Cruz stood like a man and apologized for something his campaign staff did, not him. Yes he did the honorable thing. He accepted the blame for the actions of a few people in a very large staff of mostly volunteers. Where is the apology from Rubio or Trump for their campaign staff doing the same thing? Where is the apology from Trump for claiming Tom Coburn made statements about Cruz that Tom refuted and repudiated as soon as he did. Where is the apology from Trump for his lie about everyone else having left Nevada (Cruz was still in the state).
What is inconsistent about my line on Hillary? And no the third line is not made up? Hillary is a felon. I spent a career in the Army focused on the safe handling of Classified information. What she did is a felony several times over. She is a soon to be indicted (unless the Obama Justice Dept covers for her) felon. Where is the inconsistency.
Here is the difference: Hillary committed a felony and instructed her staff to commit felonies. Is someone under investigation for multiple felonies a valid candidate for President. Meanwhile some volunteers on Ted's campaign staff picked up a CNN report and started citing it to encourage Carson voters, who supposedly just lost their candidate, to vote for Cruz instead. If you can't see the difference in those acts you are a lost cause.
In 2008 while deployed to Afghanistan I noticed many sites displaying as corrupted and started digging. Turns out the internet service provided for personal use by troops was subject suffering from this. The service (which we paid for) was satellite service operated on the base by Indian Nationals but was routing through Chinese internet providers and every url served had a script injected. I complained, and raised the security concerns but it was never fixed. It was clumsily done so no-script blocked the injected script and my websites started displaying properly again. But I didn't really have the time or resources to dig further.
So was I. Get your facts straight. Yes Cruz did the honorable thing and apologized. But the source for the info his campaign workers were citing was a CNN news report, not exactly a lie or a bad strategy when the media says "Hey this candidate is leaving, Surely that means he's about to suspend his campaign." The Rubio and Trump campaigns also pushed this line.
Then in Nevada Trump claimed falsely that all the other campaigns had abandoned the state for the Super Tuesday races.
Again, if you want to criticize Cruz, do so based on real issues not this bs. Cruz Apologized for election politics that others did as well based on a publicly available news report.
Get your facts straight. CNN published that as news that his campaign staffers picked up and pushed, as did at least two other campaigns.
And Trump did the same thing, but without the benefit of a national news network publishing it first. In Nevada on the night of the Caucus he proclaimed that he was the only candidate still in Nevada campaigning.
If you want to criticize the Cruz campaign do it on the issues and the positions of his that you disagree with, not this bs.
Which also begs the question how many different distance rounds will soldiers have to carry. It seems this is a solution that causes more problems than it solves. A soldier can only carry so many rounds, given the choice they will load up exclusively on the longest range rounds so as to always have the ability to reach as far as possible and not have to let the enemy get to within 50 meters because they are out of their 300 meter rounds. So given the choice soldiers will undermine the purpose of such rounds in the first place.
Ever heard of google wallet? It only goes to the card if there is nothing in the wallet. I'm not worried about the credit card. But the money in my wallet from google surveys, that I use for my gaming desires.
The fact stands that this has become the new NUMBER 1 most annoying advertising technique on mobile browsing. I click a link to read a news or political article, I want to read the damn article, not wait for the play store to load to try to get me to buy some totally unrelated game. In a browser that is called click-jacking. It needs to be stopped!
And with Mobiles (at least on android devices) the new tactic of redirecting to the Play store without permission or requesting such. I'm afraid to let my kids use my devices now for fear of finding new aps purchased, by kids that don't realize what is happening.
Thank you for asking the question that nobody else seems to be concerned about. Do they not realize the problems they cause when they take away Superman's changing rooms?
They had control for two years. Yet the ACA was about the only significant legislation they accomplished during that time. And that was (as it was for the remaining 4 years until the Republicans took the Senate) because Harry Reid held a tight control on what even got onto the floor for debate. His own party members complained often about how hard it was to get anything done, because he wouldn't let the bills be debated in fear the Republicans would be able to sway a few democrats over to support them on certain issues. So he stopped any legislation that he did not know he had full support from his Democratic Senators from even being debated.
And then he'd blame the Republicans and the media didn't question him on his claims. During the Shutdown the House sent multiple budget bills to the Senate, with gradually reduced demands, but he wouldn't even let them be debated on the Senate floor let alone get voted on. Everybody loves to blame the republicans but the Senate history shows clearly where legislation was getting stopped.
