I see a nice white window with a please get the plugin in the middle. oh wait, yes, I never downloaded the shockwave plugin, (if it even works on mozilla....).:):)
Anyway I do NOT need the web to live. If they wish to force feed me advertising then , fine, I will limit myself to site where i can avoid it by pop up blocking, IP blocking. If not, well they do not want me as viewer/client.
The grass is green outside, friends are smiling, bier is fresh, who need browsing on the NET anyway ?
The censorship is : you risk to loose or have a lot of money to be "frozen" for a time, to get a lawyer to defend you. If you do not have the deep pocket of a big company then this money would be a murderous move on your budget.
Thus you have no choice. Temporair ruin and blocking of asset (if oyu win AFAIK you get your money back) or take back your opinion/strip/whatever.
Censorship isn't only governemental and law enforced, and you do not need a gun to force censorship on somebody. Merely inconvenience them to the extrem, put them in a difficult position, which nmight make their life a hell and most except idealist will bow. This is also censorship.
Frankly, to make into plain sarcasm I see right now a minority [the richt, the corporations] having a field day over the mass [normal citizen].
And what you say about EC forcing people to take into account minority *isn't right*. If it was from day 0 slave would have been freed and racism & racistic law would not have gone well beyond the 1950's. I bet that by looking a bit more you can find a lot more example.
And look at EU country where many use direct democracy. Is there less freedom ? Are the minority oppressed ? It doesn't seems so at first view.
Look at the some of the guys which were released from prison after being cleared [innocented] by DNA evidence, and still people think him guilty (there was a ncie article about the procurator still thinking his conduct is suspect and the neighbourghs shunning him but I can't find a link).
Public follow (wrongly IMO) the old adage "there isn't smoke without fire". Cleared or not your REPUTATION is MARRED.
I got the feeling that a minority will say that compression is so good you can't differenciate from a CD, another minority will say it is poor quality, wheras the majority will shrug their shoulder, continue their download and not care what both camp says.
The guy with his "soviet russia" sig may be joking
on
DMCA, Auf Deutsch
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
... but it starts to smell likes you have to go to beyond the ex iron curtain to get some liberty on your privat stuff (like back up every single of your soft *which* I do after loosing 2 cd to accident) or loosing public domain or everything. We really seems to go into the Corporantism at outrance where we human cease to have rights except obying what the corporation comes up with sicne they hold or nearly hold the hands of the law.
And before you starts speaking of alternative, let me snort a big time and ask you if those alternative are for the big public or only a few hacker resistant.
Sound like something you could hear in Soviet russia (to paraphrase a signature I read on slashdot) and CERTAINLY sound like somehting my DDR friend told me when I visited DDR long ago.
And PNR data are NOT conserved forever. With the 100's of 1000 of people we have which travel each days that would be really really really expensive after a while. No, we get hold onto them depending on what we have to give account about. PNR data if I recall correctly is 6 monthes to 2 years. Flight data is two days. Electronic ticketing data is 60 days to 1 years.
Now the US governement may be tempted to conserve it more than that but it is a different story.
But there is no "dellusional" de-mod.
"Read the books yourself, you won't find a more benevolent world power anywhere in history. "
benevolence is when you give up without benefice. US gave money after WW2 to Europe only because it beneficied them on many ground (we having money allwoed us rebuild , thus economy rising, thus buying from US; plus politically thuis allowed for us avoiding turning toward the east).
"Compare America's "economic imperialism" to the military imperialism practiced by western Europe in the 19th century. " Yes I can do that. US supported a lot of dictature in the 20th century , and sometimes rebelle when the dictature wasN#t to their liking. And in some case they projected killing governement head. Plus one can argue that in the case of vietnam , grenada, panama this was bordering invasion into local politics. As for the rest ogf the comparison, please compare country at the SAME DATE. Do not compare 20th century US with 19th century europe for logic's sake.
Most people do not see a benevolent US but a "real politik" US which do things only if it profits its intern and extern politics (economic or pure politic).
free mark^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H Tarif.
