 6MB to 4MB awhile back. If they were so pressed for space that they couldn't spare 2MB, where the hell are they getting all these reserves for gigabyte+ storage?!

      It's like those people who won't buy their screaming kids a freaking candy bar at checkout but lease a different SUV every few years.

  22. It took Google to do this! by puke76 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It took Google to do this. I mean, what were the chances of the incumbents doing this, if Google hadn't?
    That's what happens when you sit around and be complacent.

    Well done Google! The others are just playing catch-up.

    1. Re:It took Google to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, that's what happens if you sit around and MAKE MONEY, which Google are quite unlikely to do with their Gmail offering given their low revenue per pageview (Google makes more than average per click, but people click less on their properties than on the major portals due to the subdued nature of their ads) and the added cost of storage.

      Google is doing this because they needed to shake up the market to have any hope of making an impact with their mail service. They are either hoping falling storage costs will make it profitable at some point in the future OR that they will make up for the cost of Gmail in increased page views to their search engine.

      This isn't about being complacent - it's about not shaking up the market when you're already one of the major players - shakeups are ridiculously expensive for everyone involved, and highly risky. They only make sense when you're the underdog or new kid on the block and it's your only real markey entry possibility.

    2. Re:It took Google to do this! by swanky · · Score: 1

      Apparently, even Excite mail is also going to increase their storage capacity for their free email service:

      We'll soon be upgrading your current 3MB email account to allow up to 125MB of storage - FREE! That means enjoying your Excite Email experience more, and checking your storage quota less (or not at all!). Plus, we're increasing your email size limit to a whopping 10MB. This will give you the freedom to attach larger files, documents, whatever you want.

      * 125MB of Storage Space!
      * 10MB message size
      * 100% FREE

    3. Re:It took Google to do this! by mjh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well done Google! The others are just playing catch-up.

      You think so? I don't. I think the others are playing "user retention". They're trying to lower the impact of 1GB of space on their existing user base. Remember the incumbants have some inertia on their side. Most people don't want to have to deal with changing their email address. So if you make the storage disparity less, then it makes the cost of changing your email address more.

      I think this will have the exact intended effect. Users were tempted to put up with the pain of changing their email address to get the huge increase in space. Those same users probably won't switch now, because they've not got 100x more space than they used to have. Space isn't an issue anymore. Changing your email address is.

      IMHO, it's a good move by these guys.

      I think that google's response to this should be to offer free, permanant email forwarding. Essentially, what they'd be saying is this: OK, yes, you have to switch your email address today. But it's the last time you'll ever have to switch your email address... EVER. Do this, and it lowers the long term cost of switching your email address to gmail.

      $.02

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    4. Re:It took Google to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. What google need is to automatically fetch you hotmail account content.

      --fred

    5. Re:It took Google to do this! by danheretic · · Score: 1
      I think that google's response to this should be to offer free, permanant email forwarding. Essentially, what they'd be saying is this: OK, yes, you have to switch your email address today. But it's the last time you'll ever have to switch your email address... EVER. Do this, and it lowers the long term cost of switching your email address to gmail.

      There are services out there that offer this. Not usually for free. They're basically permanent mail forwarders. One such is pobox.com, which I used for years, with the intention of "never switching your email address again". Unfortunately, after having it for 5+ years, I decided to ditch it due to the inordinate amount of spam it was receiving. (The poor email address had been plastered everywhere since before spam was a known problem, so it'd been harvested 20 million times, plus pobox.com was proving popular for the dictionary spammers.)

      The lesson here is that nothing on the net is permanent.

    6. Re:It took Google to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done Google! The others are just playing catch-up.

      You think so? I don't. I think the others are playing "user retention".


      It's quite obvious that they are. Google led, the others followed. Yes, they are trying to retain their users, but if you had comprehended the parent, you'd see that their actions are a direct response to Google's lead.

      I think that google's response to this should be to offer free, permanant email forwarding.

      Unfortunately, it's not up to Google to offer forwarding services from the competitors. If that were the case, we'd suddenly find Hotmail conveniently "forwarding" everyone else's email to their service. Honestly, how does this tripe which makes so little sense get modded +5 insightful???

    7. Re:It took Google to do this! by dustman · · Score: 1

      I have been using my current email address (posted right up here in my user info) for more than 5 years as well.

      I switched it (and my other addresses) to forwarding to gmail, and use gmail as my primary mail interface, for about a month now.

      Gmail's spam filtering is good enough that I am barely troubled by spam.

      I really like gmail a lot.

      Before gmail, I was hosting all my email myself, off of my home linux machine, using fetchmail to pull down out of POPs and secure IMAP to access it (from anywhere).

      The main problem was spam filtering... Like you mention, it's difficult to tune a spam filter which receives so much stuff.

      Bogofilter worked super well for me a few years ago (this was when I was hosting my email at another shell account ISP)... When I switched to hosting myself, and got the latest bogofilter, it wasn't nearly so good (up to 50 spams getting through per day). I briefly looked at other spam solutions, and they all looked like a PITA to set up properly.

      (I will admit, that one problem, is that I do like to receive email from one "kind of" spammy source. Basically, it's a "how to hit on women" list, and gmail flagged it as spam, so maybe it was making my bogofilter too lenient on all those penis and other "male enhancement" spams).

    8. Re:It took Google to do this! by mjh · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, it's not up to Google to offer forwarding services from the competitors. If that were the case, we'd suddenly find Hotmail conveniently "forwarding" everyone else's email to their service.

      I wasn't suggesting that Google forward hotmail accounts to gmail. I was suggesting that google allow gmail accounts to be forwarded to some other account. Meaning that once I get a gmail account, I can set it up to forward to some other account if I ever decide to leave gmail. This means that if I ever leave gmail, I don't have to go through dealing with changing my email address.

      While this may sound like gmail would be shooting themselves, the idea is to add value to a gmail account that isn't in a yahoo or hotmail account, thus encouraging people to switch. Being able to permanantly keep a gmail account so that you don't ever have to worry about switching email service providers is of value to folks.

      The point is to get them in the door. Initially 1GB did this, but it's been countered. Now, you have to offer something that the other guy won't offer -- free email forwarding. Hotmail and Yahoo won't offer this because it will encourage people to switch. But gmail can offer this because they're not currently worried about people switching away from gmail - hardly anyone is on it. They're worried about getting people in the door.

      And if there service is as good as all of the beta testers are saying, then their service will keep them there.

      Honestly, how does this tripe which makes so little sense get modded +5 insightful???

      Because those people who modded it up, understood what was being said.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    9. Re:It took Google to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would google offer free email forwarding, which bypasses their ads, just to try to get you to switch? Your gmail account is not actually free because it is being subsidized by their ad revenue. Offering totally free services indefinitely is a recipe for disaster...

    10. Re:It took Google to do this! by mjh · · Score: 1

      Because right now, in order for that ad revenue to be of any value, they need to get users. Their initial draw was 1GB of storage space. To go from 2MB of space to 1000MB of space, I suspect most users would be willing to change their email address. However, that tactic was effectively countered by Yahoo & Hotmail, who upped their space to 100MB and 200MB (respectively). Now the jump in space doesn't look as big, and the relative cost of having to change your email address is pretty big.

      So for google to counter and get more interest, they have to do something. One suggestion is to make it so that users get to keep their gmail address forever. That's certainly not the only thing they could do, but it's my suggestion. I think it's a good suggestion because it's one that Yahoo & Hotmail can't offer. Gmail has nothing to lose by offering it - only users to gain. Yahoo & Hotmail have a lot to lose by offering it, so they can't. Now, of course, if some other (better) webmail service comes along, gmail could easily lose those users to that better service. So after this strategy, gmail needs to ensure that they are always the best.

      Anyway, it's just one suggestion. I think it would work. But I don't hold google's purse strings, so take it for what it's worth.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    11. Re:It took Google to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, it's a "how to hit on women" list

      Link?

    12. Re:It took Google to do this! by Shadarr · · Score: 1
      I think the others are playing "user retention".

      Exactly. They don't have to attract anyone, because they already have the users; all they have to do is keep them. That's why they all offer a fraction of gMail's 1GB, when they could've just as easily upped the anti to 1.5 or 2GB.

      I have to admit, I've chafed against Hotmail's 2mb limit and occasionally pushed Yahoo's limit. With that consideration effectively nullified, it becomes a question of "is gMail that much better to justify the hassle of changing my address?" For my Yahoo acount (which I use mostly as a spam trap) the answer is definitely no. Hotmail, I hate, so I may end up switching anyway.

  23. Whoever you use for your free email, thank Google by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In less than three months since their announcement of Gmail (April 1st) they have redefined what a free email service should provide, in terms of storage and attachment size if nothing else.

    If Gmail hadn't appeared to shake up the status quo then Yahoo, Hotmail, etc would still be providing storage in the 2MB region rather than two or three orders of magnitude more.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  24. Competition? by MP3Chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet this is a new and uncomfortable experience for Microsoft, eh?

    1. Re:Competition? by BarryNorton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually they played and won in a competitive world of DOS and C-compilers. Then moved on the word processors. If it's new to anyone it's Google, who want to project forward from killing off Altavista...

    2. Re:Competition? by johannesg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They have felt it hundreds of times before. Their response was always the same: (cue robotic voice) "Eliminate. Eliminate. Eliminate."

      The fact that you don't seem to realize this confirms they have been wildly succesful doing just that...

    3. Re:Competition? by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      Eh ... I'm well aware of it. It was meant in humor...

    4. Re:Competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, by using anti-competitive tricks (DR-DOS anyone) and leveraging.

    5. Re:Competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And which compiler were they better than? Watcom smoked anything running on DOS, and even Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 doesn't even compile simple standard C++ programs.

      And word processors? They blew that one after Word 2.0 - every release after has been nothing but feature creep and bloatware. Unfortunately, Word Perfect went the same way with WP6.0 and up, and the rest just disappeared.

    6. Re:Competition? by CrystalChronicles · · Score: 1

      When Dos was dying and programs were moving to Windows MS intentionally denied WP the windows sdk. It delayed the mlong enough that by the time Wordperfect got on windows MS Words market share was too great to take back.

    7. Re:Competition? by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      Oh just great. You forgot to close your robotic voice tag and now the rest of the thread sounds like that. Thanks a lot, buddy.

    8. Re:Competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop lying. The Windows 3.0 SDK was available for anybody to purchase, and long before Win Word 2.0 came out. Wordperfect thought that Windows 3.0 would fail and people would prefer to stay with DOS, so they kept trying to sell DOS Wordperfect. This turned out to be a blunder.

    9. Re:Competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron. Just because something is available for purchase to anyone doesn't make it easy for any particular company to get especially if they want to get it early. Look at how Sony got successfully prosecuted for threatening to cut the supply line of PSXs during the Saturn VS PSX years. It hurt businesses even when those businesses could buy PSXs elsewhere. Same goes with when Microsoft 'strongly discouraged' OEM computer builders from bundling a competitors products with windows.

      You only have to delay the competior from getting what they need to slow them down. MS knew that and thats one of the ways they killed wordperfect.

      Lastly, you got your history wrong. Windows 3.0 DID fail.

  25. And it will still be no good by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

    if they offer all of that extra storage space without a good search ability to go with it. AND MS is going to ask money for the increased storage space. Right. I am slowly moving from .mac to gmail for all of the above reasons -storage, SEARCH and money. I cannot think why someone would want to use and pay for hotmail or something if there is a service such as gmail available. Just my 2 eurocents...

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    1. Re:And it will still be no good by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Well nobody said Gmail will stay free forever - I believe you do remember when Yahoo and Hotmail were free with no practical limitations (one wouldn't need a big mailbox because it was hard to send and download big files via 14.4 modem..).

      Why would someone want to use Hotmail or other paid-for email service?
      Simply because they want an address that won't get screwed up - of course it's impossible to tell with certainty, but if I want an email address that won't disappear, I do want to pay the provider because if nobody pays, one day they'll go under.
      If ad clicks in Gmail and other tricks don't do it, do you think Gmail will continue forever?

      In other words, $20 bucks (or whatever) a year is a reasonable insurance fee (as I said, it's impossible to get a 100% guarantee, but still) and proper contribution to the folks who work at the provider and need to get paid.
      I don't _want_ to use my Gmail address in resumes or for correspondence with people I plan to stay in touch with in 10 years time.

    2. Re:And it will still be no good by epsalon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want to pay "e-mail insurance", better buy your own domain and host your e-mail address there. If your ISP goes under, you can always switch.

  26. I'm still not seeing the point.... by Atrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the thing about the 'loads of storage space' thing is, right, archived mail, right? and to get to a web-based email service, I have to be online, right?

    what if I'm not online? what if I'm in hicksville on my laptop and want to access an old email message from someone for some really important reason (yeah I know, incoherent sentence, but bear with me)

    with the POP mail I have, my messages are RIGHT HERE. In have no need to go connecting to tha Intarweb to do this, right? but Gmail's amazing search capabilities so heavily plugged, are aimed right at this, going through your archived mail, right?

    Is there some link I'm not making here? Forgive me, I'm in the pub so maybe I'm just lost.

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Equally, what if you didn't have your laptop? But Hicksville has a "web enabled"(tm) library, then you can see your emails, anytime MadDaug is not looking at rattlesnake pr0n.

    2. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by ecrips · · Score: 3, Insightful
      what if I'm not online? what if I'm in hicksville on my laptop and want to access an old email message from someone for some really important reason

      On the other hand what if you are in hicksville without your laptop and want to access an old email. Being stored on a webmail account means you can access it with any internet connection computer anywhere. Which for those of us without a laptop is a definite plus.

      Personally I think a mixture is the best solution. Forward your email to Gmail, but also keep it on your own machine. Then you don't have to access the internet every time you want to read an email, but you can read your emails from any internet connected computer.

    3. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by Atrax · · Score: 1

      > On the other hand what if you are in hicksville without your laptop and want to access an old email.

      OK, catch 22. hourses for courses, swings and roundabouts and all that stuff. I like the idea of forwarding to GMail. that's pretty good. Better would be an account where you had both worlds. like GMail with POP. Now that would prod buttock.

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    4. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by jokach · · Score: 1

      I find that exactly being the case. There are lots of times when I'm disconnected from the net that I need my email ... POP is the way to go.

      Although I do have a Yahoo account (just boosted to 100MB), its for exchanging email with people that I don't want to have to give my real email address to. The 100MB Yahoo box just allows me to archive more email and clean my inbox up less often.

    5. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go use another free webmail service for a while and you will see the attraction to gmail. Most people proberly won't change from their current webmail service because they can search their mail better. They will change because most current services are rubbish. You hardly get any space, they are slow and are fequently down. You get your first spam moments after signing up, the ads are not subtle and some even go as far as puting ads in your outgoing mail.

