Slashdot Mirror


Initial ROTS Reviews Hit the Internet

Trunks writes "The first reviews of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith have started to trickle onto the Net. Reviews are posted at ComingSoon.net, Ain't It Cool News, Variety, and there are three separate reviews at TheForce.net. The current issue of Time magazine has a review as well. The reviews have all been positive so far, and the consensus appears to be that this is the best film of the prequels and it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two."

475 comments

  1. No it won't by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll still be unsatisfied with the first two.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:No it won't by euxneks · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree, I think Lucas should remake the first two. ;P

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    2. Re:No it won't by vivin · · Score: 4, Funny

      The reviews have all been positive so far, and the consensus appears to be that this is the best film of the prequels and it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two

      Oh boy! Oh boy! Does this mean we get to see Jar-Jar Binks die in a horrible way? Will he be killed by Anakin? Personally, it would make my day if I heard Jar Jar say something like this:

      "Ahhhh!!! Mee-sa skins-a burning! AAHHHH!!!"

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    3. Re:No it won't by eyegone · · Score: 5, Funny


      I agree, I think Lucas should remake the first two.

      Don't worry. If history is any guide, he will.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    4. Re:No it won't by Hugonz · · Score: 3, Funny

      He will, we'll pay for it.

    5. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is dead-on.

      Frankly, I was so offended by the first 2 that I couldn't give a fuck about episode 3 either way.

      Saw 1 at the cinema and waited for episode 2 to hit DVD, don't think I'll ever be exchanging money to see a Star Wars film again.

    6. Re:No it won't by sunnydayjj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is this modded as funny? That was exactly my reaction when I read "...it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two."

      How does a decent third movie make up for the crap that was the first two movies. If George Lucas only had enough content for one prequel he should have only made one prequel. Force fitting this prequel nonsense into a trilogy just to squeeze more dollars out of the fans has made me no longer a fan...

      --
      "He'd already RATHER be bowhunting!" -Max Filmont
    7. Re:No it won't by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      He has already announced they he is remaking them in 3D...

      http://movieweb.com/news/news.php?id=7210

    8. Re:No it won't by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Yes yes, but are you going to watch it?"

      Yours

      George

    9. Re:No it won't by peragrin · · Score: 1

      And this time qui gon Jin gets to shoot first.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    10. Re:No it won't by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      And this time qui gon Jin gets to shoot first.

      He doesn't shoot, fool, he's a jedi and uses a lightsabre!

      The Gungans will fire upon the Trade Federation Bot Army first!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:No it won't by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      Replace Jar-Jar with Ewoks?

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    12. Re:No it won't by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0
      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    13. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      "Yes yes, but are you going to watch it?"

      As soon as we can download it

      Yours

      Asia/Europe/Russia/Australasia

    14. Re:No it won't by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

      Please say he'll do Return of the Jedi too.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    15. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Narratively remastered!

    16. Re:No it won't by UserGoogol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because he had a story to tell. He's an artist, and if the story demands that he make two shitty movies, so be it.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    17. Re:No it won't by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is a scene directed by Mel Gibson called "The Passion of the Binks". You get to watch Jar-Jar get whipped for 30 minutes straight then nailed by his ears to the side of an Imperial Walker.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    18. Re:No it won't by purple_cobra · · Score: 1

      Heh, while the massed ranks of Star Wars geeks shout "Die! Die!" in Ancient Hutt-ese?
      BTW, try playing 'Lego Star Wars'; it contains Jar-Jar but as he doesn't actually speak he isn't anywhere near so irritating.

    19. Re:No it won't by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Well, "The Fellowship of the Ring" was necessary to set up the story, but what didn't you like about "The Two Towers"? Still, I don't get the write-up. ROTK came out like a year ago, and it was reviewed plenty back then. Slashdot seems a tad out of date.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    20. Re:No it won't by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I have lost pretty much all respect for George Lucas as a storyteller at this point. Yes, Eps. 4, 5 and even 6 were great movies. And I had nothing but respect for the man when he refused to license his characters to advertisers who wanted to exploit them (C3POs cereal notwithstanding). Unfortunately, now that this is his so-called "last movie" (yeah, right), he is milking his franchise for every last penny .. Yoda is now selling Pepsi, Chewbacca is selling cellular phones .. it's so patently whoreish it makes me ill.

      Lucas: "Well, this is the last chance I'll get to make a few hundred million more bucks off of these guys, might as well take the bucks while I can. Cause hey, I can never have too much money. Principles? Yeah, I used to have those."

      I feel sorry for the kids growing up today .. they'll never really understand what it was like to grow up with Star Wars.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    21. Re:No it won't by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

      I heard that Jar Jar is in the film but does not speak. No I don't have any links to back this up and I'm too lazy to research this.

      --
      this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
    22. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To prevent piracy, ROTS has been encrypted with the advanced ROT13 alogorithm.

    23. Re:No it won't by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

      He does attack first. That's why he dies.

    24. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by Hoi Polloi (522990) on Friday May 06, @01:25PM (#12453447)
      It is a scene directed by Mel Gibson called "The Passion of the Binks". You get to watch Jar-Jar get whipped for 30 minutes straight then nailed by his ears to the side of an Imperial Walker. /Wipeing tears out of my eyes

      You are my new hero

      hehehhehe

    25. Re:No it won't by Atraxen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm... maybe this time, someone shoots at Jar-Jar first... Naw, that won't happen... -sigh-

      --
      Be careful of your thoughts; they could become words at any minute...
    26. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You now owe me a new pair of pants.

    27. Re:No it won't by chrish · · Score: 1

      Also, it's a great game, and you can kill Jar-Jar yourself as much as you want.

      --
      - chrish
    28. Re:No it won't by henni16 · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I think somebody else should remake the first two. ;P

    29. Re:No it won't by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1
      "...How does a decent third movie make up for the crap that was the first two movies..."

      Your lack of faith is disturbing!

      [raises hand to begging throat crushing]

      ;)

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    30. Re:No it won't by SQLz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe he really tried to make good movies and he failed so he came up with this "I'm telling a story" excuse.

    31. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The novels of TPM and AotC weren't bad though. Therefore, the story didn't demand that he make two shitty movies. He's just a horrible writer and director when it comes to characters talking and showing emotion. The reason ANH was great was because somebody else made Lucas change a few things here and there so that the acting/dialog wasn't horrible. ESB was great because Lucas got another director to do it. If he'd done it himself with the free hand he's had on the prequels, Han/Leia would've ended up like Anakin/Padme (wooden performance, complete lack of believability).

    32. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TLOTR trilogy was based on a book that was written as a cohesive story from start to finish. Lucas' movies are patched together because he makes up the story as he goes along so his films are full of plot clashes, gaps, and things that simply don't make sense.

    33. Re:No it won't by Basehart · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Please say he'll do Return of the Jedi too."

      He'll do Return of the Jedi too

      Anything else while I'm here sir, or will that be all?

    34. Re:No it won't by evil-osm · · Score: 1

      I think what was intended, was that we will be satisfied with the *knowledge* that this is the last one. That then will make up for the other two.

      --


      E.

      Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
    35. Re:No it won't by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      It'd be easier if they just don't save him from getting hit by that flying tank in the forest...

    36. Re:No it won't by WillWare · · Score: 1
      remaking them in 3D

      That's OK, as long as they have visible raster scan lines.

      --
      WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    37. Re:No it won't by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      With this much noise you just know it's going to suck. Independent of anything else. If the studio feels it has to give away cars and hire prostitutes to independent reviewers just to get some "buzz" it is an undeniable fact that they already know it can't create any on it's own.

    38. Re:No it won't by Kizor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anakin will beat the Midi-Chlorians to death, all of them, using Jar-Jar's twisted body for the task.

    39. Re:No it won't by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for the kids growing up today .. they'll never really understand what it was like to grow up with Star Wars.

      Jesus Christ! It's just a movie franchise. Give me a break with all of the whining and bellyaching about it.

      I grew up watching ST:TNG and reading the pocket books. Do you see me bitching about my kids not knowing what it is like to grow up with real Star Trek? It's a fcsk'ing work of fiction! What with the War in Iraq, the rising cost of oil, the threat of terrorism, the British elections or any number of more important real world events to worry about -- let's all bemoan the perceived loss of Star Wars innocence.

      Hell, were the original movies even that great to begin with or were we all just easier to impress back then? Add two decades of age and experience to the audience and constant exposure to the same quality (if not better) visual FX and what do you have? Do you think any of the first three movies would have been as impressive if they were released in the late 90s instead of the 70s? Hell, would Star Trek Nemesis have sucked so badly if it had been released in the 70s when eye candy phaser/turbolaser fights could still dazzle audiences?

      Sorry to head off on this rant but I'm really sick of people whining about George Lucas every time Slashdot decides to post a story about Star Wars. Whether or not you agree with him that this was always his vision of the story (right down to you-know-who firing first) it is his story to tell and he can tell it however he wants. Where's the usual Slashdot crowd rising to the defense of the creative artist? Or does that only work when it's Joe-little-guy going up against the RIAA or MPAA?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    40. Re:No it won't by sambira · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "Return of the Jedi 2"?

    41. Re:No it won't by sambira · · Score: 1

      They should use "The Dip"!

    42. Re:No it won't by initialE · · Score: 1

      He gets shot at, and then multiplies into two! Twice the fun!

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    43. Re:No it won't by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "Shouldn't that be "Return of the Jedi 2"?"

      You are so correct, other Sir.

      Return of the Jedi 2

  2. About friggin time! by CptTripps · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been waiting for a "real" Star-Wars for years....let's hope this one works.

    Bonus poiints if there is a scene where Anakin kills Jar-Jar.

    --


    My .sig can beat up your honor student.
    1. Re:About friggin time! by Holi · · Score: 1

      Actually better yet,
      Obi-Wan kills Jar-Jar.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:About friggin time! by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 0

      This is not the film you seek.

      Unfortunately.

    3. Re:About friggin time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet - her highness sleeps with Jar-Jar.

    4. Re:About friggin time! by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need to see this film. This is not the film you're looking for.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    5. Re:About friggin time! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Bonus poiints if there is a scene where Anakin kills Jar-Jar.

      Yes, I can imagine the applauses, yells and whistles of all the fans - just like when Yoda took out his light saber and began to fight.

    6. Re:About friggin time! by Loki_1929 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Bonus poiints if there is a scene where Anakin kills Jar-Jar."

      Double bonus points if there's a 10-second scene with no dialog or other characters except for Jar-Jar putting a laser pistol in his mouth and pulling the trigger.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    7. Re:About friggin time! by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      bonus points for NO jarjar at all. I would gladly have a plot discontinuous with the previous two disasters if jarjar were destroyed off-screen and without mention.

    8. Re:About friggin time! by Fishstick · · Score: 3, Funny

      No.

      Laser pistol in the mouth woudl be too quick and easy and unsatisfying.

      Let him fall into the lava pit and be horribly burned and scream for a few minutes before someone goes down and puts a couple in him to shut him up ala Austin Powers:

      "Meesa alive, but meesa verri badlee burnded!!"

      BAM!

      "How could you missa!!"

      BAM!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    9. Re:About friggin time! by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Actually better yet,
      Obi-Wan kills Jar-Jar.


      Actually better yet,
      c3p0 kills Jar-Jar.

      Turns out the main memory core Anakin used was salvaged from a ancient AK-47.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    10. Re:About friggin time! by lgw · · Score: 1

      FWIW: JarJar does not appear in the book, at all.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:About friggin time! by CthuluOverlord · · Score: 1

      Not to be overly pedantic, but if you're referring to the assassin droid from Knights of the Old Republic, it was HK-47.

      Although I'm sure the memory core from a Kalashnikov would fill the bill as well.

    12. Re:About friggin time! by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a re-make of that scene in Deer Hunter where Jar Jar is playing Russian Roulette for money. The contrast of such a realistic gritty scene paired with an unbelievable jackass of a character would be great.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    13. Re:About friggin time! by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      -100000000 points if R2D2 has a battle scene as stupid as Yoda's...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    14. Re:About friggin time! by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Then Lucas will re-re-re-edit episodes 4-6 so that Jar-Jar is really Luke and Leia's father and digitally add big floppy ears to Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    15. Re:About friggin time! by TimeForGuinness · · Score: 1
      Triple Bonus points if Greedo shoots him first..

      ...wait

    16. Re:About friggin time! by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but does Jar-Jar shoot first?

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    17. Re:About friggin time! by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      two words:

      lightsaber colonic

    18. Re:About friggin time! by MouseR · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for a "real" Star-Wars for years....let's hope this one works.

      Episode 1 and 2 were pretty much a "real" Star Wars. If you're sorry about their nature, to thankful you outgrew your young kid's movie taste. Because after all, SW 4 and 6 were as childish as 1 and 2 were. And they were all still good movies.

      Episode 5 was darker because it needed to portray the demise of Luke's illusion about being so good and the demise of the alliance.

      So please all stop bitching about the fact that you've grown (at least a little bit).

      Bonus poiints if there is a scene where Anakin kills Jar-Jar.

      And I precisely dont want that. He wouldn't be so evil if he killed him. instead, he's going to destroy Gen. Greious, taking his place, by locking him in the same room as Binks.

    19. Re:About friggin time! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Because after all, SW 4 and 6 were as childish as 1 and 2 were.

      Right, because Yoda as a wise grand master in harmony with the force in ESB is just as childish as Yoda as Sonic The Hedgehog with Lightsabers in AoTC (who forgets his non-physical force abilities).

      To start the list...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    20. Re:About friggin time! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Well, there should be a special edition coming out in a few years.

      Hey, maybe if Lucas got sober with Ep. III he'll re-do I & II as special editions we can watch.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:About friggin time! by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      Hey! Your jedi mind tricks wont work on... er, well actually, I suppose you're probably right.

    22. Re:About friggin time! by dswartze · · Score: 1

      Right, because Yoda as a wise grand master in harmony with the force in ESB is just as childish as Yoda as Sonic The Hedgehog with Lightsabers in AoTC (who forgets his non-physical force abilities).

      alright, what about when yoda first meets luke. I'd have to say that that incarnation of yoda is more childish than ANYTHING in all of the Star Wars movies, including all of the actions of both Luke and Anakin, and those Skywalkers are pretty damned childish.

    23. Re:About friggin time! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      alright, what about when yoda first meets luke. I'd have to say that that incarnation of yoda is more childish than ANYTHING in all of the Star Wars movies

      That was a test of Luke's decision making process, his patience, and his general worldliness. Classic kung-fu movie stuff.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:About friggin time! by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Better still Mace Windu. Now everyone go to the Samuel L Jackson soundboard on albinoblacksheep.com and click on the top right button.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    25. Re:About friggin time! by mink · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out why he stopped the crane(or was it a pillar) from falling. It would have required less force (sic) to either push it as it fell so it missed them or to just yank the two jedi out of the way.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  3. Best film of the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about shooting for the stars!

    1. Re:Best film of the prequels by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

      It could easily be better than 'Jedi'. Star Wars will always be #1, because even if you wanted to, you can't shake the nostalgia value. 'Empire' would be #2. 'Attack of the Clones' could have been #3 if it weren't for the painfully awkward scenes between Amidala and Skywalker.

      Don't forget, 'Jedi' gave us Boba Fett going down like a bitch and Ewoks.

    2. Re:Best film of the prequels by stlhawkeye · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The more influence Lucas has over the screenplay, the shoddier the story is.

      The more influence he has over the directing, the crappier the blocking and acting it.

      Lucas reminds me of an old programmer. He's great at painting the big picture, but keep his hands off the source code, he'll just fuck it up. Lucas is an architect, not a carpenter.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    3. Re:Best film of the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lucas is an architect, not a carpenter." So you're saying they need to make use of Harrison Ford again...?

    4. Re:Best film of the prequels by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can deny that it is an accomplishment for a director to helm a trilogy in which each film is much better than the previous one. Admitedly however the start George Lucas had with Episode I may have been setting the bar just a bit low.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  4. Bittorrent by Jemima's+Witness · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah but I can't even find the bittorrent yet.

    1. Re:Bittorrent by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of all the movies which should never be released on BitTorrent, StarWars III is the one that leads the pack.

      This would prove once and for all to 'the powers that be' on a legal level that P2p CAN lose money for people. Especially considering the lack of tanking reviews, if this movie fails or is even disappointing for ANY reason econommically, there is 0 chance that if there is a torrent out there it will not get blamed.

      From what I've seen, the pre-teen crowd might be not going to this movie, which could hurt its success. The question is whether this loss is enough. But really, if this movie fails and there's a torrent out there, there will be a witch hunt. Lucas might not even do it. In fact, I can't see him doing it, seeing as he's not that much of a luddite. But really, the WORST thing I can think of happening to Digital Copyright Stuff is this movie getting leaked.

