Slashdot Mirror


First Cell Phone for Dogs

revelCyllufyalP writes "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call. In addition, the PetCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their dogs wander outside a prescribed area. Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?"

395 comments

  1. I don't think it'll be cheap by seifried · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a feeling this will cost a pretty penny, of course that won't stop most people that are insecure enough that they would feel they need this to ensure their dog doesn't run away (crazy idea, why not look after your dog responsibly?).

    That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

    1. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

      I am a cat person as well. I got my cat for free and was suprised to see that its previous family didn't even wanted it. It made such a good pet - of course it didn't seem that active like most other cats - but I loved it anyways. One day I found it dead, and was very heartbroken. Since then, I haven't been able to find a companion that touched my heart like this one did.

    2. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

      Funnily, I've seen FAR more "lost cat" posters than "lost dog" posters.

    3. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have a feeling this will cost a pretty penny, of course that won't stop most people that are insecure enough that they would feel they need this to ensure their dog doesn't run away (crazy idea, why not look after your dog responsibly?)."

      Large dogs can jump surprisingly high if they want to, can sometimes dig under fences, and depending on the mechanism, can sometimes figure out how to open gates or doors. Sometimes a neighbour kid might come to get the ball he threw over your fence and leave the gate open. So it's not always an issue of simply being responsible.

      But I agree that this is overboard. All but the stupidest dogs can find their way home, most won't wander far, and if you've got your pet licensed finding it shouldn't be an issue...

      "She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is."

      On the other hand she might get eviscerated by the german shepherd whose yard she wandered into, run over by a car, in certain areas eaten by large birds of prey or other wildlife, and so on.

      Worse yet, she might decide to make my yard her litterbox or destroy my garden.

    4. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by JanneM · · Score: 5, Informative

      Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in.

      Except when Kitty gets run over, or sneaks onto a truck bound for Vladivostok, or urinates on the wrong car, or gets caught by animal control, or... Quite apart from the lack of consideration towards your neighbours (people can be allergic, phobic or just plain don't want kittycrap in their yards), it's not good petkeeping to let it run free either.

      If you want to have a cat in a city, keep it indoors or walk it leashed. Seriously. Just like with dogs, if they are trained to wear a leash as kittens they have no problem with it.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      What about when Kitty decides to go to France?

    6. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean like $350 to $400 or something?
      Third paragraph man...

    7. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Cplus · · Score: 4, Funny

      People must actually care about their cats.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    8. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by seifried · · Score: 1

      And maybe a meteorite will hit the earth. Or maybe I'll get hit by a Volvo while biking home from school.. oh wait that happened. Bad things happen, life has risks. Get over it and live. Life is full of risks.

      P.S. there's only one fenced in dog in a 3 block radius and it's a poodle that wears a diaper (seriously, I can't make stuff like this up). My cat could take him.

    9. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or people don't grasp that a dog is a slave to man, while a cat is only slave to himself and doesn't give jack shit about his so called owner unless it's feeding time or he wants to play. Cats are t3h w1n.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    10. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by jyanix · · Score: 1

      Funnily? I can not remember going over this word in English class.

    11. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not everyone lives in a city. Our cat runs free, as do most other cats in the neighbourhood. Given the fact that I live in of a small town* that's perfectly okay as long as one doesn't mind the occasional slaughtered bird on the doorstep (hey, it's supposed to be a present after all). Of course I wouldn't let a cat run around in a large city, but then again I'd probably not keep a cat there in the first place.


      * In Germany, the town is considered rural; according to American standards it's probably a suburb - after all it's only 30 km (18.7 mi) from the next large city.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    12. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by thatshortkid · · Score: 1

      Cats are t3h w1n.

      my ass. if i feed it and it shits on my property (whether in my backyard or [ugh] in my house in a litterbox), it should do what i say. besides, when is a burglar going to think twice about a "warning: cat on premises" sign?

      --
      The IRS is the one organization that you don't want to fuck with. Remember, these are the guys who took down Al Capone.
    13. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dogs are almost always on a leash. People don't let their dog out on their own. Also, what tells you that the cat is lost ? Most of the time it's dead (most probably killed by a car or an angry neighboor).

      I had cats and dogs. Cats are far more intelligent than dogs.

    14. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      The cellphone part is overboard, but I'd argue that the GPS tracking feature could help dog owners be even more responsible. I'm extremely careful with my $1300 Bracco Italiano, since there have been instances when they've been stolen from backyards. My dog has still gotten out of my fenced backyard twice due to people not latching the gate completely, and once when I was pushing a wheelbarrow through. I caught her every time within 2-3 blocks snooping around in neighbor's yards. Being able to know EXACTLY where she is if she gets loose would allow me to catch her faster and bring her home before she gets hurt or causes damage to other people's property.

      I won't be buying one of these, however, unless they take out the cellphone portion and make it into a GPS transmitter and receiver. A receiver that could also be used for geocaching, hiking, etc. That would make it worth a couple hundred dollars to me, and would be far easier for them to manufacture.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    15. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by kfg · · Score: 1

      So it's not always an issue of simply being responsible.

      Kitty is not restrained by fences and gates in the first place, but comes home.

      What poster meant was be nice enough to your dog that it wants to come home in the first place.

      Found a "lost" dog once. Put an ad in the paper. Owner showed up. Dog ran and hid under the sofa wimpering. It still breaks my heart to think of it 30 years later.

      "On the other hand she might get eviscerated by the german shepherd whose yard she wandered into, run over by a car, in certain areas eaten by large birds of prey or other wildlife, and so on."

      None of these are issues of choice on the part of kitty, although in the case of "my" kitty she let every German Shepard in town know just who was going to get eviscerated if they wanted to make an issue of things.

      And I'm the one who gets run over by cars in this family.

      KFG

    16. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 4, Funny
      if i feed it and it shits on my property, it should do what i say.
      You misunderstand your relation to your cat. He does you a favour by accepting your offerings and living at your home, you ungrateful bastard !
      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    17. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cellphone part is overboard, but I'd argue that the GPS tracking feature could help dog owners be even more responsible.

      Without the cellphone part, how is it supposed to send the GPS coordinates back to you?

      I won't be buying one of these, however, unless they take out the cellphone portion and make it into a GPS transmitter and receiver.

      You must have watched too many bad movies. There's no such thing as a GPS transmitter. GPS modules are passive devices - they listen for satellite signals and work out their location by accurate timing measurments and comparisons. GPS does not send any data to the satellites, nor does it provide any mechanism for remote tracking - that's what the cellphone part is for.

    18. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm a cat person.

      And thus, the second-oldest flamewar in the history of mankind is brought to Slashdot! Flame on! :P

    19. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Cats are never lost anyway, they perfectly know where they are.

      At worst, they're geographically impaired.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    20. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      Don't feel so bad about the dog. Dogs who run away very often know they are going to be punished for being "bad". It's very likely that the dog you found simply didn't want to be punished and normally gets along just fine with the owner. The dog probably got a slap or two on the head, and maybe didn't get his dinner that night, but he was probably fine after that.

    21. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT YHL HAND

    22. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      a dog is a slave to man, while a cat is only slave to himself
      But a pig treats you as an equal, as Churchill said.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by dlZ · · Score: 1

      Talking about kitty getting it from a dog whose yard she wanders into, about 12 years ago a beautiful white cat wandered into my yard and my dog happened to be out. I tried to get her off it, but there was no chance (she like to grab things and break their necks.) I felt so awful, but she was just protecting our yard (she would chase the neighbors cats away, but never hurt them. Squirrels, skunks, birds, and this poor kitty were another matter.) My dog was half Great Dane and half Ridgeback. She was 105 pounds of pure hunter (tall and thin like a great dane.) *sigh*

      I tried to find the owner of the cat, figuring it was maybe one of the people on my block or on the other side, but no one knew anything about it. I felt so awful I was willing to take the screaming I would have probably gotten just to let them know.

      Now I'm going to find my kitty (who never leaves the house) and hug her, because I feel crappy all over again.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    24. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      And eveyone likes presents right!

      I got a dead rat on my doorstep this morning.

      Not sure what to do with it though!

      My cats rock!

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    25. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by narcolepticjim · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're looking at these relationships the wrong way.

      To a dog, you're family.

      To a cat, you're staff.

    26. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by squiggleslash · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Plus cats taste better, as customers to your local fried chicken outlet will attest.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    27. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Sorry, just comes from observing the dogs&cats I or family owned, cats don't care about you unless you may be of any use.

      If you're nice enough to them, they may reward you with a dead mice or something, though

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    28. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      OK, as a test, (my cat is outside now), I'll go to the door and say, "Where's my Cat!" and let's see if he comes in.
      (pause while I go do that)
      Here he is, having popped in the door right on cue. Food bowl?
      Yes, he's checking that out right now.

    29. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Mmm, very true indeed.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    30. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Let the kitty roam I say. They make great sandwiches.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    31. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by shawb · · Score: 1

      I work for an animal control facility, and i will give you three kudos points here.

      1) Paying enough attention to your dog when it was outside to notice that it was attacking that cat.

      2) Not letting your own cat outside.

      3) Trying to find the cat's owner: very brave, very responsible action.

      The only thing I think you did wrong was trying to get her off the cat (Well, assuming you tried physically stopping the dog, verbal commands would probably be allright, but I doubt the verbal commands would work in this instance unless the dog and trainer had been through a couple serious obedience courses with dedicated training practice outside of class.)

      If more pet owners acted in the ways I gave kudos for, I would be happy to be out of a job.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    32. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      besides, when is a burglar going to think twice about a "warning: cat on premises" sign?

      It all depends on what kind of cat you have.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    33. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Funny

      besides, when is a burglar going to think twice about a "warning: cat on premises" sign?

      Heh, I owned a cat that did have little trouble changing a burglars mind about that (think Garfield and postman like scenes). It also made a point of chasing dogs, no matter their size, which resulted in some quite funny situations (imagine a really large dog fleeing with some loud howling, being chased by a small black furry, and the owner of that dog rolling on the floor laughing)

      Despite being half wild, it was a fun animal to have around.

    34. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      people mangle existing words, and use them in contexts where they don't apply

      I thought that was a required action for all the litigants on Judge Judy, Judge Joe Brown, et. al.

    35. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I've seen FAR more "lost cat" posters than "lost dog" posters

      When you move out of the apartment sector to the rural areas, where dogs are more feasible as pets, then you'll see the difference.

    36. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by mailtomomo · · Score: 0

      and that's the most stupid way to act : you should punish the dog for being gone but reward him because he came back. Otherwise it will think that you punished it because it came back.

      you should punish it only if you caught him trying to go away.
      It may sound stupid but it works .. :)

    37. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the people who live in Ottawa. I've seen tons of people with dogs in apartments. Even great danes. It's amazing how bad people will treat their pets. Dogs are not meant to be kept inside apartments all day. Especailly the big ones. Yet some people have no problem leaving their dogs inside a 400 sq. foot apartment all day. People think it's fashionable to have a dog or something, so they get one. Without thinking about whether its the best thing for the dog.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    38. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by dhanes · · Score: 0, Troll
      meh. kitty may go out and come back in, but it is also the only domesticated pet that can KILL a pregnant woman and the unborn faetus just from the fumes coming outta that nasty sand-shitter-urine-catcher next to your toilet.

      I've always thought that cat-owners were a bit loony, and one of the citations at the end of the above-linked wikipedia entry seems to support that notion, at least the lower IQ portion of it ;)

      --
      Wait, What?
    39. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the human may think the cat is "lost". A common misconception. In reality, the cat left, for a better deal with some other human, such as better food, greater tolerance for slavishly opening the door on the whim of the cat, plenty of soft pillows and furniture left in sunny locations, or simply better/more cat toys.

      Cats are finicky about what humans they choose to associate with, and some humans just don't understand the relationship. It's sad, but some humans just can't be trained.

    40. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by kpwoodr · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Funnily, I've seen FAR more "lost cat" posters than "lost dog" posters.

      I'll be the first to admit it...if my wife's cat goes missing...I ain't gonna make any damn posters.

      --
      This sig has been removed pending an investigation.
    41. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Liam+Slider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More along the lines of "temple attendant." They never have gotten over the whole "worshipped like gods" treatment with the ancient Egyptians.

    42. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Liam+Slider · · Score: 2, Funny

      A cat is never late. Nor is he early. He arrives precisely when he means to.

    43. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by ghislain_leblanc · · Score: 1

      It's actually not your cat, you are it's human!

    44. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by dlZ · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the positive response (I was waiting for a few "You jerk" type responses.) I didn't try to physically stop the dog, I could imagine that being a bad situation (she was my best friend, yes, but she was a hunter at heart.) She did end up bringing the cat to me and dropping it at my feet, sitting down, and looking proud. The only good thing I guess about the situation was she wasn't brutal, and barely left a mark on the cat (she still was up at the vet to be checked out afterwards.)

      I still feel guilty I never did find the owner of the cat, I know I would be going nuts if I was in that situation. Luckily my cat is an indoor cat, like I said before, and she has no want to go outside (she's a lap cat, that's for sure. Acts more like a few dogs I've had than the few cats I've had.)

      Oh, and our yard was nice and fenced in, with a very high fence to prevent the dog from ever getting out. Her only other animal contact was the neighbor's dogs (who she loved to play with. They were so passive compared to her, but it was fun to watch) and my pet rat, who she tried to treat like a puppy.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    45. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      That may be true but the cats arn't lost, they know where they are. If they are gone it is because they don't like you anymore. Dogs just run out of the house and get lost because they are dumb.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    46. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      As a cat owner, I feel that anyone outside of farmers who let their cats wander outside to be absolutely irresponsible. Cats are domesticated and should be kept indoors, or leashed when taking them for a walk. The only time cats should be allowed to roam free is when you own a large piece of land and actually need them to catch critters (IE: farm).

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    47. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by schon · · Score: 1

      I find it rather ironic that someone who's talking about being a responsible pet owner thinks it's OK to let their cat outside uncontrolled.

      Responsible cat owners keep their cats indoors. The cats live longer, are happier, and healthier.

      And for the record, I have both a cat and a dog.

    48. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Except when Kitty gets run over, or sneaks onto a truck bound for Vladivostok, or urinates on the wrong car, or gets caught by animal control, or...

      Yeah, I worry about that with my cats. But I found one, bought two; and being smashed by a car is not that bad for the cat. Its pretty much a thump, thump, and then instant death with no pain. I would suffer much more than my cat.

      Quite apart from the lack of consideration towards your neighbours (people can be allergic, phobic or just plain don't want kittycrap in their yards), it's not good petkeeping to let it run free either.

      I agree about the neighbors part. I worry about that sometimes too, but my cats have plenty of other cat friends and enemies, so its not just me that lets theirs out. I felt a little better about one neighbor because one of them came home and one or more of my cats was chilling on their porch and she said, "What's up sweetheart?", and petted him/her.

      What I want instead of a cell phone for my cats, is a webcam with night vision!

      I would kill to be able to know and see what they are up to when they go around kicking other cat's asses and getting theirs kicked. I have no idea how far they go from home, or where in the world they go when its raining or below freezing outside. I would pay big bucks for that.

    49. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on /. can you find a story about a persons pet dying and see it modded +1 funny.

    50. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by itscolduphere · · Score: 1

      I got a dead rat on my doorstep this morning.

      Your doorstep? You're cats must not love you. Mine bring them all the way to my BED! :)

    51. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donate it's brain for research.

    52. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by 3GMobile · · Score: 1

      Or rewards of dead rabbits and pigeons as my maniac cat sometimes does. My dad actually told my mum to keep the rabbit for a stew....she didnt...

    53. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by bohemian72 · · Score: 1

      Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and quick to anger.

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
    54. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, a 400 sq. feet apartment is sure a hell of a lot better than a 3 sq. feet cage shared with 2 other dogs at the shelter.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    55. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat tracking devices do exist, but they are costly. $800-$900 USD, I looked into it after my cat disappeared for a month. http://www.trackerradio.com/pets.htm#cat

    56. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this will cost a pretty penny

      Brings all new meaning to the term "roaming charges".

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    57. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You think you have problems with people stealing your dog now, wait until you strap a $400 peice of electronic equipment to it.
      Of course, I am still of the opinion that you shouldn't pay more than $0 for a cat or dog. My wife disagrees with me about half the time. Like when we bought a Shitzu for $100 for my stepson against my wishes. But then sometimes she agrees with me, too. Like 6 months later when she gave the Shitzu away for free because my stepson wouldn't take care of it. Of course, at that point, it was also against my wishes to give it away for free.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    58. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      If you want to have a cat in a city, keep it indoors or walk it leashed. Seriously. Just like with dogs, if they are trained to wear a leash as kittens they have no problem with it.

      That's assuming that all of us get our pets when they are young. If you get a pet from a friend/family member when they move, or you adopt one from the local animal shelter, you're pretty much stuck with whatever training the animal recieved when it was young.

