What would be even better is if the projected image provided force feedback so if you stuck your finger in it you could feel some resistance.... mmmmmmm
I think Thomas Jefferson would be crying right now
well no wonder, a person can't do anything religious in public now without someone else crying "I'm offended!!" and the other person being shutup and/or arrested.
I've done an OpenLDAP install once if I remember correctly and the install itself went fine, but I'll be damned if I could figure out how to administer it or really do anything with it as there were no tools that came with it.
Active Directory and even Netscape Directory Server(or Sun iPlanet) are a lot better to experiment with. Both of those will give you an idea of how the classes and attributes correlate and since you are trying to learn OpenLDAP I'd suggest going with Netscape/Sun (both can be downloaded from Sun's website and as far as I can tell after downloading them they are both free but Sun does have a pay version of theirs; I know that for sure) because they won't have Microsoft related classes and attributes spread throughout the schema. Your lowest level default class for a user is an inetOrgPerson in standard LDAP; MS uses user as the lowest leve default class for users. At the top is just "top". And it flows down from there to inetOrgPerson. Each user class down the hierarchy gets more specific by adding in more attributes while inheriting attributes from those above it. Since Netscape/Sun conform to the LDAP standard, viewing their schema should prepare you for OpenLDAP and they have much better tools to do that as well.
For just one highly simplistic example: Tom, LDAP is NOT a database.
Just to redeem Tom a bit here: the reviewer does make it a point to say that Tom "makes a clear case that an LDAP directory is not a relational database" so based on that I don't think anything was said that should make you think he said LDAP is a database.
The more famous shot is where Keanu Reeves is dodging bullets up on top of the building before the subway scene because that scene gave the camera trick its name: bullet time. The pictures were taken with the cameras and stitched together for an animation while the backgrounds were filled in with computer graphics.
And now they try to use PG-13 whenever possible no matter the content so that they can rake in more money. The standards for PG-13 are lower than they used to be.
Why would a phone need a hard drive in the future?
So you can store your address book, ringtones, games, songs, data files on your own phone instead of on T-Mobile's servers where they can be hacked into and publicized on the Internet.
What's the point of a journalism degree if you can be called a journalist by making your own site and posting messages to it? I say anyone with a journalism degree is a journalist and anyone not having that degree is not a journalist. That seems pretty cut and dry to me. Why do people like making gray areas with every aspect of life? geez.
I think that Yahoo has a problem with this in a sense because people can send other people messages on Yahoo messenger, the recipient will wonder who it is and visit the sender's Yahoo profile page and when visited the sender can steal the Yahoo password of the visitor and change it so you can't get back into your account anymore. And then they use your address book to send to your friends and try it on your friends then. Anyone know anything about this?
George Carlin should take his own advice about how some words just are not needed to get a point across. You can leave out all swear words in all movies and still get the same effect. Don't believe me? Watch a movie on TV once it has been censored and see if the explosions or the naked women (different topic) look any different or the plot is scarred somehow. I'm not talkin about the stupid words that get inserted because of the censorship but when the sound is totally blanked out I can still get the full plot just fine. When unnecessary words are removed then a bigger viewer base is capable of seeing the content and doesn't that bring in more revenue? I don't see why the media producers don't get that concept. Those who feel the need to hear f*ck every other sentence can feel free to say it to themselves but I don't think having to use more than my fingers and toes to count how many times that word is said in a movie is a sign meaning the movie is great. It is just the opposite in fact. It sure doesn't make it a movie that most people would enjoy.
You should take your own theory into account as well and realize that without "f*ck" being used at all in a tv show or movie that the idea can still be very clearly expressed so what's the added value of including the swear words then? Simple answer: there isn't any added value.
There is no Constitutional infraction going on here. No one says the media producers aren't allowed to produce the crap they produce. They just have to distribute it in a way that prevents just anyone from getting it. The speech is still free because no one is telling them to shutup, they are just being told when and how to talk because not everyone wants to or *should* hear them. Sure we can change the channel but the media producers need to show some responsiblity just as parents do. The producers think they are all high and mighty and don't need to show any responsibility and most people disagree. As one person said here a few months ago, just because you change the channel doesn't mean it goes away and when you choose to ignore someone they will get worse and worse because they know they can get away with it. It's about time we rein in the producers.
'Shared Source' must be doing something correct, otherwise it wouldn't still be here. What is it doing right?
It is making MS money. The only reason I can think of that people would use to sign up is that they just want to see the quality of MS coding for curiousity's sake.
I have always found it intriguing that the US both celebrates the day of its independance from the British empire and continues to use old British units of measurement.
Slashdot Mirror
wget got stuck in an infinite loop on thousands of zombie PCs
Probibly but I highly dout it becauz there are meny other werds out they're that culd be mispeld.
Christians have always said God works in mysterious ways and only certain people are able to realize just how God works.
Girlfriend? You give him too much credit. Remember, he is ambidextrous.
What would be even better is if the projected image provided force feedback so if you stuck your finger in it you could feel some resistance.... mmmmmmm
I think Thomas Jefferson would be crying right now
well no wonder, a person can't do anything religious in public now without someone else crying "I'm offended!!" and the other person being shutup and/or arrested.
we like Canada now or are they still evil up there?
