Slashdot Mirror


Sonic 'Lasers' to be Deployed in Hurricane Region

MacDork writes "Wired News is running an article about high powered acoustic technology to be deployed in the hurricane Katrina disaster recovery. Apparently, the technology will allow authorities to communicate with others up to a mile away along with providing a non-lethal means of crowd control. No word on additional busses and shelters..."

619 comments

  1. obligatory by coaxeus · · Score: 4, Funny

    how about some frickin sharks ?

    --
    My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    1. Re:obligatory by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative
      Already there.

      "Officials said a 3-foot (0.9-metre) shark had been spotted cruising the flooded streets"

    2. Re:obligatory by OctoberSky · · Score: 0, Troll

      Speaking of Sharks... it appears the Bush Whitehouse has just jumped one.

    3. Re:obligatory by zephc · · Score: 1

      Looters and Gators and Sharks, Oh my!

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:obligatory by coaxeus · · Score: 0

      there there, it will be ok.

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    5. Re:obligatory by mikefe · · Score: 0, Troll

      It seems to me that it only takes a few people who the joke is either new to them and thus funny, or one of those old jokes where it still makes you chuckle whenever you see it.

      If they have mod points, then you should be able to see why this happens.

      You can always change the point value of a "funny" mod in your prefs...

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    6. Re:obligatory by blackicye · · Score: 1

      FWIW I came to this thread looking for lame shark jokes.

    7. Re:obligatory by OctoberSky · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Sharks... I think the Bush Whitehouse just jumped one.

    8. Re:obligatory by coaxeus · · Score: 0

      Me too.. didn't see any though, so had to contribute. Just like when someone posts about "podcasting" there has to be the necessary amount of people wishing harm upon the poster. Remember kids, slashdot comments are SERIOUS BUSINESS.

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    9. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could always get MTV PimpMyRide to paint an attacking white shark on each pickup truck with one of these accoustic lasers installed on the back.

    10. Re:obligatory by Bertie · · Score: 1

      That would imply they were any good to start with...

    11. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor, stupid shark. 100% dead already.

    12. Re:obligatory by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      I was looking for Alan Parsons Project jokes myself ("laser" being in quotes in the article's title).

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    13. Re:obligatory by Sanksa+Wott · · Score: 1

      Ive heard this a million times, and never knew...
      from wikipedia:

      Jumping the shark is a metaphor used by US television critics since the 1990s. The phrase, popularized by Jon Hein on his web site, jumptheshark.com, is used to describe the moment when a television show or similar episodic medium is in retrospect judged to have passed its "peak" and shows a noticeable decline in quality. Most "jump the shark" moments follow a noticeable change in the show, such as a main cast member leaving or a change in setting, which are subsequently quoted as the marker point signifying when the show's decline started. Frequently "jump the shark" is used to describe a series that has undergone drastic changes as a result of a ratings decline that has already occurred, especially when the changes do little to halt or reverse this decline. Hein also uses the "jumping the shark" concept to describe other areas of pop culture, such as music and celebrities, for whom a drastic change was the beginning of the end.

  2. Bus Report by toupsie · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    No word on additional busses and shelters...


    Geraldo is reporting there are "buses" at the New Orleans Convention Center.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Bus Report by jangobongo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What gets me is, why weren't the buses rolling in to pick up people and give them rides away from these areas before the hurricane hit. As soon as it was obvious that Katrina was aiming for these areas, why couldn't they have used all these buses to to start moving people out.

      And why not move in the food and water before the storm hit, and have it already there for those who will need it. I guess foresight and planning ahead no longer applies, even with all the models and predictions concerning hurricane disasters in that area.

      Then, too, there will always be some people who will say, "I'm not leaving. I'll just take my chances." Then these same people yell the loudest about not being helped out of the situation they got themselves into. (Note: I am not referring to those too ill or feeble to move, or who just can't for some reason, nor to those who may be too poor to be able to find the means to leave.)

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    2. Re:Bus Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      short answer:

      the people that matter were already out of there.

      that's also the reason why more resources are spent on protecting property and chasing "looters" than actually helping people.

    3. Re:Bus Report by Silentnite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mobilizing a Relief-force for 1 million people+ is a lot harder then we've been led to believe. Especially when the damage was so widespread.

      A large percentage of those people down there really had no way to get out but walk, and so chose to stay. Yes we should have tried getting all the busses and such there sooner, but I think in all reality we're doing as much as we can.

      Sadly there are cases of people shooting at the relief helicopters and looting in a time like this. With relief on the way some of these people are looting guns leaving the food and shooting at the people there to help.

      Then with the news coming out about the forced rape situations down in the Dome, I'm starting to wonder if a small minority of stupid people is ruining the press for this.

      Its sad to think, but it may be possible with all this bad publicity, and the cries that we're doing nothing may end up becoming a self-fullfilling prophecy.

    4. Re:Bus Report by eyeye · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those elderly patients must have just been stubborn eh!

      In other news, america goes to war against its own population:

      Troops begin combat operations in New Orleans

      By Joseph R. Chenelly
      Times staff writer

      NEW ORLEANS -- Combat operations are underway on the streets "to take this city back" in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

      "This place is going to look like Little Somalia," Brig. Gen. Gary Jones, commander of the Louisiana National Guard's Joint Task Force told Army Times Friday as hundreds of armed troops under his charge prepared to launch a massive citywide security mission from a staging area outside the Louisiana Superdome. "We're going to go out and take this city back. This will be a combat operation to get this city under control." ...

      While some fight the insurgency in the city, other carry on with rescue and evacuation operations. Helicopters are still pulling hundreds of stranded people from rooftops of flooded homes.

      http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1077 495.php

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    5. Re:Bus Report by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Theft is one of the simplest crimes, satisfying a need without physical harm to someone else. The reason that looting is being suppressed is that as the social order degrades, instances where violations of societal norms are seen to occur without punishment become more acceptable. This furthers the breakdown of order, and the level of the crimes will increase as time goes by and nothing is done. Desperation and fear feed the chaos, and eventually it becomes impossible to control without drastic measures.

      Enforcing order in a situation such as this is critical in saving lives, because it provides a sense of returning structure to the lives of the affected people. Without that, further restoration efforts, including returning electricity to the area, become impossible, and more people suffer because food and water remain unavailable and hospitals cannot function.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    6. Re:Bus Report by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Quick bit of back-of-the-envelope math:

      500 buses * 40 people per bus = 2000 people

      How far away should they have been taken? Lets say 30 miles -- it's short. Chances are, a round-trip for that bus, factoring in traffic, loading and unloading times, refueling, and so forth, would have averaged two hours, so they could have moved 24,000 people in a day. If they had started at midnight on Friday morning and kept going until midnight Saturday (well after the airport had closed), they could have moved 48,000 people.

      How many people stayed behind? I've heard estimates of up to 200,000, meaning 2000 buses would have been needed to move all of the people -- if that many could even be found and deployed.

      People just are not grasping the logistical challenges here.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    7. Re:Bus Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not in the disaster recovery business, so I'm just guessing here. I think New Orleans became a special case that we just weren't ready for. Southern Mississippi got hit a lot harder, but recovery is going faster because we have access. New Orleans would have been alright (relatively) if the levee hadn't broken, but when it did the situation got far, far worse than hurricane damage. Plus, between the flooding and the broken bridges it became really hard to get people and supplies in and out of the city. Then with the looting and shooting the recovery effort had to be put on hold until we could provide some safety for the people trying to help.

      From what I've read, the emergency teams and supplies are deployed before the hurricane, just outside of town. Afterwards, they are moved to where they can be of most use, and put into service. I doubt they were prepared for the levee break, though, so they wouldn't have had enough.

      According to the Corps of Engineers rep, the levees were designed for a Cat 3 storm, and they performed exactly to spec. I guess the disaster guys have been predicting this situation for a while, too. So, maybe we should have known better and been more prepared (especially since NO could have been hit directly, which might have broken the Mississippi side and flooded the city much worse). I can't tell from here. I think things just compounded in a way that threw the whole system off. The city looked okay after the storm, until the flooding started. Rescue was proceeding until it became unsafe. Then the Guard and Reserves needed time to rally and go in force. They seem to have their shit together now, so things should improve (such as it is) from here.

      Hopefully we will learn good things from this, and be better prepared for the next disaster. Being jaded, I think it just as likely that we will learn the wrong things from this, and spend a lot of money on preparing for events that happen once a century, followed by cutting back because it's too expensive, followed by being unprepared again, but with more people in office running the new departments (and sucking up resources for excessive political infrastructure).

    8. Re:Bus Report by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Quick bit of back-of-the-envelope math:

      500 buses * 40 people per bus = 2000 people


      Yikes!

      500*40= 20,000 people.

      Big difference.

    9. Re:Bus Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      why not move in the food and water before the storm hit, and have it already there for those who will need it.

      Probably because they would want it somewhere safe that would survive the hurricane. The nearest guarranteed safe point (high enough to be sure that it wouldn't be flooded) from New Orleans is about 80 miles away.

      The Red Cross has always refused to build shelters in the area of New Orleans since they didn't want to build a shelter that would likely be demolished.

    10. Re:Bus Report by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Spend much time hungry and on top of a roof?

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    11. Re:Bus Report by darthlurker · · Score: 1

      Just another image of the buses left behind.

    12. Re:Bus Report by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      Because the mayor of New Orleans apparently can't plan ahead either without help from the Feds.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    13. Re:Bus Report by mikael · · Score: 1

      Is that a surprise? The most desirable areas of real estate are on the coast, epecially hills, dockland areas and beach fronts (See Dodgers Stadium, Kelo vs. City of New London, London Docklands etc...)

      The effects of hurricane Katrina will give property developers and city officials the excuse to invoke the urban blight and eminent domain legislation and reclaim the land for more profitable purposes. The main barrier to the regeneration of deprived areas is always street crime. Now, with the all the civilians out of the way, they can use whatever force is necessary.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re:Bus Report by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It'd have to go about a hundred miles, and such a journey would take all day. Maybe 10,000 people could have gotten out.

    15. Re:Bus Report by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spend much time hungry and on top of a roof?

      No, and I don't expect to. Because if I were to live my whole life in a below-sea-level town on a coast that gets hit with hurricanes every year, I'd probably save up the same amount of money it costs to buy one pizza, and put a few liters of water and a couple dozen snack bars in a cheap backpack, along with a $3 flashlight and some toilet paper, and be way, way ahead of the thousands of people in that town that decided not to do anything to help their town have less of a disaster on their hands.

      There's no excuse for watching that storm approach for days, and not doing the simplest things to prepare yourself for a Tuesday-through-Thursday wait while the buses and helicopters get lined up. Of course that wouldn't have made everything just peachy for every person - but it would have hugely reduced the stress on the local help that was supposed to be taking care of the local people while other resources moved in. Honestly - it's like being responsible for your own well being is so out of fashion that a little food and water is too much to think about in advance, even as the news and your own city government is screaming at you about it.

      Of course, there were thousands and thousands of people who did take care of themselves enough to not slow down emergency workers with other priorities - but those people didn't make for very dramatic sound bites, and since they weren't as ready to bitch about the government, there just wasn't any Pulitzer-winning spin to extract.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    16. Re:Bus Report by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      500 buses * 40 people per bus = 2000 people

      Wow. That's some really bad math there. You might wanna think about bringing a calculator with you next time...

    17. Re:Bus Report by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      In other news, america goes to war against its own population

      You're an ass. The conflict, here, is New Orleans being attacked by a small number of its own residents. Of course, a small number of New Orleans residents has been attacking that town for years (see the extremely high ongoing murder rate, not counting this week). But if there weren't what's left of retailer's clothing and shoe inventories being stolen, houses being looted for small fencable items, sporting goods stores being raided for firearms, and then gangs of people ambushing ambulances and staking out clinics to steal narcotics, or organizing rapes in the shelters... it only takes a small number of people doing these things to require a huge response from law enforcement. You'd rather that wasn't done? The people that have to wade into areas where authorities are being shot at are exactly facing combat issues. Calling it anything else is nonsense, and glosses over the situation that the city's punk contingent has made many-fold worse.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:Bus Report by ugmoe · · Score: 1
      I'm sure there will be plenty of blame to go around - but if the city had been evacuated a lot of the suffering and death would have been avoided.

      http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:wE7Dn7WQ_9kJ:ww w.thewmurchannel.com/hurricanes/4887230/detail.htm l+new+orleans+%2Bmayor+evacuation+%2Bdinner+%2Bsun day+%2Bsaturday&hl=en

      According to the Louisiana governor: "Blanco said President George W. Bush called and personally appealed for a mandatory evacuation for the low-lying city, which is prone to flooding."

      But the Mayor had to sleep on it on start the evacuation the next morning:

      http://weblog.sinteur.com/?m=20050828

      In an interview on Eyewitness News, Nagin said his Saturday night dinner was interrupted by an urgent call from Governor Kathleen Blanco who asked Nagin to call the Hurricane Center.

      Nagin said the Hurricane Center Chief told the mayor that if it was possible at all, he should order an evacuation due to winds that could reach 145 miles per hour sustained and 170 mile per hour gusts.

      Nagin said he would consider ordering evacuations by Sunday morning and may employ buses and trains to help get people out of the city.

      The mandatory evacuation was ordered Sunday morning at 10 AM - over 14 hours after the president, governor, and the chief of the Hurricane center had requested it.

    19. Re:Bus Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all.

      500 * 40 = 20,000 people, thats a lot of people... would be nearly 1/4 of a mill with your own 2 hour thinking.

      Secondly, You think they'd have 40 people on the bus, even if it was only a 40 seater. There are coaches that can carry upwards of 90.

      The army vans that they trasport troops for deplyment can carry 100s of people a trip and would be faster than busses.

      'They' just didn't try to get people out of there!

    20. Re:Bus Report by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Well, I did say back of the envelope, and being a computer person, I'm rather stuck without a calculator. :)

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    21. Re:Bus Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you knew exactly where the center would hit, when, and with what force, and how far inland it would go with what force, and how much water, and where the levee would get hit by flotsam, and where exactly the levees would break, and when, and how many police, buses and weapons it would have taken to forcibly remove 100,000 people, which is an illegal act; well, then you and the thousands of media and psychics who know just about everything there is to know about what everyone else should have done, are morally and personally responsible for the disaster, knowing as you undoubtedly do all things which shoulda woulda coulda been done by people who actually had the responsibility and not telling anyone. If I didn't suspect you haven't reached your fifteenth year, and have a beer in your sweaty little hands, I would feel offended that you opened your mouth.

    22. Re:Bus Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a native of slidell, north of the lake for those of you who are unfamilliar with the area, the notion that there would have been TIME to coordinate comercial vehicles, ie the greyhound and other private charter busses that have been being used to evacuate people, is just plain wrong. By the time the busses could have gotten to new orleans it would not only have forfieted the lives of the drivers but would have also lost any and all supplies that would have been bussed into the city. Keep in mind that some of the hardest hit parts of the city of N'awlins (btw that's how it is pronounced, not new or-LEANs) are 22 feet below sea level. Also keep in mind that the area hit by the storm, not just New Orleans but the entire gulf coast is 90,000 square miles. That is simply enormous. The people who chose to stay behind that had the means to evacuate are responsible for thier own fate. They were warned and knew it was going to be catastrophic, as did everyone along the gulf coast. It is just part of the risk of living in the area, similar to the risk of earthquakes in California, or the risk of tornadoes in the midwest.

              I don't mean to come down hard on you but unless you have lived through a cat 4 or 5 hurricane you simply do not have the ability to concieve of the level of devistation. The most effective illustration for you would be to imagine an f3 tornado that has some parts that are f4 who's diameter is measured in hundreds of miles, not feet. If you have ever seen the devistation from a severe tornado, then you have seen on a very small scale the level of wind damage.

      If you have seen the horrific flooding in the central us in the last few years then you have some idea of the flood damage involved.

      If you have ever seen the effects of a tidal wave, then you have some idea of the destructive power of a storm surge.

      Please, if you have not seen first hand the magnitude of such a disaster, do not presume to criticize those who are helping others in need as fast as they can.

      Yes, they were ill prepared, but that cannot be changed. What can be done from today onward is what is important. Helping those in need now is what is important. Pointing fingers and second guessing decisions is not going to help at this point. If you really want to make a difference, get off your ass and head to the gulf coast and lend a hand, otherwise think before you speak.

    23. Re:Bus Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if I were to live my whole life in a below-sea-level town on a coast that gets hit with hurricanes every year, I'd probably save up the same amount of money it costs to buy one pizza, and put a few liters of water and a couple dozen snack bars in a cheap backpack, along with a $3 flashlight and some toilet paper, and be way, way ahead of the thousands of people in that town that decided not to do anything to help their town have less of a disaster on their hands.

      You may note that people a town that gets hit by hurricanes "every year" might not expect yet another hurricane to be much different than the last twenty. Most likely, most of those people did set food aside. They just didn't expect a levee to break, have their homes flooded, and end up fleeing without any food or water.

      But you apparently would have been prepped with a backpack and a plan to run out into the storm if things got too rough.

  3. What a horrible mess... by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No word on additional busses and shelters...

    *sigh*

    I am having a hard time with this one. I think the camel's back was broken sometime last week. What person in their right mind would decide that shooting out the eardrums of an already broken people would be of any tactical use at all?

    What a clusterfuck NOLA has become. Buncha dimwit politicians can't wrap their heads around the value of human life, the need for expidited aid for refugees (and how not to treat a refugee like a criminal), so they figure it's best to simply treat it as a run-of-the-mill race-riot.

    Good luck with that situation, Uncle Sam, you're gonna need all the luck you can get at this point.

    With the response thus far, I wouldn't be surprised if the whole south broke into complete chaos. Might not happen this time, but the water is starting to boil, as is the blood of every American, uniformly.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as is the blood of every American, uniformly.
      br I'm quite content actually.

    2. Re:What a horrible mess... by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Cost cutting at it's finest. They decided to build levys that only handle a category 3 storm, even though a category 5 storm hit really close (IE: Camile). So, instead of spending the money to upgrade the levys, they decided to spend it on other things....and here we go, look what happens.

      I think the delay in the response was because it looked like New Orleans didn't suffer much. Until the levy broke, which I believe was late on Monday night......

      I live in Earthquake country. I really think politicans should take note. Don't cost cut construction projects. Levy, bridges, buildings. Doesn't matter. Spend the money, avoid disaster.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:What a horrible mess... by bladernr · · Score: 5, Informative
      and how not to treat a refugee like a criminal

      Are you serious? Most of my (large) family live in New Orleans and the surrounding parishes, and I speak with them as often as possible (sometimes the phone lines are too jammed to get through). You should get some real information.

      The police and authorities are not treating people all the same. There is no firing into crowds, and that sort of thing. No doubt the authorities are overwhelmed and need all the outside help they can get, but they are coping as best they can. If people are shooting, looting (not food - TV's, etc), causing violence and intimidation, they are being treated like the common criminals they are. If they are people in distress who need help, everyone is trying to get help to them.

      As an aside, anyone trying to score poliltical points in either direction on the back of this disaster should be taken out back for summary execution. Sorry, I'm pretty close to this, and politics has no place until after this is sorted.

      A question though: I am living outside the US, so I don't know if any offers of foreign aid have come in. Not just money, but doctors, freshwater, etc. With the level of support sent by the US to disasters around the world (like the Boxing Day Tsunami), I wonder if the rest of the world is trying to help the US now?

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    4. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You must have missed the part where these "broken" people were shooting at the helicopters sent to rescue them, stealing big screen tvs, mugging and even killing each other because there's nobody around to stop them.

      I don't feel bad for the majority of them. I feel bad for the few here and there who were left behind in hospitals and such, or little kids who suffer at their idiot parents hands. The rest can rot there.

      Even worse, this whole situation is enough to turn someone into a racist.

    5. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      as is the blood of every American, uniformly.

      br I'm quite content actually.

      That is because you are not really American. Yes, you maybe do live in the US of A and have a house and a car or two and speak English and even have an American passport. Still, if your blood is not boiling at this you are not American. As in: you do not subscribe to the American values. That old, "quaint", Constitution of yours goes:

      "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America".

      But don't listen to me, a foreigner that I am, Ben Franklin said it better: "We must all hang together, or, assuredly, we shall all hang separately."

      And if what is going on in the South is to your "content", separately you will hang, indeed.

    6. Re:What a horrible mess... by globalar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not that I don't share some of your opinion, but this article has very little to do with New Orleans. From the article:

      "In mid-90's morning heat at Edwards Air Force
      Base, HPV Technologies and American Technology demonstrated prototypes of non-lethal sonic devices for a group of military and law enforcement guests, including representatives of the U.K. Home Office.

      Representatives of both companies say that within days, they will ship some units of their respective products to areas hit by Hurricane Katrina, so authorities can use the tools for crowd control, aid distribution and rescue operations."


      So it's a publicity stunt for corporations. They are sending them to Marine MP and hope they will get some free press when one of the thousands of reporters in the area gets the scoop of Marines using some scifi crowd control.

      I read nowhere any government official asking or endorsing this specifically for New Orleans. Maybe I missed it. It does mention the LAPD is looking at it and that the Navy already uses similar devices in Iraq. Never having been on the receiving end of crowd control techniques, I can't say this weapon is any better than things like tear gas. I would damn well like to know that before any member of any force uses it on anyone. Especially in an area with martial law.

      Of course, if there is a riot and the government does nothing, everyone will watch it on CNN and complain the government is not doing their job. So either the military ship thousands of individuals to handle upset people (vs. rescuing - or we could trail off about Iraq here too) or they use a allegedly non-lethal weapon. I'd prefer to pass judgement after we know all the details of what leaders and people alike are dealing with down there.

    7. Re:What a horrible mess... by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With the response thus far, I wouldn't be surprised if the whole south broke into complete chaos. Might not happen this time, but the water is starting to boil, as is the blood of every American, uniformly.

      The civil war is coming. Natural disasters are getting worse (a possible raise in the level of Hurricanes to 6?) and oil prices are rising.

      We have an administration in place that has questionable tactics and a family tradition to uphold. It's becoming more of a royal family than our traditional view of the Presidency.

      It's very possible that continuous war, raising inflation, and declining rights combined with natural disasters and oil prices may end up causing civil war.

      I'm scared.

    8. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're extremely uninformed. And I'd say there's no need for you to be 'turned into' a racist, since, given your commentary, you appear to be one already.

      Honestly, what you said was unspeakably unjust and cruel. I have nothing further to say to you.

    9. Re:What a horrible mess... by richdun · · Score: 1

      Moreover, I think this whole mess has very painful pointed out the lack of understanding some (emphasis on some) Americans have for different cultures and different socioeconomic situations. Your city floods, you have no car, no money, no food, and there are stores all around you - stores that for all practical purposes won't reopen commercially for weeks - and you're supposed to sit there nicely and wait for the nice aid people to get to you eventually? Or do you deserve no aid at all simply because when the order to evacuate was given, you stayed because you couldn't afford transport out of the area?

      It never ceases to amaze me how people underestimate the basic needs of a people in crisis - they don't need to know why the levees failed, or who cut the funding, and they certainly don't need someone telling them about all the warnings and orders to evacuate given in the days before the storm hit. They need food, shelter, a shower, clean clothing, etc. I hate to say it, but it sounds way too familiar - the only saving grace is that we haven't started blaming the lack of aid getting into the area on Louisiana insurgents.

    10. Re:What a horrible mess... by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      A question though: I am living outside the US, so I don't know if any offers of foreign aid have come in. Not just money, but doctors, freshwater, etc. With the level of support sent by the US to disasters around the world (like the Boxing Day Tsunami), I wonder if the rest of the world is trying to help the US now?


      Canada, and specifically my province of alberta is willing to send staff and write a cheque for aid, however there is no organization directing this aid yet.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    11. Re:What a horrible mess... by slashmojo · · Score: 5, Informative
      With the level of support sent by the US to disasters around the world (like the Boxing Day Tsunami), I wonder if the rest of the world is trying to help the US now?

      Well I have heard reports of aid being offered by many countries from sri lanka to israel, the uk and others.. some of that will no doubt be largely symbolic but still they were made..

      What I haven't heard is if the US has accepted any of those offers or if any of it arrived in the area yet.

      "Germany, France, Russia, Japan, Honduras and Sri Lanka are among countries that said they would send aid. A special United Nations task force is ready to help also, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said.

      Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, a target of criticism by the U.S., offered $1 million to the Red Cross through Citgo, the U.S. subsidiary of the country's national oil company. Cuba's President Fidel Castro offered to send 1,100 doctors and 26 tons of medicine to the U.S. Gulf Coast areas stricken by Hurricane Katrina, CNN reported last night."
      http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&si d=a3BvGso1ZFb4&refer=us

    12. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is the people that claims to bring peace and democracy elsewhere (let you guess where).

      I'm very very scared about it.
      I was already before anyway.

    13. Re:What a horrible mess... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      It never ceases to amaze me how people underestimate the basic needs of a people in crisis - they don't need to know why the levees failed, or who cut the funding, and they certainly don't need someone telling them about all the warnings and orders to evacuate given in the days before the storm hit. They need food, shelter, a shower, clean clothing, etc. I hate to say it, but it sounds way too familiar - the only saving grace is that we haven't started blaming the lack of aid getting into the area on Louisiana insurgents.


      There's a bunch of bullshit on both sides. Many of the looters just want food and water that is true. Some of the looters are also murdering and rapign people, the army has been sent in to control these people. The police and military are working with imprefect information and sometimes other factors such as racism ect.. create situation where innocent people are also victimized as being one of the murderers and rapists. So you have a bloody mess with both sides looking like shitheads, one saying "hey, they just need basic nessecities." while the other says "look some of them are murdering people and rapign people we need marshall law". While both are partially true, both are also partially wrong.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    14. Re:What a horrible mess... by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A smaller percentage of New Orleans residents had cars than even New York City - 2/5ths of the city. It was the poorest major city in the United States. How were they supposed to get out - hop in their private jet?

      What about the tourists? Flights were suddenly cancelled without warning. All of the taxi drivers fled. Were they supposed to try to walk out in the hurricane?

      The "few" in hospitals were actually many thousands. The kids that you mention outnumber adults. Those in retirement homes, those guarding critical facilities (like prisons), etc - how the heck were they supposed to leave without an organized evacuation plan?

      Very few people are actually "stealing TVs" and "shooting at the police". There were 200,000 or so people left behind in the city - how many do you think were doing this sort of stuff? 100? 500? Read some reports from the people that are actually on the streets - it's amazing how self sacrificing so many of the people are being, even people that you would often view as "ghetto thugs". People dressed like gang members rounding up the neighborhood to get them into boats, people who look to be in their 70s searching houses, etc. It's a testament to humanity more than anything else.

      Back to the looting: I've seen about a hundred pictures of people either looting or carrying looted goods. I've not seen a single "big screen TV". I've seen a lot of food, water, diapers, etc. The worst pictures I've seen were couple bottles of alcohol, and even that was *anything* but representative. If you want a broad range of pictures, check out Yahoo's news picture site - they gather pictures from any online news reports that they can find, so you get the whole spectrum.

      Really, more than anything, you sound like you're just looking for an *excuse* to be racist.

      --
      sed "s/SJW.*$/... never mind. I was about to say something stupid, and also, I'm a troglodyte./Ig"
    15. Re:What a horrible mess... by che.kai-jei · · Score: 1
      i like you, i know you mean nothing by it, but please could we all refrain from referring to the human beings currently exepriencieng great trauma in a human tragedy of mis-financing, ill-will and malicious disregard. these callous containment strategy against the poverty strciken underclass in american society.
      these people are displaced AMERICAN CITIZENS. not refugees.
      i know techincally the term is correct but implies too much .. since WWII the is term is loaded with immigration implications and diasporas of foreign people in wars.


      they kind of become de humanized and alien to the public mind. the media love calling them this. they are merely displaced citizens. your fellow americans.

      Although it is too early to say, maybe the one good thing that comes from this is that most decent, white, ordinary americans get to see what the hell is going on in the emptied cities ands towns they fled years ago.

      kudos to the massive efforts and will of the ordinary people i see on pbs and npr reports and bbc news.

      Shame about your federal overlords, but as is the way of these things, the courage and compassion of the people dwarfs the meagre empty words of the patrician elite.

      i posted this not as AC as i would like you to strongly consider what i mean without dismissing it 'in' with the sometimes subtle trolls.

    16. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 5, Informative
      A question though: I am living outside the US, so I don't know if any offers of foreign aid have come in. Not just money, but doctors, freshwater, etc. With the level of support sent by the US to disasters around the world (like the Boxing Day Tsunami), I wonder if the rest of the world is trying to help the US now?

      Over 40 countries so far. Canada is sending its top notch DART team (experts in urban rescue, the team also comes with a portable water purification plant). Canadian Navy is sending ships with supplies, choppers and what not to assist. There have been massive fund raising operations here, the Governments both Federal and Provincial are chipping in, Air Canada is shuttling people between cities in the South using largest planes in its fleet, etc etc.

    17. Re:What a horrible mess... by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      anyone trying to score poliltical points in either direction on the back of this disaster should be taken out back for summary execution.

      I guess you'll be starting the shooting any time now. I think your understanding of "political" is flawed. It was politics that led to the destruction of the Mississippi. It was politics that led to the destruction of the wetlands, and the idiotic construction right in the most dangerous areas. It was politics to dig canals right through New Orleans, thus dramatically increasing the risk of broken levees. It's certainly politics to propose the killings of people for saying something with which you disagree.

      For people to speak out about incompetence, indifference, and horrible decisions is entirely proper. Politics is life.

    18. Re:What a horrible mess... by dfung · · Score: 4, Informative

      CNN carried a press conference with Condoleeza Rice, the US Secretary of State, who commented that there had been many offers of financial aid from foreign nations and that none had been refused.

      That was all fine and good, but the next question was from another reporter who asked, "but isn't it true that none of these donations have actually been accepted yet?" Yup, you guessed it, that was correct - the offers are being recorded but not being accepted by the US. Don't ask me why (although seriously, I wouldn't be surprised if that is a process that might take some time).

      Another question followed up on a comment from Rice that Sri Lanka, which is poor and still rebuilding from the tsunami, had made a pledge of an undislosed amount. The reporter asked whether this made any sense since this was basically giving back US foreign aid to Sri Lanka.

      It's sort of interesting to watch these press conferences as you see they pretty much alternate puffball questions from shills with (often ridiculously accusatory) questions from the other side. Just another sign of the stupidly polarized political environment around here these days. Imagine trying to drive down the street if your only steering mechanism was full-lock left and full-lock right. Grrr...

    19. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because you are not really American. Yes, you maybe do live in the US of A and have a house and a car or two and speak English and even have an American passport.

      Hmm...Well, I live in the "US of A" but do not have a house. It is an ok apartment. Only one car at the moment unless you count the old, nonworking truck I purchased in Texas when I was 17 another car. I do speak English but, alas, no American passport. Possibly because I was born in America as were my parents and the parents quite a few generations before them.

      And if what is going on in the South is to your "content", separately you will hang, indeed.

      Hang me then. I grew up in that area and quite honestly belive that Katrina was a good thing. We'll be able to weed out the popularity of the gangs (through seperation or execution), reengineer New Orleans to make it a safer harbor to live in, and generate more jobs for low income families to work in. With the destruction brought by Katrina, we may bring a rise of constructive ingenuity. Am I sorry for what happened to those caught in it? No. They had plenty of time to get out. For those who had no ability to get out all I can say is that is their own fault. They've lived in New Orleans for years knowing this day will come and yet they dwelled in gang filled neighborhoods living in poverty waiting for the next check from Uncle Sam. I am not the least bit sympathetic torwards any of them. Thats what they get for living in a damn bowl below sea level.

    20. Re:What a horrible mess... by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Funny

      John Titor is that you?

    21. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, Cuba has offered 1,100 medical doctors. USA has turned them down. Would be too great a loss of prestige I think.

      http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmorestory.asp?slu g=Cuba+offers+help+to+US&id=78273

    22. Re:What a horrible mess... by blibbler · · Score: 0

      Are you for real? The boxing day tsunami was orders of magnitude more devastating than this. On boxing day, 310,000 people died, with no warning. Compare that to just a few thousand people dead after plenty of warning.
      The level of support that the US sent to that was small compared to what other countries sent. Australia, with an economy a twentieth the size of the US sent three times as much.

      Other countries have send money in support. As far as other support, how would suggest countries send in fresh water? fly it over from europe? ship it from Japan?

    23. Re:What a horrible mess... by bladernr · · Score: 1
      Australia, with an economy a twentieth the size of the US sent three times as much.

      I don't understand. I read here that the Australia gave $860M, while the US gave only $350M, but that the US also put up $950M in long-term aid. That would make the US the highest contributor, right?

      As far as other support, how would suggest countries send in fresh water? fly it over from europe? ship it from Japan?

      Could they just do it the same way the US got freshwater to Indonesia after the tsunami?

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    24. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sweden is sending a couple water purification plants (and the necessary containers) that supposedly covers the needs of 15000 people. Planned liftoff is in 12 hours or so IF the US government accepts the offer.

    25. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Lets see... five days warning? Vast majority evacuated ahead of time? Yeah, you can walk your ass out in a worst case scenario, which this turned out to be. Those that can't SHOULD have been taken care of, thats why I'm all for helping out kids stuck behind and people left in hospitals or somehow decrepit. Then I'd like to see their caretakers beaten with a stick.

      As for not seeing anyone ripping off non-essential product, please... pick a station and turn it on. Money says you'll even find it all over your Yahoo news.

      Oh, and if there were 500 people in 200,000 shooting and mugging, they wouldn't have stopped resuce flights and sent in national guard with weapons on security detail under marshall law. There's a serious problem there. Is it because they're poor in the first place, and not because they're black? Yeah probably. For all practical purposes however, the shoe is fitting frighteningly well.

      Theres a rational individual inside everyone that knows better than to assume anything about a person because of their race, but this situation is not helping. Read into that however you like.

    26. Re:What a horrible mess... by sabernet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many countries are offering support, including my own, Canada. The USA, however, has yet to accept any of it.

      And I -will- be political here. As politics are just as god damned important to this situation as anything else. Because -politicians- are calling the shots here.

      I just damn well hope that the delay in accepting aid from Koffi Annan is due to the flawed system rather then any kind of face saving or those responsible should be punished greatly.

      And -speaking- of politics. Cuba and Venezuela have both offered assistance. The Red Cross accepted Venezuela's help I think. But the USA has not accepted Cuba's. If -THAT- ain't political, I don't f***ing know what is.

    27. Re:What a horrible mess... by modecx · · Score: 1

      That's really cool, the one thing they needed right after all this hoopla started was water and the basic essential stuff, and I've tried to do my part in that... The've shown airplanes and helicopters full of water, but I have to wonder where our military's water purificaion abilities are in all of this. A few rigs have got to be more efficient and more consistently productive than all the Chinooks and C5's in the world hauling bottled water.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    28. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "no American passport. Possibly because I was born in America as were my parents and the parents quite a few generations before them."

      That's the funniest thing I've read all day.

      "Why would I go somewhere? I'm already in USA" :D:D:D:D

    29. Re:What a horrible mess... by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      A question though: I am living outside the US, so I don't know if any offers of foreign aid have come in. Not just money, but doctors, freshwater, etc. With the level of support sent by the US to disasters around the world (like the Boxing Day Tsunami), I wonder if the rest of the world is trying to help the US now?

      Last I heard, aid from the Dutch was offered but not accepted yet, but nevertheless is on its way pre-emptively in the form of a marine frigate with fresh water supplies and equipment, marines, smaller boats, emergency rations, helicopters for medical evacuations, and such. The frigate is called "Hr.Ms. Van Amstel". Other material and expertise has also been offered, such as pumps, F-16s and identification teams, but is pending American request. (This roughly summarized and translated from the awfully crappy news site http://www.nu.nl/news/584318/22/Nederland_stuurt_f regat_naar_New_Orleans_%28video%29.html in Dutch.)

    30. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A question though: I am living outside the US, so I don't know if any offers of foreign aid have come in. Not just money, but doctors, freshwater, etc.

      The Philippines. Cuba. Lots of others.

      Actually, I read one country (Saudi Arabia?) had offered doctors, but hadn't been given the go-ahead to send them, but I can't find where I read that again.

    31. Re:What a horrible mess... by mikefe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare

      Notice the two words "provide" and "promote"? There is good reason why "provide" isn't used twice.

      In those days, the government didn't have the power to impose an income tax. Most government monies were raised through bonds that were paid back with interest (your modern day T-Bills).

      The names for our modern day "welfare" systems were chosen very craftily by the politicians, and should be added to the weasel word list IMO.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    32. Re:What a horrible mess... by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      They're not attacking civilians or anything, as far as I've heard. The main information I've been told is that, at least in the first few days, a lot of the police and such were set to guarding buildings or particular areas and would train their guns on anyone that came near. There was a similar reaction from the patrolling officers, who would told their weapons outside the car windows as they drove. I understand that the police officers stationed there are under an incredible amount of stress and they have to be careful. It just that the orders that they were being given just don't seem to coincide with the best interests of the law-abiding refugees.

      I don't think this is a political issue anymore, I'm just upset at how ineffective the support has been up until now. The most insightful comment I've read was from Newt Gringrich, who said "I think it puts into question all of the Homeland Security and Northern Command planning for the last four years, because if we can't respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the Gulf for days, then why do we think we're prepared to respond to a nuclear or biological attack?"

      There was an interesting blog based in New Orleans where they comment on things like this. It has links to a lot of pictures they have been taking of the events.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    33. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      .. I grew up in that area and quite honestly belive that Katrina was a good thing. We'll be able to weed out the popularity of the gangs (through seperation or execution), reengineer New Orleans to make it a safer harbor to live in, and generate more jobs for low income families to work in. With the destruction brought by Katrina, we may bring a rise of constructive ingenuity. Am I sorry for what happened to those caught in it? No. They had plenty of time to get out. For those who had no ability to get out all I can say is that is their own fault. They've lived in New Orleans for years knowing this day will come and yet they dwelled in gang filled neighborhoods living in poverty waiting for the next check from Uncle Sam. I am not the least bit sympathetic torwards any of them. Thats what they get for living in a damn bowl below sea level.

      The term is "social darwinism", one of the avenues of bottomless stupidity on the glorious way to fascism (or possibly feudalism). The poor all should die because they dared to get born poor or with debilitating illness or got old and lost their earning capabilities. The rich are God Chosen to prosper and multiply. God should kill all the poor to make way for the afluent. Etc and so on.

      Sigh.

      You, Sir, are one of the half-digested pieces of poisonous, rotten meat in the vomit of a dying democracy.

    34. Re:What a horrible mess... by eyeye · · Score: 1

      they werent even letting the red cross in. Its almost as if they wanted more people to die.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    35. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What! These people down there better cut the whinning
      and get self relient. If they are thirsty, make a fire and distill some water. Christ, they are having no trouble making a fire and burning down buildings while they are busy robbing.

    36. Re:What a horrible mess... by presarioD · · Score: 1

      CNN carried a press conference with Condoleeza Rice

      Is this the same Condoleeza Rice that went shoe shopping on Thursday?

      This is going to be big, this is going to be very big and the implications to the american society are yet to be seen. One thing is for sure, historians in the future will refer to this period in sociological, economic and political terms as well. Not only as a natural disaster.

      --
      Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
    37. Re:What a horrible mess... by Mike1024 · · Score: 4, Informative

      With the level of support sent by the US to disasters around the world (like the Boxing Day Tsunami), I wonder if the rest of the world is trying to help the US now?

      A quick Google News reveals this article: "By Friday, offers had been received from Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Belgium, Britain, Canada, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, France, Germany, Greece, Georgia, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Paraguay, the Philippines, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Venezuela and the United Arab Emirates."

      Some of the more interesting offers include:

      Venezuela - "apart from the million dollars in monetary assistance, Venezuela is offering two mobile hospital units, each capable of assisting 150 people, 120 specialists in rescue operations, 10 water purifying plants, 18 electricity generators of 850 KW each, 20 tons of bottled water, and 50 tons of canned food."

      Cuba - "1,100 doctors and 26 tons of medicine and equipment."

      France - "a range of aircraft and two ships, with helicopters and planes capable of airlifting tons of supplies, a disaster unit with 20 soldiers, a civil defense detachment of 35 people and an airborne emergency unit"

      Germany - "medical evacuation planes and airlift field hospitals, water purification systems and portable shelters"

      Of course, one could criticise these offers as oppertunistic publicity-seeking, but then the same could be said of political photo-ops like Bush 'comforting survivors'.

      Oddly enough, I found this quote in the washington post:

      Bush told ABC-TV: "I'm not expecting much from foreign nations because we hadn't asked for it. I do expect a lot of sympathy and perhaps some will send cash dollars. But this country's going to rise up and take care of it."

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    38. Re:What a horrible mess... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      For people to speak out about incompetence, indifference, and horrible decisions is entirely proper. Politics is life.

      Now is the time to be giving a flying fig about the dead and dying not the scoring of points for your pet political views and from my observation thus far, 98% of the political comments online and on television are the usual far left idiocy we got all the way through the elections which scared the electorate and cost Kerry what should have been a much easier fight. When will the Howard Dean moron brigades get it? The public doesn't want to hear it and the slaps at George Bush, Republicans, the USA in general, etc. are only going to backfire badly.

      As has been shown, the bad decisions cross all the political lines. It wasn't George Bush who caused the local government down there to stumble any more than it was the Clinton administration which single-handedly undercut flood prevention funding. Either you're being naive or disingenuous. Mere politics in a theoretical vacuum wasn't being referred to. Using the tragedy to damage one side and build another was. Political opportunism is going on and it shouldn't.

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    39. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I i find really irritating when people try to make a racial issue of everything.

      Mobs of armed black bandits are looting the city shooting at normal black citizens and rescue workers who come there to rescue them and government sends in troops to protect the population some "usefull" idiots start screaming RACISM!

    40. Re:What a horrible mess... by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      latest I heard was that some folks shot off guns when helocopters were coming by in order to get attention, as in "over here, help!" The FAA claims no aircraft have been shot *at*. Sorry, no link but I was reading it last night.

      with that said, sure, you get the best in people and the worst in active emergencies. I have been through a few riots, glad I was armed for self defense. Some people looking for an excuse to go medieval all the time, whereas most folks just want to get by. No one race or culture or society has a lock on "all good folks" or "all bad folks". the civilization veneer is quite thin, no one would be immune to becoming desperate I would think.

      Not sure about the rest of the nation, but we just came back from our weekly trip to town, in just our little community I counted ten tractor trailers being loaded up with provisions to be sent down there (we chipped in of course). This is probably happening all over the USA.

    41. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Notice the two words "provide" and "promote"? There is good reason why "provide" isn't used twice.

      I don't want to be a nit-pick but it is my understanding that in those days it was considered a bad literary style to use the same word more then once in an oratory statement. Note that they used "establish", "insure", "provide" and "promote". None of them appears more then once. It is possible that your interpretation is the correct one, but I am somewhat skeptical of reading the wording with such detail.

    42. Re:What a horrible mess... by eyeye · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Arent you right wing guys worried about how you will be able to cope with those terrurists when they attack, what colour is the alert level these days? When they detonate their dirty bomb it will be 5 days before homeland security things of taking some action. You better hope to fuck that they dont bomb any levees (or are all those in non bush voting states?) as you have no idea what to do and all your troops are too busy killing people thousands of miles away to save people at home.

      Of course all the money that was put into homeland security is in the pockets of a bunch of rich men and their companies so when the shit hit the fans you will just have to sit there and blame it on the "left".

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    43. Re:What a horrible mess... by richdun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the only way you really solve crises like this is to get in there, and get in there as early as you can - if there had been National Guard relief units moving in on Monday night or Tuesday, a lot of things could have went better. But of course, now that things have not gone well, I agree that focusing on either security or aid exclusively just makes things worse.

    44. Re:What a horrible mess... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      They had the option to write "provide for the common defence and the general Welfare"

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    45. Re:What a horrible mess... by ifdef · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...people are shooting, looting (not food - TV's, etc), causing violence and intimidation"

      What kind of a F!-ed up society do you guys live in, anyway? In most places around the world (not all, admittedly), when a natural disaster hits, or even a power failure, people's natural instincts are to help one another, not steal things from stores, or beat and rape each other.

