Slashdot Mirror


SETI@Home 2nd Look at Possible Hits

cpk0 writes "This article from MSNBC discusses how data returned from SETI@Home users is beign retested by the Institue for a possibility of alien radio signals being included. At just over 4 years old, I think this would be the first big break for SETI@home." This is a followup to a December Slashdot story. Apparently this is getting some major attention in the mainstream media lately.

407 comments

  1. Fun Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It would be nice to see more people running SETI@HOME to take advantage of those spare CPU cycles.

    1. Re:Fun Stuff by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      I would, but then my apartment gets too damn hot.

      Seriously, 6 computers, 4 of which are in the same room, running at full CPU stuff heats my apartment up to about 80 degrees, not to mention what the one room heats up to...

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    2. Re:Fun Stuff by Surak · · Score: 1

      Hey...I live in Michigan...I should try that...might lower my gas bill. :)

    3. Re:Fun Stuff by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      I live in michigan to.

      A friend had a AMD K6-400 Linux box, and P3-1GHZ running all day at the same time. This room went up to about 90 in the dead of winter. We had to crack this window to cool off.

    4. Re:Fun Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Florida, my computer room is 80 degrees before I even turn on my computers.

    5. Re:Fun Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey...I live in Florida...and it doesn't do shit for my bills!

    6. Re:Fun Stuff by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Wow, who installed your insulation? :-P

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    7. Re:Fun Stuff by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it runs as an idle process running at 100% CPU, not slowing anything special down. BUT that would mean my Pentium 4 would constantly sound like a jet plane, like it usually does when you run anything 90%+ CPU for an extended time period. :-(

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:Fun Stuff by Surak · · Score: 1

      Good thing they weren't BOTH AMDs then, huh? :-P

    9. Re:Fun Stuff by gr8gatzby · · Score: 0

      ima at 3162 units.... w00t! seti@home user for 4 years

      --
      Hard work often pays off in time, but laziness always pays off right now.
    10. Re:Fun Stuff by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      yeah, i keep all my windows in my apartment cracked as it is....i have my heat turned all the way down too, problem is, all the way turned down == still too hot due to the settings in the apartment building. ah well, at least i don't have to use a fan this year. Last year i was on the 3rd floor of an overheated apartment building, and we had to have a fan in one of the windows up by the ceiling in order to keep the apartment a reasonable temperature.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    11. Re:Fun Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a better heatsink and fan combination for your P4. Mine was doing the same thing, and crashing frequently too when it sounded like a jet plane for too long. After much frusteration, I bought a Thermaltake GoldenOrb heatsink/fan combo and the sucker never revs up anymore plus it doesn't crash as frequently.

      Turns out the old heatsink was not seated properly.

      Your mileage may vary.

    12. Re:Fun Stuff by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      That makes sense, since I guess the extra fan (the one that makes NOISE) only kicks in when the temperature pass some threshold. Preventing the temperature to rise in the first place should do the trick. Thanks for the tip :-)

      Another annoying thing with my fan is that when the loud fan starts, sometimes it doesn't stop even if the temperature sensors clearly show something like 30 degrees celsius! What's up with that?? The only think that works to silence it, is a reboot. Grr! Must be some low-level BIOS / motherboard bug or something...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  2. could be just what we need... by mike77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I'm being too poetic, but with a world on the brink of war, a confirmation of an alien civilization would be an amazing thing right now. Maybe give our leaders a kick in the ass that their petty squabbles are not the end all be all of our existence.

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

    1. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah, why don't you fly to Iraq and personally deliver the message to Saddam....

    2. Re:could be just what we need... by k3v0 · · Score: 0

      or maybe we will organize a preemptive attack, since they would of course be an immediate threat to us....

    3. Re:could be just what we need... by borgdows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yeah!! bomb these terrorists aliens!!

      and bring them democracy and liberty!!

    4. Re:could be just what we need... by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence.

      Then I can see us taking over that race, cuz those fuckers would NEVER see that shit coming.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    5. Re:could be just what we need... by ip_vjl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of a Twilight Zone episode (from the version that ran in the 80's)

      Aliens come to Earth and tell us that they seeded our planet years ago ... but are disappointed in us because we have this "small talent for war with all our petty border skirmishes and such" and will wipe us out in a few days.

      World leaders feverishly work to hammer out their differences in the days before the aliens return.

      When they return, they are handed a huge treaty as we stand back and proudly proclaim "Peace in our time."

      The alien laughs.

      "No, you misunderstood. We breed warriors."

    6. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up insightful!

    7. Re:could be just what we need... by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      and Jesus too!

    8. Re:could be just what we need... by borgdows · · Score: 1

      of course!
      don't forget that "democracy is a gift of God to americans" according to G.W.Bush ;)

    9. Re:could be just what we need... by SoulRain9999 · · Score: 1

      Considering that the universe is 30 billion light years wide, it would take billions of years for most aliens signals to reach us, let alone reaching us with spaceships.
      I think this is basically impossible, but it's the kind of thing that's so important that we can't give up no matter what; It's something we NEED to know just like we need to know how how and why we exist at all.

    10. Re:could be just what we need... by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      I always liked that Jack Handy

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    11. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      First Contact will go something like this:

      "This is Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz of the Galactic Hyperspace Planning Council. As you will no doubt be aware, the plans for development of the outlying regions of the Galaxy require the building of a hyperspatial express route through your star system, and regrettably your planet is one of those scheduled for demolition. The process will take slightly less that two of your Earth minutes. Thank you."

    12. Re:could be just what we need... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Instead of sending out sattelites with a record and pictures and crap like that. Why don't we send out a spacecraft with a particle that is quantum entangled with a particle on earth, and then using quantum superpositioning use this as a method of instantaneous communication with anything the satellite comes into contact with. We could slingshot it around Jupiter and try to send it along the same concentric circle our solar system is in, around our galaxy. Just a thought.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    13. Re:could be just what we need... by DevilM · · Score: 1

      Since they plan on starting the analysis on March 18th, they will be one day too late to stop the war.

    14. Re:could be just what we need... by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Higher beings from outer space may not want to tell us the secrets of life, because we're not ready. But maybe they'll change their tune after a little torture." -Jack Handey

      --
      "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    15. Re:could be just what we need... by LudditeMind · · Score: 1

      And how do you propose stringing the fiber between earth and that craft? That'd be one hell of a spool. Also if you were to slingshot it around Jupiter the fiber would get all tangled up, and that definately wouldn't work.

    16. Re:could be just what we need... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

      LOL. That is just flat out WRONG! Oh man I haven't laughed that hard and that loud in a long time. Thank you.

    17. Re:could be just what we need... by jokercito · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence.

      Actually, THEY would probably be able to kick OUR collective asses since what they would need to gain the security of being able to have a society free of crime, war, and violence is the ability to kick anybody's ass.
    18. Re:could be just what we need... by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Thats why he is proposing we use quantum entangled particles. They are "networked" without having any "wire" betwen them. I am sure there are major flaws to the proposal I just don't know enough physics to know what they are :)

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    19. Re:could be just what we need... by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      In all truthfullness, it will come down to who has the bigger board with bigger nail.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    20. Re:could be just what we need... by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Your superior intellects are no match for our puny weapons!

    21. Re:could be just what we need... by gorilla · · Score: 1

      Because we don't know how to do it?

    22. Re:could be just what we need... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about quantum physics besides what I casually read about quantum computers. I am by no means an expert. It was a question, nothing more.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    23. Re:could be just what we need... by uptownguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence

      I wrote a short story on this subject. When they step foot off of their ship, just like any other visitors to a foreign shore we greet them with open arms. They come in peace... they don't want our oil... They don't want our water...

      They want to convert us...

      Makes sense if you think about it. Missionaries would be on that first ship, my friends. And if you think the whole Arab vs. Jewish vs. Christian thing that's playing itself out right now looks bad, just imagine an alien religion gaining mass numbers of converts (free technology, free alien schools, nice little carrot there)and the opposition to it...

      Summary: Just because they are free of crime, war and violence doesn't mean that those buggers won't spell trouble!

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    24. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, the 80s series had a few of nice 5 minute ones like that.

      "A Small Talent for War"
      http://www.thetzsite.com/pages/tz1985/index. html

      I also liked "I of Newton"

    25. Re:could be just what we need... by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

      No alien technology, discipline, or dedication can even BEGIN to compete with the unfathomable power of the lawyers of the scientologist. Those 2 butt heads, you'll be buying siezed alien spacecraft at insurance auctions for low low prices.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    26. Re:could be just what we need... by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence.

      you know its strange, a LOT of people automatically assume a civilized alien race would be this great utopian society eager to enlighten us and save us from our follies. They would have technology to stop hunger and suffering and answers to prevent war. But who knows, they could just as easily show up as lamers preaching some religeon X and kill everyone who doesn't worship God Y... just like the lamers here.

      I don't mean to rant but i have been working on hardware all morning while my software projects slip further behind so i'm kind of in a bad mood but hte abolishment of all religeon or the adoption of a single global religeon would be the greatest thing to happen to the human race... maybe contact with something other then us would set us on that track.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    27. Re:could be just what we need... by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      The universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding
      In all of the directions is can whizz
      As fast as it can go, at the speed of light, you know,
      Twelve million miles a minute, and that's the fastest speed there is.
      So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure,
      How amazingly unlikely is your birth,
      And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space,
      'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth.

      --Monty Python, "Galaxy Song"

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
    28. Re:could be just what we need... by spiro_killglance · · Score: 1

      There are indeed networked, but you still need a
      classical slower than light channel as well as
      the quantum entangled particles. So you can't
      communicated faster than light.

      With a n-bit classical channel alone you can
      send n-bits obviously.
      With n units of entanglement you can send nothing
      at all, but the entanglement is non-local and
      doesn't travel slower than light, indeed you
      could say it doesn't travel at all, its already
      there.

      But with both of the above, you can send 2^n bits
      of information (note not two times n but 2 to the
      power of n). Wierd huh.

    29. Re:could be just what we need... by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      And how ironic that this morning I started watching A Private Little War , the Star Trek episode from the original series that was a direct stab at the (then ongoing) Vietnam war.

    30. Re:could be just what we need... by Simeon2000 · · Score: 1

      So who's going to abolish religion worldwide? Scary. Who's going to enforce it? Scarier yet, how are you going to enforce it?

      Thinking before posting is good. You sound like a nazi.

      --
      warn "Just Another Perl User" if $anyone_cares;
    31. Re:could be just what we need... by fobbman · · Score: 3, Funny

      They'd better not stop at my house first, cuz I'll blow smokerings in their bug-eyed grey faces, too. Hell, I don't even smoke. But I keep a pack of cigs right next to the door for just that type of emergency.

      The Mormon's have already condemned me to Hell, so I might as well take the planet with me for company.

    32. Re:could be just what we need... by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      That scenario does not seem much different from South America during the XVI and XVII centuries. Christian missionaries were sent to convert the amazonian tribes. There isn't much left from them.

    33. Re:could be just what we need... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1


      I think I would become a universatarian.

    34. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      What if ... the scientologists are right!


      Kill me now.

    35. Re:could be just what we need... by PD · · Score: 1

      An alien religion would be completely irrelevant. There's no distinction in believing one superstition, or a different superstition. This type of invasion would be the biggest mountain made out of a molehill, ever.

    36. Re:could be just what we need... by newyhouse · · Score: 1

      Well, if their religion seamlessly incorporates the existence of other life forms and can cope with the new found knowledge that the founders of the religion are NOT necessarily the pinnacle of the holy food chain, perhaps it is a bit closer to the truth than what we have here?

    37. Re:could be just what we need... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      of course!
      don't forget that "democracy is a gift of God to americans" according to G.W.Bush ;)


      if you're going to be rude, at least be correct. He never said that. what he did say is that freedom is not granted by governments, but the god given right to all persons. Even the Declaration of Independance says all persons, not just Americans. This is why NON citizens have the same rights as citizens within our court system.

      While I am not a christian, I do agree with the concept that freedom is NOT given, it is inhearant to every individual, and govt. can only act in ways to limit it, never to grant it.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    38. Re:could be just what we need... by blincoln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it will come down to who has the bigger board with bigger nail.

      IMO it's more like who has the board with the big nail and who has the supernova-inducing solar system destroyer.

      The chances of an alien race developing at about the same time as us (thereby giving them technology that's only a bit better than ours) are essentially nonexistent. Aliens are most likely to either be way behind us or way ahead of us.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    39. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>but with a world on the brink of war, a confirmation of an alien civilization would be an amazing thing right now. Maybe give our leaders a kick in the ass
      >I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence.


      The aliens land. They want peaceful relations with us.

      I can then imagine some insane nutcase attacking the aliens using chemical weapons. Probably for religious reasons (they don't worship Ala or somesuch, even though the political leadership may not actually be "believers" themselves). Or perhaps for political reasons, they aren't picking sides in <favorite conflict>. Or the aliens pick the wrong side by siding against the blowing up of civilian busses, pizza parlors, etc. Or the aliens interfere with soverign powers because the aliens are against the poverty and oppression of the mass population by a few nutcase greedy dictators.

      But hey, I'm being too pessimistic. I should trust in the goodwill of insane madmen not to do stupid things. The discovery of aliens would completely invalidate any possible motive (right or wrong, regardless of disagreements with other nations) for being on the brink of war.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    40. Re:could be just what we need... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      espically cince the first transmission from them is more than likely the following ....

      A/S/L Wanna?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    41. Re:could be just what we need... by rabidcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not quite. The spanish were primarily interested in taking gold from America.

      Sure, they were blessed by the Pope so long as they tried to convert the heathen they found there (and gave Rome a cut of the spoils), but they didn't make more than a symbolic gesture for that. They told the natives, in a foreign language, that they had to convert or they would be tortured. Then, they tortured them and took their stuff.

      They worked the natives to death to get gold which wasn't there, then they worked the survivors to death growing sugar cane so they could sell rum to europe.

      Religion was a minor factor in South America in the 16th and 17th centuries, it was all about money. Religion was a rationalization at best.

    42. Re:could be just what we need... by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Way to rip off Jack Handy.

    43. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. God forbid that they may have a religion that might teach peace and tolerance over greed and hate. Human civilization will never be the same!

    44. Re:could be just what we need... by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1

      I wrote a short story on this subject. When they step foot off of their ship, just like any other visitors to a foreign shore we greet them with open arms. They come in peace... they don't want our oil... They don't want our water...

      They want to convert us...


      I can imagine the pope combating aliens. Thousands of jews throwing David stars as shurikens. Those raelians claming it is a different alien race...

      OK, I'm hooked. Where can I read your story?

      --


      Kilroy was here!
    45. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, any race sufficiently advanced to be able to manage interstellar transportation may have figured out that there isn't a God, and therefore no relifion needed.

    46. Re:could be just what we need... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      So, exactly what is the definition of quantum entangled particles. I thought it was something along the lines of: two particles whose spin change at the exact same moment, in the exact same quantity, and in the exact same direction as the other. I am fairly ignorant on the subject. Just wondering.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    47. Re:could be just what we need... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't be aliens unless and until they came here.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    48. Re:could be just what we need... by msfodder · · Score: 1

      Maybe they would be preaching anal love.. Truthfully, it sounds like your bag.

      --
      ..Free Live Free...
    49. Re:could be just what we need... by torpor · · Score: 1

      They could just as easily find us incredibly delicious to eat live, yet also good to torture in diverse and terrible ways, for sexual - or 'other' - forms of pleasure.

      In which case, we'd all be fucked.

      So, lets just hope they're the nice kind, eh?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    50. Re:could be just what we need... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Wait till the aliens get a load of the scientologists, maybe we can sell them as comedians.

    51. Re:could be just what we need... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      If they have a nasa on their planet maybe they will just miss a moonshot and get here instead.

    52. Re:could be just what we need... by TheOldFart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you think he sounds like a Nazi, you sound just as foolish. It's not about "forcing" the end of religions or "forcing" the adoption of a single religion. The point brought up has to do with the fact we as a civilization, kill each other in name of our respective religions and we would probably be better off without it as we know it.

      The answer to most our problems will arrive the day we realize religion does not make us any different from each other. Ending all religions, the adoption of a single religion, or learning how to cope with the differences is irrelevant to the extent we differentiate people based on their religious believes.

      Religion, as I see it has two unrelated purposes. The first is trying to explain the inexplicable. Giving people hope and meaning to their lives in a spiritual level. The second is the corruption of this belief system in order to obtain power and control. The latter however is what we see the most across the board. From radicals in the Middle East to the White House.

