Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Cell Phone Features 3GB Hard Drive

An anonymous reader writes "Samsung will be showing off a new cell phone which runs on Microsoft's Windows Mobile operating system which features a built-in hard drive. The SGH-I300 will offer 3GB of storage which allows you to store up to 1,000 songs on it for playback through the music player. The 3GB hard drive is similar to the type of hard drive that is found in Apple's Mini iPod. These 1-inch drives with very low power requirements, are ideal for cell phones and other mobile devices."

290 comments

  1. More Details by fembots · · Score: 5, Informative

    The friendly article is pretty light on details, given it's overclockerclub.com.

    Engadget stated that the phone supports MP3, WMA, AAC, and AAC+ audio files, and a plug-and-play drag-and-drop no-brainer way of transferring files as you please.

    1. Re:More Details by fanblade · · Score: 1

      But does it sport WIFI? 802.11b is one thing I would really want to add to a phone. Otherwise you get charges per minute or per kilobyte of internet access.

    2. Re:More Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. As soon as Verizon or Cingular get ahold of this they will deactivate all the cool features. And they'll make you pay to put songs on it. Just wait.

    3. Re:More Details by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) Go with Spring PCS and get the Unlimited Vision package for $10 per month for all you can eat internet access on your phone - then you don't have to worry about it. I have a Treo 600 with Sprint and I can download a whole lot o' data for only $10 per month.

      2) The only way most people are going to be able to get one of these phones is to buy it through their cellular provider - almost every (if not every) smart phone out there is carrier specific and has custom firmware that ties it to the carrier. Most carriers are not going to enable features that allow their users to get free access to anything that they could be selling them instead. Sure, a lot of these phones can be unlocked and used on another carrier using the same cell technology, but only if they install the custom firmware for that provider. Very few people buy an unlocked phone directly from the manufacturer (with no discount) and use it this way.

      3) There are alternatives to having 802.11 built in that make better sense to the manufacturer/retailer of the phone. Building it into the phone increases the cost of the phone and if the phones are too expensive, noone will buy them, thus reducing possible profits. Either add a WiFi SDIO card (like the Treo 650 allows) or other WiFi accessory (the Treo 600, for example, has a WiFi Sled available) that gives you 802.11 connectivity.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    4. Re:More Details by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      SPRINT PCS, Not SPRING...

      dang, I previewed it and still missed my glaring typo

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    5. Re:More Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but all files have to be sent to the phone via air time.

      so that mp3 you paid 99 cents for will cost you 3.25 in airtime kilobytes.

      you know the scumbag cellular providers will turn off all other weays of getting data in/out of the phone in order to force you to use airtime and pay them mooooola.

    6. Re:More Details by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      When you're talking about my cell phone, don't say "Drag and Drop!".

    7. Re:More Details by roseblood · · Score: 1
      Engadget stated that the phone supports MP3, WMA, AAC, and AAC+ audio files, and a plug-and-play drag-and-drop no-brainer way of transferring files as you please.


      Hah, drag and DROP. I can't tell you how many times my cellphones have fallen from ear height (I'm 6'3" tall) to hard surfaces (usualy concrete or asphalt parking lot surfaces.)


      I've only killed one cellphone (the display cracked.) Once these things get fast moving precision parts with vital data stored on them a significant addition of DeltaV could ruin the devices. I'm not sure I'm looking forward to a device like this. I'd rather take a flash memory based alternative.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    8. Re:More Details by fanblade · · Score: 1

      I've looked at the Treo and it seemed unappealing to me because of the style. Doesn't it look like you're speaking into your PDA? I don't think I'm prepared to embrace that geek factor.

      I get excited about new phones because I'm hoping for a small flip-phone that lets me surf the web over 802.11b. It's a little discouraging to hear your opinion that WIFI isn't something they want to add. I definitely want it. I would think that many other people would like free WIFI internet access on their cell phones, too. Isn't that enough reason to support creating it? If there is enough demand, then there should be room for profit. Granted, less demand for internet "plans" that give companies continual profit.

      I actually already have Sprint PCS. And when I first got it I had a month of the Unlimited Vision Package for free. I didn't like it because my phone has very limited web capabilities. Now if my flip phone had a real browser, I probably would have liked it. Would I have liked it enough to pay an extra $10 a month on top of my monthly cable internet charges? Tough question.

    9. Re:More Details by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I got the largest number of minutes plan (2000 Anywhere, I think) and share it across two phones. I get my unlimited Vision plus Picture Pack for free as part of that plan. Yes, it does look like you're talking into your PDA, but I usually use either a wired headset or a bluetooth headset I just purchased. The Treo 600 isn't BT enabled, but I purchased a Jabra A210 BT dongle that plugs into the headset jack and it allows me to use my choice of BT dongles. Personally I don't mind that it looks like I'm talking into a wide phone, but appearances aren't important to me. While I agree with your statment that demand for WiFi should drive manufacturers to add it, the problem is that very few people buy their phone from the manufacturer but from the phone company themselves, and the phone companies have very little desire to give up a lucrative part of their market. There are WiFi options available for most of the newer smart phones, but usually through an SDIO card or other external accessory.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  2. Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's amazing how far things have come. I remember only ten years ago we were lucky to have 3GB in a desktop computer let alone something like a phone :lol:. then again most of us didn't have or need cellphones :shakehead:

    Makes you wonder if we'll have 120 and 200GB drives in our cell phones in 2015 :worry:

    1. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Makes you wonder if we'll have 120 and 200GB drives in our cell phones in 2015 :worry:

      You worry about that?

      Luddite.

      By 2015, I want a cell phone with a 200GB HD installed sub-dermally in my jaw!

      And where's my damn flying car!?!?!?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ten years ago? In 1995, my HDD was 340MB, I upgraded to a 810MB Connor (remember them?) drive for Windows 95. I vaguely remember doubling my RAM to 8MB too. I think it was around 1998 that I got a 2GB drive, so maybe 7-8 years ago, 3GB may have been quite common.

      What's scary is that in 1989, I paid around £500 (then about $800) for an external 20MB drive for my Amiga. Ouch! That and my dad's Motorola mobile phone, which was essentially a car battery with a phone on top. If someone said then that phoes would have HDDs one day, I'd've really not agreed.

    3. Re:Amazing how far things have come by servognome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Makes you wonder if we'll have 120 and 200GB drives in our cell phones in 2015 :worry:
      Why would a phone need a hard drive in the future? I would imagine you could have an advanced wi-fi type internet phone, that does VOIP, and allows you to access your home network to allow you to stream music and movies directly to your phone. It would also be able to take pictures/video and stream them directly to your computer at home.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:Amazing how far things have come by qyiet · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder if we'll have 120 and 200GB drives in our cell phones in 2015 :worry:

      Oh, that's the cheap model, you can barly use it to store your video messages and contacts, let alone any other important stuff I'm saving for the 4TB model.

    5. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By 2015, I want a cell phone with a 200GB HD installed sub-dermally in my jaw!


      Well, if you go up to a gang member and say disparaging things about his Mom, you could get your current cellphone installed sub-dermally in your jaw today!

    6. Re:Amazing how far things have come by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Yeh, but what happens when you drop these things? I am very abusive to my cellphone and have dropped it hard enough for the battery to fly off and land a few feet away from the phone ... several times over. I bang it up against the walls when it is on my belt clip and I'm working. I toss it on my desk. Etc. So far it seems to be in good working order. But if it had a mechanical device in it rather than solid state memory, I'm sure it would have died by now.

    7. Re:Amazing how far things have come by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Why would a phone need a hard drive in the future?

      To store its operating system, silly! You think they're gonna be able to fit Windows 2030 Mobile Edition into an EPROM?

      Not to mention its cache of GPS coordinates, storing your exact location for the last 30 days, so that Starbucks knows when and where to spam you.

    8. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having been born in 1941, and seen some stuff in my time, I have this to offer:
      Too often, predictions of the future center around having more of something. For instance, "In the future, we'll all have cars that go 200 mph." Sure, those exist, but what we really needed to predict, was the type of powerplant in the car, what the car would run off of, etc.
      That would require some imagination. The ability to imagine things like the hybrid power plants now offered in some cars is the key. So, fast-forward ahead a few years, and come up with what our "cell phones" will actually be like, and what they can do. Those ideas will be the ones that will make money, in that products based on those ideas will be the next big thing. Not just 'more' of what we already have. Imagine the unimaginable. The vision of the future, year 2000 from the 1934 World's Fair showed elevated highways, with streamlined cars. The overpopulation, wars, disease, uncontrollable economies and all have robbed us of those dreams in many cases. A man on Mars by 1990? Money used up by wars, so man's creative mind can make spacecraft that cannot be built. Just food for thought...

    9. Re:Amazing how far things have come by idsofmarch · · Score: 1
      And where'y my damn flying car!?!?!? It's backordered, from the same company that's building your jet-pack and the meal-in-a-pill.

      2005 sucks!

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    10. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do it even today with ORB (www.orb.com). Windows only though for now

    11. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The definition of irony: In a recent poll 50% of respondents agreed that George Bush was a uniter.

      He is.

      Notice how all the "Red States" are connected to each other. :)

    12. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want my cell phone to be a thick-client, you insensitive clod!

    13. Re:Amazing how far things have come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would suck if...

      - Your jaw would lock when the phone's OS crashed
      - Hackers could take over your body after you somehow got a worm
      - You were filled with spyware

      I'm sure there is more.

  3. now featuring Spyware on your Phone by jephthah · · Score: 2, Insightful


    yay. thanks.

    1. Re:now featuring Spyware on your Phone by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Not sure why that's off topic...I think he raises a valid point in troll like manner. As our phones and the like get more integrated what are the consequences?

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:now featuring Spyware on your Phone by jephthah · · Score: 0

      hows this offtopic?

      you get a mobile Windows-enabled cellphone, with a 3GB harddrive.. next thing you know every other message you get is gonna be:

      DOWNLOAD BRITNEY SPEARS RINGTONES FOR FREE NOW!!!!!

      DOWNLOAD FREE PRON NOW!!!!!

      and blah blah blah.

      and since its WINDOWS, in no time at all youll be infested with tons of malware, and youll have to fill your 3GB harddrive with AdAware, HijackThis and SpySubtract.

      you wont have any room for 1000 new ringtones.

  4. obligatory... by DeusExMalex · · Score: 0, Troll

    that's nice... but does it run linux?

    1. Re:obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that with a calculator in 4th grade. It still worked. My plan == failed.

    2. Re:obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.. but it runs NetBSD :o)

  5. My cell phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    My cell phone does not need:

    Camera
    Pop Music Ring Tones
    Color Display
    Java
    Videogames
    Internet Access

    I just want a phone. That will last me all week without having to recharge it, talking on it 2 hours a day. And it has to be small and light, and it can't break if I drop it on the floor. Waterproof would be nice. And it needs to hold about 400-500 phone numbers. Fewer dropped calls and better reception would be nice as well.

    1. Re:My cell phone... by generic-man · · Score: 5, Informative

      So get a Nokia 6010, T-Mobile's bottom of the line, and quit your bitching.

      There are plenty of cheap, boring phones that work primarily as phones. They don't get much attention from the tech press because they don't have any useless whizbang features.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:My cell phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want a phone. That will last me all week without having to recharge it, talking on it 2 hours a day. And it has to be small and light, and it can't break if I drop it on the floor. Waterproof would be nice. And it needs to hold about 400-500 phone numbers. Fewer dropped calls and better reception would be nice as well.

