Slashdot Mirror


Fraudsters Abusing Canada's Do-Not-Call List

J ROC writes "Phone numbers on Canada's Do-Not-Call registry have apparently been sold to off-shore telemarketers, scam artists, and other ne'er-do-wells, according to reports in the Globe & Mail and CBC News. The CRTC, which runs the registry, sells lists of phone numbers online for a small fee; making it available to anybody who might be interested in buying it, including con artists. I guess this explains why, ever since I added my number to the registry, I've been getting phone calls from 000-000-0000 trying to interest me in some free vacation scam. Canada's Privacy Commissioner is currently investigating."

229 comments

  1. What Idiots by kenj0418 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What idiots -- Illegally contact people that you already know are especially hostile toward dealing with you. How many sales do they actually expect to make?

    1. Re:What Idiots by MrKevvy · · Score: 4, Informative

      re: "What idiots -- Illegally contact people that you already know are especially hostile toward dealing with you. How many sales do they actually expect to make?"

      Just as with spam, the telemarketer gangs don't make money off of sales. Rather, they make money off of selling their "service" to the "companies" whose "products" are being advertised. So even if there are no sales at all, they still profit.

      --
      -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
    2. Re:What Idiots by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The penalties for telemarketers are far too low.

      Make it punishable to try to market anything using hidden of forged numbers, and let that punishment also propagate to the company whose product is promoted.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:What Idiots by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What idiots

      I'm trying to think of what should be done with someone so sleazy as to do this.

      I understand Guantanamo Bay's going to be vacant next year. Not even Amnesty International would mind if we put them there.

      Spammers, too, while we're at it. Although I suppose if we lock them up we have to feed them.

      I'm a man of peace, but I could take my nickel-plated M1911A1 to their heads and then enjoy a nice meal and peaceful night's sleep with no problem at all. Actually, I'm getting a little dreamy just thinking about being able to use my email address without having to worry about getting 40 of the same message asking if I want to "be more man", or having to squint at my phone's caller ID so I don't have to deal with some poor, bored young woman offering me aluminum siding or better interest rates.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:What Idiots by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just as with spam, the telemarketer gangs don't make money off of sales. Rather, they make money off of selling their "service" to the "companies" whose "products" are being advertised. So even if there are no sales at all, they still profit.

      However, companies don't keep using tactics that aren't profitable, so if there were no sales, there would be no reason for those companies to buy telemarketing service - at least from that provider. In most businesses, repeat customers are the key to long term success and I suspect telemarketer service providers are not immune to that.

    5. Re:What Idiots by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      I get several such calls per day, even on cellphones. I'm not even on the registry. They just have an autodialer walking through every number! My wife and I have adjacent cell numbers, and she gets called seconds after I hit "ignore" on my cell. If I do answer it goes a bit like this.
      "Hello Sir, you've won a free vacation, I just need some information to send you your free tickets, absolutely free"
      "I doubt that you criminal."
      "Fair enough" *click*

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    6. Re:What Idiots by goaliemn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically, the telemarketers aren't breaking the do not call list laws. They aren't in canada.

      I'm in the US and recently have had canadian based companies calling me.. I tell them I'm on the do not call list "we're in Canada so the US list doesn't apply to us" Canuck companies are doing the same thing now.

    7. Re:What Idiots by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      The amount of money we'd spend feeding them is negligible compared to the amount of money we'd save in the mailservers alone. Imagine how many spam messages are relayed every day. Even if no human ever reads it?

      Plus, the internet isn't a truck, it's a series of tubes...(but if we assume 500 bytes per spam (a low number), then one 350 MB movie is about 700000 spam messages)

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    8. Re:What Idiots by Linuss · · Score: 1

      We don't have to feed them, with the amount of spam they produce it shouldn't be long before it becomes so overwhelming that it materializes into everyones favourite meat-in-a-can!

    9. Re:What Idiots by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but until they learn, the telescammers can rip off those companies.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technically, the telemarketers aren't breaking the do not call list laws. They aren't in canada.

      I'm in the US and recently have had canadian based companies calling me.. I tell them I'm on the do not call list "we're in Canada so the US list doesn't apply to us" Canuck companies are doing the same thing now.

      That's not exactly correct. Technically, they are breaking the law. They just can't be prosecuted easily.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    11. Re:What Idiots by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they make SOME sales. Like spam, it only take one guillible person out of 1000 to make profit.

      The lesson I learned:

      - You can't trust the government with your data. Whether it's stolen social security numbers, do not call lists, or medical information, the government WILL be used and abused. Power corrupts politicians; they don't care.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:What Idiots by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      >>>"we're in Canada so the US list doesn't apply to us"

      Not yet.

      After we annex the provinces (except Quebec) and turn them into states, you'll be just as liable to U.S. law as all the rest. Anyway I don't have any Canadian "looneys" so I'll hang up now.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:What Idiots by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      There have been several rounds of US scammers calling people in Canada too. They claim you've won a free cruise or vacation.

      I talked to them to see where it would go one time. All they needed for me to claim my prize was my credit card information so they could "confirm my hotel reservation." Riiight. I mentioned that credit card fraud is frowned upon and they had the guts to quote some US law.

    14. Re:What Idiots by pnewhook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      - You can't trust the government with your data. Whether it's stolen social security numbers, do not call lists, or medical information, the government WILL be used and abused. Power corrupts politicians; they don't care.

      Do you believe the politicians you vote for have anything to do with peoples private data? Your data is being compromised by lowly paid swivel servants that have the same job regardless of what party is elected in.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    15. Re:What Idiots by pnewhook · · Score: 3, Funny

      After we annex the provinces (except Quebec) and turn them into states, you'll be just as liable to U.S. law as all the rest.

      Ha! Don't forget Canada has more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia. Once oil goes up again we will simply buy the debt ridden US and you will wake up in a province! Bwuu ha ha ha!

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    16. Re:What Idiots by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you have some other card that isn't a credit card, like some rebate card or so you can give them that number.

      Will keep them busy for a few moments extra at least!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    17. Re:What Idiots by Cennon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work as a caller for a marketing research company in Canada (read: surveys - NO sales), and we called the U.S. more often than not. We ran into a lot of people that would honk on mightily about their rights regarding the do-not-call list, not realizing that - at the time, at least - we were exempt by virtue of our business: opinions, not sales.

      I can't imagine ever telling a person that 'the US list doesn't apply to us'. I wonder if they were actually in Canada, or just saying so (the telemarketer equivalent of a maple leaf on their backpack.)

      It doesn't do any business any good to ignore the local laws. The logic of a previous post applies: - if people don't want to be talked to, why bother badgering them? There's plenty of other people to talk to.

      However, it would have been nice (and more effiicient) if people realized that the do-not-call list was limited to sales. If they want it changed, they should talk to the people in charge of the legislation. If what people want is "no businesses I don't know may call me, EVER", they need to write a law that states that.

    18. Re:What Idiots by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Given enough incentive a bounty hunter may be able to take care of that.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    19. Re:What Idiots by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      Does the fact that the agency responsible for maintaining the do-not-call list sells said list to telemarketers stand out to anyone else? Am I reading this right? That, in and of itself, should be a major political scandal demanding the head of the Agency Head (OK, figuratively! I meant job!). This situation demands an example be made.

    20. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a buddy that sold encyclopedias one summer, he was great at it. He specifically looked for no soliciting signs. Chances are the husband put up the sign because the wife would buy anything.

      I would imagine the same thing applies to the phone. I know my wife can't say no to a "charity" on the phone.

    21. Re:What Idiots by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      That would be a great business tool! Your company makes something that competes with my company, so I pay the phone scammers to promote your product and your company gets sanctioned or punished...
      Dollar for dollar I'll bet that's a lot more effective than marketing my own product or having a better product, just thin out the competition.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    22. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see: Gov't makes plan. Plan has reverse effect of what was intended. Yeah, that's totally unpredictable.

      Anyone who thought the gov't could actually do something properly doesn't understand gov't.

    23. Re:What Idiots by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      They will make a ton of sales. Back in 1985 we had a local outfit with a scam pitch that went along these lines: They had a sucker list from affiliated sellers of people who had been ripped off for big sums or repeatedly. The pitch went that the sales person was a retired FBI agent who was working to catch, collect and turn over criminal salesmen. He asked $500. as an up front fee. A nice long month would follow before the mark got a second call indicating that they had the offending salesman and his company in close sight and only needed another, larger sum to complete the investigation in such a way as it would be bundled up and handed to the cops in such a way that prosecution was assured and that pay back would be part of sentencing. As usual many people fell for the pitch.

    24. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer your wife's phone as well, and go "Hey, don't hang up on me, the trace's not through yet!"

    25. Re:What Idiots by jeffstar · · Score: 3, Informative

      how do you expect telemarketers to avoid calling people on the do-not-call list if they don't have a copy of the list?

    26. Re:What Idiots by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

      The marginal cost of making phone calls is much higher than that of sending spam e-mail.

      Say it takes one person one second per 100 e-mails, and that same person a bare minimum of 10 seconds for one phone call (likely longer, going for easy math) that makes telesales 1000 times as time-consuming, and thus expensive.

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    27. Re:What Idiots by schon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your logic is astoundingly bad.

      In most businesses, repeat customers are the key to long term success and I suspect telemarketer service providers are not immune to that.

      Why do you suspect that?

      These people are fraud artists. What on earth makes you think that they are "most businesses"?!?!?!

      It's like saying "oh, those people running a pyramid scam can't stay in business for long, because eventually they'll run out of people to scam."

      You are astoundingly naive if you think that con artists rely on the same methods as normal businesses.

    28. Re:What Idiots by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      lowly paid swivel servants

      Is this some obscure pun, or is this like how I said "for all intensive purposes" until I was 15?

      Civil servants.

