America have bill of rights --> but inofficially it isn't worth a cent democratic elections --> sure... as democratic as east germany in the '70s ethnic diversity --> other words for "no culture" *g* root name servers --> actually in the eyes of nearly the whole word, this is a bad thing for america Google, Microsoft, Cisco, Apple.... --> so you count companies as something good. guess what. other cultures exist where industry feudalism actually is seen as something bad.
just to remember you what "the rest of the world" (that does not have such a massive FUD-feeding) is seeing...
by the way: i don't think chinese government is better. i think they are somewhat on the same level.
and finally i think government is something bad by definition: poeple ruling over other poeple. this is absurd, because the dominance of humans on this planet - as a result of the rules of evolution - prove that humans always worked mainly for themselves. because of course everyone (read "every body and/or mind entity") wo is helping others more than himself - so that he has not enough success to influence the world - will extinct.
Have you ever seen what a bloat xml is?;) First it has a very damn bad information density. Normally you can compress it by 90%. This is because of the descriptive tags and end tags. Fine for humans, but a night mare for computers. Additionally parsing xml is pretty slow compared to optimized binary file formats.
There is a very good way to get both: Use EBML. It's like XML but with binary tags. every tag is a short numeric value. (the only ting that's probably slow here is the variable-length encoding of tag-ids. but this could be left out.) Then you could have a 2-column list association ids to human-readable names and there you go...
I already wrote a fixed-with ebml-parser and -encoder in javascript (in form of a stream) and php for fast communication instead of XML-requests. It works great, and i even added a transparent Rijndael-encription-stream in between so it is encrypted when it's needed. It's pretty fast too. It even serialies and deserializes php- and javascript-objects, arrays, or simple values. So i don't have to use the stupid DOM but i have a cute object to work with.
NO, IE 7 STILL is the old shitty core inside. It's the same patchwork as Windows ME. New stuff outside, same crap inside. (Here even XHTML+CSS2 support counts for "outside")
That is because you'll still have INTENTIONALLY build-in incompatibilities to lock out competitors. Any to anyone who does think that this is okay: PLEASE let me get to your freak list!;P
Hmm... i think the main pros and cons look like this:
Where Opera is better: - extremely fast page rendering. if you think firefox is fast, i have something for you: in opera the only way to see that you just reloaded a page is by seeing other banners on the page. (so with an adblocker you'll ask yourself: did it really reload right now?)
this makes the "rocker"-gestures much better: you can easily go "right mouse button down, left mouse button click-click-click-click-click-click-click-click, left mouse button release" in a mad speed without any problems. try this in firefox. it most times does not recognize the release of the right button or do something mad like zooming images when you click on them. - everything inside. somewhat like the mozilla suite. but primailiy focused on users, not developers. - many funtions that you can get as en extension in firefox came from opera (even tabbed browsing). and i think opera got it right, while many copies in firefox aren't that great. they're just not that mature in things of usability. - no interpreting layer for the ui. - renderer not as bloated and chaotic as gecko.
Where firefox is better: - many more extensions for every thing you could think of. very easily extensible. - cleaner and better standards support. more technologies implemented. - very good web-developers support with venkman, webdev toolbar, dom inspector, css-inplace-editor and whatever you can think of. - truly open source. modify it if you like (an can!;).
So in the end there is no "best" browser. I'm using Firefox as my development browser and Opera as my "normal user" browser for exactly the reasons stated above. At the end this is no war.
The only thing i would wish for is: Firefox: - Do a complete rewrite of Gecko. This time CLEAN PLEASE! - GTFO those stupid tons of layers of between the ui and the cpu. XML always was a pretty stupid idea for on-the-fly usage and will always be. At least you could create an on-the-fly compilation if the xml- and js-files changed, and then use the compiled modules.