And i thougth most American hated socialism (support of the gouvernement to firm/people which could not autosupport itself without a crutch).
...some country have a scientific comitee (*cough* US *cough*) use this as an argument there isn't global warming due to pollution and that one don't really have to reduce CO2 emission or other Serre-effect gas ?
Finished school 30 june, got hired 1st july after i told I learnt fortran. There is such a lack of skilled people wanting/knowing fortran 77 that they hire foreigner not speaking a bits of the language but a bit of english.
I never lived in a house which was built in this century (I used to live in Paris then switched to province). Best I got was 1897. "Oldest" was probably 1780-1820. Yes you read right. Although its deck was made again and canalisation added. Most of those house were built in the same scheme : massive stone about 60cm*25*25 (2.5 cm ~ 1 inch ?). GRanted there was no "inner" wall and the deck was broken but the wall still stood. And the tower not far from there was even older, so old that there was already no trace of when it was built at revolution time.
PS: it seems to be also the same type of stone used in aqueduc not far away from roman.
I mean, such a news would make the ire and anger of the industry I work in. So why this only source is cited and nobody else heard of it here in germany ? I am not even speaking of major media network, but of people in the know and in the industry. So , is thias UIP "source" reputable ?
How much energy is necessary to move it at 50 mph for 1 hour ? How much pollution generated the car during this our ? How much energy generate a small coal plent for this one hour ? how much polution ? Now how much car would you need to generate as much enegry ? How much polution would they egnerate in total ?
Do you have calculated those data ? NO ? Too bad because you would have seen that due to the scale , car generate more pollution when scaled to the size of the coal plant. If electric powerplant are ecological nightmare, then oil car are door of doom.
Final point : you can force the people to recycle the battery of a car.
I think if we had an obvious proof of a civilisation so "near" from us a lot of governement woudl begin seriously of a way to make space defense, protect Sol system, while other would be smithing plan to invade or send (gasp) missionar there and convert people to the true and only god (insert name here : christ, allah, jeovah,Shiva, goublibougah).
Yeah the twins had a show in France called "temp X" and whereas sometimes there was a bit of normal science most of the time it was bad science or pseudo science which went thru. But a lot of people bought it as "Morning gold".
Only one person can use the same plot of meat-space , or physical universe. So it is easily defensible that propriety should exist on the physical side. Actually everything in our society is absed on this concept of physical appropriation.
Now for idea this is dfar more complicated. Many person can posses the same idea, the first person to come with do not loose the idea. it isn't like a physical object, inmformation and idea can be copied at will. Now where the problem comes is that since 100,150 years to ensure developpement and research the various govt saw fit to give a small advantage to the discoverer. And one can argue that this small advantage was enough, but by lobbying and pressuring the industry wants to transform this advantage into a incredible pressure and monopolysation machine. Therein lies the problem with all the IP stuff, what people contest : It should be a balance but it ceased recently to be.
Nevertheless to comes back to your post, NO IP is not like meatspace. Truth cannot be owned for the simple reason that as soon as you spread it you share its apropriation. The only way to "protect" truth and really own it in the litteral science is either 1) abvoid saying it (protection by secrecy) 2) introduce artigfical barrier to spreading like IP law. But both are not natural for social animals like human.
Actually the number of conflict is not an all time low, on the contrary. What you mean is that there is peace in Europe and north america. but if you look down at the other continent, either there is a war somewhere , or a cease fire, or terrorism (when it comes right down to that, another form a war far more pernicious : civilist from a country against civilist from another). A lot of country have rebelious or insurgent. Heck slavery is still widespresad in some region.
The difference from the other century is that now some war tends to spread like wildfire to neighbourghs instead of being limited conflict. And between, the US military did not bring peace. In many case it brought war, and in the case of CIA & south america even created the war where there was nothing.
At the time of Galileo "law" of nature or at least the model we have for them, were not grounded. But now everything as fundemmental as been found, most new "model" are only a correction at some frontier point of the old model (at least where I work in physic). Hreck, even relativity is only a frontier model at certain speed, for everyday's life people can use newtonian law and still find the same result to many digits after the coma.