      --
      Fnord.
    29. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between saying: "no you can't call this one" and "here's all the numbers you can't call".
      The details of the implementation are left as exercise, with the obvious advantage that the more bureaucratic and inconvenient the procedure is, the better for the general public.

    30. Re:What Idiots by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      It's what we call civil servants that work in offices. Implies they do fuck all but spin on their chairs all day.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    31. Re:What Idiots by AsmordeanX · · Score: 1

      Better yet, we'll sell you guys Quebec.

    32. Re:What Idiots by ccguy · · Score: 1

      What idiots -- Illegally contact people that you already know are especially hostile toward dealing with you. How many sales do they actually expect to make?

      Easy: Because those people expect never to get a telemarking call, so they're easier to get off guard... in fact, if the script is any good the caller can get 30 seconds of so of conversation before the victim knows whats going on.

    33. Re:What Idiots by HungSoLow · · Score: 1

      As much as I'm a proud fellow Canuck, and would love to view our nation as one that will stand the test of time -- the US will just begin taking resource laden countries by force as they become incapable of purchasing / trading for resources legally. We also have enormous amounts of fresh water too. Oh wait... I've said too much...

    34. Re:What Idiots by green1 · · Score: 1

      the time per person is the same as these are automated phone calls, they use an (illegal in Canada) robo-call system.

      The real expense difference is that phone lines cost more than email addresses.

    35. Re:What Idiots by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      Thanks; this amused and enlightened me.

      --
      Fnord.
    36. Re:What Idiots by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Ha! Don't forget Canada has more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia.

      Well of course I know that. That's why I said the U.S. will annex the provinces (except Quebec).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    37. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they'll want Québec, given that its hydropower is just as essential as the oil and gas.

      Canada: we keep your lights and heat on, because you pay us beer money for it, eh.

    38. Re:What Idiots by Gorshkov · · Score: 1

      Foreign oil suppliers to the USA, in terms of volume:
      #1: Canada
      #2: Mexico
      #3: Venezuela
      #4: Saudi Arabia

    39. Re:What Idiots by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Oh, so the non-bureaucratic approach of simply torching their buildings and lynching their leaders is not so good?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    40. Re:What Idiots by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Oil? The US got sold to Canada because President Max needed the money!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    41. Re:What Idiots by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Spammers, too, while we're at it. Although I suppose if we lock them up we have to feed them.''

      Feed them SPAM.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    42. Re:What Idiots by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The solution is to go after the companies selling the products, constantly harass reception at their building and see how they like it.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    43. Re:What Idiots by Strider- · · Score: 1

      In Canada, at least, the people that can be fined not only includes the telemarketing firm itself, but also the company that hired them. If a company in Canada hires a telemarketing firm, even if they're in India, and they violate the Do Not Call List, the company in Canada is subject to a $1500 fine per violation.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    44. Re:What Idiots by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The difference is that telemarketing scum still need actual humans to make the call and that still cost them something, even if its feeding slaves.

      Email costs them nothing to send, only legitimate email users pay anything, it's all a question of accountability the spammers normally use exploited systems to send millions of emails at once. The only link back to them is some obscure phishing site setup via anonymous proxies.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    45. Re:What Idiots by Joebert · · Score: 1

      if people don't want to be talked to, why bother badgering them?

      Because a large enough portion of those people will eventually buy something just so you'll leave them alone.
      They teach you that on your first day at any sales job.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    46. Re:What Idiots by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Easy - instead of having them buy the list, shove it down their throats for free and make damn sure you enforce it.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    47. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sometimes consider wasting their time with fake numbers like that, but then I don't because I get worried wondering, "What if it just happens to be someone's real credit card number and I end up giving them a whole lot of hassle?"

      I remember the first time this happened to me was when I was young and some creep was asking for my phone number on Diablo. I played along and gave him a fake one for fun, but a week or so later I started worrying whether I gave him a real phone number by accident. I still wonder sometimes...

    48. Re:What Idiots by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      How many sales do they actually expect to make?

      Plenty, and I'll tell you why.

      When I sold encyclopedias, door-to-door, about forty years ago, I took a couple guys out with me as training one afternoon to show them that going "by the book" wasn't the only way to do things. For example, guys with a lousy pitch will just keep knocking on more doors, relentlessly, until they get in (the same thing happens in bars). That's the equivalent of SPAM.

      I didn't go for that, so, besides looking for visual clues such as tricycles or kids things in the yard, orange curtains in the kitchen window (don't ask), I had other bits of evidence that made a place worth knocking on.

      My favorite item was a little plaque that said something very similar to:

      No Peddlars, Solicitors or Agents

      So there we were, faced with that old favorite sign, and the kid asked me, "If they don't like salepeople, why are you knocking on the door?"

      And I said, "You know why people really put these things up?"

      "Well sure, they don't like salesmen."

      "That's what they want you to think, but the "real" reason is: If the doorbell rings and it's a salesman, they're afraid they're going to buy something ... again."

      To be sure, there were other forces motivating the people; being entertained, for one, as silly as it might seem. But the first time I saw this thing about the creation of a no-call list it was obvious that this would be the best place to start, in terms of more profits per phone number called. Guaranteed, zero doubt about it.

      For one thing, consider this: Assume that everyone out there is, collectively, more average than the readership here. If an otherwise decent-sounding caller has just called you, and even volunteers that he knows you are on a no-call list, before he goes into whatever the "pitch" is, most people will have already assumed that if the guy called, despite the "Law", then "there must be something to it."

      The no-call list as source, is the opposite of the strength-in-numbers, law-of-averages (spam-like) approach of the amateurs. It is, literally, money in the bank, for the people who "believe in their own pitch" and abilities.

    49. Re:What Idiots by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      These people are fraud artists. What on earth makes you think that they are "most businesses"?!?!?!

      I agree with your point-of-view, in the sense that fraud artists aren't dealing in the actual goods and services that "legitimate" businesses deal in.

      However, that's as far as the differences go. The psychology of sales is identical, fraudulent or not. But the poster you replied to is also 100% wrong in asuming that "repeat clients" aren't a concern of fraudulent firms. They are. As a matter of fact, "invoices" from previous scammed victims, is worth its weight in platinum.

      On Wall Street every prospectus states thet "Past performance is no guarantee of future results." (And a lot of investors in shaky deals just go right past that clause with an attitude very similar to "Well, they have to put that in there, by law.") In the world of telemarketing fraud, the "past performance" of the mooch, is almost certainly a guarantee of any one, or more, of a long list of pre-existing pathologies that come into play on the buyer's end. (If none existed, no sale would take place, as a rule, with more or less statistically insignificant exceptions, of course)

      Anyone who thinks that so-called legitimate businesses are immune to taking advantage of the same character defects, that are predominant in the general population, is in for a surprise.

      Fraud is harmful and cynically sociopathic. I want to be clear on my stance. The fact that it may, indeed, "take two to tango" is absolutely not an exculpatory factor, except in the fragmented minds of the most self-serving (and pathological) types out there. But it does take two, and the fact that humans are, by default, creatures who rely on an instinctive predilection toward habituation, makes "repeat business" a serious factor in business and marketing ... again, fraudulently-based or not.

    50. Re:What Idiots by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Do you believe the politicians you vote for have anything to do with peoples private data?

      Yes. The civil servant is just following the law the politicians in Parliament passed, and said law allows our private phone numbers to be sold.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    51. Re:What Idiots by SAABMaven · · Score: 1

      I live in the northern US and wouldn't complain. A collapsing superpower with falling-apart infrastructure, a debt-addict government and a personality cult surrounding the chief executive --- is not a good place to raise children.

    52. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to burn down the white house again.

    53. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you expect telemarketers to avoid calling people on the do-not-call list if they don't have a copy of the list?

      The easiest way is to set up an online site where people can look up whether or not a given number is on the list. I believe this is how the US implements their do not call list.

      More complicated methods include using hash functions and/or some form of oblivious transfer. For example, you can send someone a database of hashes of the phone numbers on the list.

    54. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, it's already illegal, what more should they do?

    55. Re:What Idiots by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > how do you expect telemarketers to avoid calling people on the do-not-call list if they don't have a copy of the list?

      Are you serious?
      Telemarketers should NEVER be given any phone numbers that they do not already know.

      They should submit THEIR OWN call list to a web site, which returns to them a list of which of the numbers are do-not-call and which are ok to call.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    56. Re:What Idiots by ex-telemarketer · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends on how you look at it: if their goal is to get their hands on a fresh list of households where people are more likely to answer (they don't expect a telemarketing call, right?) then the do not call list is really a perfect phone book. If it's a telemarketer, the callers might stage their call as a survey ("Who vacuums the floor in your household? What would you say if I tell you that there is a better way? Would you like to see how....?" ). If the caller is a con artist then they just got their hands on a newly updated contact list.

    57. Re:What Idiots by green1 · · Score: 1

      The only real solution is find a way to work with the foreign countries to make it enforceable.

      Until they do that, companies in the US will continue to call Canada, and companies in Canada will continue to call the US.

    58. Re:What Idiots by Torontoman · · Score: 1

      I don't imagine we'd WANT the US. We should just keep them down as a country and let the more ambitious folks come in illegally and use them as servants, crop workers and snow shovellers.

    59. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spammers, too, while we're at it. Although I suppose if we lock them up we have to feed them.

      Well, there's a non sequitur if I've ever seen one.

    60. Re:What Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had better hurry up before we get our coal liquefaction production ramped up.

  2. Double Up by Guy+G · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks like we now need a do-not-call, do-not-call list!!

    1. Re:Double Up by zoomshorts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we need is a "My Data is worth $5000.00 to me" so IF you use my data,
      YOU OWE ME $5000.00 per disclosure.

      IF My data is worth anything, it is worth MORE to me than you.

      Turn the idiots in to a collection agency and ruin their credit, etc.

      Simple.

