and if you really tried to frame someone I hope you like sharing rooms with rough men because that's where you are headed.
Dear Sir,
I wish to complain in the strongest possible terms, about the comment which you have just submitted about the rough men that are frightening to be in the same room with. Many of my best friends are rough men, and only a few of them are transvestites.
Well, I'd more care to use the real apostrophe, real quotes, the ellipsis character, list point, wide dash, Euro symbol, mathematical symbols, write foreign names and many other useful characters, that are on my keyboard.:)
Instead I am forced to use really stupid replacements.
As I perfectly predicted. YEAH! Go search for it in my comment history. You will find very old comments saying what I said here.
Yes, MY best shot at fixing this. Because, other than you, I actually think about fixing things and helping out people, instead of just ranting, and insulting people who try to help you. Actually, ideas are my business. It's what I'm good at, and what I pay my food with. If I were gospel-singing bricklayer, I would build a tower, and sing about it. What do you bring to the table to fix it? Hm?
I find it funny that you -- with that attitude of yours -- think you even remotely know what the vast majority of people think. I think you should put a picture of you on the Wikipedia site for "crab mentality", and then protect it. Because with that "what I think is what everyone thinks" p.o.v., you most certainly are an admin there.
Wikipedia is a broken experiment, for exactly the reasons I stated in GP comment. You did not bring a single argument to the table that attacked them. You chose to rather argue "ad hominem", and with distractions that did no counter anything. Mainly the distraction about "the abuse of the brand"...of a organization, that is seemingly completely open, but in reality is quite the opposite. Which is exactly the point of GP post.
I'm sure, there's a Wikipedia article about it. If not... Well, to me it looks like a Bose-Einstein condensate, but made of two whole atoms. For those condensates, they use pretty much the same technique.
Well, I had a new Athlon 800 in 2000, and we had Celeron 700s where I worked, and I always played music without noticing the performance difference on WinAMP. Even with the WinAMP 3 skins. Before that, I had a Pentium 133, and some ridiculously low amount of ram. Yet WinAMP never posed problems, even in the times where MP3s was brand-new, and I still had to download MP2s!
Isn't it strange, that an article that only talks about the looks of an OS, does not contain a single image or video? Sorry, but this makes the whole article pointless.
... go and do your casual crap games. Do in just for the money. And see where you end.
Meanwhile, I'll be doing games for those that you forgot about, and for the pure fun of doing what I love. And hey, I even know how to still live from it. (Pretty easy actually.)
Well, you should know that he went insane from a disease that did destroy his power to control his emotions, in some TNG episode.
But I always wondered why anyone would think that it would be an ideal to not have emotions. Is is a horrible, weak, lame state, that drives you insane by not letting you use the natural psychological repair functions of your brain. And well, it would just suck to never feel a thrill, love, and all the cool stuff.
Nope. Wikipedia became -- as I perfectly predicted -- a horrible joke of itself.
"Everyone can edit" is dead and gone forever. A ruling class has established. And they are controlling Wikipedia reality and laws now. Getting in gets harder and harder, as more and more entry rules and hierarchy levels get implemented.
I wonder if anyone ever really believed that it would "just work" with giving access to everyone. I mean, sure, we all had a strong wishful thinking syndrome. I quite possibly was one of Wikipedia's strongest defenders. But I soon realize how stupid and ridiculous it really is. I mean what other community allows anyone to anonymously write whatever he thinks he's right? 4chan. We should have looked at how that turned out.^^
Interestingly (or not so interestingly), it went the same way that every other organizational system goes. The bigger it gets, the more the opinions differ. But nobody is wrong, because on many many subjects, it is either impossible to determine the physical truth, or the whole thing is just relative to the person, which is a basic law of physics, that is somehow completely ignored at Wikipedia.
My best shot at fixing this, would implement the possibility for an infinite cascading views [like CSS cascading rules are creating the final layout] for one article, and reality-relationship models, where you could choose who to trust on what subjects (also in a cascading manner [again, like CSS rules]). So I could perhaps choose "Jon Steward" as my basis, extend with some scientists that i know, and add an overlay of what a friend thinks about the politics in his country, to form my view of Wikipedia.