The point is : point 2 is not really valid because the establishment in question WASN'T the scientific establishement but something altogether diffeernt. the argument being that the scientific establishement itself would not let something new remain hidden, they would rather be the first to investigate it ASAP for the nobels.
And point 7 as per above was before the model were set so it is ok, because there was nothing b4.
Finally einstein did not work "alone" isolated. He was in cooperation and dialogue with many scientific at that time which had as many extremly important discovery made. And again it was a fundemmental law, thus the "celebrity". heiseberg uncertainty principle isn't as known, but IMO should be : the principle shows that whatever we will want to do there willalways be limitation due to measurement and not everything can be known on a particule/conjugated variables in Q systems.
It is falsifiable, not the discovery of only one, was extensively discussed among peer and certainly do not make media headline except in hollywoods fertile (sic) creative mind.
When you have such a disclaimer, better support it with good grounded argument instead of a throw-it.
IF you read their term and service they reserve the right to bill again you up to after 2 years after a bill if there is a need to be a correction. For example they forgot 1 month of DSL of my bill+montage cost I got billed 15 monthes after.
As the amount of data to analyze pike up , it becomes more and more difficult to get out true data from the noise. My prediction : if CAPS I would have been with ethnicity it would have changed nothing at all on the contrary to what you are purporting. Because the system would have been overwhelemed by the number of "high risk" passenger.
Exepect such chips to appear in every kind of items where you have consummable, or additional part needed. Now that a judgement has been upholded that you can use the DMCA to stamp out somebody making a cheaper replacement, you can artificially make your own monopoly. Buy Ford Tire ? We have this new chip we check for air pressure in it ! Secure and stuff. You want to replace it ? Oh, bad luck you have to do it at our condition in a ford garage. Oh, and don't try to put another tire the car won't start (security check on tire pressure fail).
We do not live in republic or democracy we live in a Corporatocracy.
Slashdot Mirror
I see a nice white window with a please get the plugin in the middle. oh wait, yes, I never downloaded the shockwave plugin, (if it even works on mozilla....). :):)
Anyway I do NOT need the web to live. If they wish to force feed me advertising then , fine, I will limit myself to site where i can avoid it by pop up blocking, IP blocking. If not, well they do not want me as viewer/client.
The grass is green outside, friends are smiling, bier is fresh, who need browsing on the NET anyway ?
The censorship is : you risk to loose or have a lot of money to be "frozen" for a time, to get a lawyer to defend you. If you do not have the deep pocket of a big company then this money would be a murderous move on your budget.
Thus you have no choice. Temporair ruin and blocking of asset (if oyu win AFAIK you get your money back) or take back your opinion/strip/whatever.
Censorship isn't only governemental and law enforced, and you do not need a gun to force censorship on somebody. Merely inconvenience them to the extrem, put them in a difficult position, which nmight make their life a hell and most except idealist will bow. This is also censorship.
Frankly, to make into plain sarcasm I see right now a minority [the richt, the corporations] having a field day over the mass [normal citizen]. And what you say about EC forcing people to take into account minority *isn't right*. If it was from day 0 slave would have been freed and racism & racistic law would not have gone well beyond the 1950's. I bet that by looking a bit more you can find a lot more example. And look at EU country where many use direct democracy. Is there less freedom ? Are the minority oppressed ? It doesn't seems so at first view.
Look at the some of the guys which were released from prison after being cleared [innocented] by DNA evidence, and still people think him guilty (there was a ncie article about the procurator still thinking his conduct is suspect and the neighbourghs shunning him but I can't find a link).
Public follow (wrongly IMO) the old adage "there isn't smoke without fire". Cleared or not your REPUTATION is MARRED.
I got the feeling that a minority will say that compression is so good you can't differenciate from a CD, another minority will say it is poor quality, wheras the majority will shrug their shoulder, continue their download and not care what both camp says.