    6. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand what if you are in hicksville without your laptop and want to access an old email. Being stored on a webmail account means you can access it with any internet connection computer anywhere. Which for those of us without a laptop is a definite plus.

      Personally I think a mixture is the best solution. Forward your email to Gmail, but also keep it on your own machine. Then you don't have to access the internet every time you want to read an email, but you can read your emails from any internet connected computer.


      Have you heard of IMAP?

    7. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      But you can use Hotmail this way... use Outlook Express to have an offline history and access the new stuff at any old web terminal, without hoping there's a POP client that won't leave your messages behind, or a SSH client.

    8. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by Atrax · · Score: 1

      yeah, sure, but we're talking about GMail. does GMail provide POP? If it does, rock and roll.

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    9. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      The thread as a whole is about Hotmail, and only comparing it with GMail; I think mine is a perfectly valid observation to make in such a thread. (Agreed, though: to match this capability Gmail should use POP as this proprietary HTTP thing is garbage, albeit useful behind some oppressive firewalls.)

    10. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by Atrax · · Score: 1

      true. I posted my reply before the penny dropped about the pseudo-POP thing in OE. I don't think Outlook does the pseudo POP3 thing, does it? just OE?

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    11. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      It does, but only Outlook XP (not previously).

    12. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by jbarr · · Score: 1

      It's just another example of technology providing personal choice. For someone like you, a PC or laptop-based answer is the best solution. It sounds like you often (always?) have your laptop with you, so that solution works best for you. For me, an online solution is best because I am rarely at my home PC. Being able to access my personal email from any Web-connected computer is a huge convenience. I don't carry a laptop with me, and I find email on PDA's simply kludgy.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    13. Re:I'm still not seeing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides using Outlook Express to create an offline Hotmail store, you can also use Outlook and Entourage (email clients that come with Win Office and Mac Office, respectively).

  27. fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden one by cryophan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have not seen gmail, but I know that one thing that attracted me to google at the start was that on my dialup connection, google was a FAST download, because of its lack of large graphical ads, etc., compared to the slow and bulky yahoo interface. The reason I avoid hotmail and yahoo mail now is because their interfaces are still ad-ridden and bulky and slow as hell on dialup.

    If the Gmail interface is as fast as the google interface, gmail will eat hotmail and yahoo for lunch.

  28. Re:Very good news by idsCypher · · Score: 0

    Hum true imagine that google hadnt lunch gmail still have the 2mgs on hotmail and account that i have humm like 8 years. on the other hand damn if when my account was full of fwd... and refused to accept more on 2mgs well with 200mgs damn lot more emails to see... and i dont talk the 2 gig refered hahah :)

  29. Re:Very good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should have just posted that in whatever your first language was, I'm sure more people could have understood it.

    TRANSLATION:
    Hmm. True. Imagine if Google hadn't launched GMail, you would still have only 2mb on hotmail, like you've had for the last 8 years! On the other hand most of the email I receive is SPAM or junk mail forwards (Almost 2mb worth), now I have 200mgs to look forward too, (wait until I get 2gbs! Haha :) )

  30. It's funny... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The main people who won't switch away from Hotmail are the home users who like Hotmail. If you ask them if they want to try something better, after they complain about spam/not being able to send big attachments/spyware, their response will be "NO, I'M HAPPY...shit, this service has so much spyware..."

    And now that Microsoft has disallowed signing up for a Passport with a non-Microsoft email address, tieing these (usually) MSN Messenger using Hotmail to Hotmail, we'll have lots of people locked into it, and they'll bitch, piss and moan at you to help them, then ignore you.

    God, I love users who are deluded as to the utter shitness of their email service. Trust me, I know loads of them.

    (I'll bet there's not one Hotmail account NOT covered in spam by now. They're all just spam buckets. Evil, evil Hotmail...we hates it my precioussssss...)

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:It's funny... by iapetus · · Score: 1

      You'll lose that bet. I keep my Hotmail address as quiet as possible (in particular it isn't mentioned on any web pages that I know of), and haven't had a single piece of spam there yet (unless you count mail from Hotmail, that is...)

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    2. Re:It's funny... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Trust me, it'll start. I've seen it happen so many times before. Clean Hotmail account, and the spam will start flooding in.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    3. Re:It's funny... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Really? Have you tried? Because last I tried, you couldn't. They've stopped doing that, because they don't want you to. Right now, all you can do is register for a "Limited .NET Passport", which is basically Hotmail but at passport.com.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:It's funny... by value_added · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether I'm embarassed or proud that I really don't know what Passport is all about or how it works, but I was "required" to get one to be able to download the Services From Unix package. The email address I provided to Microsoft was a DSL sub-account (used for throwaway registrations) and not a hotmail account.

      I suppose now I have to figure out what, if anything, happened to my system as a result of the transaction.

    5. Re:It's funny... by Spad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the reason I usually get given by Hotmail users, when asked why they don't switch to something decent, is that they don't want to have to change their email address.

      It's a fair bit of hassle notifying all your contacts, updating mailing list subscriptions, changing account details at online retailers and soforth.

      Especially as AFIAK Hotmail doesn't allow you to forward your emails to another account - besides, it's just be shut down after a month of "inactivity" anyway, so it's far from a sensible option.

    6. Re:It's funny... by iapetus · · Score: 1

      I thought that might happen, but a couple of years after opening the account I'm still spam free...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    7. Re:It's funny... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I'll back you up...

      I've had my Hotmail account for years. I've never sent a single piece of email using the hotmail address. The only 'spam' I recieve is from Microsoft themselves, and that only happens once a month, and it's not a problem.

      I use it for IM and nothing else. I didn't tick any of the "I want spam" checkboxes.

      Had it years, I tell you. Zero spam.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:It's funny... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      BUT YOU DON'T USE IT.

      I'm talking about users who use it for their day to day email.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    9. Re:It's funny... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      The email contacts thing is the reason that the Bcc: email header was invented.

      Or at least a good upshot of it.

      Anyway, I've changed my email address several times recently, and there's been no hassle.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    10. Re:It's funny... by FoboldFKY · · Score: 1

      ... because I happen to have three Hotmail accounts. One is a spam bucket (so no points for guessing it's perpetually buried in penis enlargement offers), I have another that I use more cautiously that only gets a few spam messages every week (and that's without turning on the spam filters), and a private one that has gotten (in total) ZERO spam messages.

      Hotmail isn't the problem, as usual, it's the people using it that wouldn't know about online privacy if you beat it into them with a sledgehammer.

      Also, I really don't care about the 2MB storage limit. I use Hotmail Popper with Thunderbird and never have to see any Hotmail ads :)

      --
      We're geeks... We're the sorcerers of the modern-day world. --
    11. Re:It's funny... by Gleapsite · · Score: 1

      As much as microsoft rubs me the wrong way... you're being a little overzealous.

      The only reason i'm still on Hotmail is for a lack of alternative. Yahoo, in my mind, is just as bad, and therefor not worth a change of addy. I'd rather not have an email with the word Spy (spymac) in the domain name, and no ones been kind enough to shoot me a gmail invite as of yet.

      My homail account receives about 1-2 spam messages a week. I have my filters set to the lowest possible settings, but even still Hotmail bounces someof my legit mail.

      don't get me wrong, Hotmail does smell bad, but until I can get something better, I'm mired in it.

      (i'm also probably a minority amongst users you describe)

      --
      face the world with eyes of fire.
    12. Re:It's funny... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      The main people who won't switch away from Hotmail are the home users who like Hotmail.

      No, the main people who won't switch away from Hotmail are those users that don't want all the hassle of telling all their friends their new email address, changing their profile on all the websites they are registered to, maintain two seperate inboxes for 6 months whilst they catch all the people/websites they missed and then finally dump the old one and pray that you've not missed anyone.

      Personally, I'd rather Hotmail sorted out their abysmal spam filtering than the extra storage space because, most of the time, that space is wasted because of all the spam.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    13. Re:It's funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have ONE Hotmail account, which I use for MSN Messenger only. Never for sending or receiving anything. Then I started getting messages in MSN Messenger "you got new mail". So, I deleted all the spam, and turned on the most aggressive filter: Whitelist. Of course, since I don't use the account for mail, I never added any addresses to the list = noone is allowed to send to me. That reduced the amount of spam, but I still got a few each month. Tried to blacklist them, but no "Hotmail does not allow you to blacklist this sender". By now, I think it finally stopped - or I found a way to turn off that "you got mail" message.

    14. Re:It's funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Especially as AFIAK Hotmail doesn't allow you to forward your emails to another account - besides, it's just be shut down after a month of "inactivity" anyway, so it's far from a sensible option.

      Sounds like further justification how the sooner you make the transition, the better. It doesn't have to be overnight, but this time around choose something that will likely be higher quality in the longer-term. I'm not sure why people are so against paying for quality e-mail. For a buck or two a month, you can get high quality service with backups. My parents pay more than that for a new mail box every year when some drunk or snow plow takes it out.

      mailsnare.net fastmail.fm

    15. Re:It's funny... by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 1

      ... which allows you to use MSN IM. Your point is??

      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    16. Re:It's funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just email all their email addresses to abuse@hotmail.com, with the subject 'SPAMMER'. That should convince them to switch.

      PS If not, do it again, and snatch their former address once it becomes free again.

    17. Re:It's funny... by oberondarksoul · · Score: 1

      I managed to sign up for a Passport with a GMail address yesterday. They hide the option, but it's definately still possible.

      --
      And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
    18. Re:It's funny... by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have absolutely no spam in my e-mail account at all. Never have either, I simply don't get spam, and have never cited it as a problem with Hotamil.

      On your other point however, I am one of those users tied to Hotamil as an MSN Messenger user, etc. Not only that, but because of everyone knowing my email, and changing it really is a hassle that you shouldn't have to go through. I still check my old e-mail address (yes, another hotmail account that does not get spam) for e-mails that people have sent to the old one, not realizing the new one that I have had for 3+ years. But hey, thats all :)

      -Brandon

    19. Re:It's funny... by Hybby · · Score: 0

      A person doesn't need to be tied into one email address, though.

      I use my hotmail account for things which aren't neccessity, such as signing up for free forums. That way if I do get trolled, I shrug it off, knowing that my hotmail inbox is expendable. I also use my hotmail acount for msn. I have no qualms with that. Why? I wouldn't want to have my Gmail account being linked to hotmail. Someone doesn't like you, signs you up for tons of forums and you get spammed. I also do that same thing with the email address from my ISP. I use it for private things, not public use.

      On that same topic, I have to say that Gmail's spam filters are wonderful. The deleted/spam boxes are very nice with the messages that they have. It's so fast, from work and from home. The conversations are great.

      And in reply to hotmail boxes being covered in spam... mine isn't. I've had it for 3 years now. It's a rather long address, and has _'s in it, so that does protect it. But I also have filters on the account to remove anything that comes in with fwd: in it. It provides HUGE amounts of protection. I also weeded and blocked tons of the porn spam a few years back, so I rarely get anything anymore.

      It's all about how you use your inbox and how well you configure it. And the fact that the other geeks didn't think of this....

    20. Re:It's funny... by paragon_au · · Score: 1

      Let's see I've had hotmail as my secondary e-mail accounts for years now. I have NEVER had spam that got past there spam filters, and even then I only get 1-2 spams a week. As it's my secondary e-mail I don't need to keep my e-mail's archived because I rarely get important e-mails to it. And if I do I can just forward it. Hotmail works fine if you don't need a lot of storage space, and don't mind the ads. Which is a lot of people.

    21. Re:It's funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone just take a deep breath and look around. Here's some news for the oh-so-righteous and cooler-than-thou slashdotters...

      hotmail is FREE. Don't bitch about something thats free... if you don't like it, don't use it but it's FREE... F-R-E-E... what do YOU give people for free? Who here complaining about how awful it is to have a free hotmail account actually gives anyone else anything, ever?

      I don't care what motives you want to superimpose onto MS.. I've had a hotmail account for 10 years and i wouldn't switch to gmail on a bet... i get ZERO spam in my hotmail inbox because ONLY MY CONTACTS are allowed to mail me - a feature hotmail has had for a very long time. MSN is great. It's also FREE and it lets me chat to friends and enjoy being online... for FREE...

      I don't use hotmail for my "main" email account & i don't know anyone who would... but for a good FREE link to MSN Messenger and something to check in a net cafe... for FREE, that's followed me around for 10 years, that ain't bad...

      Seriously... get off your high horses...

    22. Re:It's funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can sign up with passport using any email address... just click the big graphic on the top-right of the passport.com page

  31. Paging Apple, paging apple by weave · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yo Apple, how about boosting the space us .mac PAYING subscribers get? They charge like $350 a year EXTRA for a gig of space. For $100/year you get 15 megs for mail and 100 megs for storage.

    Granted, .mac does a shitload more than these others, but, hey, it's time to boost! :)

    1. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by Donny+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Customer

      We are storry to inform you that becuase our Xstor RAID isn't scalable enough and its RAID cannot be rebuilt online, we are currently unable to provide any extra space to our faithful customers.

      Please wait until the new and more powerful version of Xstor RAID is released and check back again!

      Sincerely,
      Apple Customer Service
      New Delhi

    2. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      Yo Apple, how about boosting the space us .mac PAYING subscribers get?

      Have patience, friend. WWDC is next week, and there are typically a lot of interesting announcements then. Let's see what happens on Monday.

    3. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by subtillus · · Score: 1

      Wait until monday!
      Then we'll talk.

      Apple pulled so many tricks out of its sleeves over the last month, I wouldn't be surprised to see this as one of the "big surprises" along with the new displays and G5 imacs.

      : )

    4. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I prefer the paid service of fastmail.fm. They have a free service, a service with a one time fee of $15, and services starting at $20 a year. If space is an issue, you can pay for it as your need it for the one time fee of $25 per 100 MB.

      Their service is web-based but is strictly text-no images or ads so it is very fast. They also let you create and delete alias email accounts for spam.

      I looked into the .Mac but it seemed overpriced for what it's offering though I'm still considering it for backup purposes.

      I'm not a fastmail employee or anything like that. I just think it's an excellent free and paid email service.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    5. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bleah.... I own no less than 3 Macs over here, and yet I never signed up for a .Mac account!

      I've used it a fair bit, since I used to work for a guy who hosted 4 different web sites from his .Mac acct. - and it was up to me to maintain all of those for him.

      My impression was, it's way too slow. Apple's only attempt to "address" this issue was to try to cache everything locally on your hard drive in OS X Panther, so it *appears* to be more responsive, rather than solving the real problem.

      Not only that, but it only "does more than the others" if you're using it from a Mac. If you have to access a .Mac account from something like a Linux box, or even a Windows PC, you run into immediate limitations. (Sure, Apple provides a Windows client for .Mac, but it's annoying you need one in the first place. Why can't I just ftp files directly up to the account, if need-be?)