    2. Re:Bittorrent by Knara · · Score: 5, Funny
      A Star Wars movie that isn't a blatant financial success? Where have you been the last 20 years?

      Sir, we've analyzed the bittorrent scene and there is a danger, we have your legal team standing by?

      - Litigate? In our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances!

    3. Re:Bittorrent by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, so sad for you. :P

      I'm not going to mind going and seeing it in the theater. Biggest issue I see with going to the theater is sharing a space with drooling geeks. That place is going to stink of B.O. like crazy!

    4. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Bittorrent by HAKdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My biggest issue with going to the theater is seeing 20 minutes of advertisements before the previews begin after paying $8 per ticket.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    6. Re:Bittorrent by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, but defining success is the problem here. People in the entertainment industry can sometimes.... welll..... Yeah. Remember, this is the kind of people who, in the music industry, were screaming, "We've only had 50% revenue growth in the last three years," when Mp3 sharing was at its height. An industry which, while not hurting at all, continually pushes rapaciously towards more... Not exactly the kind of people to leave a rock unturned in any case they think they can make a little money under it. Especially if they think it's THEIR money.

    7. Re:Bittorrent by rjelks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention the fact that using BitTorrent for any "prerelease" is risky. I remember how many of my friends saw the 1st prequel days before it was in theaters. If you want to test the legal waters with p2p, then Episode III will get you attention. :) I'm sure the studio has tons of people that are looking for that one to pop up.

      Reviews like these, and news of the PG-13 rating are startging to get my geeky hopes up for this one. Do we dare hope that this movie could be good?

    8. Re:Bittorrent by Golias · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, the pre-teen crowd might be not going to this movie, which could hurt its success.

      Why, because it's PG-13?

      Dude, when I saw "Kill Bill, Vol. 1" in the theater, some dumbass parents in the row ahead of me actually brought their 5-year old daughter along. (That experiment lasted about four minutes. The kid actually got through the opening flashback without bursting into tears, but the living room knife-fight was a little too much for the little moppet.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:Bittorrent by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 4, Funny
      Biggest issue I see with going to the theater is sharing a space with drooling geeks. That place is going to stink of B.O. like crazy!

      This may be funny to some people, but it can lead to a very real, and tragic, experience. When the Fellowship of the Ring opened up, I saw it at midnight in the Loews on Boston Common. There were definitely people that took it way too seriously, but everyone seemed like they were having fun, so whatever. They let us into the theater proper about a half hour before the show. Everyone was cheering and people were in a jolly mood. "Rob" came out to tell us that he was very happy we all came to his theater and that he is very excited that we are excited and says "if there is anything I can do, let me know." Everyone clapped and Rob left. There was no air conditioning in the theater, which is not really a problem in December, but it was noticeable that the air wsn't "fresh." After about 15 minutes of hundreds of (MIT) people in the theater, we start to notice the odor. Clearly not everyone notices. Most in fact have no clue. They continue laughing at the "ents" in the audience and checking out their promo Lord of the Rings cards. But we did see some people looking around and wrinkling their nose. Five more minutes go by and more people are making faces. I decide its time to do something about this. I leave the theater and find Rob. "Hey Rob, real glad you guys are doing his. Everyone is pretty excited. One thing: it's uh... kinda warm in there... and uhh... well, some of these people haven't showered in a few days... could you.. uh... turn on the AC or something." Rob laughs and says "sure." 5 minutes before the movie starts, the AC kicks in. 5 more minutes and the smell has (virtually) disappated and everyone enjoyed the movie.

      Let this be a lesson. Please, if you are reading slashdot, do your part on movie-night. Take a shower. It will be appreciated.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    10. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL, BRILLIANT!

    11. Re:Bittorrent by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      You're right. I keep forgetting that This Is America and We're Complete Idiots....

    12. Re:Bittorrent by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I saw a young couple bring a child who couldn't have been any more than 5 to "Sout Park: Bigger, Longer, Uncut!".

      About 30 seconds into "Uncle Fucker" and they were on their way out...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    13. Re:Bittorrent by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I've seen, the pre-teen crowd might be not going to this movie, which could hurt its success

      Not Really.. this is where Lucas Marketing whiz wheels kick in to action..

      Instead of kids going to the movie alone, or with other kids (PG), now they drag their parents along to watch it with them. Additional revenue that would otherwise been not there..

    14. Re:Bittorrent by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to mind going and seeing it in the theater. Biggest issue I see with going to the theater is sharing a space with drooling geeks. That place is going to stink of B.O. like crazy!

      Not to mention the blinding light & sounds of 1,000 people text messaging their friends about every little detail or blooper in the film.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    15. Re:Bittorrent by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      What theaster are you going to that has 1000 seats?

    16. Re:Bittorrent by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. There was a hispanic family of 5, ages 2-6, that sat behind me for the South Park movie. The dad drug the whole family out before Terrence and Phillip got to the second verse of "Unkle Fucker." Was one of the funniest parts of that movie for me.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    17. Re:Bittorrent by LiquidRaptor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reminds me of the time I went to see Bad Santa, I was carded for the movie, all my friends were carded for the movie. There were big signs saying that it was not a childrens movie and it was not appropriate for kids in the slightest. We go in and there were at least 10-12 little kids in the 3-6 age group. Whats bad is that some of them ended staying through the whole movie while bawling their eyes out. Thats when I realized that some people should not be allowed to have kids.

    18. Re:Bittorrent by jocknerd · · Score: 2

      Hey, I balled my eyes out at the end of the movie too because I thought the movie sucked so bad and I wasted $8 on it.

    19. Re:Bittorrent by chameleon3 · · Score: 1

      if this movie fails or is even disappointing for ANY reason econommically, there is 0 chance that if there is a torrent out there it will not get blamed.

      much as they hate P2P, I think the MPAA/media/lucasfilm/etc. will blame the dark subject matter and excessive bloodletting first.

    20. Re:Bittorrent by lgw · · Score: 1

      I can see you don't grasp the mindset fully. In their minds, ALL money is THEIR money, other people just happen to be carrying it, which I'm sure must be soime sort of crime.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:Bittorrent by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the ads are lame, but a lot of the time the previews are better than the movie :)

      They need to bring back the Snapple ads with the hamsters.

    22. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey, I balled my eyes out at the end of the movie too because I thought the movie sucked so bad

      Umm, I *really* hope you meant "bawled", not "balled".

    23. Re:Bittorrent by mforbes · · Score: 1

      Now I get it! The RIAA/MPAA are staffed by Kender!

      --

      Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
      Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

    24. Re:Bittorrent by ollie_ob · · Score: 1

      My biggest issue is having to pay GBP9 (equivalent to $17) to see any mainstream film at a cinema here in central London. $8 would be a bit of a bargain.

      --
      #define ROSE any_other_name
    25. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the movie was pretty bad.

      Not "accidently killed your father and married your mother" bad, maybe, but people are entitled to their opinion.

    26. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man it's gonna be so bad i'm not leaving my house until mother gives me money for carfare, the ticket, and packs me a cheese sandwich because I am HUNGRY ALL THE TIME

    27. Re:Bittorrent by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah and it's pretty sad that just about the only way to view the original Star Wars movies as they were when I was a child is to download the bootleg DVDs off of bittorrent, usenet or other such illegal distribution.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    28. Re:Bittorrent by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      What theaster are you going to that has 1000 seats?

      There are plenty although many have been split up into smaller sections over the last several decades. Most people only think of 'Mall' theaters these days where the average seating capacity (USA) is ~225.

      The Arlington in Santa Barbara seats over 2,000 people and has a very nice atmosphere.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    29. Re:Bittorrent by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      I live in Oregon. I don't think I've ever been in a theater that held more than a few hundred people.

    30. Re:Bittorrent by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      You mean the 20 years it's been since there was a Star Wars movie released?

    31. Re:Bittorrent by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      I live in Oregon. I don't think I've ever been in a theater that held more than a few hundred people.

      Take a look at the site below. You might find a nice older large capacity theater in your area. It's quite a different experience than modern theaters and well worth the money. Large theaters designed like these are a dying breed so if you get a chance, check one out.

      http://www.cinematreasures.org/location/country=18 1&state=38/

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    32. Re:Bittorrent by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if the jerks just left the A/C on. You're lucky that your climate allowed for it. My climate requires A/C... apparently year round for a packed movie theatre. I went to a Midnight showing of LotR and regretted it. Full price for a movie and a sauna.

    33. Re:Bittorrent by loshwomp · · Score: 1
      Especially considering the lack of tanking reviews, if this movie fails or is even disappointing for ANY reason econommically, there is 0 chance that if there is a torrent out there it will not get blamed.

      I don't think there's a 0 percent chance that you don't not need no more negatives in that sentence.

    34. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Pay someone $5 to save you a seat and call you when the ads or previews are finished. Wait outside and go in when you get the call.

    35. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the movie was pretty bad.

      Do you not know the difference between balled and bawled?

    36. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Skullfucked
      :P

    37. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know the parent post was an Oedipus joke?

      Granted, Oedipus used hair pins instead of a melon baller, but it was still pretty funny.

  5. Poll? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I will see RotS:
    • Been there, done that.
    • First showing.
    • First day.
    • First week.
    • First month.
    • Never.
    • I'll watch it at CowboyNeal's when he gets the DVD.

    Even Spielberg chimed in, while making a plug for his travesty of War of the Worlds.

    "You'll cry at the end."

    baaaawwwwlll! I want my money back!!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Poll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first "missing poll option" troll will be: "downloading it now. Fsck the MPAA!"

    2. Re:Poll? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      The first "missing poll option" troll will be: "downloading it now. Fsck the MPAA!"

      Yeah, but the problem with so many of these is the heads of that guy and those two robots in the front row who never shut up.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Poll? by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I'll see it when it hits the $3.00 theater near my house and I'm one of only a few going. That way I can heckel and it will be ok. Infact if I get the right show, hecklers are encourged. It's great fun, especly with a film you enjoy but don't take serously.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    4. Re:Poll? by wax66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First showing.

      The first two may have been a travesty, but the two reasons to go to the first showing are obvious...

      It's the last episode we'll see in a long time (probably), so this completes the visual story for all of us. The sooner I can get that done, the sooner I can either cherish the whole thing or forget about it.

      The standing in line for the midnight showing with all the nerds like me is just too cool.

      --
      This is not the signature you are looking for...
    5. Re:Poll? by MaGogue · · Score: 1

      I'll watch it on DVD which I'll rent from a rental shop near my house for 1$.

      This way I get to enjoy it twice : the first time when it comes out, with all the talks and other people's excitement and all, and then after a year or so when I've completely forgotten about it, I'll see an advertisement for it at the rental shop and I'll go "Hey! it's that fabolous movie everybody liked! Yuppie!" or "Bah! Stupid commercial stuff for a bad film..".

      Then I'll probably need another 200$ for sub replacement...

    6. Re:Poll? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'll watch it on opening day ... but only because the (software) company I work for has rented the theater and given us all the afternoon off to go watch. Sometimes it's fun to be a geek.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Poll? by omibus · · Score: 1

      First Month.

      Sorry, after LotR, Star Wars is no longer my master.

      At the very least, you know Aragorn would tell Jar Jar to put a sock in it!

      --
      Bad User. No biscuit!
    8. Re:Poll? by welkin · · Score: 1

      Maybe never...I stayed home when Episode II played the Cinerama. I still haven't rented it on DVD. I may check out a library copy at some point, maybe not. I saw Episode I at the Cinerama during the first month...kinda soured me on the saga. The only reason I might want to see Episode III is to see what might be the most exciting parts of the "Vader origin story." I don't think I'm going to cough up $10 for the privilege of seeing it in a theater, though. Well, maybe I'd see it at my local http://www.columbiacitycinema.com/...eh. I think I've grown too old & jaded for the whole thing.

  6. Satisfy? by MudButt · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two.

    No... Nothing can take the pain away...

    1. Re:Satisfy? by metlin · · Score: 1

      No... Nothing can take the pain away...

      Use the force, Luke!

    2. Re:Satisfy? by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      No... Nothing can take the pain away...

      Would it make it better if they locked Jar-Jar and a bowl of flava beans in a room with Dr. Lector?

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    3. Re:Satisfy? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      "Saga, I AM your prequel"

      Nooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!

  7. Rotten tomatoes by Reignking · · Score: 5, Informative

    I prefer to let Rotten Tomatoes compile all of the ratings for me...

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    1. Re:Rotten tomatoes by Mercano · · Score: 1

      100% so far, out of seven reviews. Who will be the first reviewer to break the perfect record?

      --
      #include <signature.h>
  8. Looks great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    But at this point, most of the slashdot crowd has their opinions engrained in their minds at this point. It may be the best of the prequels, but since it's "cool" to hate Star Wars, we'll see the usual posts shitting on Lucas.

    But please, spare us the "Lucas raped my childhood" or "digital actors are the sux0rs" comments. We've seen them a million times and they still aren't clever. Come up with something new, please.

    1. Re:Looks great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK...

      Lucas violated my childhood, and real actors 0wnz joo.

    2. Re:Looks great.. by peterpi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lucas is the sux0rs?
      digital actors raped my childhood?

    3. Re:Looks great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But please, spare us the "Lucas raped my childhood" or "digital actors are the sux0rs" comments. We've seen them a million times and they still aren't clever. Come up with something new, please.
      Thank you for posting the "please stop posting X comments" comment. It's my duty to now post the "please stop posting the Y comment about people posting the X comments" comments.

      I think we should just end this charade, and all get together for a game of Twister. I have root beer!
    4. Re:Looks great.. by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      But at this point, most of the slashdot crowd has their opinions engrained in their minds at this point. It may be the best of the prequels, but since it's "cool" to hate Star Wars, we'll see the usual posts shitting on Lucas.

      Do you express similar disdain for those who shit on Microsoft or SCO? I don't hate Star Wars, but my opinion of George Lucas as a storyteller and filmmaker has undergone serious revision since about 1984. That has nothing to do with Slashdot groupthink.

      But please, spare us the "Lucas raped my childhood" or "digital actors are the sux0rs" comments. We've seen them a million times and they still aren't clever. Come up with something new, please.

      Why? It's clear that your views are just as ingrained as everybody else's, you've already decided on the source and cause of everybody else's opinion on this, so why bother debating it with you?

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    5. Re:Looks great.. by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something new? How about this:

      The problem with the first two prequels was not the digital actors. The problem was the real ones.

      Jar-jar may have grated on a lot of people, but at least it wasn't a dull, wooden performance by a performer who's obvioulsy capable of far better work.

      Portman, Jackson, Neeson, McGregor, Stamp, and yes even Christiansen... all have proven in other films that they are perfectly capable actors, yet Lucas seems to have a unique ability as a director to take these extremely talented people and suck all signs of life and soul out of their performances. It's really quite remarkable.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Looks great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bwwahaaahahahahaaaaa!!!

      ROFL -- Revenge on the Floor Laughing!

    7. Re:Looks great.. by bmalek · · Score: 1

      But at this point, most of the slashdot crowd has their opinions engrained in their minds at this point.

      I'm confused, did you mean at this point

      or at this point?

    8. Re:Looks great.. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      "I don't hate Star Wars?"

    9. Re:Looks great.. by metlin · · Score: 1

      bwwahaaahahahahaaaaa!!!

      ROFL -- Revenge on the Floor Laughing!


      Shouldn't that be ROTFL - Revenge of the Force Laughing?

    10. Re:Looks great.. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " It may be the best of the prequels, but since it's "cool" to hate Star Wars, we'll see the usual posts shitting on Lucas."

      Actually, it's not so much that it's cool to hate Star Wars, it's that it's uncool to like it. The difference? Which looks cooler:

      "I think I'm super smart and all knowing, so I predict the movie will smell of ass. My smugness prevents me from enjoying movies. Still, though, I'm going to throw my money at it just to prove how smart I am."

      "I refuse to learn from my mistakes. Not only am I obscenely hyped by these trailers even though it's more likely that just I'm hyped by the concept than the actual content, but I also give George Lucas far more credit than he really deserves! I think everybody who hates Star Wars is irrational and stupid and only does it because they're crazy. Sadly, that is the only rebuttal I have left because all my other ones have been shot down. I still cannot even fathom the concept that maybe, just maybe these really are bad movies and I just happen to see something I personally like in them. It's all academic, though, since I'm terrible at expressing my thoughts well enough to have a reasonable debate. Oh well. I'm still going to be loud mouthed and annoying then act like the victim."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Looks great.. by Fizzog · · Score: 1

      "so why bother debating it with you?"

