I find product reviews made by different people who have done other product reviews on disparate types of goods much more valuable than product reviews on a website where users can make up names. I can think of other examples where, as a consumer of products and information on the Web, I appreciate the use of real names. Sending someone money would be an example, instead of sending money to some random email address.
I believe our club pays a couple hundred bucks per month per T-hanger, which is nice but not strictly necessary, even in the winter. I've brushed snow off of the plane several times when I was using flight school planes tied-down outside. Tie-downs are much cheaper. But, our airport is on re-purposed farm land in SW Ohio. You SF Bay Area folks have to pay for your beautiful climate, culture, views, job market, etc., somehow;)
There is an official policy, I believe something like 3 hours / day on a long holiday weekend, 2 hours / day on a normal weekend, and 0.5 / day during the week or something, but I have taken a couple multi-day trips, haven't met the minimums, and it hasn't been a problem. I think it's one of those policies on the books to throw at people who are not aligned with the spirit of the club. There's also a 100 hr / year max rule as a result of someone essentially tying up one club plane the whole year by flying it for business. I don't think this rule has been enforced since that one guy.
You only control your own decisions and motivations, not others'. So, unless you want to be taken advantage of, attempting to get the biggest savings and make the biggest profits is the best we can do. Furtively wishing that contract negotiation looks like the market scene opening Disney's Beauty and the Beast is not realistic.
Note that I am describing people negotiating on price. I do not suggest that people lie, cover up flaws, collude, or participate in other similar immoral activities to achieve this maximization.
I paid a one-time fee of $650 to get in, $60 / month in dues, and that gives me access to two C-172s, (about $80 / hr), an Archer II (~$80), Dakota ($120) and Saratoga ($140). All rentals are "wet", meaning that they include fuel. The 172s and Archer cannot take full fuel and four people, but the Dakota and Saratoga certainly can - about 800 lbs of people and baggage with full fuel.
The 172s are great for two people though; my wife and I flew direct from the Cincinnati OH area to Raleigh NC a few weekends ago in a Skyhawk. 3 hours each way, about the same cost as airline tickets, beats the hell out of the 10 hour drive through Charleston WV (there is no good route by car), and the view was better.
A hundred hours of flying in rented / club planes, instruction, FAA fees, etc., to get your Private and Instrument Rating will set you back around $10k - $12k. A 200 MPH kit like the RV-7 will set you back around $100k.
It's not cheap, to be sure, but it's not a millionaire sort of thing. I don't mean to be argumentative, just to realign the elitist image many non-pilots have of the small piston airplane crew.
If you are willing to settle with 130 mph instead of 200, a serviceable used Skyhawk can be had for less than the price of a decked-out F-150, and get similar fuel mileage.
If you fly on the airlines into places with clouds under a thousand feet or so, the pilots likely have their arms crossed and are watching an airplane, designed and built by a private company, flying itself onto the runway. (It's called a CAT III ILS if you want to research.) Sure the FAA checked it out, maybe reviewed the code, etc., as would the NTSB or DOT with the Google cars.
You could successfully argue that people would balk even if the computer crashed the car 1/100 as frequently as humans do, but to say you wouldn't feel as safe with a calculated, reviewed computer system compared drunk, tired people with limited vision and slow reflexes texting and shaving their lady-bits while driving... that's silly.
In a country like Japan (i.e. Not North Korea), I do assume that primary sources are providing pretty much accurate information. I noticed your username after I posed the first time; in light of that, it seems appropriate that you make doom and gloom assumptions of corporate and government cover-up. I will give my best attempt at getting the facts and avoiding the rhetoric (as another poster noticed the words "NUCLEAR NIGHTMARE" are being used as thousands are without power, food, water, and are looking for loved-ones. Seems to distract from the real issue at hand.
Alright, alright - enough with the word inflation. The actual earthquake may have been a catastrophe, the tsunami certainly was, but a nasty industrial accident in which no one has been killed and workers are still remediating is not close to the same magnitude.
Like the recent economic recession is billed as "The Economic Crisis", this kind of linguistic drama does a disservice to the people who really got screwed, e.g. Haiti in their earthquake, Japan in the tsunami, etc.
A functioning society needs money to circulate. Earning more than you need and hording it is bad for everyone.