      Is the USA really in such a state that law and order are maintained only by the presence of police? And if something happens to disrupt the power of the police, that the first things that come to people's minds is to break into the neighborhood shops and take the TV's? Is your country filled with people who are so ready to backstab their neighbors?

      If this is true, it seems like a really, really sick (and scary!) society. You've got far bigger problems than worrying about the DMCA or the Patriot Act. Yes, those things are a danger to any society, but it sure sounds like you are way past the point where changing the laws or changing the administration will help very much. Wow!

    46. Re:What a horrible mess... by Burz · · Score: 1

      "Just another sign of the stupidly polarized political environment around here these days. Imagine trying to drive down the street if your only steering mechanism was full-lock left and full-lock right.

      I'm calling you on this one: Refresh me about that period when Democrats tried to nationalize all or most of the country's economy. I can't recall.

      The country is 'poliarized' to one economic pole, with a very wimpy center. The Republican party is what incipient fascism looks like in red, white and blue.

      And I will remind you that other developed countries with a better quality of life than the US have far more authentic Left parties sharing power that go by names like 'labour' and 'socialist'.

      Americans need to quit staring at themselves in the TV all the time and get a clue. There are excellent examples of governance and culture around the world today...not that anyone here would care to notice.

    47. Re:What a horrible mess... by Kahless2k · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.. I dont think they have any shortage of water in the area right now.. they just need to make it drinkable.

      But then, I dont think a lot of people are thinking as clearly as they should in this situation.

    48. Re:What a horrible mess... by sabernet · · Score: 1

      The US has plenty of freshwater itself.

      Would you rather that some mid-eastern country with water 5x the cost of gas send their freshwater over or should the US with it's multitude of freshwater lakes, including it's border with Canada, which , I might add, contain the largest freshwater lakes in the world, supply it's own water.

      Adding to that, Canada, Venezuela and others are offering to send over water purification systems to make all that water currently -in- New Orleans drinkable if the damn US gov't were to accept it already.

    49. Re:What a horrible mess... by Fishead · · Score: 1

      The USA is rich enough that financial aid isn't necessary. My province, British Columbia, has just sent our team of rescue/disaster specialists to help out.

    50. Re:What a horrible mess... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      What can I say? Thanks world. I hope my politicians are smart enough to accept the aid and feel your brotherhood, rather than turn it away out of some foolish sense of pride.

      I honestly thought that the number would be... zero.

    51. Re:What a horrible mess... by bladernr · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Is the USA really in such a state that law and order are maintained only by the presence of police?

      Hardly unique to the US. I'm an American, but living in London. People are mugged and stabbed right in front of others in the UK... no one does anything.

      I know a lady who was with her two small children and was shoved down in a fast food resturant full of customers and employees so some guy could steal her purse. No one lifted a finger.

      Don't think indifference to the pain of others is unique to the US.

      In fact (and this is far off topic), I've been to a couple dozen countries and most US states, and the only place in the world I've seen people defend each other, including strangers, is the central part of the US. Try to push over a lady and mug her in a McD's in Iowa... you'll find, at best, your ass kicked, and, at worst, some customer shooting you. You may think it's harsh, but at least people are looking out for each other.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    52. Re:What a horrible mess... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Informative

      NO has issues with drugs and gangs. They are magnified by the disaster, reduced police, and smaller/sicker/older population left to prey on. ---

      In many places around the world, people are killed/raped without the need for a natural disaster. ---

      If you want to look what the country is full of, look at Texas. In fact, people frequently say Texans are full of it... hehe.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    53. Re:What a horrible mess... by Ours · · Score: 1

      France is mobilizing aid by the way of the Martinique island. I bet nobody ever expected help to go from the Carabians to USA instead of the other way around (more common). But unexpected events require the help of all those who can. Here in Switzerland we would usually give a hand but we've had unprecedented floods to take care of so hands are tied. The capital was hit pretty hard. Not much compared to the US but for such a small country it's a hard blow. I hope I'm not the only one worrying about the weather getting weirder every year. A record here, a record there. Every season sets a new record somehow. Hotest, coldest, driest, wetest, windiest. You name it. It September and here I have summer temperatures. In August-July? Colder then usual temperatures. Seasons are a thing of the past. I'm sure winter is going to be some mad mixture again.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    54. Re:What a horrible mess... by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What kind of a F!-ed up society do you guys live in, anyway?

      The best one in the world, obviously.

      people's natural instincts are to help one another, not steal things from stores, or beat and rape each other.

      This is a "dog eat dog" society, with traditions of Wild West obviously fresh in many minds.

      Is the USA really in such a state that law and order are maintained only by the presence of police?

      In many places - yes; in some smaller places, no. Large cities rate very poorly on friendship and mutual assistance scale.

      And if something happens to disrupt the power of the police, that the first things that come to people's minds is to break into the neighborhood shops and take the TV's?

      Of course; it's profitable.

      Is your country filled with people who are so ready to backstab their neighbors?

      It would be nice to know a country which bred humans with better behavior. Generally, one must be completely and totally fulfilled in every aspect in order not to desire something that someone else has. Or one must have nerves of steel to combat such desires. Many people, in any country, will steal when they have a chance. Some will steal small things from a store; other steal big things, like national currency, from a nation. But humans always steal.

      If this is true, it seems like a really, really sick (and scary!) society.

      You are not the first to comment on that.

    55. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      They had the option to write "provide for the common defence and the general Welfare"

      Note that they did not use that construct anywhere in the sentence. Instead they kept coming up with a new verb for each of the items, such as "secure" Liberty instead of "insure" which they used with "domestic Tranquility". They could have used "secure domestic Tranquility and Liberty". But they did not. I think it was all merely a literary style.

    56. Re:What a horrible mess... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      If you think there are better places to live, you're always free to move there. If you're planning on moving to a socialist country, though, I'd advise leaving yourself a decade or so, governments of that type have even worse red tape than the US. I'm going to stay here, though, where I get to vote for the actual individuals that will hold office rather than the juvenile clubhouses they belong to. Also, if you're looking for a party that wants to socailize the nation's economy, there are several, I think. The american Communist party springs to mind, you're welcome to vote for their candidates, as well.

      You seem to have some confusion about politics in the US because you are putting it exclusively in terms of political parties. Recall that, from the constitution up, the country has been all about interactions between individuals (not gangs or mobs of people), and the spread of political sentiments makes a lot more sense. You can't make the kind of comparison you're trying to make because the fundamental framework in which politics takes place is different in the US and most European countries, which are what I assume you're referring to. Now, if you're referring to China, North Korea, or another partly-socialist country in that region, I'll freely admit I don't have enough knowledge of those places to know wether your grounds for comparison is valid or not. Also, your 'quality of life' argument is a crock, as are all 'quality of life' arguments, because the speaker always simply defines the term to mean what he wants.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    57. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good does changing the laws do when some of New Orlean's Finest errr.... help themselves in a Wal-Mart? Also note the lack of flooding in/around the Wal-Mart store. You can tell they're not thugs nor crooks, as they're using a shopping cart.

      http://www.zippyvideos.com/8911023771013466/countd own-looting-in-walmart/

    58. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Also, if you're looking for a party that wants to socailize the nation's economy, there are several, I think. The american Communist party springs to mind, you're welcome to vote for their candidates, as well.

      This is quite disenginious since the views which would be considered "left" in most of the world constitute a tiny minority within US politics. Taken indivdually or as parties, US politicians are at best center-right to far-right from the point of view of most of the world. What you term "left" bears no resemblance to the typical "left" elsewhere. I think this is a part of deliberate extreme right wing strategy, to loudly label and denounce even most miniscule deviation from their agenda as "liberal" and "left". And soon after that, center-right viewpoints, such as the ones represented usually by CNN are labeled "liberal". So the witless victims of this try to be more "balanced" and "receptive" and move further to the right. Never sufficiently enough though to cease being called "liberaly biased". That would only stop if they were to hand out scripts written by Karl Rove himself to all their staff to read.

      You are defending this of course because it suits your own particular bias, that of a far right wing, and you have no use for oposition to it because you see democracy as a system for hammering out minutia of implementation of right-wing policies.

    59. Re:What a horrible mess... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge lots of countries have offered (and the us probably has accepted) aid I know for sure that all european countries did, even the poor Balkans and of course Russia as well... I am pretty sure most of the world who can afford it has done it by now. How much of this aid has been accepted by the US gov is another question. The problem is, that most of this aid, cannot be there overnight which is needed...

    60. Re:What a horrible mess... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Lets see... five days warning?

      Methinks you need to recheck your timeline.

      At a news conference 10 a.m. on August 28, shortly after Katrina was upgraded to a Category 5 storm, New Orleans mayor C. Ray Nagin, calling Katrina "a storm that most of us have long feared", ordered the first ever mandatory evacuation of the city. Thousands of poor city residents were unable to leave the area because they lacked transportation or the means to pay for it.

      Then...

      Hurricane Katrina was a hurricane that caused extensive and severe damage over the southeastern United States, including Louisiana's largest city, New Orleans, on August 29, 2005.

      Last I checked, 29 - 28 = 1, not 5.

      The hurricane really snuck up on people and confused the weather service each step of the way. In 1 1/2 days, it went from a tropical depression to a hurricane right before hitting Florida. Then, instead of staying over Florida and weakining, it skimmed it. Then, instead of turning back to Florida as predicted, it went west. Then, instead of slowly strengthening before hitting landfall, it swelled from tropical storm to category five hurricane in three days.

      So, either you weren't paying attention, or you're just trying to distort what was known.

      pick a station and turn it on

      I've probably watched about 20 hours of Katrina news coverage since it hit. No pictures of TVs being looted or anything of the sort, just reports of it.

      all over your Yahoo news

      First off, it's not *their* pictures - they gather the pictures from everyone else. Secondly, you're wrong. I spent about four hours looking through photos, and I already told you the results.

      Oh, and if there were 500 people in 200,000 shooting and mugging, they wouldn't have stopped rescue flights

      They most certainly would. You don't send in a helicopter to where people are shooting at you - even one. Best case, you land to pick people up and someone has a gun, you lose your helicopter and/or are taken hostage until you do what they want. Worst case, they shoot down the helicopter and kill you and all of your passengers.

      In the news, I've ran into two reports (which may be the same incident) of helicopters getting shot at - *two*. One didn't have a location specified, and the other was trying to rescue people from charity hospital. I've seen about a dozen reports (plus two videos) of police getting shot at. This isn't the level of violence that you'd get from, say, even 10,000 of the 200,000 being violent. This is a couple dozen to couple hundred people.

      --
      sed "s/SJW.*$/... never mind. I was about to say something stupid, and also, I'm a troglodyte./Ig"
    61. Re:What a horrible mess... by scarolan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Not sure where you live, UK perhaps?

      Consider that it is mainly the poor neighborhoods inhabited by blacks and Mexicans where law and order are maintained only by the presence of police. Generally speaking, the middle and upper class live outside US cities in comfortable suburbs.

      This is America's dirty little secret, and Mother Nature has washed the whole thing out in the open for the rest of the world to see. Almost 30% of New Orleans residents live below the poverty line. Almost all of them are black. The truth is, we have a *huge* number of people in this country who live beneath the poverty line. Many of them canot afford even basic health care or food for their families, so they turn to drug dealing and prostitution to make more money. There are practially NO jobs and nothing for these people to do so they suck off the nipple of the government and sit around idle, getting into all sorts of mischief. Look what's happened to Detroit to get a small taste for what this urban decay looks like.

      I'm embarrassed to say also that the most powerful country in the world has no national health care system! Most of the "working poor" in this country such as the Wal-Mart employees have no access to even basic health care for their families. Even Costa Rica has a basic health care plan for all its citizens!

      We have already received thousands of refugees here in San Antonio, Texas. I've been listening to the police scanner the last couple of days and it's a complete mess. The last part I heard today, someone was asking where to deliver some insulin, and the reply was that nobody was available to answer the question, because most of the gov't office supervisors were OUT OF TOWN for the 3 day weekend!

      These days I am embarassed to be an American, which has become something completely different than what the founding fathers envisioned.

    62. Re:What a horrible mess... by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      Well... keep in mind that just like with a smaller accident, there's only so many resources that are useful. Beyond that you're just another rubbernecker.

      Of course, it's hard to imagine money and doctors being oversupplied.

    63. Re:What a horrible mess... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually most western european countries gave the offers rather quietly (I am from Austria and expected that they will do something, but they do not make a high profile political case out of it, because this is a standard give back situation), because this is what is needed in a situation like that, money does not very much in this case, money is needed in the long term, and probably can be raised from the US themselves, what is needed now, is material, rescue workers, doctors etc....

      And the US should be wise to accept the situation and do not play the tough man, this is not a time for political games, but to stick together to ease the desaster. The political debates will follow, for sure, as well as the search for a scapegoat (which is equally false in this situation) but this is not the time yet.

      This is pretty much the whole way how the world will be able to handle the upcoming catastrophies (and they will come) the world has to grow and stick together...

    64. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, I was born in a poor family and am still poor. The difference between them and myself, however, is that I got the fuck out of there. So shut the fuck up and quit the damn assuming. I am not rich. I am not an immigrant. I am not putting them down for being poor. I'm telling you I don't care what is happening down there at this moment because I had the sense to leave. We all saw it coming. The idiots who stayed are the ones I don't care about.
      br If you're in hostile territory, know it is hostile territory, choose to stay and get shot, is it your fault or shooters?

    65. Re:What a horrible mess... by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course, one could criticise these offers as oppertunistic publicity-seeking

      One could, if one was an ungrateful arsehole. It saddens me to see Americans in forums and Usenet whining about how the rest of the world hates them and why aren't they getting the same help as the tsunami victims, and then turning around and saying things like that. America gets MORE than its fair share of aid after hurricanes, terror attacks and other disasters, probably because the world's media is largely based there. Anyone thinking any different ask yourself, how much did YOU give to help with the Mumbai floods a month ago?

    66. Re:What a horrible mess... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      How was the parent troll modded up as insightful?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    67. Re:What a horrible mess... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they could've done quite alot differently but consider that English usage in our region has changed quite a bit since then; where "there" means when Americans actually spoke English. I feel their version sounds better, certianly more dignified.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    68. Re:What a horrible mess... by Burz · · Score: 1
      If you think there are better places to live, you're always free to move there. If you're planning on moving to a socialist country, though, I'd advise leaving yourself a decade or so, governments of that type have even worse red tape than the US.

      I'm sure there is much red tape for immigration. For the rest of life (such as healthcare, transportation and housing) probably not so much.

      Also, they are not really "socialist countries". They are mixed, democratic economies that contain a vociferous socialist vein among their elected offices.


      You seem to have some confusion about politics in the US because you are putting it exclusively in terms of political parties.

      No, I put it in terms of ideologies and parties.


      You can't make the kind of comparison you're trying to make because the fundamental framework in which politics takes place is different in the US and most European countries, which are what I assume you're referring to.

      Europe, Canada... yes. And they are human beings just like us; that is the 'fundamental' that counts. If you can't relate at this point, then there is likely nothing I can do to help it. And don't tell me that the US Constitution makes looting agreements like CAFTA or NAFTA necessary. We could pushing agreements that resemble the EU framework, which accounts for human rights... but we do not.

      The US Constitution does not make this necessary.


      Also, your 'quality of life' argument is a crock, as are all 'quality of life' arguments, because the speaker always simply defines the term to mean what he wants.

      That's pretty sweeping... Have I hit a nerve?? The United Nations seems to value quality of life as a concept, as do many countries. You are welcome to visit their site and read the reports along with their methodology. Of course here in the US it is all about GDP, which is assuredly the biggest "crock" currently getting lipservice.

      "President Bush, Latin America is calling with offers of aid... Mr. President? Mr. President???"

      Looks like voting for oligarch-vetted so-called "individuals" has its sharp pitfalls.

    69. Re:What a horrible mess... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually I was talking to a friend about this, and he basically said, too many easy weapons, in combination with poverty which leads to high drug abuse (not the drugs are the problem, the poverty is which leads to drugs) and once people are deprived of drugs they go haywaire. I would add to that a self induced high acceptance towards violence, due to a wrong focus, and an overwhelming you can only survive on your own mentality (which is not working in a situation like that)

      It could be true, I mean looting for food can happen at such a desaster it is natural and understandable, but taking away tv and other industrial junk in such a situation is out of any logic at all, because it is really junk at situations like that.

      And no it is not normal that at such a situation severe looting and shootings arise, Europe was hit by a flood three years ago, I can remember similar chaos situations where the politicians simply were unable to do anything. People started to act on themselves, opened roads broke damns, just to save others, in the end people started to stick together, I cannot remember having people running around shooting and looting although it would have been possible, everybody tried to save everybody elses ass, by trying to control the flood or trying to rescue others.

      I also can remember the stories of the days after WWII one thing my parents and grandparents told me was that people started to stick together like they did not used to ever before and afterwards to bring everything which was in ruins and ashes up again. There simply was no other way of survival.

      Also the Tsuanmi an Asia did not lead to the chaos which currently is shown, although it was worse, people also seemed to stick together and start to rebuild things.

      Same goes for the midwest flooding in the nineties, I am not sure what is different this time, but this is not normal behavior for a huge catastrophe, not even for the USA...

    70. Re:What a horrible mess... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      [b]Financial[/b] aid for America? You've got to be joking! Doctors, engineers, equipment, fine. Those are things that New Orleans could do with more of straight away. But money is something that the world's richest nation is not lacking. The best thing foreign nations and individuals could do financially right now is to increase donations to other areas that need aid, like Southern Africa where over 4 million people have been suffering from famine for years now, and Mumbai, where the average annual rainfall fell in just three days a little over a month ago, leaving 1.5 million people homeless. America needs to redirect its aid inward for a while, so the rest of the world should take up the slack.

    71. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah we have these fucked up little things running around in our country - they are commonly called "niggers" by most. They have a tendency to show their asses and do this sort of thing during, especially times like these.

      That's right folks. I said it. It's the truth. I call them as I see them; and for those of you that are getting your feelings hurt - that's really too fucking bad.

    72. Re:What a horrible mess... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      ' ... when the shit hit the fans you will just have to sit there and blame it on the "left". '

      Of course you hear this a lot already, with the Iraq occupation supposedly going poorly.

      The left is hurting the war in on terrorism/Iraq/whatever because they are demoralizing the troops.

      If the US comes out of Iraq and it is considered a failure, the pundits will absolutely blame the left for the failure of the operation for just that reason.

    73. Re:What a horrible mess... by abulafia · · Score: 1
      If you think there are better places to live, you're always free to move there. If you're planning on moving to a socialist country, though, I'd advise leaving yourself a decade or so, governments of that type have even worse red tape than the US

      Oddly enough, that's not true. Check out Finland as a destination: they're quite accomodating. Yes, I'm considering it. Sure, the language is a bitch, but you can learn Swedish, which is much easier (and my route, as I already speak German). The logistics of moving a family and a business are the hard parts, not some baggage from the evil commies. And have you looked at the tightening of US immigration lately? ("but we're a war. That's different. 9/11 changed everything.")

      Also, your 'quality of life' argument is a crock, as are all 'quality of life' arguments, because the speaker always simply defines the term to mean what he wants.

      Tell that to someone sitting in the Superdome, while soldiers stop the Red Cross from bringing in supplies, and George apes for the cameras in front of helicopters sitting idle for the photo-op.

      The best summary of this situation was voiced a while back, and I can't remember who said it. The notion was that lot of people in the area hoped that Haiti would start to look more like New Orleans, but instead, New Orleans now looks like Haiti.

      This is the biggest federal train-wreck, I think, since the Civil War. (I could be wrong, and overwrought with what I'm seeing.) But, hey, Trent Lott's gonna get a nice porch, so it is all OK, right?

      --
      I forget what 8 was for.
    74. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already trying to blame others for your own total moral failures and those like you, I see. What a true failure of a human being.

    75. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreigners have no clue how fucking big the US is. We have states larger than some countries. Drive from one end of this country to the other and see enough cultural change to think you are in a different country. I spent 3 years living with international students, and the one comment everyone had when I asked them what they thought about america was "It's so big".

      Yes, it is entirely possible to live your entire life in the US and never have need to travel (nor means) to another country.

    76. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian Navy is sending ships with supplies

      The advantange of the Canadian Navy, is that ALL of its "ships" are well suited to travel up and down all of New Orleans' street. The best part of being in the Canadian Navy, is that every member gets a standard issue Rubber Ducky. Good times

    77. Re:What a horrible mess... by kumachan · · Score: 1

      doh! George W. Bush and I both read that part "promote the general Welfare" as "promote the general Warfare"

    78. Re:What a horrible mess... by matzi11a · · Score: 1

      People are mugged and stabbed right in front of others in the UK... no one does anything.
      hey i live in london and methinks you exagerate.

      Sure it has some idiots but you need to get a grip, there are plenty of decent people about.

      anyway, dont forget, we have Angle-grinder Man
      --
      http://www.reporo.com
    79. Re:What a horrible mess... by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      A smaller percentage of New Orleans residents had cars than even New York City - 2/5ths of the city. It was the poorest major city in the United States. How were they supposed to get out - hop in their private jet?
      It's pretty clear that some people did have the resources to leave, yet they chose to stay anyway, adding to the work of the rescuers
      Back to the looting: I've seen about a hundred pictures of people either looting or carrying looted goods. I've not seen a single "big screen TV".
      Perhaps because many of these people are armed and shooting at photographers?
      There were 200,000 or so people left behind in the city - how many do you think were doing this sort of stuff? 100? 500?
      How many armed and dangerous people do you think it takes to disrupt rescue efforts?
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    80. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Bullshit about the hurricane sneaking up on people. I have no TV, rarely listen to the radio, and don't spend much time watching the weather sites, but even I over 500 miles away knew there was a hurricane heading towards NO days before it made landfall. Arround here, when theres even a rumor of a hurricane, people start leaving, why the idiots in NO (below sea level) decided it would be a good idea to stay and see what happens is totaly beyond me.

    81. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Methinks you need to recheck your timeline. ...
      Last I checked, 29 - 28 = 1, not 5.


      IF you are talking about from the time the Mnadatory evacuation order went out until Katrina actually hit,then yes, it was 1 day. But they knew for many days before that that Katrina was big, and was heading their way.

    82. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main problem is not supplies. The problem is coordinating the distribution of supplies and rescue workers over an area the size of Kansas that has had its infrastructure destroyed. Without communications to most of these areas, it takes time to find out what resources need to be sent to different locations. Could things have been done better, probably, but now is not the time to take cheap shots at whatever politician you hate. There will be plenty of time later to review how the response could have been better.

    83. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      If you're in hostile territory, know it is hostile territory, choose to stay and get shot, is it your fault or shooters?

      Specially when the territory turned hostile when you were already in it and you are crippled or sick and unable to get out...

      By the way, in your example, it is always the fault of shooters. Always. Were it not so, Iraqi civilians could be blamed for being "stupid enough to live in a warzone". And you are a "self-made, pulled-himself-by-his-bootstraps" idiot.

    84. Re:What a horrible mess... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      I dont' know about you. But if im living in a city BELOW sea level, with a catagory 5 hurricane bearing down on me, and a manatory evacuation order in effect, I don't care if I have to crawl on my hands and knees, I'm getting the fuck out of dodge.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    85. Re:What a horrible mess... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I agree with both of you. It may have been done stylistically. However, they spent months deciding the exact wording of the bloody thing and then wrote a book on why and how they made each decision (federalist papers). I tend to think the word choice was with intent and great care.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    86. Re:What a horrible mess... by brainburger · · Score: 1

      Nearly every country has regions which are larger than some countries - there are some very small countries!

      It would be entirely possible to live your life in most countries and never need to travel outside. However, people often travel because they want to...

      I read somewhere (no source handy, sorry), that the USA has the lowest number of passports per head of population of any democracy. Does that worry you at all?

      (And, no, the USA isn't the biggest democracy by either area or population).

      You should get out more ;-)

    87. Re:What a horrible mess... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I agree. I hope we will accept the help graciously while being reasonably cautious. I can't fault anyone caught in the disaster for complaining and being upset- but anyone not personally affected needs to be positive and pitch in to help out.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    88. Re:What a horrible mess... by Lordfly · · Score: 1

      Actually, the response has been heartwarming.

      Over 40 countries have pledged assistance in some way (money, donations, equipment, doctors, and so on), including Japan, Russia, China, South Korea, most of South and Central America (even Venezuela and Cuba). Australia is donating 8 million to the red cross, Japan is donating 400,000. Even Sri Lanka, bless them, is donating $25,000. Doesn't sound like much, but consider that they're a) a tiny country, and b) still recovering from the tsunami.

      Everyone's together on this. The media hasn't reported it yet because there's too much of a tragedy in NO.

      --
      hookers and grits.
    89. Re:What a horrible mess... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      The left is hurting the war in on terrorism/Iraq/whatever because they are demoralizing the troops.

      Whatever the "left" can do to hurt the troops' morale is nothing compared to how the Bush Administration's incompetence can hurt their morale.

    90. Re:What a horrible mess... by daspriest · · Score: 1
      It appears Mayor Nagin isn't too impressed by the support from the national govt so far, transcript of radio interview with him recently. From the transcript:

      "NAGIN: You know the reason why the looters got out of control? Because we had most of our resources saving people, thousands of people that were stuck in attics, man, old ladies. ... You pull off the doggone ventilator vent and you look down there and they're standing in there in water up to their freaking necks.

      And they don't have a clue what's going on down here. They flew down here one time two days after the doggone event was over with TV cameras, AP reporters, all kind of goddamn -- excuse my French everybody in America, but I am pissed.

      WWL: Did you say to the president of the United States, "I need the military in here"?

      NAGIN: I said, "I need everything."

      "

      He seemed pretty upset with the national response to me.

    91. Re:What a horrible mess... by ex0duz · · Score: 1

      Whether to help someone or not is up to the individual, whats unique to the u.s is the gun laws? desperate people/looters with guns + lack of policing = bad refusing aid or ignoring aid even if symbolic, typical US arrogance. Politics before humanity.

      --
      All these moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain..
    92. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. If I choose to vacation in Iraq and I get shot, it is not my fault but theirs. Thankfully, according to you, I can go into a danger zone and blame my injuries on everyone else. Since when does common sense matter anyway?

    93. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am more or less what is considered an anti-american , this disaster made me shure about one think :If you are poor your are scrued...
      As I observed all off these events i was very sad about all i saw.I would like to share a few observations and points i make of the hole story as i witnessed from the international media:
      1)There was (before the hurrycane) a huge evacuation of people funded only by the people them selfs.
      2)Such an evacuation would cost to an individual about 500$ at the cheapest any people unemployed etc ,could not afford that ...
      3)People who where left on there own to manage the disaster go and lute what the rich guys left beehind ,why should they show any respect for the wealth off the people who left them on their own?
      4)Most off the people outside the US make a fraction of what people in the states make so indyvidual donations will practicaly have only a symbolic effect,the same would apply for most cases.
      5)It seems ridiculus to me to see the President ask people to donate funds the NGOs as the Red Cross because the all the funds that could be rased by individuals and other countries would only be 1% or even less off the defence budjet.
      6)Althow it seems quite cynical ,i am under the impression that the african american community came out loocking even worst because of media coverege:People in despear dont look realy respectable , if they are almost only black and you add up alsow the stories about rapes in the superdrome ,shooting at the hellicopters etc ,what you get is a blurry situation wich makes them look worthy off sympathy but as distant as tsunami vicktims from a typical WASP...
      7)The effective solution would be for the people to be evacuated to neiboring states .That to my understanding (the coordination off different states) is by definition is a federal task.
      8)As you already know a lot of goverments offered help but i ,in cynical thought would say,it is diplomatic manovers and not real sympathy ,to my opinion the same applies when the US sends humanitarian aid.I would say it resembles the multinationals sponsoring the Olympics ,the motive is strategy and not solidarity or anything noble motive anyway.

      PS:
      I mean no disrespect in any way especially to the people affected by the disaster.
      Excuse my english and my speling but its not my mother tung.

    94. Re:What a horrible mess... by swillden · · Score: 1

      I think it was all merely a literary style.

      Then why did they proceed to establish a government that had no power to tax?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    95. Re:What a horrible mess... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Canada, and specifically my province of alberta is willing to send staff and write a cheque for aid, however there is no organization directing this aid yet.

      Have you heard of this organization called the Red Cross.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    96. Re:What a horrible mess... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      the offers are being recorded but not being accepted

      Other "red tape" is sometimes involved in offers and donations. Lets say you get a donation of water purifiers with donations. You have to figure out where to put them, who is going to run them, who needs them and how to supply and protect them.

      Doctors/personel, visa/paper work for being in the country, temporary identification, what agency are they going to be under/co-ordinate with, where they are going to be stationed/work/get supplies from.

      Then entire thing comes down to a big mess of logistics. You can have all the help in the world, but if you can't organize it properly either nothing gets done or resources (including personel) are not put to the best usage. When that gets figured out, the help will be accepted.

      One clarification on the "location" of people/supplies. Saying "anywhere" or "NOLA" isn't very precise given that the area that needs help is about 90,000 square miles. The location of specific items needs to be much more precise (down to the block or address in some cases, like generators) or the square mile for some types of people and supplies.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    97. Re:What a horrible mess... by empvirus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed. The last thing this nation needs is a civil war, especially after that hurricane disaster. If memory serves, the US lost more people than in any other war.

      --
      Sometimes I comment just to hear myself typing.
    98. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're generalizing there. Yes, those things are happening in NO, but look at the population there. #2 crime rate in the US before Katrina. Another factor is that there are several tragedies/disasters that have resulted in Americans helping each other for the majority. The mideast blackout and 9/11 come to mind.

    99. Re:What a horrible mess... by mildgift · · Score: 1

      I hope they are not "too proud" to get assistance because the people paying the ultimate price for the pride are Black.

    100. Re:What a horrible mess... by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Everyone seems to talk about socialized healthcare like it's the be all end all of advancement in the world, like no nation is good enough without government provided health care for all.

      Yet, in nations with such care, Canada and the UK spring to mind as examples that people have openly discussed on this board in the past, the whole thing is a giant buracratic debacle filled with long lines and frustration. It's especially funny that you link to Thomas Jefferson who was hands down one of the largest opponents to any national program. If you want to talk about TJ, roll back the national bank, the income tax, the standing army, all other federal taxes while you're at it, and then call me about "a national healthcare system."

      Working at Wal-Mart is a shitty job, working at McDonalds is a shitty job, being a janitor(non-union) is a shitty job, shitty jobs have shitty benifits. When you do a job that a monkey with a hand scanner can perform you can't expect them to value you as an indespencible part of the work force; not to mention working in a field where employee retention spans anywhere from a few weeks during the holidays to forever for people unmotivated to move beyond cashiering at a Wal-Mart Supercenter. Providing these people with health care is a logistical and logical nightmare. Before anyone jumps on me about being a heartless shill though, I worked for Target for three years and watched on a daily basis the problems invovled with even providing health care for a fraction of a single stores employees.

    101. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on now, do you honestly believe that?

    102. Re:What a horrible mess... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere (no source handy, sorry), that the USA has the lowest number of passports per head of population of any democracy. Does that worry you at all?

      Plenty of people travel in the US. It just happens that the type of area most people are interested in going to (beach, ski slopes, whatever) can be gotten at without a passport.

      I'd also be willing to say that plenty of people have a desire to travel outside the country, however flying your family to France or (my personal pick) Austria is a lot more expensive than driving or going by train from one end of europe to the other. Why bother getting a passport if you can't afford to go anywhere with it?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    103. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Then why did they proceed to establish a government that had no power to tax?

      I am not sure that was the case. Constitution, Article I, Section 2: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons

      The federalist papers also speak of taxes in great extent, See for example Fed 11 or 12.

    104. Re:What a horrible mess... by Shark · · Score: 1

      I believe Castro offered to send 1100 doctors and 2.6 tons of meds.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    105. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is cancelled due to the recipient being "unable to receive foreign help at the moment" ....

    106. Re:What a horrible mess... by dkhoo · · Score: 1

      The first foreign response to actually arrive in Louisiana was a contingent of three Singaporean CH-47 Chinook helicopters and 38 personnel from a training detachment based in Grand Prairie, Texas. They arrived in Fort Polk on Tuesday, 1 Sep 05 and are assisting the Texas Army National Guard with airlift and resupply missions. This help was requested and accepted by FEMA, probably due to its quick availability.

      Sources:
      http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/n r/2005/sep/02sep05_nr.html http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelo calnews/view/166195/1/.html http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_ page/0,5744,16477524%255E1702,00.html

    107. Re:What a horrible mess... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers

      Exactly my point. The Federal government had no power to levy taxes directly, they had to request the money from the states. If you only read this article, it appears that the Federal government could simply decide how much cash they needed and divy it out, per the stated apportionment scheme. In practice, any such legislation had to pass both houses, and since the sentaors were appointed by the state legislatures, and could be recalled by them at any time, no tax bill that didn't meet with the approval of a majority of the state legislatures could possibly pass.

      The 16th amendment was passed for a reason. The combination of the 16th and 17th amendments radically altered the balance of power between the Federal and State governments. Whether or not the system that was established in the early 20th century is better or worse than what the Founders set up is a matter for debate, but there's no question at all that the two are very different.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    108. Re:What a horrible mess... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, that's not true. Check out Finland as a destination: they're quite accomodating.

      Welcome.

      Yes, I'm considering it. Sure, the language is a bitch, but you can learn Swedish, which is much easier (and my route, as I already speak German).

      Many of us speak pretty good English too, and especially the younger people are probably generally more adept with it than Swedish, since both are taught at schools, but Internet and TV make mastering English actually useful, and that's what counts for wanting to learn something...

    109. Re:What a horrible mess... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      The Federal government had no power to levy taxes directly, they had to request the money from the states.
      Not quite. They tried a government where they merely "requested" money from the states in the Articles of Confederation. Quite often, the states told the feds to FOAD.

      So the Constitution requires states to pay taxes.
    110. Re:What a horrible mess... by abulafia · · Score: 1
      Welcome.

      Kiitti! (Paljon kiitoksia? I'm unclear on formality rules. And case. Sorry.)

      Many of us speak pretty good English too, and especially the younger people are probably generally more adept with it than Swedish, since both are taught at schools, but Internet and TV make mastering English actually useful, and that's what counts for wanting to learn something...

      I was mainly referring to immigration law, which appears to welcome schmucks like me who have earning potential, so long as they make a good faith effort to blend in. Swedish is only an angle for me because I can already mostly passively understand it, if not speak it. From the perspective of someone who natively speaks English and is fluent in German and Spanish and speaks some French and a tiny bit of Italian, Finnish is a pretty perverse language... That's sort of why I'm enjoying trying to learn it. The only thing less intuitive I've tried was Mandarin, which, well, I had no reason to keep trying at.

      The main barrier is not primarily language. Moving a family and a business is a big challenge. So long as I stay awake all night and eat the cost of phone calls, I can probably keep existing clients, but it is a huge risk to relocate to a place where I can't speak the native language and have almost no contacts. I want to, but it is hard. I'm not well suited to the work-for-a-company game; I doubt anyone would want to hire me (Hell, I wouldn't hire me - if I'm not in charge, I'm a pain in the ass.). So options are limited.

      Know any local firms who need software engineering consultants? My partner does speak fluent French, so that's a communication channel option, too. (And Old and Middle English, Saxon and Latin, but I suspect those are of only nominal value.)

      Gah. I'm rambling now. Sorry.

      --
      I forget what 8 was for.
    111. Re:What a horrible mess... by swillden · · Score: 1

      So the Constitution requires states to pay taxes.

      Yes, I know that. Read the rest of the post you responded to.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    112. Re:What a horrible mess... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Exactly my point. The Federal government had no power to levy taxes directly, they had to request the money from the states

      Which is still taxation. The claim was being made that no taxation was authorized/occuring. The exact mechanism by which the taxation is happening is secondary in light of that claim.

      The 16th amendment was passed for a reason. The combination of the 16th and 17th amendments radically altered the balance of power between the Federal and State governments.

      Quite possibly, but note that this goes only to the mechanism of taxation (income tax) and the direct vs indirect route. One way or another the Federal government was authorized to collect taxes in some form from the get-go, as that original passage from the Constitution clearly shows. The mechanism of collcection was originally left to the states, who as the other poster already pointed out, failed miserably in doing so. Subsequently the Feds took over forcibly.

    113. Re:What a horrible mess... by shicaca · · Score: 0

      You did hear about the study that the New Orleans PD performed, didn't you? They fired 500 blank rounds into the air around the city and did not receive one phone call complaining or informing police of it. I guess New Orleans had/has gotten a bit sketchy and a bit of a scary place to live. Their PD is either corrupt or not funded enough/don't have enough officers, the murder rate in the past few years have been horrible in numbers, etc. In short, each state (and big city, for that matter) has their own set of people. Toledo and Detroit are poverty stricken, Cleveland isn't much better, yet you go to Columbus and you have an insane nice city with huge amounts of police. It's all in demographics, I guess.

    114. Re:What a horrible mess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Got nothing to say back?

    115. Re:What a horrible mess... by ifdef · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it doesn't take much to be modded insightful these days. I got modded insightful a few months ago for a post which literally said nothing but "It's difficult to RTFA when it's slashdotted already."

      On the other hand, I wasn't deliberately trolling, either. I really meant what I wrote, although I admit it did sound like a troll or like flamebait.

      I found the responses interesting and, in general, encouraging. Maybe part of the problem is the way things are reported in the media -- if out of a million people, ten do something violent, it is those ten who will make it onto the evening news and the fron pages of the papers. The vast majority of N.O. residents may indeed have been helping one another (and, come to think of it, there was at least one major story about that, as well), but the ones who are doing something "newsworthy" are the ones that get reported. But, yeah, I was also thinking about power failures -- in some cities, people sat outside and talked to their neighbours while they waited for the power to come back on, while in others, they used the opportunity to loot stores.

      I found quite amusing what one friend wrote to me in email: Apparently, when there was massive flooding in Bombay a while back, everyone pulled together to help each other. And they didn't loot stores and homes. And they didn't shoot at rescue helicopters. So I guess we can chalk this up to "cultural differences" rather than "human nature".

    116. Re:What a horrible mess... by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      The levies may not be 'the shit', but hey man look at these kick arse speakers we got you'se.

    117. Re:What a horrible mess... by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      What i really dont get is that the USA has the biggest economy in the world. Even down here in Australia we have had calls by the Red Cross for assistance for New Orleans.

      Well, no disrespect to those who are affected by Katrina, the US can bloody well look after itself! They are spending a Billion dollars a day in Iraq. I absolutely refuse to send 1 hundred, $10, or even 50 cents to the US for aid as they dont need it.

      Now with the tsunami i had no problems sending money to countries that couldnt feed themselves before a disaster, let alone after it. But seriously, the New Orleans disaster is not a monetary one to be fixed by aid, it is clearly political and procedural. The US just has to fix it. And those people effected should be assisted by the government to get back to a 'normal' life.

      However, the technical assistance, flood equipment and managment sent by a few countries is well spent, and is hard to get without some help. But i do have to wonder why a superpower that can invade other countries on the other side of the world doesnt have a ready supply of emergency equipment hanging around to use a moments notice...

    118. Re:What a horrible mess... by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      purified water on-mass is all good, but you still need to distribute it in something....

      Those water purifiers are more usefull to re-supply the infrastructure of the city, or for camps that have to service hundreds/thousands of people.

  4. Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " No word on additional busses and shelters..."

    First things first, I guess.

    1. Re:Priorities by ericdano · · Score: 1
      You have to have some semblance of order to evacuate people. Otherwise there will be choas.

      I just can't believe the looting and people SHOOTING at rescuers. That is insane.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Priorities by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      1. Looting doesn't stop evacuation. Evacuation should take precedence.

      2. I've heard of only two incidents of relief workers being shot at. One was a helicopter, and one was at a hospital. There has been more going on in the city, but that still doesn't explain why water and food couldn't be got to the superdrome or whatever it's called.

    3. Re:Priorities by ericdano · · Score: 1
      1. Evacuations. I believe the ball was dropped as to the number of people who stayed in New Orleans. Still, Friday was the day when all the stuff happened. The Military got into high gear. With the number of people who stayed, and the evacuation order given Sunday (not enough time in my opinion), things are going well all things considered.

      2. You don't send helicopters with relief into a place that is NOT SAFE. Hence, no helicopters to the superdome (which was next to where one of these shootings happened). Now that there are ARMED troops on the ground, we see LOTS of helicopters and stuff going in...

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    4. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > people SHOOTING at rescuers

      Sigh, yet another victim of the Bush propaganda machine. How many honest people have you heard mention the shooting? ZERO! Every single person that has reported this lie has been white. You can't trust them to tell the truth when this lie helps their agenda. No one is shooting at rescuers. That's just ridiculous. It's as ridiculous as the story last night Faux News published about "nigger snipers" that had firemen and their families trapped in a BellSouth building. Faux admitted this morning that they lied. There were no blacks outside the building with guns.

      David "Skinner" Allen

    5. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        You have to have some semblance of order to evacuate people. Otherwise there will be choas.

      I just can't believe the looting and people SHOOTING at rescuers. That is insane.


      When your city's claim to fame is getting smashed and women flashing their breasts for beads, there is some other baggage that ou have to carry with that.


      Regardless of your situation, when there is a major crisis I don't know what makes you steal a TV while other parts of your community are bitching about the lack of support.

  5. Yeah, but... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    But will we have those "lasers" on the "moon", too?

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and henceforth it shall be called 'Death Star'.

  6. Aet your phasers to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... talk?.. :P

  7. But will it... by no_pets · · Score: 0

    But will it go to 11?

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  8. Testing ground.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, looks like they found a great opportunity to test some of the new toys out.

    -HmmmT Vzmo

  9. Something called radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would be more usefull and most likley more reliable is a radio system which could be deployed quickly.

    One simple and effective system would be a deployable phone cell. This acoustic "laser" is a pointless waste of resourses. Better to use a mature tried and tested technology instead of one which probably doesnt even work without line of sight.

    1. Re:Something called radio by nametaken · · Score: 1



      Maybe they're doing both. That would be fine with me.

  10. Oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dual purpose! They let you communicate reliably and induce blinding pain in bystanders!

  11. Sonic Food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of a sonic laser perhaps they should bring some food and water.

  12. Is this really what they need? by RUFFyamahaRYDER · · Score: 1

    Can you hear me now? GOOD!

    I hope this will be helpful somehow although I just can't see it doing much. :-/

    1. Re:Is this really what they need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it'll be plenty helpful for the one message they'll send:

      "Hello poor black people. I just wanted to inform you that we are going to leave you in the city of New Orleans to starve to death. If you try to resist, we will send sonic pulses in your direction that will cause your eardrums to burst.

      Thank you for your cooperation, and, please, have a pleasant twilight."

  13. This will work great... by sljgh · · Score: 1

    until a crowd goes nuts and in the process of communicating and controlling the crowd someone forgets to throw a switch and blows away their support staff a mile away.

  14. i for one... by know1 · · Score: 0

    welcome our new sonic laser remote voice unit overlords

  15. Oh that sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No shelters for these people, supplies are too late, the beginnings of what might turn out to be an all-out class/race war in place...but hey, now we can zap those dirty black people from space!

    Nice to see that the Bush administration has its priorities straight.

  16. Trades by Murmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what the going exchange rate between high-powered acoustic lasers and, say, MREs and bottled water is at this point.

    --
    Mike Hoye
    1. Re:Trades by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      MREs and bottled water is at this point.

      This is what I thought as an outsider: The USA is a big, rich country. They must have millions of bottles of water in storage around the country. Millions of meals ready to go, not just military stuff but packaged food of some kind. Energy drinks would be ok for a couple of days. There must be thousands of helicopters around the country in private and government hands.

      Given the resources available and the (relatively) small number of people in need I don't see why the response should have required more than 12 hours or so.

  17. Crowd Control Is Easy by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    M16. Instant crowd control.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Crowd Control Is Easy by MatrixCubed · · Score: 1

      Fuck the M16, they need a BOOMSTICK!