      I agree. There is already plenty of mass debating going on around here!

    12. Re:Looks great.. by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      ROROFOFLOL

      Revenge of Rolling on the Floor of the Force Laughing Out Loud

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    13. Re:Looks great.. by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      My childhood is the sux0rs? Digital actors raped Lucas?

    14. Re:Looks great.. by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I just watched Garden State a few days ago and, with all the Episode III hype going around, I couldn't help but compare Natalie Portman's performance in that to her performance in Attack of the Clones.

      Of course, the presences of a fireplace scene in both films probably contributed...

    15. Re:Looks great.. by peterpi · · Score: 1

      heheeh, those are better than mine :)

  9. Nails in the eyes by adamplas · · Score: 1

    Anything, including having nails pounded into my eyes by a mildly irritated Chewbacca, could have been better than the first two. However, I shouldn't hold my breath - Lucas can fail us yet . . .

  10. Dark matter and lightsabers by Cirrocco · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is what I've been waiting for...two solid hours of lightsaber duels!

    Because, let's face it, SW is really all about the lightsabers. You know you want one, and so do I.

    1. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd settle for a death star.

    2. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by multiplexo · · Score: 4, Funny
      Because, let's face it, SW is really all about the lightsabers. You know you want one, and so do I.

      I want and need one, but I'm afraid that the rest of you couldn't be trusted with one.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    3. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Watch the Clone Wars cartoons for the best lightsaber duels and battle scenes. General Grevious vs. Obi-Wan one-on-one? Bah, gimme Grevious taking out a dozen Jedi at once. Or the awesome battle between elite battle droids in the high speed train station. Or Mace Windu taking out a capital attack ship (and thousands of battle droids) single handedly. Just watch his force-fu.

      Awesome.

    4. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by Council · · Score: 1

      Hey, honestly:

      I'm not interested in creating a new mythology to attach to the star wars of my childhood.

      But lightsabers, man. Lightsabers are awesome, and I would be honestly happy if this movie just WAS two hours of lightsaber fights punctuated by occasional emotional scenes.

      Lightsabers.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    5. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by highspl · · Score: 1

      Your very own lightsaber can be obtained here:

      http://www.z-bolt.com/generic27.html

      Full effect obtained after consumption of large amounts of cough medicine.

      --
      It puts the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again.
    6. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Why these are way better, and you don't need the drugs.

      http://parksabers.com/fusion.html

      Though the drugs might help you utilize the force.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Troll
      Because, let's face it, SW is really all about the lightsabers. You know you want one, and so do I.
      I want and need one, but I'm afraid that the rest of you couldn't be trusted with one.

      If they really did exist, they'd probably run on Windows and flake out, need upgrades or get infected anyway.

      blue lightsabre of death!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical male fascination; Just enough emotion to give reason for extending your saber.

    9. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by Council · · Score: 1

      Typical male fascination; Just enough emotion to give reason for extending your saber.

      Even Freud admitted that sometimes a lightsaber is just a lightsaber.

      Of course, no one knew what he was talking about. Come to think of it, it's kind of weird to see a clinical mention of lightsabers something like half a century before their invention by Lucas. And why on earth has that quote survived? That's seriously pretty weird, man.

      I mean, giving this more thought, I'm deeply shaken.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    10. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Even Freud admitted that sometimes a lightsaber is just a lightsaber.


      Freud was intelligent, interesting, and very wrong. The majority of his ideas have been found to be incorrect.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    11. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by spongman · · Score: 1

      lightsabres are like girlfriends: if you get one, would you know what to do with it?

    12. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      You know you want one, and so do I.

      So what are you waiting for, go build one already! Sheeeesshh, and you call yourself a geek.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    13. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for a death star.

      I'd settle for Padme Amidala and some hot grits.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    14. Re:Dark matter and lightsabers by Council · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      An odd thing to say; did you read the rest of the quote? It was a point where Freud was saying "this idea of mine isn't always applicable" and I was quoting him on that.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  11. Best film of the prequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the consensus appears to be that this is the best film of the prequels...

    But still not better than any of the originals right? At least we'll be able to accurately refer to "the crap trilogy" and "the good trilogy" without confusion.

  12. ROTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTS? LoTR?

    STFU! Do you have any idea how stupid you sound or how pathetic you look?

    1. Re:ROTS? by tuxguy · · Score: 1

      So *you're* the guy who goes to Katsucon every year and shouts at the top of his lungs 'Anime is stupid! Don't you all love me!?!' ~_~

      --
      "I don't really care if they label me a Jesus Freak / There aint no disguising the truth!" - DC Talk
    2. Re:ROTS? by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you have any idea how stupid you sound or how pathetic you look?

      Well, in a word, yeah.

      Why, does it bother you?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. Re:the force is strong with this one by fshalor · · Score: 1

    it's jarjar!

    But seriously: This should be good. I didn't have many expectations for the first two. I knew there was a vaperous past.

    And I had one major disapointment. Boba Fett was a guy named Jaster Meril long before Lucas wrote him in as the "son" of the template for the first clone warriors.

    That was an annoying. I mean. Those books were written and stamped down as the universe. Sure Lucas created it, but he also let them be published. It's like he said "I don't care about those authors" or something.

    I understand why he popooed Calisto, I mean Luke and Mara were a definate match from the begining. Callsto was just dressing.

    Dark...darker... darth.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  14. So when will it be leaked to the net? by teshuvah · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Seriously, where is the torrent already?

  15. How can you not see it? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I, along with most of /. probably can't count the number of times that we've seen the original 3 Episodes of SWs. I also know I'm not alone in having watched the first two prequels. So now, after all that, how can we not see Episode III? Even if the reviews said it was more of a cross between Ishtar and Battlefield Earth than a SW flick, we'd all still go see it just to finish the series off. After that many hours of investment, no matter how bad it was, we would still have to see it- because not seeing it would still be worse than seeing a horrendously awful movie.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:How can you not see it? by fredistheking · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Easy. I just wont see it.

    2. Re:How can you not see it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't count the number of times that I saw the first 3 Police Academies. I also know that I'm not alone in having watched the next 2. So now, after all that, how can we not see Police Academy 6 & Police Academy: Mission to Moscow? ... we'd all go sitll go see it just to finish the series off. After that many hours of investment, no matter how bad it was, we would still have to see it - because not seeing it would still be worse than seeing a horrendously awful movie.

    3. Re:How can you not see it? by infochuck · · Score: 1

      we'd all still go see it just to finish the series off. After that many hours of investment, no matter how bad it was, we would still have to see it- because not seeing it would still be worse than seeing a horrendously awful movie.

      Uh. No. Maybe YOU will HAVE to go see it, but I will wait for somebody to rent/buy it and borrow it from them. I KNOW how the story ends. SPOILER: Anakin is DARTH VADER. Darth Vader is Luke's Father. There. Now you can stay home and not give that fat windbag called Lucas any more money.

    4. Re:How can you not see it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result.

      If somebody makes two crappy films, then I'm not going to see the third in the trilogy, because I am not insane enough to expect anything different. I didn't see the third Matrix film either.

      When are you drooling idiot fanboys going to STOP REWARDING PEOPLE FOR MAKING CRAP FILMS? You do realise this only encourages Hollywood to keep doing it? You fuckwits are the reason the film industry is as dire as it is!

    5. Re:How can you not see it? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I've resigned myself to it. The way I see it: I was suckered in by the first two movies and payed full price. I made my bed when I chose to see Attack of the CG, and now I should sleep in it. Now I still believe the 3rd movie is probably crap, but hey, I'm a sucker. And on the off-chance that it actually isn't crap, how would I feel if I saw the two crappy movies in the theatre and then skipped out on the only good one? Like a sucker.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:How can you not see it? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      After that many hours of investment, no matter how bad it was, we would still have to see it- because not seeing it would still be worse than seeing a horrendously awful movie.

      I still haven't seen the one with the little kid, but I did watch the last one which was pretty boring. Personally I just don't understand the zealotry for any of the Star Wars films, they just don't have much appeal for me as an adult.

    7. Re:How can you not see it? by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Even if the reviews said it was more of a cross between Ishtar and Battlefield Earth than a SW flick, we'd all still go see it just to finish the series off.

      I'm not sure about that. If Waterworld were to be thrown into the mix with Ishtar and Battlefield Earth, I'd hesitate and think about brain damage that could occur.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    8. Re:How can you not see it? by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      20th Century Fox loves copyright term extension, the DMCA, placing people in prison for years for copyright infringement, and the power to buy more media outlets. I don't.

    9. Re:How can you not see it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insane Audio pronunciation of "insane" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-sn) adj. 1. 1. Of, exhibiting, or afflicted with insanity. 2. Characteristic of or associated with persons afflicted with insanity: an insane laugh; insane babbling. 3. Intended for use by such persons: an insane asylum. 2. Immoderate; wild: insane jealousy. 3. Very foolish; absurd: took insane risks behind the wheel.

    10. Re:How can you not see it? by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      You're right I do want to see it. That being said, I'm also planning to see it 2 weeks after it opens so that the movie theater gets a bigger cut of my addmission than Lucas does.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    11. Re:How can you not see it? by feloneous+cat · · Score: 1

      Even if the reviews said it was more of a cross between Ishtar and Battlefield Earth than a SW flick, we'd all still go see it just to finish the series off.

      Not to quibble, but allegedly there were supposed to be 9 of these suckers.

      No, wait, I'M the sucker!!!

      --
      IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
    12. Re:How can you not see it? by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      Your puppet strings are showing.

      George Lucas is the single most financially successful film maker of all time. He doesn't need any more of my money and I'm not prepared to hand any more to him just for the sake of being a stereotypical geek.

      The first 3 movies were great, but had Lucas directed Empire and Jedi I fear they'd have been as bad as the prequels. And the prequels really showed Lucas's true colours. He's a visionary in the sense that he loves special effects and visuals.. but he has no fucking clue how to deliver a story or how to direct.

      The reviews are making me curious.. but I'll wait to rent it before I hand over any more money to Lucas.

    13. Re:How can you not see it? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Why would I bother? I already know what happens. Lucas told me back in 1978. Why should i piss away money on a movie I'm probably going to disklike? Should I keep eating the last of a loaf of moldy bread just to finish it off? Should I go ahead and cut my finger completely off just to finish off me accidently slicing into my hand while trying to split a bagel for the toaster?

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    14. Re:How can you not see it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was an Einstein quote, Einstein.

    15. Re:How can you not see it? by wmorrow · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see the third Matrix movie...

    16. Re:How can you not see it? by mihalis · · Score: 1

      Easy. I just wont see it.

      But you'll still secretly want to.

    17. Re:How can you not see it? by welkin · · Score: 1

      Most people could probably live without seeing it. It was a dull rental, IMHO...

    18. Re:How can you not see it? by hswerdfe · · Score: 1
      After that many hours of investment, no matter how bad it was, we would still have to see it

      does the Same thing Apply if your reading the Wheel of time Series?
      --
      --meh--
    19. Re:How can you not see it? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Well, you and I can be the two people in line for "The Red Balloon" when it is re-released as counter programming to Star Wars.


      Well, actually I'll only stand in the line to look cool until Star Wars starts. After that you are on your own.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    20. Re:How can you not see it? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      Even if the reviews said it was more of a cross between Ishtar and Battlefield Earth than a SW flick, we'd all still go see it just to finish the series off.

      Huh. And I was under the impression that Lucas already finnished the series off with Attack of the Clones. Or... at least, he did for me.

      And that's why I don't even know when the movie is being released. I'll probably see it. It is very unlikely it'll be on opening night. It is somewhat possible I'll see it at a matinee. It's most likely I'll put it in my Netflix queue; in with all the other flicks I'm curious about but haven't put too much effort in to seeing.
    21. Re:How can you not see it? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately yes. Now that it looks like there are only two more books coming down the pipeline*, one of which will be out this Fall, I believe, I will go ahead and finish it off. I know that Book 10 was reviled by a good number of the readership, but I was actually heartened by it. Its sole purpose seemed to be setting up the last two books. Of course if RJ keeps stretching the story out to like book 14 or 15, then I might give it a miss.

      *RJ apparantly signed a contract to start a another series of books with the same publisher, so he is more likely than not actually winding it down.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  16. But They Say That Every Time by vjmurphy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "the consensus appears to be that this is the best film of the prequels and it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two."

    Every time one of these comes out, they say that it's better than the previous one. And each time, I'm sorely disappointed. This one will be no different, I suspect. The hype machine is in full spin mode.

    Jedi Master: "This IS the film you are looking for."

    Former Fan: Your Jedi mind tricks won't work on me this time. Sure, you got me to see the Phantom Menace, and I regretted it. You coaxed me into seeing Attack of the Clones and I swore revenge. This time, NO WAY. My mind is too strong!

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
    1. Re:But They Say That Every Time by JWW · · Score: 1

      Every time one of these comes out, they say that it's better than the previous one.

      But thats true. Episode II was way better than Episode I. Even within the movie, the last half of Episode II is a lot better than the first half.

      So the movies have been getting better. And after the Clone Wars cartoon, I have my hopes up even more for this movie.

      Face it. Lucas should have made just ONE prequel, he really didn't have story material for 3.

    2. Re:But They Say That Every Time by stlhawkeye · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Every time one of these comes out, they say that it's better than the previous one. And each time, I'm sorely disappointed. This one will be no different, I suspect. The hype machine is in full spin mode.

      What the hell are you talking about? That's only happened once! There's been _ONE_ sequel to a prequel so far.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    3. Re:But They Say That Every Time by serialXP · · Score: 0

      To tell the truth the best star wars movies to me are the clone wars cartoon... I never liked the movies (yes even the clasic ones).

    4. Re:But They Say That Every Time by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Former Fan: Your Jedi mind tricks won't work on me this time. Sure, you got me to see the Phantom Menace, and I regretted it. You coaxed me into seeing Attack of the Clones and I swore revenge. This time, NO WAY. My mind is too strong!

      Sith Master: What totally drives Anakin to the dark side is he finds Jar Jar with Padme making tadpoles. Anakin slices, dices, chops and juliennes him.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:But They Say That Every Time by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      "That's only happened once! There's been _ONE_ sequel to a prequel so far."

      I seem to recall that the Attack of the Clones was hyped as being better than Phantom Menace, which was hyped as being better than Return of the Jedi, which was hyped as being better than the Empire Strikes Back, which was hyped as being better than Star Wars.

      By "these" I meant "Star Wars" movies. Though one could also apply it to Star Trek, Blade, Batman, Superman, etc.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    6. Re:But They Say That Every Time by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      Sith Master: What totally drives Anakin to the dark side is he finds Jar Jar with Padme making tadpoles. Anakin slices, dices, chops and juliennes him.

      Okay, you got me, where do I sign up?

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    7. Re:But They Say That Every Time by Kelson · · Score: 1

      And because of that pattern, I would be waiting at least two weeks for the word of mouth to get around before seeing this movie if there were going to be more.

      Since it's the final installment, I figure I'm willing to shell out $8-10 just to see the conclusion. And on the off-chance it turns out to be any good, I'll shell out more to see it again.

  17. But by SimianOverlord · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it true that Annakin Skywalker dies at the end? Someone told me this and it's just ruined the movie for me.

    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    1. Re:But by Drachemorder · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Is it true that Annakin Skywalker dies at the end?"

      It's true, from a certain point of view.

    2. Re:But by eth8686 · · Score: 0

      Nah, I'm pretty sure he makes it. Not 100% though... /sarcasm

    3. Re:But by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Yes.... he is killed by a guy named Darth Vader. Shesh watch the Star Wars: A New Hope and it will explain it.

    4. Re:But by Glenn2372 · · Score: 1

      Paraphrasing a certain deceased Jedi, "What you have been told was true... from a certain point of view."

    5. Re:But by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      ...wait... Annakin is... undead? I see where the franchise is going: Interview With a Sith.

  18. you know whats funny by tont0r · · Score: 1

    despite everyone hating lucas because its fun and cool and despite people hating the first 2 prequals, everyone will go see these movie. you cant stop yourself. just the curiousity factor is enough to drag you in. and it would be even better if people stopped acting like lucas owes this to us. the whole 'lucas can still fail us' thing is BS. i think the people who made barbarshop failed us. even though the other movies havent been the most entertaining of films, on a technological side, they both made huge strides forward. i was never a starwars fan but ill defintely see the 3rd one. tont0r

    1. Re:you know whats funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wont bother with this lame movie just like i turned off the second lame movie half way through

    2. Re:you know whats funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I hate Lucas because it's "fun and cool?" I thought it was because he's trying to ruin Star Wars. Not that you would know what I'm talking about being that you "never [was] a star wars [sic] fan." Please, you're comparing the Barbershop movies to Star Wars. Get the fuck out of here.