    2. Re:Double Up by Linuss · · Score: 0

      You're trying too hard. A shotgun would be so much more efficient. And easier.

    3. Re:Double Up by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      What we need is a "My Data is worth $5000.00 to me" so IF you use my data, YOU OWE ME $5000.00 per disclosure. IF My data is worth anything, it is worth MORE to me than you. Turn the idiots in to a collection agency and ruin their credit, etc. Simple.

      You're right- it's really that simple! And not just another minor variant on that stupid quasi-legalistic solution that IANALs on Slashdot propose every time a topic like this comes up.

      This is the geek equivalent of guys who mouth off in pubs about how politicians are stupid and how their simple ideas would put the world to rights.

      If it was really that simple, someone would have done it already- if only for the money.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Double Up by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Is it that hard? Maybe it's just me, but the US do-not-call list has been extremely effective. I did get a spam call about a week ago (from Bank of America - thanks guys) and it was pretty surprising, because it had been so long, whereas before the list it was all the time. It's a piece of legislative action I'm very happy with, probably the high point of the Bush legacy :)

    5. Re:Double Up by walt-sjc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No.... What we need are callerID numbers that are always transmitted and accurate. We need carriers to be held liable for bogus caller ID info transmitted on their networks. No exceptions.

      This makes it a little harder for voip termination providers, but it can and needs to be done. Make it a criminal penalty to knowingly use bogus or forged callerID (allowing the loophole to use a number that BELONGS to you.)

      Currently, (and I've mentioned this several times in the past) I use Asterisk for my phone system. In fact, I've been using it for over 5 years now (It is ROCK SOLID)

      I've also had a few simple rules setup. First, I have a white list of close family and friends (those calls always go through, with callerID name re-writing so I see it's Bill and not "Wireless Caller".) Second, local calls are allowed during waking hours to get right through. At night, they have to press 1 to leave a message or press 5 to ring through. Third, tollfree numbers and NO callerID ALWAYS have to press 5 to ring through. Finally, the blacklist which just gives a disconnect tone sequence and phone company like message that the number is disconnected :-)

      What have these rules done for me?

      First, telemarketing calls are all blocked - along with charity solicitations and political crap. The sole exception (due to my rule set) was a couple calls from LOCAL political volunteers (I actually don't mind those - at least they are HUMAN.)

      Second, wrong numbers in the middle of the night totally stopped.

      I have my phone back. I can have dinner in peace. I sleep at night!

    6. Re:Double Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea. If I had a land line, I'd install something just like that. I only have a cell for now.

    7. Re:Double Up by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Asterisk looks interesting. Can you describe (one more time) your setup?

    8. Re:Double Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone always comes out in these threads to talk about asterisk, and yet they never mention what was actually involved in setting it up. So... how did you do it?

    9. Re:Double Up by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      No, I was referring to the GGP's implied suggestion that we could all just declare our data worth $500,000 or whatever and simply sue and win against the spammers using existing legislation.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Double Up by walt-sjc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, setting it up wasn't that bad. I already use a debian box (been using debian since before Ubuntu existed) for my internet gateway that sits in the basement. I bought a Digium analog FXS/FXO card (old style) with 4 ports on it for my two phone lines, and two extensions. I also have some old Cisco ATA's I bought long ago to provide 4 additional extensions. I actually don't use all the old analog ports since I got a couple Polycom VoIP desk phones (which have AWESOME speaker phones.) Again, I initially installed Asterisk long ago before there were distro packages, so I compiled from source. To be honest, it wasn't trivial (especially getting the ata's working) but not hard either. Certainly no harder than installing apache from source and configuring it.

      Today it's stupid simple as the documentation for Asterisk is WAY better, and the configuration tools are far easier. Distro packages make Asterisk an apt-get install away, and there are pre-setup CD installs of asterisk available.

      Originally (years ago) I had some issues with echo but modern code has totally solved that problem.

      Since my install is so old, I can't really give you the perspective of what it would be like for someone new to it, I just know it's soooo much easier now than it used to be.

    11. Re:Double Up by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      You just need to install pf on your phone then block all calls from certain countries.

    12. Re:Double Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably is not that difficult - assuming the regulatory agency involved isn't so totally incompetent that they're willing to sell citizens' private information to exactly the kinds of disreputable fucks the citizenry wants to avoid contact with.

      I for one am so glad to have an unlisted # which I never submitted to the obviously flawed do not call list. This is a fucking travesty.

    13. Re:Double Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this was a political setup all along...there should be a call list, instead of a do not call list.
      Put your name on the list if you don't mind spammers, telemarketers, etc. calling at all hours, interrupting whatever you are doing. It should be an opt-in process, not opt-out, which just lets idiots access your number(s).

      The Do Not Call concept is a great capitalistic way of ensuring that you are called by all those "American Way" advertisers/spammers/etc., provided free by your wonderful law makers...

      Advocating that spammers/telemarketers/advertisers shouldn't call you anytime they like? What are you, communist? :-) Must be one of those terrorist linux freaks...:-)

    14. Re:Double Up by nacturation · · Score: 1, Funny

      Asterisk looks interesting. Can you describe (one more time) your setup?

      Here you go:

      "I've also had a few simple rules setup. First, I have a white list of close family and friends (those calls always go through, with callerID name re-writing so I see it's Bill and not "Wireless Caller".) Second, local calls are allowed during waking hours to get right through. At night, they have to press 1 to leave a message or press 5 to ring through. Third, tollfree numbers and NO callerID ALWAYS have to press 5 to ring through. Finally, the blacklist which just gives a disconnect tone sequence and phone company like message that the number is disconnected :-)"

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    15. Re:Double Up by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, the biggest barrier for me in setting up Asterisk (I built a PVR... why not a PBX? :) was the availability and cost of those Digium cards. At nearly $200 a pop (at least in the bit of searching I did), it's an *awfully* pricy investment just to avoid a few telemarketer calls ('course, Asterisk also provides a *ton* of other features, but for most home setups, they really aren't useful enough to justify the cost).

  3. That does it! by jonadab · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's it! I'm moving to... oh, wait. Nevermind.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    1. Re:That does it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... telemarketers or Obama?

      Telemarketers it is.

  4. CRTC Garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it to the bleeding CRTC to pull something like this.

    Those of us whom have signed up for your "please call me more frequently than normal" list did NOT agree to have you sell our names to Sook-Mehoff Incorporated.

    I find myself even further disgusted by the CRTC's actions. How can something like this be allowed to happen?

    Government? You anywhere to be found? *Can you hear me..me..me..me..me...*

    To the CRTC: Do something right, or don't even bother doing it at all.

    1. Re:CRTC Garbage. by PIBM · · Score: 1

      How are people supposed not to call you, if they don't have the list ? That list has to be handed out so people will skip you when you are on it.

      Thing is, it seems the law is not strong enough, and hard to enforce oversea.

      Maybe make sure to sell only the list to canadians and have them suffer for selling it ? But then I guess it's hard to know 'who' leaked it too.

      Personnaly, all the spam phone calls I used to get stopped. I was previously getting between 2 and 4 calls per months (Mostly free bahamas vacation, just had to give your name, credit card number and expiration date to validate you were over 18, and some junkie out of some part of africa who had managed to get 50 millions locked up because he had not paid his taxes, which amounted to 20k, and needed to provide it in order to get the money out .. blah blah blah), and I've been on the list for what, 4 months ? That's a good chance of it being very effective.

    2. Re:CRTC Garbage. by gwait · · Score: 1

      At first I too got far less calls, but in the last couple of weeks I've been getting scam calls,
      a recorded voice telling me this is my last chance to set my "credit card accounts" in order, no mention of a particular brand.

      Even if you managed to only get the list in the hands of Canadian telemarketers, it's pretty trivial for the list to then leak out, either directly or via some windows trojan or virus..

      My guess is the scam traffic is going to increase..

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    3. Re:CRTC Garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cure to this is to give out hashes instead of the phone numbers themselves. You can see if a number is on the list, but you can't read the list itself.

      The problem with this is the marketer who writes a program to try the hash of every possible phone number.

      I like the solution someone else gave: honeypot phone numbers.

    4. Re:CRTC Garbage. by legirons · · Score: 1

      How are people supposed not to call you, if they don't have the list ? That list has to be handed out so people will skip you when you are on it.

      Why not just make it a webservice? URL somesite.gov/?phone_number_to_check returns OK or DO_NOT_CALL. Easy for callcentre software to check before each phone call.

      Alternatively, hand out a list of hashed phone numbers. Giving out the full plaintext list seems absolutely the *worst* way of going about it.

      As others have mentioned, a plaintext list would need honeypot phone numbers and serious penalties for calling them

    5. Re:CRTC Garbage. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The search space of all valid telephone numbers is not very large. You could easily scan the hashed list in a few minutes on modest hardware to find out if an number was valid.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:CRTC Garbage. by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Honeypots are necessary, no matter if you give the list or the hashes. For the hashes, you also need to use something to prevent dictionnary attacks, as it would be very easy to hash all of the possible canadian phone numbers to test them against the list (23 area codes for the whole of canada, which means 230 million hashes operation to build the full dictionnary, not skipping any of the invalid numbers)

      A web service would be easy to farm from (400k units botnets each request a few numbers for call or not, and you have the up-to-date list).

      It is easier to just harvest the numbers from canada411 and not check for do not call list.

      If it becomes problematic for you, you can prevent 'invalid' phone callers from reaching you, ie, if you were to phone the showed number, it is required for it to work and match the source (as far as the carrier can tell). At least some carriers offer that.

    7. Re:CRTC Garbage. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe each list should be salted with a number which identifies the recipient of the list. When that number is called, sue the original recipient.

