Slashdot Mirror


Cell Phone with Built-in Projector

karvind writes "Siemens researchers have developed a cell phone featuring a built-in projector system. A laboratory model was presented at CeBIT 2005 in Hanover. The system makes it possible to project a complete keypad or display onto a surface. With a special pen, users can write on the virtual keypad and operate the phone's functions. Other projection keyboard concepts can be found here and here"

137 comments

  1. That's not a projector. by VJTod · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want a 1280x1024 projector. They're just projecting a keyboard.

    1. Re:That's not a projector. by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1
      It's a weird keyboard, though... some of the letters aren't quite where I'd expect them to be. That might make it difficult to use for anything other than simple communications-related functions.

      It would be neat to see this used for cellphone games: there'd be more space to work with, and the input method would also make life more interesting for designers.

    2. Re:That's not a projector. by Lispy · · Score: 5, Funny

      and I want a small Princess Leia on my desk: "Help me Obi-Wan Keinobi, you're our only hope..."

    3. Re:That's not a projector. by keli · · Score: 1

      The letters are exactly where they should be... for a German telephone. (For some reason German keyboards swap the Y and Z keys...)

      Actually a projected keyboard would be great in that sense, that the projected "keycaps" always can match the current keyboard layout... Oh have I longed for a keyboard with some electronic ink on top of the key caps so it could change according to the layout. :-P

    4. Re:That's not a projector. by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And I want a decent Star Wars prequel! ;)

    5. Re:That's not a projector. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just don't cross the beams. Trust me, it will be bad.

    6. Re:That's not a projector. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Germans swap the "y" and "z" keys for quicker typing of words like "ze"

    7. Re:That's not a projector. by yincrash · · Score: 1

      They are projecting more than a keyboard. It says it can either display a keyboard or the other functions of the phone.

    8. Re:That's not a projector. by flowerp · · Score: 1

      Very funny. Not. Now get ze hell out of ze room.

      --
      --- Eat my sig.
    9. Re:That's not a projector. by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      What would be even better is if the projected image provided force feedback so if you stuck your finger in it you could feel some resistance.... mmmmmmm

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  2. hard to type by alatesystems · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who has ever used these type of keyboards knows you need a completely steady surface, it needs to be semi-dark so you can see the keyboard, and it hurts the hell out of your fingers to type on a non-giving surface.

    None of these aspects are well-suited for portable typing. I want a SELMA hologram for my portable electronics interaction.

    1. Re:hard to type by zenneth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All they'd need to do would be to incorporate some type of thin glove with specially-padded fingertips to get around the hard-surfaced keyboard.

      But imagine laying in bed and have your phone ring and project the Caller-ID info onto your wall or ceiling so you would/wouldn't have to get out of bed.

      That'd be sweet.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    2. Re:hard to type by adlaiff6 · · Score: 0

      Yes, but is it that you're typing too hard, or is it that way anyway? Or, do you need to type that hard anyway?

    3. Re:hard to type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I want a SELMA hologram for my portable electronics interaction.
      Holy crap, +5 obscure reference.

      That was a good show, too. Wonder what happened to it.
    4. Re:hard to type by alatesystems · · Score: 1

      Time Trax was extremely awesome. I don't know what happened to it; I even emailed the sci-fi channel asking to buy dvd's or vhs or anything they have. I would love to have any versions I could find. Sci-Fi never responded, of course.

      I found episodes on Gnutella, but they were all in German.

      If there's 2 things Germans are good at, it's pirating digital content and making cars.

      (In case you're wondering what I'm talking about, I'm replying to an AC; lower your threshold to see it.)

    5. Re:hard to type by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You emailed the wrong people, Time Trax was in syndacation, sci-fi probably doesn't own it (unless I'm wrong and they bought it later).

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:hard to type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But imagine laying in bed and have your phone ring and project the Caller-ID info onto your wall or ceiling so you would/wouldn't have to get out of bed.

      I just press the silence button.

    7. Re:hard to type by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      Paris Hilton could have used one of those in her sex video.

      Too little too late, unfortunately.

    8. Re:hard to type by Tom · · Score: 1

      Depends on your use, I figure. Does it already hurt after writing 2-3 mails? (if so, maybe you shouldn't hit the keyboard as hard, it's not a wife :) ).

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    9. Re:hard to type by hgavin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried out the Canesta projection keyboard at the Symbian expo in London two years ago. The keyboard was projected using a laser, and was perfectly visible in the artificial light of the exhibition hall. The keyboard generally worked well, and was linked bia Bluetooth to a Sony Ericsson P800.

      The real drawback of these devices in my opinion is the lack of tactile feedback - until the character appears on the screen you don't know whether you've hit the key correctly. It's fine for hunt-and-peck typing, but touch-typists have trouble with them.

    10. Re:hard to type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Project onto a rubber mouse pad.

    11. Re:hard to type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy to type: http://chicagologic.com/

  3. Bald men rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your shiny pates will keep you from the unemployment line

    1. Re:Bald men rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      gb2/b/, we need more Cracky-chan!

  4. Giant Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How far does this thing project? Can I set it up across the room and have giant keyboard that I can jump around on, like in Big?