Nope, Harry Reid refused to let any bills come onto the Senate Floor to be debated and voted on. He shut down far more legislation than all the Republicans combined. Getting him out of control was the key. Another Democrat might have let more work be done, his own party even complained about how seldom he let bills be debated on and voted.
So because the police didn't wait long enough (they did announce themselves) not being grounds to exclude copious amounts of drugs thus makes peoples lives worse? Maybe if they are drug dealing thugs.
Scalia basically said, the cops had a warrant to search the residence. So the mere fact that they didn't wait quite long enough after the knock and announce to actually enter the home does not achieve grounds for excluding the evidence found, which evidence would have still been found had they waited two or three seconds longer.
That doesn't exactly meet the criteria of making peoples lives worse and not following the Constitution. The police had a warrant, and would have found the evidence had they waited the couple seconds longer. Thus not a serious enough violation to exclude the evidence. Sounds like a solid ruling to me, especially since as footnote 5 on your linked article states, a set time to delay has never been set. So it's not as if the officer violated a hard and fast rule of (for hypothetical example) waiting 7 seconds after announcing before entering. The officer in question did knock and did announce and then entered after a 3-5 second delay.
Well since the Republicans took control of the Senate, they've passed the first budget bills and actually funded the government since Obama was elected as opposed to the six years of continuing resolutions the Reid senate forced on us. They repealed/reworked No Child Left Behind, greatly improving that mess. They've passed a major highway funding bill that had languished for years under Reid. And several more bills, they passed more bills in the first year than Reid had allowed to pass since becoming Senate Majority leader in 2007.
You realize until Scalia died it was actually balanced. Four reliably conservative Justices and Four reliably liberal justices, and Justice Kennedy who while nominally a conservative would swing back and forth based on the case. On most social issues (gay marriage, abortion, and the like) he was a reliable left vote. On other issues (2nd amendment, legal procedure and so on) he was a fairly reliable right vote.
We had a balanced court, now it's lurched to the left, with Kennedy either siding with the left for a win or with the right for a tie. If the President gets a nominee past the Senate, it will swing hard to the left, with five liberal Justices, three conservatives and Kennedy swinging from supporting the winning side of any issue to supporting the losing side of other issues.
Don't know where you got your information but there are many refineries, we are not down and certainly not down to 5 or even 14. There have not been any new ones built in the last few decades, but we are at far more than five. Hell there's five refineries in the state of Utah alone, and they've all increased production and capacity over the last few years. But they are not doing all the refining for the entire nation.
Agreed, Bush's biggest flaw is his last name. America will not vote for another Bush, at least not for a few decades. For him to get the nomination would in my opinion guarantee a Democrat win on his last name alone. That despite his actual accomplishments and abilities.
Re:but ted cruz birth issues can throw a monkey wr
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 1
There are no birth issues. It's a false claim. His mother is a US citizen by birth, and had met residency requirements before his birth. By standing law and long time precedence he is therefore a citizen by birth, regardless of location of his birth.
Re:shifted to corrupt union bosses, yes
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 1
Yes, because the several other Unions that did agree to the needed terms, the company said it needed to remain afloat also blamed the one Union that refused to cooperate and thus forced the company out of existence. The Hostess product you buy today is made by another company that bought the rights to the names, logos and recipes .
All because one Union refused to budge when the company pleaded with them that the Union's demands would put them out of business.
We justify it by the fact that NK has so much artillery aimed at Seoul SK, that if we ever start anything millions will die in a matter of minutes. It's a pretty effective barrier to any offensive actions by the US or the ROK.
U.S. Military who actually runs the facility, and is running the tribunals based on the evidence we have, and who is doing all interrogations and interviews of detainees at Gitmo. The CIA may have placed some of them originally but the Military is running the show and they don't play CIA games.
Only one parent has to be a US Citizen to bestow natural born citizenship. His mother was born in Delaware, and she met the residency requirements with ease. He is in fact eligible. The question is not up for debate the law and requirements are clear. Being born in Canada does not change his status.
Not everybody on the right is a birther. Although I despise his politics was born in Hawaii and even had he been born overseas his mother is a citizen as well. His eligibility was never in question.
