Slashdot Mirror


Google Talk Available Early

smash writes "Google's new IM service is already live. All you need is a Jabber-compatible Instant Messaging client (such as Apple's iChat, or gaim), and a GMail address." This should answer, at least in part, all of the speculation that has been flying around the net over the last couple of days. Update: Many users have been eager to let us know that Google Talk in indeed live.

897 comments

  1. Google tomorrow? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stay tuned to Google tomorrow for details.

    Er, is that one http://tomorrow.google.com/ ?

    1. Re:Google tomorrow? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some enterprising young PFY is going to run around the google campus tomorrow shouting off about all the hits to a new google subdomain.

      Any number of PHDs will be fevorishly amending their projects to fit into this new domain.
      The stock price is going to rocket based on yet more speculation of features and we will have even less reason to leave google.

      All because you made a first post joke.

      Congratulations.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Google tomorrow? by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Couldn't locate tomorrow.google.com"... whoa! You've slashdotted Google! I didn't think that was possible!

    3. Re:Google tomorrow? by kuhneng · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, now there's a service I'd like to see from Google: search web sites from the future. That would put an end to all of this tiring speculation on what new service they'll think up next.

      Come to think of it, they could incorporate the technology into other parts of the side. Why present a list of results when you can search the future logs to find out which result I'm going to click and take me straight there.

    4. Re:Google tomorrow? by Aeiri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, now there's a service I'd like to see from Google: search web sites from the future. That would put an end to all of this tiring speculation on what new service they'll think up next.

      Come to think of it, they could incorporate the technology into other parts of the side. Why present a list of results when you can search the future logs to find out which result I'm going to click and take me straight there.


      That would create a paradox, it would click a link because in the future you were to click that link, but since it clicked that link for you, you couldn't have clicked the link, and the information it used to determine which link to click couldn't possibly have existed, so we're screwed.

      Just wait until the standards are updated, when verison 2.0 of the future comes out, then you'll be able to do this.

    5. Re:Google tomorrow? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      Actually it's http://talk.google.com/ (click through to see Google's most interesting 404 page).

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    6. Re:Google tomorrow? by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Any number of PHDs will be fevorishly amending their projects to fit into this new domain. The stock price is going to rocket based on yet more speculation of features and we will have even less reason to leave google.
      Google tomorrow??? Stock prices rocketing??? Are you suggesting that Google is about to release a time machine? I knew it! I'd better call my broker.
    7. Re:Google tomorrow? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      that will be used for their new predictive news service

    8. Re:Google tomorrow? by kai.chan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Er, is that one http://tomorrow.google.com/

      Google Tomorrow's mission is to organize the future and make it universally accessible and useful. When you, a Slashdot user, visit tomorrow.google.com, you'll be able to find information about your future love and careers; search through more than three billion girls and find that you will be alone for the rest of eternity; then peruse the world's largest archive of future jobs -- that have all been outsourced to India dating back to 1995.

    9. Re:Google tomorrow? by newsiness · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Google tomorrow? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1

      That would create a paradox, it would click a link because in the future you were to click that link, but since it clicked that link for you, you couldn't have clicked the link, and the information it used to determine which link to click couldn't possibly have existed, so we're screwed.

      *head explodes*

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    11. Re:Google tomorrow? by DJStealth · · Score: 3, Funny

      This review has pictures of the actual client! No word on how they got a copy.

    12. Re:Google tomorrow? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 3, Funny

      sounds like "I'm feeling lucky"

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    13. Re:Google tomorrow? by DJStealth · · Score: 4, Informative
      You can NOW DOWNLOAD GOOGLE TALK Just got this message
      [2005-08-23 23:13] gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!
    14. Re:Google tomorrow? by adolfojp · · Score: 1

      404? Check again ;-)

    15. Re:Google tomorrow? by passion · · Score: 1

      I guess that web design will be a snap, eh? Just "save as", and publish. :)

      No, there would be problems with that as well, since the site you're wanting to see will be optimized for FireFox Explorer 5, and your old-ass ghetto browser won't be able to render that shit.

      --
      - passion
    16. Re:Google tomorrow? by 3D+Lover · · Score: 1

      That link is now no longer a 404. It's a real live page for Google's IM client. I just got this message on my Trillian/JABBER IM Client:

      gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

      At first I wasn't sure what it meant by a broken link, but I tried an http connection to the talk server and lo and behold a page existed with download links. :)

    17. Re:Google tomorrow? by MikeXpop · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not available today...

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    18. Re:Google tomorrow? by Refrag · · Score: 5, Funny

      They probably downloaded it.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    19. Re:Google tomorrow? by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
      Sweet! Just installed the client. Looks like they are looking at ambitious things. Talk about covering all corners

      If your contact is online, give them a call...
      If they don't have a mic, send them an IM...
      If they are offline, send them an email

      It's such a simple idea, I can't beleive nobody thought of trying to consolidate all points of communication under one roof. Very very slick!

    20. Re:Google tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am online... mcdett (the @ symbol) gmail.com

      send an invite

    21. Re:Google tomorrow? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      Dude, Yahoo's been doing it for a while.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    22. Re:Google tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, get access to all the future slashdot dupes.

      What a bonus!

    23. Re:Google tomorrow? by wdr1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh, so is that where the downloads for Linux & OS X will be?

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    24. Re:Google tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work in Wine, incidentally. Have to use a native Jabber client in Windows. Haven't found one of those that I really like yet.

    25. Re:Google tomorrow? by 13bPower · · Score: 2, Informative

      Double click the titlebar of google talk to dock it inside the google desktop v2 side bar. Niiiice.

    26. Re:Google tomorrow? by hritcu · · Score: 1

      Yup, works great.

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    27. Re:Google tomorrow? by mp3phish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not in the theory of multiple universes..

      In this case, predicting the future and then altering it by doing something in the present just means you switched to an alternate universe. the other one still exists... and you still clicked the link.. you just don't know about it because in your current universe you didn't click it.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    28. Re:Google tomorrow? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      It uses an open standard, so you can write your own...

      Power to the people!

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    29. Re:Google tomorrow? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yahoo supports voicecomm. And webcams. And offline messaging.

      I wont be impressed until they add AIM-style direct connections at least. Then theyre comparable to aim, but really no better client wise. Now, if you could convert/resize images inside (especially pasting screenshots), then it would set it ahead in my book. (And as mentioned before, webcam support).

      They also don't allow customizing of fonts, which I'm glad of but will mean they'll never capture the IM crowd. They should do it gaim style, and allow it but have an option to strip it all for people that dont like others assuming they know how to style text to match /your/ desktop. Speaking of which, gtalk is yet another app on my list of things that assume you want to use their skinning engine instead of the native settings. Why do developers do this? Do you really want to get/make 15 different skins just so all of your apps look right together?

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    30. Re:Google tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to see what Google's planning, visit here.

    31. Re:Google tomorrow? by bhsx · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/answer.py?a nswer=24077 that one is how to get on with Trillian. Of course, talk.google.com has the official client now if you'd like to use that; or: http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/answer.py?a nswer=24073 if you'd like to connect with GAIM (my linux box is pretty much unuseable due to freenet eating all its cycles, so I'm opting for the "O" client on XP).

      --
      put the what in the where?
    32. Re:Google tomorrow? by shadowmas · · Score: 1

      They also don't allow customizing of fonts, which I'm glad of but will mean they'll never capture the IM crowd.

      its still beta. i'm sure the things will improve by the time they do the release version. also in the faq they have mentioned that they will be supporting encryption which will defintley move me from msn to google talk.

      also since there using the jabber protocol i think it would be possible to use one of the other clients which support fancy fonts and stuff to get these features (they have mentioned that you can use these other clients in the faq)

      pretty much everything that google has done has been a improvement from what others have done. so i doubt they wouldve started a IM service just to make "just another chat client".

    33. Re:Google tomorrow? by papukanghi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I dont know whats the big deal. its weak looking interface ... the voice feature is avaliable only on windows. even skype is better than this. Yahoo has all these features and more.. avtars for example.

      Its just a case of one company making people go gaga about its products. its a same crappy IM with a protocol that has been around for 4 years. when jabber came out no one was excited because it was an intiative on the parts of some open source developers.

      now google does it and somehow its cool. I really dont get it. its stupid to the point of being painful.

      here is a conversation with a non-techi friend.

      (11:39:45) dqasddw: http://www.google.com/talk/
      (11:39:54) dqasddw: its there
      (11:52:31) parvati: wow..
      (11:53:18) dqasddw: what is the wow paro?
      (11:53:23) dqasddw: please tell me.
      (11:53:59) parvati: heh.. it's *google*
      (11:54:08) dqasddw: skype is better than this.
      (11:55:58) parvati: well yeah.. but it's *google*.. and there's this guy on the slashdot list who said basically because it's google EVERYone will have it in a week.. first the techies, then their friens.. then anyone who wants to be cool..
      (11:56:15) dqasddw: yes. so?
      (11:56:48) dqasddw: how is it cool?
      (11:59:00) parvati: it's not cool.. it's google..
      (12:06:02) parvati: accha ok.. am not google PR.. but the fact remains, there's something attractive about anything google... in time, it'll lose the charm..
      (12:06:11) parvati: and something new will come to replace it..
      (12:07:29) dqasddw: im not a yahoo PR but the fact is ... yahoo has had this service before. jabber came 4 years ago which was essentially the same thing.
      (12:07:55) parvati: yes baba.. i still love yahoo :-)
      (12:08:28) dqasddw: no no thats not the point. i was talking to this guy who said "you know google has RSS news feeds feature"
      (12:08:42) dqasddw: i said yahoo has had that feature for a year.
      (12:08:51) dqasddw: he said i dont like yahoo.
      (12:08:58) dqasddw: i said why?
      (12:09:00) parvati: why?
      (12:09:02) dqasddw: he said i dont know
      (12:09:36) parvati: no, you're right.. i mean, i tried yahoo search after you told me about it, and it IS better..
      (12:09:53) parvati: but google has that *thing*.. like coke and pepsi..
      (12:11:29) parvati: because google has managed to retain that 'underdog' feel..
      (12:12:26) dqasddw: yes. clean interface.
      (12:12:54) dqasddw: they dont put any adv on their website but put those ugly text adv's on almost all of the websited in the world.
      (12:13:25) parvati: lol.. yeah! that's true.. clean interface = deep psychological impact

      --
      ( 2b || !2b)
    34. Re:Google tomorrow? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      See, what puts it ahead in my book is backending into XMPP (and, in the near future, SIP). Granted, that's not an advantage of the client but the service -- but in my book, it's a pretty big plus.

    35. Re:Google tomorrow? by pr80ik · · Score: 1

      today is the tommorrow you are talking about...
      see http://www.google.com/talk/

    36. Re:Google tomorrow? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Or a PC, for that matter. MSN IM has done this for ages, too. And from what others are saying, so has Yahoo.

      Of course, where Google will probably win (because it's how they usually do) is in the simple, direct and uncluttered UI. Not that I've done anything other than install Google Talk so far - just a guess.

    37. Re:Google tomorrow? by Rui+Lopes · · Score: 1

      that didn't work here on my computer... the double-click did nothing.

      --
      var sig = function() { sig(); }
    38. Re:Google tomorrow? by neur0maniak · · Score: 1

      today.google.com can't be found either :(

    39. Re:Google tomorrow? by Indras · · Score: 1

      Not in the theory of multiple universes..

      In this case, predicting the future and then altering it by doing something in the present just means you switched to an alternate universe. the other one still exists... and you still clicked the link.. you just don't know about it because in your current universe you didn't click it.


      In other words, go watch Primer.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    40. Re:Google tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking Google may have a cryogenics department ? Tomorrow could be a site to subscribe to this service.

      They even have a slogan ready:
      "Why, you might wake up dead tomorrow!"

    41. Re:Google tomorrow? by springbox · · Score: 1
      Do you really want to get/make 15 different skins just so all of your apps look right together?

      Actually, things like that don't bother me. If it looks good, then why do I care that it doesn't look uniform? More variety is better. Applications like Winamp never used the standard UI widgets and no one seemed to complain about that. The one good thing I can see coming from certain applications looking different is that their look and feel makes them stand out if you have a lot of other stuff open at the same time.

    42. Re:Google tomorrow? by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      its still beta. i'm sure the things will improve by the time they do the release version.

      Um, when did Google last actually move from beta to release on anything..? Did I miss something?

      Q.

    43. Re:Google tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the future it will be possible! ;-)

    44. Re:Google tomorrow? by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

      Except you can't use the voice talk bits...

      However there are many clients that use jabber and it's very easy to set it up to connect to talk.google.com:5222

      In fact they list some popular clients and how to configure them here:
      http://www.google.com/talk/otherclients.html

    45. Re:Google tomorrow? by adamfranco · · Score: 2, Informative

      Huh, so is that where the downloads for Linux & OS X will be?

      Linux/OS X(X11): http://gaim.sourceforge.net/
      OS X: http://www.adiumx.com/

      I don't use Windows, so I haven't been able to try Google's client, but I honestly can't see why anyone would want to use anything other than Gaim or one of its derivatives (i.e. Adium). One Gaim client can support unlimited [I am assuming] accounts using AIM, Jabber (GoogleTalk), Yahoo!, MSN, ICQ, Zephyr, Novell Groupwise, .Mac, Lotus Sametime, and somthing called Gadu-Gadu. Why bother with different clients for each messaging protocal?

      - Adam

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    46. Re:Google tomorrow? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Why not cut the searching part out entirely, and just have www.google.com automatically re-direct to whichever site you were going to click?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    47. Re:Google tomorrow? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      "Greetings, my friends. We are all interested in the future, for that is where you and I are going to spend the rest of our lives. And remember, my friends, future events such as these will affect you in the future."

        - Criswell

    48. Re:Google tomorrow? by mr_jrt · · Score: 1

      Working webcam to MSN users is the dealbreaker for me that stops me using GAIM.

      --
      Boo.
    49. Re:Google tomorrow? by millennial · · Score: 1

      Not if you believe in predestination. If you were destined to search for something, it would have already been sought in the future.

      Or, if you believe in absolute free will, your present choices may form the course of events in the future in such a way that even if you didn't intentionally search for something, a glitch in the system would make it come up for you anyways.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    50. Re:Google tomorrow? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      If you want encrypted IM, why not use http://www.trillian.cc/ Trillian? That client supports encryption over multiple networks, AIM, Yahoo, MSN, ICQ, and I think others.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    51. Re:Google tomorrow? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      ICQ could do this a very long time ago. While it is great the main thing here is that finally a major provider is offering this service in a way which can interoperate with other networks. The only two networks that have been able to interoperate thus far have been AIM and ICQ and they don't count because they are owned by the same company. IM is finally going to mature into the same level of ubiquity as email--ISPs will begin runnning Jabber servers in addition to the mail and news servers they currently run. While this has been a long time coming and the technology has been available for a while (though to be honest jabber hasn't been standardized that long) it really took someone like Google to make it happen on a wide scale. How Google will turn this into revenue is anyone's guess but it gives them major major goodwill to the people out there who have been waiting on this.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    52. Re:Google tomorrow? by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Applications like Winamp never used the standard UI widgets and no one seemed to complain about that.

      I do! The hard part of my switch from mac to powerpc linux was experiencing xmms (winamp clone) and similar software who shares the "let's imitate the look and feel of a VCR, since they're so user friendly" attitude.

      But hey, it works, there are no audio dropouts (as those i heard on a three times faster Vaio with XP) and comes for free, and if I don't like it I can download the source and... use Rhythmbox instead :)

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    53. Re:Google tomorrow? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What I meant was that communications software on the Mac seems more integrated than MSN IM or Yahoo, even though it uses discrete applications. One big reason for this is the fact that the Address Book is a system-wide service, not just an application -- it means that all the information for a contact is cohesive instead of fragmented. The computer knows that a given email address, phone number, and IM handle all refer to the same person, and every application refers to the person by name. For example, my iChat buddy list shows "Bob" and "Fred" instead of "joe6pack" and "fooBar".

      It's just... better. And that's not a troll!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    54. Re:Google tomorrow? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I don't see this is some big advancement in the client technology. I don't think anyone is claiming that. The advancement is that now (hopefully) IM and voice are going to be as legitimate and ubiquitous as email. Your ISP will eventually host a jabber server in addition to its mail and news servers. Google isn't doing anything beyond being a MAJOR presence supporting this. AIM, Yahoo, and MSN (though it will be a cold day in hell for MSN) will hopefully eventually be forced to interoperate with each other, not to mention Google, because of this. Google honestly doesn't have that much to gain from it--but the longer the others wait to join in on it the more they will lose to Google. IBM didn't gain many tangibles from opening up the PC platform in terms of marketshare of the PC platform (if they kept it closed they would have 100% of it). Instead they got a miniscule percentage of a giant market.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    55. Re:Google tomorrow? by Vulturejoe · · Score: 1

      That would create a paradox, it would click a link because in the future you were to click that link, but since it clicked that link for you, you couldn't have clicked the link, and the information it used to determine which link to click couldn't possibly have existed, so we're screwed.

      Yes, but it should be able to detect what link that it will choose for you in the future thus bypassing the paradox. Or something like that.

      --

      Out of Cheese Error:
      Please reboot universe
    56. Re:Google tomorrow? by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      FYI, this was posted before the google client was available on their web page.

    57. Re:Google tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha love it! =D

  2. Wow, I get to use Jabber on a different server! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whoop.

    Dee.

    Do.

  3. Cool, I'm there...! by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    I just created my account. I'm cbergeron.

    Feel free to add me so we can try this puppy out...!

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Cool, I'm there...! by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just created my account. I'm cbergeron.

      I'm bgates$$. Please feel free to add me to your list.

    2. Re:Cool, I'm there...! by Malyven · · Score: 1

      Malyven, feel free to add. I tried adding you guys, but CenterICQ crashes out when adding a google talk user.

    3. Re:Cool, I'm there...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for providing him with a list of the emails of 500 thousand /. readers to sell to marketing companies...

    4. Re:Cool, I'm there...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cabaal, if wants to test it

    5. Re:Cool, I'm there...! by quanticle · · Score: 1

      I just added myself as quanticle. Feel free to add and instant message me.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    6. Re:Cool, I'm there...! by XMorbius · · Score: 1

      same as my slashdot name, with the appropriate suffix =D feel free to message me, although I might be asleep soon

  4. Gmail by bobsacks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any word on when Gmail is going to go public? Last I heard google news was waiting because of it's inability to create revenue because they were using other peoples news or some such. But the mail portion has adds and the like, so I guess it is able to make revenue.

    1. Re:Gmail by Malyven · · Score: 5, Informative

      It may not be 100% public, but as far as I can see everybody has 50 invites, and it resets everyday.

    2. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone send an invite to lapan1[at]hotmail.com Been looking to try out gmail. Thanks.

    3. Re:Gmail by THotze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, and there's a good chance it will stay this way. Its probably the best way to make sure that spammers don't start getting gmail accounts.

      Its a method of 'verifying' users by having other users verify them (by making the service invite-only.) Its more secure than say, having to enter the text from some obscured image (which can be done en masse by paying somebody probably something small.)

      So yes, at this point, anybody who really wants a gmail account has one, but spammers have largely been shut out.

    4. Re:Gmail by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1, Funny

      Feel free to send an invite my way:

      l0rdjedi at yahoo dot com

    5. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to send one here too, if you have a spare minute.

      concatenate("posco", "at", "elvene", ".", "net")

      thanks.

    6. Re:Gmail by mgoff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its probably the best way to make sure that spammers don't start getting gmail accounts/

      I don't get it. Why couldn't a spammer beg for an account like everyone else? Once they get in, they get 50 invites and create 50 more accounts (and repeat). I suppose they could track who invited whom and watching the parents and children of known spam accounts.

    7. Re:Gmail by Panaphonix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So yes, at this point, anybody who really wants a gmail account has one, but spammers have largely been shut out.

      How so? Couldn't spammers invite each other?

    8. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry I cant send you an invite. I spent my only spare minute typing this post.

    9. Re:Gmail by bryan8m · · Score: 1

      If he's getting a Gmail account then who cares if he gets spammed on his old account. lol.

    10. Re:Gmail by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0

      Do you really think spammers are social creatures?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    11. Re:Gmail by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1, Informative

      I noticed that as well. Heck you do not even need invites anymore, just check out this link - https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount

    12. Re:Gmail by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Well, if you get your 50 invites, how about tossing me one as well (address above)? I received an invite once but it didn't work at all (might it have expired because it was sent while I was away from e-mail for week?). :)

    13. Re:Gmail by roach2002 · · Score: 1

      GFS (The google file system) stores everything in triplicate.

      Right now, I have 2.5 gigs.

      This means there's 7.5 gigs of storage dedicated to me.

      Assuming the server costs nothing and their only cost for me is the hard drive space, and it costs $0.50 per gig, that's $3.75/user. This also is assuming they have all the hard drive space to allow everyone to use all their storage (big assumption).

      I don't know about you, but I've probably never clicked more than 3 ads, at most $0.30/ad.

      They're probably not breaking even on Gmail - yet.

    14. Re:Gmail by marcop · · Score: 1

      Can I get an invite too? Thx.

      marco a-t panzanella d-o-t net

    15. Re:Gmail by atam · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will only set up a Google Account which currently does not allow access to Gmail.

    16. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invite Sent

    17. Re:Gmail by Sixpack,+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

      heh, even I knew that.

      --
      Joseph Sixpack - Representing the average pc user from Americas heartland since the day before yesterday.
    18. Re:Gmail by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      Ah, I did not know that. I have been using my GMail account for a year now and haven't bothered to set up a new one. Thanks for pointing out my mistake.

    19. Re:Gmail by _Splat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not exactly.. it's similar to how a bank doesn't have enough cash to pay out every account at once... they assume that most people will only use a small fraction of their space, and only allocate that much. If everyone decided to fill up their Gmail accounts all at once, there would be trouble.

      --
      -Splat
    20. Re:Gmail by Baricom · · Score: 1

      If you read the GFS paper closely, it's fairly clear that they don't actually use GFS on all their production systems - only some of them. Sorry, I don't have it in front of me, so I can't give you an exact page number.

    21. Re:Gmail by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you, but I've probably never clicked more than 3 ads, at most $0.30/ad.

      I hardly even notice the ads. And I've never clicked on one.

    22. Re:Gmail by Sancho · · Score: 1

      It's kinda interesting. Of course, all the asking for invites on public forums breaks the system, but if it wasn't for that, this would be a good way for Google to track people who might have similar interests (people who give invites to others are probably friends).

    23. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It will only set up a Google Account which currently does not allow access to Gmail.

      Bzzzzt! Wrong answer.

      The initial services available with your Google account are:

      * Google Alerts - Receive news and search results via email

      * Froogle Shopping List - Shop smarter with wishlists of your favorite products

      * Gmail - A Google approach to email

    24. Re:Gmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      ou cannot log into Gmail using your Google Account username and password.

      Gmail is in a limited test period and is only available to a small number of people who are helping test and improve the service before it is made more widely available.

      If you have been asked to test Gmail and have not yet created a Gmail account, please click on the link in your invitation email.

      If you have been asked to test Gmail and have already created a Gmail account, please try to log in again using your Gmail username and password.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    25. Re:Gmail by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      I have no invites. I had 6 a long time ago. I gave them away and now I have 0.

      I don't really care though since I have my 2523 MB :D

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    26. Re:Gmail by Malyven · · Score: 1

      Really?
      I wonder what the criteria is then. I have probably given out at least 15-20 invites since I got gmail.

      I gave an invite out to a friend the other day it went to 49 and was back up to 50 the next morning.

    27. Re:Gmail by notthe9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they invite each other, it leaves a trail and you can cut off the whole bad branch.

    28. Re:Gmail by damiam · · Score: 1

      They don't have anywhere near the hard drive space for everyone to use all their storage. Most people never come close; I only have 50MB in my account. And even if someone did use all their space, plain text compresses extremely well, so 2.5GB of text would be 1GB or less compressed.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    29. Re:Gmail by nsasch · · Score: 1

      Sure, but how many Google ads have you clicked on from non-Google sites that cost only what it costs a web server to send out the ad text? More than $3.75. More like $15 and same with everybody else on your street with Internet access.

      --
      Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
    30. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, guilt by association and catering only to the "in" crowd aka invite only group.

      That's downright near the last straw if true.

    31. Re:Gmail by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      invite sent

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    32. Re:Gmail by paulsomm · · Score: 1

      It doesn't break the system. Google is smart, they'd be looking for accounts that use up their invites quickly and never contacts the people once the invite is made. That would fit the profile of someone offering invites. That information would be logged and counted as one way invites are used and excluded from the similar-interests calculations.

      Where money is involved and personal information is available, there are algorithms upon algorithms designed to sort and classify and utilize that information and very little (if anything) can be done by the originators of that data to make it unusable in some form or another.

    33. Re:Gmail by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Interesting
      > Feel free to send an invite my way:

      Done! And if anyone else wants one, reply to this thread, too.

    34. Re:Gmail by Red+Alastor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's kinda interesting. Of course, all the asking for invites on public forums breaks the system, but if it wasn't for that, this would be a good way for Google to track people who might have similar interests (people who give invites to others are probably friends).

      That would be stupid of them since it's easier to establish such relationships : people who e-mail each other frequently are probably friends.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    35. Re:Gmail by bahwi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, shut up. It's the only exclusive club I can get into these days(and I still had to buy my invite!). Now I can laugh at all those 100meg hotmail users. Losers.

    36. Re:Gmail by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've played around with a "social networking" site (thefacebook.com) which used to have -- and perhaps it's back now, I'm not sure -- a really neat feature. It would give you a zoomable 2-D representation of your social network as an SVG file.

      The SVG part isn't important (I was never really clear why they picked this format over any other vector format...) but the idea was pretty cool. With yourself at the center you could see who was near you in the social structure of the network, and who they were closely associated with, etc.

      I never used the service long or heavily enough to develop a very robust social network (and not enough of my friends used it to make a very good model of the real world) but this is not so with email. Practically everyone I know, with the exception of a few older or particularly Luddite relatives, I've emailed at one point or another.

      It would be neat to have a program that scanned your email archives (with Gmail this wouldn't be too hard, since all mail is retained in the archive unless manually deleted) and constructed a social network from it. If I were going to design it, I'd make "closeness" be the frequency of emails, and the angular separation between two people who both talk to a third based on the number of shared keywords in their emails. That way you'd end up with all your business associates off in one direction (say all radiating away from you within a few degrees of each other) but your family, with whom you probably use few words in common with your business emails, in a different direction entirely.

      If the program could scan people's emails recursively -- assuming they were all on Gmail and had suitably large archives of email -- you could create a pretty neat social model that would actually be reflective of the real world.

      Of course, the privacy issues surrounding something like that would be gigantic. People get all creeped out by Gmail scanning emails and then presented targeted advertising...I doubt they'd tolerate a system that scanned all their archived email in order to produce a graphical model, even if it was semi-anonymous.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    37. Re:Gmail by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      I could use one.

      kjholdich at yahoo dot co dot uk

    38. Re:Gmail by Tom_M_Riddle · · Score: 1

      I don't like this invite-only concept. If you don't happen to know anyone who uses gmail, but you just want to test the new technology, you're left out. To some, it might seem sketchy, begging for invites on a public board. Those wishing to try out the Yahoo Messenger on Linux, need no such invite. So folks end up trying that, and staying with it. Because the initial experience didn't remind them of high-school cliques. I don't know if Google gains mindshare by that scenario.

    39. Re:Gmail by Tripman · · Score: 1

      Please send me an invite

      sam at clowncorp dot juneks dot com dot au

      Thanks!

    40. Re:Gmail by nikster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wasting karma.. but.. This is a fantastic idea!

      I would have a crawler go over my emails and send it back to a central server (again, Google comes to mind). Then that server can make a global network of connected emails. It would not really reflect social networks because email doesn't say how real or strong the contact is as I easily fake to know all manner of celebrities as long as I find their email addresses.

      I really would like to see my 6 degrees network, and I also would like to see how large it really is. If the 6 degrees of separation theory were true, then all email users world-wide should be in it.

    41. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gmail is in a limited test period and is only available to a small number of people who are helping test and improve the service before it is made more widely available.

      3 errors found.

    42. Re:Gmail by wackywendell · · Score: 1

      Google would never do this.

      The reason: In order to be useful, the graphical social networking would have to prove information to non-Google people that is not anonymous.

      In order to be useful, the graphic would have to show
      1) connections between mutual friends
      2) the strength of these connections

      This is different from any other privacy things google has done because:
      1) This is information specific to the person
      2) it is available to people outside of google (any friends who would have the person in their graphic)
      3) This information would be available without the specific request of the individual it concerns.