      Apple keeps trying to get more people on-board with .Mac - but it seems like they're trying to bribe users with perks, rather than truly improve the service itself. (EG. Sign up for .Mac, and you'll get 20% off on your next software purchase at the Apple store! Or sign up now, and we'll let you download free anti-virus software.) Thanks, but no thanks. .Mac would be fine for some small fee like $25/yr. but it's not worth more than that.

    6. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Only apple could charge you MORE per year for online storage than it costs to buy a harddisk!

      Jeeez, for $350, you could buy 1000GIG of HDs, so apple as usual does a 1000x fold markup, they go for perception of value, rather than what its real value is. If every MacOSX sale/copy got a .mac account for 12months free, and made the default price $49/yr for 1gig storage, or $19/yr for say 300meg, then they would get 1000x more customers.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    7. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by weave · · Score: 1

      As an IT manager, I know that enterprise-level disk storage is nowhere near as cheap as consumer level hard drives. It has to be in some sort of storage array, be redundent, fault tolerant, and backed up. This adds to the cost of storage tremendously. I'm not going to trust my enterprise to hundreds of Maxtor IDE drives that like to fail every year or so.

    8. Re:Paging Apple, paging apple by weave · · Score: 1

      The biggest value I get from .Mac is it being the central logistical point for syncing my devices. I have three Macs, iPod, and two GSM-based bluetooth phones. All sync seemlessly to each other via various contact points. You don't get this kind of level of sync with Active Sync. Trust me, I tried and tried to get that all to work a few years ago. The fact that things like bookmarks sync as well is just very nice icing on the cake as well.

  32. Re:Very good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    In Mojave space port, you can go into space. In corporate MS Hotmail, space comes to you...

  33. p2p? by RMH101 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    what stops you using the 1GB for data storage, then publicising your password so it can be used for filesharing?

    1. Re:p2p? by fredrikj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easily stopped by preventing an account from being accessed by more than a few IPs in a limited time.

    2. Re:p2p? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Depends what the limited time is though; AOL IPs can change within one session as they use proxies.

      Of course, maybe blocking AOL isn't such a bad idea...hmm.

    3. Re:p2p? by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Don't bother sharing an account. One bad apple can change the password and you're screwed.

      Just forward the mail from one Gmail account to another. It's likely that Google wouldn't store the attachment twice, but would basically send the recipient a link.

      Maybe there will be webforms where you enter your email address and you're forwarded your file.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    4. Re:p2p? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I had the opposite thought, that the obvious workaround for that sort of limit is to fileshare thru a proxy, so everyone has the same IP address.

      Would be a good place to store a few "files I would die if I ever lost", tho, just as Yet Another Remote Backup.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  34. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    Cryo send me an email to my username on gmail.com and i'll give you an invite :)

    *Mods, this isnt offtopic, I'm gonna show him that he's not wrong :)*

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  35. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hey moderators: How can the first post be redundant?

  36. Too little too late by swerk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fortunately, I've snatched up a beta Gmail account and am finding it to be the bee's knees thus far. I've been fed up with Yahoo for a long time. Had I gone with Hotmail I'd have been even more fed up.

    For several years I've had to trim all kinds of stuff out of my email archives due to the claustrophobic 4- and 6-meg limit on Yahoo mail. Then suddenly I log in and there's 100 meg available. Well that sucks, I've deleted maybe half that in stuff I'd rather have kept over the years. And it's still Yahoo; they still puke up obnoxious ads every chanse they get, and at the end of every single outgoing message.

    On the other hand, since the dot-bomb, most over-the-web services have gotten crippled or disappeared entirely for non-paying users. It's a breath of fresh air to see some things actually improve, regardless Microsoft's and Yahoo's motives for doing so.

    If an all but ad-free environment, a clean interface and the other Google niceties become competitive features that many webmail services mimmick, then great, everybody wins, including those unwilling to switch services. But for my money (or lack of it), I'd rather be signed up with an outfit whose mission statement amounts to "don't be evil" rather than "always be evil except to save face".

    1. Re:Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know, I have a few issues with Gmail:

      1. The "Oops... the system was unable to perform your operation. Please try again in a few seconds." dialog. I had this all afternoon once and was unable to access my mail at all.

      2. The group by discussion feature.

      3. The fact that it only works with certain browsers (because it's written completely in javascript).

    2. Re:Too little too late by XMyth · · Score: 0

      Insightful? The point is he doesn't have to anymore. Gmail is here.

    3. Re:Too little too late by TheReal_BarkMan · · Score: 5, Funny


      Is the bee's knees similar to the cat's ass?

      If your not sure, sent an invite to gmail and I will do a thorough analysis for you! :-)

    4. Re:Too little too late by swerk · · Score: 1

      The "oops, try again in a few seconds"... yeah, that sucks. I chalk it up to Gmail's beta status. I do prefer it to the way Hotmail flakes out, you submit something, the server never answers, and eventually the browser times out and you're left wondering whether to resubmit.

      I really dig the group by discussion thing. Matter of taste, I suppose. My guess is by the time it's out of beta, Gmail will have the option to show messages in a more traditional way as well, for folks like you.

      Javascript is one of those necessary evils if you want a web app to act as responsive as a client program. In Gmail's case it's used for keyboard shortcuts (yayy!) and preventing the page from going all wonky if the server's acting up or there's a network hiccup. Would lynx support be neat? Of course. And given Google's friendliness with PDAs, cell phones etc (see http://www.google.com/imode ), I wouldn't doubt it will happen eventually. For the record, Hotmail requires javascript too. Yahoo mail, to my surprise, does not.

    5. Re:Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, there's also:

      4. You can't copy all text on the screen (try dragging the mouse on the serders email address).

      5. Changing the reply-to field on the settings page doesn't seem to work completely right like other web based emailers.

    6. Re:Too little too late by stevesliva · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Too late for me, as well. I'm already substantially transitioned over to Gmail, and it's extremely nice not being limited to 10 paltry mail filters!

      Goodbye Hotmail, you've lost me as a customer.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    7. Re:Too little too late by Arker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I agree, the system being unavailable at times is to be expected in a beta problem, and their system fails gracefully here - this is a good thing.

      I haven't had my gmail account long enough to have much experience with it yet, but group by discussion seems great so far. I hope it handles threading correctly - by using the header information, not just the title of the message. If so, it's brought back a feature I remember from early email programs that the more modern ones all seem to mess up horribly.

      Javascript everything is very sad, on the other hand. I'm really hoping that they'll have a usable WAP version soon, and a proper html one. Better yet would be IMAP access, of course, but I can see why they won't want to do that. An XUL interface would be great too. I'd be willing to bet that if they opened up some sort of accessible interface to their system others would quickly use it to code such things.

      The only real complaints I have with it so far are the TOS (I almost backed out at that point, it's really horrible, and even though I don't believe click-throughs have any legitimate enforceability it really made me mad reading this thing... I only clicked on because I figured the worst they could realistically do is delete my account, and that most of it is clearly illegal and unenforceable... and I really wanted to see it, and do think google is a decent bunch of folks that will probably come around on this issue later) and the no-deletion thing. I don't care if it's a gigabyte, eventually I will fill that, what then? Particularly when the spam starts hitting, no-deletion just isn't going to work out forever.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    8. Re:Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think its fair to compare public corporations that have to answer to stockholders to a privately held company with enough capital to do whatever they want.

      now that google is going public too, we should see if their "don't be evil" motto gives way to "don't be evil... if possible"

    9. Re:Too little too late by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      But yet they still limit your ability to add filters to only a couple fields. Why is is to hard to allow user-defined headers?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    10. Re:Too little too late by Reziac · · Score: 1

      You can have all the same functions, except keyboard shortcuts, without javascript -- the old (now gone) Earthlink webmail interface was *fantastic* that way, full-featured and worked perfect with any browser from anywhere and any settings, all functions intact. So it's not like it can't be done.

      And I also use the no-js old Yahoo interface, by preference.

      Thanks be to liquidcoooled here, I now have a GMail account (already found and reported a bug! I can break anything.) Their docsource is a sight to behold. Just about pure javascript!

      Given a choice, I'd go without js, and be able to use my preferred browser, but they does what they does...

      I did get an amusing textad with the Welcome message:

      Related Pages
      The page cannot be found
      The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its ...
      www.thisdayonline.com

      But the link worked and was a valid page. ???!!

      Should be interesting finding all the odd little hidden GMail functions -- already had a surprise when I clicked one spot and got an instant reply box.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Too little too late by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Actually you can delete messages. That's an option but it's not as simple as Y! and Hotmail. Not so simple because it's different that's all... but you can still delete messages.

      As for the message grouping feature, it's ok for the most part. REading message headers instead of the subject line would be smarter in my opinion... But if there was a way to go back to the old way of viewing messages, it would be nice - and keeping the starring of conversations (if only to keep track of them) is a great thing!

      Oh, I have one gmail Invitation left, reply to this post (DO NOT EMAIL ME!) will get it... however I have an inclination to help out someone from hotmail. So POST A CLICKABLE liNK! and not an obfuscated one and you'll get it. Otherwise you won't :)

    12. Re:Too little too late by Arker · · Score: 1

      Ok, so share the wealth here and tell me how you delete messages?

      As for the message grouping feature, it's ok for the most part. REading message headers instead of the subject line would be smarter in my opinion...

      So it doesn't use the header information, but the subject field?

      Too bad, if so. As I said I haven't had enough traffic on mine to tell yet.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    13. Re:Too little too late by zoloto · · Score: 1

      select messages with their checkbox.
      open the dropdown dialog and select "Move to trash"
      click on the trash link
      select all messages with "all link"
      open same dropdown dialog and select "delete forever"

      Hope that helps :)

      and yeah, it goes by subject line. I've tested it with my Mom and brothers gmail accounts and true to my statement, it goes by subject line.

      So it's not bad, but could be better (like most things). As for now, I'm not complaining one bit. It is a free service after all..

      -zoloto

    14. Re:Too little too late by Krunch · · Score: 1

      1. maybe that's why they call it "beta" 3. looks like they are working on this

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    15. Re:Too little too late by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      josiahworcester@yahoo.com
      Does being a yahoo user count as close enough to hotmail?

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    16. Re:Too little too late by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      Er, Fixed Link. (needs to use preview button)

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    17. Re:Too little too late by zoloto · · Score: 1

      sure, you're on my list to get one as soon as I have another invite, it was given to a family member b/c well... it's my little sister, I couldn't say no!

      --zoloto

    18. Re:Too little too late by bot24 · · Score: 1

      I've always had issues with those advertisments in your mail, and I dislike Yahoo even more now. I have had a Yahoo account for about a year now. I log into it every day with my messenger. A few days ago I started getting invalid password messages from Kopete. I suspect that my account has been deleted. I didn't really use that account, but just because they deleted it I am much less likley to ever consider using there services again. I did not get any notification of any sort before it was canceled.
      Just for fun: YIM: mpdonoughe.

    19. Re:Too little too late by bot24 · · Score: 1

      *GASP* they blocked me from using YIM under Linux again(should have read the whole newsletter)?! Hmmmmm... Time to get a new SN because now everybody who reads at -1 will know it. Maybe I'll keep it.

    20. Re:Too little too late by Rexdude · · Score: 1
      "For several years I've had to trim all kinds of stuff out of my email archives due to the claustrophobic 4- and 6-meg limit on Yahoo mail. Then suddenly I log in and there's 100 meg available. Well that sucks, I've deleted maybe half that in stuff I'd rather have kept over the years. "

      For starters-Yahoo offered POP access till April 2002, for free. You could have downloaded all your mails at any time. Even after POP went paid, YahooPOPs will let you download all your yahoo mails to your POP client. I've been using this combination for over 5 years now-where's the problem? They can continue with 6 MB, goto 1 GB, hell, 1 TB-I get all my mail into my POP client when I want to. I have mails archived all the way from 1999 on my PC. For ads-use AdMuncher Again-where's the problem? I haven't EVER been subjected to a single ad, popup, driveby activex or anything in the last five years. Use Admuncher-and you won't have to care about seeing any ad ever again. Yahoo's pages are absolutely clean and ad free for me-they've always been.

      I don't see whats so great about being able to store all your emails ever received on some company's servers. What happens if, years later, Google gets taken over, or closes down? Would you rather have all your mails sitting pretty there? Recall when Google took over Dejanews and made it Google Groups-many people were upset that all the dumb posts,profanities and flames they'd made years earlier would now go public. Do you still trust someone else to store every single mail you've ever sent?
      Then again-that's me.
      Now that we've addressed two major issues-mailbox size and type of ads-what's left? Oh, yeah, 'I trust google but not $COMPANY'-a view expressed by many people here. Just what's so great about them? Any company is in business for one thing and one thing only-PROFIT. Google is not a charity. There's NO telling how their current user friendly stance may change after the IPO. Look at Apple-people held out Steve Jobs as some great evangelist who's come to save the world from evil Microsoft and IBM-he's another bird of the same feather. Recall the Playfair vs iTunes controversy a couple of months back (should be somewhere here on /.) In the end-Google is a great company no doubt-but they're not infallible. They've provided excellent service till now, there's no reason however to expect that they won't serve up something unpleasant in the future.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  37. aventuremail by zam4ever · · Score: 4, Informative

    How about this aventuremail?. 2GB free storage. cheers

    1. Re:aventuremail by oshy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not accepting anyone for free at the moment. They'll take you if you want to pay. And they wait till you give them a username and password before they tell you all of that. Grrr

    2. Re:aventuremail by chungking+mansions · · Score: 4, Informative


      Aventure Mail Error
      We are currently not accepting new registrations. Accounts can be purchased in our store (http://www.aventuremail.co.uk/store) in the mean time.

    3. Re:aventuremail by Clovert+Agent · · Score: 1

      Yeah?

      "We are currently not accepting new registrations. Accounts can be purchased in our store (http://www.aventuremail.co.uk/store) in the mean time."

  38. Why? by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

    I have a Yahoo Mail account and the extra 94 megs is useless, i keep my area tidy and don't need any more, i don't understand the big deal. Plus the jump from 2MB to 250MB is huge, think of the extra xserves MS is going to buy to accomodate everyone. In the end its plain crazy when we can have more than one account and most of us will never need that much space as a home user.

    1. Re:Why? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      have a Yahoo Mail account and the extra 94 megs is useless, i keep my area tidy and don't need any more, i don't understand the big deal.

      A quick du tells me that my mail archive is now just under 700MB. 1GB would give me a bit of extra space, but not much. I keep my mail tidy as well (everything is stored in folders based on content, either manually or by mail filters). The operative word here is keep. I have a copy of almost every email I have sent or received since 1997 (I lost a few due to disk crashes and having to restore from backups a few days old. Oh, and I don't keep spam more than a few days either). I have changed email addresses and mail clients at least three times during that time. Before you ask, yes it is useful to keep these. I frequently search for things people said in old emails, and I have no way of knowing before hand which emails are going to be safe to delete and which aren't.

      the jump from 2MB to 250MB is huge, think of the extra xserves MS is going to buy to accomodate everyone.