      Alien life shakes the very foundation of this belief system. That's why it is a threat to so many. I have no doubts we will be a very different society after the discovery of new life elsewhere. We don't ever need to contact them. The knowledge of the existence will suffice. It makes every thing else look petty and irrelevant. Only than we would concentrate on living our lives as one unit as opposed to go on as warring idiots trying to prove to each other we're better.

    53. Re:could be just what we need... by spiro_killglance · · Score: 1

      No its more general than that, any property of
      a particle can become entangled except ones that
      produce a long range field like charge. The position of particles can become entangled as can
      spin or momentum. Often entanglement is created when a particle in a prepared state is
      split it into two parts, a downconverted photon
      (i.e. a photon split by non-linear crystal into two photons of lower frequencies) or a decaying atom, you don't know that properties
      each part has, but you do know that they have to
      add up to the previous total.

      But you can do more tricks with entanglement, for example, by preforming a measurement on a two particles from two seperate entangled pairs, you can make the other two (potentially millions of miles away from you or each other) entangled with
      each other. Using tricks like that, we could potentially make a quantum entanglement telephone exchange type system, distrubting entanglement
      connection to any points in a network as required, but as I said above, you still need a
      slower than light classical channel as well to
      do communication.

    54. Re:could be just what we need... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      I recall a science fiction story that takes place from the point of view of aliens who are exploring the earth just before the sun goes Nova. While looking for where all the humans went, they brag about how this guy's species has 12 pieces of artwork! This other guy says, "Yeah, but my planet only took 3000 years from the invention of radio to the invention of the rocket!"

      The story ends when they find all 10 billions of humans in gigantic spaceships out around the orbit of Pluto on a very slow trip to escape. They can't comprehend such a species that could accomplish it.

      The short story ends, with one alien saying to another, "Well, they'll be glad when we get to them. We'll save them a very long trip indeed. Shouldn't be a problem integrating them into galactic society, either. After all, we only outnumber them by about 20,000 to 1." The aliens laughed.

      20 years later, it wasn't so funny.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    55. Re:could be just what we need... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      I've been tellin' 'em. I've been saying it for twenty years.

      Instead of wondering whether they have souls, we should be praying they think we have souls.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    56. Re:could be just what we need... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but god only knows what the quasi religion of unrestricted democratic socialism might yield on a galactic civilization a billion years old.

      You heartless cad, you haven't paid your taxes to support the Fleeblejumbos of Qualicon 7, whose religion says you must feed them. Don't forget also to get your breathing permit. Also, all food except these machine created nutrient goops are illegal because someone somewhere finds them offensive. Also, you must have no fewer than 7 intelligent parasites surgically attached to you. We are not permitted to stop them from reproducing rapidly, so we need all the hosts we can get. You are not allowed to protest this or even talk about it, since that offends over seventy two billion species. j00 r 0wn3d!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    57. Re:could be just what we need... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      And what if Galactic Saddam is in our local neighborhood, and we become the 19th planet of his little despotism, and Andromeda doesn't want the United Galaxies to free Earth but they should just send inspectors to make sure he's not threatening Andromeda and The Sombrero Galaxies.

      SEND IN THE UNITED GALACTIC TROOPS! FREE EARTH! God damned Andromedans.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    58. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote that story too! Heh. Yours was probably better. Got a link? I'd love to read it.

    59. Re:could be just what we need... by greenrd · · Score: 1
      What kind of nonsense logic is that? Is that like the old question (paraphrased) "If an alien falls in the forest and no-one hears it, does it really exist?"

    60. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, are they? Is this a different American than the one south of Canada that you're talking about?

      Terror suspects 'have no right to US trial

    61. Re:could be just what we need... by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      I though I was the only human being alive now that remembers this! I remember that EXACT epsiode to this day! HA HA :) !

    62. Re:could be just what we need... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      espically cince the first transmission from them is more than likely the following ....

      A/S/L Wanna?

      I had to Google for this, so perhaps others don't know it either. A/S/L is "Age, Sex, Location." See item "2)" on this page .

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    63. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And...and freedom fries!!!

    64. Re:could be just what we need... by dacarr · · Score: 1

      But there's already an alien religion. It's called Scientology.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    65. Re:could be just what we need... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Just because they are free of crime, war and violence doesn't mean that those buggers won't spell trouble!"

      Just because they are free of crime and war amongst true believers doesn't mean they're really free of them. Think of all the weapons the Pope banned for use against fellow Christians (like crossbows), but were still fair game on heathens in the Middle East and South America.

  3. What a waste by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The probability of catching radio waves from intelligent life forms in a 4 year window is crazy. The distances they'd have to travel are enormous, and that civilization is probably long extinct, and the spectrum we are looking at is very narrow, and our definition of intelligence is also very narrow... what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise? Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:What a waste by no+soup+for+you · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.
      A waste of resources? If the idle cpu cycles are being used to perform calculations, what resources are being wasted?
      --
      If you blog it...
    2. Re:What a waste by dethl · · Score: 1

      The distances they'd have to travel are enormous

      Who says that the aliens haven't been sending out radio waves for hundred or even thousands of years?

      --
      "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    3. Re:What a waste by Chairboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > it's really a waste of resources. ...as compared to posting on Slashdot, of course.

    4. Re:What a waste by J3M · · Score: 1

      I agree with some of your points, with the exception of it being a waste of resources. A waste in your mind, maybe, but I for one have been allowing SETI to use my spare cycles for over a year now. Why not? I had always wondered if they would actually act on any signals, so I'm glad to see it. Besides, even if ET is never found, this research could lead to some other discovery.

      --
      Aych tea tea pea colon slash slash slash dot dot org slash
    5. Re:What a waste by SpamJunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      that civilization is probably long extinct

      You're assuming they also have Bushes as leaders. That's unlikely.

      what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise?

      Then it wasn't meant for us. We're not trying for a man-in-the-middle attack, we're looking for life explicitly trying to contact another civilization.

    6. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its positive thinking like yours that the world really needs!

      We should channel all our resources into something far more useful like bombing people we don't like. oh. I see.

    7. Re:What a waste by adpowers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Idle cycles that could go to other better projects.

    8. Re:What a waste by wiggys · · Score: 1
      what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise?

      Kinda like alien steganography? I hope the NSA knows about this!

      --

      Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    9. Re:What a waste by sethaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The probability of catching radio waves from intelligent life forms in a 4 year window is crazy

      You have to start somewhere. Its not really just a 4 year window, since all searches for other civilizations occur one after the other building upon each other and using previous discoveries. This is just the way science works.

      The distances they'd have to travel are enormous, and that civilization is probably long extinct

      This is irrelevant.

      definition of intelligence is also very narrow

      And what is our definition?

      what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise?

      Yes some data may be encrypted, however it is a reasonable assumption that some of it is not. In general most data that we send is not encrypted. If also including data that has been compressed (which would seem like encryption to us) we would just need to find something about it that is not a natural pattern, we wouldnt have to be able to read it.

    10. Re:What a waste by Lovepump · · Score: 1

      I think, perhaps, the poster meant that with the amount of assumptions being made, and the unlikelyhood of being able to do anything with the fact that "oh, there is alien life out there", the idle cycles could be used more efficiently - say in the folding@home project, or any of the other distributed computing systems currently running.

      Then again, I've happily spent the last 4 years checking RC56 encryption keys, and my machine is currently checking Optimal Golomb Rulers to try to find shorter ones that those already known, so I can hardly preach about wasting CPU cycles.

    11. Re:What a waste by borgdows · · Score: 1

      You're assuming they also have Bushes as leaders. That's unlikely.

      Resistance is futile! Bushes are everywhere in the galaxy!! You will be assimilated!

    12. Re:What a waste by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm not sure I agree with you 100% on your police work there, Lou.

      Firstly, the distance that signals from another potential civilization *could* be enormous, but then again they could be reasonably small. There are a pretty fair number of stars within, oh, 100 light years or so of our own primary. The real question there is what sort of values to plug into the Drake equation, and we won't have a good idea there until we collect some data points.

      Secondly, why would you assume that an alien civilization would carefully hide their transmissions? We don't, even though we understand that we're basically advertising the location of our planet with TV and radio and radar. Besides, if you really wanted to mask your location, you'd stick to cable. Sure, we wouldn't pick them up, but for each ultraparanoid civilization (and I'll grant you that they very well may exist), there are probably others less cautious.

      Sure, we could be all the life that's out there -- in the absense of any concrete proof, there's always that chance. That said, I personally have a hard time believing that in a universe as big as ours the there's a unique instance of anything. Anyhow, putting in a minimum of effort seems pretty reasonable when you're talking about making the greatest discovery in the history of history, doesn't it?

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    13. Re:What a waste by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Much of the data is data that they have had for a long time, just didn't have the resources to process. So yes, seti@home is 4 years old, but the data is not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:What a waste by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, you will be glad to hear that no tax money goes to support SETI. Zero public resources are spent on it.

      Everyone that contributes to SETI, from Paul Allen to Team Lambchop, is spending their own resources of their own free will. They obviously think it's not a waste.

      So, what exactly are you complaining about?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    15. Re:What a waste by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about this? You spend your spare cycles on something you think is important, and I'll do the same.

      Sound good? Alllllllllrighty then.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    16. Re:What a waste by Becquerel · · Score: 1

      True, the only chance of us detecting them is if they are either, in the same (short) period of technology as us, where they use vastly powerful electomagnetic radiation to transfer low bandwidth data over great distances. Or they are deliberatly trying to contact other life around 'suitable' star systems, which if they are anything like us then they will be doing.

      The former would be quite difficult to find as there is such a small window to look in, requiring a seti style programme. Wheras the latter should be alot easier to find, assuming they are vulcanesque and using logical frequencies and patterns to try and communicate. This should only require a single good detector that cycled round looking at the most appropriate local star systems in the most likely spectrums. ASSUMING they are doing the same with a signal the two should meet up eventually...

      --
      My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
    17. Re:What a waste by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      > Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really
      > a waste of resources.

      but it's still fun to try.

      for those of us humans (ie, nearly all) who will never be granted the privilege of escaping earth's orbit, or even less taking a picture of something new, or even more remotely cruising through the cosmos, taking part in silly projects like seti@home is about the closest we'll ever get to helping accomplish something in space.

      for those of us who still want to take part in space exploration, seti@home is the easiest, most reachable, way for joe schmoe to join in on it. Just because it's probably futile doesn't mean it's a "waste".

      It's still fun, like playing a cosmic lottery. ;)

    18. Re:What a waste by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The probability of catching radio waves from intelligent life forms in a 4 year window is crazy.

      I don't know we've been sending signals pretty much continuously for over 50 years. They could be sending something but we just haven't got it yet.

      The distances they'd have to travel are enormous, and that civilization is probably long extinct, and the spectrum we are looking at is very narrow, and our definition of intelligence is also very narrow...

      I'll give you the first point, the second is doubtfull since they could only be a few hundred away, they've probably changes but extinct? doubtfull. Even if they are extinct does it really matter? We kind of got a speed limit already so chances are we wouldn't have much meaningful communication anyways. The fact is that all we need is a confirmation of their existence, and if we were able to distinguish their signals we might get some interesting TV programs. Which brings we to you narrow spectrum comment. The fact is that we've pretty much saturated the spectrum for quite a region. If the aliens did used radio waves for their communication as well they would be likely to use up a fair region also meaning all we need is one hit from that portion. And I'm not sure what you're getting at with def'n of intelligence. Either thier sending signlas or their not. Maybe that they've found a better means of communication?

      what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise? Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.

      Well hopefully they didn't feel the need to encrypt everything. So what if they did maybe someone else didn't. I really don't see anything here to convince me that your assumptions that we won't find anything are any more convincing than the assumptions that could lead us to something. As to a waste of resources perhaps if you consider the cycles that people actually do donate to be a small resource that could better go to curing cancer than perhaps. On the other hand in real economic costs it's almost trivial! Really when it comes down to it we're drilling for oil. We probably won't find anything and it costs a bit to do it but if we ever find something...

      --
      I stole this Sig
    19. Re:What a waste by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If the idle cpu cycles are being used to perform calculations, what resources are being wasted?

      Electricity.

    20. Re:What a waste by asparagirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I think, perhaps, the poster meant that with the amount of assumptions being made, and the unlikelyhood of being able to do anything with the fact that "oh, there is alien life out there", the idle cycles could be used more efficiently..."

      Now this is an interesting point. Suppose we do find out that somewhere out there is intelligent life. Would it *really* change things that much?

      I mean, the assumption that the discovery of alien life would radically change human behavior on an indivdual and international level is just that: an assumption. It presumes the aliens are some sort of messianic figures, the answer to all our petty Earth problems.

      I don't see it that way at all. Human nature being what it is, I find it much more likely that we'll all oooh and aaah over the discovery for a while, and then go back to being the squabbling low-brow folks we usually are. Once the novelty wears off, we've still gotta go about our mundane lives.

      This is the more likely scenario: if we find life, it's probably going to be very, very far away, so unless there were the possibility of trade between our planet and theirs or one of us threatening the other in some way, we'll probably just shrug, sit back, and wait for a loooooong time for the most basic information to flow both ways. Meanwhile, we'll still pick fights with one another, still watch bad TV, still have corrupt politicians, still have yokels claiming to have been picked up by UFO's and given proctological exams. Life goes on.

      To be clear, I do support the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and have been running SETI@Home for a few years now- over 1000 data units processed. And I think the discovery of alien life would be way cool. But is it going to radically change my outlook on the world? Nope. And that's because I already assume it's out there--which is why I'm running SETI@Home in the first place.

      --


      - Asparagirl
      asparagirl at dca dot net
    21. Re:What a waste by jared9900 · · Score: 1

      "The probability of catching radio waves from intelligent life forms in a 4 year window is crazy."

      It's my understanding that the data they're crunching isn't just from the last 4 years. It's data that's been collected since about the time seti began. It's just that seti@home has only existed for about the last 4 years.

    22. Re:What a waste by IanCarlson · · Score: 1

      We're not trying for a man-in-the-middle attack, we're looking for life explicitly trying to contact another civilization.

      While the rest of the planet is busy with this, I'll be spoofing the Milky Way's default gateway using dsniff to intercept all the SSH/SSL traffic between the Grays and the Martians. Civilization will be mine!

      --
      aÍÍ©ÍÌÍ£Ì'̽ͩÌÍzÍYÌÍÌY
    23. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the money it's costing him to fill up his SUV now.

    24. Re:What a waste by mypalmike · · Score: 1
      Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.


      Are you talking about SETI or Slashdot?

      -_-_-

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    25. Re:What a waste by malfunct · · Score: 1

      There is a question of whether the time they spend on the radio telescopes and such (which are an extremely limited resource for the human race) could better be spent elswhere. I honestly don't have an opinion one way or another right now, I'd love to find a communication from aliens but on the other hand if we could learn some amazing fact about the universe that would push our society or even just our technology forward that would be really cool too.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    26. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how your cell phone works? I did'nt think so. Any standard RF communication from advanced civilizations will probably look like noise. The more advanced, the more noise like. So even if the data is not encrypted, our chances of finding unnatural patterns is ~0. BTW, I am a digital comms engineer :P

    27. Re:What a waste by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Sure, we could be all the life that's out there -- in the absense of any concrete proof, there's always that chance. That said, I personally have a hard time believing that in a universe as big as ours the there's a unique instance of anything.

      Exactly.
      Either we on this little planet are truly alone in the universe, or there are other intelligences out there. Either way, it's a scary prospect.

    28. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean? It's all encrypted data transmissions! There is no "background noise"! Remember gravity is a myth - the earth sucks!

    29. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'm a math graduate student so I see the fun in searching for Mersenne primes, but how can you claim that it holds any more significance than crunching SETI data? Besides the "Neat! We found another one!" factor, is there really any practical need to find them?

    30. Re:What a waste by Ig0r · · Score: 1

      The SETI reciever just sets on the Arecibo platform and points whereever it happens to, there is no time devoted for SETI to look at a specific point.

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    31. Re:What a waste by LMCBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are correct, time on large radio telescopes is a precious resource. The decision of who gets to use a telescope is almost always left to a panel of experts called a Time Allocation Committee (TAC). Astronomers write proposals to use the telescope, and the TAC weighs them by scientific merit, awarding time to the best of the proposed projects.

      So, apparently the TAC at Arecibo also thinks that a few nights for SETI are resources well spent.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    32. Re:What a waste by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      Sometimes that is true, but in this case, they will be making targeted follow-up observations of their strongest SETI signal candidates.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    33. Re:What a waste by AssFace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMO, just the "itelligence" issue alone is enough to make the SETI effort questionable at best - not to mention the stats side of things.
      What is intelligent to us is limited to the breadth of our experience and environment - we treat communication with very high regard... but perhaps that isn't a true definition of intelligence - it just serves our purposes well.
      "Intelligent" is just a term related to our outlook - it just replaces a certain construct that we are looking for - but to match that construct doesn't necessarily fufill the true definition of that word.