      Basically, if I were your friend, I would be able to use google to find out what your other friendships are even though you didn't specifically provide this information to me.

      This would almost certainly violate google's 'don't be evil' principle, and would get many privacy advocates really irritatingly irritated.

    43. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what makes you think spammers don't have real life friends they can get a gmail account from?

      All they need is one, you know... So I think that logic is flawed.

    44. Re:Gmail by Nutshell_TA · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't need invitations anymore! now everyone can get one by simply signing in here: https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount Enjoy!

    45. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you send one to me too please. Thanx a lot!

      ffelder-at-gmx-dot-de

    46. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The invite system is about building a social network of users.

      Unless you can encrypt your chats with GoogleTalk , I wouldn't use it.

    47. Re:Gmail by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      That's Google making money, not Gmail. We all know google if profitable, but Gmail probably isn't.

    48. Re:Gmail by agwilliams1000 · · Score: 1

      So basically you want to write a computer program to see how many friends you've got?? Jesus, how much of a geek are you ;)

    49. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mee too!

      martins (at) florian-mueller (dot) de

    50. Re:Gmail by hughk · · Score: 1

      Hey, the bank where I work hates to allocate 500MB for email. The fact that these days we have to retain everything seems to have been ignored.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    51. Re:Gmail by Fross · · Score: 1

      actually, i never got round to getting one, could you send one my way please, too?

      david at modernangel dot org

      thanks :>

    52. Re:Gmail by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      not me :(
      I used to give all my invites to the gmail spooler... but since it was getting flooded towards the end, hardly any of them got used, and now I'm not getting any more...

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    53. Re:Gmail by zarkzervo · · Score: 1
      It would be neat to have a program that scanned your email archives (with Gmail this wouldn't be too hard, since all mail is retained in the archive unless manually deleted) and constructed a social network from it.
      This way, my closest friends will be "Ur fav0ur1te pharm n Canada" ;)
      --
      Insert `fortune -o` here
    54. Re:Gmail by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      done

    55. Re:Gmail by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      if I were your friend, I would be able to use google to find out what your other friendships are

      What if the graph just showed unlabelled dots (and Kevin Bacon) beyond your immediate cloud of friends?? That wouldn't give away anything you didn't already know, with the possible exception of cross-links between your friends, in the case where you didn't realise they knew each other.

    56. Re:Gmail by the_xaqster · · Score: 1

      Looks like my closest friend is sdfjbhasfbj@yahoo.com. At least that is who I get most emails from, telling me about my pre-approved 4.25% rate...

      --
      I'm just here to regulate Funkyness
    57. Re:Gmail by erki · · Score: 1

      In a limited test period? For over a year???

      And when will gmail bother to start working Opera? talk doesn't support Opera either.

      --
      AhForgetIt tendency rated 39%
    58. Re:Gmail by evanism · · Score: 0

      give me an invite!!! I cant stand IM !!!

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    59. Re:Gmail by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      the people you gave them to...did you actually *know* them? Is it possible that one of them was a spammer, or that one of the people that you invited then invited a spammer?

      If so, then you could be cut off for that reason. You may want to check.

    60. Re:Gmail by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      From TWS (The Web Site)
      The initial services available with your Google account are:
      Google Alerts - Receive news and search results via email
      Froogle Shopping List - Shop smarter with wishlists of your favorite products
      Gmail - A Google approach to email

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    61. Re:Gmail by slthytove · · Score: 1

      Uh... isn't Talk a standalone application, and so it wouldn't really matter what browser you're using, as it doesn't use your browser at all? Unless you're referring to the process by which you download it?

      Gmail has a "plain HTML view," as well, meant for browsers which don't support the AJAX stuff it does, and that should work fine with Opera.

    62. Re:Gmail by SamSim · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a challenge to me!

    63. Re:Gmail by erki · · Score: 1
      isn't Talk a standalone application, and so it wouldn't really matter what browser you're using
      If I try to access my inbox or account settings from the links and buttons in Talk, it brings Opera to the foreground, but nothing additional happens.
      Gmail has a "plain HTML view," as well, meant for browsers which don't support the AJAX stuff it does, and that should work fine with Opera.
      The plain HTML is quite severely handicapped. For example, there is no invites or labels panel, and settings cannot be accessed (tells to use a "fully supported browser"). And even the Gmail notifier link is missing.
      --
      AhForgetIt tendency rated 39%
    64. Re:Gmail by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about ? I made myself several accounts by sending myself some invites and nothing is stopping a spammer from making dozens to spam his heart out.

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    65. Re:Gmail by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

      what you don't think a spammer could have gone onto any board and said something like:

      I NEED A GMAIL ACCOUNT!!!!!

      and then someone gives him an invite (or two or three) He then has 50 invites a day to send to himself.

      I mean I got two different invites, from two different people on two different message boards. I didn't know either person who gave me the invites. I could easily have been a spammer. It's a good way to make it a bit harder for someone to get accounts that spam but it's still possible.

    66. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tag, you're it.

    67. Re:Gmail by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      "I doubt they'd tolerate a system that scanned all their archived email in order to produce a graphical model, even if it was semi-anonymous."

      What makes you think Google doesn't do this already? Go study the history of Xerox and think about their newer software for tracking document relationships, and OCR, and internet connected copiers. Read up on Echelon. Then come back and tell us how Google couldn't possibly have been approached by three letter agencies. Oh, I suppose you think that if they were approched they'd say "no" because of the whole "don't be evil" philosophy? Evil is a relative thing - using such stuff to stop terrorists is generally a good thing. Using it to gather intelligence on your adversaries is also considered a "good" thing. Google is famous for finding patterns of relevance in mountains of data. If you think for a second that they don't do this on gmail you need a serious reality check. The good news is they don't appear to be doing evil with it.

    68. Re:Gmail by vvjcarter · · Score: 1

      Me too, to marcstraemke at gmx dot net

    69. Re:Gmail by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      I am not suggesting assuming guilt from the relationship, but it is certainly probable cause to look at the inviter and invitees.

    70. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jcmadick at sound dot net, if you wouldn't mind.

      Thanks

    71. Re:Gmail by wackywendell · · Score: 1

      The thing is, Google works in black and white on this issue. Even that is giving you some small personal information about your friends (the cross-links) that they probably wouldn't mind you knowing, but it's still personal, non-anonymous, available information. Google is against that. At least so far.

    72. Re:Gmail by shaum · · Score: 1

      Me too, please.

      kevin at shaum dot com.

      Thanks.

    73. Re:Gmail by midnightblaze · · Score: 1

      Can't spammers just pay for those invites? Or get them through those online invite spooler deals?

    74. Re:Gmail by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1
      And when will gmail bother to start working Opera?

      I don't have any problem using Gmail in Opera. (Under Windows, anyway, can't remember trying it on my linux box)

      Make sure you have Opera set to identify as Opera. It defaults to identify as IE, so gmail tries to use ActiveX.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    75. Re:Gmail by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's not reliable enough yet. Often when you click on a mail in the inbox it just freezes up. And it takes ages to load. You don't get the spinning thing on the tab in Firefox like a normal site, it just says 'loading' on the top of the page. Sometimes it just stays like that.

      Also it's not very configurable. Sometimes it opens up two tabs when you click on a link, for no particular reason.

      They really need to iron out the creases. But then it's only been out a few years, and they only have a few hundred PHDs to work on it, and webmail is a monumental task that definitely couldn't be put together in a weekend by a single amateur.

    76. Re:Gmail by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

      Please send one to: boy_afraid.geo@yahoo.com

      thank you!

    77. Re:Gmail by Empty_One · · Score: 1

      https://www.google.com/accounts/SmsMailSignup1 will work to sign up for a gmail account with out any invitations.

    78. Re:Gmail by erki · · Score: 1

      Dammit. Looks like I should upgrade to Opera 8, that seems to be "fully supported"

      :(

      --
      AhForgetIt tendency rated 39%
    79. Re:Gmail by maggern · · Score: 1

      The next service from Google may be a "friendster" kind of thing. Why? Because:

      1. Who did you give\receive your first gmail-invites from? Ah, not a close friend?

      2. As you got more and more gmail-invites, did you not increasingly give invites to other (less close) friends?

      Ok, it's a wild guess, but I guess the invitation-information may not only be a media-stunt and for beta-testing...

    80. Re:Gmail by maggern · · Score: 1

      wow, I agree with you and just before I read your post, I posted this:

      ----
      The next service from Google may be a "friendster" kind of thing. Why? Because:

      1. Who did you give\receive your first gmail-invites from? Ah, not a close friend?
      2. As you got more and more gmail-invites, did you not increasingly give invites to other (less close) friends?

      Ok, it's a wild guess, but I guess the invitation-information may not only be a media-stunt and for beta-testing...

    81. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm....

      what about any spammers replying to this thread?

      Guess that blows the whole no spammers thing...

    82. Re:Gmail by Salvo · · Score: 1

      I want a Gmail account, but I will not lower myself by begging; I will ask Politely instead.
      I would like a Gmail account, and would be grateful to anyone who can oblige.

      Thanks Mate!

    83. Re:Gmail by Salvo · · Score: 1

      I s'pose my address would be handy too.
      salvo underscore dan at YAHOO dot COM dot AU

      ta muchly

    84. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much of the world's e-mail comes from newsletters or mailing lists, so and gmail would theoretically only have to store one copy of each message for all the thousands of people receiving it.

    85. Re:Gmail by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point.

      Perhaps what I should have said was "I doubt they'd tolerate a system that scanned all their archived email in order to produce publicly available graphical model, for academic or curiosity purposes." :)

      I don't pretend to have any insight into what the people at those agencies do, but I agree that if I worked there, I'd definitely have approached Google by now. Having that much important information in one place, indexed and searchable, is just too much of an opportunity for an entity that essentially lives by sifting nuggets of data from seas of irrelevant noise to pass up.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    86. Re:Gmail by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I knew them. I just think that it was because I had the 6 invites for sooo long (about 4-6 months) before I got rid of them.

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    87. Re:Gmail by Eil · · Score: 1


      Uh, no. Going there will give you a "Google Account", but not a GMail account. You still need an invitation. Fortunately, now that Google is giving them away like candy, there are hundreds of invites stockpiled over here:

      http://b10m.swal.org/cgi-bin/gmail_invites.cgi

    88. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      posco@elvene.net posco@elvene.net posco@elvene.net posco@elvene.net -- )&#/ Use the fource, Fluke!

    89. Re:Gmail by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Although I am metamoderating this informative, I strongly disagree with you.

      Most people I know are just too lazy to clean up their inbox. When using hotmail@2MB, we had to every now and then. This did account for a fairly organised inbox. With gmail, I just don't delete nor sort anything, leading to a big mess and slowly eating up all of my gmail account (although it's not filled up yet). If - as I suspect - many people are like me, a lot of gmail accounts will be filled up in a few years, and then:

      1. It's going to be a HUGE pain to cleanup, compared to the relatively easy task it was with hotmail@2MB
      2. It's going to eat-up a bunch of hdd space...

      I wouldn't worry about #2 though, as hdd is cheaper by the day.

  5. Not a full fledged messaging program by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So this isn't exactly google chat, the AIM killer. Don't see any reason to bother with this.

    1. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Not yet, this just shows that they're playing with jabber. Soon they'll most likely release their IM app that is just a prettied up jabber client. Heres hoping they do it right.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by Seumas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Um. Jabber is a full fledged messaging program.

      This is basically just google providing a public jabber server. I haven't gotten around to setting one up for myself, but have wanted to use a high quality, highly available, reliable jabber server to stick an account on. Now that google is doing it - I absolutely will.

      This is exactly what I said they should do in the first place. Hurray!

    3. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by DarthTaco · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know. I'm not too excited about using as a chat server host a company that is known specifically for their data warehousing and searching and mining capabilities

    4. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by BandwidthHog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then this oughta give you the creeps.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    5. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by remove+office · · Score: 1

      you don't see any reason yet. yet. google hasn't even launched this yet. nobody outside of the developing team has any idea what this thing can do. we only know what we've stumbled upon so far.

      dismissing a product before you have any idea what the features are is not wise.

    6. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Did anyone say it was meant to 'kill' AIM?

      For all we know they may allow Jabber connectors so you can access your AIM / MSN / Yahoo etc accounts via the google server.

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    7. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Here ya go.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    8. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 2
      Um. Jabber is a full fledged messaging program.

      Wrong. Jabber is a instant messaging protocol (a great one, by the way). If you are talking about the chat application, then you should call it a jabber client.

      For more information check out jabber's site

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    9. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Google is not putting out a client. They are running a jabber server.

      There are plenty of full fledged jabber clients. GAIM, PSI, Adium, Exodus and tKabber to name only a few.

      This makes up a full-fledged messaging system, without reinventing the wheel.

      I think the original poster's reference to it as a program was clear in that they were speaking of it as a "system" as was my reply.

      I really don't see a reason for people not to use Jabber. I only touch AIM because so many peopel I know are on AIM and it's difficult for them to find a good public jabber server (other than the main jabber one). Being able to point them to talk.google will make it much easier to convince and convert them now.

      We've written some really amazing applications that work over Jabber through any of the jabber clients on our Jabber network (pretty much our entire corporation uses it) and these custom apps have made life a lot easier.

      Having a really big player like Google take on the role of hosting a jabber server for the public is just what Jabber has needed. I think this is an absolutely awesome development and I only hope that Google is keeping their "first, do no evil" mission statement in mind.

    10. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by paulsomm · · Score: 1

      Exactly why I don't actually use my GMail as anything other than what I use Hotmail for: a free account to use when I know it's going to end up on spam lists.

      What concerns me is the long term usage of the data being collected. Will all IMs be logged and stored? Will someone in the nether reaches of Google (or some government agency via subpoena) be able to issue a keyword search and see all relevant IMs, emails, and contacts of mine? what about the cross-referencing abilities I'm sure someone is already salivating to set up for a fee for anyone who can pay (credit agencies, credit card purchases, government records (DMV), cell logs, etc)?

      while I think the possibility of such a Big Brother entity is remote presently due to the sheer volume of information available to process and collate and catalog, one day processing power will be sufficient to make such paranoid consipiracy theories less laughable.

    11. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they are putting out a client. Google Talk homepage is here: http://talk.google.com/

    12. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right to be concerned.

      You're wrong to blame Google for it, though. All Google is doing is making the technology of surveillance more obvious. Your emails and IMs aren't, and never were, private. Unless you were using some form of end-to-end encryption, that is. But for the vast majority of people, that assumption of privacy, at least when it comes to the Internet, is just that: an assumption. And a very poor one at that.

      Frankly, I like GMail. I think everyone ought to use it. Okay, not really. But I like that it makes people like my parents, who despite years of cautioning never gave a second thought about emailing someone their bank routing number or Amex-online account login, think twice about what they type in. You can rail all day to people about how email is really nothing more secure than a postcard, passed from machine to machine across the network, but that's all very abstract. The first time you notice how those GMail ads seem to eerily change depending upon what you're writing about, the whole thing becomes more clear.

      Google isn't invading your privacy. It's just making you aware of the fact that you never had any.

      Of course, people say, before Google existed and thousands of users' emails were archived and indexed, intercepting email was hard. Okay, point granted. But really how hard? Certainly not outside the reach of government agencies. If you're really afraid of the three-letter-guys, then everything Google does to drive the unencrypted=insecure link home to the average user is good.

      Because the only privacy you'll get on the internet is the kind you create for yourself. The more users who realize this and the sooner they take steps to implement it, the better. When everyone starts actually encrypting their email and messaging, then we'll actually have some privacy for the government to try and invade.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    13. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by RenatoRam · · Score: 1

      Not exactly: http://www.google.com/talk/

      They HAVE a client, even if in beta, and it integrates gMail, docks to the google desktop search, and does voice talk.

      Sure, you can use any jabber client for the chat part. Fortunately google seems to love open standards.

      Hey! A corporation that's not ugly, faceless, and apparently evil... now that's weird! :-)

      --
      Ciao, Renato
    14. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by bcmm · · Score: 1
      Um. Jabber is a full fledged messaging program.
      POP3 is a fully-fledged mail client too...
      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    15. Re:Not a full fledged messaging program by paulsomm · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. The cases of people being convicted in court because of SMS logs subpoena from cell companies is further, public proof of the lack of true privacy and security in our popular electronic communication methods

      My blame isn't on Google at all. However, there's a difference between, say, yelling in a crowded room with the possibility of someone paying attention to your conversation and having those conversations definitely recorded, archived, indexed, and referenceable. Do I think Google is evil for doing the latter? Not at all. But I chose to not participate.

      But, to be honest, its inevitable that this ease of access to personal information will happen. While the ease of access scares me, I'm more worried by the fact that there are currently no laws equating personal information with a person's property. I should own the log of my IMs or emails regardless of whether Google caches it or I keep it on my harddrive. I should be able to issue a notice to have those logs purged or to request a copy for myself. I should be able to sue should those logs get stolen and used for illegal purposes.

      My concern about personal information goes further than just the whole Google/lack of security issue. It also extends to medical records (which aren't owned by you but by the entity paying for the care, which in 99% of American's cases is not the patient) and credit/purchasing records (which belong to the financial institution that processed the transaction).

      End-to-end encryption does need to be adopted for all electronic communications (although a means to allow everyday users to effectively use good encryption schemes like PGP without having to figure out the complexities of those schemes needs to be developed, since the cert setup steps/key management steps turn most people away from using them). But there also needs to be more stringent legal protections for said information and clearer distinctions on who has rights to the information and for what purposes.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. huh? by keyvoh · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is a google?

    1. Re:huh? by dratox · · Score: 1

      If memory serves its 1 followed by 100 zero's

      or

      10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
    2. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A google is a small four-legged Norwegian Highland creature which has the limbs on one side shorter than the other side. This means that it is well adapted to run around the hills at a steady altitude without either ascending or descending. However, a google can easily be caught by running around the hill in the opposite direction.

      Duh.

    3. Re:huh? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      No, that's a googol

    4. Re:huh? by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 1

      No, that's a googol

      Maybe it's a "google" if the zeros get broken up indiscriminately by the lameness filter.

      Cheers,
      IT

      --

      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

    5. Re:huh? by aurb · · Score: 1

      Wrong question. It should be: "What is google?"

    6. Re:huh? by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      What is a google?

      "Google is your friend" :)

    7. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is the Number of the Beast.

      Just think about it...

    8. Re:huh? by I'm+Troy+McClure · · Score: 0

      So they have google on computers now, huh?
      Summon up images of a future google web appliance

      --
      larryvagina@gmail.com
  8. Now spy on your friends! by IIDX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use the power of google search to find juicy tidbits in other's google talk conversations!

    1. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Indianwells · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly! Google will now have a reocrd of: 1. Your web searches 2. Your email 3. You im conversations If google were the government would you be afraid?

    2. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Jorkapp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you consider that the government can use google?

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    3. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you consider the government doesn't need to use Google? Or are you one of the 0.00000001% of people who encrypt their email, encrypt their IM, and either run their own search engine or access a trusted party's search engine through HTTPS?

      Hell, you don't even have to be the government to get this information. You just have to have access to one of the routers between you and the rest of the Internet - e.g. people who work at your ISP.

    4. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      More like now you can be hit by targeted ads while IMing.

    5. Re:Now spy on your friends! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Exactly! Google will now have a reocrd of: 1. Your web searches 2. Your
      > email 3. You im conversations If google were the government would you be
      > afraid?

      Frankly? No.

      Do you have any idea how *many* users there are, and how *much* the volume of web searches, email, usenet (you forgot that one), and IM conversations adds up to? The very idea of monitoring it all is, frankly, utterly preposterous. The sheer amount of material is prohibitive.

      Now, if you were someone they have a specific interest in monitoring (say, a suspect in a major FBI case), then that would be another matter. But, frankly, in that case they could just bug your house, plant a couple of cameras, and have done; they wouldn't need to tap in to your communication at the Google level.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    6. Re:Now spy on your friends! by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      The FBI might be willing to wade through the volume at the Google level. However, if they did, why wouldn't they just get it from the *ISP* which has *all* of your internet traffic?

    7. Re:Now spy on your friends! by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      "Now, if you were someone they have a specific interest in monitoring (say, a suspect in a major FBI case), then that would be another matter. But, frankly, in that case they could just bug your house, plant a couple of cameras, and have done; they wouldn't need to tap in to your communication at the Google level."

      Now, if you were someone they have a specific interest in monitoring (say, a major political figure, a business man, a beaurocrat, a teacher, anyone with a career who is ripe for abuse) then that would be another matter. But frankly, in that case they could just get a warrant and bug your house, plant a copule of cameras, and have done; they wouldn't need to tap into your past communications to blackmail or coerce you into something someone (or some group) in power wants from you.

      You see, it isn't the morally legitimate uses that are the problems. It is the use where it becomes the norm to "oh I will just check the google database to see what is going on with this person" or "oops, I leaked this political figure's google IM chat on the internet and now he is ruined" or "I saw you had an affair, now your going to pay or fess up" etc etc etc...

      It is the abuse of the power that is the problem. And where there is power, there is _ALWAYS_ the abuse.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    8. Re:Now spy on your friends! by sud_crow · · Score: 1

      who sayd im not afraid? crap. Im tyred of all that shit and paranoia!

      For the subway, i use a magnetic card that records every time/date/station i go trough, when i go to buy something, i use a credit card or a debit card, when im on internet, i leave posts, messages, commentaries, most of the times under the same nick.

      We are already without "privacy", the thing is some people still dont get it, but we live in an interconnected world, and you cant help corporations getting every data they want from you just crying!

      --
      no sig
    9. Re:Now spy on your friends! by jma05 · · Score: 1

      This company called Google BTW, happens to know a thing or two about searching :-).

    10. Re:Now spy on your friends! by birge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If Google were the government you'd have $2 deducted from your paycheck for each search, they'd deliver half the e-mail to the wrong address and would convince Amazon.co.uk to help them defeat Mac fundamentalism by invading Apple. If you tried to search for "Bin Laden" you'd get nothing except 4 billion pages about Terry Schiavo. All gay porn sites would automatically forward to www.patrobertson.com (unless the HTTP request comes from Karl Rove's IP).

    11. Re:Now spy on your friends! by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      The Google Talk client has no ads. You can use any Jabber client, anyway. I am currently logged-into Google Talk via Gaim.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    12. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Google will now have a reocrd of: 1. Your web searches 2. Your email 3. You im conversations If google were the government would you be afraid?

      The difference is: The government (well, governments around here) are elected by the stupid majority. Google were elected by geeks, and the rest of the world only found out about them after geeks started telling them.

    13. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, because google is free

    14. Re:Now spy on your friends! by gkitty · · Score: 1
      If you've got something to hide and the FBI has a warrant to tap your ISP's router, you're fairly screwed (and your ISP is not the worst of your problems) but I have high confidence my ISP does not have a cache of past traffic.

      I expect that google does cache and mine everything that passes through them as well as everything they have ever found.

      If you wanted to know what someone has been up to for the last decade, Google will likely have far better information than their ISP or the FBI.

    15. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Google were under the auspices of a foreign government with a track record of disdaining even its own citizens' privacy, would you be afraid?

      Posting AC for fear of my Google profile being subpoenaed (Due process? Ha, I should be so lucky!)

    16. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is a public company controlled by the stock owners.

      The owners can change what ever they feel like. Google is run by investors like any other public company.

    17. Re:Now spy on your friends! by eduo · · Score: 0

      And how do you know this isn't the case already?

      I haven't seen that conspiracy theory yet (which just shows I'm not as good searching for things as I'd like to know) but it'd be a funny thing if google suddenly turned out to be a government ruse to have people willingly provide the information they can't get from them directly.

      Especially since people assume Mail and/or IM is private or, at least, ephimerous (sp?).

      Eduo

    18. Re:Now spy on your friends! by davesag · · Score: 1

      Did you consider that the government can use google? I have considered for a long time that google supply special keys and APIs of all kinds to all manner of US Government agencies. They pretty much say they are required to in their terms of service.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    19. Re:Now spy on your friends! by TheRealJFM · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Exactly! Google will now have a reocrd of: 1. Your web searches 2. Your email 3. You im conversations If google were the government would you be afraid?"

      From the Privacy Policy:

      "We do not store any of the content of your text or voice communications in our logs."

      So no.

      --
      Joseph Farthing
      http://josephfarthing.com
    20. Re:Now spy on your friends! by dascandy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No.

      What are they going to do with it?

      All those things reveal not much, except that my interests are as broad as the universe (and occasionally larger, when I try to find stuff about something people call god).

      They could send me more spam (gets me off their mail service), spim (gets me off their IM service) or more ads (gets me on more effective adblock measures). Until they're going to ask money, I'm going to keep using the services. When they do, I'm gonna be the first to leave.

      There's no point in worrying for privacy in public places. When I change clothes in the middle of times square NY I'm not getting much privacy. Didn't I choose for that? Nonencrypted emails, websearches etc. do the same.

    21. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uhuh, you forget to mention the next paragraph:

      When you use Google Talk, we may record information about your usage of Google Talk, such as when you use Google Talk, the size of your contact list and the contacts you communicate with, and the frequency and size of data transfers. Information displayed or clicked on in the Google Talk interface (including UI elements, settings, and other information) is also recorded. We use this information internally to deliver the best possible service to you, such as improving the Google Talk user interface and maintaining a consistent and reliable user experience. We delete all personally identifiable information from our logs after a period of time reasonably necessary to do so. We do not store any of the content of your text or voice communications in our logs.

      Because even we don`t have that kind of storage, I would finish that sentence. Why would you quote the paragraph that says what they don`t intend to store, and not the one that lists what they do intend to store?

      Anyway, read the *entire* thing before using this service. The parts about the transfer of data to others is especially interesting. You will be notified... Great, ofcourse if you notify google after changing its privacy policy, or the new owner of the data that you want your data removed, what will they say?

      Also read the law enforcement/"when we may disclose your information" part. It says google will preserve and disclose "personal data" if it feels like following the law or preventing abuse. This isn`t just the stuff they already collect, given this text they might very well start collecting the contents of your communications if the get a warrant to do so... So how is end-to-end crypto for jabber getting along?

    22. Re:Now spy on your friends! by intangible · · Score: 1

      Encrypt your emails using GPG, connect to Google IM using Gaim and use the gaim-encryption plugin (http://gaim-encryption.sf.net./ Forward all your connections through random anonymous SOCKS proxies (remember, SSH can do that for you too, and there's a few places that offer free shell accounts). That should give you a little privacy.

      It's not "being paranoid" when they really are out to get you.

    23. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Krunch · · Score: 1
      how is end-to-end crypto for jabber getting along?
      It works fine.
      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    24. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Except #1 isn't associated with #2 or #3, and if you have a different email address than IM name, #2 and #3 are disjointed too. They can't tell man.

    25. Re:Now spy on your friends! by alexandre · · Score: 1

      I wonder what is harder to do:

      To search the answer to a query from a user or to run grep on the queries...
      (ok now they seem to be adding voice, which is harder to filter but still...)

      I would think that an Echelon like system wouldn't be very hard to implement if you centralize everything like google is doing right now...

      Not that they're doing that, but they could :)

    26. Re:Now spy on your friends! by doctorjay · · Score: 0

      Lets not forget your social network as well.. www.orkut.com

    27. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Indianwells · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that's why I can search my email, Google has no record of my email or my websearches ... I wonder where all that data for personal search comes from? Oh yeah, its stored in google .. duh ...

    28. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Indianwells · · Score: 1

      Except that my isp doesn't store traffic, it just logs connections, so, no, that wouldn't be a good place to go to pull information on the content of thsoe connections. Google would be.

    29. Re:Now spy on your friends! by TheRealJFM · · Score: 1

      I was referring specifically to the IM conversations. Note that with AIM your conversations ARE recorded, and the licence famously says that they can do anything they want with your data.

      The encryption in Jabber should make this perfectly acceptable - the contact details that they store are standard things - MSN, AIM and even the public Jabber servers also store this data.

      If you're not happy about the "quality control" reporting in the talk client then you can switch to GAIM or something which is Open Source. The server software they are using is Jabber standard software (more or less, they've added this VoIP - something I'd like to see released for use in other clients).

      Frankly, I think the way that they are handling this is fantastic. Not perfect, but better than the other commercial entities in this arena.