      I understand now. We have a phone, toaster and kitchen sink combination which would be perfect for your needs.

    3. Re:My cell phone... by PopeAlien · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want a cell phone that doesnt recieve calls.

      I want it to take good pictures, check my email, sync to my server, play music, browse the web and have a fold out QWERTY keyboard.. I want a big color screen, weeks of battery life, kinetic charging, and it needs to fit in my pocket and be very light.

      but it should NEVER recieve incoming calls, thats just a nuisance and needless distraction.

    4. Re:My cell phone... by pinkocommie · · Score: 1
      Au contraire
      My cell phone does need:

      Camera
      Pop Music Ring Tones
      Color Display
      Java
      Videogames
      Internet Access

      I want a phone that I can have fun with it and I have no issue with plugging it in to a charger at the end of a day as long as it lasts the 2-3 hrs a day I may use the phone.

      I guess to each his/her own?

    5. Re:My cell phone... by Dejohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then this is probably not the device for you. Don't buy it?

    6. Re:My cell phone... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Truely amazing that you can actually buy a phone such as that! Really, I think that cellphones do better than many other products in terms of keeping the low end utilitarian. Even the lowest of low end cars seem to come with power everything, ABS, A/C, and a CD player these days.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    7. Re:My cell phone... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I just want a phone."

      Whoop-de-shit. Why'd you even read the article to begin with?

      I wouldn't mind, but this exact same stupid comment keeps getting modded up in every single "coooool cell phone!" story. Frankly, it's getting old, and it's really starting to smell like a cheap "gimme karma" comment.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:My cell phone... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      I figure, if I'm going to be carrying a cell phone around with me anyway, I might as well get one that includes everything else I might want to carry around with me. Makes things easier.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    9. Re:My cell phone... by thirteenVA · · Score: 1

      What is your criteria for women? A few moist holes and too little sense to care which one you use?

    10. Re:My cell phone... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      If you plan to carry only a phone could be ok. If you have to carry always your phone, AND sometimes need internet access, or a camera, or a music player, an organizer, etc, then it is a solution, you know, if well you can have all the separate functions in separate devices carrying all of them will make you need only a batcape to finish the custome.

    11. Re:My cell phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I use a Startac because it has amazing signal, amazing battery life, and the sound is great. It holds plenty of numbers and the phonebook is easy to access.

      I think this guys point is that they need to make the PHONE work well first, and then worry about what they can add on. This phone will last for half a day, and then you'll be SOL.

    12. Re:My cell phone... by LucidBeast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats how my Nokia 9500 Communicator gets when I don't pay my phone bill

    13. Re:My cell phone... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Troll

      My slashdot does not need Anonymous Cowards. Don't let the door hit you on your way out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:My cell phone... by mgranit11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. Cameras are the worst thing that has ever happened to the cell phone industry. I wish the companikes would concentrate on the phone part, and once we matered that, then move to new things.

    15. Re:My cell phone... by Reignking · · Score: 0

      Cell phone makers should continue to try to innovate any way that they see fit and sink or swim because of it.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    16. Re:My cell phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there are fewer and fewer phones that don't have these features. Does the term bloatware mean anything to you? These bells and whistles don't come for free, you know.

    17. Re:My cell phone... by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1
      Haha...

      guy.. I'm still using my Nokia 5190 that I purchased in Oct 1999.

      It has everything I need for now so, unless it dies, I won't be getting one anytime soon.

      I'd buy a new Cell phone if it has the following features

      min 4 MP Camera

      min 4 x Optical Zoom

      10 Gig HDD

      MP3 Player with FM Tuner and Transmitter

      PDA with MS Pocket PC, or MS Mobile

      Then I would not have to worry about carrying so many items...

    18. Re:My cell phone... by toolshed7 · · Score: 1

      And the "just shutup award" goes to........this guy, known as AC. He also won the "obvious award", for pointing out nothing.Thanks for the worthless comment ... Dude, quit your whining....if we where only using tin cans and a wire, you would bitch because they are made of old fashion american steel instead of wood..I guess this is flamebait...start modding down. There are speelling errrors....i hope someone makes a speelling comment.

      --


      Deserving got nothing to do with it.....shuffle
    19. Re:My cell phone... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Heck, for that matter there are plenty of push button Ma Bell phones with a thin little cable connected.

      They don't get much attention either...

      WHY?

      Because this is "news for nerds" not "news of the old"

      Duh....

    20. Re:My cell phone... by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Go to any cell phone store and ask to see the least expensive phone they stock. Sure, companies will try to sell you a feature-packed phone, but there are always options that involve little cash for a very low-end phone.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    21. Re:My cell phone... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      I have the 6010 and it rocks my socks. Great reception, good voice quality, and free from every provider. Anyhow I agree with the grandparent on most points, except that I find the color screen (doesn't need to be 16.7 mil though) actually makes the phone easier to use, because its much easier to read.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    22. Re:My cell phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's really starting to smell like a cheap "gimme karma" comment.

      This might be true if it wasn't posted by a coward.

    23. Re:My cell phone... by pg133 · · Score: 1

      You might be on to a winner, check out Japan's "s-phone" and here

      By contrast, the "S-Phone", which has attracted thousands of Japanese subscribers since its introduction by the Tu-Ka
      network last November, has no function except that of a basic telephone. It does not even have a screen.

    24. Re:My cell phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Called a PDA :)

    25. Re:My cell phone... by coderrich · · Score: 1

      nokia 6190 or 8290 fits your requirements nicely. both of them are plain, simple, get the job done with superior voice quality. drawback, however, they are old and so not cool, and besides your gf hates them. :)

    26. Re:My cell phone... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      If it can automaticaly post dupes to slashdot, that'd be sweeeeet.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  6. 3GB HDD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not very good for a HDD, tell me when they make a 30GB one, I'd buy that even if I do have to use Windows Mobile!

  7. Maybe I should just RTFA... by pjt48108 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but how long do you think it will be, before this opens up the door to massive conversation-recording? All it needs is an ambitious hacker, right? You have the phone, and you have an integrated audio storage device. Oy, the possibilities...

    --
    Mmmmmm... Bold, yet refreshing!
    1. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Um can't you do this already? People record phone conversations all the time.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      It could come as an option out of the box. Recording conversations in which you're involved is NOT illegal (as far as i know) - and it could actually be very useful in certain situations.

    3. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by Chineseyes · · Score: 0

      Sorry to burst your bubble but many phones that have upgradeable flash memory and many that don't already have had the ability to record conversations for awhile. Please place your tin foil cap in the proper receptacle Thank You.

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    4. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Actually, many states require informed consent and/or an audible beep indicating that the conversation is being recorded...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    5. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
      > It could come as an option out of the box. Recording conversations in which you're involved is NOT illegal (as far as i know) - and it could actually be very useful in certain situations.

      That depends on what state (of the US) you're in.

      In some states, both parties have to consent to the call's being recorded, and/or an audible "beep" has to play at specified intervals as a reminder that the call is being recorded.

      You could actually do this in firmware; cell phones have locator technologies, and are theoretically capable (over the data stream as a back channel) of exchanging information regarding in which state each party to a call is physically present.

      From that, it's a small set of if/then logic to work out whether the "beep" comes on automatically, and/or whether consent is required ("Press 'GO' to consent to monitoring") of more than one party to the call.

      There lots of legitimate (banking/finance) commercial applications where users (both clients and brokers, for instance) might want their calls recorded.

      Of course, real men don't need recording devices to back up their phone conversations. They just casually mention materials that have high neutron cross sections, mention the curve of binding energy a few times, and NSA records their calls for them.

    6. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh how unfortunate. I hate it when a post is both informative and Funny (your last line). I'm glad you get the Karma boost for the informative, but on longer comments that have both good and funny content, I wish I could know ahead of time. Some type of dual moderation view perhaps.

      The best content is both informative and funny (The Daily Show, for example). What a shame I can't easily filter on posts that are both.

      Anyway, Kudos.

    7. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > I hate it when a post is both informative and Funny (your last line).

      In other words, the other cheap way to get your conversations automatically backed up is to moderate certain posts as informative. :)

    8. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      > real men...NSA records...for them.

      Now if only we could find an application for this
      novel form of write-only memory!

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    9. Re:Maybe I should just RTFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That beep thing is really not cool with me. For example my phone (and all my previous phones) is set to make a beep every passing minute. Who would wish to make long explanations for everyone who happens to hear this beep on the other side ? Not me.

  8. Perhaps... by goldspider · · Score: 1, Interesting
    "These 1-inch drives with very low power requirements, are ideal for cell phones"

    ...but first you need to convince me why a cell phone needs a hard drive to begin with.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Perhaps... by Cheese+Grits · · Score: 0

      You could store some serious data with 3G of space. For lawyers, it would be pretty slick to have your entire exhibit set stored in your phone in PDF format. With Bluetooth, you wouldn't even need to wire your phone to your digital projector to run your courtroom presentation. With the right software, I'd buy. I'd prefer to see 20G though...

    2. Re:Perhaps... by BarryNorton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every time there's an article on mobile phones on Slashdot, there's some smug little luddite like yourself posts: why isn't a phone just a phone and a word processor just a typewriter? Why does it need a hard drive? Because I carry a HDD-based music player and a phone and I'd rather just carry one device that dips the volume on my music when the phone rings, like the mp3 players in phones used to, but with more storage. Who are you to tell me I shouldn't have that? Who are you to say a very successful company hasn't done their market research? Just go back to sleep...

    3. Re:Perhaps... by taskforce · · Score: 1

      The idea is that devices like the iPod are merely temporary and that once cell phones have large enough HDs we won't actually need dedicated MP3 players any more and only have to carry around 2 bricks anymore. Personally I won't be getting one until the storage reaches a little higher, but I'm all for people buying these things as it's paying for the R&D of my future phone ;) Theoretically though, once faster long range wireless networks are in place (such as the WiMax thing which is being pioneered and looks like it will go ahead in London pretty soon) we'll have as much storage as we like, as it can all sit on a RAID array on a wireless server at our Wireless Carrier's tech center.

      --
      My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    4. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that whenever someone suggests that any technology might be excessive, they are met with such angry retribution?

    5. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also don't have a right to drive a car. They burn fossil fuels, which create chemicals that are bad for children and the environment.

      Why are you so selfish that you believe you should get to work faster than someone on a bicycle? Why do you feel entitled to kill him with your polution? Do you think you are better than him?

    6. Re:Perhaps... by Urkki · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • ...but first you need to convince me why a cell phone needs a hard drive to begin with.

      Nah, it's not about if you need one or not (of course you do). What I'd need to be convinced about is, will the hard drive survive when I drop the phone while riding a bicycle and it hits the pavement and it's parts are thrown all around. Any current phone can handle that kind of repeated abuse pretty well (well, at least my Nokias have...).

      No, mobile phone isn't a place for moving parts... Solid state all the way is the only way.
    7. Re:Perhaps... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ...but first you need to convince me why a cell phone needs a hard drive to begin with.

      No, I don't. All I have to do is realize that you think that your beliefs are superior to everyone else's and that settles the whole thing.

      Just because you don't see the utility in a hard drive in a cellphone it doesn't make it wrong. I want my cellphone to act like a full-fledged computer. My motorola phone is many times more powerful than (for example) my Amiga 500 was; it has more ram, it has a faster processor, it has faster I/O (USB) and so on. The only things it's lacking is a couple of interfaces, like video output and a way to hook up a keyboard and mouse. Some more storage would be nice but since it already has almost six times the storage that I could mount on my Amiga at once, and over ten times the memory, I could definitely do useful things with it.