      I would think that one could postulate on other life forms out there with pretty close to near certainty.
      But in order to think of other life forms that would communicate in a way that we would know about adds so much more complexity that I personally think SETI is a total waste (in terms of its end goal - in terms of getting people together and also in terms of a well known distributed system, it serves its own purpose).

      Were there bacteria and/or viruses out there, I'd not be surprised at all.
      Where there some sort of creature out there that is animal-like? Even that doesn't surprise me as much, but I still find that much less likely.

      But is there something else out there that commincates via radio waves? I really don't know - but looking at the numbers, I'd bet a lot against it.
      It is a wonderful thing to think that we aren't alone - whether in terms of a God or in terms of others in space - but there are so many parameters at work that I certainly don't count on it.

      And for those that think of things such as the greys - that is beyond retarded. To think that something will look anything like earth - let alone us is pretty narrow minded to say the least.
      And that doesn't even approach those that think the Earth was seeded by aliens landing here and we are the offspring of that...

      In the end, it saddens me - I tend to put too much faith and trust in people that have strong scientific outlooks.
      But those same people then frequently end up failing my idealistic view that they are somehow immune to the logical curiosities of religion or search for alien communication - two things that I group in the same.
      (although interestingly the absolute discovery of one would negate the other by their current definitions)

      And this thread seems to be full of the people here on slashdot that are of the "I don't agree with you, therefore you are a troll" mentality, so I don't suspect this post will last long.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    34. Re:What a waste by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Now this is an interesting point. Suppose we do find out that somewhere out there is intelligent life. Would it *really* change things that much?


      1. Idea of confirmed extraterrestrial, intelligent life appeals to the Trekkie/nerd in me.

      2. The shock such discovery would cause in worlds religions appeals the atheist/agnostic in me.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    35. Re:What a waste by ianscot · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So, what exactly are you complaining about?

      This is slashdot. S/he needs a reason? From SETI@home's donations page:

      Almost none of our budget is spent on hardware (desktop and server computers, disks, tapes, telescope electronics etc.); these items have been generously donated by corporate sponsors.

      Yeah, it does sound like a real sinkhole for money, doesn't it?

      Why is it that people whining about waste always pick on the government and nonprofit tries like SETI@home? Could their objection be to the ends, and not the means they claim to be ridiculing? Gillette's initials plans, at least, were to spend $300 million on marketing the Mach 3 razor. Their previous model, the Sensor, cost nearly $200 million to develop. If you want to complain about waste, why is it you're choosing the idealistic scientific endeavor?

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    36. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't cause too much of a shock. Many even point to a Biblical story (Ekzikiel's wheel) as prove FOR alien life. There are also the accounts of Jesus leaving to preach to sheep in "other pastures", which some take to mean North America, some take to mean other planets. It can be adapted any way you see fit.

    37. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking please. In the US anyway, I can guarantee that WAY more energy is wasted on AC for fat-ass CEO's with high blood pressure than will ever be used by SETI@home clients. There are so many other, and significantly larger, areas of energy waste that to bring it up re: SETI@home is utterly laughable.

    38. Re:What a waste by rcamera · · Score: 1

      taking part in silly projects like seti@home is about the closest we'll ever get to helping accomplish something in space

      my tax dollars are helping to accomplish things in space... no? my tax $$ helped blow up a mars lander and a mars orbiter! now that's accomplishing things!

      --
      Wave upon wave of demented avengers March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream
    39. Re:What a waste by Bagheera · · Score: 1

      Actually, the SETI project doesn't expect to receive signals from "enormous" (on a galactic scale, anyway) range. The signals they expect to receive are more or less the equilivant to I Love Lucy re-runs broadcast from our stellar neighborhood. The chances of the originator being extinct would be fairly low.

      The assumption (admitedly debatable) is that radio transmission is a technology that an advanced culture will at some point probably stumble on to, and thus we may be able to hear thier transmissions. Further, since the strength of the signals will be incredibly faint, the chance of hearing a signal from especially far away is remote. As I remember it, they were figuring on a range of something like 30 - 100 light years max given the estimated signal strength and the sensitivity of the receiver.

      The definition of INTELLIGENCE is not the question, but the definition of "Signal of Intelligent origin." There are quite a few papers on the subject if you're interested.

      Finally, the "Waste of resources" is more or less irrelevant. The SETI receiver was piggy-backed on the Aricebo dish and got it's data more or less free of charge. At least compared to other projects. The analysis was done by volunteers around the world. They chose to contribute. While I've heard people say Distributed.Net is a better project, I heartily disagree. Those challenges are all exploring a finite mathamatical space. There IS a solution.

      With SETI, there -may- be a solution - and if there is, it will be the most profound discovery in Human history.

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    40. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would bet alot against the chance of other intelligent life!!??

      Considering how vast the universe is, we are but 1e1000th of the matter in the universe if that! It seems the ODDS are pretty much in the favour of there being other intelligent life out there.

      Regarding your point about the Greys. My comment is slightly "tongue in cheek" but aren't we ALL created in God's image? Even the aliens?

    41. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking please. In the US anyway, I can guarantee that WAY more energy is wasted on AC for fat-ass CEO's with high blood pressure than will ever be used by SETI@home clients.

      The question wasn't what resources are being wasted more than on AC for fat-ass CEO's. It was what resources are being wasted.

    42. Re:What a waste by AssFace · · Score: 1

      It has already been shown that not all of that number leaves space for life, and certainly life as we know it. There are certain conditions that must be met, and those conditions are far rarer than your 1eN value.

      Which then begs the question of life that we don't comprehend or lives in an environment unlike ours, thereby bringing back your full 1eN...
      At that point, then you are assuming that no laws at all apply to life - which means you can then assume anything at all.

      Which simply means that you are fantisizing.
      Which in itself is fine, and further evidenced by your mention of God.

      But along with that - leave me out of your fantasy world where there are no rules, and I will stay seated here in reality and logic and be just fine with that.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    43. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice I said 'used' when referring to SETI, and 'wasted' when referring to the CEO's.

    44. Re:What a waste by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The data may not be encrypted, but it may be sent using spread spectrum, UWB, or something we haven't invented yet.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    45. Re:What a waste by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Not to mention being highly compressed, which would look very close to random noise.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    46. Re:What a waste by 54nd3r · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't want to shake hands with your first alien with a badly shaven face? Do you?

    47. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the worlds that transmit radio signals out into the cosmos heedlessly don't last very long, so it's hard to find them?

    48. Re:What a waste by Patersmith · · Score: 1


      I agree...why are we even bothering? We won't find anything.

      Everyone knows first contact doesn't happen until a civilization becomes warp capable. We have a few years to go yet.

    49. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.

      Isn't it about time for a "In Soviet Russia" joke for this thread?

      ~me clears throat

      ~me says "In Soviet Russia resources waste you!!!"

      ~me blushes.

  4. Hack by Deton8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There were so many well-publicized hacks to SETI@home that I'll bet that there will be a lot of skepticism about any results even if we discover a jpeg file of an Arcturian time machine in there.

    1. Re:Hack by Directrix1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure they have the original data. The only thing they have to do to settle a claim like this is to reprocess the data in question.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    2. Re:Hack by unicron · · Score: 1

      Seti@Home scientists are still having a tough time with this one:

      People of earth, this is Bartron, commander of the Martian invasion force. Your planet is in our hands. Resistance is useless. Your President was delicious.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:Hack by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      So you mean to tell me that the Aliens didn't really get first post?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Hack by sethaw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thats why they send every packet to multiple people to verify the results. Conflicting results should appear and the scientists can execute tests on that data. However, even if there are positive results this doesn't mean anything is found. This is why we have to go back and look for signals where they were found in the past, because there is justified skepticism in any result that says "we found aliens."

    5. Re:Hack by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      Bartron, you forgot the part about how you replaced the President with a android smarter than the real W.

    6. Re:Hack by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      True, but then all we have to do is build the sucker, travel back, and patch the holes that the hackers used in the first place. Pretty simple, really.

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    7. Re:Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean a brick, right?

    8. Re:Hack by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      I'm sure anything remotely a candidate is rerun through trusted computers.

      Also, I'm sure a certain percentage of all returns are sent back out again to other computers to see if the results are duplicated. This would stop other spoofing, such as those who would fake results (fast turnarounds) to get higher rankings in the number of returns for a particular group.

      Any such group caught faking even one would immediately have all their returns called into suspect and be rerun.

      Anyway, that's what I'd do. This is probably among the things they won't reveal lest it help spoofers.

      Oops.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  5. sei@home by wiggys · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always thought that "settee at home" was a reference to armchair astronomers.

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    1. Re:sei@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought that "settee at home" was a reference to armchair astronomers.

      That's manatee@home.

  6. First conversation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Picks up phone, "Hello?"

    E.T., "Hi, mom? This is you long lost son--I need a ride!"

  7. Issue by BenV666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only problem they have with Seti@home these days is the statistics.
    I know a few people who actually compete over who has computed the most packets. People also try to cheat to get high stats, that is where it goes wrong...
    Therefore it might be better to ditch those stats all together, or at least make them less informative...

    1. Re:Issue by k3v0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      i believe that the powers running SETI@home send out redundant data and compare, so as to reflect a more accurate statistic

    2. Re:Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird how a search for intelligence has revealed such ignorant behavior on earth. All the people cheating. It's pathetic and sad.

      But it's not seti's fault. Anything that causes large groups of people to stand up and reveal themselves is going to reveal the same horrible truth that always lurks below the surface.

      People are stupid. Mental retardation is not some unique condition that stands apart and far away from general humanity. It's something not far removed from just about every single person you encounter on this planet.

      What I'm trying to say. We're not as smart as we imagine. All this technology. It didn't come easy for us. And we'll always have one foot firmly planted in the monkey cage, ready to throw shit at the other primates.

    3. Re:Issue by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only problem they have with Seti@home these days is the statistics.
      I know a few people who actually compete over who has computed the most packets. People also try to cheat to get high stats, that is where it goes wrong...
      Therefore it might be better to ditch those stats all together, or at least make them less informative...

      Yeah, cause that worked to stop all the Karma whoring on slashdot...

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    4. Re:Issue by IanCarlson · · Score: 1

      Cheating is an easy problem to remedy, though.

      No more stats.

      --
      aÍÍ©ÍÌÍ£Ì'̽ͩÌÍzÍYÌÍÌY
    5. Re:Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which - Here's the article text, because I don't know if MSNBC can handle the bandwidth demand of a million tiny tiny space geeks...

      March 10 -- Researchers spearheading a worldwide effort to find E.T., or anyone else out in space besides us humans, plan to revisit a group of their most likely candidate radio signals using the world's largest radio telescope.

      THE SETI@HOME PROGRAM, a distributed computing effort that uses the personal computers of millions of volunteers to examine radio signal data, is planning a stellar countdown to check the extraterrestrial-potential of up to 150 radio signals detected with the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.

      The signal batch is cream of a candidate crop of 5 billion radio observations pulled from the SETI@home network, which program organizers will recheck to see if they are strong enough to be an extraterrestrial communiqué, repeating and emanating from portions of sky bearing sunlike stars and planets.

      "Our chances right now [of finding something] are small," SETI@home chief scientist Dan Werthimer said in a telephone interview. "But you have to plan for success."

      The Arecibo Observatory will work for three and a half days, starting March 18, to revisit the candidate signals identified by SETI@home users. In addition to onsite analysis, each of the new observations will also be fed into the global program for a more detailed examination, Werthimer said.

      Launched in May 1999, SETI@home uses the computers of 4 million astronomy buffs in 226 countries. Together they act as a supercomputer, collectively sifting through the 35 terabytes of raw data collected by the 1,000-foot (305-meter) Arecibo dish and reporting the results to the program headquarters at the University of California at Berkeley. One terabyte is about the equivalent of 231 million pages of typed text, but SETI@home volunteers received a fraction of that -- 350 kilobytes -- at a time to examine.

      Volunteers download a screensaverlike program that examines Arecibo radio observations while the computer user is away. Once the analysis is complete -- varying from a few hours to a few days, depending on the computing power of each machine -- the program alerts the user and sends the examined material to SETI@home researchers via the Internet.

      "It was always the idea to revisit observations once the first analysis was complete," said Louis Friedman, executive director of the Planetary Society, SETI@home's founding and primary sponsor. "The question is, are these signals really good enough? That's still an unknown, and it's what this next phase of the program is going to tell us."

      SETI@home is an extraterrestrial search effort separate from the SETI Institute, a group that pursues several scientific and education projects aimed at the discovering intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. Space.com has a partnership with the SETI Institute.

      © 2003 Space.com. All rights reserved.

    6. Re: Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh oh oh, I gotta good one.
      In soviet russia, "All Your Belong Are Base To Us!"
      Hey hey hey...
      oh wait, that's not karma whoring, that's a troll. But they are just two different sides of the same coin, so here goes...

    7. Re:Issue by passion · · Score: 1

      dunno about karma-whoring, but i haven't seen any frist p0st! messages in a long while. Unless it's someone joking about one that is.

      --
      - passion
    8. Re:Issue by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
      Therefore it might be better to ditch those stats all together, or at least make them less informative...
      Yeah, cause that worked to stop all the Karma whoring on slashdot...
      Maybe SETI@home could implement the same system as Slashdot -- ditch the numbers and use something like plain-English explanations...

      "You have processed 123 work units" would become "You haven't processed many work units (mostly affected by you not running the client)"

      "You have processed 123,456,789 work units" would become "You have processed a whole lot of units (mostly affected by you leaving your computer on 24x7 for a long time)"

      "You have processed 123,456,789,012 work units" would become "You have processed an Excellent amount of units (mostly affected by you craftily setting up the client in a large computer lab)". :^)
    9. Re:Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      frist p0st!

    10. Re:Issue by ender81b · · Score: 1

      i believe that the powers running SETI@home send out redundant data and compare, so as to reflect a more accurate statistic

      They do, iirc every packet is sent out to at LEAST 3 clients to get 3 independent results.

    11. Re:Issue by lommer · · Score: 1

      thanks for making me laugh...

  8. PARENT IS OFFTOPIC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    End of message

  9. Re:Paul Harvey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got better things to do with my time than to listen to infomercials. You got Paul Harvey doing his little infomercials, and in between them you get regular commercials.

  10. The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by wiggys · · Score: 5, Insightful
    http://www.seds.org/billa/psc/pbd.html

    We succeeded in taking that picture [from deep space], and, if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.

    The earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity -- in all this vastness -- there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us. It's been said that astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly and compassionately with one another and to preserve and cherish that pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    1. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Sedennial · · Score: 5, Funny

      There needs to be a new moderator choice - 'Depressing' :)

    2. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You cannot experimentally prove or disprove an oppinion (which that post was nothing more than). You are being ignorant to what science actually reasons about.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    3. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by timeOday · · Score: 1

      It think "The Great Carl Sagan" is wrong. In terms of information content, to me it seems obvious that the earth IS larger than the rest of the known universe combined.

    4. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      No, we just *know* more of the information contained on Earth than we do anywhere else. What we don't know dwarfs that paltry amount by many orders of magnitude.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    5. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      ...every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.

      Try a different angle on this significance issue. Think of an infinitely large universe with no conscious life. Now think of a universe with only one conscious lifeform, limited to the minimum size required to sustain said lifeform.

      Which universe is more significant?

      (To say it differently, or over-simplify the meaning, would you rather have the most powerful computer in the world, or the only AI in the world?)

      Earth is the most significant spec on the fly's ass even if just because that's where we keep all our stuff. It's rampant self-awareness, and nothing can belittle that.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    6. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Like what? Are each of Sagan's "billions and billions" of stars unique in some way that is important or even interesting?

      Sure it's true that earth contains only an infinitesimal fraction of the universe, but I don't think mass or volume are the right metrics for significance. To write off all that happens on earth because there are so many stars in outer space is wrong. Why should we feel insignificant in contrast to blobs of hydrogen that don't even care about themselves?

      I'm not saying space exploration is unfruitful or wrong, and I suppose humanism can be taken too far as well. But I think Sagan is wrong in dissing earth, the only known home of intelligent life.

    7. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by nhavar · · Score: 1

      Does this remind anyone of the torture from Hitchhikers? Put a person in a chair and show him the universe and how he compares to the vastness there and effectively kill his ego. Straight past humbling and directly to "why shouldn't I shoot myself".

      Great post!

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    8. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit ... that is one of the most beatiful thing I have ever heard!

    9. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      In terms of physics, yes, much of what we know on Earth is likely to be applicable universally.

      But how much of the particular geography of other planets in other systems do we know? How much history?

