It will stop external interference from entering the building; However, it wont stop your signal from leaving though. So people people can still sniff and listen, but you get very low interfernance and noise.
Her doctorate is an "Sc.D., Harvard School of Public Health" Don't inflate it, this isn't a hard science PhD. Its not even a Psych PhD! Her field is "risk analysis"
So MS had to break the ability to run tasks at a later time due to a security bug? No at command for you Windows user!
What other Posix pieces are disabled to secure the box?
First all the "news photos" that are badly implemented by the matrix that they look like bad photoshops; now we see computer overlords directing food store employees. Next thing you know you'll see the same cat twice.
I agree with you. However in 200 years when synthetic pure white diamond is used commercially in very large crystals, when corundums(i.e. saphires) are used for windows, our great grandchildren will wonder about us wearing what is to them just glass. I wonder what jewelry will be like when our physical scarcity matches our current digital scarcity. How will we adapt to such abundance?
You, on the other hand, are ignoring the environmental impact of battery production/recycling. How much energy does it take to make a NiMH battery? You are also ignoring transmission losses in the power grid.
Not to mention that the battery packs cost GM more than total lease cost to the consumer. Those cars cost almost $250,000 a piece to make including development costs.
You wouldn't IFF you are a legitimate governement. If you are a terrorist in Iraq or Afganistan the US Military dropping in every time you turn on your shortwave transmitter might get you to try some other method. Or if you're a government and worried that the US Military will start doing that to you soon you may decide to setup another channel as well.
So what other method could be used? Why not VOIP. Posting on slashdot might still be smarter, but still may draw more attention. Easier for automation to flag the Slashdot post than to try to listen in a VOIP call and automatically flag it for decryption. Hey its voice traffic just like all the other VOIP traffic, but the slashdot post isn't natural language like all the other slashdot posts.
I also assume that the recipient is probably hand decoding these. If they were to use a computer there are of course even better ways to do this.
Remove their legal protections as common carriers as a corporation. They want to tier the internet make them legally liable for everything crossing thier wires. Let the MPAA/RIAA eat them alive. Let them go to jail for transmitting kiddie porn. Have at it. You want to differentiate the packets flowing then you should have to do the full check on those packets. And hey to make sure you don't weasel out of anything, you don't get to claim common carrier status on anything.
It cant possibly be that Venus is 23 million miles closer to the sun. It cant be that Venus is 25% closer to the Sun than the Earth. Has to be the carbon dioxide. After all there can be only one cause for any effect.
As to who said evolution is random; I didn't say it I said that the genetic changes in evolution are a random process. I asked what other random processes are described using terms of design.
Random: lacking any definite plan or order or purpose governed by or depending on chance; "a random choice"; "bombs fell at random"; "random movements" [ant: nonrandom] 2: taken haphazardly; "a random choice"
If evolutionary changes are nonrandom, then there is a plan or order to it. That implies design. Darwinian evolution pre-supooses random mutations as the change agent for evolution. If you are saying it is nonrandom, your saying that evolution is the method of some intelligent design.
The major tenets of the evolutionary synthesis, then, were that populations contain genetic variation that arises by random (ie. not adaptively directed) mutation and recombination; that populations evolve by changes in gene frequency brought about by random genetic drift, gene flow, and especially natural selection; that most adaptive genetic variants have individually slight phenotypic effects so that phenotypic changes are gradual (although some alleles with discrete effects may be advantageous, as in certain color polymorphisms); that diversification comes about by speciation, which normally entails the gradual evolution of reproductive isolation among populations; and that these processes, continued for sufficiently long, give rise to changes of such great magnitude as to warrant the designation of higher taxonomic levels (genera, families, and so forth)
-- Futuyma, D.J. in Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates, 1986; p.12
So it appears that evolution as currently understood by biology is caused by random changes, just as I implied. What other random even is described using terms of design?
I am not argueing that the terms are "owned" by ID. I am argueing that the terms are terms that in other contexts describe design.
"I re-used the code in Module A, and modified the Code in Module B to do this new thing."
"I re-used the tail ligts from the Trailblazer in the Solstice. I modifed the ecotech from the Saturn to 2.4 liters for the Solstice."
Does anyone say:
"The lottery commision re-used two of the numbers from last night"?
"The random number generator modified the number sequence fro the last run to this run"?
What random process, other than evolution, is described using terms that are normally used when talking about people designing things?
Now can this story please explain it without using terms of design.
"reusing and modifying existing parts"
This begs the question who is modifying and reusing existing parts? Can't evolutionist stop using
concepts and words describing a design that is implemented by intelligence? Won't that more than anything help them put to rest intelligent design.
You overestimate the ethics of Best Buy. They fired the whistleblowers. They fired the ones who came up with the policy allowing partial returns on the bundles. When accounting found out they lost millions on returns and the bad press from the leaks heads rolled alright. Just not the ones insinuated in the article.
