He's uid 56, we're not supposed to nor capable of understanding his scripture in it's essence. It's the force of uid1000 and mere letters do it no justice.
I agree, with Bredbandsbolaget (Sweden) I get 10/10 full duplex for 285 SEK/40 USD. For twice the cost you can get 100/100 albeit with a 300 GB monthly quota. This service isn't/wasn't even government subsidized.
The whole class could've passed just spending 15 minutes looking at IE.
Sure, but that class wouldn't amount to much more than random typing and clicking. Extra credit if you use a debugger or go into real detail and skim the source.
In line with your analogies, perhaps we need a "reset" every so often by ECT (electro-convulsive therapy) or perhaps in the future
there is a possibility of a complete reinstall. The need of course depends on your gliaCeLLOS genotype come phenotype. I can serve as an illustrative example of the reinstall market need in that even though I use OSX my brain is more like Windows, capable of spectacular feats once in a while but mostly quite erratic, flimsy and unpredictable. And inadvertently ruining my karma yesterday. So mod me up, I have bad karma to spare. I repent.
I agree with the poster, definitely 01337. Too me it seems that the script only tries to run John the Ripper on pw hashes from 10.2 and samba + like hashes from 10.3 but does it doesn't get any pws from 10.3. When I mimic parts of the script
nidump passwd . >> blabla
and
nidump passwd / >> blabla and then jtr
then the resulting dump of passwd only contains ******** in the password field, even when I do this as sudo through an admin account. Of course, this may be different when you run the whole script and it sure does other harm but it's not 1337 and definitely not done. And the comments make good natured me feel like a bona fide osx-conquering black hat.
My situation and attitudes seem to be close to yours, judging from your post. I used DOS/Win for about 15 years, linux for 4 (of which ~2 where with gentoo) but two weeks ago my 2 year switch-to-osx contemplation ended and I got an iBook G4. I think you'll be pleased with your new laptop.
If I were a tinfoil-hat kind of person, I'd wonder if this isn't some sort of SCO-ish related thing.
As a pastiche based on your argument and considering close-to-entertaining tinfoil-hat thoughts:
You won't learn anything useful, and more importantly, you need to be able to truthfully say "I've never thought as a tinfoil-hat wearer, and specifically and intentionally avoided getting impressed by tinfoil or looking at it".
So repost, the otherwise nice post, with the last line dropped.
IANANativeEnglishSpeaker/Writer/Thinker, so drop the sado grammar spelling fetischism
E.g. the pattern zse4rfvgy7ujm on the keyboard
or bvfr56yh or something like that. Circles, triangles, squares, serpentines or whatever form and their connections. I would never remember the actual assword in letters but the pattern is a spinal reflex by now. If password crackers would search for these patterns I suppose the key space wouldn't be so large.
For me the damage wouldn't be so great. Actually, someone making my research papers in medicine public would be a great help!:)
Of course the real goal for this contest could be the design of vehicle for use on another planet. But then, why not land directly where you want to go?
'navigate on its own over a 250-mile desert course in less than 10 hours.'
a cruise missile does that easily.
'without external communication or human control.'
Get a chimp to use joystick which controls a dot (representing the vehicle) on a screen. When it gets the dot to the, say sexy chimp or gorilla, at the other side of the screen it gets some reward. Dolphins, maze mice or any other animal would probably work as well.
Or get huskie dogs to tow the vehicle towards a "home" across the desert.
I believe the U.S. military budget would be better spent on me.
How to describe tests, e.g. in this case college admission, has been a well studied practice for a long time. A specific tests is evaluated by how close it meets the desired student body composition of the college. Factors involved are the sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive and negative predictive value and others. In college admission terms these could perhaps be translated to:
Sensitivity - what proportion of high-school students with post priori or retrospective success in a college will be admitted by the test. Or the question "If with omniscience we know that some student would do well in a college, how likely is it that the student to be accepted by the admission tests of that college?"
Specificity - what proportion of high-school students with post priori or retrospective success in a college will be rejected by the test.
Sensitivity and specificity often relate reciprocally.
Positive predicitive value - what proportion of the students who were accepted by the admission test of college will actually succeed in that college.
Negative predicitive value - what proportion of the students who were rejected by the admission test of college would in fact actually have succeed in that college.