      --
      Joseph Farthing
      http://josephfarthing.com
    30. Re:Now spy on your friends! by Indianwells · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to be so snarky. Sorry about that. My point is simply that by becoming a jabber server, and by having a vast indexing engine available to them, it seems a short stop to be able to build a full "profile" of any user in google. It would be different if instead of a privacy policy, there was some standard of encryption on your own personal material that you store up there, but even then, one would have to assume their encryption was safe. I suppose it would be nice to see a jabber based solution not readily indexable by any of the search giants ... It is nice to see them expanding and doing other work, and I don't really have an issue with profiling users in itself.

    31. Re:Now spy on your friends! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The FBI might be willing to wade through the volume at the Google level.

      No, you don't get it: they don't have anything like the resources for that. The sheer volume is totally overwhelming. Google sees more traffic in an hour than the FBI has the resources to "wade through", as you put it, in a decade, much less in real time.

      Like I said, if they could narrow it down to a very tiny percentage of the traffic (say, all the packets to or from a certain narrow IP address range, or more likely all the accounts known to be connected to a certain individual who is under investigation), then it becomes feasible -- to stake out individual people. But blanket-monitoring everybody is completely out of the question. It's not a question of motivation (you *know* they've thought about it); it's a question of magnitude and finite resources. The job is entirely too enormous.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  9. ugh, throw it on the heap... by rlthomps-1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... with all the other IM servies I have to sign in on at once to be in contact with everyone. MSN, AIM, misc jabber servers... and on and on. I wonder what google thinks they're going to add to chat services?

    1. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but gaim had better watch out. It could be infringing copyright!

    2. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by urdine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why, friendly google adwords, of course! Talking about baseball? Why not visit espn.com? Or better yet, Baseball on eBay. 1000s of Baseballs for Sale!

    3. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by principor · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use Trillian and probably even use GoogleTalk without the ad words.

    4. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by OpenGLFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Encryption? Like, good SSL-based encryption? Do you know how many people use AIM or Yahoo Messenger without encryption? Do you know how many use it with their university or coffee shop's unencrypted wireless service?

      Google, if you're listening, please please please make authentication and encryption the default with your new messaging service! Please! I'm stuck on campus all day, and I've got non-tech friends who refuse to use GAIM with GAIM-encrypt!

    5. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      IM and e-mail integration on the level of AOL without having to bother with such bullshit...

      Seriously, google's getting to be AOL for the not-stupid.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    6. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by DA-MAN · · Score: 5, Informative

      Encryption? Like, good SSL-based encryption? Do you know how many people use AIM or Yahoo Messenger without encryption? Do you know how many use it with their university or coffee shop's unencrypted wireless service?


      If you RTFA, you will see that talk.google.com requires TLS to connect. TLS is basically SSL, with negotiation for clients that don't support SSL. However without enabling TLS you will not be allowed to connect to Google Talk Server.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    7. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Heisenbug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder what google thinks they're going to add to chat services?

      It's a bit of a toss-up ... google maps and gmail changed the whole landscape for those services, and I wouldn't have thought there was much to add there. Google groups and froogle, on the other hand, didn't change much of anything. I'm reserving judgement, because they're smarter than me and that seems safest.

      The only thing I can think of, since it uses your gmail account as a login, is integration with your gmail address book -- but then yahoo and MS chat services do the same thing with their mail services, and that didn't exactly change my life.

    8. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by slavemowgli · · Score: 3, Informative

      While we're on the topic of encryption, let me say that while gaim-encryption is nice, there's an even better solution, namely Off-The-Record messaging (OTR). It's available as both a GAIM plugin and an AIM proxy server (for other clients); Adium X (a multi-protocol IM client for OS X) also has built-in support for OTR.

      Definitely worth a try if you value your privacy and don't want every rag, tag and bobtail reading your IM conversations with people.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    9. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Red+Alastor · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can use Trillian and probably even use GoogleTalk without the ad words.

      And you can use any e-mail client to access gmail without seeing the the ad words.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    10. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by batkiwi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      STANDARDIZATION. They will be the FIRST IM service to use the IETF messaging and presence standard.

      Remember the days back when Prodigy users couldn't email AOL users, and you coudln't email either from a university "internet email"

      That is where we are now with IM.

      Imagine if back then someone was whacky enough to make an email client which required an account from every major provider in order to email your friends, rather than simply everyone moving to the official smtp and mime standards.

      That is where we are now with IM.

      Google having an IM service should give the critical mass necessary to jabber for other IM services to investigate, and finally use it (at least bridged).

      I yearn for the day when I have only 1 IM ID. People who like yahoo can use their client and YIM ID, people who run their own jabber server can use whatever client they want, etc. Hell, they can even run propriatary video conferencing/etc which require their own software for all I care as long as I can do simple messaging with anyone on any service.

    11. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Pansy · · Score: 1
      Definitely worth a try if you value your privacy and don't want every rag, tag and bobtail reading your IM conversations with people.

      I don't worry so much about inanimate objects or quail reading my IM conversations so much as other people.

      --
      People are the problem, stop procreation now!
    12. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by atomm1024 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      True, but that doesn't actually protect your conversations from Google. People connected between your Internet connection and Google's server won't be able to monitor your conversations, but Google itself will, which is just as undesirable. Another reply has already mentioned Off-The-Record Messaging, a good solution for existing systems.

      --
      Signature.
    13. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by clymere · · Score: 1

      IIRC, GAIM-encryption is still pretty weak, and passes its key in the clear at the beginning of the transaction. My preferred client(naim) does the same thing actually. I guess its still probably good enough for most things, as someone has to think you're important enough to be watching when the conversation begins and the key is sent. I don't generally disclose important information over aim anyways.

      --
      once you go slack, you never go back
    14. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > STANDARDIZATION. They will be the FIRST IM service to use the IETF messaging and presence standard.

      Yes, that's what my sister is always talking about. "I like to chat on AIM with my friends," she says, "but I really wish there was an IETF standardized messenging service that I could use instead."

    15. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by batkiwi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I like to chat on AIM with my friends, but brittney uses that y one. Her boyfriend's on it so she won't get aim! What a bitch"

    16. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      My point is that once google uses it, and is open, another service somewhere will pop up that uses it.

      Then another.

      And finally AOL and yahoo will be forced by the market to allow XMPP S2S connections, even if they don't allow "any old jabber client" to connect.

    17. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Spetiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      You must be thinking of Trillian encryption, which, last I checked, is snake oil. Gaim-encryption uses a reasonable implementation of PKI... the key is supposed to be passed in the clear, hence its designation as the "public key." It's still not trusted unless you can verify the key's fingerprint with the key's owner.

      Just do a search for "public key infrastructure" (PKI).

    18. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by XO · · Score: 1

      i sure as heck don't have everyone on my yahoo messenger list (some 400+ people) in my yahoo contact list for email.. kinda annoying...

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    19. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Spetiam · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Google's still reading your email and gleaning market knowledge from it...

    20. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by TLSPRWR · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you RTFA, you will see that talk.google.com requires TLS to connect.

      Don't you dare use me to connect. I have limited enough bandwidth as is.

    21. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      I read the article, then I tried it out with iChat. When I tried to connect, a lovely little window popped up and said "Your username and password are about to be sent unencrypted." So, tell me mister know-it-all, where is this encryption?

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    22. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about YOU RTFA. It says "use TLA if AVAILABLE." 5222 is the non encryption port (like port 80.) 5223 is the encryption port (like 443).

    23. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be using OTR so your friends are stuck using GAIM. With OTR, I'm able to use Adium on my PowerBook, rather than trying to run the suck that is gaim.

    24. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by kayak334 · · Score: 1

      Dude seriously... it's IM. Do you really need encryption? Aren't you being a little paranoid?

    25. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      I yearn for the day when I have only 1 IM ID. People who like yahoo can use their client and YIM ID, people who run their own jabber server can use whatever client they want, etc. Hell, they can even run propriatary video conferencing/etc which require their own software for all I care as long as I can do simple messaging with anyone on any service.

      Can't happen. If you removed the part about the proprietary networks actually playing nicely, then you're squarely within the realm of realism. If you want it to happen, now is a good time to start moving your contacts to Jabber and let the proprietary networks just die already.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    26. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      Well, half the people on here seem to be worrying about google reading their IMs. Encryption would solve that.

    27. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      But if your messages are encrypted, how is google going to scan them and send you targeted ads?

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    28. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Cracell · · Score: 1

      cleanliness and organization. If your using trillian or gaim sure they are decent clients but because of their natural (being universal clients) they lack advanced and useful features and have issues with things like file transfers. And aim's client is simpyl evil, msn's is intursive and rude, and yahoo is (actually I don't use yahoo's cause noone uses it) anyways google can add a lot, just like it did to email and search.

      --
      Signatures are so 90s
    29. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by neoform · · Score: 1

      and when that day comes, the networks will be hammered with IM spam.. yay!

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    30. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's why I use a client like Trillian. I can talk to anyone on most any service and switch to a native client if need be. That said, it would be nice to have 1 ID, but it's not really an issue for me.

      Email has a different background as it wasn't developed for commercial purposes originally whereas IM is really about serving ads to as large a userbase as possible and getting said userbase through features and established userbase.

    31. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Just as an aside, email being sent in the clear, anyone that has a rounter out on the internet can probably read billions of emails a year with all sorts of information...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    32. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by paulsomm · · Score: 1

      Lol, exactly.

      While it'd be nice if google was the impetus to standardize and open IM, it's rather naive to think it'll happen. As long as people are satisfied having two or three clients installed and running (other than geeks who know about GAIM and Trillian, most people I know run AIM and Yahoo and MSN messengers all at the same time) there will be no real push from the user bases of each community to interoperate.

      Only once a standard does exist that does get implemented by a major IM vendor that does interoperate with at least one other major IM vendor, then people will start leaving the proprietary vendors.

      Since i doubt Google has a deal with AIM and Yahoo or MSN, I doubt Google will offer anything people will consider a standard or "interoperating". They may offer a nice way to proxy all the other im networks to their own, but without some sort of agreement with those vendors I assure you it'll be blocked by the other vendor immediately (a la MSN's attempt to bridge with AIM in 2000).

    33. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by TLLOTS · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you've never used ICQ...

    34. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      According to Google, it is not encrypted.

      12. Can you tell me more about Google Talk and privacy?

      "Google Talk currently does not encrypt chats or calls. But we are working hard to make many improvements to Google Talk while it is in beta, and we plan to fully support encryption of chats and calls before our official release."

    35. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      You mean first (hopefully) popular IM service to use the standard. My @jabber.org log-in has worked quite fine for serveral months (and the service itself is older). I just only know one or two other people with @jabber.org log-ins.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    36. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by slux · · Score: 1
      Just use a Jabber client that supports GNUPG message encryption such as Psi. That way no-one in the middle will see your messages unencrypted.

      Even if you trusted Google, TLS might not be present on server-to-server communication if you're talking to a person on another jabber server (and you'd have to trust that server as well) or the other user might not be using TLS when talking to their server.

    37. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by davesag · · Score: 1
      Encryption?

      well when i tried to connect using iChat it warned me that i was sending my data via an insecure connection. Fire on OSX works with jabber and also with GPG.

      on the upside, i tried a voice chat via google's jabber server to another ichat user and that worked fine.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    38. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      You must be thinking of Trillian encryption, which, last I checked, is snake oil.

      Do you have any sources to back this up?

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    39. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      reverse it. You have ppl on ur im list from ur address book, not the other way round...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    40. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Ahem, I have a couple of hundred contacts on YIM. It' a bit of a bold and sweeping statement to say nobody uses it... THOUSANDS use it actually...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    41. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      Yes. Simple observation tells us that there is no way, with Trillian encryption, to verify the authenticity of the key to which you're encrypting.

      If you just want to scramble your IMs to prevent a casual, I-wonder-what-big-plans- nzhavok-has-for-spring-break network sniffing attack, Trillian is fine. However, if you want to prevent your unethical business competitor from capturing your communications and finding out your trade secrets, you'd be insane to rely on Trillian encryption.

      I suggest you do some basic reading on how PKI works. Google/Yahoo/MSN/etc. is your friend.

    42. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by Cracell · · Score: 1

      hahaha...ya thousands compared to the millions that use aim and msn...

      --
      Signatures are so 90s
    43. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      OK if you want REAL numbers, 14.3 Million for Yahoo, 28,million for AOL, 20.7 for MSN... Not too shabby eh?

      OK this was for the US and from 2001. (haven't time for a more thorough search, but Google could help you if you want more recent numbers)

      (Quoting from pcworld.com)

      START QUOTE
      Yahoo Messenger appears to be holding firm as the third most popular instant messaging client. Market researchers say Yahoo Messenger's U.S. customer base is growing faster than that of America Online.

      During September, 28 million customers used America Online's AOL Instant Messaging client in the United States, according to Jupiter Media Metrix. Microsoft's MSN Messenger service had 20.7 million unique users, and Yahoo Messenger weighed in with 14.3 million.

      END QUOTE

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    44. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by I'm+Troy+McClure · · Score: 0



      Google could add connection to other services, or they could be forced to use Jabber too!

      --
      larryvagina@gmail.com
    45. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      I have something like 50 people from high school, 40 from college, 30 from various clubs and grou pactivities, 20 professional contacts, some coworkers, maybe 30 scattered across the internet... and these people typically have multiple SNs on multiple services.
      Buddy lists that are limited to a couple hundred contacts just don't cut it.
      Even if you only talk to a few dozen people, what about the multiple SNs each person is likely to have?
      If you only have one level of security (only one permit/deny list?), you might have multiple screen names with different permit/deny lists---for example, to keep your personal and professional lives separate. Or, how about the screen name for your phone or hiptop? You probably don't want every single person you know to be permitted to message your phone, if it costs you money.
      How about bots and automated services? Those use up buddy list slots, too.

      The multiple service issue is a problem, but even if we were all on one universal system, that system would need to be flexible. I need probably three layers of permit/deny style security and a contact list that can grow up to 400 or 500.

      The mess of multiple SNs on multiple services is somewhat alleviated by gaim's Contact versus Person system, but even that has its limitations (aliases are currently implemented on two levels in a mildly inconsistent manner).

      I yearn for the day when IM is flexible enough... and when everybody else only has one IM id (but will they ever, if the system can't meet most people's needs?)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    46. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yeah you can use trillian but you still need to create an account on every single one. This google messenger will mean YET ANOTHER place to create an account if you want to be able to talk to everyone.

      The world needs LESS messaging systems, not more. Google is doing the wrong thing here.

    47. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      I read the article, then I tried it out with iChat. When I tried to connect, a lovely little window popped up and said "Your username and password are about to be sent unencrypted." So, tell me mister know-it-all, where is this encryption?

      At the transport layer. This is using TLS. Let me draw an example by using mail which now mostly supports TLS.

      In Outlook you have the option to use secure authentication or standard. Standard sends the password in plain text, secure authentication uses a hash. If you use IMAP SSL, you are still sending the password in plain text even though you are sending it through a secure tunnel.

      My Mac died a few days ago so I can't verify this, but I know that Gaim disconnects when I try disabling TLS support and I know that reading my ethereal output shows the stuff going encrypted to the server.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    48. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      It says "use TLA if AVAILABLE." 5222 is the non encryption port (like port 80.) 5223 is the encryption port (like 443).

      443 is SSL, not TLS. When you have a TLS web server, it's still on port 80 and clients such as Firefox encrypt when talking to said server. Check Preferences/Advanced/Security on Firefox.

      Another example is SMTP, these days most SMTP servers use TLS. TLS uses the same port, and encryption is negotiated. Run this command on an SMTP server that supports encryption:

      $ openssl s_client -starttls smtp -showcerts -connect server:25

      You will see that connecting via telnet or openssl 's TLS configuration will still connect to port 25.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    49. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      According to Google, it is not encrypted.

      12. Can you tell me more about Google Talk and privacy?

      "Google Talk currently does not encrypt chats or calls. But we are working hard to make many improvements to Google Talk while it is in beta, and we plan to fully support encryption of chats and calls before our official release."


      That means that the payload isn't encrypted. It doesn't state whether the connection to the server is encrypted. For example, if you go to https://www.gmail.com/ you will have an SSL connection to Gmail the whole time you are logged in. All of the e-mail you have doesn't magically convert to encrypted e-mail, but you are receiving it through an encrypted tunnel.

      There is a difference.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    50. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by lord+sibn · · Score: 1

      Hold on there, cowboy. We're not there yet.

      You say we've standardised on SMTP for email, and now we can all send mail to AOL users.

      You neglected to mention that AOL considers you a spammer by default and filters your SMTPD by subnet, based on whether they *believe* you have a dynamic IP address. You can send email to AOL users? Great.

      I don't know why I'd want to, but on the few occasions that I have tried, the message has bounced because AOL is convinced that I am conducting some illegal activity.

    51. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by mroell · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. You were quoted in a CNet article on the GIM Client.

      http://news.com.com/2100-1032-5842511.html

      --
      I have no sig.
    52. Re:ugh, throw it on the heap... by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      I know how PKI works and I always assumed trillian was susceptible to a MITM attack, but when you called it snake oil I was expecting you to tell me it used XOR or something :) I don't know how trillian encryption works, for all I know the pub keys are stored and distributed by cerulean studios making a MITM attack less likely, or perhaps it's just point to point encryption. I can't verify the encryption, and I don't know the system, but that's a pretty different situation than calling it "snake oil" like you did.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  10. nonstory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? The client isn't available...all this means is that you can get on GAIM with with your gmail account now and lock yourself into the google network.

  11. OMFG Google by katana · · Score: 2, Funny


    r u google? omfg! lol

  12. Meh by mstich · · Score: 1

    What's the point anyway? There are already dozens of jabber servers available that are potentially more extensible.

    1. Re:Meh by mattyohe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All it is is proof that google has a public jabber server.. One can assume they will be releasing a client anyday now... Let them at least... ANNOUNCE the product before you judge it.

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    2. Re:Meh by flibble-san · · Score: 2, Funny

      the point is... google is teh cool

      --
      My other sig is crap too
    3. Re:Meh by jarich · · Score: 1
      What's the point anyway? There are already dozens of jabber servers available that are potentially more extensible.

      Who is funding and maintaining all those IM servers? Looks like Google might start doing this for free! Just like GMail.

      The Gaim developers (and all the other IM clients) are always having to catch up to the latest protocol changes. With Google in the playing field, there might actually be a stable IM protocol standard. Changes to the protocol might be announced...

      This all looks like a good move to me.

    4. Re:Meh by themoodykid · · Score: 1

      I don't know what they'll offer users over other IM systems, but I bet they will mine conversations for general buzz that they can then sell to companies who are interested in what consumers are talking about. Just from sociological standpoint, it would be interesting to see if there are any common topics being discussed at any point in time. Like with gmail, there will be privacy concerns, but they'll probably argue that they will not tie together people directly to conversations and that they will have some bots combing through the talks versus human beings.

    5. Re:Meh by KeyserDK · · Score: 1

      It's already a standard, jabbber. No need to reinvent the wheel.

      --
      still reading?
    6. Re:Meh by loconet · · Score: 1

      So far from my testing, It automatically added people I added through the jabber client to my gmail account. This is also proof of integration with Gmail.

      --
      [alk]
    7. Re:Meh by bwalling · · Score: 1

      Are we really even sure that it isn't just the server for Hello?

    8. Re:Meh by mwigmani · · Score: 1
      Are we really even sure that it isn't just the server for Hello?
      Yup. Just downloaded the Google client here:

      http://www.google.com/talk/
    9. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. April 1st? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

    So is August 24th going to be the new April 1st of Google? All the on again off again rumors make it feel like an April Fool's Day joke and how Google typically handles that day.

    1. Re:April 1st? by mesach · · Score: 1

      Remember, Gmail was announced on April 1st, and it took several months for everyone to believe it was a real service that Google was offering.

      --
      moo.
  14. Try adding Google@gmail.com by OlivierB · · Score: 1

    and get disconnected + loose your buddy list...

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    1. Re:Try adding Google@gmail.com by OlivierB · · Score: 1

      Ok, GTalk is completely down now..
      It will drop your connection in 10 secs.

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    2. Re:Try adding Google@gmail.com by Cobra_666 · · Score: 1

      LOL Slashdot - a great way to stress-test your new service

    3. Re:Try adding Google@gmail.com by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Although it's rather surprising that *Google* of all companies is unable to cope with a Slashdotting. I mean, seriously - these guys have *hundreds of thousands* of servers in their farms. How many more do you need?

      Of course, they didn't officially announce the whole thing yet, so it may well be that they didn't anticipate the amount of load at this point, but if that's the case, then someone at Google deserves a naivity award for opening up the service to the public at this point and relying on the hope that nobody will find out that it's already working (and post it to Slashdot). :)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:Try adding Google@gmail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps since it is *NOT LAUNCHED* they are tinkering with the server and shutting it down for whatever reason. I have a feeling they know how to deal with scaling issues.

    5. Re:Try adding Google@gmail.com by kraiger · · Score: 1

      That's kind of early to pass that type of judgement... The service *ISN'T EVEN ANNOUNCED* yet! Don't pass judgement on a book that hasn't been released from the editors =P

  15. link ins... by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    I think google if they linked in extra services (search results over IM? Its been done by bot before). Plus cant you connect to aim via jabber on some servers?

    I'd like to see what google comes out with as a client, and what "features" they'll offer. Getting an IM notice of newly arrived email would be cool (Yes there is the desktop thinger, but IM's would be cooler)

    1. Re:link ins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Search through IM has been around for ages, look in any IRC' warez channel and you'll see dozens of query requests per minute.

      @find or @search

  16. Steps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    -- For iChat, just enter the information above.
    1. Add an account, select "Jabber" as the protocol.
    2. Your screen name is everything before the '@gmail.com'.
    3. Server is 'talk.google.com' as listed above.
    4. Click "show more options" and make sure "use TLS if available" is checked. Leave "Force old SSL" and "allow plaintext..." unchecked for now. Connection port should be 5222, connection server should be blank... if not just 'talk.google.com' without the quotes.
    5. Ta-da! Just login and you should be good-to-go.

    All the trouble and... no one's online. Anyone wanna break it down why I should use this thing?

    1. Re:Steps... by AndreiK · · Score: 2, Informative

      For gAIM, I found these steps worked: Screen name: Your account name, withoug the gmail. Server (The first one): is JUST 'gmail.com' Resource is whatever, I'm using 'talk' Connect Server: is 'talk.google.com' That should do it. And DONT click register. Just click save and log in.

  17. /.'d to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone provide a linky to the google page which allows you to do google talk instead of the weak server'd site listed?

    1. Re:/.'d to death by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0

      It's down again anyways, so don't bother.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  18. Re:AIM still owns the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL - yes, but not with AIM but with ICQ.

  19. can't get on by protocol420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GAIM won't let me on, using me@gmail.com as a username, it seems to be trying to resolve me@gmail.com@talk.google.com and fecking it up. anyone have ideas?

    --
    www.gaian-mind.org - eco-punk/crust coop and collective | www.anarchistfederation.org - so cal anarchist federation
    1. Re:can't get on by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah. Just put the part before the @ in the username box. That'll let you on.

      At least, it let me on.

    2. Re:can't get on by Tedddee · · Score: 2, Informative

      just use the first part for your username, "me"

    3. Re:can't get on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      your user name doesn't include the '@gmail.com'.

    4. Re:can't get on by Ratbert42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just use "me" as the username, without the @gmail.com. I got on with GAIM just fine.

    5. Re:can't get on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fields:

      Username: Gmail logon WITHOUT @gmail.com
      Server: talk.google.com

    6. Re:can't get on by All_Star25 · · Score: 1

      Take off the "@gmail.com." Worked for me.

  20. Eh by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google Talk is great, but what I REALLY need is 'Google ShutUp' to make the irritating people I know go away while providing them with targetted, text-based ads.

    1. Re:Eh by RyLaN · · Score: 1

      Get Your Sexual Meds Now U.S. Pharmacy, Low Prices Safe, Easy, Overnight. www.directusrx.com Learn more about VIAGRA® www.viagra.com Ask your doctor about a free Viagra (sildenafil citrate) sample5/100mg - Buy Online Next Day Delivery Discreet There you are.

      --
      At least the war on the environment is going well
    2. Re:Eh by youngerpants · · Score: 1

      I already have this. Its called Firefox with the "CustomiseGoogle" extention.

  21. It works. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    It works.

    *Stupid comment begins*
    Someone IM me.
    *Stupid comment ends*

  22. http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's another nice jabber client for windows available here http://www.miranda-im.org/.

    It supports AIM, ICQ, Jabber, IRC, MSN and maybe some others.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Ark42 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Like Trillian, Miranda-IM doesn't support ICQ if you put AIM contacts on your ICQ contact list. Unlike Trillian, Miranda will let you use your ICQ UIN as an AIM account, and load the full and proper contact list, but it will then leave all of your ICQ contacts as just numbers. Either way, it's entirely useless, just like Trillian, and people like me still have to use ICQ 2003b to fully utilize their existing contact list.

    2. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile I can't figure out how to connect to Google Talk trough Miranda. GAIM Worked fine tough...

    3. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Wonko42 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Here's an idea: use the ICQ protocol for your ICQ contacts and use the AIM protocol for your AIM contacts. I know, I know, it doesn't make any sense, but it works, believe it or not!

      Now if only I could figure out how to put on these damn pants. I can never seem to get them past my shoulders...

    4. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Tsian · · Score: 1

      Umm, whats wrong with setting up Trillian (or, I presume Miranda) with one AIM and one ICQ account?

    5. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work because the AIM people already on my ICQ contact list have my ICQ UIN in their AIM. I don't want to have to give out a new account to half of the people. The worst part is when the AIM contacts are ignored, so are any incoming messages from those AIM contacts!
      Yes, getting a AIM account which is not an ICQ UIN would work, but it also means redoing all my contact lists, for no real gain other then changing clients. I don't want all that hassle, and I like having 1 single IM account to keep track of.

    6. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      Telling all the AIM people on my ICQ contact list to no longer send messages to that account, but instead to a brand new account, for no reason other then to change my IM client.

    7. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1

      Honest question: Why won't Miranda allow me to put the '@' character in my jabber username (necessary for using the gmail address as the username)?

    8. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      Or use Jabber instead and let the Jabber server work out dealing with AOL's inability to make their own systems play nice with each other...

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    9. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't AOL, the problem is both Trillian and Miranda have only partial ICQ support. ICQ 2003b works just fine.

    10. Re:http://www.miranda-im.org/ by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      If the problem wasn't AOL, IETF would have made ICQ or AIM the standard for instant messaging, not XMPP. It's not anybody's fault but their own that they don't publish the specs.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
  23. Re:AIM still owns the market by sonoluminescence · · Score: 1

    In europe MSN is pretty much king and yahoo second. Almost no one uses AIM.

    --
    Karma: Bad. Calmer, good.
  24. OK by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Check this one - nn to the next round of breathless speculation about what Google will do.

    Will they release an office suite?
    Will they release a browser?
    Will they release a line of refrigerators?
    Will they purchase Oracle?
    Will they purchase Uruguay?
    Will they hire Stallman?
    Will they hire Ballmer?
    Will they hire Peter Griffin?

    I sure as hell don't know, but I'm sure I'll hear about it constantly on GashDot. Um... I mean Slashoogle. Er, that is... Slooshdot. Eh, fuck it.

    1. Re:OK by ResQuad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wasnt there mention of google making a Google branded version of firefox in the past? So thats possible.

      They could make a google branded open office.

      Will they buy oracle? No 'cause its not open source.

    2. Re:OK by big+tex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will they hire Peter Griffin?

      That would be freakin' sweet.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    3. Re:OK by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will they buy oracle? No 'cause its not open source

      Not until they buy it... muhahahaha!

    4. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on! We all know is Slappgle.org ;)

    5. Re:OK by MatthewNewberg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Peter Griffin? What about Stewie Griffin? Stewie would be more interested in googles plan of world domination and development of death rays on the moon then Peter would be. http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html

    6. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey...you're not Peter Griffin!

    7. Re:OK by killjoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Google should make a calender app. Then google itself could be a competitor for exchange. Then M$ (yea I said it but at least I figure if you call me a communist you have no cause to bitch) would be shitting bricks.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:OK by natrius · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be freakin' sweet.

      No, that would really grind my gears.

    9. Re:OK by clayasaurus · · Score: 1

      It's http://www.googledot.org/ , get it right! ;)

    10. Re:OK by hritcu · · Score: 1

      The answer is Yes.

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    11. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they buy the American government from Microsoft?

    12. Re:OK by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      They will purhase Slashdot. That one is for sure.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    13. Re:OK by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/tenthings. html
      Google does not do horoscopes
      They won't buy Oracle.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    14. Re:OK by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen http://home.google.com? Check out this screenshot!