    8. Re:CRTC Garbage. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Maybe we should get longer telephone numbers.

  5. Simple answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Log calls and invoice the registry operator for your time. Don't know about anybody else but if I'm doing something involved (eg: accounts, coding, electronics) it takes me 10 - 15 minutes to get back to where I was.

    My phones are for the benefit of family, friends, buisness and emergencies. Other interruptions are simply not welcome.

  6. Do Not Call - What a joke by Xoron101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I added my cell, the wife's cell and our home phone number to the list. A month or so later, I got my first telemarketer call.

    I called up the government's do not call list registry to complain, but they hung up on me and told me that they weren't interested in what I was selling. They asked "how would I like it if they called me at home during dinner", and asked to be taken off of my call list

    1. Re:Do Not Call - What a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I added my cell, the wife's cell and our home phone number to the list. A month or so later, I got my first telemarketer call.

      I called up the government's do not call list registry to complain, but they hung up on me and told me that they weren't interested in what I was selling. They asked "how would I like it if they called me at home during dinner", and asked to be taken off of my call list

      BULLshizz

    2. Re:Do Not Call - What a joke by shentino · · Score: 1

      He was making a joke you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Do Not Call - What a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **RING!RING!**

      Hello?

      **Whoooosh!**

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. And here I thought I was imaging it by AsmordeanX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, good job CRTC.

    My telemarketing calls went from about 2 a week to 6+. Good thing I'm rarely home and they get the answering machine instead.

    1. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by mevets · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know if these help yet, but apparently if you make your answering machine/voice mail message start with a "disconnected signal" (http://www.telephonetribute.com/signal_and_circuit_conditions.htm) you can discourage autodialers. Somebody even markets a little device (telezapper) to do this for you.

      I have no love for the CRTC, but the pressure probably came from elected officials via heavy lobbying. Regardless, after years of "click here to be removed from the list", how anyone didn't see this coming is beyond me.

    2. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Wow, good job CRTC.

      My telemarketing calls went from about 2 a week to 6+. Good thing I'm rarely home and they get the answering machine instead.

      If you read the CRTC charter carefully, you'll see that it exist to protect the Canadian INDUSTRY of telecommunication.
      Not the consumers.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing I'm rarely home and they get the answering machine instead.

      In that case you'll also want to sign up for the Do Not Burgle list, noting which hours you're out of the house.

      It's for your own benefit. Don't worry, we're only selling the information to legitimate thieves.

    4. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

      I've been getting alot of telemarketing calls lately and thought about getting one of those devices that play the "disconnected signal". Then I figured there might be a product to filter the calls with some kind of blacklist/whitelist before they reach my phone. Hang-up on blacklisted numbers while all other calls are then connected to my home phone which would then ring. I could not find anything off the shelf to do this however - at least no solutions where I did not have to answer the calls via my computer.

    5. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. The are several times more frequent. Plus they are 10x as annoying as before, and I've been following the "press 3 to be removed from our list" for months, and the same companies keep on calling -- i.e. they are flagrantly breaking the law.

      Last time a company called I spoke to a human and found out their name, "Credit Card Services", that they were in Texas, that they knew they were calling Canada and they were familiar with the law (they said they had 31 days to remove me from the list -- but obviously hadn't actually done that). They *refused* to provide a mailing address or their phone number (yet somehow still wanted to do business).

      I've had it. I submitted a complaint to the CRTC with the meager information I had. I'm going to waste the company's time and money by speaking with a human every time they call.

    6. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by edschurr · · Score: 1

      Yeah well, my telemarketing calls went from 6+ a week to zero. I used the DNC list and Micheal Geist's iOptOut.

    7. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Well, personally, as a Canadian citizen I expected the Canadian government to do something other than let anyone download the full list of numbers.

    8. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by mevets · · Score: 1

      They aren't letting anyone download it - they are charging them to, thus getting a piece of the action. If the "new government of Canada" had been in any way honest, they would have setup the infrastructure where any autodialer had to issue a "can I bug ###.###.####" at a known web location every time it wanted to call a given number, and be bounded by the response. If they were in any way interested in their citizens, they would have extended the service to permit blocking charities, pollsters, etc... The F-OFF database would be private, and any disputes can be resolved by a simple database lookup.

      Of course, it is more fashionable to have businesses regulate themselves.

      As a fellow citizen of Canada, I am not in the least bit surprised.

    9. Re:And here I thought I was imaging it by Trillan · · Score: 1

      The DNC list was the Liberal government, wasn't it?

      But I certainly think it falls on the new government to fix it, and fast. It's already been too long for them to look good on it.

  9. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by nattt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is the most annoying call ever. I blame bell for all this. THey're making money of each scam call in network fees.

    --
    -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
  10. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been getting this calls before they even made that do not call list (from Toronto, Ontario). I've gotten that captain one about 4 times in the past 2 months. And most of the time the numbers are 100-000-0000 for me.

  11. Remove me from Your list! by madcat2c · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you no longer wish to receive our emails for the crap we sell, just reply by email with the following:
    Sunject:I am a real, valid email address
    Body:
    Your age
    Number of children
    Do you own a home?
    Take prescription meds?

    And we promise to remove you forever!

    1. Re:Remove me from Your list! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, me too, unsubscribe please! UNSUBSCRIBE

    2. Re:Remove me from Your list! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since the Dutch law changed, the new trick is to run the advertising from a temporary company, so they can start a new company every week. If someone no longer want there spam, they say it will take about a week before the request is processed, and you can not yet object to the spam from next weeks company....

    3. Re:Remove me from Your list! by v1 · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking the whole idea of making the DNC list available is kinda counter-productive unless you have some serious teeth behind it.

      I wonder if anyone has considered a "do not spam" email registry? That'd go over just about as well.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    4. Re:Remove me from Your list! by TheTapani · · Score: 1

      Just slightly related, Sweden actually had an opt-out list for email marketing. Let's just say, having a public list of email adresses that are not allowed to be spammed did not work out too well.

    5. Re:Remove me from Your list! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  12. Take control yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Fritzbox simply rejects phonecalls with suppressed caller ID.

    1. Re:Take control yourself by kent_eh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Caller ID?
      Oh, right. That feature that my telephone company wants me to pay extra for...
      How about the telco refuses to pass calls with invalid caller ID numbers?

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    2. Re:Take control yourself by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Most phone companies are happy to block all calls from unidentified and invalid caller ID numbers. For a fee, of course.

    3. Re:Take control yourself by dargaud · · Score: 1

      How about making it into law that all calls must have valid caller ID, with the phone company making sure to drop callers that don't.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  13. Re:omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that sucks. I bet it rained on your wedding day too.

  14. How to get around the Do-Not-Call list by kpoole55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm in Canada and find, via *69, that these calls are coming from telemarketers with phone numbers in the United States. So, the list is working. We're not getting calls from Canada we're getting them from the States and, likely, there are equivalent scenarios being used to get around do-not-call lists for the States. Since the calls are coming from the States you can try to put your number on their list but they won't accept an area code outside of the U.S. So, that's how you get around the list. Originate your calls for one country from another country that doesn't abide by the do-not-call list. What's going to be needed now are cross border agreements that each country will help enforce the other's do-not-call lists.

    1. Re:How to get around the Do-Not-Call list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't really work. even if canada and the US began enforcing each other Do not call lists. Telemarketers would just start calling for India etc.

      The simplest answer to all this would be just have phone calls originating outside the country to be blocked by default unless a pass code for the number that you are calling is used.

             

    2. Re:How to get around the Do-Not-Call list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need to give people a pass code to call you, then you're really just making the phone number longer. Now if that "pass code" were a secret function of the caller phone number, we might be getting somewhere.

    3. Re:How to get around the Do-Not-Call list by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if a Canadian firm has hired the US firm, the US telemarketers must follow the Canadian registry, if they do not, their client (the one that's trying to sell stuff to you) is liable to be penalized. They just need to start enforcing and applying the fines.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  15. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by cperciva · · Score: 2, Funny

    *Sound of fog horn*

    I agree, that's the most irritating call I've ever gotten. I normally hang up on telemarketers, but now I make a point of trying to keep that one on the line as long as possible.

  16. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Bob_Sheep · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that is the first time I have heard of international telemarketing. I have heard the exact same recorded message here in the UK.

  17. unlist by workbench · · Score: 1

    You can de-register your phone # by doing the following:

    To remove a residential, wireless, fax, or VoIP telephone number from the National Do Not Call List (DNCL), you must call the National DNCL Service Line at 1-866-580-DNCL (1-866-580-3625) or by a TTY 1-888-DNCL-TTY (1-888-362-5889) from the number you wish to remove.

    from https://www.lnnte-dncl.gc.ca/annins-dereg-eng.

    --
    Carry on.
  18. Call Blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get those annoying calls trying to tell me I won a trip all the time. The CRTC has pretty much screwed the do not call list up royally. The only thing I can see the CRTC doing to help is to force the Telcos to make call blocking free so we can all block the annoying numbers for free. That way as soon as we get a telemarketer we can add the number to the block list and never hear from them again.

  19. Not much different in the U.S. by Caduceus1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To DNC registry worked well for a while. But then unscrupulous telemarketers started figuring out how to issue bogus number identifications so you can't issue complaints against them, and using an automated system, claiming to be about your auto warranty, or your "credit card company" (not by name), and try to get you to press 1 - at which point you then establish a business relationship with the telemarketer/vendor and they are then exempt from harassing you forever more.

    Lately, we have been getting numerous phone calls from "Texas Guaranteed". And now, I'm getting phone calls from a "white pages/yellow pages" company to continue a listing for my fictional company which has never had a listing in any pages since it isn't really real. The funny part is these are from a real person, who gets rude when my wife says that she won't talk to them.