I believe that the article is inspiring and that the purpose of the article were to illustrate success in spite of (over-)whelming odds. However, without knowledge of the above test describing variables and knowledge of college admission goals as distilled in the tests I find it difficult to immediately come to the conclusion that one/some/all tests are a failure. (Note before rest of text: I sort of presume that most Ivy league students are dull and don't do miracles and the brilliant one's are at least a bit eccentric or out-of-the-box). For example if an Ivy league school's admission test goal is to minizime future failing students over admitting perceived "high-risk" students with potential genius capability then it would prefer a test with a high positivt predictive value and you would expect the outcome illustrated in the article (I don't think a genius necessitates a "high-risk" personality but bear with me). Another school perhaps wants to find all the gems hidden in the mainstream Ivy league applying sand and would consequently value a test with a high sensitivity and a low negativt predictive value even if that means they admit some rather dull but performing students.
Of course my points may be moot coming from U of Rant at Nonsensespam-by-the-sea.
Does anyone which (software) tool does the best job of wiping on a ReiserFS partition? According to the man page for shred it doesn't do an "effective" job on ReiserFS.
Re:Why can't anyone see the implications of this?
on
This is IT?
·
· Score: 1
Does it sigsegway?
(lameness filter prevented the caps but not this post:)
Slashdot Mirror
There's still episodes 7,8 and 9 for the complainers :)
He's uid 56, we're not supposed to nor capable of understanding his scripture in it's essence. It's the force of uid1000 and mere letters do it no justice.
I agree, with Bredbandsbolaget (Sweden) I get 10/10 full duplex for 285 SEK/40 USD. For twice the cost you can get 100/100 albeit with a 300 GB monthly quota. This service isn't/wasn't even government subsidized.
The whole class could've passed just spending 15 minutes looking at IE.
Sure, but that class wouldn't amount to much more than random typing and clicking. Extra credit if you use a debugger or go into real detail and skim the source.
I wish the would put the extra effort in to make it a movie fit for cinema and not just late night sci-fi rerun channels.
Oh...
I quite surprised with the moderation, this has to be one of the most life-ascertaining unexpected unintentional trolls.
In line with your analogies, perhaps we need a "reset" every so often by ECT (electro-convulsive therapy) or perhaps in the future there is a possibility of a complete reinstall. The need of course depends on your gliaCeLLOS genotype come phenotype. I can serve as an illustrative example of the reinstall market need in that even though I use OSX my brain is more like Windows, capable of spectacular feats once in a while but mostly quite erratic, flimsy and unpredictable. And inadvertently ruining my karma yesterday. So mod me up, I have bad karma to spare. I repent.
BSD is resurrected!
I agree with the poster, definitely 01337. Too me it seems that the script only tries to run John the Ripper on pw hashes from 10.2 and samba + like hashes from 10.3 but does it doesn't get any pws from 10.3. When I mimic parts of the script
nidump passwd . >> blabla
and
nidump passwd / >> blabla and then jtr
then the resulting dump of passwd only contains ******** in
the password field, even when I do this as sudo through an admin account. Of course, this may be different when you run the whole script and it sure does other harm but it's not 1337 and definitely not done. And the comments make good natured me feel like a bona fide osx-conquering black hat.
Uma, please kill the bill.
It's lose you idiot! LOSE
Every day i see some idiot saying loose instead of lose, and i'm sick of it! Your mom is LOOSE. You LOSE your money in Vegas. Get it?!
Everytime I communicate with Americans they ufck their language. You don't see some one saying something. You hear speech, you...you too idiot!
Unless, of course, you read lips as I'm sure you're geekly capable of. My mistake...sorry.
I think Avalanche or Avalaunch would be nice names. And btw a new Lindows/Windows lawsuit debate keeps /. readers focused on the necessities.
/. to /.. take the discussions to higher levels?
Curiosity: Would renaming
Finally I can contain my baby and her toy projectiles behind blast locks and save myself.
I'll not post any findings, nor will I give you any numbers of my OWN personal experience.
...,nor support my position with anything else, not even a google search:
Your search - "default install size" XP os x - did not match any documents.
and
Your search - "default install size" XP osx - did not match any documents.