      Optimally the system would actually have a projector and one of those laser-rangefinding keyboards, so I wouldn't need any peripherals, just a blank wall. I'd definitely want video out as well, though; composite video would do.

      The basic idea is that I don't want to carry a bunch of devices around. If I can have a single device that is a phone, a pda, a passable camera (1MP is enough for most of my purposes), a music player, a video player, and a general purpose computer, then I'd far prefer that to carrying around a palmtop, a cellphone, and a camera. I need carry only one kind of extra battery, and batteries take up less space than devices by definition, so it would be a major win for me.

      Your idea of the perfect device is not gospel, unless your name is Jehovah, you live on a cloud, and you can smite people down with your righteous anger. (Insert other snarky religious comments here if you like, I'm in the US and the God-fearers are the obvious example... I'm agnostic and they simply came to mind first.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Perhaps... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      but first you need to convince me why a cell phone needs a hard drive to begin with.

      Because taking pictures with the 7 megapixel camera on your phone will exhaust the flash drive too quickly?

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    9. Re:Perhaps... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "..but first you need to convince me why a cell phone needs a hard drive to begin with."

      3 gigs is a hell of a lot of music. I don't know about you, but my cell phone goes more places with me than my mp3 player, game boy, digital camera, etc. Why? Pocket space.

      You may or may not care, but I dig the idea. An MP3 player or Digital Camera is worthless if either are not around when you want them. Low Quality > 0.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Perhaps... by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      I don't drive a car, I walk to work... listening to my MP3s!

    11. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you have a job! I bet you selfishly keep that money too, denying your needy neighbors what they cannot achieve on their own. You enjoy your mp3 player while a mother of 7 kids cannot even afford to keep their shanty apartment heated. Shame on you for such callous disregard of the people you force into abject poverty.

    12. Re:Perhaps... by BarryNorton · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why is it that whenever someone suggests that any technology might be excessive, they are met with such angry retribution?
      ... because they ask stupid questions like "why is it needed?"?

      It's not needed - none of it is needed. The questions are: is it possible? is there a market? is there a reason not to?

      It's hypocritical reading this site then not allowing the same enthusiasm that applies to computers, software, television etc. to be expressed about mobile phones just because they're not as popular in America as in Europe and Japan.

      We Europeans don't jump on the HDTV stories as soon as there posted and say 'why's that needed?'... even if we do think it ;)

    13. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're an angry loser who can't afford a car so you act all richeous about riding your bicycle.

    14. Re:Perhaps... by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Every time there's an article on mobile phones on Slashdot, there's some smug little luddite like yourself posts: why isn't a phone just a phone and a word processor just a typewriter? Why does it need a hard drive?

      The question I've not seen asked yet is this:

      What happens when you drop it?

      Hard drives typically don't like being dropped. Cell phones, being handheld devices, stand a good chance of getting dropped. I fumblefingered my Ericsson T610 within 24 hours of getting it. It has a ding in the case where it hit the pavement, but it still works. A few years ago, I had a Motorola i1000 fly out the passenger window onto a freeway overpass. I parked my car, walked out onto the overpass, and retrieved the phone. It was a little bit scratched up, but it still worked. Will you be able to say the same for a hard-drive-equipped cell phone after it slipped and fell?

      Flash storage density is up to at least 4 GB now. (That's the largest CompactFlash card (not a Microdrive) I've seen at Fry's; there might well be something even larger on the market already.) That would be a better match for a cell phone than a hard drive. Flash doesn't suffer head crashes when it's dropped.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    15. Re:Perhaps... by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      The question I've not seen asked yet is this: What happens when you drop it?
      True. On the other hand, people chase you to insure your phone, I doubt they'd want to know about it on your home contents insurance if you dropped an iPod... (I could be wrong)
    16. Re:Perhaps... by thenefariousone · · Score: 1

      No I don't.

      Anymore than you are forced to buy one, when other models without hard drvies are available today.

      If anything, I'd be happy that these are coming out, as they'll drive down the prices of existing models.

      --
      http://hughgordon.com/
    17. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is idiotic. Learn to read! He said WALK not bicycle! Also learn to spell. The word is "righteous" not "richeous". Since the rest of your post is just more juvenile assumptions I'll leave them alone.

    18. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your IQ is below room temperature.

    19. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or windows. or any other fully fledged multitasking OS. That makes me shudder.

    20. Re:Perhaps... by Delita · · Score: 1

      SanDisk makes CF cards up to 8 GB and Type II PC Cards up to 16 GB, though they're tough to find.

      http://sandisk.com/pressrelease/20041109.htm

  9. Apple vs Microsoft by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The 3GB hard drive is similar to the type of hard drive that is found in Apple's Mini iPod."

    But Apple has the good sense not to try to cram OS X-mini onto the iPod hard disk. Instead a much simpler, special purpose OS does the job simply and well. But cram Windows-mini onto a hard disk, and well, you've wasted a lot of space for no real valid reason.

    Plus the delicious treat of viruses headed your way as a brand new target sits there and says, "Attack me, please."

    Why can't people realize that special-purpose devices work best with special-purpose OSes?

    1. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that Windows Mobile *is* a special-purpose OS. Are you actually trying to say that it's some kind of subset of XP? Wrong.

      Anyone out there who has done some development on Windows Mobile ... what is your estimate of the size of the OS? 64 MB maybe?

      Oh noes, 64 MB taken on a 3 GB drive!!!11

    2. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by vidarlo · · Score: 1
      Why can't people realize that special-purpose devices work best with special-purpose OSes?

      I guess this makes Linux a bad choice for a special device. Joke aside, Linux can be customized, and with 2.6 the kernel even included pretty neat rutines for stripping away uneeded code, so I guess someone should be porting Linux to this quite quickly, altough it'll be one of the darn difficult porting tasks as I guess Samsung won't give out one little detail of the hardware in the phone. Prove me wrong on that one, Samsung!

    3. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Windows CE/Pocket PC is a completely separate codebase, and while it contains APIs that follow the same signature as their Win32 equivalents, and it marginally looks like the desktop equivalent, it was built from the ground-up for micro-devices.

      Having said that, my experiences with a PocketPC PDA were less than savoury - I experienced lockups several times (just because it's specially targeted doesn't mean it's perfect). If my phone locked up once I'd toss it and get another one.

      It's interesting how everyday devices are getting less and less stable. My new DVD drive has locked up on me several times. My PVR/cable box has unceremoniously virtual-BSOD and restarted several times, cars electronics are crashing, and soon cell phones. Progress?

    4. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Why can't people realize that special-purpose devices work best with special-purpose OSes?"

      Cell phones aren't really special purpose devices anymore. At least in comparison to an iPod...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by krunk4ever · · Score: 0

      Why can't people realize that special-purpose devices work best with special-purpose OSes?

      that requires pumping money into research for a product they won't know if it'll do well. it's a lot cheaper to take the easy way out and put an existing program onto your hardware which you know will work, even though it's less efficient or more bug-prone.

      it's similar to how many companies use the symbian OS as their cellfone OS, which i personally dislike because of the lag between input and displaying on the screen and the sometimes long load times.

      http://www.symbian.com/press-office/2005/pr050214b .html

      Symbian licenses Symbian OS to the world's leading handset manufacturers. The following Symbian OS licensees have Symbian OS-based mobile phones in production and / or in development: Arima, BenQ, Fujitsu, FOMA, LG, Lenovo, Mitsubishi, Motorola, Nokia, Panasonic, Sendo, Sharp, Siemens, Samsung and Sony Ericsson. In 2004, over 14 million Symbian OS-based mobile phones were sold worldwide and almost 25 million have been sold to date.

    6. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's interesting how everyday devices are getting less and less stable. My new DVD drive has locked up on me several times. My PVR/cable box has unceremoniously virtual-BSOD and restarted several times, cars electronics are crashing, and soon cell phones. Progress?
      It's progress for the following people:

      - the manufacturer who gets to sell you another one
      - the shipping carrier who couriers the RMA package from
      - the retailer who gets to sell you another one or maybe something else while you're there
      - the tech support rep who gets to log another call
      - the manufacturer again when they refurb your device and sell it to a bargain basement OEM
      - the OEM who makes a tidy profit on the refurbed parts sold as new

      The disposable culture is a huge step backward for society, but because so many people can make money off of it, it's considered progress, at least in legal terms.

    7. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by andymullins · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't been keeping up on your mac rumours. Mini-OS X may be on the way. Of course, only time and lawsuits will tell if this rumour is true.

    8. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by Deviate_X · · Score: 1

      Yes you are correct the Smartphone OS is a subset of Windows Mobile, which is itself derrived from the Windows CE operating system designed for Handheld devices and industrial control devices.

      Windows CE is not descended from Windows XP!

      Windows Smartphone OS

      Windows Mobile/CE

      This phone will be based on Windows Mobile Magneto the next generation of Windows CE.

    9. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      Not even 64MB, Windows Mobile 2003 takes 32 MB (I'm talking about the PocketPC edition, I guess the phone edition is roughly the same size) and I bet it's stored in ROM or in flash, like any other smartphone.

    10. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "Windows Mobile ... what is your estimate of the size of the OS? 64 MB maybe?"

      closer to 32, since that's the usual ROM size on a pocketpc.

      still, u gotta figure 32megs is pretty big for a OS that should be so incredibly simple, i mean PalmOS is like half a meg.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    11. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      PVR cable box (if Dishnetwork)....or maybe similar manufacturer might have the same problem mine has.

      Looked at the plug. It's a two - prong plug. Now you have a hard drive, tons of static and no ground. The unit is periodically short-circuiting itself. Dumb...

      Bet all the new ones have grounded plugs. ;)

    12. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by rbrome · · Score: 1

      "But Apple has the good sense not to try to cram OS X-mini onto the iPod hard disk. Instead a much simpler, special purpose OS does the job simply and well. But cram Windows-mini onto a hard disk, and well, you've wasted a lot of space for no real valid reason."

      But it's not "Windows-mini", it's Windows Mobile, and it IS a special-purpose OS. Windows Mobile is based on Windows CE, and it's a wildly different OS from full-on Windows.

      "Plus the delicious treat of viruses headed your way as a brand new target sits there and says, 'Attack me, please.'"

      Actually, to date, there has not been a single real virus found for Windows Mobile. The same cannot be said about its chief competition these days - Series 60.

    13. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by brer_rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny
      Except that Windows Mobile *is* a special-purpose OS.

      Windows Mobile certainly is special, kind of like how the short school bus is special.

    14. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by servognome · · Score: 1

      The disposable culture is a huge step backward for society, but because so many people can make money off of it, it's considered progress, at least in legal terms.
      Manufacturers have to deal with tech-support, inventory, tracking, etc. on returns. In the commodity electronics market margins are so small that companies actually lose money on returned items. How much money do you think a manufacturer makes on a $50 (retail) DVD player? Maybe $5-$10. That probably doesn't cover the 15 minute tech support call, the dock worker, the warehouse space, inventory tracking, and taxes on inventory. Not to mention the stuff you can't calculate like company reputation, and relationships with customers (best buy probably doesn't like getting their named sullied by your defective product)
      The disposable culture has many advantages, technology progresses so fast, it makes more sense to buy a $50 DVD player now and in 5 years when it breaks buy a $50 Hi-Def DVD player, rather than spend $100 now to have a DVD player that lasts 10 years

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    15. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Huh?
      You expect them to make money on returned items?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    16. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_window_fallacy

    17. Re:Apple vs Microsoft by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because static is so much harder to defend gainst than complex bugs introduced by ground loops. Mild sarcasm there. Actually, you can drain static into a pair of power lines just as well as into a ground line.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  10. Yeeeeeeha! by Phidoux · · Score: 0

    The Samsung iPhone!