    --
    rm /dev/mem
    Sci-Fi Storm
    1. Re:Not much different in the U.S. by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      This is my experience, as well. The DNC registry worked great for a while, but the telemarketers are getting bolder every month. They know the odds of getting busted are slim to none.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    2. Re:Not much different in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my experience, as well. The DNC registry worked great for a while, but the scammers are getting bolder every month. They know the odds of getting busted are slim to none.

      Fixed.

    3. Re:Not much different in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So feign interest: "Where do I send the check?" and file a complaint against THAT company.

  20. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the only ones I do (and they're annoying) are from the RBC Royal Bank trying to sell me insurance, "

    That sure is a nice cellphone you got there, sure would be a shame if something happened to it. Maybe you'd better buy some 'insurance'

  21. Hash Tables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just provide a list of hashed phone numbers instead?

  22. Simple solution ... by phoxix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The CRTC should create a series honey-pot numbers, and give different combinations to those who purchase the lists. Scammers and those-who-sell-to-scammers would not be aware of which numbers are honey-pot numbers, and would call them anyways.

    The CRTC could use this to easily weed out the bad from the good.

    1. Re:Simple solution ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CRTC should create a series honey-pot numbers, and give different combinations to those who purchase the lists. Scammers and those-who-sell-to-scammers would not be aware of which numbers are honey-pot numbers, and would call them anyways.

      The CRTC could use this to easily weed out the bad from the good.

      I like that idea :) Also, calls from 000-000-0000 should be filtered by the phone company!

    2. Re:Simple solution ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CRTC and any such organization is there for the companies and not for the people.....

      CRTC does not care that you have been bothered. DNC list have proven that they increase calls.

       

    3. Re:Simple solution ... by ccguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The CRTC should create a series honey-pot numbers, and give different combinations to those who purchase the lists.

      Since the lists are cheap, the scammers can just get 10 copies and filter out the differences. I don't think it would work (at least more than once).

    4. Re:Simple solution ... by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the Phone company should be using ANI data to validate the Caller ID information given instead of trusting some jackasses Asterisk box thats set up in Romania.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  23. List Washing by LostCluster · · Score: 0

    Here's the way you do it...

    Telemarketer comes up with a list. Telemarketer sends list to the Do-Not-Call team. Do-Not-Callers do the compare, and return only the numbers that were on the telemarketer's list that doesn't match the no-call list.

    Telemarketer gains the information of the numbers they can't call, but doesn't gain the whole no-call list unless they had it already.

    1. Re:List Washing by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Telemarketer gains the information of the numbers they can't call, but doesn't gain the whole no-call list unless they had it already.

      Telemarketer sends in a list of all possible telephone numbers. The numbers removed from the list are the DNC list. Telemarketer recovers his cost by selling the DNC list to others at a price somewhat less than it would cost them to do the same thing that he did.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:List Washing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telemarketer sends 0000000 - 9999999 list to the Do-Not-Call team. Do-Not-Callers do the compare, and return only the numbers that were on the telemarketer's list that doesn't match the no-call list......

    3. Re:List Washing by TheTapani · · Score: 1

      Here's the way you do it...

      Telemarketer comes up with a list. Telemarketer sends list to the Do-Not-Call team. Do-Not-Callers do the compare, and return only the numbers that were on the telemarketer's list that doesn't match the no-call list.

      No. You prohibit phone advertising.

    4. Re:List Washing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet that telemarketers have there own do-not-call-list. for instance it would be bad to call the police, high politicians, etc.
      All you have to do is get on that list.
      "This is a number reserved for insert-funky-3-letter-agency-here. Please never ever call this number again."

  24. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by kent_eh · · Score: 1

    I've also seen an increase in the usual scam calls recently, and it seems to be pretty evenly spread across all the phones I answer (home, 3 cell, 1 listed work and 1 unlisted work number). Only the home number is on the DNC list.
    I think it's a combination of effects. Perhaps a handful of scammers going online simultaneously, wardialling, and teh DNC list being abused.

    And, really, is anyone surprised that someone who is already doing something illegal (telephone scams) wouldn't illegaly use the DNC list?

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  25. Re:unlist - (only partly effective) by wfstanle · · Score: 2

    I think that will not help much if you are already getting telemarketer calls. If your phone number has already been sold by the CRTC then it's out there. It can be sold by the telemarketer and resold much like email addresses and SPAM.

  26. 000-000-0000 by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

    I think everyone has been getting these, whether or not you have signed up for the do-not-call list.
    I've had 000 calls range from travel/vacation scams to offers from Bell Canada telephone/cell/tv. Really doesn't make me like Bell Canada any more than I do currently (which on a scale of 1-10 is in the negatives now from my last count).

    --
    I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    1. Re:000-000-0000 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I found a good way to scare them is to tell them they've called a cell phone. I don't think it's technically illegal in Canada to telemarket to a cell, but it seems to scare them anyway.

      I had some idiot call me offering fraud protection on my credit card. The company doing it was not actually my bank but was contracted by my bank. I explained to him that he'd made a telemarketing call to a cell phone. He replied that this was the number I'd given to the bank and authorized them to call it. When I told him that I'd authorized MY BANK to call the number, and not his company, he hung up.

      First time I've ever been hung up on by a telemarketer.

  27. Wilful acts such as these by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Wilfully abusing systems intended to control or curb malicious or abusive behavior should come with triple the established penalty unless they can show it was somehow accidental beyond a reasonable doubt. But what happens when these calls are coming in from the U.S. or from Pakistan or some such place outside of Canada's jurisdiction? I don't know.

    Better idea: ALL outbound calling phone business activities should be properly licensed in some way. Once again, local laws and regulations need to apply...

    This is beginning to feel like that stupid form letter with the check boxes saying "your solution advocates a _______ solution and will not work because of one or more of the following ..."

    This calls for a vigilante group with super-powers to destroy the perpetrators.

    "Your solution advocates a __super-hero__ solution and will not work because __super-heroes_are't_real__" DAMNIT!

  28. Trivial dictionary attack. by ClayJar · · Score: 1

    In this case, there is no effective difference between a list of the numbers themselves and a list of the hashes thereof. You can trivially do a dictionary attack covering the whole phone number space, as there cannot be more than 10^10 phone numbers on the list (given a ten-digit phone number space).

    Think about how trivial it is to run an exhaustive search across eight lower-case alphabetic characters. It's easily more than an order of magnitude less work to traverse the entire ten digit phone number space naively.

    Now, if you *want* to have some efficiency and you're even minutely intelligent, you don't need to bother traversing the entire space naively. Instead, you take into account that the first three digits are an area code, and therefore populated with significantly fewer than 1000 different values. You can also eliminate several swaths from the trailing seven digits by taking into account a few rules (such as seven-digit phone numbers not beginning with 1 or 0).

    Likely the only thing you'd get out of releasing hashes instead of numbers are that someone would make a Windows-only application to sanitize your telemarketing lists for the low, low price of $250 per seat.

  29. Do not call list worked for me. So did the CRTC. by urbanriot · · Score: 1

    I used to receive multiple calls daily on my Bell line after a new phone number was added to the phone book. I registered with both the CRTC do not call list and Michael Geist's ioptout.ca and my the amount of calls I received dropped dramatically within a month or two.

    I occasionally had blips where the same number would continually call me, so I filled out the CRTC form for each number, and a very helpful woman tracked them both down - one number was Canadian and enforced to stop calling, the other was American and could not be legally bound to stop, however she politely asked them to stop calling me and they did. For those in this post that claim they contacted the CRTC and they wouldn't help, I don't believe you

  30. Get VoIP by clarkn0va · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two calls from an unsolicited number is all I ever get. After the second call the number simply gets screened and the incoming call gets forwarde--guess where--back to itself. Sometimes I get giddy imagining the telemarketer reciting her pitch to the person in the next cubicle.

    Of course, callers with the caller ID of "000-000-0000" or "10" simply get forwarded to the Rejection Hotline.

    I'm on primus, but I imagine other voip providers have similar functionality, as would asterisk and its ilk.

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    1. Re:Get VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Rick Roll Hotline" would be a great choice:
      http://www.rejectionhotline.com/prank.asp

      They apparently have a "Telemarketer's Nightmare Hotline," too:
      http://www.rejectionhotline.com/telemarketers.asp

      I like the Rick Rolling better.

    2. Re:Get VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded.

      I'd be very surprised if you couldn't contact your telco and have them block certain numbers from calling you. Even the big telcos should still be able to manage that amount of customer service.

      I know my VoIP company does this. I had to have a few numbers blocked when I first switched; but I haven't had an unsolicited call since.

      Shameless promo: www.IndyDevelopersNetwork.com

      Lame name, decent company.

  31. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Trevin · · Score: 1

    I wonder if that's the same scammer who's been calling me almost every day for the last two months? My caller ID box shows a Florida number (561-xxx-xxxx, which could be a fake), so I never pick up, but the caller never left a message until just last week. Then I had his pitch captured on my voice mail: it was from "Imperial Majesty Cruise Lines" claiming I've received a free cruise. I've reported every instance to the national Do Not Call registry, but the calls just kept coming until a few days ago.

    I think sending the FTC a complete transcript of each voice mail message may have helped.

  32. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If telemarketers are all calling from 123-456-7890 or 000-000-0000, then why not program your phone to simply ignore calls from these numbers?

  33. Do what I do by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    When called, first talk really quietly so they turn their headset up, then use a very sharp whistle (or a foghorn, up to you and how sensitive your neighbors are). Repeat as needed until they hang up.

    For some odd reason, I don't get any telemarketer calls anymore. Works better than any do-not-call list.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Do what I do by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      This is why people have dialup modems. Loud modem noise works far better than any airhorn.

    2. Re:Do what I do by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They got smarter, they call me on my cell.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Do what I do by Mgns · · Score: 1

      Just tell them the owner of the phone is dead, then burst into a crying fit. Took two years before they went at it again

  34. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    Happens all the time... Our main line is on TPS and gets 2-3 calls a week from recorded messages with american accents saying we've won something implausible.