      We have a wonderful cat that we got full-grown from a shelter. She's friendly, cuddly, has a great personality, and is well-trained regarding all indoor rules (doesn't go on tables/counters, doesn't use potted plants as litter boxes, etc.). She loves to go outside, but she stays pretty much in our backyard. We have yet to have a complaint from the neighbours (and trust me, if she was pissing them off, these are not the kind of neighbours who would keep it to themselves). However, when we got her, I thought I would do the "right thing" and put her in a harness and on a leash when she went outside. After a half-hour struggle to get the damned harness on, when we let the cat outside, she promptly took a hissy fit, then she flopped down on the ground and played the "oh, I am so weak, I cannot lift my own body weight plus this harness and leash" routine for all it was worth. Disgusted with the whole affair, I went inside to clean up some of the scratches. By the time I went to check on the cat (about 5min later), she'd somehow wormed herself out of the harness and we didn't see her again for three days. We went through this whole routine a couple of times, and every single time she was gone for longer afterwards. Only when she wasn't on a leash did our cat come back promptly.

      I live in the 'burbs. We have many cats in our neighbourhood, and although every once and a while I do find a cat turd in my garden, for some remarkable reason, I never have rabbits eating the veggies or voles digging up my lawn. Just saying.

      Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in.
      Except when Kitty gets run over, or sneaks onto a truck bound for Vladivostok, or urinates on the wrong car, or gets caught by animal control, or...


      Most of the cats that I've noticed that have gone missing were indoor cats who for some reason got out. Many outdoor cats come from a long line of cats who have come to grips with the concept of a car. If you live in a smaller city/town or on the outskirts, though, your cat may dissappear due to predators -- but that can happen with or without a leash. And if you havea a collar on your cat with a nametag that has your phone number, you're bound to get the her back from animal control -- for a fee, of course.

    59. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Responsible cat owners keep their cats indoors.
      My cat would tend to disagree with you.
      Of course, I have an acre, but the cat doesn't seem to desire being confined to the acre either. He wanders off into the five acre unoccupied lot next door, or the one across the street. The neighbors have commented on seeing him around their yards, too. But they also said he hasn't been any trouble. When it's cold or wet, I let him sleep in the garage, if I can find him. But he is usually just as content to sleep in some unknown location outside.
      For an outdoor cat, he is very friendly, and likes to be pet. He will bite or scratch, but mostly because you wandered off without finishing petting him. He gets nervous around little, loud people and has smacked my girls shoes when they get too rowdy too close to him, which terrifies them, but does not actual do any harm.
      My cat is smart enough to avoid traffic, and the gangs of unleashed dogs that irresponsible owners allow to wander the neighborhood, attacking cats and small children.
      I wouldn't have an outdoor cat in an urban environment, but in my reasonably spaced neighborhood, my cat can enjoy having a family care for it while also enjoying his natural instinct of being outside.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    60. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling this will cost a pretty penny,

      RTFA -"The PetCell will ship in early 2006 and will sell for $350 to $400, the company said." Don't need a feeling, just use your eyes and read. It won't be cheap.

    61. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by green1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have yet to see a stray dog in my neighbourhood, however there are at least 4 different stray cats that regularly haunt my yard and confuse my flower bed with a litter box.

      the difference? dog owners realize they are supposed to keep tabs on their pets, cat owners assume the cat will take care of itself... I don't want any pets in my yard, that's why I don't have any pets... one of these days those cats will find themselves in a trap and animal control can deal with it...

      ps... why is it that dog owners have to pay a license fee, yet cat owners don't?

    62. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by AristaFiction00 · · Score: 1

      Cats w. leashes?

      Hmm. Good point, but extreme to say the least?

    63. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by sandwiches · · Score: 1

      I know most people seem to believe that cats are smarter than dogs because they do what they please as opposed to a dog who seems to follow orders almost without hesitation, but I think the true reason is quite the opposite: Cats are not as smart as dogs. How's that? Well, dogs respond to humans in an almost human way. They react the way you'd expect a person (sometimes a child) would. They obey your orders as though they felt that you're part of their pack. They seem to identify with you and they understand you. To me, a cat seems like it does as it pleases because it doesn't relate or understand humans as well. I'm not saying cats can't empathize and show some kind of appreciation with humans to some extent, but rarely at the same level as dogs.

    64. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cat didn't "disappear" for a month, he just went on vacation you insensitive clod!

    65. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by BlueStraggler · · Score: 1

      most people that are insecure enough that they would feel they need this to ensure their dog doesn't run away

      I can say from personal experience that this device will ensure your dog will run away. It works like this: call the dog on the phone. Dog hears your voice, and thinks "hey, Master is here!" You say, "Come, Fido! Come!" Dog says "Whee! Must go to master! But where the hell is he? OMG, Master is calling, and I can hear him, so he must be nearby, but I CAN"T SEE HIM! HOLY SHIT THIS IS SERIOUSLY FUCKED UP!" At which point the dog bolts like a bat out of hell, madly searching behind every car, tree, and street corner for where you are obviously hiding.

      Yes, I've tried this. It took half an hour to get the dog calmed down again, and thankfully the door was closed, because the dog went straight for the door as soon as she figured out that master wasn't inside.

      My mother's dog attacks the TV whenever nature shows are on. Listen people, telecommunications and animals don't mix.

    66. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by RiotNrrd · · Score: 1

      Whenever I was sick my cat used to go out and find mice and/or voles and leave them for me on the back doorstep.

      It was sweet in a feral kinda way.

    67. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by wed128 · · Score: 1

      check the link, it's a joke

    68. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by jskiff · · Score: 1

      I've seen tons of people with dogs in apartments. Even great danes.

      Strangely enough, Great Danes make +great+ apartment dogs. Seriously...they'll just want to spend all of the time on your couch, and they'll try to get in your lap. Greyhounds also make good apartment dogs. People think of them as very athletic (which they are), but they're sprinters. Give them a little bit of exercise during the day, and they'll laze about the house for the remaining 23 and a half hours.

      It's dogs like Border Collies (which are fantastic dogs, BTW) that people think are cute that make horrible apartment dogs. +Never+ get a Border unless A) You spend most of your time outside, B) You've got a few acres for it, and C) You have a pond of ducks for it to herd. Borders, and simliar breeds like Australian Shephards, are 9 times out of 10 much more active, and a lot of times much more clever, than you.

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    69. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Or people don't grasp that a dog is a slave to man

      A dog's behavior might seem fawning and servile to us, but is it really? He has, after all, managed to convince us to feed him. Maybe we're the ones who have been duped.

      When you think about it, dogs act a lot like parasites. Almost everywhere except the cities of the First World, feral dogs are tolerated because they clean up garbage and have sufficient "cuteness" that people won't kill them or banish them. Perhaps it's we who have been 0wnz0red by dogs, not the other way around.

      The idea of owning a dog as a personal pet is relatively new. In ancient times, who had the resources to give a portion of their own food to maintain a pet? Only the rich could do that, and owning a dog was a sign of status.

      Cats have also been historically used as rat control. The cat may enjoy this task immensely, but it is in fact serving a human purpose.

    70. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by 70Bang · · Score: 1



      Besides, Woz already developed something similar to this and it was published in Wired (hardcopy) several months ago.


    71. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH.. If you want it to be possessive, it's just 'ITS', but if it's supposed to be a contraction then it's 'IT-apostrophe-S'. Scalawag!

    72. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat caugth a rabbit once - it was pretty weird.

      She's not the biggest cat, and pretty mild mannered around people, but she is a very very good hunter.

      One day, she jumps thru the window, holding a rabbit - a small one, but waaay bigger than her head, then proceeds to try to kill this shrieking wild rabbit in the corner. Her technique wasn't quite up to this though, as she developed her neck-breaking technique with rats and the like, and this was a whole different challenge.

      I had to intervene and put the rabbit out of its misery - it was kinda damaged at this point, and I didn't want it to suffer.

    73. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Most cats get fed as well, while doing what pleases them.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    74. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      I don't think you know what you're talking about. Domestic cats still have the instinct to roam around and hunt. Their instinct is also to urinate and defecate outside if possible. They use a litter box only if they cannot go outside to take care of business.

      I grew up with cats on a 1 acre suburban property, and our cats would get anxious and crazy if they weren't let out periodically. Letting them out in an urban environment might not be such a great idea, but if you live in the suburbs or rural area it's no problem IMO. Sure you might have a vet bill here and there from fighting, but all our cats went out whenever they wanted, and they all died of old age.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    75. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why waste this on a dog? This would be great for children and teenagers.

    76. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I know most people seem to believe that geeks are smarter than Taco Bell employees because they do what they please as opposed to a Taco Bell employee who seems to follow orders almost without hesitation, but I think the true reason is quite the opposite: Geeks are not as smart as Taco Bell employees. How's that? Well, Taco Bell employees respond to humans in an almost human way. They react the way you'd expect a person (sometimes a child) would. They obey your orders as though they felt that you're part of their pack. They seem to identify with you and they understand you. To me, a geek seems like it does as it pleases because it doesn't relate or understand humans as well. I'm not saying geeks can't empathize and show some kind of appreciation with humans to some extent, but rarely at the same level as Taco Bell employees.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    77. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      or sneaks onto a truck bound for Vladivostok

      I always thought cats "accidentally" got shipped to Abu Dhabi...

      --
      I got nothin'
    78. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by ultranova · · Score: 1

      When you think about it, dogs act a lot like parasites. Almost everywhere except the cities of the First World, feral dogs are tolerated because they clean up garbage and have sufficient "cuteness" that people won't kill them or banish them. Perhaps it's we who have been 0wnz0red by dogs, not the other way around.

      Yes, because they don't guard people and locations, locate prey, herd sheep or other animals, find explosives or drugs at checkpoints, and are utterly useless to the police and military, and never, ever could be used to locate missing people. And the function you mentioned, cleaning up garbage, is utterly useless too. Not to mention the stress reliefing effects they have...

      I think that you need to check what the word "parasite" means.

      The idea of owning a dog as a personal pet is relatively new. In ancient times, who had the resources to give a portion of their own food to maintain a pet? Only the rich could do that, and owning a dog was a sign of status.

      Actually, in ancient times, dog were made to work, guarding their owners, their owners homes, their owners children, their owners livestock, and whatever else needed guarding. Mercenaries were expensive and you never knew if you could trust them; a dog is loyal, doesn't require pay beyond food and doesn't reveal any secrets it might learn (like where you keep your purse). Dogs could also locate prey for their owners, and some were specifically bred for dealing with vermin.

      In short, a dog in old days wasn't a status symbol; it was a neccessity.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    79. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they're lost, they just left.

    80. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by benoitg · · Score: 1

      > besides, when is a burglar going to think twice about a "warning: cat on premises" sign?

      Well, statistically a lot more burglars should be alergic to cats than dogs ;) Uncontroleable coughing isn't usually burglar's favorite activity...

    81. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      and kitty ends up dead because kitty finds my bowl of antifreeze I leave out for damned kitty.

      Why is it that cat owners seem to be the most irresponsible people on the planet? They let their animal roam the neighborhood to crap in people's yards, kids sandboxes and kill the Koi in my pond. Yet there are very few loose dogs running around and crappin in my yard.

      You want to let kitty out? fine make sure it is tied out or restricted to your yard like a dog is legally required to and kitty will remain safe.

      your cat tresspassing and destroying my property gives me the right to trap it, poison it and kill it if I happen to be outside with my rifle when the bastard is spraying my house.

      Support cat licensing and leash laws to force irresponsible cat owners to control their animals.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    82. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Yay semantics. What I meant is a device that would act as a GPS receiver and then transmit its coordinates to the other device. The person' handheld device would also require a GPS receiver and would just calculate the distance and direction between the two locations.

      For communication, they could use a shorter range transmission frequency, similar to the ones walkie-talkies use. Then you're not limited to areas that have cellphone coverage either. I've seen cheap GPS receivers for $70. I've seen nice walkie-talkies for the same. Pair them together (2 GPS devices & 1 set of walkie-talkies) and you have a usable system for just over $200. Make the dog's device much more compact and raise the price to $300. Viola.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    83. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's the cat supposed to hunt down all the vermin with a leash on? Have *you* ever tried to hunt with a leash on?

      Personally, I can't see cats as much of a domestic pet, but the one at the farm back home is darn useful. She inhabits our barn and knows how to take care of herself. We tolerate her presence because she keeps the barn free of field mice and rats. That's about all the use I have for cats, though.

    84. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've owned indoor cats all my life, including the 4 I have now. They have not shown any need or want to ever go outside. Heck, 3 of my 4 current cats won't even go out on a leesh,as they claw the carpet to stay indoors. Only 1 will merrily go outside, but when she does she doesn't wander around or do her business. she just happily walks beside whomever is walking her (and this is the one who used to be a stray before we took her in). Everyone I know in my circle of friends, acquaintances and family who do let their cats roam free have either lost a cat by either it never returning home or getting run over by a car. If you want to take that risk (along with the risk of them catching life-ending diseases like feline HIV from fighting with other cats), go right ahead. I value the lives of my pets too much to do that. All it takes is one time.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    85. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Ipeunipig · · Score: 1

      Cat License? That's a dog license with the word dog scratched out and cat written in with crayon. Alright then, I'd like to get a license for my pet bee. His name is Eric. Eric the Half-a-Bee.

    86. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a real hit with the neighbors.

    87. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Informative
      What is supposed to be affordable is Woznet, the tracking network from Steve Wozniak's new company, Wheels of Zeus.

      Steve Wozniak's old company is, of course, Apple.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    88. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your cat tresspassing and destroying my property gives me the right to trap it, poison it and kill it if I happen to be outside with my rifle when the bastard is spraying my house.

      Keep on thinking that, and I'll laugh at you as they haul you off on animal cruelty charges.

    89. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      You could do that... or you could use something like the Siemens TC65 GSM/GPRS module. It also costs around $70, but has an integrated processor which runs Java code, so you could easily program it to relay the GPS coordinates via SMS or upload it to a web server.

      That way you don't need a receiver - just a PC or a cellphone to check the location and show it on a map. It cuts the cost in half, and will have a much higher range than walkie-talkies.

      Of course not all areas have good GSM coverage, but 99% do (at least here in the UK; I'm not sure where you live). If you lose signal temporarily just wait till your dog walks out of the coverage blackspot. Walkie-talkie range tends to be crap, especially in built-up areas.

    90. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by pstils · · Score: 1

      both should be spayed or neutered

    91. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this speech would sound sane if you substituted the word 'kid' for 'kitty'?

      At what point did you get the impression that you owned a particular piece of land? Just because you could build a fence around it and some other human sold you a deed? Fascinating idea. When you can explain that, with something slightly more advanced than 'the logic of might makes right' to our animal friends, let me know.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    92. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geeks don't need to be neutered. They practice involuntary abstinence.

    93. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by tenton · · Score: 1

      I always thought cats "accidentally" got shipped to Abu Dhabi...

      Only cats named Nermal. Dogs named Odie may have the same accident.

    94. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by dhanes · · Score: 1
      rofl, modded a Troll. yeesh. Let us review:

      I stated that toxoplasmosis _can_ kill a pregnant woman and the foetus. This is a fact, referenced once in the first paragraph. Google your own dang self for further confirmation.

      The second paragraph ended with an emoticon denoting a 'sly wink and a smile'. This was to ensure those that didn't have an iota of humour would recognize my intended good-natured barb at cat lovers for what it was. Omigod you'd think it was a jab at emacs users by a vi nazi. ( ;) )

      --
      Wait, What?
    95. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1
      Not everyone lives in a city. Our cat runs free, as do most other cats in the neighbourhood. Given the fact that I live in of a small town* that's perfectly okay as long as one doesn't mind the occasional slaughtered bird on the doorstep

      Yeah, as long as you don't mind the skyrocketing rates of feline leukemia, or FIV, I'm sure you feel it is just fine to let your non-native predator run free of its own accord.

      Now, don't think I am totally ignorant here, I grew up on a farm. I am totally at ease with the concept of outdoor "working"/farm cats. Aside from that circumstance, I feel that cat owners should be held to the same restrictions as dog owners in regards to letting their animals roam. They should be fined when they do not follow those rules, and the fines should go to cover the operating costs of your local shelter... and maybe some to us.

      I am a IWRA licensed wildlife rehabber. We specialize in squirrels, raccoons, and groundhogs. (You know, native species) A very high percentage of my intake tends to be animals that are maimed, or orphaned due to cat attacks. In, for instance, a squirrel/cat fight, the cat usually ends up wounded but okay to hunt again, while the squirrel usually ends up with a bite or two. Because of the very high rate of infection from feline bites though, odds are the squirrel will die. This is usually bad because most squirrels that will stand their ground against a cat are those defending the young in their nests, who will now die.