      We know hardly anything about the world we do live on. There is much which has been lost, probably even more which has never been noticed.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  11. Somewhere, light years away by presroi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (Disclaimer: there might be bad physics involved in this posting)

    When I startet this posting, I realized, that all bad jokes about Seti@home were already made and there is nothing more to invent left. Let's try a new approach:

    Recounting? That reminds me of something...
    Florida, I hear you calling. Will the number of Aliens found increase or decrease when you recount the number of blibs and blurbs coming out from the Universe? Will the Federal Court of the Universe stop this recount by a 5:3?

    Well, if someone could finish this pointe.

  12. bizarro universe by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alien message decrypted: "Greetings. I am the Democratic, peaceloving, and openminded President Eroeg W. Hsub, from the plant Htrae. We will allow your planet to continue to produce weapons of Galatic Destruction, instead of wiping your puny solar system off the map.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:bizarro universe by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      *planet

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    2. Re:bizarro universe by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

      Easy for you to say, speeding around in your Dilithium guzzling Superluminal Utility Vehicle... How unpatriotic can you get? You need to get an environmentally conscious solar sail powered ship before you can discuss politics with me, htraeling...

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    3. Re:bizarro universe by ShieldWolf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Small correction:

      "Greetings. I am the Democratic, peaceloving, openminded, and elected President Eroeg W. Hsub, from the plant Htrae."

      --
      just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
    4. Re:bizarro universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a democratic honestly being elected would be bizarro. I wonder how the Dems know how all those dead people want to vote for anyway?

    5. Re:bizarro universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that would be weird wouldn't it, with a Supreme Court like the U.S. has? More people voted for Democrats in the last 3 U.S. presidential elections, yeah they just can't get elected. :P

      You're an idiot, go blow Hannity and Limbaugh, hick.

    6. Re:bizarro universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that we love your yeasty malted products and derivatives of your local cocoa plant.

  13. War, warrrrrr by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 5, Funny

    (from the article) "Our chances right now [of finding something] are small," SETI@home chief scientist Dan Werthimer said in a telephone interview. "But you have to plan for success"

    He continued: "and in this case, success would mean an intergalactic war that would result in the destruction of entire galaxies. We have already begun training our astrosoldiers in the art of zero-G warfare, but chances of defeating the alien menace is slim. I for one welcome our new alien overlords... Hail ants."

    --
    "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    1. Re:War, warrrrrr by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      Simpson's qoute: Homer: Don't blame me, I voted for Kronos!

  14. ET... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Mommy, I'm scared!
    Why are those men with the dark glasses pointing walkie-talkies at ET and Henry?!!!"

    "Why don't you grow a set Timmy, and go play with your GI Joe?
    You pansey little shit!"

    1. Re:ET... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      ET: Mom, GET ME OUTTA HERE! You should've seen what this one sick guy wanted me to do with my long finger with the light on the end of it!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  15. The chosen few? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else get a message indicating their machine processed a packet of interest and requesting contact information for the media?

  16. The message by soundofthemoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone in the Pleiades needs help moving 50 billion quatloos out of a forgotten government bank account, and they want Earth to help.

    1. Re:The message by Exedore · · Score: 4, Funny

      Increase the size of your spore-pods naturally! 100% safe and effective!

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    2. Re:The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...50 quatloos on the newcomer....

    3. Re:The message by zephc · · Score: 2, Funny

      ya know, I bet there's this really sad guy in Nigeria asking himself "All i need is help with this money, I wonder why no one wants to help me? *sniff sniff*"

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see it now...

      Refill your replicator cartriges for paebes on the quatloo!

      Upgrade your nanobots to Tinnort's Nanoworks 4.0 today!

      Meet unmated xenos from all over the galaxy! Sign up today!

      Make thousands of quatloos at your homeworld!

      Hot stock! Invest in denooq starskimming!

      Naughty blisks want to show you something special...

    5. Re:The message by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Alls I knows is where the hell can I buy one of those Lexx chicks.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    6. Re:The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Life's a bitch when you're a disembodied brain. :(

    7. Re:The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a disembrained body.

  17. lost my interest by milktoastman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know, I used to be so interested in SETI, but in the last few years I've lost all enthusiasm for it. I guess because, ultimately, I don't think its likely that intelligent civilizations are very dense out there, and if they did, we'd probably never recognize the signal...and if we did, I'd say, 'okay, now what? We still have to go on living alone because we can't talk back and forth, so it's even more disappointing to know they exist but are unreachable.' We'll probably destroy ourselves before that's an issue, anyway.

    1. Re:lost my interest by Gropo · · Score: 1
      ...and if we did, I'd say, 'okay, now what? We still have to go on living alone because we can't talk back and forth, so it's even more disappointing to know they exist but are unreachable.
      I disagree... If we found a signal we would then be able to pinpoint the origin... Perhaps it eminated from a solar system we wouldn't normally consider hospitable to life (let alone advanced life), a star other than G class. We'd get tremendous insight in to the very nature of life. Eventually, we could send billions of AI envoys in to space, aimed at candidate young stars. The envoys would remain dormant until they reached the system (millions upon millions of years later) at which point they would survey for life. If they don't find signs of emergent life within that system, they move on to the next - ad infinitum.

      Suppose your 'consciousness' was within these machines, alongside others who passively scanned their 'consciousnesses' in to the project. Wether or not that part's physically and logically possible is the only drawback of the nice optimistic picture drawn in my mind :)
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    2. Re:lost my interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god! Why don't you just kill yourself now and get it over with. That is so pessemistic!

    3. Re:lost my interest by Tripster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your post is interesting, personally I feel that too many people discount alien visitation to our planet as nothing more than mass halucinations or weather anomolies.

      We aren't far away from improving technology allowing us to reach other star systems within a few hundred years in some cases.

      On the other hand, we aren't that far ahead in time from our recent past when we still thought the earth was flat, when we thought the earth was the center of the universe, when we thought our star system was the only one with planets, when we had to travel for months or years to discover just another land mass on our own planet, etc. etc.

      I tend to actually hope that we have been visited, because that gives us a chance at longevity by being able to leave our home planet if needed should it become uninhabitable (and it will eventually).

      There are certainly enough *hints* left in the past that some type of visitation events may have happened, ancient pictures and artwork have some peculiarly familiar ships in the sky for example, many years before "flying saucers" were coined as a name for them.

      We live on a funny world, a good number laugh at the notion of alien visitations and pass it off as fairy tales, yet at the same time these same folks believe in an invisible "God" like creator who apparently watches out for them and created the Earth just for our use, conveniently ignoring the fact that reptilian based lifeforms ruled the planet for millions of years before us (oh yeah, God planted these fossils there just for us to have something to do by digging them up, convenient for their storybooks no doubt).

      Then again, we could be just a giant computer simulation in some huge universal mainframe, after all, just try and fathom the very notion anything exists in the first place and what it is we exist in, it's tough to come up with a how scenario, but just because we can't figure out how/why it happened doesn't mean we should start praying to a creator.

      In a universe as vast as ours seems to be, the notion that who/whatever created this (if it was created) pays any particular attention to every grain of sand in our universe (apparently there are likely more stars than grains of sand on all of our beaches on earth), the chances of us being noticed, beyond passing interest in "how is my Build your Own Universe kit doing?", is to me laughable.

    4. Re:lost my interest by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > Then again, we could be just a giant computer
      > simulation in some huge universal mainframe

      Given that the only "real" things appear to be infinitely small points, like electrons and quarks, with the properties of mass and energy, sort of, I'd say that's a pretty good bet.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  18. Global Extraterrestrial Hunt to Revisit Old Signal by rpiquepa · · Score: 2

    Besides MSNBC, other medias are *revisiting* the SETI@home project. Read for instance this Space.com article, published yesterday (March 10, 2003). Tariq Malik wrote: "Researchers spearheading a worldwide effort to find ET, or anyone else out in space besides us humans, plan to revisit a group of their most likely candidate radio signals using the world's largest radio telescope." He added that "the Arecibo Observatory will work for three and a half days, starting March 18, to revisit the candidate signals identified by SETI@home users."

  19. Guess they were right by rde · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As someone who scanned that part of the sky for seti@athome (so to speak), I got a mail from our berkelean chums, suggesting that a lot of media interest might be forthcoming. I mentally scoffed at the possibility, but here I am talking about it on a *cough* reputable site like slashdot!

    seti - acting under the auspices of the planetary society - were kind enough to ask whether I'd like my fifteen minutes now, and make my name available for interview to those legions of reporters who'd be after a human interest angle.

    Of course, 'human interest' is exactly not the reason I signed up for seti@home, but there you go. Nonetheless, I volunteered, just in case they want a European perspective. However, I really, really doubt that anything will come of it. Just like a seti user should.

    1. Re:Guess they were right by DrPhred · · Score: 1

      I too got that message saying that "Your computer was one of the ones that processed the data for the
      selected candidate radio sources. "

      So how many here got that that are regular SETI users?

    2. Re:Guess they were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      me too!

      no serious, i too got that email. i'm based in the UK. havent yet decided whether i'd want to be some publicity nerd for local media...as, if i'm the only UK person, local would then mean national TV and radio. duh! no thanks! :-)

  20. SETI Hoax by gestapo4you · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's been known for a while that the SETI@Home has nothing to do with finding aliens but is used for target calculations by US "Intelligence".
    A lot of $$$ saved on free processing power.
    So why don't you open up your box to help out?

  21. However it turns out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have to admit that the Crab nebula is the better nebula for rapping, because nebula rhymes with -- oh.

  22. Useless piece of software by supergiovane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Mr Seti@home project leader,
    we can tell for sure that your software needs some serious revision because as it is it doesn't work well in finding alien lifeforms.

    Respectfully yours,

    Alf
    Mork
    E.T.
    Chewbecca
    Yoda
    Spock

    --
    Signatures are for stupids.
    1. Re:Useless piece of software by Seahawk · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you forgot Elvis Presley...

    2. Re:Useless piece of software by supergiovane · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, I am Elvis Presley.

      --
      Signatures are for stupids.
  23. Four year window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not really a 4 year window. You can sample 10 seconds of data and the time origin of the information that reaches you in that period can range from a year to many billions of years.

  24. Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by bogie · · Score: 0, Troll

    No doubt actually finding and verifying(good luck) alien signals would a great discovery. But at the same the practically speaking its a complete waste. All of these people could and should be donating to something like Folding or some other distributed effort that actually will probably help humanity by finding a cure for cancer or some other disease. But I guess actually helping your fellow humans is less glamourous then being the first nerd or geek to discover some faint signal which when discovered probably won't even be accepted by the rest of the world and will be debated forever.

    Seti being first and all earned its user base, but since other more practical and worthy uses for distributed computing have come about its time to shift resources to tasks which will actually may improve the world's quality of life.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by ThePlague · · Score: 0

      Maybe the people who are donating their cycles to the project aren't interested in those other things? This isn't (yet) a completely command economy.

    2. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "All of these people could and should be donating to something like Folding or some other distributed effort that actually will probably help humanity by finding a cure for cancer or some other disease."

      Of course if there actually _are_ aliens out there and they're close enough for us to communicate with in a reasonable timescale, they might be able to tell us how to solve all those problems and many more. Not to mention that finding a sentient alien species would have a far greater impact on humanity than curing a few diseases.

      Why sit in a forest trying to figure out why apples fall from trees, when by walking a few miles to the nearest town you might find someone who'd explain relativity to you?

    3. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but at least it's not working on stuff for the military without telling you .... or is it?

    4. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by Tailhook · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "But I guess actually helping your fellow humans is less glamourous then being the first nerd or geek to discover some faint signal which when discovered probably won't even be accepted by the rest of the world and will be debated forever."


      It "glamorous" you silly twitch.


      Stick your fucking guilt trip in your ear. My fellow humans get more than enough "help" already. With what is left over, we're doing as we see fit. Don't like it? Allow me to bend over so you can plant a juicy wet one on my left cheek. Enjoy.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    5. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious -- have you ever read a book? Watched TV?

      HOW COULD YOU???

      You're wasting your time, when you could be out searching for a cure for cancer! Helping the homeless! Unless you devote 100% of your waking time, every day, to helping those less fortunate than you, you are less than a human being. You are scum.

      No books. No TV. No entertainment or leisure of any kind until cancer is cured!

      Wait a sec... you say that you HAVE sat on your ass and watched TV for hours on end? You've wasted endless hours reading stupid books about fantasy worlds that don't exist? Then what the hell are you doing berating anybody else for how they choose to spend their time? What gives you the right?

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    6. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by SETIGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      No doubt actually finding and verifying(good luck) alien signals would a great discovery. But at the same the practically speaking its a complete waste. All of these people could and should be donating to something like Folding or some other distributed effort that actually will probably help humanity by finding a cure for cancer or some other disease. But I guess actually helping your fellow humans is less glamourous then being the first nerd or geek to discover some faint signal which when discovered probably won't even be accepted by the rest of the world and will be debated forever.

      Ever consider how many hours a week you spend reading slashdot, watching TV, or listening to music. Practially speaking what you spend most of your spare time doing is a complete waste of time and resources.

      Why aren't you volunteering your time to something that will actually help humanity? Try volunteering in a soup kitchen. Cut all power to your house in order to reduce greenhouse emissions. Travel everywhere by bicycle. Give all of your money to charity.

      There are other more practical and worthy uses of the time and resources you waste on yourself. It's time to shift those resources to tasks which will actually improve the world's quality of life.

      To get real for a moment, SETI@home has about half a million machines running at the moment. That might represent at most one percent of the available resources. There's plently to go around.

      Granted, I'm not unbiased, since I'm working on the observing schedule right now. Next week, Arecibo...

    7. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by jafiwam · · Score: 1
      But I guess actually helping your fellow humans is less glamourous then being the first nerd or geek to discover some faint signal which when discovered probably won't even be accepted by the rest of the world and will be debated forever.

      Maybe if I didn't spend most my days wishing 80% of the human race would DIE...

      I find SETI to be interesting, as discovering ETI would be up in the top three of humankind's greatest scientific discoveries...
      1. Fire
      2. Wheel
      3. ET
      Sure cancer is a problem. Once my co-workers discover the irony in having their PC crunching numbers to cure cancer while on their smoke break maybe I will switch. Until then I will continue looking for ET.
    8. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by BobFunk · · Score: 1

      What was most important: figuring out that the world was round or figuring out the vacine for smallpox? The comparison is not one that really makes sense, and its the same with discovering extraterestial life versus discovering a cure for cancer. One is basic medical progress alowing us to live longer - the other is scientific insight that redefines our view of our place in the universe.

    9. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Emily Littela: What's all this I hear about people "folding" and "donating cycles"? It enheartens me that people are donating bikes to the poor and helping the elderly do their laundry. It's about time something like this happened, what with all the bad news we hear day to day.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  25. Or even better.. by Mindjiver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People could lend their cpu cycles helping something worthwhile out Folding @ home instead of looking for something that isn't there. Helping the fight against diseases like Alzheimer and Parkinson is a lot more rewarding than looking for little green men.

    --
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    1. Re:Or even better.. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Helping the fight against diseases like Alzheimer and Parkinson is a lot more rewarding than looking for little green men.

      No, everybody's going to eventually die one way or another, and we have no problem making replacements. Curing any given disease is just a temporary stopgap which isn't that significant in the big scheme of things. Our race somehow muddled through millions of years before we had cures for any diseases.

      OTOH, finding little green men would probably be the single most significant moment in human history.

    2. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technology will advance such that we can find the little green men easilly, so why bother?

    3. Re:Or even better.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "People could lend their cpu cycles helping something worthwhile out Folding @ home [stanford.edu] instead of looking for something that isn't there."

      If we knew that nothing was out there, Seti wouldn't be looking for it. Seti doesn't know, none of us knows, and you certainly don't know.

      It's one thing to say "medical research is more important", it's another to say that something doesn't exist when there's no proof that it does or doesn't. Space is awfully large.

    4. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but we are a greedy species. Given that I'd rather not have my time here hampered or shortened by an ailment that could have been cured.

    5. Re:Or even better.. by Greedo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if the little green have the cure for Alzheimers and Parkinsons?

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    6. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ain't life a bitch, huh?

    7. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you get cancer soon. Of the terminal kind.

    8. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I suppose you refuse any medical treatment whatsoever.

      Of course, you don't. You're a hypocrite.

    9. Re:Or even better.. by moominpapa · · Score: 3, Funny

      And wouldn't ya bet the first words the aliens say to us are "Have you guys found a cure for Alzheimers yet?"

    10. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't prove something doesn't exist, only that it does, bitch.