    3. Re:you know whats funny by tont0r · · Score: 1

      its his story. he isnt ruining someone elses work. saying he is 'trying to ruin starwars' is a thoughless statement. its his story. he isnt saying 'how can i really fuck people over'. if you dont like them, then dont watch and dont complain about them. but we all know you are still going to watch the third one so i suppose it doesnt really matter too much how much you hate him.

    4. Re:you know whats funny by megarich · · Score: 1
      despite everyone hating lucas because its fun and cool

      naaa i dont like him cause the man is too greedy and i'm gonna get stoned for this but outside the special effects, never saw anything that great about star wars anyways.. there i said it. i'm not denying the original 3 were good movies but i just never saw what was the big deal in getting obsessed with it?

      if you ask me that best thing that star wars did was inspire space balls :) and yes i'm going to see the movie. hey like him hate him and good movie is a good movie.....

    5. Re:you know whats funny by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      I don't hate Lucal because it's cool. I hate him because he produces garbage. I hate him because he spouts off about artistic integridty while whoring out Yoda to sell potatio chips, Darth Vader to sell M&Ms and anyone else he thinks he can lisence to sell us crap we don't need. I hate him because he takes talented actors and reduces their performances to a wooden mockery of their skills. I hate him because he's such a control freak that he uses copmputers to digitally manage the number of times characters in his movies blink. I hate him because he uses special effects to mask a complete lack of story telling skills.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    6. Re:you know whats funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, saying it's his story so I can't criticize it is a "thoughless [sic]" statement. People publish their work so others can share in the experience. Once a story is published in any form anyone who comes into contact with that work becomes part of the story. Read some of the comments here. Peoples lives have been influenced by these stories. If they were just his storied he'd keep 'em to himself.

      By the way, nice use of English. Try using an apostrophe in the contractions and capitals at the beginning of your sentences. I know, grammar nazi, but that's what my degree is in: Grammar Nazism. It's a B.A.

    7. Re:you know whats funny by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      Lots of artists went through periods where they burned manuscripts, slashed paintings, otherwise ruined their own creations because their self esteem was low.

  19. Dissapointed... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 4, Funny

    From TFA:

    Yoda in a lot of action, more cool bad guys, and no Jar Jar (well, at least no Jar Jar dialogue)

    You see, I searched through the TFA's and what is missing is very dissapointing:

    Jar Jar dies in a hideous 5 min torture scene where Annie cuts him slowly into kebabs with his lightsaber.

    That scene alone would have made the movie. Hopefully, someone will add it later.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Dissapointed... by hanssprudel · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Jar Jar dies in a hideous 5 min torture scene where Annie cuts him slowly into kebabs with his lightsaber.

      That scene alone would have made the movie. Hopefully, someone will add it later.


      Lucas couldn't kill Jar-jar, even if he wanted to. Even if he had intended, since the very introduction of the character, that he should be killed by Darth Vader, there is no way he could have done it now. Why? Because the audience would have applauded!

      I can see it now - dramactic scene where Anakin draws his light saber and decapitates Jar-Jar with one single swipe. Obi-Wan screams "Nooooooooo" in ones of those Lucasesque I-would-not-know-emotion-if-it-hit-me-on-the-head pieces of dialogue. Dramatic camera cut to Jar-Jar's body. Meanwhile, the audience cheers and applauds.

    2. Re:Dissapointed... by pastpolls · · Score: 1


      That scene alone would have made the movie. Hopefully, someone will add it later.



      Trust me, it will. It will be in a special edition box set, that comes out a year or two after the first full box set (which you will buy), and because it contains this scene and a poster, it will cost twice as much.

    3. Re:Dissapointed... by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Hello Deluxe DVD Edition.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    4. Re:Dissapointed... by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Jar Jar dies in a hideous 5 min torture scene where Annie cuts him slowly into kebabs with his lightsaber.

      Looks like Miss Hannigan pushed Annie too far this time.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    5. Re:Dissapointed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Kutcher's arms in Butterfly Effect...

    6. Re:Dissapointed... by dokkeri · · Score: 1

      It'll be on the Special Extented Holographic version that'll be released in 2026...

      --
      This sig is funny.
  20. My first glance at the title of TFA... by pg110404 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Initial ROTS review.... Rots...... rots..... return of the king?....no, that's ROTK.... Rots.... WTF?..... Oh that's right revenge of the sith. I wonder if the movie will live up to the hidden meaning in its abbreviation?

    1. Re:My first glance at the title of TFA... by fgb · · Score: 1

      do you mean: Return of the Shit?

    2. Re:My first glance at the title of TFA... by pg110404 · · Score: 1

      I meant it rots as in several days dead and decaying. One need not take a pulse to ascertain that it is truly dead.

    3. Re:My first glance at the title of TFA... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Random Factoid :

      "Rots" in dutch means "cliff".

    4. Re:My first glance at the title of TFA... by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Just be unfortunate enough to stand downwind.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    5. Re:My first glance at the title of TFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTT per chance? Rise Of The Triad?

      I'm old.

  21. Even if it somehow does suck.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Record numbers of people will still go and see it. It's almost like you have to.. just like eating the last cookie in the cookie jar.

    Can't leave that last piece out of the puzzle. Sure, we know how the rest of the story goes, but that's not enough. :)

    Heck, we might even take a work-sponsored outing to go see it. Like I'll turn *that* down. heh.

    1. Re:Even if it somehow does suck.. by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Record numbers of people will still go and see it. It's almost like you have to.. just like eating the last cookie in the cookie jar.

      Uh, yeah, that's what Hollywood's counting on but that old line has worn out its welcome.

      Just like the Matrix 3; We just all needed to see that... my favorite part was... oh yeah, I still haven't bothered with it. This film will be no different. I may see it; in about 10 years when it hits the late late movie on my local UPN station.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Even if it somehow does suck.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      But if I recall correctly, early reviews of Matrix:Revolutions (that was the third one, right?) said "Ugh. It sucks!" where as reviews of Episode III have been overwhelmingly positive.

      I haven't seen the 3rd Matrix movie either. It's on my Netflix list, down below some B horror flicks. heh.

      Besides, the Star Wars franchise has been a consistant money maker for years. The Matrix series kind of fizzled out.

    3. Re:Even if it somehow does suck.. by east+coast · · Score: 1

      The Matrix series kind of fizzled out.

      Star Wars is dying in its own way. I'm not say that it's going to be in the Best Buy 6.99 bin by August. I'm just saying that people are getting tired of sequels that suck and are no longer as easy to accept the "maybe this one will be better" excuse as a reason to shell out cash to see these films.

      This will become more of a trend as theaters continue to raise prices. At one point an evening at the movies was just something to kill time, now it's becoming an investment. The increasingly unsatisfied public is not as easy to placate.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:Even if it somehow does suck.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's true. It's not dying as fast as Star Trek has, fortunately.

      I think that more people will go and see this one because it's (as of now) the last chapter of the story.
      Oh, and the fact that it's got lots of Darth Vader in it might help.

      You're absolutely right about movie theatres. It's been 4 months since I've gone to a theatre to see a movie, and I don't miss it at all.

  22. RIP KLERCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    miss ya little buddy

  23. I & II weren't that bad by qw(name) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't really mind the first two movies. You could tell that they were leading up to some sort of finale with the details surrounding Anakin's turn to the dark side. They were not instant gratification movies and I don't think they were meant to be either.

    True, some parts/characters could have been left out of the final production but it/they didn't take so much away from the movies that it rendered the movies horrible.
    1. Re:I & II weren't that bad by brewer13210 · · Score: 0

      No, they were horrible. If Geroge Lucas had actually made the entire Star Wars movies in order, after the first two, he would never have been able to raise a dime to make the rest.

    2. Re:I & II weren't that bad by qw(name) · · Score: 1

      I don't agree at all. I think the main reason people thought I & II were bad was because they weren't instant gratification movies. Character development done right is a very difficult thing to do in a movie. There just isn't enough time. This is the norm for books. If the reader couldn't get into the mind of the characters the book would be dull.

    3. Re:I & II weren't that bad by LouCifer · · Score: 1

      No, had he made them in order, he'd have made 1 & 2 better. 4 - 6 would suck balls as they'd be out in present-day.

      --
      Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
    4. Re:I & II weren't that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree at all. I think the main reason people thought I & II were bad was because they weren't instant gratification movies. Character development done right is a very difficult thing to do in a movie. There just isn't enough time. This is the norm for books. If the reader couldn't get into the mind of the characters the book would be dull.

      While you do have a point, I wouldn't hold up either of the previous prequels as shining examples of character development in science fiction. Lucas is no Bujold.

    5. Re:I & II weren't that bad by mtaco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, I and II are Acts I and II in a 6 hour long movie. Phantom is mostly exposition, Clone is development, leaving Sith for the climax if we follow standard dramatic structure used since the ancient greeks. I and II had to be toned down a bit, because Lucas has to build dramatic tension up in III. If I was as intense as III, you would'nt be able to watch the whole thing.

      Longer version of the same thing on my blog:
      http://www.opinionatedbastard.com/archives/000379. html

      Jar Jar is supposed to be an idiot, its his job to stand in for all the people deluded by the Chancellor. (i.e. Hindenberg in pre-Nazi Germany...)

    6. Re:I & II weren't that bad by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, some parts/characters could have been left out of the final production but it/they didn't take so much away from the movies that it rendered the movies horrible.

      Erm. Yes they did. ;-)

      Honestly though, I like esp 4,5 and 6 (roughly in that order of appreciation as well) but I struggle to find anything good to say about 1&2. The acting, script, editing and special effects were all dire... what did I miss? I'd honestly have left the cinema in episode 2, except that I was in the middle of a row. And I'm not even that fussy - I like Daredevil! ;-)

    7. Re:I & II weren't that bad by qw(name) · · Score: 1

      I like your write-up.

  24. Messa thinks biased sample. by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1
    Hmm. Let's do a little deductive reasoning.
    • Many people flock to Ep. 1 based on the good will generated by the original series.
    • After a dissapointing experience with Ep. 1, only true Star Wars fans line up to see Ep. 2.
    • Well, #2 turns out also to be a stinker of a movie. So now only the really die hard fans (naming your kid Anakin?) line up for Ep. 3 on opening day.
    • And now we're supposed to be suprised at the generally positive reviews? Color me skeptical.
    1. Re:Messa thinks biased sample. by Holi · · Score: 1

      A truely die hard fan would not name his son Anakin. Luke maybe or Han, or if a girl Leia. Remember the die hards are in their 30's and would get their names from the original 3.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Messa thinks biased sample. by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Informative
      Anakin was named in Return of the Jedi:

      Vader: So, you have accepted the truth.
      Luke: I have accepted the truth that you were once Anakin Skywalker, my father.
      Vader: That name no longer has any meaning for me.

    3. Re:Messa thinks biased sample. by Feynman · · Score: 1

      Or even more subtly: A friend of mine (29) named his son Harrison. I am 30 and named my son Alec.

    4. Re:Messa thinks biased sample. by Sandman1971 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I call shenanigans! Where's you proof that only Star Wars fans lined up to see Episode 2?

      From Box Office Mojo:

      The Phantom Menace
      Worldwide: $924,488,301
      Opening Weekend: $64,820,970
      (2,970 screens, $21,825 average)

      Attack of the Clones
      Worldwide: $649,476,740
      Opening Weekend: $80,027,814
      (3161 screens $25,317 average)

      Episode 2 had a bigger opening weekend, and each screen had a higher gross. Your reasoning is not really based in fact, but more personal judgement. Sure AotC made less money worldwide, but 650 million is still nothing to sneeze at (320 million domestic, which is exactly the same as each LotR movies made, to bring up a comparison).

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    5. Re:Messa thinks biased sample. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite the rise in opening weekend receipts, there were a lot less bums in seats for AOTC. How? Ticket prices increased 20-40% in most North American markets between the 1999 and 2002 releases.

      So less SW fans came out for Ep 2. Then less of the general populace - burned by Ep 1 - showed up later on, even if AOTC was a better movie. In North America, bums in seats after opening weekend declined more than 50% - a pretty precipitous drop.

      Still, ROTS may do better than AOTC, but I doubt it will do better than TPM. To surpass both its predecessors, it's going to need long legs, requiring good reviews and word-of-mouth, plus a pretty clear schedule without other blockbusters. That clear schedule does appear to be there, so now the question is: can Vader make the difference?

    6. Re:Messa thinks biased sample. by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      That's totally good news. I'm going to have a positive opinion of humanity for days now. By your figures, only about 2/3 of people are suckers. When you take into account that many of those are really just reasonable people with bad taste, it positively warms my heart.

    7. Re:Messa thinks biased sample. by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      How does this follow pertaining to these reviews? Sure they are biased, but these happen BEFORE opening day.

  25. Someone please post the full Time review! by goldspider · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn capitalist pigs and their oppressive subscription model! Someone needs to free the ENTIRE article... because... erm, I don't feel like paying for it.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  26. But does Jar Jar... by nweaver · · Score: 3, Funny

    But does Jar Jar get the Lightsaber Enema he so greatly deserves?

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  27. Re:the force is strong with this one by Golias · · Score: 1

    I feel something... a presense I haven't felt since...

    Best MST3K moment in the entire run of the Star Wars movies.

    Re-watching Star Wars on video with a crowd of friends, it got to that part and a friend of mine chimed in during the pregnant pause just after Vader says:

    "a presense I haven't felt sense..."

    "... Line?"

    Comedy gold.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  28. Star Wars Script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe it or not... It's authentic--I saw the movie yesterday in a screener. And honestly? I think it's not that great. Anakin's turn to the dark side is too quick, and not believable enough.

  29. Surprise, Mikey Likes It! by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    The first reviews of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith have started to trickle onto the Net. [snip] The reviews have all been positive so far

    Isn't that what they said about the Hitchhiker movie? Brillaint? True to Adam's vision? Except critics are pretty much split about it...and many Hitchhiker fans all have the same thing to say, which is that it really wasn't that funny, because it didn't have that mix of absurdity and sophistication his books had- ie, it wasn't true to Adams at all. Example- we don't learn that beer is a muscle relaxant that'll help with teleporting- we're just left to assume they're getting drunk because that's the right thing to do when the end of the world is coming. We all knew that was probably the REAL reason when we read the book...but we were robbed of this by the movie.

    Remember, folks- the first people to get previews of products- movies included- are those who are guaranteed to say nice things about it. Either because they always have something nice to say, they're getting compensated to have something nice to say, or they're desperate for the attention that comes with being first in line to "review" a product.

    1. Re:Surprise, Mikey Likes It! by Knara · · Score: 1
      61% is an even split?

      Is that similar to how 51% is an overwhelming election victory?

  30. I'm a nerd.... just not THAT bad! by topper24hours · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I like Jar Jar! The "my tubung is nubung" line when he shocks the bejeesus his tongue in Ep1 was possibly the best in the film! I imagine the real-life equivalent of Simpsons "comic-book guy" when I hear ppl bash Jar Jar and talking about the "purity" of Star Wars. It is a silly premised Sci-Fi ppl! (NOTE: the Fi stands for Fiction!). At any rate... the c3p0 humor from the old ones was lame IMO. "dry robotic voice - "oh no, r2 I'm so worried about our survival". THAT passed for humor?!?! Lighten up ppl! Jar Jar was funny and you know it... I wish Lucas wasn't such a pussy and would've given him more screen time in 2 and 3 for the "non-freaky" just standard nerds.

    1. Re:I'm a nerd.... just not THAT bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      worst troll....ever

  31. Re:Bloodthirst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the American mindset to desire blood from every corner.

    s/American/human/

  32. Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-13 by forsythe450 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and give us a topless Padme scene. I'd definitely walk out satisfied.

    --
    Did you ride the short bus? http://sh.ortb.us
  33. I have an idea by futuresheep · · Score: 1

    Let's get George to make a special 'Readers Digest' version the first two. That was we can sit through one, instead of five hours of crap to understand the major plot points of this one.

    1. Re:I have an idea by faust13 · · Score: 1

      Already working on it.

  34. Rots? by abulafia · · Score: 1

    I guess it is a better (more descriptive?) moniker than "lotter".

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  35. The Matrix by Durzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the consensus appears to be that this is the best film of the prequels and it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two. ..which isn't exactly difficult given the bar has been set so low by the previous two prequels.