      I understand that many people do NOT understand what we do, and why we do it... and most people who bring me 4 baby raccoons don't understand that to raise and release will cost me an average of $1000 per animal (all out of pocket), but it is a calling.

      Please understand that letting your "domesticated" cat run free in urban/suburban areas is irresponsible, and leads to:
      1) More unwanted, stray, or feral cats from unfixed animals.
      2) Higher rates of diseases that affect the cats.
      3) Needless suffering of animals that the cat may attack.

      Cleaning up your cats messes costs many of us a lot of time, money, and tears.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    96. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by bulliver · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a sick fuck. Did you start fires when you where a kid too? By your logic, I should be able to shoot your dog for incessantly barking and keeping me up at night. Don't get me wrong, nothing the matter with _pet_ owners taking more responsibility for their charges, but really, does simply venturing onto your property warrant a death penalty? Give your head a shake.

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    97. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      Plus cats taste better...

      That isn't flamebait...might be a bit inaccurate though. Quick, when's the last time anyone saw a cat running around in Chinatown? Hint: Spring rolls.

      I'm not eating animals these days, but the historical justification for the keeping of animals [including dogs and cats], was a source of food when times went crappy. Check a little detailed history of, say, the Roman Empire. An 'emergency' diet that included cats, there, would, no doubt, have ticked off a citizen of old Cairo. Just a point of view, culturally speaking.

    98. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      I got a dead rat on my doorstep this morning.

      Your doorstep? You're cats must not love you. Mine bring them all the way to my BED! :)


      Dead rats to your bed? You're cats must not love you. Mine bring them in and put them on my pillow, ALIVE!

    99. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      What I want instead of a cell phone for my cats, is a webcam with night vision!

      Just duct tape a camcorder, perhaps a betamax broadcast unit that weighs over 10 pounds to kitty (or is that duct tape the kitty to the betamax?).

      That would make me quite happy...

    100. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, we do make sure that when we get a cat it gets spayed ASAP; a non-spayed cat is an easy recipe for trouble.
      Concerning the diseases... I have yet to see a cat in the area that actually dies of something that doesn't run on gasoline. Of course I'm no specialist but I haven't heard of any cases of sick cats in the area yet - excluding injuries and worms.
      As for the attacked animals... Well yeah, cats are predators. And yes, our cat is the dedicated enemy of all birds. Again (not being a specialist) I haven't heard of any andangered species that are threatened in their existence by cats. Plus, I think that in the ecosystem of a small town there should be a place for predators like cats. If the town's wildlife can't handle a few roaming cats there's something seriously wrong.

      Besides, non-native? Until we god rid of all the forest we used to have wildcats (felis silvestris silvestris) all over the continent. We (Germany) still have a few of them in the mountain areas (except for the Alps). We also used to have lynxes, but they didn't live in North Germany.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    101. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I was going for Funny, and I went for fried chicken because it's relatively neutral and inoffensive as opposed to jokes about Indian/Chinese/etc restaurants that are the other traditional butts of these kinds of comments.

      The major reason for the domestication of cats, as I understand it, was pest control. Be it mice or cockroaches, they're very good at that, and there's a fairly large amount of history showing this usage. Dogs, conversely, were widely used to help with hunting.

      I can imagine cats and dogs were eaten as a last resort, but I don't believe that was ever the primary reason for keeping them by the vast majority of owners. More a "Shit! We're out of food! Eat the cat!" rather than "Hmm, what if there's a famine in 150BC like the prophets were forecasting on the Weather Temple last night? Better get a cat, just in case."

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    102. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by sandwiches · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying cats aren't stupid... they're just antisocial?

    103. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by isilrion · · Score: 1

      That isn't flamebait

      No flamebait indeed. That post made me remember the deep crisis we had in 1990 at Cuba... we almost ran out of cats. I naver ate one (as far as I know), but it is said they taste like chicken.
    104. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by shadowz143 · · Score: 1

      It's Kind of very funny to know that some people love cats to dogs. On the Contrary Dogs are called a man's best friend. It seems as though these people live up to the reputation of being nerds that's why no friend's and hence CATS

  2. Calling Rex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gives a whole new meaning to "calling the dog."

    1. Re:Calling Rex by CPhelan · · Score: 1

      This cell phone for dogs could get expensive, think of the roaming charges.

    2. Re:Calling Rex by dettifoss · · Score: 1

      Once we allow them to communicate, it's all over. You think they don't know we're MEAT???

  3. Bah, beaten to it by years by nihilistcanada · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Bah, beaten to it by years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, these have been around for years, at least here in Finland hunters have used GSM phone-GPS-gadgets for years to keep track of their hunting dogs. I think the cheapest ones are around 300 euros or so.

    2. Re:Bah, beaten to it by years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah some guy in New Zealand did this two years ago so he could control his farm dogs from his house without having to go out in the paddocks.

    3. Re:Bah, beaten to it by years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. Just in time for Christmas... by boog3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    another worthless widget to consume!

    Please, go fulfill the American Dream (TM) and buy one today!

    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
  5. GPS by mikeleemm · · Score: 1

    Makes sense in the case of a lost dog to have a GPS on the animal. Not sure about "calling" the animal though.

    1. Re:GPS by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, you have to call it so that it can read the GPS display back to you.

      Duh.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering about this too, the GPS capability seems to be a secondary feature in case the dog does not "respond"... let me say that again... in case the dog does not RESPOND...that just hurts my head!

  6. Sure... by Nichotin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fine for those serious pet owners who would die if their pet ran away, but it will be a total mess if people just purchase these things and let their dogs run loose just because they can track them.

    1. Re:Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you have the self-destruct button.

  7. Or as Snoop Dogg would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... an easier way of callin your b*tches!

    fo shizzle...

    1. Re:Or as Snoop Dogg would say by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Funny

      good idea, I'll put one on my wife. It can warn me when she comes within 100 yards.

    2. Re:Or as Snoop Dogg would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      b*tches!

      botches? what the fuck you talkin about nigga?

    3. Re:Or as Snoop Dogg would say by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      tell me about it. my dog ran up a $1,000 cell phone bill just from text messaging his friends at obedience school.

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    4. Re:Or as Snoop Dogg would say by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Or spying on them.

      I think this whole thing is just a cover for an amazing spy tool. Nobody would ever suspect the dog is wearing a wire.

  8. How chew proof is it really? by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My dog can pretty much chew through anything it wants. I am not sure I want him chewing on something with a battery inside. If I attach this cell to him, he will think it is his, and think he is allowed to chew on it.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    1. Re:How chew proof is it really? by boog3r · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You are thinking too hard about dog ownership.

      Get a cat. Seriously.

      --
      signatures are for fools with hands
    2. Re:How chew proof is it really? by Ours · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your dog but mine never got to chew it's collar as long as it's attached to it's neck. Your dog must be quite flexible :-). Check the picture in TFA, it's quite small and no more "bitable" then a dogtag.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    3. Re:How chew proof is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your dog must be quite flexible

      Hey now, we are talking about animals that can lick their own private parts. Anything is possible.

      Now imagine if humans cou... er nevermind.

    4. Re:How chew proof is it really? by Ours · · Score: 1

      Just ask Marilyn Manson. Or then again don't...

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
  9. Re:Pooping, Peeing, Farting: The Scott Lockwood Li by boog3r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do they have an anti-face-biting-off attachment for rottweilers?

    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
  10. First cell phone for dogs by pulaski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I could be wrong but $350 to $400 doesn't sound too much like a cheap gimmick.

    --
    Quid, me anxius sum?
    1. Re:First cell phone for dogs by panth0r · · Score: 1

      Don't take me as a jerk just looking to shut you down, but cheap isn't always talking about low in price, it can be referencing quality or usefulness/respect, I'm sure this device has its uses, but overall, it seems like it'll be another gimmick that shows up on infomercials at 3:30 AM... (as I look at my clock)

      --
      I like suggestions, but I don't like contributing towards them.
    2. Re:First cell phone for dogs by Aldric · · Score: 1

      $400 is pretty cheap for a GPS tracker with geofencing.

    3. Re:First cell phone for dogs by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, no. You got it all wrong. It will only be 5 easy payments of $70. $70, that's like what, a few sandwiches? It is cheap.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    4. Re:First cell phone for dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah, especially considering that's just the cost of the phone itself, and probably doesn't include connectivity...

      But hey, maybe we'll start to see good cellular plans popping up. Ex: "Family & Pet Plan! For a LIMITED TIME ONLY sign up yourself, your spouse, and up to 2 children AND/OR dogs (PetCell not included!) for cellular service! Press # or bark loudly for more details!"

  11. What the fuck? by Legion303 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call."

    You know, just on the one-in-a-million chance your dog either doesn't answer the phone at all or does answer it but can't quite make out the street signs so he can tell you where he is.

    I saved a bundle my just giving my dog a quarter. Last time he got lost he found a payphone and asked me to come pick him up. It worked out well enough, but I'm also considering getting him one of those Franklin translating electronic phrasebooks, in case he gets lost in the Spanish-speaking area of town and needs to ask for directions.

    "Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?"

    Gosh, that's a real stumper.

    1. Re:What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also considering getting him one of those Franklin translating electronic phrasebooks, in case he gets lost in the Spanish-speaking area of town and needs to ask for directions.

      You must be stupid or something! Dogs can't read!!!

    2. Re:What the fuck? by masklinn · · Score: 3, Funny
      You must be stupid or something! Dogs can't read!!!

      But they can show the translator's screen !!!

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:What the fuck? by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO

      magic .. where's my damn mod points ..

    4. Re:What the fuck? by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I saved a bundle my just giving my dog a quarter.

      I saved a bundle by switching my dog to Geico.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    5. Re:What the fuck? by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      You must be stupid.. Dogs can't look up, and therefore would not be able to read the street signs.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    6. Re:What the fuck? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Dogs can't look up, but they can use Google instead.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:What the fuck? by dptalia · · Score: 1

      Where do live that phone calls are only a quarter? My dog needs 35 cents!

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    8. Re:What the fuck? by groot · · Score: 1

      "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call."

      You know, just on the one-in-a-million chance your dog either doesn't answer the phone at all or does answer it but can't quite make out the street signs so he can tell you where he is.


      For an extra $9.95 a month you can get voicemail installed for those discerning dogs that want to screen their calls.
      --
      "Just remember, it takes a village idiot." -- The Motley Fool.
    9. Re:What the fuck? by Zorandler · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think the company is overlooking the fact that your dog may not want to answer the phone. They may be in a movie, library or other quiet place or perhaps "occupied" with another dog. There is no mention of the vibrate feature that we humans have become so accustomed to..

      Dogs want their privacy too!

    10. Re:What the fuck? by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      >>> For an extra $9.95 a month you can get voicemail installed for those discerning dogs that want to screen their calls.

      Dogs probably wouldn't use the feature, but cats certainly would.

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    11. Re:What the fuck? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Don't ask me...last time I let Ma Bell shaft me on payphone calls, it was twenty cents.

  12. Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this had come out a few years ago it could have prevented the Baha Men from releasing "Who Let The Dogs Out".

  13. For Dogs? by ignoramus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A thinly disguised means of putting a GPS leash on your kids... My guess is the pet angle just makes it look more friendly/gets more press, whereas the paranoid parent market will be the real revenue generator.

    bleurk. Must be nice to be treated like a parolee by your parents... really inculcates that sense of responsibility. Ah well, you get the kids you deserve--and then we all deal with the consequences.

    1. Re:For Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On4 Communications, is simultaneously rolling out models for kids, the elderly and outdoor sports fanatics"

      It's not even thinly disguised!

    2. Re:For Dogs? by hackerjoe · · Score: 1

      What I'd really like is to sneak one of these in the top tube of my bike... and never worry about it getting stolen again. It might disappear for a day, but then I'd be able to give the police a solid lead on the assholes that took it: yum.

      I might wait until the device costs less than my bike did, though.

    3. Re:For Dogs? by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And the strange thing is: there actually exists people who think stuff like this will actually help. It's bullshit.

      If you do this to a kid, one of two things will happen:

      • The kid accepts it (perhaps grudgingly) and bows down to an unreasonable invasion of privacy. You've now got a kid less prepared to stand up for its rigths. Unless you think the same kid will later grow up able to figth back when government wants to invade the same rigths with pretty much the same reasoning ("safety")
      • Or the kid will outfox you. He'll give the handy to a friend who's attending school while himself/herself going to the beach. Or he'll announce he's going to do homework with a pal, then leave the phone-device there and head somewhere else. Or he'll find and use any of the other millions of ways of tricking a device like this. You've now established yourself as an enemy of the kid, someone who must be lied to, someone who doesn't rtust the kid and which the kid should therefore in return not trust.

      I actually consider alternative 2 the best case scenario. But for the life of me I can't figure out why any parent (and I am one) should want either of these scenarios to come trough.

    4. Re:For Dogs? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Well, lojack is under $1,000 and they have a huge recovery rate with most being returned within 90 minutes to 24 hours. Since they don't let you see it get installed (don't want you to know where it's at for obvious reasons), I have no idea how big it is - but I would presume it might work on your bike.

    5. Re:For Dogs? by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Dunno, my parents used to leash me when we walk in the neighborhood when I was 4-5 years old, because I was far too curious for my own sake and would flee running anytime I'd see something looking interresting.

      They considered that I was better leashed, looking stupid and safe than unleashed, looking cool and very flat after trying to headbutt a truck by accident.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    6. Re:For Dogs? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      . But for the life of me I can't figure out why any parent (and I am one) should want either of these scenarios to come trough.

      Beacuse it didn't happen that way on the commercial, of course...

    7. Re:For Dogs? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Come on, now. Parents can't be expected to raise their kids, so why should they be expected to look after them? Really, the only thing that's missing is an artificial uterus capable of giving birth to in-vitro children so that the parents don't have to ever meet their offspring at all.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:For Dogs? by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      Heh. That reminds me of the Dane Cook bit about implanting GPS trackers on your kids. He proposes also putting remote detonators in your kids, too, 'cause if you can't have your kids, NO ONE CAN! (sorry, Flash-heavy site)

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    9. Re:For Dogs? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      bleurk. Must be nice to be treated like a parolee by your parents... really inculcates that sense of responsibility. Ah well, you get the kids you deserve--and then we all deal with the consequences.

      Hey, you are the one who came up with the idea.

    10. Re:For Dogs? by Eivind · · Score: 1
      No ? What *did* happen on the comercial then ?

      I fail to see the third alternative: Either the kid bends over and takes this invasion, or it figths back and refuses to accept it. What's the third alternative then ? The one that happens in the comercials ?

    11. Re:For Dogs? by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      You know...they will come up with that, probably before too long right? Artificial wombs have long been a biotech and sci-fi dream, and tissue engineering is making some pretty good leaps right now.

    12. Re:For Dogs? by borawjm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I am confused, for I am not a parent.. but.. wouldn't it be a good thing to be able to know where your kids are at all times? I see all those anti-drug commercials stating that being a good parent means invading the privacy of your children, so wouldn't this help? Perhaps the paranoia is that, if it's okay to use on children, the government might think it's okay to use on it's citizens.

      I see it as a tool to be used in conjunction with your normal parenting routine.

    13. Re:For Dogs? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Why, the collar keeps the kids safe and alive to grow up into strong, healthy adults that can carry on the great American Dream for one more generation, of course!

    14. Re:For Dogs? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're kidding us all, right? Those Anti-Drug commercials are complete bullshit, the best thing you can do for your child is to respect their rights. This, in turn, teaches them by example to respect the rights of others.

      Oh, and there is that whole "government will do it" paranoia, but the vast majority of us feel that tracking your kids everywhere is dehumanizing.

    15. Re:For Dogs? by jred · · Score: 1

      Third scenario. You give one to your kids. "Here, you've been halfway decent, here's a shiny new mobile for ya."

      You don't tell the little shit that it has GPS. Not even when you bust them with it. "Oh, really, at Mike's all night? Well, *someone* saw you at the rave I specifically told you not to go to...."

      Just because *you* know it has GPS, doesn't mean *they* need to know.

      My daughter is 9. She's getting a mobile for xmas (her mom has 50/50 custody & is bad about paying her phone bill). If I could get GPS for a reasonable amount I would. If, god forbid, she ever gets abducted, it could come in *extremely* handy.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    16. Re:For Dogs? by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      >> Perhaps I am confused, for I am not a parent.. but.. wouldn't it be a good thing to be able to know where your kids are at all times?>Perhaps the paranoia is that, if it's okay to use on children, the government might think it's okay to use on it's citizens.

      I think that might be the fear but the relationship that a Parent has with their children is different.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    17. Re:For Dogs? by borawjm · · Score: 1

      You're kidding me, right? Not wondering what the heck your kids are doing during their freetime on the sole basis that you might be infringing on their rights? Give me a break.