And if you don't move out when the door goes open and wait until it closes again without sitting down......well, you certanly don't want to experience this!;)
haskell - as i said - seems to have the main target on functional programming. I don't think something out there can beat that strictness. For many jobs it even feels to strict. (or using its non-functionals part (monads) does feel too dirty...;)
Your second paragraph makes not much sense because like the great-grandparent post you place statements on the room, but you don't add any arguments why you think it's that way. That way you can't convince anyone. Such statements only work for poeple who let you coax themselves.;) I don't know if you intentionally left the arguments away because you knew it was not that right, because you thought it's a paradigm, or because of something else, but when you want to be taken seriously: add arguments (preferably based on paradigms or previous statements that where based on paradigms).
To come back to your statements:
> Unfortunately, even compiled FL cannot compete with structural ones, because FL are from a different class of languages by definition (see lambda calculus versus turing machines).
What i'm missing here is the reason, why being able to compete implies that the languages have to be from the same class. (Argument [real world example]:) I can easily compare them. I take a set of the best implementation of often used problems on those languages, run them N times and measure time and space usage. Then i can take the one with the lowest numbers in the area that is most important to me.
... I *do* like ocaml. Especially as a replacement for C/C++. So i'm even planning to use it for games (has opengl and sdl support.)
But every language has its purpose. And ocaml is more targeted on a fast next-generation language for everything, while haskell wants to be the perfectionist.
And i guess this job is a perfectionist's job.
Use Ocaml where speed really matters and C is too outdated for you.;)
You make a statement but don't say why. Because i like haskell too (still a beginner in haskell), nut i also don't really understand the bad thing inside his statement...
Is it because haskell is the only really type-safe and purely functional thing out there? (I'm not so sure that this is even true)
Please enlighten us, oh great master lambda of curry!;)
Write some wrappers for haskell and then use haskell's fully deterministic type-safe behaviour in the right way. Then logically *prove* that your deterministic code does what it should. Now you only have to worry about the non-deterministic part. So keep it as small as possible under any circumstances!!!
Then be sure to modularize your code in a way that allows runtime replacement (of parts where you forgot some exceptional possibility a by fully proven and unit-tested new module) for that case of some problem, that *WILL* happen (but will not be a problem if you work that way)!
If you can't use haskell in *any* way, try to create fully deterministic and type-safe (think *micromanagement*) code WITHOUT state-dependend objects for everything where you would use haskell.
I've some pretty advanced design patterns here, but i can't draw them right in here....
I guess you got modded offtopic because poeple did not understand that you meant that creating a debate is exactly what those ID-idiots want, and that there is no debate, because only one of them two sides is a theory and only one side is provable. PERIOD.
So even *talking* about ID is pretty damn stupid. It's not worth thinking of it for more more second for everyone with half a brain. (Of course this only makes sense to poeple with at least half a brain. But how a wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. First he'll drag you down to his level, and then he beats you with experience")
I repeated the core problem of all this often enough: The more poeple we are, the less intelligent every single being has to be. And the industry plus the "not caring, but complaining" mentality resulting from this are the motor that accelerates it even more via a feedbaack loop.
"Whenever a controversial law is proposed, and its supporters, when confronted with an egregious abuse it would permit, use a phrase along the lines of 'Perhaps in theory, but the law would never be applied in that way' - they're lying. They intend to use the law that way as early and as often as possible."
Okay, i have a web server out there. So i'll create an encrypted tunnel from here to my webserver and to "industry planners" this looks like one single commection.
FACE IT, "industry planners"/MPAA/RIAA: Poeple will *always* fild a trick around it if they want to. It's one of the most basic principles of being a human to find solutions for problems (if they suck enough).
And guess what's: There'S an ultimate solution for us, but not for you: We can live *without* your products. We can for example make our own net out of interconnected wlan nodes.
And most of all: What idiot invented the idea that the more you threat your customers like crap, the more cash you'll earn? Oh, well... maybe it was the same one who recognized that his customers were that stupid that they would accept that threatment.