    It does look however as if the Star Wars prequels will actually achieve the polar opposite levels of critical acclaim as the Matrix trilogy did (i.e. Matrix/SWEP3:ROTS - great, Matrix Reloaded/SWEP2:AOTC - good-ish, Matrix Revolutions/SWEP1:TPM - dire)

  36. A couple of things to keep in mind: by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's important to keep a couple of things in mind:

    1. The action scenes and special effects will be cool. The storyline will be OK, the fall of the senate and rise of emperor and empire will be interesting. It will be nice to see the "straw that breaks the camel's back" and see Anakin finally snap.

    2. The acting and the dialogue will be incredibly stiff. It's Lucas after all. I can imagine that exchanges between Padme and Anakin will be just as meaningless as before. (Padme looked pretty convincing though, crying on one of the trailers.)

    If you keep those 2 in mind as you go see the movie, it should be a cool and a welcome conclusion to what started out as a kickass story, turned into a disappointment.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, Mace "Bad Mother Fucker" Windu is NOT going to go down without a fight. You just know that's not going to play out like the "Han Shoots First" thing...

      I have a feeling that will be worth the price of admission alone.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, Mace "Bad Mother Fucker" Windu is NOT going to go down without a fight.

      Lucas so should have given him a lightbat instead of a lightsaber. That would have rocked.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    3. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The storyline will be OK

      By all appearances the storyline is crap.

      Palpatine wants to conquer the republic. The republic doesn't have an army. So Palpatine builds two massive armies, one of driods and one of clones. So far so good, the republic doesn't stand a chance.

      Palpatine gets his two armies to attack er... each other... until one of them has pretty much finished off the other and THEN gets the remnants of one to attack the republic... WTF? Maybe this is all going to be explained but I really don't think so.

    4. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      His pre-fight conversations with the Jedi council should end with "We should have fucking shotguns for this..."

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    5. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      its not that complicated really
      if Palpy sprung a droid army or a clone army out of nowhere on the Republic, the Jedi and the member planets would shut him down and kick him out of power so fast his head would spin, dismantle the army and lock him away forever

      he used a bunch of idiots with a cheap disposable military force as an excuse to bring in his "real" powerful army of clones. Then he uses the war as a way to get emergency powers granted, and now there's nothing the Jedi or Republic member worlds can do about it.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    6. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, it shows us why it's bad idea to give emergency powers during times of war.

      That's why nowdays we have "sneak and peak" searches, completely voiding the 4th amendment, and US citizens can now be held indefinitely without charge, again voiding the 6th amendment.

      If only we had lightsabers... (or laser swords, as Lucas likes to call them)

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    7. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by _Neurotic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, Lucas hired a dialogue coach (a director for actors) so it might not be so bad:

      http://www.starwars.com/episode-iii/bts/profile/f2 0050105/

    8. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      And somewhere in there he has to say "What?! What ain't no country I ever heard of muthafucka. Go ahead and say what one more time!"

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    9. Re:A couple of things to keep in mind: by Stormie · · Score: 1

      Actually, Lucas hired a dialogue coach (a director for actors) so it might not be so bad

      Haha!! He's written some of the most infamously awful dialogue ever filmed, everyone knows that he is utterly incompetent at writing dialogue, so what does he do to remedy this deficiency? Blames the actors for now delivering his pearls well enough, and hires them a dialogue coach. Pathetic.

  37. Why ruin slashdot by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is nothing I live more than reading every thread about the Matrix or Star Wars telling me that certain movies stink. It doesn't grow tired at all.

    That horse is dead and the users are know bleaching the bones.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Why ruin slashdot by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      There is nothing I live more than reading every thread about the Matrix or Star Wars telling me that certain movies stink. It doesn't grow tired at all.


      Try the red pill, Luke. Anakin never did.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  38. Another review here... just FYI by failrate · · Score: 1
    --
    Voodoo Girl is the bomb!
  39. I'm boycotting ... by davidyorke · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Because George Lucas had the gall to replace Sebastian Shaw with Hayden Christensen (ending scenes of RotJ) ... he basically pissed all over one of my fondest childhood memories.

    1. Re:I'm boycotting ... by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Funny

      Looking at another man appearing for less than one minute in a science fiction movie is one of your fondest childhood memories?

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:I'm boycotting ... by philwx · · Score: 1

      Yes, to me it looked like they tried to pick the actors to get the teeny bopper audience; i.e. they look like backstreet boys, especially Anakin.

      But there was no essence, or strong character. Just what appeared to be rehearsed lines and a "where's my paycheck now" attitude.

      I think that's the biggest disappointment, even over the unnecessary jar jar appearances. And the princess Amidalia, although "cute", did not have the personality for it IMO. She just sat their looking pretty. The star wars movies have typically had very strong willed women, such as princess Leia. And it was a disappointment to see a character fall far short of that.

      Ironically, in one of the movies Amidalia (dont know if this is spelled correctly, and don't care) had one of her servants impersonate her. Honestly, I could not tell the difference between her and her servant, and I don't think that was intentional on their part. My wife had to explain to me that she was being impersonated, as I was having a hard time staying interested in the storyline as it was. That is not good.

    3. Re:I'm boycotting ... by bjomo · · Score: 1

      The star wars movies have typically had very strong willed women, such as princess Leia.

      Ok, thats one strong woman. Can you name another?

      My wife had to explain to me that she was being impersonated...

      She seemed to have no trouble following the story.

    4. Re:I'm boycotting ... by davidyorke · · Score: 1

      Are you completely bereft of any emotion?

      That is one of the few moments in the whole trilogy that Lucas is able to convey a deep sentiment without beating you over the head with it.

    5. Re:I'm boycotting ... by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      If it's the moment that's supposed to be effective, what difference does it make if one actor is CG'd out for another? And besides which, what was the big emotional involvement in that scene? Two generations of dead guys smiling approvingly at the fourth generation that didn't manage to fuck up?

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    6. Re:I'm boycotting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, thats one strong woman. Can you name another?

      Mon Mothma, she was the 50ish woman who headed the briefing in RotJ, she's also the leader of the entire Rebel Alliance. Although it's more of an implicit thing, I think leading a diverse and potentially very fractious bunch of para-military organizations would require a strong personality.

    7. Re:I'm boycotting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She just sat their looking pretty

      I'm having trouble parsing this sentence. I guess that "sat" can be a transitive verb -- shorthand for something like "baby-sat." But them I'm still not sure what "she just baby-sat their looking" is supposed to mean. Whose "looking" did they baby-sit? What's a "looking" exactly, and why do you baby-sit it? And where does "pretty" fit into this sentence? Is it supposed to be an adverb (sorta like "I done got you good")? Because it's not.

      Amidalia had one of her servants impersonate her.

      no she didn't.

    8. Re:I'm boycotting ... by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      Good. One less person to piss in the pool afterward.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    9. Re:I'm boycotting ... by philwx · · Score: 1

      Ok you got me on a sentence contruction technicality, which doesn't take away from my point. There was a strong willed woman, princess Leia, and she was the main female character.

      In the "new" series, there is also a main female character, Amidalia, but she is not very impressive in this respect. It seems to me that she could be more convincing on a WB sitcom.

      Anakin, I won't even get started on that. I thought I was watching an after school special when I saw him crying about his mom dieing (ok I will get started but I won't finish).

      As far as missing that she was impersonated, well I think I honestly fell asleep or zoned out halfway through the movie. Not that that's the movies fault, hm.. well maybe it was.. She's a cute girl, no doubt about that, but to me she wasn't very convincing as a character.

      I'm not a very cynical person, I wanted those movies to be good. But they were just "ok."

  40. Uh... by infochuck · · Score: 1

    ...the best film of the prequels and it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two.

    Uh... no. Sorry. One half-decent thrid movie does not make the shit that was the other two shine.

    1. Re:Uh... by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Uh... no. Sorry. One half-decent thrid movie does not make the shit that was the other two shine.

      That's not what's being implied.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      things that suck more than Ep 1,2
      - fans that bicker about wasting their money, but
      will still see Ep 3, with a $5 popcorn on one hand
      and a $3 soda on the other
      - fans that talk like they've made movies before
      - fans that bicker about bickering fans.

      you are more annoying than Jarjar.

  41. Re: Fool you three times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anybody else think a new Real Time Operating System was on the market?

  42. ugh by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I, along with most of /. probably can't count the number of times that we've seen the original 3 Episodes of SWs

    You're right- I can't, because each time was less memorable than the first. Ever since I purposely watched it- probably over 10 years ago- the only times I've seen it have been when absolutely nothing else was on TV, and it was being re-run for the fiftieth time on the SciFi channel.

    This'll get me marked as a troll by all the rabid SW fanboys (or the Space Fetishists) with mod points, but hell if I care. Believe it or not, not everyone thought Star Wars was more than just "a nice scifi film from the 70's".

    1. Re:ugh by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "Believe it or not, not everyone thought Star Wars was more than just "a nice scifi film from the 70's"."

      Dude, it's way more than that. It's a way of life!

      "the only times I've seen it have been when absolutely nothing else was on TV"

      When Star Wars is on, nothing else can possible be on. Remember, this is Star Wars we're talking about. Star Wars!

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:ugh by CarnivorousCoder · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, not everyone thought Star Wars was more than just "a nice scifi film from the 70's" Maybe it's only amazing to people who were around in the '70s when the original first came out. At the time it was revolutionary. I was only 7 years old when my pop took me to see it, but I remember being completely awestruck.

      --
      What are you doing now, you lazy drunken obscene unsayable son of an unnameable gipsy obscenity?
    3. Re:ugh by susa-no-o · · Score: 1

      You'll get marked as a troll because you are a troll. What's the point of saying something like that in a discussion about star wars? The point of trolling is trolling, I guess.

  43. Re:Torrent Link by thecardinal · · Score: 1

    Great link, I couldn't download it though ;)

    I can't believe that people are wanting to download it already ... actually, I can. This is one torrent I'd definitely steer clear of though, its going to get the MPAA and all their minions chomping at the bit.

  44. No need to worry by axafluff · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's still episodes 7,8 and 9 for the complainers :)

    1. Re:No need to worry by AxafluffRIP · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      What a tragecomedy!

      November last year I made an ill-received joke here on the resurrection of BSD, kindly meant. I was modded as a troll and had to post at 0 with bad karma. So as the dutiful surgeon I am I wanted to rectify my mistake and have been posting 6-7 coldly received posts the last 7 months (!). The above post was the final shot to get modded up and my pride thus restituted. No positive mods for a couple of hours. This is it, never another post. I change my mail at slashdot and paste in an unknown password from terminal (covering my eyes) to finally kick the habit. Love slashdot, read every day but my account is tainted and my pride couldn't take it.

      Ok, my curiosity killed me. I go back, check the account. Lo! +2, I'm back! Err no password...but I copied the scramble pw from the terminal...it's still there I see, oops erased it (how the * did that happen, at this point?). Try to reply to the "do you really want to change your email adress?" from /., but the mailbox at ./ has filled it's virtual quota.

      I give up...feel free to mod me off-topic :)

  45. Ahh, a "Bitch at Slashdot" post.. original.. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    I'll take your post, and show the hidden meaning to the world:

    "But at this point, most of the slashdot crowd has their opinions engrained in their minds at this point. Many people might like it, but I'm going to bitch at the few that complain about it. I will write a whole post about how it's old, and dumb, and to come up with something original - all the while I'm being dumb, unoriginal, and old. But since it's "cool" to bitch at Slashdot, we'll see the usual posts shitting on Slashdot."

    "But please, spare us the "Slashdot hates everything because of a few loud mounths" or "Slashdot are the sux0rs" comments. We've seen them a million times and they still aren't clever. I should come up with something new, please."

    Ah hah!

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  46. We all know... by imthatguy · · Score: 0

    that we're going to go see this movie even if the critics say it blows donkey balls. If you're on this website you made up your mind long ago if you were going to go see it or not so alot of the bickering back and forth is asinine at best. Take a chill pill, hit a bowl, get some head, whatever; and go enjoy it for what it is, a movie, entertainment, and something to be a part of. That's why we liked it in the first place.

    --
    Did you know you can be apathetic to apathy? Not that I give a shit...
  47. yep. by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    61% is an even split?

    Considering most of the reviews marked "plusses" say things like "it was an insult to Adams, but it's saved by decent graphics and acting"- yeah. A lot of critics tried really hard to have something nice to say about it.

    Is that similar to how 51% is an overwhelming election victory?

    That is a "mandate", citizen! Prepare for re-education!

  48. Re: Fool you three times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but then, I'm not dyslexic.

  49. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    She's too much of a prude to do nudie scenes, so this won't happen... YET. Wait until her career falls apart, then wait patiently for the day she does her stint in Hustler.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  50. And Superman??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The New Superman Movie has a really awful fashion!!
    Star Wars is instead very cooool!!
    What's the best episode? Perhaps the first, but this is the most mature of all the new trilogy.

  51. Mod Parent Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...ppl...ppl...ppl...

    Yes, Star Wars was always pretty crappy but anyone who spells "people" as "ppl" has no business complaining about anyone else. It's almost as bad as spelling "you" as "u".

  52. No way?!?! by east+coast · · Score: 1

    From the blurb: the consensus appears to be that this is the best film of the prequels

    No way? Man, I seen some stuff on the Weather Channel last night that was better then the first two prequels.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  53. Dialogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, how about the dialogue in the past 2 movies has been horrible.

    "Good call, my young Padawan"

    WTF is that?

  54. Obi Wan and the droids by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope Revenge Of The Sith answers the question of why Obi Wan cannot remember R2 and C3P0 in A New Hope.

    1. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPOILER-------------

      it does, they're sent off to have their memories wiped

    2. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 1

      My theory - they were the only ones to have witnessed Annie and Padme's wedding.

    3. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      I think he didn't remember "owning any droids."

      Which, as far as the prequels have indicated, is true. C-3PO was Anakin's creation, and R2-D2 was assigned to Padme's ship.

      Of course, one might wonder if Vader should've recognized the duo, but then again, there's probably a ton of similar looking droids running around.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    4. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He asked why OBI-WAN didn't remember them... not why they didn't remember him.

    5. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      i know what he said and its still true.. they wipe obi-wans mind.. cause

      SPOILER----------

      obi wan is a robot!

    6. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      So what he said was true, from a certain point of view.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    7. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      Would YOU claim to remember a big flaming robot always bitching about this or that???

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    8. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by j-pimp · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Which, as far as the prequels have indicated, is true. C-3PO was Anakin's creation, and R2-D2 was assigned to Padme's ship.


      He was also attempting to lead Luke on the trail to become a jedi. Ben told Luke certain things at certain times to give him "a certain point of view." If he just came out and said, "Vadar is your father, Owen is your step brother, your sister was adopted by members of the royal court of alderan, and I've been bidding my time here waiting to undo 'bringing balance to the force.' So come with me becasue the entire galaxy depends on you and your daddy meeting and coming to terms," Luke might have ended up seeking out Vader to overthrow palpatine and take his place at his side.


      Of course, one might wonder if Vader should've recognized the duo, but then again, there's probably a ton of similar looking droids running around.


      Do you think Vader cared about a toy he built as a child and an astromech droid. Those droids, like the name anikan, no longer held any meaning for him. He didnt react to seeing them becasue destroying would mean acknowledging the droids and his "former self" held any signifigance.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    9. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      regardless, *Vader has never been in the same scene with C3PO/R2-D2 in the O/T!!!*

    10. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      AHH! *stabs brain with a qtip* /me has forgotten carbonite freezing scene in ESB, DOH! welll.... Maybe he didn't see 3po on the walking carpet's back, perchance?

    11. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Vadar is your father, Owen is your step brother, your sister was adopted by members of the royal court of alderan, and I've been bidding my time here waiting to undo 'bringing balance to the force.' ..."

      Well, that would indeed by false though. Owen would be his legal uncle (step-uncle?), since Anakin's mother married Owen's father. In fact Luke's aunt and uncle are the only two living relatives he has known about his entire life. No wonder he took their death so hard.

    12. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s'OK. A gold protocol droid isn't exactly THAT unusual in the Star Wars universe. It's not like C-3PO said, "Master Darth Vader! How are you, and would you please take me off this wookie's back?"

    13. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Maybe he did... At one point chewie is going nuts, throwing stormtroopers around and boba fette is about to blast him and darth stops him. Maybe he was doing it to protect c3po?

    14. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Maybe he didn't see 3po on the walking carpet's back, perchance?"

      It's worth mentioning that another identical droid was in that complex. C3PO greeted him and the reply was rude.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      could have sworn that rude one was silver, wasn't he/she/it?