    18. Re:For Dogs? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wondering what they're doing is one thing. Spying on them is another. It's perfectly natural for parents to want to keep up on their kids' activities. However, removing what little autonomy kids have these days by constantly tracking their movements and actions is seriously detrimental to any child's development. The right way to go about this would be to cultivate a trust relationship with one's kids, so that when they say they're going to a friend's house you can take them at their word and not worry about what they might be doing instead. Kids don't always make the best decisions, but their choices are often quite rational given the limited information and experience that they possess. It is important to understand that trust implies more than just always telling the truth: kids need to know, from experience, that their parents are looking out for their best interests and not just settings limits arbitrarily. Answering the "why" questions is one part of this; letting them make mistakes occasionally is another. People learn best from their mistakes, and keeping kids out of (reasonable) trouble is an excellent way to ensure that they are unable to handle it later on.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    19. Re:For Dogs? by Kodachi1980 · · Score: 1

      If you have a three-year-old, it would certainly be a good idea to know where your kids are at all times. If you want to monitor every single move your 16-year-old makes, you've either raised a hellion who will no doubt soon get into trouble anyway or you're ridiculously overprotecting a good kid.

    20. Re:For Dogs? by Phishcast · · Score: 1
      ...really inculcates that sense of responsibility.

      Am I the only one who had to look up inculcate?

    21. Re:For Dogs? by borawjm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. I think good communication between the parent and child is very important. Perhaps a cell phone (GPS enabled?) would be a better device for a child in their teens, where they could call the parent at their discretion, taking responsibility, and knowing full well why such action is necessary.

    22. Re:For Dogs? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      What the grandparent said. Everyone in my family has/had their own cell phone, and we've never needed kid-tracking stuff. The phones don't even have GPS.

    23. Re:For Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      headbutt a truck? sheesh...i'm really sorry, but at some point i have to say "survival of the fittest". thin the herd, already.

    24. Re:For Dogs? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      From the moment I heard about the 100 foot tall Indians, Dane Cook has been my hero. *sniff*

    25. Re:For Dogs? by KILNA · · Score: 1
      Or he'll find and use any of the other millions of ways of tricking a device like this.

      Like, say... putting it on a dog.

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    26. Re:For Dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    27. Re:For Dogs? by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      That is why it needs to be concealed in some of those $200 sneakers all the kids where all the time. They don't know there is a GPS tracking device in there with a cell phone. Of course then you have to come up with something that will make the kids plug their sneakers into an outlet every few days so the battery can be recharged.

      Of course that is a problem with the dog version too. How do you train fido to plug his collar in once a week? Wonder if this would not be a good use for broadcast power. Set it up on the dogs bed so when he sleeps the GPS/phone unit gets recharged. Otherwise most of these will be useless after about two weeks if that long when the battery discharges.

    28. Re:For Dogs? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Dane Cook is a cock-block. His routine on BJs all but ruined them for me for a while. I kept thinking "big money, no Whammies" :-D

    29. Re:For Dogs? by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Then you have already lost. This would blow up sky high for a gazillion reasons, for example:
      • What proportion of parents know *more* about mobile phones than their teenage kids ?
      • What are the odds that a kid will never want to look online for features in his/her phone ? Never visit nokia.com or whatever, that it'll stay unknown in the teenager-community if parents start doing this ?
      • Offcourse it is only a considerable cause of action in the first place for parents that think lying to and spying on their kids is acceptable.
      • Pulling up the "security" card was predictable. Americans always do. For some reason I can't manage to reconcile with your history you run like scared little chickens, prepared to give up *any* of the ideals that you are, at the same time, so proud of, over any little promised convenience or "security". I never did get that part of the American psyche.
    30. Re:For Dogs? by jred · · Score: 1

      Most of your points are valid, I will take exception to the "security" comment. Nowhere did I say that *I* would want a phone with GPS. Just that it would be nice to have it for my kid. I also have one of those IdentaKid cards with her picture & info on it. Somewhere, in a computer, is a copy of her DOB, name, picture, and fingerprint. Did I give up some of her privacy to do it? Yes. It was an acceptable trade.

      Do you always pay in cash? Have a driver's license? Bank account? Mortgage/lease? Job? On the dole? Hmph. Giving up all your privacy and freedoms for a little "convenience".

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    31. Re:For Dogs? by Eivind · · Score: 1
      I admit that the comment about americans and security was a little inflamatory. I don't mean that when the balance is convenience/security versus privacy one should and must *always* go for privacy. As you point out, nobody (or as close to nobody as makes no difference) does that.

      It is however worth a consideration. Even if the police claims that installing 3781 cameras in the inner city will reduce visible crime by 40%, and even if this is true, it's not (to me) obvious that this is worthwhile.

      Even if it so happens that installing a GPS-tracker on your teenager will be a benefit in a few situations (most of which should be exceedingly rare, assuming you've raised your kid sensibly in the first place) it's not obvious to me that it's worthwhile. Even less so is it obvious to me that lying to your child, abusing their trust, spying on them and then lying again ("someone saw you at the rave") is even close to acceptable.

      It may be "your" child, but it's not "yours" in the sense that a car, a house or even a dog is yours. A child is a separate individual, with its own separate rigths and interests. It's not obvious you should be allowed to trample all over those, even if you do so "for the security of the child".

  14. It's all a plot by MDMurphy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next thing you know the government will use these things to tax our dogs. Take it outside your backyard, pay a walk tax.

    1. Re:It's all a plot by mikerubin · · Score: 1

      already have to pay a license fee

      --
      I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    2. Re:It's all a plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are local governments that actually have a tax on pets. If I am not mistaken, Durham County in NC is one. But, fear no those of you who have lost your job to India. If you should decide to move there, you can deduct the cost of moving your furry friend!

      The deduction can be found in the IRS publication number 521. It clearly states that the cost of transporting a pet due to employment issues such as corportate relocation, moving to accept a new job or for better job opportunities is tax deductible.

    3. Re:It's all a plot by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      Insightful?

      They could also use them to track down non-poop scoopers. "Based on the core temperature, this dogbomb is less than 4 hours old. Only Rex from over on 3rd has been past here in that time. Let's get him boys!"

      Or your dog could be used to listen in on you by the government. "Gee, why does Fido seem to get real interested when we discuss our money laundering scheme?"

    4. Re:It's all a plot by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      Insightful? I was making a joke!

  15. Forget about dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This would be useful for a girlfriend, lets see:

    - "The phone will allow users to call their girlfriend in case the girlfriend gets away", very useful feature!

    - "and also includes a GPS tracking device if the girlfriend doesn't respond to the call", very nice, I definately want to check where she is going!

    - "In addition, the GirlCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their girlfriends wander outside a prescribed area.", also very useful. No more going to shopping/partying to a nearby city without my knowledge.

    1. Re:Forget about dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, you act like you have a girlfriend. You are posting on /., my friend. You aren't fooling anyone.

    2. Re:Forget about dogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to hook up with you if the batteries die and your current girlfriend gets away...

    3. Re:Forget about dogs... by dpiven · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but what if the girlfriend chews through the collar?

    4. Re:Forget about dogs... by Upphew · · Score: 0

      What is this "girlfriend" thingy everyone keeps talking about?

      Is it something to eat?

    5. Re:Forget about dogs... by zoobsolar · · Score: 1

      If you need that for your girlfriend, maybe you should get a new girlfriend instead of spending the hundreds to keep tabs on her.

      Aside from that... hmmm... calling your dog with your phone.. probably the dumbest idea I've heard about in a long time. All these talented and underpaid people in the world just barely scraping by and then there is some jerk out there that throws hundreds of dollars at a cell phone dog collar? Anyone that buys one of these should be run over by their own SUV. If you think this product may be of interest to you, please do the world a favor and kill yourself now.

    6. Re:Forget about dogs... by marsjays · · Score: 2, Funny
      - "In addition, the GirlCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their girlfriends wander outside a prescribed area.", also very useful. No more going to shopping/partying to a nearby city without my knowledge.
      .. Going to a nearby city? More like leaving the kitchen! :)
  16. how will they respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from article:
    "if the dog doesn't respond to the call."

    Now... besides Lassie, how much dogs are able to answer a phone?
    and what will they answer it with? 'hi there my dear owner, I appear to have ran away from you and *obviously* I fail to remember just which road I took. Could you help me out here? I'm standing next to that nifty-smelling telephone-pole I always use to... you know, and I'm wondering whether I should take a left or a right...'

    1. Re:how will they respond? by Barnoid · · Score: 1

      from article:
      "if the dog doesn't respond to the call."


      That's not from the article, but rather from the (incorrect) summary of the submitter. The article says:
      It[The phone] automatically answers when the owner punches in a code on their telephone keypad that means, "Lassie, come home!"

  17. Is it just me or.. by everithe · · Score: 0

    Does this thing sound totally useless? I can't imagine anyone I know buying it.

  18. You people who have dogs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GET A FREAKING FENCE!!!

    For the price of this phone thing you could get a fence.

    I am tired of your damn dog coming up my driveway and barking at me like it's his driveway!

    Why do you people think it's OK for your dog to run and poop all over the place?

    The only reason I don't tell you directly is that then you will then say to everyone I am the bad guy on the block.

    I can't win !

  19. Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you loose your dog, call it up and say "Come here", or maybe "Stay" if you want to track it

  20. Lassie! by Umuri · · Score: 5, Funny

    *answers his cell phone*
    What boy? There's trouble at the well? Little timmy's stuck?
    GOOD BOY! I'll be there right away!

    --
    You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    1. Re:Lassie! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Just a minor point:

      The aptly-named 'Lassie' was a girl. (Speaking of the character, who may or may not have been "played" by a male dog at some point.)

    2. Re:Lassie! by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lassie must be a pretty stupid dog... I've trained my beagles to text me when they have a problem.

    3. Re:Lassie! by Gleng · · Score: 1

      How does the predictive text input handle "Grrrrurururrruffruffgrrrrrr!"?

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    4. Re:Lassie! by LlamaGui · · Score: 1

      plz com 2 the well. tim needs u 2 help him. thnx <3.

    5. Re:Lassie! by PassiveAggressive · · Score: 1

      Or just: "Lassie, call 911, Timmy's stuck in the damn well again!"

      --
      Is passive resistance passive aggressive ?
  21. Re:Pooping, Peeing, Farting: The Scott Lockwood Li by drmaxx · · Score: 1, Funny

    I SOOOO want to have mod-points for /. stories ....

  22. So it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone and their dog has a cell phone these days.

  23. $350 is not "cheap" by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gimmick, yes; cheap, no.

    1. Re:$350 is not "cheap" by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      1. Buy XBox 360
      2. Affix Xbox 360 to dog
      3. Connect XBox 360 with a wall/pole/etc. using a chain

      You have just made your dog more secure and it might still be cheaper than a cellphone for canines.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  24. Cheap? by vanyel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?

    Sounds like just another expensive gimmick to me...

  25. YHBT.... again! by B0tnet+0perator · · Score: 1

    Jeeez, how many PlayfullyClever stories are we going to have today?

  26. Why is this a cell phone? by AvoidTheNoid · · Score: 0

    "Crap, Biscuit is missing! I can't find him anywhere."

    "Bummer dude, it probably ran away because you gave it such a lame name"

    "Shut the hell up Donny, I've had it up to here," Brett gestured to a spot just below the base of his skull," with you. Just give me your damn phone so I can call him."

    Donny's face shriveled in confusion as he hands Brett his phone. Brett dialed, stabbing at the buttons.

    "Biscuit?"

    A look of confusion spread across Brett's face.

    "So, you expected it to tell you where its at, and wait for you to pick it up?"

    Brett opened his mouth to object, but Donny continued.

    "Oh, I get it, you're supposed to use advanced computer technology...you know...use the ambient noise to figure out where he's at? Like that movie, the Fugitive, you know, with Harrison Ford? Remember, he was in...Chicago I think, and they could hear the eleveated train in the background when they talked to him on the phone...and the one dude was like, 'Wait, he's in Chicago, that's the only place with an elevated train!' Do you hear an elevated train in the background Brett? Is Biscuit in Chicago? Or is it just fucking retarded to have a cell phone on your dog?"

    Brett slugged Donny, knocking him to the ground, and tossed his phone next to him. Brett walked off in search of Biscuit.

  27. Dogs call You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In soviet Russia, dogs call you!

    1. Re:Dogs call You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia and Soviet really have an XOR relationship you know..

    2. Re:Dogs call You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know. You actually missed a chance of making one of these "in Soviet Russia" jokes actually have real meaning.

      You could have said:
      "In Soviet Russia, the dogs track down you."

      See how that works. Still uses the same formula, but actually has meaning that alludes to the opressive government that Yakov Smirnoff was trying to weave into the joke.

    3. Re:Dogs call You! by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      --
      You just got troll'd!
  28. Honesty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on... "Dogs"? Who gives a crap about where his dog is goin?

    I'd build this into my new car... or hide it in the bag of my stupid wife so I can track her position while I make out with another... hmm.. oh wait...

    Children! This device is made for my annoying children... Since I'm not allowed to depend on the PS2 and XBox anymore (They only like to play the violent games)... I'll attach this device to their little asses and can make out with women to make new children...

    Dogs... that's a laugh... leave these poor little animals alone...

  29. Cell sounds like least useful of its features by caenorhabditas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The GPS and GeoFence features sound like they'd be much more useful to the pet owner than the cell phone capabilities. What, exactly, are pet owners going do tell their dog over the phone? "Sit?" "Stay?" And how will the dog respond to a disembodied voice that seems to be coming from behind its head?

    That's why this seems like a giant gimmick to me. If it weren't a gimmick, and were actually useful, the designers would have ditched the cell phone capability as a very expensive add on and just marketed it based on the dog-tracking capabilities. This will probably be bought by those pathetic dog owners who make ridiculous outfits for their pets to wear and visit pet psychologists when Fido barks twice more this week than he did last week.

    1. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's bought and used by hunters. They get the dog's position sent to them via SMS and can call the dog up to hear what he's up to (barking at a bear), but the main reason for the phone is the SMS capability. The alternative up to now has been a transmitter and triangulation gear, but that's slow and cumbersome. How else do you propose the owner would get the GPS info, if not from some kind of transmitter on the dog?

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by caenorhabditas · · Score: 1

      "Bear hunters" seems like too limited a market for something like this. According to the article, this is something meant primarily for pet owners worried that their dogs might run away or those who want to talk to their pets while at work or on a trip. The article even mentions that the inventor got the idea when his colleague called home and asked his wife if he could speak with his dogs while on a business trip.

      However, I can certainly see how it would be useful to hunters, particularly as it has a camera on it as well (unmentioned in summary, but present in article). The voice thing is really what seems to me to be a gimmick - talking to your dog could wind up too loud for hunting, and a barking dog could likewise scare away the quarry. It just seems to me that it would be still nearly as useful and somewhat less expensive if they left the "phone" part out.

    3. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      And how will the dog respond to a disembodied voice that seems to be coming from behind its head?

      Hell, I'd just love to watch a dog wearing this while speaking "come over here" into the phone over and over...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by hachete · · Score: 1

      A market for hunting terriers? Sometimes they send terriers underground. I suppose you could call the dog and listen for the ring. Then call in the diggers...

      OTOH, to call a dog, the voice has to be somewhere else. As a poster elsewhere has said, a dog can't respond to a call just behind it's head. That's ridiculous.

      umm. How would a dog react to the standard ring *just* behind its head?

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    5. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Bear hunters" seems like too limited a market for something like this.

      Possibly, but there are over 100 000 elk hunters in Sweden alone, most of them with one or more dogs. I know of several with this kind of product already and many more with the old style . A good hunting dog can easily cost a few thousand USD, not to mention the emotional ties to it that you get after a while, so a few hundred is a very reasonable price for something like this.

      a barking dog could likewise scare away the quarry

      Elk hunting dogs specifically are trained to bark at the elk to make it stand still and look at the dog to distract it from noticing the hunter. After a while, the hunter learns to recognize the type of bark, if the dog has found an elk or is in distress, for example.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    6. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by caenorhabditas · · Score: 1

      Elk hunting dogs specifically are trained to bark at the elk to make it stand still and look at the dog to distract it from noticing the hunter. After a while, the hunter learns to recognize the type of bark, if the dog has found an elk or is in distress, for example.

      I did not know that about elk hunting. Learn something new every day, I guess.

    7. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by Puf_Almighty · · Score: 1

      People hunt bears in cell phone range?

      Damn, I thought they were kidding with those commercials. "Can you hear me now?"

    8. Re:Cell sounds like least useful of its features by deprecated · · Score: 1

      My sister was bitten by a møøse once.

  30. This won't work because... by nuckfuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you call a dog it comes to you because it hears your voice coming from the direction you want it to go. So how is the animal supposed to understand where you are calling it to when your voice is coming from a speaker beside its ear?

    1. Re:This won't work because... by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it will start running in circles trying to orient itself toward your voice? :)

      Or more probably it will remember your last location and come there. My dog comes running to me when it hears me calling for it on a home video playing in another room, but I don't know how it would react to a moving source of voice.