    1. Re:Giant Keyboard by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 5, Funny
      Let's hope not...

      Think about it: a keyboard you can jump on, plus long and annoying ringtones. Do we really need a cellphone version of DDR?

    2. Re:Giant Keyboard by keli · · Score: 1

      Do we really need a cellphone version of DDR?

      Uhh... A communist cellphone with a wall around it? No probably not. :-P

    3. Re:Giant Keyboard by alfrin · · Score: 1

      And if they did, that would just be another excuse for kids to get new cell phones, i can just see it now..

      Kid: Please mommy, I have to get a new cell phone
      Mom: Why in the world would you need a new cell phone
      Kid:But its good exercise..

      Now that I think about it thats a pretty good marketting campaign...

    4. Re:Giant Keyboard by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Be very very frightened, for it already exists. Well, just minus the jumping around part.

    5. Re:Giant Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I set it up across the room and have giant keyboard that I can jump around on, like in Big?

      No, but you can project a tiny keyboard, like in the hypothetical movie Little.

    6. Re:Giant Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we really need a cellphone version of DDR?

      YESSSSS! That would make me finally buy a cellphone.

  5. too clunky... by kebes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFA claims:
    "At first glance, the mobile phone looks exactly like a conventional cell phone."

    ...but I disagree. It looks big and clunky. Frankly I don't think this feature is worth the added bulk, cost, complexity, and battery-usage. This will remain a gimmick until it can be integrated seemlessly into current cellphones, and more importantly, until the interface is actually smooth and efficient.

    1. Re:too clunky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      TFA claims: "At first glance, the mobile phone looks exactly like a conventional cell phone."

      ...but I disagree. It looks big and clunky


      TFA didn't say what era the conventional cell phone was from...

    2. Re:too clunky... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      With the exception of enough technical advances
      along this line to enable very very small cell
      phones, what is the point?

      Unless it is the precursor to a cell phone/PDA
      with a projected viewing screen and keyboard?

      Exactly how much more unsafe will it be to use
      your cell phone while driving, with the keypad
      (, or display & keyboard) projected up onto
      the interior of the windshield?

    3. Re:too clunky... by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am amazed at your studpidity, kebes. What you are saying is essentially "the feature is useless and will remain a gimmick until it works perfectly". May be you were not aware of it, but all new technologies go through these stages. First DVD players were bulky, expensive and there were no DVDs to play on them. First mobile phones, for fuck's sake, weighted several kilos and were carried around in a briefcase. Of course this is a prototype - have you seen any phones with projectors before? Of course, it is not perfect - it is just a prototype. Would you prefer companies keeping all their concept products secret? No one expects customers to buy these phones en masse. But if there is some interest, the technology will be developed further and eventually perfected.

      You don't seem to understand any of this and act as if your groundless and irrational bashing has some merit. It doesn't. Your comment is 100% content-free and in the future, please kindly think before typing anything on the keyboard in front of you. Thank you.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:too clunky... by kebes · · Score: 1

      For the record, my comment was mostly pointing out the hyperbole of the article. It was the article that was incorrectly implying that the technology was mature, not the company showing off its prototype, and I was taking issue with their analysis.

      Furthermore, not all features are created equal. Some are so new and innovative that consumers are worth sacrificing something (like paying money, spending time, carrying something heavey, etc.). Other features are not worth much, and are only accepted once they are so innocuous that they don't get in the way of other features. Cell phones were sufficiently revolutionary that they were worth the cost and bulk. That hardly proves that every new feature is worth bulk and cost.

      It is my opinion that this feature is insufficiently useful to be worth any added bulk. Of course, I may be wrong and I'm certainly willing to be convinced otherwise if someone has persuasive arguments (or perhaps I'll use one and fall in love with it). Saying that my concerns are groundless is, itself, groundless.

  6. Stupid idea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This has got to be the stupidest cell phone idea of the year!

    So you'd have to hold the rather klungy cellphone still near a suitable surface and plug the projected keyboard with a thick bluetooth pen? Why not just use morse code by panging your head agaist the wall?

    Bluetooth foldable keyboard is a much better choice.

    1. Re:Stupid idea.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A bluetooth foldable keyboard is still another item to carry around. I'm not going to wear one of those scott e-vests unless I get a job infiltrating buildings or something, because they make you look like a moron. Also, you don't hold it up. You can usually find desks near walls. Put it on the desk. If not that, then a TV dinner table or something.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Stupid idea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just use morse code by panging your head agaist the wall?

      Oh that's what people are doing. I thought they were getting annoyed with my ringtone.

  7. pen operated or can I touch type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    In this concept a virtual touch typist demonstrates he can type directly on a laser-projected keyboard, but this newer concept indicates that a special pad and pen are required. What happened? This was hot a couple years ago...

    1. Re:pen operated or can I touch type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After things went from marketing engineers decided that they need some way to read user's input

    2. Re:pen operated or can I touch type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Siemens on Cebit 2004 has shown cell phone with keyboard like from Canesta Inc. But As I remeber it was technology from german company.