And who made them that stupid? I guess(!) it became pretty easy to survive, in a world with products that even a baby with half a brain could use perfectly and where the advancement you get (from the state or from poeple) is directly proportional to your incompetence to survive. (instead of how valuable you are for those who give it to you) In other words: Regenerative inverse evolution made them that stupid.
So i only can quote another slashdot user: "Pull the warning labels off of everything, and let the problem solve itself." (if i remember it correctly)
Well... Now we possibly get to the core: Why do we have this inverse evolution? I guess mainly because of two things: C1. Companys live for the profit. Only for the profit. They get nothing for caring for their customers because poeple still buy if they don't care. C2. Somhow poeple began to confuse supporting the biggest losers in town with being social. Really being social means helping those that are valuabe for us, and for those who are valuabe for us. Right? Simple example: If someone living on the street asks for money: Check if he's woth the dollar before giving it to him.
So how do we solve those two problems? (I ask you too!) S1. We have to make the price of a product its worth again. So poeple have to realize what it's worth. For example they shoud have the possibility to buy in another place if the company or their product sucks. Nowadays they can't really do that because all companys of one sector normally have the same terms and conditions, like if they were a cartel. So you can ony get out fo the frying pan into the fire.
Okay. Now this seems to be the core problem: In poeple don't care anymore. Not if they get dupered and not if poeple are valuable to them.
And i only call this the core problem because i'm stuck with solutions here...
Hmm... you know... I eally whished that they make a good browser. Because in the end i'm not the one who will hate ms because they are ms, but because of what they do and have done. If they start to only do wonderul things i will slowly start to love them.
But... well... i guess i have to continue whishing.:( (Is there a chance that they quickly fix the problems until it goes final or until 7.1?;)
P.S: Compared to my post you don't have to call yours "harsh", do you? *g*
Okay, I'm sorry for saying they are stupid because they don't care. Everyone has its priorities.
But i think not caring has its limits. Things like not caring if someone dies is an extreme example. It even gets more complicated when someone really *deserves* to die in the eyes of everyone you know - including you.
So to get back to the general problem, where the popularity of the IE is just one result of it:
It is simply out of my mind, why poeple complain about their "computers" (mostly meaning crappy software) *every* day, say that they have so much problems with it, say they now can save the work that they did not have to do before they had a computer,
and STILL don't care and accept the situation blindly.
So in the core of it, i don't have a problem with this behaviour of realizing there is a big sucking problem in something they have to deal with, but accepting it and not caring.
I don't know how you call that, but i call it pretty damn stupid. Any human with a common sense would try to change the situation, no?
Or asked from another point of view: How much more torture do they need until they try to change a thing?
Bonus question: Is the art of Microsoft to always keep it as near as possible unter this level?;)
P.S.: I would mod you up if i could. (And me too;))
PLEASE, don't do it! IE 7 is still a nightmare for us web-developers, because it *STILL* shits in the face (YES, that's the correct term) of every standard and every developer trying to create something that simply works WITHOUT being forced to choose if you have it working in every browser that supports the standards OR adapting it to a idiotic non-consistent model of a so-called browser that 90% of the users use (who are stupid by the fact that they use it), because 90% of the big websites still think the have to support this load of crap because 90% of the users... (repeat... until (death);)
And someone EVER comes to me with the argument, that in version 7, everything will be clean and wonderful, then GET THIS: IE 7 *STILL* uses the trashy old codebase. No matter what the tell you. It only uses another layer on top of that upside-down pyramid of an application design. Ho do i know this? Well... If it still has the same quirks, then it normally is the same code. Why would anyone replicate such awful quirks in new code?
I'm really sorry for "trolling" (if it really is), but the dullness of that mass (of poeple) out there who still use IE, think microsoft rocks, think the pharma industry does care if you were healty, or any industry would care if you are happy as long as you bring profit to them is making me so mad i wish them a big epidemic plague, causing a wonderful *natural* selection, so they FUCKING have to get up their asses to win the game of life!