  11. In related news... by bartyboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Samsung announced today their new line of hernia belts and corsets. "These will keep our customers from injuring themselves when they have to lift our new phone," said the CEO of Samsung.

  12. Contacts by Reignking · · Score: 0

    Think of all of the contacts that I could store on 3 gigs! After all, it is a phone...

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  13. When did the 'song' become the standard... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...unit of memory? I guess we can blame it on Apple. How long before we start seeing hard drives advertised as storing megasongs or gigasongs? My first computer didn't even hold a millisong!

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by ruxxell · · Score: 1

      that's debatable. what if the song was "All" by the descendents? (clocking in at 1 second)
      even ripped at 320kbps, i bet your first computer could handle it.

      --
      "when the sun sets on the ghetto, all the broken stuff gets cold"
    2. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      Soon it will be feature length movies... whatever unit that is...

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    3. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that's when feature length dvds and libraries of congress take over.

    4. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm using the classic system, how many songs to the midi?

    5. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Bah! I measure my storage arrays in epic length films. If it doesn't include an overture for the intermission, its just not big enough.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    6. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      More importantly, how many station wagons full of tapes is that? And, if I try to figure out how many of those phones will fit in a station wagon, will that result in the formation of a black hole?

    7. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...I remember when the unit was "complete copies of the works of Shakespeare". I think that was around when CD-ROMS first appeared.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    8. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      ive been using 'songs' as a translation measurement for non-technical people for years. 4gb ~= 1000 mp3's

    9. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      No way! It was a Sinclair ZX80 with 1K of RAM. (BTW That was 1K for use by the 'OS' and BASIC interpreter, your program, data, and the framebuffer.)

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    10. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Wow! You make my life seem so meaningless. I've been writing code for many years now but if you add up the total amount of code I've written in my lifetime it's probably only a couple of songs - if it's even that. Even the lamest of street musicians has an opus orders of magnitude larger than mine.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    11. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by TMonks · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well, I just overclocked my iPod over the 6 gigasong barrier!

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new karma-whore sig writing overlords
    12. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by RTFM-XP · · Score: 1

      Next variable = 8-Track or Cassette?

    13. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Ahhhhhhh, but if you broke the song down into notes and melodies, then the musician will also have only created a small amount.

      Audio tracks as we hear is afterall just an inefficient rendering of the sheet music :)

      Don't be worried about the quantity of code, but focus on the quality.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    14. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      To update the /. standards books:

      1 'hidef' movie = 0.001 Libraries of Congress
      1 movie = 0.00001 Libraries of Congress
      1 song = 0.0000001 Libraries of Congress

      --
      -Styopa
    15. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gah my eyes!

      Use scientific notation, you insensitive clod!

    16. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by cnj · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      diff -Naur coreutils-5.2.0/src/df.c coreutils-5.2.0-ipod/src/df.c
      --- coreutils-5.2.0/src/df.c 2004-01-27 10:55:38.000000000 -0500
      +++ coreutils-5.2.0-ipod/src/df.c 2004-08-26 06:04:57.360652050 -0400
      @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
      {"block-size", required_argument, NULL, 'B'},
      {"inodes", no_argument, NULL, 'i'},
      {"human-readable", no_argument, NULL, 'h'},
      + {"ipod-standard", no_argument, NULL, 'p'},
      {"si", no_argument, NULL, 'H'},
      {"kilobytes", no_argument, NULL, 'k'}, /* long form is obsolescent */
      {"local", no_argument, NULL, 'l'},
      @@ -737,6 +738,8 @@
      -a, --all include filesystems having 0 blocks\n\
      -B, --block-size=SIZE use SIZE-byte blocks\n\
      -h, --human-readable print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G)\n\
      + --ipod-standard print sizes in approx. number of songs.\n
      + http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=119376&cid=100 74498 \n\
      -H, --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024\n\
      "), stdout);
      fputs (_("\
      @@ -816,6 +819,9 @@
      human_output_opts = human_autoscale | human_SI;
      output_block_size = 1;
      break;
      + case 'p':
      + output_block_size = (4*1024*1024); /* 4MB is one iPod song */
      + break;
      case 'k':
      human_output_opts = 0;
      output_block_size = 1024;
      diff -Naur coreutils-5.2.0/src/du.c coreutils-5.2.0-ipod/src/du.c
      --- coreutils-5.2.0/src/du.c 2004-01-21 17:27:02.000000000 -0500
      +++ coreutils-5.2.0-ipod/src/du.c 2004-08-26 06:05:11.276316549 -0400
      @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@
      {"exclude", required_argument, 0, EXCLUDE_OPTION},
      {"exclude-from", required_argument, 0, 'X'},
      {"human-readable", no_argument, NULL, 'h'},
      + {"ipod-standard", no_argument, NULL, 'p'},
      {"si", no_argument, 0, HUMAN_SI_OPTION},
      {"kilobytes", no_argument, NULL, 'k'}, /* long form is obsolescent */
      {"max-depth", required_argument, NULL, MAX_DEPTH_OPTION},
      @@ -185,6 +186,8 @@
      "), stdout);
      fputs (_("\
      -h, --human-readable print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G)\n\
      + --ipod-standard print sizes in approx. number of songs.\n
      + http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=119376&cid=100 74498 \n\
      -H, --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024 (deprecated)\n\
      -k like --block-size=1K\n\
      -l, --count-links count sizes many times if hard linked\n\
      @@ -609,6 +612,10 @@
      output_block_size = 1;
      break;

      + case 'p':
      + output_block_size = (4*1024*1024); /* 4MB is one iPod song */
      + break;
      +
      case 'k':
      human_output_opts = 0;
      output_block_size = 1024;
      diff -Naur coreutils-5.2.0/src/ls.c coreutils-5.2.0-ipod/src/ls.c
      --- coreutils-5.2.0/src/ls.c 2004-02-01 14:31:00.000000000 -0500
      +++ coreutils-5.2.0-ipod/src/ls.c 2004-08-26 06:05:17.217559146 -0400
      @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@
      {"dired", no_argument, 0, 'D'},
      {"full-time", no_argument, 0, FULL_TIME_OPTION},
      {"human-readable", no_argument, 0, 'h'},
      + {"ipod-standard", no_argument, 0, 'P'},
      {"inode", no_argument, 0, 'i'},
      {"kilobytes", no_argument, 0, 'k'}, /* long form is obsolescent */
      {"numeric-uid-gid", no_argument, 0, 'n'},
      @@ -1394,6 +1395,10 @@
      file_output_block_size = output_block_size = 1;
      break;

      + case 'P':
      + file_output_block_size = output_block_size = (4 * 1024 * 1024);
      + break;
      +
      case 'i':
      print_inode = 1;
      break;
      @@ -3944,6 +3949,8 @@
      -g like -l, but do not list owner\n\
      -G, --no-group inhibit display of group information\n\
      -h, --human-readable print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G)\n\
      + --ipod-standard print sizes in approx. number of songs.\n
      + http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=119376&cid=100 74498 \n\
      --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024\n\
      -H, --dereference-command-l

      --
      Never trust anyone over 90000.
    17. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      Heh. I remember when I bought my iPod it advertised being able to hold 1000 songs. It was 5 gigs. Then generations of the iPod went on, and the 5 gig wasn't being sold anymore. Later, they released the 4 gig iPod mini, which holds *gasp* the same 1000 songs. Now, I see that this 3 gig device holds 1000 songs. Measurements like this are completely useless, because they can be stretched to do anything. Hell, I'm sure this phone could hold tens of thousands of songs, if you define a song as "midi ringtone".

      Also, an afterthought. My iPod has 300 kb free, and is currently holding around 800 songs. I guess 160 Kb/s is too much for Apple. Also probably because I have a thing for live songs, and a lot of these tend to be more than 8 minutes.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    18. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should just admit that it holds "100 high-quality Metallica songs" or "1000 low-quality Beatles songs". actually, that conversion ratio is about right... :)

    19. Re:When did the 'song' become the standard... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      i know its meaningless, but if somebody completely non-technical wants to know how much space something is (like ive got 1gb free, is that a lot). i use 4mb = 1 average length mp3, so that 1gb can hold 250 mp3's.

  14. 3gb? by z3r0w8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So with 3gb drive and Windoze Mobile installed, that leaves what about 6k available for user use?

    --
    -----
    1. Re:3gb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like 6k for your virus/spambot

    2. Re:3gb? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      you forgot about swap space, incase they ever decide to port winfs to it.

  15. Over 1,000 songs...blah blah blah. by vidarlo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never tought I was gonna see this at slashdot, it is mainly marketing buzzwords. How many songs depends on bitrate! If they by this means that the FS only can handle 1,000 files (I guess not), then this is bad.

    1. Re:Over 1,000 songs...blah blah blah. by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
      indicating the capacity with the number of songs may have started as a marketing tool, but it is increasingly becoming popular. the main memory consuming use of these HD is for music anyway.

      car's gas milage depends heavily on the driving condition/pattern. so what? it's still a fairly useful metric. same thing here.

  16. Do you really wanna carry a disk in your pocket ? by nomad63 · · Score: 1

    I sure don't. As flimsy as today's cell phones are, they are susceptiple to failing from a slight shake without the added risk of a hard disk. Add another fragile device to this picture.. Oh my god... I personally prefer not to have a moving part other than the flip cover and the pull out antenna on my cell phone.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
  17. Uh, oh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Instead of your call being dropped for whatever reason, Windows Mobile will reboot the cell phone automatically to prevent the user from seeing the blue screen of death. Great...

  18. my black and white tv is fine ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    i dont need color, teletext,hdtv , 600+lines, interactivity, choice

    who cares if you are a luddite, you think these phone companies just make stuff for the hell of it or because people demand those features

    personally i love em , shame about running on MS but i want all those features and more !

    1. Re:my black and white tv is fine ! by corsican · · Score: 1
      People don't demand those features; that's not the way it works anymore. Nowadays companies just slap on a little ill-conceived bling-bling and then market it so everyone thnks they need it.

      Then: demand > engineering > product
      Now: product > marketing > demand

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
  19. yeah! by fr1kk · · Score: 0, Troll

    imagine a beowulf cluster of these babies! ...but can it run linux?

    --
    sig: Playfully doing something difficult, whether useful or not
    1. Re:yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the fuck up shuts you!

  20. Yeah! Sure! *SAMSUNG* by lonesometrainer · · Score: 1, Informative

    Shit,

    we've been waiting for their Palm OS Phones SGH-i500, i530 and whatever they were called, anounced afaik at CeBit April 2003, then delayed and delayed, and delayed, cancelled??? I don't know.

    Dear Samsung, somehow you managed to make me wait for for the SGH-i530 and now I'm completely disappointed :-)

    No Samsung in my shopping cart. Never ever.

    1. Re:Yeah! Sure! *SAMSUNG* by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1
      we've been waiting for their Palm OS Phones SGH-i500, i530 and whatever they were called, anounced afaik at CeBit April 2003,


      It was October 2003. The SGH-i500 was cancelled; the SGH-i550/i505 was shown in early 2004. Samsung hasn't shipped a single unit of either model.

      I commented on it here.
    2. Re:Yeah! Sure! *SAMSUNG* by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      why not just get the Samsung i700?