    2. Re:This won't work because... by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not because of this.
      You could still shout "stop you stupid fleabag!" and then using the GPS catch up with the dog waiting for you. Or shout "Go home" or such. Smarter dogs understand it and would obey.
      But it won't work, because all the dog will hear would be some nonrecognizable screech. GSM is a psychoacoustic(sp?) audio compression model meant to be understandable and working for humans. Dogs have wider recognizable audio spectrum, focus on other frequencies than humans, and generally catch different features of the voice than humans. Shout "come" and the dog will come. Play the same "come" from mp3 player to speakers, and the dog won't recognize the signal. For dogs things like mp3, computer-generated music etc are just some nondescript noises. Sometimes, rarely they understand some very characteristic noises - barking, cat's meow etc. Audio CDs are for them about the sound quality of 72rpm vinyl records. GSM is just a random noise.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:This won't work because... by dido · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think that'd make much sense. If I were asked to design a similar device, it'd be a stripped-down phone with no audio capability. Just a radio transceiver and all the extra GSM circuitry, including a slot for the SIM card that would provide my dog's phone number, and of course the GPS. It'd work a lot like those mobile services that seem to be popular in countries that have heavy GSM deployments. Maybe I'd text it 'locate' and it would reply with the current readout of the GPS tracker. Or I could call my dog's number, which would immediately hang up and then send me the text message in response. It would notify me by text if the current GPS readout shows that my dog's out of the GeoFence area.

      In fact, the GPS may not even be necessary, if one has access to cellsite location information, but of course this approach will never be as accurate as GPS, and the better accuracy for this application, the better the product, naturally.

      It's not really "calling" your dog, but figuring out where your dog is.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    4. Re:This won't work because... by Anakron · · Score: 2, Informative
      In fact, the GPS may not even be necessary, if one has access to cellsite location information, but of course this approach will never be as accurate as GPS
      I believe GPS units are much more accurate than cellsite information, even with all the triangulation tricks you can throw at it.
      --
      There are 11 types of people. Those who understand binary, those who don't and those who are sick of this lame joke.
    5. Re:This won't work because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it won't work, because all the dog will hear would be some nonrecognizable screech. GSM is a psychoacoustic(sp?) audio compression model meant to be understandable and working for humans. Dogs have wider recognizable audio spectrum, focus on other frequencies than humans, and generally catch different features of the voice than humans.

      That's not quite so... Even the sampling rate is below the dog's hearing frequency treshold the reproduced sound is taken through a filter and the signal integrated. The high frequency noise is greatly attenuated, beyond 60db.

    6. Re:This won't work because... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Smarter dogs understand it and would obey.

      Maybe the dogs running away are being smart by running away and not obeying?

      Hmm.

    7. Re:This won't work because... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Informative
      GSM is a psychoacoustic(sp?) audio compression model

      I believe the GSM compression is just a linear-predictive coding model. It's band-limited (low pass), but that really doesn't qualify as a psycho-acoustic model like music CODECs are. Here's a link to a summary of audio CODECs for telephony: http://www.broadcom.com/products/software/mobmm_au diocodecs.php

      Dogs have wider recognizable audio spectrum, focus on other frequencies than humans, and generally catch different features of the voice than humans . . . GSM is just a random noise.

      Are you sure about this? If you did your thesis on canine audio perception or something like that, I would gladly defer, but that just doesn't sound right.

      For instance, I've dealt with humans of varying hearing acuity. Those humans with a wider frequency range of hearing tend to find it easier to understand speech, whether in person or over the phone. Additionally, those humans with "better" hearing also tended to find it easier to deal with impairments and limitiations in the channel than those whose hearing was more limited.

      I know we're talking different species here, but human experience suggests that wider range of hearing implies improved understanding of speech.

      Can anyone offer a citation or some expert knowlege on this subject?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    8. Re:This won't work because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it won't work, because all the dog will hear would be some nonrecognizable screech. GSM is a psychoacoustic(sp?) audio compression model meant to be understandable and working for humans.

      The dog can be taught to go home when he hears any sound. It doesn't have to be speech. As soon as my alarm clock goes off at 6:30am, he knows to bug me for food, and that's without training.

    9. Re:This won't work because... by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      gps *is* triangulation.

  31. They need to work on their Marketing copy (Humor) by Gryftir · · Score: 4, Funny
    Apparently the company doesn't have that great opinion of kids, the elderly or outdoor sports enthusiasts.

    From the article (italics are mine)

    "Sturdy and slobber-resistant, the PetCell isn't just for dogs. PetsMobility's parent company, On4 Communications, is simultaneously rolling out models for kids, the elderly and outdoor sports fanatics who enjoy snowboarding and kayaking."

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  32. Re:anti-face-biting-off attachment for rottweilers by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    You may laugh, but it's all fun & games until you wake up one day to find somebody stuck John Travolta's mug on your face. You couldn't beat the scientologists off you.

  33. I may get one by uspsguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, dis me if you want but I happen to have a $1000 dog. Unusual purebreds come high. When he gets nervous or excited, he can scale a 6-foot fence. I'll likely wait 'till the price drops a bit but it would be a valuable service to know if he leaves the area and to be able to go out and positively track him down. The "call your dog" feature seem to me to be a subset of the other necessary functions. To call and get GPS location, you need full-bore cell functionality anyway. Hey, maybe next they will add a camera and I can see where he is.

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    1. Re:I may get one by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Just buy a real dog instead of a crappy wimp of a stupid poodle.

      Seriously, poodles are only good for kicking them across the fields, and feeding their rotten brains to their stupid owners.

      Get a f'cking Siberian Husky or an Alaskan Malamute, feed him raw frozen meat as God meant him to be fed, and see if he gets "nervous or excited"

      Or just get a Saint Bernard or a Great Pyrenee, these dogs had "nervousness" ripped out of their genomes centuries ago.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    2. Re:I may get one by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      I also have an expensive dog ($1300 Bracco Italiano and worth every penny) and would consider something similar for her. However, it would be more due to my attachment to her than the replacement cost.

      The cell phone functionality is kind of stupid. I'd much rather see some type of mid-range (1-2 miles?) transmitter paired with a receiver. The receiver would just show you the direction and distance to the dog. If it works via GPS even better... have the receiver act as a normal GPS device so I can use it for geocaching as well. I'd pay a couple hundred for a combination device like that.

      For those people that say people just need to be more responsible about their dogs, you obviously haven't owned an extremely active dog. My dog could get over our 4' fence in the backyard if she really wanted to (we're not allowed a taller fence due to city regulations). The real issue is with my wife, who will not always double-check the gate latch when she goes through it. Same for the UPS man who leaves packages at our back door. Hell, the dog has even decided to be a daredevil and run right by me as I came through the gate with a wheelbarrow. She was 2 blocks down running in neighbors yards when I finally caught her.

      Not all dogs can be yard trained properly, either. Some extremely active dogs (like mine) can't even be contained with invisible fencing. This isn't about owners being irresponsible... it's about those of us who want to be responsible and catch our dog before they cause damage or get hurt.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    3. Re:I may get one by halleluja · · Score: 1
      Never needed any gadget to track my dog.

      The secret?

      Get some dog trainings and appreciate the real value of a dog. It is way beyond some $1000.

    4. Re:I may get one by apt142 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you mostly. However, no amount of training will ever take the dog out of a dog.

      Some breeds can never be trained to leave certain objects alone or not do certain behaviors. For example: Teaching Saint Bernards not to drool, Jack Russells to have less energy, Border Collies not to herd and Chihuahua's not to be annoying.

      If a dog's drive is strong enough, no amount of training will prevent them from following it. Training however, will let you get a good handle on it, in so much that you'll learn what to expect and how to manage these behaviors. (I have to let my Jack turbo around the house at night or he'll never go to sleep)

      Training my dogs has been one of the most rewarding experiences!

    5. Re:I may get one by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I have a husky, and she can get out of our fence anytime she chooses. I got the Petsafe wireless fence (look on drfostersmith.com under containment) on the advice of a vet friend, and it works great. It was expensive (almost $300), but it lets you set up an adjustable circular zone around your house which triggers the collar to start chirping and then deliver a shock if the dog keeps going. (BTW, the shock isn't too bad, I tried it on my hand and it's annoying, but not really sore.) When we got it my dog was really getting used to hopping over the fence, so I put it on and let her figure it out. Next time I checked she was sitting by the gate waiting to be let back it. I should add that these (and training collars) should only be used on dogs that already know what's expected of them, ie they need to be properly trained first or they will just be confused. For me the wireless fence had two advantages over the traditional buried wire ones - first, our yard is small, and we would have had to bury the wires in our neighbor's yards in order to let our dog have the full use of our yard. Secondly, the wired fences can be run through and then are actually acting as a barrier to the dog returning, ie the zapping stops again once you're on the other side of the perimeter. With the wireless one, the zapping continues intermittently as long as you're outside the range of the transmitter (there is a failsafe to stop it from zapping in the event of a power failure). Anyway, if what you're looking for is a way to stop the dog getting out & getting run over, you should look into it. The people I know who are using them have all had good luck with them.

    6. Re:I may get one by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My dog could get over our 4' fence in the backyard if she really wanted to (we're not allowed a taller fence due to city regulations).

      No, but you are allowed to have a smaller dog...

      The real issue is with my wife, who will not always double-check the gate latch when she goes through it.

      ...or a smarter wife.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  34. Erm by squoozer · · Score: 1

    Ok so you call your dog and do what exactly? Give it directions home? I've yet to meet a dog that understands "left and then the second right after the kebab shop". Perhaps this inventor has a particularly clever dog.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Erm by dpiven · · Score: 1

      Or...

      Dog says: I'm at N43 33.200 W87 57.125

      Owner says: WTF?

  35. If you have a good dialogue....... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    with your pet already then he'll know what he can and can't do. Which is why you should buy this first

  36. Can't wait for the law suit... by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when someone's dog is run over because their owner calls on one of these gadgets and the dog is distracted. I mean most humans would be confused if a voice started coming out of some place on their body. I can just picture one of my dogs cocking his head from side to side in confusion.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Can't wait for the law suit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I picture the owner driving around looking for the dog. Of course, he's talking on his phone to the dog, so he's driving while distracted. The inevitable next step is he runs over his own dog. Talk about irony.

      No, I haven't had my coffee yet. Why do you ask?

  37. In finland we have had dog-gsm-gps's for ~2 years. by hkultala · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. So we deveice being mentioned is NOT the first one.

    http://www.pointersolutions.com/eng/hunting.htm

    My dad bought one for his dog last summer.

    it's based on benefon esc gps-enabled mobile phone,
    and has been on market for couple of years now.

    the kit contains two phones, one wiith full phone functionality ( for the hunter ) and one without keyboard and display ( for the dog ).

    the hunter can see where the for is going from his map display, and can also call a call and listen if the dog is barking.

  38. Re:Hope this thing doesn't offer a camera option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok ok, I just read TFA...

    "useful in search-and-rescue or bomb-squad missions"

    I hear ya. *wink* *wink* ;)

  39. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except the ability to talk to the dog which is useless, other features are already available in this product http://www.tracker.fi/metsastys.htm. I think it's mostly used in hunting.

  40. Dog and bone? by mosschops · · Score: 1

    I get the feeling someone's taking Cockney Rhyming Slang a bit too far...

    1. Re:Dog and bone? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      "Dog and Bone" -> phone? Or did I completely miss the joke?

      Shut up. I do not have an unhealthy fascination with Cockney Rhyming Slang!

    2. Re:Dog and bone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dog & Bone is phone.

  41. Netstumbler by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    If we're going to start equipping our companion animals with electronic devices, why not have them achieve something useful at the same time. For instance, you could get any old WinCE handheld, install NetStumbler, duct tape it to his back, and let him go wardriving.

    Or get several and set up a wireless mesh network using all the neighborhood strays!

    We don't need no stinkin' municipal wifi.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Netstumbler by Epsillon · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Or get several and set up a wireless mesh network using all the neighborhood strays!" ... and call it Fidonet.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  42. This Just In by thelonestranger · · Score: 1

    Pet owners vet bills on the increase due to doggy brain tumours.
    With this thing strapped to his head how long will it be before Fido's brains start dribbling out of his ears?

    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
  43. The wheel, reinvented by Card · · Score: 1

    Once again /. is reporting something that has been in the market for over a year. Pointer Solutions has been doing this for a while; my father is one of the early adopters.

    As others have pointed out, the idea is that you can listen your dog working. Compared to the older radar equipment this GPS system has been a tremendous help, even though the prices are quite high/unit. I don't know how useful this thing is for US hunters - in Finland the GSM has almost 100% coverage. If you guys have connection problems in city areas, I don't want to know what the rural conditions are like.
    1. Re:The wheel, reinvented by dpiven · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, the idea is that you can listen your dog working.

      I already know what a snoring rottweiler sounds like; I don't want to use up cell minutes listening to it.

  44. Sad by wocket44 · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked at what people will waste their money on.

    "Mommy, can I call Spot?"
    "Sure honey, use your prepaid cellphone."

  45. Actually what I've been looking for.... by antifederalist · · Score: 1

    It's a shame the price is so high, this is just what I've been looking for for a while now. I have a neighbor with an autistic child, and they are always afraid of him running away and getting lost. I looked a bit at the mologogo, but this would be even better because they would be able to call and talk to him while they go search. Unfortunately, they're a bit tight on finances at the moment, so they'll have to wait for the price to come down or something new to come out.

  46. Hey! by aitikin · · Score: 1

    I think I'll get one of these things. Never can be too safe!

    Oh, wait. I have a fence.

    --
    "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
  47. Not THAT ridiculous... the PROBLEM, that is... by lumbricus · · Score: 1

    My friend's dog managed to get out of her car while she ran into a friends house to drop something off. This might not have been a big deal with some dogs, but her dog is a rescued dog, and was previously abused, so it's a real 'fraidy - dog, scared of everthing and everybody. My friend went back to the area for days (we went along also), but the situation felt hopeless because it was a woodsy area, and we knew we could be standing right next to the dog and never know it. (We eventually found it after 5 days of actively looking).
    I looked around for little techie things to help in this situation. Very early, my friend and I dismissed the idea of a cell phone/gps combo as too expensive, and intractible (for us at least), but this definately would have helped. Eventually we settled on one of those bi-directional keyfinders...I'm not going to put the link because this isn't an ad, but it works great, and all for around $20. She's even trained the dog to come to her when it hears the response tone. And, of course, she no longer loses her keys.

  48. fines by ksamus · · Score: 1

    Will my dogs be caught by the police and get fine if he answer the phonecall while driving car?

  49. Kids phones in NL by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Ditto here in NL... the phones are typically around 80-100 euros and offer...
    - 4-5 pre-set (not changeable by the kids, supposedly) numbers. E.g. mom, dad, grandparents, 112 (911)
    - the ability to be called
    - the ability to be silently called and automatically answer (i.e. the phone picks up, and the parents can listen in on whatever, without the kid knowing)

    and some models do indeed also have GPS, though I'm not 100% sure how that works - call, and you can temporarily track the kid online ? or do you get an SMS (text message) with the street name and maybe house number they're in?

    Not thinly veiled at all - and I see them selling like hotcakes.

  50. I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by Animaether · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My pet maltese will happily "sit", "speak", (lay) "down" and "roll over" whenever my girlfriend calls and I set my phone on speakerphone ('crappy' GSM combined with uberscreech of a small speaker).

    It may be true in general, but there's exceptions as always.

    That said, she also looks oddly at the phone and will savagely attack it if I let it go on for too long ;)

    1. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the dog react to the phone commands "out of the box" or did you have to teach it to do the tricks?
      I mean, most dogs can be trained to react to commands over the phone just the same as to any arbitrary signal, voice command, a bell, a light etc. They just find it very hard to recognize the same natural voice command in audio that goes over the phone, so you'd have to re-teach the dog to react to the phone commands just the same as to normal ones.

    2. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by tmortn · · Score: 3, Informative

      No the real issue is whether the dog is responding in particular to the command or to the person. It has been well established that dogs can understand vocabulary. IE a word as an abstract meaning. Thus they do not need a person to understand that fetch *object* only means fetch it if a certain person asks it in a certain way. If you doubt this go look into it. There was a story about a border collie not to long ago that recognised dozens of objects... that is in a room full of these objects if you asked the dog to fetch a specific one it would find it and bring it back, and bring back nothing if it was not to be found.

      As for recognising a voice on the phone. Hell some people can't do that and just like you wouldn't necesarrily do something some unrecogniseable person asks you to do niether will a dog. On the otherhand a dog may be more willing if they are trained to do more. Also they may recognise (perhaps even mistakenly identify) the voice and then be willing to do anything they would normally. Also the dog may be unwilling to seperate the voice from the presence of the person. Same thing happend to people with the invention of the phone in the first place. But we deal with abstraction better than dogs.