    We just leave it off the hook. If they're prepared to pay international call rates for their scam they're going to pay as much as I can fleece them for.

  35. I HAVE A PLAN! by vawarayer · · Score: 1
    1. Anyone can register their number on the Do Not Call List with no verifications wether you're the real owner of that particular number.
    2. The list is being leaked to scammers out there.

    Why not register the CRTC to the list? So when THEY receive a call for a free vacation they could issue scammers a fine riiiiiite away?

  36. How I love the CRTC by sabernet · · Score: 1

    More proof that the CRTC is absolute junk. The only thing they're good for is patting Bell on the back and waiting for the FCC to make a decision and claiming it as theirs.

    They have no accountability and are responsible for such wonderful things like our horrible TV service and world renowned cellular service.

    I mean, seriously, who thought it was a good idea to sell people's private phone numbers without checking up on whomever was requesting it?

    It should always have been "You call these people, you are fined. Oh, you don't know who they are? Send us some paperwork and we may send you a list. Until then, I would advise you don't call anyone".

  37. Dammed if you do, Dammed if you don't by Rutefoot · · Score: 1

    If you don't sign up for the list, you end up in much smaller pool of available numbers for legal telemarketing companies to pull from. Which of course means more calls for fewer people.

    If you do sign up for the list, stuff like this happens.

  38. Ha. Dear CRTC: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please remove me from the do not call list, I don't wished to be called anymore. Opps, too late!!

  39. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's why I never wanted to sign up for that list in the 1st place. (I'm from Ottawa, Canada)

    (except for my god damn bank still)

    Sorry, but you are ignorant. +Informative is entirely undeserved. This is YOUR PROBLEM.

    First off, pre-existing business relationships never fall under the category of telemarketing. They are specifically exempt. That is why your bank can call you on your cell phone. You need to inform them that they can no longer call you and threaten to terminate your business relationship when they do. Then actually grow a pair and terminate it when they do. Walk in and talk to a branch manager and send a letter to the regional management stating that you intend to do so, and another letter/conversation when you actually do. That will affect them. It is your failure to properly deal with your own bank.

    I used to do database consulting for a Telemarketing company and I was made responsible for creating a system that checked their own lists against the Canadian registry as well as the US registry. It is IMPOSSIBLE to create a registry in which the information is not made available to the same people you hate. I didn't like them either, I just worked for the devil for awhile. Had to eat you know.

    When you don't put your number into that registry you don't ever have the right to complain since both the Telemarketers that are in compliance and the offending ones have no idea that you are on the list. You really think the offending ones are using the lists of people that hate telemarketers? I can promise you it is not the case in the US. The firms in the US love the lists since calling the people on it is a waste of time and money.

    Not putting your number on that list actually hurts you more than helps. The moment any marketer or list broker *thinks* your number is active with a person on the other end your number will make it to everyone within 90 days. I SWEAR IT IS TRUE.

    At least with the registries most sane telemarketing firms religiously scrub their own lists against them. They don't want to risk the fines. They also don't want to risk attention from the government. In the case of the US, once attention came from attorney generals from a state they wrote off *the whole state*.

    I can tell you that I found access to lists for *everything*. The telephone companies would tell us what ranges were active, what were reserved, special ranges, etc. Just like TCP/IP defines 192.168.x.x do be a private network only, there are the same rules created for 10 digit phone numbers.

    I could even get at the time every single cell phone number range in the US. No shit. Why?

    Calling a cell phone was considered insanity. Do it enough and the cell phone company itself will *butt fuck* you into oblivion since you are messing with their systems and pissing off their customers. You are not just messing with the customers, but costing the cell phone company money. All that system bandwidth you suck up could have been sold to one of their customers. In fact, I know in the US it is illegal to telemarket to a cell phone *PERIOD*. That is why I used the cell phone lists at the time to scrub out any cell phones in my clients database.

    Put simply, the vast majority of so-called legitimate telemarketing firms were in compliance with the registries and not putting your number on the registry was just stupid.

    As for the jerks that are calling anyways, well that is Canada's fault for not actually spending the resources to enforce the lists in the first place. They may have well just given hand jobs to all the telemarketing execs.

    I can tell you that US is far more serious. The FCC and attorney generals were very vigilant in prosecuting offenders and telemarketing firms that violated the lists, or called cell phones, were quickly given the shaft by some government agency.

    Putting your number on the US registry *plain fucking works*.

  40. Exactly the reason why... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ...I am not signing up for a DNC list here in The Netherlands (called "Info Filter").
    I have gotten a lot of issues with a local lottery ('National Zip Code Lottery'), and have written them numerous letters to leave me alone. Even the government insisted I put myself on the "Info Filter" list, but I objected citing the fact that the list is run by the spammers themselves.
    So I filed a complaint with the foundation that the spammers are in - "Commercial Code Commission" - which is obligated (by their own statute..) to correct mistakes in commercials.
    I put in my complaint that they (the lottery) got numerous letters from me that I didn't want on their mailing list, and have 100% proof they have read those letters. The case is accepted, and I am waiting for the lotterys' response, and will seriously consider the courts if they decide negatively.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Exactly the reason why... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem, but when I called them, they turned on the "not active" flag on my info (which they got from the KPN, dutch national phonecompany).
      They did warn me that since I was in the system and they prepare letters etc for 6 months in advance or so, that I would still get those letters, after that I haven't had 1 single letter from them.
      Sorry to hear your case went sour, I hope you nail them to the wall :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    2. Re:Exactly the reason why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope I'll do to ;=)

  41. One Solution by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    One step in the right direction to a solution it to not allow "Unknown Number" calls any more. Yes, I know people can spoof their number (that would be the obvious step #2...) but, preventing people from hiding their numbers would go a long ways towards reducing the number of unwanted calls ("I don't recognize this number - screw it, voicemail can take it if it's important"). The fact that people can still hide their number is simply mind-boggling to me. If _you_ are calling _me_ (and thus invading my privacy) then you should have no expectation of privacy in return. Solve that hypocrisy and dealing with unwanted phone calls will become easier. imho

  42. Overall, it works. by Dzimas · · Score: 1

    I added my numbers to the Canadian Direct Marketer's internal "Do not call" list years ago and saw a dramatic decrease in calls and unsolicited mail. I added my numbers to the new federal list a few days after it was unveiled, and the calls from local hearing aid companies and carpet cleaners dried up. The system works.

    Where it falls down is that there's no effective way for the Canadian government to regulate foreign calls, so we still receive the dreaded 000-000-00000 "You've won a cruise!" recordings and occasional offers to reduce the interest rate on credit cards we don't have. Parliament should approve the use of JTF2 to shut down those operations - it would take mere minutes and word would get around pretty quickly. :)

    1. Re:Overall, it works. by topham · · Score: 1

      The advantage to these '000' calls is: I have NEVER received one that was a legitimate call. As such, I ignore them completely and have assigned an appropriate ring-tone on my phone. (Crickets, I need a silent MP3 ringtone but haven't got around to it yet).

      After not answering the 000 numbers for 2 weeks I haven't received any in 3; I suspect it's only a couple of organizations using it and they are actively filtering their own list so they don't waste their time calling non-answerers.

  43. Fine the idiots who are paying by davecb · · Score: 1

    And one can stop spam by using the same technique that both Canada and the U.S. use for scams : charge the company that's paying for it.

    Mind you, that does require extra staffing for the fraud squad! A suitable levels of fines applied to the companies who pay for this dreck should nicely cover it.

    Hmmn, time to write to my MP!

    --dave

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
    1. Re:Fine the idiots who are paying by theMatrix777 · · Score: 1

      And one can stop spam by using the
      same technique that both Canada and the U.S. use for scams : charge the company that's paying for it.

      Mind you, that does require extra staffing for the fraud squad! A
      suitable levels of fines applied to
      the companies who pay for this dreck should nicely cover it.

      Hmmn, time to write to my MP!

      --dave

      I don't care what I do, how many lists I have put myself on; they still seem to find me.

      I am an invalid. I never go out. But yet, somehow, one of those jerks got my numbers and sufficient information to use it.

      From now on, I'm not going to bother. It doesn't do any good.

  44. Signed on... then signed off by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    I signed up for that do not call list, and then almost immediately realized "Hey... I'm not getting any telemarketing calls. Why would I put my phone number on there now?" so I took it off immediately. Instinct paid off!

  45. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Trevin · · Score: 1

    I take that back -- the scammer called again just now.

  46. Hash?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are they giving out the actual phone numbers and not a hash? Is it too trivial to create a lookup table for all possible phone numbers? Can't the government add a random extra 10 digits to the end and give those hashes? Then the lookup table would be orders of magnitude bigger.

    If my number is 613-555-1234, then they could give out the hash for 612355512341947364957 or 6135551234967365973 or one of 10 billion different numbers with my real number at the start. It can still work for exculsionary purposes. The telemarketers would have to hash my number 10 billion times and if it matched even once then my number is excluded.

    1. Re:Hash?! by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "Why are they giving out the actual phone numbers and not a hash?"

      Because a hash of your phone number might match the hash of someone who really, really likes getting telemarketing calls. Because supposedly such people really do exist, or something.

      The correct solution would be a 'please call me' list instead, that way none of these problems would occur. And it would be easy to handle because there would only be a dozen numbers on it and ten of those would have been added by their enemies as a prank.

    2. Re:Hash?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't done the math, but I'm pretty sure the odds of any two twenty-digit numbers colliding is pretty small with MD5.

    3. Re:Hash?! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Telephone numbers are only 10 digits long in US and Canada. There's no reason they couldn't come up with a perfect hash function that guarantees no collisions.

  47. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Number 123-456-7890 calling
    *Sound of fog horn*
    Automatic voice: "Hello, this is your captain calling... Congratulations, you've won a trip to..."