I don't know if you have any numbers that are significant in your life
69
I've done an OpenLDAP install once if I remember correctly and the install itself went fine, but I'll be damned if I could figure out how to administer it or really do anything with it as there were no tools that came with it.
Active Directory and even Netscape Directory Server(or Sun iPlanet) are a lot better to experiment with. Both of those will give you an idea of how the classes and attributes correlate and since you are trying to learn OpenLDAP I'd suggest going with Netscape/Sun (both can be downloaded from Sun's website and as far as I can tell after downloading them they are both free but Sun does have a pay version of theirs; I know that for sure) because they won't have Microsoft related classes and attributes spread throughout the schema. Your lowest level default class for a user is an inetOrgPerson in standard LDAP; MS uses user as the lowest leve default class for users. At the top is just "top". And it flows down from there to inetOrgPerson. Each user class down the hierarchy gets more specific by adding in more attributes while inheriting attributes from those above it. Since Netscape/Sun conform to the LDAP standard, viewing their schema should prepare you for OpenLDAP and they have much better tools to do that as well.
For just one highly simplistic example: Tom, LDAP is NOT a database.
Just to redeem Tom a bit here: the reviewer does make it a point to say that Tom "makes a clear case that an LDAP directory is not a relational database" so based on that I don't think anything was said that should make you think he said LDAP is a database.
This IS a fundamental problem with Wikis.
This IS a fundamental problem with Wiki pages that are not locked down. Then the debate crops up about which pages should be locked down though.
The more famous shot is where Keanu Reeves is dodging bullets up on top of the building before the subway scene because that scene gave the camera trick its name: bullet time. The pictures were taken with the cameras and stitched together for an animation while the backgrounds were filled in with computer graphics.
And now they try to use PG-13 whenever possible no matter the content so that they can rake in more money. The standards for PG-13 are lower than they used to be.
Why would a phone need a hard drive in the future?
So you can store your address book, ringtones, games, songs, data files on your own phone instead of on T-Mobile's servers where they can be hacked into and publicized on the Internet.
What's the point of a journalism degree if you can be called a journalist by making your own site and posting messages to it? I say anyone with a journalism degree is a journalist and anyone not having that degree is not a journalist. That seems pretty cut and dry to me. Why do people like making gray areas with every aspect of life? geez.
So you are saying that WinFS is sand?
Firefox with two tabs: 49,532K Opera with two tabs: 20,188K Opera with 13 tabs: 31,780K
About your sig, I don't use Firefox but I have 11 tabs open in Opera 7.x right now and it's using 145 megs.A bigger idiot is being developed as we speak. Afterall, what do you think Microsoft's R&D is for, creating new features for Windows? LOL
I think that Yahoo has a problem with this in a sense because people can send other people messages on Yahoo messenger, the recipient will wonder who it is and visit the sender's Yahoo profile page and when visited the sender can steal the Yahoo password of the visitor and change it so you can't get back into your account anymore. And then they use your address book to send to your friends and try it on your friends then. Anyone know anything about this?
Many users are reporting 404s on the Microsoft Watch article, but its working fine for others. Hopefully they'll fix their server soon.
They won't ever fix their server. MS will never give in and switch to Linux.
George Carlin should take his own advice about how some words just are not needed to get a point across. You can leave out all swear words in all movies and still get the same effect. Don't believe me? Watch a movie on TV once it has been censored and see if the explosions or the naked women (different topic) look any different or the plot is scarred somehow. I'm not talkin about the stupid words that get inserted because of the censorship but when the sound is totally blanked out I can still get the full plot just fine. When unnecessary words are removed then a bigger viewer base is capable of seeing the content and doesn't that bring in more revenue? I don't see why the media producers don't get that concept. Those who feel the need to hear f*ck every other sentence can feel free to say it to themselves but I don't think having to use more than my fingers and toes to count how many times that word is said in a movie is a sign meaning the movie is great. It is just the opposite in fact. It sure doesn't make it a movie that most people would enjoy.
You should take your own theory into account as well and realize that without "f*ck" being used at all in a tv show or movie that the idea can still be very clearly expressed so what's the added value of including the swear words then? Simple answer: there isn't any added value.
There is no Constitutional infraction going on here. No one says the media producers aren't allowed to produce the crap they produce. They just have to distribute it in a way that prevents just anyone from getting it. The speech is still free because no one is telling them to shutup, they are just being told when and how to talk because not everyone wants to or *should* hear them. Sure we can change the channel but the media producers need to show some responsiblity just as parents do. The producers think they are all high and mighty and don't need to show any responsibility and most people disagree. As one person said here a few months ago, just because you change the channel doesn't mean it goes away and when you choose to ignore someone they will get worse and worse because they know they can get away with it. It's about time we rein in the producers.
Let me give you my number in case you need to talk to someone. Here's my card *whispers* call me *wink*
'Shared Source' must be doing something correct, otherwise it wouldn't still be here. What is it doing right?
It is making MS money. The only reason I can think of that people would use to sign up is that they just want to see the quality of MS coding for curiousity's sake.
I have always found it intriguing that the US both celebrates the day of its independance from the British empire and continues to use old British units of measurement.
At least we can spell.