    2. Re:Crowd Control Is Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God bless america! *puke*

    3. Re:Crowd Control Is Easy by ViX44 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why control the crowd? God sent His agent, the angel Katrina, to show us the truth of human nature.

      People aren't going to learn to change themselves until they are thoroughly disgusted with what they currently are. This is step one.

  18. Unstoppable. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn, why didn't I think of that?

    Shoot lasers at the hurricane and we can SCARE IT AWAY.. either that or there will be a fierce battle of lasers vs. wind, and we all know lasers are the strongest thing ever.

    Fuck. The answer has been here the whole time and we just didn't see it.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Unstoppable. by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't laugh. Heat up the air enough with a big damn IR laser, and who knows what kind of countercurrent you could create? Sure, it might take the entire energy output of the US to do it, or some other really big number, but, hey, we're America! If we can conquer the weather using the power of inefficient light generation then who's to stop us?

  19. sound lasers by RevengeOfPoopJuggler · · Score: 0

    sasers

  20. Safety Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The presumption with these as a form of crowd control is that the targets will move away when these are directed upon them. That may not always be possible in a mob situation. And we have too many people getting killed by cops getting aggro with "non-lethal" weapons as it is.

  21. Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Gorobei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is ridiculous. We're the richest nation in the world, and it takes us over 7 days to evacuate 100,000 poor people from a disaster area?

    We don't (or didn't) need high-tech toys to control the crowds. Simple, common-sense, things like on-going airdrops of food and water, combined with convoys of buses, and temporary shelters at schools, etc, would have prevented major losses of life in this fiasco.

    Sure, news photos of helicopters rescuing people look cool, but helicopters are 100 times as expensive as simple, tried and true tech like small boats.

    We had advanced warning (36+ hours) that this was going to happen. Where were FEMA, the NG, Homeland Security, etc?

    I'm disgusted and depressed at the bureaucratic mess that allowed this situation to get so out of hand.

    1. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The evacuation situation is bad, but they didn't know 36+ hours in advance that the levees were going to breach. Since NO got missed, the resources were likely diverted to where Katrina hit hardest.

    2. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1, Troll
      Well, let's have a look at the situation. The head of FEMA Michael Brown, was fired from his last job after mismanagement in the high, exalted position of commissioner of the Arabian horse association. His only qualification for the role appears to be that his college roommate was a big Bush fundraiser. And of course, the guy at the top, GWB himself, is an AWOL coke-snorting drunk. There's basically nobody in the chain of command qualified to lead in this situation. Probably the highest ranking member who has demonstrated any competence is the Commandant of the Coast Guard.

      This is what you get when you "drown the government in the bathtub".

    3. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      this bigger issue remains is why didn't the mayor and governor deal with this before hand? The governor had the power to call out the national guard and enforce the mandatory evacuation. The mayor had the power to put literally hundreds of school busses into action to get people out.

      They did neither.

      FEMA was there, and the police under the mayor never told them where to send the food. FEMA provides resources, but they are still under the direction of the local authorities. The local authorities are the ones in charge on the ground. Instead of being in charge and leading this situation they were on TV whining that the Republican administration in washington wasn't doing enough. Once again the liberals (both the mayor and governor are democrats) will exploit any tragedy for their own political gain, at the expense of suffering people. Shows how caring they really are most of the time. They only care when its politically helpful, and they don't care when not caring is politically helpful. Just typical of them.

    4. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by CptNerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I'm sure the pictures of police and soldiers dragging poor people from their homes and throwing them on buses in the forced evacuation would have gone over so well, especially if the hurricane had missed.

      Yeah, the people who didn't want to leave for any reason would have made great photo-ops displaying the cruelty and racism of the Bush Administration, for displacing poor blacks from their homes.

      The point is, the current administration can do nothing right, and will always be painted with evil motives, no matter what. Most Americans are sick of hearing it, but until the ClintonII administration takes office, that's all we will hear. That's why I've turned the news off.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    5. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by tempehop · · Score: 1

      I doubt its the refugees they'll be turning these "weapons" on. Instead, consider that they may be placed on patrol with other officers, so that if they're going down a street and see a man with a shotgun they don't have to shout out and ask if he's just defending his property of if he's going to take a pot shot at them as so many reports have indicated. Just because a weapon is for crowd control doesn't mean there needs to be a crowd.

    6. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mayor Nagin and the governors are at fault.

      Emergency response plans and disaster relief are planned at the local, county, and state level. FEMA bases their response and help on the existing state and local plans, and on the information given to them when they are asked to come in. The feds do not plan evacuations, they plan response techniques and strategies then apply those, they do not release aid until asked for by the local/state authority. Each Governor is responsible for that state's national guard.

      People are making claims about what FEMA and the fed. gov. should have done when it is not their responsibility. False claims are also being made about why relief didn't come immediately, as some relief was there prior to this disaster. The levys were being assessed to be repaired immediatly after the storm has passed.

      I love how people are also ignoring the fact that response teams were sent to other cities as well, as New Orleans wasn't the only place to need aid.

      The reason that helicopters were not used to drop supplies. Available helicopters were being used to transport isolated people much more in need of rescuing than those in a group large enough to help each other.

      No, boats are not effective rescuing somone from certain locations, such as unstable buildings, though small boats are being used. Take a look at the logistics of getting busses into the locations you are talking about, you cannot drive a bus thru 20' of water. A convoy of busses would also have to travel some distance (thru other areas also devastated by the hurricane).

    7. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by klang · · Score: 1

      ..just to pour salt in the wound..

      from TFA ..but generally range from $10,000 to $75,000 per unit.
      Personel for deployment and operation probably not included.

      How many small boats or busses would that kind of money pay for?

      At this point, people wouldn't need to be told where the busses or boats to save them were situated. Hell, add a small field duster plane with a banner containing an appropriate message.

      Richest nation in the world indeed, because this mess is certainly rich!

    8. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by garcia · · Score: 1

      The evacuation situation is bad, but they didn't know 36+ hours in advance that the levees were going to breach. Since NO got missed, the resources were likely diverted to where Katrina hit hardest.

      The levees were not meant to handle a category 4 storm. Why? They should have been meant to handle above a C5. Why? So that this problem wouldn't happen.

      If such devistation can occur due to people living twenty feet below sea level and it impacts the rest of the country so much -- the short term high-priced investments need to be made so that $100+ billion in losses along with 25+ billion in insurance losses won't occur.

      They've had a long time to think about this. Not just 36+ hours.

    9. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      We had advanced warning (36+ hours) that this was going to happen.

      Right. So how dumb are you if you just sat around rather than getting the hell out of the city?

      Where were FEMA, the NG, Homeland Security, etc?

      What, you wanted them to be on-site before the storm and flood ended so that the people and resources for rescue would themselves be destroyed?

      Traveling takes time. Putting together volunteers (such as national guardsmen who have real jobs they have to be called away from) takes time. Not to mention, the federal government can't just waltz in and start doing shit in your state. There is a legal structure that they are required to follow before they just start coming in and running things in any given state on a federal level.

      Honestly, I don't know what it is people expected. Plus, nobody knew it was going to be this bad ahead of time. I saw "experts" on the news a couple days ahead of time telling news reporters that they were blowing things out of proportion and that the storm would come and go and with little impact.

      Anyway, evacuating more than 100,000 people - many of whom were trapped in and surrounded by water and hard to get to - in seven days? Sounds pretty impressive to me. Not to mention, it hasn't been 7 days unless you're counting the time before the storm ended, which is dumb... because nobody's going to send people and resources into the eye of a storm.

    10. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by toupsie · · Score: 4, Informative
      This is ridiculous. We're the richest nation in the world, and it takes us over 7 days to evacuate 100,000 poor people from a disaster area?

      You're kidding, right? Have you ever tried to move 100,000 people from a disaster area? These are the sick, the old, the very young, injured and, unfortunately, some are the criminal. It is not easy to move them, especially when large parts of the transportation infrastructure has been destroyed. Flat bottom boats are not going to do the job well.

      We don't (or didn't) need high-tech toys to control the crowds. Simple, common-sense, things like on-going airdrops of food and water, combined with convoys of buses, and temporary shelters at schools, etc, would have prevented major losses of life in this fiasco.

      They did try airdrops and were shot at. The Mayor of New Orleans had over 400 buses at his disposal after he was urged by President Bush to evacuate New Orleans ~48 hours before Katrina hit. He chose to leave those city and school buses in the motor pool. The buses that are in New Orleans had to come from outside the city. The buses that were used delivered the victims to locations without adequate resourses such as the Superdome and Convention Center. It is unfortunate that Nagin ignored his own disaster plan.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    11. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Because, if they went through all the trouble of evacuating people and it turned out to be nothing, the entire city, state and country would be PISSED.

    12. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Bush is getting a WAY bad rap on this whole thing.

      You're right -- helicopters are 100 times more expensive, which is why the feds are not usually in charge of disaster recovery. The country is too damn big to have disaster plans for every region, which is why it's the responsibility of local and state governments to have plans. Why the hell didn't the mayor of New Orleans have a plan to get HIS OWN CITIZENS out?? The guy is being a total a-hole blaiming the feds for his own failure, as well as the failure of the governor of Louisiana.

      Did you know that it was BUSH who personally called the mayor to order a mandatory evacuation? From this...

      "Gov. Kathleen Blanco, standing beside the mayor at a news conference, said President Bush called and personally appealed for a mandatory evacuation for the low-lying city, which is prone to flooding."

      In other words, Bush saved thousand, if not tens of thousands of lives. The deaths can be put squarely on the government of Louisiana and New Orleans.

      Not that things couldn't have been done faster -- they could have. But Bush is getting way too much of the blame here. The feds are not designed to move fast, combined with the fact that it was an incredible mess, and it doesn't help when people are shooting at the rescuers.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    13. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Diamon · · Score: 1
      We had advanced warning (36+ hours) that this was going to happen. Where were FEMA, the NG, Homeland Security, etc?
      The first forecast that put the likelihood of the eye of the hurricane passing within 65 nautical miles of New Orleans above 50% was issued by NOAA at10 PM CDT Sunday. The hurriance made landfall at about 4 AM CDT Monday morning.
    14. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is ridiculous. We're the richest nation in the world, and it takes us over 7 days to evacuate 100,000 poor people from a disaster area?

      Exactly, this is simply fucking ridiculous.

      Step one:
      Get a bunch of school buses. This should be easy as hell. There's probably over two hundred just in my county (although I'm not nearby).

      Step two:
      Put food on the buses and drive the to New Orleans. This should take ONE DAY.

      Step three:
      Drop off the food and put fifty people on each bus.

      Step four:
      Drive the buses out to somewhere with food and water.

      BAM! You're done.
      I see this taking a MAXIMUM of three to four days. And that's if we had NO WARNING, which isn't the case here.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    15. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

      In 2001, FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S.

      That's roughly 35040 hours.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    16. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mms://wmscnn.stream.aol.com/cnn/us/2005/09/02/wwl. nagin.intv.affl.ws.wmv open with windows media player or xine... remove the gaps as well

    17. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's not really true. There was an evacuation for a false alarm last year. The city was *empty*. Nobody was PISSED. It was fine. People would rather be safe than sorry.

    18. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      So how dumb are you if you just sat around rather than getting the hell out of the city?

      "dumb"?

      Look at those old, sick ladies in wheelchairs and tell me they were "dumb" for not leaving.

      Even in the poorest parts of the country these people obviously all have cars, right?

      I want you to turn on the news at look and look at those poor, sick, dying people and tell me that they were "dumb."

      Come on, this is a pretty sorry, pathetic excuse on your part, and I'd like to see you try to repeat it in front of these people.

    19. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by winwar · · Score: 1

      "They did try airdrops and were shot at."

      So exactly why would small arms fire stop airdrops from military aircraft such as helicopters? I know helicopters are somewhat fragile but if they can't handle a disaster area with small arms fire I suspect they shouldn't be used in war zones...

      The mayor certainly isn't blameless in this. Pretty sad to see diesel buses sitting in water-not very bright. The people who stayed aren't blameless. The police response is pathetic-their new motto should be "When the going gets tough, we can run with the best of them". Leadership is bad at all levels. Some seem to be doing well-the relief agencies, some police officers, the military on the ground, etc. But overall I suspect this will be a case study of how never, ever to respond to a human disaster.

    20. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, and if Bush had authorized the Corps of Engineers to start work on the levees 5 years ago, you can see the news stories:

      "'Leveegate' allegations continue as the Bush Administration faced increasing criticism from poverty groups concerning the spending of billions on so-called 'improvements' to levees in New Orleans. The Reverend Jesse Jackson was quoted as saying, 'The poor folks in New Orleans don't need flood control, they need jobs control!' The Reverend Jackson was leading a protest vigil at a construction site where hundreds of families had been displaced by the Army Corps of Engineers' to make room for levee 'enhancement' work. Noted scientists continued to maintain the lack of immediate need for these 'enhancements,' citing the extremely low probability of a category 5 hurricane hitting the New Orleans area."

      And of course Slashdot would have been ablaze with articles claiming the only reason the levee work was being done was to make Bush's cronies rich.

      And one other thing, since the construction would have taken years, the levees under construction would have been more vulnerable to the hurricane and flood waters than those not being worked on. But that wouldn't matter, Bush would still have been blamed for the "failure".

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    21. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by 4of12 · · Score: 1
      This is ridiculous. We're the richest nation in the world, and it takes us over 7 days to evacuate 100,000 poor people from a disaster area?

      I'm surprised everyone is so surprised about this.

      Do we believe the people running the country are more familiar with their own problems, or with the problems of the 100,000 poor residents of N.O.?

      Taking an action such as evacuation is something I could plan and execute for myself if I needed to.

      But, then, I rely on homeowners insurance to protect my property while I'm gone, I have good credit and can buy supplies on my VISA card, I have a working vehicle, I can buy gas, I have a cell phone I can use to call friends and relatives, etc.

      Many of the working assumptions I rely upon are missing altoegether for the very poor.

      But I suspect too many of the decision makers in the highest places have no familiarity with that issue.

      Which comes to down to competency in leadership.

      And since the leaders of a democratic republic are the results of elections in which we citizens vote (or choose not to vote), then this failure of leadership reflects our own bad collective judgement, our shortsightedness or our gullibility.

      No, as appalling as it is, as sad as it is, none of it is particularly surprising.

      Let's just pay attention and actually learn a lesson, shall we? Then, perhaps there's a chance the country, or some part of it, will suffer less the next time that careful thoughtful planning, active responsible relevant leadership and execution is needed. We really do have the capability of doing much better.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    22. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by winwar · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The first forecast that put the likelihood of the eye of the hurricane passing within 65 nautical miles of New Orleans above 50% was issued by NOAA at10 PM CDT Sunday."

      And well before that time, President Bush had signed disaster declarations for the area. FEMA stated it was ready to go. So what's your point again?

      Anyone who was reasonably prudent expected the Hurricane to hit N.O. well before Sunday and cause significant damage. Probably not the current level with certainty but that is never going to happen with significant advanced warning. There was ample warning and expectation that something bad was going to happen.

      Leadership failed at ALL levels. Mobilization of significant resources is not quick or easy. But if you are signing disaster declarations for the area before the storm hits, you had better be mobilizing resources. You can always tell people to go home.

      The people responsible for making these hard decisions failed. At some point they should be fired. Some will have to be voted out. Because I have no confidence that these people are qualified to rebuild the region. And I don't want these people in charge of billions of dollars funds and levels of responsibility that they can't handle.

    23. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by eyeye · · Score: 2, Informative

      Flat bottom boats are not going to do the job well.

      One resident was saving peoples life with exactly that, days before any official help even bothered turning up. Journalists even got there to interview him and still there was no help from the authorities.
      Journalists FROM THE UK flew over and were reporting on the disaster days before the bush adminsitration did anything (apart from flying over at 5000 feet in air force 1). People were asking journalists for help!
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    24. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      One of the other two most likely disasters listed was a terrorist attack on NYC.

      2 out of 3. Go figure.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    25. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      >The point is, the current administration can do nothing right, and will always be painted with evil motives, no matter what.

      Funny, I turned off the news for the opposite reasons.

      1. The war in Iraq rages on. Why? Where is the WMD? Where is the outrage?

      2. The Christian Right's talking heads (who are 99% pro-Bush) seem to be the only voices on the news with little to no appropriate secular answer to their insane claims and hate-mongering.

      3. The lack of discourse about why our National Guard is in Iraq and not waiting for events just like these to happen.

      4. How the FEMA head Michael Brown's background is in being a laywer and city councilman. The favor system in Washington hurts when real work is demanded from these types.

      5. How all the cries of "smaller government" also include smaller emergency services.

      Then again you always have Fox news.

    26. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Mortlath · · Score: 1
      Step one: Get a bunch of school buses. This should be easy as hell. There's probably over two hundred just in my county (although I'm not nearby).

      The New Orleans buses are underwater. I imagine that many of the buses in the area are damaged as well, if they already weren't used to evacuate people. Step two: Put food on the buses and drive the to New Orleans. This should take ONE DAY.

      Drive on what roads? The Hurricane didn't just destroy New Orleans. A bus carrying people overturned just the other day, killing at least one. The roads are in really bad shape.

    27. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by toupsie · · Score: 1
      So exactly why would small arms fire stop airdrops from military aircraft such as helicopters? I know helicopters are somewhat fragile but if they can't handle a disaster area with small arms fire I suspect they shouldn't be used in war zones...

      Sure, but the people hanging outside dropping the cargo tend to be not as bulletproof as the helicopters they are riding in. I don't know about you, if you are dropping water to hurricane survivors and someone is shooting at you, I would tend to cease operations and try someplace safer.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    28. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by toupsie · · Score: 1
      One resident was saving peoples life with exactly that, days before any official help even bothered turning up. Journalists even got there to interview him and still there was no help from the authorities.

      Aren't journalist just the most wonderful people? They are always there to interview people that need help. Too bad they rarely provide it. Still, a flat bottom boat can carrying 5 to 10 people...and not very safely. How many would it take and how long to transport 100,000 people?

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    29. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the mayor issuing a mandatory evacuation had more to do with the guys from NOAA advising him to do so.

      Nice story, though.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    30. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by div_2n · · Score: 1

      It never helps when a huge chunk of your local National Guard is in another country. I wonder how they got there?

    31. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by demachina · · Score: 1

      There is actually something called the National Response Plan published by DHS in December 2004 which is just coming in to effect that outlines in excruciating detail how the DHS and the rest of the Federal government is supposed to respond to incidents such as this. It was obviously written with a major terrorism incident in mind but applies equally to natural disasters when they rich a threshold called "event of national significance".

      It is mind numbing exercise in bureaucracy to read. The parts I've struggled through though suggest the burden for disaster response is almost entirely placed on the backs of state and local governments and the Feds only support them and can only step in and take control when the local officials "overwhelmed" which they obviously were in this case.

      Having just seen Chertoff's press conference the cynic in me thinks that in fact the Bush administration probably intentionally sat on their hands for a few days because they want the situation to spiral out of control. They now have the opportunity to justify declaring an "event of national significance" and Federalizing the whole situation. Chertoff indicated this was in fact a golden opportunity to christen the National Response Plan.

      There is a wicked double edged sword at play here. For disasters of this epic scale obviously the Federal government and the military have vast resources to bring to bear.

      It is however setting a dangerous precedent. The reason we have the Posse Commitatus act passed in 1878 was that during and after the Civil War the U.S. military ran rough shod over the South, devastating most of it, and imposing martial law to the misfortune of Southerners who in many case had their land and property confiscated by carpetbaggers with military support. Sherman's march to the sea, though perhaps a legitimate military action in some books, is in others an act of savagery and gratuitous revenge in others. Its not open to dispute that it was a case of a Federal army applied a scorched Earth strategy to a huge swath of the South.

      Its great that there is now aid flowing to those that need it but the thing to watch now is how far the Federal government overcorrects and uses this incident as a justification for dramatically expanding the ability of the Federal government and the military to exert martial law in the U.S. and to overrule the power of the states and their governors. It will be interesting in particular to see if they actually do deploy all the new DOD toys for "non lethal" crowd control here to establish precent for using them in times of anarchy, a precedent that could be used downt he road to suppress antiwar or anti government demonstrations.

      9/11 was used as a basis by the power hungry Bush administation to justify the Patriot Act, National Intelligence Reform and dramatically expanding the powers of the executive to engage in arbitrary arrest and detention in the U.S of U.S citizens without due process.

      I am willing to wager this incident will be used as the basis in coming months to overturn Posse Comitatus and to give the Federal government broad new powers to impose martial law and to seize control of cities and states in the U.S. in order to "restore order". They are still tiptoeing very carefully, for example in using the 82nd airborne in non policing roles to free up the Guard for policing duty because that is the law. Don't be at all surprised if six months from now laws will be passed the give the Federal government sweeping new power to intervene in domestic affairs. This will be a plus in dealing with major disasters. But, the other edge is it will give the President sweeping new power to impose martial law and approach dictatorship.

      The cynic in me thinks the Bush administration saw the chaos in New Orleans, let it spiral out of control for a few days and, as is there way, saw a silver lining that it may turn in t a tool to let them vastly expand their alre

      --
      @de_machina
    32. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      The Mayor of New Orleans had over 400 buses at his disposal after he was urged by President Bush to evacuate New Orleans ~48 hours before Katrina hit.

      Gov. Kathleen Blanco, standing beside the mayor at a news conference, said President Bush called and personally appealed for a mandatory evacuation for the low-lying city, which is prone to flooding.

      So George Bush had more clue than the Governor and Mayor. Is there any stronger proof that they must both be idiots?

    33. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bush is getting a WAY bad rap on this whole thing."

      So tell me, why are we spending hundreds of billions in this so-called "War on Terror" and ending up in a situation where we can't mitigate the damage of a natural disaster?

      Are you telling me that natural disasters are actually more dangerous than terrorists? Then why waste all this money and throw away our rights at the same time to fight imaginary terrorists when we should be using the money to defend against actual dangers?

      Bush, and almost all of Congress (Republicans and Democrats alike), are to blame not for the disaster, but for the utter hypocrisy of their actions -- emptying the coffers of our entire nation to pretend to make us safe, while doing nothing to make us actually safe.

    34. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by t35t0r · · Score: 1

      Not that things couldn't have been done faster -- they could have. But Bush is getting way too much of the blame here. The feds are not designed to move fast, combined with the fact that it was an incredible mess, and it doesn't help when people are shooting at the rescuers.
       
      They sure as hell moved fast when it was time to attack Iraq. Or when it was time to push the Patriot Act through. Or many other things that directly help whatever agenda they have.

    35. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by fzammett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a Bush supporter, I have just one thing to say here...

      BULLSHIT.

      Bush deserves every bit of blame he's getting, and probably more. He has done virtually nothing to make a horrible situation better, and aruably has made it worse by not reacting in a timely fashion.

      He also says something stupid seemingly every time he opens his mouth these days.

      Look, I voted for the guy. I felt he was the best available choice. I supported going to war in Iraq. But his second term has frankly, thus far, made me absolutely regret that vote. This situation is not helping any at all. The one thing he should be doing more than anything is LEADING. Get up there, be definitive, tell people what to do and see that it's done. He's not doing that.

      Bullshit. Bush deserves every bit of flake he's getting now, and that's coming from a supporter.

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    36. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here he is playing country music star while people are dying:

      http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/8/31/1442/5 3877

    37. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Gee man, the affected area is larger than many countries in the world and is roughly the size of the United Kingdom. FEMA was simply overwhelmed by a problem 10 times bigger than they could possibly handle. Yes, some stupid things were done over many years, like building the whole damn NO city there in the first place, but you can't blame all of that on the present mayor. So, don't look for malice when stupidity provides an adequate explanation...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    38. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't. I wish people had paid some attention in civics. Look read your constitution, Bush has NO authority to order anyone except some federal troops on what to do. All the local and state organizations are under control of the local and state governments. Bush CAN NOT by LAW tell them to do anything. He can ask them nicely, but he can't tell them to do shit.

    39. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Two thirds of the NO police held under horendous conditions. They are true heroes and we need to recognize the MAJORITY of the police who stayed.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    40. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      That is why one should use cargo planes. A C-130 can carry more cargo, and airdrop it quickly while in motion. It is difficult to intercept with small arms fire. The precision is less, but with the added cargo area, you could also drop inflatable rafts, so people could retrieve the supplies that missed dry land. Using helicopters to drop cargo is very ineffecient, especially from a $$$ in fuel to mass of supplies ratio. And if there is a major disaster, you run plane after plane. Helicopters are slower, and cannot move the tonnage that a cargo plane can.

    41. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by donutello · · Score: 1

      The problem is not that we have too few National Guard troops available. The problem is that most of the resources were moved far from the disaster area to keep them from being destroyed. Resources that weren't moved away were rendered mostly unusable. The disaster area is 90,000 square miles and a lot of the infrastructure in terms of roads and airports was destroyed or rendered unusable. It takes time to get these resources back in in such conditions. New Orleans is on TV the most but the entire Gulf coast has been affected by Katrina. There are two things that should have been done and weren't. One, all possible resources should have been dedicated to getting all people out of NOLA. This wasn't done. Secondly, national guard troops and resources should have been assembled and kept on guard in nearby areas like Houston so they would be in a position to move in as soon as the storm left the area. There's a lot of blame to go around and we should definitely get to the bottom of this. However, now is not the time to do so. At this time the nations thoughts and energies should be focused on saving as many lives as possible while there are still some left to save.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    42. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      In other words, Bush saved thousand, if not tens of thousands of lives. The deaths can be put squarely on the government of Louisiana and New Orleans.

      Whoah, whoah. That's a hell of a claim. Just because Bush made the call does not mean a mandatory evacuation would not have been made otherwise.

      Not that things couldn't have been done faster -- they could have. But Bush is getting way too much of the blame here. The feds are not designed to move fast, combined with the fact that it was an incredible mess, and it doesn't help when people are shooting at the rescuers.

      The feds are not designed to move fast? Who gives a shit? People were dying, and nothing was being done. Bush et al could and should have had supplies cached well before the hurricane even hit, and they should have been evacuating people as soon as the hurricane cleared. Who cares where in the chain of command the fuckup occurred? It's ultimately Bush's responsibility, and he failed. Miserably.

      And the rescuers, or whoever was in charge, are a bunch of fucking pussies. The small chance of an injury to a few people, based on some vague reports of shots, simply does not begin to stack up against tens of thousands of people dying of dehydration.

    43. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by donutello · · Score: 1

      They sure as hell moved fast when it was time to attack Iraq. Or when it was time to push the Patriot Act through. Or many other things that directly help whatever agenda they have.

      Really? How many days did those things take?

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    44. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Bush CAN NOT by LAW tell them to do anything. He can ask them nicely, but he can't tell them to do shit.

      Obviously your civics class didn't explore the finer points of government. The federal government controls the states with money. Where do you think the national drinking age of 21 and highway speed limit of 55 come from? Federal grants that are given on these conditions.

      Anyway, Bush also directly controls the DHS and FEMA, which he can order wherever he wants.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    45. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      why are we spending hundreds of billions in this so-called "War on Terror" and ending up in a situation where we can't mitigate the damage of a natural disaster?


      To do exactly what we've done, prevent an even worse unnatural disaster.

    46. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by RobynTryst · · Score: 1

      And the third one was...?

    47. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by toddestan · · Score: 1, Troll

      And I'm sure the pictures of police and soldiers dragging poor people from their homes and throwing them on buses in the forced evacuation would have gone over so well, especially if the hurricane had missed.

      I don't think a forced evacuation would be nessecary. A lot of people say that they had no place to go, and no way to get there. So give them a place to go (a real place, not like the Superdome turned out), and run the buses to pick up anyone who wants to go there. If they did that, I don't think many people would be feeling very sorry for the few that would stay behind anyway.

      The point is, the current administration can do nothing right, and will always be painted with evil motives, no matter what. Most Americans are sick of hearing it, but until the ClintonII administration takes office, that's all we will hear. That's why I've turned the news off.

      What ever happened to "The buck stops here"? The current administration does nothing but point fingers and shifts blame. Katrina was a huge fuck up - both in preperation and dealing with the aftermath. So is the war in Iraq. And the economy. And the war on terror. All that the Bush administration does is either pretend the problem doesn't exist ("Stay the course") or simply point fingers at others. Where's the accountability? The American people are sick of it, and Bush's popularity is plummeting because of it.

    48. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      A massive earthquake in San Francisco.

      http://www.hurricane.lsu.edu/_in_the_news/houston. htm

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    49. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Still, a flat bottom boat can carrying 5 to 10 people...and not very safely. How many would it take and how long to transport 100,000 people?
      That's not the right question to ask. The question is, how many live people could be evacuated by flat-bottomed boats, compared to how many dead corpses could be retrieved by "official help" later?

      The point is that they should have used every resource available, as fast as possible. It appears that they chose not to, and that more people died because of it.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    50. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The media would have had a field day if the police had tried to force those little old ladies to leave on a bus. If the hurricane hadn't been as bad as it turned out to be, there would have been charges of police brutality and lawsuits left and right.

      You're the one who is pathetic playing the armchair general now that you know how this disaster played out.

    51. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by wronskyMan · · Score: 1

      Then people would be whining about somebody who accidentally got hit by a pallet of MREs coming down..

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    52. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Where were FEMA, the NG, Homeland Security, etc?

      Under the weather with a severe case of budget cuts and political appointments, in Iraq, and making sure nobody gets through the airport without a rectal exam respectively.

    53. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Hm...

      1. Not so much 'rage' as 'putter along unsteadily'

      2. If you get all your news from the TV, expect nothing but crap. The newspapers are also mostly crap, but occasionally they take a break from Bush-Is-Evil articles to actually report something.

      3. The national guard is primarily a military/peacekeeping organization with more additional expertise at infrastructure repair than your average battalion... I assume that's why they were put into a military/peacekeeping situation that requires infrastructure repair. but yeah, they're kind of supposed to stay near the borders.

      4. Um... so? It's a sad fact of american politics that all the competent people have real jobs. It's plagues our nation since day one. The only people with enough free time for public office without sacrificing their normal important activities are the politician types.

      5. Most of the cries are for smaller federal government. Emergency services are primarily state or local level. And, admittedly, if the mayor of NO hadn't waited around for a federal handout to repair the city's levies, the place would probably be slightly less wet right now... so they might have a point.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    54. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The point is, the current administration can do nothing right, and will always be painted with evil motives, no matter what.

      Except for the other half of the country, who seem to think that Bush is the second coming and has never made a mistake in his life (which he will heartily agree with). What happened to the reasonable center, which can look at everything critically but open-minded, and try to find what is best for everyone? All we have is vicious partisanship all around.

      <warning: I don't like President Bush's policies. If you do, try not to take these comments personally. >

      1. The war in Iraq rages on. Why? Where is the WMD? Where is the outrage?

      Well, whether we should have gone to war in Iraq or not, we are there now. While the administration can't seem to state the obvious, leaving now would be a serious blunder. If we withdraw while Iraq is in the state that it's in, we would have taken a stable (if not-free) country and turned it into an anarchy where people aren't safe to walk the streets. Maybe not, I haven't been there, but they don't seem to have a coherent government or a working police force. We have to finish what we started, then we can concentrate on not doing it again. (Although it would be nice to get some UN forces in to help out. Maybe the insurgents would go easier on some Muslim troops from Thailand or Egypt.)

      2. The Christian Right's talking heads (who are 99% pro-Bush) seem to be the only voices on the news with little to no appropriate secular answer to their insane claims and hate-mongering.

      In response to a claim that everything you hear is anti-Bush. Both sides are at it, and Karl Rove seems to have proven that today's winning political strategy is to ATTACK. No debate. No admitting fault. No acknowledging the other side's strengths. They are wrong and we are right.

      3. The lack of discourse about why our National Guard is in Iraq and not waiting for events just like these to happen.

      See #1. We committed to a war (or 2), and that committment has drawn on more than our full-time forces, which wars tend to do. The debate is whether we should have gone to war, and in the way that we did. I think the answer to that question will be in limbo until we see if Iraq stabilizes and becomes a solid, free country.

      4. How the FEMA head Michael Brown's background is in being a laywer and city councilman. The favor system in Washington hurts when real work is demanded from these types.

      All governments have issues with appointing 'friends' instead of those most qualified. Actually, not just government. The skills to succeed in any organization are not the same as the skills to do your appointed job at the organization. More important is the ability to make your superiors think that you are doing your job well. Note, however, that the head of an agency like FEMA is going to do mostly politics and some administration, and doesn't need to know much about disaster relief, so it's not quite that bad.

      5. How all the cries of "smaller government" also include smaller emergency services.

      Some would argue that private interests could respond better than the government. Others would say that the Federal government should be smaller, leaving the disaster preperations for the local governments. I have a sinking feeling that the reaction to the poor response to this crisis will be to fund a very expensive FEMA expansion, which will use an unreasonable amount of money to be over-prepared for most disasters.

    55. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with San Francisco is not just that it sits directly on a rather active fault line, but that much of downtown is built on landfill.

      In fact, the landfill is mostly made of the rubble that was left over from the last time San Francisco was destroyed.

      Unless we come up with a way to predict earthquakes, we will have no warning when a big one does eventually hit. If the epicenter is near the city, thousands will die, especially in the sections built on landfill. We could save many lives if we razed that section of the city and turned it into a wilderness preserve.

      Scientists say there is a 70% chance that a major earthquake will hit the area in the next 30 years. Presumably this means there is a 91% chance that it will happen within 60 years, and a 97% chance that it will happen within 90 years.

    56. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You prevent a worse unnatural disaster by repealing the Bill of Rights?

      By removing the right of Habeas Corpus?

      By removing freedom of association?

      By invading Afghanistan, leaving it to recover under an installed dictator when you fail to achieve the ostensible purpose of the invasion (capturing bin Laden)?

      By invading Iraq, directly and indirectly killing tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians, and replacing its secular dictator with a militant Islamic theocracy?

      By taking hundreds of billions of dollars from American citizens to "rebuild" and giving it, without even requesting bids, to the corporate friends of the President and Vice President?

      By creating prison camps with which the military may accuse anyone of "being a terrorist," holding them forever without any trial to prove their guilt or innocence?

      By allowing police to wiretap any American, without even requiring any suspicion of a crime having been committed?

      That's a darned interesting way of preventing disasters you've got there.

    57. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Apotsy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "They did try airdrops and were shot at."

      I content that this is nothing but a false rumor, an urban legend, a lie. Where is your source for this? I've seen this repeated many, many times, but so far not one source has ever been named. I expect none ever will, because it simply didn't happen. The FAA has had no reports of air vehicles being fired upon.

      When all this shit is over, people are going to need a better excuse than that.

    58. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Manchot · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Bush is partly to blame for this. Last year, the federal funds earmarked to maintain the levees around NO were cut by the Bush administration to a third of what they needed (though Congress bumped it up to a half). Also, 3000 National Guardsmen were in Iraq. If Bush doesn't deserve any blame for this, I don't know who does.

    59. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did try airdrops and were shot at.

      Nope. This story is a rumor.

        The people who should know say otherwise:
      "We're controlling every single aircraft in that airspace and none of them reported being fired on," she said, adding that the FAA was in contact with the military as well as civilian aircraft.

    60. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Hey, genius... An awful lot of the people there look pretty fucking ambulatory to me. For every old person or wheel-chair bound person, I'm seeing twenty or thirty you are up and walking around and even look pretty fucking athletic. So don't give me this bullshit about some 91,000 of those people stranded being too sickly or institutionalized to take a car, bus, cab, bike or train 20 miles before the shit hit the fan.

      And as far as the government doing an "awful job". Sure, they could probably have done better, but what were they supposed to do? Start sending everyone at great time and expense to New Orleans on a hunch? And what if it turned out that it was Florida or Texas or elsewhere that was seriously hit, instead? Now you have to right-turn the entire effort and deploy somewhere else. Not to mention, the storm wasn't enough to have done a lot of damage... if it weren't for the levee breaking.

      I think it's pretty idiotic to act like everyone who is there, is there because they couldn't possibly make it out of the city with two days advanced warning. I'm sure if you told them they were giving away free televisions in Lafayette, they'd have fucking rollerskated the 130 miles.

    61. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      In other words, Bush saved thousand, if not tens of thousands of lives. The deaths can be put squarely on the government of Louisiana and New Orleans.

      No, I think the deaths can be put squarely on the fucking hurricane.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    62. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The real problem was logistics.
      Go ahead and look at google earth at New Orleans.
      Its got a lake on one side an ocean on the other and very few federal interstates connecting it.
      In other words it is a choke point.

    63. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by eander315 · · Score: 1

      Ok, Bush, stop posting on Slashdot and get back to work.

    64. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Diamon · · Score: 1
      And well before that time, President Bush had signed disaster declarations for the area. FEMA stated it was ready to go. So what's your point again?

      It was announced Sunday that Bush had signed a disaster declaration. I wouldn't call that "well before" something that happened later that same day. Additionally the area the was declared a federal disaster area is 90,000 sq mi (or at least that's the number that's being reported) which is twice the size of the state of Ohio and included parts of Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana. So where exactly in that area did you want them to put the troops?
    65. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by pointguy · · Score: 1

      We had advanced warning (36+ hours) that this was going to happen. Where were FEMA, the NG, Homeland Security, etc?

      Good question, but a better one might be: what kind of a dumbass stays home when he's been told to evacuate because his city is about to be flooded?

    66. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Bush deserves every bit of blame he's getting, and probably more. He has done virtually nothing to make a horrible situation better, and aruably has made it worse by not reacting in a timely fashion.
      ROTFL. And just what could he have done? Gone down there and piloted a helicopter himself?

      It takes *time* to get relief organized on this scale. It takes *time* to move people and equipment. The President doesn't have some magic wand he can wave and make everything all better - but a lot of people do have very unrealistic expectations as to how fast things can be done.

      (And very few people seem to realize the New Orleans is about 2% of the population and about .01% of the land area involved.)

    67. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by daspriest · · Score: 1
      " Flat bottom boats are not going to do the job well."

      It would be real helpful if they were allowed in to try and help.

      From http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/371

      "Just to give you a sense of just how badly FEMA has f*cked up.

      Posted by Clark Warner on September 3, 2005 - 9:25pm.

      This is beyond my comprehension and after spending two frustrating days trying to just get someone to let us help we've FINALLY been told we can conduct "renegade" boat rescues via the just concluded press conference that Gov. Blanco just held.

      Why is this JUST NOW being allowed? Well let's start from the very beginning as relayed to me.

      On Wednesday morning a group of approximately 1,000 citizens pulling 500 boats left the Acadiana Mall in Lafayette in the early morning and headed to New Orleans with a police escort from the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Department. The flotillia of trucks pulling boats stretched over FIVE miles. This citizen rescue group was organized by La. State Senator, Nick Gautreaux from Vermilion Parish. The group was comprised of experienced boaters, licensed fishermen and hunters, people who have spent their entire adult life and teenage years on the waterways of Louisiana.

      The State Police waved the flotillia of trucks/boats through the barricades in LaPlace and we sped into New Orleans via I-10 until past the airport and near the Clearview exit. At that time they were stopped by agents of the La. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries. A young DWF agent strolled through the boats and told approximately half of the citizens that their boats were too large because the water had dropped during the night and that they should turn around and go home.

      They were pulling a large (24ft) shallow draft aluminum boat that can safely carry 12 passengers and had ramp access which would allow the elderly and infirm to have easier access to the boat. They then politely informed the DWF agent that the local and national media had consistently reported that the water level had risen during the night which contradicted his statement to them that the water was dropping and no boat over 16ft. in length would be allowed to participate in rescue operations.

      They then specifically asked the DWF agent that they (and other citizens in the flotillia) be allowed to go to the hospitals and help evacuate the sick and the doctors and nurses stranded there. They offered to bring these people back to Lafayette, in our own vehicles, in order to ensure that they received proper and prompt medical care.

      The DWF agent did not want to hear this and ordered them home -- ALL FIVE HUNDRED BOATS. They complied with the DWF agent's orders, turned around and headed back to Lafayette along with half of the flotillia. However, two friends were pulling a smaller 15ft alumaweld with a 25 hp. The DWF agents let them through to proceed to the rescue operation launch site.

      They were allowed to drive to the launch site where the La. Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries were launching their rescue operations (via boat). They reported to me that there were over 200 DWF agents just standing around and doing nothing. They were kept there for approximately 3 hours. During that time they observed a large number of DWF agents doing absolutely nothing. Why? After three hours had passed they were told that they were not needed and should go home. They complied with the DWF's orders and turned around and went home to Lafayette.

      Watching CNN later that night, there was a telephone interview with a Nurse trapped in Charity Hospital in New Orleans. She said that there were over 1,000 people trapped inside of the hospital and that the doctors and nurses had zero medical supplies, no diesel to run the generators and that only three people had been rescued from the hospital since the Hurricane hit!

      I can't come up with one logical reason why the DWF sent this large group of 500 boats/1000 men home when we surely could h

    68. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They sure as hell moved fast when it was time to attack Iraq. Or when it was time to push the Patriot Act through. Or many other things that directly help whatever agenda they have.

      Really? How many days did those things take?

      The Senate passed legislation in response to 9/11 two days after the attack.

      The USA-PATRIOT act was submitted to congress less than a week after the World Trace Center attack. The President signed it on October 26, 2001.

      Major fighting in Iraq lasted 43 days. The attack began on March 20, 2003. Bush announced that major combat had ended in iraq on May 2, 2003.

    69. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by serutan · · Score: 1

      The point is, the current administration can do nothing right

      Wait, I think you've put your finger on it.

    70. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're a fucktard for voting for him, especially after witnessing his first 4 years in office.

    71. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      The New Orleans buses are underwater. I imagine that many of the buses in the area are damaged as well, if they already weren't used to evacuate people.

      Are you nuts?
      There are PLENTY of buses around. Shit buses from here in upstate freakin new york could have been there by now. You think every bus between here and there is inoperable?

      Drive on what roads? The Hurricane didn't just destroy New Orleans. A bus carrying people overturned just the other day, killing at least one. The roads are in really bad shape.

      So fix them. Sheesh, the hurricane is over.
      It's not like every single road needs to be clear.

      I don't see why you're making excuses for the obvious total fuckup that is going on right now. They knew what to expect. We, as country, have the resources to tackle it. The problem is obviously at an admisitrative level.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    72. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by indiechild · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why is your post moderated insightful?

      A lot of people really do have nowhere else to go when a Hurricane strikes. Not everybody has a car or transport. They didn't all just stay behind to spite you and Bush, you know.

      Yeah, there's a lot of scumbags, murderers and rapists running aorund loose. But most of those who were left behind were just ordinary people with no means of escape.

      And those tourists left stranded, damn those foreign hippies -- always trying to make teh George W look bad!!!!

    73. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      ROTFL. And just what could he have done? Gone down there and piloted a helicopter himself?

      Hmm, let me think. Oh yeah, how about even TRYING to coordinate the relief effort?

      It takes *time* to get relief organized on this scale. It takes *time* to move people and equipment.

      I suppose you're right, playing guitar with Mark Wills and keeping the vacation and PR tour going is much more important, after all, it would take time anyway, so few more days before getting started doesn't really hurt anyone.

      The President doesn't have some magic wand he can wave and make everything all better - but a lot of people do have very unrealistic expectations as to how fast things can be done.

      Unrealistic assumptions such as even bothering to drag his ass to a goddamn "war room" where he MIGHT, despite his obvious incompetence, have the SLIGHTEST change of getting the relevant reports from people out there for forming the "big picture" and the communications channels for even STARTING to move the people and equipment.

    74. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They did try airdrops and were shot at.

      Show one FAA report of aircraft being shot at. Just one. Otherwise STFU.

    75. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by nytmare · · Score: 1

      Well there's this nasty little thing called "reputation" that, when decidedly earned, has a habit of not going away very easily.

    76. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On top of that, I would say: we spent $40 billion just for the initial allocation of funds to Homeland Security. For four years now they've been scaring us with the idea of terrorists getting nukes. And we don't have some kind of rapid response force ready to deal with major emergencies?? Where'd the money go?

      Oh, yeah, it got allocated proportionately to every state, and rural deputies everywhere got night vision goggles.