Yup, i think most poeple actually are allowred to cheat more than they should be allowed to.
And: No, i don't think it is wrong to gain some profit of the iditicity of others.
My basic tought is that this dullness and stupidity make the life of everyone other bad too. And i really like having a good life.
The internal 3d-space movement detector. I don't think that any other feature - except the additional nunchak - come even close to the relevance of this feature.
The only thing that sucks is that it's like aremote control. But i can't find a better combination of something like a handle of a stick/sword/whatever and a traditionad gamepad.
So i really hope this movement detectors will be the next big thing in controllers. Think of it inside a handheld console.... So much else could evolve.... *schweeeet*;)
All i can see in this video is an octopus coming near, and a submarine taking refuge in panic...
I guess the octopus - by the way a pretty smart animal - just wanted to say "hello... could you please PISS OFF?" in his way, because he felt disturbed... Animals are not like humans. They always have *reasons* why they do such stuff. And i even guess that an octopus knows that this submarine is nothing you can/should eat. So what are the reasons left for doing this?
Slashdot Mirror
America have
bill of rights --> but inofficially it isn't worth a cent
democratic elections --> sure... as democratic as east germany in the '70s
ethnic diversity --> other words for "no culture" *g*
root name servers --> actually in the eyes of nearly the whole word, this is a bad thing for america
Google, Microsoft, Cisco, Apple.... --> so you count companies as something good. guess what. other cultures exist where industry feudalism actually is seen as something bad.
just to remember you what "the rest of the world" (that does not have such a massive FUD-feeding) is seeing...
by the way: i don't think chinese government is better. i think they are somewhat on the same level.
and finally i think government is something bad by definition: poeple ruling over other poeple.
this is absurd, because the dominance of humans on this planet - as a result of the rules of evolution - prove that humans always worked mainly for themselves. because of course everyone (read "every body and/or mind entity") wo is helping others more than himself - so that he has not enough success to influence the world - will extinct.
Can anybody tell me, why they use THIS date when you click on the images for zoom?
Wed Feb 8 18:32:34 2008
2008?? 32?? My date output right now is:
Thu Feb 9 10:18:30 CET 2006
About 2)
;)
Have you ever seen what a bloat xml is?
First it has a very damn bad information density. Normally you can compress it by 90%.
This is because of the descriptive tags and end tags. Fine for humans, but a night mare for computers.
Additionally parsing xml is pretty slow compared to optimized binary file formats.
There is a very good way to get both: Use EBML. It's like XML but with binary tags. every tag is a short numeric value. (the only ting that's probably slow here is the variable-length encoding of tag-ids. but this could be left out.)
Then you could have a 2-column list association ids to human-readable names and there you go...
I already wrote a fixed-with ebml-parser and -encoder in javascript (in form of a stream) and php for fast communication instead of XML-requests.
It works great, and i even added a transparent Rijndael-encription-stream in between so it is encrypted when it's needed.
It's pretty fast too. It even serialies and deserializes php- and javascript-objects, arrays, or simple values.
So i don't have to use the stupid DOM but i have a cute object to work with.
Exactly. And, very important:
;P
NO, IE 7 STILL is the old shitty core inside. It's the same patchwork as Windows ME. New stuff outside, same crap inside.
(Here even XHTML+CSS2 support counts for "outside")
That is because you'll still have INTENTIONALLY build-in incompatibilities to lock out competitors.
Any to anyone who does think that this is okay: PLEASE let me get to your freak list!
Hmm... i think the main pros and cons look like this:
;).
Where Opera is better:
- extremely fast page rendering. if you think firefox is fast, i have something for you: in opera the only way to see that you just reloaded a page is by seeing other banners on the page. (so with an adblocker you'll ask yourself: did it really reload right now?)
this makes the "rocker"-gestures much better: you can easily go "right mouse button down, left mouse button click-click-click-click-click-click-click-click, left mouse button release" in a mad speed without any problems. try this in firefox. it most times does not recognize the release of the right button or do something mad like zooming images when you click on them.
