Slashdot Mirror


Cops To Start CrimeTube To Report Offenses

An anonymous reader writes "UK citizens may soon be able to report crimes by uploading videos taken from their mobile phones. Ian Readhead, director of information for the Association of Chief Police Officers, told silicon.com that forces want to build a video reporting portal to allow the public to upload potential evidence. Checking YouTube is now a routine part of many police investigations, he said, and police want to build on the extra functionality that this gives them."

238 comments

  1. Holy crap! by plover · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So as a subscriber, I get to see stories before TFA is slashdotted. The preview stories come with this little question: "See any serious problems with this story? Email our on-duty editor." I don't think emailing the Slashdot editors is going to fix the problems I see with this one!

    TFA gives the example of a white van involved in some crime. Well, I have a neighbor whose dog barks all night, but drives a brown van. No problem, a little Photoshop here and there, and voilá! "Instant Evidence"! The neighbors dog spends 6-8 months in the kennel while his owner does the same thing.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Holy crap! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      How is that any different to doing that then posting the 'evidence' to the police?

    2. Re:Holy crap! by csartanis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wonder what will happen to the videos of police committing crimes?

    3. Re:Holy crap! by A+non-mouse+Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where do I upload suspected thoughtcrime?

      --
      libertarian: (n) socially liberal, financially conservative; neither left, nor right.
    4. Re:Holy crap! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      No problem, a little Photoshop here and there

      That would be getting into the realm of video effects which are much less trivial than Photoshop. The idea is still troubling, because the fewer the people who could do it, the much more believable it would be. That level of skill is asking to be abused!

    5. Re:Holy crap! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1
      They could arrest Jethro Tull's Ian Anderson for thoughtcrime:

      Sitting on the park bench
      Eyeing little girls, with bad intent...

    6. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The exact same things can be done right now, pre-CrimeTube.
      Evidence can be, and has been very many times, faked.

      But the fact that this is an official police site, i doubt anyone would be stupid enough to submit shopped videos, because it will mean that you are now involved with the case (oh, they'll find you)

      Just because you recorded someone that looked like they may have been planting a bomb, doesn't mean it is an instant-win against said potential bomb planter.
      He could have just been planting a plant.

    7. Re:Holy crap! by vertinox · · Score: 1

      TFA gives the example of a white van involved in some crime. Well, I have a neighbor whose dog barks all night, but drives a brown van. No problem, a little Photoshop here and there, and voilá! "Instant Evidence"! The neighbors dog spends 6-8 months in the kennel while his owner does the same thing.

      Wouldn't you think that they'd notice he really drives a brown van when they show up?

      Its not as if you can report people as it is with certain authorities. In my city the official city website allows you to not only report potholes, but illegal activity.

      I suppose if they had an "upload file" I could submit more data which I could spent more time doctoring, but as the current law has it, police can't use citizen media as evidence directly because of tampering legality issues (IANAL)

      Either way I still can make up stuff in the report, but I'm sure it could come back to me once they figured out I was lying.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    8. Re:Holy crap! by dwiget001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, it's not so much "Big Brother is watching you" it is "Little Brothers and Sisters are watching you".

      This can't be good.

    9. Re:Holy crap! by snowraver1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It makes it too easy. Let's say that your neighbor likes to smoke pot from time to time, and that bothers you. Normally you would have to call the police and file and official complaint. Not anymore. Just get your crappy cell phone out and submit the video and wait for the police come to take them away.

      To me, it is one of those "whatwouldpossiblygowrong" type things. I feel that it should be at least a "little bit of a pain in the ass" to file a complaint with the police. Making small amounts of red tape (i.e. you actually have to call a phone number and talk to somone) limits the number of frivilous complaints.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    10. Re:Holy crap! by noidentity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hopefully the videos are simply used to generate leads, since as evidence there is no way to verify their authenticity. But it seems that it'd be more productive to simple have the people, you know, call on the phone to report suspicious activity. They could send a patrol to check it within the hour, rather than waiting for it to show up on YouTube.

    11. Re:Holy crap! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      No problem, a little Photoshop here and there, and voilá! "Instant Evidence"!

      Even a dude defending himself in court could dodge that. "Here's a picture of my not-brown-van and documentation to back that up."

      Theoretically speaking, if the photograph is all they have to go on, it shouldn't lead to jail time. Of course, I understand reality is more theatrical.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Holy crap! by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      You're modded funny, but that's the same thought I had. All the coppers need to do now is organize local chapters of 'The Junior Spies' and the circle will finally be complete.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    13. Re:Holy crap! by cs02rm0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder what will happen to the videos of police committing crimes?

      If believed to be connected with terrorism (and isn't everything?) then taking pictures/video of police offers is against the law in the UK.

    14. Re:Holy crap! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It makes it too easy. Let's say that your neighbor likes to smoke pot from time to time, and that bothers you.

      I'm not saying that the behavior should be any more illegal than smoking tobacco (Arguably it should be far less so) but if you smoke weed where it's illegal and you do it in plain sight of someone you don't know you can trust then you're a bozo.

      Making small amounts of red tape (i.e. you actually have to call a phone number and talk to somone) limits the number of frivilous complaints.

      You'll probably have to fill out a form when you upload the video, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Holy crap! by vandon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Even better, how many videos will be deleted because they show a cop running a red light, illegally parked, littering, sleeping in their cars, making illegal turns, etc?

    16. Re:Holy crap! by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Silly citizen, that only happens in the movies.

    17. Re:Holy crap! by senorpoco · · Score: 1

      Why is there not a 'troublingly prescient' mod point.

    18. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will be replaced with videos of funny cats.

    19. Re:Holy crap! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not so much "Big Brother is watching you" it is "Little Brothers and Sisters are watching you".

      This can't be good.

      Can't it? Supposing you're walking home from the pub some night and you see an argument brewing. You pull out your phone and start filming, and you catch a local thug kicking the crap out of an innocent person over a bag of chips. Wouldn't it be nice to have somewhere to upload it to? Or supposing you have a problem with unruly kids terrorising the neighbourhood but the cops give the usual 'too busy' excuse and let them run riot.

      Sure there's potential for abuse, but quite frankly that's what the checks and balances of the justice system are there for. For every abuse of a system like this that you can think of, I can think of a legitimate use.

      Crime is a real problem in a lot of areas. Sometimes you need to be able to crack down on it, and enlisting the help of local people is often a key ingredient, particularly where police resources are over-stretched.

      We've had non-police helping out with law enforcement for years, like traffic wardens(parking wardens), school crossing patrols, private security firms, etc. There's nothing sinister about it.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    20. Re:Holy crap! by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technology changes things. Back before electronic attendance, and electronic grades, a teacher would be very suspicious if something didn't check out in their records. Today, most teachers believe that the technology is always right, even when it contradicts paper gradebooks. Common sense gets thrown out of the window whenever you have a bunch of technology illiterate people together with technology.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    21. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really not, you can film the police in public like anyone else. The thing is, the police generally don't actually realise this, or they simply lie, and will tell you that it's illegal.

    22. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like Youtube, you would still have the original copy.

      Also if your local authority is that corrupt, then you probably need to consider building a case against them and bringing it to the attention of a higher authority such as the county or state.

    23. Re:Holy crap! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Better than Big Daddys and Little Sisters. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    24. Re:Holy crap! by AxeTheMax · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's easy, all of them will be deleted. Because they would be information about the police that may be of use to terrorists, and it's illegal to collect such information.

    25. Re:Holy crap! by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This website would become a veritable Mecca for such videos! If the cops were to take them down, they would be spending all of their time doing that.

    26. Re:Holy crap! by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      Even better, how many videos will be deleted because they show a cop running a red light, illegally parked, littering, sleeping in their cars, making illegal turns, etc?

      seems likely

      That's easy, all of them will be deleted. Because they would be information about the police that may be of use to terrorists, and it's illegal to collect such information.

      Instant way to arrest anyone who has posted such a video for supporting terrorism--nice. Who needs a PATRIOT act in Britain!

    27. Re:Holy crap! by chis101 · · Score: 1

      No need to delete them, just ignore them. This doesn't sound like it's going to be a public video gallery, it's just going to be a way for people to upload videos to police. The police can view the videos, not the general public.

    28. Re:Holy crap! by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      When did sleeping in your car become illegal?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    29. Re:Holy crap! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's illegal in a lot of places, the state, county, or even city can make it illegal to sleep in your vehicle in their jurisdiction. That's pretty much the norm these days, and in fact in some places it's even illegal to sleep in a tent in your own back yard, although in practice this is almost never enforced... a bad law is still a bad law. It's illegal to live in a trailer on your own property in Lake County, CA unless you have plans and permits to build a house. It's hard to see how that serves society, unless you want people to be homeless. Hmm...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:Holy crap! by kuliphex · · Score: 1

      A dog who drives a van while barking? You're going to have to Photoshop that rather well to pull it off.

    31. Re:Holy crap! by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      The Ministerium fur Staatssicherheit nods approvingly.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    32. Re:Holy crap! by causality · · Score: 2, Informative

      It makes it too easy. Let's say that your neighbor likes to smoke pot from time to time, and that bothers you.

      I'm not saying that the behavior should be any more illegal than smoking tobacco (Arguably it should be far less so) but if you smoke weed where it's illegal and you do it in plain sight of someone you don't know you can trust then you're a bozo.

      Making small amounts of red tape (i.e. you actually have to call a phone number and talk to somone) limits the number of frivilous complaints.

      You'll probably have to fill out a form when you upload the video, too.

      It's problematic because the police, in fact the entire government, are supposed to be servants of the people and this did not arise due to overwhelming demand from the people. I don't know if I have ever seen anything fitting that description that was actually a good or desirable thing. That alone should be a giant red flag.