    11. Re:Or even better.. by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      The "little green men" might be from a very powerful, very ancient very wise civilzation which would know enough to destroy us quickly before we become a threat to them. After all they have been around for a long time and seen many puny upstarts like us cause them grief.

    12. Re:Or even better.. by PyroMosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Using your logic:

      Our race somehow muddled through millions of years without finding little green men.

      That said, I run SETI@home myself. According to my SETI@home user profile, I've dedicated 1.788 years of CPU time so far and I've been a user for 3.694 years. So I'm certainly not against the program.

      But to say that everybody's going to die anyway, so why bother is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. By that logic, we might as well shut down all the hospitals, and repeal all the laws on murder. After all, we're all going to go sometime.

      It's kind of interesting. I've been using SETI@home for years now, and as far as I know, it was the only distributed computing application when I first started. For a long time, it certainly seemed the most worthy of my spare cycles. Now, however, there are apps for cancer research and other life and death ailments. It's got me thinking...

      Which discovery would have the greatest impact on us? ET or a cure for cancer? Now, nobody supports space exploration, research, etc. more than I do. And I've put my money where my mouth is on this subject. But I've thought about this.

      If today, while watching CNN, I saw breaking news, and it was a press conference where NASA or SETI or some other organization announced definitive proof of Extra Terrestrial Intelligence, how would it change life here on earth?

      Well, most likely, the news media would immediately wet their pants, ask all kinds of stupid questions "is it likely that they're hostile?" "Could they support the terrorists?!?" etc.

      But that wouldn't last long, because eventually the scientific community would be able to explain to all but the thickest skulled journalist that that they're 500 light years away, and that the message we received left their planet while Christopher Columbus was still alive. They'd also have to explain to them that it would take just as long for us to *respond* to their message, and that with a 1000 year delay, the very civilization that sent the message might not even be there any more.

      So to make a long story short, if SETI finds ET, all it will do is make us *know* that ET is out there. It won't make any difference in our day to day lives what so ever. Basically what we are undertaking is the most expensive quest to find an answer to a trivia question ever. Because that's all we can hope to get out of this: trivia. Knowing that there's ET intelligence is no more useful than knowing that in another million years there will be another Hawaiian Island.

      Now what about cancer research (just to name one example). Let's say that distributed computation does lead somehow (I'm nowhere nearly as well versed on how this works as I am SETI@home) to a cure for cancer... Millions of lives will be saved. Millions of people will be spared suffering. Drugs or treatment programs will come to market. This will effect economies. Our understanding of our own biology will be expanded, and that could lead to even *more* quality of life improvements. I'm sure there will be other benefits that I can't even think of.

      Being the space buff that I am, finding ET would move me more emotionally. Wow, what a discovery. But it wouldn't actually *do* all that much. I have no illusions that it would. On the other hand, medical research is perhaps one of the most noble things that we can lend our proc cycles to. And it's been tempting me for several months now. I'd certainly recommend it to anyone else.

    13. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Or maybe some run SETI @ Home because it is the only one that does not ignore their OS. Folding @ Home and the others are only interested in my CPU cycles if I have a Windows or possible a Linux machine... My BSD & Solaris farm just is not good enough for them.

    14. Re:Or even better.. by oni · · Score: 2, Informative

      But to say that everybody's going to die anyway, so why bother is the most absurd thing I've ever heard.

      Fortunately, you did not hear it in the comment you replied to. He didn't say "so why bother" and he didn't imply that medicine was worthless - just that in the larger scheme of things it's futile.

      His comment was more about the relative importance of healing one individual human vs. contacting an alien race.

    15. Re:Or even better.. by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

      If we are alone in the universe.. God created it like Microsoft is writing software, i.e. lots of loss of space!

    16. Re:Or even better.. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But to say that everybody's going to die anyway, so why bother is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. By that logic, we might as well shut down all the hospitals, and repeal all the laws on murder. After all, we're all going to go sometime.

      That's not what I meant. I was reacting to the prevalent attitude around here that until we find a cure for every fatal disease, no other activity is worthwhile.

      Why don't people say: "Those guys on TV in that NASCAR race are just wasting resources we could be using in the war on cancer!" For some reason they don't. They save their criticism for activities that actually have their own intrinsic value.

    17. Re:Or even better.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "You can't prove something doesn't exist, only that it does, bitch."

      And how does that do anything but reinforce my point?

    18. Re:Or even better.. by PyroMosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure I did. We can nitpick about the exact wording until the end of time, but he said that medical research is a waste of time compared to SETI. That's absurd. And he implied (whether intentionally or not) that such pursuits are futile. The inferance that "Our race somehow muddled through millions of years before we had cures for any diseases" implies that such cures for diseases aren't important. Again, I'm not a mind reader, so I don't know if that was the idea the post's author *intended* to convey. But never the less, that's what it looked like.

      Also, if you had read my post, you'd see that I made (IMHO) a fairly good argument for why medical research is relativly more important than SETI. SETI is a feel good "because we can" type of project. Worthy in my mind, but not nessisarily best for humanity.

      Not only that, but who said anything about healing *one* individual? These programs are about finding cures for diseases that strike millions, not just an individual.

    19. Re:Or even better.. by PyroMosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why don't people say: "Those guys on TV in that NASCAR race are just wasting resources we could be using in the war on cancer!" For some reason they don't. They save their criticism for activities that actually have their own intrinsic value.

      Good point! Sorry if I took the wrong meaning form your first message. I do of course support SETI, but I guess the only point I disagreed with your post on was that I don't nessisarily see SETI as the *best* use of my space clock cycles, it just happens to be my *favorite* use.

      But I see what you mean. It's tempting to say "let's not wast resources on x, when y is a big problem to life an limb" Keep doing this long enough (eliminate pro sports, record companies, video games, and anyother high dollar but unimportant-to-life-itself industry) and pretty soon you're living to be 280, but there's no books ,or films, or video games, or art, or sports, or computers, or any of the things that make life so *enjoyable* today!

    20. Re:Or even better.. by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      This is an overused old argument. If creationists are correct, physical space is inconsequential. God could just as easily have made an infinite universe just to put us in, or put us in a shoebox under his bed with a few holes in the top.

      From our perspective, it does seem like a waste of space, but on the grander scheme of things, all of that physical space means nothing.

    21. Re:Or even better.. by N0decam · · Score: 1

      I think it's one of those things that's tough to put a value on until (or if) it happens. There could be gold in them thar signals.

      It might not be obvious now what kind of things we could learn once the signals were decoded, but given the vast reverse-engineering expertise thats out there, I have to think that the signals will be decoded, and something will be learned from them.

      Even if it's only that Wingo Frumplesnoot was the first one voted off the island in "Survivor: Quirmlik"

    22. Re:Or even better.. by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      As an aside here. My faith doesn't ensure or prohibit the existance of alien species, so the existance or lack thereof would not affect my beliefs. But knowing what I believe to be the purpose of our lives here, I doubt that we will ever encounter such a race. It would be great to be wrong about that, though. (As long as the Klingons aren't our first contact, anyway.)

    23. Re:Or even better.. by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      But what if the little green men can cure Alzheimers and Parkinsons? Then you can do both at the same time......multi-tasking :).
      he he he

    24. Re:Or even better.. by BrerBear · · Score: 1

      Why don't people say: "Those guys on TV in that NASCAR race are just wasting resources we could be using in the war on cancer!" For some reason they don't.

      Because if you put all your resources into finding the cure for cancer, and none into entertainment, the quality of life drops, your citizens revolt, and then the other players launch an attack on you. Didn't you ever play the game "Civilization"?

    25. Re:Or even better.. by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

      Creationism?

      It shouldn't even be an argument (sorry if I get rude with anyone here)..

      I have harsh views about religion as a whole.. and I know what I'm talking about since I was a really fervous believer when I was younger.

      I guess I just become marxist/leninist before I even knew what marx/lenin said/did.. (just surrounding religion, btw, don't think I'm all for communism or something, that's not true).

      We know that there could be a huge lot of other habitable planets, yet a lot of us are still too egocentric to even think about the possibility that there could be an other race.

      Even worst, at some point there we 2 'human' races on earth, but one got killed because they were too dependant on their environnement.

      How's that againts creationism?

    26. Re:Or even better.. by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      I say that! I'd much rather see all sports reduced to a local level, and the money spent on other activities. This would not only eliminate annoying pro sports, but it would encourage community togetherness, promote health as more people are playing sports than watching it, and give people something to feel positive and worthwhile about themselves.

      But that'll never happen. People want to be fatasses watching a game on the couch or stadium and somehow feeling that they're important because a bunch of people from their area (or who moved to their general area) are somehow a reflection on them.

      I'm a better person 'cause a bunch of people in my state, most of them weren't even raised here, are better <sport> players than other a bunch of other similar groups! Yeah! Blegh.

      As for which is more important, folding@home or seti@home, I think folding@home is. Once we have even a basic nanotech, finding and processing signals from space will be _so_ much cheaper and faster. We'll also have the benefit of having the potential to cure cancer, AIDS, and other horrible modern plagues.

    27. Re:Or even better.. by Ian+Peon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So to make a long story short, if SETI finds ET, all it will do is make us *know* that ET is out there. It won't make any difference in our day to day lives what so ever.

      Think about it - Learning that the world is round, learning that the the Earth revolves around the Sun, and indeed many other discoveries were inconsequential to the Joe Sixpacks of the time. The persons tilling the fields and squabbling, their lives were not effected by those realizations. However, those advances in understanding had very large ramificaitons years later.

      Einstein's theories initially had no effect on people - who cared that time slowed down when you moved near the speed of light? Wasn't driving that fast anyway! We have yet to see the practical implications of his ideas, but the impact they have had is enormous.
    28. Re:Or even better.. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > It's tempting to say "let's not wast resources on x, when y is a big problem to life an limb" Keep doing this long enough (eliminate pro sports, record companies, video games, and any other high dollar but unimportant-to-life-itself industry) and pretty soon you're living to be 280, but there's no books ,or films, or video games, or art, or sports, or computers, or any of the things that make life so *enjoyable* today!

      Not a sport, not music, not a game, and can't be expensive...

      ...pr0n!

      Betcha the first SETI transmission decoded is alien pr0n. The Japanese will go nuts.

    29. Re:Or even better.. by ezberry · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're being facetious or you're actually that callous. The probability of finding "little green men" is so miniscule that it's debatable wether we should spend all this time looking or not. In addition, even if we WERE to find them, we still wouldn't actually be able to do anything about it because they'd be lightyears away.
      Using your argument, however, this is more important than ending the horrific struggles of those with Alzheimer's? These people live terrible, horribly depressing lives and the reward from finding a cure to this disease isn't to make human's immortal, it's to end unnecessary suffering and improve the human condition in measurable and direct ways.
      Come to think of it, you may have proposed one of the worst arguments I've ever heard.

    30. Re:Or even better.. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Apparently, I'm not getting my point across very well. What I'm doing is pulling my focus way up past the 200,000 foot level and looking at the really big picture. Look over thousands of years of history, Civilizations come and go. Tens of billions of people come and go. Epidemics, diseases, wars and famines come and go.

      Amongst all that, contacting an alien civilization would really stand out. Maybe it would take a century for round-trip communications. That amount of time is still only 1/50th of recorded history. We might not see any benefits from such a discovery in our lifetimes, but we could still make a contribution to help shape the destiny of the human race.

      Nobody's saying that we have to stop working on curing diseases. I'd be surprised if the money spent on SETI is more than 1/1000th of the money spent on medical research. All I'm saying is that demanding that that last tidbit be taken away as well is short sighted, especially when the majority of the people in this country piss away most of their spare time and resources anyway.

      As far as the probability question goes, the odds of payoff for this project may be slim, but I'm sure it's better than the 1 in 50,000,000 that drive people into a frenzy over lotto tickets.

    31. Re:Or even better.. by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that anything was against creationism. The argument is that if God created the entire universe, and only put inhabitants on one little planet, then it is a huge waste of space. I was simply pointing out that by using the creationists view of the world, the space that is involved is inconsequential. God could have created an infinite amout of space as easily as a finite amount of space.

      I also did not make a claim that there is no other race in the universe. I admit that it is definately a possiblity, and I for one would love to be around if we ever encounter them. But because of my interpretation of the purpose of our lives here, and knowing what I do of the Bible, I must say that I think it is a long shot. According to the Bible (and if you don't believe this then that is fine. I am describing what I understand to be true.) the most important part of "creation" is humankind. The space involved in the rest of the universe doesn't matter much compared to the human soul. If the Bible is true, then I just don't see much room for other races that we can possibly encounter. That doesn't mean that there are none. There could be other races that are so far away that they are beyond our technological means to contact. Or there could be one much closer. Only time will tell. I doubt it, but would love to be wrong about this one.

    32. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the other hand.
      I surely would be broadcasting knowledge, so why wouldn't they?

      But true, a cure for (human specific) cancer to be broadcasted by a completely unrelated species is slim.

    33. Re:Or even better.. by shird · · Score: 1

      While I agree with all of that, there is one thing which finding ET may change. Peoples religous beliefs, and theyre thoughts on life etc. Knowing that we're not alone, and that the 'god' thing is basically just a cult gone wrong, could help to end many wars and conflicts. Then again, probably not.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    34. Re:Or even better.. by oliphaunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to be a total ass, but what makes you think that folding@home is altruistic? Sure, I can help scientists learn how proteins fold with spare cycles. Do they pay me? No. If my cycles find something significant, do i get rewarded? No. If they win the Nobel for the research done on my equipment, do I get any thanks? No. When they license their discoveries to AmGen, do I get a cut? No.

      fuck Stanford and their never-ending supply of MBA-wannabees. They can buy their own lab equipment. I'd rather waste electricity looking for aliens.

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    35. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cancer affects all life on this planet and not just humans. The chances are still slim, but slightly less so.

    36. Re:Or even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans being the prideful and selfish creatures they are, I'd have to say that the news would cause riots and screams of "heretic!" or "infidel!" followed by bloodshed. Starting with the lynching of the discoverers.
      It's a pity. I wonder if by then I will be able to alter my genes to the point where I can be a completely different species.

    37. Re:Or even better.. by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      If the aliens are there, and we can glean even a tiny bit of info from them, that will rocket science ahead so quickly protein folding won't be a problem anymore.

      That's right, folks. By supporting SETI, you may be solving protein folding solutions faster than by working on protein folding.

      It's kinda like the way capitalism kicks the ass of socialism even though it doesn't seem like it should be.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    38. Re:Or even better.. by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      If today, while watching CNN, I saw breaking news, and it was a press conference where NASA or SETI or some other organization announced definitive proof of Extra Terrestrial Intelligence, how would it change life here on earth?

      Well, first thing, NASA would get a bloody great appropriation to go out there and straighten them out about Jesus.

      rj

    39. Re:Or even better.. by Madcapjack · · Score: 1
      its a little late and i don't know how often this will be read, but I want to put my two cents in. or three.

      curing diseases and the research to do this is a noble and just calling. However, much medical research simply exacerbates a more important problem. Population growth.

      Sure medical research has done wonders for birth control. But i think that the lives saved from medical research probably outweighs those prevented by birth control. maybe.

      but i'm not going to forgoe a medical cure for the sake of limiting the world's population!

    40. Re:Or even better.. by pediddle · · Score: 1

      Technology will advance so that we can find the [cures for diseases] easily, so why bother?

    41. Re:Or even better.. by landaker · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, it's commonly known that they do have the cure--unfortunately, on their worlds, the technology is tied up in a small handful of elite government-like corporations that hold it encumbered in their version of patents and licensing. Even among them, the cure for most diseaes is mete out only to those with lots of power and influence.

      The group of them that first landed here would have loved to sell us some pills showing the cure, but we couldn't afford the up-front licensing costs (although they said they'd take good ol' Sol for trade, but we couldn't show documents that we actually OWN it...) and the NDAs we would have had to sign to get it also included a clause that let them completely wipe our brains of all concious thought, turning us into mindless slave-drones.

      Actually, it's probably a good trade, and all, but in the end our delegates ended up offending them by hitting on some of their space-program interns and they left in a huff.

      You don't already know all this? Don't you watch CNN?!

  26. Either that by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 2, Funny

    or they are running out of money, and need some more.

    "Hey...that data sounds just like a....Higgs Boson!"

    1. Re:Either that by Zak3056 · · Score: 2, Funny

      or they are running out of money, and need some more.

      Or, worse yet, the first alien communication begins, "Dear Sir, I am contacting you with a business proposal. My brother, Melgar, is the former head of the government of Tau Ceti, and is attempting to export 30,000,000 galactic credits..."

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  27. The sad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that even if we pick up Alien Superbowl XII, religious fools will not shut up.