      A guy on the radio was defending how long it took to get active-duty military on site, saying it takes time to organize. It's ridiculous that we're not ready to go with a massive response, especially given that we had a couple days warning before it hit. It took five days to evacuate the freaking *hospitals*...there's no excuse for this crap.

      I've got some ideological sympathy with the administration, but this goes beyond ideology...this is an issue of basic competence. Not that congress doesn't share the blame. This is a national disgrace.

    77. Re:Why not just machine gun the refugees? by Tune · · Score: 1

      So are you saying the FEMA should be aquited?

  22. Well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't we just use this to yell at the storm to go away?

  23. Longitudinal wave lasers? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Warning: dopey science rant follows!

    Man, I wish people would get this right. Sonic laser doesn't make any sense. Can you really call longitudinal waves coherent? There's more to a laser than just high fluence and the ability to be focused. Sonic waves don't even have a particle nature, really, unless you wanted to count the vibrating atoms. Since you can't amplify atoms, you really can't get a sonic laser. Here, let's look at this:

    "... like the sonic equivalent of a laser, or spotlight."

    That's from the article. A spotlight and a laser really don't have much in common besides producing lots of light. A spotlight isn't coherent, or even monochromatic. It's just really, really "bright." Photons of laser light all have a fixed phase relationship--coherency, basically. This leads to lots of interesting properties like, oh, the entire science of interferometry. More importantly for the purposes of this discussion, lasers are _really really really_ "bright." I'm using "brightness" as a misnomer for fluence, or power through an area: you can get a much higher fluence from a decent laser by reducing area than from a spotlight by increasing power. I wish people wouldn't abuse the term laser so very much.

    At the _very_ least, don't say "laser," because the "L" means light, and we're not talking about light here. Say "saser" or something, even though that's meaningless--stimulated emission of sound waves makes no sense under the traditional definition of stimulated emission, which really only applies to photons.

    I realize that perhaps the functionality of the equipment makes the "beam" have laser-like properties, but I'm just irritated that "laser" is one of those fancy new buzzwords that the military and businesses like to toss around so much. They seriously degrade the good name of the device and, by doing so, cheapen science and help contribute to the scientific ignorance of the American population.

    1. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Ask your mom to buy your underwear a couple sizes larger next time.

    2. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by photonic · · Score: 1
      I agree that comparing it to a laser is a little bit far-fetched, but at least get your facts right while you are ranting:
      Can you really call longitudinal waves coherent
      Yes you can. Longitudinal/transverse only decribes the direction of the vibration with respect to the direction in which the wave travels. Coherency depends on the stability of the oscillation, that is over how long a time/distance a wave will interfere with itself.
      Since you can't amplify atoms, you really can't get a sonic laser
      You don't need to amplify atoms, you need to amplify the amount of energy in the oscillation which is a pressure oscillation for sound. I don't know how you would do this for acoustics, but apparently Acoustic lasers do exist.
      the entire science of interferometry
      Interferometry can be done with every kind of wave. What about standing waves in flutes or organ pipes, or even acoustic interferometry?
      or even monochromatic
      An acoustic wave can be made really 'monochromatic' (monotonic??). What about a loudspeaker connected to a very stable electrical oscillator?
      "laser" is one of those fancy new buzzwords
      You are talking about that technique we know since 1960?
      --
      karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    3. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by thomasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about Sonic Phaser instead. That way we could send in Captain Kirk to help.

    4. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about instead of lasaer, use aaser? You know, "a" for accoustic...

    5. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I've always thought these sound devices were really neat, but I have found no possible way to explain their functionality to non-science types without the phrase "sonic laser." It's by far the simplest way to get the idea across. It's a just a metaphor anyway, so it doesn't have to be a completely accurate description.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    6. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      What about a loudspeaker connected to a very stable electrical oscillator?

      It'd have to be generating a perfect sine wave. Google on Fourier Analysis, for starters. Any function (including, of course, all periodic functions) can be expressed as a linear combination of sine and cosine waves of different frequencies. In other words, any waveform other than a perfect sine wave (whatever the phase, so yes, cosine works just as well) is not monotonic.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    7. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Sonic waves don't even have a particle nature, really, unless you wanted to count the vibrating atoms.

      Not exactly. I'm taking Solid State Physics this semester, and in flipping through my textbook, I ran across a mention of something called a phonon, which is, you guessed it, quantum of sound. It is just as much of a particle and just as much of a wave as a photon is. Albeit, as I understand it, you only can really call them phonons when its in a crystal, but I'm not sure about that. And of course, air is not crystalline at all, but nonetheless, the point stands. Sonic waves do have a particle nature. (at least in crystals.)

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    8. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by bryane · · Score: 1
      Beware using misquotes. What the article actually says is this:
      ... and is capable of aiming sound precisely for thousands of feet -- like the sonic equivalent of a laser, or spotlight.

      That's from the article. Nothing about the technology behind the new device, just a simple comparison of the ability to aim precisely to that available to laser or spotlight.
    9. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm hard-wired to think in "photonics" mode, hence the stupid "amplifying atoms" comment. Being optics-oriented will do that to you.

      It appears that that "acoustic laser" does accomplish energy amplification, but I'm still stuck on the coherency issue. What about spatial coherence across the emission area of that acoustic laser? I also don't really see how this counts as a stimulated emission of energy. The heating element contributes heat energy, which helps create a pressure gradient, but that seems to be about it. It's still not stimulated emission, so it's not a laser in the sense that I understand it.

      I'll admit that I was completely wrong in my interferometry remark. I'd come to the conclusion that most practical applications of the science were optical--acoustics wasn't emphasized in my curriculum. However, I maintain that the laser did bring the science of optical interferometry into the realm of practicality.

      Yes, monochromatic was a stupid thing to say about an acoustic wave--again, I'm a photonics-oriented thinker. I'm going to stand by this one, though, since the wavelength spread in a laser is limited more by the properties of the gain medium than by the properties of some idealized driver.

      I also stand by my buzzword comment. Just because something has been known for a long time doesn't mean that it's been practical for that long, or has been a "pet" for so long. Now that lasers are becoming practical (I should say weaponized, actually) for mounting on vehicles and aircraft, you're staring to hear more and more about them. The public is only starting to really see weaponized lasers becoming practical in recent years, so I feel justified in calling it a fancy new buzzword since, in the original context, it was being used as such--"sonic laser" sounds better than "loudspeaker." Maybe the generals have been _talking_ about using lasers since SDI or before, but only in recent years is the possibility coming into the realm of reality.

      My hangup is that this device--as described by the article--is as different from that acoustic laser as a searchlight is from a visible laser. I guess what I really fail to understand is how a disparate array of magnets vibrating a membrane can produce sound waves that have a coherence length of a mile. Maybe I shouldn't try to frame this thing in terms of optics, but that's what I know.

      Again, I should say that my real point is that the abuse of this kind of scientific terminology for non-scientific (i.e. political or military ends) is harmful to the overall scientific knowledge of the public, especially in cases where that terminology is misapplied. It's an easily-avoidable mistake, one that is sometimes intentionally made to get more and better press, without thinking of the other effects.pedagogue Like those people who know exactly where and when an em dash should be used, indeed like any pedant, I believe firmly that the incomplete understanding of my tiny field of expertise by the general public will result in widespread stupidity, disease, famine, and, eventually, a plague of zombies and the downfall of civilization. In other words, I understand that this is petty of me to harp upon, but I still believe that it's a symptom of a greater malaise from which our society is suffering.

    10. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by photonic · · Score: 1
      Of course, you would need to use a sine generator, which you can find in any well equiped electronics/physics lab. I was talking about a very stable oscillator, which is an approximation for a delta-function in the fourier space you speak of. Even if you would have a somewhat crappy sine generator you can use it for interferometry. Remember that all lasers have a finite line-width and thus cannot be considered a monochromatic source if you are picky. That does not prevent you for using them to do interferometry, as long as you keep all your path-length differences within the coherence length.

      As an example take an electrical oscillator that has a frequency that is stable to one part in a million (easy to achieve with a crystal). That means that you can have a length of roughly 1 million wavelengths over which the wave is 'coherent', and thus suitable for interferometry.

      --
      karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    11. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      That's a very good point. I guess I'm picking up more on the use of "sonic laser" in the title. At least the editors had the forethought to put laser in quotes.

    12. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by photonic · · Score: 1
      I am in optics too, but all the wave mechanics you learn there are equily valid in acoustics. I didn't read the acoustic laser article well enough to see how it operates, but I think it wouldn't be impossible to generate some acoustic oscillator by plain old pneumatics. Not really quantum stuff, but you can amplify.

      As for coherence length: this depends a lot on the scale of the wavelength. Roughly speaking the coherence length is the length over which a wave train is coherent with itself. If the oscillator is stable to one part in a million you would have to shift over a million wavelengths before you could see the wave deviating significantly from the nominal case. In optics your laser should be stable to 1 part in 10^9 to reach a coherence length of a meter, since the wavelength is roughly a micrometer. In acoustics however, the wavelength is on the order of a meter, so you would only need a source that is stable to one part in you 10^3 to reach a coherence length of a kilometer! Easy...

      What might be the problem is the turbulent air, which probably acts like a scatter plate in optics. What about adaptive acoustics (phased array of loudspeakers with a tuned phase delays for each speaker)??

      --
      karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    13. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      The November-December 2000 issue of American Scientist (vol. 68) has an article about this, which somewhat clarifies things. ( I attended the 2002 Physical Acoustics Summer School, and one of the speakers was Steve Garrett, from Penn State, who helped develop the little "laser" device referred to earlier, and he included one of these articles in his talk.)
            Anyway, the article draws some analogies:
                "Borrowing some vocabulary from optics, one would say that a non-equilibrium condition (correspongind to the population inversion of electron energy levels in a laser material) is maintained across the heated stack. The test tube amounts to an acoustic resonator, which, like a laser cavity, allows a standing wave to build in amplitude as energy bounces back and forth. The open side of the test tube serves the same function as the partially silvered mirror [...] Although Chen's "acoustic laser" produces about a watt of sound power, a similar device heated by the burning of natural gas produces in excess of 10 kilowatts..."

    14. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by blake213 · · Score: 1
      Being a former employee of ATC, the creator of the HSS or "sonic laser", I can safely say that it doesn't anywhere near resemble a laser. The technology behind it is an ultrasonic carrier tone (somewhere around 40kHz) amplitude modulated by the incoming audio source. The smaller wavelength means a more "focused" angle of dispersion.

      Having tested it, too, I can say it sounds like complete crap and can't be heard well from far away. The LRAD, however, is probably what they are using, and it is extremely loud (somewhere around 150 dBSPL at one meter, I believe). With the right tone fed through it, can be extremely painful.

      --
      mund freud.
    15. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning: dopey science rant follows!

      Man, I wish people would get this right. Sonic laser doesn't make any sense. Can you really call longitudinal waves coherent?


      Wow, if that's is a troll, it's a good one.

      Yes, sound waves can be coherent. In fact, that's how pretty much how this thing works.

      As your primary complaint, you have picked one of the few essential characteristics that this system does have in common with lasers.

    16. Re:Longitudinal wave lasers? by xPsi · · Score: 1
      I agree with the spirit of your rant: TFA is using "sonic laser" too loosely ("like a spotlight"); sloppy journalism often contributes to scientific ignorance.

      However, I just wanted to point out (as one physics-y nerd to another) that vibrational quanta (the mechanical analog to electromagnetic quanta) do exist and are called phonons. Just like with photons, you can in principle create states that are eigenstates of the destruction operator and truly call them coherent in the "laser" sense of the word. Granted, phonons are usually discussed in the context of solid state lattices, not free-standing air near riots.

      --
      i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  24. May seem unneeded and cruel.... by vialation · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But in all seriousness, take a look at what's going on down there. There is an insane amount of looting and anarchy, stores are being looted, people are hoarding anything they can find. Hell, even reports of horrible crimes such as rape have been going around, because there is no way to control a mob the size of a city...

    The government *is* doing what it can, which isn't much really, the city is flooded, and we're trying to fly as many people out as we can, but in the meantime, we need some order, and a nonlethal method of maintaining order seems very appropriate.

    1. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      because there is no way to control a mob the size of a city...

      Yeah there is. Personal responsibility.

      Do ANY of you reading this think that you personally would descend into rape, murder, shooting at rescurers, hijacking ambulances, and all the other assorted nastiness that's been going on?
      No.

      Granted...we are not in that situation, and it's easy to pontificate from an airconditioned living room. But I cannot imagine any possible set of circumstances that would lead you or I down the path to rape someone. Break into a grocery store for food/medicine/clothes? Sure. But all that other crap? Come on.

      It's awful hard to rescue someone, if some other asshat is shooting at you.

      (Lest you think i'm bashing you...I agree with what you said.)

    2. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1, Troll

      Umm.. If I'd had no water for 3 days and another day would likely kill half my family I'm damned sure I *would* murder, hijack an ambulance, etc. Probably shoot at a few helicopters too to see if I could hijack one of those.

      It's easy to say you'd stay civilised from your nice comfy chair.

    3. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
      That's total bullshit. If I had no water for 3 days, etc, I would welcome rescuers with open arms, not fire a freakin' gun at them. The people firing the guns DON'T WANT rescuers in there, because they are trying to pillage as much as possible.

      And if you would murder someone to save yourself, you deserve to be shot on sight.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Actual reports from people who are actually there disprove your words. It is not an out-of-control gangland atmosphere. There is no mob. And SFA was done for five days, while various government agencies with their heads up their asses delayed making any decisions that might require someone to be personally accountable for the outcome.

      No balls at all.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      "And if you would murder someone to save yourself, you deserve to be shot on sight."

      Screw you too. What automatically makes someone else's life worth more than your own? People with the sort of moral strength that will allow them to get themselves killed over someone else should STAY here and do some damn good where they are, not sacrifice themselves for some random schmuck.

      Also, one of the earlier posts in this series... how does personal responsibility help control a mob? Do you get megaphones and shout "If you're looting, you are a BAD PERSON and should be ashamed!"?

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
    6. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Murder and rape would have happened with or without Katrina. This is true in every major city, and has been for the last thousand years.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    7. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Why didn't you bring your own water?

      Guess what. I live in SE virginia. Just a couple of miles from the coast. We have hurricanes quite often.

      I have water, ready and waiting. Several old soda bottles, just stuck in the bottom of the freezer. Not doing anything special...just there. Doesn't cost anything, except not throwing out a plastic bottle. When a hurricane is imminent, i also fill up the bathtub. And get some other assorted stuff ready.

      If an order came to evacuate, I would. Even if I had no car, and had to walk/bus to whatever emergency shelter, we would each carry enough supplies to manage for a couple of days.

      If you live in a hurricane prone area, you learn to prepare. If you don't, and expect the government to provide in the midst of the devastation...you're an idiot.

      Being prepared with your own supplies doesn't cost anything. Except for the already frozen water, we don't have a full hurricane kit packed and ready, like some people do. But everything we need, we could find, pack, and be ready to move in 30-45 minutes. Food, water, medical, some paperwork, 2 pair of shoes each, baby crap for the grandkids, harddrives and at least one of the laptops,
      No place to evacuate to? Bullshit. Drive west a couple hundred miles...sleep in the car for a day or two. You don't need a 'place' to go to. Camp in someones yard. Camp in a church yard. Camp anywhere. It would be nice to be warm and dry in a shelter. But not really essential.

      But have yourself prepared!

    8. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Where did I say anything about "sacrificing themselves for some random schmuck?" What I said was murdering someone to save yourself, say, shooting someone to steal their food.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    9. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      there is no way to control a mob the size of a city...

      Granted. So, you try to provide safe havens for them (in this case the superdome and the convention center). Now, several of the reports of rape (of children) and murder came from those very locations. IMHO, it should have been possible to provide rudimentary policing in the safe havens.

    10. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but self-preservation has something to say about that.

      If you're 1 meal from dying, and no chance of getting food aside from the guy sitting next to you eating, who won't share as he's in the same situation, do you think you'd just sit there and die?
      Sorry, instincts dictate that you're going to do something, even if it leads to the other's death. You're human, I'm human, we have instincts, we have self-preseveration: we're animals, first and foremost, no matter how morale we may seem with food in front of us.

      As for the raping and such, that's bullshit, and shouldn't happen.

    11. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      how does personal responsibility help control a mob?

      Personal responsibility, as in "hmmm...maybe I shouldn't do this." Not dictated to you from a megaphone.

    12. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      But in all seriousness, take a look at what's going on down there. There is an insane amount of looting and anarchy, stores are being looted, people are hoarding anything they can find. Hell, even reports of horrible crimes such as rape have been going around, because there is no way to control a mob the size of a city...

      Who gives a fuck about tellies getting nicked when people are dehydrating to death? You don't need to control the city, just fly in supplies and fly people out!

    13. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Ya know, most of the people in NO that didn't evacuate were the poorest of the poor... they didn't have cars to camp in. I'm more inclined to blame the government (who, let's face it, have been crap) for not providing more evacuation support for this group.

    14. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Yeah. A lot of them didn't have cars. That STILL doesn't excuse not being prepared while at the Superdome.

      Which 'government' are you blamimg, Feds, state, or local? The mayor, being intimatley involved with his own population, should have helped these people more. He didn't.

    15. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Umm.. If I'd had no water for 3 days and another day would likely kill half my family I'm damned sure I *would* murder, hijack an ambulance, etc. Probably shoot at a few helicopters too to see if I could hijack one of those.

      You're an idiot. This isn't GTA3. Do that, and don't be surprised if the ambulances and helicopters stop coming and leave you to rot. Or start shooting back. Chances are, by acting like a uncivilized barbarian, you're just going to put yourself and your family into a worse situation.

    16. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1
      --
      TIAEAE!
    17. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And if you would murder someone to save yourself, you deserve to be shot on sight.

        And if /. were Lord of the Flies, you'd be the dumb kid with the conch shell. In extreme circumstances civilization may go out the window and you will either do whatever you have to do to survive or else you might as well just lay down and die. If you think you'd rather die with your morals intact than kill someone else to take their food and water so you and your family can live, I don't think your genes are going to be in the next generation.
        Say hello to Mother Nature, red in tooth and claw.

    18. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

      Ya he was busy making sure the paying tourist were put in the front of the line of people, many who waited 3 days, to get on the next bus out of there. Hw doesn't care any more for his people then any other disassociated politician trying to keep his ass from being turned into a hat!

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    19. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by FFFish · · Score: 1
      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    20. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ewww.... required registration

      ill assume your link had some story about some officals stating there was no mob problem in the wake of katrina; but you see the thing is it only takes one case to disprove something, and ive already presented that case. normal people dont shoot people trying to help them, and kill and rape those around them; this was a mob

    21. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Grrr. Buggers threw up a reg page. It *was* freely accessible before.

      It's about the soldiers who went in to kick ass on "the insurgency" and instead found a whole lotta people just plain desperate for recue, and very little in the way of badass behaviour.

      *OF COURSE* there was some killing and raping: that happens *every goddamn day* in cities *all over* the USA. There's absolutely nothing exceptional about that.

      But to present it as a mob, to present it as a reason to abandon some 100 000 people who were unable to evacuate -- that's just cruel.

      One thing I'm learning from this disaster is that there are a lot of selfish, heartless, sick bastards out there who have no compassion whatsoever for the poor, the sick, and the elderly.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    22. Re:May seem unneeded and cruel.... by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      So, not shooting them and then dying from starvation in some way is not sacrificing yourself?

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  25. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the USA could manage disaster recovery at least at the rate of a THIRD WORLD COUNTRY they wouldn't need some fancy 'non-lethal' (yeah right) crowd control.

    1. Re:well by fussili · · Score: 1

      Katrina devastated an area larger than Great Britain. Perhaps you need to be a Brit and hear that statistic to really make sense of it. I don't honestly think the United Kingdom would have dealt much better with such a disaster and as for a 3rd world country it'd be mother nature's genocide.

  26. Harm by Saiyaman · · Score: 0

    "Products from both companies could be used, at high volume, to harm subjects who do not comply with commands." So instead of crowd-control we have gone to torture?

    1. Re: Harm by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

      So instead of crowd-control we have gone to torture?

      Aparently, yes.
      From the article (second page): ... the device sends out streams of noise in intervals of about 10 seconds. The specific sonic frequencies chosen affect the inner ear, creating dizziness and nausea in human targets.

    2. Re: Harm by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else thinking of a Kate Bush song?

      "We were working secretly for the military
      Our experiment in sound is nearly ready to begin"

      ("Experiment IV", Kate Bush)

    3. Re: Harm by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      And what other method of crowd control would you prefer? Bullets? Beanbags from shotguns? Tear gas?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  27. LRAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LRAD Deals 2d6 sonic damage, fortitude save for half.

  28. typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by Cryofan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bubba: How, Joe Bob, what's happening?

    Joe Bob: Aw, there's a buncha Niggers trapped down in the city. We trying keep in penned, and shit, well, you know...

    Bubba: Hey, you coming over for beers at the icehouse after house?

    Joe Bob: You betcha!

    But seriously, folks, that was just a joke. Bubba and Joe Bob aint to blame for the Lake New Orleans tragedy. The people to blame for that are those in power in Washington DC. By failing to tax the wealth and income of the rich in order to rebuild our national infrastructure and emergency services, the political elite in DC murdered them.

    In my opinion, Bush, his cabinet, and all the GOP congresspeople and Democratic congresspeople collectively (hereinafter, the "Political Elite") are responsible for the deaths in New Orleans because they failed to properly tax the rich and use that money to protect New Orleans. That was murder.

    Therefore, I hereby petition the US Justice Dept to indict all of above aforesaid Political Elite for those New Orleans murders, and try them on capital murder charges in a court of law, in accordance with custom and due process.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by bladernr · · Score: 1
      The people to blame for that are those in power in Washington DC.

      Wow. Seriously.

      The person to blame for rape is the rapist. Not some politician.

      The person to blame for murder is the murder. Not someone in DC.

      The person to blame for looting is the looters. The only exception here is the "theft" of food and water from damaged stores in the name of survival. Stealing TVs hardly falls in this category.

      Interesting theory you have, but it removes responsibility from criminals. I would love to see it in court: "Your Honour, I know I raped and then killed that 14 year old girl, but am I really to blame, or the guys in power in DC? I submit to you I should be acquitted of this crime - and all the others I stand accused of - 'cause it's really the fault of the politicians."

      Makes a load of sense...

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    2. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, not every situation has a single cause. In fact, I don't think any situations have a single cause.

    3. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by loqi · · Score: 1

      Wow. Seriously.

      The hitman is to blame for the murder. So is the guy that hired him.

      A poor criminal is to blame for his crimes. So should people who act consistently to make the poor poorer.

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    4. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only exception here is the "theft" of food and water from damaged stores in the name of survival. Stealing TVs hardly falls in this category.

      What about stealing TVs to trade to the guy who already "stole" the food and water, because now that he's done that, you can't anymore, and you're still just as hungry and thirsty? Would that be theft or "theft"?

    5. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen any rapists ? have you seen anyone looting anything but essentials ? I have watched a lot of media and I have seen people with food and clothes being told to drop it by armed police.

      I think media in the USA is pretty fearful of the poor - that is the problem.

      A TV could be used to keep up to date with news and government efforts and help keep spirits up. No power? Find one can work with a car.
      Spirits can be used to disinfect wounds and dull extreme pain - sure its not ideal but when you've got cuts and you've been wading in shit.
      A lot of stuff has uses, some vital, uses that could save your family who are waiting at the Helldome, steal a car - steal jewellery to trade your way out - Jesus Christ man its only stuff - people are losing their lives.
      Channel4 UK showed at least 15 cops hunting a 'looter' on the same street that people were begging for protection at the convention centre.
      Many many eyewitness reports have stated that they will not let privately chartered rescuers in.
      A lot of crap about roads being out, but 'pirate' buses make it in OK.
      Fuckin Lies, Fuckin Damn Lying Neoconservative in the Media and The Government - shame.

      Better either get out there and help society cohere or hoard food and arms and head for the hills because this weather is going to get worse.

      Do good.

    6. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, poor people in the US tend to be two-pack-a-day smokers with televisions in their apartment, a cell phone, and several sets of clothing. In other words, there really aren't that many people in this country that are actually at the level of existence you imply. You have to somehow manage to not get government aid, for one thing, which is really bloody hard...

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    7. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by loqi · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying most of them are driven to it in any justifiable sense. I'm merely saying that poverty (which does exist in the U.S.) creates criminals at a faster rate, which hurts all of us. Each criminal is responsible, but that doesn't mean we've done our job once the criminal is in jail.

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    8. Re:typical conversation transmitted on sonic lase by bladernr · · Score: 1
      Have you seen any rapists

      How about this. Read the last paragraph. Care to respond?

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  29. Crowd Control? I can do it cheaper and faster. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Provide Water. Then provide food, and then transportation out of there (or at least a clear path).

    By the sound of it, there is just a small group of people who are out of control. The rest are dehydrated.

    If I were the cops, I would worry more about the person(s) who is running around starting fires.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Crowd Control? I can do it cheaper and faster. by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      I had to look around in this topic to find a response that was mostly correct, so now that I am here, here is my short story on Katrina as it came through central MS. I thought the damn winds would never stop. Every 5 minutes or so, we got a good strong blast, perhaps up to 70 MPH, and then it would die down a while. Trees came down on houses, cars and powerlines every so often where I live.
      You could hear the crash when the tree fell. Eventually, my barometer began to go back up, but the winds continued for a few more hours. Worn me out just wondering when I would get hit by a falling tree. I put a new roof on my house (myself) last year, and nailed it down good. It held. No power for several days, now it is back up. I was here when Camille came through in 1969, and this was way worse.

  30. This is all fine and good until... by rob_squared · · Score: 1
    ...Paul Atreides tries to use sonic weaponry to take over Arachis.


    For those that haven't seen Dune:

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087182/

    --
    I don't get it.
    1. Re:This is all fine and good until... by Omegium · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read the book instead of refering to a badly made movie in which they conjured those weirding modules.

    2. Re:This is all fine and good until... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Granted, I liked the books better, but the movie was actually really good for its time.

      We didn't always have massive budgets and whiz-bang effects.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    3. Re:This is all fine and good until... by Moses_Gunn · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but Frank Herbert was on hand for the making of the movie and fully approved of it.

  31. Tragedies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They don't want to evacuate the remaining residents of New Orleans until they absolutely have to. That much is clear. It is also clear that there are certain prejudices that still exist against those who are poor and those who are black.

    What is surprising is that this is actually news to people. This situation regarding the class divide and the racial divide has been a reality in America for hundreds of years and it takes something like this for people to wake up.

    What is happening down in New Orleans right now is a tragedy of the highest order. But lesser tragedies of a similar nature occur in all major cities in the United States every single day. The fact that nobody normally bothers to care about such things and are generally ill-informed about them is, perhaps, the greatest tragedy of all.

    To me, the people still stuck down in New Orleans represent everybody that America would just as soon forget. Shame on us all. And let us not forget from now on.

    1. Re:Tragedies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are differences and I'm not going to pretend for a second that there are class problems in the US and inequality. I think at some point though it's too much, it's not an excuse. Wall Street got destroyed and I don't remember hearing about looting or rape and gang shootings. There weren't people sniping at the rescuers.


      Sure having food and water might chnage the matter and lower the stress levels but what on earth makes it okay to start mob ruling old west style? That's just completely classless, there is no excuse, there is no reason. Elsewhere, we come together in tough times, we work hard and we over come the adversity, true leadership rises out of the chaos, people do more than they think that can and we get through it. In NO right now, there are thugs actively trying to prevent help. I was in the Bay area in an earthquake 12 years ago and everyone worked together. New York came together during 9-11.


      Looters, mobs, thugs, whoever fucking tried to snipe recuers and a helicopter and whoever raped somebody (I'm not sure if that's just a nasty rumor or not) represent the very very worst of society and there are no excuses for that. I'm all for making that kind of behavior the worst kind of felony, send those people to Guantanamo. Believe me, America would just as soon forget those people and it has nothing to do with class or money or race, it has everything to do with character and how you rise to the occasion during adversity; they are failing the test.

  32. Buses? by TummyX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tell me why the idiotic democrat mayor of NOAL did not use the city's buses to evacuate his people?

    Why are they sitting half submerged in water?

    Oh yeah, it's all Bush's fault.

    1. Re:Buses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      maybe because he wasn't in charge of the evacuation? the state should have ordered the use of all public transportation including public busses, school busses, etc. and the federal government should have made amtrak and other train lines halt operations and redirect them to evacuation of the hurricane zone. For that matter, why did the federal government cut funding to the levy system when fema predicted that New Orleans was at top of the list of potential disasters? It seems to me like the mayor is the only one in this situation that is making any sense at all!

    2. Re:Buses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, this is coming from someone who's just been sitting at his desk computer watching the chaos, but with idiots getting appointed head of FEMA and levee funds getting sliced, as well as the aforementioned bus non-use and other local ill-preparation, this seems like a grand multi-level bi-partisan fuckup.

      Mayor being democrat is small potatoes here. How I see it now, they all deserve to get fired, including Bush and Brown.

    3. Re:Buses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Tell me why the idiotic democrat mayor of NOAL did not use the city's buses to evacuate his people?

        Racism, that's why. They were afraid those niggers'd steal the buses! You know how they are, born thieves, they're like animals, etc., etc., etc.

        I'm not making that up, either. The mayor actually said the reason they didn't use all those buses was they were afraid the refugees would steal them.
        From the perspective of black folks down there, it looks a lot like the state and federal government are engaged in, if not outright genocide, at least complete racist neglect. And yeah, some people have gone right over the edge. Even leaving aside the junkies who are flipping out from lack of a fix and shooting up the place, you have ordinary people who see a government that doesn't seem to give two shits about them, that haven't eaten in days and are hot and dehydrated, and are watching the bodies of their neighbors float down the streets to be chewed on by sharks and alligators, and yeah, some of them fucking snap.

    4. Re:Buses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you're one of those hairy-backed neanderthals from the south with a confederate flag in his window.

      Of course, people like you have always been around. Hitler counted on it. But Hitler lost, and sooner or later, racists like yourself will go the way of the dinousaur. And trust me, no one's going to miss your sorry ass when you're gone.

    5. Re:Buses? by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

      > Tell me why the idiotic democrat mayor of NOAL did not use the city's buses to evacuate his people?

      Do you know if they had fuel to put in those buses? Electricity to power the fuel pumps? People to drive the buses? Perhaps the answer is a bit more involved.

    6. Re:Buses? by yelvington · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mod parent down as "clueless."

      Here's why the mayor of New Orleans didn't use the buses: He doesn't run the school district, which has been a complete organizational disaster for some time. Cities and school districts are not the same thing.

      For a taste of just how bad the school district has become:
      http://www.cnn.com/2005/EDUCATION/08/18/new.orlean s.schools.ap/

      The person you label as an "idiot democrat mayor" didn't make the mess. He is a relative political outsider, a former Cox cable executive, who was a Republican until he decided to run for mayor of a traditionally Democrat city.

      He has been on a campaign to clean up the extremely corrupt New Orleans government, working actively with the FBI.

      Maybe you should read something other than right-wing hate blogs.

    7. Re:Buses? by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      Why did it even occur to you to mention that the mayor was a democrat?

    8. Re:Buses? by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      Hey clueless, the mayor of New Orleans is African American. Go stick your foot-mouth someplace else.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    9. Re:Buses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way the blacks have been murdering, looting, shooting at help and raping it seems he was correct to not use the buses.

    10. Re:Buses? by joto · · Score: 1
      Do you know if they had fuel to put in those buses?

      This can be bought at gas stations. Not that hard, really... Even if there was a fuel shortage, we are talking about the government. They can expropriate the entire fuel station, if necessary. And they can use supplies from the military.

      Electricity to power the fuel pumps?

      Oh, please. First, they had advance warning. Secondly, even if the city didn't have emergency generators themselves, don't tell me they couldn't find the resources to buy them or lease them from some company when the shit happened. In fact, I think most companies would be more than happy lending out both generators and qualified personell to handle them for free.

      People to drive the buses?

      Who drives the buses regularly? Don't tell me they can't be used, because I can't even imagine a bus-driver not willing to work >12-hour days, if it meant saving lots of peoples lives. Even if the bus-drivers were all occupied elsewhere, I'm sure someone could drive the fucking buses. There are lots of bus-drivers around, just ask the fucking motorist service. And if you can't find any fucking bus-drivers, just use a fucking truck-driver. Give them a temporary license, if necessary.

      Perhaps the answer is a bit more involved.

      Most likely, but it's very hard to find anyone else to blame than "the people in charge".

    11. Re:Buses? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      I looked at photos of those buses - they are probably OK and would start if only there were drivers available. However, the diesel tanks required to fill them up, may be under water.

      In fact, if I'm not mistaken, the very first bus to reach the Houston Astro Dome was one that some guy managed to start, fill with people and drive - he deserves a medal.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    12. Re:Buses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, they arrested some people who found buses and used them to transport people out of the flood zone. this is crazy

    13. Re:Buses? by TummyX · · Score: 1


      maybe because he wasn't in charge of the evacuation


      WTF? He's the bloody mayor of the city.

      Doyou have proof that he was prevented from using those buses?

    14. Re:Buses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The busses are submerged and thus may not be started anymore (a motor magazine warned to start submerged cars because they are very likly to break. Although if this is the only chance one should at least try to start them). Btw. you are missing the point. The New Orleans desaster is only secondary caused by the hurricane but by the breach of the levee's. These very leeves where in very bad condition because a lot of money has been shiftet to the irak war. This issue has been known at least since 2002 (http://www.nola.com/hurricane/?/washingaway/).

      Lots of links are burried in this small article:
      http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/20/20848/1.html

      So if you still think that there is no administration error, well i can't help you :-(

    15. Re:Buses? by DerProfi · · Score: 1
      But AC, but the Army Corps of Engineers (a slightly better source than ANY media outlet in Germany) says you're wrong:

      http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-05090 1corps,1,7189346.story?coll=chi-news-hed&ctrack=1& cset=true

      WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said Thursday that a lack of funding for hurricane-protection projects around New Orleans did not contribute to the disastrous flooding that followed Hurricane Katrina.

      In a telephone interview with reporters, corps officials said that although portions of the flood-protection levees remain incomplete, the levees near Lake Pontchartrain that gave way--inundating much of the city--were completed and in good condition before the hurricane.

      However, they noted that the levees were designed for a Category 3 hurricane and couldn't handle the ferocious winds and raging waters from Hurricane Katrina, which was a Category 4 storm when it hit the coastline. The decision to build levees for a Category 3 hurricane was made decades ago based on a cost-benefit analysis.

      "I don't see that the level of funding was really a contributing factor in this case," said Lt. Gen. Carl Strock, chief of engineers for the corps. "Had this project been fully complete, it is my opinion that based on the intensity of this storm that the flooding of the business district and the French Quarter would have still taken place."

      Strock also denied that escalating costs from the war in Iraq contributed to reductions in funding for hurricane projects in Louisiana, as some critics have suggested. Records show that corps funding for the Louisiana projects has generally decreased in recent years.

      --

      3000+ comments meta-modded. 0 mod points awarded.
      Lesson for other meta-suckers: Don't believe the hype!
    16. Re:Buses? by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      Why has the Red Cross not been allowed into the city? Why are people at the Superdome and Convention Center not allowed to leave? Why was it that while the military was ready to begin food drops, it didn't because it was waiting for a request from FEMA (scroll down to bit about "Bill Wattenburg")? Why are Federal stockpiles of supplies sitting unused? And biggest of all, why did Federal officials have no idea what was going on?

      There's plenty of blame to go around. You wanna keep score? That's one against the mayor, 5 against the Federal government. Your turn.

    17. Re:Buses? by TummyX · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot.

      He's the mayor of the city. In a time of crisis he can bloody well confiscate the buses and use them to evacuate people. Hell, he could have just pretended to, you know, be a leader and asking the school district if he could borrow the buses and some drives. Yeah, I'm sure they would have said no.

      Now he's spending time sitting on his ass spewing about how nothing is being done and blaming the federal government for his complete lack of leadership.

      What a screwup of a mayor.

  33. Wrong emphasis by caluml · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that it seems the US is so keen to send in troops: "They have M-16s and are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot and kill and I expect they will," Kathleen Blanco said., and test out it's latest anti-civilian weaponry?
    It's easy enough for the US to get thousand pound bombs to Iraq, but saving people in its own country seems to take a back seat. Why not use all that money, and technology for good, and help the poor, the elderly, the pregnant, the disabled.

    1. Re:Wrong emphasis by torpor · · Score: 1

      The US is a totalitarian Police State, dude. Of course the only 'real solution' appears to be a militarily derived one ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Wrong emphasis by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      because the stupid fuckers they're trying to save are shooting at them.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Wrong emphasis by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      People are lawlessly looting and destroying the city. There have been rapes at the Superdome. Read the paper and watch the news.

      Guess what, when the EMA is overloaded and so are the police, the military takes over. If you're going to rape and pillage, expect a 5.56mm bullet in your head. That's just how it should be. Would you rather they rob the whole city, rape your wife, and kill your children just because in an emergency situation, there's nobody to stop them? That's how criminals are.

  34. "with providing a non-lethal means of crowd..." by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

    This is about convincing the public to accept these
    tools as ways to control crowds. Shooting
    a bunch of protestors isn't acceptable, but finding
    a 'non-lethal' means to control a crowd is a
    lot more palatable.

  35. Let's start blaming! First up FEMAs Michael Brown by mozumder · · Score: 1

    So this guy needs to be removed from his job immediately. Clearly he's disappointed that he now has to rescue black people with his statement of "the victims bear responsibility". WTF?!?

    Why didn't Bush fire his sorry ass for stating that all these destitute black people, with absolutely no money or places to go, were at fault for not evacuting?

    Does he think all these people, on food stamps and welfare, would suddenly magically find the $20 it takes to even buy the Gasoline needed to drive out of the city? And that's assuming they even HAD a car or a place to go!

    Does he assume everybody is rich and has a big cozy SUV? And that everybody in America has a magical pile of $20 bills tucked away somewhere in their suburban picket-fenced single-family home lined with Crape Myrtle trees and big black SUVs with "W" stickers ready to evacuate people?

    Clearly this suburban redneck had no clue what the real world was like in New Orleans. "Oh why don't you guys all pack up in your minivans and rent a hotel room for at the Marriott for the night, and we'll all get together after this whole thing is over." Yah right, moron.. Instead, he sees large groups of black people, and immediately thinks 'guns'. Shiny sci-fi guns, no less!

    BTW, if this disaster is the victim's responsibility, then what exactly is YOUR job? How does 'government helping people' fit in with your capitalist's view of 'poor people deserve what they get'?

  36. The whistles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bub' Rub and Lil' Sis: The whistles go... woo woo!

  37. What about radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, the technology will allow authorities to communicate with others up to a mile away...

    Um, I don't want to sound like an idiot, but don't radios do this? And aren't they a proven technology that everybody is familiar with? Why aren't we using something that is known to work and that can be operated by anybody?

    ...along with providing a non-lethal means of crowd control.

    Near as I can tell, this is the only thing it does that radios don't, and this is of dubious value.

    Representatives of both companies say that within days, they will ship some units of their respective products to areas hit by Hurricane Katrina, so authorities can use the tools for crowd control, aid distribution and rescue operations.

    Ohhh... I get it now. The companies are doing this for PR. The last thing the authorities need right now is to beta test some experimental stuff on behalf of private companies. Did the authorities ask them for it, or are they shipping them only to sit in a corner untouched, useful only for good publicity?

    The way some people are milking this disaster for PR makes me sick. I got an email yesterday from tribe.net pointing out that for every new person you sign up, they'll donate a dollar. Maybe their hearts are in the right places, but it just stinks of a crass attempt at using other peoples misery for your own gain. So I'm dumping tribe.net.

  38. Compassionate Photons by ngr8 · · Score: 1

    Well, the lasers could be used to warm the Soylent Green.

    --
    Verizon: Latin for "poor rural service".
  39. First up, the mayor by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative
    "We need buses!" Yes, Mr. Mayor. We need those 200 bright yellow school buses that you let sit, and are now under water. 200 buses, 50 people per...that's 10,000 people you could have evacuated in one trip.

    Sorry, IMHO, any blame here goes from the bottom up.

    1. Re:First up, the mayor by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sorry, IMHO, any blame here goes from the bottom up

      I would agree with you here in the sense that blame goes to the cult of extreme selfishness and disdain for everything "common" or "public" which the neo-cons with the help of libertarians have been instilling in the American public for a few decades now. The result are cowering, frightened local government who consult with lawyers for days before declaring mandatory evacuation because they are afraid of "lawsuits by the casino and hotel owners". Then comes fright of lawsuits by citizens if they are forced to leave on buses. And then there is cost. FEMA is now under these people a "charity coordinator". Dont expect a "charity coordinator" to pre-emptively force an evacuation. And so on and so forth. Weak, and attuned to the rich exclusively, government is the source of all of this. Grover Norquist (one of the chief ideologues of neo-con moement) wants to "get the government to the size where we (neo-cons/libertarians) can drown it in a bathtub". He got his wish, except the bathtub he spoke of is the city of New Orleans.

    2. Re:First up, the mayor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. A libertarian does not encourage the government to purchase busses, and then refuse to use those busses in an evacuation. The flood control system, the evacuation, the flood insurance...the government controls it all. This entire situation has absolutely nothing to do with the free market that libertarians advocate.

    3. Re:First up, the mayor by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      I would attribute it more to overconfidence. "Hey, we've been hit by hurricanes before, it's not like it's going to destroy the city completely."

      Oops.


      And don't give me that 'they were warned' nonsense. Laymen trust their own experience beyond any amount of expert advice (especially advice from people like climatologists, who habitually hyperbolize), and you know it. Hubris, pure and simple. Also, stupidity. Probably no one in a position to act on it thought of the school busses at the time.

      Never attribute to malice what can be more easily laid at the feed of stupidity-- the old saying is as relevant now as it was yesterday.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    4. Re:First up, the mayor by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Never attribute to malice what can be more easily laid at the feed of stupidity-- the old saying is as relevant now as it was yesterday.

      The old saying misses the possibility of malice being combined with stupidity, which is the way I see the Bush Administratiom.

      Let me put it this way. Cuba managed to evacuate their people before the last big hurricane hit. Ponder that while you compare their resources with that of the richest country on the planet. Where was their "hubris" and disbelief at the climatologists?

    5. Re:First up, the mayor by Nephster · · Score: 1

      " "We need buses!" Yes, Mr. Mayor. We need those 200 bright yellow school buses that you let sit, and are now under water. 200 buses, 50 people per...that's 10,000 people you could have evacuated in one trip."

      I'm willing to bet that either he didn't have the authority to comandeer those buses (are they privately owned?), or that it was not feasible to satisfy the logistics required to get those busses running.

      Not to mention - so he commandeers the busses, then what ? He sends people to Houston? There was no place to send evacuees before the storm hit. Or even immediately after.

      FEMA is the organization created to solve these logistical issues. FEMA had the authority to do all of that two days before the storm hit. FEMA dropped the ball. In a big way.

      Nephs

    6. Re:First up, the mayor by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      I'm willing to bet that either he didn't have the authority to comandeer those buses (are they privately owned?), or that it was not feasible to satisfy the logistics required to get those busses running.

      That's all part of the city evacuation plan. Or should be, if he actually had one, and followed it. Authority to use those buses should have been worked out years ago. That should be a full section in the contract.

      And if not...you call the company owner, and lay out the situation.
      "Mr. BusCompany president, this is the mayor..can we use your buses to move people?"
      "Yes."

      Done deal. Leaving those buses to be flooded is criminal, at the very least.

      Emergency planning begins at the local level. State and federal assistance is needed only to coordinate between other jurisdictions.

    7. Re:First up, the mayor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt the people would have been ready to go, or understood what would happen to them when the hurricane and flood waters came, and just jump on the bus when it came down the street picking up anyone who would get on it. It is just not that simple. Just driving a bus down a street does not mean that the people will get on it and be taken away to an unfamiliar place.