      I think this is connected to what may go by various names, but the term I have heard for it is "proactive policing". At least in the USA, it arose during the 80s. It's what has filled jails with minor non-violent drug offenders and others who are involved in victimless crimes. The basis of it is that if their idea of how many arrests should be made is unmet, they go looking for something, anything, even the most minor violations, to compensate. It should be common public knowledge, and it's shameful that it isn't, but the job performance of police officers is evaluated entirely in terms of how many arrests they make, with more weight given to severe crimes like felonies. They receive no encouragement whatsoever to find other ways to handle the more minor victimless offenses. They don't score points with their boss by being more community-friendly, like at more often issuing warnings instead of tickets or confiscating marijuana and saying "look, I better not catch you doing this again" instead of outright arrests. The result is that people don't respect authority anymore because it's no longer respectable, it has lost its human side and has become a set of mechanical rules.

      It's a shame and it's part of how things are getting worse. Talk to your parents or grandparents and you'll hear about a time when the police were your neighbors, people you knew. Teenagers who were caught drinking etc. used to be taken home with a lecture or a stern warning and the matter was left to their parents to handle, and you know what, if prevention of a reoccurance is the goal, this was more effective. Now, someone who gets caught doing that has a criminal record for the rest of their life and stands to lose their driver's license etc. There is no longer any understanding that "they're young and dumb and have their entire lives ahead of them; it should not be harmed or ruined because of an indiscretion that they are likely to outgrow."

      I'm not saying that all crime isn't serious or that all crime should be dealt with softly. I'm talking specifically about cases where the "criminal" wasn't harming anyone except maybe himself. There's a world of difference between that, and actually intentionally hurting another human being. The former is merely poor judgment that is better corrected by education and loving family and good role models, whereas the other is truly wrong and must be fought. That difference used to be recognized, then along came proactive policing and other political movements that always have the effect of increasing both state power and state involvement in daily life. I really believe this is heading down the wrong path and has been for some time now. There is no better evidence for this than the fact that it seems impossible to change.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    33. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You still think laws are there to serve society? That's so cute.

      The idea is to force everyone out of the community that can't afford a house.

    34. Re:Holy crap! by Animaether · · Score: 1

      It makes it too easy

      Shit - I didn't realize reporting crimes was supposed to be difficult.

      What's next, www.stopthesnitchingtube.com to oust people who reported crimes?

      As per a sibling poster - I, for one, don't care much about pot use (heck, it's legal here in your own home / at a coffeeshop, so whatever). If I see somebody setting fire to a trashcan in front of the house again, yeah I might be tempted to get a good video of them to upload if I could here. Sure beats reporting it to the cops *again* waiting for them for half an hour *again* giving them a 'good description' *again*, etc. It also beats the neighbors pondering vigilantism, but maybe that's just me.

    35. Re:Holy crap! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, getting the citizenry involved in self-policing is the key to eliminating most of the police. Making sure that the people police the police is the hard part. If you really want to see the negative effects of this decision mitigated, make sure that you take part in copwatch or similar. Sure, there will be some overactive reporting, but eventually there will be a backlash. Or, maybe it won't be that eventual.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:Holy crap! by Animaether · · Score: 1

      /nokarmabonus

      Just to clarify - I believe people -should- try to settle their differences between them *first*, if possible. When all those avenues have been explored, that's where either a civil suit OR the cops come in; and crimes, I think, are the non-civil judicial system's department.. starting with cops investigating.

    37. Re:Holy crap! by causality · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, getting the citizenry involved in self-policing is the key to eliminating most of the police. Making sure that the people police the police is the hard part. If you really want to see the negative effects of this decision mitigated, make sure that you take part in copwatch or similar. Sure, there will be some overactive reporting, but eventually there will be a backlash. Or, maybe it won't be that eventual.

      I appreciate what you're saying and I agree that it is very important. The citizenry is not supposed to take a backseat but rather should be actively involved in their own communities. I think that understanding is another something that we are slowly losing.

      I think all of these things are symptoms. Proactive policing and the rise of the "law and order" mentality, which dictates that if we can just catch enough people and be harsh enough with them then somehow all of our problems will go away, are the wrong responses to a problem. People see that crime is worse than it was a couple of generations ago and they feel afraid and they don't know what else to do. The measures we are taking currently are the wrong response. Crime, especially malicious violent crime, is the end result of a series of failures. What we are actually dealing with here is the decline of virtue. Before you can harm another human being with an unprovoked attack, or steal from them, you first have to view them as something other than a human being who is worthy of love and respect. That is the actual ultimate problem. We don't seem to know how to handle that so we concentrate on its effects. I submit that this is a dead end. I think it's no coincidence that treating other people as mere resources, which is how corporations view us, goes along with this more general dehumanization quite neatly.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    38. Re:Holy crap! by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's really not, you can film the police in public like anyone else. The thing is, the police generally don't actually realise this, or they simply lie, and will tell you that it's illegal.

      Any police officer who tells a citizen that something is illegal, when it is in fact clearly legal, is actually trying to intimidate that person. It's an attempt to coerce that citizen to get them to stop doing something merely because the officer personally does not like it. The cop knows it's not illegal, and if not, the cop is incompetent. We don't need cops who are either malicious or incompetent. This is wrong and should never be tolerated. Any officer who does this should be fired and barred from ever holding any law enforcement position. I would feel this way even if there were a severe shortage of police officers. I am not very fond of cops, but sometimes I feel like I respect the importance of their job more than they do.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    39. Re:Holy crap! by causality · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like Youtube, you would still have the original copy.

      Also if your local authority is that corrupt, then you probably need to consider building a case against them and bringing it to the attention of a higher authority such as the county or state.

      That might work. Not because the higher authority hates corruption, but rather, because they don't like competition. Besides, it'd be good PR.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    40. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What. The. Fuck.
      The most surveilled country on the planet still isn't catching all the crimes they *think* are happening, so they're recruiting Joeseph Q. Public to cover the remaining 10% of land mass without mounted cameras.

      How does British Immigration spin this? "We keep you safe from yourself"?

      My public perception of modern day Britain is as follows:
      #1. Used to win World Wars, now supports pointless wars.
      #2. Politicians don't trust citizens, and citizens don't stand up to politicians.
      #3. Won't give up their currency until it's worth less than the Euro.
      #4. Cockneys. Everywhere.
      #5. Curry. Everywhere.

      This might seem flamebait, but I have enough expat british relatives to gain citizenship if I choose to, and I feel the 20th century charm and strength and culture of Britain is now just a quaint memory.

    41. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be getting into the realm of video effects which are much less trivial than Photoshop.

      At 24 frames/second, more time consuming, yes. But not any harder. Can't Photoshop be set to remember what you did and then apply it in batch mode to an entire folder of images? I don't use Photoshop so I don't know if it can, but I know that there are other image processing utilities that can.

    42. Re:Holy crap! by billcopc · · Score: 1

      That's fine, because you upload a 2nd copy to Youtube for all eyes to see. Sure, it will get taken down, but at least they'll have to fight for it.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    43. Re:Holy crap! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      You just did. Thanks, we'll be in contact.

    44. Re:Holy crap! by adminstring · · Score: 1

      Another problem is how the judge/jury would know that the picture of the not-brown van itself hadn't been Photoshopped.

      Accused of a burglary on Feb. 20th? Click, click, click... "Here, Your Honor, is a picture of me having tea with President Obama in the White House Rose Garden on Feb. 20th, proving my innocence."

      Court could get pretty entertaining in the future...

      --
      My truck is like a series of tubes.
    45. Re:Holy crap! by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      This is wrong and should never be tolerated.

      Try saying that with a taser in your back.

      Heck, you don't even have to say anything at all? Just be minding your own business.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    46. Re:Holy crap! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      The cop knows it's not illegal, and if not, the cop is incompetent. We don't need cops who are either malicious or incompetent. This is wrong and should never be tolerated. Any officer who does this should be fired and barred from ever holding any law enforcement position.

      You realise what you're advocating here? One cop makes one screw up, one mental lapse, one misjudgement of one situation, or one failure to keep up with additions/subtractions from the law, and the cop is incompetent, and should be fired and bared from ever holding a law enforcement position.

      OK, who here wants to invest their future into becoming a police officer now? No one?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    47. Re:Holy crap! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Oh for god sake! Little brothers and Sisters have always been watching you! There are always nosy^H^H^H^H concerned neighbours, and they will even report to police from time to time. It's part of life in the public, and always has been.

      Not only that, it's the only way that police can actually operate. Do you think they have the funding and the numbers to patrol all of their district a reasonable portion of the time? They need to be pointed in the right direction from time to time, otherwise they would be rendered almost completely ineffective. All this new website does it makes tipping off the police more anonymous and more efficient, which I, for one, welcome.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    48. Re:Holy crap! by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Sure there's potential for abuse, but quite frankly that's what the checks and balances of the justice system are there for.

      Well, therein lies the problem. I do actually agree with you in theory. However, the potential for abuse in a program like this is far too great, and there do not appear to be adequate checks and balances on this program. Yes, enlisting the community to crack down on crime can be very useful. In fact, it can even help cement community bonds in an age where people tend to live their isolated lives. The problems are (1) busy bodies trying to get rid of "undesirables" and (2) the vast proliferation of absurd laws. Instead of busting someone for assault, people will wind up busting someone for scratching their nuts in a public place.

    49. Re:Holy crap! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Wow. That was pretty bad. They should jail that cop for murder or manslaughter.

      Say you were upset at someone and just pushed them, if you were unlucky enough that they tripped over something, smacked their head on the ground and later died, you often end up in jail.

      But the police get away with worse, even shooting people.

      --
    50. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack into your computer like the rest of us and eat the red pill ... or was it the blue pill ... darn it!!!!!

    51. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, but it's ok for us to be screwed over when they do have that mental lapse, one misjudgement or

      one failure to keep up with the additions and subtractions from the law

      Are you serious about that last one? If they don't know the law they are enforcing then they shouldn't enforcing it without advice from those they do know.

    52. Re:Holy crap! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Perhaps policeBrutalityTube.com is in the pipeline?

