it doesn't handle psd files well enough, unfortunately.
nobody cares if gimp loads psd files created with gimp if the layout design file received from the designer refuses to open or opens in a wrong way and is a total pain to take out assets to use on the page. you seem to think that psd is a format set in stone when it isn't, so supporting it is tricky.
however the question is why the OP wants to switch to linux when he wants to run windows software on every PC? you can run the gimp, inkscape etc on windows and setting up virtualization to run linux inside windows is not that complicated(furthermore, if you want most out of the photoshop or whatever windows only _multimedia_ software they want to run it's better if the windows runs natively, it doesn't matter too much for the webserver, db etc stuff if they run in a virtualized linux).
if he already has the win8 licenses it would be trivial to switch them over to win10 licenses.
put up lighted signs saying that anyone coming to look at you will be shot then.
and stay in your house. maybe buy some southern states flags while at it through amazon and make an exception to not shoot at the delivery guy who looks at your house and box while delivering it.
sometimes some americans seem to think that they're in a warzone.
(really if you're that concerned about someone peeping at you, just call the cops)
so you think that someone took the plane, put it in parts and dumped the parts over ukraine with other 200 people in it than was in the first plane? stupid, trolling or crazy.
what do you mean tomorrow? that's already the assumption for private ip's.
the only reason they didn't come busting in and sorting the mess later was that it was a company ip address.
so yeah, great - not so great if you plan on running a tor exit node from your home network. which might be a bad idea anyways for other reasons as well but hey..
is quite simple. bought advertisements, targeted for the site, bought from the site.
not involving the ad network middlemen. the problem with them in the first place is that any friggin site can have ad network ads in the first place and as result there's no CURATION whatsoever and quality of content doesn't really matter(only getting the viewer to the page matters! if the content is worse than the ad then that's a plus for the publisher too.. ).
the cancer of the modern internet is quite simply the ad networks - it makes it possible to monetize a site on the day one before a single human being looks at the site and thinks "do I want to pay ads to appear on this piece of shit?". it also leads to rather shitty content and just verbatim copied content propagating without reason.
then there's the cancer of the cancer: chained advertisement sites! you know, paying for clickbait advertisements that then only lead to pages that have MORE advertisements in an effort to pay for clicks that are supposed to be worth more directly just in adverts.
mobile slashdot sucks bigtime because of their advertisements. it makes it stutter even on galaxy note edge and I seriously doubt even the editors know what kind of advertisements get inserted(half a screen sized shit that is poorly coded making scrolling stutter). if they were advertisements bought from slashdot served _from_ slashdot with some sort of editiorial resemblance it wouldn't be half bad. now they only rely on miss clicks when scrolling. the stuttering makes the miss clicks even more likely!
all the browsers should just ship with ad blocking. but why do you think google came up with Chrome in the first place?
you can turn any xbox into a dev kit of some level and any windows phone into a dev phone.
provided that you're willing to shell out your credit card number;D. anyhow, you can develop on windows without giving a credit card number too.
aaaaaaaaanyhow, they originally marketed it as an open kind of box, while actually making it as closed as they could get away with without stomping on licenses of the stuff they used pretty much.
the whole marketing was to more or less market it as an "OPEN" "new kind" of console more akin to let's say a dos pc or whatever, but what the users got was a box that asked for their CC before letting to do _anything_. they got a box that felt more closed and more intrusive than a friggin surface(non pro).
it was just that for some reason they were hyped up into thinking that an android box from company B would somehow be upermegasupadupacool compared to just any other android box(and usb controller) that's on the market and for some reason they got into thinking they'd get cooler games than on android even though it's the same frigging thing.
thing is, an used 100 bucks laptop would do the role much better. but majority of ouyas backers were people who have used 100 bucks laptop or two laying around anyways. it's baffling though why they got excited for it - a bunch of those are just hipsters "showing it to the man!"(ms/sony) without understanding what they're buying, what it's made from and why it's not sticking it to the man in the slightest.
and slashdot editors: MMS IS NOT SMS SO FUCK YOU SLASHDOT EDITOR. it's not even remotely same technlogy.
mms is vulnurable? duh. how about sharing the image preview vuln(presumably) that's actually used since that has much more to it than just mms. but that mms implementation is exploitable is quite a bit less fatal/interesting than sms vuln.
besides than that I'm pretty fucking sure that 950 million android phones (total androids out there) don't have preview of mms in the notifications bar. only a subset has that feature. but the more interesting and potentially attackable route is through anything else that shows images.
anyhow... expect mobile networks to filter these messages in 1.2.3.4....
either that or 400 million phones in use in asia will receive an attack today if the attack really works as described in the blurb (proof of concept that installs something or gtfo).