    15. Re:OK by sebisor · · Score: 1

      You meant: Will they buy Microsoft?
      Will they fire Ballmer?

    16. Re:OK by Kalgash · · Score: 1

      Go to your options. See the Google Topic. Deselect it and leave your 'humour' elsewhere. GOOG 4EVA hehe

    17. Re:OK by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean Red Hat, right?

      How many things has Google boutht and opened the code?

      Now ask the same question about Red Hat...

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  25. Great News! by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm very happy that this indicates they may be using the Jabber protocol for IM. I've been using it for my friends and family (I run my own Jabber server behind an OpenVPN network) for quite some time now and it's a much nicer protocl than any of the other ones out there. The main reason being that it's free/open. Plus, I don't need to change my chosen clients to talk to the rest of the world now since anyone who matters (to me) has a GMail account. Here's to Google making a wise choice yet again! :)

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Great News! by humina · · Score: 1
      Too bad that Jabber server of yours can't communicate with those googletalk servers until you "federalize" with them:

      http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#service_ 4

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    2. Re:Great News! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Well, the server I run is intended to be private. It's how I keep in touch with my friends and family and don't have to worry about my chat becoming someone else's intellectual property. (Until some ISPs start claiming copyright on everything that traverses their networks from the way things are going)

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  26. Google spellchecking by flibble-san · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they will add Google-style spellchecking... omfg lol rofl - Did you mean "I'm a sad script kiddy?"

    --
    My other sig is crap too
    1. Re:Google spellchecking by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      s/script kiddy/preteen girl/

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Google spellchecking by evanism · · Score: 0

      no, like you know, omg, like, duh its nothing like that....

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
  27. ok, the server works by mecro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, so their server works. That's the part that most of us don't care about. What sort of client will GIM be using? Isn't that what makes it or breaks it for most of us?

    1. Re:ok, the server works by sonoluminescence · · Score: 1

      Dunno about you, I'll be using Gaim

      --
      Karma: Bad. Calmer, good.
    2. Re:ok, the server works by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What sort of client will GIM be using? Isn't that what makes it or breaks it for most of us?
      Why would it be? I will just keep using Psi as I always did. But what is good now is that more people will use Jabber on their side, making life easier for me (sure, there are transports already, but they are not feature-complete, and sometimes simply buggy).
    3. Re:ok, the server works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to speculate that it will be a sweet browser-based client ala gmail with the ability to connect with a Jabber compliant PC-based client.

      Just my $0.02.

    4. Re:ok, the server works by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      A cool client would be nice, yes, but I'd like to know whether or not they're going to enable transports to other services.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    5. Re:ok, the server works by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Optimally, it would be a jabber client in the form of a Google Desktop sidebar plugin. Of course, since both the sidebar API and the Jabber protocol are open, that's bound to happen at no cost to Google all on its own.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    6. Re:ok, the server works by Swaffs · · Score: 1

      I too use Psi, and so far, I can't seem to log in to talk.google.com. Have you had any success?

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    7. Re:ok, the server works by anethema · · Score: 1

      Why dont you just download it at talk.google.com to see it? Its a very simple client.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    8. Re:ok, the server works by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Forget about what the instructions on their website say, tick both the SSL and allow plaintext checkboxes, and there you go.

    9. Re:ok, the server works by cmeans · · Score: 1
      Thanks...I spent 10 minutes trying to figure out why it wasn't working before I decided to google the answer, and your comment showed up.

  28. Searchable IM's, yay! by qw0ntum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's going to be great to be able to leverage Google search stuff into IM conversations. I know, we already have logs and Google Desktop, but the same could have been said about email prior to Gmail. I know I make use of Gmail's powerful search on at least a weekly basis. After your messages reach the thousands, it makes things so much easier, and I'm sure most people IM more than they email.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:Searchable IM's, yay! by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      adium for OS X already has thie capability; highlight a word or phrase, right click, select "search in google". There's also a "search in spotlight", which could be handy for searching contacts and calander events.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  29. Made Clear? by Azarael · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reasoning behind google sponsoring so many people to work on GAIM for summer of code? Maybe they will release a gaim based client?

    1. Re:Made Clear? by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      Too bad none of gaim's SoC projects have anything to do with Jabber...

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    2. Re:Made Clear? by Azarael · · Score: 1

      No, but you might consider some of them to be general improvements that will help gaim become more mainstream.

    3. Re:Made Clear? by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      As far as *nix goes, gaim is the mainstream when it comes to IM clients -- especially multi-protocol ones. As far as being something that a huge number of people use (like the official AIM client, etc'), the only way I see gaim getting mainstream-status is if AOL, MSN, Yahoo, etc open up their IM protocols. For example, all of the things we know about Oscar (the protocol AIM uses) is through reverse engineering it. If you've used gaim on AIM for more than a few hours you'll see it suffers from it. Every 3rd party client has the same problem and there's no way around it without some brilliant hacking, or the opening of the protocols' specs.

      Don't get me wrong. I'm all for F/OSS in the mainstream, and when the SoC projects make it into releases I'll be chomping at the bit to take advantage of them, but even with some of the cool things the gaim SoC'ers are working on, there's still quite a few proprietary hurdles yet to jump in order to have a shot at Mainstream-IM-Client status.

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    4. Re:Made Clear? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      According to the GAIM webpage, GAIM received the second most applications for Summer of Code, first place being Google itself. Market driven, it seems like, and not a plan by Google.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    5. Re:Made Clear? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Ummm... I use Gaim as my main IM client and I (mostly) use Windows. The only problems I have noticed with Gaim's AIM support are (1) it tends to show more generic error messages (specifically, if you add a buddy to a full buddy list, the official AIM client will say something about too many buddies, but Gaim will just say error adding buddy) and (2) lack of voice and video support, which is being worked on, but I would not use anyway. It that what you were referring to?

      As a note, I have gotten a few of my not so techy friends to switch to using Gaim instead of the official AIM client because of its lack of ads and support for spell-checking.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    6. Re:Made Clear? by plott · · Score: 1

      In Europe MSN is more used. And, if you don't have the games + winks + oversized ugly OK signs ehn you type ok (or other words, of course), the IM isn't going anywhere.

    7. Re:Made Clear? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Gaim can do the emoticons (it should come with them, but I do not use MSN much, so I do not know about the MSN ones), but games support is a lot more difficult, and it is probably not a focus of the Gaim team.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
  30. smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now! by sootman · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Thirty-odd comments and the site is little slow. Just in case...)

    I'm on Google Talk right now.
    Google Talk = Google's new IM service that they're announcing tomorrow.

    All you need is a Jabber-compatible Instant Messaging client (such as Apple's iChat, or GAIM), and a GMail address. Digg this, NOW!

    WELCOME SLASHDOT!

    Server: talk.google.com
    Username: youremail@gmail.com **OR** youremail@talk.google.com (pick one)
    Password: yourpassword

    Note: If you can't login, try to turn off 'Secure Messaging' or 'Encryption'... etc.

    -- TRILLIAN USERS: Someone just told me that they got it working with Trillian, but I can't verify this. Just go to Trillian's plugin page on their site and download the Jabber plug-in, install it, and configure a new connection as below:
    "server : talk.google.com
    port : 5222
    Use legact SSL for connection : not checked"

    How to set it up with GAIM on Windows/Linux, or Adium on the Mac:
    -- For iChat, just enter the information above.
    1. Add an account, select "Jabber" as the protocol.
    2. Your screen name is everything before the '@gmail.com'.
    3. Server is 'talk.google.com' as listed above.
    4. Click "show more options" and make sure "use TLS if available" is checked. Leave "Force old SSL" and "allow plaintext..." unchecked for now. Connection port should be 5222, connection server should be blank... if not just 'talk.google.com' without the quotes.
    5. Ta-da! Just login and you should be good-to-go.

    Another user reports the following:
    "weird, I've never sent you email from my gmail, and now that you're on my buddy list on google talk, it autofilled your email address, and alias on my gmail"
    -- The "/me" command works too, even on iChat. "/me says hi" translates to "smash says hi" or whatever if you're not familiar!

    Feel free to IM around with fellow GMail users just by adding their addresses to your list! I'm not sure how long this is going to work, but let's make the best of it.

    UPDATE: I'm online right now, give me a hollar if you're able to login! I'm talking with someone I added to my list. :)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  31. No s2s support? by MysticOne · · Score: 1

    I just logged in using my account information and noticed that it's not letting me connect to other Jabber servers/services. Perhaps they're not planning on supporting server-to-server and allowing their Jabber server to talk to others? Hopefully that won't be the case.

    Also, does anyone have any idea which Jabber server they're using? Did they roll their own or are they using an already available one?

    1. Re:No s2s support? by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      They obviously modified it; it supports the google user cookie format as an authentication mechanism. Which makes me wonder if they will use a modified connection component and AJAX for a web-based client.

    2. Re:No s2s support? by tiptone · · Score: 1

      I would be extremely surprised at this point if the speculated IM client wasn't browser-based (no, I won't use that useless, made up, psuedo-acronym). They've just got at least a couple of teams that are so good at it. They've got most of the cross-browser problems solved, though I am still surprised how much stuff they have that's Windows only.

      And I'm also speculating about a client that is pure speculation sooo, take that big block of salt over there with you when you leave.

      --
      Please don't read my sig.
  32. Not Really? by 13bPower · · Score: 1

    I mean, yeah you can use a client to connect to google, but you can connect to any jabber server with Gaim or whatever, right? I think the cool stuff starts if/when google releases their own client.

  33. insider source? by netdur · · Score: 1

    how poeple could know about talk.google.com and that jabber server running up?

    --
    "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
    1. Re:insider source? by wilf · · Score: 1

      they discovered talk.google.com days ago

      and today they discovered (via telnet) that if you sent it the right queries it replied like a jabber server does.

      s'not rocket science really.

    2. Re:insider source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      have a cron job to do a dictionary search of *.google.com every few hours....

    3. Re:insider source? by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      Strange that it took so long ... 5222 is the standard jabber c2s port. And jabber responds if you telnet in and type anything at all, followed by enter.

  34. Great by dtfinch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I have yet another account with no buddies in Gaim.

    1. Re:Great by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      <AOL>

      Me Too !!!!!

      </AOL>

    2. Re:Great by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Don't worry,it appears the server was just up temporarily and is down again. They probably had it up for testing unless I see it come back on again in the next few minutes.
      Regards,
      Steve

    3. Re:Great by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'd let you add me, if it weren't for the fact that they're now giving me 405 errors :(

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:Great by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      So register with some transports and add your legacy IM account buddy lists to your Jabber buddy list. It really isn't that hard if your Jabber client supports service discovery (otherwise, dump Trillian, scrap that stupid GAIM and use a real Jabber client like Psi so you can take advantage of it).

      Once you have that done, convert your friends to Jabber and replace their legacy IM network contacts with a single Jabber ID.

      Easier done than said, it really is.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    5. Re:Great by dougllio · · Score: 1

      It's back up

      --
      Take it easy. But take it. And if you can get it easy - take it twice.
  35. No Communication with other Jabber Servers? by Sarkoon · · Score: 1

    I was able to setup a jabber client and log in successfully, however when I try to add contacts they never get any subscription request. And if i try it the other way around (try to add my gmail JabberID to my other jabber accounts) the request never gets to my gmail account.

    Is this intentional? Is Google trying to create yet another closed network? Or have they simply not enabled server-to-server functionality yet?

    -Sarkoon

    1. Re:No Communication with other Jabber Servers? by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping they simply have not yet enabled s2s...

  36. Serious idea by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How about the /. editors collecting up all of the stories about google into one posting a day? It's not that I'm completely uninterested in the subject. But multiple free ads for google every day is kinda annoying. But then, of course, the editors would have to actually edit.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Serious idea by willfe · · Score: 1

      The editors have done their jobs -- note all these Google-related articles appear in the Google section of Slashdot's article system. Go hit up your profile page (select "Preferences," I believe) and turn off the Google section if you're sick of seeing that news on the front page, then go visit the Google section manually when you decide you want a Google news fix.

      Works with all the other sections, too :)

      --
      Read my stuff.
  37. In other news by grazzy · · Score: 1

    Google sets up web-server, supports HTTP 1.0!

    Once again Google really comes thru and shows all these evil monopolies that following standards will give us nerds cleaner beards, less dampened basements and perhaps a girlfriend.

    1. Re:In other news by SumDog · · Score: 1

      You're being sarcastic right?

      None of google's websites have a DOCTYPE nor do they validate. If anything Microsoft is trying harder to conform to web standards than Google!

  38. IM Client - Mac OS X by nighty5 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using http://adium.sourceforge.net/ for a while now, it totally rocks.

    1. Re:IM Client - Mac OS X by remove+office · · Score: 2, Informative

      incidentally, Adium was just updated today as well.

      Adium is a fasat and free instant messaging client which supports AIM, ICQ, Jabber, MSN, Yahoo!, Yahoo! Japan, Bonjour, Gadu-Gadu, Novell Groupwise, and Lotus Sametime. Adium supports beautiful WebKit message display, tabbed messaging, encrypted chat, file transfer, and more. Give it a try; you won't look back.

      oh, and it's based on gaim too.

    2. Re:IM Client - Mac OS X by mblase · · Score: 1

      I don't think Adium is any better than, say, iChat. It's not much better than Yahoo Messenger or AIM, either.

      What it does do, of course, is provide connectivity to all those and a few more besides in a single app. Not a big deal to me, but my daughter has a few dozen people she chats with online, and some of them have MSN, some have YM, and some have AIM. I got tired of the Mac being cluttered with so many IM apps, so I forced everyone to use Adium now instead. Didn't even take long for them to get used to it, and I think they're happier, too.

    3. Re:IM Client - Mac OS X by roach2002 · · Score: 1

      I'd say Adium is better than iChat, Gaim, and Yahoo Messneger.

      Adium gets out of your way when you're talking, iChat is too cartoony for me - and the lack of a name (since it uses buddy icons instead) is distracting.

      Hovering over a user's name and seeing their status and picture is nice - in Gaim you see a lot that isn't relevant.

      The fact Adium doesn't have ads makes it instantly nicer than the AIM client.

      MSN's client is pretty awful, at least on OS X.

      The polish & ability to let you get what you want done on Adium is very nice - something that I never found on another chat client.

      Your milage may vary - but Adium and Quicksilver are the 2 major reasons I'll stick with Adium.

      (Disclaimer: pretty soon I'm hoping to be an Adium bugfix contributor)

    4. Re:IM Client - Mac OS X by bot24 · · Score: 1

      It was updated, yes, but there are some issues that are popping up with the new client. Some people are having contacts disappear/stay offline, and avoid the "Pushpin" theme, because it will cause Adium to hang. Hopefully there will be a prompt bugfix release.

    5. Re:IM Client - Mac OS X by wandazulu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I completely agree with you...as soon as I fired it up I though that it was much cleaner than Fire, and when I saw all the options (they have a separate website at AdiumExtras) I was hooked. I love the customization...I now have a Hobbes dock icon and the sounds from a Japanese train station. Awesome!

  39. This is all fine and dandy but.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    This is all fine and dandy but some of us can't even get to our e-mail. For the last few days all I get is " Gmail is temporarily unavailable. Cross your fingers and try again in a few minutes. We are sorry for the inconvenience." whenever I try to log in. Rather than mess around with new things why not fix the damn problems with the current ones?

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:This is all fine and dandy but.. by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, I haven't had this problem in months. Perhaps it's on your end- GMail is very JavaScript heavy, plus the fact that it uses some kind of AJAX-style mojo to send data, I'd bet it's connection-sensitive.

    2. Re:This is all fine and dandy but.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      I have two accounts. My private one works perfectly, my newlists/spam/annoying friends one doesn't.. :/

      --
      I like muppets.
    3. Re:This is all fine and dandy but.. by Dicky · · Score: 1

      AH! So it's not just me!

      I've not been able to get in since Sunday, but all my friends seem to be able to get in fine. I've tried with multiple browsers from multiple computers running multiple OSs on multiple continents, with cookies/cache cleared where needed...

      I tried mailing a help address, but all I got back was a "We can't reply to mail sent to this address, but here's how to reset your password" which didn't really help.

      Do me a favour, let me know if you get back in or find any help anywhere...

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
    4. Re:This is all fine and dandy but.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Of course and if you find anything could you pass it along please?

      Google groups have some things reported. Some saying it's been fixed for them. No idea why it's happening but really annoying :/

      --
      I like muppets.
    5. Re:This is all fine and dandy but.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      back up this morning, no clue why.

      --
      I like muppets.
  40. yay! by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

    I'm logged on right now using

    server: talk.google.com
    username: google/gmail username
    password: duh!

    I think all of us geeks are extremely happy google is using this protocol. Yay google!

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:yay! by Sixpack,+Joe · · Score: 1

      You really shouldn't post your password to public fourms.

      --
      Joseph Sixpack - Representing the average pc user from Americas heartland since the day before yesterday.
  41. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by cortana · · Score: 1

    So they aren't supporting TLS? :(

  42. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does not appear to be working with my account via Fire on OS X. It's asking me if I want to create the user...yet I have a gmail account.

  43. Re:AIM/MSN still owns the market by Sweetshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Despite attempts at breaking into the instant messenging market, I believe AOL still rules the market, atleast here in the US. Yahoo, MSN, etc. didn't really decrease the market share of AIM. I doubt this Google IM thing will be any different.

    In europe MSN is pretty much king and yahoo second. Almost no one uses AIM.

    And which architecture was designed with the ability and the intention to bridge to those existing services?
    Right - only Jabber.
    Microsoft gets a bit of its own poison - embraced and extended by an open standard.

  44. works with miranda by gfody · · Score: 1

    just use your gmail login and dont forget to use SSL

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
  45. Damn, those nasty critters are everywhere! by kg_o.O · · Score: 1

    Am I the only only one starting to fear Google?

    1. Re:Damn, those nasty critters are everywhere! by kertong · · Score: 1

      Nope. There are plenty of other change-fearing paranoid individuals as yourself. :)

  46. gmail icks me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I know it's childish of me but if bill gates were handing out a thousand dollars and 50 golden fish rings to anybody with a golden fish ring and the only way to get the golden fish ring was to beg one off of somebody who had 50 of them and had gotten theirs in the same way, then I'd say, "Stick the thousand in your fish ring!". I've been offered a zillion GMail accounts and I just can't stomach the way they are being dolled out.

    1. Re:gmail icks me by SumDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason for their distribution pattern is a little to prevent abuse, a little to create a community network and to be honest, it was a really good beta testing idea.

      It prevents spammers auto-registering a ton (if someone starts to invite a bunch of spam bots, you can easily trace and break the propagation chain) and prevented the server from being overloaded during the initial run.

      From a Computer Science and Social Engineering standpoint, it was/is a good setup. Get over it.

    2. Re:gmail icks me by KFury · · Score: 1

      What's a fish ring?

    3. Re:gmail icks me by Nutshell_TA · · Score: 1

      but now everyone can get one by simply signing in here: https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount

    4. Re:gmail icks me by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

      unfortunately there is still a few pockets of people that are not in the loop (I met someone who once nearly shat himself when I told him I could send him an invite).

      --
      Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  47. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by cortana · · Score: 1

    Oops, I just realised that "legact" == "legacy". Never mind. :)

  48. Problems adding buddies? by ThyPiGuy · · Score: 1

    I'm connected via GAIM, but unable to add any buddies, or get anyone to be able to add me...

    Anyone else experience similiar problems?

    1. Re:Problems adding buddies? by Cutterex · · Score: 1

      Are you adding names using the @gmail.com after their username? That was the only way I could get it to work.

  49. Now that theres funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  50. What about Hello? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Google Hello lets you send images almost instantly to other Hello users and integrates with Google Picasa very well. Hello also has a built-in IM client for other Hello users. I actually use Hello at work to chat with my wife since all the other IM protocols are blocked where I work and Hello works over HTTP.

    Does anyone know if Hello will work with Google Talk? I don't feel like having to run Hello and Google Talk. However, if they do both work together, what would be the point of Google having both Hello and Google Talk?

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    1. Re:What about Hello? by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

      I don't feel like having to run Hello and Google Talk.

      Um... you don't have to run them both. You can just ignore Google Talk, and probably no one will notice. It may end up being another tool for the geeks that no one else notices.

    2. Re:What about Hello? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that the two would be combined.

      So, Google Talk('s Jabber client) would integrate all of the Hello features.

      Jabber does have file transfer capabilities, after all...

    3. Re:What about Hello? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      But it looks like Jabber runs on port 5222. So that means I cannot use Google Talk from work : (. I only use Hello at work so I can chat with my wife if she needs me for something. I personally would rather use a much more used IM protocol than Hello so I can also chat with other friends at work. Though with our firewall restrictions, only protocols that go over ports 80, 443, 21 and 25 (I know why do the MS admins allow telnet and not SSH?) are allowed.

      Oh, and have you used Hello? It is much more than IM and just transfering a file. Hello is Id10T proof. You just click a big button labeled "Transfer Picture" and it lets you pick from using Picasa or Explorer. It also integrates with Picasa so right from Picasa you can send a picture via Hello. I hope Google Talk will have the same features and be Corp-Firewall friendly.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    4. Re:What about Hello? by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      You can define a HTTP proxy in the account settings and create a username in a server that listen in port 443 (like amessage.info). You can even use any transport you want with this setup, from whichever server, it all goes throught the proxy.

      This works in at least Psi, both Linux and Windows.

    5. Re:What about Hello? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      You do know about Jabber 80, right? Ironically, a 30 second google search of Jabber.org would have saved you a lot of frustration on this problem.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    6. Re:What about Hello? by caluml · · Score: 1
      only protocols that go over ports 80, 443, 21 and 25 (I know why do the MS admins allow telnet and not SSH?)

      I don't see 23 in that list.

    7. Re:What about Hello? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      That is called a typo ; )

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    8. Re:What about Hello? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Nope. I never tried Jabber. I have never used IM's much. I just started recently for when my wife needs to ask me a quick question. I found Hello based on a recommendation of a friend and just started using that. I will take a look at Jabber.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  51. Works with tor, yeehaw! by mwilliamson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    looks like it allows connections from tor servers. I love routing my IM's over tor to stop prying eyes. ;-)

    1. Re:Works with tor, yeehaw! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Pardon my ignorance, but isn't your messages just going to routed all around the world for anyone on tor to see?

      Sure, they won't know where the messages came from - but they'll have snippets of the messages you are sending right? If your Google account name is there and any personal information you screwed right?

      I'm not bashing tor, just asking - respond with insightful/informative comments please. If you tell me that isn't a problem, I'll install tor right now.

    2. Re:Works with tor, yeehaw! by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

      It's actually all encrypted until the last node. Each node peels off a layer of encryption hence the term onion routing. No node but the last has knowledge of the message, and each node sees only the last and next hop. You'll have to use something like gaim-encryption to provide end-to-end encryption. Tor is, at this stage, mostly a proof-of-concept and shouldn't be used for anything really serious, but it's plenty to keep the local network admins from seeing my personal chats. ;-)

  52. so..... by Emperor+Cezar · · Score: 1

    Why is this better than anything else?

  53. Re:AIM still owns the market by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

    In fact, AIM only owns the market in the USA. Everywhere else in the world uses MSN.

  54. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DOH. Needed to check SSL. It's using port 5223, and now it's working. It doesn't care if I use a domain name in my username or not.

  55. opinion and some links by KarMax · · Score: 1

    Personally i take all of this Google "thing" (*paranoid*) with some doubts, the concentration of information (a LOT of personal data) never will be good.

    I use Jabber(i use it from centericq, imcom, Gaim, kopete, among others) for a long time ago, and i REALLY try to all my friends start using it, but they still use the (lack of "geek" features and stability) MSN Messenger. I really wait the Google IM program, becouse jabber exist for some time ago, and IMHO doesnt have ANY reason to use the Google servers. The good thing of this news is that maybe with the Google IM all my friends (and everybody) start using a FREE IM protocol (i say that for Jabber)

    --
    Rock and Roll
    1. Re:opinion and some links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Could you please speak english?

      If this is the way you talk on IM no wonder your friends ditch you.

    2. Re:opinion and some links by KarMax · · Score: 0, Redundant

      LOL "Anonymous Coward", you are right.... I wrote my previous comment sooo bad (BTW i lied i have no friends, nobody understand me)

      sed s/wtf/excellent comment/g PreviousComment >> NewComment

      All of this Google "thing" (*paranoid*) bring me some doubts... the centralization of data (a LOT of personal info) NEVER will be good.

      I hope that "Google IM" has the features that the "regular" user seek in his IM prog (all the "cool" stuff that MSN Messenger has), thus maybe my friends (and everybody) will begin to use a FREE IM protocol.

      Jabber (the FREE IM protocol) exists for some time ago and i dont see ANY reason to start using the talk.google.com (jabber server).

      --
      Rock and Roll
    3. Re:opinion and some links by arose · · Score: 1

      The problem is that talk.google.com does not (yet?) talk with other jabber servers. The good thing is that according to their privacy policy the conversations aren't recorded.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  56. Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can I possibly be the only one wondering if Google saw all the people chasing their own tails about a google messenger, and tossed a jabber server online just to mess with your heads?

    Or could it possibly just be the jabber server that google itself uses internally?

    Let me introduce you to "Grip", and suggest that it's a fine product that you all should get.

  57. iChat for Panther: No by feijai · · Score: 0

    So far as I know, the only iChat client which will work with Google Talk is iChat for Tiger. If you don't have Tiger, you're out of luck -- time to get another program.

  58. gaim by niteice · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, works perfectly in gaim.

    someone IM me

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    1. Re:gaim by niteice · · Score: 1

      opps, the "someone IM me" part was supposed to be in fake HTML "pathetic mode" tags, but /.'s crap HTML parser must have ruined it. let's try again:

      [pathetic mode]someone IM me[/pathetic mode]

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    2. Re:gaim by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually...

      Slashdot's "crap HTML parser" failed it correctly. <pathetic mode> is taken and compared with the valid tags. "pathetic" isn't a valid tag, so it's rejected (there's a couple VERY good reasons for this - they're called the "script" tag and the "embed" tag).

      Even if Slashdot had let it through, though, your browser would have ignored the tags anyway, as "pathetic" isn't a valid tag, last I checked...

      (btw - & lt; and & gt; were how I got the < and > (without the spaces between the & and the l or g))

    3. Re:gaim by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      Dude, use the HTML escape codes.
      &lt; will get you a <
      and
      &gt; will get you a >

      (Note that to make it look like that, I have to type something like: &amp;lt; to make it come out with the literal escape code (with the ampersand). And to say that, I have to use &amp;amp;lt; and to say that, I have to... ^_~)

      Anyway, to get:
      "<pathetic mode>someone IM me</pathetic mode>"
      You'd need to put:
      &lt;pathetic mode&gt;someone IM me&lt;/pathetic mode&gt;
      Weird, but you get the idea.
      Any good HTML reference should have an escape code table.

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
  59. dude how did you get me@gmail.com? by rebug · · Score: 1

    that is one sweet email address, man.

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
    1. Re:dude how did you get me@gmail.com? by Council · · Score: 1

      Sadly, they don't allow usernames with more than six letters. My standard username for years now has been 'xkcd', and I was getting pretty universal with it (AIM, I own xkcd.com, etc) and I was sad that I couldn't have xkcd@gmail.com.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    2. Re:dude how did you get me@gmail.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xkcd has fewer than six letters.

    3. Re:dude how did you get me@gmail.com? by Buran · · Score: 1

      Fewer than six. And it did that to me too. My usual name is five letters, and it wouldn't let me register it. So I had to use my AIM nick instead, and I don't really like my AIM nick.

  60. AP Press Release by Volcane · · Score: 3, Informative

    some news agencies are quoting a AP press report:

    http://www.kron4.com/Global/story.asp?S=3757295

  61. It adds buddies by it's self by sonoluminescence · · Score: 1

    I just set it up, then emailed someone from my gmail account (also to a gmail account), and it added them to my buddy list.

    Interesting stuff.

    --
    Karma: Bad. Calmer, good.
    1. Re:It adds buddies by it's self by Malyven · · Score: 1

      Also when someone is added to you google talk buddy list it adds them to your gmail address book.

    2. Re:It adds buddies by it's self by roach2002 · · Score: 1

      Which client are you using? Adium doesn't auto-add anyone to the client, but gmail will add them to the address book when added in Adium.