    53. Re:Holy crap! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's ok for us to be screwed over when they do have that mental lapse, one misjudgement

      Yeah, that's not what I said. There's middle ground between:

      a) It's A-OK and the officer gets of scott-free and
      b) Immediate firing and barred from ever holding a law enforcement position ever again.

      It's called disciplining. It encourages officers to be wary of making such mistakes, without ruining their lives permanently. Just like the fact that we don't punish speeding with death, we just give the person a wrist-slap of varying degrees.

      Are you serious about that last one? If they don't know the law they are enforcing then they shouldn't enforcing it without advice from those they do know.

      It could happen. It's true, a good police officer would know the law, and keep up with all its changes. However, on the other hand, it's not really possible for a single person to know the entire law. I can imagine there would be circumstances when it would appear, even to an otherwise competent police officer, when they need to make educated guesses as to certain grey areas of the law.

      Besides, even if they do, is it really the end of the world? It's a mistake. Sure, one person's freedom is momentarily curtailed slightly, but all that calls for is, again, a slap on the wrist, not a full-blown sacking.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    54. Re:Holy crap! by spliffington · · Score: 1

      Domain Name: POLICEBRUTALITYTUBE.COM
      Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
      Creation Date: 27-jun-2008
      Expiration Date: 27-jun-2010

    55. Re:Holy crap! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      hehe. they haven't done much with the site...

    56. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Animaether reminds me that you have the local media. An obvious choice, not sure how I missed that one. Of course they are just as susceptible to corruption as the government they report on whenever there's a chance to throw politics in the mix.

    57. Re:Holy crap! by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      the job performance of police officers is evaluated entirely in terms of how many arrests they make

      Hey, that sounds almost as sensible as evaluating programmers by counting lines of code.

    58. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one failure to keep up with additions/subtractions from the law, and the cop is incompetent

      Ignorance is no excuse!

      I suspect that should something like this go through, the law will become much simpler.

  2. Insurance Fraud Galore by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How long before people start using this new tech to make bogus insurance claims??

    1. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Informative

      How long before people start using this new tech to make bogus insurance claims??

      If most people can watch a staged youtube clip and call it out as a sham, I think the cops will be even better equipped at spotting a faked clip. And making a false statement to the police is itself a crime, so their 15 minutes of youtube fame will run out pretty fast...

    2. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Duradin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would the cops care? They have "evidence", someone ends up in the pokey, and they get to be "tough on crime". Everyone is guilty of something so whoever they do throw the book at had it coming anyways.

      (Brought to you by the Word of the Day: Quota)

    3. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just like in East Germany (back in the day)... Spy on your neighbors, report back to The State!

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by lgarner · · Score: 1

      Probably about as long as it takes now.

    5. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, where's my damn life insurance
      Quagmire death scene

    6. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You fail at Godwin. Please leave.

    7. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just about nailed it, right there. I got chills. :(

      I guess the worst part is, doesn't YouTube already do this? I mean, what's to stop someone from posting videos of me, now, notifying the police or not?

    8. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Just like in East Germany (back in the day)... Spy on your neighbors, report back to The State!

      So crime should only be reported by police and witnesses should shut up? Only in the old Eastern Bloc was there the concept of a witness submitting evidence of a crime? I beg to differ.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    9. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by chis101 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever read YouTube comments? It doesn't matter if the video is a sham or obviously legit, there will still be two dozen people shouting 'fake!'

    10. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      East Germany was run by the Soviets, not the Nazis.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Certain laws - but the instant posting of videos, their digital nature, and the Streisand effect make it impossible to enforce those laws effectively.

    12. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by gparent · · Score: 1

      Except we're not spying on people disagreeing with nazis, we're taking pictures of people possibly committing real crimes. They're not asking you to send videos of you badmouthing the president.

    13. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like in East Germany (back in the day)... Spy on your neighbors, report back to The State!

      Fabulous prizes to be won!

    14. Re:Insurance Fraud Galore by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The only way Godwin's Law applies to Soviets on Slashdot is that somebody will always pull out the tired "in Soviet Russia" meme.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  3. So what are they going to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what are they going to do when people start uploading videos en masse of the police breaking the law?

    1. Re:So what are they going to do by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Charge them with disseminating material that might be potentially useful to terrorists, of course. Easy enough.

    2. Re:So what are they going to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what are they going to do when people start uploading videos en masse of the police breaking the law?

      Every keyboard I have ever seen has a "Delete" key. The police will eventually find it on theirs.

  4. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your every action is already videotaped in England.

    1. Re:What's the point? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      yeah, there are many terabytes of footage of hooded persons doing all sorts of dodgy deeds.

  5. Crimes by cops? by ShadesFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that this will be mostly used to video tape cops doing terrible things and uploading it for all to see. I also can't help but think that it will be largely ignored.

    1. Re:Crimes by cops? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Post it on YouTube AND their site. If it doesn't appear on their site, come back to YouTube and say "I sent this to the official crime-reporting site but they pretended it didn't happen" and watch your view counter spin like Orwell in his grave.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Crimes by cops? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Actually recently riot police have been done due to footage caught on cctv AND footage submitted by individuals

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:Crimes by cops? by chis101 · · Score: 1

      I think that this will be mostly used to video tape cops doing terrible things and uploading it for all to see.

      I really can't imagine their site being 'for all to see.' This will just be a way to privately submit videos for the police to see.

    4. Re:Crimes by cops? by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 1

      Post it on YouTube AND their site.

      I can't wait to see what they do with videos like this classic of an NYPD officer bodychecking some cyclist into the sidewalk.

    5. Re:Crimes by cops? by Henry+Pate · · Score: 3, Informative

      The resolution to that case was fairly interesting. FOr those not familiar with it you can see the video here. Basically this officer, Patrick Pogan, picked a guy out of a huge group of cyclists riding in a rally and decided to body check him, hard. In the video the cyclist clearly steers away from the cop and the officer charges him. The officer then arrested the cyclist, writing in the police report that he was weaving in and out of traffic, forcing vehicles to swerve or stop, and generally disrupting the normal flow of traffic. He said that he suffered lacerations on his arms because the cyclists steered his bike into him and knocked him down, and that when he tried to arrest him he began flailing, kicking and screaming, "You are pawns in the game!". The cyclist spent the next day in police custody charged with attempted assault, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.

      The charges against the cyclist were dropped. Pogan, after being a police officer for three weeks got put on desk duty during the investigation. Then on Dec 16, 2008 he appeared in court and pleaded not guilty to felony charges of of falsifying business records and filing a false instrument and misdemeanor charges of third-degree assault, second-degree harassment and making a punishable false written statement. After the indictment, he was suspended. Two months later he resigned as the department prepared to fire him.

      In a way this cyclist was lucky, the cop was so stupid he did it in front of at least 100 onlookers. His partner saw it all and still went along with it which doesn't say much for him either. Had there not been so many people around the outcome could've been very different.

      --
      Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
    6. Re:Crimes by cops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While what the cop did was wrong as it was obviously done on purpose by the cop its also obvious that Critical Mass is a way to be a pita to those who drive cars in cities.

      Personally, to me it appears as a protest. A protest against motor vehicles and the city as a whole. The whole idea of corking is basically a "safe" way of illegally making a road block for drivers.

      The whole idea that its some sort of "parade" or "organized protest". I don't know about you but the last time I read about a protest they usually required some sort of official documentation allowing them to hold a protest in a specific location so as not to disrupt normal life for the citizens that live in the area. (ie: making sure proper roads are blocked, etc). Its obvious bikers (not all I'm sure) that participate in these love the idea of being able to be a pita to motorists. Motorists *share* the road with bikers and vice versa. Bikers don't get to own the road nor are they entitled to own the road.

      Why not just arrest the guy "corking" for holding up traffic illegally, let the DA figure a way to find a law that makes these things illegal. Its obvious to me they mean to disrupt traffic other wise they'd get organized and actually work with the cities they are in. The whole idea is just like Improv everywhere; show up and do something crazy. While Improv is neat, I can completely understand the other side of things where they disrupt either a store or a specified area. I know if I was in the book store when all the phones were going off I would have left and I'm sure people actually buying books left to, which most likely resulted in lost profits...of course this is no tangible way to know for sure if the store did or did not lose profits I'm just saying. Its reasonable to think it did.

  6. This is brilliant? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is brilliant, but I don't know how well it will work.

    I tried it out, to see if I could get results. After spending a full day videotaping the dealings of the CEO of a major US company this week, and posting it, the police responded "Well, I mean, we don't really deal with this kind of stuff. Find me a guy who stole some cigarettes or something"

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    1. Re:This is brilliant? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      (Substitute US with UK, you get the idea)

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    2. Re:This is brilliant? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Maybe you accidentally taped the honest one.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:This is brilliant? by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      Like they say, "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Anatole_France

    4. Re:This is brilliant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK CEOs get US bailout money, so it's all the same, really.

  7. Report on your neighbor! by brian0918 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Orwellian much?

    1. Re:Report on your neighbor! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not a huge surprise. They already have the "If you suspect it Report it" campaign.

      Not to mention good old "Secure beneath the watchful eyes".(yes, they are actually serious. As in, that poster is not ironic.)

    2. Re:Report on your neighbor! by raburton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And here is another fine example... http://jamesholden.net/billboard/

      This nice webpage allows you to generate your own, but the ones shown are genuine ones, I've seen both these billboards around my own town, and it's not like I live in London.

    3. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, it's the UK; the police probably already have it on video.

    4. Re:Report on your neighbor! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      What exactly is wrong with reporting a crime that your neighbor did?

    5. Re:Report on your neighbor! by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Not to mention good old "Secure beneath the watchful eyes".(yes, they are actually serious. As in, that poster is not ironic.)

      God. I want one of those posters SO bad!