  8. Awesome by Rolling_Go · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait, no, my bad.

    Also what do you really need a projected keyboard on your cell phone for? Is it really that time consuming to put in a new contact with your keypad, or are people writing 20 page business reports and stuff on them? I'm getting too old for this shit.

    --
    sup
    1. Re:Awesome by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "are people writing 20 page business reports and stuff on them"

      No, but they are browsing the web more and more on them, and if cellphones keep shrinking to the size of an earring or something, we're going to need SOMEWAY to input to them.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I completely agree with you. You are getting too old for this shit. See ya...

    3. Re:Awesome by myov · · Score: 1

      "What's wrong Amy? Did you swallow your cell phone again?"
      - Leela

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    4. Re:Awesome by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1
      Obviously there is no use (yet) for this in a cell phone. The time it would take you to find a flat surface and get the pen ready would be too long - it's easier to just punch in the letters on your keypad. I maybe could see this maybe having an impact on PDAs or something which requires more typing, but the miniature wireless keyboards for PDAs are cheap, portable, and you get to strike an actual key, so I don't think there's a really a good reason to use this system.

      If you RTFA though, you'd see that this is just a prototype and Siemens have not decided if the technology is worth putting in a phone.

  9. VKB Bluetooth Virtual Keyboard Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:VKB Bluetooth Virtual Keyboard Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah all of 3 reviews,
      1 is obviously a paid shill
      1 is complaining he cant get it to talk to his phone (i bet he cant set his video either)
      and 1 complains its too expensive

      hardly an insight into the product in operation

  10. mobile? by orson_of_fort_worth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Very nice technology and all but it requires the user to be stationary, kind of defeating the purpose of a mobile phone.

    1. Re:mobile? by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1
      Not entirely... you could still potentially use this technology on the bus, or even (though I hope not) while driving, but I get your point.

      You might find it easier to think of this as conceptually equivalent to a laptop -- it's mobile in that you can move it around easily, not that you can literally run around while using it.

    2. Re:mobile? by orson_of_fort_worth · · Score: 1

      Yes, one wonders how much functionality (and size and weight) will keep being added to PDAs & cell phones until somebody realizes they've just reinvented the laptop.

    3. Re:mobile? by Gubbe · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      Perhaps you can just turn the projector around and it will project everything to the windshield...

  11. Wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they are going to build a projector into a cell phone, then it needs to display the screen on the wall, not a keyboard on a desk. I've long wondered why no one has integrated a projector into a laptop.

    1. Re:Wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've long wondered why no one has integrated a projector into a laptop.
      1. Even the smallest projectors are quite big.
      2. Projectors are expensive.
      3. Projectors get really hot, and laptops run hot enough as it is.

      So unless you want a big, heavy, hot, expensive laptop...
    2. Re:Wrong direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe IBM tried that years ago. They had a laptop where the back of the LCD display came off so you could put it over your average overhead transparency projector. It didn't work so well.

  12. Old news by elzurawka · · Score: 0

    I saw something like this presented for palm pilots years ago, when i still used my shitty ol' m505, it looks realy impressive, but its still new technology, so i wouldnt trust it...
    http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_story.as p?ID=57 62
    back in 2003 they had a story on this, Old news i say
    -EL

    --
    -EL
  13. Looks to be... by justforaday · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Looks to be yet another solution in search of a problem...Don't get me wrong, I'm sure something useful will evolve out of this tech at some point..

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:Looks to be... by Gordon+Meier · · Score: 1

      Yes, sucks. We did pay a lot of money to buy every electronic toys, how can we buy one or two stuff, and they make it perfectly, one time!

  14. Cell Phone bloat! by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What I observe is what I call cell phone bloat. Much as I'd like to send my photo to my loved ones once a while, I resent the idea that these gadgets are no longer produced in their simplest terms as it once used to be.

    Here in Canada, major Telcos charge exorbitantly just for the previledge of being able to send and/or view video. These are features that users do not use that much. How many of you send photos via their cell phones on a regular basis?

    Now one sees projectors...next will be God knows what...! Maybe it's because I am in Canada and being charged unfairly. What is the experience of others?

    1. Re:Cell Phone bloat! by Troed · · Score: 1

      Bla bla bla

      I want it all - and I want it in one device. There's nothing negative about using my phone as an mp3-player, camera, notes-taker, email client, games system, web client etc. It's only good.

      Yes I work for a cell phone manufacturer.

    2. Re:Cell Phone bloat! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Well, the projectors obviously won't be using their network(it's all local), so it's safe to say that they won't be chargin you much for it. Now, they could always charge you when you buy the phone, but it's a one time charge and a)phone prices are to a certain extent set by the manufacturer(though you can always jack them up) and b) Most telcos use neat feature laden phones to sucker people in to long term shitty contracts so they tend to price them cheap if you are getting a contract(and way too fucking expensive if you are not)

    3. Re:Cell Phone bloat! by x2A · · Score: 1

      a) no tech's cheap at first.
      b) ppl who complain about "too many features" (features they're not forced to use, or even own) are the actual bloat. I like the features on my phone. Without mobile net access, I couldn't use my mobile telnet client to restart services on my servers whilst I'm away from a connection... but mostly, without the camera, I would have had nothing to take those pics 'n vid clips of my gf stripped, blindfolded, 'n tied down... there's no way ANYONE in my position could argue against mobile phone features.