- everything inside. somewhat like the mozilla suite. but primailiy focused on users, not developers.
- many funtions that you can get as en extension in firefox came from opera (even tabbed browsing). and i think opera got it right, while many copies in firefox aren't that great. they're just not that mature in things of usability.
- no interpreting layer for the ui.
- renderer not as bloated and chaotic as gecko.
Where firefox is better:
- many more extensions for every thing you could think of. very easily extensible.
- cleaner and better standards support. more technologies implemented.
- very good web-developers support with venkman, webdev toolbar, dom inspector, css-inplace-editor and whatever you can think of.
- truly open source. modify it if you like (an can!
So in the end there is no "best" browser.
I'm using Firefox as my development browser and Opera as my "normal user" browser for exactly the reasons stated above.
At the end this is no war.
The only thing i would wish for is: Firefox:
- Do a complete rewrite of Gecko. This time CLEAN PLEASE!
- GTFO those stupid tons of layers of between the ui and the cpu. XML always was a pretty stupid idea for on-the-fly usage and will always be. At least you could create an on-the-fly compilation if the xml- and js-files changed, and then use the compiled modules.
Here in germany, they do this *every* time.
...well, you certanly don't want to experience this! ;)
And if you don't move out when the door goes open and wait until it closes again without sitting down...
haskell - as i said - seems to have the main target on functional programming. I don't think something out there can beat that strictness. For many jobs it even feels to strict. (or using its non-functionals part (monads) does feel too dirty...;)
;)
Your second paragraph makes not much sense because like the great-grandparent post you place statements on the room, but you don't add any arguments why you think it's that way. That way you can't convince anyone. Such statements only work for poeple who let you coax themselves.
I don't know if you intentionally left the arguments away because you knew it was not that right, because you thought it's a paradigm, or because of something else, but when you want to be taken seriously: add arguments (preferably based on paradigms or previous statements that where based on paradigms).
To come back to your statements:
> Unfortunately, even compiled FL cannot compete with structural ones, because FL are from a different class of languages by definition (see lambda calculus versus turing machines).
What i'm missing here is the reason, why being able to compete implies that the languages have to be from the same class.
(Argument [real world example]:) I can easily compare them. I take a set of the best implementation of often used problems on those languages, run them N times and measure time and space usage. Then i can take the one with the lowest numbers in the area that is most important to me.
... I *do* like ocaml. Especially as a replacement for C/C++. So i'm even planning to use it for games (has opengl and sdl support.)
;)
But every language has its purpose. And ocaml is more targeted on a fast next-generation language for everything, while haskell wants to be the perfectionist.
And i guess this job is a perfectionist's job.
Use Ocaml where speed really matters and C is too outdated for you.
As far as i know ocaml allows side-effects, which is pretty much the root of all evil, right?
So i would not recommend it as a secure language.
Additionally it does no lazy evaluation and allows imperative loops.
Maybe side-effects and imperativity make it fast. But that's a pretty hight price if you go for stability at any time...
You make a statement but don't say why. Because i like haskell too (still a beginner in haskell), nut i also don't really understand the bad thing inside his statement...
;)
Is it because haskell is the only really type-safe and purely functional thing out there? (I'm not so sure that this is even true)
Please enlighten us, oh great master lambda of curry!
Write some wrappers for haskell and then use haskell's fully deterministic type-safe behaviour in the right way.
Then logically *prove* that your deterministic code does what it should.
Now you only have to worry about the non-deterministic part.
So keep it as small as possible under any circumstances!!!
Then be sure to modularize your code in a way that allows runtime replacement (of parts where you forgot some exceptional possibility a by fully proven and unit-tested new module) for that case of some problem, that *WILL* happen (but will not be a problem if you work that way)!