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    6. Re:Report on your neighbor! by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      and this classic

      oh, sorry I mixed up my fascists. Don't report me.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      How fitting, then, that the Wikipedia article of the day is the biographical article on Judge Learned Hand, who said:

      [M]y friends, will you not agree that any society which begins to be doubtful of itself; in which one man looks at another and says: "He may be a traitor," in which that spirit has disappeared which says: "I will not accept that, I will not believe that--I will demand proof. I will not say of my brother that he may be a traitor," but I will say, "Produce what you have. I will judge it fairly, and if he is, he shall pay the penalties; but I will not take it on rumor. I will not take it on hearsay. I will remember that what has brought us up from savagery is a loyalty to truth, and truth cannot emerge unless it is subjected to the utmost scrutiny"--will you not agree that a society which has lost sight of that, cannot survive?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:Report on your neighbor! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      What exactly is wrong with reporting a crime that your neighbor did?

      What's wrong with reporting a crime that your [boss|teacher|brother|parent|child] did?

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    9. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Jesus H. Christ...I am thoroughly convinced that the British (and many other Europeans) have a fetish with subjugation and pacifism.

    10. Re:Report on your neighbor! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You may say that, but if I look out the window and see you robbing my neighbor, you better believe I'm going to report you. And if I see you raping someone, I'm coming out with a baseball bat.

      Same goes for if you're a policeman, although in that case I think a cell phone and video camera would be a more potent weapon. There is no better way to stay safe than watching out for each other as a society. It's not Orwellian to report crime, it's Orwellian if 'crime' is redefined to mean 'unpatriotic behavior.' Which doesn't mean it's ok to fight against the government. If I catch you seriously plotting to kill the president, I will report you too.

      On the other hand if I see you smoking weed I won't report you.

      --
      Qxe4
    11. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      Nothing. But being cynical, we look at every intrusion into the technical field by amateurs as just begging to be abused. Because, based on something simple like email, it will be abused.

      The question isn't how useful this technology will be when used properly, but how many resources it will tie up when being utterly abused by people uploading staged and/or doctored images and video through Tor. Because it will happen.

      And probably by actual terrorists who want to tie up said resources in Northern London while they plant a bomb in Southern London.

    12. Re:Report on your neighbor! by nizo · · Score: 1

      The one that comes with built in cameras or without?

    13. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong if it's a real crime, i.e. murder, theft, etc.
      But when you (and you will) see made-up crimes such as copyright infringement and making fun of important political figureheads, do you really want your neighbors to be trigger-happy in reporting you for any crime they can find so they then can steal all your stuff once you're taken away to be gassed?

    14. Re:Report on your neighbor! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Oh man, you wish that that was a merely European disease.

    15. Re:Report on your neighbor! by speedtux · · Score: 1

      As in, that poster is not ironic.

      Well, the poster is actually ironic, but not intentionally so.

    16. Re:Report on your neighbor! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      It's not Orwellian to report crime, it's Orwellian if 'crime' is redefined to mean 'unpatriotic behavior.' Which doesn't mean it's ok to fight against the government. If I catch you seriously plotting to kill the president, I will report you too.

      On the other hand if I see you smoking weed I won't report you.

      Who put you in charge of what's a 'real' crime and a 'fake' one? You ought to be consistent. Report em all, or none.

    17. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      What exactly is wrong with reporting a crime that your neighbor did?

      Technically, you are not reporting a crime. You are reporting suspicious activity which an officer MAY investigate and which MAY result in an arrest, which MAY end up with a conviction. Only then is it a crime.

      The problem is, if you are innocent, the process of going from "suspect" to "acquitted" can destroy your life, bankrupt you financially, lose you your job and friends, and make it difficult to find another (job or friend) for the rest of your life.

      Encouraging people to do this to each other, participating in what could ruin an innocent person's life, is irresponsible and, I would argue, morally wrong.

      If you don't believe me, please post your home address, and I will provide the police an anonymous "helpful" tip that I saw you forcing a 12-year old boy into your basement. Let me know what your life is like in 12 months.

    18. Re:Report on your neighbor! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The will of society is in charge of what's a 'real' crime and a 'fake' one, represented imperfectly through laws written by our representative republic (or written by your king, depending on where you live). My sense of right and wrong is not dictated to me by 'law'. I feel no need to align my views to be consistent with the law, thankyou very much.

      --
      Qxe4
    19. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is fucking scary.

    20. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Triv · · Score: 1

      You realize that the same sorts of campaigns have been running in major US cities for years, right?

      New York's got "If you see something, say something" posters plastered all over its subway cars and buses. A similar campaign exists in Boston, and in New Jersey Transit stations, and (I'm guessing here) in airports country-wide.

      England is bad for that stuff, sure, and lousy with CCTV and misinformed police, and and and. But really, it isn't the fact of the thing that gets to me as much as how preposterously heavy-handed their attempts at selling the populace on it are.

    21. Re:Report on your neighbor! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      A great quote, but what do you do when your neighbors are savages who don't observe society's rules? The question that will decide the fate of our current society.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    22. Re:Report on your neighbor! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Can we report cops misbeahviors ? I suspect this tool will mainly be used for that...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    23. Re:Report on your neighbor! by shentino · · Score: 1

      One could just as easily prioritize what gets reported to deal with the fact that police resources are limited?

      Smoking weed, illegal or not, doesn't have the urgency that rape or murder does.

    24. Re:Report on your neighbor! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      So basically you're against all form of police questioning, since witnesses can just lie?

      And how is your example any different to just calling 911/999 and telling the police a lie? Are you saying that we should close down 999 as well?

    25. Re:Report on your neighbor! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      How is that any different to said terrorists just dialing 999 and reporting some false bomb in North London? Should we close down the phone lines too?

    26. Re:Report on your neighbor! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Oh I get it - you think that because it was someone that you like that they should be allowed to do illegal things.

  8. Let's get started! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they had this in the US, I would upload video of my ATT phone/wireless/internet bill.

  9. We the people ... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    ... are BIG BROTHER ... Who knew????

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:We the people ... by Reziac · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly what bothers me about such schemes. Your neighbour becomes your possible enemy... divide the people so they cannot possibly move against an oppressive gov't, because they all distrust one another too much.

      Cue the "in Soviet Russia" jokes... oh, how about this one??

      Subject: KGB
      Place and time: Somewhere in the Soviet Union in the 1950s.

      The phone rings at KGB headquarters.

      "Hello?"

      "Hello, is this KGB?"

      "Yes. What do you want?"

      "I'm calling to report my neighbor Yankel Rabinovitz as an enemy of the State. He is hiding undeclared diamonds in some fallen trees on his property."

      "This will be noted." Next day, the KGB patrol arrives at the Rabinovitz's house. They chop the trees into pieces, but find no diamonds.

      Later the phone rings at the Rabinovitz house.
      "Hello, Yankel! Did the KGB come?"

      "Yes. Did they chop your firewood?"

      "Yes, they did."

      "Okay, now it's your turn to call. I need my vegetable patch plowed.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:We the people ... by aaandre · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I think that the agents would soon figure out that it would be cheaper to start by waterboarding the suspect. In their own bathroom!

  10. Slashdot footer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My EARS are GONE!!

    You shouldn't have dueled in Diablo 2.

  11. what.... by Dyinobal · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see any way this could possibly go wrong!

  12. Police Abuse Videos by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What happens when you upload a video of the police abusing a citizen (assuming you can smuggle your copy out of the situation)? Do they auto-delete or does the spin machine automatically fire up?

    1. Re:Police Abuse Videos by senorpoco · · Score: 1

      after seeing some of the G20 footage I am considering buying a small video camera. There is too much going on that gets hidden or ignored.

    2. Re:Police Abuse Videos by Minwee · · Score: 4

      No, they just send someone over to arrest you for taking photographs of a police officer.

      No spin is necessary as you are clearly a terrorist.

    3. Re:Police Abuse Videos by DaFallus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Someone just needs to start their own YouTube style site specifically for uploading and sharing videos of police brutality, corruption, or any other type of malfeasance. You could search by city, state, names, etc and link it to Google Maps. I think the fallout of such a thing would be interesting to say the least.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    4. Re:Police Abuse Videos by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      Of course spin is necessary. How else are they going to justify their little police angels being treated differently than the regular citizen when there is media coverage?

      If a citizen commits a crime on camera, the news media invariably gets a copy of the footage and, at least in America, blares it all over the evening news, and brings in "experts" to comment on what happened in it, and occasionally brings in a lawyer to talk about what possible legal penalties could be faced. Often, the suspect's face isn't blurred (unless they're under 18, and the only reason for that is that it's the law forced on the media), and people very infrequently refer to the suspect as "the suspect" or "the accused".

      If a police officer commits a crime on camera and the news media does the above, the police department goes ape shit. "You're putting this officer's life in danger because people now know he's a police officer!" "You shouldn't be convicting him in the court of public opinion!" "Until we've done our internal investigation (a time when the officer is on PAID leave, he gets a vacation for breaking the law), we won't comment but stop showing the footage!" Often, the media blurs out the face of the officer, and very often refers to him as "the accused" or "the suspect".

      If media like that is laid out for all to see without commentary, who's going to give the police that special treatment that they so want but don't deserve?

      That leaves them with only one other choice - deleting the footage to protect their superstar thugs.

    5. Re:Police Abuse Videos by Reason58 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They already had something very much like this, Rate My Cop.

      Police complained and GoDaddy pulled the site.

    6. Re:Police Abuse Videos by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Let's try it again then. Anybody willing to put up space for coptube.org? I'll get to work putting the site together. Any dev help is appreciated, too.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  13. cops on crimetube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you submit a video of a cop committing a crime, would they actually do anything about it? Or is that what YouTube is for?

  14. Lawyers Will Love It! by Velska1 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the British are not as lawsuit-happy as Americans, but I'm sure the lawyers still are going to love this.

    Just think all the people, whose faces get inserted into questionable videos. The more rich and famous you are, the more people want to do that to you, and the more likely you are to sue for defamation.

    Unless they really are able to sort the videos out in some meaningful way, that will be a cross between 4chan and Big Brother, in a way that minimizes comedy and maximizes misery.