    3. Re:Yeah! Sure! *SAMSUNG* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usual marketing method. Keep customers busy so they don't buy elsewhere. The opposite of the bazaar: announce early and often.

    4. Re:Yeah! Sure! *SAMSUNG* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, you don't want a samsung phone. Every samsung phone I've ever seen has been incredibly slow.

  21. Your needs do not govern anybody else by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is silly. Every time a new cell phone appears which has features somebody doesn't like, they post another ridiculous rant like yours, as if nobody should ever manufacture something YOU don't want.

    Did Jesus die and leave you in charge? Is your name GW Bush by any chance?

    And some other idiot moderated your post as insightful. Yeh, right.

    1. Re:Your needs do not govern anybody else by Mantorp · · Score: 5, Funny
      Did Jesus die...

      That sounds familiar, let me google it, I'll let you know.

    2. Re:Your needs do not govern anybody else by Golias · · Score: 1

      People would complain less often if the phones were better at being phones before all the engineering effort went into adding silly toys to them.

      My current phone is from Motorola. It folds into a small enough size to fit in a front jeans pocket (an important requirement), and pretty good battery life (another)... but has a lot of features I didn't care about (a crappy camera, a color screen, web browsing, text messaging, etc. etc. etc.)

      The color screen wallpaper did default to a lovely photo of T-Moble spokesmodel Katherine Zeta Jones, so I guess that's a plus.

      But here's the thing: It sounds like crap. Also, if I were to drop it from any higher than about 5 feet, I'm pretty sure it would shatter into a stunning array of little multi-colored pieces.

      I would gladly trade all of the funky features, even the picture of Ms. Jones, for a phone of the same size which could withstand falling out of a car window on the highway and produce a signal which sounds at least as good as what you get from a quality land-line phone.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Your needs do not govern anybody else by operagost · · Score: 1
      Did Jesus die
      Only temporarily.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Your needs do not govern anybody else by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a Nokia 5510. Absolute brick. Can't destroy the bastards.

    5. Re:Your needs do not govern anybody else by mce · · Score: 1
      Take a seat, then read on...

      I work in micro-electronics research. The main pogram driving most of what the people in my division do, is aimed at enabling future low power multi-media multi-mode terminals with no end of features. The stuff we work on today is aimed for appearing on the consumer market in 2009/2010.

      So even though I personally will never ever buy one of these godzilla cell phones, they sure as hell pay my living. But another thing they do, is define the research goals of my team (amongst others). As such, I can tell you that in the quest for the ultimate device that does everything that product managers dream of with just a single battery, we're (in more ways than one) stretching the limit of the design complexity that can be managed. An enormous amount of (wo)manpower is being invested (sometimes I say wasted) for making possible all these toys with feature lists that nobody fully understands and even less people use.

    6. Re:Your needs do not govern anybody else by desenz · · Score: 1

      They're out there. Sanyo makes a phone that is actually quite large by todays standards. WOn't fit in your pocket, but like you said, i bet it would take a nasty fall with ease. Decent sound too. (Tried lots of phones, work for that place that claims to have all the answers)

    7. Re:Your needs do not govern anybody else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An enormous amount of (wo)manpower is being invested (sometimes I say wasted) for making possible all these toys with feature lists that nobody fully understands and even less people use.

      Ah, the MS Officization of the cellphone; who'da predicted that?

  22. Windows and 3gb HD by G00F · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    That must mean they have a max 1 gig of free space?

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  23. Battery life by ColonelFubster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those hard drives must be hell on battery life, low-power or not.

    --
    :-M
    1. Re:Battery life by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 1

      If they can make 512MB (and larger) usb thumb drives without a 1" hard drive, why not use the same technology to make a 3GB flash drive cell phone?

  24. And if you have US Cellular... by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...you still won't be able to get anything onto or off of that drive without paying for both a monthly subscription and a per-file fee.

    (USCC will sell you a camera phone, but thy have disabled the phone to disallow the use of a local connection cable to upload or download any audio or graphics. Nice, huh.)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:And if you have US Cellular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just them; pretty much every US carrier does that.

    2. Re:And if you have US Cellular... by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      They do it in Brazil too, those wicked carriers. Can't upload pictures from my Nokia 6225 to my computer via a USB cable or IR. Perhaps other countries there is no such limitations, or there are laws to forbid it; if not so, why then make phones with those capabilities, if they arrive to the end user crippled like that?

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
  25. A cell phone does not by Billy+Bo+Bob · · Score: 1

    run on the OS, the OS runs on the Cell phone.

    Try to get the whole hardware/software thing sorted; it sounds a lot more credible.

  26. this Sparc... by J_Omega · · Score: 2, Funny

    3GB?!? That's 3x more HD space than this Sparcstation5 I'm trying to install linux on. Cripes!

  27. Mod parent up! by Local+ID10T · · Score: 2, Informative

    Exactly.

    Make my phone a phone. I already have a laptop. Just make the phone work more reliably and for longer periods at a time.

    --
    "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    1. Re:Mod parent up! by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      nokia 1100 - great phone.

  28. Now I see... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    The real reason Motorola delayed unveiling their iTunes compatible phones TODAY. As they said, it was NOT the carriers that caused it. The more things change the more they stay the same, thanks a lot Bill.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Now I see... by taskforce · · Score: 1

      *gasp* Are you suggesting that an evil Microsoft based venture was quicker off the mark and more feature loaded that a freedom loving [insert group here] product, so the freedom loving [insert group here] product didn't even make it to market!

      --
      My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
  29. Yes it is illegal by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    In California at least, you cannot legally record a phone call without permission of both parties, or maybe you have to announce it at the beginning and put in that periodic beep.

    I personally think it a waste of a law which can't be enforced except as to making it inadmissable in court, and simultaneously wish it were enforceable. As far as I am concerned, that conversation belongs to everyone in the conversation, and they should all have veto over its uses. I really resented Amazon making purchase history available to the general public for sufficiently large domain names; that info belongs to the domain name owner also, and amazon has no right to unilaterally make it public.

  30. Don't drop it by starlabs · · Score: 1

    Just don't drop it... there goes your shiny new $$$$ investment.

    With all these new features they're adding to phones nowadays, I sure hope they try to make them durable enough to last at least several drops from several feet.

    I mean, who hasn't dropped their celphone? Multiple times??

    1. Re:Don't drop it by hsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just dropping? What about getting pissed off and throwing it across the room. Or what about drunken stoopers where you drop it in the toilet! hasn't happened to me, but many a friend. cell phones now can dry and and be usable, but what about ones with a disk drive?

    2. Re:Don't drop it by mingot · · Score: 1

      I have a samsung i700. It's been dropped on cement about 5 times now. Dropped onto carpet, car floor, etc more times than I can count. It's not a VERY ugly phone, but it still works.

      Yes, I am clumsy.

    3. Re:Don't drop it by Xyde · · Score: 1

      If anyone throws their phone across the room in some fit of anger I hope it does break. Self control, etc..

  31. 1000 songs.. by aerthling · · Score: 1, Informative
    ...yeah right. At 96kpbs, perhaps. I find it hard enough to fit 500 on my 4GB iPod Mini, which also is supposed to hold up to 1000 songs.

    I wish these people would just say 'It has a 3GB HDD' or something, instead of 'It can hold up to 1000 songs!!'.

    1. Re:1000 songs.. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The packaging tells you 1,000 songs, assuming they are of average length and are all encoded at 128kbps AAC. I have mostly 192kbps AAC's on mine and can maybe fit about 780 songs. I could probably fit a little over 800 if I didn't have anything in 256kbps or 192kbps MP3 from my eMusic subscription days.

    2. Re:1000 songs.. by jayloden · · Score: 1

      I agree, but do you know how many times I've said to someone "it's a 40GB iPod" and gotten a blank stare, followed by "how many songs it that?"

      -Jay

  32. To Bloat a Stoat by fm6 · · Score: 1
    If Windows were there just to support the MP3 player, then of course this would be overkill. But it's obviously there to support PDA functionality and general-purpose apps. As with a lot of other smart phones.

    Which is not to say that you're wrong about the security issues. Or that cramming MP3 and PDA functionality into a phone is a good idea. But Samsung and its competitors seem to prefer feature-bloated phones to simple phones that interoperate -- probably because they don't make any money off of the devices they interoperate with.

    1. Re:To Bloat a Stoat by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1
      I don't know why, but your title made the following pop into my head:

      A stoat is a stoat, and bloat is bloat,
      and nobody wants to bloat a stoat,
      unless that stoat is full of bloat,
      and then you've bloated a stoat!

      Sorry, your points were valid, but my mind is weird.

    2. Re:To Bloat a Stoat by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm the one that threw in a stoat, apropos of nothing. So your mind is no weirder than mine. Unfortunately, that's pretty weird!

    3. Re:To Bloat a Stoat by aminorex · · Score: 1

      And the weirdness of your mind invalidated his pants?

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  33. But what we REALLY want is... by jephthah · · Score: 0

    a hard drive running windows embedded our eyeglasses.

    Now THAT would be useful way more useful than 10 zillion different ringtones on your cellphone.

    think about it -- with a special one-way reflective coating on the lenses, we can just download pr0n all day at work or school, and people will think we're dilligently paying attention to our duties.

  34. What I'm looking for by gillbates · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is a cell phone that does everything. Yes, I've heard the whining from people who just want a cell phone to be a phone, but from my perspective, the fewer devices I have to manage, the better.

    Imagine you're going on vacation. You could pack:

    • Your camcorder
    • MP3 player
    • digital camera
    • PDA
    • Personal video player
    • Personal tv
    • Cellphone
    Or, you could just take your:
    • Cellphone

    Right now, we do have the technology to incorporate all of these features into one device with the form factor of a small notebook or PDA. Instead, people spend 5 times the amount of money on discrete appliances, and then have the added burden of having to carry them all. And then they whine because their phone isn't just a phone - as if they enjoy having dozens of electronic gadgets lying around the house, waiting to get lost, stolen, forgotten, etc...

    I'm tired of using a dozen different gadgets to do what could easily be integrated into one. If cellphone manufacturers are going to break into new markets, their phones are going to have to be more than just phones.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:What I'm looking for by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why stop there? Here's what I expect in a cell phone (one that weighs less than 6 oz. too):

      camcorder

      MP3 player

      digital camera

      PDA

      Personal video player

      Personal tv

      Cellphone

      toothbrush and toothpaste

      shampoo AND conditioner

      toilet paper

      hairbrush

      credit cards

      week's worth of clothing

      golf clubs

      my car

      Chinese hooker

      Anyone who doesn't think these belong in a phone is simply a luddite who resists technological evolution.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:What I'm looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine you're going on vacation. You could pack:

      Your camcorder
      - No, I'd rather enjoy my vacation than sit around recording it.
      MP3 player - No, that is an entertainment device. If you go on a vacation and have to bring something with you to keep you busy, you picked the wrong vacation.
      digital camera - See above
      PDA - See above
      Personal video player - See above
      Personal tv - See above
      Cellphone - Unless the call was important or was outgoing for an emergency, my voice mail would probably say something like "I do not want to talk to you. I am on vacation. In closing, go away."

    3. Re:What I'm looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you could integrate all these nice things, but what if you're going on vacation and you don't want people to bother you on the celly? Then you'd have to leave your cell phone, plus all the other things you wanted to bring behind. Or I suppose you could just not answer it...