If people "hoard" money, demand decreases, and prices fall. As prices fall, the "hoarders", one-by-one, decide that a "deal" can be had, and buy. This slows the decline of prices until equilibrium is attained.
If you are arguing that growth slows if people don't buy, I'll somewhat agree, but I'll exchange a few points of growth for more meaningful growth, e.g. McDonalds toys, DVDs, cigarettes, thousand-dollar purses, etc. VS investment in efficient manufacturing techniques, sustainability, etc.
Suggesting that the economy must operate on deficit spending like the government and many households is irresponsible. China manages to pull off growth and a trade surplus.
This was somewhat disjointed, sorry. No time to edit; back to work.
In the current US tax system, if you cannot afford a $33k vehicle, you are NOT paying the subsidies. Many valid arguments can be made against subsidies, and many against this car, but yours is not one of them. If you mean the long-reaching effects of heavy taxes on the upper middle class preventing trickle-down, you may have an argument, but you have to elaborate.
Another thing is when nitwits link porn and call it something else, which is what lead slashdot to post the root domain for all links (specifically goatse, AFAIK).
My mother-in-law was trying to buy her son a basketball for Christmas and went to Dicks.com to locate one. Unless you have the "is there a porn pun to this search string?" brain-filter on all of the time, it can occasionally happen.
We play a game to search for something totally innocuous with Google Image search and see how many pages we can get through before finding porn. One can get to page 11 of "photo" results for the search string "Slashdot" before finding a naked woman's ass.
lol; I think they mean the boat / pump thing will be underwater, not the jetpack. Divers are limited by physiological things when ascending and descending, not how fast they can swim. SCUBA certification organizations will tell you one foot per second up and down is about the limit. They already have underwater propulsion things (little units you hang on to that you point in the direction you want to go, and they run of batteries) to combat currents, long distance requirements, etc. that are about as good as required.
The marginal cost of making phone calls is much higher than that of sending spam e-mail.
Say it takes one person one second per 100 e-mails, and that same person a bare minimum of 10 seconds for one phone call (likely longer, going for easy math) that makes telesales 1000 times as time-consuming, and thus expensive.
(Sorry about the lame reply to my own post, but, there is no post editing...)
If you think about which large employer has the crappiest employees (hint: U.S. Govt, in the U.S.), this employer also has the most fact-based hiring process. The cool companies are the fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants experiential interviews with questions that dig into your personality traits.
Would you be more comfortable with the hiring manager deciding, based on your interview and his personal opinion thereof, that you were a pessimist and not hiring you?
Interviews are personality tests - if the hiring process were fact-based, you would sit in a chair and fill out a quiz on job-related information, they would score the quiz, and hand out the job.
Your characterization is a bit off - Galt was successful at what he did, and explicitly would not accept financial support from the government.
The heads of companies being bailed-out are the Jim Taggarts; those held at the top by corruption and tradition. Without government bail-out, Galt would stay at the top, or rise to the top, and the Jim Taggart-like folks would fall. Yes, it would take time, they have lots of money to burn through first, but that money burn is proper re-distribution of wealth.
Improper redistribution of wealth is as you describe - printing money and handing it to people undeservedly. This directly leads to increased demand for goods, supply doesn't change, prices go up. You cannot couch this as a tax refund either; if we actually refunded taxes paid by the people back to the people, this would be legitimate, but that money (and lots more) has already been spent.
The Romans did not invent wine; wine as we know it was first produced in The Republic of Georgia in about 6000 BC. The Roman empire never stretched far enough East of the Black Sea to encompass the area that is now Georgia.
I want a Cessna Citation and can't get one. Is that because there is a Citation shortage? No, it's because I have a money shortage;).
It's this concept that everyone should have access to some McDonald's level of health care that is a broken idea. If you believe that everyone should have access to a minimum level of health care, should they not have access to a minimum level of food? So McDonald's should offer free food to everyone and if you want Filet Mignon you need to pay?
Slashdot Mirror
I find product reviews made by different people who have done other product reviews on disparate types of goods much more valuable than product reviews on a website where users can make up names. I can think of other examples where, as a consumer of products and information on the Web, I appreciate the use of real names. Sending someone money would be an example, instead of sending money to some random email address.