      Well, I hardly think everyone is going to jump from 2MB to 250MB instantly. The new space will probably fill up gradually over time.

      In the end its plain crazy when we can have more than one account and most of us will never need that much space as a home user.

      Having one account is more convenient than having lots. And do you really think home users are not going to fill this up quickly? At the moment it's hardly uncommon to email people photographs (and getting even more common with camera phones). In a few years I suspect sending moving pictures will become a more everyday occurrence*.

      * Personally, I dislike it when people send anything over a few KB in an email - that kind of thing is better handled out of band - but I am not a normal person.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Why? by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

      Okay you make a good case, i never thought about the photos and its only because i upload mine to my .mac account and then let people view them from there. I guess it depends on what works for other people in the end.

  39. Re:Stick it to M$!!! by dyefade · · Score: 0

    "Self-spamming"?

    That sounds like a good idea if it's on the 250mb scale. You could sign up manually, then mail-bomb the accounts you'd opened. Opening four accounts wouldn't take long, then spam them, MS has to deal with a gig of spam.
    Pretty juvenille though...

  40. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1
    If the Gmail interface is as fast as the google interface, gmail will eat hotmail and yahoo for lunch.

    From what I can tell, Gmail is unbelievably fast, but I've never used it on a slow connection. If I give you an account, will you try it for a while with dial-up and then let us know how it is?

    Reply or email me for an invitation.

    Doug

  41. gmail availability... by RapDes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been patiently waiting for gmail to become available publicly. But until it does I'll start using my Yahoo account again now that I have increased attachment and storage space. I wonder if hotmail, yahoo and the like are luring away many potential gmail users because of the long beta testing period...?

    1. Re:gmail availability... by City+Jim+3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well I wanted an invite and after around 20 minutes of googling I found a person giving away invites. Later that day I had a Gmail account. Soon there will be so many Gmail invites that you'll have no problem at all getting one.

      You can notice Gmail is in beta though (some minor but often-used features such as remote access and simple blocking are missing), but its still much better than anything out there. I think the beta stage is mostly about training their spam classifier.

      Hint: What's "gmail invite" in icelandic? finnish? ...

  42. and gmail by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

    has'nt launched its services to a larger audience. great.

    1. Re:and gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      has'nt launched its services to a larger audience. great.

      Could've fooled me. It's pretty easy to get an invite to Gmail. Ebay has them for about $1.

  43. Re:Very good news by hatchet · · Score: 1

    Thank you very much.. I thought my english was so bad, that i didn't understand him. It's my third language after all.

  44. Re:Gmail invite? by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

    No, but you know that those who have an account can now invite others.

  45. Compression for fun and profit. by kinema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never understood why email providers limited their subscribers to a measly 5 megs. Most email is pure ASCII text. Every time I have felt the need to compress a text file it nearly disappears. This is even the case when I have used gzip on the 'fastest' settings. A gig of email compressed onto today's unbelievably cheap storage costs a provider like Google, Yahoo or Hotmail damn near nothing!

    1. Re:Compression for fun and profit. by chegosaurus · · Score: 0

      I'll send you 1Gb of goatse jpegs, and you see what you can gzip those down to.

    2. Re:Compression for fun and profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But costs a lot of CPU load, think of the poor sys admins roasting away in their server rooms.

  46. Re:Gmail invite? by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

    3 invites in 5 minutes, Thanks guys!

  47. Holy crap thats brilliant. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Sign up with somthething like blindmellon@hotmail.com, anyone who sends you an e-mail gets sent the full collection of mp3s from the group.

    I like it.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Holy crap thats brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :: type type type ::

      Dear RIAA,

      I would like to report a guy who is using the account, "blindmellon@hotmail.com" to transmit music across the internet to other users. I know you probably want to sue the pants off of him, so this is why I am informing you.

      Of course, Microsoft, being another being another huge company, will work with you to determine who the person behind the e-mail address is.

      Sincerely,
      Concerned Citizen

      Seriously, dude. Not a good idea.

  48. Capitalism hard at work... by EmagGeek · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A shining example... nice... now I will be able to save 250MB worth of SPAM in my hotmail account :)

  49. Next month... by kinema · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the next month or two I fully expect that we are going to see some admititly slow but inexpensive storage solutions. Actually I'm supprised we haven't already seen GmailFS and HotmailFS.

    1. Re:Next month... by aoeu2 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you have heard of Yahoo! Briefaces?

  50. Filesharing and backups by email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It's becoming a good way to share files with friends. Create a new email account, upload a CD image to an email account and hand out the password.

    Also a good way to backup those music CD's. :-)

  51. Re:Will Yahoo upgrade accounts for other countries by Spad · · Score: 1

    My .co.uk account was upgraded a couple of days ago.

  52. .MAC by winski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now when are Apple going to follow suit and up the paltry 15mb e-mail storage I get for $99 a year!!!

    --
    Shameless self-publicity is all we have!ebyrne.net
    1. Re:.MAC by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now when are Apple going to follow suit and up the paltry 15mb e-mail storage I get for $99 a year!!!

      Unknown. But I think Apple is one company that probably realizes that they need to do more than just add a lot more space. What are you going to do with a gig of e-mail storage unless you also get some cool tools for sorting through it all?

      Besides, I think most .Mac users read their mail at least part of the time with OS X's Mail.app. Can you imagine syncronizing the mail on your machine with your online account if you had anything close to 1GB of mail stored online? And on the flip side, if you're downloading your mail to your Mac at home, you can have as many gigabytes of stored mail as you like. It just won't be online and searchable from anywhere.

      Don't get me wrong: I'm looking forward to the day when Apple increases the e-mail limit for .Mac users. But I can also see Gmail being a good thing for .Mac in the sense that at some point, more people may be willing to pay for a service like .Mac. Many people pay for premium cable channels like HBO, and non-premium, non-cable public broadcasting, because they like the higher quality content and they appreciate not having ads. If .Mac can become the HBO of online services, it'll be a very good thing for Apple.

    2. Re:.MAC by cmacb · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but mine is set to expire in October and I've already redirected subscription mail elswhere in preparation. I think they are counting too much on the loyalty factor. At some point you have to actually provide a competitive service too one would think.

    3. Re:.MAC by winski · · Score: 1

      Yeah I just renewed mine a month, primarily because all my contacts use that as my email address and there wasn't enough time to start redirecting everyone. Also, .MAC does have good integration with OS X, although I rarely use iDisk, I do like the Bookmarks and Address Book sync. But if they don't improve the email service (15mb for 99 - come on, no one should pay for that) substantially they'll lose my business, and I imagine quite a lot of other as well.

      --
      Shameless self-publicity is all we have!ebyrne.net
  53. It is NOW we are getting somewhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While this competition is mild in terms of upgrading existing technology it is these types of competitions I've been expecting from the tech industry.

    -AMD vs. Intel
    -Apple MAC OS vs MS Windows vs Linux
    -Nvidia vs ATi
    -Playstation 3 vs X-Box 2 vs whatever the next big "N" system is...

    I hope my ISP http://www.speakeasy.org follows suit!

    1. Re:It is NOW we are getting somewhere! by Wizworm · · Score: 0

      My ISP has followed suit, Small rural market DSL has virtual monopoly Cable comes into town DSL price drops AND speed increases. Speed is still lower than Cable.

      --
      I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
  54. Re:Whoever you use for your free email, thank Goog by Aphelion · · Score: 1

    Is there a max attachment size for messages?

  55. Well, the desire for bigger profits I suppose. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, you're absolutely right - storage costs next to nothing per-megabyte, and compression can make it go a lot farther. But consider it like this: almost all the free email services have 'free' and 'premium' offers, and the main thing that differentiates the free from the 'premium' is how much storage you get.

    Now, when they give free customers >= 100MBytes of storage, there is less reason to pay for the premium service. So, until GMail came in and broke the cartel's artificial shortage, the email services could count on plenty of people coughing up the cash to get a useable amount of storage.

    At this point, given the above, why are they increasing their storage quotas? . . . Because if all the free & premium customers decided to move over to GMail (or at least a significant percentage of the user-base), then their current revenues would plummet fast. So, while they get a lot less money per 'free' customer (just the revenue they derive from advertising), by increasing the storage, they mostly take away the prime driver for people to go to GMail.

    Predictions: now that GMail is eating away at their ability to sell 'premium' accounts with more storage, I expect that

    1. We will see advertising taken to all new levels of obnoxiousness by the free email providers, to compensate for revenues lost from premium account sales declining.
    2. I suspect some of the features that are currently available with the 'free' accounts (like spam filtering) might be moved over to the 'premium' accounts to attempt to still have differentiation between them so people might still consider using the premium accounts.
  56. Re:forget about gmail and all others, get spymac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spymac is ungodly slow and their interface is terrible. As other posters have said, it's not just about the storage.

  57. Re:Very good news by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    now I have 200mgs to look forward too

    Even this "translation" is wrong:

    The upgrade will increase Hotmail's free e-mail storage limits from 2 megabytes to 250MB

    geesh...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  58. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by value_added · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IIRC, yahoo recently advertised an "image free" interface. Never use it myself, but I just checked and there's only a couple of small gifs on the page.

  59. I believe you have it backwards... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    The email services could afford to do this because storage is already very inexpensive. I don't believe increased demand by a few webmail providers would be enough to influence the actions of the manufacturers (unless one donates a slew of drives so it can say 'FooWebMail runs on Hinky Hard Drives!').

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  60. Re:What about spymac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first off, Spymac sucks. but that's just opinion. it's opinion based on the experience that it's brutally slow, and the UI is terrible.

    but "better code"???? go home astroturfer... actually I can't imagine that this is astroturf it's so bad.

    this is laughable. GMail is well thought out, and incredibly responsive (even in Beta)

  61. good filter by mm0mm · · Score: 1
    ...and had one spam mail in 4 months.
    and are you still waiting for an invitation from Gmail? No, right?
    1. Re:good filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or any of my emails. None arrives to any hotmail account these days.

  62. stop spamming around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spymac is teh suck. never seen a free mail service unstable like that. most of the time it's offline or bouncing mails. they just did it for the show without having the resources or a real plan for it.

  63. Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by pgrst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google may be the poster child for a 'good' corporation but the roll-out of the gmail system is most definitely not one of the better acheievements. By pre-announcing gmail so far in advance, all the other free providers have now upped their storage. While gmail is still not publicly available.

    The barriers to switching email address are high; no one wants to ditch the address they may have been using for seven years. gmail's real selling point was the extra storage, but with that advantage negated I don't see so many people likely switch.

    Compare with this scenario:

    gmail carries out large scale internal testing, carries out a low-key public beta (no additional invites, etc.) and then BOOM! Press announcement "gmail is up and running!!!" . Users now flock to the service because the other providers don't currently offer anything like the storage space of gmail.

    the gmail rollout could definitely be handled better. aside from the goolgle fanboys, how many regualr hotmail/yahoo useres will switch now that hotmail/yahoo have increased storage?

    1. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by The+Cydonian · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Actually, I'd say the Gmail public beta is one of the most successful viral marketing attempts I've seen in recent history. I mean, think about it:- had Google announced Gmail through a teeny weeny link on, say, labs.google.com, I'd probably have not bothered about it. OTOH, now that there's such a big hype factor about owning a Gmail account, I'm all ga-ga over it, virtually blackmailing a (Slashdot) friend into sending me an invite. :-)

      Always remember; Gmail isn't just about the space, it's also about the UI as well. It definitely isn't easy for either Hotmail or Yahoo or any other webmail to compete against it easily.

    2. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by diemorph · · Score: 0

      By allowing people to join only by invite, Google has created a groundswell of interest and demand for gmail. Internal testing would not have created the same effect. Create Demand..Brilliant! Furthermore by allowing the service to grow incrementally they can ensure a reliable service and can allocate resources efficiently, thus providing the best service.

      --
      you = (Freedom > Security ? NPR : FOX )
    3. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by scrm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Google may be the poster child for a 'good' corporation but the roll-out of the gmail system is most definitely not one of the better acheievements. By pre-announcing gmail so far in advance, all the other free providers have now upped their storage. While gmail is still not publicly available.

      I disagree totally. Gmail's two-phase rollout has given Google the option to observe the competition's response and react to it before their service is even officially launched (not to mention creating a buzz that would make Seth Godin proud).

      I've had a GMail account for about two months now and the system is in a constant state of flux. I've reported bugs one day and they've been fixed the next. Each and every bug report or piece of feedback gets a personal response from the Google team. They are very serious about perfecting the system.

      The only reason Google are waiting so long to launch it is because they want to make sure it's the best webmail out there bar none. When it's launched, that's when the comparisons can really start. And that's when Hotmail et al won't be able to shake a stick at Gmail.

      --
      ---- scrm
    4. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by 1arkhaine · · Score: 1
      I think the invites idea was a fantastic one. It created a LOT of hype, everyone wanted in RIGHT NOW, as opposed to just waiting until they felt like it. Gushing reviews were posted on blogs and message boards all over the place, which increased hype. Of course now, gmail accounts are easy to get, and most people I know can't get rid of invites - they've run out of people to give them to! And yet, and yet...even with this, it is STILL hyped to hell, desirable to have, and a talking point. What that effectively means is that, while 'everyone' has it - or has super easy access to getting it - the hype stays high.

      Genius, if you ask me.

    5. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by olorinpc · · Score: 1

      the only problem i have had so far is the inability to pop other email accounts (school, work, etc)

      I do hope google adds those in, becauase then it would make switching to gmail full time well worth it.

    6. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by _Neurotic · · Score: 1

      I have had my GMail account for about a week now and I have yet to get a response to any of the questions I submitted last Saturday.

      I also never got the confirmation email for all but one of my submissions. GMail seems to have some intelligent filtering to drop messages with identical bodies.

    7. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by scrm · · Score: 1

      That and the ability to customize your sender e-mail address (not just the 'Reply-To' address). This would eliminate the need to change your existing e-mail address, like Yahoo's paid customers can do right now.

      As Sergey Brin said back in April, there are a lot of features planned for GMail including POP3 and IMAP access. I have no doubt they'll include customized sender addresses before it's released to the public.

      --
      ---- scrm
    8. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      What is this GMAIL everyone is talking about, is it worth the hype? Will anyone invite me to try it out, or is it out of the question?

    9. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Actually, it threads them. Click on the one you got, the rest of them should show up there.

    10. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by _Neurotic · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip but no, nothing but the first auto-response.