      -2A

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  15. Drivers by irritus · · Score: 1
    Just when you thought drivers with cellphones couldn't get any worse, someone gives them a stylus to manage with. Wonderful. Now they'll have to drive dangerously with their knees while distracted, instead of with one hand.

    Do cell phones really need this much capability? I remember seeing PDA phones a couple years ago. This almost seems like a cosmetic technology-advancement. Something for the sole purpose of wowing people into buying things they don't really need (and odds are, won't use).

    1. Re:Drivers by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Do cell phones really need this much capability? I remember seeing PDA phones a couple years ago. This almost seems like a cosmetic technology-advancement. Something for the sole purpose of wowing people into buying things they don't really need (and odds are, won't use).
      I have a Sidekick II; the screen flips open, and underneath is a QWERTY keyboard (as I mentioned, like, three threads up). When I drove, I still never talked on it, I'd just let it go to voice mail. If I got a text message, I'd still wait for a red light to check it.

      The problem isn't the phones, it's the dipshits using them.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:Drivers by irritus · · Score: 1
      The problem isn't the phones, it's the dipshits using them.

      No one complains about the responcible drivers.

  16. advantage to typing on hard surfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    When I used to study piano, my teacher would often recomend playing out a scale on a hard wooden surface. This strengthens the fingers significantly; however, I wonder if doing that for a long while might have adverse effects.

    ------

    Get a Free Xbox/PS2/DS
    Wired Article Says this is not a Scam

    1. Re:advantage to typing on hard surfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing the piano requires tactile sensation to allow for the strength of the note , strength in the fingers in this fashion would cause rigidity

      Even anon people are using fake sigs now,

      -----
      People who use fake sigs are prats (the hipocracy I'm aware of)

    2. Re:advantage to typing on hard surfaces by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      iu leaefbnt rto tyyoper luikwe thast niow i havbe teree treuynk fingfeers.

      mno adcverrsde efdfexcts ghere!"

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  17. Help me Obi Wan Kenobi! by dick+johnson · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Help me Obi Wan Kenobi!
    Help me Obi Wan Kenobi!

    --
    - dj
    1. Re:Help me Obi Wan Kenobi! by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Now, if you'd remembered "... you're my only hope" then you'd have got modded up!

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  18. Touchless holographic human-machine interfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    holographic interfaces are not as far off as you may think...

  19. Speech recognition? by October_30th · · Score: 1
    A virtual keyboard is pretty nifty, but how far has speech recognition progressed?

    My Nokia 6600 has rudimentary speech recognition software for setting the phone modes and probably (haven't tried it) for selecting the person who you want to call, but it's not working so well that I would trust it yet.

    It's been years since I tried speech recognition on computer and I wouldn't want to prepare an entire document that way, but dictating short text message or e-mail could work. "Phone. Text message to Eve. Begin message. I'll buy the wine and food for tonight. Adam. End message. Send."

    Of course you could leave a voice message, but that so old technology... ;-)

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:Speech recognition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because general speech recognition takes a lot of processing power and cell phone processors are not up to the task, I have thought it would be interesting to setup Asterisk, a SMS gateway, and IBM's ViaVoice.

      I really hate typing anything on my cell phone and generally refuse to "text". The only messages I send to my friends are through free Internet SMS gateways. With speed dial and the above setup, I could easily send text messages to friends when it is more convienent than voice mail or talking to them directly.

    2. Re:Speech recognition? by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      A virtual keyboard is pretty nifty, but how far has speech recognition progressed?
      Until we reach Star Trekkish levels of speech recognition -- well, holodeck levels, anyway[0] -- I'll stick to QWERTY. (Yes, even on my phone. <3 my SKII.)

      [0] As opposed to "tea, earl grey, hot".
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    3. Re:Speech recognition? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It makes a lot more sense to do the voice recognition on a central server, since the device is already designed with transferring audio to a remote location in mind.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Speech recognition? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      As opposed to "tea, earl grey, hot".

      Yeah, what's the point of that? It'll just deliver a cupful of liquid that is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea. (Or it'll just get it completely wrong and connect you with El Tigré Hutt.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Speech recognition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It makes a lot more sense to do the voice recognition on a central server, since the device is already designed with transferring audio to a remote location in mind.
      One word: lag.
    6. Re:Speech recognition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm and then instead of sending to Eve, it goes to Evan and Evan walks over with a pot of vaseline...

    7. Re:Speech recognition? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      that's funny, I don't notice any significant lag when I'm making a phone call with my mobile. I'd say that the latency is well within useful limits.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Speech recognition? by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Try calling someone who's right next to you. The lag between when they speak and when you hear it is about half a second.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    9. Re:Speech recognition? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it doesn't interfere with anything. How long does speech recognition take on handhelds now, anyway?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Speech recognition? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Great questions of our time:

      Why doesn't the computer know he always drinks Earl Grey? It knows he doesn't take lemon, doesn't it?