OS X has the only tolerable PDF viewer already (Preview.app). If anything, the other platforms are worse off with PDF support.
I believe our club pays a couple hundred bucks per month per T-hanger, which is nice but not strictly necessary, even in the winter. I've brushed snow off of the plane several times when I was using flight school planes tied-down outside. Tie-downs are much cheaper. But, our airport is on re-purposed farm land in SW Ohio. You SF Bay Area folks have to pay for your beautiful climate, culture, views, job market, etc., somehow ;)
There is an official policy, I believe something like 3 hours / day on a long holiday weekend, 2 hours / day on a normal weekend, and 0.5 / day during the week or something, but I have taken a couple multi-day trips, haven't met the minimums, and it hasn't been a problem. I think it's one of those policies on the books to throw at people who are not aligned with the spirit of the club. There's also a 100 hr / year max rule as a result of someone essentially tying up one club plane the whole year by flying it for business. I don't think this rule has been enforced since that one guy.
You only control your own decisions and motivations, not others'. So, unless you want to be taken advantage of, attempting to get the biggest savings and make the biggest profits is the best we can do. Furtively wishing that contract negotiation looks like the market scene opening Disney's Beauty and the Beast is not realistic.
Note that I am describing people negotiating on price. I do not suggest that people lie, cover up flaws, collude, or participate in other similar immoral activities to achieve this maximization.
Depends on the club, I guess.
I paid a one-time fee of $650 to get in, $60 / month in dues, and that gives me access to two C-172s, (about $80 / hr), an Archer II (~$80), Dakota ($120) and Saratoga ($140). All rentals are "wet", meaning that they include fuel. The 172s and Archer cannot take full fuel and four people, but the Dakota and Saratoga certainly can - about 800 lbs of people and baggage with full fuel.
The 172s are great for two people though; my wife and I flew direct from the Cincinnati OH area to Raleigh NC a few weekends ago in a Skyhawk. 3 hours each way, about the same cost as airline tickets, beats the hell out of the 10 hour drive through Charleston WV (there is no good route by car), and the view was better.
A hundred hours of flying in rented / club planes, instruction, FAA fees, etc., to get your Private and Instrument Rating will set you back around $10k - $12k. A 200 MPH kit like the RV-7 will set you back around $100k.
It's not cheap, to be sure, but it's not a millionaire sort of thing. I don't mean to be argumentative, just to realign the elitist image many non-pilots have of the small piston airplane crew.
If you are willing to settle with 130 mph instead of 200, a serviceable used Skyhawk can be had for less than the price of a decked-out F-150, and get similar fuel mileage.
If you fly on the airlines into places with clouds under a thousand feet or so, the pilots likely have their arms crossed and are watching an airplane, designed and built by a private company, flying itself onto the runway. (It's called a CAT III ILS if you want to research.) Sure the FAA checked it out, maybe reviewed the code, etc., as would the NTSB or DOT with the Google cars.
You could successfully argue that people would balk even if the computer crashed the car 1/100 as frequently as humans do, but to say you wouldn't feel as safe with a calculated, reviewed computer system compared drunk, tired people with limited vision and slow reflexes texting and shaving their lady-bits while driving... that's silly.
In a country like Japan (i.e. Not North Korea), I do assume that primary sources are providing pretty much accurate information. I noticed your username after I posed the first time; in light of that, it seems appropriate that you make doom and gloom assumptions of corporate and government cover-up. I will give my best attempt at getting the facts and avoiding the rhetoric (as another poster noticed the words "NUCLEAR NIGHTMARE" are being used as thousands are without power, food, water, and are looking for loved-ones. Seems to distract from the real issue at hand.
Alright, alright - enough with the word inflation. The actual earthquake may have been a catastrophe, the tsunami certainly was, but a nasty industrial accident in which no one has been killed and workers are still remediating is not close to the same magnitude.
Like the recent economic recession is billed as "The Economic Crisis", this kind of linguistic drama does a disservice to the people who really got screwed, e.g. Haiti in their earthquake, Japan in the tsunami, etc.
A functioning society needs money to circulate. Earning more than you need and hording it is bad for everyone.
If people "hoard" money, demand decreases, and prices fall. As prices fall, the "hoarders", one-by-one, decide that a "deal" can be had, and buy. This slows the decline of prices until equilibrium is attained.