    11. Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      If you report a bug to MS, you wont see it fixed for 7 plus years if ever. Why did all those windows boxes have mixing pixel in W if used as the first word in a text block? I mean how much tonnes of weed are MS employees smoking there.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  64. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by cipher+uk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it is. the main reason i use gmail is because of its speed.

    i don't have to download spam mail from my isp which can take a while on a 56k connection of you have >150 spam emails. With google not only does it sort the spam nicely and out the way, it stops me having to download the body of the email.
    Couple that with the other great features of gmail and the fact that i won't fill it and i don't have much reason to use my isp's email address.
    The only time i use my isp's email address is for job and university applications.

  65. Re:What about spymac? by acariquara · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Completely free!

    And completely useless. My email account there does not receive a single message. After some outages and weird behaviour like 3 days to get a message sent to SELF it simply got dormant. Now every single message sent to that address goes AWOL.

    The hosting thing is really tricky to work. Expect 2 weeks before your account is set up. I know it's a free service but I think they went overboard on the "1gig" announcement and couldn't handle the load. They are not Google, you know.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  66. I wonder..... by R1ch4rd · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Didn't GOOGLE take this April's Fool Joke too far ?

    We should thank them for getting everyone to push the standard on web mail storage.

    This would be the BEST April's Fool I know of.

  67. MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by n0dez · · Score: 1, Troll

    Facts about MSN Hotmail

    1. They will only give you more space if two (or more) competitors give you at least 50 times more MB. (Y!Mail: 100MB, MSN Hotmail: 2MB)

    2. If someone tries to send you an email from a non-Hotmail, 99% of his or her email messages are bounced back with reason "action failed".

    3. From time to time, they will put JavaScript code in MSN's Website so non-IE browsers (such as Opera) can't access MSN.com. They will do it in a way that it appears that Opera (or other browsers) suck.

    1. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by Njovich · · Score: 1

      Yes, these are facts, which means that they are either true or false. I'd say the last two are false, and the first is hard to prove. They just happened to increase the size this time, that they would only do it with a 50x competitor size seems a bit strange to conclude from this.

      Please don't exegerate when you try to make a point.

    2. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It must stink for those who recently paid for Premium Hotmail storage... $$$ down the drain.

    3. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by n0dez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heyy, slow down cowboy!

      Yahoo! Mail was the first to upgrade their service following Gmail's storage boost.

      If you send email messages to some Hotmail address, they bounce them back to you with no aparent reasons. And don't say that you haven't had some email message bounced back saying "action failed". As I don't save all my email messages, many proofs are gone.
      I remember once that I wrote about 10 email messages to a Hotmail.com user and he only got one. In my last message I was asking if he had a non-Hotmail account. I don't know why, but this message wasn't bounced back. He told me that his Hotmail inbox was empty.

      Anyway, here's one proof:

      She has told me that her Hotmail email account is active, is not the wrong one, and her mailbox is not full nor empty. I have tried to contact her via email several times with no success.

      Short version:

      64.4.50.99 does not like recipient.
      Remote host said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable


      Long version:

      24 Jun 2004 14:11:20 -0000
      From: MAILER-DAEMON@[removed]
      To: [removed]
      Subject: failure delivery

      Message from [removed].
      Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
      [removed]@hotmail.com:
      64.4.50.99 does not like recipient.
      Remote host said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
      Giving up on 64.4.50.99.

      --- Original message follows.

      Return-Path: [removed]
      Message-ID: 20040624141120.8231.******@********.****.[removed]
      Received: from [**.**.**.***] by ********.****.[removed] via HTTP; Thu,
      24 Jun 2004 07:11:20 PDT
      Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
      From: [removed]
      Subject: hello
      To: [removed]@hotmail.com
      MIME-Version: 1.0
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

      Are you getting my email messages?


      Note: some email addresses, hostnames (excepting hotmail.com) and IPs have been removed due to privacy issues.
      [removed] = email address, username or hostname.

    4. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      How do you figure? Paid users get 2GB of space...

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    5. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by singleantler · · Score: 1

      Yahoo and AOL don't like receiving e-mail from servers which they can't do reverse DNS on, they either mark the mail as spam or bounce it. Are you sure Hotmail isn't doing the same thing to you?

      --
      "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
    6. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by zoloto · · Score: 1

      That sucks.

      Personally, I've emailed only 4 invitations to hotmail users (my family/roommates) and the rest communicate through GMail now. However I've had plenty of conversations with a friend with hotmail etc and nothings' gone wrong yet.

      Anyways, I'll be hoping that she'll switch over to gmail soon b/c I think hotmail has "misplaced" my emails to her. Sucks, but probably true.

    7. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by Go+Aptran · · Score: 1
      If I were paying $20 a month for the premium version of Hotmail or Yahoo, I think I would feel slightly irritated to discover that those tiny mailboxes that I'd been putting up with for years, were completely uncessary.

      It's nice that the premium accounts are given two gigs of space, but upsetting that Hotmail/Yahoo had to be "forced" into doing it by Google.

      I think it's telling how accustomed we are to getting screwed over that MOST PEOPLE THOUGHT GMAIL WAS A JOKE when it was announced on April 1st, because they couldn't imagine a 1 gig webmail account.

      --

      "Under the spreading chestnut tree, I sold you and you sold me."

    8. Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      premium hotmail costs $20 per *year*, not per month, noob.

  68. Haha! by fok · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now imagine if Google drops the project!

    --
    \m/
  69. Re:Whoever you use for your free email, thank Goog by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, 10mbyte for the entire message.

  70. My take on it all by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So Google and others want to offer a 1GB e-mail service with indexing and searchability. Well, that's fine and dandy as far as ideas go, but you have to remember that this means your mail being stored on someone else's server; possibly for longer than you wanted -- and no way of being sure it's been deleted when you no longer want it.

    I'm thinking about rolling my own searchable e-mail archive. And it won't be limited to one poxy gigabyte, either! I could register a domain and point the MX to my TV cable broadband connection, but the IP address is not guaranteed truly static, so there's a possibility that mail could get lost or even wind up on someone else's box -- so I'll trust my existing PO3 connection for now, counting it as another reason to add to my list in favour of a "proper" (read: business class) broadband connection. Next I'll hack Spamassassin to bits: when I'm done, it will store the header info and spamminess test results in a MySQL database, and the body in a text file. While I'm at it, I'll index the attachments in terms of mime type and encoding into another database. Finally, I'll set up some scripts to manage searching according to my databases and body contents.

    Eventually -- which is to say, once I can go a month without resorting to phpMyAdmin or grep -- I'll release it; probably under a BSD-like licence, but with this extra little clause: "Any redistribution of the software or derived work in binary form must be accompanied by an offer of the source code, to be valid until the lapse of copyright on the work in question".

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  71. yeah maybe by xedx · · Score: 1

    they upgraded to FreeBSD 5.2.1+vinum nice one...

  72. Re:Gmail invites by TVC15 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    > I have 5 gmail invites, with no one to send them to. If anybody wants one, send me a note.

    Ah, the modern way to harvest email addresses.
    Just dangle gmail invites and they come running. ;-)

  73. backup solution by peu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me or these new huge free email accounts serve as a zero cost online backup solution, for example your digital photos?

  74. 1GB not the only draw by jbarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While 1GB of storage is nice, it's certainly not the only reason I like Gmail. Features like "Search", "Labels", "Conversations", "Keyboard Shortcuts", and a lightning-fast interface help leverage the 1GB of storage enabling me to easily and quickly find and manage my email information in ways I never could.

    Also, and sometimes more importantly, Gmail's ads are so unobtrusive and relevent that implementations like Hotmail and Yahoo Mail seem like complete jokes with their flashy, intrusive, irrelevent ads.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  75. In related news ... by Octagon+Most · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google turns the tables to imitate its rivals. Changes motto to "Be Evil."

  76. This is like the OSes they use... by n0dez · · Score: 1

    Yahoo! Mail... no strings attached, good service (FreeBSD)

    Gmail... strings attached (some of them are not hidden), too much noise (a Linux distro)

    MSN Hotmail... poor service, strings attached (most of them hidden)

    1. Re:This is like the OSes they use... by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      im curious to know the apparent strings you think gmail has. with the tiny amount of user info they collect (your name, thats all) i really doubt that there are any more strings than yahoo

      --
      TIAEAE!
  77. Reminds me of the Cold War by dioscaido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The US continually bought more and more weapons, which it would never use, so that Russia would follow suit -- until Russia bankrupted itself.

    Gmail only has a couple of thousand users, so it can continue upping it's storage. Hotmail & Yahoo follow suit, but with it's million users, they asplode!

    1. Re:Reminds me of the Cold War by aixou · · Score: 1

      Communism sucks. (in the voice of peter griffin in the episode where lois learns martial arts) /ducks

      Google represents the future. The organization and archival of information is one of the most important markets out there. We are one step closer towards an age of 99% free information (with a few ads to pay the bills of course :). Imagine the library of congress indexing every book (every word in every book), and having them accessible for some sort of reasonable fee. It would completely alter the way people research and utilize information.

    2. Re:Reminds me of the Cold War by asavage · · Score: 1

      Google has way more than a couple thousand users. Some people are saying over a million (still a long way to go though compared to hotmail and yahoo). Right now people who have it are getting basically as many invites as they can give out. I get 6 new ones around 12 hours after I send out my last one. I haven't given any out for a couple of days as I have asked almost everyone I know. Although it is still invite only, the number of gmail users is increasing rapidly. Check ebay, accounts can be bought for less than a dollar and there are around 6000 auctions. I haven't used ebay for any invitations but it has been fun watching the average price for a gmail account.

    3. Re:Reminds me of the Cold War by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      First, very few customers will fill up their accounts, at least for a while.

      Second, have you priced disk space lately? A gigabyte costs less than a Coke. The only way Google's competitors will go bankrupt is if they have no redundancy management and keep buying "server-class" SCSI drives or propietary SANs.

  78. other uses by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Unless I can store MP3s, videos and general USEFUL stuff on it when I reboot and can't be bothered to burn then why the hell do I need a gig of space for my e-mail?

    my average e-mail is 2-5kb, I'm not even going to do the maths to fill my G mail account..

    --
    I like muppets.
  79. Is not size what matters.... by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... is to have an interface that makes sense to store and manage that size. With traditional mail client software (when only 300Mb of stored mail), if i have to retrieve something and not remember where it is and some clue on how it will look (with good details) i'm out of luck.

    Google move was to give not only a big enough (?) space for mail, but also a interface to effectively deal with it, and...well, google to search within.

    Is like those pills that have "the vitamin C of 40 lemons" or something similar, you can handle that in that way, will feel like a pill but will have the amount you need, but if a "traditional" vendor gives you to eat 40 lemons to get that amount of vitamin C at the same price, and try to eat all of this you will end with problems. The "content" will be the same, but in a way that will be hard to deal with it.

    1. Re:Is not size what matters.... by knodi · · Score: 1

      That a funny analogy; actually, I was comparing using hotmail with eating 40 lemons YEARS ago.

      --
      Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    2. Re:Is not size what matters.... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I have the Inbox Collection From Hell myself. You've given me the horrid thought of uploading the entire mess to GMail and letting THEM sort it out. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Is not size what matters.... by sas123 · · Score: 1

      For Gmail the siZe matters...When i first openend gmail i was totally surprised the simplicity of menus. The conversation style and multiple labelling is a fantastic feature..Gmail needs the space to hold all the conversations you want to remember for the whole life! It makes sense for the feature offered to have a GB mail. It's a personal data mining to some extent.

      What i am going to do with the 100 MB yahoo, 1GB rediffamil and now hotmail without all the Gmail features? It sounds silly to really have so much space in yahoo and other mails.

  80. Re:Will Yahoo upgrade accounts for other countries by n0dez · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, Yahoo! has upgraded their service in other countries. At least in Europe.

  81. Re:Gmail invites by Zalminen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd certainly appreciate one... (i'd have to change webmail anyway soon enough)

    zalminen.city@fi

  82. Runbox by azoqueue · · Score: 1

    for those of you who want 1 gig without waiting for gmail, try Runbox for $30 a year... They just decided to upgrade their service (obv. because of gmail) and it will be 1 gig july 1st according to their news page.

  83. Re:Gmail invites by rimmon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That would be really great!
    if you still have one, I would be really happy to get one...

    hendrik.gmx@net

  84. Wasn't it "Exterminate" ? by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    Or have I got the reference to Darleks(sp?) wrong ?

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
    1. Re:Wasn't it "Exterminate" ? by johannesg · · Score: 1
      Arg. Yes, you are right.

      "Exterminate! Exterminate! Exterminate!" ;-)

  85. Re:Gmail invites by Jacer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I do. If you reply, I'll send you my e-mail address for it please. Thanks

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  86. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by jbarr · · Score: 1

    Yes, for $19.99 per year. Gmail is free. Even if Gmail charged for its service, the ads are not only unobtrusive, but they are often useful. Because they are relevent and targeted to the message content, it's sometimes useful to have instant access to related companies. Persinall, this is how *I* want advertizing. Intrusive, annoying ads like Hotmail and Yahoo Mail are just plain so last century.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  87. Gmail=Good IDea, Excellent Execution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ah, spoken like someone who doesn't yet have a Gmail account. The extra space is the *least* impressive thing about Gmail.

    Gmail will succeed because it's interface is a radical improvement not only over webmail, but of email in general. I wish my standard email client had half the features Gmail has, and given time I'm sure it will.

    Just like word of mouth spread that Google was a fantastic search engine that did things better than all the others, so too will word spread that Gmail's interface is far and away superior to what the others are offering. Hotmail/Yahoo could offer a terabyte of free space, and I'd still use Gmail because its interface is that good.

  88. Re:Gmail invites by twilight30 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey I'd love an invite!

    northtwilight2003(at)yahoo.co.uk

    Cheers!

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  89. Sorry to burst your bubble... by ZarkDav · · Score: 1

    Years of email sit in my hard drive. I won't move them to Google, even though I work for an ISP and thus enjoy 100Mbps to our peering and transit neighbours.

    In fact, the following did not produce a result until after a few minutes:

    % du -s Maildir
    4034711 Maildir
  90. Re:Gmail invite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please invite me for a GMAIL account... I'm sick of hotmail and libero.

    Please invite me, mailing to:
    sickofmicrosoft@libero.it

    Immensely grateful,
    Tux

  91. Oops, ... by n0dez · · Score: 1

    ... I forgot something! You probably guessed it but I'm writing it for those who didn't guess it...