If you can't use haskell in *any* way, try to create fully deterministic and type-safe (think *micromanagement*) code WITHOUT state-dependend objects for everything where you would use haskell.
I've some pretty advanced design patterns here, but i can't draw them right in here....
I guess you got modded offtopic because poeple did not understand that you meant that creating a debate is exactly what those ID-idiots want, and that there is no debate, because only one of them two sides is a theory and only one side is provable. PERIOD.
So even *talking* about ID is pretty damn stupid. It's not worth thinking of it for more more second for everyone with half a brain. (Of course this only makes sense to poeple with at least half a brain. But how a wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. First he'll drag you down to his level, and then he beats you with experience")
I repeated the core problem of all this often enough: The more poeple we are, the less intelligent every single being has to be. And the industry plus the "not caring, but complaining" mentality resulting from this are the motor that accelerates it even more via a feedbaack loop.
Why? Very simple. Because:
d =14110356d =14110356
"Whenever a controversial law is proposed, and its supporters, when confronted with an egregious abuse it would permit, use a phrase along the lines of 'Perhaps in theory, but the law would never be applied in that way' - they're lying. They intend to use the law that way as early and as often as possible."
by http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169294&ci
seen on http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169294&ci
No! It's even worse!
They still use FLAT SHADING!
No way! The pixels of mindstorms are wayyy to big!
To me it feels like lego duplo soem years ago...
Okay, i have a web server out there. So i'll create an encrypted tunnel from here to my webserver and to "industry planners" this looks like one single commection.
FACE IT, "industry planners"/MPAA/RIAA: Poeple will *always* fild a trick around it if they want to. It's one of the most basic principles of being a human to find solutions for problems (if they suck enough).
And guess what's: There'S an ultimate solution for us, but not for you: We can live *without* your products. We can for example make our own net out of interconnected wlan nodes.
But you can't live without us! HA!
And most of all: What idiot invented the idea that the more you threat your customers like crap, the more cash you'll earn?
Oh, well... maybe it was the same one who recognized that his customers were that stupid that they would accept that threatment.
And who made them that stupid?
I guess(!) it became pretty easy to survive, in a world with products that even a baby with half a brain could use perfectly and where the advancement you get (from the state or from poeple) is directly proportional to your incompetence to survive. (instead of how valuable you are for those who give it to you)
In other words: Regenerative inverse evolution made them that stupid.
So i only can quote another slashdot user: "Pull the warning labels off of everything, and let the problem solve itself." (if i remember it correctly)
Well... Now we possibly get to the core: Why do we have this inverse evolution?
I guess mainly because of two things:
C1. Companys live for the profit. Only for the profit. They get nothing for caring for their customers because poeple still buy if they don't care.
C2. Somhow poeple began to confuse supporting the biggest losers in town with being social. Really being social means helping those that are valuabe for us, and for those who are valuabe for us. Right? Simple example: If someone living on the street asks for money: Check if he's woth the dollar before giving it to him.
So how do we solve those two problems? (I ask you too!)
S1. We have to make the price of a product its worth again. So poeple have to realize what it's worth. For example they shoud have the possibility to buy in another place if the company or their product sucks. Nowadays they can't really do that because all companys of one sector normally have the same terms and conditions, like if they were a cartel. So you can ony get out fo the frying pan into the fire.
Okay. Now this seems to be the core problem:
In poeple don't care anymore. Not if they get dupered and not if poeple are valuable to them.
And i only call this the core problem because i'm stuck with solutions here...
Anyone...?
Hmm... you know... I eally whished that they make a good browser. Because in the end i'm not the one who will hate ms because they are ms, but because of what they do and have done.
:( ;)
If they start to only do wonderul things i will slowly start to love them.
But... well... i guess i have to continue whishing.
(Is there a chance that they quickly fix the problems until it goes final or until 7.1?
P.S: Compared to my post you don't have to call yours "harsh", do you? *g*
Okay, I'm sorry for saying they are stupid because they don't care. Everyone has its priorities.