... but it starts to smell likes you have to go to beyond the ex iron curtain to get some liberty on your privat stuff (like back up every single of your soft *which* I do after loosing 2 cd to accident) or loosing public domain or everything. We really seems to go into the Corporantism at outrance where we human cease to have rights except obying what the corporation comes up with sicne they hold or nearly hold the hands of the law.
And before you starts speaking of alternative, let me snort a big time and ask you if those alternative are for the big public or only a few hacker resistant.
Sound like something you could hear in Soviet russia (to paraphrase a signature I read on slashdot) and CERTAINLY sound like somehting my DDR friend told me when I visited DDR long ago.
And PNR data are NOT conserved forever. With the 100's of 1000 of people we have which travel each days that would be really really really expensive after a while. No, we get hold onto them depending on what we have to give account about. PNR data if I recall correctly is 6 monthes to 2 years. Flight data is two days. Electronic ticketing data is 60 days to 1 years.
Now the US governement may be tempted to conserve it more than that but it is a different story.
But there is no "dellusional" de-mod. "Read the books yourself, you won't find a more benevolent world power anywhere in history. " benevolence is when you give up without benefice. US gave money after WW2 to Europe only because it beneficied them on many ground (we having money allwoed us rebuild , thus economy rising, thus buying from US; plus politically thuis allowed for us avoiding turning toward the east).
"Compare America's "economic imperialism" to the military imperialism practiced by western Europe in the 19th century. " Yes I can do that. US supported a lot of dictature in the 20th century , and sometimes rebelle when the dictature wasN#t to their liking. And in some case they projected killing governement head. Plus one can argue that in the case of vietnam , grenada, panama this was bordering invasion into local politics. As for the rest ogf the comparison, please compare country at the SAME DATE. Do not compare 20th century US with 19th century europe for logic's sake.
Most people do not see a benevolent US but a "real politik" US which do things only if it profits its intern and extern politics (economic or pure politic).
free mark^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H ^H Tarif. And i thougth most American hated socialism (support of the gouvernement to firm/people which could not autosupport itself without a crutch).
...some country have a scientific comitee (*cough* US *cough*) use this as an argument there isn't global warming due to pollution and that one don't really have to reduce CO2 emission or other Serre-effect gas ?
Finished school 30 june, got hired 1st july after i told I learnt fortran. There is such a lack of skilled people wanting/knowing fortran 77 that they hire foreigner not speaking a bits of the language but a bit of english.
I never lived in a house which was built in this century (I used to live in Paris then switched to province). Best I got was 1897. "Oldest" was probably 1780-1820. Yes you read right. Although its deck was made again and canalisation added. Most of those house were built in the same scheme : massive stone about 60cm*25*25 (2.5 cm ~ 1 inch ?). GRanted there was no "inner" wall and the deck was broken but the wall still stood. And the tower not far from there was even older, so old that there was already no trace of when it was built at revolution time. PS: it seems to be also the same type of stone used in aqueduc not far away from roman.
I mean, such a news would make the ire and anger of the industry I work in. So why this only source is cited and nobody else heard of it here in germany ? I am not even speaking of major media network, but of people in the know and in the industry. So , is thias UIP "source" reputable ?
How much energy is necessary to move it at 50 mph for 1 hour ? How much pollution generated the car during this our ? How much energy generate a small coal plent for this one hour ? how much polution ? Now how much car would you need to generate as much enegry ? How much polution would they egnerate in total ? Do you have calculated those data ? NO ? Too bad because you would have seen that due to the scale , car generate more pollution when scaled to the size of the coal plant. If electric powerplant are ecological nightmare, then oil car are door of doom. Final point : you can force the people to recycle the battery of a car.
I think if we had an obvious proof of a civilisation so "near" from us a lot of governement woudl begin seriously of a way to make space defense, protect Sol system, while other would be smithing plan to invade or send (gasp) missionar there and convert people to the true and only god (insert name here : christ, allah, jeovah,Shiva, goublibougah).
