Perhaps he could save a lot of trouble by just photographing or videotaping the license.
Sure, but he stressed (and I believe him) that small claims court is a fastpacedthing. No time to f' around and whine and get too technical, lest you get ruled against for just being a pain in the ass.
I don't think wheeling in AV equipment would ingratiate you with a judge trying to clear his docket in a timely manner. Since whether you installed it isn't the factor being decided here, I think you'd be wasting yours and the court's time.
If I spoke German, and could tell where the original breaks were, I'd have gladly put them in. On the google translation page, if I used the http:// function, it just kicked back the page title. I had to paste the story into the text area, which stripped the breaks off. Sorry to have ruined your day...dude.
The second senate of the Federal Constitutional Court forbade the court submitted damage suit of a group of US of American music author and publishing houses of the complaint guide (BF), American before US, today in the way of the provisional arrangement of the president of the higher regional court Duesseldorf for the duration of six months, at the latest up to a decision over the constitutional complaint, the Bertelsmann AG to let set in Germany. It concerns in the express procedure the following: The plaintiffs of the US-American output procedure state, the BF is in the meanwhile insolvent music exchange stock exchange "Napster" been and to that extent also for possibly copyright infringements committed by the music exchange stock exchange responsible involved. In the complaint procedure introduced as collecting complaint payment of damages at a value of 17 billion US dollar is stressed. The feed of the klageschrift is on the one hand condition for process in US American right, on the other hand one it is after German civil proceedings the condition for the later acknowledgment of the foreign judgement. The president of the higher regional court Duesseldorf granted the feed request of the plaintiffs for feed as responsible "central authority" after that Hague conventions over the feed of judicial and documents out of court abroad (HZUe) positively and issued a feed arrangement. The zustellungsversuch with the BF failed however because of nonacceptance of the document. The BF remained with their thereupon request posed for judicial decision against the feed arrangement before the higher regional court Duesseldorf without success. Hiergegen raised it in the main thing constitutional complaint. It makes an injury of its fundamental rights from art. 12 exp. 1 and art. 14 exp. 1 GG as well as from art. 2 exp. 1 GG valid. For its request for provisional legal protection it refers to the high probability of a forthcoming further zustellungsversuchs. With the feed the impairments of its fundamental right positions would occur and its business concern would negatively affect. From the reasons of the decision follows: 1. The constitutional complaint in the main thing procedure is neither inadmissibly nor obviously unfounded. The domestic legal order is not made fundamental the test yardstick for a feed after the HZUe. Exeptionally a feed request can be rejected however due to the reservation in the HZUe, if the asked state considers the feed suitable to endanger its sovereignty rights or its security. Federal Constitutional Court has decided in this connection already that the grant of legal aid does not hurt the general freedom of action in connection with the constitutional state principle by the feed of a complaint, with which requirements on punishing payment of damages are made valid after US-American right. With the fact however it remained open whether the feed of such a complaint with art. is to be agreed upon 2 exp. 1 GG in connection with the constitutional state principle, if the goal aimed at with the foreign complaint offends obviously against indispensable principles of a liberal constitutional state. If procedures before national courts in an obviously abusive way are used, in order to make with publizistischem pressure and the risk of a condemnation a market participant gefuegig, this German constitutional law could hurt. Clarifying the question, whether this border is exceeded in the available case, remains reserving the main thing procedure. This is more near implemented in the decision in detail. 2. The decision to favour of the BF is issued due to a consequence consideration. If the provisional is issued request in accordance with arrangement, although the constitutional complaint turns out unfoundedly later however than, the feed of the complaint in the way of the legal aid would have only retarded. Irreparable prejudices for the plaintiffs of US of American output procedure do not connect themselves with it recognizably. However if the decree of the provisional arrangement is omit
I find the best part of doing the 'mini-goals' is that as I see more and more things physically checked/crossed off, my pace picks up. When you see so many things scratched off and fewer things left, it's like seeing the finish line.
