Ok, look at how Mozilla's Bugzilla usually handles the/. effect (eg. a separate page for/. referals). Setup a simple static page giving people permission to mirror when refered from a/. page. Maybe even have a static copy of your site available as a.torrent and encourage people to use that and start the mirroring process.
True it would be nice if the editors gave these sites some warning, but maybe the webmasters should make some preparations ahead of time.
Did *any* of the moderators see "South Park, Bigger, Longer, Uncut"? The whole problem in the movie is that the kids see the Terrance & Phillip movie with a bunch of profanity and start using it daily. This should be moderated +1 Funny, not Offtopic.
Not that your google query is bad, but keep in mind that Bridgeport is going out of business, so good luck finding new good machines. As an alternative, Republic Lagun seem to be good manual knee mills.
I would mod you unfunny but there's no such option.
I've been on a small campaign to add an equal and opposite moderation to the mod system, eg: for +1 Funny, there would be a -1, Not funny. -1 Troll, +1 Not a troll.
I know that this is offtopic, but does this sound like a good idea?
Why bother, when other servers are several times simpler to set up, smaller and faster? Pheh!
Because, when the time comes that you need a feature that Apache provides, you just setup the module and restart Apache. Otherwise, you have to change your server setup from (insert odd other web server here) to Apache and go through all the setup steps anyway.
I agree, it's not legally supported to download all the music and just send the artist a check. I also don't think that sending a check for $2 is appropriate. However, you say that you continue to buy CDs. Of the purchase price for the CD, how much of that money do you think the artist actually sees?
If (and this is a BIG if), people would download the tracks, and send the $10-$20 you would have paid for the CD to the artist, maybe artists would drop their worthless labels, start making their own recordings, and make the music available at a reasonable price (insted of production costs + label markup + distributor markup +...
Then again, Stephen King tried online only, honor system payments with one of his books and look what happened.
Imagine being an administrator of an all-Gentoo government department...you could easily update everyone from your own desk via terminal emulation, simultaneously from your office, while maintaining that humming little pentium II (if that high) buzzing in the corner as a portage download mirror for speed...
Although, consider that these systems running Win95 probably aren't the fastest systems around. Therefore, do you really want to do an emerge some-big-program on a gutless computer and wait 3 days while it builds?
I could see setting up a beefy server and building packages on that, then distributing the packages to the users. But, if you're going to do that, why not just use Debian as a base, run your own package repository, and have apt-get update cron jobs on the desktops?
Considering all the features available, it seems like this would be the ideal time to freshen up slashcode. Then, maybe we'd see valid HTML 4, CSS support, layout without n-level deep tables, etc.
The word is "insight". It isn't used at all in the linked article, and is misspelled twice in the original posting.
Roxio, the company that took Easy CD Creator and turned it into an unstable piece of garbage is going to do something with Napster? Good luck.
While occasionally, you'll find someone who says "The artists deserve to get paid for their work," most people say "CDs cost too much, and Kazaa, Gnutella, EDonkey, WinMX, etc. are free." If you really want to support an artist, download what you want from the P2P networks (or FTP or IRC), and send the artists a check in the mail. Cut out the middleman and show the RIAA that they aren't adding any value and don't deserve to get paid
By that I mean, will readers be able to make suggestions, corrections, etc. to the stories? Or, once submitted, the story is "set in stone" and won't be updated?
Also, will someone begin "karma whoring" and mirroring pages and posting links to the mirrors?
Visit the W3 PNG test page using IE and Mozilla. IE doesn't fully support PNG, why would you expect Paint (IMHO the worst image editor EVER) to fully support the PNG format?
If Windows.net produces html & javascript that isn't cross-browser compatible developers can either switch over entirely to mono or perhaps just use the equivalent mono dll ( System.Web.dll? ) (which I presume will be made to produce cross-browser html & javascript) in place of the Microsoft one.
But, doesn't that mean that you are no longer using.net, you're using.mono. Also, if.net specifies that the html + javascript is written in one fashion, and.mono deviates from that,.mono is no longer considered.net compatible.
If anything, this may be the first real indication that Miguel and the.mono group is wasting their time by trying to implement a "standard" that is created and controlled by MS
They figured out a way to make a feature work on a platform that doesn't support that feature. That's called innovation, and not in the terms that Microsoft would use it.
Furthermore, since this has been reverse engineered, they might be able to work this into NetBSD, thus fixing the problem of NetBSD not supporting multi-threading. I say, "congratulations."
Have you been to any modestly large cities in the Midwest? I'm not talking about Chicago, IL, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, or Indianpolis,IN. I'm talking about cities like Madison, WI, Rockford, IL, or Des Moines, IA.
Most of these cities score reasonably high on quality of living surveys and are hardly "white-trash wastelands". Take a week and visit before going off on a stereotype.
You're thinking of Jeff Dunham and Peanut.
Ok, look at how Mozilla's Bugzilla usually handles the /. effect (eg. a separate page for /. referals). Setup a simple static page giving people permission to mirror when refered from a /. page. Maybe even have a static copy of your site available as a .torrent and encourage people to use that and start the mirroring process.
True it would be nice if the editors gave these sites some warning, but maybe the webmasters should make some preparations ahead of time.
Ok, just checked. Mozilla 1.3 - WinXP - Site works.
Debian Testing - Mozilla 1.0 - Site Works.
Debian Testing - Konq. 2.2 - Site works.
Looks like the problem's somewhere else.
Ctrl+PgUP / Ctrl+PgDown
Don't feel bad, someone pointed it out to me also.
Did *any* of the moderators see "South Park, Bigger, Longer, Uncut"? The whole problem in the movie is that the kids see the Terrance & Phillip movie with a bunch of profanity and start using it daily. This should be moderated +1 Funny, not Offtopic.
Posting logged in with karma to make the point
Not that your google query is bad, but keep in mind that Bridgeport is going out of business, so good luck finding new good machines. As an alternative, Republic Lagun seem to be good manual knee mills.
I've been on a small campaign to add an equal and opposite moderation to the mod system, eg: for +1 Funny, there would be a -1, Not funny. -1 Troll, +1 Not a troll.
I know that this is offtopic, but does this sound like a good idea?
This is the first mention of bugzilla not allowing /. referrals in the comments. How the fuck is that redundant?
Motion to remove redundant from the moderation system. All in favor...
Say of the school admin, Dean's office, etc. and send packets on a port commonly used by P2P?
Also, is there a reward for turning someone in on this violation? Sounds like a money maker for some poor geek who happens to be able to fake traffic.
Not planning for the future?
Why wouldn't you take a free (speech/beer) server like Apache and deploy it?
So again, what's your beef with Apache? And, what do you suggest insted?
Because, when the time comes that you need a feature that Apache provides, you just setup the module and restart Apache. Otherwise, you have to change your server setup from (insert odd other web server here) to Apache and go through all the setup steps anyway.
Overrated and underrated are the dumbest moderations on /. Fortunately, there's an easy way around that.
In doing this, you would eliminate the cowardly over/under rated moderation, which isn't subject to meta-moderation.
I agree, it's not legally supported to download all the music and just send the artist a check. I also don't think that sending a check for $2 is appropriate. However, you say that you continue to buy CDs. Of the purchase price for the CD, how much of that money do you think the artist actually sees?
If (and this is a BIG if), people would download the tracks, and send the $10-$20 you would have paid for the CD to the artist, maybe artists would drop their worthless labels, start making their own recordings, and make the music available at a reasonable price (insted of production costs + label markup + distributor markup +...
Then again, Stephen King tried online only, honor system payments with one of his books and look what happened.
Although, consider that these systems running Win95 probably aren't the fastest systems around. Therefore, do you really want to do an emerge some-big-program on a gutless computer and wait 3 days while it builds?
I could see setting up a beefy server and building packages on that, then distributing the packages to the users. But, if you're going to do that, why not just use Debian as a base, run your own package repository, and have apt-get update cron jobs on the desktops?
Considering all the features available, it seems like this would be the ideal time to freshen up slashcode. Then, maybe we'd see valid HTML 4, CSS support, layout without n-level deep tables, etc.
- The word is "insight". It isn't used at all in the linked article, and is misspelled twice in the original posting.
- Roxio, the company that took Easy CD Creator and turned it into an unstable piece of garbage is going to do something with Napster? Good luck.
- While occasionally, you'll find someone who says "The artists deserve to get paid for their work," most people say "CDs cost too much, and Kazaa, Gnutella, EDonkey, WinMX, etc. are free." If you really want to support an artist, download what you want from the P2P networks (or FTP or IRC), and send the artists a check in the mail. Cut out the middleman and show the RIAA that they aren't adding any value and don't deserve to get paid
</rant>And "Special Edition Longhorn (Build 4008)"
By that I mean, will readers be able to make suggestions, corrections, etc. to the stories? Or, once submitted, the story is "set in stone" and won't be updated?
Also, will someone begin "karma whoring" and mirroring pages and posting links to the mirrors?
Visit the W3 PNG test page using IE and Mozilla. IE doesn't fully support PNG, why would you expect Paint (IMHO the worst image editor EVER) to fully support the PNG format?
Wonder no more. IE6 on Win98 performed every test flawlessly. YMMV, IANAL, etc.
But, doesn't that mean that you are no longer using .net, you're using .mono. Also, if .net specifies that the html + javascript is written in one fashion, and .mono deviates from that, .mono is no longer considered .net compatible.
If anything, this may be the first real indication that Miguel and the .mono group is wasting their time by trying to implement a "standard" that is created and controlled by MS
There is. See here
They figured out a way to make a feature work on a platform that doesn't support that feature. That's called innovation, and not in the terms that Microsoft would use it.
Furthermore, since this has been reverse engineered, they might be able to work this into NetBSD, thus fixing the problem of NetBSD not supporting multi-threading. I say, "congratulations."
Have you seen the number of Penis increasing emails in the average AOL user's mailbox? These people should have the libido of a rabbit on ecstacy.
Have you been to any modestly large cities in the Midwest? I'm not talking about Chicago, IL, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, or Indianpolis,IN. I'm talking about cities like Madison, WI, Rockford, IL, or Des Moines, IA.
Most of these cities score reasonably high on quality of living surveys and are hardly "white-trash wastelands". Take a week and visit before going off on a stereotype.