    Or sometimes it's a number 000-000-0000 like from the summary, I can confirm that. It's ANNOYING AS HELL.

    Yup, I've got both of these ... (I'm in Waterloo, Ontario.)

    After having signed up for the DNC list, I'd say that I get fewer calls of the "sponsor my charity" type, and way more calls from the Captain, whom I wish we could make walk off the plank.

  48. Easy way out of this by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Change your phone number to an unlisted number. Give it to friends, family and work. Then give it to the companies that absolutely need to get in contact with you such as your bank, credit card companies, etc. The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Document Act (PIPEDA) prohibits those companies from sharing your personal information except in cases where it would be considered reasonable. Say, if you default on payments passing your information to a collection agency. But, selling your contact information on a list to telemarketers would be outside what is considered reasonable.

    1. Re:Easy way out of this by pentalive · · Score: 1

      I have an unlisted number.. I still get the calls 2-3 a day, usually the guy who want to sell me a car warranty (my car's warranty has been finished for at least two years now)

      They use random dialers..

    2. Re:Easy way out of this by Xoron101 · · Score: 1

      So why, please someone tell me, do I have to pay the phone company to not list my phone number in the phone book? I consider it a privacy issue, and anyone requesting it (for privacy reasons) should be given an unlisted number, for free.

  49. That won't work by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Do that enough times and by comparing what they got back with what they had telemarketers would be able to build the DNC list.

  50. Ok, sent to my MP by davecb · · Score: 1

    You may have seen the Globe article about telemarketers using the do-not-call list as a source of people to call, including some explicitly fraudulent calls: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090123.wdonotcall23/BNStory/National/home

    There's quite an discussion on one of the nerd sites on this (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/24/1312203) where I ran across it.

    It strikes me we can best deal with this by addressing companies that pay for the unwanted calls. Not the companies that do the illegal acts, but instead the ones who pay them.

    They (Canadian) purchasers of the illegal advertisements deserve a nasty fine. Mind you, that does require extra staffing for the investigators! An appropriate levels of fines, though, should nicely cover the cost.

    To a degree, the same thing would dry up email spam: if there was a Canadian do-not-spam list, and substantial fines for paying someone to disobey it, the number of Canadian spammers would fall rapidly. Alas, Canada isn't where all the illegal calls and emails originate, so that might have to wait for a majority of countries to implement it.

    Returning to do-not-call lists, a purely Canadian effort to fine the paymasters would dry up a lot of the calls, especially the ones being made from local numbers or for Canadian products.

    --dave

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
    1. Re:Ok, sent to my MP by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      It strikes me we can best deal with this by addressing companies that pay for the unwanted calls. Not the companies that do the illegal acts, but instead the ones who pay them.
       
      "Rachel from Cardholder Services" appears to be a credit card or identity theft scam outfit. Why would they be worried about a fine for non-compliance with the do not call list? A bank robber isn't going to be concerned with the fact that he's parked in a handicapped space.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:Ok, sent to my MP by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Nah.. You got it all wrong.. And while your at it, lets pass some more gun control laws.

      Your right, criminals breaking the law don't really care if they break the law. That's the problem with all the kneejerk we have to do something about that which comes around after something happens. A law was typically already there but somehow, making another law covering the same thing is automagically supposed to stop it from ever being broken again.

    3. Re:Ok, sent to my MP by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 4, Informative

      Alas, Canada isn't where all the illegal calls and emails originate

      Where have you been? I won't argue about the email bit, and I realize it's nothing to be proud of, but Canada has the best, as well as the most successful/notorious fraudulent telemarketers on Earth.

      Check news articles from end of the 1990s and a year or two after. Montréal has an international reputation for having the highest grossing ongoing, organized criminal telemarketers in the Entire World (Vancouver is doing okay along those lines, also).

      Interpol, in Europe and the FBI, down here in the US, had to go up there and basically "shame" the RCMP into raiding and taking down the top of that food chain. Two chains, really, one, a non-denominational consortium of Irish, Jewish, Greek and Cosa Nostra guys, and the other being the financial "fund raising" arm of the Hell's Angels, headed by Denis Morin.

      The "Phonebusters", up at Thunder Bay, were outgunned and subverted once cases hit the Court system. There were rumors, underground, that the first really huge case to hit the system in Ontario (which involved two Montréalers, one of whom was Les Pinsky) was a slam dunk, requiring a $250,000 payoff to someone in the Ministry of the Attorney General to get away scot free. The Ontario Provincial judge in the case was furious at having to throw out a case against a guy who had made $12 million in the previous year ("officially", the actual figure was way up there), because of "screw-ups" by Crown lawyers.

      Meanwhile, in Montréal, the RCMP had one of their people visiting owners and part-owners of a dozen seemingly separate businesses, telling them what amounts of individual Bank Drafts, etc, were going to be "flagged" in the system, which ,mail drops had been added to surveillance, etc. "Guidance" in other words.

      The biggest gang didn't go down until a lady in Ontario, who was addicted to sending cash to telephone fraudsters, and was embezzling huge cash from a firm she worked at, killed herself, and the FBI just blew a gasket. And Denis Morin, who was under observation for years, by Canadian legal people, wasn't busted until he was walking into Disney World, in Orlando, by FBI agents (with OPP and RCMP guys tagging along for the photo op.

      Les Pinsky, one of the old-school telemarketing guys in Montréal, died recently, before his recent case could get to Court (natural causes). If you visit the Portage, a drug and alcohol treatment facility on St antoine Street in Montréal, chances are that Les' picture is still up on the wall of grads. Even some of his closest friends knew that what he was doing was not just illegal, but all the way wrong, yet still loved him, in some cases, for the beneficial work and volunteering he had done. But the notion that man can sin with one hand and do good works with the other, and that these things "balance out" somehow, morally, are delusional. Isaiah, in the Old Testament, was very persuasive about what those who thought that they could, God-like, make these assessments and draw conclusions about their "faith saving them in the end" were in store for.

      A lot of folks will be glad Les is dead. That's easy to understand. People who knew him, who knew something about him besides "his job" can only wonder how things might have gone if he had used his skills and abilities for something that was "good." But he didn't, or, rather, he did, but those numerous acts were simply outweighed by his "real" work. A lot of people got hurt, and even his close friends know that that is totally unacceptable.

      Don't think for a moment that Canada isn't more than adequately "represented" as far as fraud goes. There's a reason, or two, why the gargantuan heroin importing "company" that was known as "The French Connection" had Montréal and little ports up and down the Canadian east coast as its last stop on the way to New York, Chicago and Detroit. And it wasn't smoked meat sandwiches and Molsons.

    4. Re:Ok, sent to my MP by davecb · · Score: 1

      Those folks are already being chased by the existing (underpaid, overworked) fraud squads (;-))

      Fining companies only works on real companies trying to use arguably illegal means to flog legal products.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  51. god bless this mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    in my country of AMERICA, we have a special organisation called the N.S.A. that filters bad calls for us. All canadiens should file a complaint with their phone company to urge them to sign up for this fantastic service. I'm pretty sure it's free.

  52. Speak as few words as possible over the phone by Max_W · · Score: 1

    A phone call may seem legitimate, but the real reason may be recording words in your original voice to reproduce them for a con later.

  53. Do not call lists are useless by pentalive · · Score: 1

    You have to identify the caller, Inform them that your number is on the do not call list.

    Usually the first whiff they get that you are going to do that they hang up.. ask for their supervisor, they hang up. Say "I am on" click - gone

    Or they take your info and promise to put you on their do not call list, in like 6 months.
    and then they call back...

    If you do manage to ask the name of their company its usually the name of the company that bought advertising.

    Caller ID says: "no number, no name." I don't answer any call I don't recognize the caller ID.

  54. The best thing you can do for telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is take the call, feign interest, and give slightly wrong information. i.e. if your address is 222 SW Mirrison street, you would say 666 NW Devil Street. repeat. When the credit card part comes up, keep giving them a number that starts with your bank code (the first four,) but make up the rest. This eats into their time and costs.

  55. This was easy to predict by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If there is a list, and it has value, it will eventually be sold. It is important to remember that the government consists of regular people, not angels, no different from people doing any other job. A certain percentage will be unscrupulous, as in any collection of people, and the unscrupulous will be attracted to positions of power, influence and money, just like in any other organization.

    You might be able to vote out the person who wrote the bill, and the politicians that put it into law, but you can't vote out the bureaucrat that actually handles the goods -- that person is outside the influence of us regular citizens. Not because of any Star Room conspiracy, but simply because he's the person who has access, and the temptation is too great.

    So for a given list, like a do-not-call list, or back-door passwords held in escrow, or a list of people in a certain position, if it has value, an unscrupulous person will find a way to cash in on it, or someone will be coerced into doing so by another unscrupulous person. The more valuable the list, the more likely that the attempt will be made.

    This is vital to remember. When you hear "the government will take care of it" the first question you should ask is "why do you think so? What makes the people that make up the government any different from the people who make up, say, the phone company?"

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:This was easy to predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would telemarketers know which numbers not to call if the list was not distributed? They aren't selling for profit... they're selling for compliance.

    2. Re:This was easy to predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't intend to be mean, but how about "-1, missed the point"?

      The entire purpose of the list was that it should be sold to unscrupulous, scum-of-the-earth, telemarketer types so that they knew who they couldn't call and could be punished for breaking those laws. The problem is not that the scum-of-the-earth types are getting the numbers, but that some subset of that group outside of the jurisdiction of Canadian law is using that Do Not Call list as a Call List, and calling the numbers with relative impunity.

  56. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dial 9 during this call, it will 'remove' you.

    I have done this personally and do not get this call anylonger.
    I am on the west coast of Canada and recieved that call almost everyday.