    4. Re:What I'm looking for by mce · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you pack a personal TV? And if you do need TV access and really can't rely one having one in your hotel, then sure as hell a real TV (even if it's a small portable one) is going to give you a lot better quality than a cellphone. So your imaginary super-cellphone is by no means equivalent to the sum of your first list of stuff.

    5. Re:What I'm looking for by newdamage · · Score: 1

      Yes, technically you could have all these devices as an all-in-one solution. All these really depend on is a processor that does sound, audio, and video, some memory, some storage, and a reasonably decent display.

      The only problem I see is making a decent interface for user input that excels at all these functions.

      I can dial my cellphone with one hand.
      I can navigate my iPod with one hand.
      Yet these are two vastly different interfaces.

      Coming up with a universal interface that allows easy user input and still remaining compact seems extremely difficult.

      --
      ce n'est pas un Sig.
    6. Re:What I'm looking for by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Right now, we do have the technology to incorporate all of these features into one device with the form factor of a small notebook or PDA. Instead, people spend 5 times the amount of money on discrete appliances, and then have the added burden of having to carry them all. "

      Well... I think you're both getting the point and then missing it at the same time.

      A lot of Slashdotters in a rush to get the first +3 Insightful are quick to poo-poo integration. They don't care about a camera in a cell phone because it only does 640 by 480 and they've got some whiz-bang digital camera that does 5 megapixels. They paid considerably more for that camera, and they also got considerably better quality out of it. The point has been made ad-nauseum here that the more something can do, the less competent it is at doing it. It's a valid point. However, this is where they miss they miss the point entirely: That 5 megapixel camera is only good when you have it on you to use. Common sense, right? You'd think so, but when people poo-poo phones with cameras built in, they suddenly forget this point. (Race to get that +3 Insightful?) A cell phone is a nice convergence device because it stays with people at all times. I go to work: There's my cell phone. I go to an arcade: There's my cell phone. I take my family out to dinner: There's my cell phone. I take a dump: There's my cell phone. (yeah yeah, I know that'll attract smart ass comments, oh well.) Would I take my 5mp camera to an arcade? Dinner with the family? Not likely. While I'm taking a... err. Okay, that was a really bad example. I was actually thinking more about cell phone with built in games/internet etc. You get the point. Value. My cell phone does MORE. It may not be perfect, but it's better than nothing. I have photos of my nephew being silly at dinner that I simply would not have captured if my phone didn't have a camera. (I could keep going but I think the point was made right there.)

      I mentioned before that you got the point and then missed it. I think you get what I just said above. I think you understand why having this stuff in a cell phone is cool for a lot of people. But what I'm really replying to is "you're going on vacation". Ugh. That wouldn't be my first example. A stronger example would have been "going on a spontaneous trip". The "master of none" point still very much applies. You want a 5 megapixel photo of the Grand Canyon.

      So, yes, I agree: Cell phone convergence == generally good. Moaning about new features in cell phones == generally obnoxious.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:What I'm looking for by afidel · · Score: 1

      Let me give you a big hint, the best vacation I ever took was one with ZERO tech involved. I went to a ranch where my cellphone didn't work, I stayed in a cabin where the only electricity was for the wall clock and a single bulb, and there was no phone in my cabin. It was the best week of my life. I rose when I wanted, communed with nature, and left being the most relaxed I have been since childhood. Getting away from technology for a while was truely refreshing. Then again the same argument for integration would have worked VERY well when I was traveling around the country for IBM, having just one device instead of a bag full would have been quite nice =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:What I'm looking for by nizo · · Score: 1

      The good news is we can make a device that does all this. The bad news is if you want to use it for more than an hour, you need to either plug it into the wall or carry around a 20lb (about 9kg for the metrically-enhanced readers) external battery.

    9. Re:What I'm looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now this guy has the right idea. Personally I could leave off the personal video player and personal TV options, but the rest would be nice to have in one device that doesn't weigh 5lbs.

    10. Re:What I'm looking for by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with all but the digital camera - it's *not* a device to entertain you while you are there, its so when you are 90 years old and having your arse wiped for you, you can remember that snowboarding/hiking/clubbing/whatever holiday you had 60 years before. Actually while I'm here, whats wrong with a bit of chilling out and listening to music, so I would take the MP3 too.... No wonder this was posted AC. Tool.

    11. Re:What I'm looking for by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      I can tell by your post that you are not a photographer by any means, that you don't quite understand what vacations are for, and that you desire quality far, far less than convenience.

      Right now, we do have the technology to incorporate all of these features into one device with the form factor of a small notebook or PDA. Instead, people spend 5 times the amount of money on discrete appliances, and then have the added burden of having to carry them all.

      Not by a longshot. None of the integrated devices hold a candle to the quality and capabilities of any of the standalone products. If i go on a holiday, I don't want to come back with 25 seconds of 160x100 video and a few pictures not fit to print on stamps. The smallest lense for my cameras is larger than my current cellphone.

      Just how big would your phone be if it had the quality and features of a mid range point and shoot digital camera, could record DV quality video to removable storage, have all the features and usability of an iPod, record and store video and play TV from a variety of sources. Oh and take phone calls.

      And then they whine because their phone isn't just a phone - as if they enjoy having dozens of electronic gadgets lying around the house, waiting to get lost, stolen, forgotten, etc...

      Yeah, it's much more convenient to bring an all in one device on a vacation, and drop it / lose it / have it stolen. One device, with everything on it. There goes your vacation pictures, video, your agenda, and the phone number for the cute chic you met at the bar. And you won't even be able to watch TV to get your mind off of your loss.

      When I charge my cell, I can still go out and take picutes. I can watch TV and talk on my phone at the same time, without mirrors. Not that I carry around my TV.

      I'm tired of using a dozen different gadgets to do what could easily be integrated into one.

      A great many of the things you mentioned are not gadgets to others. At any rate, if all these "gadgets" make you so tired, maybe you should take a holiday, and leave them all behind this time.

    12. Re:What I'm looking for by hackstraw · · Score: 1
      Imagine you're going on vacation. You could pack:
      • Your camcorder
      • MP3 player
      • digital camera
      • PDA
      • Personal video player
      • Personal tv
      • Cellphone
      Or, you could just take your:
      • Cellphone
      Or you could just relax and enjoy nature for a change.
    13. Re:What I'm looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell is the GPS????

      how about a lighter? signal flare? Mirror?

      cripes kids today just do not think of the important things...

      well you did get the chinese hooker in there, that 's a start... but costs money... hooker=cost.... whore = freebie!

      change it to a whore and you got a deal.

    14. Re:What I'm looking for by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Funny, I can disable WiFi in my laptop. Even cell phone reception in my phone. And with a hard drive they can have many more settings. Outgoing only mode, emergency incoming only, etc.

    15. Re:What I'm looking for by Rocko's+Modurn+Life · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So that when I lose my phone on my vacation, or it drops and breaks into 5 million peices I also lose my:
      • Camcorder
      • mp3 player
      • digital camera
      • PDA
      • personal video player
      • personal tv (??!)
      • cellphone
      or I could just lose my:
      • cellphone
      All this consolidation isn't a boon. I don't have masses of electronic items lying around waiting to get lost and honestly the only thing a phone should have in addition to the phone is the pda feature, since it can tell time and has a calendar. Everything else is extravagance that only adds to the price the manufacturer can charge. Better make sure to get that extended warranty/replacement plan!
    16. Re:What I'm looking for by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Not by a longshot. None of the integrated devices hold a candle to the quality and capabilities of any of the standalone products. If i go on a holiday, I don't want to come back with 25 seconds of 160x100 video and a few pictures not fit to print on stamps. The smallest lense for my cameras is larger than my current cellphone.

      [[[Now let me ask you this, how much would you pay for a modular system in which your cell phone could be popped into your 10-megapixel SLR camera and used to wireless upload your photos to your 200gig drive in your home PC? And record GPS position, date, time, etc.
      ]]]

      Sometimes the unit should not be put into the phone, I think it'd be awesome if the phone could be put into the unit too... ;)

    17. Re:What I'm looking for by noidentity · · Score: 1
      • camcorder
      • MP3 player
      • digital camera
      • PDA
      • Personal video player
      • Personal tv
      • Cellphone
      • toothbrush and toothpaste
      • shampoo AND conditioner
      • toilet paper
      • [...]

      You know, you had me going until the toilet paper part. I'm not going to use a phone that's been used... uh, yeah.

      And you left out the most important of all, the kitchen sink.

    18. Re:What I'm looking for by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      What's to enjoy?

      Sand gets in between your toes. Waves crash on the beach. Trees just sit there and make that "wooshing" sound.

      It takes me about 5 minutes of watching nature before I get bored.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    19. Re:What I'm looking for by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      An Apple Shuffle is $99. If a cellphone can duplicate that simple functionality and only cost $50 more than a similar model that does everything but mp3s, that would be a good deal to me.

      If I wanted a low-end, HD-based camcorder which used the same HD to playback video, and could use a TV module for playing and saving TV, even better. Yeah it might get lost, stolen, or crushed, but if it costs $700 instead of $400 + 400 + 100(TV), I might think it's worth it.

      Combine all of the above in one device for considerably less than the individual parts, and it might be worth the risk, depending on my lifestyle and plans for using it.

    20. Re:What I'm looking for by Rocko's+Modurn+Life · · Score: 1

      Low-end is the right term. Sounds like a phone that is jack of all trades, master of none.

      I'm not one of those "a-phone-should-be-a-phone" guys. I understand that some features would be useful. I mentioned the pda feature before. But come on. They, the manufacturers, only add features onto phones so the service providers can roll out new towers that enable the phone with the ability to send photos, send videos, buy ringtones, buy screensavers, buy subscriptions and do everything but not drop a call and not make it sound like you're talking on a cellphone.

      But I own a Treo 600, mainly because I can operate the thing with one hand more than 75% of the time, so maybe I'm not qualified to even comment on no-frills cellphones.

  35. You are such a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Did Jesus die and leave you in charge?"

    He was king of just the Jews, dumbass!

  36. Re:Ah, the good ol' days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya those days were great. Remeber the "Car Phone" A phone in a bag that weighed 10 pounds... yes those were the good ol days.

    Or not...

  37. Swiss-Army Phones by bigtallmofo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you think in some secret lab somewhere deep within the walls of a mobile phone company there are prototypes of cell phones with all sorts of things attached to them?

    Things to Try Mounting on Phone:
    Philips-Head Screwdriver
    Can Opener
    Scissors
    Deathray

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Swiss-Army Phones by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Umm.

      I'd buy a phone with a deathray, as long as it wasn't too much larger and had decent range (~50m or so against human opponents).

      I'm not a huge fan of device convergence but *that* I could go for.

    2. Re:Swiss-Army Phones by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

      Dude,
      I work for a mobile-phone company and we had a competition a while back whereby employees could submit new ideas for phones or mobile networks. Me and a collegue suggested mounting a bottle-opener on a phone (after he scarred his phone physically and mentally trying to open a beer bottle with it)and we thought it was the best idea ever! We are still waiting... Anyway, I REALLY like your idea about the philips-head screw-driver. That would have saved my ass a couple of times late at night in a server-room.

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  38. Yay for Single Point Of Failure! by simetra · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now there's a way to lose your phone and mp3 player at the same time!


    Personally, I don't even want a portable phone, as people tend to annoy me.


    When will this end? What's next, a pacemaker with built-in mp3?

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Yay for Single Point Of Failure! by Danimoth · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna go patent that, that way in 3 years when Apple announces the iPacer I'll be able to sue their asses of like everyone else.