Slashdot Mirror
Cruz stood like a man and apologized for something his campaign staff did, not him. Yes he did the honorable thing. He accepted the blame for the actions of a few people in a very large staff of mostly volunteers. Where is the apology from Rubio or Trump for their campaign staff doing the same thing? Where is the apology from Trump for claiming Tom Coburn made statements about Cruz that Tom refuted and repudiated as soon as he did. Where is the apology from Trump for his lie about everyone else having left Nevada (Cruz was still in the state).
What is inconsistent about my line on Hillary? And no the third line is not made up? Hillary is a felon. I spent a career in the Army focused on the safe handling of Classified information. What she did is a felony several times over. She is a soon to be indicted (unless the Obama Justice Dept covers for her) felon. Where is the inconsistency.
Here is the difference: Hillary committed a felony and instructed her staff to commit felonies. Is someone under investigation for multiple felonies a valid candidate for President. Meanwhile some volunteers on Ted's campaign staff picked up a CNN report and started citing it to encourage Carson voters, who supposedly just lost their candidate, to vote for Cruz instead. If you can't see the difference in those acts you are a lost cause.
Ted Cruz was still in Nevada and remained so until the Caucuses closed.
In 2008 while deployed to Afghanistan I noticed many sites displaying as corrupted and started digging. Turns out the internet service provided for personal use by troops was subject suffering from this. The service (which we paid for) was satellite service operated on the base by Indian Nationals but was routing through Chinese internet providers and every url served had a script injected. I complained, and raised the security concerns but it was never fixed. It was clumsily done so no-script blocked the injected script and my websites started displaying properly again. But I didn't really have the time or resources to dig further.
So was I. Get your facts straight. Yes Cruz did the honorable thing and apologized. But the source for the info his campaign workers were citing was a CNN news report, not exactly a lie or a bad strategy when the media says "Hey this candidate is leaving, Surely that means he's about to suspend his campaign." The Rubio and Trump campaigns also pushed this line.
Then in Nevada Trump claimed falsely that all the other campaigns had abandoned the state for the Super Tuesday races.
Again, if you want to criticize Cruz, do so based on real issues not this bs. Cruz Apologized for election politics that others did as well based on a publicly available news report.
Get your facts straight. CNN published that as news that his campaign staffers picked up and pushed, as did at least two other campaigns.
And Trump did the same thing, but without the benefit of a national news network publishing it first. In Nevada on the night of the Caucus he proclaimed that he was the only candidate still in Nevada campaigning.
If you want to criticize the Cruz campaign do it on the issues and the positions of his that you disagree with, not this bs.
My kids aren't old enough to have their own accounts. I don't want them to have their own accounts.
I will try that ad-blocker, I've been less than impressed with AdBlockPlus's Android offering.
Which also begs the question how many different distance rounds will soldiers have to carry. It seems this is a solution that causes more problems than it solves. A soldier can only carry so many rounds, given the choice they will load up exclusively on the longest range rounds so as to always have the ability to reach as far as possible and not have to let the enemy get to within 50 meters because they are out of their 300 meter rounds. So given the choice soldiers will undermine the purpose of such rounds in the first place.
Ever heard of google wallet? It only goes to the card if there is nothing in the wallet. I'm not worried about the credit card. But the money in my wallet from google surveys, that I use for my gaming desires.
The fact stands that this has become the new NUMBER 1 most annoying advertising technique on mobile browsing. I click a link to read a news or political article, I want to read the damn article, not wait for the play store to load to try to get me to buy some totally unrelated game. In a browser that is called click-jacking. It needs to be stopped!
And with Mobiles (at least on android devices) the new tactic of redirecting to the Play store without permission or requesting such. I'm afraid to let my kids use my devices now for fear of finding new aps purchased, by kids that don't realize what is happening.
Boo hoo, go to control panel, Default programs and reset the defaults you want.
Problem fixed, takes all of 30 seconds.
Thank you for asking the question that nobody else seems to be concerned about. Do they not realize the problems they cause when they take away Superman's changing rooms?
They had control for two years. Yet the ACA was about the only significant legislation they accomplished during that time. And that was (as it was for the remaining 4 years until the Republicans took the Senate) because Harry Reid held a tight control on what even got onto the floor for debate. His own party members complained often about how hard it was to get anything done, because he wouldn't let the bills be debated in fear the Republicans would be able to sway a few democrats over to support them on certain issues. So he stopped any legislation that he did not know he had full support from his Democratic Senators from even being debated.