If you are arguing that growth slows if people don't buy, I'll somewhat agree, but I'll exchange a few points of growth for more meaningful growth, e.g. McDonalds toys, DVDs, cigarettes, thousand-dollar purses, etc. VS investment in efficient manufacturing techniques, sustainability, etc.
Suggesting that the economy must operate on deficit spending like the government and many households is irresponsible. China manages to pull off growth and a trade surplus.
This was somewhat disjointed, sorry. No time to edit; back to work.
In the current US tax system, if you cannot afford a $33k vehicle, you are NOT paying the subsidies. Many valid arguments can be made against subsidies, and many against this car, but yours is not one of them. If you mean the long-reaching effects of heavy taxes on the upper middle class preventing trickle-down, you may have an argument, but you have to elaborate.
edit: animated bestiality on page 17.
Another thing is when nitwits link porn and call it something else, which is what lead slashdot to post the root domain for all links (specifically goatse, AFAIK).
My mother-in-law was trying to buy her son a basketball for Christmas and went to Dicks.com to locate one. Unless you have the "is there a porn pun to this search string?" brain-filter on all of the time, it can occasionally happen.
We play a game to search for something totally innocuous with Google Image search and see how many pages we can get through before finding porn.
One can get to page 11 of "photo" results for the search string "Slashdot" before finding a naked woman's ass.
Honestly, no; it gives me a bit of a superiority complex to not be told what to do when by a TV schedule.
lol; I think they mean the boat / pump thing will be underwater, not the jetpack. Divers are limited by physiological things when ascending and descending, not how fast they can swim. SCUBA certification organizations will tell you one foot per second up and down is about the limit. They already have underwater propulsion things (little units you hang on to that you point in the direction you want to go, and they run of batteries) to combat currents, long distance requirements, etc. that are about as good as required.
The marginal cost of making phone calls is much higher than that of sending spam e-mail.
Say it takes one person one second per 100 e-mails, and that same person a bare minimum of 10 seconds for one phone call (likely longer, going for easy math) that makes telesales 1000 times as time-consuming, and thus expensive.
How many times must this be debunked
Source?
(Sorry about the lame reply to my own post, but, there is no post editing...)
If you think about which large employer has the crappiest employees (hint: U.S. Govt, in the U.S.), this employer also has the most fact-based hiring process. The cool companies are the fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants experiential interviews with questions that dig into your personality traits.
Would you be more comfortable with the hiring manager deciding, based on your interview and his personal opinion thereof, that you were a pessimist and not hiring you?
Interviews are personality tests - if the hiring process were fact-based, you would sit in a chair and fill out a quiz on job-related information, they would score the quiz, and hand out the job.
Your characterization is a bit off - Galt was successful at what he did, and explicitly would not accept financial support from the government.
The heads of companies being bailed-out are the Jim Taggarts; those held at the top by corruption and tradition. Without government bail-out, Galt would stay at the top, or rise to the top, and the Jim Taggart-like folks would fall. Yes, it would take time, they have lots of money to burn through first, but that money burn is proper re-distribution of wealth.
Improper redistribution of wealth is as you describe - printing money and handing it to people undeservedly. This directly leads to increased demand for goods, supply doesn't change, prices go up. You cannot couch this as a tax refund either; if we actually refunded taxes paid by the people back to the people, this would be legitimate, but that money (and lots more) has already been spent.
The Romans did not invent wine; wine as we know it was first produced in The Republic of Georgia in about 6000 BC. The Roman empire never stretched far enough East of the Black Sea to encompass the area that is now Georgia.
Where are mine?
I am part of "every"one and I don't receive access to a minimum level of food.
I want a Cessna Citation and can't get one. Is that because there is a Citation shortage? No, it's because I have a money shortage ;).
It's this concept that everyone should have access to some McDonald's level of health care that is a broken idea. If you believe that everyone should have access to a minimum level of health care, should they not have access to a minimum level of food? So McDonald's should offer free food to everyone and if you want Filet Mignon you need to pay?
It's workers and consumers who drive the economy, not the rich.
The workers and consumers may power or support the economy, but the rich at the top drive.
If the industry innovators at the top disappeared, it would make quite a bigger impact than if the equivalent number of line-workers did.