      I always find it funny when people insist that a dog does not understand a command given by someone they don't know. They seem to be unable to understand that the dog is quite capable of deciding they are not someone they have to obey. Some will respond to any attention just like some people. And some are loyal to one person.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    3. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      They just find it very hard to recognize the same natural voice command in audio that goes over the phone, so you'd have to re-teach the dog to react to the phone commands just the same as to normal ones.

      I don't think this matters (or is even necessarily true). My dogs recognize, I think, the cadence of my voice and command, which is why they react to my voice even under all sorts of different acoustic situations. They hear my voice through fog, over hills, echoing down an alley, over two-way radios, and even over the phone (we've tried this) and respond splendidly. They know the pattern of a familiar voice's commands, in much the same way we do. At least, the better developed dogs do... and I think they're all pretty similar along those lines. Their ability to wisely act on a command will vary hugely by breed, but they know what they're hearing, especially if regularly challenged under different circumstances.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "No the real issue is whether the dog is responding in particular to the command or to the person. It has been well established that dogs can understand vocabulary. IE a word as an abstract meaning."

      Could you post the research behind this please, or at least give me some info to look it up.

      Every bit of research I've seen suggests the exact opposite, that dogs respond to tone, not words.

      So I'd be very interested in reading such research.

      "If you doubt this go look into it. There was a story about a border collie"

      Oh, I get it. You're basing your opinion on one data point. Don't do that.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    5. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by tmortn · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ch ronicle/archive/2004/06/11/MNGTL73SSM28.DTL

      Or perhaps you could take the time to actually look it up. Yes dogs respond to tone. So do people, go ask ten people to do something rudely, then ask another ten people politely. Compare your results. Just because they do does not suggest that is ALL they respond too. For instance hunters often train to hand signals, because the dog can see them from a distance where voice commands are impractical. Herders have long used a combination of hand signals and whistle sequences. This is not one data point. This is a tradition that dates back centuries.

      As for words specificlly, the example of Pico and other similar research have shown that many animals (not just dogs) can develop vocabulary in the sense of understanding that a word refferes to a specific object.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    6. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "Or perhaps you could take the time to actually look it up."

      First of all, fuck you. If you're so smart, why didn't you read this statment

      "If you doubt this go look into it. There was a story about a border collie

      Oh, I get it. You're basing your opinion on one data point. Don't do that."

      What "border collie" did you think I was talking about? Why would you ASSUME I DIDN'T look it up?

      "This is not one data point."

      Yes it is, the "study" you link to has ONE dog in it. ONE. ONE data point. So, you're wrong again. Show me where your link talks about any other dog than Rico? Oh it doesn't, so either you don't know what "ONE" means, or you can't count. Either way, you're wrong AGAIN.

      "As for words specificlly, the example of Pico and other similar research have shown that many animals (not just dogs)"

      Ok, it's "Rico" not "Pico" and I wasn't asking about "other animals" I was asking about dogs because this story is about dogs, and other animals are irrelevant. GOT THAT? An ape is not a dog, a dolphin is not a dog, and their behaviors don;t generalize across species. Why would you even bring this up?

      In the future, perhaps you could actually READ my post, and respond to it instead of posting a link to ONE study that involves ONE dog, which I ALREADY FUCKING ADDRESSED IN MY ORIGINAL POST.

      God what the hell is wrong with idiots like you?

      PS, I did my undergrad work in language acquisition. I was asking out of academic interest, and your dumbass post pops up. Unless you have a study which provides what I asked for, and NOT the same study that hundreds of other idiots like you assume shows dogs respond to language, then you need to shut up.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    7. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Well then out of academic interest what is you response to the methods of hunters and herders. Which is what I was pointing to as more than one Data Point of dogs being trained to more than just tone of a persons voice.

      As for the issue of a single study with a single data point, surely you know that uniqueness is a highly strange thing in nature. Thus the study of Rico is highly relevant because if Rico does indeed understand words and possesses the ability to work put the meaning of new words then either other dogs can or Rico is unique. And it is far more likely that Rico is not unique. However I certainly grant that Rico is only one dog. A rather extrodinary example actually. To dismiss that study like you just did, you either think it is fake, misunderstood or simply an isolated exception (unique). Care to Elaborate ?

      Two, I would say that other animals are relevant though I grant not specificlly to dogs. I merely pointed that out because many try and use the arguement that only humans can learn words/language to proove that dogs cannot. I apologise if in my attempt to anticipate other arguments I unfairly lumped you in with such.

      And please if you feel so steamed you have to respond as you just did then don't bother. I am willing to give you the benifit of the doubt and listen to your expertise. I wouldn't mind seeing at least one link to a study with at least one example suporting your claims. I am sure there are many and yet you havn't pointed to one thus far and I have. At least do as much before raking me over the coals like that else your the one who looks like a fucking idiot whether you are right or not.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    8. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based upon your actions in your posts, I seriously doubt that you have an undergraduate degree. In fact, I would suspect that you are still working on your high school degree. Does your mommy even know that you are on the computer?

    9. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always find it funny when people insist that a dog does not understand a command given by someone they don't know. They seem to be unable to understand that the dog is quite capable of deciding they are not someone they have to obey. Some will respond to any attention just like some people. And some are loyal to one person.


      My parents' dogs are a good example of this. They got the dogs after I moved out. I am only home 2 or 3 times a year, and never for more than a week at a time. However, they still know me as part of the family and will obey me just like they will obey mom or dad. They won't, however, obey my grandmother and she's around them a lot more frequently than I am. They haven't learned to associate her as family, like they have me.


      As for recognising a voice on the phone. Hell some people can't do that and just like you wouldn't necesarrily do something some unrecogniseable person asks you to do niether will a dog. On the otherhand a dog may be more willing if they are trained to do more. Also they may recognise (perhaps even mistakenly identify) the voice and then be willing to do anything they would normally. Also the dog may be unwilling to seperate the voice from the presence of the person. Same thing happend to people with the invention of the phone in the first place. But we deal with abstraction better than dogs.


      According to my mom, when I'm on speakerphone at home, one of the dogs (the smarter one) does appear to recognize my voice. Especially if I talk to directly to the dog over the speaker phone - they said she reacts in a happy manner. Take that for what it's worth. She might just recognize her name and be responding to that and only that.


      No the real issue is whether the dog is responding in particular to the command or to the person. It has been well established that dogs can understand vocabulary. IE a word as an abstract meaning. Thus they do not need a person to understand that fetch *object* only means fetch it if a certain person asks it in a certain way. If you doubt this go look into it. There was a story about a border collie not to long ago that recognised dozens of objects... that is in a room full of these objects if you asked the dog to fetch a specific one it would find it and bring it back, and bring back nothing if it was not to be found.


      Again, this is very true. Bridget, the smarter and more well trained of the two Yorkies, will respond to a request from my parents or myself to get a particular object. The real kicker is this though: one day Dad tells her to get her ball. She goes to her toybox and comes back with Ball A. Dad just looks at her, chuckles, and says "No, not that ball." This dog actually dropped the ball, went back to her toybox and brought out Ball B. I was flabbergasted as I'd never seen a dog do anything remotely like that before. She associates all of her balls as "ball" but can actually understand us when we tell her to bring a different ball. My parents said that now, the hardest part about getting her a new toy, is coming up with a new name for it so that she can identify it individually. I'd say she probably knows the names of about 30 - 40 different objects around the house now.

    10. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "At least do as much before raking me over the coals like that else your the one who looks like a fucking idiot whether you are right or not."

      I'm going to bring this down a level, but keep this in mind.

      "Or perhaps you could take the time to actually look it up."

      YOU said that. YOU were the one who posted a link after supposedly reading my post, despite the fact that I addressed that study in my post.

      If you want to accuse others of looking "like a fucking idiot" then you should try to to a better job of reading what you're responding to.

      "As for the issue of a single study with a single data point, surely you know that uniqueness is a highly strange thing in nature."

      Not with respect to intelligence. Don't act like you know things that aren't true, it makes you look "like a fucking idiot".

      If you'd like to understand why it's important to be diligent in studies such as this, look up the "counting horse" and you'll understand.

      Lastly, I have to say, it's amazing to me that you can continue to act the way you are acting, in light of your original post, because it made you look "like a fucking idiot".

      "I wouldn't mind seeing at least one link to a study with at least one example suporting your claims."

      God, this is too easy. "Perhaps you could take the time to actually look it up."

      We're done.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    11. Re:I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Damn dude you asked me to post a link to a specific study so I did. And no, you did not give me any inclination that you had specifically looked up anything regarding that specific study involving a border collie other than to suggest I had made a statement based on only one study. You did not address the specifics of the study or state why my allusion to the story about the Border Collie was incorect as reasonable evidence for claiming that dogs are responsive to more than just tone of voice. You still have not.

      In response I posted a link discussing a specific study, the one to which I had reffered to earlier and pointed out that hunters and herders have long used means other than tone with which to train dogs. Something you still have refused to address, or dare I say, look into. But perhaps you have. For all I know you are the author of the definitive work on the subject debunking the idea that herd dogs do not in fact respond to anything other than tone of voice. Yet you have presented precious little to that effect. I again offer you the chance to respond intelligently instead of with third grader insults.

      You raise a good issue with respects to uniqueness and intelligence. The specific example of high levels of intelligence in an individual is a very poorly understood phenomenon. However, I was quite specifically reffering to the capacity for intelligence. The possibility that Rico is unique in his/its capacity for language processing is not very likely (again provided there was learning of language). However that Rico may be a unique example of a dog making good on that capacity or to such a level may well be the case. It is certainly not a common practice to try and teach a dog anything at all beyond stop, fetch, sit etc... At such levels of rudimentary communication it is of no matter whether the dog learns to respond to tone/body language or a specific word So long as they do learn to respond to something consistent in your request. On the other hand the idea that this is what Rico did is rather absurd if the results are valid. IE can return the right object out of 200 possible around 37/40 times and that the request is made from different people hidden from sight. The results, espeically the surprising ability to determine the value of an unknown word, are pretty strong that Rico did in fact learn words.

      Obviously you have already questioned the significance of a single finding. There is deffinatly the possibility that the percentage of the canine population capable of such learning is vanishingly small. On par with say the percentage of humans with the ability to be 'Einstiens'. But then if that is the case you have to deal with the insane odds that this dog came along at the same time a study was seeking to find the extent of language learning capacity and that somehow the two collided. Deffinatly a possibility. Far more likely is that Rico is more of an average representation of Canine capacity for learning language, of the border collie breed in particular, and that similar results could be acheived if similar efforts were made with other dogs. Enter the possibility of follow up studies during which such a supposition can be tested or prooven false.

      I am sure this is all elementary to you... yet by your responses you have left much to be desired. The best deffense you have presented so far has been a rather hypocritical one. You jump on me for pointing to other animals as examples as not relevant to dogs and then turn around and present me with the issue of the Counting Horse. The fact you too resorted to using examples with other animals aside, I take it to mean you imply that the experiment revolving around Rico the vocabularly learning dog is simply a variation on a theme of the "counting horse" or "clever hans" trick and that the study was not valid for some reason. So, what was wrong with it? How did they pull off the 'counting horse' deception in this study? (yes same study but at the bottom the have refferences to the actual study itself which one can hope has citations

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  51. What About Battery Charging? by superchi · · Score: 1

    Although the company is working on further miniaturization, the battery has proven to be a formidable obstacle.

    Sure, it's an obstacle for size. Maybe that will be overcome. How about the obstacle about charging the battery? If this device is to prevent unforeseen runaways, that means either charging it when you know your pet cannot run away, or rotating it out with a 2nd copy while the 1st recharges. Constantly having to recharge this device is going to be what kills this product, unless you train your dog to do it himself (I don't think kinetic motion will cut it).

    Sturdy and slobber-resistant, the PetCell isn't just for dogs. PetsMobility's parent company, On4 Communications, is simultaneously rolling out models for kids, the elderly and outdoor sports fanatics who enjoy snowboarding and kayaking.

    Being slobber-resistant is also for whom?

    1. Re:What About Battery Charging? by bfischer · · Score: 1

      The old people slobber, of course. Kids drool.

  52. Re:In finland we have had dog-gsm-gps's for ~2 yea by nissu · · Score: 1

    And another from Finland: Tracker I think that Tracker's solutions have also been available for years in some form or another. Maybe they both need some help in international marketing...

  53. Pet Cellular, Question for the Carriers by Stitch_Surfs · · Score: 1

    Okay, so assuming that people (or pets that really like to gossip) are going to buy these things, what say the carriers? Is Sprint going to pick this up and if so, do pets qualify for the "friends and family" plan? Are they friends? Or family? Or can the pets pick their own friends (which might even be other people's pets?) Can I block 976 numbers so they don't call doggie porn lines? I mean the heavy breathing was bad enough but the heavy panting has got to go...

    Oh yeah, and does anyone know if these are CDMA or GSM? I can see the Qualcomm lawsuits already; they'll claim HSDPA (howling spectrum dog polarization amplifier) is infringinging on their CDMA (Cats Don't Modulate Amplitude) products. One thing's for sure, it's still cats vs. dogs and it's gonna be ugly.

    --
    There is no "I" in B-O-R-G.
  54. The Big C by Grym · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody has asked this question yet, but shouldn't owners be worried about the consequences of attaching a relatively high-powered RF transmitter directly to their dog's neck at all times? Think about it. RF penetrates soft tissues the easiest. Seeing as how the neck is about as soft as it comes on a dog's body, I think this product is a legal disaster waiting to happen.

    If there's a lawsuit, it's going to be pet owners (legitimately or not) suing the company for giving their dog(s) cancer. In states like California where pets can be classified as "companions" you can even win damages in far excess of the purchased value of the animal.

    Ambulance-chasers, start your engines...

    -Grym

    1. Re:The Big C by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...and do you have any idea which parts of the electromagnetic spectrum are passing through your body right this second? More often than not, at vastly higher radiated power levels than any cellphone is capable.

      Find yourself a spec-an and plug it in some time.

    2. Re:The Big C by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Shielding can be easily applied on the bottom of the device as if your dog is on it's back, it is either dead or playing dead (in which case you shouldn't have called him/her and told him/her to play dead) and you no longer need to locate him/her.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    3. Re:The Big C by uncle2 · · Score: 1

      Brendan please make contact. nicknoff@iinet.net.au David Rees

    4. Re:The Big C by nerdus · · Score: 1

      dchky this is your sister nerys did you know that carrots arnt eaten on inverted tuesdays please contact me completely private. i hope im not dead to you also.

    5. Re:The Big C by sillylilly · · Score: 1

      Brendan i know you truly dont mean that we are all dead to you. You are a spiritual person and to say these things would not bring you comfort. You are not dead to me and never will be. I am truly saddened that you dont want to contact any of us. At least please contact Nerys. If anyone could do with contact it is her. I only want to know that you are safe and happy. I want you to know that my heart is always open. I am still living in the same address with the same phone number only my last name has changed. You have 7 nieces and nephews that would love to know you. And i see from Blender website that you have a daughter. Im verry happy for you. Im sure when she is older she will want to talk about your family so please dont close us all out. I truly wish i knew about the carrots but hey! i just eat them diced nearly every day. I think your wallpapers are fantastic. Stay safe and happy Brendan...........Love Tracey

    6. Re:The Big C by nerdus · · Score: 1

      Dear dchky you kow my e-mail. you sent me a letter a few years ago i wrote back to you but never got any more replies, what have i done?, i have tried to get a hold of you at the post box number a few times but nothing I miss you and wonder all the time how you are when hazel told tracey how to get a hold of you i just did the same and typed your name into my search engine and found this web site. set me as foe if you truley dont want anything to do with me. im still in WA not in albany though got married have two kids 9years(boy) and 10months(girl) bye for now i will keep a watch for the little red and green, pill i miss you Nerys

  55. dogs... by xushi · · Score: 1

    So this is what it comes to... Instead of helping other countries push forward in mobile technology, or help improve/cheapen what they currently have, but no.. we have these wasting god knows how much $$$ just go make a phone to call a dog ffs ?

    1. Re:dogs... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      So this is what it comes to... Instead of helping other countries push forward in mobile technology, or help improve/cheapen what they currently have, but no.. we have these wasting god knows how much $$$ just go make a phone to call a dog ffs ?

      This reminds me of the scene in... was it "Animal House?" A group of students is planning an event of some sort, and the pious, liberal-guilt-New-England-sorority-type girl says something to the effect of, "I don't know how anyone can be planning a party when there are hungry people in the world!"

      How can you be using a recent-vintage computer when other people have none? How can put hours of your life every year into learning how to use some shiny new disto or dev tool when you could be working in a soup kitchen or mowing lawns and sending the cash to the U.N.? How can software developers work to make domestic companies more producitve and less wasteful when there are whole villages with no software at all!