    --
    Every problem has a solution that is simple, easy and wrong. Selling our Liberty for a little Security is a much too de
  15. Panopticon prison by b0ttle · · Score: 1

    We are getting closer to the panopticon concept.

  16. CopTube by Weedhopper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm more interested in a mobile phone YouTube to report misdeeds and abuses by police officers.

    I say that even though most of my interactions with police officers, even if they haven't been necessarily pleasant due to the circumstances, have been professional. It's just that I've been there and seen enough abuses of authority by bad cops to know that when it does happen, the only thing that's going to help you is video evidence.

    I wish those nine out ten good cops wouldn't cover for that one bad cop.

    1. Re:CopTube by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any "good cop" who covers for a bad cop is a bad cop.

    2. Re:CopTube by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wish those nine out ten good cops wouldn't cover for that one bad cop.

      What makes you think those are nine out of ten good cops, and not just nine out of ten situations where a cop is good? People who often do the wrong thing also sometimes do the right thing. And as the sibling to my comment says, if you're covering for misdeeds of another officer, you are a bad cop. Don't want the label? Quit, or fess up. Don't want to get shot fessing up? That's understandable, but it doesn't make you any less hypocritical, or any better a person.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:CopTube by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      9/10 good and 1/10 bad?

      You are really optimistic. We had a guy die in the airport here after an encounter with the police (Robert Dziekanski). All 4 cops told the same lies in their statements, and all 4 only recanted after they were confronted with a citizens video of what really happened. The cops "borrowed" the video camera, promising to return it, but then refused, and only gave it back after they were threatened with legal action. The cops said they tasered Mr Dziekanski because he attacked them with a stapler, and that they did it twice because he was still standing after the first jolt. The video showed the guy walking away with his hands up, that he was on the ground after the first jolt, and that while he was on the ground they tasered him four more times.

      Without the video the cops statement would have been acccepted as the truth, instead of the self-justifying pack of lies it really was.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    4. Re:CopTube by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I wish those nine out ten good cops wouldn't cover for that one bad cop.

      The thing is, it's that collusion that makes them all bad cops.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    5. Re:CopTube by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      I wrote that because it would be hypocritical of me to condemn all police, in the same way that an officer who assumes wrong might lead to him making a serious mistake.

      I wrote a much longer post, but I skipped it for brevity's sake but the short version is this.

      I believe that cops should be held to a higher standard that the average citizen. To accept a position of authority comes with it the responsibility to wield that authority with moral caution. I also don't buy the argument that cops cannot think of these things because they are doing a dangerous job.

      I give them the benefit of the doubt, because I do understand why they make the choices that they do, even if they are incorrect. Cops are human, just like everyone else. A single mistake doesn't make you a bad cop. On the other hand, there are cops out there who are just plain bad. Decent cops cover for each other because they don't want one bad decision bringing their buddy down. Then again, you cover too much and you're enabling him to continue bad behavior. This is wrong and exists because it's easy to lose sight that a police officer's first duty and function is to society, not the maintenance of social order within the ranks.

      I say this as a former soldier and officer. 11A, if that means anything to you. I see too many police officers who use the rationale of bodily peril to excuse their actions. I've trained with police and sometimes, their mentality and patterns of speech disgust me. If you knew how certain breeds of cops talks behind closed doors, it would frighten you.

      It really bothers me when cops start considering certain groups of citizens as the enemy. They then start considering themselves as "brothers-in-arms" and form the blue wall. No, you are not a soldier. Military justice is harsher and swifter than civilian justice for a reason. It is because the repercussions of a soldier's transgressions can be far reaching. I don't see police misdeeds being corrected as immediately or punished as harshly. In fact, I see a lot of police operating above the law. This is wrong and it needs to be fixed. The system will not do it on its own. The best recourse is citizen awareness and not accepting this.

      There. A much longer winded post that amounts to the same thing as my original post.

    6. Re:CopTube by speedwaystar · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in a mobile phone YouTube to report misdeeds and abuses by police officers.

      I assume you're familiar with this ongoing investigation?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Tomlinson

      If it wasn't for mobile phone cameras, the completely unprovoked police brutality which led to Ian Tomlinson's death would been neatly covered up with a bogus "natural causes" finding.

    7. Re:CopTube by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I give them the benefit of the doubt, because I do understand why they make the choices that they do, even if they are incorrect. Cops are human, just like everyone else. A single mistake doesn't make you a bad cop. On the other hand, there are cops out there who are just plain bad. Decent cops cover for each other because they don't want one bad decision bringing their buddy down. Then again, you cover too much and you're enabling him to continue bad behavior. This is wrong and exists because it's easy to lose sight that a police officer's first duty and function is to society, not the maintenance of social order within the ranks.

      This is the part (the whole paragraph) where I disagree with you. While it contains nuggets of truth (a single mistake doesn't make you a bad cop) it entirely misses the point that a single bad decision made in the full cold light of reason does make you a bad cop if it is permitted to go without correction. The answer might or might not be the same as for any other citizen, but the question does need to be asked. To cover for any transgression is inappropriate. Put simply, if you cannot do your job without following the rules, do something else. As a citizen things are somewhat different, because I am not tasked with enforcing the rules. If I break them it's not inherently hypocritical. And as you say, we need to hold both military and paramilitary to a higher standard than the average citizen. So long as we do otherwise, we simply enshrine bullying.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:CopTube by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Let's do this then. Anyone interested in putting up space for this or helping me develop the site? I'm thinking of stealing your CopTube name (coptube.org?)...

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re:CopTube by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      This is the part (the whole paragraph) where I disagree with you. While it contains nuggets of truth (a single mistake doesn't make you a bad cop) it entirely misses the point that a single bad decision made in the full cold light of reason does make you a bad cop if it is permitted to go without correction. The answer might or might not be the same as for any other citizen, but the question does need to be asked. To cover for any transgression is inappropriate. Put simply, if you cannot do your job without following the rules, do something else. As a citizen things are somewhat different, because I am not tasked with enforcing the rules. If I break them it's not inherently hypocritical. And as you say, we need to hold both military and paramilitary to a higher standard than the average citizen. So long as we do otherwise, we simply enshrine bullying.

      No, I don't believe that you and I disagree.

      I brought this up as an example of incorrect reasoning leading to "backing up" your buddies even when you know he is wrong.

      It is my belief that for those branches of the government that require and/or allow armed personnel to use force, justice should be harsh, swift, and goddamn near unforgiving. If you do something wrong and are found guilty of it, you should be nailed to the motherfucking wall as example to others.

      I believe a mechanism for catching and correcting cops for street level mistakes does not exist, or if it exists, it is dysfunctional or just plain broken.

      We've arrived or are arriving at a point in time where the technology is available not to just be a police state but also a police aware state.

      This is to say, the answer to the question, "Who watches the watchers?" should be clear. Us. The citizens.

      As it should be.

    10. Re:CopTube by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      I was being generous and giving the benefit of doubt. I also didn't want to sound like I was going on an anti-police polemic, particularly because I don't believe all cops are bad.

      On the other hand, there are very few things I hate more than a bad cop. A bad cop is much worse than a common criminal because at least the criminal understands where he stands in relation to the law. A criminal breaks the law. A bad cop uses the law to his own ends, stays above it and destroys trust. His/her betrayal of the public trust and contributions toward the degradation of the public good are insidious and worthy of highest order of contempt.

      That said, by painting all cops with the same brush, you're doing the same thing cops do with blacks/Arabs/Mexicans/protesters/etc. That's hypocrisy.

  17. And that surely will include... by aaandre · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...crimes committed by cops

    Right?

    Right?

    1. Re:And that surely will include... by gaderael · · Score: 1

      Okay, to the nice officers who modded this troll,

      Shouldn't you be out solving crimes instead of reading slashdot?

      --
      Anyone got a light for my sig?
  18. Rather Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a bit pointless, as it will just give the police one more place to check. Some users are still going to upload their video to YouTube and not CopTube, so the police will likely still need to search YouTube for videos.

    What I don't see in the article that would be more useful, is having all videos submitted to CopTube be watchable by the public. Then users get to ridicule the perpetrators and can even help identify some of them. The cops could even post their own surveillance videos that needed identification.

    And, as for this being too Orwellian, I would agree if you were posting videos of your neighbor contemplating a crime, but until cell phone cameras can read minds, I don't see it happening.

    Aero

  19. Report on the cops! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Classic all-time backfires much?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Routine? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Checking YouTube is now a routine part of many police investigations

    I'd bet that checking other kind of *tube sites is more like their daily routines for a part of them.

  21. The nature of people by mraudigy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My concern is that this will turn into citizens adopting a semi-crazed state of vigilantism. In the States where I'm from people around here take the Neighborhood Watch program WAY too seriously -- 24/7 neighborhood patrols in their cars, radio communications, etc. Now that people can upload possible evidence, I can see people taking a fairly innocent concept to a whole new level -- actively looking for "crimes" and recording the footage. And, what about privacy issues? It would only be a matter of time before people start suspecting their neighbots of "crimes" and put 24/7 surveillance on them.

    1. Re:The nature of people by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can see people taking a fairly innocent concept to a whole new level -- actively looking for "crimes" and recording the footage

      Since people are already doing this, I guess you should be able to see it.

      And, what about privacy issues? It would only be a matter of time before people start suspecting their neighbots of "crimes" and put 24/7 surveillance on them.

      The nosy old lady across the street is already doing this, too.

      I can put you under some level of 7x24 surveillance totally legally if I so choose. I won't be able to watch you in your bedroom with the shades drawn, but I'll know if you leave your house and what you're wearing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. CPD by chicago_scott · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this were Chicago the system would eventually become overwhelmed by police crimes.

    1. Re:CPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If this were Chicago the system would eventually become overwhelmed by police crimes.

      Or crimes by your Governor..
      *rim shot*

    2. Re:CPD by chicago_scott · · Score: 1

      They're one in the same. Different heads of the same beast.