(if you browse on a mobile from asia you might notice that shitloads of adverts that try to exploit or trick the user into installing sw. even slashdot carries occasionally ads targeted to asia tha will just straight up open another page that will try to fool the user into installing sw and doesn't let the user easily press back. thats without clicking the friggin advert. it's like ad networks do no curating whatsoever of asian targeted ads)
it went from experimental to release without fixing the shit found in the experimental to get broken. some of them are "design decisions" true, but still crap from user point of view.
especially when the claimed performance increases are.. well, 50-100% ? nowhere to be benched. "apps start faster" which was never a problem to begin with..
I mean, the point of the entire bug(more like a feature tbh) is that it gets around conventional checks for multiple failures(which is why you wouldn't be able to do this much of bruteforcing on normal connection because you would be banned).
he was complaining because without notice the behavior changed and he started missing valid emails from addresses previously he was responding to, partially without rhyme or reason, since he started missing in-between emails and sometimes would get a later email but see that there was mail in the 'thread' that he had missed due to the spam filter.
the point is, gmail changed the spam filter without notice (like starting to mark mail "this would go to spam next week") or whatever.
"Out of curiosity, what secure locations can you use your smartphone?"
the oval room.
just think of the possibilities for the next clinton.
also, just about any military base USA has, any donetsk rebel base... of course, you might want to opt to say that any location that allows anyone to have smartphones isn't secure. but that's just the way it is, people have them now and if you can't trust them to not be snapping pictures with 'em phones you can't trust them to not photocopy the shit out of the stuff either.
"anyone who knows the carâ(TM)s IP address gain access from anywhere in the country. âoeFrom an attackerâ(TM)s perspective, itâ(TM)s a super nice vulnerability,â Miller says."
though, I have to ask, why the car has a public facing IP in the first place? sounds like waste of ip. I assume it's provided cellular provider, which would make most of them sit behind.
Slashdot Mirror
it doesn't handle psd files well enough, unfortunately.
nobody cares if gimp loads psd files created with gimp if the layout design file received from the designer refuses to open or opens in a wrong way and is a total pain to take out assets to use on the page. you seem to think that psd is a format set in stone when it isn't, so supporting it is tricky.
however the question is why the OP wants to switch to linux when he wants to run windows software on every PC? you can run the gimp, inkscape etc on windows and setting up virtualization to run linux inside windows is not that complicated(furthermore, if you want most out of the photoshop or whatever windows only _multimedia_ software they want to run it's better if the windows runs natively, it doesn't matter too much for the webserver, db etc stuff if they run in a virtualized linux).
if he already has the win8 licenses it would be trivial to switch them over to win10 licenses.
put up lighted signs saying that anyone coming to look at you will be shot then.
and stay in your house. maybe buy some southern states flags while at it through amazon and make an exception to not shoot at the delivery guy who looks at your house and box while delivering it.
sometimes some americans seem to think that they're in a warzone.
(really if you're that concerned about someone peeping at you, just call the cops)
my guess: pdf.js runs on different permission set since it's not downloaded over the web.
I'm pretty sure he was trolling.
either trolling or stupid and can't tell cgi from real anymore.
Oh, then that solves that problem. Thanks. Still interesting to think about for applications which are GPL that offers similar functionality.
oh.. this one thing called gcc...
so you think that someone took the plane, put it in parts and dumped the parts over ukraine with other 200 people in it than was in the first plane? stupid, trolling or crazy.
blah blah, why do you thin it would cut off your damn arms?
it's not so bad, actually. ever see a free-fall vertical wind tunnel? just scale that up to skatepark size.
apple knows of bug. fixes it in beta(first anyways, dunno if it's fixed in non beta). journalist tells it's fixed in the latest version.
story gets posted again after a week on slashdot.
but osx being exploitable if you have console/local access? that's not really news.
what do you mean tomorrow? that's already the assumption for private ip's.
the only reason they didn't come busting in and sorting the mess later was that it was a company ip address.
so yeah, great - not so great if you plan on running a tor exit node from your home network. which might be a bad idea anyways for other reasons as well but hey..
Why? Was the script badly structured?
yes. very. the sets were badly constructed as well.
for html5 apps it's not that bad of a feature.
like, for firefox OS they need such a feature anyways so might just as well put it on the browser.
however, then they implemented it without rounding without thinking about it one bit.
is quite simple.
bought advertisements, targeted for the site, bought from the site.
not involving the ad network middlemen. the problem with them in the first place is that any friggin site can have ad network ads in the first place and as result there's no CURATION whatsoever and quality of content doesn't really matter(only getting the viewer to the page matters! if the content is worse than the ad then that's a plus for the publisher too.. ).
the cancer of the modern internet is quite simply the ad networks - it makes it possible to monetize a site on the day one before a single human being looks at the site and thinks "do I want to pay ads to appear on this piece of shit?". it also leads to rather shitty content and just verbatim copied content propagating without reason.
then there's the cancer of the cancer: chained advertisement sites! you know, paying for clickbait advertisements that then only lead to pages that have MORE advertisements in an effort to pay for clicks that are supposed to be worth more directly just in adverts.