      Don't you get it? Our economy's continual pursuit of newly leveraged technologies - even on relatively trivial things - is what makes our economy so good at making technology. And the largess that comes with that is one of the reasons that the U.S. (as an example) is such a large donor of development and relief materials, funds, and expertise throughout the world. Do you really think that someone who decides to buy a tracking device for their dog is suddenly faced with the dilemma of whether to do that, or go ahead and send the $300 off to Feed The Children, or invest in micro-finance for a village in one of the 'stans? No, that person is already putting money/time into those things, or isn't. The same people that come up with a way to produce cooler things bought and paid for by our economy are in a better position to sell deritive things, cheaply, to those markets in the world that haven't yet come become as productive.

      wasting god knows how much $$$ just go make a phone to call a dog

      Next time (so you can be consistent) that you see some kid putting up 50 photocopied posters about her lost dog, tell her that she should be ashamed of wasting paper and toner when there are poor countries in the world that can barely afford to print up local-language directions to go with the medical supply shipment they just received from the US.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  56. Wouldn't work in London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rrrring. Blah blah. Click
    "So who was that on the dog and bone?"
    "The dog."
    "... and bone, yeah, so who was it?"
    "The dog."
    "Look, it's DOG and BONE... the PHONE, mate. Who was it on the phone?"
    "The dog."
    "...yeah, well, alright sod that. By the way, where's the dog?"

  57. Re:They need to work on their Marketing copy (Humo by Soruk · · Score: 1

    I know you're making a joke, but seriously, kids can wander off. The elderly may forget where they are (assuming they knew in the first place), and it's so easy to get lost or injured in risky sports such that you can't call for help, but would make life much easier for rescuers to locate you before it's too late.

    --
    -- Soruk
  58. Power and Control.... by JumpingBull · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah. It isn't sufficient that we have an electronic leash on ourselves by the "powers that be"; we have to make the same indignity to the rest of the world, too.

    Suicide is looking more and more as the "thinking mans option"

    I am looking to the new ice age; maybe nature will get this broken species off Gaia. We seem to have been a supreme f**k-up. Starting from our own sexuality, for one

    --
    This is progress?
    1. Re:Power and Control.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (doublechecking poster's nick to make sure it didn't say "Squatting" instead of "Jumping")

  59. Repurpose this device by klubar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This device seems more designed for tracking people than animals. If I was marketing the device, I'd sell it as a security device for children/memory impaired adults. The value of tracking is higher, and the wearer is more likely to respond to voice commands.

    It didn't say if the phone is two-way so the responder could respond--but I guess it would be useful to be able to hear the background. I wonder if there is a "stealth" mode, where the owner can hear what's going on in the background, but the wearer doesn't hear any ringing or other noises---kind of scary.

    I could also it be useful in an auto--I wonder if the GPS is good enough to find your car in a parking lot--uncovered of course. Presumably, all the auto theives/chop shops have learned to put stolen cars in covered building, but the voice listen capability might be useful--hey you could hear your car being chopped up until the very end.

    1. Re:Repurpose this device by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      if you really want to track your car, just get a lojack installed. it does realtime monitoring and at the least will announce where the car was when the signal died. and, they already have a tracking device for children, where you can check their position on the web. good idea for small children if you can't afford to actually take care of them. it locks onto the wrist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  60. Cell Phones for Dogs? by kubevubin · · Score: 1

    Wow...considering the fact that most dogs have attention spans even lower than those of a typical human, I wonder how long it'll be before we see dogs with cell phones colliding with one another while walking. And then there's the possibility of them ignoring people altogether if they find out how to hack these things and dial out to their friends.

    1. Re:Cell Phones for Dogs? by crimperman · · Score: 1

      Wow...considering the fact that most dogs have attention spans even lower than ...

      Sorry I tuned out for a moment there - what were you saying?

  61. Saves on drinking time by Clifton+Beach · · Score: 1

    You no longer have to go see a man about a dog - You can call the dog direct!

    --
    42 hidden comments
  62. Ring tones? by wheatwilliams · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about selecting a ring tone for your dog?

    "Runaway" by Dell Shannon?
    "Walkin' the Dog" by Rufus Thomas?
    "Hound Dog" by Big Mama Thornton?
    "The Dogs of War" by Pink Floyd?
    A Snoop Dog medley?
    "How Much Is That Doggie In The Window", by Petula Clark?

    The possibilities are endless.

    1. Re:Ring tones? by dpiven · · Score: 1

      As long as we're talking about Floyd, I'd be going for the synthesized dog barks in the middle of "Dogs".

    2. Re:Ring tones? by buddhahat · · Score: 1

      and of course.... "Who Let the Dogs Out?"

      --
      ------ How can making people laugh lead to bad karma?
  63. Re:It's only a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not you, just the humorless sod who modded this flamebait.

  64. +5 for Dog Thieves by TallMatthew · · Score: 1

    Now we can find your dog before you do. Why would anyone steal a dog? I wouldn't personally but a $350 doohickey that's a hit with the Upper East Side Yentas would be totally worth it.

    1. Re:+5 for Dog Thieves by Stitch_Surfs · · Score: 1

      I can hear the dog-napper's voice now... uh, yeah, I might have your doggie... he says as he unbuckles the little blinged out phone from fifi's studded Louis Vuitton collar... "what did you say the reward was for her safe return again?"

      and then a few days later...

      "oh dear, Fifi seems to have lost an ear...maybe you'd better increase that reward a little before something bigger comes loose..."

      --
      There is no "I" in B-O-R-G.
  65. it's not the first. by hamburger+lady · · Score: 3, Funny

    Brain from Inspector Gadget had one of these years ago.

    if you're trying to impress me, you've failed. harumph.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  66. Cramping the Style! by TheKnave · · Score: 0

    OMFG! Someone always calls when you're about to get it on with a hot bitch!

  67. Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you hear me now? *WOOF* Good!

  68. Cartoon bubble by Wylfing · · Score: 2, Funny
    Rrrrriiinnnggg.

    Reh roh?

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  69. OT Poodle wearing diapers by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

    I think the Poodle is wearing diapers because it's a female and in heat! Unless your female is casterated she will be dripping blood all over your house! That is definitely not a nice experience!

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    1. Re:OT Poodle wearing diapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Seeing as how females don't have testicles, I can see why they might be bleeding if you tried to "castrate" them.

      Hope you haven't been practicing this at home or anything.

    2. Re:OT Poodle wearing diapers by dhanes · · Score: 1
      rofl! It's been so long since I owned a female dog that I forgot that little tidbit.

      Yup, our Keeshound bitch wore my and my brother's old 'whitey tighties', with her tail poking out where the front opening is on those underwear :)

      --
      Wait, What?
  70. I Disagree entirely by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is very useful... Sometimes when walking your dog(s) in the forest they will get a scent. At that point it is nearly impossible to stop them, especially if you have a hunting dog. Or how about those people that own "fighting dogs", where you can react very quickly if they break out of garden. Overall a good idea I find... I know I would get it for both of my dogs.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  71. Other uses... by chhamilton · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure about the usage for dogs, but I would totally use this on a motorcycle. They're so easy to steal that it would be a great thing to have some sort of relatively cheap and reliable tracking device installed. All they need is the ability to easily enable/disable the virtual perimeter (ie: disable it when you're riding, re-enable it when the bike is parked), and it'd be a great system!

    (I'm speaking from experience of having had a new bike stolen, and having that terrible empty feeling in your gut realizing that there's nothing you can do about it. I eventually got it back, 2 weeks later, completely wrecked, found lying in 3 feet of water in a ditch!)

  72. Unsporting by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    This is a rather expensive and unsporting con. I mean, most grifters like the chase. This company is spending an awful lot of money building technology to extract money from morons.

  73. Cats ( was "I don't think it'll be cheap" ) by crimperman · · Score: 1
    That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.


    Their food bowl is not always where we think it is. My sister had a cat who often disappeared for days. Eventually they found out he was getting fresh fish from a lady down the road who "thought he was a stray" (somehow overlooking the yellow collar with his name on).

    The GPS side may work well for cats - if they could make 'em smaller. Cats are more prone to disappearing than dogs IMHO - especially when they sense a trip to the vet approaching.
  74. But wolves already had phones! by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    In Finland we've already been using GSM-based tracking collars for wolves for a while now! Some of these things can, as far as I know, use both GPS and cell network triangulation to pick up the locations.

    The only problem I've seen is that wolves have big paws, and cell phones are getting smaller all the time... Obviously, a small usability problem!

    1. Re:But wolves already had phones! by hughk · · Score: 1
      Apparently finnish dogs have had phones with GPS for some time. Benefon, the other cell phone company in Finland has a phone with build in GPS and there is a "tracking mode" allowing the tracker to see their position relative to that being tracked.

      Forests are dense in Finland and a hunting dogs can end up being lost. GPS penetration is near enough 100% so it becomes viable to stick the phone on the dog as described, hence the problem is solved.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  75. May make things worse.. by 21chrisp · · Score: 1

    There's a good chance that if you "call" your dog, it's going to go looking for you. Since it's outside, and it hears your voice, it may not necessarily look for you at home. There's a good chance that it will wonder off further thinking it's going to find you.

    When my dog has gotten off her leash, she'll run around for a bit and then go looking for me. If the last time she saw me was when I drove off to work (meaning someone else took her out), then she just keeps going down the road thinking I'm down there somewhere. I could see "calling" having a similar effect.

  76. Maybe It Doesn't Like You by r0wan · · Score: 1
    The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call. In addition, the PetCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their dogs wander outside a prescribed area.


    If it takes all that to get your dog to stay, perhaps it doesn't want to be with you in the first place.
    --
    If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
  77. Practicality by Shrug · · Score: 0

    I fail to see the practicality of this. One, any dog owner will agree with me, don't spend more then $15.00 on an item for your dog (besides, food and one of those invisible fences).
    Owning two Labs, I can honestly say that this thing had better be pretty rugged to withstand a day with my two pups playing out side. Or do you just put it on when you think they might run off? Also....calling ones dog on a cell? He might not be paying attention while he is trying to answer the phone and walk right in to traffic. If you got the cash and they ever make one a small indestructible GPS unit would be a brilliant idea! As of now however, an RFID chip is still the best way to find your missing pet. I mean...what happens if they forget to pay their bill and the numbers cut off.

  78. Please leave a message after the beep by seniorcoder · · Score: 1

    My dog has one of these. He only accepts calls from bitches with the same device. When I call him, he just lets it go to the voice mail.
    Maybe I should text him instead...

  79. Call my pet? what for? by KIEDIS · · Score: 1

    I really dont see a good utility on this thing, i think its pretty much a waste of money... Unless you only want to know where your pet is wich is unnesesary if you take good care of it...pets mainly dissapear when they are stolen so...if they are stolen the burglar will probably throw away the device and then it will be once again useless... I really dont justify paying every month for calling my dog...specially since i dont even like cell phones they are too expensive and voip is a lot better and cheaper and computers are never that far...

  80. Just imagine... by Stoned+Necromancer · · Score: 1

    The possibilities for the law enforcement:
    "Sit... sit... Now! Bite!"

  81. Seriously, I would get one by Cyburbia · · Score: 1

    For the longest time, I was thinking "why doesn't someone make a GPS tracker for dogs?" I don't have the resources to create and market such a device, but I"m glad somebody did. I have a very friendly -- and very expensive -- Portuguese Water Dog who used to be a homebody, but is now struck by wanderlust; he ran away three times this year. Fortunately, all three times he was found.

    He's got regular tags with a multitude of contacts, a FidoFinder tag, and an RFID microchip. He's probably going to get this GPS/cell collar, too.

    The cost of such a device is far less than the stress toll I take when he unlatches the gate I might have forgotten to padlock, and catches a scent.

  82. Sure by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Add to this just one case of a dog bitting a child and it will become mandatory. So, people will be tracked whenever they walk their dogs out. Is there a tin foil hat for pets?

  83. Nah Leap Frog already makes one for those parents by random+coward · · Score: 1

    LeapFrog already makes a cell phone for kids that does most of this. Its the leap frog tictalk With parents today no need to beat around the bush. Just come out and say it. And its cheeper too!

  84. I can see it now... by c++ · · Score: 1

    Ring ring ring.

    Muffy! Come home muffy!

    patter patter patter screeeeeaaaccchhh splat silence

  85. First Cell Phone for Dogs? by tut21 · · Score: 1

    It is times like this that I wonder why Slashdot's RSS feed is still in my aggregator. Stuff that matters indeed.

  86. To heck with my dog. . . by jhumkey · · Score: 1

    To heck with my dog, how bout tossing one in my car for when its stolen? Not to mention the fact that . . . unless it's solar powered (I didn't look) I'm not sure how I train the dog to charge it once in a while. But in the car, I can at least wire something to the car battery for a bit longer life.

    --
    No, I don't remember your name. But the memory mapped screen on a TRS80 from 1977 is from 15360 to 16383 if that helps.
    1. Re:To heck with my dog. . . by wpiman · · Score: 1

      Mologogo does what you are looking for at a fraction of the cost.

  87. Wrong Numbers or Telemarketers? by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    I definitely wouldn't get this for my pooch... I just know she would be using up her minutes chatting with wrong numbers and buying anything a telemarketer pitches! Keep in mind what a dog's IQ ranges as! She'd cost me a fortune!

    ~Kat ^_^

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  88. "What was that, Skippy?" ... by the+Haldanian · · Score: 1

    "... you're trapped down a mineshaft?"

  89. Re:They need to work on their Marketing copy (Humo by Gleng · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I've known a few users in my time that could use some slobber-resistant technology.

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  90. Monthly Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think this could be you going to the mail box.

    PetMobile Cellular Bill
    Regular Charges $ 49.95
    Roaming Charges $1000.00
    Out of Network charges $ 500.00
    In-Network PetMobile calling $ 500.00
    Total amount due: $2049.95

    #@$! Fluffy you racked up your phone bill again.
    You need to stop roaming around & Going out side of your coverage area. Stay in the yard! And Who the #@$ are you calling. It is that pitbull across the street again, isn't it! You have any idea how much i paid for that cellphone. You even ate the charger 3 times. Drulled on it twice, "The warranty doesn't cover drull abuse". You left it in your water dish again....

  91. At 400$ by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    it's not a cheap device, I would think your pet would be in greater danger with a device like that on it's neck, going outside by itself. I am sure there would be people hunting dogs/whatever down just to take away this phone/GPS tracker. Of-course they better figure out why and what to do with these gadgets because they do have phone/GPS on them and are designed specifically to be tracked :)

  92. Re:They need to work on their Marketing copy (Humo by karnal · · Score: 1

    The elderly may forget where they are (assuming they knew in the first place), and it's so easy to get lost or injured in risky sports such that you can't call for help,

    I once saw this very very very very BAD porn clip of an elderly person, speaking of the elderly getting injured in risky sports.

    I wanted to gouge my eyes out.

    --
    Karnal
  93. Am I the only one thinking about talking dog jokes by neo · · Score: 1

    Some race horses staying in a stable. One of them starts to boast about his track record. "In the last 15 races, I've won 8 of them!"

    Another horse breaks in, "Well in the last 27 races, I've won 19!"

    "Oh that's good, but in the last 36 races, I've won 28!", says another, flicking his tail.

    At this point, they notice that a greyhound dog has been sitting there listening. "I don't mean to boast," says the greyhound, "but in my last 90 races, I've won 88 of them!"

    The horses are clearly amazed. "Wow!" says one, after a hushed silence. "A talking dog."

  94. I have a Chihuahua by BigCheese · · Score: 1

    I know exactly where Paco would be with one of those. Stuck to the floor. Our cats are bigger then him.

    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  95. Forget the phone part... by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

    Just do the GPS, and make it less expensive and make it implantable. Dogs are stolen, and this would be a surefire way to nab a dog thief. The phone thing described is just something on a collar that a thief can remove, but an implanted GPS chip or whatever that thieves won't know about till they're arrested could help stop all dog thefts. And while they're at it, why not do the same for cats.

    1. Re:Forget the phone part... by spammyd · · Score: 1

      forget dogs, put this inside of reporters in iraq, that would stop all the kidnappings

  96. Dumbest. Statement. Ever. by chinton · · Score: 1
    also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call

    Of course dogs can't answer the call! They don't have a thumb to press "Send".

  97. Wallace & Gromit by ecloud · · Score: 1

    The next movie ought to feature this product, and tell us whether it's useful or not.

  98. Why not eat Rabbit? (veering OT) by mtdnelson · · Score: 1

    My dad actually told my mum to keep the rabbit for a stew....she didnt...

    Why not? Does she cook meat otherwise? Beef, lamb, pork, bacon, ham, gammon, chicken, turkey?

    For the record, I'm vegetarian, for several reasons. However, I didn't used to be vegetarian, and my mum loves cooking, so I have enjoyed all of the above meats, as well as other things like duck, eel, pheasant and rabbit.