Now this may sound like the reality distortion of Fox. But in reality, you will not change what someone thinks, when he does not trust you. And my method is a software model of this. And there really are things, where two completely opposite views are rightfully true for both people. Nobody has the right to censor or dominate those views. And, hell, why not. My philosophy is, that everybody can think whatever he likes to think. As long as he does not hurt me (directly or indirectly [eg. by hurting friends]). No matter how crazy he is. Wouldn't I be the oppressor for not allowing him to think that way? If he's all by himself... so what? Let him be, if he's happy that way.:)
I see what you did there. On a more serious note: We're not the FBI. So us not being able to identify you, would mean nothing for the question if the FBI could do it.
"A network of hackers, most based in China, a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/04/22/2009-04-22_international_hackers_lauching
I really, really, really Wondered, how this went trough all of the firehose, the Slashdot "editors" and everything... Maybe all people at/., are already dead and replaced by very small shell scripts. And the comment submitters are programs too......because, that would explain A LOT!
(Oh, and the preview is broken too. The layout has huge free space in them, and the line breaks are missing.)
Nice. Pioneer always rocked. But this sounds like my next electronics device should preferably be a Pioneer one. If only they had some kind of video turntable. Maybe a hack of their variant of FinalScratch...
FLV is a media container format that can (and usually does) contain video streams, that are encoded in H.264. Just sayin... (*hint* false dichotomy *hint*:)
...nobody over here has, or has the need for a TV anymore anyway.
What do you need it for? News? -> Websites! Movies? -> Torrent + Beamer. TV series? -> Ditto. Sports? -> Live stream + Beamer. (Preferably with friends and/or even in the stadium.) Stupid boring crap shows? -> You're still watching them? For real? Better go get a game, before I kick your butt to the 21st century! ^^
Slashdot Mirror
Better than Big Daddys and Little Sisters. ^^
and if you really tried to frame someone I hope you like sharing rooms with rough men because that's where you are headed.
Dear Sir,
I wish to complain in the strongest possible terms, about the comment which you have just submitted about the rough men that are frightening to be in the same room with.
Many of my best friends are rough men, and only a few of them are transvestites.
Yours faithfully,
Brigadier Sir Charles Arthur
Strong (Mrs)
P.S.: I have never kissed the editor of TFA.
Well, I'd more care to use the real apostrophe, real quotes, the ellipsis character, list point, wide dash, Euro symbol, mathematical symbols, write foreign names and many other useful characters, that are on my keyboard. :)
Instead I am forced to use really stupid replacements.
As I perfectly predicted. YEAH!
Go search for it in my comment history. You will find very old comments saying what I said here.
Yes, MY best shot at fixing this. Because, other than you, I actually think about fixing things and helping out people, instead of just ranting, and insulting people who try to help you.
Actually, ideas are my business. It's what I'm good at, and what I pay my food with. If I were gospel-singing bricklayer, I would build a tower, and sing about it.
What do you bring to the table to fix it? Hm?
I find it funny that you -- with that attitude of yours -- think you even remotely know what the vast majority of people think.
I think you should put a picture of you on the Wikipedia site for "crab mentality", and then protect it. Because with that "what I think is what everyone thinks" p.o.v., you most certainly are an admin there.
Wikipedia is a broken experiment, for exactly the reasons I stated in GP comment. You did not bring a single argument to the table that attacked them. You chose to rather argue "ad hominem", and with distractions that did no counter anything. Mainly the distraction about "the abuse of the brand" ...of a organization, that is seemingly completely open, but in reality is quite the opposite. Which is exactly the point of GP post.
And this is where we come full circle.
Q.E.D.
I didn't know, that Mr. T worked on the Enterprise. Or was he Worf?
I'm sure, there's a Wikipedia article about it. If not... Well, to me it looks like a Bose-Einstein condensate, but made of two whole atoms.
For those condensates, they use pretty much the same technique.
Hmm... not even HTML entities work: 18 µs = 18 s = 18 s (numeric entity)
Sorry, but the /. developers should be ashamed. They are the only site I know, that does not support UTF-8...
Well, I had a new Athlon 800 in 2000, and we had Celeron 700s where I worked, and I always played music without noticing the performance difference on WinAMP. Even with the WinAMP 3 skins.
Before that, I had a Pentium 133, and some ridiculously low amount of ram. Yet WinAMP never posed problems, even in the times where MP3s was brand-new, and I still had to download MP2s!
Isn't it strange, that an article that only talks about the looks of an OS, does not contain a single image or video?
Sorry, but this makes the whole article pointless.