    3. Re:It adds buddies by it's self by roach2002 · · Score: 1

      Apparently it doesn't auto pull everyone from your address book, but after you first use Talk, it will add buddies when you email them.

    4. Re:It adds buddies by it's self by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      You have to select which contacts to add as friends - there's a button in the add contacts window.

  62. Trillian? by vivin · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to get it on Trillian Pro.

    I use me@gmail.com for the username, but for the connection, I use talk.google.com.

    It gets in, authenticates, and then disconnects with a series of "iq errors" (any idea what they are?):

    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:04:55] *** Creating connection "myusername@gmail.com/"
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:04:56] *** Server supports TLS encryption...
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:04:56] *** Negotiating XMPP SSL connection...
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:04:57] *** Connection established using EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (TLSv1/SSLv3)
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:05] *** Attempting to authenticate using PLAIN
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:06] *** Authenticated.
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:15] *** You have successfully connected to Jabber.
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:15] *** ERROR: iq error 501
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:15] *** Retrieved user roster from server.
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:16] *** ERROR: iq error 501
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:16] *** ERROR: iq error 503 from gmail.com
    [Tuesday, August 23, 2005 - 17:05:16] *** ERROR: iq error 503 from gmail.com

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Trillian? by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 0

      Don't know what they are, but ignore them, you're on (I'm using it right now)

    2. Re:Trillian? by vivin · · Score: 1

      Let me try it - the purple dot seems to show a disconnected state though (faded).

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    3. Re:Trillian? by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 0

      Make sure you changed the server to talk.google.com but kept the email the same.

    4. Re:Trillian? by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      At least you got further than I've been able to. I'm using Trillian Pro 2.013, and it crashes if I try to connect to talk.google.com using the jabber plugin. And before anyone says upgrade, this is a company purchsed license, and they don't see the need to pay again for version 3.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    5. Re:Trillian? by vivin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the server name is talk.google.com, and the username is [my gmail id]@gmail.com - seems to be working now, albeit with the iq errors. Thanks!

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    6. Re:Trillian? by vivin · · Score: 1

      It's working - sort of. Check it out here.

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    7. Re:Trillian? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can legitimately blame Google for your IQ errors, can you?

    8. Re:Trillian? by springbox · · Score: 1

      Well, you might end up noticing form the other posts that you don't include the @gmail.com in your user name when logging on. Maybe they should have been more explicit about that.

  63. Conference Rooms? by randomErr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there anyway to get a list of conference rooms on Google Talk?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Conference Rooms? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      Feel free to start up slashdot@conference.ursine.ca if you can't find it...

      --
      Help us build a better map!
  64. Find people to chat with here... by webwormx · · Score: 1

    http://groups-beta.google.com/group/google_im
    (google messenger google group)

    1. Re:Find people to chat with here... by qaq · · Score: 1

      all 3 of them?

    2. Re:Find people to chat with here... by webwormx · · Score: 1

      More like 53 at the time I write this and rapidly growing.

  65. Ya know what Google could do... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Add an AIM/Yahoo/MSN gateway to their Jabber server so we don't have to have 4 different IM connections. Then people could easily transition without having to use a multiservice IM client like Miranda or GAIM.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  66. if you don't like gaim, by ghee22 · · Score: 1
    although i'm a huge fan of gaim, the ubuntu guys are raving about another Jabber client. It's called Gajim

    from the site: Gajim is a Jabber client written in PyGTK. The goal of Gajim's developers is to provide a full featured and easy to use xmpp client for the GTK+ users. Gajim does not require GNOME to run, eventhough it exists with it nicely. Gajim is released under the GNU General Public License for windows, & lots of linux distros including an auto-package ...package.

    --
    "Persistence is annoying success." - ghee22 11:28:1999 - 10:53:PM
  67. automatically adds your gmail contacts by adpowers · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using Google Talk for a little while with my Gmail account and iChat. One interesting thing I noticed is every time you send an e-mail in Gmail, that person is automatically added to your buddy list as "Not Authorized" (where users I add are "Waiting for Authorization", at least until I talk to them). This is kind of annoying, since there are lots of people I contact using Gmail that I know will never get Jabber (for example, a mailing list e-mail address).

    Other than that, it seems really neat. Oh, also, icons and offline IM don't appear to work. If someone knows how to get those to work, I'd be interested to hear it.

    Andrew

    PS: You can jabber me at adpowers@gmail.com

    1. Re:automatically adds your gmail contacts by adpowers · · Score: 1

      loconet just pointed out to me that the reverse is true. If someone IMs you, they are automatically added to your Gmail contacts list. I confirmed this.

    2. Re:automatically adds your gmail contacts by srid · · Score: 2, Funny

      PS: You can jabber me at adpowers@gmail.com

      s/jabber/slashdot/

      --
      - srid
    3. Re:automatically adds your gmail contacts by davesag · · Score: 1

      welcome to viral marketing 101. cheers dave

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    4. Re:automatically adds your gmail contacts by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      the official client lets you have a contacts list and a friends list basically it works like an interface for the gmail addressbook.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  68. Not working for me by Council · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'm on, but not. (Gaim forces me to add a 'resource' field, which is by default 'Gaim', might have something to do with my problem.)

    It appears to connect, but I don't show up on my own buddylist and I can't send any messages. I don't see any of y'all. But it claims it's online.

    Anyone got more info?

    server: talk.google.com
    using the name from my gmail account (rmunroe).

    Any message I send gives me "Message delivery to [whoever] failed: (Code 404)"

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:Not working for me by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      GAIM is a poor excuse for a Jabber client and lacks many key features (off the top of my head, service discovery). Just use Psi instead.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    2. Re:Not working for me by Council · · Score: 1

      GAIM is a poor excuse for a Jabber client and lacks many key features (off the top of my head, service discovery). Just use Psi instead.

      I'm not about to run another program just to get on this experimental service. I use messengers heavily for messenging, not just to be there. But thanks for the client; hadn't heard of it. Maybe someday I'll have a reason to use it.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  69. Any Jabber transports? by the_1000th_Monkey · · Score: 1

    I haven't been able to log onto Google Talk with anything besides Gaim, which doesn't appear to list any Jabber transports available on the server.

    For the uninitiated: transports are servers that talk with the Jabber server to bridge protocols with other services (AIM, MSN, etc).

    I suspect there are none, because I don't think Google would want to attack AOL or Microsoft so directly. I'm sure that would end in a lawsuit. Though I'd believe it if there were a transport for Yahoo up there.

    --
    where'd my typewriter go?
    1. Re:Any Jabber transports? by socialist+fish · · Score: 1

      I also think that cross-server messaging is not working. If they don't enable that, I'm SO not using it....

      --
      yadda yadda
  70. GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google Talk ... and all that dark fibre Goggle has been buying up? This isn't just about instant messenger - Google is building the next voice communications network! With their new WiFi hotspots - it could be wireless voice communications (at least if you're in a major center).

    Bee-bee-boo-boop "Picard to all phone companies: You are being replaced."

    --
    - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
    1. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by dtk13 · · Score: 1

      I would sign up! I heart google. Google is becoming the digital area 51. People have some ideas and speculations to what goes on there but no one knows what goes on there for a fact. People have been wondering about that damn dark fiber for a while now. And how 'bout that 4 billion dollars they just added to the 'ol 2 billion account. What is going to come out of that? Im curous as heck too.

    2. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by Momoru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure how Google gets away with being so clandestine, yet people think they are not evil. It reminds me of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory... If Google is such a great open non evil company, how come their employees don't have public blogs like all those at MS? (In fact they fire the one person that had a semi famous blog) How come they are one of the most opaque companies on wall street in telling their shareholders what's going on? How come all their projects are so top secret despite the fact they end up just being another jabber knock off? I understand things like their search algorithim should be kept secret, but cripes why all the mystery?

    3. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by ankhank · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did you ever read a story called "The Sources of the Nile" by Avram Davidson?

      Imagine finding a way to know what people are going to be thinking about, talking about, asking for -- in advance.

      Well?

      You could, say, direct advertising to them based on what you knew, if you could do that.

      Email, digitized voice, a huge networked universe of fast computers growing all the time.

      The Internet sees Google as unthreatening, and uses Google as a preferred route.

      Has anyone ever asked the folks who came up with "Don't Do Evil" what the other half of their statement is? It must have a corollary.

      I suspect it's -- Be God.

    4. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Well, they are a company of a GOOD Evil Genius! ;)

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    5. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      How come they are one of the most opaque companies on wall street in telling their shareholders what's going on? How come all their projects are so top secret despite the fact they end up just being another jabber knock off?

      Because one of their competitors is Microsoft, who have a long history of finding out what their competitors are going to do, and then either beating them to it or making it very hard to do.

      Google is so ubiquitous it's easy to forget that, in many ways, they're still the little guy in comparison to some of their competitors. Keeping quiet about what they're doing is a valuable survival stategy, they'd be idiots not to use it.

      --
      So.. it has come to this
    6. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I'm a Google employee, and I have a public blog. I don't advertise it as "the blog of a Google employee", and I'm not dumb enough to talk about confidential stuff on it.

      I suspect that we just don't feel it's worth spewing information on how to use Google. I read two MS blogs - one of them talks about how to program Windows, one of them talks about Windows history. Google doesn't really need either of those.

      Of course I could be wrong on all of this, I'm not in PR, but there's certainly nothing you sign that says "you must not under any circumstances make a public blog".

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    7. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Google is so ubiquitous it's easy to forget that, in many ways, they're still the little guy in comparison to some of their competitors.

      I'm not sure they are the "little guy" anymore by anyone's definition...with 4,100 employees, a market cap of $80 bil (larger then Time Warner, Yahoo, and Ebay, Amazon), and a warchest of now $6 bil in cash (larger then Yahoo, Ebay, Amazon) really the only competing software company that is consistently larger then them is Microsoft. And although they are definitely a company to fear based on previous tactics, I'm sure MS could find out what Google is up to before reading it in the LA Times if they wanted to.

    8. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

      Looking at the devoper page http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html

      Google Talk supports XMPP with the beta release. We plan to support SIP in a future release.

      Then yes, they are planning on building the next voice comms network.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    9. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by davesag · · Score: 1

      nice thought, and obvious really. the first thing i tried iChat to iChat via googletalk was a voice chat. it worked fine.

      i didn't realise google were also rolling out wifi hotspots. i guess that's US only right now, or are they really thinking large and rolling out world wide with some sort of Sat based WiMax service?

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    10. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --I understand things like their search algorithim should be kept secret, but cripes why all the mystery?--

      It's just marketing. Just like Coke has a secret formula, KFC has a secret recipe. It's there just to make you think they know something others don't and therefore that makes them better.

    11. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      I think that the grandparent answers you very nicely. What if they are planning on using wireless net, dark fiber, and Google talk to launch a "free" (only pay the cost of phone) alternative to cellular in all of the major metropolitan markets? Talk about a revolution...

      But this is a war they would definitely not want to fight head-on. If the cell companies cannot kill it legally (and you can bet their lobbyists would try), they would simply copy them.

      Look at how Gmail took the internet by storm, look at how much ground they gained while their competitors struggled to play catchup. How effective would their Gmail coup have been if they had announced it years before it was ready?

      Don't get me wrong, I don't advocate unconditional trust of any for-profit corporation, but I find nothing odd or wrong or evil about their development process being kept secret. On the contrary, if Google really is committed to being non-evil, keeping their products a secret until launch may well be the only way in which they can remain competitive.

    12. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by Momoru · · Score: 1

      What if they are planning on using wireless net, dark fiber, and Google talk to launch a "free" (only pay the cost of phone) alternative to cellular in all of the major metropolitan markets?

      There are many problems with that idea...you can't lay that kind of infrastructure without the cell phone companies knowing, Google can't offer something that expensive for free (want ads in your phone calls?) and that has even less to do with search then any of their other ideas.

      But that crazy speculation aside, I understand wanting secrecy in launching new products, hell it got them like 6 stories on Slashdot just for their talk client...but it's the way that everything about Google, not just their products is secret. As I mentioned above, Mark Jen got fired just for saying "they have some cool stuff coming up next year" without giving any details. When investors wanted a tour of Google's financials, they got the "Chief Food Officer". Meanwhile insiders dump shares at uncanny rates and the company gets billions more on the open market. In a recent presentation they showed a server room but completely dimmed, so no one could tell what was going on?...wtf about a bunch of blinking servers could be so top secret? I'm just saying that all the secrecy surrounding the company gives it an eerie feeling, it doesn't feel like a legitimate, out in the open company....you would think a company that prides itself on being non evil would be completely transparent...and take this chat client for instance, there is nothing new or unique about it...it didn't tap into some gold mine or start some revolution so why the secrecy?

    13. Re:GoogleTalk + Dark Fibre = Internet Phone System by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Has anyone ever asked the folks who came up with "Don't Do Evil" what the other half of their statement is? It must have a corollary.
      Protect the innocent.
      Uphold the law.

      ;-)
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  71. MOD PARENT UP by Justin205 · · Score: 1

    I normally don't do this, but parent has a good point.

    Port 5223 seems to work with SSL when port 5222 doesn't work. (On iChat, right now, SSL + port 5223.)

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  72. How to get it work in trillian by staeiou · · Score: 1

    After some configing, I got it to work in trillian.

    Go to the preferences menu, click on plugins, and make sure the jabber plugin is enabled. If you don't have the jabber plugin, you'll have to download it from cerulean studio's website (I'll let someone else karma whore for posting it). Then, click on the purple dot that has just appeared right next to the yellow, green, blue, etc., dots.

    Click "add a new connection", then use your gmail account @ talk.google.com. Click connect. There ya go.

    1. Re:How to get it work in trillian by bigblueball · · Score: 1
      --
      What does that tag cloud look like? http://www.jeffhester.net/
  73. Dr. Ruth Says by Mr_Krabs · · Score: 1

    I'm doing it right now!

  74. Kinda interesting by damionfury · · Score: 1

    Hmm...I wonder how long talk.google.com will take before there's an actual site there. For that matter, I wonder how long it's been up.

  75. Good going.. by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot effect meets Instant Messaging!

    1. Re:Good going.. by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just figured that out the hard way. I think google pulled my account, because I'm getting a 405 not allowed error when I try to connect.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:Good going.. by Tester · · Score: 1

      arrrgg.. I'm getting a 405 too.. with both of my gmail accounts... Well I guess I'll try later

    3. Re:Good going.. by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

      dude i'll give you eight bucks for your slashdot account ... paypal work for you?

  76. Kopete by l0perb0y · · Score: 1

    Anyone get Kopete to work with this thing?
    No luck here. I've tried different combos of un/encryption settings and different permutations of usernames.

    1. Re:Kopete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With kopete 0.10.3 and kde 3.4.2

      Jabber ID: username@gmail.com

      connection tab...
      X Use Protocol encryption (SSL)
      X Allow plain-text password authentication
      X Override default server information
            talk.google.com 5223

    2. Re:Kopete by dJCL · · Score: 4, Informative

      Used my gmail address for username, same pw.
      On the second Tab I checked the first 3 boxes and set the server to talk.google.com with port auto set to 5223.

      I had an error with qca tls on connection, but an apt-get install qca-tls later I was online.

      Now if only all my contacts would get over to google messenger we would be set...

      JCLoony [is at] gmail [you know the rest]

      --
      On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
    3. Re:Kopete by l0perb0y · · Score: 1

      I guess I had to tick both allow plain-text and use ssl.

      Working on kde 3.4.1 kopete 0.10.2.

      Now, if only the voice feature worked in something besides their Windows-only client.

    4. Re:Kopete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks that got it working for me!

    5. Re:Kopete by hauer · · Score: 1

      Kopete connected just fine for the first try for me, no hassle whatsoever

    6. Re:Kopete by Stauf · · Score: 1

      Also works if you just tick the 'Use SSL' box, without having to install qca-tls.

    7. Re:Kopete by testerus · · Score: 1

      Not for me. It worked only after I did urpmi libqca1-tls

  77. They are on to us! by penguinix · · Score: 1

    Looks like Google is getting abit mad that we ruined the big surprise and has starting disconnecting people now. Why would they do this after the secret has already been leaked? Is there some bigger feature in there that Google does not want us to discover?

    1. Re:They are on to us! by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Or they may be testing things and rebooting the server periodically. It's not supposed to be up yet, if there's downtime you have no right to complain. FWIW, I just got connected now. Kopete doesn't seem to like it, but gaim connected easily enough.

    2. Re:They are on to us! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't stay connected either. GAIM (for Windows) won't log the attempts either or I'd provide them for all to see.

  78. Service locked? by Wizarth · · Score: 1

    I was connected to it, just got disconnected, timed out a reconnect, tried again, and got 403: Forbidden. Have they just locked down because of the pre-announcement?

    Wait till tomorrow for it to really launch, I guess.

    1. Re:Service locked? by Lozay_2k · · Score: 0

      I get the same thing too.

  79. Working via Trillian Pro by bigblueball · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got it working via Trillian Pro, and posted the details here: here. Works great, but nothing to get excited about. Right now it looks and acts like a standard Jabber server. I'm more interested to see if they'll include connectors for the other IM networks (I suspect they will) and what the Google Talk client looks like. With multi-network support, a no-nonsense UI (while most IM programs are nonsense-full), and voice chat (or better yet, VoIP) support -- Google Talk will rock.

    --
    What does that tag cloud look like? http://www.jeffhester.net/
    1. Re:Working via Trillian Pro by TGK · · Score: 1

      Key to making this work is patience. For me it took about 60-90 seconds for Trillian to connect to the google server and indicate that the connection was successfull. Once it's configured, just hit connect and wait. Be patient, it takes a while.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    2. Re:Working via Trillian Pro by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      When I try to connect with the Trillian Pro Jabber plugin, I get...

      [23:04] *** Creating connection "[ID redacted]@talk.google.com/Trillian"
      [23:04] *** XMPP Error: iq error 405 from unspecified: unspecified
      [23:04] *** Connect: Unknown account failure.

      What am I doing wrong?

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    3. Re:Working via Trillian Pro by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Your user ID needs to be your gmail address (i.e. username@gmail.com). You then need to manually change the server to talk.google.com - it will default to gmail.com.

  80. Those Rascals by fracex · · Score: 1

    Who wants to bet that google just set up a jabber server to mess with all of our minds?

  81. iChat != Jabber Compatible by Omega · · Score: 1
    All you need is a Jabber-compatible Instant Messaging client (such as Apple's iChat, or gaim), and a GMail address.
    Evidently this is some new use of the word "compatible" that I am not aware of. iChat mangles Jabber roster lists, screws up Jabber chat rooms and doesn't handle away notifications properly.

    I'd say stick with Adium for now.

  82. Help me out here... why Jabber? by mblase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand that (a) Jabber is XML and open protocol and all that, and (b) anyone can install a Jabber server, and (c) Jabber provides secure connections to said server, in Google's case by default.

    Granted all this. But speaking as someone who's just running a client, why should I care? Aside from the secure connection, will chatting on Jabber be much different for me than chatting on Yahoo or AOL or ICQ?

    With GMail, there's a web-based client which has a lot of whiz-bang features that clearly distinguish it from AOL Webmail or Yahoo Mail. But I need a chat client to connect anyway, and it's the client's features that impress me, not the protocol.

    Hmm, perhaps I just answered my own question.

    1. Re:Help me out here... why Jabber? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      It's google. 'Do no evil'. Jabber is open source, therefore jabber is good. If they made their own protocol, it couldn't be much better than Jabber, and it'd most likely be copyright, which is evil, and incompatible with current clients and services, which is evil.
      And it's less work.
      I'm betting their client will have features normal jabber doesn't though. Probably some special stuff on their server that isn't standard jabber, but they're still compatible.

    2. Re:Help me out here... why Jabber? by euphony · · Score: 1

      I was discuss some math problem with a friend over msn, and we had a lot of trouble to get each other understood. I haven't used Jabber that much ( just tried centericq in linux a couple of times), but as it's based on XML, it sounds to be possible to use MathML and all the other ML languages in chatting. Isn't that very helpful to make Jabber more geek's IM?

  83. Concern by Council · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hate sitting here and hoping beyond hope that Google isn't evil.

    Did we trust them just because of their colorful, friendly-looking logo?

    Are we making a terrible mistake?

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:Concern by Council · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? I'm totally serious!

      I'm saying, Google is gathering to themselves an awful lot of information about everyone, and I hope they don't plan to use it for less-than-moral purposes. I don't really know why we trust them beyond that they seem pretty cool. But if they're 'bad guys', we could be in a lot of trouble. The shorthand for that here seems to be 'evil'.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  84. good name for a calendaring app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe that's their new calendaring app. I wish they'd integrate one into gmail already!!!

  85. They just pulled the plug by ion · · Score: 1

    They just pulled the plug.

    No one able to reconnect.

    1. Re:They just pulled the plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody set up us the bomb. What you say !!

    2. Re:They just pulled the plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, they're just changing things around. I can connect but everytime i try to send a message to someone Gaim crashes, weird.

      username: gmail (before @)
      server: gmail.com
      Use TLS
      Port: 5222
      Connect Server: talk.google.com

  86. Kicked out by chrisbro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Myself and a buddy of mine just got kicked off. Think they found out and shut it down? Any others having the problem?

    1. Re:Kicked out by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Gaim reported a read error and wouldn't let me sign back on. Probably did.

      They'll probably start allowing select people to join at first, as they did with gmail (perhaps based on gmail account seniority?) for feature reduction / addition requests. Whoever these people add to their buddy lists, gets an invitation.

      It'd make sense, though.

  87. Doh it's not working anymore by MyLeftFoot · · Score: 1

    Well it worked for about 15mins for me... I'm not getting a not allowed message. nice post btw.

  88. Jabber BlackBerry Client: Search Is On by thecaramelsensation · · Score: 1

    I am really impressed with Google lately. Building it on the Jabber framework was pure genius. The service a bit finicky at the moment; haven't gotten the Trillian solution to maintain a connection, but and behold Gaim is working beautifully. IM'd 3 individuals, no AIM-esque lag. It rox0rs! Now, onwards to find a BlackBerry Jabber client!

  89. Suddenly stopped working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was logged on with Gaim to talk.google.com....

    When suddenly it threw me off with a "Read Error"...
    Now it gives me a HTTP 405 (Not Allowed) error when I try to reconnect...

    1. Re:Suddenly stopped working by DeathFire · · Score: 1

      I am having the same problem as well. Wonder if they are in Lockdown now.

    2. Re:Suddenly stopped working by phraust · · Score: 1

      same here. figures, i just got it working too...

      --
      bury the past(TM)
    3. Re:Suddenly stopped working by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

      I got the same thing a little while ago. They probably closed it or something.

    4. Re:Suddenly stopped working by Trevahaha · · Score: 1

      It's up now... and public http://talk.google.com/

  90. Now where is group search? by elucido · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We could use a group search feature. If we all are talking via IM why not let one person search and have everyone access the results?

    1. Re:Now where is group search? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Google is doing more damage to innovation in the Valley right now than Microsoft ever did,"

      said Reid Hoffman, the founder of two Internet ventures, including LinkedIn, a business networking Web site popular among Silicon Valley's digerati. "It's largely that they're hiring up so many talented people, and the fact they're working on so many different things. It's harder for start-ups to do interesting stuff right now."

      http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/24/technology/24val ley.html?pagewanted=2

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Now where is group search? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      It's called a `link'.

      Watch this. I can share an entire search with just a few HTML tags!

      How cool is this?

      --
      My other car is first.
    3. Re:Now where is group search? by elucido · · Score: 1

      Why is that bad? Just do something which wouldnt be profitable for Google. Invent a new industry.

    4. Re:Now where is group search? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      You are answering a differet question. It isn't about competing with Google in the marketplace! This is about competing with Google for engineering talent.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:Now where is group search? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      And competing with Google for engineering talent is a whole different can of worms to Microsoft's idea of competition - "cutting off their air supply", as applied to Netscape in the Halloween documents...

  91. 405: Not Allowed by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I logged in earlier, but now I'm blocked.

    1. Re:405: Not Allowed by I+kan+Spl · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they are not done with it yet?

      I can not seem to connect as of yet.

      --
      My UID is prime and so is this number: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.
    2. Re:405: Not Allowed by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      Yes I've been getting this too. I assume they found that Slashdot was getting on, and decided to stop allowing connections.

    3. Re:405: Not Allowed by Barnoid · · Score: 1

      My UID is prime, is your's?

      yes, it is.

    4. Re:405: Not Allowed by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      The updated instructions seem to fix it.

    5. Re:405: Not Allowed by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

      no, I think they're quite fine with it. 'gmail.com' IM'd me and it said:

      (23:16:34) gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

      cool!

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
    6. Re:405: Not Allowed by Packets · · Score: 4, Informative
      I logged in earlier, but now I'm blocked.

      I dug down into the help documents, and there's a bit of a strange thing you have to do, you have to set up your username/server as such:

      Username: stephen.thorne
      Server: gmail.com

      but you have to then go into the advanced options and set the 'connect server' as such:

      Connect Server: talk.google.com

      This will allow you to connect properly, and the 405 error will go away.
      --
      A little overkill never hurt anybody.
  92. gaim-otr or gaim-encryption is your friend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    problem solved.

  93. This (may) sucks by Krunch · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It looks like talk.google.com users can't talk to external Jabber users (like thoses using jabber.org for example). I really hope it's not a feature and that it will be fixed when they'll announce the new service. If it's not the case it's not that better than MSN, it's just leaving a monopoly for another one. Nice to see they use an open protocol but it would really sucks to have a closed Google Jabber network.

    Another thing some people might have noticed is that reverse DNS for talk.google.com is toolbar.google.com. Now have a look at JEP0151.
    Virtual presence on Web pages (also sometimes known as co-browsing, while co-browsing can also mean something different) makes people aware of each other, who are at the same Web location at the same time. The basic purpose of a virtual presence system is to show names, icons, and/or avatars of people who are on a page or a set of pages and to let them communicate.
    --
    No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    1. Re:This (may) sucks by humina · · Score: 3, Informative
      I set up a jabber server to try and see if I could talk to my gmail IM. Took me forever and it looks like the google talk won't let you connect from an outside jabber server. I found people talking about opening the googletalk servers here:

      http://groups.google.com/group/google-talk-open

      I'm going to recommend that people post on it to request that google open their network to the full jabber community instead of keeping it locked up.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
  94. Integration with Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you add a contact, it appears automagically in your gmail contact list.

  95. Basic instructions for Psi by darrylo · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those people using Psi:

    • Use your full gmail address for the Jabber ID.

    • Check "SSL encryption to server".

    • Check "Allow Plaintext Login".

    • Manually specify server host/port: talk.google.com, port 5223.

    • Set proxy if needed.

    You will get SSL cert warnings, but you can get rid of them via the "Ignore SSL warnings" checkbox (but do so at your own risk!).

  96. AJAX Client by icrooks · · Score: 1

    Ideal for me would be for Google to roll out an AJAX client for talk.

    1. Re:AJAX Client by Newton+IV · · Score: 1

      There's one - chatango.com, although it's flash i belive

    2. Re:AJAX Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://jwchat.org/
      seemed to work fine also

    3. Re:AJAX Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's another one - AIM.com, although its AOL I believe.

    4. Re:AJAX Client by kenrick · · Score: 1

      Do any AJAX clients work with Google Talk though?
      I had a play with jwchat but with no joy.

      --
      Not a member of the General Public
  97. jabberd can translate to other protocols by clymere · · Score: 1
    IIRC, you can set jabberd up to intermediate between a single jabber login, and multiple other protocols: AIM, MSN, Yahoo, etc.

    I nearly set this up myself once so i could log in with jabber from wherever i was and have access to all accounts. Ultimately, i decided ssh+screen worked for me better

    I will be really surprised if this is not what google plans to do: single single sign-on for all messaging services

    --
    once you go slack, you never go back
  98. Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can still log in to the server! You just need to fudge it a little.

    In Gaim's "Server" field put in gmail.com.

    But, in the "Connect server" field put in talk.google.com.

    Now, connect :cool:

    1. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by MyLeftFoot · · Score: 1

      Woot! thanks for the update.

    2. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by noackjr · · Score: 1

      This worked for me as well. Mod parent up!

    3. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by DeathFire · · Score: 1

      This just gives me a "stream error" rather than a "405 Now Allowed"

    4. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by scruff323 · · Score: 1

      Great! Works perfectly, thanks! Mod Parent WAY up.

    5. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      How on earth did you figure that out?
      Regards,
      Steve

    6. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by Anakron · · Score: 1

      I got the same error too. Try it again in a few minutes - that worked for me, at any rate

      --
      There are 11 types of people. Those who understand binary, those who don't and those who are sick of this lame joke.
    7. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by DucoNihilum · · Score: 1

      Any way to fix this for trillian, or are we out of luck?

