But that was in 2001. The landscape has changed a lot since then and the OSS world has lost ground on the desktop, due to anti-oss marketing and just not being able to keep up. I feel that things have advanced in the server world, but the average user doesn't know or care about that.
As i am not a masochist, if i wanted to go minimalist I would choose Joe. Back in my MSDOS days i used to use Galaxy ( i couldn't afford anything else, until i bought FrameWork II.. and it worked just fine for me )
And they said it couldn't be done. This is actually a quite elegant solution: ALL internet access goes thru a SIM card, and if you do bad things it gets turned off by your carrier.
They should get involved by turning off your service and have you call them to turn it back on, routing you only to a in-house site for cleaning the PC.
Yes, maps are a security risk, it shows access roads and potential targets. Zipcodes, and addresses should also be banned, only allowed to be used by the government.
Same here after several generations of blackberry, tho my iphone battery doesn't last 2 days like yours. But one day is really all i need. That is why god made chargers.
The question we should be asking is not "Should the pentagon be burning books?", it's "Should the pentagon have (so much) classified information?"
Depends on what the data in question was. Some things really would effect our security. ( others, not so much )
Since i missed the first story, does anyone know what really was in the books that was so bad? Or is it still the abstract 'names, techniques and places' excuse?
Slashdot Mirror
But that was in 2001. The landscape has changed a lot since then and the OSS world has lost ground on the desktop, due to anti-oss marketing and just not being able to keep up. I feel that things have advanced in the server world, but the average user doesn't know or care about that.
Mechanical devices are more durable then silicon? Who would have thought.. other then Captain Obvious of cousre.
As i am not a masochist, if i wanted to go minimalist I would choose Joe. Back in my MSDOS days i used to use Galaxy ( i couldn't afford anything else, until i bought FrameWork II.. and it worked just fine for me )
This would be done by GPS more effectively. If you are on a road, and moving faster then say a brisk bike ride, then it locks the phone.
If you are a passenger, you are just outta luck.
Or you stub your toe, or are sore from a run, bought a new pair of shoes....
Really only need one reason: First Amendment of the US Constitution.
And they said it couldn't be done. This is actually a quite elegant solution: ALL internet access goes thru a SIM card, and if you do bad things it gets turned off by your carrier.
in china, that gets you killed. AND your family if you aren't careful.
To a google truck near you.
err wait.. never mind.
Umm with all the turmoil i just cant remember it.
They should get involved by turning off your service and have you call them to turn it back on, routing you only to a in-house site for cleaning the PC.
It will backfire as people will be un-taught the 'dont click on popups' lesson being taught now.
Yes, maps are a security risk, it shows access roads and potential targets. Zipcodes, and addresses should also be banned, only allowed to be used by the government.
Its neither if they are reporting what they see posted. Its not their job to verify.
Same here after several generations of blackberry, tho my iphone battery doesn't last 2 days like yours. But one day is really all i need. That is why god made chargers.
WTF is wrong with these people. Advertisements do NOT enhance anything, and I'm sick of them as they are everywhere..
Except for the other 99% of their customers, who will be quite happy with its features.
Its great they are going to be independent, but who is going to fund things now?
Right, and that attitude has really killed Apple's computer products.. Oh wait, perhaps not. :)
There is a place for both ideals in this world.
But you can, just become a career politician.
Don't you mean will? This is their second chance.
The question we should be asking is not "Should the pentagon be burning books?", it's "Should the pentagon have (so much) classified information?"
Depends on what the data in question was. Some things really would effect our security. ( others, not so much )
Since i missed the first story, does anyone know what really was in the books that was so bad? Or is it still the abstract 'names, techniques and places' excuse?
Sounds like they just got a gig to sell a bunch of books that they printed. That is their job.
Nope, don't need that anymore, that is so 1990's.