    MSN Hotmail... poor service, strings attached (most of them hidden) (Windows)

  92. The brilliance behind this strategy... by spoonani · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GMail's rollout appears to have a two-pronged approach: 1) Force other e-mail providers into costly capital expenditures. remember, 1gb of space initially for a couple thousand invitees is still less than 250 mb for millions of users. MS and yahoo's teams will no doubt be prodded to recoup their capital expenditures for all users, while gmail can stay lean and mean as long as it wants, while at the same time dictate the market structure. 2) generate ginormous buzz. As others have said, "why not go to spymac?" The answer for John Q. public lies in the difference in brand equity between spymac and google. If an average user has decided to make a switch over to a new e-mail provider, johndoe@gmail.com is "worth" more than johndoe@spymac.com, regardless of features.

    1. Re:The brilliance behind this strategy... by alexq · · Score: 1
      1gb of space initially for a couple thousand invitees is still less than 250 mb for millions of users. MS and yahoo's teams will no doubt be prodded to recoup their capital expenditures for all users,

      not true at all. you don't think hotmail etc. actually _bought_ this storage already, do you? they're just going to buy it on an as-needs basis. most users are not going to use _nearly_ that must storage, and so there is not a need for 100M*#users storage. just like the way banks have your money 'deposited', but if everyone needed the money at once, the bank would be screwed (since it's actually been loaned out to other people).

  93. Friendly advice by gnobal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Backup your Hotmail account

  94. Actually a good idea... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    I got a webserver doing 100 000 hits / month on one site that also host a genealogy database... the whole thing holds 800Mo on a 10 Gig hdd, system included...

    maybe you just gave me an idea to a nice disaster recovery/backup plan....

    now if someone can send me this gmail invite everyone is speaking about

    knewbie at jadwio.com 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  95. Am I suppose to care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have a GMail account and labels are way better than folders. I use it for mailing lists, so it makes things much easier to track. Competition is good. Maybe it will force the others to really think about how to innovate and improve email.

  96. Footer/Signatures by Dalroth · · Score: 1

    Will they be removing this super annoying footer/signature messages (Provided by Yahoo!)? We already know it's provided by Yahoo!, that's what the @yahoo.com Email address is for!!

    Bryan

    1. Re:Footer/Signatures by Notrace · · Score: 1

      Try using it as an POP/SMTP-server with a regular mail-client.
      I use Evolution and Yahoo,. Works great. When I send mail through Evolution, there are no annoying signatures/footers.

      There is a way to get it for free, at least there was, I think if you agree that they do sometimes send you some messages too about special offers or whatever. It's called the Yahoo Delivers membership.
      I was worried this would open the way to spam-hell, but I do still only get a few spam-messages a week, if that.
      And that's after more than a year of extensive use.

  97. Reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Invest in some solid state storage, man. When I reboot, all my data stays on the hard disk (cue spooky music) >:P

    1. Re:Reboot by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      I ment reformat, didn't sleep last night and mind don't work. sorry

      --
      I like muppets.
  98. Google OS by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Mail and storage are just the beginning. If Google really tried to develop an OS, it would give Microsoft a run for their money. I don't know if they would do it or not. But they definitely have the power to scare the competition in other areas.

  99. The real war behind the Gig storage battles by CinqDemi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I will venture here (or remind those who think that way already) that the real issue is about "owning" everyone's personal files, **not just email**. So the Gig battles are just the opening salvo. Having your files easily accessible from anywhere without you having to lug your laptop or a hard drive *is* useful.

    I'd like to hear about alternatives and what this means for the IT/ISP players in the next few years. To elucidate on all this:

    It doesnt take a Ph.D to add 1 + 2; and maybe consider a more standards driven approach as in (3)

    (1)Microsoft, Yahoo, eBay, Amazon, etc. all want to have your personal info for targeted advertising. Both Microsoft and Apple are researching a system whereby all the info in your hard drive is easily searchable.

    (2)All indications are that most computing will soon be delivered over the (internet) pipes, with broadband available everywhere. ( SUN's original motto, then IBM's, now everyone's)

    Well, personally, until the dust settles on the privacy issues I wouldnt mind having a GMail account to use as "light" personal/business info internet folder.

    I use my own server VPN connection meantime, so I can already always access all my files from anywhere. But i dont see it being a practical mode for the majority of users - as .. recently said, we dont need to run a power generator in every home to get electricity; simialrly why would we need to maintain a server with all its headaches.

    (3)which goes back to the issue, might it not be better in the meantime for all ISP's to adopt a standard user-friendly personal data repository, possibly mirroring what the user has at home/office ?

    Andre

    PS. Slightly off topic, on a personal note: if I'm on target on this issue, that would make it 3 out of 3. (previous posts indicated that the MAC /Win comparisons didnt fairly compare systems of the same price, and that the Palm-Handspring thing was for Palm to get into cell phone territory FAST - in hindsight, that was confirmed)

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---
  100. Firefox works fine by denjin · · Score: 1

    I agree with some of it. But, I've never gotten anyone complaining about my mail getting lost, and the mail works just fine in Firefox for me. I know there were some issues (or still are) with Opera, though.

    I honestly just use hotmail for my junk mail though, it isn't used for anything important.

    1. Re:Firefox works fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They never sent the opera.css to firefox users. Even IE display'ed MSN the same way as Opera, when you tricked it into using opera.css instead of default.css.

  101. but it's .mac - by Corf · · Score: 1

    ...your hardware of choice is reflected in the doman! Surely that intangible is well worth all the money. Or at least, that's what Apple is banking on.

    --
    The pain was excruciating and the scarring is likely permanent, but that just means it's working.
  102. Re:Gmail invite? by FubarPA · · Score: 1

    Oooo bribing for codes... uhm... crap, I have nothing good... if you're feeling nice and have an extra invite, drop one to brad at fubarpa.com.

    --
    "Well, I am mad, and I'm a crazy fucka when it comes to tea"
  103. Argh! by denjin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Argh, now all my crappy accounts have tons of space, but I still can't try out gmail. :( It's a conspiracy, as I've never gotten an Orkut invite either. :|

    1. Re:Argh! by maelstrom · · Score: 1

      send me an email mmichie at gmail.com and i'll invite you... i've got a couple invites for anyone else..

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
  104. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by onco_p53 · · Score: 1

    As requested:

    you wouldn't per chance like to send me a gmail invite would you?

    this is my slashdot email account, the other was my personal ISP. Thanks to the wonders of alias they all end up at the same place. On a completely unrelated note I have never been spammed at the slashdot address, the fudging must work.

    (Maybe I should take that back)

  105. Gmail speed by sudotcsh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm really not sure where I stand in this fight here. Wait, no ... I know where I stand - I'm a screaming Gmail fan.

    I have a friend who has a paid Yahoo! account and I sent him an invite while he was over at my place. He logged in to Yahoo! to retrieve the invite (which of course had been placed in the Spam folder, but that's neither here nor there). When he finally found it and got signed up he couldn't stop talking about how cool Gmail was, how fast it was, thanks a lot for the invite, etc. etc.

    Then the next day Yahoo! upped their space for paid users to 2 gigs or whatever it was, and all the sudden he was gloating about "I have TWO gigs!".

    Yeah, man. Two gigs of a service you were blasting yesterday for being slow and inferior. Whatever.

    I guess the point is that to some extent these carrots are working, and they're able to make users forget their pain by offering more space.

    I have faith that in time he'll remember how fast his Gmail account is and start moving over there. Our friends and family can be extracted from the dark side - it'll just take some work.


    Oh, what? You don't have a Gmail account yet? Well, I gots four invites left - hit me up at kevinomara bat gmail mot com.

    1. Re:Gmail speed by sudotcsh · · Score: 1

      Just in case you're reading a story this old ... sorry, I have run out of invites. If you still must have one, send me an email and next round I'll try to hook you up.

  106. Yet another space competition game? by deconvolution · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As I remembered, in 1999, when most Chinese email services offered 2M space for free account, Sina, one of the leading .com companies started to provide 50M free space to attactive people applying their account. Then other competitors following up to add their space to 20M, 50M and 100M... and go to our campus and send us free email accounts for all students. Finally, etang.com says they provided unlimited free space to every one and put this to the adverts.

    After couples months, most of them declared a free "large space" emails are "unmaintainable". Sina decreased their account from 50M to 5M, and even a company called 263 canceled their free email service, "As a professional ISP, we dont need click rate from the unrelated public" they explained the reason something like that.

    Till now etang still provides unlimited space email access if you pay about 40 USD a year(Sorry, it is Chinese). But most people never interest it.

    Regarding my previous experiense, a "unlimited" email space is not the key point attacting public to their service. The more important question is : HOW LONG?

  107. Re:Gmail invites by CinqDemi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hey. i'd like one too - nothing like experiencing the real thing -
    Cheerios

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---
  108. I agree by baker_tony · · Score: 0
    I've had my hotmail account for god knows how long now. Was weighing up the pain I would have to go through to notify everyone of a new address and keep checking my hotmail one for a few months after a change over. Now I'll have enough space to hold all the spam I get when I go away on holiday, so no worries!

    Now I just have to consider weather GMails interface is gonna be worth the change...

  109. Re:Gmail invite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please invite me for a GMAIL account... I could really use the extra storage

    Please invite me, mailing to:
    paul_hutschemaekers@hotmail.com

    Immensely grateful,
    Meester

  110. Don't be a Hater! ;-) by Robert+Petersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think what Google is attempting to do with all that storage is get *life* users, i.e. people that will end up archiving 5, 10, or dare I say it, 15 years worth of email. In that span, I could see that 1GB of space coming in handy. One thing that I think Google could do to get me 100% on board would be a way to back up my email archive to my local PC. Not that i'm worried (*right now*) of Google going under, but who know's, 5 or 10 years from now when iv'e amassed a few hundred megs of email.....

  111. Why do people care about the search? by LincolnQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, I haven't used Gmail, but what makes searching your email through Gmail any better than a grep? (or any old indexed search if you prefer). The POINT of the Google search algorithm is to rely on cross-references between items in the search space to determine which items are the most likely to be important.

    There are no cross-references between emails.

    (well, besides In-Reply-To, which is not too tough -- finding the first email in a thread is not particularly hard).

    I usually search the _web_ for something I don't know a lot about in order to find out more about it. But when I search my email, it is because I am trying to remember a specific detail of a certain conversation. I have to know a word or two in the email in both cases in order to find it anyway.

  112. Re:Whoever you use for your free email, thank Goog by Patik · · Score: 1
    Yes, 10mbyte for the entire message.
    Only ten millibytes?!
  113. Memory or Storage space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My pet peeve. May be a little pedantic, but I do wish people would stop saying memory when they mean disk space or storage. Now it seems that ZDNet has gotten into this habit as well. Check out the link in the original post. I wonder how many times this happens to us in Tech support. I feel like pulling a McLaughlin on them; shouting "Wrong" and hanging up.

  114. Look what happens by adeyadey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look what happens when you search google for the keyword "gmail" - this site comes up third!

    http://gmail-is-too-creepy.com/

    Good on google for not censoring it, Cant imagine MS would allow that..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Look what happens by jpmorgan · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if you look at the WHOIS records, you'll see that the site is owned by Daniel Brandt. Brandt is the guy who launched the anti-Google crusade because he was pissed that his site (NameBase) wasn't ranked #1 whenever you searched for anybody.

  115. more space for spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i quit hotmail after they lost my data a few weeks ago...

    so what would happen when they offer 250mb and wipe it out for no reason!

    don't use hotmail!!!

  116. So what by blahbooboo2 · · Score: 1

    I just got a Gmail account. All I can say is WOW. It is so much better then yahoo and hotmail. The shortcut keys, the mail presentation, the CLEAN interface... Just simple and fast, like google itself

  117. my email gets cleaned out every month by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    At least thats how often I have to rejoin the bloody thing. Backup is useless when they keep deleting your account.

    I used to trust Eudoramail but it has totally crapped out now.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  118. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by budn3kkid · · Score: 1
    gmail will eat hotmail and yahoo for lunch.

    And grow fat? then slow down to a crawl just like Yahoo! Mail and Hotmail??? Better hope gMail doesn't. ^^

  119. Bad elitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally agree with that. I don't like the invite system at all. I do have a GMail account (for testing), but i hate the perceived elitism that the invite system creates. Why should anyone who knows the right geeks be offered the first choice to pick a good username? To me this is completely unfair. This and the privacy invading advertising system (just wait until they start using your complete e-mail archive for advertising!) have lowered my opinion of Google.

  120. 250 Mb by triptolemeus · · Score: 1

    That is an awful lot of spam

    --
    The site where: "I'm right, as long as you ignore the things that prove me wrong", became a valid method of debate.
  121. Will FastMail follow? by yotam · · Score: 1

    Anyone knows whether FastMail will follow the generous-1Gb move and when?

  122. So when... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    ... will Google have tie-ins to my IM client (for inbox notifications) and a homepage where I can combine my mail with my stock quotes and all the other stuff I currently do on Yahoo?

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  123. IMAP by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    I can't stand webmail. Where are the IMAP hosts. Paid, free, whatever, just want somebody to IMAP host "myname@mydomain.com". I don't want yet another email/gmail/hotmail e-mail address.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:IMAP by papyr · · Score: 1

      Have you looked into fastmail? The domain email hosting isn't free, but they do offer IMAP.

  124. what I would pay for... by jared51 · · Score: 0

    I keep all my old emails. I'm a nut - I have them going back to the early 90s.

    I want them all to be online, all the time. I also want to be able to use anything to get at them, to me that means imap. I don't trust myself or my isp to run my own mail server.

    I want to pay someone like google or yahoo $20-$30/yr for a few GB of space that can also send mail on behalf of my domain. And have it be imap accessible, too. That way I can always move it and back it up.

    When will that happen?

    Anyone do it now?

    On a sidenote, I've been using yahoo/yahoopops for a while - I like the sync with outlook features that yahoo provides. If google can start adding all the other portal features (briefcase, notepad, real address book, calendar), then they've got something.

    --
    "I love California. I practically grew up in Phoenix." -Former Vice President Dan Quayle
    1. Re:what I would pay for... by KhaosSpawn · · Score: 1

      You can check out Runbox. It offers IMAP and will have 1GB of space at the end of the month.

  125. Hotmail sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, hotmail really sucks, not just because of the lack of space, not just that.

    among other things, its completely bloated, full of crap, takes an eternity to refresh every page.
    What about the "server too busy" annoing message so often?

    BTW, i am tired it also cripples the mails (e.g. try forwarding an graphic-emedded mail, you just lose all the GFX, or HTML-formatted mails)

    It sucks.

    Up tu now, Yahoo never disappointed at all. Cheers to Yahoo for its technological innovations, crap-free, availability and everything else hotmail lacks of. Those guys rule.

  126. Re:Gmail invite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get one too, please.
    guruno1 at hotmail dot com

  127. Say what you will about hotmail.. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1
    but once they put their most recent spam guard or whatever in about 9 months ago I have received zero spam through hotmail. By zero, I mean ZERO and all my regular mail has gone through. I dont know what they did, but it was amazing.