    1. Re:The sad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And neither will the atheist fools.

  28. Ob-ritualistic suicide reference by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

    As long as it's not "suttee at home", I think we're fine.

  29. Slashdot vs UT by wiggys · · Score: 3, Funny
    Ever played Unreal Tournament? It would be satisfying to have the announcer shout out the moderator categories, ie instead of "Dominating!", "Godlike" or "Multi-kill!", a well-crafted response on Slashdot would be rewarded with cries of "Fascinating!" or "Thought-provoking!"

    Just an idea...

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    1. Re:Slashdot vs UT by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Yes! Unreal Karma Tournament 2003! The best thing? It runs as well under Linux as it does under MacOS X.

    2. Re:Slashdot vs UT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mo-monster kill kill kill


      take that bitch!

    3. Re:Slashdot vs UT by Scott+Francis[Mecham · · Score: 1

      ..which becomes an interesting coincidence, when you realize that the native physics engine embedded in UT2k3 is called "Karma". ;)

      --
      --
    4. Re:Slashdot vs UT by tabby · · Score: 1

      and when you click on a slashdotted link... "SITE DENIED!!!"

      --
      I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    5. Re:Slashdot vs UT by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Ever played Unreal Tournament? It would be satisfying to have the announcer shout out the moderator categories, ie instead of "Dominating!", "Godlike" or "Multi-kill!", a well-crafted response on Slashdot would be rewarded with cries of "Fascinating!" or "Thought-provoking!"

      So instead of "Ma-ma-ma-ma-monster Kill-kill-kill" you'd hear "Plu-plu-plu-plus three, funny-funny-funny?"

      No thanks, I'll pass. :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  30. And if they find ET? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Assume for a moment that this second pass finds a signal that is not random and is coming from a Sun like star 3,000 light years away. We watch it with more and more telescopes and damn if it doesn't send a big old red flag of intelligence.

    Now what?

    Any transmission there and back will have a 6k year life span. That's far to great of a distance for us to explore yet, and far to much of a time to comprehend between signals. So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?

    My pessimism says we let it divide us even more. Some will claim it as Atlantis, others will see it as home of the Aliens that have abducting them. The religious zealots will condemn, and our government will try and ignore it.

    My optimism hopes that it will inspire us to space. Give us a goal worthy of sending Humans to, and something that will also inspire kids to get more involved in Science.

    I know that there has been much written about what a positive result in this search would mean to society, but I'm wondering if anyone else has their own thoughts?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:And if they find ET? by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?

      That's a plausable scenario and a good point. A signal lag time which represents most of the whole of human history is obviously not workable, and given the size of the universe (big), it's not hard to see it happening.

      But that hardly means such contact could in any way be considered a failure. As I see it, we as a species stand to gain a lot from it:

      A data point for the Drake equation. Hey, if *somebody* else is out there and within 3000 light years, there are quite probably a lot of other somebodys out there.

      Potential research value. Their science may be more advanced and would certainly be different from our own. We could almost certainly pick up insights into our universe just by interpreting and communications (or, at least, Fox could steal their reality shows and produce them on earth).

      Mindset. A lot of the conflict of the last 50 years or so has been centered around the fact that our technology is making the earth "smaller" far faster than our various cultures are able to compensate for. This sort of discovery could give some perspective as to what "us" means, or at the very least drive some competetive juices that drive humans (gotta get to Mars, gotta colonize the Oort belt, gotta get good at this whole space thing...)

      Sure, some people'd react badly to it. We'd probably see some mass suicides, maybe a couple of new religious cults, but that'd all encompass people who'd go for that shit anyhow (Tom Cruise, etc). Seems like a fair trade-off to me.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:And if they find ET? by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Now what?"

      Good question. Whatever the consequences, bring it on. Yeah, we'll probably see new religions appear. They'll be radical cult like messes that contribute nothing. Our existing religions will adapt, because they're good at it, or they wouldn't still exist.

      Bring it on. I've got about 30 worthwhile years left in me. I have no intention of allowing the fools of this planet to keep me ignorant. Lets have at it.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    3. Re:And if they find ET? by PygmyTrojan · · Score: 3, Funny
      So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?

      Eh, more like 17,636,358,300,000,000, but who's counting.

      --

      Trying is the first step towards failure.

    4. Re:And if they find ET? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Maybe the message that an advanced alien race would broadcast over the radio waves would be instructions on how to set up a zero-latency subspace channel.

    5. Re:And if they find ET? by TheHawke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This finding might inspire NASA to move up their next generation of deep space telescopes and infereometers, like the OWL project that uses adaptive optics in a array that spans 300 square meters.
      Of course, we do need to get improved reuseable launching systems in place first...

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    6. Re:And if they find ET? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Guess those leap Feb 29's do add up after awhile...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    7. Re:And if they find ET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they can invade?

    8. Re:And if they find ET? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Skyshadow writes
      [the benefits of SETI contact with an ET includes...] Fox could steal their reality shows and produce them on earth

      Convinced me. SETI so that the networks have more shows to steal!

      Seriously though, can you imagine the amount of pseudoscience that would be broadcasted if SETI came back as positive?

      After all, that local nut has been talking about aliens for years. He was right, lets put him on the air.

    9. Re:And if they find ET? by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      "Any transmission there and back will have a 6k year life span. That's far to great of a distance for us to explore yet, and far to much of a time to comprehend between signals. So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?"

      Personally I don't think distance really is an issue for an advanced space faring species. Should there be one or more out there then distance isn't going to annoy them as much as us.

      Look at what we've accomplished over the last 100 years. From a mighty 5 MPH vehicle to over MACH 18. Tomorrow we might discover WARP or something even faster (sure it's a Star Treck term... but it works).

      Perhaps if we weren't always at each other's throats all the time we would be exploring other planets personally ourselves. Again I say why not? 40 years ago people laughed at today's common cell phone which fits in my shirt pocket :-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    10. Re:And if they find ET? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      So they can invade?

      No, so they can fax us our Intergalactic Federation tax forms.

    11. Re:And if they find ET? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Look at what we've accomplished over the last 100 years. From a mighty 5 MPH vehicle to over MACH 18. Tomorrow we might discover WARP or something even faster (sure it's a Star Treck term... but it works).

      I think that this is an excellent point. Star Trek notwithstanding, throughout our evolution we have broken down the barriers of distance. Why should that suddenly stop where space is concerned? Maybe its just me, but I think that our future generations are going to look down on us much like we have looked down on past civilizations; pitying us our ignorance and ineptitude while shaking their heads in wonderment as to how we could have been so blind as to have not seen the Answer which was right next to us.

      Maybe something like a SETI positive will give us the impetus to move beyond our own planet. If not, maybe the strife in the world right now will provide it.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    12. Re:And if they find ET? by Kombat · · Score: 1
      Any transmission there and back will have a 6k year life span.

      Come on, I would have expected the answer to be immediately obvious to a Slashdot fan. Hello?!?! Do the words "subspace signal" ring any bells? Sheesh, no wonder the Vulcans' technology was so far ahead of ours.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    13. Re:And if they find ET? by dirkmuon · · Score: 1
      > So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?
      1. Vice Admiral John M. Poindexter would be appointed to head the Alien Total Information Awareness project.

      2. President George W. Bush would extend his "Axis of Evil" to include the alien civilization. When the aliens fail to heed the the U.N.'s call to disarm, President Bush will declare war.

      3. However, members of the Organian Council would use their mental powers to heat all Federation and Klingon weapons to 350 degress Farenheit, thus rendering them useless.
    14. Re:And if they find ET? by Wandering+Goliard · · Score: 1

      "However, members of the Organian Council would use their mental powers to heat all Federation and Klingon weapons to 350 degress Farenheit, thus rendering them useless."

      I must confess, however, that the thought of George W. Bush placed on a desert planet, having to fight an alien by cramming sulphur, saltpeter, and rocks into a hollow log is strangely, hypnotically appealing.

    15. Re:And if they find ET? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Potential research value. Their science may be more advanced and would certainly be different from our own. We could almost certainly pick up insights into our universe just by interpreting and communications (or, at least, Fox could steal their reality shows and produce them on earth).

      I highly doubt we'll be able to recieve the equivalent of "Mr Wizard" or "Bill Nye the Science Guy" (Morbo the Xenogeneticist would be quite entertaining tv though)

      we might get a glimpse of what they have, that is considering we can even decide what is in the carrier and subcarriers, the modulation type, are they even 10 based? they might be a race based on 9 or 11 for their "decimal system" the periodic table may be listed backwards or sideways from their point of view.

      remember EVERYTHING we have as a "standard" is only a decision made by a person or group of people for no real concrete reason other than perspective.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:And if they find ET? by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Nah...they just want to show off their uber-uber-uber-1337 CounterStrike server...where the pings are 0 and the cheaters get teleported to another universe.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    17. Re:And if they find ET? by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      > "So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?"

      >> "That's a plausable scenario and a good point. A signal lag time which represents most of the whole of human history is obviously not workable"

      Ok, so I am NOT going to play Doom III against these guys with that kind of lag!

    18. Re:And if they find ET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, at least, Fox could steal their reality shows and produce them on earth

      In other news, the RIAA has recently moved to pass a bill that would expand international copyright law to cover intergalactic distances. Hiliary Rosen comments on the bill: "That should stop those evil earth-music pirating alians from stealing our radio transmissions!"

    19. Re:And if they find ET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have a two hundred fold increase in the number of alien cults.

  31. Space.com article by lucretio · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is also an article here.

  32. Decrypted Alien Message by papadiablo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "No! All your base are belong to us!"

  33. SETI Algorithm by llsouder · · Score: 0, Troll

    while(get.nextIpAddress()) { if (downloadedSETISoftware==true) intelligentLifeFound=false; }

    --
    What
    1. Re:SETI Algorithm by e_xworm · · Score: 1

      hmmm you're implying that there is an object of some kind named "get"? that's plain ugly how about sth like ipRegistry.nextAddress() ?

      --
      X~
  34. HHGTTG by Exedore · · Score: 1

    No big deal... It's probably just Zaphod asking if anyone has any mixers.

    --

    I take drugs seriously.

  35. The machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but if we find a message from some alien it will be the blueprints of some machine that when built and activated will turn out to be a trojan horse that will flood our planet with syrup mmmm syrup

  36. Re:not a troll, but... by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

    Too bad for the U.S. government, because they opted to discontinue funding SETI in the 1990s. It is now a private, non-profit corporation using donations from such tech luminaries as both Hewlett and Packard, and Paul Allen.

    So, even if the gummint *wanted* to squelch a SETI discovery, they wouldn't be able to, because it's totally out of their hands now.

    I was pissed when congress cut SETI spending (the way it happened was a total farce), but I have to admit in hindsight, it's about the best thing that ever happened to them.

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  37. How does one succeed without trying? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 0

    Just a lucky guess I suppose.

  38. You left out the most RELEVANT part! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The plans have been displayed for comment for the last 200 years at your regional planning board in Alpha Centuri.

    What do you mean you've never been to Alpha Centuri?!!!

    If you can't be bothered to take an interest in local affairs, then that's your own lookout. "

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:You left out the most RELEVANT part! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a sign on the planet that read "Beware of the Leopard."

      (Yes, I know.)

  39. ET already knows all about us by scotay · · Score: 4, Funny

    The fact that we're still using screen savers on non-monochrome monitors is proof we're not advanced enough for first contact.

    1. Re:ET already knows all about us by bluyonder · · Score: 1

      If you are implying that non-monochrome monitors don't burn, that's what I thought too. Until I noticed that on our three year old workstations you can still read the main menu window after you turn the monitors off. We tell them it's an energy saving feature.

    2. Re:ET already knows all about us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I have a few three year old SVGA 17" monitors here at work that have the background image burned into them. I think it would have been a good idea to use a screen saver of some kind.

  40. Dude... by TopShelf · · Score: 0

    just be sure to pass that stuff around so we can all have a puff...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      puff puff give, puff puff give. Man, you're fucking up the rotation!

  41. Re:March 18th... Next Tuesday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent comment seems to be one of about three comments that is directly commenting on the current slashdot article. All the other highly moderated comments are discussing general SETI activities, and even the war on Iraq. And yet the parent comment has been moderated Redundant.

    I didn't used to believe SexyGal when she said she was being moderated unfairly, but now I do.

  42. ALF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    seti@home is an evil plot by the Alien Task Force!

    Don't help them! They want to track down escaped aliens and do bad things to them!

  43. Shoot AlQuida a copy please by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Thanks.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  44. What if... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The aliens are broadcasting the cure for cancer?

    Saying that everyone should just be looking for the cure to cancer is just another form of putting all your eggs in one basket. You can't really say what you would learn from analysing alien signals.

    Plus, the discovery of alien life would have a vastly more profound influence on the human race as a whole than helping the small percentage of the earth who contract serious diseases like cancer.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I do agree that we shouldn't put all our eggs in one basket.

      helping the small percentage of the earth who contract serious diseases like cancer.

      You have a strange definition of small. Cancer is the #1 killer in the US. I couldn't find exact percentage of people affected (not just killed), but I think its close to 25%.

    2. Re:What if... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Actually, heart disease/obesity kicks everything else's ass.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  45. Re:not a troll, but... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

    Might be kind of tough to keep under wraps. One of the things that has to be done to confirm a "hit" is that someone other than your team has to be able to replicate your results.

    With the way that Seti@home works, that confirmation would effectively require that someone who has agreeded to interupt whatever radio astronomy project they happen to be working on, and happens to be pointing at the right area of the sky, to do that and do what they can to check that star.

    Part of the problem is that about all Seti@home can do is identify that there may be a signal there. It is not designed to collect or analyze content.

    The "results" so far provide a list of stars that have a higher probability of being a signal source.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  46. A better way to waste your processor by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 1

    What if we are all dead by the time the aliens come???
    Lets cure cancer first!!

    1. Re:A better way to waste your processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will curing cancer help the world? Their are 6 billion of us now and do we really want there to be 6 billion more?

  47. Re:aliens, war? by anarxia · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone need SETI@home to distract people when you have unecessary wars and Hollywood?

  48. Spread Spectrum and ET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If extraterrestrial civilizations use ( used) the type of com systems that we are deploying today, what are the chances that we would be able to recognize it as the product of intelligence?

  49. Yeah, it might be big. by skia · · Score: 1

    At just over 4 years old, I think this would be the first big break for SETI@home.

    You mean you think that discovering alien radio transmissions would be a big break for SETI? Sheesh. Whatever, man. I guess you're definition of "big break" isn't as demanding as mine.

    --

    --

  50. Now I know why Apple called him... by roxy-skya · · Score: 0, Troll
    Butthead Astronomer.

    excerpt from wired

    "Lighten Up, Carl: Remember when we reported on Carl Sagan's new nickname over at Apple Computer (for your edification, it was "butthead astronomer." Apple developers had code-named a secret new computer "Sagan," only to be threatened by Sagan's lawyers that the use of his name on a product, even in prototype stage, was infringement). Well, ol' Carl's now suing Apple for libel, claiming that the "butthead astronomer" moniker is defamatory and subjects him to "hatred, contempt, ridicule, and obloquy." The Wall Street Journal pointed out that the outcome of the case will hinge on the definition of "butthead." Thanks for helping us understand, Carl. "

  51. ARTICLE TEXT IN CASE OF SLASHDOTTING(Hehe.)(right) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgot the right title for my post...

    March 10 -- Researchers spearheading a worldwide effort to find E.T., or anyone else out in space besides us humans, plan to revisit a group of their most likely candidate radio signals using the world's largest radio telescope.

    THE SETI@HOME PROGRAM, a distributed computing effort that uses the personal computers of millions of volunteers to examine radio signal data, is planning a stellar countdown to check the extraterrestrial-potential of up to 150 radio signals detected with the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.

    The signal batch is cream of a candidate crop of 5 billion radio observations pulled from the SETI@home network, which program organizers will recheck to see if they are strong enough to be an extraterrestrial communiqué, repeating and emanating from portions of sky bearing sunlike stars and planets.

    "Our chances right now [of finding something] are small," SETI@home chief scientist Dan Werthimer said in a telephone interview. "But you have to plan for success."

    The Arecibo Observatory will work for three and a half days, starting March 18, to revisit the candidate signals identified by SETI@home users. In addition to onsite analysis, each of the new observations will also be fed into the global program for a more detailed examination, Werthimer said.

    Launched in May 1999, SETI@home uses the computers of 4 million astronomy buffs in 226 countries. Together they act as a supercomputer, collectively sifting through the 35 terabytes of raw data collected by the 1,000-foot (305-meter) Arecibo dish and reporting the results to the program headquarters at the University of California at Berkeley. One terabyte is about the equivalent of 231 million pages of typed text, but SETI@home volunteers received a fraction of that -- 350 kilobytes -- at a time to examine.