mobile slashdot sucks bigtime because of their advertisements. it makes it stutter even on galaxy note edge and I seriously doubt even the editors know what kind of advertisements get inserted(half a screen sized shit that is poorly coded making scrolling stutter). if they were advertisements bought from slashdot served _from_ slashdot with some sort of editiorial resemblance it wouldn't be half bad. now they only rely on miss clicks when scrolling. the stuttering makes the miss clicks even more likely!
all the browsers should just ship with ad blocking. but why do you think google came up with Chrome in the first place?
not to mention that there's no mention of who they are, just talking.
it's like it's lacking final edit. sheesh, even gamer youtube stuff is better edited. this is just pointless babble without even a clear objective.
binaries.* needs a friggin credit card nowadays.
yeah so why it's marketed in the blurb as an open source cpu when the interesting thing is an open source toolchain for a closed silicon fpga?
you can turn any xbox into a dev kit of some level and any windows phone into a dev phone.
provided that you're willing to shell out your credit card number ;D. anyhow, you can develop on windows without giving a credit card number too.
aaaaaaaaanyhow, they originally marketed it as an open kind of box, while actually making it as closed as they could get away with without stomping on licenses of the stuff they used pretty much.
the whole marketing was to more or less market it as an "OPEN" "new kind" of console more akin to let's say a dos pc or whatever, but what the users got was a box that asked for their CC before letting to do _anything_. they got a box that felt more closed and more intrusive than a friggin surface(non pro).
they didn't get screwed as such.
it was just that for some reason they were hyped up into thinking that an android box from company B would somehow be upermegasupadupacool compared to just any other android box(and usb controller) that's on the market and for some reason they got into thinking they'd get cooler games than on android even though it's the same frigging thing.
thing is, an used 100 bucks laptop would do the role much better. but majority of ouyas backers were people who have used 100 bucks laptop or two laying around anyways. it's baffling though why they got excited for it - a bunch of those are just hipsters "showing it to the man!"(ms/sony) without understanding what they're buying, what it's made from and why it's not sticking it to the man in the slightest.
or never configure it in the first place to work.
that's your fix.
and slashdot editors: MMS IS NOT SMS SO FUCK YOU SLASHDOT EDITOR. it's not even remotely same technlogy.
mms is vulnurable? duh. how about sharing the image preview vuln(presumably) that's actually used since that has much more to it than just mms. but that mms implementation is exploitable is quite a bit less fatal/interesting than sms vuln.
besides than that I'm pretty fucking sure that 950 million android phones (total androids out there) don't have preview of mms in the notifications bar. only a subset has that feature. but the more interesting and potentially attackable route is through anything else that shows images.
for iphone 4 as well? I don't think soooo.
anyhow... expect mobile networks to filter these messages in 1.2.3.4....
either that or 400 million phones in use in asia will receive an attack today if the attack really works as described in the blurb (proof of concept that installs something or gtfo).
(if you browse on a mobile from asia you might notice that shitloads of adverts that try to exploit or trick the user into installing sw. even slashdot carries occasionally ads targeted to asia tha will just straight up open another page that will try to fool the user into installing sw and doesn't let the user easily press back. thats without clicking the friggin advert. it's like ad networks do no curating whatsoever of asian targeted ads)
yeah but 10 seconds with you phone and BOOM one year in federal jail.
kinda stupid. kinda mega stupid. he's a public figure anyways.
and further than that they would need to put in extradition requests for half of Iran and ISIS
ART wasn't ready.
it went from experimental to release without fixing the shit found in the experimental to get broken. some of them are "design decisions" true, but still crap from user point of view.
especially when the claimed performance increases are.. well, 50-100% ? nowhere to be benched. "apps start faster" which was never a problem to begin with..
you sure about that?
I mean, the point of the entire bug(more like a feature tbh) is that it gets around conventional checks for multiple failures(which is why you wouldn't be able to do this much of bruteforcing on normal connection because you would be banned).
the original blog post is unclear about that.
he was complaining because without notice the behavior changed and he started missing valid emails from addresses previously he was responding to, partially without rhyme or reason, since he started missing in-between emails and sometimes would get a later email but see that there was mail in the 'thread' that he had missed due to the spam filter.
the point is, gmail changed the spam filter without notice (like starting to mark mail "this would go to spam next week") or whatever.
"Out of curiosity, what secure locations can you use your smartphone?"
the oval room.
just think of the possibilities for the next clinton.
also, just about any military base USA has, any donetsk rebel base... of course, you might want to opt to say that any location that allows anyone to have smartphones isn't secure. but that's just the way it is, people have them now and if you can't trust them to not be snapping pictures with 'em phones you can't trust them to not photocopy the shit out of the stuff either.
to be fair, the "10 miles away" is arbitrary.
"anyone who knows the carâ(TM)s IP address gain access from anywhere in the country. âoeFrom an attackerâ(TM)s perspective, itâ(TM)s a super nice vulnerability,â Miller says."
though, I have to ask, why the car has a public facing IP in the first place? sounds like waste of ip. I assume it's provided cellular provider, which would make most of them sit behind.
still pretty shitty design though.