If you're using IMAP, let IMAP auth to LDAP and be done with it. I think both cyrus and dovecot support it, and PAM is another good way to accomplish the same thing.
The reason for that unstoppability is the lack of an awareness on anyone else's part of the value of an end to end solution where everything works together using the same technology
Riiiight. I work in an almost all MS shop, and if everything suddenly started working seamlessly, I'd have a friggin' heart attack.
Not POP. IMAP. I use webmail on my home server when I'm on the road, and I use thunderbird when I'm home. Since both use IMAP, I get the same mailbox and folders either way.
I agree. The only major entity to successfully buck standards and survive without interoperability is Microsoft.
I don't actually think any nation would try it. I just think the idea of one country controlling all the root DNS servers is a bad idea. They should be distributed and managed cooperatively.
Will there also be a fracturing of existing standards going forward? Will HTML 5 be defined by individual countries? Might TCP/IP fork? Might firewall rules at national borders mess with worldwide connectivity?
I'd much rather let the UN manage the net than even begin to contemplate the above. I'm not saying the UN has properly managed everything they've touched, but there is no other international body capable of managing the internet. And it needs to not be exclusively under Amerikan control.
People, generally, will tend to learn as much about a given tech as they need to know to operate. I know C++, PHP, etc. I Have no need to ASM, so I never bothered. If I someday need to accomplish something that's either best done with or only possible through ASM, I'll learn.
This is typical for most people. The knowledge will be preserved by those who need it, until it is no longer relevant. An example would be how hard it is to find AmigaBASIC hackers.
Even if that were true, and not just ripped-off National Review agitprop, the question remains: Where are the supplies and equipment the Guard should be using?
Except they said multi-domain, indicating that the systems in question auth to multiple locations, possibly including AD, vanilla LDAP, NT4 Domains, NIS, or local accounts. LDAP would only work if all the systems could auth to the same spot, and if that were the case, the question would not have been asked.
Why build the spacecraft out of plastic? Who cases if it's flimsy? Why not simply put it into the wall s like insulation? How much thickness would you need? Talk about weight savings. . .
If you give the employees not only tools to effect real positive change but also a sense of ownership, some say in operations and a voice of some type, they'll work harder, do better work, and stick around. Why isn't this common knowledge? I've been workplaces where this was the M.O., and it was great.
it's best to have a knowledgable manager. Failing that, it's best to have one who knows his/her limitations. I have a manager currently, for example, who, while largely ignorant of the nuts and bolts, is willing to learn and has no illusions about his own knowledge. If he doesn't know something, he doesn't just spout off some crap trying to make himself sound impressive, (like my old supervisor), he either does the research and comes up with a correct answer or informed opinion, or refers the question to someone who knows. He also tries to make an effort to educate himself about issues he needs to know about, such as email, spyware, virii, etc. He's no sysadmin, but he's not actively a problem, either, which is worth a lot.
Slashdot Mirror
How many furlongs is that?
It'd be like trying to run one language through another language's interpreter. Oh, wait, that sounds like Parrot/Perl6. :)
If you're using IMAP, let IMAP auth to LDAP and be done with it. I think both cyrus and dovecot support it, and PAM is another good way to accomplish the same thing.
Choice is the point.
Bingo. I'd also report my Exchange server missing. :)
Riiiight. I work in an almost all MS shop, and if everything suddenly started working seamlessly, I'd have a friggin' heart attack.
Not POP. IMAP. I use webmail on my home server when I'm on the road, and I use thunderbird when I'm home. Since both use IMAP, I get the same mailbox and folders either way.
I don't actually think any nation would try it. I just think the idea of one country controlling all the root DNS servers is a bad idea. They should be distributed and managed cooperatively.
And I am in fact from the U$. :)
I'd much rather let the UN manage the net than even begin to contemplate the above. I'm not saying the UN has properly managed everything they've touched, but there is no other international body capable of managing the internet. And it needs to not be exclusively under Amerikan control.
And I'm and Amerikan.
B> You could only give me one.
[/anal]
But thanks! :)
So, like, Spaceballs could compromise my boxen?
I like it breaded and deep-fried. :)
This is typical for most people. The knowledge will be preserved by those who need it, until it is no longer relevant. An example would be how hard it is to find AmigaBASIC hackers.
Unless, of course, you're going "toothing". In which cas, you might catch altogether another kind of virus. :)
Oh yeah, Iraq.
Except they said multi-domain, indicating that the systems in question auth to multiple locations, possibly including AD, vanilla LDAP, NT4 Domains, NIS, or local accounts. LDAP would only work if all the systems could auth to the same spot, and if that were the case, the question would not have been asked.
At the very least.
I still don't think I'd trust it.
A: Start multiple cars that they own
B: Start other people's cars
Sometimes, to a shallow ditch in the desert.
Hard to implement online, actually. Nevermind. :)
Why build the spacecraft out of plastic? Who cases if it's flimsy? Why not simply put it into the wall s like insulation? How much thickness would you need? Talk about weight savings. . .
No thank you. Don't decide for me what traffic I can generate.
Dr. Chandra. HAL's creator was Dr. Chandra.
If you give the employees not only tools to effect real positive change but also a sense of ownership, some say in operations and a voice of some type, they'll work harder, do better work, and stick around. Why isn't this common knowledge? I've been workplaces where this was the M.O., and it was great.
it's best to have a knowledgable manager. Failing that, it's best to have one who knows his/her limitations. I have a manager currently, for example, who, while largely ignorant of the nuts and bolts, is willing to learn and has no illusions about his own knowledge. If he doesn't know something, he doesn't just spout off some crap trying to make himself sound impressive, (like my old supervisor), he either does the research and comes up with a correct answer or informed opinion, or refers the question to someone who knows. He also tries to make an effort to educate himself about issues he needs to know about, such as email, spyware, virii, etc. He's no sysadmin, but he's not actively a problem, either, which is worth a lot.