    Of course, I was (am) paying $19.95 a year for 10 measely gigabytes, so there has to be some other benefit :)

    (I use the hotmail account strictly as a backup account.. for this reason, it is quite good that it does not fill up with junk as I routinely go weeks without checking it)

  128. Still using my hotmail account more... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    My main address is a hotmial account, and I'm still using it. Why? One main reason: Gmail can't be accessed through Thunderbird (Techincally hotmail cant eaither but at least there's a 3rd party program to do it)

    I realize the best part of gmail is in its web interface with search things and whatnot, but right now I don't particularly care to use any of that, and I don't want to ahve to browse to a site to check it, just open Tbird and check it with all my other addresses

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  129. But google is honest, thats the difference by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    And just to add a little twist to this comment, imagine of MS was doing what Google is doing. People would be screaming bloody murder and citing the reason I cited above. Sort of sad really....

    You've completely forgotten 1 important thing: google is an honest company. From there on you can't compare this to if MS was doing the same thing.

    Even with 250megs of hotmail storage I know they're just going to sell the address to a spammer anyway!

    bums

    1. Re:But google is honest, thats the difference by singleantler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure you can call Google honest, only that they have not been proven dishonest, unlike Microsoft.

      Google is still a company, the point of which is to make a profit. I don't think they're going to do anything nefarious with my e-mail, but I also don't give them any special dispensation because one of their mottos is "Don't be evil." So far they're just a company which makes a very good search engine, and a few peripheral tools and utilities. I don't see anything to make me think they're honest or dishonest, they are just good at providing their service.

      --
      "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
  130. The best webmail service offers NO storage by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mailinator.com

    No account sign-up, no password, just type in any user account name you can think of and check the email for it. Works great for the bazillion or so sites out there that have "free registration" but require a valid email address. All emails are deleted after a few hours.

  131. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by Joe+Schlabotnik · · Score: 1

    And grow fat? then slow down to a crawl just like Yahoo! Mail and Hotmail??? Better hope gMail doesn't.

    This seems unlikely since the main Google search page has been around for years and is still lean and fast. That is, of course, as long as the corporate culture remains the same (Hello IPO!).

  132. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by ThomK · · Score: 1

    Sure, for the dialup community.

    Then Yahoo and Hotmail will offer low-res versions.

    --

    TK

  133. Re:Gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get one please.
    guruno1 at hotmail dot com

  134. yup! and they're still bata to! :D by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    GMail is simply the best webmail, hands down, on all fronts. And its still beta!

  135. Re:Whoever you use for your free email, thank Goog by Cyberdork · · Score: 1

    Oh, damn it, that's about 1/12 of a bit!

  136. FUD: Behind the Bullshit by Disevidence · · Score: 1

    Facts about n0dez's post

    1. He posted no proof.
    2. He got modded up for making assertions which might be true, but as there is no proof, how do we know?
    3. Via anecdotal evidence of my Hotmail account, n0dez's fact number 2 is wrong.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  137. Spell Check by Dukat · · Score: 1

    One thing I haven't seen many people comment on is G-Mails spell checker on mails. You hit spell check and it works like Word where you click on each word that is highlighted and it gives you popup options. The best spell checker by far of any of the major 3. Also the Tagline is gone on sent mail!!!!!!!

    1. Re:Spell Check by Dukat · · Score: 1

      Also people are talking about new mail notifications. Gmail has a built in refresh so it refreshes after like 2 minutes and if you have new mail and keep your browser minimized it changes from G-mail - Inbox to G-mail Inbox (1)

  138. This will continue to get out of control until.... by boschmorden · · Score: 1

    Google ups diskspace on their free membership email system to 1TB to top Hotmail's 500GB

  139. Pure HTML on the way by gentoo1337 · · Score: 1

    About the only thing I can really complain about Gmail is that it's so heavily reliant on Javascript. It'd be really nice if it worked through a text-based browser.

    They are working on creating a pure HTML version.

    1. Re:Pure HTML on the way by gentoo1337 · · Score: 1

      It seems like a Gmail account is required to visit that link. Sorry, didn't realise that. Here's what it says:

      Can I access Gmail using plain HTML?

      Google believes in helping people quickly and efficiently organize, access, and make better use of information, in both search and email. We are working hard to develop a plain HTML version of our service that supports browsers without JavaScript, as well as browsers using screen readers for the visually impaired.

  140. Google Instant Messenger by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    I want Google Instant Messenger. And I want it this year. Google has proven that they are the Internet company that can innovate (instead of just talking about innovation, like a certain company whom I will not name but is run by Bill Gates). Now it's time to do something innovative in the Instant Messenger arena. And perhaps if they were the first "big name" to tie into Jabber, the other three would be forced to do so as well!

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Google Instant Messenger by aok · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Making a Google Instant Messenger would probably increase the number of Gmail users which is desirable since that gets them more potential ad views/click-throughs.

  141. Re:Gmail invite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How bout little old me? I promise to be good!

    pozmuscleguy at comcat dot net

  142. Begun, this Yahoo-versus-Users war has. by RPoet · · Score: 1

    Says TFA:
    "This time, however, Yahoo said it will continue changing its protocols to prevent clients such as Trillian from finding new ways to incorporate Yahoo."

    So it's obvious that clients like Gaim, Kopete and Trillian need to come up with a scheme to keep up. It would seem prudent to have a feature that detects a failure to connect, asks the user if he would like to update the Yahoo protocol plugin, and if yes, downloads and installs it automatically, and then connects successfully. It just takes some manpower to keep the plugins up to date, but this would be coordinated by a cross-client task force that would share information on the latest protocol changes.

    Of course, one can wonder if all this is really worth it. One day the whole world will be on Jabber (except we will rarely call it Jabber since it's so ubiquitous), and we will tell tales to our children of those days when we couldn't necessarily communicate with other IM users since there were competing (!) systems, and IM communication companies spent resources on trying to prevent communication. And they'll smile politely and think "old age has caught up with gramps." (and then they'll fly home in their cars, but that's another story)

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    1. Re:Begun, this Yahoo-versus-Users war has. by RPoet · · Score: 1

      Haha, well that's funny. Posted under the wrong story. Excuse moi.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  143. costs $0.20 an account by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The cost of bulk disks is around $0.80 a gigabyte. This expansion will cost Hotmail about $0.20 er user, presuming the customer would fill it. I wonder how it takes for advertising revenue to pay for this. About one week?

  144. Sorry. It's the "No HomerSSSS" club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're allowed one.

  145. currently not accepting new registrations by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    We are currently not accepting new registrations. Accounts can be purchased in our store (http://www.aventuremail.co.uk/store) in the mean time.

    But thanks for all the fish anyways...

  146. This just sweetens the deal for MyWay users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MyWay's email service has been banner ad free since the beginning. Now the 120MB boost (from 6MB) simply sweetens the deal.

    I'd say that if you can't get a GMail invite, grab a MyWay account - it's the next best thing.

    As for MSN Hotmail, the jump from 2MB to 250MB is impressive. However, this will only serve to slow the mass migration from Hotmail to GMail. I think the same principle applies to Yahoo! Mail.

    1. Re:This just sweetens the deal for MyWay users by keefey · · Score: 1

      I'm with you there. I'm 100 % satisfied with MyWay, absolutely fantastic web mail client (which allows me to check my pop mail from wherever in the world I happen to be). No spam, no banners, just great.

  147. It's not the storage, stupid! by anrwlias · · Score: 1

    It amuses me that Yahoo, Hotmail, et al are rushing high storage accounts into place. Google's 1GB storage served to get everyone's attention but that's not what's generating the buzz, anymore. The simple fact of the matter is that it's a superior product. The interface is clean, elegant and functional. The search features and the utility of labels place it well beyond the competition. Finally, the lack of obnoxious flashing banner ads makes it pleasant to use.

    I had a Hotmail account for years. I wouldn't go back to them if they offered me an exabyte of storage and free gift certificates for the rest of my life.

  148. Another Gmail invite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU! Can save my soul from the eternal damnation and endless pain that is hotmail!
    loraksus at yahoo.com
    (damn hotmail account will probably be full of spam by the time someone sees this)
    thanks in advance. . .

  149. Re:Well, the desire for bigger profits I suppose. by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

    "GMail came in and broke the cartel's artificial shortage"

    can Google get into the diamond business and make DeBeers stop charging us so much for blood diamonds???

  150. How hard is that? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Not hard. I've had my own business internet connection for my home. I've moved on average once a year for the past 4 years, yet my static business connection is always there for me, and my email follows me easily because it's all IMAP.

    Now that I have DSPAM integrated, I don't even need to use a good IMAP client like Thunderbird. I can use anything and know that my email is already filtered and in tip-top shape!

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  151. have to love google by moondo · · Score: 1

    talk about thanking god for gmail! i'm probably stating the obvious but i think that gmail has really been a catalyst for effectiveness...

    it has had the effect of pushing the slow and often-times-ineffective monopolistic huge corporations. somehow i get the image of a fat guy at microsoft who works for hotmail who used to sit down on his chair munching on a donut while chatting with his mom... now has to actually put down the half-eaten donut, say 'bye' to his mom and get to work.

  152. The funniest part about Gmail so far... by Devil · · Score: 1

    The funniest part about Gmail so far was when I logged into my account for the first time. Gmail sends you a message when you open your account, with the subject "Gmail is different. Here's what you need to know." I opened that message and noticed that one of the ads along the right side read:

    The page cannot be found
    The page you are looking for might have been
    removed, had its ...

    That's comedy, right there.

    Seriously, though, I moved my totally non-techie father over yesterday, too. He'd gotten sick of Hotmail's paltry 2MB limit. Now MSN says they'll up it to 250MB early next month. Sounds like too little, too late to me.

  153. What Gmail have YOU been using? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "The real good stuff comes in the form of a clean and fast interface..."

    Ummm, clean yes, fast no. It's a buggy piece of shit so far, and I'm not the only one that's noticed. It times out a LOT, and I'm already tired of the "Oops, there's been an error, try again in 30 seconds" messages. And I get this from multiple locations, and I'm getting similar reports from other friends that use it.

    It may eventually turn out to be the greatest thing sinced sliced white bread, but it's got a long way to go before the bugs are fixed. I know it's a beta, but I'm dissapointed in the quality at this point.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:What Gmail have YOU been using? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Ummm, clean yes, fast no. It's a buggy piece of shit so far, and I'm not the only one that's noticed. It times out a LOT, and I'm already tired of the "Oops, there's been an error, try again in 30 seconds" messages. And I get this from multiple locations, and I'm getting similar reports from other friends that use it.

      Goes both ways, I suppose - during about 2 weeks so far, apart from 2 or 3 times lasting maybe 15 mins, it's been nice and speedy for me. Same with the error message, which i've only seen twice and which cleared up after a couple minutes.

      I've sent out 10 invites so far, and nobody has said anything about having problems with it, so...I dunno. Like you said, it's still beta, so don't condem it quite yet :)

  154. Hello gmail - goodbye netaddress? by Shoeler · · Score: 1

    I've been a loyal user of netaddress since '97 or so - I can't even remember, but it's been a long time. When they switched to a pay-only service (remember the "Always free!" moniker so many dot-bombs used back then?) I gladly paid to keep my address.

    Now it seems every service but netaddress is expanding their size - funny, my renewal is up with them soon, and their tech support says that their 10MB for $50 a year is worth it because of the awesome tech support they give.

    Do we really need awesome tech support on an e-mail account???

    1. Re:Hello gmail - goodbye netaddress? by DavidBieniek · · Score: 1

      In my opinion...no.

      --
      David Bieniek www.abovethesecret.com/forum
  155. Yahoo has searching by Gregoyle · · Score: 1

    Umm, Yahoo has searching now, at least for the subscriber email (19.99 a year).

    --

    "He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil."

  156. I wanna try GMail by aduxorth · · Score: 1

    The only prob is I gotta wait for an Invite.

    This could take years, I don't know anyone with a gmail account. :(

    1. Re:I wanna try GMail by cuzality · · Score: 1

      You gotta be proactive -- not wait for someone to come along and place one in your hands.

      Try:

      gmail4u.blogspot.com
      gmailswap.com

      That's just a couple -- there are others.

      Go get one!

  157. How many users does google have now? by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of conspiracy theories on how google is forcing MSN and Yahoo! into capital expenditures for allowing their users to go from 4-6MB to 100-250 MB. This begs the question: How many users DOES gmail have? From the frequency of invitest that we've seen and not too mention all the users of blogger.com, there's got to be over 1 million users.

    While that is not as much compared to the 100+m for the MSN and Yahoo free customers, most of those are just dummy spam-bait accounts anyway so don't really require that much space.

    Since google offers 4-10 times the size to begin with, the capital investment should be comparable. Tho google is probably more efficient at taking advantage of current tech for this because this was planned for them while the others are just catching up.

  158. Re:Gmail invites by lordcorvin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could you or someone who has a spare invite option please invite me? I'm duying to try the gmail, and I'd be very thankful. alexkra@bezeqint.net Thanks a lot.

  159. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by tayhimself · · Score: 1

    I'd really like to know if any of these services offers email backup. What happens when a disk fails? Surprisingly I havent seen it mentioned in any past gmail discussions by the /. crowd.

  160. Perhaps off topic - Does Gmail support text based by blue_teeth · · Score: 1

    My only question before I shift to gmail is...does it support Lynx/Links (text based browsers).

    Cheers..

  161. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by Reziac · · Score: 1

    I use the "old" Yahoo mail interface, with images and javascript off, and it's slick as hell even on dialup.

    You'd think since bandwidth is at least SOME of the cost of doing business online, they'd WANT to keep the size of what's served down to a dull roar??!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  162. If they were all able to do this... by hal9000 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it seem like anyone who has been paying for Yahoo or Hotmail has been totally getting ripped off? It's obvious now that their product as of a couple months ago was half a hack, considering what they are able to offer today. Thanks, Google, for bitchslapping the companies that have been bitchslapping their customers.

    --
    Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
  163. Step 3a - by Spoticus · · Score: 1

    Watch all the competition run themselves into the ground spending lots and lots of $$ scrambling to buy up hardware to try and keep up

  164. Maxtor, Seagate, Western Digital.... by kidgenius · · Score: 1

    With all of these storage increases by all of these email providers, I have a feeling that the harddrive manufacturers are laughing their asses off right now....all the way to the bank

  165. How to write your own notification for GMail... by Otto · · Score: 1

    Write a program that does http. Have it load up the gmail pages and parse them and such (exercise left to the reader) until you see a URL that looks like this:
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail?search=inbox& view=tl &start=0&init=1&zx=XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

    With the "XXXXX" replaced by some form of key.

    In the source of that page, you'll find a bit of text that looks like this:

    D(["ds",1,0,0,0,0,0]

    D is a javascript function, but frankly you don't care.. The first number after the "ds" (in this case, 1) is the number of unread mails you have in your inbox. Reload this from time to time and check that number. Simple as that.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:How to write your own notification for GMail... by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Simple, but suffers from the problem of any screen scraper; It is almost guaranteed to break at some point.

      Google really needs a simple API into Gmail that allows this sort of limited functionality (new mail notification, address book access, etc.) outside of the browser client. They also need to offer an alternative very simple frontend for mobile devices, etc. so that they can send/receive mail without requiring all this javascript.

    2. Re:How to write your own notification for GMail... by Otto · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if that sort of thing exists, but they simply haven't documented it publically yet.

      My guess is that they'll integrate it into the Google Toolbar at some point. Of course, this is a Windows/IE only thing, but the method it'll use can be found if/when that occurs. The method I posted before will work as an interim solution if needed by somebody.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  166. Is Email Provider Megalomania contagious? by CharonX · · Score: 1

    When I read the story I thought "what the heck".
    I can understand that Google offers an e-mail account with a 1GB storage (it was a great publicity deal, and the Google founders were - and probably are still - at least partly geeks.
    But now honestly speaking, I agree that ~2MB is too small, ~10MB sound ok for users that don't get many attachments, ~50MB are good, ~100MB are comfortable for almost everyone, BUT what are you going to do with 250MB+ of e-mail storage space (well, except illegal activities or storing Pr0n - "honey, I just gotta check my e-mail" er... )?
    I think its great that many providers upgrade from they measly space allocations (2MB at hotmail, 6MB at Yahoo etc.) but I fear many will overdo it, just to make sure they don't "lose out" to Google's Gmail, and have to face the consquences sooner or later (reducting storage again -> public backlash, not reducing -> being exploitet by "power users")

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
  167. Invite me pls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HI!
    Can someone invite me to gmail please!
    Thanx. ok!me 2 clever!!!
    forgive!
    my email is : slashdrop(at)yahoo(dot)com

  168. Re:Very good news by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    In other news, most of the enlarged free storage offered on hotmail will be used to store free enlargement offers.

  169. Huge mailboxes, but... by kannibul · · Score: 1

    We'll still be limited to 2MB attachements...

  170. Too late by 1000101 · · Score: 1

    Like most things Google creates, gmail spent too much time in "beta". They should have opened the flood gates and then everyone would already be lined up with Google. Now I already have my existing 100 megs on my Yahoo! account which I'm perfectly fine with. If Google gave me an account last week I would have switched and not looked back. Granted this beta hasn't been out very long, but the company tends to let their beta software stay in beta for too long.

  171. Re: Your sig by redune45 · · Score: 1

    I have a few spare invitations.. But I'm not a beautiful woman, sorry

    --
    redune.com: The World 3.2 Megapixels at a time
  172. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by Politburo · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. If he "never uses it" and "just checked", you're implying he paid $19.99 just to look at the image layout. On my free yahoo account, there are a few gifs (~1k, 25x25) on the left hand side, and an ad banner across the top. The current banner happens to be flash, so I can't get much info about it without exerting effort.

  173. Sheesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When you have to switch your paid service from 10 megabytes to 2 gigabytes (a factor of 200!) doesn't that sort of indicate that you massively misjudged the market?

    That would be like the gas prices dropping to $0.02 a gallon. Somebody made a major fuckup somewhere.

  174. yahoo by zogger · · Score: 1

    I don't know what I was doing wrong, but the other night I was trying to get my girlfriend a yahoo account so she could email her dad, who now has an email. I thought yahoo would be nice so she could have her own webpage as well where she could put family pictures and crapola like that. Man, I ate cookies,like half a dozen of them, allowed scripts, took all images, all that happened is I got trapped in a loop that kept taking me back to a login screen. I even changed the password again, thinking I made a mistake, nope, still wouldn't work. She, not needing tons of features or space, I then went over to netscape and got one there, no problems. Has there been a problem with yahoo lately anyone know, or was there an ID 10 T error between the keyboard and monitor?

    No way did I want a hotmail account, just don't like them no more...

    ya, I know, really set myself up on that one.... ;)

  175. Re:Very good news by pclminion · · Score: 1

    You measure your email in milligrams?

  176. Confession of a metamoderator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is simply too much work to determine whether a post is truly redundant. Reading in flat time-stamp order is confusing and reading threaded makes you lose track of the time sequence. I simply skip any item that has been modded redundant.

    1. Re:Confession of a metamoderator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been wondering if repeat posts (not trolling GNAA-style so-called "crapfloods") really should be punished anyways.

      It seems that the wrong guy gets wacked, and because of the delay in seeing what's on Slashdot and the time it takes to compose your post -- I'd wager that most redundant posts are not even due to carelessness on the part of the poster.

      I also skip reduntant moderations when I meta-moderate -- for the same reasons you stated.

  177. What next? by joeljkp · · Score: 1

    What will Google do next? How about "Google Linux". They've already got a killer reputation among the /. crowd, they're innovating thinkers, they have the industry by the ears, and they have money to blow.

    Sounds like a match made in heaven.

    --
    WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  178. But Why? by Psymunn · · Score: 1

    Constantly I hear the 'how could google afford to give 1000 Mb argument' and it's really quite stupid.
    When did hotmail come out? I can't even recall but i got my 'before microsoft' hotmail account 8 and a half years ago. Now, at the time, if i recall, teh survice provided 1 Mb of e-mail. Since then, there has been virtually no improvement in services. So, 10 years later,a company provides 1000 Mb of free e-mail. Even if everyone uses all the space they are granted, Google is still earning money. And so is their competition. Had microsoft and yahoo been scaling their services along with computer memory inflation, google would hardly have been making a jump at all
    If microsoft loses money, it will be because people are switching to google, not because they are forced to give out more mmemory then they can afford. Had they not been lazy or had decent competition all these years, there would be no danger of a sudden collapse. It's like a fish that's moved from cold water to hot water too fast, it's heart explodes. Google caught them off guard and didn't provide a suitable buffer.
    Of course the average person still remains skeptical. A gigabyte still sounds huge, especially when you are primarily filling it up with small flat text files

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  179. 1Gb is not the "golder grail" ... by Monkey+Overlord · · Score: 1

    ... and Hotmail/Y!/Lycos don't seem to understand that it is not just about the space. I have about 1800 e-mails in my Gmail account right now that take up about 160Mb of space and if it weren't for Gmail's great search capabilities, multiple labels per e-mail message and automatic filtering/sorting I would be a lot of trouble every time I went looking for an e-mail. Instead it is quite easy to locate pretty much anything. Anyways, if you don't have Gmail yet I suggest you read my poorly articulated collection of thoughts on the matter. I try to emphasize some of the great things (besides 1Gb storage that I don't even mention) about Gmail that make it better than other webmails.

  180. 250MB for Hotmail... by nite_warrior · · Score: 1

    Now I need to send myself 250 MB so that I can keep my hotmail inbox full and not get any junk mail into that. The only reason I have for keeping that address is that a lot of my friends only use msn :S

  181. yes.... by presmike · · Score: 1

    they have now given me enough space to store all my spam i get at hotmail.

    --
    presmike
  182. Re:Whoever you use for your free email, thank Goog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that sucks... What's the point of having 2gb of storage if you can only send 10 megabytes at a time? That's not even an entrte shareware game, and it's only two or three photos at full resolution, even with jpeg compression, out of my camera.

  183. 250MB eMail == Free FTP Hosting? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    Hey There,

    Apparently disk storage is so cheep we offer it free to the bio-mass.

    Why not free FTP sites?
    Or anything else that requires disk storage!?

    Cheers,
    -- The Dude

    1. Re:250MB eMail == Free FTP Hosting? by praxis · · Score: 1

      It's hard (but not impossible) to deliver ads over FTP. Probably not as effective as web-based electronic mail anyhow. These services aren't really for free; they're partially funded by advertising revenue.

  184. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't tried it, you say? Here's a free account! Just copy and paste this URL in your browser...

    gmail.google.com/gmail/a-eacf0b6e4e-83a1bdf2b9

    Hope you grab it before someone else does!

  185. 30 Petabytes?! by ZuilSerip · · Score: 1

    So... let's see... Hotmail has about 120Million subscribers, times 250MB - or a 1/4GB - that will give us what... about 30 Petabytes?! That's not chump change even for Uncle Gates. (Any cost estimates?!) Obviously, they are relying on the fact that the overwhelming majority of these accounts will never use anywhere close to 250MB. Still, as people stop cleaning up their mailboxes, and start sending more gargantuan attachements, it will probably start to hurt them soon...

  186. Re: Your sig by smaug195 · · Score: 1

    Unlike parent of parent, for a GMail invite, I am very flexible.

  187. The new large accounts limit how you use them... by Dzimas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was surprised to discover a couple of severe limitations to my GMail account. 1) Attachment size is limited to 10MB. 2) Email attachments such as .exe and other "suspicious" files are not transferred. This includes files placed in achives (.zip, .tar, .tgz, .taz, .z, .gz) formats. In other words, I'm stuck storing a few pictures, a couple of mp3s per message, and a heck of a lot of source code. Unfortunate, because I was hoping to use GMail as a very effective archive tool for stuff I want to keep.

  188. Cold war in the 21st century... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    So this is like a technology cold war... However, instead of a nuclear arms race, it's an email capacity race...

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  189. Your wish is google's command by joNDoty · · Score: 1

    Funny you should mention that. Google is working on a plain HTML alternative to their javascript interface as we speak. I found this out by writing their comments/suggestion department recommending a keyboard shortcut for deleting emails. Yes, I know, you're theoretically never supposed to NEED to delete an email. But this isn't as cut and dry an issue as it may seem.

    Think about it, when you do get spam, or a note-to-self, or just some assinine comment from a friend, do you WANT that email archived? I don't. In fact, I want it deleted. The keyboard shortcuts feature of gmail puts it head and shoulders above all the other free email clients I've tried. Everybody write in with your suggestions to gmail if you agree!

  190. Who's going to pay for all those diskspace? by .Chndru · · Score: 1

    IMHO, yahoo and msn has fallen into a big trap. Though, the cost of 1GB is $1 these days, scale it to 40+ million users, you are talking fat dough here. Google's ads have a higher click-thru and are relatively give G more $/click compared to all these silly banners in Yahoo Mail & Hotmail.. Me thinks, the only one who know what they doing are Google..they have a solid plan to monetize for sure.

  191. SBC by supmylO · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even the DSL provider SBC is going to boost their storage to 100mb for mail accounts. I'd still rather have a gmail invite though.

    1. Re:SBC by maxume · · Score: 1

      Really? I was under the impression that SBC only did transport, and that they got most of thier content from Yahoo!. I hear that @sbcglobal.com style addresses now get 2 GB. huh.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:SBC by supmylO · · Score: 1

      I have an @sbcglobal.net and they only said about the 200mb. Hmmm.

  192. Great by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1

    Now instead of fulfilling my plan of spending 2 hours going through all my old mail on what I need and what I don't, I no longer have to...I can wait another year or so and put my summer holidays aside to do it instead!

    Groan...Don't you think the only reason they want you to have larger email boxes is so that you can receive the future advertisement containing full-screen video?

    Karem

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
  193. Go buy HD company stock! by zhangyong · · Score: 1

    They're the Levi's in the Gmail rush.

  194. Hotmail Premium by funklord9 · · Score: 1

    I'm stuck using Hotmail for a while, even though I have plenty of newer, easier to use email addresses because hotmail doesn't allow automatic email forwarding. I don't care much about storage space, but I would pay for hotmail premium if it would let me access my hotmail with POP3.

  195. [Q] Encryption? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    So how easy is it to use GMail to send encrypted email?

    I'm guessing if you don't trust Google, then you have to encrypt locally and cut `n paste.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  196. Invitation! by elliot2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I invite you all to Hotmail but can anyone invite me to Gmail? :-)

  197. 20th century Cold War: Four 'forgotten' men.... by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    In 1962, President Kennedy and Soviet Leader Khrushchev worked together to prevent the Cuban Missile Crisis from escalating into World War III, which would likely have turned much of the Earth's land surface into a radioactive wasteland devoid of life and civilization....

    Their thanks?

    Kennedy is murdered in 1963 and Khrushchev is 'kicked out' and replaced by Bhreshnev in 1964.

    In 1987, President Regan challenged Soviet Leader Gorbachev to 'tear down' the Berlin Wall. In 1989, it came down--perhaps symbolically ending the Cold War at that time....

    Their thanks?

    Naysayers downplay the efforts of Regan (and likely Gorbachev as well) to end the Cold War, detracting somewhat from their impact on world history.

    What is all the fuss about email capacity? It is intrinsically nothing more than abstract, magnetically encoded zeroes and ones stored on spinning round metal platters inside hard disks.

    Contrast that to what could have happened.... What world could have existed had the nuclear arms race between the USA and the USSR not end the way it did back then due largely in part through the work of these four men?...

    Nowadays, due to the increase of terrorism and nuclear poliferation, will there be a day when life imitates art?

  198. I need a domain name!! Im trading 2 invites... by tit0.c · · Score: 1

    domain names are cheap from godaddy.com but I dont have a credit card. Ill give 2 invites for a domain.

  199. Screw Practicality....lets see who likes us best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but I don't have time for 2G of email....spammers are drooling!

  200. Re:Perhaps off topic - Does Gmail support text bas by Lao-Tzu · · Score: 1

    Nope.

  201. Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden by jbarr · · Score: 1

    Well, all I can say is when I log into my free Yahoo Mail account, the first thing I'm confronted with is a large Flash ad covering about 1/4 of the right side of the screen for some investment company. When I view a message, there is a large, animated Flash banner across the top of the screen. When I open an empty folder, I see a HUGE, static ad that takes up almost 1/2 of the screen for some Trip company. So my point is two-fold:

    1. Yahoo Mail's ads are totally irrelevent for my needs--almost to the point of being insulting. Trips, Investing, Screensavers, High Speed Internet service. They're all pretty much the same--redundent and annoying. Gmail's ads are at least relevent or related to the message I'm reading.

    2. You have to PAY $19.99 in order to eliminate the graphical ads. And I don't know if they still include "text" ads because their "Upgrade" information specifically states "Eliminate Graphical ads". Yes, Gmail includes ads, but they're text and tastefully done.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  202. GMail Invites, I still have'em by valmont · · Score: 1

    as of this writing i have 2 invites left, tho i've been getting new ones on a fairly regular basis. If you're interested in one, just add yourself to the queue by looking for the appropriate GMail related post on meh blog.

  203. it's WEBMAIL by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    it's DESIGNED to be used from multiple IP addresses!

  204. Yay! by KIEDIS · · Score: 1

    I will be able to go on vacation and come back without having my hotmail full and rejecting all mails:)