My situation and attitudes seem to be close to yours, judging from your post. I used DOS/Win for about 15 years, linux for 4 (of which ~2 where with gentoo) but two weeks ago my 2 year switch-to-osx contemplation ended and I got an iBook G4. I think you'll be pleased with your new laptop.
Please allow me to launch a sado grammar spelling fetishist first-strike preemptive almost american daisy cutter response:
:)
fetishism
(but my memory is short, this may be wrong as well
If I were a tinfoil-hat kind of person, I'd wonder if this isn't some sort of SCO-ish related thing.
As a pastiche based on your argument and considering close-to-entertaining tinfoil-hat thoughts:
You won't learn anything useful, and more importantly, you need to be able to truthfully say "I've never thought as a tinfoil-hat wearer, and specifically and intentionally avoided getting impressed by tinfoil or looking at it".
So repost, the otherwise nice post, with the last line dropped.
IANANativeEnglishSpeaker/Writer/Thinker, so drop the sado grammar spelling fetischism
Cable at 640/256 for ~50 USD (at 7,17 SEK/USD). Switching soon.
E.g. the pattern zse4rfvgy7ujm on the keyboard or bvfr56yh or something like that. Circles, triangles, squares, serpentines or whatever form and their connections. I would never remember the actual assword in letters but the pattern is a spinal reflex by now. If password crackers would search for these patterns I suppose the key space wouldn't be so large. For me the damage wouldn't be so great. Actually, someone making my research papers in medicine public would be a great help! :)
Of course the real goal for this contest could be the design of vehicle for use on another planet. But then, why not land directly where you want to go?
'navigate on its own over a 250-mile desert course in less than 10 hours.'
a cruise missile does that easily.
'without external communication or human control.'
Get a chimp to use joystick which controls a dot (representing the vehicle) on a screen. When it gets the dot to the, say sexy chimp or gorilla, at the other side of the screen it gets some reward. Dolphins, maze mice or any other animal would probably work as well.
Or get huskie dogs to tow the vehicle towards a "home" across the desert.
I believe the U.S. military budget would be better spent on me.
How to describe tests, e.g. in this case college admission, has been a well studied practice for a long time. A specific tests is evaluated by how close it meets the desired student body composition of the college. Factors involved are the sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive and negative predictive value and others. In college admission terms these could perhaps be translated to:
Sensitivity - what proportion of high-school students with post priori or retrospective success in a college will be admitted by the test. Or the question "If with omniscience we know that some student would do well in a college, how likely is it that the student to be accepted by the admission tests of that college?"
Specificity - what proportion of high-school students with post priori or retrospective success in a college will be rejected by the test.
Sensitivity and specificity often relate reciprocally.
Positive predicitive value - what proportion of the students who were accepted by the admission test of college will actually succeed in that college.
Negative predicitive value - what proportion of the students who were rejected by the admission test of college would in fact actually have succeed in that college.
I believe that the article is inspiring and that the purpose of the article were to illustrate success in spite of (over-)whelming odds. However, without knowledge of the above test describing variables and knowledge of college admission goals as distilled in the tests I find it difficult to immediately come to the conclusion that one/some/all tests are a failure. (Note before rest of text: I sort of presume that most Ivy league students are dull and don't do miracles and the brilliant one's are at least a bit eccentric or out-of-the-box). For example if an Ivy league school's admission test goal is to minizime future failing students over admitting perceived "high-risk" students with potential genius capability then it would prefer a test with a high positivt predictive value and you would expect the outcome illustrated in the article (I don't think a genius necessitates a "high-risk" personality but bear with me). Another school perhaps wants to find all the gems hidden in the mainstream Ivy league applying sand and would consequently value a test with a high sensitivity and a low negativt predictive value even if that means they admit some rather dull but performing students. Of course my points may be moot coming from U of Rant at Nonsensespam-by-the-sea.
> Thank God Sex is not licensed under GPL or everyone would get to watch! -- me
But the faults in your technique would be quickly exposed and corrected.
Does anyone which (software) tool does the best job of wiping on a ReiserFS partition? According to the man page for shred it doesn't do an "effective" job on ReiserFS.
Does it sigsegway?
:)
(lameness filter prevented the caps but not this post