they really hate hearing themselves in their headphones if what they're hearing is coming in 100 ms later than when they're making the sound.
Well, the human can play along with the delayed recording. Of course, that means that any sound recorded is automatically 100ms too late.
Surely there is a means to write the live audio to the place where it was 100ms ago, thus cancelling out the delay?
Exactly. I trade off between total paranoid security and usability here - I know the network here isn't the most secure, but it's more usable than our corporate network which is what this network was built to get around.
Good lord. What a lot of nonsense that looks like. I wonder why they haven't taken it to extremes and have "Windows Webserver", "Windows Fileserver", "Windows Domain Controller", etc versions. Surely Workstation, Server, and maybe Advanced Server (for clustering, load-balancing, etc) are the only versions really needed. All the rest are so they can gouge a few more pounds/dollars/euros/yen out of the users.
Still - I'm not worried - it looks like England will win the Test, and I run Linux, so all is well.
That's quite an interesting theory. Are there any links about it? Because I'd have thought that it would take a lot longer for that effect - evolutionary timescales.
Why remove - why not just disable, and make it an entry in a config file to re-enable it? I'm all for removing any software that is insecure, but this might cause trouble for users trying to access sites. It's all about choice, people.
gk etc # myisamchk/var/lib/mysql/apachelogs/access_www.foo.com.MYI Checking MyISAM file:/var/lib/mysql/apachelogs/access_www.foo.com.MYI Data records: 361086 Deleted blocks: 341998 myisamchk: warning: Table is marked as crashed - check file-size - check record delete-chain
myisamchk: warning: Found 110043532 deleted space in delete link chain. Should be 110043308 myisamchk: error: Found more than the expected 341998 deleted rows in delete link chain myisamchk: error: record delete-link-chain corrupted - check key delete-chain - check index reference - check record links myisamchk: warning: Found 110048856 deleted space. Should be 110043308 myisamchk: warning: Found 342010 deleted blocks Should be: 341998 MyISAM-table '/var/lib/mysql/apachelogs/access_www.foo.com.MYI' is corrupted Fix it using switch "-r" or "-o"
Thanks for that.
I wonder if it's to do with the way the UK and the US talk about companies.
UK: The BBC is (as though it were an entire entity)
US: The BBC are
The DBAs I worked with always told me "Postgres is better". But I tried it a good few years ago, couldn't install it, it didn't "just work", and I was not that good with Linux at the time, so I just moved on to the next thing - MySQL.
MySQL was good enough, and all the stuff that hardened DBAs said to me - "It doesn't do transactions", or "It handles NULLs wierdly", etc, just didn't apply.
But when I tried to do a query like this: SELECT * FROM foo where bar NOT IN (SELECT blib from wheee) - MySQL advised me that it "didn't do" "NOT IN" queries. I tried to work around it, but after trying all the JOINs I could, it just didn't seem like something that I could get round. (I wasted quite a long time trying to work around this, and although I'm sure that some really top DBAs out there can do it, I couldn't.)
So, mysqldump > mysql.dump, and then restore into Postgres.:%s/mysql_/pg_/g in all my PHP files. Change mysql_error to pg_last_error, and fiddle with pg_num_rows, and it all worked. Moreover, one huge query that took 25 seconds to complete in MySQL (lots of JOINS and nastiness) took about 1 second in Postgres.
I've never looked back. MySQL is now just coming to fill in all the gaps it's missing - but just go with Postgres. It's rather good.
No mention of SQL servers can go without the Gotchas: Mysql and Postgres. The worst MySQL is probably that it modifies data as you insert it without throwing an error. Yuk.
I would much prefer to be able to carry on using my signature. Someone standing behind me wouldn't be able to knock me over the head, and go to a cashpoint to withdraw cash after seeing me sign my name. Sure you can forge them, but it's a bit harder than punching in 4 numbers.
if i can't take the train somewhere, or walk somewhere, i don't get there. simple enough, and i would say my quality of life is superlative as a result.
Train from Bristol to London, maybe standing all the way. £80. Hire car, + petrol for a day: £50. It only works if you have a public transport system that is designed to make peoples lives better, not make profit.
Hah! I always love it when I hit a Wiki page that has "The neutrality of this article is disputed" at the top. Means you're in for an interesting read.
I'm confused. I am connected all well and fine, but I've tried to add my "normal" Jabber account in. No request, nothing. I hope Google aren't going to keep it's Jabber users locked in and unable to contact the rest of the Jabber world. That's equivalent to only letting their SMTP servers talk to their SMTP servers.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, the human can play along with the delayed recording. Of course, that means that any sound recorded is automatically 100ms too late.