    8. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured that Google would want us to use our Gmail addresses to talk, but would also want us to log in using their talk.google.com server that they've set up.

    9. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Try setting your user name as @gmail.com and the server you connect to as talk.google.com.
      Regards,
      Steve

    10. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by Alystair · · Score: 1

      What about Trillian though? Where would I put "gmail.com", there's only one area to put in a server name.

    11. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Slashdot messed up my thing. That was: set your user name as ${name}@gmail.com but replace ${name} with your real name, i.e. lnxaddct@gmail.com

    12. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by tweek · · Score: 1

      probably the same way anybody who's dealt with jabber did.

      Your JID is like an email. By default it will try to connect to the hostname part of your JID. In some cases, such as our corporate IM, we operate with an LDAP backend that indexes off email address. Our domain xxxxxxxxx.xxx points to another host than the Jabber server so what we do is advance configure IM clients to use a specific host.

      Since people were saying that this is tied into gmail and that your gmail account was your login, you would guess that your JID is username@gmail.co m but it's doubtful that gmail.com would be listening for Jabber traffic right now. talk.google.com had been mentioned previously as the server where the service was running so you would gather that is the connect server.

      Simple really. Not that I figured it out just because I've had all IM traffic except ours blocked on the firewall for the longest time. I'm only slightly tempted to allow gmail jabber traffic through but because of how jabber is setup, I can just define an s2s connection in our server config.

      Kudos to the GP.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    13. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by bhsx · · Score: 1

      Works completely! However, as of 12AM Central Standard Time the talk.google.com URL is serving-up the official client. It is pretty freakin' sweet! I'm on as bhsx72 (min. 6 char login), hear/read you there!

      --
      put the what in the where?
    14. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by alt-j · · Score: 0

      Change your port to 5222 instead of 5223

    15. Re:Getting around the "Not Allowed" message by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

      No mod points, so thanks dude.

  99. This works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This works for me, now anyway. We'll see how long it lasts...

  100. WOW... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    ... a loose buddy list! That's probably one of the features google IM will have! To tell the truth I'm already getting tired of the tense contact list I have now.

    jk, jk...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  101. There goes Philosophy point #2 by wombert · · Score: 5, Funny

    From http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/tenthings. html

    Google does search. Google does not do horoscopes, financial advice or chat.

    (Guess they better remember to update that page when they make the announcement...)

    And the real burning question - When can I get my Googlescope???

    --
    Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    1. Re:There goes Philosophy point #2 by jotux · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are really interested in having an IM service. They probably just want to get more people using gmail, and get a gmail logo on the desktops of a few hundred thousand people.

      Plus...google is starting to get so large, if they don't grow into other net service areas they'll fall behind.

    2. Re:There goes Philosophy point #2 by MANYplaces84 · · Score: 1

      Seems Google started on horoscopes, or at least lucky numbers. In the about box of google talk it says "Play 23 21 13 16 21 19 7 1 13 5"

    3. Re:There goes Philosophy point #2 by Barrakketh · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the same page:

      "* Full-disclosure update: When we first wrote these "10 things" four years ago, we included the phrase "Google does not do horoscopes, financial advice or chat." Over time we've expanded our view of the range of services we can offer -- web search, for instance, isn't the only way for people to access or use information -- and products that then seemed unlikely are now key aspects of our portfolio. This doesn't mean we've changed our core mission; just that the farther we travel toward achieving it, the more those blurry objects on the horizon come into sharper focus (to be replaced, of course, by more blurry objects)."

    4. Re:There goes Philosophy point #2 by YaKaLeDo · · Score: 1

      What Google does is programming, and Google does it with excellence. It seems to me that Google is coding for fun, not to generate revenues (M$). I don't think Google is following any marketing strategy other then exploring the limits of the programming era... I think that they are intersted in everything related to the net or programming.

      --
      http://blog.yakaledo.net/
    5. Re:There goes Philosophy point #2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They probably just want to get more people using gmail /sarcastic

      Yes, of course.

      From gmail.google.com:

      "2. How do I sign up? When can I get a Gmail account?

      We're currently only offering Gmail as part of a preview release and limited test. We don't have details on when Gmail will be made more widely available, as that depends in part on the results of the test."

      That is why I love /. A bunch of cluless talking throught their asses. Exactly like the one I have in the office...

  102. tomorrow today ? by pedrobeltrao · · Score: 1

    Review and download ?

  103. Specific Gaim Instructions Here by MicroPat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here are the exact settings that are working for me as of this current timestamp:

    Gaim: 1.5

    Protocol: SILC
    Screen Name: [Google Account username]
    Network: talk.google.com/Gaim
    Password: [Google Account password]
    Alias: [Blank]

    For "Show More Options", use the defaults.

    Good luck!

  104. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    feel free to mod parent up

  105. Oh, damn... by lullabud · · Score: 1

    You meant loose as in tension, not loose as in randy. =/ Back to ICQ...

    1. Re:Oh, damn... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Lol :) I didn't even knew what randy means. Thanks for the new word :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:Oh, damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never seen Austin Powers?

      "Do I make you randy, baby? Do I?"

  106. There is a review online check it out ! by pedrobeltrao · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:There is a review online check it out ! by rudinz · · Score: 1

      the revies look pretty cool..........can't wait to get my hands on it....

  107. i guess... by XO · · Score: 1

    I guess I will finally need an invitation to gmail.. anyone?

    ekdikeo5@yahoo.com

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:i guess... by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      I sent you a response.

    2. Re:i guess... by XO · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the invitations!

      Now, I'm getting a 403 Forbidden error when trying to login to the jabber server :(

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  108. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whore.

  109. Meanwhile, at AOL.... by perigee369 · · Score: 0

    ...The drones are chanting away, then suddenly "All yur conversations are belo... wha?, er... Oh Shit! Google's moving in!"

  110. SRV Records...The other DNS RR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't any SRV records for gmail.com (yet), so those excited about a "global mesh" of IM have some time to wait.

    There is no clear way for other XMPP servers to talk to Google right now.

  111. MSN, Y!, ICQ through iChat - here's how by Lord+Satri · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's how you can connect to all 5 IM protocols with Apple's iChat.

    http://allforces.com/2005/05/06/ichat-to-msn-throu gh-jabber

    It works flawlessly and yes, it uses Jabber :-)

    1. Re:MSN, Y!, ICQ through iChat - here's how by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      As soon as iChat supports tabbed chat windows, I'll probably switch back to it. It feels so.. 2001.. to have multiple chat windows on my screen.

    2. Re:MSN, Y!, ICQ through iChat - here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I seem to recall Apple's design guidelines eschewing the use of tabbed windows. If that's true, you're fairly unlikely to see tabbed chat windows anytime soon.

      That said, I've currently got two opened tabs in Safari, so maybe they changed their minds...

  112. Re:AIM/MSN still owns the market by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0
    Microsoft gets a bit of its own poison - embraced and extended by an open standard.
    Yet more proof that open source and open standards are evil communistic cancers that need to be destroyed by all-american corporations like SCO.</sarcasm>
    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  113. Self fulfilling prophecies by Mikey+Rowan · · Score: 0
    Anyone else find out that Google Talk was available from their Google 'personalised home' Slashdot feed which they offer as standard?

    Seems like they did it to themselves.

    1. Re:Self fulfilling prophecies by VJ42 · · Score: 0

      Yep, I saw this story on Google this morning (UK) luckily the Official Google Talk client (which had been released by the time I woke up) seems to work well.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  114. Jabber interoperability by TardisX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmmm, as of this point it doesn't appear that you can have contacts on other jabber servers.

    The whole point of jabber is that servers are distributed, the server name is part of the JID (Jabber ID) which means that JID's look a lot like email addresses.

    I hope the inability to have contacts with non @gmail.com JID's is merely a pre-launch wrinkle.

    --

    Command attempted to use minibuffer while in minibuffer
    1. Re:Jabber interoperability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah I noticed this too .. kinda.. useless?

    2. Re:Jabber interoperability by humina · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#service_ 4 makes it look like a post launch bump.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
  115. Web-based interface? by agraupe · · Score: 1

    Is there any word on having a web-based interface? There are times when I can't install software, but would still like to have IM (for example, in Internet Cafes, or at school). Still, even without, it sounds very cool.

    1. Re:Web-based interface? by Kredal · · Score: 1

      If you have ICQ, you can use ICQ2Go at go.icq.com

      (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  116. These services can only be bridged by melted · · Score: 1

    These services can only be bridged for as long as their owners want them to be bridged. If Google taps into MSN IM, you can bet your ass they'll be shut off the next day.

  117. Not Allowed by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Anyone else getting a "405: Not Allowed under Gaim?

    1. Re:Not Allowed by teslatug · · Score: 1

      Hmm, switched server to gmail.com and now I'm getting "Server does not use any supported authentication method"

      I guess I'll have to wait until (if) they release it.

    2. Re:Not Allowed by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Which they have!

      http://www.google.com/talk/

  118. That may be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I've been using Gaim with Jabber for a while now, and I don't really see how you could make the Jabber portion work any better. It's feature complete.

    Better to improve the rest of the client.

    1. Re:That may be by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      Okay, bad wording. I've got nothing against gaim's Jabber prpl. The original poster mentioned the abundance of SoC projects for gaim and surmised that Google's IM client (if there is going to be one) would be based on gaim -- particularly Jabber. I just figure if this was Google's intent, they would be developing the Jabber prpl. Sure, Jabber is fully implemented in gaim, but AFAIK, only part of the XMPP standard is implemented in Jabber so it's not like it there's no room for improvement. It's certainly plausible that Google would develop a Jabber server that implements more of XMPP (Jabber++? ^_~).

      Then again, all this is based on the rumor that Google is jumping into the IM business. We may confirm this as early as tomorrow, or find out down the road it's all been a load of crap.

      We'll see.

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    2. Re:That may be by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

      Google's IM client (if there is going to be one)

      what do you mean "if there is going to be one"

      go to talk.google.com and download the client

    3. Re:That may be by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're intelligent enough to notice that I posted before talk went live. Like I said, until this morning, it was all rumors, but as it turns out, they were right.

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
  119. Wait.... by codefungus · · Score: 1

    ...I'm on.
    -- I can't connect!
    - I'm on with iChat
    -- Gaim works
    - iChat Doesn't work
    -- Wait, wait, noooo
    - Ok I'm on
    -- I can ping it
    - Google is on to me!!! HA HA Woooo
    -- Ok I'm on now...can you see me?
    - No
    -- Trillian wont work because it sucks
    - Ok now can you see me?
    -- They are on to me! Woo WOO GOogle!
    - Hey...they clearly have IM, should we just wait?
    -- Google! You are on to me!

    --
    -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
  120. Client Already Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apparently a Google Talk client already exists:

    The folks over at Download Squad have a copy. Read the review: http://www.downloadsquad.com/2005/08/23/googe-talk -review/.

    Now I'm just hoping we all get a copy damn soon.

  121. Still works - changer server to gmail.com ... by ashlux · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've got mine setup in gaim as:

    Screen Name: ashlux
    Server: gmail.com
    TLS: checked
    Port: 5222
    Connect Server: talk.google.com
    And it works just fine.

    1. Re:Still works - changer server to gmail.com ... by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. These settings work in GAIM as of 10:28pm EDT.

    2. Re:Still works - changer server to gmail.com ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does NOT work for me as of 3.52am GMT

    3. Re:Still works - changer server to gmail.com ... by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      OK, I've filled in everything per your suggestions. Now it asks me for a password. What should I fill in?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:Still works - changer server to gmail.com ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK i did just like you asked
      but...but..
      what do i fill in the password field ??

    5. Re:Still works - changer server to gmail.com ... by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      On Exodus it works just fine also:

      ACCOUNT DETAILS
            Jabber ID: username@gmail.com

      CONNECTION
            Host: talk.google.com
            Port 5222

      That's all...

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  122. Trillian Instructions by NickCatal · · Score: 2, Informative

    I posted instructions on using Trillian with GoogleIM on my site.

    --
    -nick
  123. MOD PARENT UP by Alystair · · Score: 1

    Informative, good overview of some features and what not.

  124. Anyone else expecting ads? by voxel · · Score: 0

    Just like Gmail, Google could display contextual ads in your conversations (or perhaps only with their client off to the side) while you chat...

    Blah.

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  125. Consolidation by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You only need one Jabber ID to talk to every internet-connected Jabber server out there. You only need to register your logins on the other IM systems and you've just obsoleted the need for Trillian, Gaim, Kopete and all the other half-assed attempts at IM unification. You're thinking this is added complexity, when it's actually complexity removed.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:Consolidation by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Except that Google's Jabber server doesn't support AIM (etc.) transports yet.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Consolidation by humina · · Score: 4, Informative

      And google's jabber won't accept connections from other jabber servers making it a closed network. Think aim only running an open protocol. This just means that gaim doesn't have to reverse engineer anything. It's still not open to the jabber community.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    3. Re:Consolidation by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      You only need to register your logins on the other IM systems and you've just obsoleted the need for Trillian, Gaim, Kopete and all the other half-assed attempts at IM unification.

      They may be half-assed, but it's better than having 5 asses clogging up my resources.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    4. Re:Consolidation by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Considering they're planning to link to other networks(Earthlink and something else for starters) it'll prolly accept connections from other Jabber servers eventually.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:Consolidation by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      They may be half-assed, but it's better than having 5 asses clogging up my resources.

      At bat, HD Webdev! Here's the pitch. Ooh, swing and a miss.

      I was alluding to the fact that you can kill three birds (switch to the recently standardized XMPP protocol, thus ensuring future compatability; maintain connectivity with obsoleted IM systems and use one single client) simply by joining a Jabber server and registering your legacy IM logins just a single time. Why should anybody sit through organzising their contact list and setting aliases for their entire contact list more than once? Why should anybody use a half-assed client that makes you do just that every time you log in for the first time with it on a new machine?

      With Jabber, once you're logged in, everything's been registered and you've sorted your list for the first time, you're done. Your jabber server will log you in to the obsolete networks and remember everybody's name and what group you put them in, no matter what network that contact is on. As far as the client is concerned, they're all Jabber; the server does all the heavy lifting and network translation. And because the client only has to speak a single, simple protocol, a full-featured client comes in around a single megabyte.

      Why defend the multi-protocol clients when they're a greater pain in the ass to use?

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    6. Re:Consolidation by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Why defend the multi-protocol clients when they're a greater pain in the ass to use?

      I didn't. I said that 1 client is better than 5 for me.

      That's all. No more. No less. Different folks, different strokes.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    7. Re:Consolidation by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      Please reread my posts for comprehension. I wasn't saying run five clients, I'm saying, let the server do the heavy lifting dealing with the other protocols.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    8. Re:Consolidation by rbullo · · Score: 1

      Idunno. Yahoo transports seem to be a bit flaky, at least for me. If you can point me to one that actually stays up for more than two days, I will be in your debt.

      --
      OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
  126. NM, should've read further. -NT- by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1

    NM, should've read further. -NT-

  127. very nice PR/spin by pedrobeltrao · · Score: 1

    There were 2 posts on /. and 3 sites on the front page of digg. Several thousand blogs are talking about it and it is dragging on for hours and building anticipation. It has been a very interesting buzz build up. Was it on purpose ?

  128. internet telephony too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Guardian has a blurbish article including a quote from a Google exec on the new service. The article mentions that Talk isn't just IM; it also includes Internet telephony.

    1. Re:internet telephony too by Louisville_Clark · · Score: 0

      on the Google Talk website it says "Google Talk is not a telephony service and cannot be used for emergency dialing"

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  129. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
    Use legact SSL for connection : not checked"

    Where does Cerulean get off thinking that SSL is somehow "legacy?" Wait, never mind, we're talking about a company that thought a client that speaks a dozen protocols to do the same thing is somehow better than an IM service that can bridge the protocols...

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  130. SIM by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

    I use SIM (Simple Instant Message), it was the closest to Miranda-IM I found for Linux.
    Anyone out there has manage to connect to Google talk using this client? I haven't found the right config yet.. :/

    The user name is mynick@gmail.com or just mynick?
    The Jabber server is talk.google.com or gmail.com?
    Do I check the 'Register new account' checkbox or not?
    SSL or not?

    1. Re:SIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't. SIM doesn't support TLS.

    2. Re:SIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't. SIM sucks. It is absolutely unable to connect to their SSL server.

  131. http://psi.affinix.com/ by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
    It supports AIM, ICQ, Jabber, IRC, MSN and maybe some others.

    So it's not a Jabber client, then? Jabber clients don't fuck around with a bajillion different protocols, that's the server's job to sort out. Psi, however, is a real jabber client that makes it easy to use the transports to the obsolete IM systems still kicking around for some god-forsaken reason.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:http://psi.affinix.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miranda is plugin based, so if you want it to only run Jabber protocols it can do so.

      The rest of us don't turn up our noses at the prospect of running one client with all the protocols. As much as I'd like to believe otherwise, Psi has been a buggy POS the last dozen times I tried it.

    2. Re:http://psi.affinix.com/ by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      So it's not a Jabber client, then? Jabber clients don't fuck around with a bajillion different protocols, that's the server's job to sort out.

      This Jabber client does, to still let its users connect to non-Jabber servers as well.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:http://psi.affinix.com/ by ABaumann · · Score: 1

      Psi uses server transports to do the same thing, therefore creating a single sign-on. If the server your using (and there are pleanty of open servers out there that support it) has transports for IM services, you can get all of your traffic going through one connection.

      Like the grandparent said, "Jabber clients don't fuck around wiht a bajillion different protocols."

  132. You know what this means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've Slashdotted Google!!!

    Yay!

  133. but but.. it needs to be called gtalk!!!! by boojew · · Score: 1

    Anybody else notice that gtalk is registered to Hasbro already :(

    1. Re:but but.. it needs to be called gtalk!!!! by baadger · · Score: 1

      and have done since the 19th of february 1998

  134. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Nugget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jabber's use of a dedicated SSL port is legacy and deprecated behavior, in favor of using STARTTLS to negotiate SSL on the normal port.

    That's how they "get off".

  135. Whats the point? by Momoru · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity what is the point of Google doing this if they are just going to use Jabber? Why would i switch from my iChat or Jabber name to my gmail one? And what does this have to do with search again? Unless they made an IM client that could search for other buddies better then the current ones out there....

    1. Re:Whats the point? by Paleomacus · · Score: 2, Informative

      The about box in the windows client says that it includes audio components from Global IP Sound. I don't know anything about the Jabber protocol's capabilities but maybe the whole voice chat thing is the selling point?

    2. Re:Whats the point? by mp3phish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see what your point it?

      In my opinion, using jabber in a mainstream IM client (ie, one that is going to be used by joe schmoe and susy ann in jr. high keyboarding class while the teacher isn't looking) is a dramatic step forward.

      Google is competing head on with the services that yahoo, aol, and msn provide. Only they are doing it using open standards, and allowing 3rd party clients. From my perspective, this is equivilent of Google putting the rest on notice:

      "Look, we aren't going to let you rape your users anymore. We are going to do what you do... Properly."

      I think this is a great step forward. Sure, you might think it is a waste of time in the long run.. and you might be right. But something like this NEEDED to be done in order to get the other IM services to play fair. Everyone already knows that the other services would have never opened their protocols without something like this coming forward. The rest will be required to follow suit or bail out of the business. (you may not see it now, but it is coming.. just watch)

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    3. Re:Whats the point? by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      It may not help your usage of YOUR client, but it sure as hell allows a lot more people to be added to your buddy list *without using gateways*.

      For example, I use jabber all the time. One of my servers on the left coast runs a jabber server. 10 of my friends that have shell accounts on it use the jabber server. We can easily IM each other, and our other IM friends through the jabber gateways to AIM, MSN, and Y!. But wouldn't it be nice to have a non-gateway set of friends instead?

      For you, nothing changes except that now anyone with a gmail account can be added to your native jabber list.

    4. Re:Whats the point? by sebisor · · Score: 1

      Is their VoiP application protocol using any open standard?

    5. Re:Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What IM services can you not log into using third party clients? Heck, some services even document their protocol extensively (like AIM's TOC) to promote third party client support.

      Now, if google interacts correctly with other jabber servers, that's something else entirely. That means the central server disappears from the chat network. Which would be a dramatic change from the current situation, where you can't join an IM network as a server without permission from the IM network's owner.

    6. Re:Whats the point? by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      Let me correct that - it seems that the google servers don't (yet?) allow server to server communication, making the whole thing still a closed service. It sounds like that isn't a permanent situation, but now it falls into the 'mostly useless' territory for previous jabber users.

    7. Re:Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm not sure which of these are open: http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#protocol s:

      Google Talk supports the following standard voice codecs: PCMA, PCMU, G.723, iLBC. We are also evaluating the Speex codec. We also support codecs from Global IP Sound: ISAC, IPCMWB, EG711U, EG711A

    8. Re:Whats the point? by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Why would i switch from my iChat or Jabber name to my gmail one?

      Because if I wanted to use Jabber I'd trust talk.google.com a helluvalot more than makhmud.no-ip.com

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    9. Re:Whats the point? by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

      The way I understand it from their FAQ, not at this time. But they intend to fully document the protocol so thrid party developers can add it to their clients.

      http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html#protocol s

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    10. Re:Whats the point? by Krunch · · Score: 1

      Speex is open, iLBC is free (as in no royalty and documented in RFC3951). I don't know much about other voice codecs but I guess they are at least well documented (not like the MSN audio codec).

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  136. Is there a web-based Jabber client? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

    My wife's company prohibits them from installing IM client software so, naturally, everyone uses a web-based client (AIM Express or MSN's web-based client). Does anyone know of a web-based Jabber client? Hopefully one that doesn't suck? I don't use the web-based AIM or MSN clients, but from hearing my wife gripe about them they sound less than desireable.

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    1. Re:Is there a web-based Jabber client? by TardisX · · Score: 1

      Jeti (http://jeti.jabberstudio.org/) is a java based jabber client, you can click the link in the top left corner of that page to launch it in your browser.

      It's not too bad.

      --

      Command attempted to use minibuffer while in minibuffer
  137. What's the big deal? by Jeian · · Score: 1

    I really don't get it - it's just another Jabber server that happens to be run by Google.

    1. Re:What's the big deal? by arekq · · Score: 1

      This is the first time a big guy supports the jabber protocol so I think it's still significant.

  138. Sadly by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    I think its weird that Trillian only works with the Jabber plugin if you use the "pro" (i.e. PAID-FOR) edition.

    I don't fault the developer, but you have to admit that its a *weird* restriction.

    Maybe I'll try Miranda.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Sadly by cronot · · Score: 1

      I'm using it with Miranda just fine.

      Username: everything before "@gmail.com"
      Resource: anything, just leave the default
      Login server: gmail.com

      check "Use SSL" and "Manually specify connection host". Fill the field below it with "talk.google.com", and the port should be 5223 (5222 won't work).

      Works fine here.

  139. Miranda-IM settings by aok · · Score: 2, Informative

    - close miranda
    - go to plugins folder and make a copy of the jabber.dll to gtalk.dll
    - start miranda
    - username: gmail username without the @gmail.com
    - password: gmail password
    - Login Server: gmail.com
    - Use SSL checked
    - Manually specify connection host checked
    - Host: talk.google.com
    - Port: 5223

    This works as of this posting.

  140. openssl dll's also needed by aok · · Score: 2, Informative

    I forgot to mention to get these dll's and put them into the Miranda folder (not the plugins subdirectory):

    http://jabber.au.edu/miranda/openssl097d_dll.zip

    1. Re:openssl dll's also needed by baadger · · Score: 1

      Not working for me. Followed your exact procedure, tried installing OpenSSL 0.9.8 and (seperately) placing the dll's from that zip into the folder... nudda

      I'm using "re-build 32" from the Miranda development journal (both Miranda.exe and the Jabber plugin). Windows 2000.

      [12:28:48 JABBER] ( SSL ) Data received
      <iq type="error" id="mir_6"><query xmlns="jabber:iq:auth"><username>MYUSERNAME</usern ame></query><error code="405" type="cancel"><not-allowed xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/><text xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas">Server does not support PLAIN</text></error></iq>

    2. Re:openssl dll's also needed by aok · · Score: 1

      Are you using port 5223? I could not use 5222 because, and I'm guessing, the Jabber plugin doesn't support TLS.

    3. Re:openssl dll's also needed by baadger · · Score: 1

      I tried both. Nudda

  141. Google Talk Help by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

    Here is a forum I've setup for getting help with Google Talk:

    http://www.gtalkhelp.com/

  142. MESSAGE FROM GMAIL.COM by MustardMan · · Score: 1

    (cheaply riding on the top post)

    I just recieved the following message, logged into talk.google, from gmail.com

    11:12 PM 8/23/05
    The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

    1. Re:MESSAGE FROM GMAIL.COM by Alystair · · Score: 1

      You and two others (one of them happens to be me), ride the wave.

  143. the broken link has been fixed? by vena · · Score: 1

    [23:12] gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

    WAY CREEPY, but i guess ends speculation that they're mad about the leak :)

    1. Re:the broken link has been fixed? by ashlux · · Score: 1

      Yah I got the same message as you...

      Looks like http://www.google.com/talk/ works now *cheers*

    2. Re:the broken link has been fixed? by vena · · Score: 1

      wow, client and all. looks neat, though i'll stick to a multi-network client for now.

      interesting point in the FAQ: You can invite an unlimited number of Gmail users to download Google Talk and get added to your Friends list. If you invite someone who doesn't already have Gmail, we'll include an invitation to that as well, since they'll need a Gmail username and password to use Google Talk.

      does that mean gmail is "officially" public?

    3. Re:the broken link has been fixed? by dwayner79 · · Score: 1

      GMail went public a while ago when they gave everyone 50 invites. At that point, it was essentially public.

      (though it does still say beta... but that point has been discussed too much already.)

      --
      Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
  144. It's live!! by holiggan · · Score: 1
    --
    "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
    1. Re:It's live!! by holiggan · · Score: 1

      And it features "tabbed" conversation windows! Awesome!! :D

      --
      "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
  145. The broken link has been fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (23:14:08) gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

    You're welcome, Google! :cooleocanth:

  146. It's official by roach2002 · · Score: 1

    Hey Everyone,
    Just got an IM on Google Talk saying "The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!"
    Google Talk has gone live, officially.

  147. First Broadcast message... by oPless · · Score: 1

    gmail.com
    Jabber
    04:14:23
    The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

    (thats 4am BST)

    What broken link ? hmm ? :-)

    1. Re:First Broadcast message... by hrbrmstr · · Score: 1

      talk.google.com pretty much didn't work (delivered a google error page). you can now go to talk.google.com and d/l its *WIndows* only client (sigh...again with the single platform software).

      to get a secure login with iChat I have to go through port redirections . guess i'll stick with other services until google either gets with the program and writes cross platform software or makes it more compatible with existing s/w.

      --
      Mind the gap...
    2. Re:First Broadcast message... by oPless · · Score: 1

      Port redirections?

      Really no need to do that, besides, try AdiumX - it's much less braindead than iChat.

  148. Client now available by jtmas83 · · Score: 1

    The Google Talk client is now available at http://www.google.com/talk/. Unfortunately, it's Windows-only.

  149. The broken link has been fixed! by DucoNihilum · · Score: 1

    Just got a message from "gmail" "(22:15:48) gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users! "

  150. Woot by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 1

    Just got this:
    (00:15:51) gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

  151. anyone else get this? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    (23:15:58) gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

      heh this is cool, though a little empty

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  152. Their client is available now. by jeremedia · · Score: 1
  153. Just received from "gmail.com" on iChat... by chrisbro · · Score: 1

    "The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users! "

    Also, on my mac at least, users that mail.app pulls in from both Gmail AND Yahoo automatically adds them to my jabber list for gmail. It might be other services, too, but that's what I see so far. Eeeenteresting...

    1. Re:Just received from "gmail.com" on iChat... by chrisbro · · Score: 1

      Followup: I just got a mac this week so this could be old news for people ;) Still learning this thing.

    2. Re:Just received from "gmail.com" on iChat... by I'm+Troy+McClure · · Score: 0
      • That is frakking awesome!
      --
      larryvagina@gmail.com
  154. Google Talk is LIVE! by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

    Just click this link to download the software

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:Google Talk is LIVE! by terrox · · Score: 1

      can a person put google talk on their USB? will it work nicely from there?

