Slashdot is a business. If they started using Google's partner link, the NYT would hand their asses to them in court.
Perhaps Slashdot should get in touch with the NYT and see if they can get a partnership set up, but stealing someone else's wouldn't be such a hot idea.
Why does every story linking to a New York Times article have people such as yourself complaining about it? Your comment lends nothing to the discussion and identical sentiments have been expressed countless times. Write a journal entry if you want mindless discourse regarding the New York Times registration requirement. Complain to the Times and tell them what horrible, horrible people they are for making you take ten seconds of your time to provide them with false information.
The fact is that the New York Times often has excellent content and they do not syndicate. This article isn't available elsewhere, but it's worthy of discussion, so either register and read it or do not participate in the discussuion.
I find it hard to believe that you're too lazy to fill out their registration form but somehow found the energy to come here and complain.
and I would go and I would go everyday almost to the sandbox and 'cause I loved the sandbox so much and 'cause I had my pail and shovel and shovel
and I would play in the sandbox and it would be so much fun and I would make mountains in the sand and I would have so much fun
and and but one day I went to the sandbox and it was so sad and I cried and I cried because someone took a doody in my sandbox someone took a doody in my sandbox
and that was so bad and that was so disgusting and how could they do that? and and that was so bad
and and and I didn't see it and and I sat right down in it and it felt squishy and I got up and I cried and I cried and I cried
and why didn't they clean up after themselves? and why didn't they clean up the mess?
and now my pants are dirty and I'm crying and I'm crying and I'm crying and I'm never going back to the sandbox again! and I hate everybody!
yes, you are required to update
on
Longhorn in 2006
·
· Score: 1
It's a sure shot that apps will require 10.3 just as they required 10.2. OS X upgrades are non-optional if you want to keep your applications up to date.
Because Apple got it right. I'm free to transfer my files to as many CDs or iPods as I like. I can play them on three machines. I can quasi-legally sell them if I want.
Yes, there are restrictions, but they're loose enough that I haven't bumped into them. I'm not against DRM the same way I'm not against laws: they're fine by me as long as they're not too restrictive.
Slashdot Mirror
It's much too difficult to change the default browser.
Launching applications? Setting preferences? What do they think we are, rocket scientists?
Slashdot doesn't stand a chance.
Firstly, it sounds like you were pretty much a wuss in 7th grade.
Secondly, hip-hop is much more than a fad. You wouldn't call rock and roll or jazz a fad, would you?
Thirdly, Elvis imitated no man.
I think it means that you are not too smart.
"Wannabes and their imprecise language..."
Elitists and their insistence on pointing out how wrong everyone else is...
Why don't you take it up with the W3C, who used the word valid repeatedly on their html validator?
But it doesn't validate as XHTML transitional, either.
It doesn't validate as any sort of XHTML I'm aware of.
From the page: "Here is a snippet of XHTML you can paste into a page.
' ></a>"
<a href='http://www.catb.org/hacker-emblem/'>
<img src='http://www.catb.org/hacker-emblem/glider.png
Note that this isn't valid XHTML.
I'm sure you already knew this.
A small island situated somewhere around Europe or somewhere like that.
See the CIA World Factbook Entry for more info.
Official client (Doesn't work on Panther!)
A decent Mac-only client
Azureus, a Java client.
You can also grab the standard distribution and run btdownloadheadless.py in Terminal.
They don't support my extremely obscure operating system!
Yes, folks, Linux on the desktop is obscure.
Just go down to the Free Admin Depot and pick up some guys to run it all?
Valenti?
Wrong *AA, I guess.
Slashdot is a business. If they started using Google's partner link, the NYT would hand their asses to them in court.
Perhaps Slashdot should get in touch with the NYT and see if they can get a partnership set up, but stealing someone else's wouldn't be such a hot idea.
Why does every story linking to a New York Times article have people such as yourself complaining about it? Your comment lends nothing to the discussion and identical sentiments have been expressed countless times. Write a journal entry if you want mindless discourse regarding the New York Times registration requirement. Complain to the Times and tell them what horrible, horrible people they are for making you take ten seconds of your time to provide them with false information.
The fact is that the New York Times often has excellent content and they do not syndicate. This article isn't available elsewhere, but it's worthy of discussion, so either register and read it or do not participate in the discussuion.
I find it hard to believe that you're too lazy to fill out their registration form but somehow found the energy to come here and complain.
We're left with a race of people who are thirteen feet tall and stunningly beautiful.
Creepy.
No, wait, this must be a Microsoft conspiracy!
"Steve Jobs referred to it as the greatest Windows app ever. This is somewhat of an overstatement..."
HOLY SHIT! Steve Jobs made an overstatement?!?!
A BMW is more or less just tires and metal.
and I would go
and I would go everyday almost to the sandbox
and 'cause I loved the sandbox so much
and 'cause I had my pail and shovel
and shovel
and I would play in the sandbox
and it would be so much fun
and I would make mountains in the sand
and I would have so much fun
and and but one day I went to the sandbox
and it was so sad
and I cried and I cried because
someone took a doody in my sandbox
someone took a doody in my sandbox
and that was so bad
and that was so disgusting
and how could they do that?
and and that was so bad
and and and I didn't see it
and and I sat right down in it
and it felt squishy and I got up
and I cried and I cried and I cried
and why didn't they clean up after themselves?
and why didn't they clean up the mess?
and now my pants are dirty
and I'm crying and I'm crying and I'm crying
and I'm never going back to the sandbox again!
and I hate everybody!
It's a sure shot that apps will require 10.3 just as they required 10.2. OS X upgrades are non-optional if you want to keep your applications up to date.
Apple says
Which is total bullshit. I'd say they sound about as good as a 192 kbps mp3 file, much better than the 128 kbps mp3 files littering Kazaa.
Because Apple got it right. I'm free to transfer my files to as many CDs or iPods as I like. I can play them on three machines. I can quasi-legally sell them if I want.
Yes, there are restrictions, but they're loose enough that I haven't bumped into them. I'm not against DRM the same way I'm not against laws: they're fine by me as long as they're not too restrictive.
This article is lots of places.
Way to use google news, karma whore.
Humanity? I don't think so, sister!
It should be personkind, or personity.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to write a very long letter to the people who make Manwich.