    8. Re:First up, the mayor by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Jesus christ.

      The mayor orders mandatory evacuation.
      For those that cannot leave, go to the Superdome
      For those of you who have no ride, there will be city school buses at the intersections of State and Elm, blah, blah, blah...
      This is a Cat4/5 hurricane. If you do not leave, you may die.

      It's called knowing your city, and having a plan. And then using it.

    9. Re:First up, the mayor by Grym · · Score: 1

      The result are cowering, frightened local government who consult with lawyers for days before declaring mandatory evacuation because they are afraid of "lawsuits by the casino and hotel owners". Then comes fright of lawsuits by citizens if they are forced to leave on buses.

      Oh come on... You can't blame the litigious nature of the American public on neo-conservatives. They haven't been in power THAT long.

      As a matter of fact, if you actually examine the origins and history of lawsuit-filled mentality in which we find ourselves, you'd realize that much of it follows closely to the anti-establishment movements of the 1960's. Without God or country to look to, it seems most people (obviously not all) tend to turn towards materialism and selfishness. Combine that with new surges in marketing and psychology, and you have a general populace focused on little more than consumption and greed.

      Moreover, the neo-conservatism movement, was themed around the idea that such aforementioned apathy would be the downfall of our society. In other words, they are against what you're talking about, not for it. Hence, the stressing of patriotism and simplification of foreign political issues to try and rally the populace around something other than themselves. And as far as lawsuits go, just look at the last election: whom were the trial lawyers voting for? It most certainly wasn't Bush, with things like lawsuit damage-caps being discussed.

      The neo-conservatives aren't good and should be fought against. But let's at least maintain a realistic view of what they are--and more importantly what they aren't. (i.e. some nefarious group responsible for all of the world's ills)

      -Grym

    10. Re:First up, the mayor by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Oh come on... You can't blame the litigious nature of the American public on neo-conservatives. They haven't been in power THAT long.

      That was not my claim. I merely indicated that the government officials were cowed by this attitude instead of being strong when strength was being called for. That cowing is the result of "government is the evil to be destroyed" attitudes of the people in power in Washington as well as the predominant political culture where Rove, amplified by the likes of Rush Limbaughs and O'Reilly, gets to dictate the agenadas. It is a state of political paralysis. Witness the frightened Democratic officials all over the country and their meek "criticisms" of the administration. Very few of them have spine enough to actually opose forcefully the right's agendas. This is what I speak of, not the litigious nature of society, which was something that could have been pre-empted on the basis of national emergency.

      The neo-conservatives aren't good and should be fought against. But let's at least maintain a realistic view of what they are--and more importantly what they aren't. (i.e. some nefarious group responsible for all of the world's ills)

      No such claim is being made. There are certainly other causes of all sorts of other problems and in politics frequently multiple causes exist for the same phenomenon. But in this case, the outrageous weakening of the government functions, the primary cause is the neo-con ideology. And that is on top of their kleptocratic ways, of treating vital agency appointments as rewards for political operatives.

  40. Predicted in literature by fyoder · · Score: 1
    Somewhat stronger versions exist in Atlas Shrugged and Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
    Robert Stadler attends and sanctions a demonstration of the government's previously top secret Project X. The project, housed in rural Iowa, is a new weapon that employs sound waves and is capable of mass destruction. Floyd Ferris convinces Stadler that the weapon is a necessary instrument of control at a time when hysteria and rebelliousness grip the American people.

    http://education.yahoo.com/homework_help/cliffsnot es/atlas_shrugged/70.html

    and

    Disaster Area, a plutonium rock band from the Gagrakacka Mind Zones, are generally held to be not only the loudest rock band in the Galaxy, but in fact the loudest noise of any kind at all. Regular concert goers judge that the best sound balance is usually to be heard from within large concrete bunkers some thirty-seven miles from the stage, while the musicians themselves play their instruments by remote control from within a heavily insulated spaceship which stays in orbit around the planet - or more frequently around a completely different planet.

    http://www.dwave.net/~tony/Mars/hgttg2.htm

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  41. Local Government by jeweekes · · Score: 0

    This is the local governments (State and NO) fuck up. They were not ready for this, they could not cope with this, and they did not know what to do. New Orleans always knew this would happen, and they did not spend the money to fix the levees first (The fed were ready to do it, but New Orleans did not do the paperwork). It has taken the Fed Government to step up and take control of this, which is why you see the Army there now. Bush went down and looked for himself at the mess, and is getting it fixed. If anyone is to blame for this it is the State, County and City governments, not Bush or the feds, and I hope that people are held accountable for it.

    1. Re:Local Government by jedaustin · · Score: 1

      I agree with you here. It's always interesting how people that are totally inept or corrupt will blame others for their mistakes and incompetence. Louisiana knew about this problem for at least 20 years and only put together a half assed solution. When the disaster struck County (parish) Government and Louisianan Government should have been in there taking care of this first.

      Instead of working on the problem they blame the Federal Government. Typical finger pointing aholes.. They should be pointing the finger at themselves instead.

      JD

    2. Re:Local Government by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Because of tax cuts, war costs, and various other huge expenditures sapped the funds. The Bush admin balked at costs and slashed them significantly.

      What was it, like 1 out of 3 LA Guardsmen are in Iraq along with their high water vehicles?

      Frankly, the feds should have been moving into place well before this disaster or at least putting personnel on standby and preparing to move in. But no, they didn't. Not for FOUR DAYS.

      Or how about Bush's little quip that no one expected the levees to be breached? Say that to my October 2004 Nation Geographic where in the first couple paragraphs it's practically word for word what happened. http://www3.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0410/featur e5/

    3. Re:Local Government by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep. For people that live outside the US or people that didn't pay attention in Government class in the US, the power for dealing with this is always in the State's hand. The Federal Government built the levees but the power and responsability for requesting funding and for preparing for a disaster is the job of the State.

      The National Guards belong to the States until they are Federalized, the NG units in the War on Terror outside the US are Federalized, but the NG units used for guarding airports or disaster ops are State run.

      FEMA exists to superceed the US Constitution as to what the Federal Government can do, but FEMA has never used all of it's power.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fema

      Louisiana also is different governmentally than other States.

      Louisiana is the only state whose legal system is based on Roman, Spanish, and French civil law as opposed to English common law. Technically, it is known as "Civil Law," or the "Civilian System."

      Byzantine structure of New Orleans politics requires separate governing boards for each levee that is built. The boards get to approve or deny Army Corps of Engineers plans, new levees require new boards and new elections, every election has a system of run-off elections and has to have funding approved.

      Mayor Nagin rails against the government for their slow response. Yet, if there is fingerpointing to be done, it has to rest with the local government. If they wanted people out, they should have provided ways for them to get out. They are aware of the tens of thousands of indigents that live in their city. They knew that many live pay check to pay check, having no transportation and immense extended families.

      They have only a 1200-1400 police in New Orleans. The Los Angeles Police Department (usually known as the LAPD) is the police department of the City of Los Angeles, California. It is one of the largest law enforcement agencies in the world with over 9,000 officers and 3,000 civilian staff, covering an area of 467 sq miles with a population of around 3.4 million with another 7,000 or so in the LA County Sheriff. New Orleans is 180 sq miles, 1.337 million in the metro area, 500,000 in the city proper. Many men will not serve in the police department due to the rampant corruption which continued inspite of reforms in the late 1990s.

    4. Re:Local Government by superdude72 · · Score: 1

      This is the local governments (State and NO) fuck up. They were not ready for this, they could not cope with this, and they did not know what to do. New Orleans always knew this would happen, and they did not spend the money to fix the levees first (The fed were ready to do it, but New Orleans did not do the paperwork).

      State and local governments do not have the resources to deal with a disaster of this magnitude without federal leadership. Why should they? Think about it. You're proposing that every city in the country should have the resources to cope with a once-in-300-years disaster on its own. Think of how incredibly redundant and expensive that would be. It would be like requiring banks to keep all of their depositors' money in the vault, rather than requiring them to keep some minimum amount on hand, and insuring the rest.

      Very rare, but extremely catastrophic, disasters like these are the reason we have a federal government--so that we can pool our resources to efficiently cope with these extraordinary circumstances that are too expensive for every city in the country to manage on its own.

      New Orleans did have a plan for this disaster. It was for the federal government to do its job, and lead the response to this crisis. And the Feds dithered. Do you really believe this nonsense that New Orleans "didn't file its paperwork" for the levee repairs? Bullshit! We can find $200 million for a bridge in a Republican district in Alaska, but nothing for a district that votes democratic. This has been the case for as long as the GOP has held Congress. Wyoming gets more per capita for Homeland Security than they even know how to spend; New York, LA, and New Orleans get the shaft. New Orleans got no help because they didn't vote for Bush. That's it. They didn't lose their paperwork, you maroon.

      New Orleans' plan, one would assume, would also involve having Louisiana National Guard stationed nearby enough to get to the disaster area in time. And this was doubtless affected by the war in Iraq, for which Bush has pressed the Guard into a role which is far from their usual mission. They are overseas so that the rest of us don't have to pay the real price of this war. And now, New Orleans is paying.

    5. Re:Local Government by will_die · · Score: 1

      That is not how the emergency situation is set up in the US.
      It is the responsibility of the local and state governements to setup plans and if they have additional needs at the time of the emergency they can request help from the federal level. The federal level will provide supplies, personnal, or whatever but it is all controlled by the local or state level on how and where it will be used.
      FEMA will do run some exercises and help with inter-state problems, for instance last year or the year before they ran an exercise where they needed room to house people. After a bunch of paperwork and white house getting involved they got agreements over housing such as the Houston Astrodome, which is being used now.
      Lousisian still has over 60% of there national guards around to provide help and have agreements with other states. Also most of lousianas national guards are in bosnia and afganistan.

    6. Re:Local Government by Sleet01 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you're getting your propaganda shipped in from, but three years ago when NO did their natural disaster wargaming and told the federal government they needed tens of millions of dollars to upgrade their infrastructure, when the Army Corps of Engineers told the administration they needed nearly $80 million to reinforce the levees, did Bush give them that money? Did he say, "Gee, well, that's a piddling amount compared to billions we spend each month in Iraq, so why not?" Nope. He cut the funding, congress tried to add a little extra, and nothing was done. If the Mayor of New Orleans is enraged, if he didn't release buses, I'm not so sure it's any different from FDR witholding intelligence about Pearl Harbor before the the Japanese raid in '41. If it was simply bureaucratic sluggishness, it's hard to compare his weeks of immobility with years of inaction by the Feds.

      --
      -- Let him who is without spelling error ignite the first flame --
  42. who is responsible for 1000s of drownings? by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    The political elite are responsible because they let the plutocrats strip America of its wealth without taxing them aqequately. If they had kept some of america's wealth for our protection and infrastructure, all the 1000s who drowned in New orleans would still be alive. I petition the Justice Dept to indict the politcal elite for murder.

    I say indict them for capital murder, try 'em in a court of law, convict 'em, and sentence them.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:who is responsible for 1000s of drownings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The political elite are responsible because they let the plutocrats strip America of its wealth without taxing them aqequately.

      So, Cryofan, your position in the message you reply to is that the rapist should get away with raping the 14 year old girl because the wealthy were not taxed adequatly?

    2. Re:who is responsible for 1000s of drownings? by Cryofan · · Score: 1

      The murders I am referring to are primarily those 1000's who drowned in the flood. That flood was due to lack of infrastructure. That infrastructure was not improved because the political elite chose to help the plutocrats loot America, and in return the plutocrats keep the political elite in power.

      I call that murder on the part of the political elite. They intended to loot the country, the better to keep their power. They knew with a substantial certainty what would happen--that 1000s would drown because they looted the country, thus depriving New Orleans of infrastructure improvements. But even with this unreasonably high risk, they went ahead and did it anyway. This is a typical "depraved heart" murder, on a mass scale--In my opinion. Mass murder, actually.

      I say the Justice Dept should indict for murder each and every member of the Political Elite.

      The above is not a legal opinion or legal advice of any sort. IANAL.

      --
      eat shiat and bark at the moon
    3. Re:who is responsible for 1000s of drownings? by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      The political elite are responsible because they let the plutocrats strip America of its wealth without taxing them aqequately.

      You are, of course, aware that the IRS accepts additional tax payments in excess of the amount owed, right? Let's take a look at your 1040 and see how much of your own wealth you're willing to put behind your words.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  43. Relying on government by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 0, Troll

    Government is good at only a few things. Disaster recovery is not one of them. It would be MUCH, MUCH better if the government got out of the way and let the free market take care of this problem, thankyouverymuch.

    This disaster has been caused by excessive reliance on government. Don't blame FEMA. Blame yourself.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Relying on government by Thanatopsis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume this is a joke as disaster recovery is one of things the government is good at. Look at the previous hurricanes in Florida and the response they had. Joe Scarborough with MS NBC who went through several hurricanes is Florida was aghast at the ineffectiveness of the response. Please tell me about the free market disaster response alternatives.

    2. Re:Relying on government by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      Please tell me about the free market disaster response alternatives.
      Tulane Hospital in New Orleans arranged a charter of helicopters to evacuate their patients and staff. This was based on their judgment that they could not rely on the official rescue services.
    3. Re:Relying on government by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Ok - Now how does this scale to 50,000 poor people? The people who could afford to hire buses to leave, left NO.

    4. Re:Relying on government by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

      From the Department of Homeland Security Website:

      In the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or other large-scale emergency, the Department of Homeland Security will assume primary responsibility on March 1st for ensuring that emergency response professionals are prepared for any situation. This will entail providing a coordinated, comprehensive federal response to any large-scale crisis and mounting a swift and effective recovery effort. The new Department will also prioritize the important issue of citizen preparedness. Educating America's families on how best to prepare their homes for a disaster and tips for citizens on how to respond in a crisis will be given special attention at DHS.

      In other words this is a matter of national security. New Orleans is the largest port in the United States. Without it oil doesn't flow to much of the country and international trade is disrupted. Avoidance of chaos in the face of disaster requires coordinated planning and resources, one of those important reasons governments exist.

    5. Re:Relying on government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the hurricanes in an election year in the president's brother's state? Gee, I can't imagine why there would've been more timely responses there...

    6. Re:Relying on government by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It would be MUCH, MUCH better if the government got out of the way and let the free market take care of this problem, thankyouverymuch.

      And the vast population of poor in New Orleans who couldn't afford a rescue could what? Go straight to hell?

      Oh wait, I know. They should get off their asses and get a job. Freaking lazy poor. They'll get rescued after they've earned it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  44. Maybe its racism at its worst by phiberoptik3 · · Score: 0

    I believe nobody cares about new orleans the people are black and they are poor.

    1. Re:Maybe its racism at its worst by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      I think that's too simplistic. The federal government cares way too much about PR then to allow racist beliefs in a few top officials to over power what the country thinks of them. In any deficit of the feds I think incompetance is the main factor.

    2. Re:Maybe its racism at its worst by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yes... that's why they are completely ignoring the whites and asians in mississippi and alabama to take care of the blacks in new orleans. --- Calling racism in this massive catastrophe is only going to make things worse and may result in people dying. Please set it aside until things get quieter and you can resume politics as usual. --- We will know what happened next year- for now go donate your time and money and volunteer to help those in need. I spent last night doing the same and will continue to do so over the rest of this holiday. I set my ego aside and just helped wherever they needed me down here in houston- now please do the same and set your racism aside for a few weeks and get the job done now without it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:Maybe its racism at its worst by linguae · · Score: 1

      If nobody cares, they why are so many people donating millions of dolars to help the poor people in New Orleans?

      I wouldn't call it racism. If that were the case, then nobody would be donating and nobody will be helped. I would call this drama the result of local and state governments finger-pointing instead of being proactive (these people should have been evacuated days before the hurricane), and FEMA's molasses-slow response to the hurricane and flooding.

    4. Re:Maybe its racism at its worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just black people left to fend for themselves in New Orleans. I saw a white woman with her family on TV today, walking along a highway. The TV news crew had to get an ambulance (which they flagged down) for them, as both her and her husband had injuries to their legs and feet. The woman was a nurse, and her place of employment was destroyed, so she had to set out walking, to get out of there. I mention all this to point out that not all of the displaced persons are black. This woman was very pretty, and reminded me of Meryl Streep. Believe me, she was pretty, and worthy of any Slashdotter's getting up off his ass and running to rescue her! Take my word for it, she was better looking than Meryl Streep, but I could not think of a celebrity that more nearly matched this lady! (If I say so, it must be true, I am an expert on pretty women. As a test, I could show you a gallery of my pics for "pretty or beautiful women", and you will be convinced...) By the way, my "confirm you are not a script word" was "reveling". That's about all we can do now that New Orleans has moved to Baton Rouge!

  45. Because People Don't Matter by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "In 2001, FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New Orleans flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the Iraq war."

    http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,15 18,372455,00.html

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Because People Don't Matter by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firstly, thats from Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton Advisor during the Bill Clinton administration, not exactly a neutral third party journalistic source.

      February 17, 1995

      An Army Corps of Engineers "hit list" of recommended budget cuts would eliminate new flood-control programs in some of the nation's most flood-prone spots - where recent disasters have left thousands homeless and cost the federal government millions in emergency aid.

      Clinton administration officials argue that the flood-control efforts are local projects, not national, and should be paid for by local taxes.

      Nationwide, the administration proposes cutting 98 new projects in 35 states and Puerto Rico, for an estimated savings of $29 million in 1996.

      June 23, 1995

      A hurricane project, approved and financed since 1965, to protect more than 140,000 West Bank residents east of the Harvey Canal is in jeopardy.

      The Clinton administration is holding back a Corps of Engineers report recommending that the $120 million project proceed. Unless that report is forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget, Congress cannot authorize money for the project, U.S. Rep. William Jefferson's office said Thursday.

      The Bush admin isn't the only Presidental adminsitration to cut corners down in LA when it comes to levees

    2. Re:Because People Don't Matter by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      You mention that the project was approved in 1965. It was supposed to take ten years to complete, and it's still not done. That's a lot of people on both sides of the aisle over the years to smack around.

      Still, it wouldn't have helped much. Katrina hit as a Cat4, and the approved design was only rated for a Cat3. Further, the USACE said yesterday that the project had actually already been completed in the areas of the two breaks.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:Because People Don't Matter by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      The Bush admin isn't the only Presidental adminsitration to cut corners down in LA when it comes to levees

      Nope, it sure isn't, and the Clinton administration deserves criticism for it as well. The Bush administration is, however, the only US presidential administration currently in operation, and hence the one for which criticism of it stands the largest chance of actually doing any good.

    4. Re:Because People Don't Matter by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Bush bashing and Clinton bashing aside, New Orleans and the state of Louisiana has a long history of the most corrupt politicians ever in the history of the country.

      I believe that Louisiana is the only state with a former governor in prison for his corruption during his tenures.

      Growing up there, I thought it was common place for road work to take years. When I moved out, I was quite surprised to see that repaving a road really only takes a good weekend and not 8 years.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  46. I hope Ballmer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....doesn't get his hands on one of these... 'Developers, developers, developers....'

  47. pic clearly proves Bush's competence, blamelessnes by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    Unh huh...

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  48. even worse. by brad3378 · · Score: 1

    Sure we're all discusted by what's going on down there, but this irritates me even worse!

    Today I received an email solititing donations from somebody pretending to be the American Red Cross!!
    I can't tell you how discusted I was to see that!
    I would do anything to see this guy punished!! I'm so god damn pissed by this guy I'd get myself in trouble if I knew it was.

    The original message is pasted below.
      Note the fake http://www.redcross.org. cgiin.net /Proccessing.htmlwebsite address

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Subject: Individual donation-Hurricane Katrina
    From: "AMERICAN RED CROSS" Add to Address
    BookAdd to Address Book
    Date: 03 Sep 2005 17:35:52

      WASHINGTON, Friday, September 02, 2005 * The American Red Cross has
    launched an immense emergency relief effort to meet unprecedented
    humanitarian needs in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

      The American Red Cross, with support of the worldwide Red Cross,
    EarthLink, Comcast, Yahoo, SBC Group, Google, Microsoft, NBC, CNBC and
    Red
    Crescent Movement is launching a Web site and hotline to help raise
    money by encouraging viewers to donate to the American Red Cross
    Disaster
    Relief Fund.

      Follow the link bellow and You can and will help the victims of
    Hurricane Katrina:
    http://www.redcross.org.cgiin.net/Proccessing.html

      Financial contributions to the American Red Cross are tax-deductible.

      Thank you for supporting the American Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund.

    Sincerely,
    Red Cross Team.

    --

    1. Re:even worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOIS info (if it's not fake like the website)
      Domain Name.......... cgiin.net
          Creation Date........ 2005-09-03
          Registration Date.... 2005-09-03
          Expiry Date.......... 2006-09-03
          Organisation Name.... John Pate
          Organisation Address. 438 EAST SPRUCE AVE UNIT 135
          Organisation Address.
          Organisation Address. INGLEWOOD
          Organisation Address. 90301
          Organisation Address. CA
          Organisation Address. UNITED STATES

      Admin Name........... John Pate
          Admin Address........ 438 EAST SPRUCE AVE UNIT 135
          Admin Address........
          Admin Address........ INGLEWOOD
          Admin Address........ 90301
          Admin Address........ CA
          Admin Address........ UNITED STATES
          Admin Email.......... theosdaar@yahoo.com
          Admin Phone.......... +1.3106732295
          Admin Fax............

      Tech Name............ YahooDomains TechContact
          Tech Address......... 701 First Ave.
          Tech Address.........
          Tech Address......... Sunnyvale
          Tech Address......... 94089
          Tech Address......... CA
          Tech Address......... UNITED STATES
          Tech Email........... domain.tech@YAHOO-INC.COM
          Tech Phone........... +1.6198813096
          Tech Fax.............
          Name Server.......... yns1.yahoo.com
          Name Server.......... yns2.yahoo.com

    2. Re:even worse. by JedaFlain · · Score: 1, Informative

      Report it to the fed's internet fraud department: http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp

  49. crowd control only by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


    This system's sole use has to be crowd control. If you are trying to broadcast information to people a mile away, how loud would the information be to other people only 1/4 mile away?

    They need to be sending fresh water and buses into new orleans, not this kind of useless "technology".

  50. Good thing they can't spell...(nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  51. It's Just A Matter of Priorities by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    [Sarcasm Mode = 1]

    Just like when we went into Baghdad, the priority was to protect the building of the Oil Ministry.

    Not the bunkers filled with lots and lots of shells and all kinds of ammunition, not the National Museum to protect the Iraqi culture, not even the nuclear power plants with all that extra radioactive stuff laying around.

    Or so I've heard, according to Rumor Control Central.

    Obviously, here the priority is not to help people, but to follow the rules and regulations, even if it costs lives. Thus we get people sitting on resources because no one got an official request from the Govenor of Louisiana. The bureaucrats probably wanted it in writing, in triplicate. Maybe signed in blood, just to be careful.

    Obviously, here the priority is not to help people, but to maintain power and control, even if the people would be a lot more cooperative if you actually rescued them and got them food and water, etc.

    this is looking like GWB's Chernoblyl. What's he going to do, declare war on Mother Nature? he's done a good enough job of that as it is, and it looks like Mother Nature is going to fight back.

    [Sarcasm Mode = 0]

    It is likely the easiest thing to help people, if that is your actual intention. If you have some other agenda, like profiteering, maintaining power, or what have you, then something else happens. And you can see the obvious results.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:It's Just A Matter of Priorities by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Without official requests, there's no coordination on where to send them, and you end up exacerbating the chaos. You end up with situations like the Convention Center (and someone at FEMA and/or DHS needs to be fired over that -- watch the news once in a while, people -- open source information at its clearest) because no one is in charge.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:It's Just A Matter of Priorities by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, we also have this wonderful yahoo news photo of a parking lot full of school busses in New Orleans.

      Forethought and planning at it's best.

      They are there because there was no permission to get them out or to use them in the evacuation. Obviously.

      Take your pick.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  52. Federal Government by austinpoet · · Score: 1

    I disagree with you both. The Fed did fuck up. The local gov did fuck up too, but the Fed should have been better ready to handle the situation. They could have called a pre-emptive evacuation on Thursday, but the weathermen weren't sure until Sat/Sun. The federal government should have seen that regardless of where the hurricane was going to hit the gulf coast, that a response would be needed. They could have started sending the navy on the Thursday before it hit instead of taking 4+ crucial recovery days to travel there. Every year for the past 5 years, the US congress has had to override Bush's request for cuts in funding to the leavies in NO. Every year. I hope Bush is held accountable for his glaring disregard for the people of the gulf coast. - Looking forward to the War on Weather!

    1. Re:Federal Government by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      According to this, the Bush administration's cut in fundings DID hamper strengthening levees. Seems like a pretty straight cause and effect relation.

    2. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The past recommendations to strenghen the levees, which went ignored by the New Orleans local government AND the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, was for areas of the levee that were NOT breached by Katrina. So, the argument that past in-action is to blame, (wrt levee improvements) is just factually wrong.

      FEMA has the ultimate responsibility, and the power to override Governors, for the initial response to disasters. FEMA was unprepared for TWO simultaneous disasters (a hurricane AND a flood). The total complete lack of communications (even ham radios require power at some point) is what led to the rapid disintegration of conditions. The local and regional leadership chain of command could not communicate effectively.

      Let Katrina be a lesson to all those that witnessed her wrath: Never rely on your government to save your butt. Be prepared! If Katrina had been a bio or nuclear disaster (intentional or accidental), FEMA and other resources would STILL be AVOIDING the area due to contamination.

      Life is a continual series of challenges. If you are patient and persistent you are interrupted every so often by a slice of peace and quiet.

    3. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's only so much you can prepare for. If we deployed for a Category 5 hurricane hitting any at-risk city every time a storm started brewing in the Atlantic, we'd be broke in a couple of years. Risk-management is a tricky business, and this time we were on the wrong side of the guessing game.

      I don't see this as a case of any one group screwing up. I don't think there was intentional racism going on. I think we just weren't as prepared as we thought, in many ways. Levees, infrastructure (roads), disaster response teams, and police were all overwhelmed and failed. Things like the National Guard and rescue centers take time to set up, and the situation was just getting worse the whole time they were getting the wheels turning, which in turn made their initial responses inadequate.

      I don't think any individual needs to be held accountable. I think organizations need to audit their mission plans, to see if they are really prepared. Then again, maybe they are and their mission plans just don't extend to this level. Really, the armed forces are the only agencies with the ability to deal with this situation rapidly, and they are prevented by law from most activity with the US.

    4. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have started sending the navy on the Thursday before it hit instead of taking 4+ crucial recovery days to travel there. Yes, a fleet of sunken ships and thousands of drowned sailors would have been a hell of a lot of help. Emergency Response lesson #1: would-be rescuers who become victims are a problem, not a asset.

  53. Cops looting too by f97tosc · · Score: 1

    The government *is* doing what it can

    Well here is a video of some fine government officials who certainly are doing what they can...

    Tor

    1. Re:Cops looting too by Mazaev2 · · Score: 1

      Wow... that video is pretty sad, though not in the way the reporter makes it out to be. The only thing I found really foul about it is the stupid cop trying to cover her ass instead of saying "look.. we need this stuff. It's not being flown in from anywhere else and it's not like they can buy it. Why the hell are people so outraged about this looting? The Walmarts will get their total loss insurance anyway, but this stuff, that people NEED, is THERE on the shelves of these stores. What are they expecting people to do, go and starve? Not use clean clothes and shoes that are already there? I just cannot comprehend people that are openly advocating shooting these "looters".

      There was another video out earlier of a black lady walking out with a cart filled with shoes. The reporter was trying to guilt her about taking all this stuff while she's saying that her whole family and others NEED SHOES! It's an emergency, people are dying and with all this going on, trying to survive gets you shot at.

      Later on, it was reported on CNN that something like 70% of the people at the convention center didn't have shoes.

      What are people really expecting when nothing is being done and people are forced to take things into their own hands?

    2. Re:Cops looting too by Mazaev2 · · Score: 1

      BTW, one of the reasons that shit has hit the fan as it did is that the Red Cross was NOT ALLOWED into New Orleans this whole time. It may sound like a tin-foil type thing, but it's right there on their website: http://www.redcross.org/faq/0,1096,0_682_4524,00.h tml

      Beside this, many countries and National Guard units were ready to go in and help but were unable to because of FEMA and Homeland Security.

  54. Its Been Done Before! by Hexxon · · Score: 0

    It Worked Really Great In Dune. They Should Probably Get Some Freemen In To Use The Sonic Tech. Properly Though.

  55. Insanity all round.. by macjim · · Score: 1

    You think looting and people SHOOTING at rescuers is insane? I'd say getting thousands of people to go to a stadium expecting some assistance and leaving them without food, water or any organisation and NOT expecting such problems in a nation of gun nuts is insane. Evidently the state authorities didn't have the resources, preparation or whatever to do the job that FEMA was supposed to be doing on a Federal basis. If only the foresight had been there to arrange ORGANISED looting, scouring the area for water, food, pampers and clothing (and leaving IOU's so that the governement could compensate Walmart or whoever afterwards) then distributing it in an organised way to those people in the stadium. As it was, from what I've read some people were doing that themselves, and being hailed as heroes by those inside. The image that the first priority of the USA is to shoot its starving citizens in case they're taking private property in these circumstances is absolutely dreadful.
    -----
    Does "No Child Left Behind" mean they'll all be right arses?

    1. Re:Insanity all round.. by ericdano · · Score: 1
      The Superdome (stadium) was the shelter of LAST RESORT. I don't think anyone expected that they would be there more than a day, perhaps two. And that probably would have been true if the levys had not broken.

      From what I understand, FEMA has to WAIT for the Governor of the state to call them in. They might be prepared, but if the Governor doesn't give direction, nothing happens. I think it's been, thankfully, taken out of the hands of the state and local officals now. It seems it was a huge case of too many chefs in the kitchen.

      First priority is to save people. That is obviously. Second is to keep law and order. I can see taking FOOD out of a store, but seeing people walk out with BOXES of shoes, tvs, and non-essential items, it makes me wonder about people in New Orleans.....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Insanity all round.. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Actaully, I'd advocate the taking of shoes and clothing as well. Granted, most of the people looting the stores for them were doing so for personal gain, but in a situation like that, reliable footware and dry, clean clothing is really a necessity.

      When you're spending most of the day on your feet in an area where the ground is wet, covered with debris (including broken glass), and you aren't in a situation to keep very clean, anything you can do to prevent blisters and other injuries which can become infected is necessary for survival. This is something the people serving in the military in jungle climates have learned well.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  56. FEMA head fired from last job by slashflood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The federal official in charge of the bungled New Orleans rescue was fired from his last private-sector job overseeing horse shows. - BoingBoing

    Link

    1. Re:FEMA head fired from last job by will_die · · Score: 1

      The IAHA(the company he work for) has already said this is all false. According to them at the time Mike Brown resigned he had recently been given a 3 year contract, in the past they had only given 1 year contracts. He call a meeting of the entire board and announced his decision to resign. The main reason that people think he resign is because of on ongoing set of lawsuits from a person kicked from IAHA over a bunch of problems; now go check the who wrote the original article.

    2. Re:FEMA head fired from last job by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Who cares about whether he was fired or resigned? He has spent the last twelve years running horse shows. That certainly doesn't qualify you to run the Federal Emergency Management Agency. He had ZERO experience but all the political connections. He should resign.

  57. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No word on additional busses and shelters...

    No word on intelligent comments and perspectives on the disaster...

  58. Learning is a process. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Why control the crowd? God sent His agent, the angel Katrina, to show us the truth of human nature.

    Hm. I don't see how God can think that way. God is infinite, after all, which means it's impossible for God to care. --God is the Hurricane, God is New Orleans, God is each and every person in that mud-hole. God is the mud. And God is you and me. Maybe you already get it, but I do enjoy pointing it out; Infinite means there is nothing God is not, and thus God cannot judge, because God is both sides of every coin.

    This New Orleans thing is just Karma balancing the scales. And I don't think the goal is to become disgusted with what we are so much as it is to learn that it is far less painful to be selfless than it is to be selfish. Every bit of pain and joy is a lesson. --And one of the biggest is learning not to judge; to be disgusted with ourselves means that we hate ourselves simply because we don't know the answers yet. That's not an effective way to learn. Learning is not about hating what we are, but about learning how to love, and this cannot be achieved through hate.


    -FL

  59. Reference to Cuba interesting for another reason by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    How many people here remember this report from July:
    Cuba was hit hard by Hurricane Dennis, the most ferocious storm to lash the Caribbean island nation in four decades. It caused the deaths of 16 Cubans and left a swathe of wreckage in its wake. The death toll would have been far higher had it not been for the timely evacuation of more than 1.5 million people.
    The quality of the disaster preparedness of the impoverished Cubans compared to that of the US is striking.
  60. The lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lazy, the fat, me

  61. domain details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cgiin.net = [ 68.142.234.58 ]

        Domain Name.......... cgiin.net
            Creation Date........ 2005-09-03
            Registration Date.... 2005-09-03
            Expiry Date.......... 2006-09-03
            Organisation Name.... John Pate
            Organisation Address. 438 EAST SPRUCE AVE UNIT 135
            Organisation Address.
            Organisation Address. INGLEWOOD
            Organisation Address. 90301
            Organisation Address. CA
            Organisation Address. UNITED STATES
        Admin Name........... John Pate
            Admin Address........ 438 EAST SPRUCE AVE UNIT 135
            Admin Address........
            Admin Address........ INGLEWOOD
            Admin Address........ 90301
            Admin Address........ CA
            Admin Address........ UNITED STATES
            Admin Email.......... theosdaar@yahoo.com

            Admin Phone.......... 1.3106732295
            Admin Fax............
        Tech Name............ YahooDomains TechContact
            Tech Address......... 701 First Ave.
            Tech Address.........
            Tech Address......... Sunnyvale
            Tech Address......... 94089
            Tech Address......... CA
            Tech Address......... UNITED STATES
            Tech Email........... domain.tech@YAHOO-INC.COM

            Tech Phone........... 1.6198813096
            Tech Fax.............
            Name Server.......... yns1.yahoo.com
            Name Server.......... yns2.yahoo.com

  62. India too by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  63. whois cgiin.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Domain Name.......... cgiin.net
        Creation Date........ 2005-09-03
        Registration Date.... 2005-09-03
        Expiry Date.......... 2006-09-03
        Organisation Name.... John Pate
        Organisation Address. 438 EAST SPRUCE AVE UNIT 135
        Organisation Address.
        Organisation Address. INGLEWOOD
        Organisation Address. 90301
        Organisation Address. CA
        Organisation Address. UNITED STATES

    Admin Name........... John Pate
        Admin Address........ 438 EAST SPRUCE AVE UNIT 135
        Admin Address........
        Admin Address........ INGLEWOOD
        Admin Address........ 90301
        Admin Address........ CA
        Admin Address........ UNITED STATES
        Admin Email.......... theosdaar@yahoo.com
        Admin Phone.......... +1.3106732295
        Admin Fax............

  64. Shutup please by DigitlDud · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're relying on the government to rescue you from a natural disaster, you're making a huge mistake. We don't live in a country where the government is expected to wipe the ass of all its citizens. When there's a category 5 hurricane barring down on you, you get the hell out of there. People leaving the city and not just sitting there would have prevented much of the loss of life. Sure a few people here and there didn't have the means to leave, but surely if everyone who could have left had evacuated beforehand, overwhelming all the emergency services would have been avoided. Oh and looting and sniping doctors doesn't help much either.

    Using boats to rescue people? Where are you going to get the boats from? Boats are slow and they'd have to be brought in from far away. An area the size of a small country just got leveled after all.

    We were expecting a hurricane but instead ended up with broken levees, massive anarachy, a total communications breakdown, etc. NO ONE knew the scope of this disaster until it was too late.

    1. Re:Shutup please by xlv · · Score: 1

      Using boats to rescue people? Where are you going to get the boats from? Boats are slow and they'd have to be brought in from far away.

      Well, have you heard of military cargo planes? Oops, there's only one problem: they're deployed in Irak or the few ones left in the States are not used due to utter lack of planning and incompetence. The same goes of the transport helicopters (Chinook and black hawks) that we've only seen since yesterday, 5 days after the hit.

      And before you tell me the airport is not fonctional, see this link from Wed. Aug 31:

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/TRAVEL/08/31/new.orleans.a irport/index.html%3Fsection=cnn_travel/:

      Louis Armstrong International Airport, but aviation director Roy Williams said the airport is "open and operational" despite some hurricane damage.

      It's hard to understand that there was not more aerial help provided. Think about the Saigon evacuation, the Berlin airlift, ... performed by the US army and you'd figure there would be more resources for something happening on US soil. Sad, sad, sad...

    2. Re:Shutup please by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      NO ONE knew the scope of this disaster until it was too late.

      *I* knew what the scope of the disaster was going to be. About 5 years ago, Scientific American ran an article where the authors spelled out exactly what was going to happen if a strong hurricane hit New Orleans. The events have played out just as they predicted.

      I don't see how anybody can be surprised at the outcome; this has been common knowledge for years.

    3. Re:Shutup please by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where in New Orleans are you going to land a C-17? Oh yeah, nowhere.

      How many sorties does it take to evacuate 100,000 people with Chinooks? Let's see, if I remember correctly, they'll carry 50 troops with gear. So call that 70 people, assuming some are on stretchers. 70 into 100,000, that's...1400 sorties.

      Where are you going to take them? Houston? Dallas? Birmingham? Each of those cities would be about five hours away by helicopter, give or take.

      How do you handle the air traffic around the Superdome? That's not trivial.

      We've got some transport helicopters, yes...but not nearly enough to solve this problem. And then, can you imagine the flak that would happen when one crashes?

      Suffice it to say, the problem is a little bit more complex than "Well, just get some helicopters!"

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Shutup please by xlv · · Score: 1

      Where in New Orleans are you going to land a C-17? Oh yeah, nowhere.

      The New Orleans airport wasn't that damaged by the storm. CNN article from Aug 31:

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/TRAVEL/08/31/new.orleans.a irport/index.html%3Fsection=cnn_travel//

      [Louis Armstrong International Airport] aviation director Roy Williams said the airport is "open and operational" despite some hurricane damage.

      I was in New Orleans last February and the airport is not far away from the city center. You can check that out with Google Earth.

      A field military/FEMA hospital should have been set up there on Tuesday and heavy helicopter rotations should have been started then as opposed to seing transport helicopters only yesterday. From the airport, evacuation to distant cities can be done by plane.

      Private airlines could have been summoned to provide transport out of New Orleans airport. This is a national emergency and it should have been treated as such at the local/state and federal levels right away.

      How do you handle the air traffic around the Superdome? That's not trivial.

      DHS was created after 9/11 to deal with catastrophic attacks in the US. This is not terrorist based but it still is a catastrophic attack. DHS, FEMA and the military should have plans in place for such disasters and in fact they do but they didn't implement them soon enough. Budgets for all those agencies have been increased in response to 9/11. How has the money been used? Improved cooperation and preventing communication problems were amongst the main stated goals? Was it enough?

  65. Muad'DIB! by Helios292 · · Score: 1

    Non-lethal until they find out that their name is a killing word.

  66. That area was declared a Federal Disaster Area by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    well in advance of the storm. So WHO was supposedly in charge at that point, again? The Feebles at FEMA. Their boss, the chump, hid his thumbs and people died.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:That area was declared a Federal Disaster Area by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      And WHO waited until the last minute to order a mandatory evacuation for the city? And provide a 'shelter of last resort'. (Superdome and COnvention Center) Said shelters with NO thought of management or supplies. The idiot mayor.

    2. Re:That area was declared a Federal Disaster Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FEMA press release, August 27:

      "Michael D. Brown, Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Emergency Preparedness and Response, today announced that Federal resources are being allocated to support emergency protective response efforts response efforts in the parishes located in the path of Hurricane Katrina. Brown said President Bush authorized the aid under an emergency disaster declaration issued following a review of FEMA's analysis of the state's request for federal assistance. FEMA will mobilize equipment and resources necessary to protect public health and safety by assisting law enforcement with evacuations, establishing shelters, supporting emergency medical needs, meeting immediate lifesaving and life-sustaining human needs and protecting property, in addition to other emergency protective measures."

      (But alright, it doesn't say anything about when they were going to do that...)

    3. Re:That area was declared a Federal Disaster Area by Zordak · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree with you. The mayor knew he had a city full of poor people with no way out, and then just left them to their own devices. But you're not allowed to say that. Mayor Nagin is black, and if it's even partially his fault, that confounds the Congressional Black Caucus and other idiots who are trying to politicize this thing by making it racial. It has to be that our white President and the white director of FEMA just made a conscious decision to leave tens of thousands of people to die BECAUSE THEY'RE BLACK. It certainly couldn't be just a bunch of politicians who like getting re-elected but have no intelligent plan for this kind of thing, partly because it's never happened before, so their best bet is to blame each other until they can all figure it out.

      Honestly, it disgusts me how much finger pointing has been going on while there are still people stranded in that hell hole. ALL of these politicians need to get their priorities in order. FIRST, make sure the people stuck there have some food and water to survive on and finish picking up the ones who are stranded (maybe some of those helicopters dropping sandbags on the friggin' levees could be rescuing people still stuck on their rooftops). SECOND, get everybody out of the city. THIRD, plug the levees and start figuring out what to do with this mess. THEN they can all start bickering about who didn't respond quickly enough and who didn't prepare well enough and who should've done something first and should we even bother rebuilding the place. Somebody needs to step up and show some leadership here. It looks like Gen. Honore is the only one who has so far.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    4. Re:That area was declared a Federal Disaster Area by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      The mayor screwed up in a multitude of ways...

      School buses should have been used to transport people as already stated.

      He basically ordered that thousands of folks to show up at the superdome for an emergency situation. How can you do that and not make sure that the place has food/water and some police/security??? Truely unbelievable.

      Lack of planning on how to evacuate the elderly/infirm who couldn't even walk 5 miles to higher ground if needed like the able bodied.

      Lack of planning for evacuating the hospitals.

      The list goes on and on, lots of screwups. There was no planning.

      But waiting until 24 hours before to actually order the evacuation was not out of line. Those big hurricanes are notorious for changing course rapidly, and they didn't really know for sure it would hit anywhere near New Orleans till then.

      But he had plenty of time before then to set up a battle plan before that time to handle things. He didn't. "Everybody either leave town or got the the Superdome" is not a battle plan for emergency circumstances. He's as useless as the head of FEMA, and the guitar playing grinning idiot running this country.

    5. Re:That area was declared a Federal Disaster Area by dbIII · · Score: 1
      The mayor knew he had a city full of poor people with no way out
      Consider the parallel situation of Darwin in Australia in 1975 after cyclone (hurricane by another name) Tracey. Evacuation didn't happen beforehand becauase there was very little warning, and Australia effectively shuts down over Christmas. After the city was almost completely flattened the only places to evacuate large numbers of people to were over a thousand miles away with unreliable or completly cut roads. The majority of the population in Darwin at the time were very poor, there was a lot of racism, and a high level of gun ownership but instead of excuses huge amounts of transport were organised, everyone was moved out and the city was rebuilt. The big differences in this case were that the armed forces were immediately called in to solve the problem and co-ordinated with volenteer groups and the city was smaller then New Orleans.
    6. Re:That area was declared a Federal Disaster Area by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Consider the parallel situation of Darwin in Australia in 1975 after cyclone (hurricane by another name) Tracey.

      I remember Tracy (it was spelled without the "e") fairly well, and you are right in saying the size of the respective cities is the major difference. There are a few other aspects which mattered though - it wasn't really the military that got the diaster response going - Alan Stretton, the Director of the National Disasters Organisation, was on site within hours of the city being flattened, set up a command organisation, and started an evacuation. Other communities on the routes out of Darwin organised themselves to provide shelter and food for the refugees. That lasted for two days, then most of the people remaining decided to stay and rebuild. They moored a cruise ship (the Patria?)in the harbour to provide services and temporary housing.

      Interestingly, the response from the rest of the world was amazingly generous, just as we are seeing with Katrina. I remember hearing that Lesotho, a poor country with a population less than most cities, had donated.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  67. Really? I call BS by pin_gween · · Score: 1


    This is the local governments (State and NO) fuck up... New Orleans always knew this would happen, and they did not spend the money to fix the levees first (The fed were ready to do it...