    Why eat one animal and not another? I never understand why some people will happily eat a lamb, but draw the line at dog. What's the difference? The animal's already dead.

    Obviously, I'm assuming that the animal was healthy, and newly killed, amongst other things.

    --
    Michael Nelson
    1. Re:Why not eat Rabbit? (veering OT) by 3GMobile · · Score: 1

      It was more the fact that the cat had had its teeth in it etc than the actual dislike of rabbit meat. It probably would have been completely fine, but, apart from dad no one seemed that keen to eat it!

    2. Re:Why not eat Rabbit? (veering OT) by mtdnelson · · Score: 1

      Fair enough! I didn't mean any criticism by it.

      I was just curious... I do know a fair few people who don't mind eating some meats, but who object strenuously to others - with fairly limited reasoning, it seems to me.

      As an example, I know many people who eat lamb happily, but would object to eating dog, because dogs are "cute". Where's the logic in that?

      --
      Michael Nelson
  99. Re:They need to work on their Marketing copy (Humo by gymell · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a joke too ... but it really says that in the article! Reminds me of the old "I've fallen and can't get up" commercial.

  100. Sturdy and slobber resistant ! by gagypsy02 · · Score: 1

    This exactly what I need for my boyfriend!

  101. So if I call my dog by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

    And he says lol yeah its me, how do I know it is my dog?

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  102. Not the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A similar device mainly targeted for hunting has been in use in
    the nordic countries for a while.

    See http://www.pointersolutions.com/eng/hunting.htm for more info.

  103. If he actually follows commands from it... by eamonman · · Score: 1

    That would be cool. Then you could talk your dog into coming back! That'd probably not happen with my dog; when he hears a voice from a phone (mine or not), he freaks out. Probably finds hearing a disembodied voice troubling.

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  104. rescued cat acted like dog by doorbender · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some neighbor kids brought a kitten to me one rainy day. It was shivering and covered in mud. I brought it in and gave it a warm bath. Before it was even dry it was purring loud enough for my father to hear it over the football game and through two closed doors. I gave it some cat food, and named it "gato" (after John Waynes dog "dog" in Big Jake) he slept on my shoulders I slept face down for 9 years(not straight through). He would come when I called. He "fetched". I put carpeting halfway up the walls and he would run aroud the room like the motorcycle dome of death. He could jump 6 feet straight up from a crouch. Whenever he jarred open the door of my room and ran down the stairs it took him 2 footfalls.

    "THUMP-THUMP" A sound everyone in my family dreaded. He hated every other person on the planet and would growl like a demon at them. He had all his shots. I was the only one who could hold him for any reason and would restrain him at the vet. They were all deathly afraid of him but I never let him scratch or bite anyone.

    Once I left for a week and on the fifth day he bit my sister on her calf while she was feeding him and nearly punctured the skin through jeans and cowboy boot (she had a bruise for a week).

    The next time I went away I took him with me. He got carsick but scooted to his litterbox which I had on the floor in the back and puked into it. He was the best pet I've ever had. Until...

    On that trip he went crazy. I had stayed up all night in the hotelroom working on a demo website and was getting ready to take a nap before a job interview. He tore around the room growling and I looked down and my foot was bleeding. He kept growling at me and since he had never done that before I put him in his cat carrier. after an hour he seemed to have calmed down. I let him out. he tore around the room growling again. I couldn't get him back into the carrier and ended up throwing him into the bathroom as he scratched and bit my arms and hands. I called a few vets to see if I could get one to come and tranq my cat. None of the vets that made housecalls were in and they told me to call animal control. I called animal control. They said they would send the guy right over. They sent two rookies that had never handled an animal before. They were joking and laughing until they saw my hands. then they sobered up and got out the cowhide gloves and snare. 30 minutes later we had the beast in the carrier and he had ruined their nice new quarter inch thick gloves. They took him to an animal shelter and wanted to keep him for 10 days. I said they could keep him forever because I couldn't trust him anymore. I went over to the shlter to sign papers and set up the 10 days and impending "sleep" he would be put to and when I opened the front door I could hear him growling out back and everyliving creature in the building was cowering in fear of the personafied evil that used to be my cat.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
    1. Re:rescued cat acted like dog by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      "THUMP-THUMP" A sound everyone in my family dreaded. He hated every other person on the planet and would growl like a demon at them. He had all his shots. I was the only one who could hold him for any reason and would restrain him at the vet. They were all deathly afraid of him but I never let him scratch or bite anyone.

      Heh, this sounds all too familiar :) Mine did get to attack a few people over time tho.. In one case it felt that I was threatened by someoen and didn't think twice, other cases usually involved people being on our property without me or my mother (whom could deal equally well with the cat) being around. Yes, we did have a 'mind the cat' sign, but who'd take that serious (the first time they see it that is)

  105. Dog Neck Tumors Sure to Follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If cancer from cellphones is good enough for humans, it's good enough for dogs.

  106. Liability by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Is this another way for a pet owner to shirk liability? Before the flames come rolling in, I am a dog owner. Imagine, a dog is outside on a nice day, while the owner is at work the dog escapes the backyard, and attacks someone up the street, this system for whatever reason fails to notify the owner of the escape and the owner is sued for his dog running loose and in turn sues this company for failure to notify him of the event?

    Seems a bit far fetched, no pun intended, but given the lack of accountability in this country it's a matter of time before it would happen.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  107. GPS = Cool; Cell Phone = Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GPS ideas are really cool, but the cell phone idea is just dumb, and I think marketting it as a "doggy cell phone" is also very dumb. I would definately buy a "doggy GPS" before I would even look at a "doggy cell phone". The latter just sounds like a stupid idea.

    If your dog runs away and has this thing attached to their ear, and you're sitting at home calling them on it... they're just going to hear your voice coming from in their ear... they're on their own with no direction home.. ya know? They can't see where you are and where your voice is coming from. And they aren't going to just magically know their way home if they're some place they've never been before. Besides that, it'd probably take a really well trained dog to respond to just their owners voice without any line of site or what not.

  108. Davey and Galliath by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    Davey to Galliath: Where the heck are you Galliath?

    Galliath: Gee, I dunno Daaaaaveeeeey...

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  109. Not everybody loves your kitty. by onkelonkel · · Score: 2, Funny

    A former workmate used to have an Austin Healy 3000 with a $2500 hand rubbed lacquer paint job. He kept it parked in his carport (covered but not enclosed). One day he finds a line of dusty cat footprints across the hood. All the neighbours swore it wasn't their precious kittycats that did the dammage. "Fine" says buddy and hooks an ignition coil to a metal cat dish full of cat food. The next night he hears one very loud meow and no more footprints after that. If you think that's inhumane, his next step would have been to leave out a dish of antifreeze.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  110. Not the first by ltcraben · · Score: 1

    The first on the market is http://www.globalpetfinder.com/. It does all the GPS tracking stuff, there just isn't a speaker for you to talk to your dog. Full Disclosure: I was on the engineering team for this product.

    --
    I had a sig once, but someone stole it.
  111. Cheaper Alternative by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

    For about four bucks I got this little metal device with a script written on it that, when read even by a non-programmer, contains addressing information that, if decoded, can provide whomever locates my lost dog with the clue as to where to return it. The decoding process is well-known, everybody learns how to do it as a child.

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  112. How long before... by coolraul · · Score: 1

    dogs start calling each other for crack and bitches? I think that's where the real problem lies...

  113. GOVERNMENT CONTROL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's that guy from the tire story from yesterday. This is obviously a plan by the government to track us by our dogs.

  114. This one's really for the Dogs by Strixy · · Score: 0

    "and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call"

    Because if you can't train your dog to "stay", it's so much easier to train him to answer a cell phone? This was thought up by an MBA wasn't it?

  115. Great idea for Husky owners by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Some dog breeds are natural "runners" or escape artists. They love to run free and get too distracted to come home very quickly. I owned a Husky (you see where this is going from the tense) who loved to get out and run. If she was out long enough to get bored of exploring, she'd come home. Otherwise, I'd get a call from the pound. People in my old neighborhood were good folk and I'd usually hear from a neighbor on last location. Unfortunately, I moved to the Big Bad City where people steal purebred dogs "'cause they're pretty" and I never saw her again after she got out once here in town.

    Forget the cell capability, a GPS unit on your dog would be a godsend (or is that dogsend?) for those of us with runners and escapers.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  116. The Teddyfone came out last week in the UK by Ashtoreth · · Score: 1
  117. What about wrong numbers??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hello?

    Pant...Pant...

    Lisa? who is panting

    Pant...Pant...

    What the? who is that? That's it I'm coming over!!!

  118. The Real Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS tracking for runaway dogs is fine, but the real question is, "Who let the dogs out?"

  119. Execpected benefit. by fonetik · · Score: 1
    Now I can find exactly where my dog ditched her collar.

    So what is the standby time on this thing? How often does this thing need charging?

  120. I'm waiting for... by Luddite+Slayer · · Score: 1

    The all-in-one printer/fax/copier/cellphone version. My dog's a mover and a shaker.

    --

    My personality is like a coupon, it's 10% off.

  121. This would never work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GirlCell doesn't have call waiting. All your ever going to get is a busy signal.

  122. Karma Whore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he posted anonymously, you wiki-posting karma whore!

    ...and besides, that was pretty damn funny.

    1. Re:Karma Whore? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Fuck you, Anonymous Coward (Karma Whores don't flame)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  123. Peak hours...and he may be roaming. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    You know, "What the Fuck?" expresses this exactly. How does the dog answer the phone? What kind of "conversation" would you have anyway?
    You: "Where are you Boy! Come home...".
    Dog: Woof! *dog runs in circles*
    Reminds me of the T-Mobile commercial with the dog on the vets table...
    Guy: "I can't believe he ate my cell phone"
    Vet: *using stethoscope* "Sounds like he's on hold..."
    Dog: *voice in tummy* "...your current wait time is 45 minutes... *music*"
    Vet: "...during peak hours..."
    Ast: "And he could be roaming!"
    Guy: *puts on glove* "I'm going in..."
    Dog: "Huuroo?"
    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  124. other possible attachments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you attach an electric shock collar to this device so that when you call him he gets a good !!!ZAP!!!, then again for those who want to use it on their kids or girl friends... well thats up to you.

  125. Error TA37 by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    We are sorry, the subcriber you have called does not answer...
    He is currently licking his crotch...
    Please try your call again later.

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  126. In Soviet Russia, dogs are smart (really) by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    Yesterday, in Moscow I saw a dog crossing a busy street by going into the subway tunnel (waiting for a person to open the heavy swinging doors), and cross under the street, then out the otherside. Clever, these street mongrels are.

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  127. Fun for the Whole Family! by David+Nabbit · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they'll offer a family calling plan for Fido, Junior, Grandpa, and crazy cousin Curtis. No doubt Fido would use up all the minutes though.

    --
    "Her idea of wit is nothing more than an incisive observation humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing."
  128. Getting rid of telemarketers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Has anyone considered the potential of this device for dealing with telemarketers?

  129. my dogs would learn caller id by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

    or worse, set up custom ringtones
    Damn it, I went to barkmail again!

  130. Why Stop there? by cojerk · · Score: 1
    Sturdy and slobber-resistant, the PetCell isn't just for dogs. PetsMobility's parent company, On4 Communications, is simultaneously rolling out models for kids, the elderly and outdoor sports fanatics who enjoy snowboarding and kayaking.

    Sure, because why stop with demeaning just your dog when you can also demean your kids and elderly relations as well?

    You could put a bone-shaped, slobber-resistant collar around your kid, or you could go with a slightly cheaper approach and put a football helmet on them with a tall orange bicycle flag taped to it.
  131. Nifty idea... by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    But the first time my dog holds up the line at Starbucks because he's yapping on the phone with his little bitch of a girlfriend, I'm gonna put his ass down...

  132. Not so new... by Tug3 · · Score: 1

    PetCell is not the first about this. A Finnish company callen Pointer had a Pet-phone on the market a year ago. I actually saw a demo a couple a years back in an exhibition. This Dog-GPS as its called is actually an old Benefon GPS/GSM-phone (another Finnish company) in a dog harness. You put it on your hunting dog. Once the dog's running somewhere you send a SMS to the dog and get a location on your similar Esc!-phone's map display. Naturally you have your own GPS on on the phone, so you can track towards the dog. Also if you like you can "call the dog" and with auto answer on you can listen to whats going on around the dog.

    No, I don't hunt myself so I have no real knowledge about the usefullness of this. But as a dog owner I cannot think of any other reason to get phones for my dogs... I did own a Benefon Esc! -GPSphone a couple of years ago, and it was a nice gadget. But no GPRS (or UMTS) it became obsolite for me. Also this would be pretty useless in some less developed countries that don't have GSM coverage in the woods like Finland, as the system relies on GSM's SMS-messages for location enqueries.

    As for links, check out:
    http://www.pointersolutions.com/eng/hunting_dog_gp s.htm
    http://benefon.com/products/esc/

    --
    If all else fails, pull the plug and get out...
    The Life is out there...
  133. dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    no pet is worth what this would probably cost. the dumbest part of this entire thing is the cell phone part. sure, dogs know their name and respond to it, but part of calling your dog is to get his attention first, then give him directions. how do you know you have the dog's attention? he looks at you. why does he look at you and not the other direction, because he hears your voice coming from a certain direction. with a cell phone, the dog will hear his name, but not know where the voice is coming from. i can only image this will confuse, and annoy a dog more then anything, and i'm assuming after a while, the dog will just ignore it.

    and about responsible pet ownership? i agree. if your dog runs loose all the time, then you're a bad owner, and your dog will surely come upon some terrible fate. if your dog gets out of the yard that he should be contained in, fix your damn fence.

    either way, get your dog some training, and don't complain about the cost, because this gadget would probably cost much more then any obediance school would charge.

  134. LEARN TO READ SCHMUCK by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    "We're done."

    That means I've dismissed you.

    I'm not your momma, it's your job to educate YOURSELF.

    MORE IMPORTANTLY this thread began by me asking someone else for data. Sticking your nose in it, and responding the way you did, was both unnecessary and inflammatory.

    Now, this might be different, and I might be helpful if I was the one originally offering information and you asked for a link.

    But that isn't what happened. Someone made a claim, I asked for more information. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOUR THOUGHT PROCESSES THAT MAKES YOU THINK I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU ANYTHING?

    "The fact you too resorted to using examples with other animals aside"

    My example has nothing to do with the animal. It was a response to why I don't trust the results of the Rico study. It was a failure of the researchers, and COMPLETELY UNRELATED TO THE ANIMAL INVOLVED. GET THAT? FAILURE OF THE RESEARCHERS, AND COMPLETELY UNRELATED TO THE ANIMAL INVOLVED.

    "The thing I now wonder is if YOU actually know much about the Clever Hans deal. It had nothing to do with tone of voice."

    I NEVER SAID IT DID HAVE TO DO WITH TONE OF VOICE. WHY CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WRITTEN TEXT?

    WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO YOU THAT YOU MAKE BASELESS ASSUMPTIONS SO EASILY AND PROLIFICALLY?

    I used it as an example of misunderstanding animal intelligence. IT IS.

    What the fuck is wrong with you that you need to find some way to refute me, EVEN IF IT IS TOTALLY UNRELATED AND IRRELEVANT, or worse, COMPLETELY WRONG?

    Do you understand why I don't want to do this anymore? You don't even know enough to raise intelligent objections, and when you do raise an objection, it is based entirely on your misunderstandings.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    1. Re:LEARN TO READ SCHMUCK by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should check into the meaning of the phrase "I'm Done". Because if you think it means you will not respond to anything more I say you just did. Kinda silly really. Besides just because you are done with me dosn't necesarrily mean I was ready to give up on trying to learn something from you.

      Tis a true measure of my spare time to see how much I now seem to have wasted in an attempt to learn why you think I am so misguided in my thoughts regarding canine capacity for understanding human language. I have never claimed to be an expert on the subject, you on the other hand are claiming to have relevant academic knowledge and yet the best you can return with is learn to read, or spout a platitude about one source not being a solid foundation. So you don't like the study. Great. WHY? Obviously your opinion is that it is flawed. Is that all you have? Is there no greater depth of reasoning behind it? I should believe that the study is flawed on your say so? That is all you have given me thus far. Pardon me if I choose the peer reviewed study results that seem to jibe with my personal experience to your opinion.

      I interupted your thread ? Gee I finally get to use that tired line "You must be new here". Do you even understand the concept of a communal blog? In fact unless you are the AC that I initially responded to, you don't even appear in this thread until your first response to me.

      You know I should just toss you on the foe list and mod you out of my existence. But I must admit a morbid curiosity to see if you have anything further to say. Besides I have long held that you can learn something from anyone if you take the time and make the effort. So far you have proven the exception.... and yeah I know... try to learn on /. through intelligent exchange of idea... I must be new here.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.