    I usually dial'ed 1 to get a person on the line and pretended I'm a cop and the call has been forwarded to their Telemarketing abuse center ;)

  57. Works for the rest of us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Canada, but never got around to putting my name on the Do Not Call list. I just hang up as soon as I know I have a telemarketer on the line. But my number of telemarketer calls has gone way down since the Do Not Call list came into effect. I hardly get any now.

  58. Why I signed up by Trillan · · Score: 1

    My cell carrier has me under contract until June 2010. I've been with them since 2001, and have never hard problems with them before.

    But lately, they changed their branding and plans around. And for some reason, they decided to contract a company to call all their users.

    That company is an incompetent bunch of assholes.

    So after about 15 days of being called twice per day by the assholes, who would hang up as soon as I answered, and multiple complaints back to my carrier, I signed up on the DNC list on their suggestion.

    My phone calls are now down from two a day to one or two a week. They're the super annoying foghorn one mentioned elsewhere, but at least I can hang up as soon as I hear the horn.

    (Aside: My incoming calls are free. So this isn't hurting me financially, it's just pissing me off.)

  59. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only spam calls we get are from the Conservative party. Even after repeatedly asking them to stop...

  60. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went through the whole process with that call. I gave them a fake name. When they called back one day to confirm the trip, I got them to repeat the name back to me. Peter Eater. Then I told them I already lived in the Bahamas and they hung up.

  61. Well, there's a solution. by Superdarion · · Score: 1

    The phone companies could create a bunch of toll-call numbers (with a crazy fee for the caller, of course and are of no public use) and mix them up with the DNC list. That way, a spammer, who is dialing all numbers from the list, will eventually (maybe in a 1-1 ratio) hit those toll-call numbers and thus have a huge bill to pay.

  62. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Warll · · Score: 1

    Keep dreaming, international VoIP, for them at least, will be dirt cheap.

  63. Can't get away, even on pay-go by Eun-HjZjiNeD · · Score: 1

    I can't get away from telemarketers and scammers ever since I added my effing number to that blasted registry.

    Shortly after I added my home phone, I started getting calls on my cell, which is not connected to my home number at all.

    I even changed my cell number to no avail... How the hell is that I keep getting scammers calling my cell 1 dam day after I change my effing number?

    My government should get off their asses and make it a felony offense to sell private data like this.

    I even get scam calls on my Skype account... WTF

    As I wrote this I got 2 calls. One on my home phone and one on my cell.

    If this keeps up I'll just turn off my cell, unplug my phone and make a network of cans on strings to the people I communicate with most.

    --
    ..::ALWAYS : watching::..
  64. Whistling by hack++slash · · Score: 1

    Here's a tip to let telemarketers know how you feel about them calling you when you're on a do-not-call list:

    Keep a whistle next to your phone, so that whenever you get a telemarking call you know exactly what to do...

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  65. Telemarketing (Junk) Call Blocker program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try running a program called jcblock, available on sourceforge.net. Just enter 'jcblock' is the site's search window. It works for me (I wrote it!).

  66. screening out the telemarketers by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    I have a way to screen them, and that is my listed name in the phone directory. They ask in the States how you want your name listed. So I either list as just initial, and last name, or a bogus name. Telemarketers always call you by the name listed in the phone book. So As soon as I hear that name listed in the phone book. I hang up. I am not on the do not call list. Maybe the telemarketers removed me from their list? {grin} I don't get call backs.

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by jafosei · · Score: 1

    *Sound of fog horn* Automatic voice: "Hello, this is your captain calling... Congratulations, you've won a trip to..."

    Or sometimes it's a number 000-000-0000 like from the summary, I can confirm that. It's ANNOYING AS HELL.

    I get that one periodically as well. But I was getting it before I signed up for the DNC - frequency seems to have gone down, but I doubt it's related to the list.

  69. You're missing the big picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may have more oil then Saudi Arabia, but your neighbor has more tanks AND REALLY LIKE OIL.

    1. Re:You're missing the big picture by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Sure but we also have Santa. Lets see how you like a Christmas without gifts!

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  70. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by loom_weaver · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd go into your bank and ask if you can be taken off their marketing lists.

    I had the same thing happen with CIBC and one day I got a pushy salesman that pissed me off. I marched into the local branch, told them my sad story, and then was somewhat surprised to see them clicking away at their computer and unchecking me from several lists.

    The teller said it's quite rare that people ask to be taken off those lists. It must be because so few people know about it.

  71. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep getting that one as well. The other really annoying one is:

    "Oh, I'm sorry. I have the wrong number."
    *click*

    WTF??

    The vast majority of the telemarketing calls I'm getting now are automated.

  72. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should do what they do in some countries. The PERSON is added to the do-not-call list, not their phone number.

  73. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    We shouldn't have to go to the trouble to ask to be taken off a list. The default should be *opt-in*, not *opt-out*.

    Unless I've given specific permission to a company, a charity, a pollster, a politician, or a charity they shouldn't be allowed to call me, PERIOD. The DNC lists we have now fail because they allow too many exceptions.

  74. Same here by NeonFire · · Score: 1

    I put my home phone number and my cell phone number on the Do-Not-Call List and I've been getting an increasingly high amount of calls since then. I never got a single telemarketing call on my cell phone before, now I get that annoying 000-000-0000 foghorn "This is your captain!" cruise call multiple times a week. They called three times yesterday on my home phone. I should have known before I added my number, especially my cell phone number, that some con artists would get their hands on the list and exploit it (because if you aren't going to follow the law, who wouldn't want a nice, cheap list of active numbers?). I don't understand how caller ID works, but why can't the telephone companies (ex. Bell) do something about these calls coming from non-existent numbers like 123-456-7890 and 000-000-0000?

  75. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

    I get that call on all three of my phones about twice a week. All since I put the number son the DNCL. Whats worse they have a habit of calling very early in the morning. So if your hung over in bed and the phone rings and being alseep you pick it up without seeing the number your poor little head gets blasted by that fucking Foghorn. Neither Telus or Rogers will block it and the people at the DNCL are useless.

  76. Coincidentally... by nonregistered · · Score: 1

    ...CANREG, the Canadian domain registry, is the only organization that I can prove sold or somehow leaked my email address to spammers.

  77. Then design a system that protects from this. by XantheKnight · · Score: 1

    Simple. Class action lawsuit against CTRC. Creates incentive for latter institution to design a system that cannot be foreseeably stolen by any old worker in the organization. Make them liable for the tort actions of their employees (standard Canadian law), and impose huge damages. Then watch how CTRC takes measures to avoid this in the future. If they don't, sue them again for negligence (as soon as the first old granny gets scammed or loses money through the actions of one of the list purchasers).

  78. Possible Solution by drapeau06 · · Score: 1

    Needs more mountweazels!

  79. two words.. asterisk box. by qnxdude · · Score: 1

    I get a dozen calls from these idiots a day. only thing is that i don't ever have to answer a single telemarketing call. i have an PbxInAFlash box (http://pbxinaflash.net) that sits between my pots line and my phone. When you call, your caller id is looked up against a shared list, much like rbl, and if its blacklisted you get disconnect tones and hang up. if your not on the list, and you havent been white listed, you must still prove that you are a human by dialing an extension number that changes per call. If you prove your a human by pressing the right extension, you get to talk to me. There is however always an extension that announces as "if you are a telemarketer please press 1 for immediate service. pressing 1 or failing to press anything, dumps you into telemarketer hell. an announcement of "your call is important to you, please hold and your call will be ignored in the order in which it was received." then you get elevator music for a while, and another announcement comes on" please continue to hold, you are number (some large random number) in the cue and the estimated wait time is 99:99 minutes" evil, but highly effective

    1. Re:two words.. asterisk box. by cheros · · Score: 1

      I think you ought to write a howto - could be quite amusing :-)

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    2. Re:two words.. asterisk box. by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why ALL phones, including cell phones, don't come with a black/white list feature.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  80. Re:I saw that one coming...(I'm in Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A U.S. telemarketer pays nothing like "international" call rates to Canada. They probably pay exactly the same rate they'd pay to call any U.S. number. At home, I'm on a plan where all calls within U.S. *and* Canada are "free".

  81. Makes the news in Canada. In US the DNC is ignored by SAABMaven · · Score: 1

    We live in the US and have always been on the DNC list and we get hammered nevertheless. Especially around dinnertime. The DNC is ineffectual and I have concluded that being on it makes you a special target.
    This is like the recent subway stabbing in Toronto, which made front-page-news, because it is so rare. In US cities it's commonplace, and hushed up (no reporting) so as not to drag down speculative real estate values and foreign investment.

  82. 000-000-0000 by thepacketmaster · · Score: 1

    And they're not exactly bright telemarketers either. After several of their calls where I just hung up, I decided to answer their survey with bogus information and then talk to someone in person. I asked who they represented, and then mentioned some company (can't even remember the name now). After explaining to them I didn't wish to be contacted and I was on the Canadian DNC list, they still call back from time to time. When we see the 000-000-0000 number (or any other similarly obvious number like 012-345-6789) on the call display we just don't bother picking up. Hope someone finally makes a phone capable of white-listing calls. Anyone know if such a thing exists?

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  83. Like a password hash by phorm · · Score: 1

    I always thought it would be better if they had a way of submitting names/phone #'s in a standardized format to a webpage that would verify they're legit to call.

    Like when you're checking a password against a hash, the submitter never sees a plain password (or in this case a phone #), only whether or not it's accepted.

    Heck, you could do something similar with data on a CD/DVD-ROM of actually MD5'ed #'s with a quick lookup app to check them.

  84. avoid cruisemates.com by scorilo · · Score: 1

    I do not recall registering with this registry. However, I am 100% sure I started to get these phone calls ("hello, this is your captain speaking") ever since I registered with cruisemates.com

    As far as I can tell, they are a front for collecting this kind of information.

    --
    "One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that ones work is terribly important." -BRussell