    Hmm, seems the Feds were aware of the danger too -- since 2001.

    Things I've read seem to disagree with you

    --
    Ignorance is not a crime; neither should it be a way of life

    Congress control $ = inmates run the asylum
  68. So, when people are in misery. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    The solution is to do a terrible job of fixing things, make up a bunch of stories promoting fear and crime, and then send in weapons, thus proving that humans are wild animals which need to be controlled through force and restrictive measures?

    Great paradigm. I roll to Disbelieve. I get a +100 bonus, because my character can see that the Emperor Has No Brain.

    When shit hits the fan, be happy! It is an opportunity to help your neighbors and to spread calm and love and resources! Be kind and supportive work hard to make things better, folks! It's the only way out.

    Remember; the most important things in life are not things.


    -FL

  69. outrageous (a rant)!! by knopf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    First, they delayed the aid troops, to get rid of some of the poorest and most miserable (black) people in New Orleands, and now they are using them as guinea pigs and are trying out new weapons against them!!

    Outrageous!

    1. Re:outrageous (a rant)!! by klang · · Score: 1

      There is good money to be made, after a weapon has been tested in the field!

      priorities in the States are strange..

  70. Re:Buses? - LEADERS REQUIRED!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the mayor may not be directly to blame because of the school distict issue but i can say this much.

    WHO CARES WHAT THE RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE. IN TIMES OF CRISIS LEADERS NEED TO LEAD AND TAKE THE INITIATIVE.

    do you really think that the mayor would have had their ass spanked after the event for taking the initiative and saving lives?

    seems everyone is happy to pass on responisibility....

  71. Lay Blame. by FFFish · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Governor flatout stated ...I have determined that this incident will be of such severity and magnitude that effective response will be beyond the capabilties of the State and the affected local governments and that supplementary Federal assistance will be necessary."

    The assistance was dismal.

    The citizens of the USA have just witnessed the complete failure of government on all levels, from local to federal. At every stage of this disaster there has not been a single competent person orchestrating the rescue efforts.

    As a result of years of cronyism, privatization, classism, and racism, this has become an unmitigated disaster that one would expect to encounter only in the impoverished third world.

    And here is the kicker: it will happen again and again if the public does not rise up and demand a clean sweep.

    The entire system needs to be overhauled, from the very foundation of democracy -- secure, honest voting -- to the very notion of government's role in ensuring its citizens have access to shelter, food, and safety at all times and in all situations.

    The time to act is now. You should be very angry and you should be demanding accountability and change. Do something before it happens again.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Lay Blame. by FFFish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To follow-up myself:

      I repeat, blame falls at all levels. The Mayor failed to evacuate his people, despite having 300-odd buses at his disposal, laid useless because they were left in a lowlying area prior to the storm. The Mayor failed to organize volunteer rescue efforts. The Mayor relied far too much on the next-higher-up level of assistance.

      The Governor failed to evacuate her people, despite having the ability to commandeer every bus in the state. She failed to ensure water and food was delivered to stranded citizens. She failed to call upon the people of the state to take their boats and rescue the refugees. She failed to put her ass on the line and take responsibility for any fuckups from making snap decisions. She passed the buck to FEMA and then failed to recognize they were not helping.

      Michael Brown, head of FEMA, is a fuckup from the word "go." One only has to look at his history and how he came to be head of FEMA to recognize the cronyism and stupidity of the entire FEMA debacle. He is a failure.

      George Bush, Commander in Chief of the USA, failed to find out that FEMA was useless, failed to call in the National Guard and US Military, failed to call upon the American people to take direct action, failed to immediately invite expert assistance from other nations, failed to do anything useful whatsoever.

      I repeat: the US government is broken at every level.

      Get off your asses and get it fixed. Maybe this only requires writing to your representative, or maybe this requires overthrowing a dishonest, disreputable, dysfunctional government. I dunno. But the bottom line is pretty fucking clear these days; SOMETHING needs to be done, and it falls upon the American public to do it.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:Lay Blame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The entire system needs to be overhauled, from the very foundation of democracy -- secure, honest voting --"

      Just because your guy lost doesn't mean the voting isn't secure or honest.

    3. Re:Lay Blame. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      If you are going to make a call for action, you had better be prepared to lead that action. If you do not, then you will have hundreds, thousands, maybe even millions of people acting on their own and that is called... ( wait for it ) anarchy!

      Just yelling, "Something must be done!", is worse than useless.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    4. Re:Lay Blame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as something to add, I had worked in a drainage project in the upper midwest quite a few years ago.
      FEMA is a force to be delt with. FEMA can kick in even before an emergency takes place. Once they are involved, everything is played by their processes.
      FEMA more or less requires that state and local officials act in accordance to whatever FEMA tells them to do, not the other way around.

  72. Does flood insurance make the Feds more culpable? by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

    Flood insurance in this country is handled by the federal government. Even if you purchase your policy through a private agency, they're simply the go between. Try to purchase flood insurance with the same coverage and deductible through several agencies and they'll quote you around the same price.

    Because the feds handle all flood insurance, does that mean they are more liable for handling flood protection measures, NO's levees in this instance, then they would be handling other infrastructure?

    I'm just curious what people think.

  73. Bush, fuck you... (aka- Karma Burn) by dethl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its not enough that you couldn't send relief until 3 to 4 days AFTER the hurricane hit, but you have to send shit to control the crowds when just giving them more relief would control them anyway. Bush is a sick fuck. Help the people, not deafen them. Flame away Bush loyalists. A lot of the country is pissed off as well, and not just us liberals but even your own kind and everyone in-between. Don't tell me not to point fingers. The GOP and Bush are attempting to do damage control for a situation they could have and should have been able to handle very quickly.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    1. Re:Bush, fuck you... (aka- Karma Burn) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > couldn't send relief until 3 to 4 days AFTER the hurricane hit

      WTF you damn Bush apologist. Why are you claiming Bush has sent supplies? The people on the ground know he hasn't. Even Shep Smith on the network your type worships, Faux News, said there has been NO help. He has seen NO water being given-out. He has seen NO food being given-out. Geraldo, also from the same group of Bush-worshiping idiots, said the same last night. He held-up a 10 month-old baby that Bush refused to help. When even Faux admits Bush has made sure NO help has reached the area, even someone like you should give-up the lie.

      Skinner

      Visit
      http://democraticunderground.com/ for the real story on this Bush-created Holocaust

    2. Re:Bush, fuck you... (aka- Karma Burn) by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      If you had paid any attention at all in school, you would know that Bush could not send any aid other than FEMA. You do know it is illegal for Bush to deploy federal troops to a state without the request and consent of the state government right?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Bush, fuck you... (aka- Karma Burn) by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Not only is it illegal but the military really does not want to do this or set a precedent.

      They really do want to help but they don't want to risk our democracy by having federal troops used against civilians.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:Bush, fuck you... (aka- Karma Burn) by dethl · · Score: 1

      You know, I didn't mention that he sent relief to everyone. I'm on democraticunderground under the same name as here (over 200 posts there too). Bush pisses me off so much. If you're going to bash me, then do it without hiding under the "Anonymous Coward" id. Or hell, pm me on democraticunderground and I'd be more than happy to talk to you. Bush had SOME aid sent along with him just to make himself look like a fucking hero. Bush is nothing more than a Photo-op whore. I love how the context of what I say can be taken so badly. I completely diss the Bush loyalists yet you think I'm one of them? Don't be so rash to reply until you've read ALL of someone's comments.

      --
      "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  74. "If you can hear this... by qualico · · Score: 1

    ...stop your looting and turn yourself in!"
    "If you need assistance, find a "sonic laser" and talk to us!"

    Seriously though, your telling me that the US can't afford to ship out Sat phones to communicate?
    How about eBay for some CBs?
    The range is much greater and surely cheaper to deploy and operate.
    For crowd communication, how about a mega-phone?

    I have yet to see any groups rushing the relief personnel there, it's too hot!
    Screaming at them, given that you have the unit pointed in the right direction at the right time and in the right location, seems unrealistic.

    Just a footnote:
    Hurricane season runs through Nov. 30 and the Atlantic ocean temperature hit record highs.
    I'm guessing there will be a few more letters of the alphabet to use up before this season is over.

  75. New Orleans at fault. by papasui · · Score: 1

    Ok let's start with the fact that even when I was 13 years old and learned that New Orleans was below sea level I thought "Wow I bet that really floods." Secondly they was a MANDATORY EVACUATION of New Orleans days before the storm hit. If your stupid ass is stuck on a roof or in a stadium because you didn't leave then it's your own damn fault. It's a terrible tragedy but I like to think of it as evolution in progress. Let's move on to the stupid ass Mayor Nagin blaming the federal goverment for not coming and bailing them out. UH that's what local government is responsible for, planning for this kind of thing. It's not like terrorists came in and made a hurricane to destroy those cajuns. Finally New Orleans has hundreds of busses they could have used to evacuate the city, but they didn't. Here's a solution for next time. DON'T re-build a city below sea level. DON'T build a city where levees are needed to keep it safe. DON'T elect a dumbass Mayor who doesn't plan for disasters that have been predicted for decades. DON'T blame other people for your own stupid decisions. DO plan a meeting with other major city governments to see how to plan for disaster.

    1. Re:New Orleans at fault. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those elderly, infirm, paraplegics, pregnant women in labor, they shoulda just gotten up and walked it off.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:New Orleans at fault. by papasui · · Score: 1

      No they should of drove or ridden with someone 3 days before the storm hit like the vast majority of people there.

    3. Re:New Orleans at fault. by matrem · · Score: 1

      You may not have known this as a child, but you should be aware now: half of the Netherlands, where I live, is below sea-level. This does not mean we should abandon that part, it means we should take great care in protecting ourselves from the sea. In the US, there is a greater demand for "small government" compared to most of the rest of the world. As a result, the levees in New Orleans had a statistical likeliness of breaking once every 230 years. The Dutch dikes that protect our cities are made to break every 10000 years.

    4. Re:New Orleans at fault. by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      What about the ones that couldn't find a ride?

    5. Re:New Orleans at fault. by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      I hate to mention it, but a -mandatory- evacuation of NOLA was not declared until about 10 am Sunday morning -- less than 24 hours before the storm made landfall.

    6. Re:New Orleans at fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the ones that couldn't find a ride?

      You mean they were un-prepared?

      I wonder just how many of the refugees were Boy Scouts at one time.

    7. Re:New Orleans at fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the Netherlands sinking?

      New Orleans was built on silt delta. Levees were built to control the Mississippi, not the sea.

      The Mississippi was controlled, but without the regular flooding, silt deposition halted. The existing silt continued to settle, the result being that the city started sinking.

      The Netherlands dikes were built to claim land from the sea. New Orlean's levees were built to control a river. The engineering situations were quite different.

    8. Re:New Orleans at fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bunch of heatless bastards in this thread. Are you guys blind?
      I wonder just how many of the refugees were American military at one time. Since america's army consists mostly of blacks and poor people who are willing to go out and die for you mom's cellar dwelling idiots.

      The state is responsible for the safety of its citizens there is no excuse for the poor planning and execution of the evacuation of the city.

      You make me sick, grow up

    9. Re:New Orleans at fault. by kop · · Score: 1

      Some of the Netherlands dikes were built to claim land from the sea, most of it is there to protect the land in exactly the same way as in New Orleans. The setteling of mud and slow sinking of the land s a problem we have here too.

      Some people call the Netherlands the oldest democracies in the world becaulse of the way the building of dikes was organized; People banded together and elected a "Dijkgraaf"to take care of watermanagement in their region.

      We have been a Semi socailist state for years, nothing to be afraid of; the Netherlands is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, home to multinationals as Philips, Shell, Canon, Unilever, Heineken. Homelessness an poverty are rare here thanks to elaborate social security.

      We have had evacuations and floodings in the past years due to the bad management of the rivers flowing into our country.
      The state has been handeling these relatively well, all have been orderly and the old and sick where out first of course.

      Hurricanes do not exist here but global warming and melting icecaps are very dangerous for us, please sign kyoto!

    10. Re:New Orleans at fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proves the point.

      The mayor was advised to order the mandatory evacuation a full 24 hours earlier than he did.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Nagin

    11. Re:New Orleans at fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they should of drove or ridden with someone 3 days before the storm hit like the vast majority of people there.

      Yeah, all those poor assholes. Fuck 'em. They don't deserve to live since they're poor and they can't find a ride. If I was down there, I would've gotten out since I have money. Those poor people are so stupid since they're poor. *sigh*

  76. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

    This comment is ridiculous. The two aren't even comparable. When Andrew (another cat 5 storm) hit Miami, we were able to handle it. The problem in New Orleans was not the hurricane but the flooding it caused. In a normal hurricane, The hurricane goes over, the damage is done, and then you dispatch teams to clear the roads etc. and things start getting back to normal right away. In this situation the flooding meant the usual response doesn't apply. you cant drive a truck through 5 feet of water, you can't clear debris and get the communications infrastructure back up to organize relief efforts. The situations are entirely different. We are completely prepared (as much as you can be) for a "normal" hurricane. This is completely different.

  77. I for one can't wait for the movie... by tyroneking · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... a desperate president thoughtfully strums a guitar while the deep south burns (because movie presidents are either heroes or bill clinton and the deep south is evil); a valient mayor battles the dodgy paper-shuffling governor (because politics stinks, apart from mayors who always clean up towns - kinda like sheriffs) ... and bruce willis as the heroic maveric loner ex-cop who accidently shot his partner/ex-SEAL who accidently led his men to certain death/ex-navy cook who accidently poisoned his captain/ex-JAG officer with a fighter pilot past who accidently shot-down a Serbian general's evil-eyed son. Can bruce save his cute daughter/sexy but unloving wife/cute but dangerously curious son from the floods, terribly black & poor rioters, rape gangs and insane local army unit commander; lead a rag-tag gang of possibly feckless neighbours to safety AND discover the truth behind the hurricaine (a military experiment gone wrong), the sharks (a military experiment gone wrong) and the burst levys (a corporate / military engineers experiment gone wrong)?
    Or maybe this was just a huge disaster affecting an area the size of the UK, in a country without a welfare state, where the inequalities in society are trumpeted in the media, and commercial interests (i.e. a waterway near New Orleans that should have been filled in years ago) are always put above the common good (DCMA, Patent Law, etc.)
    WAKE UP AMERICA AND SAVE YOUR COUNTRY; MAKE TONY BLAIR YOUR NEXT PRESIDENT

    1. Re:I for one can't wait for the movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make Tony Blair the next US president?

      I'm liking that suggestion -the USA needs a dose of socialism, and the UK will be well rid of Bush's lapdog :)

    2. Re:I for one can't wait for the movie... by plusser · · Score: 1

      Please please please please you are very welcome to Mr Blair.

  78. I have some of these by zeketp · · Score: 1

    They call them "speakers". Together with an "amplifier", you can wake the neighbors a mile down the street.

    --
    Last Post!
  79. Only joking... by tyroneking · · Score: 1

    ... about bruce willis; Bruce Campbell would be my choice (or Sarah MG)

  80. Re:Let's start blaming! First up FEMAs Michael Bro by learn+fast · · Score: 1

    FYI:

    Why is Michael Brown the head of FEMA?

    The answer is simple enough: because he was the previous director's college roommate.

  81. HPV Technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but to me, HPV stands for Human Papilloma Virus (Google agrees), which initially made the company sound much more interesting.

  82. "We" should get some real information? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    The police and authorities are not treating people all the same.

    Well it depends on how you look at it. A few (handful) of looters struck - the next day. Most of this wasn't as bad as it was reported, but because it was so heavily focused on *everyone* has had to suffer. The idea that it was "unsafe" to enter these areas was just plain wrong. People have been doing what they can to impress those working on relief, even going as far as forming single file lines! As far as treating people with equity, why is it being reported that Hyatt customers get busses before the dying people held up in convention centers or stadiums? (Just one source.)

    Basically, everyone is suffering/dying because a few people are causing a problem. So everyone is being punished.

    There is no firing into crowds, and that sort of thing. No doubt the authorities are overwhelmed and need all the outside help they can get, but they are coping as best they can.

    Coping the best they can? We are talking about simple things like dropping bottled water and MRE's for fellow humans. Sure the local police might not be able to get a hold on the situation, but where is the Guard? Where?

    If people are shooting, looting (not food - TV's, etc), causing violence and intimidation, they are being treated like the common criminals they are. If they are people in distress who need help, everyone is trying to get help to them.

    Who even cares if someone loots a TV? It's likely ruined with all of the flooding, and by the time the insurance papers are filed it won't matter if it floated away or was water-logged. Sure, keep people out of the homes - but KMart, Wal-Mart and the rest are insured for these items. Still, people loot when they are given the chance. If you know what it was like to live your whole life poor, you'd understand what happens in your mind when the "all rules off" mode sets in. Plus you've got to figure, mob mentality. You can't blame an individual for doing what the crowd is doing. You may want to - but we've seen enough that these types of acts spread with the mob to understand that people just lose control.

    But you're idea of treating looters like "the common criminals they are" really scares me. How do you treat criminals? Beat them? Shoot them? Are they less than human? Because that isn't the country I live in, this is America. Umm... have you ever thought that the way you treat someone changes their outlook on life? I just can't get over this part of your post.

    "Everyone" trying to get help to these people is just a lie. People are trapped, still, and have people who can come and get them. People have set up ways out and places to stay but they are being told "No".

    As an aside, anyone trying to score poliltical [SIC] points in either direction on the back of this disaster should be taken out back for summary execution.

    Is it politics when you are pointing out that the federal government is failing these dying people? Is it politics to point out that FEMA has resorted to "worst federal agency" status that it held back before Hurricane Andrew? You can't make a statement like that in America - public life and politics is so intertwined that it is our duty to make an issue out of this. What makes me sick is that people out there are so loyal to the President they fail to acknowledge that he failed us - it makes me sick that they are downplaying the amount of suffering. Laura Bush has said, as well as FEMA Director Michael Brown, that the things we see on TV aren't what is going on. That's bullshit, we've not seen the worst yet. Even worse is that people like Harry Connick Jr (who made it out un-molested by these dangerous types) are saying that is in fact true.

    Who is lying? The witnesses or the people who were miles away during Katrina's landfall.

    1. Re:"We" should get some real information? by bladernr · · Score: 1
      but where is the Guard

      Good question. The slow response is what angers me at the Federal government's handling. I still defend the local authorities. In the small town outside New Orleans where my mom lives, I know for a fact the local guys are doing the best they can (and doing a good job at that).

      If you know what it was like to live your whole life poor, you'd understand what happens in your mind when the "all rules off" mode sets in.

      Don't preach to me. I grew up in one of those poor south Louisiana families. I don't even have to know you to be pretty sure I've known a lot more poverty in my life than you. In spite of that, my parents gave me a sense of right and wrong, and I know exactly what I would do in a situation like this (I've been in similiar situations in 2 countries). Let's not confuse poverty with thuggery... I was poor, not criminal. The criminals in New Orleans are criminals, no matter their race, class, or economic status.

      Plus you've got to figure, mob mentality. You can't blame an individual for doing what the crowd is doing.

      That's a poor excuse. I've been smack in the middle of a full-on riot, complete with tear gas, looting, and everything else you can think of. The so-called "mob" was a small minority of the people caught in the situation. The "mob" that will steal, rape, murder, etc, have a criminal mentality anyway and are using the situation as an excuse. Don't try to mix up the criminal element with the innocent by claiming "mob mentality."

      But you're idea of treating looters like "the common criminals they are" really scares me. How do you treat criminals?

      Why does it scare you? People stealing TVs are stealing. "Wal-Mart has insurance" is hardly an excuse. Do you have insurance? Can I rob you?

      I don't treat criminals any particular way, as I am not in law enforcement or the criminal justice system. I'm just saying that the looters (except the ones taking vitally needed food and water) should be treated like any other time those crimes are committed.

      What makes me sick is that people out there are so loyal to the President they fail to acknowledge that he failed us

      Please read what I said. I said people going for points in either direction. I am not supporter of the present administration. I don't like politics when people are dying. You spend every single bit on available energy and resources on fixing the situation... then you can look for political answers. We need priorities.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    2. Re:"We" should get some real information? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Why does it scare you? People stealing TVs are stealing. "Wal-Mart has insurance" is hardly an excuse. Do you have insurance? Can I rob you?

      Wait, that's a stretch. It's not an excuse, but these looters are hardly depriving people of things they need. They aren't depriving anyone *because* the insurance will cover it all. I'm just saying, let's stop crying for Wal-Mart or Kmart. In fact, looters clearing out the electronics section probably turned over more product (and profit) than Wal-Mart usually does in the same time frame.

      It isn't that I'm trying to justify their actions, I'm just trying to get anyone to understand that when you are so disenfranchised from society - because of race, creed or social class - you likely aren't going to care so much when it's "your turn". That is what these people are feeling, they are feeling it's their turn. Reports said that some people were trying to claim certain parts of the city as their own, and they likely have been waiting for the day they could it. Not because they are criminals, because they found out what it is like to be in control for once in their lives.

      I don't think everyone stealing stuff is a 'criminal' (before the hurricane), but even the criminal element out there aren't just born that way. Are they? I've always learned/thought/whatever that criminals are made, not born.

      I don't treat criminals any particular way, as I am not in law enforcement or the criminal justice system. I'm just saying that the looters (except the ones taking vitally needed food and water) should be treated like any other time those crimes are committed.

      It's just property, a poor boy like you should realize that. The fact that people basically committed a misdemeanor or small felony doesn't give anyone the right to order "shoot to kill". If one person walks out of Wal-Mart with $10,000 in merchandise by him or her self they are still only committing a very small crime (in comparison, we are talking theft here, not baby rape). No matter, you get Miranda rights from a rape case - not a shoplifting, robbery or grand theft case.

      To say that shooting to kill or any other inhumane treatment is on the table only makes the looters and rioters go even more crazy. All bets are *really* off. (Now, I'm not trying to say that you wanted "shoot to kill" orders, I'm just talking about the issue at large).

      The criminals in New Orleans are criminals, no matter their race, class, or economic status.

      This is true - and has been my point for days really. People I talk to confuse "black" with "criminal" in this situation (like they do with every situation). Just looking at the numbers makes you wonder why the "criminals" are almost all "black". 28% of the city is below the poverty line, 84% of the poor are black. A city of a half a million people - and over 100,000 are black.

      Whites have moved out of the city, partially due to crime and partially due to racism (remember, this is the state that almost elected David Duke governor back in just 1991). As many people are pointing out - this bothers us (me, others) because we are seeing the effects of disenfranchisement and poverty and almost what has become economic apartheid in this country.

      Fuck it: I'm a liberal and with that comes the feeling that I hate to see people die *just* because they are poor. Forget the looters, forget the failed relief efforts. The fact remains that most people living in the city of New Orleans (9th Ward, etc) didn't have access to cars - something that could have saved them from day one. People drown in their own homes because there was nothing they could do, no where to turn. When you just expect everyone to hop in the car and take off - you've committed mass murder. Are the feds, Bush, FEMA, Louisiana's response people, whoever it is, are they that stupid to think that a major city like New Orleans doesn't have a large poor population that can't just "up and go"? And to think, all of the cities poor lived right next to those levees.

    3. Re:"We" should get some real information? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Okay, all of this typing and I didn't notice your sig.

      I've been (somewhat falsely) credited with creating that quote out here on the Internet since 1994.

    4. Re:"We" should get some real information? by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....You can't blame an individual for doing what the crowd is doing....

      Boy what a rotten idea that is! So it is OK to steal, rob, rape or murder as long as a person has lots of others doing it at the same time! So then anything anyone does as part of a crowd is excused? What is a crowd anyway? Is it not simply a number of individuals? How many of these does it take to constitute a "crowd"? Some say three is a crowd. I'd say that anyone who takes advantage of an emergency situation for their own gain ought to be severely dealt with on the spot, if nothing else than to discourage others from following their bad example.

      --
      All theory is gray
  83. OT: Fox propaganda tells "true" story by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    Salon.com tells us Fox News perspective of the desaster.

    You need to press "Get Pass" to view this article for free.

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  84. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cubans are experts at evacuations because of their constant practice in trying to leave their homes.

  85. Bush was ON VACATION FOR TWO DAYS after Katrina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush was on VACATION for TWO DAYS after Katrina hit. The biggest disaster since Sept 11th - thousands of people drowning, crushed under buildings, and he thinks his bicycling and fishing are more important than the lives of those people.

    That says EVERYTHING anyone needs to know about his attitude and his level of competence.

    Cheney is STILL on vacation!

    Jesus H. Mother-F*cking Christ!!!

  86. Wrong application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think my techno dj daughter could find a far better use for these things.

    So we have people stranded for a week without food, water or a place to take a crap, babies perishing in their mothers' arms, no power, dead people and things floating through canals that were once streets...and our leaders apparently think it's some kind of priority to stage a live demo of some kinky terror weapon.

    Seems we've pretty well lost it, folks.

  87. take them over by HBI · · Score: 1

    He has police, fire departments, etc. Sanitation workers.

    Under the terms of a mandatory evacuation, seize the buses and screw the legalities until the people are safe. No judge would interfere with that.

    Of course, that would require a true leader with balls.

    Rudy, perhaps.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:take them over by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Rudy, perhaps."

      Would that be the guy who, despite a previous career as a federal prosecutor, let the mob steal materials removed from one of the biggest and most important crime scenes and subjects of civil suits ever (not counting the Nazi death camps), materials that might have been evidence?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  88. Sergeant Major by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    I always thought that is what a Sergeant Major is for. A good SM can easily communicate with a crowd a mile away, using nothing but his voice...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  89. UK TV interviewed some British tourists b4 Katrina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Channel 4 UK showed an interview with some UK Tourists who said they had tickets out of the city but the trains had all been cancelled (this is the day before) and the airport had been shut - but without making any alternative arrangements for other tourists who had tickets out.
    (they were relatively pink people).
    ITV and BBC started out mouthing the US journalistic line that black people had stolen guns and booze and were looting - although NOT ONE image shown of looters had anyone looting anything other than food and clothes - not reporting but regurgitating news - the BBC has climbed down now and admits 'some' looting may be for essentials.
    I think that this crowd control stuff is very interesting, I guess the Neoconservatives and their appointees in FEMA and DHS really are into mass Eugenics.
    It is good Bush has admitted that efforts were not good enough, seems like they still aren't.
    This Christian Fundamemtalism is a very scary thing. - theirs must be a very evil god.

    Sorry to rant but I think what has taken place was and is quite evil - and it is only being caught out that has made anything happen.

    Over at the Sonic Youth fan blog, http://www.sonicyouth.com/bboard/fanforum/viewtopi c.asp?TopicID=1766100&topic=my+wife+and+I+last+nig ht+at+the+astrodome ( via Xeni Jardin @ Boinbgboing) someone is talking about the lack of help at the Astrodome. Hopefully good people will awaken and take matters into their own hands - and try and help - Bush and his cronies like war and conflict - fear allows them power.

    Does a President have to leave Office during a civil war / state of emergency / martial law ? Bush seized power in a coo, maybe he is reluctant to give up the reigns.

    Do Good for God and Mankinds Sake.

  90. The Straight Dope... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1, Informative

    So, let me get this straight about Nagin and his expletive filled rant today. This moron of a mayor can't get his city evacuated or prepared in 3 days BEFORE the storm hits and the levees break but everyone is supposed to come from around the country and do it in 20 minutes after the place is broken by the storm and floods?

    This is what passes for 'leadership' in that city (which by all reports was barely under control in the best of times)?

    Disgusting. I think Nagin's performance leading up to this is boarder line criminal. I bet in the aftermath we are going to find a lot of money that was supposed to be used for disaster preparedness went 'missing'.

    It is very important that the country be able to distinguish Democratic blather from reality after this calms down. As far as I can see, Bush and the feds did everything by the book, as soon as danger was coming. The mayor of N.O. did absolutely NOTHING to prepare for this.

    Drudge is currently showing a parking lot full of flooded school buses. Why weren't they sent through neighborhoods to pick people up? Why was the Superdome not stocked with at least minimal supplies? I have no answer, but I think when this is analyzed that the local government will be the culprit. But for now, the Dems are going to make every effort to make Bush look bad. Political posturing during a tradgedy is something I find simply disgusting.

    All I have heard on the news is blaming the Feds for slow response to New Orleans.

    But the preparation and execution of an evacuation of New Orleans in the event of such a disaster (which has ALWAYS been a possibility... a known issue) lies squarely on the municipal and state government... not the Feds.

    It's so easy for the N.O. mayor and the LA governor to blame the Feds. It takes the spotlight off them and their incompetence. Just compare their preparation and response to other cities like NYC, SanFran and LA to their disasters.

    But... eventually, a post mortem on all this will occur... and I think the N.O. mayor and the LA governor's incompetence will come into full view.

    In the meantime, the Feds have basically taken over Louisiana and New Orleans... as they have no effective, competent government.

    When Northridge earthquake took place; did everyone sit around waiting for the feds to come rescue them? Hell no, people pulled together and helped each other. In NOLA, people pulled together and... helped themselves to some new shoes and whatever else they could get their hands on. Now we're going to see endless news reels of these "poor helpless criminals" who "couldn't help themselves".

    The RED CROSS has said that they were holding back on delivering food until they had adequate armed escorts to protect them going into this war zone.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:The Straight Dope... by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody expected things to be fixed in 20 minutes. However, the whole point of disaster response is the response part. There is absolutely no reason why there should be a 5 day period of no response other than pretty words.

      The money in the federal budget that goes to homeland security, you know the agency in charge of protecting the homeland, is obviously the biggest shell game in the history of the US govt. If this is what we can expect for a response, is crowd-control weapons being deployed almost as soon or sooner than food and water, than it is a pathetic country indeed. The interstate highway system in this country was developed for EXACTLY this kind of mobilization. Highways and bridges were built wide enough to allow military vehicles to cross the country in an organized fashion.

      As far as your 'questions' that you even admit to having no answers to, well they are quite frankly disturbing. Where do you think the money comes to pay the people to drive all those busses around to pick up everyone. Where do you think the money comes from to organize the infrastructure for the eventuality of such a disaster? Obviously you are not aware that the funding stream to enable all of those 'questions' is from the federal govt in the form of 'homeland security grants'. Did New Orleans get any of those? I do know the answer to that, and you should stop being fed your information and learn for yourself. New Orleans did have a plan and countermeasures in place to deal with such a circumstance, however my friend, unless you are paying for these things out of your own pocket it would be to your benefit to realize that these things take a level of financial commitment in order to implement correctly.

      As far as 'comparing' disasters, which is woefully innapriopriate, well lets compare them. What was the reposnse time for national guard troops being deployed to all the above incidents you cited? New York, less than one day. San Fran, also less than one day. LA, less than one day. How exactly does this compare to 5 days?

      And bush doesnt need anyone to make him look bad. He does just fine on his own. Take some time away from the TV for a few weeks(better months), better yet, go on a vacation to see how people in other parts of the world live. Then come back and watch your TV... unfortunately, the only way for you to see that the government is failing is when it will fail you. I wish you and your family are never in a disaster so catasrophic, that you learn first hand how inept our system of social protections has become. But life is long, and you are just playing the odds if you hope, or think, it cant happen to you.

    2. Re:The Straight Dope... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Nobody expected things to be fixed in 20 minutes. However, the whole point of disaster response is the response part. There is absolutely no reason why there should be a 5 day period of no response other than pretty words.
      Well, out here in the real world - there wasn't such a five day period. The Coast Guard was on scene on the first day (Tues). By the second day National Guard forces were already trying to evacuate the Superdome and the hospitals. By the *third* day convoys were already arriving with food and other aid. (Today is day 5... and my tenant just arrived in New Orleans - in the *third* wave of assistance forces his company has sent.)
      The interstate highway system in this country was developed for EXACTLY this kind of mobilization. Highways and bridges were built wide enough to allow military vehicles to cross the country in an organized fashion.
      Those facilities were designed *when intact* to do that. They aren't intact.
      As far as 'comparing' disasters, which is woefully innapriopriate, well lets compare them. What was the reposnse time for national guard troops being deployed to all the above incidents you cited? New York, less than one day. San Fran, also less than one day. LA, less than one day. How exactly does this compare to 5 days?
      And how widespread was the disaster in NY? Not very. The National Guard could be drawn from the heavily populated area around the few city blocks that were damaged. San Franciso? Same deal, small area damaged within a much larger area. Ditto LA.

      New Orleans is one small area in the middle of a *huge* and heavily damaged area - and far from other significant population concentrations.

      Yet they started arriving there in force on the third day.

    3. Re:The Straight Dope... by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1
      Yet they started arriving there in force on the third day.

      Even if that were true, how is that a supporting point to your argument? Earlier you said that the facilites to move large convoys across the country werent intact. So, somehow the entire interstate highway system in the US disintegrated and was repaired over a three day period. I live in the upper midwest, and it would take me about 11 hours to get to new orleans. If the aid was coming from as far away as chicago, what were they doing for the other 2 1/2 days? loading it?

      Unfortunately, the 'company' you are refering to is no doubt a subcontractor to the oil companies. Because those were the priority sites. Jesus, most of the refineries had power restored to them before any meaningful amount of food and water was being shipped in! Will you wake the fuck up already? The shipments from private companies are not the issue here, the issue is the inept planning the department of homeland security in particluar, and the federal governemnt in general, has done to protect the country from widespread disasters.

      Whether you are a bush brownnoser or not is none of my concern. What is my concern is when people cannot realize what an orginazational failure is on their own. No organization is going to voluntarily tell you it failed, and absolutly not the federal government. But you can bet your ass there will be people trying to CYA and patting themselves on the back to make sure they tell you how good everything is going.

      Read the response to hurricane camille in 1969, over 35 years ago, and tell me if you think the majority of those things have, or will, be responded to this time. Did HUD fly in, in less than a week, over 5,000 mobile homes to be used as shelter for the displaced? By the way, many of those same roads were washed out.

      Dont tell me that trickles of relief were happening 3 DAYS after this occured and think you are pointing out a positive. Just because you have been so conditioned by an inept administration and political climate in this country for the past 5 years, does not mean they are doing a good job. The past shows a different climate indeed. And hopefully so will the future.

  91. Give them back in kind by militiaMan · · Score: 0

    I think the people should go flood the white house and use sonic lasers on them.

    Fascist will reap what they sow.

  92. German THW by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    The german THW (Technisches Hilfswerk / technical first aid) has the technical equipment to filter 9.000 liter of contaminated (chemical & bacteria) water.

    German news report that several THW teams are on their way into the desaster zone.

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  93. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by ultranova · · Score: 1

    This comment is ridiculous. The two aren't even comparable. When Andrew (another cat 5 storm) hit Miami, we were able to handle it. The problem in New Orleans was not the hurricane but the flooding it caused. In a normal hurricane, The hurricane goes over, the damage is done, and then you dispatch teams to clear the roads etc. and things start getting back to normal right away. In this situation the flooding meant the usual response doesn't apply. you cant drive a truck through 5 feet of water, you can't clear debris and get the communications infrastructure back up to organize relief efforts. The situations are entirely different. We are completely prepared (as much as you can be) for a "normal" hurricane. This is completely different.

    This was a "normal" hurricane. AFAIK there was nothing whatsoever unusual about Katrina.

    The reason Katrina caused flooding is that New Orleans happens to be in a position where only dams keep water out. This being the case, it was certainly not impossible to predict that damage to said dams would result in flooding, or that a major natural disaster (such as a hurricane) could cause such damage. Therefore, being prepared to handle natural disasters means, in New Orleans, being prepared to handle dam damage and resulting flooding. New Orleans wasn't prepared to do this, therefore paren't comment about inadequate preparedness is completely justified.

    New Orleans wasn't prepared to handle Katrina and it's results. Both Katrina and it's results were predictable. Therefore, New Orlean's disaster preparedness was inadequate, and its citizens are now paying the price.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  94. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Informative
    According to Oxfam Canada:
    The level of disaster preparedness in Cuba is extremely high and it is thanks to this that even more losses of life and property was prevented. In advance of the hurricane local authorities evacuated over 1.5 million people, including thousands of tourists, to safer areas. Of these, 245,106 people were moved to State provided shelters and the rest of the people weathered the storm in the homes of family and friends, 8 million people were at risk.
    Katrina resulted in hundreds of deaths (at least) before any flooding occurred. Insofar as people moved into State provided shelters, it certainly was not organized to the level where they could be effectively counted. IMHO, it should have been possible to provide food and water to the superdome and convention center even if there was not a road still open (which there was).
  95. Phonons and Rabbit Lasers by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    I've heard of phonons, but never really understood them, especially since we never really discussed them in detail in either of my semiconductor courses, the closest thing I've taken to solid state. I'm tempted to think that, like you said, they aren't defined outside of a crystal lattice, but if these are the longitudinal-wave equivalent of photons, it's difficult for me to find a reason why they should require special properties of their medium in order to exist. Maybe the correlation isn't as one-to-one as I'd like to make it seem. To create an "acoustic laser," one would think that you could create an analogous situation to that found in an optical laser--more or less to stimulate atoms to emit photons with the same character as the stimulating photons. I don't know if phonons can cause this sort of behavior in atoms, and I have to think that there's something about the nature of a phonon that answers this question. Again, I don't know.

    One thing I found interesting while thinking about this is a little memory of mine: once a friend and I came up with the idea for a rudimentary mass laser. We called it a "laser," meaning "Lapine Amplification through Stimulated Emission of Rabbits." Essentially, you put a bunch of rabbits in a box with an electrified floor and a small, one-way door and the end of the box. Assuming that the rabbits have time enough to breed between pulses of the floor--which itself stimulates their movement via a shock--you could eventually get a sort of resonance going that would have some of the properties of a laser: lots of bunnies out, all with (eventually) similar genetic properties. When I think of the article's acoustic laser, I think that the term "laser" is being used in the same rather loose way. However, the difference is that while the Lapine Laser was, basically, for laughs (and to ease the study of the diffractive properties of bunnies through a small lit), this "acoustic laser" is being seriously pitched as a solution to a real-world problem.

  96. true nature of America w/ regards to poor blacks by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People around the world are looking at the situation of the poor blacks in N.O. and saying this is the true nature of America. Those rich, privledged, racist white Americans still treat blacks like that.

    That is nothing but lies and a big misunderstanding of the large picture. For decades - even centuries - the majority of black people in America have created for themselves a "I'm a victim" mentality. This does not engender motivation to make one's life better. Witness all of the other foreigners who have come to America - some literally "off the boat" at Ellis Island in N.Y. - and became successful.

    What we are seeing in N.O. is the result of socialism in America. I can't count the number of times on T.V. I've seen the poor black people complaining about "what is the government going to do", "where is the government to take care of us", "why has the government let us down." Instead of taking personal responsibility for their actions, they have been conditioned by receiving welfare checks and other government handouts, mainly from the Democratic Party, to not think for themselves.

    I think that "leaders" like Jesse Jackson actually do more have than good for the black people of America by perpetuating the "I'm a victim" mentality.

    Thus, the true nature of America that your foreigners are seeing today is the disgust we have with the failures of socialism and the continueing concept amongst blacks that they are "victims" of something that happened centuries ago. Any person, any group, any race, any religion, any civilization has been a "victim" or a descenent of "victim" of some event many years / decades / centuries in the past. You get over it and move on.

    I would really like to see my fellow Americans get over and move beyond this "I'm a victim" mentality. Only then will we all be productive and work together to make America great again. If that cannot happen, then America - the republic and now the empire - will collapse into a 3rd world dictatorship under martial law like so many other African and South American countries have.

    And so as not to be totally off-topic, I am quite concerned about this increase of weapons for controlling larger and larger crowds. What is our government thinking? Why the need to control many large amounts of people unless they see something awful coming...

  97. The Empire dispatches some of its Sonic Disrupters by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why send sonic disrupters into the disaster area? Because that way they can be tested without pissing off too many likely voters.

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  98. Correct. by Burz · · Score: 1
    Since 2003, FEMA is no longer responsible. The Department of Homeland Security has supplanted them.

    No link yet, but here is an excerpt from a FEMA Timeline by Henry Breitrose, Professor of Communication at Stanford Univ.

    January 2001: Bush appoints Joe Allbaugh, a crony from Texas, as the head of FEMA. Allbaugh has no previous experience in disaster management.

    April 2001: Budget Director Mitch Daniels announces the Bush administration's goal of privatizing much of FEMA's work. In May, Allbaugh confirms that FEMA will be downsized: "Many are concerned that federal disaster assistance may have evolved into an oversized entitlement program...." he said. "Expectations of when the federal government should be involved and the degree of involvement may have ballooned beyond what is an appropriate level."

    2001: FEMA designates a major hurricane hitting New Orleans as one of the three "likeliest, most catastrophic disasters facing this country."

    December 2002: After less than two years at FEMA, Allbaugh announces he is leaving to start up a consulting firm that advises companies seeking to do business in Iraq. He is succeeded by his deputy, Michael Brown, who, like Allbaugh, has no previous experience in disaster management.

    March 2003: FEMA is downgraded from a cabinet-level position and folded into the Department of Homeland Security. Its mission is refocused on fighting acts of terrorism.

    2003: Under its new organization chart within DHS, FEMA's preparation and planning functions are reassigned to a new Office of Preparedness and Response. FEMA will henceforth focus only on response and recovery...
    1. Re:Correct. by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Since 2003, FEMA is no longer responsible. The Department of Homeland Security has supplanted them.

      Which obviously helped a lot. They were far more concerned with dancing to the tune of defense contractors in order to defend the country against a scruffy band of box-cutter wielding malcontents who had to work diligently for 20 years before they managed to finally stage successfully one major attack. As oposed to the remote, never before seen danger of a hurricane in the South.

  99. Where is the national guard when you need them? by joey_knisch · · Score: 0

    Oh right... Shit.

    1. Re:Where is the national guard when you need them? by DerProfi · · Score: 1

      A predictable backhanded attempt to put blame where it doesn't belong, so let's get some facts straight:

      1. 25-35% (I've seen different estimates) of Louisiana's National Guard is supporting operations in Iraq. Do the math, joey. What percentage does that leave for state missions?
      2. In domestic situations like this, the State National Guard is traditionally mobilized by the Governor. So when did the Governor actually mobilize them, joey?

      The sad reality is that among the many bad decisions made by state and local (and to a lesser extent, federal) government, Governor Kathleen Blanco neither mobilized her National Guard nor ordered a mandatory evacuation soon enough. You know, actually get things moving before everything flooded, looting began, bridges were washed out, etc. Thankfully, the Louisiana Guard was eventually mobilized (along with National Guard from many other states) and are now doing a fantastic job.

      --

      3000+ comments meta-modded. 0 mod points awarded.
      Lesson for other meta-suckers: Don't believe the hype!
  100. Blame? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Oh for crying out loud.

    There's blame to be scattered around just about everywhere and with everyone. No one was controlling the weather -- that shit happens.

    As for being unable to get people out of there? Damn if it ain't just bad luck? The people left behind had good reason to stay behind. Either they didn't think it was going to be as bad as it was or they simply had no way to get out. One vacationer literally had no means out as the story was told... couldn't get a rental car or anything.

    As for looters? There's a culture in New Orleans and that general area where I am completely unsurprised about that. I'm still sickened by it, but completely unsurprised. Can you blame "culture" for being what it is? Yeah... no... maybe... I don't know. I know I'm not like that. It c could be that many people stayed behind so that they COULD loot the place.

    I haven't heard much about other countries offering aid -- I guess the news sources don't want to talk about that. Another thing the news isn't talking about much is the things going on in Iraq now.

    Is this effort being delayed? I don't know. I wish I knew more about the whole thing. But it's clear that attention is being directed here rather than elsewhere. If I could read from reliable sources that help is being turned away, then I would think there is something very bad happening.

    If a huge disaster hit in my area, I'd have no place to go... I have no idea what I'd do. None of this stuff is easy.

  101. you mean?!?!?! by austinpoet · · Score: 1

    it is I believe an audio-vibratory-physio-molecular transport device...

  102. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by Thanatopsis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This post is quite wrong on MANY MANY levels.

    " continueing concept amongst blacks that they are "victims" of something that happened centuries ago."