The problem with Wind Turbine Bird deaths is the kind of birds it kills more than the absolute number of birds killed. How many raptors are killed by cats? What percent of the car strikes are raptors? What percent of the turbine bird strikes are raptors? Since raptors are a small subset of birds that tend to be endangered, the environmentalists have the problem. Honestly, what energy source are environementalists unanimouse in supporting?
Thats what I thought. I can't think of any either.
I wonder when it is determined that the beating was a hoax he perpitrated to gain sympathy like Kerry Dunn did if we will see a slashdot article that says "Anti Intelligent Design professor sentenced in false police report."
LeapFrog already makes a cell phone for kids that does most of this. Its the leap frog tictalk With parents today no need to beat around the bush. Just come out and say it. And its cheeper too!
Why is this surprising everyone? Dell is simply telling us what we already know. Windows has a negative worth. It is a bad(as opposed to goods) and costs to get rid of, just like other garbage and toxic waste.
Intelligent Design is not just unproven, it is inherently unprovable.
I disagree. I believe that the crition for falsifacation of Intelligent Design is very similar to the Criteria Darwin suggested for his own theory.
Darwin suggested that there would in the 100 years following his theory, be discovered many many different transitional life forms in the fossil record. He also stated that he could find no explanation for the irreducible complexity of the eye and that in the future an explanation for it would be found and there would not be more problems similar to it. Both of these criterion should disprove Darwins theory. We find more and more irreducibley complex systems as we study microbiology(ex. blood clotting) and we haven't found any transitional forms.
As to intelligent design: here is a falsification criteria for you: In the next 200 years scientists will learn enough to be able to create a bacteria in the laborotory, it will be an intelligently designed lifeform. There my falsification criteria is very similar to Darwins which it appears everyone believes is rigorous enough.
you react the hydrogen with carbon dioxide and produce methanol and oxygen. You ship the methanol and use it for your fuel cells, or for regular internal combustion for that matter. This would directly reduce the carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere and produce an easily handled fuel. Retrofitting the infrastructure would not be necessary; you can handle methanol pretty much like you do gasoline.
W. Bush promised to nominate judges like Scalia and Thomas to the court when he ran bot times. So it should be a good indication that he will nominate them; however those are the types of judges that the democrats have been filibustering to the lower courts now. Apparently the Democrats believe that voting against a local government taking your house to build a new private development is out of the mainstream. Go figure.
If you dont believe me measure the squareness of your rooms. Measure the level on windows, plumbness on corners. Houses since the 80's are built with no more quality that software is.
Slashdot Mirror
Mere Christianity.
A Faraday cage solves the wrong problem.
It will stop external interference from entering the building;
However, it wont stop your signal from leaving though.
So people people can still sniff and listen, but you get very low interfernance
and noise.
Her doctorate is an "Sc.D., Harvard School of Public Health"
Don't inflate it, this isn't a hard science PhD. Its not even a Psych PhD!
Her field is "risk analysis"
So MS had to break the ability to run tasks at a later time due to a security bug? No at command for you Windows user! What other Posix pieces are disabled to secure the box?
Well as long as you dont clone Heed the world's smallest cat. That wouldn't be very filling.
First all the "news photos" that are badly implemented by the matrix that they look like bad photoshops; now we see computer overlords directing food store employees. Next thing you know you'll see the same cat twice.
I agree with you. However in 200 years when synthetic pure white diamond is used commercially in very large crystals, when corundums(i.e. saphires) are used for windows, our great grandchildren will wonder about us wearing what is to them just glass. I wonder what jewelry will be like when our physical scarcity matches our current digital scarcity. How will we adapt to such abundance?
You, on the other hand, are ignoring the environmental impact of battery production/recycling. How much energy does it take to make a NiMH battery? You are also ignoring transmission losses in the power grid.
Not to mention that the battery packs cost GM more than total lease cost to the consumer. Those cars cost almost $250,000 a piece to make including development costs.
What makes you think the only water in a person is in their blood? When you dehydrate you loose fluid from all your organs not just your blood.
You wouldn't IFF you are a legitimate governement. If you are a terrorist in Iraq or Afganistan the US Military dropping in every time you turn on your shortwave transmitter might get you to try some other method. Or if you're a government and worried that the US Military will start doing that to you soon you may decide to setup another channel as well.
So what other method could be used? Why not VOIP.
Posting on slashdot might still be smarter, but still may draw more attention. Easier for automation to flag the Slashdot post than to try to listen in a VOIP call and automatically flag it for decryption. Hey its voice traffic just like all the other VOIP traffic, but the slashdot post isn't natural language like all the other slashdot posts.
I also assume that the recipient is probably hand decoding these. If they were to use a computer there are of course even better ways to do this.
Remove their legal protections as common carriers as a corporation. They want to tier the internet make them legally liable for everything crossing thier wires. Let the MPAA/RIAA eat them alive. Let them go to jail for transmitting kiddie porn. Have at it. You want to differentiate the packets flowing then you should have to do the full check on those packets. And hey to make sure you don't weasel out of anything, you don't get to claim common carrier status on anything.