    Volunteers download a screensaverlike program that examines Arecibo radio observations while the computer user is away. Once the analysis is complete -- varying from a few hours to a few days, depending on the computing power of each machine -- the program alerts the user and sends the examined material to SETI@home researchers via the Internet.

    "It was always the idea to revisit observations once the first analysis was complete," said Louis Friedman, executive director of the Planetary Society, SETI@home's founding and primary sponsor. "The question is, are these signals really good enough? That's still an unknown, and it's what this next phase of the program is going to tell us."

    SETI@home is an extraterrestrial search effort separate from the SETI Institute, a group that pursues several scientific and education projects aimed at the discovering intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. Space.com has a partnership with the SETI Institute.

    © 2003 Space.com. All rights reserved.

  52. News Flash! by huckamania · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Slow news day finds lazy reporter surfing slashdot for something to write about.

    I think we have a new phenomenon starting here:

    First slashdot posts a small story about something vaguely scientific or geekish. Eventually, a lazy reporter slightly drunk from his usually liquid lunch reads the story with one eye closed. Proceeds to write puff piece weaving elements from the story and slashdot user's commentaries into a drunken slurry of double vision inspired verbosity. After waking up at 3 am with his head on the keyboard, drunken reporter deletes the last paragraph, which ended with a;hkjhgdferuh (because his head was on the keyboard and he can't remember what it was supposed to say) and puts it in a pile on his fat, baliding editors desk. The fat balding news editor, whose fat because he eats chocolate and bald because of genetics, reads it on a slow news day, laughs his fat az off and decides to run it anyways. Slashdot editor, who suffers from the same problems as the news editor but for different reasons, reads the headline and proceeds to post the story.

    Wash-Rinse-Repeat.

    Now if only the follow up to the follow up stories and posts would present better information than we might be on to something.

  53. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The International Fleet declared the establishment of a permanent station to be known as the "Battle School" dedicated to the training of our future space leaders...

    The Polemarch is expected to hold a press conference this afternoon.

  54. No need to judge... by Desult · · Score: 1

    This is a silly attitude, as are all of the "you're wasting your time" posts...

    People are allowed to do what they please. It's less INTERESTING to them to donate their cycles to folding or UD than to SETI (I would posit it's hardly glamourous). If we're arguing practical likelihood of finding an answer, foldingathome isn't actually solving anything, it's just testing the efficacy of an algorithm that may one day be employed to possibly solve a problem. An undefined biology problem. Cosmetics perhaps. I'm sure what the UD Cancer research actually does, either. Something for Oxford if I recall, but regardless: the "keyspace" for these projects (if they are even actually searching a worthwhile keyspace) is just as large as SETI's, and in all cases, we don't even know if a solution exists. At least with distributed.net you know a solution is out there. ;)

    If we're talking altruism-worth, how much money have you spent on your computer gear? Why aren't you spending it on the humanitarian efforts against AIDS in Africa? Why aren't you a UN peace officer getting ready for the likely humanitarian efforts in Iraq? I mean, <whatever charity you may support> being the first one you ran into an all, may have earned your money, but there are plenty of MORE IMPORTANT causes that may actually make a difference. If it wasn't so GLAMOUROUS to donate to the <whatever> fund, maybe you'd be kissing babies in Namibia. Or not.

    Don't judge other people's efforts to be charitable. Be thankful they're doing anything out of the kindness of their hearts, and try to be a better person yourself. Word.

    -Greg

    --
    -Greg
  55. Re:March 18th... Next Tuesday. by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

    I didn't used to believe SexyGal when she said she was being moderated unfairly, but now I do.

    What're the chances that you are just SexyGal (/ekrout?) posting as an AC just to try and fight the moderation... probably 95%?
    We should dedicate some spare CPU cycles to try and fight unfair moderation, he, right AC?

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  56. Wait until we decode the signal by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1

    I'm sure we'll find that those pesky aliens just encoded an alien goatse jpg into a radio wave and sent it to us so we could compare.
    Yay, aliens slashdotters are no different, what did you think ?

    1. Re:Wait until we decode the signal by Gropo · · Score: 1

      Hey, for all we know our Goatse is a spitting image of their own Rebecca Romijn-Stamos...

      Their Goatse might be a kitten hanging from a branch with "Hang in there" written in some foreign tongue to our eyes.

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  57. Let me guess the message.. by MindSlap · · Score: 1

    Lemme guess...

    "Send money, food, toilet paper"...
    Your son.. University of Iowa.

  58. Carl Sagan was an idiot? by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

    He fantasized science fiction?
    Need I say more?

    --
    "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
  59. Another Possible Message by Snowgen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Greetings, earthling!

    Now Your Fliddleton Can Be Bigger and Longer!

    This Doctor Approved Enhancement Ray Will Actually Help You Expand, Lengthen And Enlarge Your Fliddleton Safely and Naturally

    100% MONEY BACK GUARANTEE

    Click Here

    You subscribed to the fliddleton.com newsletter as SETI@EARTH.SOL. We hope you enjoyed receiving this mailing, but if you are receiving it in error, please visit here to unsubscribe and you will automatically be excluded from any future mailings.

    Thank you, and please excuse any inconvenience.

  60. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    data returned from SETI@Home users is beign retested

    Too bad that those CPU cycles can't be used for spellchecking Slashdot submissions.

  61. If the universe has a sense of humor by saddino · · Score: 2, Funny

    the signals will be calls to American Idol.

    Advance note to comic book guy:
    Yeah, yeah, I do know they couldn't have received those TV signals from Earth yet.

  62. Re:aliens, war? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Go ask about unnecessary wars in a NY fire station. Please.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  63. a million turtles vs one hare by hashmap · · Score: 0

    Just because there might be a million computers doing SETI it does not mean they are a million times more effective that one computer doing SETI...To me SETI is a concept that sounds fascinating, it is easy to implement, provides great exposure to the university and people doing it yet in the end I just do not see how real science can come out of it.

    Consider the time it takes to synchronize all that data, the time it takes to recheck and validate the results, the costst associated with the bandwith, storage etc... consider the hacks and tricks people play for fun

    Why not take a 100 node beowulf cluster, optimize the searching code using the best and most effective techniques, fire it up and let it run. It will beat millions of computers all doing some small redundant parts of the same problem. It will still be cheaper thatn SETI@home. We all grew up with the story of the tortoise and the hare, but the rabbits in science do not go to sleep... In that case we all know how the story would have ended.

    But it is not like SETI should be shut down. No other project provides more effective outreach and involves the public the way SETI does. Even if it just an illusion, keep it running folks. h.

    1. Re:a million turtles vs one hare by sirgoran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Part of the problem is the cost. By using the distributed method, they are actually getting the best bang for the buck. The cost of building the kind of computer to crunch the numbers, or renting the time on someone's system is simply too high.

      By spreading the work around the world to the 4 million subscribers, the cost of the project really is quite low. It also allows them to pay for more time at the observatory (they have to pay to use the telescope).

      Basically, it may not be faster, but it is cheaper in the long run.

      -Goran

      --
      Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  64. What about sending out our own space signals?? by mech_attack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about sending out our own space signals??

    We have been sending out weak radio and TV signals into the universe for over 50 years now ( and more...) However, I doubt that any of these same signals coming from other solar systems would be detectable by us.

    Instead of listening in to E.T. - Why don`t we go ahead and beam out stronger signals to `local` planets that would seem like likely candidates to harbor civilizations. For instance, http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~mwm/planet.html, these seem like they could be potentially good targets.

    It could be, like SETI, a joint effort too. In order to sustain the signal on a certain timeframe, specific dishes around the planet set up by amateurs and universities could be responsible for targetting specific planets for a number of days(hard due to earth's rotation). A central team would be responsible for targets and messages sent while others executed.

    I have sent this to the SETI institute as an idea, but never received a reply. If you agree that this is an interesting idea, maybe you could interest them in it too.
    http://www.seti-inst.edu/email.html

    Thanks.

    1. Re:What about sending out our own space signals?? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > What about sending out our own space signals??

      You mean the planetary equivalent of open-toed "fuck me" high heels?

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    2. Re:What about sending out our own space signals?? by D4rkm1lk · · Score: 1

      Yes, great idea - let's send out some nice powerful encoded signals, at a few hundred kilowatts to a few megawatts, at high enough frequencies to escape earth's effects, say a few gigahertz, from high-gain antennas which sweep the sky ...

      oh wait, we already do! Have a look at the transmitters used in NASA's DSN for the uplinks to the spacecraft all around the solar system, and the even bigger transmitters used elsewhere for planetary radar...

  65. Simple Challenge by dsci · · Score: 0

    Okay, let me rephrase ...

    Can you name one single article published in a refereed scientific journal written by Sagan, or that directly quotes Sagan's work as a scientist (not opinion writer)?

    Writing your thought and ideas is far from real science, which requires your thoughts and ideas to stand up to peer review. Sagan conveniently by-passed that step, yet is considered 'a great scientist.'

    Regards....

    --
    Computational Chemistry products and services.
  66. Bullshit by siskbc · · Score: 1
    Of course if there actually _are_ aliens out there and they're close enough for us to communicate with in a reasonable timescale, they might be able to tell us how to solve all those problems and many more. Not to mention that finding a sentient alien species would have a far greater impact on humanity than curing a few diseases.

    Every star within even remote communication distance has been checked for the slightlest possibility of life. Doesn't exist. So best case scenario is we find one 1000 light years away. Great. So ask them all your insightful questions, and, after they learn English (or whatever you ask them in), they'll get back to you. See you in a few millennia.

    I mean, shit, even if there were intelligent life on alpha centauri, it would take an 8-year turnaround...and there isn't life there.

    I'm all for optimism and all, but at some point ya have to actually think about this shit. Chances of finding life is slim, chances of knowing it when you find it is slimmer, chances of them explaining all of life's mysteries to us is nonexistent. So yeah, I think Folding@home is a helluva lot better as a project, because SETI isn't anything but a replacement religion for those who like believing in benevolent, omniscient aliens rather than a God.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Bullshit by kamog · · Score: 1
      Every star within even remote communication distance has been checked for the slightlest possibility of life. Doesn't exist.

      The constellation of OWL telescopes returned no pictures of planets with conditions suitable for life, and all the thousands of our Orion nuclear spaceprobes returned with negative results. Yeah right. Like we can even definitively check Mars for the possibility of life now...

      "Arrogance and ignorance walk hand in hand," as a certain rock group proclaimed (before they sold out and became RIAA shills).

    2. Re:Bullshit by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Then again, perhaps there are radio signals out there with the plans on how to build a transceiver to tap into the universal subspace network.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  67. Better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You spend your spare cycles on something I think is important, and I'll save on electricity and turn my computer off.

    That sounds like a much better idea.

    1. Re:Better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should just leave it off all the time...

  68. Can you imagine.. by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    Potential research value. Their science may be more advanced and would certainly be different from our own.

    heh, like when we were all kids, and got our Star Wars stuff together:

    "I have Chewbacca!"
    "EVERYBODY has Chewbacca"
    "Oh, well, I have R5D4!"
    "Yeah, I got two of those.. one's pink now. I left it in the sun."
    Wouldn't it royally suck if it started with some alien bitching because he can't get High Speed "TimmyNet" Access because the local phonophone company has a monopoly?

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  69. plans for transporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is Ms. Foster ready?

  70. I know how this ends... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Dammit, I wish we'd build the Macross Fleet BEFORE we advertised our position to the rest of the univers, y'know?

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  71. To The Human Race: by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    Please stop sending up those #$*!@$ ant farms!

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  72. I have deciphered an alien message... by bmalia · · Score: 1

    Dear Slashdot, SETI has been sending me encrypted alien messages hoping that my experience in cryptology would help unravel the mystery of our alien friends. I have always had a suspicion that a more advanced race would not encrypt their message, but rather compress them and what I have found is freakishly disturbing. When you take the static noise, and break the frequency into two groups, a high pitched group and low pitched group, and then assign a bit to each group, you can create a binary file from the recorded transmission. If you take several of these transmission binaries and name them in a trans.rar, trans.r01, trans.r02, fashion and then run them through WinRar, you get a big blob of uncompressed binary data. To my surprise, I named the newly created file to test.mp3 and gave WinAMP a try... The message is distorted a bit, the voices are scratchy and hard to make out, but if you listen closely, you can hear the following phrase repeated over and over:

    ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US
    ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US
    ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US
    ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US

    --
    There's no place like ~/
  73. Re:March 18th... Next Tuesday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't used to believe SexyGal when she said she was being moderated unfairly, but now I do.

    Yeah sure, you and all the other trolls make the claim.

    Boo Hoo.

  74. Total perspective vortex by Fizzl · · Score: 1

    ..Nuff said.

    (sorry if i misspelled it, i have only read the Finnish version)

  75. Space Defense. by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I think if we had an obvious proof of a civilisation so "near" from us a lot of governement woudl begin seriously of a way to make space defense, protect Sol system, while other would be smithing plan to invade or send (gasp) missionar there and convert people to the true and only god (insert name here : christ, allah, jeovah,Shiva, goublibougah).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Space Defense. by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      You mean to imply that there are still those who do accept Goublibougah as the One?

      Looks like it will be awhile before any Aliens deign to come speak with us heathens then;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Space Defense. by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > I think if we had an obvious proof of a
      > civilisation so "near" from us a lot of
      > governement woudl begin seriously of a way to
      > make space defense, protect Sol system,

      Umm, "it would be like us going out of our way to step on an ant hill in Africa."

      In the highly unlikely event that there aren't many civilizations, and that one nearby us is even remotely within technological striking distance, then a computer controlled gigantic reflective mirror to focus the sun's rays might be just about all we could do.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  76. First Message: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello. How are you? My name is Jerry.

  77. SETI signal decoded... by XNormal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "First post!"

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    1. Re:SETI signal decoded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on moderators, that's funny. :)

      I saw several posts with humorous "Decoded SETI Signals" earlier modded up to +5, Funny.
      I doubt that the /. classic "First Post!" is any worse nor better than that. :^)

  78. Star Trek IV by JasonMaggini · · Score: 1

    On the new Trek IV DVD, the trivia subtitles reference a display at Uhura's station, explaining the technical details of a spectrum analyzer, then adds "Or she might be running the SETI@Home screensaver."

    Thought that was a pretty cool reference.

  79. Yet another possible decoding of the signal by One+Louder · · Score: 1

    "..and that's how you cure cancer!"

  80. To Serve Man... by Wag · · Score: 1

    Delicious!

  81. SETI going bust? by samhalliday · · Score: 1

    i heard a while ago that SETI@home only had this year left to live with funds... anyone else think this a bit suss?

  82. we come for wacko by tsoquark · · Score: 1

    alien: "bladerunner 0087 of sector 1435 dispatched for cleaning of runaway unit known as michael jackson aka wacko jacko. unit is considerd a total freak."

  83. Why SETI@home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not the other distributed projects that go toward finding a cure for Cancer or AIDS?

    I'm no mathmatician (sp?), but I think it's safe to say that we'll all be better off finding cures to diseases than finding another race that is either non existant, or choosing not to be found.

  84. it would really suck... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    ...if the aliens had some form of "Prime Directive" that would prevent them from sharing any of their knowledge with us... I'm thinking of that heartless "Enterprise" epsiode where Archer finally made the decision NOT to help that spacefaring species cure their fatal (to their species) genetic disease in favor of letting the dimwitted simpleton species inherit their *earth* from it... However, it would be funny if they challenged on *prior art* grounds all of Microsoft's IP and then the whole company got carted away, to be used for food for the lizard aliens far far away... And that's why I run SETI! (spare the Xbox division though) ...I wanna see Diana in all her 80's glory hair, cleavage, and red leather outfit!

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  85. My Favorite Jack Handey by rhfrommn · · Score: 3, Funny

    The best Jack Handey I ever heard went like this:

    One day my son asked me "why does it rain?" I told him it rained when God was crying. Then he said "why would God cry?" and I told him "Oh, probably because of something you did."

    --
    My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
  86. Right...what next? by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
    Let's say the revisit to those good signals comes up with something that's pretty definitive (yeah, yeah, insert Contact reference here)....what next? Let's assume that we get a signal that is determinted to contain what seems like a cryptic language of sorts. So the SETI team sets out to find masters in cryptography and linguistics to translate the message. First of all, would the SETI team announce that finding? Would we all get to hear the signal, assuming they translate it into audible form?

    Now let's assume SETI breaks the news -- they've found a difinitive signal and have proven it to originate well out of our solar system. Now the cryptographers and linguistics pro's are on the case. How long before the public cries foul and demands the transmission be released to the public so we can all take a crack at it (SETI@Home2?).