Surely there is a means to write the live audio to the place where it was 100ms ago, thus cancelling out the delay?
Exactly. I trade off between total paranoid security and usability here - I know the network here isn't the most secure, but it's more usable than our corporate network which is what this network was built to get around.
Good lord. What a lot of nonsense that looks like. I wonder why they haven't taken it to extremes and have "Windows Webserver", "Windows Fileserver", "Windows Domain Controller", etc versions. Surely Workstation, Server, and maybe Advanced Server (for clustering, load-balancing, etc) are the only versions really needed. All the rest are so they can gouge a few more pounds/dollars/euros/yen out of the users.
Still - I'm not worried - it looks like England will win the Test, and I run Linux, so all is well.
That's quite an interesting theory. Are there any links about it? Because I'd have thought that it would take a lot longer for that effect - evolutionary timescales.
I believe that the role McGregor is playing is based on the life of Nick Leeson/a.
Hmmm. 1 million gmail accounts, and a corporate PGP keyserver so that all corporate email is encrypted....
Me strokes chin...
Goatsex Man!
Troll.
a. Image 1 PC and dump onto others.
b. Create binary packages on 1 PC and install on others
c. Use thin clients
To make an omelette, you have to break a few eggs. Put the eggs in a sack, and drive over them all at once. Then make a lovely Linux omelette.
Why remove - why not just disable, and make it an entry in a config file to re-enable it? I'm all for removing any software that is insecure, but this might cause trouble for users trying to access sites. It's all about choice, people.
I had an MC-202 - similar in sound output, but not "cool" like the 303. Wish I still had it... :(
Uhuh. Yep, **now** it has it.
Thanks for that.
I wonder if it's to do with the way the UK and the US talk about companies.
UK: The BBC is (as though it were an entire entity)
US: The BBC are
Is that a typo? Cos I would always have said "lego is".
Where are you from.... Just wondering....
The DBAs I worked with always told me "Postgres is better". But I tried it a good few years ago, couldn't install it, it didn't "just work", and I was not that good with Linux at the time, so I just moved on to the next thing - MySQL.
:%s/mysql_/pg_/g in all my PHP files. Change mysql_error to pg_last_error, and fiddle with pg_num_rows, and it all worked. Moreover, one huge query that took 25 seconds to complete in MySQL (lots of JOINS and nastiness) took about 1 second in Postgres.
MySQL was good enough, and all the stuff that hardened DBAs said to me - "It doesn't do transactions", or "It handles NULLs wierdly", etc, just didn't apply.
But when I tried to do a query like this: SELECT * FROM foo where bar NOT IN (SELECT blib from wheee) - MySQL advised me that it "didn't do" "NOT IN" queries. I tried to work around it, but after trying all the JOINs I could, it just didn't seem like something that I could get round. (I wasted quite a long time trying to work around this, and although I'm sure that some really top DBAs out there can do it, I couldn't.)
So, mysqldump > mysql.dump, and then restore into Postgres.
I've never looked back. MySQL is now just coming to fill in all the gaps it's missing - but just go with Postgres. It's rather good.
No mention of SQL servers can go without the Gotchas: Mysql and Postgres. The worst MySQL is probably that it modifies data as you insert it without throwing an error. Yuk.
I would much prefer to be able to carry on using my signature. Someone standing behind me wouldn't be able to knock me over the head, and go to a cashpoint to withdraw cash after seeing me sign my name. Sure you can forge them, but it's a bit harder than punching in 4 numbers.
Train from Bristol to London, maybe standing all the way. £80. Hire car, + petrol for a day: £50. It only works if you have a public transport system that is designed to make peoples lives better, not make profit.
Why is it that it seems the US is so keen to send in troops: "They have M-16s and are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot and kill and I expect they will," Kathleen Blanco said., and test out it's latest anti-civilian weaponry?
It's easy enough for the US to get thousand pound bombs to Iraq, but saving people in its own country seems to take a back seat. Why not use all that money, and technology for good, and help the poor, the elderly, the pregnant, the disabled.
That's not what I notice. We're so used to hearing other nationalities trying to speak English that we do it automatically. Maybe it's just me....
Or 254.
Hah! I always love it when I hit a Wiki page that has "The neutrality of this article is disputed" at the top. Means you're in for an interesting read.
But that looks like it refers to the Voice Chat functionality. I'm just talking about plain ol' XMPP based subscription and messaging.
I'm confused. I am connected all well and fine, but I've tried to add my "normal" Jabber account in. No request, nothing. I hope Google aren't going to keep it's Jabber users locked in and unable to contact the rest of the Jabber world. That's equivalent to only letting their SMTP servers talk to their SMTP servers.
I don't see 23 in that list.