      --
      No smoking sigs indoors.
  39. Dropped Calls by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

    What happens when you (inevitably) drop your phone? Does the probable HD headcrash kill the phone?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  40. Pictures of the SGH-i300 cell phone by mh_tang · · Score: 1
    For those who are interested, here are some pictures of the cell phone from engadget.com

    http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000730035259/

  41. Re:Do you really wanna carry a disk in your pocket by bobdinkel · · Score: 1

    Sure. And I do everyday. It's my iPod.

    --
    A publicly traded company exists solely to make profits for shareholders.
  42. The real question is... by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can you play the MP3's as hold music?

    1. Re:The real question is... by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

      Probably not, the RIAA would sue you for an "unauthorized public performance" of their intellectual property...

    2. Re:The real question is... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Can you play the MP3's as hold music?

      No, the real question is whether or not Apple will simultaneously open the iTunes Ringtone Store (iTRS) ... You see, this would be the smart move to make. In Europe, ringtone sales exceed paid internet song downloads. Once you get your sleek new iTunes enabled cellphone, you're going to want to go crazy with the Amazon patented one-click $0.99 RINGTONES!

      Like, Oh my god... it can play br1tn3y sp33rs!

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  43. Maybe this is why... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is why Motorola has delayed their iTunes Phone launch today. It couldn't compete with this.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Maybe this is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see... On the one hand we have a phone which can get viruses. On the other hand we have a phone which can't. I think I know which phone is my preference.

  44. SMS and phone call saved on HD ? by aepervius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, it is rather ralatively lackluster on detail, but if the HD is only for song and photo snapshot this is a utter waste. It would be interresting if this can also be used to save SMS data (and on 3 gb you can save a lot) or phone call... THAT last feature would be rather nice. There is a lot of phone call I would wish I had a way to save it ...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  45. Why do the features by eSims · · Score: 1
    get added piecemeal to different products?

    I want my 7 Megapixel Digital camera phone with the 3GB harddrive that I can boot my linux PPC system from...

    Oh, and $19.95 seems fair too!

    --
    I .sig therefore I am!
  46. Hope it's better than their last try! by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

    Samsung released a phone with a 1.5GB HDD last year (Info) and it's nothing short of awful. It's fat, heavy, only supports some silly proprietary format and has to check drive consistency when you copy any file onto it. If you want to copy numerous files, like say a collection of music, it checks after every single file not after all of them have been copied. They also recalled it before re-releasing it due to reliability issues. Fortunately, only Koreans will ever have to deal with it.

    I certainly hope Samsung has learned a few important lessons since its last foray into this field.

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  47. Re:Do you really wanna carry a disk in your pocket by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Troll
    I've dropped my Motorola V300 from waist height onto hard surfaces twice. No hard drive, but it is a cellphone. Total damage: some case scuffing. Hint: Don't buy nokia, kyocera, samsung etc crap cellphones and they will survive being abused. My previous phone (and my girlfriend's() which are a Siemens S46 (IIRC) and a Motorola V66 (definitely) have been dropped and abused a number of times over a two year lifespan and both work as well as they day we purchased them.

    Of course, THIS phone is a samsung phone, so I wouldn't want to carry it around. It's amazing how poor-quality their phones are. That vga1000 phone that people seem to love so much is a big piece of shit from both the hardware and software points of view, and every samsung phone I've held has felt flimy. I also extend the same criticism to nokia - the honda civic of the cellphone world. Made to be cheap and there's a zillion customizations, does not handle abuse AT ALL.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. I know this is touted as "convergence"... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but come on - I guess I could conceivably end up with an uber-gadget that is my phone, gps, iPod, PDA, universal remote, pedometer, Speedpass, web browser, biometric verifier, flash drive, camera, pager, video player, voice activated game console, garage door opener, pill timer, and nose hair trimmer, but do I want it?

    It's pretty much the current definition of jack of all trades, master of none. The browsers all suck wind from the first click. No way the phone camera matches the 4MP with optical zoom and full controls. With my luck, I'd go to open the garage door and dial the Pentagon, who'd read the fix from my GPS and catch me screaming "Attack! Attack! - No, use the sniper rifle!" in the middle of a Halo session...

    So it's really just a away of any one manufacturer making sure you buy the whiz-bangiest phone instead of someone else's.

    What if I lose it? Right now I keep track of my GPS, iPod, camera and cell phone. Suppose I lose one device. I'm either out a copy of my music, or my most recent photos, or a location fix, or my phone. Lose the uber-device and I'm out all of them at once.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:I know this is touted as "convergence"... by Reignking · · Score: 0

      nose hair trimmer

      Great idea! Just don't put it near the mouthpiece.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:I know this is touted as "convergence"... by Ulric · · Score: 1

      I want such a gadget. In fact, I want a tricorder, but for now I'll settle for a PDA with built-in phone, wlan, mp3 player, camera, gps and, oh yeah, hard drive.

    3. Re:I know this is touted as "convergence"... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I remember digital watches and how they ended up with tons of features and then people eventually went back to analogue. Partly they looked better, but also I think they learnt that they didn't use the stopwatch or world time much.

      I'd like phones to have an options menu like the Windows calculator. Except instead of scientific/standard it would be loadofcrap/standard. That way, I could get a phone and tell it to give me a phone, SMS, simple name book and clock.

      The whizz-bang stuff is quite a lot about sales of content. My phone has a single button on the front for a browser. Why? To take me to buy those reasonably priced backgrounds, wallpapers and services. Cellphones are no longer about making calls, they are a tool for selling crap.

      You can bet your life that one of the first things they'll push with this hard disk phone is direct MP3 downloads.

    4. Re:I know this is touted as "convergence"... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      do I want it?
      [[[damn right I want it...]]]

      "What if I lose it?"
      [[[insure it, keep it backed up]]]

      Sounds great, buy one processor instead of 10, one LCD screen instead of 5, one infrared transmitter instead of 20.

      One device,....

    5. Re:I know this is touted as "convergence"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I lose it? Isn't that what the GPS is for?

  49. looks pretty crappy compared to the new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nokia 7710 with widescreen touchscreen..

  50. Diskeeper, cell phone edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Is your cell phone sluggish?
    Are your calls getting droped?

    These are typical symptoms of cell phone fragmentation. Using a quality product like Diskeeper for Cell Phones Professional can imrpove your cells preformance by up to 300x.

    Remember to 'Set it and Forget it' to keep your cell phones performance top notch."

  51. Durability? by danbond_98 · · Score: 1

    The reason i don't want a hard drive in my phone is the same as the reason i'm not going to buy an ipod till they do large flash based ones: i want to be able to throw the thing around, drop it, etc, and not have to worry about anything except having to buy a new cover. Or do these hard drives have less problems with being dropped and generally abused that might be expected?

    1. Re:Durability? by jayloden · · Score: 1

      Well, I own a 40GB iPod and I carry it with me every single day, and I've even dropped it from waist height to the ground a couple times. It's held up perfectly fine and there's absolutely no sign of any problems. I am a bit leery of having a hard drive in my pocket becuase we're all constantly told how fragile they are, but I've carried this thing to the gym and worked out with it bannging around in my pocket, dropped it, and it keeps on ticking.

      Part of this is the design, which copies ahead about something like 4 minutes worth of listening time onto a flash device inside the player. That way, if you do drop it, there's a good chance the heads won't crash because it's not in constant seek mode.

      -Jay

  52. If it was easy... by rjethmal · · Score: 1
    I'm tired of using a dozen different gadgets to do what could easily be integrated into one.


    If it was easy you'd have such a device by now.
    --
    Push the envelope. Watch it bend. -Tool
    1. Re:If it was easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as a wireless engineer I can tell you that these things are on the horizon. I'm working on something like this now. Interestingly, the biggest hurdle is the size of the LCD - it needs to be as big as possible, without making the device too bulky. Of course, no one wants to carry around a flat panel monitor in their pocket, and thus the "ideal" size for an LCD is considerably debated.

      But the processor speed to power consumption ratio is picking up, and now were seeing processors in the sub-watt range which can do realtime audio and video decoding.

      We are at the point where all of these features could be integrated into a PDA:

      • laptop hard drives are now being built with 30, 40, and 80 GB capacities. While a hard drive is little power hungry, the device can run out of flash and only use the HD when decoding video or audio, to save battery life.
      • VGA CCDs are already being put into cellphones now. A small improvement in quality is all that's needed to do video encoding and good quality still images.
      • PDA processors are now fast enough to do video and audio encode/decode.
      • Flash memory is now cheap enough (1 GB for $80!) that even a device built without a hard drive could offer substantial functionality. Keep in mind that a linux system with X can be fit into less than 500 MB.

      The only thing that is missing now is a company willing to take a risk on an all-in-one device.

  53. Hard Drive ? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

    My phone gets abused. It goes for rides in bags pants and jackets, it tumbles with me through bike crashes. It will get dropped. it will take a hard falls.

    I don't think I want a mechanical drive in my phone.

    It's just another thing to break making me upgrade a piece of equipment that never really needed a hard drive in the first place.

  54. But does it run linux? by thirteenVA · · Score: 1

    Well, does it?

  55. Re:Ex-Marine Says Public Version of Saddam Capture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you must admit that this is the best place for trolling :-)

  56. Your post is nothing more than flamebait by Auckerman · · Score: 1

    You make a lot of statements here as a reply to half a sentence statement.

    " smug little luddite like yourself posts: why isn't a phone just a phone and a word processor just a typewriter? ...Who are you to tell me I shouldn't have that? Who are you to say a very successful company hasn't done their market research?"

    The grandparent post didn't say, imply or suggest anything like you read into his statement. It seems you have taken the idea that someone somewhere doesn't need a hard-drive in their phone as a ad hem attack against you.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:Your post is nothing more than flamebait by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      If the (great)grandparent post doesn't know why the HDD is motivated he ought to learn to read, it's right there: "The SGH-I300 will offer 3GB of storage which allows you to store up to 1,000 songs on it for playback through the music player."

  57. Awesome by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    Too bad it'll be 10 years before we get decent phones like this in the US. Just because companies make them doesn't mean we'll ever get to use them.

  58. Apple - watch out! by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Apple better launch an iPOD cell phone line. Watch out Apple.

  59. Re:Do you really wanna carry a disk in your pocket by menkhaura · · Score: 1

    Not even the flip cover of my old Motorola StarTac resisted when I forgot it in my pant pocket and sat down on it. So, next phone was a Nokia with no moving part at all.

    --
    Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
    Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
  60. It doesn't have enough features yet... by blcamp · · Score: 1


    Just 3 gigs? But I want a:

    Digital Camera
    MP3 Player
    Voice Recorder
    PDA
    TV
    GPS-Navigation Unit
    Scanner
    Video Game Machine
    Coffee Maker
    Dishwasher
    Car Remote Control

    That runs on Windows. Will 3 gigs be enough?

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:It doesn't have enough features yet... by Space_Balls · · Score: 1

      I still prefer to carry on campus: Laptop (SuSe 9.2 ,linux=good karma!!) Ipod PDA Camera-phone backup cell All in a Targus backpack.... if anyone ever steals it, I'm really screwed! So a single small device might just be a little more stealthy in protecting you from theft, compared to having everything seperate

      --
      this.showSig(false)
    2. Re:It doesn't have enough features yet... by Space_Balls · · Score: 1

      now why didn't I try preview, all my formatting gone to hell!

      When will we finally get post editing!?