    Perhaps you are not aware that until the voting rights act of 1965, black were largely disenfranchised and segregated. Hardly centuries ago.

    "What we are seeing in N.O. is the result of socialism in America. I can't count the number of times on T.V. I've seen the poor black people complaining about "what is the government going to do", "where is the government to take care of us", "why has the government let us down." Instead of taking personal responsibility for their actions, they have been conditioned by receiving welfare checks and other government handouts, mainly from the Democratic Party, to not think for themselves."

    A vast and very child like generalization. Many of these people are working poor who pay taxes. Many of them don't own vehicles. By call them "welfare recipients" you simply reveal your ignorance. What data is this based on? Knowing what I know about the difficulty of receiving welfare after the welfare reform act I doubt that many of them are welfare recipients.

    Take a look at the reponse the government had in regards to Hurricane Andrew - it was much better.

    As far as your immigrant success stories - yeah sure people come here and are successful. Usually because they have a great deal of money to begin with. Your quote

    some literally "off the boat" at Ellis Island in N.Y.

    is quite telling. Ellis Island hasn't been used as an immigration facility for 51 years.

  103. Thanks from the US and Texas! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to say THANKS for all the offers of assistance from around the world. It's the first I've heard of it. I've been busy pitching in myself.

    Most impressive to me are venuzuala and cuba who we have animosity with as a nation. The offers from all the nations are appreciated! Please pass the word on to your countrymen that we here in Texas appreciate the gesture!

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Thanks from the US and Texas! by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      Most impressive to me are venuzuala and cuba who we have animosity with as a nation.

      Haha. I don't think the motives of Chavez and Castro are altruistic. They know their offers of help will never be accepted; that's why they are so willing to make them. They like seeing America look bad, and these platitudes are their way of rubbing it in.

    2. Re:Thanks from the US and Texas! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. We should accept them. This is different.

      Short of an active war going on- disasters like this call for setting aside these things- maybe even during an active war with some disasters.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:Thanks from the US and Texas! by Apotsy · · Score: 1

      The US has plenty of resources. What is needed are leadership & organization to put those resources to good use.

  104. You may be correct in the general ... by khasim · · Score: 1

    but given that it will take weeks to pump out the water, theft and looting will not be a barrier to "further restoration efforts, including returning electricity to the area".

    The looters have no where to store their loot (unless you're talking gems/jewelery/cash) and no place to sell it.

    Every person assigned to watch for looters is a person that is not available for rescue operations.

    People first
    Property last

    1. Re:You may be correct in the general ... by fredklein · · Score: 1

      The looters have no where to store their loot...

      You DO realize that the looting was/is mostly taking place in the parts of the city that were evacuated, but are not underwater, right?

      Roughly 1/4 to 1/3 of the city is still dry. The people who live in those dry homes have plenty of space to store their loot.

    2. Re:You may be correct in the general ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roughly 1/4 to 1/3 of the city is still dry. The people who live in those dry homes have plenty of space to store their loot.

      Where 1/4 to 1/3 equals 1/5 -- the reports all said 80% was underwater, and that was days ago -- before the water level equalized with the lake.

      With no power and nobody working the stores, the only way to get food, water, or anything else is to just take it. Also for people on social security, mail is not exactly being delivered so they have no checks to spend.

      Additionally, the highest areas are also the richest areas. Of course poor people are looting stores that are fairly dry. However, they aren't taking the loot back to their dry houses because they lived at the lower elevations and have no houses left.

      This is a major economic disaster quite apart from any looting or refugees. The whole country is going to feel the impact for who knows how long as supplies of practically everything can't get up the Mississippi, not to mention the oil refineries being down, and a million people homeless in one city alone.

  105. ordered or appealed? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    You say Bush called to order a mandatory evacuation, but your source says he appealed for one.

    To be honest, appealing makes a lot more sense ot me. I don't like the Feds mandating things at the local level (it's called Republicanism).

    And honestly, that's all hot air anyway, because the Mayor is not stupid, he was speaking of how bad is was going to be days before Katrina hit. Katrina was possibly going to hit NO square, and so he would have mandated an evacuation anyway.

    So Bush didn't save any lives here, not at least in the aspect of whether it was mandatory or not.

    IMHO, the deaths in NO can be put square on the people in NO, mostly. Why did they stay there instead of leaving? And why when the levees broke did they still stay? Look at the satellite maps, if you just WALK two miles west (best take a circuituous route to stay in the shallow water), you're on dry land. Why would you stay in a flooded area with no power when you can go to somewhere where there is dry land and electricity? It's not like they had anything left in NO anyway after the waters started to rise.

    I know there were infirm people there, that's why the Superdome was a shelter of "last resort". But the rest have no one else to blame for why they are still in a disaster area in a trash-ridden stenchhole days later.

    Of course, none of this applies much to the areas east of NO like Biloxi and Gulfport that were destroyed in the storm, not in the floods.

    I think just the blame game is way out of hand. What official did or didn't do this or that. Like this: why weren't school buses used for evacuations? Well, did you see reports of people lining up to leave before the storm with no way to go?

    If there were buses, these people wouldn't have boarded them. They didn't want to leave, because they didn't think it would be this bad. And they were told if they leave, they possibly couldn't return for weeks, perhaps months.

    So they did the math, probably figured that if they left their homes would be looted before they got back, and meanwhile, they're paying to stay in a hotel or something for days or weeks that they cannot afford. So they went to a local shelter of last resort when they should have left.

    That's the problem. That's why these people didn't leave. It's not the government's fault.

    Now, doubly stupid is once your home is destroyed, your job doesn't exist (at least at the moment), all your possessions lost, and you're in an area with no water and no power, staying there. For the life of me I don't know why those people didn't walk S to the river (the land is highest by the river), W by the river and onto the dry land W of town. There is no breach in the levee down there to stop them or anything. I don't get it.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:ordered or appealed? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "I don't like the Feds mandating things at the local level (it's called Republicanism)."

      Uh, I think the word you're looking for is Federalism. You let me know when Congress starts remembering what that word means.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:ordered or appealed? by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 1

      >>I don't get it.

      Obviously; no need to reiterate.

  106. Impossible for god to care... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm Iv'e been saying that for a long time now.

    And todays lesson: Dont live in a damned bowl under sea level and near the ocean..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  107. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by mcbevin · · Score: 1

    Its obviously very difficult to compare two hurricanes. However, regardless of the flooding, it seems reasonable to assume that if more people had been evacuated, then more would have been saved, and I would think levels of evacuation can be relatively easily compared, and it seems like Cuba did a better job of evacuation in preparing for Dennis than was done in this case.

    The flooding of course is another matter, but again, the flooding was somewhat predictable, and thus should have been better prevented / prepared for - I'm sure this point will be debated a lot over the next few months, and hindsight is always a wonderful thing, but you touch on the point yourself that the hurricane itself wasn't particularly bad. Surely this is supports the argument that _more_ could have been done to prevent the catastrophe, given that the catastrophe wasn't anything all _that_ unusual in terms of the strength of the hurricane, and given that the resultant flooding was also not that unpredictable?

    I would argue that New Orlenas was _not_ completely prepared for a 'normal' hurricane, given that what happened is precisely the result of what a 'normal' hurricane can do to such a sunken city.

  108. not designed to move fast? by s388 · · Score: 0

    From the Department of Homeland Security Website:

            In the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or other large-scale emergency, the Department of Homeland Security will assume primary responsibility on March 1st for ensuring that emergency response professionals are prepared for any situation. This will entail providing a coordinated, comprehensive federal response to any large-scale crisis and mounting a swift and effective recovery effort. The new Department will also prioritize the important issue of citizen preparedness. Educating America's families on how best to prepare their homes for a disaster and tips for citizens on how to respond in a crisis will be given special attention at DHS.

    NOT DESIGNED TO MOVE FAST you say? how about swiftly, comprehensively, effectively? they use billions of dollars to move slowly, unswiftly, and not at all?

    (we're putting aside FEMA and army corps of engineers for the moment)

    i'm not saying nobody in LA made any bad decisions, but it's ridiculous to claim that all the death can be put "squarely on the shoulders" of the government of NO and LA.

    "not designed to move fast" looks like another way of saying "it's not the government's job to do anything, losers." and i've seen a lot of that lately. despite....those um.... TAXES everyone pays, and the mission statements and budgets of these federal agencies and departments.

  109. The following dosen't have to be the epitaph. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just left New Orleans a couple hours ago. I traveled from the apartment I was staying in by boat to a helicopter to a refugee camp. If anyone wants to examine the attitude of federal and state officials towards the victims of hurricane Katrina, I advise you to visit one of the refugee camps.

    In the refugee camp I just left, on the I-10 freeway near Causeway, thousands of people (at least 90% black and poor) stood and squatted in mud and trash behind metal barricades, under an unforgiving sun, with heavily armed soldiers standing guard over them. When a bus would come through, it would stop at a random spot, state police would open a gap in one of the barricades, and people would rush for the bus, with no information given about where the bus was going. Once inside (we were told) evacuees would be told where the bus was taking them - Baton Rouge, Houston, Arkansas, Dallas, or other locations.

    I was told that if you boarded a bus bound for Arkansas (for example), even people with family and a place to stay in Baton Rouge would not be allowed to get out of the bus as it passed through Baton Rouge. You had no choice but to go to the shelter in Arkansas. If you had people willing to come to New Orleans to pick you up, they could not come within 17 miles of the camp.

    I traveled throughout the camp and spoke to Red Cross workers, Salvation Army workers, National Guard, and state police, and although they were friendly, no one could give me any details on when buses would arrive, how many, where they would go to, or any other information. I spoke to the several teams of journalists nearby, and asked if any of them had been able to get any information from any federal or state officials on any of these questions, and all of them, from Australian tv to local Fox affiliates complained of an unorganized, non-communicative, mess. One cameraman told me "as someone who's been here in this camp for two days, the only information I can give you is this: get out by nightfall. You don't want to be here at night."

    There was also no visible attempt by any of those running the camp to set up any sort of transparent and consistent system, for instance a line to get on buses, a way to register contact information or find family members, special needs services for children and infirm, phone services, treatment for possible disease exposure, nor even a single trash can.

    To understand this tragedy, its important to look at New Orleans itself. For those who have not lived in New Orleans, you have missed a incredible, glorious, vital, city. A place with a culture and energy unlike anywhere else in the world. A 70% African-American city where resistance to white supremecy has supported a generous, subversive and unique culture of vivid beauty. From jazz, blues and hiphop, to secondlines, Mardi Gras Indians, Parades, Beads, Jazz Funerals, and red beans and rice on Monday nights, New Orleans is a place of art and music and dance and sexuality and liberation unlike anywhere else in the world.

    It is a city of kindness and hospitality, where walking down the block can take two hours because you stop and talk to someone on every porch, and where a community pulls together when someone is in need. It is a city of extended families and social networks filling the gaps left by city, state and federal goverments that have abdicated their responsibilty for the public welfare. It is a city where someone you walk past on the street not only asks how you are, they wait for an answer.

    It is also a city of exploitation and segregation and fear. The city of New Orleans has a population of just over 500,000 and was expecting 300 murders this year, most of them centered on just a few, overwhelmingly black, neighborhoods. Police have been quoted as saying that they don't need to search out the perpetrators, because usually a few days after a shooting, the attacker is shot in revenge.

    There is an atmosphere of intense hostility and distrust between much of Black New Orleans and the N.O. Po

    1. Re:The following dosen't have to be the epitaph. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry me a river... Next time try living somewhere that's above sea level and with some competent local politicians.

  110. criminal negligence, not politics by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Most of my (large) family live in New Orleans and the surrounding parishes, and I speak with them as often as possible

    If you're able to speak to them, that means they have shelter. Most people left do not.

    As an aside, anyone trying to score poliltical points in either direction on the back of this disaster should be taken out back for summary execution. Sorry, I'm pretty close to this, and politics has no place until after this is sorted.

    This isn't "politics". It's "life and death" and "people in power not doing anything to prevent mass-scale crime and rioting". That's criminal negligence and/or gross incompetence. A similar disaster occured in the 1920's and they had aid to people within 2-3 days. In this day and age, it took a week before the National Guard even decided to start doing anything (I suspect because staffing levels are so low thanks to the Iraq war; there's a lesson there in sending your civil defense people to fight a foreign war.) A US Navy hospital ship didn't even set sail until 2-3 days ago. Nobody's sending the number of busses needed to get people evacuated to other cities and states. The CDC has managed to set up under a half dozen command centers and medical teams...over a WEEK! There were two hospitals that went utterly IGNORED by the mayor, the governor...to the extent that doctors had to get ahold of AP/Reuters reporters and desperately plea for water, medicine, food, and protection from looters that were breaking into the place.

    We KNEW this was going to happen; the levees were rated to category 3, and Katrina was a category 5. Yet ABSOLUTELY NOTHING was done on a Federal or State level to prepare for the mass devastation. The major of New Orleans has flat out accused the President and the Governor of Mississippi of doing nothing but holding press conferences and smiling for cameras with refugees. The evidence is on his side- neither has done more than pat people on the back, say "it's gonna be okay, we'll get ya some aide real soon" and walk away.

    Someone on NPR just described it best- it's like a dog trying to grip a basketball with his mouth. Top government officials just can't seem to wrap their heads around how massive a problem this is. A MILLION PEOPLE have no homes anymore. They need to GO somewhere, semi-permanently, until New Orleans is rebuilt. We're talking months before basic services are up...

  111. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 1

    Again, that's the problem. 1965 was FOURTY years ago. Except for old people in their 60's no one today was a teenager back then, much less born. That is history.

    I pointed to Ellis Island because that's how the poor people came to the U.S. And look how well they've turned out compared to blacks who have been living here for centuries.

    And it was on FOX News last night that the government is setting up desks/stations in the refugee camps so the poor blacks can pick up their welfare checks.

  112. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "for decades - even centuries - the majority of black people in America have created for themselves a 'I'm a victim' mentality."

    Might want to note the fact that african americans still were victims, i.e. actively under slavery less than two hundred years go.

  113. Live is better than dead. by khasim · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter how long it would have taken to evacuate 100,000 people.

    What matters is that SOME of the people WERE evacuated.

    You're thinking along the lines of "if it is not a perfect solution for the entire problem, it is not a solution for any part of the problem".

    If he only saved 10 people, you think that's a failure.

    If he saved 10 people, I think that's 10 people who were saved and that's a success.

  114. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

    Black living here for centuries have faced centuries of discrimination and slavery. So after 40 years of saying "ok blacks, you can vote now and not get lynched," everything is fine in your mind? What an isolated little life you lead.

    " FOX News last night that the government is setting up desks/stations in the refugee camps so the poor blacks can pick up their welfare checks."

    First off - When I look at the TV I see many retired elderly people who need to pick up their Social security checks. I see a lot of old folks in the refugees. Please provide a link or some other evidence other than Fox News told me.

  115. Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cuba - "1,100 doctors and 26 tons of medicine and equipment."

    In other words, Cuba has offered to send in 1100 terrorists for free. What a deal!

  116. MOD PARENT DOWN by linguae · · Score: 1
    I would agree with you here in the sense that blame goes to the cult of extreme selfishness and disdain for everything "common" or "public" which the neo-cons with the help of libertarians have been instilling in the American public for a few decades now. The result are cowering, frightened local government who consult with lawyers for days before declaring mandatory evacuation because they are afraid of "lawsuits by the casino and hotel owners". Then comes fright of lawsuits by citizens if they are forced to leave on buses. And then there is cost. FEMA is now under these people a "charity coordinator". Dont expect a "charity coordinator" to pre-emptively force an evacuation. And so on and so forth. Weak, and attuned to the rich exclusively, government is the source of all of this. Grover Norquist (one of the chief ideologues of neo-con moement) wants to "get the government to the size where we (neo-cons/libertarians) can drown it in a bathtub". He got his wish, except the bathtub he spoke of is the city of New Orleans.

    More of this anti-libertarian and anti-conservative hate bull that I hear from leftists like you. For the final time, the events in New Orleans is NOT representative of the right-wing view of small government at all!!! The breakdown in New Orleans has nothing to do with the size of government; it just shows how inefficient the local, state, and federal governments are! This is representative of how local, state, and federal government breaks down under a heavy load. The local and state governments weren't able to evacuate their citizens quickly enough (which they should have done so at least 4 days before the storm arrived), and FEMA (federal government) acted in the way that the federal government always acts: slow and bureaucratic. It took the feds four days for them to finally show up to New Orleans. Meanwhile, thousands of people ended up dying because help didn't come their way quickly enough because of the snail-pace speed of these layers of government. It's not because a conservative is in office.

    And what is so "selfish" about free-market ideas that libertarians and conservatives champion, such as school vouchers, privatized social security, privatized health care, negative income taxes, limiting inflation, and more? Sounds to me you're a socialist or communist who have heard that "capitalism is evil" rhetoric and "rich people are greedy and selfish" and want to blame the entire situation on (neo)conservative and libertarian ideas. Sounds to me that you don't fully understand right-wing government at all. You need to read some Milton Friedman, some libertarianism, and some conservatism, and some neoconservatism before you start spewing some crap about how conservatives and libertarians are rich, selfish individuals who don't donate and don't help out people who are in dire need. Libertarians and conservatives generally wish that the layers of government had stepped in a bit quicker. However, because of the molasses-slow response of the federal government, it looks like these people will be dependent on the citizen's donations from Red Cross and the rest of these private organizations, which is normally the case in a disaster, since the government is slow and apathetic.

    To paraphrase the grandparent post, the blame starts from the bottom (local government) to the top (federal government). They all broke down. However, IgnoramusMaximus (bravo, you just got another explanation of libertarianism), what you are seeing is NOT representative of neither libertarianism or neoconservatism (the latter tends to support more social spending), no matter how much you disdain right-wing politics. This is government breakdown.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      This is representative of how local, state, and federal government breaks down under a heavy load. The local and state governments weren't able to evacuate their citizens quickly enough (which they should have done so at least 4 days before the storm arrived), and FEMA (federal government) acted in the way that the federal government always acts: slow and bureaucratic. It took the feds four days for them to finally show up to New Orleans. Meanwhile, thousands of people ended up dying because help didn't come their way quickly enough because of the snail-pace speed of these layers of government. It's not because a conservative is in office.

      I agree that the response was unacceptably slow. But it is a looong stretch to blame this on the supposed nature of government in general. If it were so, all prior disasters, some also on a major scale (California Earthquake) would be dealt with similarly. But they were not. Furthermore, most of the governments with far less resources then those at the disposal of the Federal, State and Local governments in this case were capable of handling immediately a vastly more devastating disaster: the Tsunami, where governments of impoverished countries reacted with speed and level of effort far exceeding that of the Bush Administration in regards to New Orleans. Cuba evacuated all their citizens out of the path of their last major hurricane. And so on. The failure has nothing to do with "nature" of government as you would have people believe and everything with the ideology of government being in the way of raking in money to which right-wingers subscribe. If it were otherwise, Cuba, with its outright socialist government, would be the one with people crammed in a convention center begging for food and water.

      It's not because a conservative is in office.

      I disagree. FEMA was nearly completely gutted and turned into an adjunct of Homeland Security, which itself was obsessed with defense contractors and ways of spending vast sums of money to counter-act a small band of idiots with box-cutters or perhaps with an RPG or two. These actions are directly responsible for the performance of both of these federal agencies.

      And what is so "selfish" about free-market ideas that libertarians and conservatives champion, such as school vouchers, privatized social security, privatized health care, negative income taxes, limiting inflation, and more?

      Free-market ideas are all fine and dandy as long as one remembers that free-market is a limited and narrowly applicable tool to make sure that certain types of economic activity are efficient. It is not a religion nor a philosophy.

      Free-market is perfectly applicable to 50 small businesses trying to compete while manufacturing soap.

      Free-market is not applicable to medical care because one of the cornerstones of free-market, one I am sure you are familiar with, the "competition" is absent. One does not do "price/performance analysis" when one is dying of a heart attack. You go to the nearest ER and at that point you do not have any control over prices you are being charged. Only selfish people, who are wealthy enough to have transportation arrangements with their private clinics, or who simply do not care about the price, would claim that putting free-market into such a scenario is "not selfish". The result is 40 million uninsured Americans with no health care. A situation worthy of Congo or Angola. But that is OK, because the top 10% is luxuriously served. Selfish. As in caring about your own lucky ass only, while claiming that everyone else should be left to their own devices.

      Similarly with education, in science at least, there is only one group of schools which is capable of delivering the goods: secular academia. The rest are various flavours of medieval religious zealotry masquerading as "science". Very much as the Madrasses in the Middle East. Allowing them to brainwash people until they start believing and acting on superstition and all sorts of nonsense in order to

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by linguae · · Score: 1

      Time to try to extinguish some of flames here.

      Similarly with education, in science at least, there is only one group of schools which is capable of delivering the goods: secular academia. The rest are various flavours of medieval religious zealotry masquerading as "science". Very much as the Madrasses in the Middle East. Allowing them to brainwash people until they start believing and acting on superstition and all sorts of nonsense in order to empower the various religious cults in America is what the "vouchers" are all about, and that is in addition to removing funding from public schools in order to destroy them. Only selfish people who have access to private schools (and religious zealots) would support such a thing.

      How in the hell is school vouchers selfish? School vouchers enable poor people trapped in underfunded, ghetto schools that don't offer all of the things needed to properly educate their pupils to escape their failing schools and be able to attend whatever school they want to. School vouchers, if done right, enable all people to pay for schooling and enable them to go to any school that they wish (as opposed to full privatization). Since students can attend any school that they wish, the schools will now compete on a market system in which the schools that offer the most programs and has the best performance gets the most voucher money. In the current version of primary and secondary education, poor people get stuck in underfunded public schools while rich people get to go to excellent public schools or private schools. Which is more selfish to you: poor students forced to go to poor schools, or an environment where schools compete with each other for students based on a market system?

      Negative income tax? As in the government paying you money from its income on its assets on the planet Pluto? That is the only place the money could come from, other then from dismantling and destroying everything all the previous generations worked to establish: all the public assets. The "negative tax" would soon end after the last one of them is sold and the government no longer existed. Which could only serve few wealthy and selfish individuals. Selfish and extremely Libertarian.

      Now how in the world is NIT selfish? In a negative income tax system, poor people are guaranteed a minimum income---

      ...

      Fine, I'm done! I'm done with this Hurricane Katrina talk. I through with trying to give you a lesson on libertarian thought. You don't have a clue about capitalism, free markets, laissez-faire economics, libertarianism, etc., and I don't think you'll ever will. You call the free-market a religion and selfishism, but it's not. I guess your belief that the government solves all social problems can be a religion, too. Government schools, government checks, government medicine, government subsidies, government cheese, government this, government that. Government needs to stay out of most of these issues and let the free-market do its thing. Now, does this mean I want the government completely eliminated? Hell no. The government needs to exist for protection, law enforcement, infrastructure, and some other very basic things.

      However, I am sick and tired of free-market ideas being branded as "selfish," as if your utopian collectivist government can do any better. I'm not rich, but I'm also tired of all rich people being lumped together as Mr. Scrooges that need to be forever taxed because they are sinful, selfish creatures that need to be forever punished. Let's quote you. "Rich people are greedy and selfish, otherwise they would not be rich." Huh? What the f*** is that? Michael Jordan didn't become rich because he selfishly played basketball. Your favorite musicians didn't become rich because they selfishly played music. Your lottery winners didn't become rich because they selfishly won the lottery. NOT ALL RICH PEOPLE ARE GREEDY AND SELFISH! There. Do you

    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      So what do you suggest? Paying for a private insurance plan with some defence contractor like Carlyle that will evac you in case shit happens? Like in the early '900 when bloody fire brigades were private companies and would let your building burn down with everyone inside unless it had the company brass logo on the front door? Guess what, it sucked, people died, it was expensive and more damage was made because no one would lift a finger until insured property was harmed (by then rebid, big ass fires)... go figure...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    4. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      School vouchers enable poor people trapped in underfunded, ghetto schools that don't offer all of the things needed to properly educate their pupils to escape their failing schools and be able to attend whatever school they want to.

      Yes that's the sales pitch. And it would be somewhat related to reality if it were not for the fact that there are only two types of schools where the vouchers can be redeemed by a low income family: public and religious. And because the school voucher program is coupled with reduction of funding for the public schools themselves while the religious stay funded by their respective cults, that reduces the choice to one category. A typical neo-con charade: pretend that something is an improvement for everyone, while making sure that it only benefits your backers.

      School vouchers, if done right, enable all people to pay for schooling and enable them to go to any school that they wish (as opposed to full privatization).

      School vouchers are full privatization in disguise.

      Since students can attend any school that they wish, the schools will now compete on a market system in which the schools that offer the most programs and has the best performance gets the most voucher money.

      If the "competition" was restricted to public schools only, you might have had a point. But it is designed to destroy them altogether.

      In the current version of primary and secondary education, poor people get stuck in underfunded public schools while rich people get to go to excellent public schools or private schools. Which is more selfish to you: poor students forced to go to poor schools, or an environment where schools compete with each other for students based on a market system?

      They are both fucked. The solution of course is to fund the public system properly, as it is done nearly everywhere else on the planet, including here in Canada. How is that the richest country on the planet has the most fucked up public school system? Never mind, I know the answer, it is also the country where selfish greed rules more decisively as each year passes.

      I guess your belief that the government solves all social problems can be a religion, too. Government schools, government checks, government medicine, government subsidies, government cheese, government this, government that. Government needs to stay out of most of these issues and let the free-market do its thing.

      No, government must handle things for which the free market is not an acceptable solution. There is no problem for example with private industry and the like. But even then the market must be regulated. Less important the segment of the market, less regulation. Truly free market is only possible for a horde of small companies trading in bolts and the like. That is because free-market, left to its own devices would simply devolve into a set of oligopolies and gouging cartels sprinkled generously with vast scams.

      Hell no. The government needs to exist for protection, law enforcement, infrastructure, and some other very basic things.

      It all depends what one considers "basic". Education, Healthcare, social safety nets and market regulation are some of those "basic" things.

      as if your utopian collectivist government can do any bette

      No one is proposing any "collectivism". But one has to acknowledge reality of human failings. Greed and selfishness are some of them.

      I'm not rich, but I'm also tired of all rich people being lumped together as Mr. Scrooges that need to be forever taxed because they are sinful, selfish creatures that need to be forever punished.

      The alternative is for all practical purposes feudalism. Accumulation of wealth beyond one's contributions to society is the anathema of capitalism. That is why Adam Smith was for nearly 100% estate tax and anti-cartel regulations. Unchecked accumulation of wealth perverts the market mechanisms and skews the workings of the system meant to create wealth via

    5. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least if you pay a private insurance company, they will help you. The people of NO paid the Local, State, and Federal Governments, and look at the shitty service they've received. Can the people switch to another "defense contractor" in the current system? Nope.

    6. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by swillden · · Score: 1

      And it would be somewhat related to reality if it were not for the fact that there are only two types of schools where the vouchers can be redeemed by a low income family: public and religious.

      False. Until last year, my son attended a non-religious private school with annual tuition of $3000 per year. They provided an excellent education, small class sizes (< 10 students per teacher) and didn't require me to pay extra for books, paper, pencils or even lunch. It also didn't require me to pay money to the PTA, buy crap for school fundraisers so they can buy a new copy machine, or any of a lot of other crap the public school wants. Actually, the $3K included a good breakfast and lunch, and included "latch-key" time so working parents could pick their kids up at six.

      Had the state passed the proposed voucher bill, poor families could have sent their kids to this fine school for $500 per year. Not that $500 is nothing, but the three hours per day of day care (from 3pm when school gets out, to 6pm, when latch-key time ends) provided by the school are worth more than that. Further, the state actually spends nearly $5000 per student, per year, so they really could have offered a $3000 voucher, made it possible for parents to use this private school for free, and *still* been up $2K.

      Every anti-voucher tirade I've ever seen makes the same lame error, assuming that all private schools are either expensive, or religious, or both. It just ain't true.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....one would distribute excess wealth to where it is needed......

      Now WHO would decide what is excess and where it is needed? How poor would you make say Bill Gates by taking away his wealth? Who would decide where his wealth should go? Who is the "one" who would do that and what or who gives any human the right to take away what belongs to another person, assuming the belongings were not stolen? Wealth is not the only thing that is very unevenly distributed in this world we live in. How about health? Would you also take away the health of those who have it (if that could be done) and give it those who are sick? What about intelligence? Should the smart people be downgraded to the level of the dumber ones? Athletic or artistic ability? There are great differences in humans and also in the willingness to work is greater in some than in others. Should all these differences be ironed out? There are those who are poor through no fault of their own, and they should be helped, not by handouts, but by giving them a chance to help themselves. Then there are those who are lazy and poor by choice and they should remain poor. A friend once offered a "homeless" person begging at a Walmart store parking lot a minimum wage job. The beggar turned it down, saying he made more money begging and it was tax free.

      The communist experiment was a failure. Even so, there are still so many like you who advocate such or a similar system.

      --
      All theory is gray
    8. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Further, the state actually spends nearly $5000 per student, per year, so they really could have offered a $3000 voucher, made it possible for parents to use this private school for free, and *still* been up $2K.

      Right. Do explain to me why is this that US of A is the only industrialized countrly on the planet with such problems? That and the medical care thing.

      I can only see one possibility: either your culture is akin to some primeval jungle where bands of savages skinning each other is the only modus operendi available or there is some determined and coordinated effort going on to destroy all "common" and "public" insitiutions. I do not get it.

      Not that $500 is nothing, but the three hours per day of day care (from 3pm when school gets out, to 6pm, when latch-key time ends) provided by the school are worth more than that.

      Possibly, except note that people in NOLA did not have the $40 for gas to get out of a path of a hurricane. The $500 would mean for most of poor that the public school would still be the only choice, except now it would be funded to the tune of $3000 per student, a $2000 drop, and would be attended exclusively by children of the poorest. To the great improvement of the quality of it, no doubt.

    9. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Not that $500 is nothing,

      I forgot. Also that calculation is per child. Make it a $14k a year single mother with four. See how that works out.

    10. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Now WHO would decide what is excess and where it is needed?

      The government of course, via the priorities of a voting populace. Democratically.

      How poor would you make say Bill Gates by taking away his wealth?

      The idea is not to make him poor but to create an escalating scale of taxation which makes getting richer harder as one progresses up the scale. If he ceases to be productive and does nothing to generate income, his wealth would slowly be reduced, slower the closer to the upper-middle-class he gets, until he qualizes with the median of the population.

      Who is the "one" who would do that and what or who gives any human the right to take away what belongs to another person, assuming the belongings were not stolen?

      The society, The same society which makes it possible for Gates to get education, to use inventions and ideas of others who went before him, like the alphabet and numbers. It is here prehaps, where the greatest crackpot, deceitful idea of the whole "self-made-man" etos of the right wing is at its most annoying: there is no such thing as a "self-made" man. Gates got where he got by using the society's graces to his advantage. The society deserves its due.

      Wealth is not the only thing that is very unevenly distributed in this world we live in. How about health? Would you also take away the health of those who have it (if that could be done) and give it those who are sick?

      Red herring. Health is not earned or traded. It is not a valid commodity in a free market. There is no way to "redistribute" health. One can only work at making sure that those of failing health are afforded care.

      What about intelligence? Should the smart people be downgraded to the level of the dumber ones? Athletic or artistic ability?

      See above. Red herrings galore.

      There are great differences in humans and also in the willingness to work is greater in some than in others. Should all these differences be ironed out?

      Those who can be helped, should. That has nothing to do with "ironing out" differences. The progressive taxation is about creating balancing forces. You assume that Wealth = Virtuous Hard Work (a disingenous right wing meme). As false as equation as one can possibly make. At present (in order of importance): Wealth = Luck + Inheretance + Willingnes for unscrupulous (and possibly illegal) exploitation + Inventiveness + Hard work. If you can remove the first three, then you could possibly claim that no additional measures are required. But this is clearly impossible. Thus progressive taxation is the only mechanism to offset these factors.

      There are those who are poor through no fault of their own, and they should be helped, not by handouts, but by giving them a chance to help themselves.

      Particularly the permanently sick or disabled, right? So that all the wheelchair bound paraplegics can become masters of international commerce, or some such similar nonsense.

      Then there are those who are lazy and poor by choice and they should remain poor.

      They should -- but at basic sustinence levels, not below. But their children should be given all the chances, because their parents' failings should not determine their fate.

      A friend once offered a "homeless" person begging at a Walmart store parking lot a minimum wage job. The beggar turned it down, saying he made more money begging and it was tax free.

      Or he was a junkie who would not be able to hold a job and he was after money for his fix anyhow. Which is a medical/psychiatric problem and in a sane society he would be taken care of in a mental hospital until his condition improved and if that occured, given basic work education and set up at an entry level job.

      The communist experiment was a failure. Even so, there are still so many like you who advocate such or a similar system.

      This has nothing to do with communism (other then to mis-label your opponent's position to try

    11. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by swillden · · Score: 1

      The $500 would mean for most of poor that the public school would still be the only choice

      180 days of school per year, times 3 hours per day, times minimum wage is what? Being able to leave their kids at school for those hours means parents can work those hours, and they don't have to pay for day care.

      except now it would be funded to the tune of $3000 per student

      Umm, how do you figure that vouchers would cause the funding of the public schools to decrease?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....Communism implies....

      All ideas of the artificial redistribution of wealth are basically flawed in that they take away or drastically reduce the individual incentive to be more productive or innovative than the the next person. It takes better than $20,000 of investment to create even a job for one worker. Where is that to come from if society (other people through government) take that away from someone who would otherwise expand their business enough to be able to hire someone? if someone has a good idea and a marketing plan to match, such as Microsoft or others why should they not reap the benfits. In the end, society benefits by the number of tax paying workers they employ. Society should only step in to ensure that everybody must operate by the same rules of fairness. Do you really think that government, really the bureaucrats that run it, knows better how to spend my money than I do?

      Even the most severely hadicapped person is not useless. It requires love and patience to determine how they may be useful, in addition to financial help. There are plenty of rich people in the socialist countries you mention.

      I also agree that the children of poor people should be given a boost, but the government is not always the best way to do this. We have currently a boy living with us whose mother is partially blind and disabled. He has been in our house for 5 years now. We have not gotten one red cent from any government agency other than having gotten him on the Oregon Health Plan, since we cannot put him on our own medical insurance.

      Forcing people to be responsible is generally a futile endeavor.

      --
      All theory is gray
    13. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      All ideas of the artificial redistribution of wealth are basically flawed in that they take away or drastically reduce the individual incentive to be more productive or innovative than the the next person.

      Total crock. Or are you going to tell me that Billy would be less inclined to do his shenaningas with DOS if he were to merely be a millionaire as opposed to multi-billionaire? Or that the fact that CEOs of Japanese companies earn only 10-20 times the salary of average worker makes them work less hard then the US ones who get 500-1000 times?!

      It takes better than $20,000 of investment to create even a job for one worker. Where is that to come from if society (other people through government) take that away from someone who would otherwise expand their business enough to be able to hire someone?

      Cooperative investment, aka stock market. The fact that an individual would have hard times personally becoming multi-billionaire, does not mean that his company could not manage multi-billion investment funds composed of small individual investments: see mutual funds and the like.

      if someone has a good idea and a marketing plan to match, such as Microsoft or others why should they not reap the benfits.

      For a good idea, sure. But only reasonable gain. Also, Microsoft is an example of a mediocre idea, greased by nepotism, legal stupidity of one company taken advantage of by the other, borderline illegal tactics, brainwashing of consumers and finally abuse of monopoly position. You were saying something about "reaping benefits" from abuse of society, no?

      In the end, society benefits by the number of tax paying workers they employ.

      The number of paying workers would actually increase because what we are talking about would be less conductive to multi-national corporations shipping workers overseas.

      Society should only step in to ensure that everybody must operate by the same rules of fairness.

      Precisely.

      Do you really think that government, really the bureaucrats that run it, knows better how to spend my money than I do?

      The government is to spend on social things such as medical care, education, police, army, infrastructure, funding research and arts. The rest is up to the enterpreneurs. You are jumping to conclusions that the government is to be the investor in the industries. Nothing of the sort. As to arts and science, the government should fund a vast majority of research in the academia as well as arts through patronage, while removing copyright and patent protection for art and most of the so called "inventions".

      There are plenty of rich people in the socialist countries you mention.

      They are far more rare (per capita) then in the US. Sure their systems are not perfect either. But it is a start.

      We have currently a boy living with us whose mother is partially blind and disabled. He has been in our house for 5 years now. We have not gotten one red cent from any government agency other than having gotten him on the Oregon Health Plan, since we cannot put him on our own medical insurance.

      That is very noble of you ... but on a large scale it is utterly insufficient. Charity can only work as a supplementary force, never the main one because it only covers a small fraction of needs. And did you notice how helpful your (completely barbarian) medical insurance scheme and the penny-pinching government are? And you are defending that? Here in Canada he would have automatic 100% health coverage by just being a resident of my province.

      Forcing people to be responsible is generally a futile endeavor.

      Quite true. That is why taxation is the only way out. Those people then do not have to be responsible, only to bitch and moan about how they are being "robbed at a point of a gun" of their "fair and square gotten loot" by the "evil gubmnt".

    14. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....Cooperative investment, aka stock market......

      When the government takes a dollar in taxes from someone and spends that in a distant war, that money is no longer available for job creating investments. It is not the big mega-corporations that are the life-blood of the economy and the creators of American jobs, but the small to medium size businesses. These do not tend to ship their employees jobs to far away corners of the world and therefore should be treated better by the government and not taxed excessively. Instead of taxing the income of wage earners, the government should tax the cheap, slave labor produced imports, so these would cost the same as domestically made similar items. That way there would not be as much incentive for the Walmarts of this world to buy almost everything overseas.

      The number one business of any government is to protect its citizens from each other, regardless whether these are gun wielding thugs, such as we have seen in the Katrina aftermath, or large corporate citizens (such as the Enrons and big oil) whose loyalties are only to the bottom line, at the expense of real living American people.

      Big companies, such as the entertainment megaliths for example, have discovered that they can purchase all the politicians they need to get the laws passed in their favor. We the voters need to learn who these polititans are and let them know that it is not the big companies that put them into office and then throw them all out at the next election. In the end, we the voters have to care and vote for some candidates of integrity who are not for sale at any price.

      --
      All theory is gray
    15. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      180 days of school per year, times 3 hours per day, times minimum wage is what? Being able to leave their kids at school for those hours means parents can work those hours, and they don't have to pay for day care.

      You mean most likely the parent (singular) and no that would not add up to anything because the cost is still sky high to her vs. letting them sit at the house (unsupervised most likely).

      Umm, how do you figure that vouchers would cause the funding of the public schools to decrease?

      It was your own calculation. I just accepted your proposed number as an example. I assume that would occur by voucher holding parents moving to your private schools as you have yourself indicated, leaving those who cant afford it behind and removing the presssure on fincancing of those public schools as those who are left attending them have next to zero political power, being poor, and most likely black or in some other impoverished inner-city minority.

    16. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      When the government takes a dollar in taxes from someone and spends that in a distant war, that money is no longer available for job creating investments.

      The waste of tax dollars on foreign wars is of course a valid point of disagreement. I for one posit that it is because the current government is driven by fantasies of Empire and by greed of its cronies. In any case, the mechanisms of control of government spending are of course at the crux of the matter and could be disucssed separately. I admit that it is the main weakness of any government-centered scheme, and how to keep the government in check and on the task is a daunting challenge. But in my view not an unsolveable one.

      It is not the big mega-corporations that are the life-blood of the economy and the creators of American jobs, but the small to medium size businesses. These do not tend to ship their employees jobs to far away corners of the world and therefore should be treated better by the government and not taxed excessively.

      I fully agree, that is why a progressive scale is needed. I would even agree that one can base the progression on factors such as the import/export ratios. I did not mention this but I believe that sales taxes in any shape or form should be abolished as they are the ones impeding the economy. In the scheme I am discussing, the large, humongous companies would be the ones hit hard for the reasons of their size and for their predatory import/export activities. Small business would largely see its income taxes increase marginally (while the personal taxes of the owners would increase dramatically) but at the same time they would gain from the sales taxes being gone.

      Instead of taxing the income of wage earners, the government should tax the cheap, slave labor produced imports, so these would cost the same as domestically made similar items.

      This is called "protectionism" and it has been empirically proven not to work. The income tax based gradiation scheme is harder hitting where it hurts i.e. directly at the owner's pockets without an ability to pass it onto the consumers as it is possible with the protectionist scheme you describe. The pass-it-on-to-gullible-consumer method of avoiding financial consequences has to be defeated.

      That way there would not be as much incentive for the Walmarts of this world to buy almost everything overseas.

      By making the companies of the size of Walmart financially not viable and by connecting the progression of tax to the import/export ratios of a company both of these would be achieved. Wallmart is destructive not only because it promotes abuse of foreign manufacturing but also because it displaces small, home-grown businesses. The system I describe would address both.

      The number one business of any government is to protect its citizens from each other, regardless whether these are gun wielding thugs, such as we have seen in the Katrina aftermath, or large corporate citizens (such as the Enrons and big oil) whose loyalties are only to the bottom line, at the expense of real living American people.

      Absolutely. But the government has to also protect from external threats and natural disasters. We are merely arguing about the mechanism by which best to achieve such protection.

      Big companies, such as the entertainment megaliths for example, have discovered that they can purchase all the politicians they need to get the laws passed in their favor. We the voters need to learn who these polititans are and let them know that it is not the big companies that put them into office and then throw them all out at the next election. In the end, we the voters have to care and vote for some candidates of integrity who are not for sale at any price.

      I fully agree. The problem though is cultural. The public has been sucessfully rendered indiferrent to the happenings of government by a combination of corporatization of media and promotion of what I would term "culture of selfish greed"

  117. re: busses by khasim · · Score: 1

    The problem was that those people who had somewhere to go ... left and went there.

    Those people who did NOT have anyplace close and secure to go ... stayed. (I'm not including the idiots who believed they were indestructable in this.)

    Bush called and asked for a mandatory evacuation ... but he did not put any FEDERAL resources into providing locations for the people to evacuate to.

    All talk, no action.

    As for you other item of everyone should just walk to a piece of dry land you've found, without some means of housing them, you'd have the same problems with food/sanitation/medical/etc.

    Compare that to Cuba's actions. Cuba has governmental sites prep'ed for the disaster and evacuated people to them BEFORE it hit.

  118. The topic of this story is what has me worried by bjason82 · · Score: 1

    They have had these crowd control devices for a few years now and had deployed them in new york to control the anti-war protesters during the 2004 republican convention. But what is not very well known is the fact that these same weapons were and are being used by the military in iraq against the enemy! The militarization of our police forces is what really has me worried....I saw the exact same device shown in the article's pictures in a Alex Jones documentary..

    Source: infowars.com

  119. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say we send them back to Africa, I'll even pay for a one way ticket.

  120. well, you never know by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    when you gotta need a nice pair of designer rubber boots...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  121. Catastrophe Capital (was R&D). by delire · · Score: 2, Insightful


    A National Disaster is clearly an excellent opportunity to trial new R&D in the field; harsh environmental conditions, long uptime, contingencies at a maximum - like a 'warzone' really. It would seem Bush has chosen to test future battle tech on his own people at home rather than random foreigners or US folk abroad. He doesn't miss a beat does he?

    Anyway, I guess these sonic cannons are cheaper than food, shelter and tear-gas or else he surely would have.. nevermind.

  122. you have similar problems.... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Except you're on dry land, you have water and you have electrical power.

    I know just walking away from the Superdome doesn't solve everything. it's a lot better to be on dry land with electrical power and water than to be in a stadium that is described as disgusting now.

    I do appreciate those people didn't leave because they felt they had nowhere to go. It wasn't true, there were other shelters, the Superdome was the one of last resort for people who weren't fit enough to travel out of town. On top of this, in NO, once the storm came through, they had no reason to stay either.

    I mean, if you are down to nothing, what's so great about an underwater city that you would stay there. If you have to start from scratch, maybe there are better places to do it, especially in the short term!