Let's dance about architecture!
... go and do your casual crap games. Do in just for the money. And see where you end.
Meanwhile, I'll be doing games for those that you forgot about, and for the pure fun of doing what I love. And hey, I even know how to still live from it. (Pretty easy actually.)
It's yo mom! :P
Is that what Ron Paul would be called, if he were a moon?
Well, you should know that he went insane from a disease that did destroy his power to control his emotions, in some TNG episode.
But I always wondered why anyone would think that it would be an ideal to not have emotions. Is is a horrible, weak, lame state, that drives you insane by not letting you use the natural psychological repair functions of your brain. And well, it would just suck to never feel a thrill, love, and all the cool stuff.
I's a montage of samples of a Mad-TV parody of Arnold Schwarzenegger, and a short part from the movie "Last Action Hero".
Or it's Arnie, telling you his deepest feelings... in a very funny way. XD
You decide. :)
Nope. Wikipedia became -- as I perfectly predicted -- a horrible joke of itself.
"Everyone can edit" is dead and gone forever. A ruling class has established. And they are controlling Wikipedia reality and laws now. Getting in gets harder and harder, as more and more entry rules and hierarchy levels get implemented.
I wonder if anyone ever really believed that it would "just work" with giving access to everyone. I mean, sure, we all had a strong wishful thinking syndrome. I quite possibly was one of Wikipedia's strongest defenders. But I soon realize how stupid and ridiculous it really is.
I mean what other community allows anyone to anonymously write whatever he thinks he's right? 4chan. We should have looked at how that turned out.^^
Interestingly (or not so interestingly), it went the same way that every other organizational system goes. The bigger it gets, the more the opinions differ.
But nobody is wrong, because on many many subjects, it is either impossible to determine the physical truth, or the whole thing is just relative to the person, which is a basic law of physics, that is somehow completely ignored at Wikipedia.
My best shot at fixing this, would implement the possibility for an infinite cascading views [like CSS cascading rules are creating the final layout] for one article, and reality-relationship models, where you could choose who to trust on what subjects (also in a cascading manner [again, like CSS rules]).
So I could perhaps choose "Jon Steward" as my basis, extend with some scientists that i know, and add an overlay of what a friend thinks about the politics in his country, to form my view of Wikipedia.
Now this may sound like the reality distortion of Fox. But in reality, you will not change what someone thinks, when he does not trust you. And my method is a software model of this. :)
And there really are things, where two completely opposite views are rightfully true for both people. Nobody has the right to censor or dominate those views.
And, hell, why not. My philosophy is, that everybody can think whatever he likes to think. As long as he does not hurt me (directly or indirectly [eg. by hurting friends]). No matter how crazy he is. Wouldn't I be the oppressor for not allowing him to think that way? If he's all by himself... so what? Let him be, if he's happy that way.
I see what you did there. On a more serious note: We're not the FBI. So us not being able to identify you, would mean nothing for the question if the FBI could do it.
Well... YEAH! That's the whole point!
Nah. Just go to Kongregate. Some games there are more fun than full-scale games that you buy for $50.
To me, the summary looks like this:
"A network of hackers, most based in China, a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/04/22/2009-04-22_international_hackers_lauching
I really, really, really Wondered, how this went trough all of the firehose, the Slashdot "editors" and everything... Maybe all people at /., are already dead and replaced by very small shell scripts. And the comment submitters are programs too... ...because, that would explain A LOT!
(Oh, and the preview is broken too. The layout has huge free space in them, and the line breaks are missing.)
Mine is even cooler: ::1
Hack that.
Nice. Pioneer always rocked. But this sounds like my next electronics device should preferably be a Pioneer one. If only they had some kind of video turntable. Maybe a hack of their variant of FinalScratch...
Well, you still need a brain. Duh. ^^
FLV is a media container format that can (and usually does) contain video streams, that are encoded in H.264. Just sayin... (*hint* false dichotomy *hint* :)
...nobody over here has, or has the need for a TV anymore anyway.
What do you need it for?
News? -> Websites!
Movies? -> Torrent + Beamer.
TV series? -> Ditto.
Sports? -> Live stream + Beamer. (Preferably with friends and/or even in the stadium.)
Stupid boring crap shows? -> You're still watching them? For real? Better go get a game, before I kick your butt to the 21st century! ^^
What would those "so many" games be?
Don't all serious modern engines support multiple cores?