It cant possibly be that Venus is 23 million miles closer to the sun. It cant be that Venus is 25% closer to the Sun than the Earth. Has to be the carbon dioxide. After all there can be only one cause for any effect.
As to who said evolution is random; I didn't say it I said that the genetic changes in evolution are a random process. I asked what other random processes are described using terms of design.
Random: lacking any definite plan or order or purpose governed by or depending on chance; "a random choice"; "bombs fell at random"; "random movements" [ant: nonrandom] 2: taken haphazardly; "a random choice"
If evolutionary changes are nonrandom, then there is a plan or order to it. That implies design. Darwinian evolution pre-supooses random mutations as the change agent for evolution. If you are saying it is nonrandom, your saying that evolution is the method of some intelligent design.
The major tenets of the evolutionary synthesis, then, were that populations contain genetic variation that arises by random (ie. not adaptively directed) mutation and recombination; that populations evolve by changes in gene frequency brought about by random genetic drift, gene flow, and especially natural selection; that most adaptive genetic variants have individually slight phenotypic effects so that phenotypic changes are gradual (although some alleles with discrete effects may be advantageous, as in certain color polymorphisms); that diversification comes about by speciation, which normally entails the gradual evolution of reproductive isolation among populations; and that these processes, continued for sufficiently long, give rise to changes of such great magnitude as to warrant the designation of higher taxonomic levels (genera, families, and so forth)
-- Futuyma, D.J. in Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates, 1986; p.12
So it appears that evolution as currently understood by biology is caused by random changes, just as I implied. What other random even is described using terms of design?
I am not argueing that the terms are "owned" by ID. I am argueing that the terms are terms that in other contexts describe design.
"I re-used the code in Module A, and modified the Code in Module B to do this new thing."
"I re-used the tail ligts from the Trailblazer in the Solstice. I modifed the ecotech from the Saturn to 2.4 liters for the Solstice."
Does anyone say:
"The lottery commision re-used two of the numbers from last night"?
"The random number generator modified the number sequence fro the last run to this run"?
What random process, other than evolution, is described using terms that are normally used when talking about people designing things?
Now can this story please explain it without using terms of design.
"reusing and modifying existing parts"
This begs the question who is modifying and reusing existing parts? Can't evolutionist stop using concepts and words describing a design that is implemented by intelligence? Won't that more than anything help them put to rest intelligent design.
You overestimate the ethics of Best Buy. They fired the whistleblowers. They fired the ones who came up with the policy allowing partial returns on the bundles. When accounting found out they lost millions on returns and the bad press from the leaks heads rolled alright. Just not the ones insinuated in the article.
The problem with Wind Turbine Bird deaths is the kind of birds it kills more than the absolute number of birds killed. How many raptors are killed by cats? What percent of the car strikes are raptors? What percent of the turbine bird strikes are raptors? Since raptors are a small subset of birds that tend to be endangered, the environmentalists have the problem. Honestly, what energy source are environementalists unanimouse in supporting?
Thats what I thought. I can't think of any either.
I wonder when it is determined that the beating was a hoax he perpitrated to gain sympathy like Kerry Dunn did if we will see a slashdot article that says "Anti Intelligent Design professor sentenced in false police report."
LeapFrog already makes a cell phone for kids that does most of this. Its the leap frog tictalk With parents today no need to beat around the bush. Just come out and say it. And its cheeper too!
Why is this surprising everyone? Dell is simply telling us what we already know. Windows has a negative worth. It is a bad(as opposed to goods) and costs to get rid of, just like other garbage and toxic waste.
Intelligent Design is not just unproven, it is inherently unprovable.
I disagree. I believe that the crition for falsifacation of Intelligent Design is very similar to the Criteria Darwin suggested for his own theory.
Darwin suggested that there would in the 100 years following his theory, be discovered many many different transitional life forms in the fossil record. He also stated that he could find no explanation for the irreducible complexity of the eye and that in the future an explanation for it would be found and there would not be more problems similar to it. Both of these criterion should disprove Darwins theory. We find more and more irreducibley complex systems as we study microbiology(ex. blood clotting) and we haven't found any transitional forms.
As to intelligent design: here is a falsification criteria for you: In the next 200 years scientists will learn enough to be able to create a bacteria in the laborotory, it will be an intelligently designed lifeform. There my falsification criteria is very similar to Darwins which it appears everyone believes is rigorous enough.
you react the hydrogen with carbon dioxide and produce methanol and oxygen. You ship the methanol and use it for your fuel cells, or for regular internal combustion for that matter. This would directly reduce the carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere and produce an easily handled fuel. Retrofitting the infrastructure would not be necessary; you can handle methanol pretty much like you do gasoline.
W. Bush promised to nominate judges like Scalia and Thomas to the court when he ran bot times. So it should be a good indication that he will nominate them; however those are the types of judges that the democrats have been filibustering to the lower courts now. Apparently the Democrats believe that voting against a local government taking your house to build a new private development is out of the mainstream. Go figure.
If you dont believe me measure the squareness of your rooms. Measure the level on windows, plumbness on corners. Houses since the 80's are built with no more quality that software is.