    And again, I do understand this doesn't apply to those in cites outside of NO. Once they decided to stay, and the storm left, they were out of impending danger, and as big a mistake as they made, it was over with. For those in NO, the storm was just the beginning, and once the waters began rising and destroyed all they had, they then should have not compounded their mistake by continuing to stay.

    As the to Cuba comparison, we did have sites. Were they prepped? Well, perhaps not as well as they should have been. But they were better prepped than the Superdome. No, they weren't governmental sites (unless you count schools), but they were there and ready for people. The problem was again PEOPLE DIDN'T LEAVE. It isn't an issue of governments. Perhaps Cuba can force their people to leave, we cannot.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  123. Ah, a varioation of the new talking point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...I see it's filtered out to Slashdot now. It goes something like:

    It was never George Bush's responsibility to have to do this. It was all the Governor's and Mayor's fault. So Bush saw how badly things were going, got pissed and stepped in to save people from themselves.
    You just can't get good help these days, so George took over and now everything's wonderful.

    Unfortunately, it has a few problems:
    • In this scenario, everyone has personal responsibility except George Bush. It assumes that Mr Bush has no primary responsibility in this whatsoever, and that he's basically elected and paid (on the order of 1/4 million every year) to do, well, nothing.
    • This fantasy basically ignores the fact that Bush has been president for the last 4.5 years, along with all the attendant decisions he's made that affected emergency preparedness and prevention.
    • This worldview also assumes that Mr. Bush had a hand in finally getting the needed supplies to the people in need, rather than simply using the arrival of help as a photo op.

  124. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by demonlapin · · Score: 1
    ... and if NOLA had had any public officials worth a damn, they would have had food and water at the Superdome waiting.

    Sorry, not the feds' fault.

  125. How times have changed, eh... by doddi · · Score: 1

    Marie Antoinette: Let them eat cake! Condoleeza Rice: Mommy needs some new pair of shoes!

  126. Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Bush administration is the only administration we've actually got running the country that we can get rid of.

    Clinton has been gone for years. I know Bush people don't know how to run a country, just how to make fun of an expresident who retired more popular than practically any president has ever been. I know Bush people don't know how to run a country, just blame Clinton for everything. Because they call facts that show their incompetence, written by anyone, "biased". Well, the facts are clearly biased against the Bush administration (to paraphrase the Daily Show). Whatever resistance Clinton might have had on that one day (nevermind what subsequently was done, like perhaps fully funding it) 10 years ago, before the past 5 years of Bush's rule, Bush certainly did not reverse that cut. He cut it as much as he could. He cut it, even after he's coasted on the coattails of one day in September 2001, when - after the smoke cleared - he climbed on top of a pile of rubble in NYC, and declared with a bullhorn that "everything changed".

    The #1 predicted national disaster, terrorist attack on NYC, had come horribly true - though Bush had not prepared for it. In fact, he deprioritized terrorist attacks during that first year of his administration, while looking for an excuse to invade Iraq from day 1. Four years later (minus only two weeks), National Disaster #2, hurricane devastation in New Orleans, has come true. And Bush stayed on vacation in his Texas estate, then made some BS speeches about Iraq in California, then skimmed back to DC giving just a flyover blink to "Lake George" where New Orleans once stood. While his Secretary of State took in Spamalot on Broadway, then shopped for thousand-dollar shoes on 5th Avenue.

    I know it's tough to admit that Bush is a miserable failure. That he's created catastrophe everywhere he's worked, in his whole career, but especially in the US and Iraq. I know it's tough to admit you're complicit in his catastrophes, because you voted for him and defended him. But its time to stop the BS apologies for the Master of Disaster. That old "it's Clinton's fault" BS only worked on a small percentage for a while, back around the turn of the century. It's useless now. Cut your losses and hang the blame on the Commander in Chimp now. Help us replace him with someone who can run the country some other way than into the ground. Or watch as Disaster #3, California Earthquake, kills thousands, millions more, cripples more of our ports and energy, all while we're still bogged down in Iraqmire, the Gulf Swamp, and across the nation that has been wallowing in stagnation and distrust since Bush was installed by the Supreme Court in 2000.

    Because who knows - the next disaster could be the one that your local government has been sucking Homeland Security dollars away from New York, New Orleans and San Francisco for. And you'll find yourself screaming in the streets for Bush's head, when they stole the money like the New Orleans disaster plan funds, and abandon you the same way. While some other Bush apologist posts lies, blaming Clinton, for abandoning you when your own life is destroyed by a predicted disaster for which you paid tax money for relief.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA you make me laugh.

      The attack on NY was a 'shock' simply because no one knew. The CIA had been castrated by Clinton. They have all admited as much. Even Clinton himself. Stop trying to blame Bush for what some TOTAL sickos did. Name in one way he could have stopped it with out everyone going total bonkers about 'rights'. Lets say for arguments sake on July 1 of that year the TSA had been invented. You think it would have got ANY funding from congress? You think people would not have been bitching at their reps about it? Your crazy if you think otherwise. I *KNOW* I would have been pissed about it before 911.

      As for New Orleans. Wow where to start. First the storm went from tropical depression to Cat 5 in under 2 days. The part that broke was the 'new improved' levies. So obviously there was a design problem. Secondly these people LIVE below sea level. What do you expect to happen once and awhile? Yes flodding. Bet it was a bitch to get flood insurance before this. Never mind all the people who stayed ANYWAY when the gov there said 'get out'. Now they are trapped? Im sorry but stupidity does not make me cry for you.

      Where are the states in this? It is after all the United STATES of America. Where was Louisiana in this? Yep sitting back waiting on the fed goverment to do its work for em. The rest of us paying for stupidity. They also had 40 years to prep for this. They did not. If they Fed was not doing the job why did the people of Louisiana sit back and wait? Im sorry there is PLENTY of blame to go around. If you think Bush is at falt here all the more power to you. But you sir are simply trying to justify who you voted for. What would Gore or Kerry done in either of these situations? Do you honestly think they would have done a better job? I would say no. They would be in the exact same boat as Bush. And you would still be blaming Bush. You are rationalizing your decision. Not with facts but with made up inuendos fed to you by the Tv.

      You want someone to blam in this? Blame the gov of Lousiana and the Mayor of New Orleans. They waited until AFTER the fact to ask for help. By law the president can do nothing until they ask. How would you feel if the National Guard just showed up because something 'might' happen? You would be pissed. Rightfully so too as the constitution FORBIDS IT.

      Stop watching listening to the crap on tv. They are looking for 'news' not for news sake but for ratings. So anything they can make up to sensationalize it they will do. As people do not want to watch boring things. You can not sell comercials to shows people do not watch. Make NO mistake your news is paid for by people want to tell you how to think. And if you think differently than them then you are a right wing nut job.

      I dont know about you but I live in the United States of America where the federal goverment is beholden to the states not itself.

      Now lets assume magically Bush could have done something about the flood. It takes a few days to mobilze people to go. The national guard do not all stand around waiting for things to do. They are a volunteer army. Which means that 99% of them have day jobs and play 'weekend soldier'. So lets call up 5000 soldiers from across all 50 states. First it is going to take at least 12 hours just to do that. Now another 12 hours to mobilize everyone. Oh and by the way all your runways are flooded out so you have to DRIVE in. Dont know where you live but its a 20 hour drive to get there for me. That they showed up as soon as they did is fairly amazing to me.

      What I find truly amazing is people are quite litteraly blaming Bush becaused it RAINED. wow you would have to be a seriously sore LOOSER to do that.

    2. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward, you are an insane freak who worships Bush, even when he destroys a major American city. Even though I'm obviously the first adult you've spewed your nonsense at all week, I'm not going to school you in why people stayed behind in New Orleans. Or how Bush cut off funding, while his people are lying about it to cover tax cuts for the rich and a catastrophic optional Iraq War.

      No, I'm just going to cite the fact that LA Governor Blanco accepted NM Governor Richards' National Guard help offer Sunday (before the storm), but the "necessary paperwork" didn't arrive until Thursday. So the governor acted before the storm even hit, depending on National Guard troops which BUSH'S WASHINGTON DC Homeland Security Department stalled while thousands died and the city was destroyed. I'll throw in the fact that Bush faked levee repair for a photo-op while he dropped into town after it was safe enough for his yellow ass.

      Anonymous Coward, we don't have English words to describe your evil. If I could reach through this screen, I'd rip you by the neck over here, and drown you in an alligator tank. I just wish we had microhurricanes to send up into your family's house to devastate you out of our misery. You bloody sick monster.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Everything ShortChanged by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....That he's created catastrophe everywhere....

      Next thing people like you will blame Bush for hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes and other disasters like some are blaming him for 911. Fascetious statement: Of course all hurricanes are Bush's fault since he is opposed to the global warming treaty. If he had signed that worthless piece of paper it would have averted Katrina, since she strengthened from a Cat. 1 to a Cat 5 storm over the WARM water of the gulf.

        Disasters have happened in the past and will in the future. Some aspects of them can be eliminated by not building in areas that are difficult to defend, such as locating a major city near a seacoast and below sea level. No amount of money or preparedness can avert some effects from such monster storms. Some had predicted that in a large storm the levees would be overtopped by the storm caused waves, but nobody thought that a levee would be breached. When the "big one" happens in CA, there too will be surprises that nobody thought of. When the forces of nature are unleashed in various forms, we humans, despite all technology are still quite helpless.

      People never have and cannot accurately predict the future. How many times have you thought of doing something different if you had known the future effect of your action or inaction. Why did YOU not invest in Microsoft years ago or buy real estate in certain locations? Hindsight for Bush and everybody else is 20-20 vision. Blaming Bush or Clinton or anyone else for not seeing accurately into the future is about the stupidest thing anybody, right wing or left wing can do.

      It is obvious that you hate Mr. Bush, but then you must of neccessity also hate the majority of your fellow citizens who elected him and most of the members of both houses of Congress to office.

      --
      All theory is gray
    4. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yap yap yap. What do you pay "Mr. Bush" for? To look good on TV? Because he's gotten awfully boring, monotonous. All he's got is "9/11 this" and "9/11 that", "stay the course", "noble cause" - what a load of rerun bullshit. I get that you didn't want Gore or Kerry, because you don't have a clue what presidents do. You think they just collect blowjobs, because you believed what they said about Clinton. Well, the truth is that real presidents plan and lead, pick real smart people to make sure that when we cruise through an easy spot, the disaster that waits around the corner won't kill us. Now it's here, and it's killing us.

      Listen, I lived in New Orleans for years. I know that plenty of illitierates in that town voted for Bush, along with their one-eyed cousins out in the Louisiana swamps, because they bought the line of bullshit that "Bush is one of us": a moron. But you idiots have destroyed New Orleans, you've destroyed our country. You put a retard in the White House for long enough that the problems are catching up with us, despite the good planning of generations of previous administrations. You don't have a "majority", you and your hateful zombie Bush army. You've got a tiny edge over the voting people who are awake: something like 51 million of your masochists voted him in, against 50 million who wanted someone else, and 200 million who didn't want Bush, and didn't vote.

      So stick your fake Fox News "majority" up your ass. Yeah, I hate Bush, because he's a dangerous asshole who's job was to protect my country, and has done nothing but fail. Yeah, and I hate you, too, because you're among the retard hordes who'll follow Bush to hell. You say stupid shit like "Bush didn't make it rain", or some other jive ass nonsense that's worth saying only to your fellow rejects. Maybe someone will shoot your ass out of spite this weekend: that kind of thing happens all the time, right? So it must be OK.

      "Nobody thought a levee would be breached"? EVERYONE KNEW THE LEVEE WOULD BE BREACHED, so we spent billions shoring them up, until your chimpanzee cut the funds to spend instead on Halliburton in Iraq. A greed unknowable to the sane American, because no doubt Halliburton will get the contracts for New Orleans' "reconstruction". You sick fuck, sometime soon you're going to face your own grim reaper, and if you're lucky, we'll have stopped Bush before he's cut you to the bone, too. But probably not: most tyrants in Bush's league suck the marrow from the bones of retarded devotees like you. So here's to your dismal future, making your own way through the Mad Max world your hero Bush turned your world into, from its once-promising American landscape. I've had enough of your bloodsucking stupidity. You're welcome to your doom, and the bullshit lies you wallpaper it with.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Flendon · · Score: 1

      Just for the sake of argument here, what did Kerry vote on the particular bill that cut funding to the levees? Mind you I don't know myself I'm just trying to put things into perspective. If Kerry voted against this bill it gives you a leg up in your ranting. If he voted for it you just lost any thread of credibility. So please inform us if Kerry had won instead of Bush where would New Orleans be now? I can't find the information in a quick search, but since you seem to be an expert on the subject...

      --
      chown -R us ./base
    6. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To paraphrase a comment I saw made elsewhere:

      Kerry, he would have turned himself into a giant mecha and stopped that damned hurricane!

      P.S.: Even if the levee work had been started as planned in 2001, it still wouldn't have been finished.

    7. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Why are you stuck in the past, looking for Kerry to blame? "Just for the sake of argument"? Who cares about your argument? Who cares about Kerry? All I care about is getting rid of Bush. Because he's destroying the country, and he's the only president we've got - until we get a new one. Why don't you care that he's destroying America? Why do you hate America? Your sniveling, lazy request that I maybe find someone other than THE PRESIDENT who destroyed New Orleans is disgusting. You are no judge of credibility: you are judge of nothing. New Orleans blood is on your hands, too, Bush apologist.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward, the only lame argument you've got is some stupid Kerry joke you copied from someone else. You think the wanton destruction of New Orleans is some kind of joke to be passed on, to get in some kind of late punch at Kerry? When your president has spent the past 5 years destroying America, now most obviously in New Orleans?

      If we spent $200BILLION on New Orleans levees, they'd have been finished by 2003. Instead, we spent it on Iraq, and now we've got TWO total catastrophes. If Bush had spent $200MILLION on a thousand buses, the city would have been nearly empty when those cheap levees broke. Really, the subhuman devotion you Bush worshippers invest in that criminal makes you look like the worst kind of kicked dog who won't even bite the foot that kicks it. You might remember another dog from your kennel, Colin Powell, warning Bush about Iraq, "if we break it, we own it" - the same is true about New Orleans. Bush and his slaves like you broke it: now you own it. You're repulsive.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Doc Ruby, you know about hindsight?

      It's 20/20.

    10. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Hey, Anonymous Bush apologist Coward, you know about Federal emergency planning? It's foresight that predicted all the details of this catastrophe, had a week before the storm to swing into action, and a week after the storm to relieve the damage.

      And it failed.

      Except for the cowardly assholes making excuses and quips, like you're going to get away with it. Drowning's too good for "dog ate my homework" Bush defenders like you - not slow enough for you to watch the hell left here for the rest of us to clean up.

      As for "hindsight": you're an expert, with your head stuck up your ass. Save your insights for some addled Bush worshipper still blind enough to ignore this catastrophic failure in the American Gulf.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The mayor, with his fleet of school busses, which are now submarine.

      2. The people themselves, those that actually did have the means to leave, and did not because they either didn't believe the authorities when they were told they needed to leave, or because they were too lazy.

      3. The governor, for not requesting federal help for the aftermath in advance (they had 48 hours advance warning).

      4. The criminals running amok in the ruins of the city.

      5. The president for, I don't know - not invading Louisiana with his available forces? For not decreeing that business couldn't expand or reclaim swampland that apparently acted as a buffer zone? For not being a freakin' psychic? For not standing out in the middle of the storm and holding the levees together with his bare hands?
      The federal gov't is not your mommy. That's the state's job, and the federal gov't is there to help the state help you in times like that.

      As for Kerry-bashing, substitute Gore or any of the third-party candidates, if you like. N.O. was destined to be destroyed. :P The tragedy is in the people dead, dying, or still living in horrid conditions.

      BTW, that was a nice dodge. You completely avoided the question.

    12. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're a hack, repeating the Bush talking points about why they're in charge, but somehow not to blame.

      LA Governor Blanco, requested federal help before the storm, as it headed towards LA. She requested and accepted National Guard help from NM Governor Richardson before the storm hit. That federal approval, coordination, and assistance is required to be executed so that states don't invade each other with their National Guard troops on pretexts, or the Federal troops, either. Should have taken TWO MINUTES, under a FEMA or Homeland Security plan already in action. Instead the Feds didn't process the "paperwork" until THURSDAY, 4 days after the storm - almost a week of delay, while thousands died.

      Bush has the power to send in the National Guard, the Pentagon, all kinds of Homeland Security personnel. Even without obeying the law: if he found that the bureaucracy took too long, or even if the LA governor had screwed up (again, she did not), he could have ignored all that, sent in the cavalry, and no one would have "pressed charges", or seen them held up. Bush could have acted like the cowboy hero his PR has pretended he is, but he couldn't even pull that off. Instead, he hid in his Texas estate for days, his cabinet invisible (shopping for shoes on 5th Avenue, for example). And even if he didn't have the power, after spending the past 4 years chanting "9/11, 9/11" every chance he gets to justify some other bait & switch on our country, HE SHOULD HAVE HAD THE POWER TO FIX THIS.

      Every step back you take, Bush and the Republican Congress (and its fuckup Democrats, too, tagging along) are responsible. The Army Corps of Engineers reports to DONALD RUMSFELD, and they left levees vulnerable even when everyone knew they were doomed in an inevitable F4 or F5 hurricane - several of which pass through the region every year. The levees, as they were left neglected, were doomed. But fixing them - even fixing the F3-proof ones which have sunk in recent years - could have saved New Orleans. Instead, Bush cut the levee program as much as he could get away with - even Congress nearly doubling the paltry sum last year brought it only to <8% of the request; who knows how much they actually even needed, after years of getting their requests turned down, and cutting their expectations.

      You and your scumbag Bush boosters have us feeding a Bush government that's over $3TRILLION a year. Including Department of Homeland Security, National Security Agency, Department of Defense all sucking at the tit. Saying out of the same mouth that they're spending the money and chewing up our freedoms to protect us, and that they're for smaller government. When disaster strikes, we get cunts like you telling us that we shouldn't expect them to protect us.

      I don't think Bush should be standing in the middle of the storm holding the levee together with his bare hands, but that would be better than what he did do: nothing. If only he had done what you propose, he might now at least be out of the way, leaving Cheney too busy appearing on TV in his place to be working in some undisclosed bunker on how to use the corpse of New Orleans to screw us even more than he already has. You obnoxious stupid fuck, where do you get off saying stupid shit like those insane straw man arguments about nonsensical Bush responses to the disaster? How about the simple question "why didn't Bush send in fleets of vehicles, including ships, to evacuate the city during the days before and after the undeniable disaster?"

      "Nice dodge"? Avoid the question? Who gives a fuck what your question is, about various other election losers. I want to know about the election winners, even if they stole the election, who are responsible for protecting us, who we need to get rid of now hat they're proven to be miserable failures at protecting us. And now you, Anonymous Coward, have proven that you don't care about New Orleans, about America, about the truth, about human lives. All you care about is excuses so your boy Bush won't look bad. When he's destroying all of us. You're subhuman and sickening.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yawn. They had 48 hours, not 168, as that was when it was announced it was probably going to turn into a Category 5 hurricane by landfall.

      Federal troops can't do jack without the permission of the state's governor, who apparently failed to grant it until (I have to guess here) two days after the hurricane was over. At least, not legally.

      The rest of your tripe is simply ad hominem. In return, I'll comment on what an angry little man you must be.

    14. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call it like I see it. You still avoided the original question.

      I understood that the "paperwork" didn't happen until after landfall, although it very well could be that the paperwork in question was related to N.O.'s mayor, and not the governor.
      I'm not suprised about slow processing - that's what you get with a massive government.

      No, the federal government doesn't defy the Constitution. With very good reason. If there was a screwup on the ground, don't expect Big Brother to come mop up after you illegally.
      This also goes for the whole "sending fleets" bit. In truth, it is *not his job*, it is the job of the state and local governments. Which apparently screwed up.

      It wasn't just the levees; much swampland was apparently reclaimed, swampland which acted as a buffer against such storms. Even so, according to the Army Corps of Engineers, even if they had been fully funded from the start, and began as planned in 2001... the levees still would not be ready and still would have broken. Sorry, I'll believe the Army over a raving lunatic today.

      Just where do you think "Bush government" gets its three tril? If you don't like it, write your reps. If you don't think that is working, stop paying. Sit in jail like a good civil disobeyer, and wait for the hordes of others you claim think the same as you to follow. If you're right, then taxes go down, government shrinks, the flowers bloom, and we are all happy.
      Also, just what can the "Bush" do without Congress (which is the House and the Senate)? Essentially, jack squat. That is, unless he should, and I quote, "SHOULD HAVE HAD THE POWER TO FIX THIS", in which case he'll be a dictator. Would you like that?

      As for the ACoE, and hence, according to your warped logic, Mr. Rumsfeld, what exactly do you expect them to do without money? Use old bubblegum and sticks? Your venom is entirely misdirected in this instance.

      The government is not your mommy. Courts have ruled that the police have no obligation to protect you. Try to wrap your tiny little angry mind around this tidbit: you are responsible for your own well-being. The government will happily pick up the pieces afterward, and/or shoot missiles back at the invaders. They're not going to send Secret Service agents to jump in front of you.

    15. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grandparent said, "It is obvious that you hate Mr. Bush, but then you must of neccessity also hate the majority of your fellow citizens who elected him and most of the members of both houses of Congress to office."

      You completely ignored that point, to do nothing but spew vitrol at the President. Why would you do that? It is a very good point.

    16. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Flendon · · Score: 1

      I knew you would avoid the question unless it fit precisely into your propaganda. I don't ask about Kerry because I'm looking for someone else to blame. He alone NOW could not have made a difference. You however are attacking anyone who voted for Bush without considering where New Orleans would have been if Kerry had been in office in his place. For all we know Kerry could have made the same choices had he been in office. So I suggested looking at how he voted on the bill in question to as a reflection of how he would have behaved had he been in the position of the president. You can't attack anyone who voted for Bush if the only other choice would have left things in the same or worse condition.

      I agree Bush hasn't done the best job with the country. But things could have been much worse. Not every single thing that happens in this country is a direct result of the current president as you seem to think. Many things could have been done at the state and local level that were not and Bush cannot be blamed for that.

      You attack Bush for not doing enough to fight terrorism, but then turn around and attack him for creating the DHS. Your remarks with StupidKats proves you make up facts out of the air and then flat out lie when cornered. How can you claim that everyone of those millions who didn't vote hated Bush? If they didn't want Bush they could have voted for Kerry. They were just to freaking lazy and it is their own fault who they got. You are nothing but an anti-Bush troll and every time someone points out the errors in your logic you reply with flames not facts. If you really want Bush removed then you should go about finding a way to get it legally done rather than sit here making an ass of yourself on /. If you think you are somehow creating some popular movement you need to think again. Your simply making yourself a laughing stock.

      You want some real facts? The Commander of the Army corps of Engineers stated that the bill pulling money from the levees would not have made a difference. The work that was planned under that money would not have been started yet. And the mayor did leave hundreds of school buses empty in a city parking lot that could have been used to evacuate those too poor to do so on their own.

      --
      chown -R us ./base
    17. Re:Everything ShortChanged by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's beside the point, which is the validity of my specific charges. But yes, of course I do hate Bush. If I felt the way I do, as I've specifically enumerated, and didn't hate him, that would discredit me. This defense of Bush's crimes, that his accusers "hate him", so can be ignored, is total insanity. And in keeping with all the rest of the things I hate about him. Partly because that spin is engineered by Bush and his team, particularly Karl Rove. Rove is the most hateful of all, because he does nothing but engineer these crimes and the insane, yet effective defenses of them. Without Bush's excuse of being a collosal fool.

      I hate some of the Republicans who compose the bare majority in each house of Congress. Like Trent Lott, Dennis Hastert, Bill Frist, Orrin Hatch, and the other party accomplices to Bush's crimes. Most of the rest of the Republicans who just "go along" with the crimes are contemptible, in ways not limited to their specific complicity with Bush. The Democrats who go along are also contemptible. I've got some hatred for them, but those enablers are too low-grade to earn real "hatred".

      But I've got plenty of hatred for many of my "fellow" citizens who voted for Bush and his cohorts. And for many other Americans who didn't vote, and tacitly accepted Bush's gang twice, the second time without the excuse of ignorance. The ones who defend Bush, even as Bush screws them, are the most hateful. Second only to Bush and his immediate team, I'd say.

      So yeah, I hate a lot of Americans. Because I love America. I hate what they're doing to it, and to me, and to the Americans I love (most of whom I've never met, and won't). Why shouldn't I hate them? They're criminals and enablers, hateful, and haters of America. That's why that point, defending Bush from my vitriolic facts, is entirely beside the point.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  127. No blame by Kohath · · Score: 1

    It's a good question, but blame is 100% unhelpful right now (or for the forseeable future) on the Gulf Coast. Blame isn't going to rescue, feed, clothe, or house anyone. Blame isn't going to change the price of gas. Blame isn't going to change the weather in the past, or in the future.

    Aside from being unhelpful, the blame is completely misplaced. Katrina was a weather event. People don't control the weather. It just happens.

    Could there have been better preparation? Yes, always. For everything that's ever happened, there's a way it could have gone better (or worse, or just different).

    There's a time to examine what went wrong to learn what to do different in the future. It's not that time yet. And even then, the half-informed opinions of a bunch of Slashdotters are of dubious value to that process.

  128. MOD PARENT UP by linguae · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree with you more. People are trying to call this "racism" and point the finger at other people, but the local government and the state government didn't prepare for it, the federal government didn't respond fast enough, and the city of New Orleans is paying big time mostly because of the incompetent mayor's and governor's actions, and because of the molasses-slow response of the federal government. This isn't about Bush and the rest of them deciding to "let the Negroes die."

    The breakdown begins from the local government, all the way up. It is a shame that the Congressional Black Caucus is trying to politicize and racialize the entire drama happening in New Orleans. But hey, if people are listening, and if you have big people like college-dropout Kanye West saying ad hominems like "George Bush doesn't care about black people," then this racialism of the hurricane drama will continue. And this is coming from a African-American poster.

  129. LEARN TO SWIM! by C0llegeSTUDent · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else have the Tool song Aenima come to mind when they hear about Hurricane Katrina?

  130. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

    My point about "normal" hurricane was that a hurricane does not normally cause massive flooding. You can't compare the response to a category 4 hurricane without signifigant flooding to a cat 5 which hits an area so vulnerable to flooding it may take weeks or months to drain it out. The two things are disasters on a completely different scale. Cuba is neither below sea level (they are in the sea so that would be hard)or a signifigant flooding threat. It is more fair to compare a hurricane hitting cuba to a hurricane hitting florida, where such things are a pretty normal occurence (just like cuba) and any flooding caused dissipates quickly.

  131. Why so many stayed... by Quasimodoca · · Score: 1
    From the NY Times website article (reg required booo!)

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/national/nationa lspecial/04storm.html/

    "There was no electricity in the city, and almost every office and store was closed. Bodies still floated in the floodwaters, and everywhere were signs of recent disorder: shattered storefronts, the detritus of looting that showed help had come too late. There was no water or food for sale, and no one had any idea how many people were still in New Orleans. A police officer making rescues in a boat said several people in homes five feet deep in water had turned him away, saying they had plenty of food, water and beer.

  132. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh, whenever I hear a U.S. poster attacking "socialism" I know that they are an ignorant jackass.

  133. Recent evacuation in Fujian, China by jjga · · Score: 1
    You're kidding, right? Have you ever tried to move 100,000 people from a disaster area?

    It seems that a country like China, much less developed than the US, managed to evacuate several hundred thousand people in a couple of days before the arrival of a typhoon.

  134. BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What part of mandatory evacuation order can be interpreted as leaving people to their own devices? So maybe people aren't criticizing him for not managing events he doesn't have the resources to handle.

    http://www.slate.com/id/2125587/?nav=tap3 ...In the days prior to Hurricane Katrina's landfall, the 49-year-old mayor ordered New Orleans' first-ever mandatory evacuation. He told those in the most flood-prone areas to leave early, and he set up shuttles to get the 100,000 or so residents without cars to shelters. He announced that the potentially catastrophic hurricane represented "an opportunity for us to come together in a way we've never done before." Instead, Katrina's aftermath turned into a typical--if unimaginably and hellaciously tragic--scene from New Orleans politics, with the requisite allegations that the rudderless, incompetent city government can't deal with the city's intrinsic geographic, economic, and racial problems...

    The President and the director of FEMA may not have consciously decided to let tens of thousands of people die but when the president barely mentions the people flooded in the Hurricane at a fundraiser, jokes about partying with Lott when they rebuild his house, smirkingly plays guitar and only sent help 4 days after the flooding because his incompetent political hack doesn't even know about the looting and starvation, people tend to get the impression that he doesn't care. Bush might not hate blacks but he certainly doesn't seem to give a damn about a whole lot of people. Not just blacks but also people who value reason over superstition (creationists); people who need abortions; people who need stem cell research; etc...

    Since you've chalked the fuck-ups to incompetence, now would actually be a hell of a good to find out who's screwing up so they can be replaced with people who can actually do the job. Especially since the people we're pointing fingers at haven't gotten the fucking job done! Look at who is running FEMA now and compare him with the guy who ran FEMA under Clinton.

    James Witt http://www.slate.com/id/2125224/?nav=tap3
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lee_Witt

    with Mike Brown

    http://www.horsesass.org/

    "An unmitigated, total fucking disaster." That's not a quote from Mike Brown, but rather, a quote describing him. And most disturbingly, it's not even a reference to his dismal performance as director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This blunt critique was emailed to me from a regular reader who was apparently attracted to HorsesAss.org by her passion for politics and her love of Arabian horses.

    I think I've told you that I'm into Arab horses. Well, for 3 years Michael Brown was hired and then fired by our IAHA, the International Arabian Horse Assoc. He was an unmitigated, total fucking disaster. I was shocked as hell when captain clueless put him in charge of FEMA a couple of years ago.

    * Goldy at HorsesAss's diary :: ::
    *

    He or the WH lied on the WH presser announcing him to FEMA. IAHA was never connected to the Olympic Comm, only the half Arab registry then and the governing body to the state and local Arabian horse clubs. He ruined IAHA financially so badly that we had to change the name and combine it with the Purebred registry.

    I am telling you this after watching the fucking shipwreck in the Gulf. His incompetence is KILLING people.

    Yes, that's right... the man responsible for directing federal relief operations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, sharpened his emergency management skills as the "Judges and Stewards Commissioner" for the International Arabian Hors

  135. The feds should have coordinated ages ago by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    The country is too damn big to have disaster plans for every region, which is why it's the responsibility of local and state governments to have plans. Why the hell didn't the mayor of New Orleans have a plan to get HIS OWN CITIZENS out?? The guy is being a total a-hole blaiming the feds for his own failure, as well as the failure of the governor of Louisiana. [...] The feds are not designed to move fast, combined with the fact that it was an incredible mess

    The Feds aren't designed to move fast, but they really should have thought ahead so that they'd never have to.

    I'm not a citizen of the USA. If I was, though, I wouldn't think it too unreasonable for the Federal Government to at least coordinate with the state governments, make sure they're prepared, and to help arrange preparations if necessary. This might easily involve helping to provide caches of suitable resources in strategic places (whether in the state or nearby), providing expertise to make sure that the response plans are feasible, coordinating agreements with neighbouring states, etc. It might also involve issuing warnings directly to citizens if the feds believe that state officials aren't doing their job properly, or are ignoring federal advice.

    If the Federal Government had had a proper programme ages ago to ensure that state governments had identified, were aware of, and properly prepared for possible future disasters in their region (such as this one), it might never have been such a serious problem.

  136. Need to rephase it by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    call the busses and food that go in first a
    Premptive Strike then there would be an emergency session of congress and 100,000 troops would have poured in there allready.

  137. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by arminw · · Score: 1

    ....Both Katrina and it's results were predictable.....

    The prediction has been that the levees could be swamped by large storm caused waves, but nobody predicted that a levee would fail. Holland is a country where large sections are below sea level and the water there too is kept out by a system of man made barriers which also have been damaged by unusually fierce storms. Having an entire city depending on the effectiveness of anything man made to hold up against the unbridled forces of nature is a sign of human arrogance and pride. This is NOT our world since we did not make it and we don't have control over it to anywhere near the extent we think we do. It is always better to live with nature than to try to protect ourselves against it.

    --
    All theory is gray
  138. Did anyone look at the pictures? by smithmc · · Score: 1


    Did anyone look at the pics in the Wired article? It's basically a whole mess of planar-magnetic drivers (e.g. Monsoon, Eminent, Apogee, Magnepan, etc.) mounted on a panel. Is it really that simple?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  139. Re:Reference to Cuba interesting for another reaso by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    *Sigh* .. how can parent possibly be 'flamebait'? It's 100% accurate and factual and makes a very good point. Slashdot need to change the system so you can see who moderated a post.

  140. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope others will pardon me for responding to a racist asshat, but...

    > I say we send them back to Africa, I'll even pay for a one way ticket.

      What for? We've already sent Africa to them.

  141. Re:dethl, fuck you... (aka- Karma Burn) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a stupid fuck. Pontificating about shit you have no clue about, and then acting as though anyone who doesn't agree with you is evil. Yeah, there's a lot of people pissed off, and we can't wait for you whiney DU fucks to get off your asses and start that civil war you're always talking about, so we can finally show you fucktards what fucking gun control _really_ means.

  142. This is only a test by serutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They probably had plans to test these things somewhere like Iraq, but this situation is even better. Since the feds have fallen down on their job of handling this sort of large-scale problem, they're getting ready to perform the charade of blaming looters and rioters for everything that went wrong, just like they've been blaming terrorists for everything else. Going in waving a big stick is part of that performance, and using it on a few civilians is the perfect "shock and awe" gesture. Bush's zero-tolerance right-wing supporters will be cheering, and ordinary citizens will have one more reason to shy away from any sort of political action that the government might not approve.

    Things like water cannons and riot gear are comprehensible threats to protesters, but when the government starts using spooky technology to bring a whole crowd to its knees, genuine sixties-like political unrest will cease to be possible in this country, no matter how appropriate it might eventually become. That's when America will cease to be a "free" country. Because if people are afraid to use their supposed freedoms then they no longer really have them.

    1. Re:This is only a test by (1+-sqrt(5))*(2**-1) · · Score: 1
      That's when America will cease to be a "free" country.
      There's a palpable sense in which the revolutionary American has already ceased to exist; in his place: greedy, anaesthetized masses.

      Revolution is partially a privilege of space and resource.

  143. Re:Let's start blaming! First up FEMAs Michael Bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the director of FEMA needs to be told that his services are no longer needed monday morning. He is a bigger morn than I thought.

    Root Cause of the problem is the under estimating of people left in the city. When all the people came from their houses, FEMA was surprised.

  144. Off topic! by mildgift · · Score: 1

    But I'll feed the trolls...

    The free market of education for poor people would closely resemble the "free market" for poor people generally. They would get the "dollar store" version of education.

    They would not have any real access to quality education, for the same reason why the poor lack access to quality products via the free market. There's not enough slack in the system to maintain fat profit margins - everything is tight. Choice is reduced, and people are given cut-rate product.

    This is not to praise public schools. The ones serving poor communities suck. I just *have* to shine some common sense on this issue.

  145. Re:true nature of America w/ regards to poor black by dmiller · · Score: 1

    I think it is absolutely nauseating that you are using this unfolding disaster as a justification to take some cheap ideological shots.

  146. Was told not to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A Swedish aid shipment consisting of two water cleaning systems capable of delivering 30.000 gallons/day in total was on it's route yesterday.
    Now they've been told NOT TO COME.

  147. You are passing on false rumors... by toupsie · · Score: 1

    Please read this.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  148. Slashdot ate my link. by toupsie · · Score: 1

    Here it is again.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  149. Mexico City's earthquake, 1985 by Sun+Rider · · Score: 1

    Between 10,000 - 30,000 death depending on who you believe to. Government's help broke down, people organized themselves to help each other all over the city. Still mentioned in radio and TV.

  150. Population boom in the USA! by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

    The entire population of the USA is ~280 million. That number includes all manner of folks who are ineligible to vote, such as children, felons, etc. I don't have a ready figure on the number of eligible voters, but it is CERTAINLY NOT 351 million.
    When folks start using wildly inaccurate figures while ranting and raving, is it any wonder no one believes anything they say? A little truth goes a long way...

    Just for the record: Bush officially won 62.02 million votes, while Kerry won 59.02 million. Interestingly, the reported percentage of eligible voters was 60.7%, supposedly the highest percentage since 1968. Hm.

    1. Re:Population boom in the USA! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      51 + 50 + 200 = 301, not 351. Asshole.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Population boom in the USA! by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Whoops! I suppose I should learn to read. I stand corrected:

      "That number includes all manner of folks who are ineligible to vote, such as children, felons, etc. I don't have a ready figure on the number of eligible voters, but it is CERTAINLY NOT 301 million."

      Your turn, mate.

    3. Re:Population boom in the USA! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Now it's your turn to learn to think. I'm not going to engage you in a stupid hairsplitting argument about whether 51, 50 and 200 million are statistical numbers. They're numbers that represent the actual proportions of people who wanted Bush, and those who didn't want Bush. No matter how you slice it, that's less than 1/5 of Americans who wanted Bush, and more than 4/5 who didn't. Your bad math or illiteracy is your own problem. Yapping out loud in public defending bullshit excuses for failed Republican politicians and bureaucrats is making it my problem. Especially, "mate", if you're not even among the "Americans eligible to vote" - and even more if you're just treating your Bush apologies as some kind of game. You've got nothing to add - you're just trying to board the destruction express for your own sick agenda. Get your ass off the train, and off my case.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Population boom in the USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll turn that right back around to you, since you're still spewing crap figures: looks like ~170 million people were eligible to vote in the 2004 election. 62 / 170 == 0.36. A bit more than a third of voters wanted Bush (or at least, they voted for him), not one fifth.

      I am an American voter, and I did vote, mate. (If you ask nicely, I could call you "asshole", if you prefer.)

      My agenda is currently limited to pointing out how inaccurate your figures and/or logic is/are. Note that I didn't address a single thing other than your blown-out-of-proportion figure. I made no excuse for anything.

      If you're going to present an argument, present your "facts" accurately, or people will call you on it, and/or ignore the rest of what you're trying to say.

    5. Re:Population boom in the USA! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Another Anonymous Coward for Bush. So what. I'm done with you - you're not an excuse to post information relevant to educating other readers to the facts about New Orleans, Bush or any other disaster. I'm going back to work on my other efforts to help. Not wallow in your meaningless desire to argue about bullshit. I suggest you abandon them yourself, and try to do something to actually help someone. Like never setting foot in a voting booth again.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Population boom in the USA! by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Not that the point was any less valid, but I posted the GP.

      As for educating others, we'd rather you didn't, at least not until you can either gets your facts straight, or admit you were wrong, correct the error, and go from there.

      Yes, please do go back to your "efforts to help", and please remember to be accurate with your facts in the future. It simply wouldn't do to have FIVE HUNDRED PEOPLE TRAPPED ON THAT ROOF when, in fact, there are three guys on a raft. Sure, it'd be nice for the three guys, but not for the six families across town.

      What bullshit have I presented (or, at the least, have not admitted fault on and corrected myself), mm? Also, how, exactly, would my abstaining from participating in every future election help anyone, anywhere?

    7. Re:Population boom in the USA! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Your bullshit is the game you're playing. I stated in round numbers that only a minority of Americans said they wanted Bush. The overwhelming majority did not say they wanted Bush. You've been splitting hairs and playing games ever since. Because the only thing you can say about the subject of the hurricane that destroyed New Orleans this week, while Bush sat and watched, is some meaningless nonsense about my numbers that you're misinterpreting and misrepresenting.

      Because all you care about is Bush looking good. Even when the lives of hundreds of thousands of fellow Americans are at stake, a huge city. And of course the implications of trusting Bush to protect the rest of us. That's why you'd be doing us all a favor, including your own unworthy ass, if you stayed away from the levers of the voting booth, where you and 50 million of your similarly stupid cohort are so dangerous.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Population boom in the USA! by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Your. Logic. Is. Flawed.
      36% of the eligible voters, ALL OF THEM, including the ones that chose to sit on the couch and not vote, cast a vote for Bush. 34% voted for Kerry. Some small fractions of a percent voted for other guys. Roughly 28% sat on their asses. So, since the ones that sat on their ass decided not to participate, we do what our system of government does with them and discount them entirely. THEY chose not to do jack, so no matter how anyone thinks they would have voted, the simple fact remains, they did not and so their unsaid say doesn't matter. Does. Not. Count. Does. Not. Matter.

      And you still attack the person and ignore the argument, fudging figures even when it doesn't matter. I.e., sixty-two million, not fifty. You answer an argument with insults, you rant about off-topic subjects when presented with facts. You're wrong, no bullshit.

      Forget the voting booth, man. Stay away from the rest of society! O.o

  151. Missed the point by Zordak · · Score: 1
    Your post is unintelligible and choleric and in your zeal to blam the President, you obviously missed my point. Normally this would not warrant a response, but I would like to point out one thing. The Mayor "evacuated" people to the Super Dome and Convention Center - places within the city he knew was doomed. Those also happen to be the places where people were forced to live in their own filth like animals. He knew those places were not equipped to handle evacuees. It was like an afterthought at the last minute when the mayor suddenly realized he had a bunch of people with no way to evacuate. You could counter that he didn't have time to plan a large-scale evacuation, but how long has he known that he had a largely indigent population living at up to 10 feet below sea level? Ultimately the decision to open the Super Dome and Convention Center saved a lot of lives, but you can say the same for the government aid that finally came four days later. It helped, but it could have been a lot better.

    My point was that the first failure lies with the black mayor who sent the people to "shelters" that were unfit for that purpose and who had no plan for dealing with them thereafter. He was partly responsible for the conditions at the Super Dome and Convention Center, so I think it's really stupid for morons like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to pretend that this is some kind of conspiracy of the White Man to keep the Black Man down. This certainly was not the finest hour of the government's disaster relief organization, but it has nothing to do with race. If we start blaming it on race, then we are detracting from the critical look we should take at the poor preparation, planning and execution that is really responsible. And if we do that, we are doing a grave disservice to the eventual victims of the next natural disaster we face who may be lily white but who will suffer just the same when the system fails. Your own quote:

    Instead, Katrina's aftermath turned into a typical--if unimaginably and hellaciously tragic--scene from New Orleans politics, with the requisite allegations that the rudderless, incompetent city government can't deal with the city's intrinsic geographic, economic, and racial problems...
    Sounds like you made my point for me. The incompetence and poor planning starts at the bottom and goes all the way to the top.
    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  152. Then why are people being charged for it? by toupsie · · Score: 1
    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  153. I see nothing in that article by Apotsy · · Score: 1

    Regarding people shooting at helicopters. My post stands. I'm not passing on any "false rumors"; I'm trying to stop them.

    1. Re:I see nothing in that article by toupsie · · Score: 1

      Man Charged With Shooting at Helicopter. As I said before, this is true.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  154. That happened 3 days after my post by Apotsy · · Score: 1

    Show me something that backs up the post I was replying to and predates it. My contention was that the poster had no proof of his claim. I stand by that contention.

    1. Re:That happened 3 days after my post by toupsie · · Score: 1

      That was when it was reported not when it happened. Your contention is false, rescue helicopters were fired upon. I was the poster, the firing on of rescuers was well known and not an urban legend.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  155. Here it comes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most powerful prototype now has a more-or-less legitimate reason to be in the US. Now I'm a little nervous.
    It seems like just a few weeks ago we were reading about non-lethal crowd control being tested on enemies and rioters.
    Now one's being brought to a city in the US. They're here, now, wow that didn't take long!
    Here, where, if necessary, it can be wheeled on over to your town and used against you if you assemble in a disagreeable manner. Rioting is the reason now, I know, that's deadly serious. But once non-lethal crowd dispersion is handy, cheap and convenient, can't other types of assembly be dispeled, as long as someone just has to push a button?
    I scoffed when I read someone ranting that these things were just being tested on enemy combatants (to whom we attribute little humanity) so that they may someday be used on the country's own people. Paranoia!
    Except here they are.
    Maybe they will be brought to a town near you, soon. Try not avoid leading a peaceful protest against anything now.