      Why does he have to ask for the tea to be hot? Earl Grey is correctly served hot. It knows to serve it in a tea-cup, doesn't it?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    11. Re:Speech recognition? by x2A · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try calling someone who's right next to you.

      I wouldn't say lag was the problem if I was calling someone who was right next to me.

      -2A

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    12. Re:Speech recognition? by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Haha. Well, if you're both on the same cell provider that gives you free in-network calls... Or if you start the call out of range of each other and approach each other during the call.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    13. Re:Speech recognition? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Maybe he can't figure out how to work the speed dial feature? (Pointy-Headed Boss) Or maybe by the Protocol of Antaries, all Clippyware was outlawed. (Notice how the EMH has to be told the nature of the medical emergency? He's programmed against saying anything like "You seem to have a phaser burn to the chest, would you like me to patch that?")

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  20. New excuse by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I project this onto my lap, maybe I'll get fewer odd looks on the airplane.

  21. Yeah, right by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Funny

    First thought: ta da ta da ta da ta da ta da ta da ta da ta da - Batmaaaaaan. Communicate with symbols projected into the sky.

    Second though: wow, I will have to walk around with two suitcases full of batteries.

    no dice.

  22. They've almost got it now. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is so very close. I want a color projector at minimum 640x480 resolution that I can project on a wall, and a laser projector that will draw a keyboard for me. I want this stuff in a phone, which can be the size of a PDA, and which should have a decent screen on it as well. Provided there is a decent system for writing programs for the phone, that's the convergence device I'll pay for. (Got to have a camera and mp3 player too.) Granted it'll probably be the size of a small palmtop but I want to have all of these devices in one so I don't have to carry around a bunch of stuff. Really I think they could make it not much larger than an iPod as long as it used flash storage.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:They've almost got it now. by irg1231491 · · Score: 0

      This is so very close. I want a color projector at minimum 640x480 resolution that I can project on a wall, and a laser projector that will draw a keyboard for me. I want this stuff in a phone, which can be the size of a PDA, and which should have a decent screen on it as well. Provided there is a decent system for writing programs for the phone, that's the convergence device I'll pay for. (Got to have a camera and mp3 player too.) Granted it'll probably be the size of a small palmtop but I want to have all of these devices in one so I don't have to carry around a bunch of stuff. Really I think they could make it not much larger than an iPod as long as it used flash storage.

      ... and a pony.

  23. rather see one of these attached by meatspray · · Score: 1

    http://www.overclockersclub.com/?read=7328384

    Laser keyboards should be able to take up less room though they're probably a bit delicate yet.

    they could be made much smaller than they current keyboard applications.

    1. Re:rather see one of these attached by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      link

      Laser keyboards should be able to take up less room though they're probably a bit delicate yet.

      Looks like they aren't coming out any time soon:

      link

  24. Nah nah nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about both? A projected keyboard and projected screen, coming from a tiny phone sized unit with about the computing power of a laptop two years ago, with actual phone call making ability. :D I have seen the future of computing, wahu!

  25. You will pay for it? by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    that's the convergence device I'll pay for.

    you have $79,000 (MSRP) availble to you?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:You will pay for it? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, but I'll pay as much for such a device as I would for a laptop.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Ultimate convergence device one step closer by TintinX · · Score: 1

    The phone in TFA is way too bulky to be an acceptable portable device, so I assume its merely a prototype.
    Manufacturers clearly realise that the phone in its current size is a device people find comfortable carrying around. This is the device that will end up converging with all the other gadgets that we geeks like to carry around these days.
    Personally, I can't wait for the summer day when I don't have to wear a multi-pocket combat jacket with something stuffed in every pocket - camera, phone, PDA, MP3 player, portable TV (OK, so I don't have one of those).
    A projected keyboard may well cause your fingers to bleed but it's not designed as a replacement to a standard tactile piece of hardware - merely something that serves a better purpose than multiple key presses or tapping a tiny screen with a stylus.
    Looks like a step in the right direction to me.

    1. Re:Ultimate convergence device one step closer by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Yep, but there's just one problem with an all-in-one device - namely, it's an all-in-one device.

      I want a specific telephony feature set. I do not want others.

      I want a specific camera. The one bundled on my specific phone will be a joke.

      I want a specific media player, and I want it to do exactly specific things.

      I want a specific feature set on my PDA. In fact, I don't want a PDA - I want a small PC.

      I want specific interfaces on that PDA.

      I want specific software on my PDA.

      I want a useful display on my PDA.

      Assuming that some day, someone will actually produce an all-in-one cellphone that'll let me pick my choice of Wifi chipset, cell provider, software, and have a camera that's viable, and have a provider who doesn't pull a Verizon and lock-out/gimp half of the functionality... there's still the very big problem of it being an all-in-one device.

      Things break, and other things become outmoded.

      In the old days, they made combo-PCMCIA cards that were both modems and NICs. They were wonderful - instead of buying a $50 modem card, and a $50 NIC, you'd now spend $90 on a combo. What people forget is that the connectors break (X-Jack, anyone?); and now, instead of having a dead $50 card, you've now got a dead $90 card. Likewise, after the shift from 14.4k to 28.8, all of the old 14.4 portions of the cards became useless. The NICs were still fine, however - but they still go into the trash. Then, they came out with 33.6 - so, another batch of perfectly good NICs get tossed, since they're physically on the same cards as the old modems. It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that combo-cards were a very stupid idea.

      With all the features being homed on a single device, they are all (in effect) dependant on each other. Lose one (or have one become non-useful), and the entire device must be replaced. Because of this, no long-term buy-in can happen; the device will be relegated to short term trivial usage, and treated as expendable.

      I somehow don't see the market suddenly deciding to follow this path, especially when it concerns something as scummy as a cell-phone provider. At least, not following it in a serious way, at least. There will always be "Tony the IROC guy" in the McDonald's parking lot on Friday night - but that's a trivial "Look at me" use, not a wide market buy-in.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  27. What a waste of time by cliffski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    can't 'researchers' come up with something useful? That trevor bayliss guy who invented the clockwork radio, now THAT is inventing. These are just lab-monekys churning out cool trinkets for rich kids. Arent there things to invent that satisfy a real need amongst consumers who arent tech-obsessed rich kids?

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  28. The phone itself is badly designed. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Like many cell phones, the phone itself is badly designed to make it difficult to do basic things like enter phone numbers. Something that should be a "no-brainer" like having a standard right-angle array of the phone numbers is lost on them. Why have the 7 key located way above the left key so you have to look at the keys in order to figure out where they are? (The Nokia N- Gage is one of the worst examples of this: it is like the intentionally went out of their way to make it useless as a phone).

    Maybe the projection system could make up for this by projecting a standard number button array so it can be used. However, it would be a lot simpler if they used a standard number array on the phone itself.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:The phone itself is badly designed. by hgavin · · Score: 1

      Cell phones don't necessarily have to have convenient keypads for number entry because they have a built-in phone directory. The design considerations for mobile usability are different to those of a desk phone.
      If the user wants to phone someone using a cell phone, they typically search for a contact by name rather than enter the number using the keypad.

  29. Tangible Tools by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of our motor skills require a tool to be really skillful. Because tools react to our actions, and our minds require feedback to interact with things. This projector requires a pen, which looks superfluous, but which will certainly help accuracy and counter the frustration of pushing fingers against an actually blank, flat, smoot surface like a tabletop. But it's kinda big, and has only limited gestures: press and stroke. How about a thin rubber sheet, maybe 0.1mmx10x10cm, with a textured pattern, that the phone projects onto? A video sensor next to the projector (with the phone standing upright, rather than that huge swivel projector) watches the fingertips, like existing projection keyboards. Our fingers will work the surface a lot more nimbly when it reacts. A later generation can cover the sheet with rubberized piezo actuators, or stacked MEMs, for a truly interactive surface. The sheet could be rolled up into the side of a hollow stylus used for more precise pointing when necessary. Make it cheap enough to replace several times a year, and the whole thing starts looking like a real tool, instead of a picture of a tool.

    As long as I'm writing SF, how about the MEMs sheet un/rolling itself from the stylus? And including sensors, rather than a video sensor? Or the phone with a fiberoptic jack for projecting the interface image through the sheet itself? Somebody gimme a budget!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Tangible Tools by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      The reason the thin rubber sheet would be useless is because the whole purpose of this is to project a keyboard where there is none, without needing additional things.

      If you're carrying around a thin rubber sheet, you might as well use one of those thin rubber rollable keyboards.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Tangible Tools by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      But "nothing" is inadequate. Those thin rubber keyboards aren't 0.1mm thick, because they're complicated. They're transportable, like an old KayPro luggable PC, not mobile, like a phone. The sheet I'm talking about would be carried in the phone, so there's no extra load. And would be much more useable, as I mentioned. Just like the stylus for smartphones, where you can use your unadorned fingertip for many operations, the sheet would be useful when doing anything more interactive than selecting from a few large buttons. It's hard enough working with onscreen buttons on a smartphone, with no tactile feedback. There's no way these projected keyboards will be worth the extra investment, unless they're more useable.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Tangible Tools by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      (glad to be posting buried deep in a comment thread because this is either brilliant or crazy...)

      But "nothing" is inadequate.

      You're thinking about this problem -- and "nothing" -- in a very 20th century way. I agree that, as things stand now -- with virtual keyboards working as one-way projection systems, splashing visible light on a surface, you're right, you will only get visible feedback and it won't really feel usable. But do you think your finger has to touch a rubber button to feel like it's touching something? It isn't really that far off to imagine a future where a tiny nerve in the brain itself could be stimulated by the projection program to feel like it was touching a little rubber button. Science fiction? When they are already developing cursors that can be moved by thought and attempting to do just this with artificial limbs? Cell phones with projection keypads that interface with the nerves in the brain to feel like they are pressing something. This is what the future will hold. barring any unforeseen surprises...

      It's just a matter of time...

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    4. Re:Tangible Tools by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Your cerebral cortex has to be triggered by a familiar signal to associate with the learned motor skill for skillful interaction. So when we get neural input, we'll eventually get there. Meanwhile, we're just at the horizon of monkeys sending neural output to devices. I thought demanding a little rollable plastic mat was an SF demand. Wake me when we get the neural inputs, and I'll be happy to show you my dreams.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Tangible Tools by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      Wake me when we get the neural inputs, and I'll be happy to show you my dreams.

      Now you're thinking like an open-sourcer. Which, frankly, is a shame. Or didn't you know that you were able to convert "dreams" like these into things called patents?

      You, with all your ideas, thinking of your dreams as just dreams when you could be credited as the person responsible for the idea of _______. Those dreams, Doc Ruby, should be developed. By you. Even if the technology isn't there today. When you see where we are headed, when you have the vision to peer OVER the horizon we have only just approached, you can do something about it.

      But, like I said: You are an Open Sourcer... you think ideas should be free. Fair enough. But you make the mistake of thinking it would somehow be DIRTY to be the person who owns that idea. I would just like to point you in the direction of Jonas Salk...

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    6. Re:Tangible Tools by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I dunno if I'm an "Open Sourcer" - I've always sold a "do not distribute" license to all the apps I've sold. More like "Open Sourcerer". But I do believe that patenting "ideas" is abhorrent, anticompetitive, restricts free speech etc. I believe in copyrighting the expressions (and reasonable facsimiles) of ideas, and patenting machines - working devices or prototype models. I have so many ideas that I believe in sharing them as much as possible. Strategically competitive ones I keep to myself; any others I publish as widely as possible. So I can live in the world I imagine, even if others do the work.

      Should I have patented "multiple IP#s served by a single httpd", when my partner and I were the first to invent that (hacking CERN in 1994)? Or should I have patented "Internet Pay-Per-View" when I invented that for RealVideo in 1995? How about when I invented "cross-referenced content and advertising category/keyword search reporting" (Google AdWords), in 1996? "Online Mall Kiosks" in 1995? "Integrated Fax/IVR/Web Publishing" in 1995? "Timed Exam Clients" in 1995? "Universal Equities Research Publishing Client" in 1997? There's lots more. I prefer to have the prior art, to prevent another from monopolizing those inventions, to have been paid well for the interesting work, and to remain in free currency with other innovators. I'm pretty rich, and pretty free.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Tangible Tools by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      I suppose my choice of words could have made it seem like I was saying that the only thing to do was to patent. Thank you for bringing up the issue of prior art. My point was simply that if you have the idea, you should not let it remain a "dream" but do something with it. You can find the idea of patenting "ideas" is abhorrent, anticompetitive, restricts free speech etc But that is the reality of how things are right now in 2005...

      I was all cagey when I brought up Jonas Salk earlier. My apologies. Long story short: He was a man who develolped a vaccine to help wipe out polio and he refused to patent it because he wanted to make it freely available to everyone. You can live in the world you imagine but if you understand that there are others with ideals that are not alligned with yours, it can be to everyone's advantage to see that YOU are the one who is holding the patent/prior art/claim to the thing itself...

      Not everyone plays nicely. You can. Getting in early just gives you leverage...

      Anyway, nice exchange of ideas, Doc. And an impressive CV, too!

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  30. Nice idea, evil company by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

    I love the idea of this, and if it was implimented well and extended, you could end up with a device which could transcend the limitations of screen size. Unfortunately, as an ex-owner of a Siemens SL45, which was a pioneering MP3 player phone, I can categorically say Siemens is not a company which will support early adopters of their technology. The phone was fragile and unstable, and their support was arrogant and tardy, Pity, it seemed like a great idea, just like this one...

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  31. Projecting Selma by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, do you project her in full 5'9" size? Does the projecter belch Laramie smoke to make the virtual experience more real? There are unshaven bikini-clad images available, too.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  32. It's not that useful, is it? by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I wonder how such "research" projects manage to get funded? ;-) The projection device is not even any technological breakthrough. I don't get it.

  33. Re:Giant Keyboard [winhat] by winhat · · Score: 0

    And when he had opened the fifth seal, i saw under the altar the souls of them do, they should send naked pictures of themselvs to us for inclusion in the blitzer interview was directly referring to gore's 1990 education bill, which had a huge impact on taking the small government project known as arpanet into the air, and there came a great voice out of heaven every stone about the old man.

    I have no mind, i traded it in open trenches and set it up across the room and have giant keyboard that i have almost uncontrollable urges to murder everyone around you.

  34. powerpoint presentations on the go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yikes

  35. Ah, but the service providers... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... like Verizon will want this disabled - for your own protection of course!

    To use this virtual interface, you'll need to subscribe to Verizon's easy-write(TM) service. It's only $4.99 a month!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  36. I remember those by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    I wish they took off. Interesting point though: If you're a touch typist, you don't really need the whole outline; Just two dots to know where the "home row" is.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  37. How about this projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.lightblueoptics.com/

    Seems like these guys are using LCOS chips to project a real image on the wall with diffuse light. They had a working prototype.

    I really want one of these things.

  38. But still by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "If the user wants to phone someone using a cell phone, they typically search for a contact by name rather than enter the number using the keypad"

    But even then, they have to enter the numbers on by the silly "Stylish, but not very functional" keypad to get them into the phone contact list in the first place! Unless they connect their phones to something else, like a computer, to enter their numbers. Few users do that. Also, I use my cell phone just by dialing the number, and most others I know do this too. There's no good reason not to have the numbers in the usual place.

    Some companies still get it, like Avaya.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  39. nice to see another red dwarf fan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cheers mate !

  40. Minesweeper anyone? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If your cell phone can project a game of Minesweeper onto the bathroom wall...

    PHB: Why are you spending so much time in the bathroom?

    Peon: Uh... none of your business.

    PHB: Why were you tapping on the stall walls for?

    Peon: If you were stuck up like me, you're be tapping the walls too.

    PHB: Why did you yell "You bastard!" when I walked by?

    Peon: Hey! Can't a guy take a difficult dump around her?

    PHB: Not in this company!

  41. SIEMENS did not invent this by flowerp · · Score: 1

    They merely licensed this technology from a US company.

    --
    --- Eat my sig.
  42. improvement? by SD_92104 · · Score: 1

    So, now I can write the same number of text messages in half the time before the battery runs out? Honestly, these things are called cell phones and this is what they should do - enable you to talk on them for extended periods of time without having to worry about your battery running out. All these additional features added lately are sure cute but in the end only equate to shorter battery life...

  43. I stand corrected by flowerp · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is an Israeli company who invented the virtual
    keyboard.

    http://www.globes.co.il/DocsEn/did=875104.htm

    --
    --- Eat my sig.
  44. i want a cell phone with a built in death ray by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Funny
    projectors, who's going to use that? But a death ray! That would be cool! Of course I also want to be the only person allowed to have a cell phone with a built in death ray because the rest of you can't be trusted.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  45. Can't touch-type without touch! by gidds · · Score: 1
    Surely the whole point of touch-typing is that you can do it without looking at the keyboard, by feel.

    So a projector shouldn't be needed at all. And worse still, there's no feel, so no way to judge where the 'keys' would be. So how can you 'touch-type' with this?

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  46. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm typing this reply on my Treo 600 while sitting in a cafe. This is last-gen tech that I got for a couple hundred on eBay. it's smaller than the phone in TFA.

  47. Text by Brianwa · · Score: 1

    It would be neat if something like this is integrated into a PDA so we could read ebooks (or anything else you would use your PDA for) on a larger screen. It would also be neat to take it a step further - project the text directly onto your retina. I know there has been some experimenting with this idea before, but there was nothing small enough to fit on a cell phone or PDA.

    1. Re:Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      laser projected onto the retina is being done by a company in Seattle with budget from DARPA. Better than "traditional" heads up or eyeglass screens in that there is no fatigue or eye strain while using the projected display or readjusting to having it turned off. Think of the text overlays from the movie Terminator when we were looking from the robot's POV. Very cool stuff.

  48. Red Dwarf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that from Ghostbusters?

  49. Another way to distract the user... by kponto · · Score: 1

    ...from the fact that cell phones fail miserably at their one actual purpose; vocal communication. I'd like to see providers supply users with a product that fufills it's primary objective before gluing things like cameras, qwertys... or now... lasers... onto it. The slogan "Can you hear me now?" sums up the entire industry in a nutshell (though why a company would choose to spend millions associating themselves with phrase usually spoken in desparation while using the device they sell is beyond me). Give me a phone that works at least as well as any other utility, and maybe then we can talk about nifty attatchments.

    --
    This too, will end.
  50. I was just telling my friend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine was showing me his camera phone last month, and I told him all it needs now is a projector to display the photos on a wall. I always think of these things first, then some company steals my ideas! :)

  51. mod parent up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because maybe someone at Konami reads /. :)

    In answer to your question:
    YES!

  52. Am I missing something here? by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you have to use a special pen... what's the point of having a keyboard? I mean, why doesn't it just do handwriting recognition? The whole point of having a keyboard is being able to type with all (or most of) your fingers. If you're limited to using the "special pen", it's slower than typing with your thumbs (assuming you have two of those).

    Unless they can make the virtual keyboard work reliably with people's fingers, I doubt this will be very successful.

    RMN
    ~~~

  53. ...built-in pocket protector? SWEET! by foo1752 · · Score: 1

    When I read the headline the first time, I read "Cell Phone with Built-in Pocket Protector" and thought, "Wow, that's a pretty cool idea." Cell phones are actually what I do for a living, so I'm always eager to hear about new "features." This projector, however, doesn't really excite me. But, a built-in pocket protector -- now THAT would be cool.

  54. Bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I submitted info about this new technology well over a month ago.

  55. Next thing you know... by StormKrow · · Score: 1

    ....we'll be finding people's cell phones in crashed escape pods with messages on the project like, "Help me Obi Wan Konobi....you're my only hope."

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!