  23. Educated Stupid by Millennium · · Score: 4, Funny

    These evil word bastards are perpetuating non-Cubic myth. Only Dr. Gene Ray, wisest human, can possibly understand the depth and importance of this harmonic system with 4 simultaneous days in a single rotation...

    Oh, wait; Crime Tube? Um, err, sorry about that. My bad.

    Man, that sucks.

    1. Re:Educated Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (golf clap)

  24. why a new tube? by castironpigeon · · Score: 1

    If you have something to share, just post it to YouTube. If the police are interested they know where to look.

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
  25. does criminal need to be informed they are taped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont' know about the UK, but I seem to recall something in the USA that doesn't allow video/audio tapes to be used in court unless the defendant knew about the taping.

  26. at last by Chapter80 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I finally have a server that I can store all my snuff films on!

  27. Security Cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the UK already famous for the security cameras on every street corner? I thought that would be enough...

  28. This is fantastic... by dkarma · · Score: 2

    Now when people upload video evidence of police officers committing crimes and the cops delete them there are TWO crimes committed. Something tells me that this is not going to replace youtube any time soon.

  29. Recent Events in Erie by HerbanLegend · · Score: 1

    Here in Erie, PA, recently a cop was filmed off duty in a bar apparently mocking a homicide victim and his family in a rather obnoxious manner. Somebody put it on YouTube, and now the papers are reporting that the police are launching a "probe" to find the naughty poster. Meanwhile the cop is on TV crying. No joke. Cops love it as long as it doesn't cut the other way.

    1. Re:Recent Events in Erie by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      Here in Erie, PA, recently a cop was filmed off duty in a bar apparently mocking a homicide victim and his family in a rather obnoxious manner. Somebody put it on YouTube, and now the papers are reporting that the police are launching a "probe" to find the naughty poster. Meanwhile the cop is on TV crying. No joke. Cops love it as long as it doesn't cut the other way.

      Ya probably don't want to link to it either, or you could get into big trouble.

  30. Forget about uploads ... by Syncerus · · Score: 1

    What about downloads? Does this mean we can watch every crime ever filmed? That would beat the heck out of COPS.

    Youtube better watch out.

    --
    "Man is nothing without the works of man" -- Helvetius
    1. Re:Forget about uploads ... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      > Youtube better watch out.

      Youtube better not cry,
      Youtube better not pout,
      I'm telling you why:
      Crimetube COPS is coming to town.

  31. Little Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what will happen to the system when the police are the subject of these videos? Should I be concerned with retaliation? Will submission be anonymous? Will this be an opportunity for the proverbial 'Little Brother' to force the police to see what they are doing? Or just a place for photo-shopped blackmail?

  32. Re:does criminal need to be informed they are tape by mikael · · Score: 1

    In the UK, a CCTV recording is only admissable if it has the date/time written on the video.

    Most places with video cameras have "CCTV system in use" signs on the windows. There was also a case in the South coast of England where a home owner was being harassed by kids in his neighborhood (they were throwing stones at his windows and vandalising his car). He installed a CCTV system to record the activity, then after catching the crime happening, he checked the video then called the police. The officers came to his house, asked if he had viewed the tape, then said they couldn't use it as "he had tampered with the evidence".

    Another time, a disabled resident who had a similar problem with kids and his disability adapted car and put up a CCTV system without planning permission, was sent a notice by the council to remove the CCTV system. He did so, and his car was vandalised that night.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  33. !TimeCube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read crime tube as Time Cube on the first pass.

    1. Re:!TimeCube by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

      You aren't the only one

  34. But who watches the watchers? by migla · · Score: 1

    Aren't they going to make it illegal to film cops (or was that Germany or did I dream it?)? Do the cops get to solve two crimes if one uploads a video of a cop breaking the law?

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  35. Isn't this likely to get your phone seized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like a good way for your phone to end up as evidence instead of in your possession.

  36. Bad Driver Camera? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 0

    I've been wanting to put a camera in my car, and record people driving like drunken morons during my commute. I'd love to have a forum to post this kinda stuff, and even better if the police do something about it. Bug reports for the neighborhood. People need to be shamed into driving better. Or shot.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Bad Driver Camera? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      There used to be a driving wall of shame...

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  37. Missing tag: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    nationoffinks

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Missing tag: by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      People like you are the reason crime is rampant.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Missing tag: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      People like you are the reason civilisation is doomed.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    3. Re:Missing tag: by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I hope someone you love is shot dead in front of witnesses and the killer is never found because no one wants to be a "fink" or "snitch".

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  38. Orwell spinning in his grave? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...watch your view counter spin like Orwell in his grave.

    You may need to gear it down and use a tachometer. I understand he's starting to fly apart in there.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Orwell spinning in his grave? by max99ted · · Score: 2, Funny

      I understand he's starting to fly apart in there

      "Fly him apart then!!"

      --

      Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

  39. RIP Orwell by torvik · · Score: 1

    You warned us this would happen.

  40. Seinfeld and The Good Samaritan Law by xquark · · Score: 1

    Does no one remember the trouble those guys go into in their last episode...?

    --
    Arash Partow's Philosophy: Be a person who knows what they don't know, and not a person who doesn't know.
  41. Nothing is in isolation by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Arguments like yours seem not well thought out to me. Yes you could frame him for a crime. Hell, why not shoot a few people and leave the smoking gun in his garage too?

    Well I'll tell you why, because police actually INVESTIGATE a crime. They aren't going to look at one video or piece of evidence, throw him in jail, and call it a day. They are going to look at all the evidence as a body to see what fits...

    So what happens when the evidence YOU submitted turns out to be the only information that doesn't mesh with everything else they have collected? They are going to come asking you some tough questions, and if you really tried to frame someone I hope you like sharing rooms with rough men because that's where you are headed.

    There's a reason in the past why people generally don't try to make up evidence and video is no exception. Personally I think it's great that people can submit video to help catch criminals if they are too concerned about personal safety to get involved. Wouldn't you rather have user submitted videos of crime submitted by real people than have monitoring cameras everywhere "just in case?". I lean on the side of trusting people in an area to say "hey, there's a problem here".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Nothing is in isolation by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well I'll tell you why, because police actually INVESTIGATE a crime.

      I'd like to know where this mythical place is where police are both sufficiently funded, and incorruptible.

      (Maybe you've been watching too much CSI:NY?)

    2. Re:Nothing is in isolation by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      and if you really tried to frame someone I hope you like sharing rooms with rough men because that's where you are headed.

      Dear Sir,

      I wish to complain in the strongest possible terms, about the comment which you have just submitted about the rough men that are frightening to be in the same room with.
      Many of my best friends are rough men, and only a few of them are transvestites.

      Yours faithfully,

      Brigadier Sir Charles Arthur
      Strong (Mrs)

      P.S.: I have never kissed the editor of TFA.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Nothing is in isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In communist Romania, people were encouraged to tell on each other's ... "nefarious" activities, so that any behavior that falls outside of the imposed norm would be "discouraged". It will happen to you too, and to us all over again, since we are now brethren, right?

    4. Re:Nothing is in isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'll tell you why, because police actually INVESTIGATE a crime. They aren't going to look at one video or piece of evidence, throw him in jail, and call it a day. They are going to look at all the evidence as a body to see what fits...

      Obviously you've never reported a crime in the UK. Usual process is
      * You call the police to report a crime
      * They tell you that someone will get back to you to take a statement
      * 2 days later, you get a phone call from some bored sounding officer. They take a statement over the phone, and contact details for any other witnesses.
      * 2 weeks later, you get a phone call saying they're closing the case due to lack of evidence
      * Checking with the other witnesses, the police never got in contact.
      * Another 2 weeks later, you get a phone call from the police asking how you'd rate their services.

    5. Re:Nothing is in isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'll tell you why, because police actually INVESTIGATE a crime. They aren't going to look at one video or piece of evidence, throw him in jail, and call it a day.

      Clearly, you have never dealt with the police.

      I lean on the side of trusting people in an area to say "hey, there's a problem here".

      Wow, that's so shockingly naive. Trusting people, especially when it comes to policing, is the worst mistake you will ever make. Try listening in on a conversation between "normal" people about how prisons should be run. You'll find that the "normal" people take quite a barbaric view(I'm talking 'let's feed them to the lions' ala Ancient Rome type of thining) and tend to view "criminals" as less than human and assume everyone in prison is guilty.

      If a police officer goes around questioning a person's neighbour about the person and giving them the impression that they've committed a crime then the neighbour will more than try to find something about that person that was a real clue that they were a crook because they want to believe that as a "normal" "upstanding" person that they can recognise a "scumbag" a mile away. If that person is unlucky enough to normally behave in a way that most people view as odd then their neighbours will crucify them for the police because "normal" people abhor anyone different.

      FYI, most people here on Slashdot would qualify as "odd" in the view of most "normal" people. Not gossiping and spreading rumours about people is viewed as very strange indeed. Not constantly socialising means you must be a terrorist.

    6. Re:Nothing is in isolation by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      But the other option is that you serially create evidence (including, but not limited to video) that indicates that *you* did something. Cry wolf a dozen times this way, then do something for real with some of the same style of created evidence.

      I can see a whole genre for high school and college students to try to create videos that cause the police to run around in circles.

      As to shots of the police breaking their own laws: Those get uploaded to youtube, or perhaps someone will create gedankenpolitzie.org (thought police) as a host site for such vids. (Maybe wikileaks would host it...)

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    7. Re:Nothing is in isolation by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know where this mythical place is where police are both sufficiently funded, and incorruptible.

      I don't know of any such place, which is why user submitted video of a crime in progress seems like such a damn good idea. Fewer use of police funds for cameras, and if it's multiple real citizens on the street taking footage you can be more sure the police were not involved in crafting it.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re:Nothing is in isolation by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you have never dealt with the police.

      I've certainly not dealt with the imaginary police you fear. I know a few police officers personally and have a little secret for you - they are actually people.