And then he'd blame the Republicans and the media didn't question him on his claims. During the Shutdown the House sent multiple budget bills to the Senate, with gradually reduced demands, but he wouldn't even let them be debated on the Senate floor let alone get voted on. Everybody loves to blame the republicans but the Senate history shows clearly where legislation was getting stopped.
Nope, Harry Reid refused to let any bills come onto the Senate Floor to be debated and voted on. He shut down far more legislation than all the Republicans combined. Getting him out of control was the key. Another Democrat might have let more work be done, his own party even complained about how seldom he let bills be debated on and voted.
So because the police didn't wait long enough (they did announce themselves) not being grounds to exclude copious amounts of drugs thus makes peoples lives worse? Maybe if they are drug dealing thugs.
Scalia basically said, the cops had a warrant to search the residence. So the mere fact that they didn't wait quite long enough after the knock and announce to actually enter the home does not achieve grounds for excluding the evidence found, which evidence would have still been found had they waited two or three seconds longer.
That doesn't exactly meet the criteria of making peoples lives worse and not following the Constitution. The police had a warrant, and would have found the evidence had they waited the couple seconds longer. Thus not a serious enough violation to exclude the evidence. Sounds like a solid ruling to me, especially since as footnote 5 on your linked article states, a set time to delay has never been set. So it's not as if the officer violated a hard and fast rule of (for hypothetical example) waiting 7 seconds after announcing before entering. The officer in question did knock and did announce and then entered after a 3-5 second delay.
Well since the Republicans took control of the Senate, they've passed the first budget bills and actually funded the government since Obama was elected as opposed to the six years of continuing resolutions the Reid senate forced on us. They repealed/reworked No Child Left Behind, greatly improving that mess. They've passed a major highway funding bill that had languished for years under Reid. And several more bills, they passed more bills in the first year than Reid had allowed to pass since becoming Senate Majority leader in 2007.
You realize until Scalia died it was actually balanced. Four reliably conservative Justices and Four reliably liberal justices, and Justice Kennedy who while nominally a conservative would swing back and forth based on the case. On most social issues (gay marriage, abortion, and the like) he was a reliable left vote. On other issues (2nd amendment, legal procedure and so on) he was a fairly reliable right vote.
We had a balanced court, now it's lurched to the left, with Kennedy either siding with the left for a win or with the right for a tie. If the President gets a nominee past the Senate, it will swing hard to the left, with five liberal Justices, three conservatives and Kennedy swinging from supporting the winning side of any issue to supporting the losing side of other issues.
Don't know where you got your information but there are many refineries, we are not down and certainly not down to 5 or even 14. There have not been any new ones built in the last few decades, but we are at far more than five. Hell there's five refineries in the state of Utah alone, and they've all increased production and capacity over the last few years. But they are not doing all the refining for the entire nation.
Until the States call a convention and pass an amendment repealing the prior amendment and restoring congress. Even your route is not permanent.
Agreed, Bush's biggest flaw is his last name. America will not vote for another Bush, at least not for a few decades. For him to get the nomination would in my opinion guarantee a Democrat win on his last name alone. That despite his actual accomplishments and abilities.
There are no birth issues. It's a false claim. His mother is a US citizen by birth, and had met residency requirements before his birth. By standing law and long time precedence he is therefore a citizen by birth, regardless of location of his birth.
Yes, because the several other Unions that did agree to the needed terms, the company said it needed to remain afloat also blamed the one Union that refused to cooperate and thus forced the company out of existence. The Hostess product you buy today is made by another company that bought the rights to the names, logos and recipes .
All because one Union refused to budge when the company pleaded with them that the Union's demands would put them out of business.
Mr. Roboto on an endless loop!
We justify it by the fact that NK has so much artillery aimed at Seoul SK, that if we ever start anything millions will die in a matter of minutes. It's a pretty effective barrier to any offensive actions by the US or the ROK.
U.S. Military who actually runs the facility, and is running the tribunals based on the evidence we have, and who is doing all interrogations and interviews of detainees at Gitmo. The CIA may have placed some of them originally but the Military is running the show and they don't play CIA games.
Only one parent has to be a US Citizen to bestow natural born citizenship. His mother was born in Delaware, and she met the residency requirements with ease. He is in fact eligible. The question is not up for debate the law and requirements are clear. Being born in Canada does not change his status.
Not everybody on the right is a birther. Although I despise his politics was born in Hawaii and even had he been born overseas his mother is a citizen as well. His eligibility was never in question.