;)
;))
But i think not caring has its limits. Things like not caring if someone dies is an extreme example.
It even gets more complicated when someone really *deserves* to die in the eyes of everyone you know - including you.
So to get back to the general problem, where the popularity of the IE is just one result of it:
It is simply out of my mind, why poeple complain about their "computers" (mostly meaning crappy software) *every* day, say that they have so much problems with it, say they now can save the work that they did not have to do before they had a computer,
and STILL don't care and accept the situation blindly.
So in the core of it, i don't have a problem with this behaviour of realizing there is a big sucking problem in something they have to deal with, but accepting it and not caring.
I don't know how you call that, but i call it pretty damn stupid. Any human with a common sense would try to change the situation, no?
Or asked from another point of view: How much more torture do they need until they try to change a thing?
Bonus question: Is the art of Microsoft to always keep it as near as possible unter this level?
P.S.: I would mod you up if i could. (And me too
PLEASE, don't do it! IE 7 is still a nightmare for us web-developers, because it *STILL* shits in the face (YES, that's the correct term) of every standard and every developer trying to create something that simply works WITHOUT being forced to choose if you have it working in every browser that supports the standards OR adapting it to a idiotic non-consistent model of a so-called browser that 90% of the users use (who are stupid by the fact that they use it), because 90% of the big websites still think the have to support this load of crap because 90% of the users... (repeat ... until (death);)
And someone EVER comes to me with the argument, that in version 7, everything will be clean and wonderful, then GET THIS:
IE 7 *STILL* uses the trashy old codebase. No matter what the tell you. It only uses another layer on top of that upside-down pyramid of an application design.
Ho do i know this? Well... If it still has the same quirks, then it normally is the same code. Why would anyone replicate such awful quirks in new code?
I'm really sorry for "trolling" (if it really is), but the dullness of that mass (of poeple) out there who still use IE, think microsoft rocks, think the pharma industry does care if you were healty, or any industry would care if you are happy as long as you bring profit to them
is making me so mad i wish them a big epidemic plague, causing a wonderful *natural* selection, so they FUCKING have to get up their asses to win the game of life!
Yup, i think most poeple actually are allowred to cheat more than they should be allowed to.
And: No, i don't think it is wrong to gain some profit of the iditicity of others.
My basic tought is that this dullness and stupidity make the life of everyone other bad too. And i really like having a good life.
You forgot the main feature:
;)
The internal 3d-space movement detector. I don't think that any other feature - except the additional nunchak - come even close to the relevance of this feature.
The only thing that sucks is that it's like aremote control. But i can't find a better combination of something like a handle of a stick/sword/whatever and a traditionad gamepad.
So i really hope this movement detectors will be the next big thing in controllers. Think of it inside a handheld console....
So much else could evolve.... *schweeeet*
How can a computer or a virus have obesity??
Are they running on a VM, for 64 bit and take tons of libs with them nowadays?
Ah. Thats's why you americans vote like this... ;P
"Bush" is obviously simpler to spell than "Kerrey".
an "attack"... "Tt's coming right for us!"
All i can see in this video is an octopus coming near, and a submarine taking refuge in panic...
I guess the octopus - by the way a pretty smart animal - just wanted to say "hello... could you please PISS OFF?" in his way, because he felt disturbed...
Animals are not like humans. They always have *reasons* why they do such stuff. And i even guess that an octopus knows that this submarine is nothing you can/should eat. So what are the reasons left for doing this?
Rrrrright!
Score = (numberOfPoepleHelped * averageAmountOfHelp) - (numberOfPoepleFuckedOver * averageAmountFuckedOver)
:(
:\
i guess the result will be a huge negative number!
Does anyone know a usable calculation for Jobs? Because to me he is on a lower level than Gates... too low to think of a score formula that quick...
And: Yes, I certanly wish those two things were not the way they are...