    Now skip forward a bit and someone translates the message. What then? Do we all just sort-of say, "hey...cool" and carry on with what we're doing? I guess it would depend on what the message said. Let's say the SETI team translates the message, and the news it's transmitting ain't pretty -- would they tell the world?

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  87. interactive SETI uploads... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm wondering what the *ramifications* would be if the SETI Institute marketed a peripheral accessory kit that would take sample information on its users and then uploaded it to their server and then was beamed out into the cosmos. You know, like a home anal probing kit! Just think what the Zeta Riticulans could do with that info! No more tales of weird abductions of hillbillies or ignant 3rd World peoples who still haven't invented a plow or the wheel on their own... I think I'll patent the device using USB 1.1, USB 2.0, Firewire and Firewire800, Blue*toof*, and all versions of 802.11 for the computer interface... But something tells me Warren Cuccurulo is already working on it...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  88. My favorite Jack Handey by Rai · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's hard to believe that entire families can be torn apart by something as simple as wild dogs."

  89. Re:This isn't news by Snowspinner · · Score: 1
    Hmph. Well, let's try this again then.

    SETI is miles from serious or useful science. It's odds of success are, pardon the pun, astronomical. It's methods are questionable. The fact that it's rechecking some data isn't even remotely significant. I mean, I suppose with six billion people in the world, it's not that big a waste of time to have a few of them looking for space aliens. I'm less fond of SETI@Home, but only because there are so many more productive applications of the same theory. Punch data on medical research, for Christ's sake. Much better thing to do with your spare CPU cycles.

    As for the slam on Sagan... the fact of the matter is that Sagan, although a very good writer, made a nasty habit of blurring the line between science and politics. He is less a scientist and more an entertainer who positioned himself as a scientist. His audience was never academics and scholars. SETI was a project designed for armchair scientists and people watching TV. Not for serious study.

    There. Maybe that one'll just be "troll" instead of "flamebait".

  90. How can this be a waste, look at all the benefits. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    Considering up till Seti@home came along, ask anyone what distributed computing was and they'd scratch their head and say "I donno" "Worthwhile" endevors cannot begin until somebody completes the ground work and research. I think the Seti@home program is brilliant, even though I support UD cancer project now. They created a simple piece of software and for the cost of a few servers and bandwidth they ended up with one of the most powerful computers on the planet. Doesn't exactly sound like a waste of time to me. Once individuals, schools, research orginizations, and companies saw the potential of such a system and what kind of support it could receive, a great deal has been invested in projects that are "worthwhile". So don't knock the inovators they opened the door for everyone else to step through.

  91. He's out of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Daily Telegraph reported on February 16th that billionaire James
    Packer has left Scientology.

    "'He's out of it,' confirmed one mate, who did not wish to be named, but
    who insisted the billionaire media boss had cut all ties with the Church
    of Scientology. Packer, 34, started attending classes at the Church of
    Scientology in Sydney last year after close friend Tom Cruise introduced
    him to the religion. Just last month, Packer the younger flew to New
    Zealand to catch up with Cruise, who is shooting The Last Samurai in the
    North Island. But his dalliance with the celebrity-driven religion is
    definitely over, insiders assert."

    Message-ID: 80ee9418.0302161938.209b4d81@posting.google.com

  92. pbl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Street
    14 Ventnor Avenue

    City
    West Perth WA 6872

    Country
    Australia

    Telephone
    (+61) 8 - 9320 2466

    Facsimile
    (+61) 8 - 9320 2466

    E-Mail
    info@project-biotech.com

    Internet
    www.project-biotech.com

    Summary
    Microbial, Organic & Microbial Fertilisers, Recirculatory Aquaculture Systems, Organic Cleaning Products, Project Integrators

  93. Freaks on a leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EOM.. p.s Why must I be barraged with MS VS nonsense on this site?

  94. What are you running? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    The real question is not whether or not SETI@home is a waste of time, but what you are running on your machine, and if the answer is nothing, then why not?

    Past Projects:
    Seti@home 4400cpu-hours
    Presently:
    United Devices 5400cpu-hours
    Anthrax - completed
    Cancer & Small Pox - running

    1. Re:What are you running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would if they had a Linux version. Props to SETI for supporting a huge range of OS and archs.

  95. Re:Paul Harvey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got Paul Harvey doing his little infomercials, and in between them you get regular commercials.

    Haven't you just described all of American mass media?

    Journalism? Journalism in AMERICA? It's now called MARKETING.

  96. To Serve Man by uberdave · · Score: 1

    It's a CookBook!!!

    1. Re:To Serve Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That tentacle -- it's a penis!

  97. Re:aliens, war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is by far the stupidest thing i've ever read on slashdot. What do firefighters who were injured in New York after a terrorist attack by Saudi Arabia have to do with Bush going against the UN to invade Iraq?

  98. They decoded the message ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    .. do not resist, .. You will be assimilated!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  99. alien religions by SaXisT4LiF · · Score: 1

    Newsflash: Over 3 Million humans converted to the Church of Luke Skywalker of Latter Day Saints...

    can I use the force too?

    --
    Fight or flight its all the same
    Live to die another day

    --Ryan
  100. HEY Buddy by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    music is the only thing that keeps me on this god damned rock any more...sure i COULD be throwing caution to the wind running through the cold winter night so that i can become more physically fit so that i can singlehandedly win the war against the Americans, and then swim all the way across back the ocean so that i can bring strange european flowers back to my exigirlfreind who would then promptly have her life made better by me being in it again after saving the world ---- but unfortunately after a full day of study, philosophy class and fixing my Windows 3.1 box, i'm beat. i'm just out of inspiration. there's no real reason why i should continue any more, after all...
    Why am i in university? i thought i was going to be enlightened - only i didn't realize that this it's a cold barren journey across places i'd never travel across - a mind numbing process, the acedemics have for ages been known for their ability to systematically remove anything of talent from their ranks - i work for The Man, i don't do anything all day but study...but turning the music volume up to 8 on my new Tool-AENEMA CD makes at least this day Livable. Sure, i waste some time at slashdot which i could be doing otherwise...but after a day of philosophy i find it hard to resist challanging other's opinions on matters which have nothing to do with anything...and to otherwise take up the ranks of conversation in hope that i may say something meaningful to someone else, and accomplish my goals of philosophy in some way other than reading some essay by Moore or Chrisholm or other...

    i'll tell you why i'm wasting my time. i'm pacing myself. I've burned out far too many times to count, and i know right well that if you extend yourself too far you will not only do nothing productive - but you will also snap in your mindset. Jello Biafra outlined the process pretty well in his Saskatoon, Saskatchewan apperance in think in january 2002. once you burn yourself out you become one of those cold bitter people who is EXACTLY WHAT YOU WERE TRYING TO FIGHT TO BEGIN WITH. it's dialectic, and observable throughout the ages. there's no real reason why i can fight thousands of years of human history - i know my limits. i do what i can, and fight where i may. let god sort em out. i've had enough of this life thing, anyway.

    so all you people out there - take my advice...you don't have to be a hardcore vegan uberactivist direct action hero. do what you can, and pace yourself. people have been fighting 'the good fight' for years, and little progress has been made. treat yourself to a good album every now and then. i'd reccomend Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon for a good start. [i'd highly suggest not getting stoned, but 'whatever get's you through the night'.]

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:HEY Buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > music is the only thing that keeps me on this
      > god damned rock any more

      You definitely need to download some better pr0n.

      Lesbian turdswallowing, twin sisters giving each other french kisses and oral sex, as Q said, "There are treasures out there to satisfy desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid."

  101. Sound In Space by a!b!c! · · Score: 1

    How does the atmosphere effect how sound travels. I know sound travels differently underwater, so I was wondering what happens in a vacuum, or in different atmospheres.

    How come radio waves can travel in a vacuum(In Space) but sound waves can't? Or am I wrong?

    And yes, I know, nobody can hear you scream in space. But it seems, nobody can hear me scream on Earth(or least nobody reacts to me).

    1. Re:Sound In Space by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Radio waves aren't sound. That's why you can't hear them.

      Sound waves are vibrations of the medium (air, or water, or rock, etc.). Radio waves are not vibrations of the medium. They don't need any medium. They are made of photons. Or rather, there is a wave-particle duality, where the same wave can either be viewed as a wave or as a set of photons.

  102. I feel special by cpk0 · · Score: 1

    Weee, they mentioned my ./ post on the screen savers!!! I wish they would say who submited those, but oh well, at least i can feel special!

  103. OT (Re:bizarro universe) by mandolin · · Score: 1

    I don't know why you were rated troll. I'm sure sorry I didn't vote (no I don't live in Florida), and I will be doing my part in the next election. At the time it was like "how much worse could Bush be than Gore?" .. and now we know :-)

  104. IT'S A COOKBOOK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They want to convert us...

    ...into a high-protein powdered concentrate.

  105. Yep, that's a waste. Sad but true. by SysKoll · · Score: 1

    Face it, we all want to believe in the (nice) alien next door. Heck, I want to believe, too.

    But then, let's see. Suppose there IS indeed an intelligent alien civilization nearby. Can we actually detect it with SETI? Yes, but only provided that:

    • This civilization uses radio for long range telecoms. This assumes that nothing better than radio will ever be available for that purpose. Of course, it's impossible to predict if anything better will ever be discovered, but it seems presomptuous. Just like these 19th century writers that waxed lyrical about how the telegraph was the ultimate achievement of signal transmission.

      AND

    • This civilization has no compression. OK, nothing better than radio exists and will ever exist. Radio it is. Everyone in our friendly neighborhood uses it. But wait, they don't compress their signal. SETI relies on the fact that artificial patterns can be found in signal. But compression, by definition, removes repeatable patterns, leaving only what looks like noise for better "signal entropy" (or bandwidth utilization efficiency). Isn't it contradictory? On meek Earth, we are already starting to compress radio signals for all new applications because radio spectrum is so scarce. Yet we are looking for aliens that use huge radio powers and no compression.

    So we're looking for very intelligent aliens that are particularly clueless. A convention of intergalactic Microsoft developers, maybe? (Naah. That would not be likely to remain undetected. Think of the size of the egos.)

    So while I strongly believe we aren't alone in the universe, I think that SETI is not going to give any result. It's a waste. Quasar1999 is bloody right.

    -- SysKoll
    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:Yep, that's a waste. Sad but true. by Patrick13 · · Score: 1

      So while I strongly believe we aren't alone in the universe, I think that SETI is not going to give any result. It's a waste.

      Yes, but we are talking about signals that take decades or centuries to arrive to earth. I think it is naive on your part to assume that an alien race would develop non-radio transmission technology from the offset.

      That is sort of like assuming that a civilization using paleolithic technology will immediately start producing steel implements because they are superior to ones made of stone, copper, bronze or iron.

      It is reasonable to assume that a civilization will develop long distance communications technology on a gradual basis as new discoveries and improvements are made.

      Further up the thread someone else states that an alien civilization will have completely enclosed their star with a Dyson sphere, therefore we won't detect their transmissions.

      All I can say is that it may be unlikely that we'll detect a transmission, since SETI has only been monitoring signals since the 70's. However, I believe that it's more likely that we'll detect an alien civilization's transmissions than that an alien civ. will have completely "buttoned" up their broadcasts in anticipation of extraterrestrial monitoring.

      --
      ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
  106. Re:What a waste... too many assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can aim at a star system, hoping that there are aliens inhabiting the star system, but that makes the assumption that the aliens haven't closed off their sun using a dyson sphere.

    To find the really interesting, advanced aliens, you have to listen where there is no bright star. The reason for building a dyson sphere is not only to silence all emissions, it's to recover every last joule of energy from the sun, instead of just letting it escape into space.

    There's a slight chance that a star in the process of being dysoned can be spotted, though it's anyone's guess how long the aliens would take to dyson wrap their sun. You might have to watch a star for years or centuries. On the other hand, anyone with a telescope and a camera might be able to spot that.

  107. Depressing... by dargaud · · Score: 1
    I see lots of replies that should have been marked as funny, comparing war-like aliens to GW, but what depresses me is that they are all modded as 'insightful'. It's frightening to imagine him as a Vogon...

    On a more serious note, anyone knows, with our current radio-telescope technology, from what distance could we still detect the current background noise (TV, radio...) that the Earth emits ? 1 light-year ? One Hundred ? It's an inverse square law, yes, but you also get plenty of same freqs from different countries interfering together once you get far enough. My guess is that satellite transmissions would go pretty far since they are targetted beams...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  108. Re:aliens, war? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    As I suggested, go debate the fine point of this in a NY fire station. If you ever regain consciousness, you will have a clear understanding about what one has to do with the other.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  109. It's because of spectrum compression by SysKoll · · Score: 1
    Yes, but we are talking about signals that take decades or centuries to arrive to earth. I think it is naive on your part to assume that an alien race would develop non-radio transmission technology from the offset.

    Actually, it's not naivete, it's careful reasoning. Let me explain.

    I don't think it's necessary to assume a civilization will have "buttoned up" their transmission. All I am saying is that we'll not be able to tell them apart from noise.

    To understand this, take a look at radio technology here on Earth.

    What we observe on earth is that after about a century of radiotransmissions, we have advanced the use of spectrum to the point where most new applications are using compression and frequency-hopping. Older applications (e.g. regular analog TV broadcast) are getting phased out. It's safe to estimate that in another 30 years, spectrum will be so scarse that no uncompressed broadcast will be allowed. Compression and frequency-hopping remove repetitive patterns in signal and spread it over the available spectrum. Such transmissions look like noise.

    So from the point of view of an alien, our future broadcasts will look more and more like noise (due to compression) and less and less like patterned, artificial transmissions. You can say that from 1900 to 2050, Earth will obviously broadcast artificial signal. Before that, zilch. After that, noise undistinguishable from the radio noise of, say, Jupiter.

    Now assume you are alien Zorg on planet X at N light-years from Earth. You run a SETI-like program to find intelligent broadcast sent from the vicinity of our star. To have any chance, you have only a very limited time frame: Years 1900+N to 2050+N.

    That is a very thin period of time in the history of things. Chinese and Egyptians have a 4000-year old history, and any advance civilization will also have a very long history. Yet, the very nature of radio broadcast gives you a mere 150-year sliver during which a SETI-like program has any chance of success.

    If there is any advanced civilization within a few hundred light years, chances are they already went waaay past the spectrum compression stage and that by the time we started SETI, all we could pick is noise-like.

    Now, if you can find a mistake in these assumptions, feel free to pinpoint them.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:It's because of spectrum compression by Patrick13 · · Score: 1

      What we observe on earth is that after about a century of radiotransmissions, we have advanced the use of spectrum to the point where most new applications are using compression and frequency-hopping. Older applications (e.g. regular analog TV broadcast) are getting phased out. It's safe to estimate that in another 30 years, spectrum will be so scarse that no uncompressed broadcast will be allowed. Compression and frequency-hopping remove repetitive patterns in signal and spread it over the available spectrum. Such transmissions look like noise.

      Perhaps you've never been to the third world? I live in Mexico, and I see taco vendors on the street corner that have a little portable TV running. Now, I know that the US is planning to phase in digital only TV signals in the next few years, but the first world is not the sole producer of radio transmission on the planet.

      Also, I believe there are no plans to digitize or compress short wave transmissions. So that means that "alien Zorg on planet X at N light-years from Earth" will still be able to receive the voice of America and the BBC home service, along with, I am sure, the signals of a couple of die hard setiathomers who will build a transmitter based on some kit that was featured on slashdot. In fact I believe such a device was integral to the plot of Jimmy Neutron - Boy Genius.

      BTW, even digitized signals show regular patterns that indicate that they are artificially generated.

      --
      ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
  110. Die hards would have to do it... by SysKoll · · Score: 1

    You'll have to rely on your die hard geeks, because even thirld-world countries ultimately will go digital and spectrum compression. For one good reason: after a while, it will be cheaper. Just as today, a CD player is much cheaper than an analog 33RPM pick-up table, whether it's in Bamako or in Tokyo.

    Also, I believe there are no plans to digitize or compress short wave transmissions.

    Right now, that's true. But you can bet that this will not stay true for very long. Evety band of the radio spectrum becomes increasingly crowded. Just wait until every gadget on Earth has its own transmitter. The spectrum will be full of spread-spectrum bursts that will make regular analog transmissions absolutely impossible, because all you'll pick will be interferences. The only way to get any signal over the waves will be to have a digital receiver-transmitter.

    I've seen and enjoyed Jimmy Neutron. Good animated. But hardly sound science. All it has done is convince me that all aliens want from Earthling is to sacrifice them to their god Poultra. So if I ever see one of these whacos broadcasting a signal that could betray Earth's position, I'll personally hack his transmitter into bits. :-)

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/