    16. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      It did have a slightly different color, yes. It also had the same voice as 3PO. If it decided to impersonate 3PO, it'd be difficult for the audience to tell. I'm not sure what it'd be like face, to face, though. At that point, I would start wondering about what the world looks like through Vader's mask. ;)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    17. Re:Obi Wan and the droids by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      vader probably would just rip its head off to see if his initials were scrached in the CPU or whatever. :p

  55. Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reviews have all been positive so far, and the consensus appears to be that this is the best film of the prequels and it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two."

    Hrmph... As I recall, this was the case with AOTC also. I know for sure that AICN praised it. And what I steaming pile of crap that ended up being...

    I'll wait for the video, thanks.

  56. SW:ROTS reviews by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What was wrong with the first two prequels? People complain about Star Wars episodes not being highbrow enough, or adult enough, or complex enough, etc. Star Wars is supposed to be popcorn, not trout almondine. If you can follow the symbolism to see the film at another level, so much the better, but it's a mistake to look so hard for the deep meaning that you miss the fun at the surface.

    I have seen all of the Star Wars episodes as they have been released, and each time I make it a point not to expect anything. I watch and enjoy. The cliche "it is what it is" fits here.

    These movies are aimed at multiple audiences: pre-teens, teenagers, adult sci-fi nerds, moms, dads, etc. That's why there's always a Jar-Jar, a tragic love affair, a love triangle, a classic struggle between good and evil affecting the future of a civilization, or whatever.

    If you go in thinking you want the plot to go a certain way or for there to be a final explanation of any particular story line, you'll usually be disappointed.

    Just keep your eyes open, sit back, and enjoy the popcorn.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by Control-Z · · Score: 2, Informative

      What was wrong with the first two prequels? People complain about Star Wars episodes not being highbrow enough, or adult enough, or complex enough, etc. Star Wars is supposed to be popcorn, not trout almondine. If you can follow the symbolism to see the film at another level, so much the better, but it's a mistake to look so hard for the deep meaning that you miss the fun at the surface.

      Actually Episode 1 was TOO highbrow. Who cares about the "Trade Federation"? Nobody, that's who. There was no Han Solo character to bring things back down to the level of a common man. Obi Wan and Qui Quon are likable enough, but neither of them are much fun.

      And the whole pod race thing took way too much of the movie.

      Ok I'm done complaining about Ep 1. Ep 3 sounds great so far, I just have to quit reading reviews because there are too many spoilers in them.

    2. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by angle_slam · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The disappointment is simple. In Ep 4-6, we learn that Luke's father was a great pilot and a Jedi apprentice who was eventually seduced by the Dark Side. Ep 1 had VERY little to do with that.

      What should have happend was AOTC as Ep 1. Then Ep 2 can cover the Clone Wars, with ROTS still being Ep 3. That would have been a more effective story because it would have built Anakin up as a hero more, making his Fall greater. As it stands, he is a whiny jerk who wants power. What it should have been is a War Hero who saved the Galaxy. THEN he got hungry with power.

    3. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What should have happend was AOTC as Ep 1. Then Ep 2 can cover the Clone Wars, with ROTS still being Ep 3. That would have been a more effective story because it would have built Anakin up as a hero more, making his Fall greater.

      This is actually rather insightful. If Episode 1 had featured Anakin being roughly Luke's age or a little younger then, for instance, the love story with whoever was going to be Luke's mother could have been introduced or strongly hinted at in Ep1, properly developed in an unhurried way in Ep2, then suitably tragically broken in Ep3.

      The impression I had gotten from Ep4-6 was that Obi Wan had found himself out in the ass end of space, mostly out of touch with the Jedi council, and had encountered this great pilot with a lot of natural ability with the force. Unable to discuss the matter with the Jedi council Obi wan took it upon himself (still young and inexperienced at the time) to train Anakin, fucked it up, and fell right into the hands of the empire. That would have made some sense to me, and would have offered, as you say, a great chance to really develop Anakin as a heor, to really develop the love story over a couple of films, and to contrast the way in which Obi Wan teaches Luke with the way he teaches Anakin. Ah well, too late now.

      Jedidiah.

    4. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What it should have been is a War Hero who saved the Galaxy. THEN he got hungry with power.

      Actually thinking about this part a little more, I think you are again on to something. One could easily develop a story a little akin to say Red Son which does a fine job of turning the all powerful hero into something of a villain in an elegant and believable way. Just add some material about Anakin's rage at not being able to control everything the way he feels he should/deserves to (perhaps the death of his wife could come in here somewhere) and thus falling to the dark side and you would have a much more compeeling story.

      Jedidiah.

    5. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just keep your eyes open, sit back, and enjoy the popcorn.

      Yes! Chew your cud and stare, miserable cows! Low docilely and produce your milk for the farmers!

    6. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by Palshife · · Score: 1

      What was wrong with the first two prequels?

      Three things; production quality, production quality and production quality.

      The plot was good, but its conveyance was less than stellar. The characters were good concepts, but they were portrayed by bad performances. The effects were great, but put a person in the shot and it looks faker than sock puppets in that movie my brother and I made in a barn when we were ten.

      This is a man who commands immense creative resources and he managed to screw up some of the most basic elements of filmmaking. Lucas is a fine producer but a bad director.

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    7. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by vector_prime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As badly executed as Ep1 was, I did feel it was necessary. Seeing Qui-Gon gave me a real sense of who Obi-Wan was and why. The first trilogy is about Obi-Wan anyway. In episode 1, we see him brash and young and not wise at all, we see him flirt momentarily with the dark side when his master is killed, we see him take on a task that even he thinks is too big for him because it was his master and friend's dying wish. Besides, you can't jump immediately into the clone saga without some sort of explaination of the villain. In the latter three the villain was a vast empire, easy enough, but when the good guys are allied to the vast and powerful central government, the enemy, and galactic politics in general, needs to be built up more slowly. The trade federation was a good device, but it wouldn't have worked without Ep1.

    8. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If Episode 1 had featured Anakin being roughly Luke's age or a little younger then, for instance, the love story with whoever was going to be Luke's mother could have been introduced or strongly hinted at in Ep1, properly developed in an unhurried way in Ep2, then suitably tragically broken in Ep3."

      Instead of gross foreshadowing in Ep I :p

    9. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      I partially agree. I think it is important to show that Anakin was taken away from his mother at a young age, because losing his mother was the first time his anger takes over. But I think the entire plot of Ep 1 could have been condensed into a 30 minute flashback right before AOTC. Then spend the rest of the 3 movies showing everything from AOTC through ROTS (including the Clone Wars shorts).

      While I agree that you can't go to the Clone Wars without showing the villain, I don't think TPM did that at all.

    10. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      If you can follow the symbolism to see the film at another level, so much the better

      Lucas destroyed any symbolism as soon as Obi-Wan pulled out his tricorder to read Anakin's midichlorian count. The mystical Force was reduced to little critters that infest people's bodies. Maybe George is a closet Co$ member.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    11. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      The thing about the midichlorians is that that whole concept was stolen from Parasite Eve!

      I mean it not only wasn't original, but it was ripped off from a Japanese science fiction series that had been made into a moderately popular video game....

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    12. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So stop with -your- whinging and get writing already! You obviously know what a good story should be. Such talent shouldn't be wasted reading Slashdot.

      Be sure to let us know when your film opens. We'll be waiting.

    13. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by greggman · · Score: 1

      > What was wrong with the first two prequels?

      They changed the meanings of the ep 4-6. As a kid I grew up thinking if I just believed hard enough I could do anything (ie, use the force, trust your instincts) Episode one destroyed all that. You've got to have royal blood (ie, midichlorians) or you should just pack it in. No inspiration in that message what-so-ever.

      Other complaints, in ep 4-6 the characters get through their trials by perseverance. In episode 1 Anakin gets through most things by dumb luck (or fate) either of which is a different messages than ep 4-6.

      Unforunately just like T3 changes the message of T2. Ep 1 changes the meanings of Ep 4-6 ruining them forever.

      Ep.3 will not be fixing any of this so I'm not going to go see it. FUCK LUCASS!

    14. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by nagora · · Score: 1
      The thing about the midichlorians is that that whole concept was stolen from Parasite Eve!

      Actually, it was stolen from real life. The whole question of our relationship with our mitochondrian symbiotic cells, which provide our energy ("life force", anyone?) in return for being protected by our bodies, is so strange that I'm not surprised that Lucas, or anyone else, picked up the idea and ran with it a bit. Enough biologists have remarked on it, why not a few film-makers?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    15. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      People complain about Star Wars episodes not being highbrow enough, or adult enough, or complex enough, etc.
      No, people complain about them not being good enough. Or even good.
      Star Wars is supposed to be popcorn ...
      Yeah - uncooked popcorn. Hard to swallow, impossible to digest, swallowing it all makes you sick, and it looks the same on the way out as it did on the way in.
      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    16. Re:SW:ROTS reviews by sneakers563 · · Score: 1

      Which is fine, except no one in any of the first two prequels seems to be having any fun, so why should the audience. Ep 4-6 (ok, I was 7-11 years old at the time) had the feel of a great adventure. No one in these last two movies seems to be on a great adventure. There's no Han Solo to lighten things up, there's not even a naive farmboy for the audience to relate to; there's just a whiny jerk. It doesn't matter how many spaceships and lightsabers Lucas throws in there. There's no spirit of adventure and it just isn't any fun. Seriously, the best thing any of these reviews have had to say is that Ep 3 ties in beautifully to Ep 4. What does that say? That'll remind you of a much better movie? Whoopie!

  57. According to Steven Spielberg : by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
    'You'll cry at the end.'

    I allready did as soon as JarJar hit the screen ; What's new here ?

    1. Re:According to Steven Spielberg : by smart.id · · Score: 1

      I love how you're trying to make fun of George Lucas and/or Jar Jar Binks in yet another boring, obvious Star Wars joke, yet you mention that you actually CRIED when you saw a humorous character on screen. Just stop, please.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    2. Re:According to Steven Spielberg : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet you mention that you actually CRIED when you saw a humorous character on screen.

      He didn't even mention any humorous characters.

  58. Re:Torrent Link by teshuvah · · Score: 1

    I already have my ticket for the midnight showing, so this isn't really "Stealing." I'm not depriving Lucas of any money whatsoever.

  59. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 2, Funny
    I can hear the dialogue now:

    Padme: Is that a Lightsabre in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me

    --
    Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  60. If by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    I hear that it's any good at all from people I trust, I will see it. I have not seen 1&2 because the general consensus is they suck. Movie critics are a joke, I have found the times I agree with them in my life (48) can be counted without removing shoes. If I do see it I will not pay since I have a daughter working at the theater who can get me a pass for any movie, a week after it opens. Lucas gets none of my money.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:If by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

      Make way for BCW, he's an esteemed VIP. He lets other people decide what movies he shouldn't watch and he gets in for free at the movies. What power!

    2. Re:If by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on that being able to count to 48 without removing your shoes thing.

    3. Re:If by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      You don't listen to people who like similar things? You know, friends, family etc...

      As for getting in free, I have used that twice in the last year. There have been very few movies I would be willing to spend money on and even fewer that I'd spend the time on.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  61. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll put in a second annoying clumsy Jamaican-wannabe Gungan.

  62. I posted one of the reviews on AICN... by limabone · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you enjoy the Star Wars movies/genre you will like this movie. I saw the movie on Tuesday:

    1. It is darker than the other movies...but not much darker than Empire. I think it's only two scenes that, if removed, would have given this the same rating as the other movies.
    2. The acting and writing is bad. Some good acting moments, but not many.
    3. The action and music and special effects are great.

    My biggest beefs were the dialogue between Padme and Anakin.

    You WILL need to see this movie more than one time, if for any reason then for the initial space battle scene. There is simply so much going on I wish I could have played that in slo-mo to check everything out.

    So go out, grab some popcorn and enjoy the hell out of the movie and try not to analyze it too much. It's an easy trap to fall into (Right Admiral Ackbar?), cuz I know I did.

    1. Re:I posted one of the reviews on AICN... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      1. It is darker than the other movies...but not much darker than Empire. I think it's only two scenes that, if removed, would have given this the same rating as the other movies.

      You won't like Heaven on Earth then. It's really dark too, even if it has a certain actor who played Legolas.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  63. God, I hope this one lives up to the billing by acordes · · Score: 1

    I think what frustrated me most about the first two movies is that there were parts that were really, really good and I enjoyed them a lot. The problem is the bad parts were so painful to watch that they just overwhelmed the rest of the movie. Here's hoping that Lucas got rid of those bad parts for this movie.

  64. Kevin Smith's review by DroopyStonx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://viewaskew.com/news/sith/

    He more or less said that this is the prequel all you whiners and complainers have been waiting for.

    He's a big Star Wars fan himself, and he flat out said that it's a damn good movie... darker than Empire Strikes Back... so you know it's good.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Kevin Smith's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a big Star Wars fan himself, and he flat out said that it's a damn good movie... darker than Empire Strikes Back... so you know it's good.

      How do we "know it's good"? What's changed about his tastes since liking the earlier prequels? Or do we have to just 'know' they're good too whether we liked them or not?

    2. Re:Kevin Smith's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't work for Prince of Persia 2 it's not gonna work for Star Wars. Making a character dark and edgy is just an attempt to appeal to 12-year old's. Give me a cast that is old enough to vote, drink beer, and gamble, then maybe i'll give a rat's a$$.

    3. Re:Kevin Smith's review by SoTuA · · Score: 1

      Darker doesn't mean better. As proof, I submit to the jury exhibit A, a copy of id software's "Doom III".

    4. Re:Kevin Smith's review by C_Kode · · Score: 1

      Actually there was a lot about Doom3 that was better. Just not the game overall. Visually, Doom3 outpaced them all. Repetition is a killer though. The darkness made rooms smaller so everything look the same. Architecture was a big bonus in ID games. With so much darkness, you can't see it. Damn I'm offtopic.

      Anyhow, I'm excited about the movie. The darkness I'm excited about, to finally put the peices of the puzzle together should be fun be itself. Even if I hate Jar jar.

    5. Re:Kevin Smith's review by SoTuA · · Score: 1
      Doom III was a better technology, wich doesn't mean a better game. Doom III was advertisement for id software's real product, wich is 3d game engines.

      My original point would be stated plainly as "there are dark movies that suck, there are 'bright' movies that are excellent. 'Darker of the prequels' does NOT guarantee a better movie'".

      I will see the movie, of course. And probably enjoy it more than the previous too, if not because it's better just because this time I have no expectations whatsoever :)

    6. Re:Kevin Smith's review by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Eh? Doom 3 was badass... scary as hell. Don't know what you're talkin 'bout!

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  65. Quick, Take it back! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1


    You don't want a scene where Anakin kills Jar-Jar. If you get one it won't be worth it and here's why.

    It's bound to be followed by a re-edit of the final scene in Return of the Jedi and I for one don't want to see a Jar-Jar ghost standing next to the rest of them smiling at Luke.

    I know he's not a Jedi but do you really think that would stop George? Is it worth the risk?

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:Quick, Take it back! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I know he's not a Jedi but do you really think that would stop George?

      He'll say that all along it was intended that the Jedi are all descended from Gungan-Human interbreeding long, long ago.

    2. Re:Quick, Take it back! by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Well, that explains the Rastafarians.

    3. Re:Quick, Take it back! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Jar Jar would be much cooler as a pothead.

      "Meesa think yousa got doritos, duuuuude"

  66. Jar Jar by operagost · · Score: 1
    Where is Jar Jar? You see him maybe twice, and except for background noise he doesn't even have a single line.
    Thank the Maker!
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  67. I stopped listening to Aint' it cool by arkham6 · · Score: 1

    I remember three years ago the dude from AAC gushing over AOTC calling it the 'best movie of the series'.

    And we all know how THAT turned out.

  68. How is Star Wars like Microsoft ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both are wildly popular with the masses.
    Both are mediocre products at best.

    Star Wars has some absolutely stunning visual effects. The quality of acting varies between OK and
    abysmal. The quality of directing ranges between alright and "junior high drama student". I have seen
    10 year olds write more coherent and consistent story lines.

    Please, please, please just get it over with. Let Lucas fade into the sunset and never create another movie .....

  69. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by bckrispi · · Score: 1

    Right...unless she's on a public beach surrounded by strangers, many of whom have video cameras.

    --
    Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  70. It should have been called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Return Of The Ten

  71. My mantra is... by Devil's+Advocate · · Score: 0

    don't get your hopes up...don't get your hopes up...don't get your hopes up...

    and I decided to automate it (appropriate to my programing knowledge upon the release of Episode IV)

    10 print "don't get your hopes up..."
    20 goto 10

  72. Happy I Am, Yes by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    Force has been good, Yes.

    Jar-Jar disemboweled by Anakin. Sad, but not very.

    Dancing on Jar-Jar's grave like animatronic puppet I am, yes.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  73. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of "Closer" where she plays a stripper? They cut out the good scenes for the final cut, but you can get them on the net.

  74. SNOT by rca66 · · Score: 1

    Just a silly remark: If you read "ROTS" as a word, it sounds like the german "Rotz" = snot.

    1. Re:SNOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if you read ROTS backwards, it reads STOR.

    2. Re:SNOT by douglips · · Score: 1

      If you read "ROTS" as a word, it sounds like the english "rots" = sucks.

  75. Re:Torrent Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have my ticket for the midnight showing, so this isn't really "Stealing." I'm not depriving Lucas of any money whatsoever.

    Except for the money he would have made by selling you the DVD. As well as the money he would have made if all the other losers that receive copies of the film from you had:

    1. Bought Theater Tickets. Multiple times!
    2. Bought DVDs

    If you download this movie, YOU ARE A THIEF!

  76. MoD pArEnT Up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BitTorrent rocks!

  77. Tie up loose ends. by jakel2k · · Score: 1

    What I want is for all the major loose ends to be tied. That's right! I want to see how E.T. knew Yoda in the E.T. movie, (the scene where E.T. saw a boy dressed as Yoda on halloween and started following him saying "Home, home...").

    Having a race of E.T.s in the war with lightsabres led by Yoda would be awesome. The E.T. race is strong with the force and they need to be in at least one of the Star Wars movies.

    1. Re:Tie up loose ends. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Informative

      In one of the senate scenes in either episode one or two, I beleive they have a delagation. It's a very brief moment, but I'm fairly certain I saw ET shaped aliens in the senate.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:Tie up loose ends. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      E.T. saw a boy dressed as Yoda on halloween and started following him saying "Home, home..."

      E.T.'s race has their own special kind of intelligence, but then again they mistake kids in costumes for other aliens, so you don't exactly start handing out lightsabers to these cats.

      Yoda's race may have survived to present day, but they may also have suffered greatly in Vader's search for Yoda.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  78. Harrison Ford? by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Food for thought. Has Lucas ever created a good movie that didn't involve Harrison Ford?

    1. Re:Harrison Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has Lucas ever created a good movie that didn't involve Harrison Ford?

      Perhaps Harrison Ford has some sort of natural immunity to the "Lucas Effect".

    2. Re:Harrison Ford? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Harrison Ford has some sort of natural immunity to the "Lucas Effect".

      +5 to charisma?

    3. Re:Harrison Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Food for thought. Has Lucas ever created a good movie that didn't involve Harrison Ford?

      No.

      I guess that wasn't food for very much thought, after all.

    4. Re:Harrison Ford? by JahToasted · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yup... People claim George lucas made Harrison Ford a star, But I'd say Harrison Form made George Lucas The Rich movie producer he is today.

    5. Re:Harrison Ford? by Golias · · Score: 1

      THX-1138 had its moments.

      I guess.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  79. Lessons from The Force by rfernand79 · · Score: 1

    The ability to remake a film is insignificant next to the power of getting it right the first time.

  80. Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dianne Feinstein?

  81. Stratospheric B.O.??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pew, I'm staying far away from the theaters!

  82. Creativity by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Is it true that Annakin Skywalker dies at the end? Someone told me this and it's just ruined the movie for me.

    Wanna know what would be a REAL plot twist?

    Anakin's evil twin brother rapes his wife, kills him and becomes Darth Vader!

    Or even better...

    Anakin simply does NOT become Vader, and they live all happily ever after! :D How's that, huh?

  83. Dear Slashdot by kenp2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear /.

    As I near the big 30 I look back at Star Wars with embarrasment. Somewhere along the line I learned about life and that silly things like "What was the 4th stormtroopers middle inital" were in fact trivial. I also look back at Motley Crue, Poison, and most of the 80s with a sense of distrurbed horror.

    I realize that movies I liked as a child suck. I had emotion attached to the older shows but if a new one came out in a similar fashion, without the emotional attachment, I would say that the new one sucks. I loved Looney Toons, I loved Spiderman and Friends, but I sure as hell don't like the new stuff. But when I see an old one that I liked as a kid the nostalgic attachment alters how I see it. I can watch an old re-run and not gasp at how horrible the animtion is because the old emotion and perception of the show softens the blow. Come on, watch a few episodes of Thundercats and you'll know what I mean....

    But also dealing with children I realize that they "get" that emotional attachment to the prequals because they're new to them. The fact is that all these Star Wars dorks (75.43% of /. readers it seems) dislike of the new movies is simply the lack of that nostalgic attachment because of an unatainable yearning to live in that nostaligic "moment" before the mortgage, car insurance, diaper changing, my boss is an evil demon, life set in. My 9 year old nephew loves episode 1, and 2, and is frantically waiting for 3 (He hasn't seen the original 3 yet.) In fact he loves it just like I loved watching the first 3. That is the reality. You've grown up, you tastes have changed, and there will never be another "Star Wars" like the one you remember because you will never be that child (teen) seeing that for the first time. Nostalgia is a lie, there never was the good-old-days, they're lies that you memory tells you. The lie tells you that seen a movie based on something you've seen before will give you that emotion and feel again. It won't, it's a lie.

    Think I'm wrong? Put in that Whinnie the Pooh tape you used to watch as a kid 50 times a day and see if you can watch it twice in a row... didn't think so...

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good post, but I have to say...

      I never saw "The Transformers Movie" in the 80's. My parents wouldn't let me. I finally saw it two years ago. I think it's AWESOME. Now, I find the Transformers TV show completely unwatchable (I watched the first 22 min episode and literally thought an hour had passed because it was so tedious), but the movie is actually quite good.

      So not everything put out to kids is total and utter dreck.

      Also, I would submit that "A New Hope" (aka "Star Wars") was an enjoyable, cheesy movie. Personally I never cared for any of the sequels, but the first one was pretty good. I went to see it in the theatre when it was digitally remastered and felt like I'd gotten my money's worth. There was more story, more atmosphere, and less CGI.

      (Heck, I liked it better than "Jurassic Park," which had great ideas and special effects, but struck me--at 13--as kind of stupid overall.)

      Yet, I find I agree with you in a lot of ways. I like Star Trek TOS because I found it as a teenager. It was always more special to me than TNG. I thought TNG was the Best Show on TV back in 1991, but now it can't hold my attention at all in reruns. I think I'd actually rather watch McGuyver! But TOS ... well, I've been collecting the DVDs. I'm riveted, even when the episode is total crap. It's true, I wouldn't watch something that crappy if it were new, but TOS has a certain magic because of how I was introduced to it (watching my best friend's older brother's tape at her house after school).

      So you're right. But I also think that the first Star Wars movie (which, remember, caused a sensation when it came out) really *was* better than the recent craptacular sequels.

    2. Re:Dear Slashdot by yoey · · Score: 1

      I'd say you're correct in a lot of things, but Star Wars (ep. IV) was almost universally loved by children and adults. It really was a good movie.

      The non-digital special effects like the use of models still holds up today.

      The charism and screen presense of Harrison Ford is real (as is evidenced by his successful career).

      There's more, but you get the point.

    3. Re:Dear Slashdot by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perfect perception and post!! Kudos to you.

      When TPM came out and I was able to take my child age 6 to see the show (I was 6 when I first saw Star Wars with my father.)

      And you know what -- When she fell in love with Jar-Jar, and had to have the Jar-Jar Shirt, the Jar-Jar action figure, the Jar-Jar Bowl and Plate set with matching fork and spoon....I understood things a whole lot better than most of the people who where "original star wars" fans that despised TPM....

      Well George I got it. You were giving to my kids the same thing you gave to me. (My Dad thought C3-PO and Chewbacca were strange role models...)

      What sucks is that most of you "fanboys" did not "get it". You wanted TPM to be Star Wars mixed with Blade Runner and The Matrix. You wanted George to cater to the original fans after 20+ years of hard liven'. George catered to the same crowd he did before.....Just you were no longer in it.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    4. Re:Dear Slashdot by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Come on, watch a few episodes of Thundercats and you'll know what I mean....

      Twice when I was in college, other guys in my dorm set up viewing parties for Transformers: The Movie. I respectfully declined both times.

      Why? Because I remember liking it when I was a kid. And I know if I watched it now I would be tempted to pull a MST3K on it. I'd rather keep the memories.

    5. Re:Dear Slashdot by martian265 · · Score: 1

      I never saw "The Transformers Movie" in the 80's.....So not everything put out to kids is total and utter dreck.

      The Transformer's movie wasn't aimed or marketed at kids, it was aimed at the teenagers and young adults that collected the toys. They purposely put in a swear word to get the higher rating, knowing that this would ensure that most kids would not see it (remember, in the 80s, the majority of parents were still keeping young kids from seeing anything that didn't have a G rating, and a PG rating actually meant something). Another thing that points to this was the music from the film which was definitely more mature than the cartoon series.

      Also, the first half season of the cartoon show was much worse than the rest of the series. I'm not saying that the cartoon show was great TV, but it would be unfair to judge the series by the first episode.

    6. Re:Dear Slashdot by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      I don't really agree. I was in my late teens when I first saw star wars (not because I am very old but because I am not originally from the US so I happened to miss all the hoopla). Well I liked it. I thought they were fun movies.

      As far as the Phantom Menace it is obvious that if anybody only small children would like it. But even so it was not that good. My sisters who were the perfect age for it did not like it at all.

      So first of all TPM was targeted at a younger crowd than the original series (purely a business decision as lucas knew he would make the most money out of toys and younger children buy more toys) but also it was just not nearly as good of a movie as the original series. TPM never generated the kind of obssession with today's children and teenagers the original star wars did. In fact even for his supposed target audience it was rather forgetable in comparison with other children's movies (such as finding nemo, etc.).

      Fact is that it is mostly star wars fan boys that even talk about star wars nowadays. Children and teenagers have long forgotten it.

    7. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a really much of a "fan" of Star Wars, despite being pretty excited about the movies as a kid, but I can honestly say that I can, at almost 30, still watch A New Hope and Empire Strikes Back without anything about them bothering me too much. And it isn't because of the memories or emotions, because I really haven't cared about Star Wars for years.

      The new movies are really worse. Part of the problem with the new movies is probably due to the pressure to "put more stuff in". The action sequences are more extreme, the "comic relief" characters are more exaggerated, there are more odd attempts at tie-ins to our real-world culture...

      And the dialogue...while the original three movies didn't have great dialogue and many of the actors were pretty bad, there's nothing coming even close to the kind of dialogue between Anakin and Padme.

      The original three movies weren't great movies, but they were decent entertainment that adults could and did enjoy, although not to the same extent as kids. Episodes 1 and to a lesser extent 2 fail in this respect.

    8. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds very sad and bitter. Hopefully soon enough you'll realize your tastes can mature without debasing and dismissing what you loved as a kid. Especially as you get older still, you'll realize that your youth and your vitality is going to fade, and there are indeed "good old days."

      You can move on to adult things without having to toss everything that helped shape what you are into the dustbin of history, and furthermore I think it's foolish to do so.

  84. Note source by PriceIke · · Score: 1

    > there are three separate reviews at TheForce.net.

    Is anybody really surprised the reviews were positive, judging by where they were gathered?

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  85. way to see it, and not give Lucas (much) money by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    for the first 3 weeks (generally 3...) the studio will get 80% (or so) of the ticket sales...

    from there, it drops steadily, until eventually the movie theatre is keeping 90% or so. Just wait to go until then - I can wait a couple months. No hurry.

  86. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd definitely walk out satisfied

    Remind me not to sit in the row in front of you.

  87. Spoiler Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naah, he just gets the shit kicked out of him and is so embarrassed by it he changes his name and wears a goofy mask.

  88. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by mapmaker · · Score: 2, Funny
    give us a topless Padme scene. I'd definitely walk out satisfied.

    I sure wouldn't want to be the person sitting in front of you.

  89. DeMille by airship · · Score: 1

    Cecil B. DeMille (The Ten Commandments, etc.) had the same problem as Lucas. Huge, powerful, sweeping scenes with gigantic sets, thousands of extras in cool costumes, and Oscar-winning special effects? Fantastic. Two proven and otherwise great actors trying to emote at each other? Puke-inducing. I don't know why, but the ability to create a movie with both seems to be a very rare talent.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:DeMille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Vadar is your father, Owen is your step brother, your sister was adopted by members of the royal court of alderan, and I've been bidding my time here waiting to undo 'bringing balance to the force.'

      It's a matter of scale, more precisely what scale the director engages with the story. Most people can't really think in terms of both details and the big picture at the same time. Somewhat like it would be difficult to build something that functions as both a very good telescope and a very good microsope at the same time, even though the optical principles are the same.

  90. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd definitely walk out satisfied....

    ...and spent!

    I..uhm..I've said too much. [slowly backs out Peter Griffin-like]

  91. Two words: by mapmaker · · Score: 1
    Wookie. Army.

    You know you're going to see it.

    1. Re:Two words: by chrish · · Score: 1

      Damn furries.

      --
      - chrish
  92. Even RT is vulnerable to the "Hype Shift" by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've liked that site since Roger Ebert referred to it in one of his Movie Man columns a long while back -- but even collected reviews like that are still going to suffer from the Dopplar effect of modern movie reviews. Beforehand the sound of approaching hype skews everything to a higher, better tone. It's only as they recede behind you that you realize how often "3-of-4-stars"-level movies totally stunk.

    The reviews for Episode II said the same sorts of "It marks a return to The Empire Strikes Back" stuff. The tomatometer's at 65%. That movie made my kids laugh at how bad it was, more than once. Give it two more years, and watch the tomato turn green in retrospect. I dunno how, but it happens. I swear, when "Pearl Harbor" came out, on balance the reviews liked it okay and talked about how it'd inspire interest in the real history. Back in 2001 the Tomatometer doesn't seem like it had PH at 25%.

    Is it just me, or does every blockbuster now come with a pre-release spin fest of "It's so much better than you expect, given that it's this sort of movie, that you should see it anyway"? It's like the stock market, with "retail earnings better than expected" for this April being the headline -- even though the expectations were exceptionally low.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Even RT is vulnerable to the "Hype Shift" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I swear, when "Pearl Harbor" came out, on balance the reviews liked it okay and talked about how it'd inspire interest in the real history."

      I remember the initial reviews considering it an abomination.

      Also, it's no suprise that the only people chosen to review the movie so far would be the ones guaranteed to give it a glowing response.

    2. Re:Even RT is vulnerable to the "Hype Shift" by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      It's just you.

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
  93. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by asc4 · · Score: 1

    Do yourself a favor and go see Closer. Then decide how much of a prude she is.

  94. Because we grew up... by msimm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And I was personally had hoped Lucas and Spielberg knew the significance of that (and maybe artistically and personally had been doing some of the same).

    Lucas himself claims in latest Wired "to have a stack of ideas piling up on his desk for "highly abstract, esoteric" films even more daring than his 1971 debut, THX 1138".

    Revisiting a classic set of movies a few decades after the original should have been a opportunity to showcase their sophistication and growth, but they turned out more fizzle then a bang. I guess success can be creative failure.

    I'll be curious to see if Lucas can climb out from under the machine he's built and make the kinds of films he claims to have intended to. Spielberg I have no hope for.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  95. Re:the force is strong with this one by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

    "That was an annoying. I mean. Those books were written and stamped down as the universe. Sure Lucas created it, but he also let them be published. It's like he said "I don't care about those authors" or something."

    It's not "like he said I don't care". Lucas has specifically stated time and time again that all the books, comic books, RPGs, games, etc... are non canon. It's like an alternate universe Star Wars. The only official canon is the movies.

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
  96. Simple answer: wait by gosand · · Score: 2, Insightful
    After that many hours of investment, no matter how bad it was, we would still have to see it- because not seeing it would still be worse than seeing a horrendously awful movie.

    That is exactly what Lucas counts on. My simple answer: wait. Wait and rent it. Why the impatience? You know it will come out on video/DVD eventually. I waited for Episode II, and I don't regret it one bit. I watched that entire movie in about an hour. FFWD is your friend. Remember those excruciating dialogue scenes in EPII? I don't.

    I don't get why people have to line up to see a movie, or even why they have to see it opening weekend. I hate crowds 100x and the impatient (or ambivalent) people who are there are opening weekend. I'll wait 3-4 weeks, sometimes longer, to see a movie I want to see. The theatre is less crowded, and as long as I stick to that schedule, there will always be something new to see. You don't miss out on the movie experience at all. If it is something you want to be able to pause/FFWD/etc then just wait for the DVD.

    And if it doesn't do well at the box office, it might send a message to Lucas. If you are into that. I know a movie hasn't made me quite as angry as Episode I. Fool me once, shame... shame on you.... can't get fooled again.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  97. RTOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I though this was an article about the return of real-time operating systems to something.

    who cares about star wars?

  98. I was going to see it... by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    ... when I heard it was going to be a bloodbath, I thought "at last".

    But then somone told me Jar-Jar lives thru it.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  99. And he'll make them worse, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, if history is any guide.

  100. Restriction of Trade by daveb · · Score: 1

    Saw the title, didn't glance at the paragraph, hit "read more" to see what people thought of this review of various "Restriction Of Trade" agreements ... god I've gotta take a break from business stuff - catching a movie might help

  101. The storyline's laughable, c'mon by ianscot · · Score: 1
    The storyline will be OK, the fall of the senate and rise of emperor and empire will be interesting.

    Lucas writes these things about on the level of a SciFi fan who doesn't quite "get it."

    I'll never forget how lame Episode II was on the whole political machinations thing. How long did it take the Jedi Council to get to the point where Yoda was suggesting, just suggesting, that maybe the Senate couldn't be trusted? Ooh, elaborate plotting. Imagining what a good writer could do with the atmosphere in a political body that enormous, well, it just makes me sigh.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  102. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by Halthar · · Score: 1

    And in Handcuffs, PeeWee Herman style?

  103. I won't be satisfied with any of them... by bani · · Score: 1

    ...until I see an ewok and gungan slaughter.

    I want to see ewok rugs and gungan leather handbags.

    Until then, lucas has much to answer for.

  104. I'm not going to see it.... by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am one of those cool people who say they won't see Ep 3 and then rip on it because I think it is childish and Lucas has failed with his 2 prior tries...I will argue with you about how you have b.o. and are wasting your money...then I will argue about how my friends will have it downloaded soon and how I won't even look at it then...then I will say that the reviews are all sucking up to Lucas and how terrible the ads are and all the merchandising is over the top....then, even though I have said and done al l this...I won't tell anyone but will go and see & thoroughly enjoy it.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  105. RE:I realize that movies I liked as a child suck. by Dareth · · Score: 1

    I realize that movies I liked as a child suck.

    For anyone who saw Krull as a child then later saw it as an adult will without a doubt agree with you.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  106. Everyone has Missed the Central Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Everyone seems to have missed the central point: the original "Star Wars" was panned by the critics. They accused it of being too Pollyanna-ish.

    Then, the movie turned into a multi-billion dollar blockbuster that played on American cinematic screens for over a year! In our cynicism about life, we quickly forget that the movie debuted in 1977 and played for 365 days into 1978. How many movies, today, can claim that fame?

    Let's not jump up and day in joy when the critics claim that a movie is good. They could be wrong. They were wrong about Star Wars IV.

    Why did Star War IV succeed? The main reason is that it appeared at a time when the nation was going through a great mental depression and malaise. There was stagflation and high unemployment. The cold war was in full swing. The Chinese were butchering Tibetans left and right.

    Then came Star Wars and Ronald Reagan. Both gave hope to America. Both said that good shall triumph over evil. (Nonetheless, the Taiwanese government, which was praised by Ronald Reagan, committed the only successful assassination by a foreign government against an American citizen living in the USA. The victim was living in Daly City at the time.)

    The answer is not technology. It does not solve America's problems. The answer is good values. The answer is in you. At the moment of truth, Skywalker turned off the guidance systems on his spacecraft and used his feelings to guide the photon torpedoes into the exhaust system of the death star, saving the rebel base.

    "May the force [of good] be with you," says Yoda. "At the debut in about a week, see you! To cynicism, do not lose yourself. Rise again, America shall!" exclaims Yoda.

  107. Plot flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because he had a story to tell"

    My impression from the very first movie has been George never laid out a coherent story but has been doing it on the fly. The movie details clash and create a "cobbled together" feeling. For example, Boba Fett is killed off in a completely rediculous manner yet he is presented as an ace bounty hunter and now his family has this very important place in the plot. I suspect if George had written the story out fully beforehand he would have given Boba's character more importance in espisode 6 instead of treating him as a joke.

    Time and time again you get the sense that some part of the plot is being forced in so it won't confict with another episode. If he had written out a complete story from episodes 1 to 6 it would have a far better plot flow.

    1. Re:Plot flop by FingerDemon · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was totally done on the fly. He had big plot ideas about the movies, but left the details to work out when he got to that part of the story. I think many excellent writers work that way. I'm a big Patrick O'Brian fan and he apparently sketched out several books in advance. Unfortunately, I don't think Lucas is an excellent writer. Certainly, not a pimple on P'OB's behind.

      Also, he intentionally tried in ANH to create a new mythology. The mythology he created, left a lot of people filling in the blanks, which I guess is a part of the appeal of mythology. But by doing this, Lucas was doomed to alot of criticism. By the time these latest prequels came out, hard core fans had years to develop widely divergent expectations.

      Still though, I'm not here to apologize for some of the stupid choices he's made. I mean how hard would it have been to stage a better struggle between Luke and Boba Fett on the skiff thing. Show his armor deflecting a glancing saber hit... I don't know but something better than the screaming nose dive.

      And if Leia was going to be Luke's sister all along, then that kiss in ESB is pretty creepy.

      --

      "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
  108. so are you saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that Lucas HASN'T ruined my childhood?!

  109. The Bitter Taste of Defeat by mihalis · · Score: 1

    After the last film, I resolved to not watch this one in the cinema. However just now when I came across a warning about spoilers in a review I had to stop reading. Why? Because this is the last fucking Star Wars movie of my entire life. It may suck, almost certainly will suck in parts, but damnit, it's all I've got! Lucas has got me again.

    I need him (his creations) enough that I wont read spoilers. I don't want to ruin it.

    I failed to resist the temptation of buying the AOTC DVD, which perhaps was a sign, and now I am feeling the old thrill come flooding back, FULL STRENGTH.

    Somewhere in my head, there is a guy who was muttering "these days I really insist on a good plot, I have to believe in the characters" and all of a sudden now it's "ooh, lightsabers, space battles, mass Jedi Death, this is going to RULE!"

    1. Re:The Bitter Taste of Defeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Somewhere in my head, there is a guy who was muttering "these days I really insist on a good plot, I have to believe in the characters" and all of a sudden now it's "ooh, lightsabers, space battles, mass Jedi Death, this is going to RULE!"

      I see.

      You must be one of those 'sheeple' I've heard so much about.
  110. "Stratospheric B.O. is a given" by dfung · · Score: 1

    That title, directly from the Variety review cited in the original posting.

    How could the body odor *not* be stratospheric when the geeks who show up for the first week have been in line for at least a week (and, from the tone of the AICN review, possibly for the last 28 years)? :-)

    Oh, you mean "box office"? Nevermind!

  111. Bittorrent ROTS not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but if it does well in theaters and a torrent doesn't get released, they'll say it's because there wasn't a torrent and still attack BT users anyway. I'm not for pirating, but to argue on your terms, the "best" thing that could happen is for ROTS to get released on BT and still make a killing in theaters.

    BTW, am I the only one who thinks it's rather ironic that the so-called best of the prequels has the acronym "ROTS"?

  112. How could it be worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tagline reminds me of the Chris Rock joke; "Whatdya want? A cookie?" Okay, so the 3rd film is better than the first two. But if you think about it, how could it be WORSE than the first two movies?

  113. Re:FP BITCH by Whqra+Enhf · · Score: 1
    [M]ay the force be with j00!
    Sorry: Schwartz is for Jews; force, Goyim.
  114. Clone troopers look different again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any rhyme or reason to the fact that the clone troopers look different again??
    On that note - does this also mean that Lucas is going to release an revised CG edition of Episode Two: Attack Of The Clones as another must have addon to your extended SW DVD collection??

  115. I've been waiting for this for a long time by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    personally, seeing Jar-Jar die would be ok, but there is a scene I have been looking forward to for a long time: The scene where wookie women are rounded up, shaved and sent off to become imperial 'pleasure wookies', for lonely stormtroopers.

    See, that is why you neger see any girl wookies in episodes 4-6.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:I've been waiting for this for a long time by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      Now I'm scarred for life.

    2. Re:I've been waiting for this for a long time by mink · · Score: 1

      Not yet.
      Now you are.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  116. Where is Jar Jar? by wgaryhas · · Score: 0

    [quote]Where is Jar Jar? You see him maybe twice, and except for background noise he doesn't even have a single line. [/quote] this is the most promising information from one of the reviews there is.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
  117. 2h 40m of Lightsabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the movie is anything like the PS2 game, it'll be about 2 hours 40 minutes of high light saber action.
    (mental picture: darth maul scene from Eps 1)

    G

  118. Already done by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What should have happend was AOTC as Ep 1. Then Ep 2 can cover the Clone Wars, with ROTS still being Ep 3. That would have been a more effective story because it would have built Anakin up as a hero more, making his Fall greater.

    Basically you can ignore AOTC if you like. Better yet have a hypnotist wipe that whole movie from you mind, alond with the meadow scene in EP2 while he's tinkering around. (Actually I don't think it's that bad but like you say there's little point to it).

    Now watch EP2 (sjipping the meadow scene).

    Ready? Now, watch both seasons of the Clone Wars, then EP3.

    Don't believe me? Try it and see. Alogether the Clone Wars series is long enough for a movie. It almost fits together like a movie. And the second season actually feels a lot like a movie with a fair amount of dialogue and even some romans.

    The Clone Wars series is what really made me excited about Star Wars again, and I think will help me enjoy the movie properly because as you say it goes to much greater lengths setting up Anakin as a hero.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  119. Actually yes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Is anybody really surprised the reviews were positive, judging by where they were gathered?

    Have you already forgotten the chilly reception AOTC got from the more devoted fans?

    The people that love you are the ones that can hurt you the most when they are crossed.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  120. Re:Here's hoping they get all they can out of PG-1 by Ykant · · Score: 1
    ...and give us a topless Padme scene. I'd definitely walk out satisfied.

    Eeewwww...

    --
    Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
  121. Oh yah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that this is the best film of the prequels
    Wize man say: pile of less smelly poo, still pile of poo.
    That is not the most ringing endorsement.

    it should satisfy fans who were unhappy with the first two
    And I was stupid enough to sucumb to the marketing hype that 2 would satisfy those fans who were disapointed in 1. Mmm-hmm. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice and I won't dump +10$ on your third installment. Since the only thing the theatre has over my home system is a slightly bigger screen and snazzy seats, there is no incentive to waste my time on this. I'll use an XMas Blockbuster gift certificate to rent it.

  122. Reviews for the Ep I and II were positive too by Absentminded-Artist · · Score: 1
    I remain skeptical. Consider this steaming pile of Bantha Poodoo: http://aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=11796

    The pre release review from Ain't It Cool for Episode II was filled with just enough concern to make him sound cautious, and therefor non-objective, but then Harry threw caution to the wind and began to gush. Then I lost all respect for him when he dropped these mature and non-objective statements:

    When I saw this, I screamed like a little girl.

    And my favorite...

    I jumped about 12 feet up in the air and squealed.

    Ah, yes. Ep. II was just sooo exciting. We had the Sound of Music picnic, the little orphan Ani/Amidala "feel my pain. I just slaughtered an entire village. - ooh, you poor dear" scene, and the bouncing, green CG Yoda fighting machine scene. Why do cool stuff with the force like hold spaceships in place since size doesn't matter when you can mix it up with the boys and let the bad guy get away? No, none of the glowing pre-reviews held up once the movie came out. Everyone still felt raped, unless they were fanboys...

    I think I'll pass.

    --
    The Splintered Mind - Overcoming
    1. Re:Reviews for the Ep I and II were positive too by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      Ah, yes. Ep. II was just sooo exciting.

      Sorry you didn't enjoy the film. I loved it, and I have no concern for your respect for me so make of it what you will. I think a lot moviegoers had unreasonably high expectations on these films and couldn't come to grips with the fact that they weren't the perfect, cinematic, life-changing thrill-ride that they dreamed of.

      I think I'll pass.

      For that, I thank you. If you think you'll hate this movie, then for God's sake, skip it. I hope lots of people who hated the prequels follow your lead. That will be fewer people to piss in the pool afterward.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  123. Aint-it-cool-news is the worst place for a review by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do, do not trust AICN for any star wars reviews. It is a cool site and a great place to get rumors and such about movies (and also great place for flame wars) but their reviews are questionable to say the least.

    It is just painfully obvious that they give good reviews in exchange for early access to the movie. Their review of Phantom Menace was so gushing it was embarrassing. Harry even assured us that we would love Jar-Jar's hijinks.

    I would wait until a well established critic that would never give a positive review in exchange for access (such as Roger Ebert) reviews the movie.

  124. Serenity by julesh · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I'm waiting for Serenity. That's the SF event of the year, as far as I'm concerned.

    The one review I've heard from someone who's seen a preview of it is that both existing and new fans will be happy with it. I'll be counting the days down.

  125. Since the merger we get.... Ad-cum information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else notice that since the Merger that created AOL-Time Warner, TIME has steadily moved towards showcasing product, and less content? As newsworthy as it is to many, I didn't feel that the amount of space the review and Giant pictures of Yoda etc. took away from other *cough* important new items. If I want to pay money to be exposed to an overabundance of advertising promotion disguised as news, I might as well watch cable TV.

    1. Re:Since the merger we get.... Ad-cum information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we wanted to be exposed to an overabundance of useless opinions from cowards, we could all just read /.

  126. Yes, but the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the #&@()#! is Rob?!?!

    1. Re:Yes, but the real question is... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1

      Theater manager-type guy. Can't really remember his name since it was like 3 years ago.

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

  127. Gay Porno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda like movies! I used to be all interested in story line, metaphors, and acting, but I then realized that all I cared about was the kinky homoerotica.

    This is what I've been waiting for.. two solid hours of cock-dueling!

    Because, let's face it, Porno is really all about the cocks. You know you want one, and so do I, in the bum!

  128. Re:Torrent Link by teshuvah · · Score: 0

    1. I will see it in theaters twice, just as I have with the other 2. I'll see it once in a regular theater for the midnight showing, and the other in digital about a week later. I did the same for EP2 when it came out. I see every good movie in a theater twice, no more. 2. I will buy the DVDs, just as I did witht he other 2. In fact, I have the VHS AND DVD for EP1, because we tricked us all into believing it would be on VHS only. I just want to see it early, that's all. FYI, I have an XBox with a modchip and a 200 gig drive, and rather than renting the game for $3.00 and copying it, I chose to support Lucas and buy the "Revenge of the Sith" game for $50.00. So once again, you're wrong!

  129. Re:I realize that movies I liked as a child suck. by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Hey! I LIKE Krull precisely because it DOES suck!
    Of course I'm somewhat of a connoisseur of bad science fiction. For example, I own Battlefield Earth on DVD. It makes me laugh everytime Travolta says "leverage".

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  130. Marketing Survey by initialE · · Score: 1

    *Does a keyword search*
    Wow it looks like, with all the references made to Jar Jar Binks on Slashdot, he must be like the most popular character with geeks on Star Wars! Next movie we make, we gotta have more of them Gungans. Maybe even insert them into the TV series. As main characters. Like the ewoks. Everyone loves ewoks.

    Marketing Dept.

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  131. Re:revenge of the.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anakin force-chokes Padme to death before fighting with Obi-Wan.

    (spoiler above)

  132. Screw Bittorrent by chuck.kahn · · Score: 1

    I want to see it in IMAX.

  133. Downloaders DID hurt Episode II box-office by GreenSwirl · · Score: 1

    Attack of the Clones did about a third less box office than the Phantom Menace. I think this is in due in part to bootlegs. Most of the repeat business for Episode I was hard core fanboys -- the same type of guys who would soon discover and embrace movie downloading. They only went to see Episode II in theaters once and then went home and watched the Centropy release, and then the screener, etc.

    Even with its flaws, I wanted to see Phantom Menace more than once, and back then the only way to do so was by going back to the theater. No so today.

    1. Re:Downloaders DID hurt Episode II box-office by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      I only went to see Clones once, and during the second or third week at that. I went to see Menace three times. The first 'cause I was excited, the second 'cause I was wondering if I was right, and the third to confirm that yes, this movie sucked donkey balls.

      This time I may even wait until video.

  134. Re:the force is strong with this one by fshalor · · Score: 1

    That was why I put the word "like" in front of it. I know he didn't say he didn't care. Well. He pretty much did with the cannonical defination.

    Still, it was a pretty big change. And one which disturbed me. Sure it was a shortstory by a single author he was stepping on.

    I wonder what he truely thinks of the Timothy Zahn extension...

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::