      --
      this.showSig(false)
  61. Why do these people get mod points? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    GP is insightful, but P is a troll? Hint: the parent comment and this comment have exactly the same spirit. It's only trolling if you espouse a view to which you do not subscribe and portray it as if you believed it, in order to receive a specific response from someone. If you think my above comment is a troll, you do not know what the word means. Go plague some other website. (Now THAT is sincere as hell.) THIS comment is offtopic. The parent is insightful to me but I don't particularly think it's worth positive moderation, either; it's sure as hell not a troll.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  62. Can we make a cell-phone RAID array? They did it with iPod shuffles...

    CC

    --
    CKSCIII
  63. Re:Do you really wanna carry a disk in your pocket by Meumeu · · Score: 1

    When I bought a new phone to replace my 3310, I tried to break it, I had to use a hammer to damage the cover, the LCD had nothing, I had to remove the cover to break the LCD.

    Of course my little sister achieved to break a siemens phone just by transporting it in her backpack, so yes siemens phones are crap but not nokia phones.

  64. MOD PARENT UP!!! by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

    i wish i had mod points, or i would.

  65. Hey Apple: Itunes not iPod by Mik3D · · Score: 1

    Considering the increasing number of Window Mobile and Symbian smartphones on the market, it would seem like a smart move would be to release versions of iTunes for these platforms... rather than depend on the whims of a specific hardware vendor (motorola).

  66. Re:First Application... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hint: Slashcode automagically inserts the lijnk domain ;)

  67. Re:Ex-Marine Says Public Version of Saddam Capture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  68. OGG capatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Samsung's web site they have CEBIT coverage. In that coverage they show the SGH-Z700. The specs are stating OggPlayer and H.264.

    How's that!!!

    Maybe now you can stop complaining about Ogg not on phones?

  69. I'm not a fan of whizz-bang cellphones, BUT: by TexVex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, my phone is just about as basic as it could get, and most of the bare minimum features it came with, I'm just not using. I store about two dozen phone numbers on it, I call people, I accept incoming calls, and I use my voicemail. I've never used text messaging, or played a game on my cell phone. I don't want my phone to be a substandard camera; if I want to take pictures I want a multi-megapixel digital jobbie with real optics in it. I think pop music ringtones are just stupid; I keep my phone in my pocket on vibrate most of the time just so I don't come off as a giant anus every time someone rings me up when I'm in a public place.

    But, instead of just ranting about how I think all this extra whizz-bang is wasteful, stupid, and whatnot, I spent a couple minutes thinking about what I *would* like to have in my cellphone. What extra feature would I pay to have? I've got a good idea. A genius one:

    Television and Radio. Once, many years ago, I owned a handheld backlit LCD television. It was a thing of beauty; a few ounces of mass, a two-inch screen, and a telescoping antenna. It was great to have in lots of places. It had a 1/8" mono jack for plugging in headphones or an earpiece. Its integrated speaker was adequate as well.

    Now, this was about ten years ago. I know the technology for LCDs has come a long way. I know that device would easily fit into a cellphone today. So, do it. And add AM/FM radio. Then, give me TiVo functionality for the TV and radio (I'm sure the television video scaled down for the phone display would compress pretty damn well!). If my phone had all that, I could justify paying for a hard drive in it.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    1. Re:I'm not a fan of whizz-bang cellphones, BUT: by cheerfullpixie · · Score: 1

      TV on a phone you say? http://www.cingular.com/media/cool_tools_providers #mobitv

  70. Re:sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, that's pretty cool.

  71. Solid state by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    Well, Considering I can buy a 4GB Compact Flash card they could very well do that. Cost is probably higher but I think that the power usage is lower.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  72. stability by Brandon+Dowell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows on a Cell phone? I can see it how: "Hey man, I lost you, did you drive under a tunnel or something?" "No... My phone just BSOD'ed."

    --
    cd shower ; make clean ; cd ../bed ; make install
    1. Re:stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if it does loose a call it will ask if you want to send a log of the convo to Microsoft.

  73. "We're sorry... by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..but your call cannot be completed at this time. Please run a complete surface scan and try your call again. This is a recording."

    If the drives are modular and easily removable, I smell a great line of repair work to get into.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  74. Reply to I'm Just Stupid... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Your camcorder - No, I'd rather enjoy my vacation than sit around recording it.
    [[[Guess you don't realize that some people have children. And they like to record the joy of their children at Disney World. I don't have children, but I understand such.]]]

    MP3 player - No, that is an entertainment device. If you go on a vacation and have to bring something with you to keep you busy, you picked the wrong vacation.
    [[[Guess you've never flown for 6 hours from NY to LA, or longer to Europe or Asia. I guess you've never wanted to pop on a little classical music to help filter out the drone of the jet engines so you can nap.]]]

    digital camera - See above
    [[[really, wow...I went to San Diego and got some great pictures of seals, and other unique experiences. Also, was able to take pictures of childhood memories to show friends back home.]]]

    PDA - See above
    [[[Goodness, it's so nice to have my address book in my phone. Call friends when I'm in the neighborhood. Not only that, I put the hotel, car rental and several restaurant and museum addresses and phone numbers in it.]]]

    Personal video player - See above
    Personal tv - See above
    [[[Long flight, no theatre on this plane...sure glad I brought my own.]]]

    Cellphone - Unless the call was important or was outgoing for an emergency, my voice mail would probably say something like "I do not want to talk to you. I am on vacation. In closing, go away."
    [[[Hey, gone for two weeks - want to check up on our daughter. Hey, need ot make that reservation for dinner tonight. Forgot to do it at the hotel. Sure glad I've got my cell phone.]]]

    And blast it, add the fricken GPS...cause those map directions are always wrong.

    This doesn't even count for many business men and women who travel often and need several of these features. Yes, even the camera. Guess it's nice to send a picture of video to the kids or wife saying "I love you, and look what I got little Johnny"

    *grin*

    Don't want it - fine...but please STFU! Thank You!

  75. Your flying car is 20 years away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in 2015, your flying car will still be 20 years away.

    1. Re:Your flying car is 20 years away by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      The flying car was introduced about 1948 in "Popular Sience" or "Science and Mechanics" or "Mechanics Illustrated". (I don't remember which. My brother subscribed to all three.) One version had folding wings down the side and the other was a drive-up set of wings that attached to a specific car. Based on the present trend of things, it will be more than 20 years.

    2. Re:Your flying car is 20 years away by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Based on the present trend of things, it will be more than 20 years.

      Hopefully it'll be a lot longer than that ... most drivers on the road today have enough trouble handling two dimensions. And they'll have even more trouble when they're trying to find a song on their phone with built-in 20TB drive at the same time ...

  76. TV/Radio by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    I still have one of those Casio handheld TVs :-)

    Anyway, there are phones with TV (and maybe FM) reception ... in Japan!

    Seriously, I've read a while ago about a Japanese phone which could do half of what you want. A quick search revealed that it really was a Sharp, as I suspected: Sharp V402SH, the pink one. It's only a matter of time before a cross between that phone and this Samsung appears, then you'd be able to do anything, although I don't think that the battery would last more than a few hours in recording mode.

  77. Get Cingular/AT&T... by WiseWeasel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know Verizon does the same thing, so that they can sell you ringtones and graphics, and charge you for data transfers with the data plans. Since I got AT&T (now Cingular) I'm able to transfer sounds (ringtones) pictures and themes over BlueTooth (USB optional) to my computer without hassle. That alone is worth getting Cingular (the excellent nationwide coverage, kick-ass GSM phones and rollover minutes are also nice). The only thing you can't transfer directly to the computer is the games. US Cellular is quite possibly the most user-hostile provider in existence, not to mention being expensive and using the crappy CDMA network and phones.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    1. Re:Get Cingular/AT&T... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I keep USCellular (which is evil, I know) because (1) they're the only ones with coverage in the mountains where I work and (2) I can get the cheapest plan for two people that works well for the way we use the phones ($60 for two phones sharing 700 minutes, free incoming, and regional in practially every state I'll visit for more than two days out of the entire year)

      I asked three other carriers about coverage before I re-upped, and their uniform response was "we don't do analog, and we probably won't have towers there for several years, if ever." Nice.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  78. I could use such a phone by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    but only if there is an option to upgrade to two hookers.

  79. More Details and Pictures by davidconger · · Score: 1

    See here: http://www.davespda.com/index.php?itemid=268 "The device is based on the next generation of Windows Mobile (known as Magneto). The screen is QVGA, meaning that the resolution is the same of a standard Pocket PC but on the smaller Smartphone sized screen. Unlike most devices, the directional pad is a rotational wheel music like the iPod (an obvious direct competitor of this device. The device measures 4.45" x 1.89" x 0.79" and weights 4.59 ounces. It is GSM/GPRS and does not support EDGE. USB 2.0 is present and allows the device to act like a flash drive so music does not have to be copied via ActiveSync. Bluetooth is included so wireless headphones can be used."

  80. No, im in charge by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Not the parent poster.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  81. A 3GB hard drive but it has windows.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..its like putting a sexy thong on your granny.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  82. this could be... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...a fun subthread, hope you are monitoring it being AC and all. Do you want to limit it to cellphones, or is anything fairgame? BTW, all hail fellow neogeezer! Kinda neat how you can learn to spot patterns and trends, isn't it?

    Anyway, Cellphones are the real PDAs, this should be obvious by now, they are winning the portable do-dad wars handily. Small do everything combo communications devices and more, tiny full function computers basically. Most anything you can do on a desktop or laptop you can at least get close enough for govt work on the cellpda convegence device. This is the more or less the now and the close to now immediate future.

    The big problems with them are tiny screens, and inputing, all the options we have now still suck, and badly, they are kludges on top of compromises.

    Keypads of whatever congfig out there now are just too freaking small, onscreen touch or offscreen mash a button. They sucketh large.(and as the population ages, this will become more consumer apparent) So, the next big thing is going to have to be advanced speech recognition to control the phone, even beyond what they have now. It has to be able to run all the apps, including web browsers, etc. Opera is well ahead in this regard (as it has been with browsing in general for quite a long time and it "gets it" with cellphone browsers). It will also be predictive, have some sort of AI that learns your habits and will automagically "do stuff" that you normally do, especially if you are organized and a "sequencer". After you "train" your phone speaking to it should be minimal.

    Next is the display, this is obviously harder. sound input is easy size wise,mic->in jack is pretty small or a pinhole mic, etc, no probs for speech recognition and control there. But visual display is a bother. You can't have small in physical size and big in physical screen, so-o-o-o, the screen will *have* to extend outside the physical size of the device, s-o-o, that means holographic display or something pretty darn close to that. Short of retinal implants or those dorky glasses they have now with the screen off to the side that forces you to be blind as you walk around, that's about it for doing a large enough display. It will have to expand and fill a space in front of you, and be quite large enough to be fully functional and *nice*.

    Your turn (or anyone's, I love futurist projections)

  83. Sobig Herpes? by baKanale · · Score: 1

    Dude, make that phone I'm in. But only if it comes with a good anti-virus.

  84. slashdot-enabled phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new slashdot-enabled phone should have a horrible message board interface, lots of useless text messages, a dictionary of buzzwords, and spam messages every 5 minutes. Then I'd feel very comfortable spending time with it.

  85. Does it have 802.11b/g? by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    No? Then I dont want it.

  86. Congratulations, moderator by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You have just mistaken an opinion different from your own from a troll. You are a mental midget with the IQ of a fencepost.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  87. Re:Ogg me up! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    I love how expressing a concern that something lacks a feature you require, is considered a troll these days. Such enlightened times.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!