      If that person is unlucky enough to normally behave in a way that most people view as odd then their neighbours will crucify them for the police because "normal" people abhor anyone different.

      *cough*tinfoilhatter*cough*

      I certainly behave far from "normally". But I'm smart enough to know that actually doesn't matter to police at all.

      You just wanted to rant about police I guess since you seem to have no point about video per-se. What I'll add is that if you are someone not "normal" and freaked out with irrational fear of the police, it's far better for you if you have someone who has recorded the actual crime showing it was not you who committed it. Just a thought there.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. Private in Public? by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    And, what about privacy issues?

    It boggles my mind when people out in Public expect everything they do should be Private.

    If someone started recording my home 24/7 I'd say - thanks for taking on the expense of extra security footage, sucker.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. Lets be honest by cwiegmann24 · · Score: 1

    Do you think that Cops are on Youtube "doing research?" I mean really.

  45. This is what makes America great by dbc · · Score: 1

    In England, they've spent loads of taxpayer money to carpet the country with video cameras. Here in the good old US of A, we leverage the network effect by spying on each other. Much less cost to the taxpayer.

  46. Hypocrisy in action by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Film a cop abusing his authority or breaking the law and post said film and one is a hero.
    Film a criminal breaking the law and post said film and one is a fink, or snitch, or any of a dozen other insults.

    Have you all forgotten

    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

    Yet, you would have bystanders do nothing while crimes are committed, then you cry about the crime rate.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  47. And who owms the copyrights...? by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    I bet the submitter releases all rights to the material as part of this deal. In a sense that's sorta ok, but if you don't own the rights anymore, you can't use the material to make a big fuss independently if the material is ignored.

    I also bet that the rights are not grabbed is not the case if the material is from the press. 'cos the press are savvy are copyright.

    1. Re:And who owms the copyrights...? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      You probably do lose rights to it, but you can't have your right to report crime taken away from you.

      It would be like signing a contract that says, "All illegal activities you may witness on site can not be reported, under penalty of death" with a private company.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:And who owms the copyrights...? by shentino · · Score: 1

      If you're in the mob, they even spare you the trouble of signing the contract yourself.

  48. Move Along by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 1

    Sorry, nothing like that in our database. Nothing to see here. Move along.

  49. blair witch project and Cloverfield much? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    Anyone with any sort of film SFX training can fake the hell out of something and make it look realistic. It's especially easy if you took a real video and then added some CG or other alterations then sampled it down to cameraphone quality. It'd look perfect. You could easily make it look like a gun that was being pointed at someone fire even though it never did. Add a little flash overlay and a sound effect with a filter to make it sound camera phone-like and tada, you've just been shot it. In fact, it'd be simple to add the gun to an empty hand too. This is pretty ridiculous.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  50. I will never forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My worst experience with a police officer. It was very bad and I cannot and will not go into details. The police are power-fucking-mad. The best use of this tool would absolutely be to report crimes committed BY police, even though the chances of them arresting and prosecuting one of their own is slim to none.

    I learned a long time ago not to argue with a cop because they WILL USE WHATEVER FORCE NECESSARY TO OBTAIN 100% COMPLIANCE AND ESTABLISH THEIR DOMINANCE (RIGHT OR WRONG).

    I fear the police. Not because I broke any laws. I did not. Not because I am a criminal. I am not.

    I fear them because they are power mad mother fuckers who will beat you to within an inch of your death, perhaps even kill you, simply to get you to submit to their authority or just because you pissed them off by questioning that authority.

    There is a reason police have a higher incidence of spousal abuse than the general population. Studies have shown more than 64% of officers in their 20s have committed domestic violence and that, if you're being conservative, 41% of all police officers commit abuse but that the number could easily be over 50%.

    Yes, this means most police officers are wife beaters. Spineless pricks who love to beat the shit out of people weaker than they are to prove they're stronger and to feel better about themselves. I suppose kicking the crap out of kids, weaklings, and women makes you feel like a man...if you're a cop.

    Fuck the police.

    1. Re:I will never forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is pretty much common sense to not say shit to an officer and follow their instructions to the letter; anything you say could be used against you and not following their directions could be construed as resisting. I don't know where you get your numbers from or if they are valid, but I could understand that being the case. If you've got to deal with violent scumbags all day long it must be hard to turn it off when you go home. That doesn't excuse it, obviously, but perhaps it helps explain it.

    2. Re:I will never forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is common sense only because you have to expect them to beat the shit out of you if you don't comply. But there's something fundamentally wrong with that.

      I got my numbers via google search. Found several articles referencing studies with those numbers.

      It has nothing to do with dealing with violent scumbags all day long. It as a lot to do with the job being attractive to people who desire authority, control, and power. It is only natural that police would be so much more likely to be abusers than your average man on the street because abuse is mostly about control.

      Claiming it has anything to do with the job excuses it and takes the focus off of the real problem: the police themselves are power-hungry control freaks. I stand by my original assessment and say again:

      Fuck the police.

  51. Oh, good by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    I for one can't wait to see all the G20 videos up there for extensive public analysis.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  52. Mod parent up please by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    What exactly is wrong with reporting a crime that your neighbor did?

    I'm glad I'm not the only person here who understands that, sometimes, people who are reported to the police find themselves in that position because they've committed a crime.

    I'm also glad that most of the population of /. seems to live in crime-free areas where the only offense ever committed is the illegal downloading of a bit of music. Other people in this world have more serious problems to deal with and actually need to be able to report crime to the police.

    Here is the news: Crime happens, and when it does it needs to be dealt with. Dealing with crime does not make one an Orwellian/big brother/Stasi/thought police/ninja stormtrooper. It makes you a responsible citizen.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  53. The Perfect Alibi by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 1

    I couldn't have been the masked robber of that liquor store. Right here on CopTube is a video of me littering 10 miles away at that moment!

    --
    Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
  54. Can we have this in the US... for my sheriff? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

    Can we have this in the US, for my local sheriff's office? They like to speed near the park where the kids play. Sure, it's a 40 mph zone, and kids have some self responsibility, but 55 with no lights? When they ticket at 45? They also like to run the stop sign next to the school where the drunk driver's insurance company got to replace their brick wall and most of their furniture. If they think it's a yield sign for them, then maybe they can back off on ticketing my neighbors?

    When I come from, law enforcement was held to a higher standard. Old men could sit on their lawns shaking their canes at "kids these days". These days, the kids who aren't inside playing on their Nintendo PlayBox3s would probably report me to Homeland Security for even owning a cane.

  55. Re:Checks & Balances? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    -1 1840 called. They want their faith in due process back. Please send by horse courier.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  56. Re:1840 by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Telegrammed? Wrote a letter? Send me to the first circle of hell where people who Invoked the Past mistimed the year.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  57. Wifi streaming video camera? by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there a such a thing as a wireless streaming video camera? Then if you happen to film the cops in some sort of dubious behavior, you can hand over the camera like a good little citizen when the cops ask for it, knowing that the video is safe on a server somewhere miles away?

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    1. Re:Wifi streaming video camera? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Yes, they exist. But they're mostly sold to perverts to spy on people in bathrooms/bedrooms.

      You could set some up in your car to stream to a storage system hidden somewhere in your car. Just be prepared to be beaten to a pulp and possibly never see your car again if they find out you're recording them without their knowledge.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:Wifi streaming video camera? by finkployd · · Score: 1

      http://itookthisonmyphone.com/

      http://qik.com/

      There are probably some others, but these are the two I have messed with.

  58. Tubes everywhere by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Apparently the Internet is a bunch of tubes, dudes.

  59. Police = Not a Dangerous Occupation by onkelonkel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know how we ever got the idea that police work is particularly dangerous. (Wait...yes I do...from the police!). Police work isn't even in the top 10 most dangerous occupations. Death rate for Loggers about 95 per 100,000 per year, pilots about 90, steel workers about 50. Police are about 6 per 100,000. Only about 1/2 of the police deaths are due to encounters with violent criminals, the rest are things like traffic accidents and heart attacks. We don't condone brutality on citizens by garbage collectors, and their job is 5 times as dangerous as the police.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  60. Awesome!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you can inform on your family and neighbors!!! Schweet!

  61. I Hope They Have A Naming Contest by Dreadneck · · Score: 1

    I propose calling the site SnitchTube.

    "Nothing makes a tyrant's job easier than the people policing themselves."

    --
    Power does not corrupt - power attracts the corrupt.
    1. Re:I Hope They Have A Naming Contest by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I propose calling the site SnitchTube.

      "Nothing makes a tyrant's job easier than the people policing themselves."

      Reminds me of school. The people who used words like 'snitching' and were most upset about it were the bullies who liked to kick the crap out of kids smaller than themselves and thought they had the right to be protected from the consequences by some honor code that stops people from reporting any wrongdoing.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:I Hope They Have A Naming Contest by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Despite my glib response, I agree that it could be useful. However, the worry is that it will go from a useful tool to a way to ferret out "undesirables". Once people become used to the idea that they can and should report on every little incident, it only takes a few incremental changes in the law and social mores before we go from a free society with an open reporting tool, to an oppressive one.

      Yes, I realize that I am essentially invoking a slippery slope; I'm not saying that it must happen, only that it is a possibility. And that possibility is worrying. Part of the reason it is worrying is the history behind such pushes to have the whole society work as informers. The Stasi was not some mythical, made up group, it was a very concerted effort to oppress a populous at large. The KGB are not fictional, they are quite real and also relied on a nation of informers. In the US, McCarthyism demonstrated that even the US is not immune to this type of problem. Anytime we start talking about becoming a nation of informers, we need to look critically at why we are doing it, and if it is really a good idea.

      Personally, I'd be much more comfortable with a push to convince people to get involved with taking care of their society. As in your example a couple levels up: Don't sit there and video tape someone getting the crap beaten out of them. Pull out your legally carried .45 and politely ask the thugs to leave off. If they seem resistant to the idea give them two warning shots to the chest and ask again.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    3. Re:I Hope They Have A Naming Contest by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      'Every little incident?' Where does it say that we have to report 'every little incident?'