For a project or even just my 'to-do' list for each workday, I sit down and write down all the stuff, and then tape it up on the side of my monitor. After lunch, when I see 50% or more of the things crossed off, I start to really work fast, as I know if I finish early, I can just leave work or goof off for the rest of the day and have a PBR.
When I was in school, the only way I could get any studying done was to be in the most boring place I could be at. If I stayed in my room, my roomate would come in and we'd go work out or get dinner, or...
If I went to a coffee shop, I'd either find myself people watching or someone I knew would come in a sit for awhile. (With wireless more common today in coffee shops, you may have to physically take you card out to ensure concentration.)
If I studied in the University Union, it was loud and I'd still see people I knew. So, I used to end up at the library or to the warehouse that housed the school printing press (I had keys, and there wasn't a soul around...very boring).
Now that I have a job (copywriter) and a laptop, when I absolutely have to get something done, I have to yank my ethernet out and go sit in another room with my laptop. I'm shocked at how much of my day is dicking around on the internet. I'm also shocked at how little I want to play with the apps on my laptop when it's unplugged and I have to do some writing.
As to all the people that have listed so many good methods so far, I noticed a lot of 'reward yourself's. This is fine, and if it works to set mini-goals, then more power to you. But once in the real world, there's no time for a granola bar or a game of Burning Monkey Solitaire every half hour. You will need to learn how to be rewarded by the completed job at hand. When you are doing projects that clients and employers are paying for (rather than school assignments) it feels good to finish something you can be proud of. This good feeling is what you will need to strive for to be your 'reward'. Good luck!
This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable,
Fine, get excited about the technology involved here, but spare me the statements like that. Everytime I ride to work, I keep a car or about 1/30th of a bus off the road. (I realize I'm not actually 'keeping the bus off the road', but work with me here.) I don't even need to go on about what a retarded statement that is, to call bicycles anything but a vehicle of sustainability.
What's next? Smack-talking a water powered car because it's a drought season?
Perhapse I want to bring my wireless equiped Zaurus so I can IM with my friends who can't make it to the game.
Happen to RTFA? You can. The service is provided from outside the stadium, and they (PGE Park) can't do shit about it. Nowhere did I say PGE Park was in the right on this (or for that matter doing anything to shut down the wireless, as many people who didn't RTFA seem to think).
...thinks that PGE Stadium is smoking crack to declare themselves the owners of all communications in the stadium.
No, apparently you didn't RTFA. They didn't claim to own all communications in the park, "This is our stadium, and we run the communications for it,". They said they run the communications they do have (Comcast, a "major sponsor") and they don't like headlines like "PGE Park gets free Wi-Fi thanks to Personal Telco and Moonlight Staffing".
"Their service might be the greatest thing since sliced bread. That's beyond the point," Metz said. "I just don't like the way it's been portrayed in the press release without our consent."
No God complex. Just a person who doesn't want one of their large sponsors to get pissed by a confusingly worded headline and ensuing publicity.
Yes, I'm married. Yes, I've gone to Giants, A's, and Portland Beavers games with my wife. Yes, I have a lot of fun. No, I don't particularly like baseball.
Even if you don't like ball, I find the whole experience and terrific park food and the sun and the crowd to make for a good time.
I surely would've just stayed home and played Counter-strike
I've been to the park a handful of times, and it's a great, historically restored park. Tons of tradition, and good ol' fashioned 'ballparkness'.
If you can't leave your stupid wireless equipped laptop for enough time to enjoy an evening at the park, have a beer and a dog, then I pity you. Not that I think the park has a leg to stand on here, but those on the other side obviously know nothing about what going to the park is all about.
The Digital Radio Mondiale system (the next-generation digital replacement for radio broadcasting under 30 MHZ) builds on the audio coding of MPEG-4 AAC.
A ha! They said their files have very little DRM. But, LOOK, right there! They said that DRM is the next generation! The future! Ahrg!
Well, I see it as pertinent that the very same technology being "FUD'd" up in the thread, is the same that has the potential to increase the security of their families.
Granted, this is a different argument than the assertion that people without kids can't fully grasp what rights kids deserve, but both discussion are happening here.
As to your first comment, nowhere is my admittedly hyperbolic example, did I say they were strangers or known, and frankly it doesn't matter. You probably know people who have sex crimes in their past, unbeknownst to you.
Tell you what. I'll cede that no parent deserves the absolute right to know where their kid is if they want to, if you clear up all those pesky laws that hold me responsible if a minor of my household does something stupid and hurts/injures someone.
OK, so instead of using an explicit example of when a parent might be concerned about their child (and thus deserves to control their privacy), if I had just said...let the writers read them in 15 years when their daughter leaves the house..., would that have prevented you from erecting your gargantuan straw man?
he URL points to Griffin Technologies, a strange manufacturer
Or maybe the submitter of a non-story to slashdot whom accidently submitted his own roller cleaner website instead of the great peripheral manufacturer...
Anyone who thinks that children's privacy shouldn't be subject to parental discretion is not a parent.
...or is still one of the children in question. I would love to keep some of these comments in this thread and let the writers read them in 15 years when their 8 year old daughter is walking to school through their neighborhood containing ??? sex offenders (remember how y'all objected to the 2009 criminal notification proposal due to it's implemetation of rfid tags?).
And hitting a kangaroo is of course impossible with a human driver?
You say that like it's a bad thing. One of my greatest joys as a youth out combining grass seed, was watching mice try to run the "combine belt treadmill" and stay out of the spinning jaws of the thresher.
Certain crops are grown in rows (or furrows) where the dirt is mounded up in rows, the crops are planted in the mounded rows and then water is either applied, or in the case of dryland farming, captured from rain.
When dealing with rowed crops, you pretty much have to drive your tractors down the rows. In fact, since some crops are planted at different row widths, one of the things I got frequently saddled with as a kid was helping Dad jack up the tractors, and using gigantic wrenches to widen and narrow the tires on the tractor axel, depending on which field he would be working.
When it comes to crops planted on flat ground (wheat, grass seed, etc (I'm not familiar with common crops of Australia)), most of the time you are in the field is only when planting and harvesting. When applying fertilizer when the crop is young, we hired a "swamp buggy" to come apply sprays or liquid fertilizers. They are vehicles with huge, wide, monster truck-like tires that cause virtually no compaction. And the harvesters, or combines, also have exceptionally wide tires as well. With crops like wheat, you are rarely in the field with a standard tractor at any point in the crop cycle.
So I'm assuming these reports are for row crops, and I still don't get how a modified regular tractor causes less compaction than a tractor driven by even a moderately skilled farmer.
I'm not saying I doubt the numbers they are quoting for yield improvements, it's just that I doubt them.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure, but he stressed (and I believe him) that small claims court is a fastpacedthing. No time to f' around and whine and get too technical, lest you get ruled against for just being a pain in the ass.
I don't think wheeling in AV equipment would ingratiate you with a judge trying to clear his docket in a timely manner. Since whether you installed it isn't the factor being decided here, I think you'd be wasting yours and the court's time.
I have a job like that for you. Just post your email here, and I'll send you all the information.
If I spoke German, and could tell where the original breaks were, I'd have gladly put them in. On the google translation page, if I used the http:// function, it just kicked back the page title. I had to paste the story into the text area, which stripped the breaks off. Sorry to have ruined your day...dude.
The second senate of the Federal Constitutional Court forbade the court submitted damage suit of a group of US of American music author and publishing houses of the complaint guide (BF), American before US, today in the way of the provisional arrangement of the president of the higher regional court Duesseldorf for the duration of six months, at the latest up to a decision over the constitutional complaint, the Bertelsmann AG to let set in Germany. It concerns in the express procedure the following: The plaintiffs of the US-American output procedure state, the BF is in the meanwhile insolvent music exchange stock exchange "Napster" been and to that extent also for possibly copyright infringements committed by the music exchange stock exchange responsible involved. In the complaint procedure introduced as collecting complaint payment of damages at a value of 17 billion US dollar is stressed. The feed of the klageschrift is on the one hand condition for process in US American right, on the other hand one it is after German civil proceedings the condition for the later acknowledgment of the foreign judgement. The president of the higher regional court Duesseldorf granted the feed request of the plaintiffs for feed as responsible "central authority" after that Hague conventions over the feed of judicial and documents out of court abroad (HZUe) positively and issued a feed arrangement. The zustellungsversuch with the BF failed however because of nonacceptance of the document. The BF remained with their thereupon request posed for judicial decision against the feed arrangement before the higher regional court Duesseldorf without success. Hiergegen raised it in the main thing constitutional complaint. It makes an injury of its fundamental rights from art. 12 exp. 1 and art. 14 exp. 1 GG as well as from art. 2 exp. 1 GG valid. For its request for provisional legal protection it refers to the high probability of a forthcoming further zustellungsversuchs. With the feed the impairments of its fundamental right positions would occur and its business concern would negatively affect. From the reasons of the decision follows: 1. The constitutional complaint in the main thing procedure is neither inadmissibly nor obviously unfounded. The domestic legal order is not made fundamental the test yardstick for a feed after the HZUe. Exeptionally a feed request can be rejected however due to the reservation in the HZUe, if the asked state considers the feed suitable to endanger its sovereignty rights or its security. Federal Constitutional Court has decided in this connection already that the grant of legal aid does not hurt the general freedom of action in connection with the constitutional state principle by the feed of a complaint, with which requirements on punishing payment of damages are made valid after US-American right. With the fact however it remained open whether the feed of such a complaint with art. is to be agreed upon 2 exp. 1 GG in connection with the constitutional state principle, if the goal aimed at with the foreign complaint offends obviously against indispensable principles of a liberal constitutional state. If procedures before national courts in an obviously abusive way are used, in order to make with publizistischem pressure and the risk of a condemnation a market participant gefuegig, this German constitutional law could hurt. Clarifying the question, whether this border is exceeded in the available case, remains reserving the main thing procedure. This is more near implemented in the decision in detail. 2. The decision to favour of the BF is issued due to a consequence consideration. If the provisional is issued request in accordance with arrangement, although the constitutional complaint turns out unfoundedly later however than, the feed of the complaint in the way of the legal aid would have only retarded. Irreparable prejudices for the plaintiffs of US of American output procedure do not connect themselves with it recognizably. However if the decree of the provisional arrangement is omit
I wonder is the photographers will be mad if I try to write a )( on their camera?
For a project or even just my 'to-do' list for each workday, I sit down and write down all the stuff, and then tape it up on the side of my monitor. After lunch, when I see 50% or more of the things crossed off, I start to really work fast, as I know if I finish early, I can just leave work or goof off for the rest of the day and have a PBR.
If you can actually limit game playing to a set time, then you have the responsibility level of a London Royal Guard, and you need no help whatsoever.
My freshman year at college, I used to sit down for a couple games of solitaire, and then 3 hours later, I'd blink and wonder how it got to be 2 am.
If I went to a coffee shop, I'd either find myself people watching or someone I knew would come in a sit for awhile. (With wireless more common today in coffee shops, you may have to physically take you card out to ensure concentration.)
If I studied in the University Union, it was loud and I'd still see people I knew. So, I used to end up at the library or to the warehouse that housed the school printing press (I had keys, and there wasn't a soul around...very boring).
Now that I have a job (copywriter) and a laptop, when I absolutely have to get something done, I have to yank my ethernet out and go sit in another room with my laptop. I'm shocked at how much of my day is dicking around on the internet. I'm also shocked at how little I want to play with the apps on my laptop when it's unplugged and I have to do some writing.
As to all the people that have listed so many good methods so far, I noticed a lot of 'reward yourself's. This is fine, and if it works to set mini-goals, then more power to you. But once in the real world, there's no time for a granola bar or a game of Burning Monkey Solitaire every half hour. You will need to learn how to be rewarded by the completed job at hand. When you are doing projects that clients and employers are paying for (rather than school assignments) it feels good to finish something you can be proud of. This good feeling is what you will need to strive for to be your 'reward'. Good luck!
Fine, get excited about the technology involved here, but spare me the statements like that. Everytime I ride to work, I keep a car or about 1/30th of a bus off the road. (I realize I'm not actually 'keeping the bus off the road', but work with me here.) I don't even need to go on about what a retarded statement that is, to call bicycles anything but a vehicle of sustainability.
What's next? Smack-talking a water powered car because it's a drought season?
Perhapse I want to bring my wireless equiped Zaurus so I can IM with my friends who can't make it to the game.
Happen to RTFA? You can. The service is provided from outside the stadium, and they (PGE Park) can't do shit about it. Nowhere did I say PGE Park was in the right on this (or for that matter doing anything to shut down the wireless, as many people who didn't RTFA seem to think).
No, apparently you didn't RTFA. They didn't claim to own all communications in the park, "This is our stadium, and we run the communications for it,". They said they run the communications they do have (Comcast, a "major sponsor") and they don't like headlines like "PGE Park gets free Wi-Fi thanks to Personal Telco and Moonlight Staffing".
"Their service might be the greatest thing since sliced bread. That's beyond the point," Metz said. "I just don't like the way it's been portrayed in the press release without our consent."
No God complex. Just a person who doesn't want one of their large sponsors to get pissed by a confusingly worded headline and ensuing publicity.
Even if you don't like ball, I find the whole experience and terrific park food and the sun and the crowd to make for a good time.
I surely would've just stayed home and played Counter-strike
Never mind.
If you can't leave your stupid wireless equipped laptop for enough time to enjoy an evening at the park, have a beer and a dog, then I pity you. Not that I think the park has a leg to stand on here, but those on the other side obviously know nothing about what going to the park is all about.
A ha! They said their files have very little DRM. But, LOOK, right there! They said that DRM is the next generation! The future! Ahrg!
Well, considering they are offering WMA, I'd say you'd, unfortunatley, be pretty safe in saying 'none'.
Granted, this is a different argument than the assertion that people without kids can't fully grasp what rights kids deserve, but both discussion are happening here.
As to your first comment, nowhere is my admittedly hyperbolic example, did I say they were strangers or known, and frankly it doesn't matter. You probably know people who have sex crimes in their past, unbeknownst to you.
Tell you what. I'll cede that no parent deserves the absolute right to know where their kid is if they want to, if you clear up all those pesky laws that hold me responsible if a minor of my household does something stupid and hurts/injures someone.
I'd just like to know for future reference.
to streaming archives of the show you won't have to miss
Or maybe the submitter of a non-story to slashdot whom accidently submitted his own roller cleaner website instead of the great peripheral manufacturer...
Oh sure, then everyone will think I just sit around the house all day... Oh, wait...
You say that like it's a bad thing. One of my greatest joys as a youth out combining grass seed, was watching mice try to run the "combine belt treadmill" and stay out of the spinning jaws of the thresher.
Does this make me sick?
So, is that better or worse than "girls gone wild" in my backyard?
When dealing with rowed crops, you pretty much have to drive your tractors down the rows. In fact, since some crops are planted at different row widths, one of the things I got frequently saddled with as a kid was helping Dad jack up the tractors, and using gigantic wrenches to widen and narrow the tires on the tractor axel, depending on which field he would be working.
When it comes to crops planted on flat ground (wheat, grass seed, etc (I'm not familiar with common crops of Australia)), most of the time you are in the field is only when planting and harvesting. When applying fertilizer when the crop is young, we hired a "swamp buggy" to come apply sprays or liquid fertilizers. They are vehicles with huge, wide, monster truck-like tires that cause virtually no compaction. And the harvesters, or combines, also have exceptionally wide tires as well. With crops like wheat, you are rarely in the field with a standard tractor at any point in the crop cycle.
So I'm assuming these reports are for row crops, and I still don't get how a modified regular tractor causes less compaction than a tractor driven by even a moderately skilled farmer.
I'm not saying I doubt the numbers they are quoting for yield improvements, it's just that I doubt them.