  155. talk.google.com is live by Spydr · · Score: 1

    i got a message from 'gmail.com' and it said:

    "The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!"

    So i looked at the site and sure enough there it was.

    go check it out. looks like a normal IM client.

    now the part where i got a IM from 'gmail.com' makes me wonder if they'll throw up contextual ads in a different window as you chat with people.

  156. Check it out now for details by colin_n · · Score: 1
    --

    --------- I have no signature
  157. It's Official by Bruha · · Score: 1

    [22:17] gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

    Just received that broadcast message.

  158. It's available now! by Inaffect · · Score: 1

    Just got a message: gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users! The link http://talk.google.com/ now works

  159. Google Talk is now available for download! by Alystair · · Score: 1

    Message from Google:
    "gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks
    for being our first users!"

    http://talk.google.com/ is now working and the program is ready for download!
      If your using Linux, BSD or OSX, etc... Just get an IM client that works with the Jabber network.

    Cheers!

  160. It is available now! by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

    Download it now (for windows):

    http://www.google.com/talk/

  161. It's fully live and available for download. by so1omon · · Score: 1
    http://www.google.com/talk/ is now live. There's a Windows client available for download, and official instructions for Mac and Linux users on how to connect using 3rd party clients.

    Yes, there is voice chat!

    --
    i'm the jedidiahmarkfoster your parents warned you about
  162. Googles own client is also available by technoviper · · Score: 1
  163. Get Google's IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  164. Google Talk is Live! by teckjunkie · · Score: 0
  165. http://www.google.com/talk/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The official client is available for download at http://www.google.com/talk/

  166. GOOGLE IM UP!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go to talk.google.com....download "google talk"!!!! hellz yea!

  167. The site is live by shaneFalco · · Score: 1

    The site went live a few minutes ago, and Google sent an IM to those already on saying the broken link is fixed and the site is live.

  168. Google Talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talk.google.com is now up (although the links are still a little screwy).
    Unfortunately, only the Google Windoze client supports "Voice calls to other Google Talk users."

  169. talk.google.com is up! by celticmonkey · · Score: 1

    I just got an instant message over gaim from gmail.com saying: "The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!" I went to talk.google.com and it was up. You can download the client (windows only) now. It also has instructions for using it with linux and mac using other clients like gaim. It looks like only windows users will be able to use VOIP because it needs the google talk client. I've only recently started using linux and I'm already getting mad at google for their windows first policy. I guess that's what pays the bills. I don't know why I got excited about this and when I think about it, I don't know why the media will go all crazy about it tomorrow. IM and VOIP clients have been around for ages and many of them exist in great OSS forms. Technologically there is nothing new here.

  170. I'm connected, but not with any Jabber client.. by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    I couldn't connect with several Jabber clients, but I was able to connect with Google's Own Client

    Of course, now I have nobody to talk to. So if you're on, try my alias "themeparkphoto"

  171. Do it yourself invites by chefmonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't need to ask someone for an invite anymore...

    https://www.google.com/accounts/SmsMailSignup1

    1. Re:Do it yourself invites by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      Shame its for US only

  172. Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the google talk client is now available online

  173. Google client application available for download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is a client that can be downloaded at: http://www.google.com/talk/. Pretty basic UI as far as I can tell..

  174. Its launched... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  175. great! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    now all I need is people who can stand to talk to me!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  176. Does Anyone Know: Why Jabber? by popo · · Score: 1



    Why didn't Google just *buy* Jabber?

    Or write it themselves?

    The piece of this that I find very interesting is that Google doesn't usually use "someone else's" technology like this without acquiring them first.

    Does anyone know much about Jabber? Is it just a client that bridges multiple formats?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  177. talk.google.com is now live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've just downloaded the client - talk.google.com is now live!

  178. Port 80 works too! by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

    For those of us stuck behind restrictive firewalls, I'm glad to report that you can change the port to 80 and manage to connect still. Awesome job Google!

    --
    My name fits again.
  179. Google: Like AltaVista, only worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And so, Google continues down the Portal Path trodden earlier by AltaVista, making the same mistakes -- ignoring their (whithering) core business, putting their best valuation spin on everything they do, blowing their cash on bad acquisitions. Heck, they've even hired Louis Monier! But, they run on Linux, so they must be okay, right?

  180. Re:Does Anyone Know: Why Jabber? by ashlux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jabber is an open protocol and XML-based.

    Read some more on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabber

  181. Next up: browser. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Go on, do a lil whois on gbrowser.com. ;)

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Next up: browser. by rudinz · · Score: 1

      damn......its registered to google.....

  182. It's official by Argon+Sloth · · Score: 1

    At 23:13:56 EST, I received the following message over Google Talk from the JabberID, gmail.com: "The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!"

    --
    Laziness is a virtue, anyone who bothers to tell you otherwise, is clearly lacking it.
  183. talk.google.com 'fixed' by lukej · · Score: 1

    From my Gaim Client...

    (19:14:51) gmail.com: The broken link has been fixed. Thanks for being our first users!

  184. Can't add non-gmail users to contact list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I can't add jabber addresses of contacts on other jabber servers. it seems that gmail blocks messages from other servers too. That kinda sucks.

  185. Not really by emkman · · Score: 1

    Well if you were using the now released Google Talk client you would click 'hide contacts not on my friends list'.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  186. Developers! by GraZZ · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Google Talk developer's page gives a good overview of Google's short-term plans for GTalk, such as partnering with Earthlink and Sipphone (or federating as they call it)

    "It's like the Federation of Planets on your Star Trek program."
    "Ohhhhhh"

  187. SSL by Refrag · · Score: 1

    What the heck is up with Google not allowing SSL connections? I'm not to fond of logging into their Jabber server by sending my Gmail password in the clear.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  188. SmarterChild by jmil · · Score: 1

    EXCELLENT...

    Anyone wanna bet Google will implement its own *better* version of AOL's SmarterChild?

    Even better...

    When will this guy start in on Google's version?

    --
    I wish I were old enough to put "Computer" on my resume.
  189. iChat/Google Talk supports video conferencing by Clith · · Score: 3, Informative
    I just spent about 1/2 hour video chatting with a friend after clicking on his Google Chat video icon in iChat. Hm, that is a rather unweildy phrase. What do you call chatting with someone in iChat via Jabber on Google's Server? how about iGoogleChat? :-)

    Well then, I clicked on the video icon in my iGoogleChat buddy list to start a video chat with my friend, and it worked just fine. User experience and video qualkity were the same as "native iChat". Not sure who's "fault" this is -- iChat for managing to send video presence info through Jabber, or Jabber for supporting video presence. Whoever is responsible though: well done.

    --
    [ReidNews]
    1. Re:iChat/Google Talk supports video conferencing by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Was the friend running iChat, GoogleTalk, or something else?

      iChat to iChat is nice, but not amazing.

      iChat to GoogleTalk would be incredible, but I don't seen any reference to video on their site.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    2. Re:iChat/Google Talk supports video conferencing by altopt · · Score: 1

      Can't wait to try iChat to GoogleTalk video. Hope it works. Absolutely no mention of video on Google's site--much less crossplatform video.

  190. Skype by lasse_2 · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that skype is dead? http://www.skype.com/ Lars

    1. Re:Skype by Eminence · · Score: 1
      No, Skype is not dead yet but it should be worried. Very worried. It's cool for PC-to-PC calls but its rates are anything but cheap when calling out. Google explicitly talks on its developer info page that it works closely with EarthLink and Sipphone.

      Which is a good thing. I like Skype, but I don't like the fact that it uses a closed, proprietary protocol. Google, on the other hand, wants to adhere to open standards with its communicator - also with its voice component.

    2. Re:Skype by Woje · · Score: 1

      SkypeOut calling rates are still cheaper than the Gizmo ones. Until something seriously threatening comes out from this Google-SIPPhone alliance, I'll be sticking to Skype.

      More than that, it's quite a bother to push all your contacts to download another piece of software. With all the IM services (MSN, ICQ, AIM, etc.), it's easy: you have multi-IM clients like Trillian/Adium/gaim/whatever. But can we really expect a multi-VoIP client?

    3. Re:Skype by lasse_2 · · Score: 1

      looks as if skype is opening up their API
      http://networks.silicon.com/webwatch/0,39024667,39 151654,00.htm

  191. Google Talk Website. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    The Google Talk website is now online: http://www.google.com/talk/.

    I was able to get in with iChat v3.0, but I had to tell it to use port 5223 and connect via SSL. Otherwise, I've connected without any issues -- now I just need some buddies to chat with :).

    Yaz.

  192. http://www.google.com/talk/index.html by Ksevio · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/talk/index.html Pretty cool program, I like the easy status setting field.

  193. Tomorrow's goatse today? by arootbeer · · Score: 1

    Or better yet...I could use it to get the jump on Microsoft. Like in H2G2, where they sent the breakfast cereal information(was it?) back in time, copyrighted it, and then proceeded to sue the original writer out of existence.

  194. I, for once, welcome our new Google overlords! by cesarcardoso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey, at least, they don't use a proprietary protocol to talk to us :P

    --
    Cesar Cardoso can be found at cesar at zyakannazio dot eti dot br (or at least I believe so)
  195. Wow! by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ha! Begging for Gmail invites! That's so 2004.

    1. Re:Wow! by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      Gimme one too!

      Someone send an invite to azurensis(at symbol)tekgnome.com!

      I promise I'll be your friend forever...

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  196. GAIM error by centuren · · Score: 1

    Are any other GAIM/Linux users getting a "Server does not use any supported authentication method" error?

    My account settings are per google's GAIM section (including TLS if possible). Any suggestions?

    1. Re:GAIM error by johnynek · · Score: 1

      Yes. I am using Gaim in Debian and specifically I get this reponse from talk.google.com:

      <error code="405" type="cancel"><not-allowed xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/><text xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas">Server does not support PLAIN</text></error>

      The strange thing is, Gaim is not sending plain text to the server. It is using digest authentication with all the other jabber servers I talk to.

      Finally, I am certainly using TLS, as I have verified by looking in the Gaim debug window as well as using ethereal to look at the stream and see the starttls turn on the encryption.

      --
      jabber: johnynek@jabber.org
  197. the client is out :-D by lart2150 · · Score: 1
  198. clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game" by sp1der · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the Google Talk client, in the icon tray, select About. Notice on the bottom light grey characters on the which background. They read: "play 23 21 13 16 21 19 7 1 13 5" Using a=1, z=26, it translates to: "play wumpus game" Not sure what to do with it, just thought it was interesting that it was there. Investigating...

  199. All instructions I found linked were wrong. by rindeee · · Score: 1

    The instructions on the SMSH site were incorrect, as were most others. Strangely, the instructions over at http://talk.google.com/ were spot on (imagine that). You do NOT include @gmail.com in your login name. You DO use a "connection server" which is talk.google.com. The "server" is gmail.com, not talk.google.com. Anyway, head on over to Google to get the skinny straight from the horses mouth. Find details here: GAIM support at Google.

    1. Re:All instructions I found linked were wrong. by arose · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the whole page, Gaim instructions are a little bit down.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  200. GAIM vs Gaim by jolar · · Score: 0

    Just like the Apple kool-aid drinkers will always correct someone who calls an Apple a "MAC", the Gaim developers always correct people who spell Gaim "GAIM". At least they always used to when I hung out in their IRC channel. It's called Gaim! See the faq: http://gaim.sourceforge.net/faq.php

  201. Personal Jabber Server by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll see your buddy-free accounts and raise you a buddy-free server. So that my excessively arrogant and self-centered e-mail address would be matched with an equally cocky IM address, I ran my own Jabber server for several years and had on it just the one account and on that account zero contacts.

  202. Download it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can download it now here.

  203. They're HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  204. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by sp1der · · Score: 5, Informative

    After a bit more investigating, you can add the gmail user, er bot, wumpus.game@gmail.com and type "play" in the chat window to play the classic wumpus game.

  205. Download is now availible by affinity · · Score: 0

    Download is now availible at http://www.google.com/talk/

    --
    no sig yet
  206. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by rappo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    from Wikipedia "wumpus": Hunt the Wumpus was an important early computer game. It was based on a simple hide-and-seek format, featuring a mysterious monster (the Wumpus) that lurked deep inside a network of rooms. Using a command line text interface, the player would enter commands to move through the rooms, or shoot arrows along crooked paths through several adjoining rooms. There were twenty rooms, each connecting to three others, arranged like the vertices of a dodecahedron (or the faces of an icosahedron). Hazards included bottomless pits, super bats (which would drop the player in a random location) and the Wumpus itself. When the player had deduced from hints which chamber the Wumpus was in without entering it, he would fire an arrow into the Wumpus' chamber to slay it. However, firing the arrow into the wrong chamber would startle the Wumpus, which might then devour the player. [...] Versions of Hunt the Wumpus are currently available all over the Internet, for almost all operating systems and machines, including Linux, Palm Pilot handheld computers, and mobile phones. The first bot on IRC was a multiplayer Hunt the Wumpus game, in which firing an arrow into a room with other players caused another player to be killed: "Foo is hit in the back with an arrow!" Unfortunately, the "Wumpus-o-Matic" player never made it off the drawing board. See also Rog-O-Matic. Wumpus have also made an appearance in the TCG Magic: The Gathering, specifically in the 1999 Mercadian Masques expansion. They appear mainly in the art for green cards in the set, though two are playable creatures: the appropriately named Hunted Wumpus, and also Thrashing Wumpus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wumpus

  207. They just went live by esac17 · · Score: 1

    Visit talk.google.com now .. there is a website with a downloadable client now available for download. I'm using it now.

  208. GMail/Talk invites via SMS?!?! by SbooX · · Score: 0

    Has anyone else seen this before? Give Google your mobile phone number and they'll text you an invite code for Gmail/Google Talk.

    Found the reference here: http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/answer.py?a nswer=24746&topic=1186

    Which takes you here: https://www.google.com/accounts/SmsMailSignup1

  209. If you read on... by embezzled · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It go on to say:

    * Full-disclosure update: When we first wrote these "10 things" four years ago, we included the phrase "Google does not do horoscopes, financial advice or chat." Over time we've expanded our view of the range of services we can offer -- web search, for instance, isn't the only way for people to access or use information -- and products that then seemed unlikely are now key aspects of our portfolio. This doesn't mean we've changed our core mission; just that the farther we travel toward achieving it, the more those blurry objects on the horizon come into sharper focus (to be replaced, of course, by more blurry objects).

    1. Re:If you read on... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      It should be obvious that they have changed the text since he posted his quote (which is no longer on the page)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  210. Privacy Policy by malorkus · · Score: 1

    Not to be a tinfoil hat type, but the privacy policy says they are monitoring and reporting usage data. -- Log information. When you use Google Talk, we may record information about your usage of Google Talk, such as when you use Google Talk, the size of your contact list and the contacts you communicate with, and the frequency and size of data transfers. Information displayed or clicked on in the Google Talk interface (including UI elements, settings, and other information) is also recorded. We use this information internally to deliver the best possible service to you, such as improving the Google Talk user interface and maintaining a consistent and reliable user experience. We delete all personally identifiable information from our logs after a period of time reasonably necessary to do so. We do not store any of the content of your text or voice communications in our logs.

  211. Adium: New mail notification? by Max_Wells_SH · · Score: 0

    I turned on the "Display new mail notifications" option in my Google Talk account preferences in Adium, and tried e-mailing that account, but no notification was forthcoming. Has anyone else tried this in Adium or another client? Or does it only work with MSN/Hotmail? It would be handy to be able to lose GmailStatus/Gmail Notifier and let the IM client handle that--if Gmail is going to be that integrated.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the articles.
  212. Google Talk Live Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BusinessWeek has the story

    http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug 2005/tc20050824_9823_tc119.htm

    Available as a software download, the service could turn the long-divided IM market on its ear by creating the potential for interoperability not only with offerings from established players, including Time Warner's (TWX ) America Online, Microsoft's (MSFT ) MSN, and Yahoo! (YHOO ), but also with lesser-known services such as Trillian, Apple Computer's (AAPL ) iChat, and GAIM, an IM client for Linux users.

    Georges Harik, Google's director of product management, says the company has opened communications with AOL and Yahoo, offering them interoperability on the Google Talk network free, and it will soon contact Microsoft. It remains to be seen whether these big players, especially AOL, which runs both its AOL Instant Messenger service and the globally popular ICQ service, will take Google up on its offer. ...

    SIP SUPPORT. With the launch of its IM software, Google also plans to become an important force in the growing market for Internet-based voice calls. Harik says Google is looking seriously at adding technical support for SIP, or session initiation protocol, an industry standard used to make phone calls over the Internet. When it adds the support, its network would become compatible with such Net-telephony services as Vonage, SIPphone, and others that use SIP.

  213. Google Talk Meme Effect (Flickr photos) by otisg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Simpy
  214. Competing with themselves by superultra · · Score: 1

    I love gmail. In fact, most of my friends are on gmail, and it's an understatement to say that it's changed the way we communicate. Emails used to be long, now - thanks to the conversation thread view - we don't feel bad writing one liners that would have otherwise clogged up email boxes. Mailing from one gmail account to another is almost as fast as instant message, and many of our conversations look like group chats.

    So three of us decided to mess around with Google Talk. It was lame, and just made us wonder why we weren't gmailing. The VOIP seemed solid enough, but since we all have cellphones with unlimited long distance VOIP seems kind of pointless. These weren't conversations we could archive and search later, and it was only between two people at a time - unlike some of our 20+ person threads.

    If there was somehow more integration with gmail this would have been really cool. If Google Talk could somehow have "transcribed" the entire conversation as a gmail, _and_ allowed more than two people in a conversation, we would have used Google Talk for more than 3 minutes. As it stands, it's just another medicore instant message program. Yipee.

    I'm using Google Sidebar, and I just can't fathom why all these products aren't interoperable. Why can't Google Sidebar just tell me how many new gmails I have, with a simple number? Why can't Google Talk save my conversations as gmails? Maybe that's the grand plan, whenever Google Beta finally de-beta-izes; but for now it seems like Google is sprawling in so many directions one side doesn't know what the other is doing.

  215. Great! This is absolutely freaking great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The client is awful, and Google is now officially going to have access to 90% of the communication I have online, but I can't help but think how awesome this is.

    Jabber... an open standard... for IM clients...

    No more OSCAR, Yahoo, or MSN. No more need to reverse engineer protocols that IM providers break whenever they're feeling saucy. You can connect with any damn client you want, from any OS you want, and talk to other people no matter what they're using.

    I realize Jabber has offered this for a long time, and in my more zealous moments I have advocated people switching. But, in one fell swoop, by putting out a simple client (and it is simple; overly simple for someone like me -- JUST RIGHT for my parents!) that speaks an open protocol, and putting what is bar none the hottest name in tech behind it, they've just done what 10 years of my patient evangelizing could have never done.

    How long until this is a serious market share competitor with AIM and MSN? Months? A year? It will happen, and sooner than we all think. How long until it's the only name you need to know for IM? Not much longer.

    They might be reading all of my email, IMs, and studying every one of my web searches. Hell, they might be printing out hardcopies of these things, lighting them on fire, and taking a big dump on them. Right now they are my heroes.

    1. Re:Great! This is absolutely freaking great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, but they don't allow gmail users to add jabber users from other servers. Also they block any sort of communcation (chat or message) from other jabber servers. Doesn't seem very open to me.

    2. Re:Great! This is absolutely freaking great! by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      True, but they don't allow gmail users to add jabber users from other servers. Also they block any sort of communcation (chat or message) from other jabber servers. Doesn't seem very open to me.
      From their site:
      We can say this, though: we believe strongly in user choice and open standards, and we are committed to letting users access Google Talk using the client and platform of their choice, as well as to enabling our users to talk with users from other service providers.
      I'm personally taking this to mean "we're working on figuring out how to enable s2s without getting all you guys spammed".
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  216. Gspot - Sexual Interface To Be Released Next Week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hold onto your joysticks, boys, Google is about to release Gspot, the long-awaited sexual interface for the WWW.

    Gspot's motto: "Reach out and Goose{TM) someone."

  217. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by onosendai · · Score: 4, Informative

    rumor has it - invite wumpus.game@gmail.com, then IM it 'play'

    --
    <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
  218. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by aardvarko · · Score: 1

    That user's offline right now. Slashdotted?

  219. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yeah, it works. Not as good as the terminal version, though. I can copy&paste part of a game:
    wumpus.game: BATS NEARBY!
    YOU ARE IN ROOM 6
    TUNNELS LEAD TO 5 7 15

    SHOOT OR MOVE (S-M)
    Nick: m
    wumpus.game: WHERE TO
    Nick: 15
    wumpus.game: YOU ARE IN ROOM 15
    TUNNELS LEAD TO 6 14 16

    SHOOT OR MOVE (S-M)
    Nick: m
    wumpus.game: WHERE TO
    Nick: 16
    wumpus.game: YOU ARE IN ROOM 16
    TUNNELS LEAD TO 15 17 20

    SHOOT OR MOVE (S-M)
    Nick: m
    wumpus.game: WHERE TO
    Nick: 20
    wumpus.game: I FEEL A DRAFT
    YOU ARE IN ROOM 20
    TUNNELS LEAD TO 13 16 19

    SHOOT OR MOVE (S-M)
    Nick: m
    wumpus.game: WHERE TO
    Nick: 19
    wumpus.game: YYYYIIIIEEEE . . . FELL IN PIT
    HA HA HA - YOU LOSE
    SAME SETUP (Y-N)

    Yeah, it's a nice little game. It lacks the long text discriptions of the bsdgames version, no mention of falling to the center of the earth to see if you stop there.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  220. Somebody had to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, somebody has gone off and created a YTMND of Google Talk.

    http://googletalk.ytmnd.com/

    Personally, I love the program alot.

  221. easier gmail invites- anyone with a cellphone by carmaggedon · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    gmail invites are now available to anyone with an american cellphone. https://www.google.com/accounts/SmsMailSignup1

    wondering if this is starting right now, same as google talk. first i've heard of an alternate way to get a gmail account- no bumming an invite from a friend. (although at this point everyone basically has one or isn't interested in one. still an interesting change.)

    1. Re:easier gmail invites- anyone with a cellphone by mimio · · Score: 1

      "gmail invites are now available to anyone with an american cellphone."

      This is not true. It is only available to anyone with an US Cellphone. It is not available to the rest of the countries of America.

  222. Something interesting in the faq about encryption by SeaEye420 · · Score: 1
    Can you tell me more about Google Talk and privacy?
    Google Talk currently does not encrypt chats or calls. But we are working hard to make many improvements to Google Talk while it is in beta, and we plan to fully support encryption of chats and calls before our official release.
    Not that it will ever actually be out of beta...
    --
    Wort Wort Wort!
  223. Dilbert by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Griffin in finance or the mythical creature?"

    "Whichever is harder."

    1. Re:Dilbert by juanescalante · · Score: 1

      Do you have a URL for that one?

    2. Re:Dilbert by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      No, I don't. It's in a book called 'Dogberts Top Secret Managerial Guide' (or something like that, I'm away from home ATM). It's rather old, I know that.

  224. Re:Does Anyone Know: Why Jabber? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

    Jabber is, by design, a standard.

    AIM, MSN, Yahoo, etc. . . IM protocols are designed for for official clients only, and are proprietary. They can, and do, randomly change the protocol, and break compatibility with older versions.

    Jabber, by design, is an open standard. No reverse engineering required. Feel free to write a client, or a server, or a piece of middleware.

    Why should google invent a new one when a perfectly good one exists? They didn't redesign HTML, or SMTP? They just provided a better 'solution.

    Google didn't make the first search engine. They made the first *good* search engine.

    Google didn't make the first webmail client. They made the first *amazing* webmail client.

    Google didn't design the first IM service. It'll remain to be see whether or not theirs will rock, but basing it on jabber is a really, really good first step.

    Supporting voice chat (especially if its open, as well, i.e. googletalkichatgaim-vv). That'll make the makers of Skype fairly sad, I think ;-)

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  225. someone mod this up... by sacbhale · · Score: 1

    Where are the damn mod points when u need them
    i give u +1 insightful from my magic mod points :)

  226. Skype by stud9920 · · Score: 0

    Skype does instant messaging. Unless gtalk does provide VoIP integrated with the POTS, there's no way I going to run a second programme.

  227. gtalk as a way to avoid talking through email by check+MINUS · · Score: 1

    which is exactly what we are doing now about gtalk.

  228. Not to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who's invited whom to gmail.

  229. Not Implemented (Yet)... by Gamelore · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, Google Talk Beta does not yet even create chat logs, let alone time-stamped chat logs, or even an integrated history search tool. When messaging people, it does not even show when messages were sent.

    Among other issues with Google Talk Beta, sending paragraphed messages is a pain (SHIFT+ENTER), since there is no way to remap to be "RETURN" rather than "SEND". Also, there is currently no offline messaging.

    Google has totally won me over with every tool they've released, but Google Talk Beta is quite a letdown. Old ICQ is the only IM program I've found with all of these features, and I'll sadly be sticking with that until Google Talk beefs up.

  230. Voice Chat by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    Wow! Tried out the voice chat and it's really awesome. So far it's been very responsive with very minimal packet loss and very low (imperceptible) latency.

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    1. Re:Voice Chat by lotsToLearn · · Score: 0
      Where were the clients located? in US? I am interested in trans-global results for example how it works over crappy connections on the other side of the planet.

      Also I would be soooo interested in Voice Chat working on Linux! :'(

    2. Re:Voice Chat by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      This was the next logical question. I had 3 chats last night. 2 of them were local (all within Silicon Valley which is where I'm roughly located). The last call was made to LA. It's still the same state but roughly 400 miles away and still working awesome. I want to try it across the nation next and then try it globally.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  231. There is no shortage of talent. by elucido · · Score: 1

    It's simple, if you want to compete with google for engineering talent, pay more money for talent. If you don't have as much money as good, too bad.

    Hey fellow engineers, looks like we can raise our prices!

  232. FEIC by panaceaa · · Score: 3, Funny

    But what if a major event happened and everyone needed to email each other to say everything's okay??? Would Google have enough space to hold all the emails?? I demand to have a federal email corporation that insures that there's enough space in times of emergencies! If Google runs out of space, then the government should give us enough space for 100,000 emails. Otherwise, the people who send emails first will get all the email space and everyone else will be silenced and forced on the streets (to talk to people in person, God forbid!!).

    1. Re:FEIC by I'm+Troy+McClure · · Score: 0



      Just wait for google's filesharing service! Transfer an ed2k link directly into your inbox with googlefs today!

      --
      larryvagina@gmail.com
  233. Wireless Village support ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know if google plans to support wireless village as a protocol ?

    I'd love to see a decent wireless village service out their.
    Yamigo sucks big ones.

    Anyone know of a free wireless village service ?

  234. Google Sidebar Integration by ThyPiGuy · · Score: 1

    Google Talk is also now integrated into Google Sidebar.. Select Add/Remove panels from the sidebar menu and add Google Talk.

  235. Re: Austin Powers - randy by lullabud · · Score: 1

    Actually, I haven't seen it. But I did read Linus Torvalds' description of how the Linux penguin should look full on herring, and not like a randy penguin. That was my first run-in with the phrase. This may have been before Austin Powers, but I really don't know for sure.

    http://www.linux.org/info/penguin.html

  236. Instructions on How to Play by hagrin · · Score: 2

    wumpus.game: Welcome hagrin@gmail.com/Talk.v64E5DFD1CB

    INSTRUCTIONS (Y-N)
    Robert: Y
    wumpus.game: WELCOME TO 'HUNT THE WUMPUS'
        THE WUMPUS LIVES IN A CAVE OF 20 ROOMS. EACH ROOM
    HAS 3 TUNNELS LEADING TO OTHER ROOMS. (LOOK AT A
    DODECAHEDRON TO SEE HOW THIS WORKS-IF YOU DON'T KNOW
    WHAT A DODECAHEDRON IS, ASK SOMEONE)

              HAZARDS:
      BOTTOMLESS PITS - TWO ROOMS HAVE BOTTOMLESS PITS IN THEM
              IF YOU GO THERE, YOU FALL INTO THE PIT (& LOSE)
      SUPER BATS - TWO OTHER ROOMS HAVE SUPER BATS. IF YOU
              GO THERE, A BAT GRABS YOU AND TAKES YOU TO SOME OTHER
              ROOM AT RANDOM (WHICH MAY BE TROUBLESOME)
    TYPE AN E THEN RETURN

    WUMPUS:
      THE WUMPUS IS NOT BOTHERED BY HAZARDS (HE HAS SUCKER
      FEET AND IS TOO BIG FOR A BAT TO LIFT). USUALLY
      HE IS ASLEEP. TWO THINGS WAKE HIM UP: YOU SHOOTING AN
    ARROW OR YOU ENTERING HIS ROOM.
              IF THE WUMPUS WAKES HE MOVES (P=.75) ONE ROOM
      OR STAYS STILL (P=.25). AFTER THAT, IF HE IS WHERE YOU
      ARE, HE EATS YOU UP AND YOU LOSE!