      I mean, what's it going to be next? Abolishing the police in case they abuse their powers and become the Stasi?

      This initiative is quite clearly aimed at fighting crime, not spying on left wing groups in case they say something the government disagrees with.

      As for your vigilante solution of getting people to carry weapons and take the law into their own hands, goodness knows where you're getting that straw man / slippery slope from. I'd be inclined to suspect that you're only kidding, but given some of the bizarre posts I've seen on here over the years from Americans concerning guns, I'm not sure what to think. (I refer to the serious support I got for a sarcastic proposal I made to make air travel 'safer' by allowing passengers to carry guns into the cabin. No, really.)

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    4. Re:I Hope They Have A Naming Contest by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Every little incident?' Where does it say that we have to report 'every little incident?'

      I mean, what's it going to be next? Abolishing the police in case they abuse their powers and become the Stasi?

      This initiative is quite clearly aimed at fighting crime, not spying on left wing groups in case they say something the government disagrees with.


      As I said, I will agree that the initial goal is good, but it is not a question of what it is supposed to be used for, but a question of what it will be used for. Government programs like this have a history of being abused. People don't remember the Stasi, the KGB, and other such groups because they were great works of fiction. Tell me, what guarantees can be provided that this will not happen? That this will not be used as a method of creating a massive informer network on undesirables?

      I think there may also be a difference in the way we view this based on culture. I am guessing from your that you are from the UK. I don't mean this other than to try and sort out where our differences in opinion come from. For me (in the US) this type of program smacks of McCarthyism. It immediately conjures to mind the types of witch hunts which were conducted to root out Communism in the US. Given the US Governments recent history, I more concerned about the US Government holding people indefinitely, without charges, than I am the off chance that I will die in a terrorist attack. Quite frankly, the odds of me being killed in a terror attack are so small compared to the chance that I will be killed in an car accident that I'm willing to stick with the status quo. I know that I may sound like the odd man out, but the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York didn't change much for me. Yes, it confirmed that there are people in the world who hate me and would kill me just for being an American and supporting the US Government, so what?

      Terrorism, and the War on Terror are just the latest red herrings to get people to give up their rights and ignore what their governments are doing. We don't need to become a society of informers, we do not need a surveillance society. In fact, that is the last thing we need. Free speech doesn't work when people begin to self-censor out of fear of reprisal. Without free speech, free thought cannot survive. It is far better to accept that a free society has inherent risks. There are people who will abuse those freedoms to commit crimes, possibly terrible ones. That is not a reason to set about destroying the roots of that freedom. It simply means that we must each keep our eyes open to possible threats and respond to them at the time they happen, not sit idly by while those crimes are committed and hope that some magical force will arrive and save us. They won't, they can't.

      It is physically impossible for the police to be everywhere at once. They are a reactive force, and can only to react to a crime in progress either by that crime taking so long to commit that the police have plenty of time to show up, or by serendipity. The real first responders are the people who are on site when the crime happens. If they are unable or unwilling to do anything, the criminal is likely to be successful, with the hope that the police manage to catch them after the fact. Sure, at that point a video might be useful, but some basic police work at the crime scene should be able to find that much.

      Again, I just don't see this type of tool as ultimately useful beyond creating a society of informers and as a further way to weed out undesirables.

      As for your vigilante solution of getting people to carry weapons and take the law into their own hands, goodness knows where you're getting that straw man / slippery slope from. I'd be inclined to suspect that you're only kidding, but given some of the bizarre posts I've seen on here over the years from Americans concerning guns, I'm not sure what to think. (I refer to the serious support I got for a sarcastic proposal I made to

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  62. continue to be uploaded to.... by Animaether · · Score: 1

    ...youtube? wikileaks? vimeo?

    heck, I dunno, maybe you'll risk harassment from your local corrupt cops (if any, I'll just presume the worst here) and start up your own site... www.badcoptube.com or somesuch, and accept -only- videos of cops violating laws. I'm sure you could make a mint.

    I would very much simply assume that any videos they do not want to investigate - whatever the content - will simply be deleted. I also assume that they will not be posting these videos immediately after upload (after all, if you take a video of some corpse and that gets published all over the place before the family is notified, that would be some manner of suckage that the dept responsible for the site would have to answer for).

    So I don't see why anybody would even bother to use -this- service to upload videos of bad cops.. or, rather, this service -exclusively-.

    I thought movies taught people as much.. "if something happens to me, you should know that 3 copies were also sent to major news outlets, blabla".

  63. Orwell and Brin by MyrddinBach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nothing is new under the sun...

    Orwell of course predicted this type of thing but not quite in the same way. Had he lived a bit longer I'm sure he would have extrapolated emerging technologies to this sort of thing - videotaping people and sending it in.

    David Brin did exactly that in his novel Earth. Before the onset of the WWW and when the internet was still in its infancy he extrapolated and predicted people wearing special glasses that could record everything. If they witnessed a crime they could then easily upload the video to the proper authorities with incredible ease.

  64. sure: a cell phone by speedtux · · Score: 1

    You can use Nokia or Windows mobile with ustream.tv or qik.com. I think they both do live broadcasting and they record the video.

    If you happen to be in range of Wifi, they can use that, but they also work over 3G.

  65. Wrong name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, the CrimeTube is a playon YouTube. They should have called it YouRat.

  66. How are they sorting? by Vertana · · Score: 1

    I live in the US, but what if I like to be an extra jackass and video tape US officers doing stupid things? I just proxy through the UK and post? Would they really come after me for something so trivial overseas? What if there are 50 people just like me, flooding the site with these videos? This idea won't last much longer, it was just something so the PR people didn't lose their jobs. Awesome! Now you just have to stop all the false videos filed under false pretenses! *stifles giggle*

    --
    "The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec^2" -Marcus Dolengo
  67. Gestapo by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    police actually INVESTIGATE a crime. They aren't going to look at one video or piece of evidence, throw him in jail, and call it a day.

    You might find that's exactly what they do. Police have been known to chase people through London and shoot them dead based on totally incorrect assumptions.

    Besides, the point here, it seems to me, is that the system is approaching that of Nazi Germany, where neighbors were encouraged to spy on each other, and report each other, and so no one felt safe, and anyone could be picked up for interrogation even when they had done nothing wrong... except, perhaps, offend a neighbor, or be unusual in some way.

    I wonder how long it'll be before a brain-drain occurs in the UK, with sane people who don't like this sort of abuse of liberty moving to other countries.

    "80% of all Gestapo investigations were started in response to information provided by denunciations by "ordinary" Germans; while 10% were started in response in to information provided by other branches of the German government and another 10% started in response to information that the Gestapo itself unearthed" -- from Wikipedia's Gestapo article.

  68. right by moxley · · Score: 1

    So that the police get the evidence before the press and can cover up and prepare spin before the masses see it (if they ever see it)?

    I thought they had some "it's illegal to video police" bullshit "anti-terror" law over there anyway - what, you upload it and they come and arrest you on trumped up terror charges?

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. He's not the only one that could get in trouble by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Gene Simmons (KISS): Christine Sixteen
    Is different than the actions of the homeless man in Aqualung, but still just as illegal (is that a problem, that the two are viewed the same legally)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  71. Yes, but when the tables are turned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cops REALLY HATE to be on the video themselves....

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CEFAifA1vY&feature=channel

      It really remind me of Soviet Russia...but it is happening in USA.

  72. And maybe you been reading the internet to much by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a group of people who have taken healthy paranoid delusion and turned it into something sick and twisted. The GP is so far gone that thanks to the curved universe he is coming back from the other side.

    Recently in the Netherlands we had a case that seemed a bit like his example. A call was made warning about an upcoming terrorist attack. The police investigated the alledged bombers and decided, based on their criminal record, to arrest them. Turns out, it wasn't a real call. Much crying by the lefties (who conveniently forgot that the entire family involved had an extensive criminal record) about how innocent people could be harassed like this.

    Here is a hint: THAT IS HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS!

    The police has the power and for that matter needs the power, to arrest people while investigating crimes EVEN if they are not yet 100% absolutely sure the person is guilty, even following suspicious information. It is part of how the system works. Sucks if you are the one being grinded up by its gears but over thousands of years of civilization, this is the best we found so far. Only in La-La land can the police only arrest 100% guilty people with absolutely no invasion of anyones privacy.

    The idea of using videos made by the public to solve crimes seems near perfect to me. Sure, some will try to frame others with it. Women are not unknown to on occasion report false rape. Does that mean you don't allow any rape charges because someone might be investigated not just for something they didn't do, but for something that didn't happen? Of course not.

    As for photoshopping, the police ain't all that stupid. Sure they make mistakes and we read about them all the time. That again shows the system works. I would be a far more worried if I lived in a society where I never read about the police screwing up badly. That would scare me. If I see a person coming out of jail after a decade for being wrongly convicted I see a system that works. Slow, but works. Convince me there is an other system that would work better.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  73. Timeframe by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Why does it take 2 months 3 weeks to fire corrupt morons?
    Oh yeah, corrupt unions. :P

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  74. Coincidence? by kinarduk · · Score: 1

    Funny how this story follows the one about the UK governments commitment to provide 2mb broadband to the whole of the country.

  75. I look forward to the imminent videos by Patch86 · · Score: 1

    of Police officers beating people to death with batons at protests.

    How long do you think the website will last with that sort of gold?

  76. Awsome by Yogiz · · Score: 1

    What's next? Crimespace - a place for criminals?

  77. Translaton by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In communist Romania, people were encouraged to tell on each other's ... "nefarious" activities, so that any behavior that falls outside of the imposed norm would be "discouraged".

    So to translate, you are saying that because a hammer can kill someone we should ban all hammers.

    Never confuse the tool with the users. And never ban a good tool because of fear, instead make sure the users of the tools behave.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley