well this math would say that some pharmaceutical company or another would have spilled the beans on it and started producing it. you see, that kind of conspiracy would involve tens of thousands by now if it had been hatched up in the sixties or whatever. millions if the pharma companies had been on it since early 1900s. AND they would have had to have world powers that were in war to have been on the conspiracy too.
if on the other hand the conspiracy was that one or two doctors have the cure then yeah, maybe they could keep the secret, but the traditional pharmaceutical conspiracy includes them suppressing any second discovery about that. same goes for free electricity devices and such.
sure, if say 7 researchers knew of the cure.. maybe you could keep it as a secret, but if a million pharmacists knew of it then no, you couldn't keep it a secret for a minute.
however there's plenty of people willing to "fake" expose such non existing conspiracies, in order to sell you snake oil and do just what they're blaming big pharma of. 100% of the time.
the conspiracy of course is then those million small conspiracies of people selling you herbal supplements that they know will not cure cancer.
well, if 50%+ are in a conspiracy, it's no longer a conspiracy now is it..
as with moon landing, there's plenty of people who claim that they're spilling the beans on it. as is with area 51 having ufos and all that.
as to your example, well, it took 50 years and involved a lot less people - and on the other hand, might have had very little effect on the whole war itself anyways.
i think he wants to plug a raspberry pi to ethernet. and to provide power through the ethernet wire to the raspberry. and to remote reboot the raspberry when it fails something.
this is the only thing that would make any sense at all. because it mentions poe adapters, but without "internet".
all he needs really is a network connected wall wart at the point where he is going to be injecting the poe into the ethernet cable because he is too cheap for the proper solutions and really it does just what he seems to want(to remote cycle the power that he is injecting into the ethernet cable).
or he could buy some ethernet connected arduino boards and put a relay on that to get the ethernet connected switch that he wants.
I'm guessing he wants to power the raspberries from usb, but he wants to remote boot them too.
what other usb devices tend to need remote booting anyways? also the poe being here, that he wants to actually power them from poe to simplify installation.
like, "oh how can i remote cycle usb power source" is not that common of a question because.. well, usually you want to reboot whatever the usb is connected to.
I'm guessing he wants to build some sort of network access control or surveillance..
if you make toy level programs all you need is to be able to call toy.moveLeft(20);
I thought that would be the point. that toy level programming in scratch or java needs just toy level knowledge so why not use something that can be used for something else too... not an advertisement for some weird ass wolfram language i've never heard of until now and unlikely to utilize in my work anyways.
basic was good that it was included.. even with dos computers. now javascript is what's included.. heck even with tv's.
if you're stuck with one language though then you're pretty much stuck anyways.
and Things On Internet would have made too much sense.
so they decided to go with Internet of Things. maybe actually someone thought that they would put them on a separate network or that the things would network with each other. which would make a lot more sense than to have them all on internet.
your temperature sensors interacting with your temperature display for example makes perfect engineering sense. both of them interacting with a hardware manufacturers server on a different fucking continent makes zero sense at all.
I guess the funny thing is that if you want to buy Wifi connected plugs, sensors and stuff. or even low power networking components, you can buy so frigging much of them for 500 bucks and you might actually learn something.
well if the aim of the researcher was to get gm foods banned then yeah.
and someone paid them some money to do it too, most likely. bad science on purpose is a fraud. getting the paper cited is one aim of the researchers too so that is benefit from the fraud as well.
the present copyright holders are claiming whatever suits them at the time. the foundation claims anne as the original author on their page.
then they go on to claim that all original author or such copyrights transferred to otto. so at time of publication (according to the text form the foundation) otto would have been holder of the copyrights and that anne is the original author. they will change the author(as editor) to otto soon enough I suppose.
well, they don't say when it would expire. they're trying to keep them forever, basically.
the foundation does not make the financial data easily reachable either.. so.. for all we know 90% goes to the people working for the foundation. from the semi-forced school sales of the book.
I guess if you define furthening the cause of paying more people salaries from the foundation as charity. they don't provide a financial statement to be easily found either(unlike some other anne frank related foundations).
also the foundation seems to be rather.. weird in their reading of copyright law.
in short, the foundation claims that " This is why the foundation owns and administers the rights to all writings of ANNE FRANK.". they claim that otto frank owned all copyrights of anne frank and otto transferred them to the foundation and that thus foundation owns the copyrights.
the foundation cares about that so much because it pays their salaries. it's just a job.
27 is peak, so, it might not mean anything significant or it might. if it meant anything significant then that 'research' should already be self financing.. I would think.
makerbots new extruder: makes for "better" reliability. the old one on the 5th gen makerbots(that won best of the year awards at ces based on prints done with previous generation makerbots) was so bad that it would have bankrupted makerbot if stratasys had not bought them a little earlier(I am not kidding, huge consumer returns on the 5th gen line because it did not work reliably). the replicator 1 and 2 extruders were modifiable easily to be much, much, much more reliable. the fallout was so bad that they had to close their consumer support forums. those forums had provided users of previous generations with tips and tricks how to actually make the machines do what they are supposed to do, but due to design and closed source policy with the 5th generation the community was unable to do so.
ultimakers exchangeabe nozzle: yeah uh, the article says that this is a feature not seen commonly. but in real life, of the cheap sub 1000$ printers, almost all have changeable nozzles apart from cube line or other drm'd in some way or another systems. ultimakers extruder design was an outlier. in fact, even the mentioned makerbot has had changeable nozzles since forever.
lulzbot has a new dual extruder. they already had a dual extruder that seems pretty much the same in design. who cares.
the 3d systems laser sintering machine? here's a hint. the lineup of this generation has already 100, 200, and 300 models. just a new model in old line. cool, yes, new technology? no. consumer technology? fuck no.
nothing noteworthy to consumer was announced. absolutely nothing. none of the extruders are providing anything new. makerbots smart extruder+ is a band aid design change on their already on the market model(ironically still being inferior to their previous generation, while being way more expensive. it has nothing in it to justify the large price tag).
the article is shoddily written because it's not the problem that they're cp/m or that cp/m is some magic or some shit like that.
it's that having the right drive to read the data off the disc in the first place is the problem. however, they should have known what drive it was that was in the old computer.
and getting those blurbs as "free" sms(recipent paid, according to recipents plan).
true, it started as an oneliner system. but the character limit wasn't random.
however, in typical internet fashion, 99% of users don't really know or care what twitter was made for. neither does the management.
what is AMAZING is how FUCKING EXPENSIVE twitter is to run. I mean, such a system - even with all the users - should not really cost the losses the company is making.
Slashdot Mirror
well this math would say that some pharmaceutical company or another would have spilled the beans on it and started producing it. you see, that kind of conspiracy would involve tens of thousands by now if it had been hatched up in the sixties or whatever. millions if the pharma companies had been on it since early 1900s. AND they would have had to have world powers that were in war to have been on the conspiracy too.
if on the other hand the conspiracy was that one or two doctors have the cure then yeah, maybe they could keep the secret, but the traditional pharmaceutical conspiracy includes them suppressing any second discovery about that. same goes for free electricity devices and such.
sure, if say 7 researchers knew of the cure.. maybe you could keep it as a secret, but if a million pharmacists knew of it then no, you couldn't keep it a secret for a minute.
however there's plenty of people willing to "fake" expose such non existing conspiracies, in order to sell you snake oil and do just what they're blaming big pharma of. 100% of the time.
the conspiracy of course is then those million small conspiracies of people selling you herbal supplements that they know will not cure cancer.
well, if 50%+ are in a conspiracy, it's no longer a conspiracy now is it..
as with moon landing, there's plenty of people who claim that they're spilling the beans on it. as is with area 51 having ufos and all that.
as to your example, well, it took 50 years and involved a lot less people - and on the other hand, might have had very little effect on the whole war itself anyways.
it was a mentally disordered who THOUGHT he was a programmer and wanted to make fear with that.. kind of.
i think he wants to plug a raspberry pi to ethernet.
and to provide power through the ethernet wire to the raspberry.
and to remote reboot the raspberry when it fails something.
this is the only thing that would make any sense at all. because it mentions poe adapters, but without "internet".
all he needs really is a network connected wall wart at the point where he is going to be injecting the poe into the ethernet cable because he is too cheap for the proper solutions and really it does just what he seems to want(to remote cycle the power that he is injecting into the ethernet cable).
or he could buy some ethernet connected arduino boards and put a relay on that to get the ethernet connected switch that he wants.
I'm guessing he wants to power the raspberries from usb, but he wants to remote boot them too.
what other usb devices tend to need remote booting anyways? also the poe being here, that he wants to actually power them from poe to simplify installation.
like, "oh how can i remote cycle usb power source" is not that common of a question because.. well, usually you want to reboot whatever the usb is connected to.
I'm guessing he wants to build some sort of network access control or surveillance..
no you don't.
if you make toy level programs all you need is to be able to call
toy.moveLeft(20);
I thought that would be the point. that toy level programming in scratch or java needs just toy level knowledge so why not use something that can be used for something else too... not an advertisement for some weird ass wolfram language i've never heard of until now and unlikely to utilize in my work anyways.
basic was good that it was included.. even with dos computers. now javascript is what's included.. heck even with tv's.
if you're stuck with one language though then you're pretty much stuck anyways.
well they had to get the I at the front.
and Things On Internet would have made too much sense.
so they decided to go with Internet of Things. maybe actually someone thought that they would put them on a separate network or that the things would network with each other. which would make a lot more sense than to have them all on internet.
your temperature sensors interacting with your temperature display for example makes perfect engineering sense. both of them interacting with a hardware manufacturers server on a different fucking continent makes zero sense at all.
I guess the funny thing is that if you want to buy Wifi connected plugs, sensors and stuff. or even low power networking components, you can buy so frigging much of them for 500 bucks and you might actually learn something.
well..
jj abrams star wars is certainly better than jj abrams star trek.
both are plot challenged though.
having luke only at the end for 4 secs was such a piece of crock though. like you need to haul the actor around doing pr work for that eh
it seems the brass on this was serious about the octo and that "they have fingers everywhere" and all that.
frankly, a guy like that shouldn't be running a program like this.
(also he seems to oversell the capabilities of the system as well, which makes for bad pr)
if the cars were "chipped" then most certainly the opel dealerships would not be altering the software. they probably would not touch it even.
well if the aim of the researcher was to get gm foods banned then yeah.
and someone paid them some money to do it too, most likely. bad science on purpose is a fraud. getting the paper cited is one aim of the researchers too so that is benefit from the fraud as well.
the present copyright holders are claiming whatever suits them at the time. the foundation claims anne as the original author on their page.
then they go on to claim that all original author or such copyrights transferred to otto. so at time of publication (according to the text form the foundation) otto would have been holder of the copyrights and that anne is the original author. they will change the author(as editor) to otto soon enough I suppose.
well, they don't say when it would expire. they're trying to keep them forever, basically.
the foundation does not make the financial data easily reachable either.. so.. for all we know 90% goes to the people working for the foundation. from the semi-forced school sales of the book.
why would they need to.
fyi 80% of small businesses in some countries in asia are reachable by LINE, similar to whatsapp. point is, why would the company need to pay anyways.
if you do it with same expense, you can get better quality out of china.
you can buy decent tools today if you want to pay 1960's kind of prices for them(compared to a bottle of milk)....
I guess if you define furthening the cause of paying more people salaries from the foundation as charity. they don't provide a financial statement to be easily found either(unlike some other anne frank related foundations).
also the foundation seems to be rather.. weird in their reading of copyright law.
in short, the foundation claims that " This is why the foundation owns and administers the rights to all writings of ANNE FRANK.". they claim that otto frank owned all copyrights of anne frank and otto transferred them to the foundation and that thus foundation owns the copyrights.
the foundation cares about that so much because it pays their salaries. it's just a job.
the source material is public domain.
however, editing it, the foreword etc are not.
I think what it comes down to is who they attributed it to when they published. for marketing reasons I guess Anne..
and just do it at one star?
doing it in span of 100 years makes no sense from energy use perspective.
but you would need to mine 100 planets like mars in the time, kind of.
they say turin.
it's different company.
27 is peak, so, it might not mean anything significant or it might. if it meant anything significant then that 'research' should already be self financing.. I would think.
jc3 seems to be out though.
engadget seems shitty again.
more publishers will just waste more money on this shitty drm.
da inquisition was shit btw.
well the point is that you don't allow amazon echo into the office.
now windows 10 on the other hand.. that's a bit trickier policy if you have to develop windows apps in the office.
it's just plastic.
makerbots new extruder: makes for "better" reliability. the old one on the 5th gen makerbots(that won best of the year awards at ces based on prints done with previous generation makerbots) was so bad that it would have bankrupted makerbot if stratasys had not bought them a little earlier(I am not kidding, huge consumer returns on the 5th gen line because it did not work reliably). the replicator 1 and 2 extruders were modifiable easily to be much, much, much more reliable. the fallout was so bad that they had to close their consumer support forums. those forums had provided users of previous generations with tips and tricks how to actually make the machines do what they are supposed to do, but due to design and closed source policy with the 5th generation the community was unable to do so.
ultimakers exchangeabe nozzle: yeah uh, the article says that this is a feature not seen commonly. but in real life, of the cheap sub 1000$ printers, almost all have changeable nozzles apart from cube line or other drm'd in some way or another systems. ultimakers extruder design was an outlier. in fact, even the mentioned makerbot has had changeable nozzles since forever.
lulzbot has a new dual extruder. they already had a dual extruder that seems pretty much the same in design. who cares.
the 3d systems laser sintering machine? here's a hint. the lineup of this generation has already 100, 200, and 300 models. just a new model in old line. cool, yes, new technology? no. consumer technology? fuck no.
nothing noteworthy to consumer was announced. absolutely nothing. none of the extruders are providing anything new. makerbots smart extruder+ is a band aid design change on their already on the market model(ironically still being inferior to their previous generation, while being way more expensive. it has nothing in it to justify the large price tag).
"The difficult part was CP/M and the file system itself and how it was written." that's a quote from the company doing the recovery.
that is, they're a professional company specializing in this kind of stuff and yet, for them the "file system" is claimed as the problem.
not the disc reading. but the data on the disc after reading.
the article is shoddily written because it's not the problem that they're cp/m or that cp/m is some magic or some shit like that.
it's that having the right drive to read the data off the disc in the first place is the problem. however, they should have known what drive it was that was in the old computer.
and getting those blurbs as "free" sms(recipent paid, according to recipents plan).
true, it started as an oneliner system. but the character limit wasn't random.
however, in typical internet fashion, 99% of users don't really know or care what twitter was made for. neither does the management.
what is AMAZING is how FUCKING EXPENSIVE twitter is to run. I mean, such a system - even with all the users - should not really cost the losses the company is making.