              YOU:
      EACH TURN YOU MAY MOVE OR SHOOT A CROOKED ARROW
          MOVING: YOU CAN MOVE ONE ROOM (THRU ONE TUNNEL)
          ARROWS: YOU HAVE 5 ARROWS. YOU LOSE WHEN YOU RUN OUT
          EACH ARROW CAN GO FROM 1 TO 5 ROOMS. YOU AIM BY TELLING
          THE COMPUTER THE ROOM#S YOU WANT THE ARROW TO GO TO.
          IF THE ARROW CAN'T GO THAT WAY (IF NO TUNNEL) IT MOVES
          AT RANDOM TO THE NEXT ROOM.
              IF THE ARROW HITS THE WUMPUS, YOU WIN.
              IF THE ARROW HITS YOU, YOU LOSE.
    TYPE AN E THEN RETURN

    WARNINGS:
              WHEN YOU ARE ONE ROOM AWAY FROM A WUMPUS OR HAZARD,
              THE COMPUTER SAYS:
      WUMPUS: 'I SMELL A WUMPUS'
      BAT : 'BATS NEARBY'
      PIT : 'I FEEL A DRAFT'
    HUNT THE WUMPUS

    BATS NEARBY!
    I SMELL A WUMPUS
    YOU ARE IN ROOM 14
    TUNNELS LEAD TO 4 13 15

    SHOOT OR MOVE (S-M)

  237. google, bah humbug! by much2curious · · Score: 0, Troll

    1. Google talk is windows only!! Blah! No Linux support even planned! (At least yahoo has a text messenger for un*x.) 2. Yahoo has had a voice messenger since may. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1817029,00.as p http://messenger.yahoo.com/feat_voice.php 3. Someone had you guys pegged two weeks ago!! http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=159339&cid=133 44524

  238. Formatted Instructions for Wumpus Game by hagrin · · Score: 1

    Formatted (easier to read) instructions can be found here.

  239. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by diablo-d3 · · Score: 1

    Heh, I just blogged that, about 7 minutes before your post. Go read it here.

    --
    Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || http://AdTerrasPerAspera.com
  240. Voice? by fossa · · Score: 1

    It's been a while since I looked at jabber (assuming Google talk will integrate with other jabber servers at large), and a quick search turns up little (some mailing list posts from 3 years ago implying there is no voice over jabber). Can anyone give a summary of voice over jabber (or whatever Google is using) and the chances of this working in Linux?

  241. Time for a poll by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    How many days until google posts a working http://tomorrow.google.com/ site?

    1: Before tomorrow
    2: Before the end of the work week.
    3: Before next week
    4: Later
    5: Never

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Time for a poll by Lillesvin · · Score: 1

      6. Before last week

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    2. Re:Time for a poll by turtled · · Score: 1

      7. ???
      8. PROFIT!!!
      Errr...?

      --
      "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
  242. Re:AIM still owns the market by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

    everyone in asia seems to use Yahoo

  243. being a frequent IM/Voice user by floydman · · Score: 1

    Mainly because my wife is in another continent, the voice quality is not bad at all...but what i really liked, is that its 900KB.
    I mean try downloading msn messenger (16MB), yahoo messenger (8MB)..and this is 900 freaking Kbs.
    Very nice, for a beta at least

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  244. Closed network by Nurgled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the Google Talk developer page, Google is only planning pre-arranged peering with a set of providers. Their goal, it appears, is to reduce spam and other abuses by ensuring that all clients are connecting through trusted services.

    While I see their point, it does seem like a bit of a cop out. "Service choice" doesn't really mean much unless I can choose to use my own service and still inter-operate. A truly open system should allow anyone to play, not just the big boys.

    1. Re:Closed network by ChronoWiz · · Score: 2, Informative

      The developer page seems to suggest that the pre-arranged peering is only for their voice service, as a way of interoperating with other pay voice services and maybe landlines. It doesn't say anything about IM, so I'm going to hope that the current non-compatibility with other Jabber servers is just a feature they haven't finished yet and not a deliberate policy decision. If it is deliberate they are really shooting themselves in the foot, and this will end up being "just another IM service", instead of bringing about the IM unification that it could.

  245. Wine -- It installs and runs...initially by Spoing · · Score: 1
    I gave it a quick try, and after the initial installation, Google Talk fired up and asked me for my ID and password. Not having one handy, I clicked on the menus and everything available except for web integration worked; select help and a web browser pops up with an odd URL. www.%1.com could not be found.

    After closing Google Talk and running it manually, it first crashed. After killing off the Wine processes and waiting a couple minutes, it started again.

    Here's what works and does not work (minus login as I don't have one);

    Minimize: Odd behavior.
    Close: Ignored.
    Inbox: Mozilla reports www.%1.com could not be found.
    Settings: Pops up the settings dialog that works fine...except for the help button; www.%1.com could not be found.
    Help: www.%1.com could not be found.

    Anyone else want to continue from here?

    (Installed using Windows 2000 as the Wine version. Killed Wine to exit Google Talk with the command "killall -15 wineserver wine-preloader wine-pthread" executed 2x.)

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  246. not bobtail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rag and tag are two rascals, but bobtail is a nice guy.

    He wouldn't do anything bad, not knowingly. You wouldn't know if bobtail did anything bad.

    Sam

  247. Address by mporcheron · · Score: 1

    Actually all you need is a Googe Account, get one here.

  248. Does not interoperate with other servers by niftyzero · · Score: 1

    I tried sending messages to and from accounts on other servers, and nothing gets through.

    It doesn't look like Google's Jabber server interoperates with other servers. So although it's using the Jabber protocol, it's a closed system.

    1. Re:Does not interoperate with other servers by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Same here:
      Aug 24 07:29:58 crossbone jabberd/s2s[20891]: [7] [64.233.161.107, port=5269] connection to gmail.com timed out
      I hope they're not going to try to keep it isolated -- but this is Google, of course they're not. Probably on their TODO list. :-)
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  249. For Adium/OSX by skochak · · Score: 1

    Is that any method, that any one is aware of, for pre-loading all contacts from gmail, into adium, or any other such (non-google) jabber client?
    Thanks!

    --
    This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.
    1. Re:For Adium/OSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, can it be done?

      Mods... mod parent up!

  250. Re:Google spell-checking by hritcu · · Score: 1

    I am positive that they will add Google-style spell-checking.

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  251. Other Jabber clients? (Psi) by AceJohnny · · Score: 1

    So of course, it seems that google supports other Jabber clients, like Gaim. Unfortunately, I'm allergic to GAIM (my sinuses get all clogged up)... And I seem to be having trouble with my favourite client: Psi.
    For a client to operate with google talk, I saw this from Google Talk's FAQ:
            * DNS SRV records are not configured for the service at this time
            * Client applications should connect to host talk.google.com on port 5222
            * TLS is required
            * The only supported authentication mechanism is SASL PLAIN

    When I have SSL disabled (contrary to what they ask, see the TLS requirement), Psi gives me "Authentication error: Unable to Login" but the actual XML response from the server includes: "Server does not support PLAIN"

    With SSL enabled, I get "Authentication Error: No appropriate mechanism available for given security settings"...

    Anyone have an idea whether Psi can work with this, or if it just lacks the necessary features? If it can work, what are the options?

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  252. Re:GAIM error MOD PARENT UP by kihjin · · Score: 1
    Yes!! I am getting this error as well, and have been working furiously to fix it, with no luck!

    I was told that the problem was that I hadn't compiled Gaim with any sort of SSL, such as GnuTLS. Look here: http://gaim.sourceforge.net/faq-ssl.php#q25

    I've followed these directions (the source ones, that is) without any luck. However, the gnutls plugin was compiled, Gaim just wont use it!
    [frozen@frozen ~/.gaim]$ ldd /usr/lib/gaim/ssl-gnutls.so
            libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xb7eee000)
            libgnutls.so.8 => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.8 (0xb7e94000)
            libgcrypt.so.7 => /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.7 (0xb7e49000)
            libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0xb7e34000)
            libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7d04000)
            libtasn1.so.2 => /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2 (0xb7cf4000)
            libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7ce5000)
            libgpg-error.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0xb7ce0000)
    /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
    [frozen@frozen ~/.gaim]$
    Gaim even probes it...

    plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/ssl-gnutls.so

    But still, even with that (and the option in Jabber config selected), I still receive the error.
    --
    This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.
  253. Voice thorugh firewalls/NAT by dr.+greenthumb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It just looked like YAIM to me until I read this:

    You should also be able to use Google Talk at your company, since voice calls should work across any firewall or NAT.

    If this is true, then it blows MSN Messenger, AIM, Yahoo Chat, iChat etc. out of the water.

    Getting these kinds of applications to work is getting harder and harder due to all the broadband routers out there your NAT-lock you in - and making it pretty damn hard for Joe Sixpack to configure it to properly route incoming UDP and TCP connections.

    For me, being on a campus network not allowing incoming UDP nor remotely-initiated TCP connections it's been impossible to you use any kind of voice functionality in IM clients (with the exception of Skype).

    Has anyone tested this? Is Google Talk using a P2P approach similar to Skype to make this work?

    1. Re:Voice thorugh firewalls/NAT by dr.+greenthumb · · Score: 1

      Err, replying to myself here :/


      5. What protocols are used for voice calls?

      Google Talk supports a custom XMPP-based signaling protocol and peer-to-peer communication mechanism. We will fully document this protocol. In the near future, we plan to support SIP signaling.

      6. Which voice codecs do you support?

      Today, Google Talk supports the following standard voice codecs: PCMA, PCMU, G.723, iLBC. We are also evaluating the Speex codec. We also support codecs from Global IP Sound: ISAC, IPCMWB, EG711U, EG711A

  254. Google Talk is unencrypted, TLS or not. by kjoonlee · · Score: 1

    Au contraire. Right now, Google Talk is unencrypted.

    http://www.google.com/talk/about.html

    1. Re:Google Talk is unencrypted, TLS or not. by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Au contraire. Right now, Google Talk is unencrypted.

      http://www.google.com/talk/about.html


      That page says that Chat & Calls are unencrypted. It doesn't say anything about their jabber server. Try using openssl's s_client to connect to talk.google.com, you can clearly see they have a sert and are accepting TLS.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  255. [ x ] "Allow plaintext login" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the Account settings:

    [ x ] "Allow plaintext login"

    That means plaintext password over the ssl connection...

  256. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Pingla · · Score: 1

    Hey, yourmail!
    I am connected as well, but I can't find you, duuude.

  257. Play 23 21 ... by zxking · · Score: 1

    It is a clue to play Hunt the Wumpus , an old command line interface game.

    Instructions on how to set up th play on the link above. Enjoy!

  258. no file transfers? bah by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

    ok, they're doing instant messaging and voice communication now, but what about transfering files/directories to people? This feature seems to be missing, unless I'm blind. I still prefer to use ICQ since windows/msn messenger doesn't allow you to transfer entire directories of files, not to mention actually (uselessly/annoyingly) blocks certain filetypes. Google's client/service might be good, but until they've got file transfer capability, I'll never know.

  259. communicate with other Jabber users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can my friends, using google talk, chat with {me}@{my.jabber.server.org}?

    I've just added my jabber account to my gmail account using gaim, but can't see myself online / chat (being online with psi).

    I guess I'll not be able to talk with microphone right now... but chatting?

  260. wiki is realy fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  261. I can't add an external JID? by caluml · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. I am connected all well and fine, but I've tried to add my "normal" Jabber account in. No request, nothing. I hope Google aren't going to keep it's Jabber users locked in and unable to contact the rest of the Jabber world. That's equivalent to only letting their SMTP servers talk to their SMTP servers.

    1. Re:I can't add an external JID? by aleander · · Score: 1

      In the FAQ they said that it's not working *yet*. And they're working on it.

      --
      Segmentation fault. Ore dumped.
    2. Re:I can't add an external JID? by caluml · · Score: 1

      But that looks like it refers to the Voice Chat functionality. I'm just talking about plain ol' XMPP based subscription and messaging.

  262. Google Talk not talk to other Jabber server by Jayanef · · Score: 0

    Google Talk use jabber protocol, so far GT not talk to other Jabber server

    Sigh, one feature from jabber protocol is distributed server, so username@gmail.com can talk to otheruser@other.jabber.server

    --
    -- There is four mistake in this sentences.
  263. My top 5 things Google should do by Arceliar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It would be interesting to make a list of what basic (computer related) services Google DOESNT provide yet.

    1: Not yet an ISP! - Give me WiFi, damnit!
        *Reads This * "Good boy Google, now fetch"

    2: Webpages - With the amount of storage they have for gmail, they could certainly fork up 50mb free webpage accounts by now, right? Just like with the mail, the average person probably wont use 50 megs, I'm sure that's what they'd count on. But it would be really interesting to see something like this happen with google. Oooh, what's this, searching appears to imply it exists, dispite the fact that it links nowhere...

    3: Coffee and TV - It's true you can search froogle for just about anything, and it's true google has a small merchandising department (appairently), but they don't have anything like...amazon.com as an example (all be it a rather poor one). I think you get the point...if your company makes something, they cant add it to a google store, and if you want something, you cant buy it through google. (again, froogle, I know, but it's just not the same).

    4: A Better Blogger - What the hell is up with blogging everything these days? I mean...it's like a diary, except anyone has access to read it. Now, this was fine until one day you turn on the news and they're reading some random John Doe's opinion on the economy, and acting like it's important. *ahem* but anyways, Blogger. If they slapped the google name on blogger, and wrote just a tad bit of support into the client their Google Talk client right here (something really simple, like, link your gmail account to your blogger account, and then just a little link in the drop down menu) and I'd bet my Bawls they'd see a sudden spike in blogger's popularity and it crushes other services as quickly as blogging crushed my hope in humanity.

    5: Google Browser - a Gowser? I don't know what to call it, but it's an idea that I've seen google talk about as early as September 2001. Fork mozilla already! Just think about it though, how many of you have google as your start page? (or something that links to google in bright bold letters at the top of the page, such as this lovely one you're reading right now). If they've already made a messenger client and service, then they've clearly invested at least a reasonable amount of effort into software. It's not hard to imagine a massively google-customized fork of firefox, or mozilla, finding it's way onto my desktop, laptop, and PSP (once I get a good linux port running, emulating an x86 is too much of a round-about way of doing things for me). Of course, then someone would suggest they make a google media player, and they'd jump on the idea. And people would keep naming off apps they want google to make until one day they make a google kernel (goognel? or something...) and we have a complete google operating system running. I wish.

    More importanlty, why did I stay up till 5 AM reading/posting on here? And when exactly in the night did I misplace my pants?

  264. GET OUT OF YOUR HOUSE NOW by agwilliams1000 · · Score: 1

    "if google were the government" IndianWells GET OUT OF YOUR HOUSE NOW!! The government know you are onto them and the feds are coming for you as I type. I have arranged for a contact to meet you outside your house who will take you to a man called 'Little Weaner' who will issue you with fake documents. Just to be clear go to the man outside your house and tell him you'd like to see his Little Weaner.

  265. Gmail IS public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone can now create a google account and get GMail. https://www.google.com/accounts/ At least it looks that way, I haven't actually tried it as I already have one.

  266. Indeed by Tezprice · · Score: 1
    Many users have been eager to let us know that Google Talk in indeed live.

    That in very good news.

  267. 404 Not Allowed etcetera by whatever3003 · · Score: 1
    This is googles support page for other clients:
    http://www.google.com/support/talk/bin/answer.py?a nswer=24073

    With GAIM I got it to work with:

    Screen Name: (everything before the @gmail.com)
    Server: gmail.com
    Resource: Gaim
    Password: (obvious..)
    Alias: (leave blank)

    Use TLS if available (checked)
    Force old SSL (unchecked)
    Allow plaintext auth .. (unchecked)
    Port: 5222
    Connect server: talk.google.com

    And everything Just Works(tm)!

    --
    "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
  268. Thats the whole point by Clansman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google needs to see your conversation in order to target an advert at you.

    What would they try to sell you if all they saw was an encrypted stream?

    1. Re:Thats the whole point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security software? Brute force decryption?

      Or it could assume you're a techie (safe assumption with OTR), and sell you regular nerd stuff like slashdot does.

    2. Re:Thats the whole point by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      Encryption products. At least that's what they try to sell me when I send/receive a PGP encrypted email in Gmail.

    3. Re:Thats the whole point by SamSim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thousands of [rtGDS'p7500-0'p"£!$ now available at eBay!

  269. Which server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the contrary, I'm quite interested in what server they are running. It's been my experience that there isn't really a good, stable Jabber server implementation right now. They all have annoying quirks and are under-documented. What I'd like to know is whether Google is using some existing Jabber Server implementation or whether they've rolled their own. A polished Jabber server implementation that can handle potentially thousands or millions of concurrent users would almost certainly be a boon to the Jabber community.

    (Disclaimer: I've not looked at Jabber servers in any detail since about six months ago when I set up the server at my home. If things have since got better, I'd love to be corrected.)

  270. How does its voice chat perform on 56k? by psymastr · · Score: 1

    Did anyone test its performance using a modem and specifically compared to Skype's?

    --
    Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
  271. Google web client by outofpaper · · Score: 1

    what I find realy cool about this is that because the service is using jaber. I can easly connect with out installing any thing using a jabber web client: jwchat.sourceforge.net

  272. Coming up next -- Google Talk mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google will eventually become a mobile phone provider, and integrate their mobile phone service with Google Talk.

    Just wait and see.

  273. Re:Gmail, or any other unix mail archive... by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    Neat idea - Perhaps you could try it on an "ordinary" email archive (like the email databases used on unix, I think even Apple's Mail.app uses them, and most email clients can export to this format)
    Then basically you'd need to write a parser that would read your (admittedly long) text unix mail archive. I'd love to run such a thing on my own archive :-)

    Hervé

    --
    Herve S.
  274. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by marlingrando · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the bot is no longer accepting invitations using the google talk client: "wumpus.game has not yet accepted your invitation to Google Talk."

  275. Security - Encryption and signing? by the_dreadnought · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if the Google IM will support digital certificates for encryption and signing? This has been a nice feature in AIM. SSL/TLS is good, but having the option to use certificates is even better.

    1. Re:Security - Encryption and signing? by the_dreadnought · · Score: 1

      From http://www.google.com/talk/about.html, not much detail:

      "12. Can you tell me more about Google Talk and privacy? ...

      Google Talk currently does not encrypt chats or calls. But we are working hard to make many improvements to Google Talk while it is in beta, and we plan to fully support encryption of chats and calls before our official release."

    2. Re:Security - Encryption and signing? by Kevinv · · Score: 1

      the ichat instructions say to turn on SSL support and to allow self-signed certs. Not sure if that's just for the login or the messages too.

  276. HTTPS by TexTex · · Score: 1

    Watching this thing dance through my firewall, it seems that if it fails to connect on port 5222, it then connects to google via https.

    I'm wondering if the connection is actually encrypted of if they're just floating it on a commonly-open port through the firewall.

    --
    -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
  277. It's AVAILABLE NOW! http://www.google.com/talk/ by jgionet · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://www.google.com/talk/ running it now.. pretty sweet

  278. Too Late in the Game by quibbs0 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about anyone else but I think at this point in my IMing, I don't want to exactly find a new name for people to have to find. My AIM is over 10 years old. Who wants to start over? Not me. I think Google is doing good things but they are jumping onboard a bit too late for me to make this change.
    Maybe I'll change my mind once Google is running the government, which I'm sure is just down the road.
    In other news, Google Declares War on Iran

  279. Am I the only one? by BishonenAngstMagnet · · Score: 1

    I know it's been mentioned, but do we need another IM client? All my friends are on AIM or IRC. I may not like the AIM client, but it works fine and does the job. And I've got my boxedIRC sitting there for when I go on IRC. Is it so terrible to have *gasp* TWO clients on your computer? Unified messaging will never happen for two main reasons: AIM and MSN. The two will never agree on a standard, so forget it. Google adopting Jabber makes no difference. You know, I could be wrong, but I just don't see the mass exodus from AIM to GoogleTalk that we saw to GMail. Ok, you can mod me to -1: Flamebait now.

  280. That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The other day somebody inadvertantly linked to slashdot from slashdot, and wound up slashdotting slashdot!

  281. Quantum Searches...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe one day we'll have machines that can lookup databases from alternative dimensions and possible futures using some kind of quantum computing and post back the results that may or may not have or will have happened. Take a peek into another time and find out what google 2042 thinks about all this.

    Or maybe it's already happening! Somewhere out there in the universe someone is using our quantum bandwidth! BASTARDS!

    *Dawns tinfoil hat*

  282. Re:AIM still owns the market by johneee · · Score: 1

    The same goes in Canada. We use MSN pretty much exclusively, and I have yet to meet anyone who uses anything else - at least in the last few years since people stopped using ICQ.

    It's simple to see that since the services only work amongst themselves why once you have a critical mass it's almost impossible for someone else to get into the market. I might want to try Yahoo or AIM, but if nobody else uses it it's just one more thing on my taskbar that takes up memory but doesn't provide any benefit whatsoever.

    I've been trying to figure out why we evolved into MSN while the US is AIM, and whatever other kind of regional variations are out there, but I've never been able to come up with any satisfactory answers.

    Anyone out there have any ideas?

    --
    - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
  283. Where is AIM support? by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    Everyone I know uses AIM, but AIM doesnt work everywhere I go. I also have ICQ people. Will Googletalk ever talk to these people? If it only uses jabber, then I wont bother using it, since everyone has already made their beds in AIM, MSN, ICQ. They need to be 100% compatable with ALL protocols if they want this to take off. I tried getting one person to try it out. They wont. They have too many people on ICQ to leave.

    Google! Add AIM/MSN/ICQ support asap!!

  284. Geek Matching or is it App coordination? by One_6453 · · Score: 1

    Do you really want to get/make 15 different skins just so all of your apps look right together?

    I will never laugh at a woman whose concerned about the buttons on her blouse matching her lipstick ; )

  285. Re:OK ... Gashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't see even Google getting into the ... uh ... "personal services" business. Well, who knows? They might; they'd probably want to get into the anti-virus business first though.

  286. Is there a Symbian 60 client? by testerus · · Score: 1

    Is there a client for Symbian based smart-phones?

  287. When this get's integrated into Desktop Search by thenefariousone · · Score: 1

    Then that will be something truely compelling. gmail + talk + search in one convient place would be quite interesting.

    --
    http://hughgordon.com/
  288. AOL has tried to block 3rd parties by internic · · Score: 1

    While AOL does have a documented protocol for interacting with AIM servers, they have also gone to considerable lengths trying to block 3rd party clients from using the network in the past, specifically Trillian. I believe that having the published protocol was part of requirements for the merger with Time-Warner, but it seems it was only window dressing, and they didn't actually intend to interoperate with competitors.

    --
    "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
  289. Re:AIM/MSN still owns the market by Spazntwich · · Score: 0

    Remember when AOL tried to cut Trillian out of AIM services? Cerulean Studios has only 2 developers at last check, so given the resources of Google, I have a feeling they could gain (and keep) access if they wanted it.

    Legally that's a whole other ballgame though.

  290. Google Talk Over SSH by image · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those that are stuck behind a firewall, I wrote up a detailed, step-by-step guide on using Google Talk over SSH. This includes instructions for Windows, Linux, and Mac OSX, and focuses on the official Google Talk client, iChat, and Gaim.

    You can find the guide at Google Talk over SSH.

    Enjoy!

    1. Re:Google Talk Over SSH by blofeld42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Google's jabber server is also listening on port 80, which most firewalls let through.

      No muc?

  291. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

    OK, so they have a web site up at talk.google.com now. Looks like they have a Windows client available. They suggest GAIM for Linux. Has anyone connected using Kopete (with Jabber plugin)? It's what I use for MSN, and I'd like to use it for Google. However, I keep getting connection errors.

    Jabber ID: [username]@gmail.com
    Allow plain-text password checked
    Override default server: talk.google.com
    Port: 5222

    Kopete insisted I append @gmail.com to the ID. I also tried @talk.google.com. Any thoughts?

    --
    Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  292. Is it really needed? by Jetekus · · Score: 1

    Do we really need another IM client? It's just another account I'm going to have to set up because someone I want to talk to insists on using their particular IM client.

    Thank god for Adium!

  293. Server choice by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    See their developer page, in particular the section about server choice. Apparently, they are creating a system so users can communicate with each others across servers, and use that system together with anyone else who believe in server choice. They have two partners right now.

  294. kopete by hummassa · · Score: 1

    AIM, ICQ, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber, IRC, Gadu-Gadu, Novell GroupWise Messenger... and KDE (no GNOME libraries for me, please)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  295. Smileys! by 50m31sl4sh. · · Score: 1

    I wonder why no one in this discussion mentioned smileys.
    These are the times when some IM vendors even make smileys and other emoticons the selling point for their software (wink wink, nudge nudge).

    For those curious - yes, Google Talk supports smileys, but does it in its own google way. There are no stupid yellow smiley faces, it just highlights some widely known smileys (like :) ;) :P etc.) with blue color and makes them bold. That makes smileys stand out from the rest of the text while not being gaudy. I wonder why no other IM clients use this idea?

    --
    Rediculous is ridiculous!
  296. Re:clue to easter egg in client? "play wumpus game by 50m31sl4sh. · · Score: 1

    Same here.
    I guess the poor wumpus got slashdotted.

    --
    Rediculous is ridiculous!
  297. blogging = good marketing by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

    "how come their employees don't have public blogs like all those at MS?"

    because they don't need such artificial marketing for their good products...

    M$ employees blogs are such a worthless piece of advertising...

    --
    I don't feel like it...
  298. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (using Kopete 0.10.3)

    Make sure you turn ON all three options in the Connection tab:

    [X] Use protocol encryption (SSL)
    [X] Allow plain-text password authentication
    [X] Override default server
            talk.google.com 5223

    (I have 5223, not 5222, not sure if that makes a difference)

    Mine works fine (using the @gmail.com in the JID)

  299. Other Jabber servers by jcuervo · · Score: 1
    Sorry, I think this is the third time I've posted in here saying pretty much the same thing, but I've got proof now. :-)

    From here:
    It isn't possible to call or chat with non-Gmail users through Google Talk (but we're working on it).
    So, relax. They're not cutting the rest of the world off. That would probably qualify as evil, y'know?
    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  300. Re:Gmail, or any other unix mail archive... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    That's very true. In all this discussion about GMail it sort of slipped my mind that there's no reason you couldn't do the same thing with any other mail reader.

    I guess the reason for GMail in this situation was because it retains all email by default, while I think many people who use standard offline readers delete most of their mail, while only retaining important bits. That would really skew the output of the model (although admittedly it might skew it in a very interesting direction).

    Writing such a program would be a bit out of my league, but I'd also be interested to run it on my own archive just to see the output. Of course, running it on just your own mail wouldn't produce terribly interesting a "network," since there would just be one central node and then a lot of 1st degree nodes radiating away from that, at various angles and distances. To produce a network you'd need to be able to search recursively down the node structure, which as other people pointed out, raises a lot of privacy and security concerns.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  301. Re:Does Anyone Know: Why Jabber? by I'm+Troy+McClure · · Score: 0


    yes. now only if their webmail actually threaded the messages like a usenet reader does.

    --
    larryvagina@gmail.com
  302. one more request from google... by swanton · · Score: 1

    Give me 100MB of webhosting on google.com/~username/ and support for SQL, PHP, CGI etc. Force the display of Google Ads so you can make some money. And disable the uploading of files bigger than 1mb so you don't just become a huge file server.

  303. Re:smash's world: I'm almost slashdotted right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just tested Google Talk with Coccinella and it worked. Here are the instructions for people interested in it:
    • Jabber ID: youremail@gmail.com
    • Password: password_from_your_gmail_account
    • Disable the option "scramble password"
    • IP Address: talk.google.com
    • Port: 5223
    • Enable the SSL option, but disable the SASL option.
    • After this you can log in on Google Talk!
  304. goodness by munchicken · · Score: 1

    Cool monkeyman, I finally got signed up (yeah, I know you sent the email a week ago), thanks for spreading the goodness :) Check my site for my contact info.