Yeah the twins had a show in France called "temp X" and whereas sometimes there was a bit of normal science most of the time it was bad science or pseudo science which went thru. But a lot of people bought it as "Morning gold".
Only one person can use the same plot of meat-space , or physical universe. So it is easily defensible that propriety should exist on the physical side. Actually everything in our society is absed on this concept of physical appropriation.
Now for idea this is dfar more complicated. Many person can posses the same idea, the first person to come with do not loose the idea. it isn't like a physical object, inmformation and idea can be copied at will. Now where the problem comes is that since 100,150 years to ensure developpement and research the various govt saw fit to give a small advantage to the discoverer. And one can argue that this small advantage was enough, but by lobbying and pressuring the industry wants to transform this advantage into a incredible pressure and monopolysation machine. Therein lies the problem with all the IP stuff, what people contest : It should be a balance but it ceased recently to be.
Nevertheless to comes back to your post, NO IP is not like meatspace. Truth cannot be owned for the simple reason that as soon as you spread it you share its apropriation. The only way to "protect" truth and really own it in the litteral science is either 1) abvoid saying it (protection by secrecy) 2) introduce artigfical barrier to spreading like IP law. But both are not natural for social animals like human.
Actually the number of conflict is not an all time low, on the contrary. What you mean is that there is peace in Europe and north america. but if you look down at the other continent, either there is a war somewhere , or a cease fire, or terrorism (when it comes right down to that, another form a war far more pernicious : civilist from a country against civilist from another). A lot of country have rebelious or insurgent. Heck slavery is still widespresad in some region.
The difference from the other century is that now some war tends to spread like wildfire to neighbourghs instead of being limited conflict. And between, the US military did not bring peace. In many case it brought war, and in the case of CIA & south america even created the war where there was nothing.
At the time of Galileo "law" of nature or at least the model we have for them, were not grounded. But now everything as fundemmental as been found, most new "model" are only a correction at some frontier point of the old model (at least where I work in physic). Hreck, even relativity is only a frontier model at certain speed, for everyday's life people can use newtonian law and still find the same result to many digits after the coma.
The point is : point 2 is not really valid because the establishment in question WASN'T the scientific establishement but something altogether diffeernt. the argument being that the scientific establishement itself would not let something new remain hidden, they would rather be the first to investigate it ASAP for the nobels.
And point 7 as per above was before the model were set so it is ok, because there was nothing b4.
Finally einstein did not work "alone" isolated. He was in cooperation and dialogue with many scientific at that time which had as many extremly important discovery made. And again it was a fundemmental law, thus the "celebrity". heiseberg uncertainty principle isn't as known, but IMO should be : the principle shows that whatever we will want to do there willalways be limitation due to measurement and not everything can be known on a particule/conjugated variables in Q systems.
It is falsifiable, not the discovery of only one, was extensively discussed among peer and certainly do not make media headline except in hollywoods fertile (sic) creative mind.
When you have such a disclaimer, better support it with good grounded argument instead of a throw-it.
IF you read their term and service they reserve the right to bill again you up to after 2 years after a bill if there is a need to be a correction. For example they forgot 1 month of DSL of my bill+montage cost I got billed 15 monthes after.
A word is 36 bits aned a "byte" is 9 bits which leads to a lot of fun for FTP'ing. So much for the 8 bits being the standard.
As the amount of data to analyze pike up , it becomes more and more difficult to get out true data from the noise. My prediction : if CAPS I would have been with ethnicity it would have changed nothing at all on the contrary to what you are purporting. Because the system would have been overwhelemed by the number of "high risk" passenger.
Exepect such chips to appear in every kind of items where you have consummable, or additional part needed. Now that a judgement has been upholded that you can use the DMCA to stamp out somebody making a cheaper replacement, you can artificially make your own monopoly. Buy Ford Tire ? We have this new chip we check for air pressure in it ! Secure and stuff. You want to replace it ? Oh, bad luck you have to do it at our condition in a ford garage. Oh, and don't try to put another tire the car won't start (security check on tire pressure fail).
We do not live in republic or democracy we live in a Corporatocracy.