Dual licensing is like being bisexual. Sure, other dual licensors will be happy, and you might think you're increasing your options, but the rest of the world thinks you're a sellout, or a gross pervert.
I know there used to be a common shareware X image viewer (common, as in installed by Red Hat 4), which was distributed as source code.
The problem is, people don't like paying for things, especially if they can get something for free. And this is especially free on slashdot, where people claim to want "free as in speech" but take "free as in gnutella". Everytime music swapping/file sharing is mentioned on slashdot, most people justify under various excuses (RIAA sucks! The artist only gets $0.50 per CD anyhow, so it's ok! My CD collection was stolen! Information wants to be free!). And not registering for shareware doesn't require any effort!
Shareware needs a large user base to overcome the freeloaders, something linux doesn't have (The macintosh user base may or may not be smaller, but they have an entirely different, no FREE, culture).
i think we all agree that a CS degree should teach fundamentals of computer programming (ie - a way of thinking and problem solving), not be a factory for teaching the language-of-the-month.
However, a "serious C programmer" told to write something in Perl will (initally) write drastically different code than a seasoned Perl programmer.
A serious programmer can learn the syntaz and tricks of a new language (and should already be quite fluent in half a dozen), but to learn from just a pocket reference depends on the similarity with what they already know.
C is equivalent to pascal, perl to php, and scheme to lisp, and brainfuck to k (just kidding!). But those are all different programming paradigms. A knoweldgeable manager know that, but HR keyword scanners don't.
only problem is, the discussion was protected vs static in C++, which is older than java. C has had the "static" qualifier since the 70s, and Objetive C and C++ had the protected qualifier years ago.
FYI, Java's object model is very close to that of SmallTalk.
I'd say it's closer to C++, which uses a Simula 67-style OO. Objective C uses a smalltalk influenced OO. Of course, both Java and smalltalk are interpreted, so they're similar in that regard, and Sun cowrote the NeXT OpenStep spec (before Java), so Java does have some Objective C influence.
I daresay that SUN's "support" of gnome is irrelevant. GNOME was developed and released without their blessing, SUN adopted it after it was already proven.
OF course, GNUstep dates back to 95 or 96, and was an official GNU project before GNOME was. But GNUstep was much slower to develop, obviously. When it is done, though, it holds more promise (in the same way HURD does). IMHO, of course
Slashdot Mirror
Dual licensing is like being bisexual. Sure, other dual licensors will be happy, and you might think you're increasing your options, but the rest of the world thinks you're a sellout, or a gross pervert.
You mean like how everyone stopped using OS X once gnu/darwin became available?
so, you're a 14 year-old gaybo?
So you're familiar with the Linux release paradigm.
I know there used to be a common shareware X image viewer (common, as in installed by Red Hat 4), which was distributed as source code.
The problem is, people don't like paying for things, especially if they can get something for free. And this is especially free on slashdot, where people claim to want "free as in speech" but take "free as in gnutella". Everytime music swapping/file sharing is mentioned on slashdot, most people justify under various excuses (RIAA sucks! The artist only gets $0.50 per CD anyhow, so it's ok! My CD collection was stolen! Information wants to be free!). And not registering for shareware doesn't require any effort!
Shareware needs a large user base to overcome the freeloaders, something linux doesn't have (The macintosh user base may or may not be smaller, but they have an entirely different, no FREE, culture).
Do you really want a webcam of that!
indeed, the job market is tight. Tighter than you Kathleen fent-Malda's sloppy cunt, at least.
as in, so long, and thanks for all the fish.
been there, done that.
int main(void) //* yes this is legal */10;
{
int new;
return 20
}
g++ that and tell me it ain't so!
However, a "serious C programmer" told to write something in Perl will (initally) write drastically different code than a seasoned Perl programmer.
A serious programmer can learn the syntaz and tricks of a new language (and should already be quite fluent in half a dozen), but to learn from just a pocket reference depends on the similarity with what they already know.
C is equivalent to pascal, perl to php, and scheme to lisp, and brainfuck to k (just kidding!). But those are all different programming paradigms. A knoweldgeable manager know that, but HR keyword scanners don't.
well that's a first -- a virgin on slashdot!
ask your local meth lab if you can do some intern work.
Also, it reminds her of my dick.
waterproofing books is a good idea, but jizz-proofing the sports illustrated swimsuit issue would be more useful for me!
FireWorks has a batch convert function to do stuff like resizing or converting all images in a folder. I think I've seena gimp script to do the same.
This hard drive is removable. So is CmdrTaco's penis
This hard drive is coming soon.... So is CmdrTaco's penis (Hemos is stoppping by for an afternoon quicky!)
pussy is quite intuitive as well.
only problem is, the discussion was protected vs static in C++, which is older than java. C has had the "static" qualifier since the 70s, and Objetive C and C++ had the protected qualifier years ago.
Rob? Rob Malda? Is that you?!?!
I'd say it's closer to C++, which uses a Simula 67-style OO. Objective C uses a smalltalk influenced OO. Of course, both Java and smalltalk are interpreted, so they're similar in that regard, and Sun cowrote the NeXT OpenStep spec (before Java), so Java does have some Objective C influence.
actually, the -C flag generates java-VM targetted object files. -c generates native object code.
Unfortunately, the liberal pansies in the ACLU complain about cruel and unusual punishment.
OF course, GNUstep dates back to 95 or 96, and was an official GNU project before GNOME was. But GNUstep was much slower to develop, obviously. When it is done, though, it holds more promise (in the same way HURD does). IMHO, of course
Have you ever met your mom?
2. Low cost
Have you ever met your mom?
3. Low commitment
Have you ever met your mom?
4. Low maintenance
Have you ever met your mom?
5. Have a short recharge interval
Have you ever met your mom?
Oops, you said "women". Sorry, i guess you were right after all!